Abstract
Asthma was a chronic inflammatory airway disease which characterized by complex pathogenesis, various clinical manifestations and severity. Blood biomarkers have been used to evaluate the severity of the disease, predict the efficacy and prognosis. Currently, some incredible progress in most of the research on biomarkers for asthma have achieved, including cell, antibodies, cytokines, chemokines, proteins and non-coding RNAs. We reviewed the application of these biomarkers in diagnosis, treatment, prognosis monitoring and phenotypic identification of asthma, in order to improve clinicians’ understanding of asthma biomarkers.
Keywords
- biomarker
- asthma
- cell
- antibodies
- cytokines
- chemokines
- proteins
- non-coding RNAs
1. Introduction
Asthma was a chronic inflammatory airway disease which characterized by complex pathogenesis, various clinical manifestations and severity. With an increasing prevalence, asthma affecting an estimated 358 million people worldwide [1]. According to the recent epidemiological data in China, there were 45.7 million adult patients with asthma and the total prevalence rate was 4.2% [2]. The cumulative prevalence among children under 14 years of age was 3.02% [3]. The high prevalence and different clinical manifestations lead to various treatment of asthma. Therefore, it was very important to determine the classification and specific markers for the management of asthma.
Francisaca et al. have proposed to classify asthma phenotypes into allergic asthma, eosinophilic asthma, obese asthma, persistent asthma, symptomatic asthma, positive bronchial provocation test with asthma symptoms, positive bronchial provocation test with no asthma symptoms, and negative bronchial provocation test with asthma symptoms [4]. This classification method mainly focuses on the presentation of symptoms and does not guide the precise treatment of asthma patients. Identifying the phenotype of asthma according to the molecular mechanism can solve this problem to a certain extent.
Asthma can be classified into T2 and non-T2 asthma according to the molecular mechanism of airway inflammation. The former was mainly composed of eosinophils (EOS), mast cell (MC), dendritic cells (DC), and Type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2), which secrete immunoglobulin E (IgE), Interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5, IL-13, IL-33, prostaglandin D2, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and other antibodies and inflammatory factors. Non-T2 asthma was involved in the secretion of cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-17, CXCL-1 and 8, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α by inflammatory cells such as neutrophils (NEU) [5]. A number of biomarkers have been identified in broncho alveolar lavage (BAL), peripheral blood, induced sputum, and bronchial biopsy tissue and etc. According to the pathogenesis of different asthma phenotypes, among these samples, peripheral blood can be easily obtained in clinic practice. Thus, we investigate potential biomarkers in peripheral blood for asthma patients, in order to enhance the management and treatment of asthma.
2. Blood biomarkers of asthma
2.1 Cellular biomarkers
EOS in peripheral blood were considered as an important biomarker for asthma, and can predict the treatment response [6]. A small prospective cohort study of hospitalized infants with asthma demonstrated that elevated EOS in convalescence can predict an increased risk of asthma in the future [7, 8] Neutrophils (NEU) in peripheral blood can assess asthma control and prognosis, the counts of NEU over 5000/ul means that asthma symptoms were poorly controlled and likely to get worse [9]. Basophils contains cytoplasmic secretory granules, and was consisted by proteoglycans and histamine [10]. Basophil activation test (BAT) was a useful method for marking CD63 and CD203c, which were the most common surface markers of basophil activation. The detection of CD63 and CD203c implied that basophil degranulation and may led to histamine release, which provide crucial information for the diagnosis of allergic asthma [11].
Mast cell (MC) also played an important role in allergic inflammation. A study suggested that interactions between mast cells and airway smooth muscle cells were critical for the development of the disordered airway physiology in asthma [12]. Therefore, mast cell activation test can be used as a diagnostic method of asthma.
Innate lymphoid cells (ILC), which was different from T cells and B cells, are located on the mucosal surface of the intestine and played an important role in enhancing the immune response, maintaining mucosal integrity and promoting the formation of lymphoid organs. According to the cytokine expression profile, ILC can be divided into three groups: ILC1, ILC2 and ILC3, among which ILC2 can produce a large number of T2 cytokines, such as IL-5 and IL-13 [13], which can promote EOS and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), led to exacerbating the symptoms of asthma. The level of activated ILC2s in blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and sputum of asthmatic patients were increasing compared with healthy controls [14]. Thus, ILC2 can be regard as an important biomarker for the assessment of asthma.
T helper (Th2) and non Th2 were phenotypes of asthma and have been determined by CD4+T cells [15]. Th2 asthma was characterized by elevated EOS and high levels of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13 [16]. In contrast, non Th2 asthma was characterized by NEU infiltration and high levels of IFN-γ and IL-17 [15]. Since the progression pattern and treatment plan of asthma depend on the differentiation of CD4+T cells, clarifying the biological role of CD4+T cells in the pathogenesis of asthma was very important to develop effective treatment and predict the prognosis of asthma patients [17].
Forkhead box P3 (Foxp3)+ regulatory T (Treg) cells were a special subgroup of CD4+T cells, which played a key role in maintaining immune tolerance and inhibiting immune response to antigens [18]. In patients with severe asthma, the number of Treg cells in blood, BALF and sputum was decreased [19, 20], which concluded that Treg cells can be used to assess asthma severity.
Macrophages were account for about 70% of the immune cells in the asllergic asthma, and played an important role in airway inflammation [20]. A study has shown that the impaired function of alveolar macrophages always be presented in children with poorly controlled asthma which were, characterized by decreased phagocytosis and increased apoptosis [21]. Therefore, macrophages also play an important role in assessment of asthma administration.
2.2 Antibody biomarkers
Mucosal IgA neutralizes bacteria and viruses by interfering with epithelial adhesion and improving the characteristics of mucus capture and antigen removal [22]. One report have shown that infants with low IgA levels have more common asthma and more severe allergic symptoms. In addition, infants born to allergic parents were more prone to deficiency of salivary IgA [23]. Another report shows that serum IgA levels in adult patients with asthma are associated with asthma severity [24]. Therefore, IgA level has certain guiding significance for the severity of asthma symptoms.
The amount of total IgE (tIgE) in serum and the presence of allergen-specific IgE(sIgE) antibodies are important biomarkers to assess the phenotype and symptoms of asthma patients. The level of sIgE in serum may also be helpful to predict persistent wheezing. Furthermore, tIgE was associated with asthma and can be considered as a supplementary indicator for the severity of asthma [25]. One study investigated that in the HDM sensitized children, the ratio of sIgG to sIgE in asthma children was significantly lower than that of non-asthma children, and was the lowest among the children with the most severe asthmatic symptoms, which speculated that sIgG may play a certain inhibitory role in the pathogenesis of asthma [26]. Thus, sIgG/sIgE has been used as a biomarker for more accurate evaluation of asthma than single sIgE.
2.3 Cytokine markers
Allergic asthma was driven by T-helper type 2 (Th2) cells, inducing the production of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13. IL-4 and IL-13 are key drivers of a variety of atopic diseases [27]. In addition to Th2 cells, other lymphocytes include γδT cell subsets, natural killer T (NKT) cells, T follicular helper cells (Tfh) cells and type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) can also produce IL-4 and/or IL-13 [28]. IL-4 was a differentiation factor that polarizes naive CD4+T cells to Th2 phenotype [29]. It was essential in inducing local Th2 response and the development of pulmonary eosinophilic inflammation [30], but didn’t have direct effect on mucus production [31].
IL-5 can increase expression of C-C chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3) by mature EOS [32], it was also conducive to the recruitment and activation of EOS in asthma patients [33]. Although the activation of Th2 cells in allergic asthma lead to the increase of some cytokines, such as IL-13, IL-4, IL-5, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) [34], the predominant cytokine associated with antigen-induced eosinophilic inflammation still was IL-5 [35]. In brief, IL-5 palyed an important role in the evaluation of eosinophilic inflammation in asthma.
IL-13 can induce B cells to synthesize IgG4 and IgE, which provided pivotal signal in allergic disease [36]. As aT2 inflammatory cytokins, IL-13 can be produced by CD4+T, EOS, MC, basophils, and NKT [37]. IL-13 had various roles in asthma, for example, it can switched antibody synthesis of plasma cell and produced IgE, and promoted the migration of EOS to the lungs. Because of the EOS synthesis and the up-regulation of adhesion molecules bound to EOS, goblet cell proliferation and mucus production would increased, which lead to increased sputum and AHR [38].
Asthma patients have a higher levels of serum IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 compared with healthy controls these cytokines were also increased in acute asthma [39]. A clinical study has shown that blocking both IL-4 and IL-13 signaling can significantly reduce the exacerbation of severe asthma [40], and after anti-IL-5 treatment, 83% of patients with severe asthma had a favorable responses [41].
CD4+T cells, particularly activated Th2 cells, have been found to represent a major cellular source for IL-31 [42]. Polymorphisms in IL-31 is associated with IgE production in asthma patients [43]. at the same time, IL-31 promoted the occurrence of chemokines and pro-inflammatory cytokines in human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs), and could lead to a Th2-dominant inflammation in asthma [44]. The levels of IL-31 in serum and BALF were increased in asthma patients and IL-31 also was positively correlated with Th2 cytokines (IL-5, IL-13, TSLP) and the severity of asthma [45].
Th17 related cytokines such as IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21 and IL-22 were secreted by Th17 cells. In the mice model of allergic asthma, the impairment of IL-17R signal delayed the recruitment of neutrophils to the alveolar cavity [46]. IL-17 also activated airway NEU by increasing elastase and myeloperoxidase activities, and promoted exacerbation of asthma [46]. It has shown that IL-17 may play an indirect role in airway remodeling of asthma, the increased concentration of IL-17 in PBMCs and plasma always implied that the asthmatic symptoms prone to more severe [47, 48]
IL-9 can be produced by a variety of cells including Th2 cells, Th9 cells, EOS and NEU [16], and Th9 cells were the main source of IL-9. Th9 cells promoted mast cell accumulation and activation in mice model of allergic pulmonary inflammation [49], while IL-9 can inhibit the production of IFN-γ and promote secretion of mucus and IgE [50, 51]. A study have found that both Th9 cell and IL-9 of peripheral blood increased in allergic asthma patients [52], which means that IL-9 can be regarded as a biomarker of asthma.
IL-25, IL-33 and TSLP derived from airway epithelium and played an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma [53]. Among them, IL-25 not only targeted innate immune cells to produce Th2 cytokines, but also guided the translation of naive Th cells to Th2 cells [54]. Overexpression of IL-25 in lung epithelium induced epithelial cell proliferation, increased mucus secretion, airway infiltration of eosinophils and macrophages, and up-regulated the chemokines related to Th2 cells [55]. Plasma IL-25 levels were also associated with epithelial IL-25 expression and may be useful for predicting responses to asthma therapy [56].
Genome wide and candidate gene association studies have identified that common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in IL-33 and IL-1 receptor like 1 (IL-1RL1) loci associated with asthma, especially pediatric asthma [57]. IL-33 activated a large number of immune cells and structural cells by binding to IL-33 receptor complex, which can promote occurrence and exacerbation of asthma [58]. The IL-33/ST2 (suppression of tumorigenicity 2) axis triggered the release of several proinflammatory mediators, such as chemokines and cytokines, and induced systemic T2 inflammation in vivo [59]. IL-33/ST2 pathway also contributed to allergen induced airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness [60]. Compared with healthy individuals, the concentration of IL-33 in plasma was higher in asthma patients [61].
To some extent, AHR, mucus overproduction and airway remodeling, were considered to be drived by TSLP through its downstream proinflammatory effect [62]. Stimulation of basophils with TSLP can increase the percentage of IL-25 receptor (IL-17RB) and ST2, suggesting that TSLP can enhance the responsiveness of basophils to other alarmin cytokines [63]. The levels of plasma TSLP in asthma patients were higher than that in healthy controls, Airway submucosal EOS would be reduced by blocking TSLP in patients with moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma compared with placebo [64].
2.4 Chemokine markers
Eotaxin, as a ESO chemokine, can attract EOS to the site of allergic inflammation by stimulating CCR3. Eotaxin played a role in the early stage of Th2 lymphocyte recruitment [65], and the concentration of airway eotaxin was related to the sensitivity of asthmatic airway [66]. A study has demonstrated that there was a direct relationship between asthma diagnosis and eotaxin, and the levels of plasma eotaxin were negatively correlated with pulmonary function [66].
CCR2 was expressed in monocytes and T lymphocytes [67]. CCR2 mediated release of monocyte precursors leads to the increase of lung dendritic cells (DC) in allergic airway inflammation [68]. A study showed that monocytes may modulate the inflammatory response in asthma [69]. In a mouse asthma model, CCL2/CCR2-dependent recruitment of Th17 cells to the lung promoted airway inflammation [70]. In a monkey asthma model, Neutralization of CCR2 reduced bronchial hyperreactivity and weakened the accumulation of macrophages and eosinophils in BALF [71]. Therefore, the elevated CCR2 was a diagnostic biomarker for asthma.
CCR3 was mainly expressed on EOS, and can also be detected on basophils and T cells [67]. CCR3 showed sequence homology in many species, including humans, mice and guinea pigs. Its expression was limited to cells involved in allergic inflammation [72]. MicroRNA-30a-3p (miR-30a-3p)can inhibit CCR3 signaling pathway, reduce the secretion of sIgE against ovalbumin (OVA), eotaxin, IL-5 and IL-4 [73]. The expression of CCR3 on the surface of PBMCs was positively correlated with severity of asthma [74]. Inhibition of CCR3 blocks eosinophil recruitment into the blood, lungs and airways and prevents AHR in a mouse asthma model [75].
CCR5 was expressed in T lymphocytes and macrophages [67]. The increased CCR5 lead to EOS accumulation and airway remodeling in asthma patients [76]. Compared with healthy subjects, the expression of CCR5 in peripheral blood lymphocytes increased in asthma patients, and inhibition of CCR5 was a feasible method for blocking AHR [77, 78].
Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) was produced by DC, endothelial cells, keratinocytes, bronchial epithelial cells and fibroblasts [79]. As chemokine related T2 inflammation, TARC contributed to the activation of EOS and MC driven by Th2 [80]. A series of studies concluded that the TARC concentration of asthma children increased in plasma [81], and after treatment of systemic corticosteroid (CS), the concentration decreased. In addition, the levels of TARC were negatively correlated with indicator of lung function such as peak expiratory flow rates in asthma patients [82].
Monocyte chemotactic protein-4 (MCP-4) was a potential chemical attractant not only for EOS, but also for monocytes, lymphocytes and basophils [83]. It have been confirmed that MCP-4 can induce histamine release and activation of the EOS [74]. Plasma MCP-4 was higher in patients with acute asthma than in those with chronic stable asthma [83], which implied that MCP-4 was correlated with exacerbation of asthma.
2.5 Protein biomarkers
Heat shock protein 72 (HSP-72) belongs to the Hsp70 family of heat shock proteins. It regulated protein expression during conditions of cell stress and acted as a protective factor by preventing abnormal protein aggregation, thus helping to refold damaged proteins, which was related to inflammation and obesity. Obesity was considered to be a risk factor for asthma, and serum and urine Hsp72 levels were significantly elevated in patients with severe asthma and obesity-related asthma. Hsp72 also was an independent predictor of asthma severity and could be used as a simple, non-invasive biomarker for predicting and monitoring asthma severity in obese asthma patients [84].
Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) was secreted by activated eosinophil and is a specific marker of EOS. Serum ECP levels were significantly increased in children and adults with allergic asthma during acute stage. ECP, as a strong alkali-toxic protein, had strong effects on airway and nasal epithelium and had been associated with AHR, eosinophilic chronic sinusitis, aspirin-aggravated respiratory disease, and recurrent wheezing [85]. Elevated ECP concentrations in serum reflected EOS activation and were associated with asthma severity and allergen sensitization. In children with acute asthma, serum ECP was a more sensitive biomarker of asthma severity than blood EOS [86].
Periostein was a matrix protein that expressed in fibroblasts and epithelial cells, which was involved in a variety of biological processes, such as cell proliferation, cell invasion, and angiogenesis. In asthma patients, periostein associated with EOS migration and promoted production Th2 cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-13, lead to chronic allergic inflammation. It was found that the best cut-off value of sputum periostein which distinguished mild and moderate to severe asthma was 528.25 ng/mL [87]. Serum periostein was associated with AHR, blood EOS counts and FeNO in asthma children. The level of sputum periosteins was positively correlated with age, asthma course and sputum EOS increase, which was a surrogate biomarker and therapeutic target of severe eosinophil asthma.
High mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) was a protein that specifically binds to nucleosome DNA junction region, it can enhance nucleosome stability and transcription factor interaction. In asthma, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), cystic fibrosis, lung cancer and other lung diseases, HMGB1 induced the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and exacerbated airway inflammation, and anti-HMGB1 can reduce the pathological features of asthma [88].
Serum chitinase-like protein YKL-40, a member of the chitinase family, might be involved in the development of fibrosis and airway remodeling. YKL-40 was involved in the pathogenesis of asthma by inducing IL-8 in the epithelium and was considered as one of the biomarkers of asthma patients [89]. In addition, YKL-40 also indicated neutrophil inflammation in asthma and was associated with asthma severity. Moreover, YKL-40 was significantly negatively correlated with lung function [90].
CD14 was a marker of activation of monocytes or macrophages, which existed in membrane-bound form (mCD14) and soluble form (sCD14) and had a positive effect on the balance between Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Soluble CD14(sCD14) played an important role in proliferation and activation of T and B cell. The level of sCD14 in asthma patients was significantly higher in the acute stage than in the convalescence stage. There was a significant correlation between plasma sCD14 level and the severity of asthma, lung function, asthma symptoms and signs in adults, and there was a negative correlation between sCD14 level and asthma severity [91]. Therefore, plasma sCD14 levels may be a potential biomarker for predicting asthma severity in adults.
Serum arginase I levels were significantly elevated in asthmatic patients compared with healthy controls and C-reactive protein (CRP) was a common inflammatory marker for assessing systemic inflammation. In asthma patients, serum high sensitivity CRP (HS-CRP) levels were elevated and associated with respiratory symptoms and airway inflammation. Serum arginase I level was positively correlated with HS-CRP and negatively correlated with IgE in asthma patients. Elevated serum arginase I levels might be serve as a biomarker of airway inflammation in asthma [92].
The OX40 ligand (OX40L,) and its receptor OX40 were members of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily. Serum OX40L was positively correlated with serum IgE, IL-6, percentage of EOS and NEU, TSLP, and negatively correlated with asthma severity and lung function. Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment can reduce serum OX40L levels, and the reduction of serum OX40L was more significant in steroid-sensitive asthma than in steroid-resistant asthma. High serum OX40L can be used as a biomarker for identifying glucocorticoid resistance in asthmatic patients. Changes in OX40L levels also reflect response to ICS treatment [93].
2.6 Non-coding RNA biomarkers
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) were small non-coding RNA molecules that were considered to be one of the basic regulatory mechanisms of gene expression. They were involved in many biological processes, such as signal transduction, cell proliferation and differentiation, apoptosis and stress response [94]. Sufficient evidence have been suggested that miRNA play a role in several key points of asthma, including the diagnosis of asthma, disease severity, and response to treatment [95].
Serum miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 levels were significantly elevated in asthma patients compared with healthy controls. The expression level of miRNA21 in serum of asthma patients was significantly positively correlated with the level of IL-4. In addition, compared with steroid-sensitive children, miRNA-21 was significantly elevated in untreated and steroid-resistant children, and miRNA-21 could be a promising biomarker for diagnosis and response to inhaled corticosteroid therapy [96].
MiR-20a-5p was significantly down-regulated in the lungs and OVA-stimulated cells of mouse models of OVA induced asthma, and miR-20a-5p may be a promising biomarker and therapeutic target during asthma progression by targeting ATG7’s involvement in autophagy-induced apoptosis, fibrosis and inflammation [97]. MiR-582-5p was strongly upregulated in nasal epithelial cells of children with severe acute asthma [98]. MiR-145-5p was associated with lung function in children with asthma and also increased proliferation of airway smooth muscle cell. This suggests that the decreased expression of miR-145-5p was a risk factor for early decline in long-term lung function [99]. MiR-124 contributed to the development and maintenance of anti-inflammatory phenotypes of asthmatic lung macrophages, and was negatively correlated with the risk of exacerbation, severity and inflammation in asthma patients [100].
MiRNA-155, a key regulator of type 2 innate lymphocytes in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation, was elevated in serum samples from allergic asthma patients compared with non-allergic asthma patients and healthy individuals. Expression of miR-155 was altered by allergic stimulation or glucocorticoid treatment, which can be used as biomarkers for steroids resistance/neutrophilic asthma [101]. MiRNA-223 was significantly upregulated in patients with moderate asthma compared with healthy controls, and no significant difference in miR-223 expression was found between patients with severe asthma and healthy controls, which could serve as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of moderate asthma [102]. The level of miR-192 in asthma children was lower than that in healthy children, and miR-192 blocked the activation pathway of Tfh cells by targeting CXCR5 [103]. Serum miRNA-1165-3P levels were significantly elevated in asthma patients compared to healthy controls. In addition, Serum miR-1165-3p levels were also significantly elevated in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) or allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), suggesting that serum miR-1165-3p may be used as a non-invasive biomarker to help diagnose and characterize allergic asthma [104]. MiRNA-3934 levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of asthma patients were significantly decreased, and miRNA-3934 levels in PBMCs could distinguish asthma patients, especially severe asthma patients from control group. MiRNA-3934 levels in PBMCs of asthma patients were negatively correlated with serum IL-6, IL-8 and IL-33 levels, respectively, which might also be a potential diagnostic biomarker for asthma [105]. In addition, upregulation of MiR-1165-3p reduced AHR and airway inflammation by directly targeting IL-13. MiR-185-5p was involved in calcium signaling by targeting NFAT and CaMKII proteins in cardiomyocytes and may play a role in muscle cell hyperplasia, proliferation and cell contraction in asthma, suggesting that these candidate biomarkers play a role in the pathogenesis of asthma [106]. Overexpression of MiRNA-126 in acute asthma was associated with signs of immune imbalance and can predicted disease severity, suggesting that it can be used as a potential serologic marker for the diagnosis and evaluation of asthma [107].
Long non-coding RNA (lncRNAs) affected the regulation of immune response, airway inflammation and other pathological processes related to asthma. PTTG3P was highly expressed in peripheral blood of children with asthma and promoted the progression of childhood asthma by targeting miR-192-3p/CCNB1 axis and may serve as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker for childhood asthma [108]. LncRNA NEAT1 was up-regulated in patients with asthma exacerbation compared with healthy controls and patients with asthma in remission stage, which was positively correlated with the severity of asthma exacerbation, TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-17, but negatively correlated with predicted IL-10, FEV1/FVC and FEV1%. Circulating lncRNA NEAT1 may be a novel biomarker for increased risk and severity of asthma exacerbations [100]. LncRNA-ANRIL/MiR-125a axis was upregulated in patients with acute asthma compared with those in remission and healthy subjects, and the LncRNA ANRIL/MiR-125a axis had good predictive value for the risk of bronchial asthma disease progression [109]. Compared with non-severe asthma patients, the expression of lncRNA GAS5 in PBMCs of severe asthma patients was increased. After treatment with CS in vitro, the expression of GAS5 was down-regulated in severe asthma patients, while up-regulated in non-severe asthma patients, highlighting the potential role of GAS5 as a biomarker for the diagnosis of severe asthma patients [110]. Compared with the healthy control group, the level of lncRNA-MEG3 in CD4+T cells of asthma patients was significantly increased, and the degree of Treg/Th17 imbalance was correlated with the severity of asthma mice symptoms. LncRNA-MEG3 can be used as a competitive endogenous RNA to inhibit the level of miRNA-17, miRNA-17 inhibits Th17 expression by directly targeting nuclear orphan receptor γ T (RORγ T). Thus affecting Treg/Th17 balance in asthma, monitoring lncrNA-MEG3 in asthma patients can be used to judge the course of disease or recovery of patients [111]. The level of lnc-BAZ2B in children with allergic asthma was significantly higher than that in healthy children. Lnc-BAZ2B can aggravate allergen-induced pulmonary allergic inflammation by promoting the activation of M2 macrophages, which is positively correlated with the severity of asthma and blood eosinophil count. Thus, Lnc-BAZ2B plays a key role in exacerbating the progression of allergic asthma and may serve as a potential diagnostic marker for childhood asthma [112].
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, biomarkers were indicators of normal physiological processes, disease progression and response to treatment. Although many biomarkers for asthma have been mentioned in recent studies for the diagnosis of asthma, the identification of different phenotypes and efficacy evaluation, none of them have been approved for clinical practice so far, mainly due to their limited sensitivity and specificity. With the development of biomedicine, asthma research is moving from clinical symptoms, clinical phenotypes, lung function and medication response to genomics, proteomics, epigenetics, etc. More key molecules and biomarkers will be discovered in the future. Combined detection of multiple markers can more comprehensively analyze the patient’s condition, thus providing more valuable clinical information for the diagnosis, classification and treatment of asthma, and ultimately achieving accurate diagnosis and treatment of asthma patients.
References
- 1.
Cloutier MM, Dixon AE, Krishnan JA, Lemanske RJ, Pace W, Schatz M. Managing Asthma in Adolescents and Adults: 2020 Asthma Guideline Update From the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. JAMA. 2020; 324 :2301-2317 - 2.
Huang K, Yang T, Xu J, Yang L, Zhao J, Zhang X, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of asthma in China: A national cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2019; 394 :407-418 - 3.
Lishen S, Qianlan Z, Yunxiao S. The Mechanism, testing, specific immunotherapy and anti-IgE therapy for allergic respiratory diseases in children. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2020; 47 :823-827 - 4.
Mendes FC, Paciencia I, Ferreira AC, Martins C, Rufo JC, Silva D, et al. Development and validation of exhaled breath condensate microRNAs to identify and endotype asthma in children. PLoS One. 2019; 14 :e224983 - 5.
Agache I, Akdis CA. Precision medicine and phenotypes, endotypes, genotypes, regiotypes, and theratypes of allergic diseases. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2019; 129 :1493-1503 - 6.
Pavord ID, Bel EH, Bourdin A, Chan R, Han JK, Keene ON, et al. From DREAM to REALITI-A and beyond: Mepolizumab for the treatment of eosinophil-driven diseases. Allergy. 2022; 77 :778-797 - 7.
Backman K, Nuolivirta K, Ollikainen H, Korppi M, Piippo-Savolainen E. Low eosinophils during bronchiolitis in infancy are associated with lower risk of adulthood asthma. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology. 2015; 26 :668-673 - 8.
Piippo-Savolainen E, Remes S, Korppi M. Does blood eosinophilia in wheezing infants predict later asthma? A prospective 18-20-year follow-up. Allergy and Asthma Proceedings. 2007; 28 :163-169 - 9.
Nadif R, Siroux V, Boudier A, le Moual N, Just J, Gormand F, et al. Blood granulocyte patterns as predictors of asthma phenotypes in adults from the EGEA study. The European Respiratory Journal. 2016; 48 :1040-1051 - 10.
Shamji MH, Layhadi JA, Scadding GW, Cheung D, Calderon MA, Turka LA, et al. Basophil expression of diamine oxidase: A novel biomarker of allergen immunotherapy response. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2015; 135 :913-921 - 11.
Shamji MH, Kappen JH, Akdis M, Jensen-Jarolim E, Knol EF, Kleine-Tebbe J, et al. Biomarkers for monitoring clinical efficacy of allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma: An EAACI Position Paper. Allergy. 2017; 72 :1156-1173 - 12.
Brightling CE, Bradding P, Symon FA, Holgate ST, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. Mast-cell infiltration of airway smooth muscle in asthma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2002; 346 :1699-1705 - 13.
Bartemes KR, Kephart GM, Fox SJ, Kita H. Enhanced innate type 2 immune response in peripheral blood from patients with asthma. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2014; 134 :671-678 - 14.
Smith SG, Chen R, Kjarsgaard M, Huang C, Oliveria JP, O’Byrne PM, et al. Increased numbers of activated group 2 innate lymphoid cells in the airways of patients with severe asthma and persistent airway eosinophilia. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2016; 137 :75-86 - 15.
Sze E, Bhalla A, Nair P. Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for non-T2 asthma. Allergy. 2020; 75 :311-325 - 16.
Hammad H, Lambrecht BN. The basic immunology of asthma. Cell. 2021; 184 :2521-2522 - 17.
Jeong J, Lee HK. The role of CD4(+) T cells and microbiota in the pathogenesis of asthma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22 :11822 - 18.
Josefowicz SZ, Lu LF, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells: Mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annual Review of Immunology. 2012; 30 :531-564 - 19.
Mamessier E, Nieves A, Lorec AM, Dupuy P, Pinot D, Pinet C, et al. T-cell activation during exacerbations: A longitudinal study in refractory asthma. Allergy. 2008; 63 :1202-1210 - 20.
Saradna A, Do DC, Kumar S, Fu QL, Gao P. Macrophage polarization and allergic asthma. Translational Research. 2018; 191 :1-14 - 21.
Fitzpatrick AM, Holguin F, Teague WG, Brown LA. Alveolar macrophage phagocytosis is impaired in children with poorly controlled asthma. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2008; 121 :1378 - 22.
Gloudemans AK, Lambrecht BN, Smits HH. Potential of immunoglobulin A to prevent allergic asthma. Clinical & Developmental Immunology. 2013; 2013 :542091 - 23.
Ludviksson BR, Eiriksson TH, Ardal B, Sigfusson A, Valdimarsson H. Correlation between serum immunoglobulin A concentrations and allergic manifestations in infants. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1992; 121 :23-27 - 24.
Balzar S, Strand M, Nakano T, Wenzel SE. Subtle immunodeficiency in severe asthma: IgA and IgG2 correlate with lung function and symptoms. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology. 2006; 140 :96-102 - 25.
Szefler SJ, Wenzel S, Brown R, Erzurum SC, Fahy JV, Hamilton RG, et al. Asthma outcomes: Biomarkers. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2012; 129 :S9-S23 - 26.
Holt PG, Strickland D, Bosco A, Belgrave D, Hales B, Simpson A, et al. Distinguishing benign from pathologic TH2 immunity in atopic children. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2016; 137 :379-387 - 27.
Gandhi NA, Bennett BL, Graham NM, Pirozzi G, Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD. Targeting key proximal drivers of type 2 inflammation in disease. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery. 2016; 15 :35-50 - 28.
Zhu J. T helper 2 (Th2) cell differentiation, type 2 innate lymphoid cell (ILC2) development and regulation of interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 production. Cytokine. 2015; 75 :14-24 - 29.
Swain SL, Weinberg AD, English M, Huston G. IL-4 directs the development of Th2-like helper effectors. Journal of Immunology. 1990; 145 :3796-3806 - 30.
Coyle AJ, Le Gros G, Bertrand C, Tsuyuki S, Heusser CH, Kopf M, et al. Interleukin-4 is required for the induction of lung Th2 mucosal immunity. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 1995; 13 :54-59 - 31.
Venkayya R, Lam M, Willkom M, Grunig G, Corry DB, Erle DJ. The Th2 lymphocyte products IL-4 and IL-13 rapidly induce airway hyperresponsiveness through direct effects on resident airway cells. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 2002; 26 :202-208 - 32.
Stirling RG, van Rensen EL, Barnes PJ, Chung KF. Interleukin-5 induces CD34(+) eosinophil progenitor mobilization and eosinophil CCR3 expression in asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2001; 164 :1403-1409 - 33.
Shi H, Qin S, Huang G, Chen Y, Xiao C, Xu H, et al. Infiltration of eosinophils into the asthmatic airways caused by interleukin 5. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 1997; 16 :220-224 - 34.
Robinson DS, Hamid Q , Ying S, Tsicopoulos A, Barkans J, Bentley AM, et al. Predominant TH2-like bronchoalveolar T-lymphocyte population in atopic asthma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1992; 326 :298-304 - 35.
Ohnishi T, Kita H, Weiler D, Sur S, Sedgwick JB, Calhoun WJ, et al. IL-5 is the predominant eosinophil-active cytokine in the antigen-induced pulmonary late-phase reaction. The American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1993; 147 :901-907 - 36.
Punnonen J, Aversa G, Cocks BG, McKenzie AN, Menon S, Zurawski G, et al. Interleukin 13 induces interleukin 4-independent IgG4 and IgE synthesis and CD23 expression by human B cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1993; 90 :3730-3734 - 37.
Hunninghake GM, Soto-Quiros ME, Avila L, Su J, Murphy A, Demeo DL, et al. Polymorphisms in IL13, total IgE, eosinophilia, and asthma exacerbations in childhood. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2007; 120 :84-90 - 38.
Corren J. Role of interleukin-13 in asthma. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports. 2013; 13 :415-420 - 39.
Lee YC, Lee KH, Lee HB, Rhee YK. Serum levels of interleukins (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13, and interferon-gamma in acute asthma. The Journal of Asthma. 2001; 38 :665-671 - 40.
Castro M, Corren J, Pavord ID, Maspero J, Wenzel S, Rabe KF, et al. Dupilumab efficacy and safety in moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2018; 378 :2486-2496 - 41.
Eger K, Kroes JA, Ten BA, Bel EH. Long-term therapy response to Anti-IL-5 biologics in severe asthma: A real-life evaluation. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. In Practice. 2021; 9 :1194-1200 - 42.
Bilsborough J, Leung DY, Maurer M, Howell M, Boguniewicz M, Yao L, et al. IL-31 is associated with cutaneous lymphocyte antigen-positive skin homing T cells in patients with atopic dermatitis. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2006; 117 :418-425 - 43.
Yu JI, Han WC, Yun KJ, Moon HB, Oh GJ, Chae SC. Identifying polymorphisms in IL-31 and their association with susceptibility to asthma. Korean Journal of Pathology. 2012; 46 :162-168 - 44.
Datsi A, Steinhoff M, Ahmad F, Alam M, Buddenkotte J. Interleukin-31: The “itchy” cytokine in inflammation and therapy. Allergy. 2021; 76 :2982-2997 - 45.
Lai T, Wu D, Li W, Chen M, Yi Z, Huang D, et al. Interleukin-31 expression and relation to disease severity in human asthma. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6 :22835 - 46.
Ramakrishnan RK, Al HS, Hamid Q. Role of IL-17 in asthma pathogenesis and its implications for the clinic. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. 2019; 13 :1057-1068 - 47.
Molet S, Hamid Q , Davoine F, Nutku E, Taha R, Page N, et al. IL-17 is increased in asthmatic airways and induces human bronchial fibroblasts to produce cytokines. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2001; 108 :430-438 - 48.
Zhao Y, Yang J, Gao YD, Guo W. Th17 immunity in patients with allergic asthma. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology. 2010; 151 :297-307 - 49.
Sehra S, Yao W, Nguyen ET, Glosson-Byers NL, Akhtar N, Zhou B, et al. TH9 cells are required for tissue mast cell accumulation during allergic inflammation. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2015; 136 :433-440 - 50.
Jia L, Wang Y, Li J, Li S, Zhang Y, Shen J, et al. Detection of IL-9 producing T cells in the PBMCs of allergic asthmatic patients. BMC Immunology. 2017; 18 :38 - 51.
Louahed J, Toda M, Jen J, Hamid Q , Renauld JC, Levitt RC, et al. Interleukin-9 upregulates mucus expression in the airways. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 2000; 22 :649-656 - 52.
Hoppenot D, Malakauskas K, Lavinskiene S, Bajoriuniene I, Kalinauskaite V, Sakalauskas R. Peripheral blood Th9 cells and eosinophil apoptosis in asthma patients. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2015; 51 :10-17 - 53.
Mitchell PD, O’Byrne PM. Epithelial-derived cytokines in asthma. Chest. 2017; 151 :1338-1344 - 54.
Wang YH, Angkasekwinai P, Lu N, Voo KS, Arima K, Hanabuchi S, et al. IL-25 augments type 2 immune responses by enhancing the expansion and functions of TSLP-DC-activated Th2 memory cells. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2007; 204 :1837-1847 - 55.
Angkasekwinai P, Park H, Wang YH, Wang YH, Chang SH, Corry DB, et al. Interleukin 25 promotes the initiation of proallergic type 2 responses. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2007; 204 :1509-1517 - 56.
Cheng D, Xue Z, Yi L, Shi H, Zhang K, Huo X, et al. Epithelial interleukin-25 is a key mediator in Th2-high, corticosteroid-responsive asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2014; 190 :639-648 - 57.
El-Husseini ZW, Gosens R, Dekker F, Koppelman GH. The genetics of asthma and the promise of genomics-guided drug target discovery. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2020; 8 :1045-1056 - 58.
Saikumar JA, Hesse L, Ketelaar ME, Koppelman GH, Nawijn MC. The central role of IL-33/IL-1RL1 pathway in asthma: From pathogenesis to intervention. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2021; 225 :107847 - 59.
Schmitz J, Owyang A, Oldham E, Song Y, Murphy E, McClanahan TK, et al. IL-33, an interleukin-1-like cytokine that signals via the IL-1 receptor-related protein ST2 and induces T helper type 2-associated cytokines. Immunity. 2005; 23 :479-490 - 60.
Kearley J, Buckland KF, Mathie SA, Lloyd CM. Resolution of allergic inflammation and airway hyperreactivity is dependent upon disruption of the T1/ST2-IL-33 pathway. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2009; 179 :772-781 - 61.
Bhowmik M, Majumdar S, Dasgupta A, Gupta BS, Saha S. Pilot-scale study of human plasma proteomics identifies ApoE and IL33 as markers in atopic asthma. Journal of Asthma Allergy. 2019; 12 :273-283 - 62.
West EE, Kashyap M, Leonard WJ. TSLP: A key regulator of asthma pathogenesis. Drug Discovery Today Diseases Mechanism. 2012; 9 :e83-e88 - 63.
Salter BM, Oliveria JP, Nusca G, Smith SG, Tworek D, Mitchell PD, et al. IL-25 and IL-33 induce Type 2 inflammation in basophils from subjects with allergic asthma. Respiratory Research. 2016; 17 :5 - 64.
Diver S, Khalfaoui L, Emson C, Wenzel SE, Menzies-Gow A, Wechsler ME, et al. Effect of tezepelumab on airway inflammatory cells, remodelling, and hyperresponsiveness in patients with moderate-to-severe uncontrolled asthma (CASCADE): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2021; 9 :1299-1312 - 65.
Lloyd CM, Delaney T, Nguyen T, Tian J, Martinez-A C, Coyle AJ, et al. CC chemokine receptor (CCR)3/eotaxin is followed by CCR4/monocyte-derived chemokine in mediating pulmonary T helper lymphocyte type 2 recruitment after serial antigen challenge in vivo. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2000; 191 :265-274 - 66.
Nakamura H, Weiss ST, Israel E, Luster AD, Drazen JM, Lilly CM. Eotaxin and impaired lung function in asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 1999; 160 :1952-1956 - 67.
Murdoch C, Finn A. Chemokine receptors and their role in inflammation and infectious diseases. Blood. 2000; 95 :3032-3043 - 68.
Robays LJ, Maes T, Lebecque S, Lira SA, Kuziel WA, Brusselle GG, et al. Chemokine receptor CCR2 but not CCR5 or CCR6 mediates the increase in pulmonary dendritic cells during allergic airway inflammation. Journal of Immunology. 2007; 178 :5305-5311 - 69.
Al-Rashoudi R, Moir G, Al-Hajjaj MS, Al-Alwan MM, Wilson HM, Crane IJ. Differential expression of CCR2 and CX3CR1 on CD16(+) monocyte subsets is associated with asthma severity. Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. 2019; 15 :64 - 70.
Wang A, Wang Z, Cao Y, Cheng S, Chen H, Bunjhoo H, et al. CCL2/CCR2-dependent recruitment of Th17 cells but not Tc17 cells to the lung in a murine asthma model. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology. 2015; 166 :52-62 - 71.
Mellado M, Martin DAA, Gomez L, Martinez C, Rodriguez-Frade JM. Chemokine receptor 2 blockade prevents asthma in a cynomolgus monkey model. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2008; 324 :769-775 - 72.
Pease JE, Williams TJ. Eotaxin and asthma. Current Opinion in Pharmacology. 2001; 1 :248-253 - 73.
Li X, Wang B, Huang M, Wang X. miR-30a-3p participates in the development of asthma by targeting CCR3. Open Medicine. 2020; 15 :483-491 - 74.
Lun SW, Wong CK, Ko FW, Ip WK, Hui DS, Lam CW. Aberrant expression of CC and CXC chemokines and their receptors in patients with asthma. Journal of Clinical Immunology. 2006; 26 :145-152 - 75.
Grozdanovic M, Laffey KG, Abdelkarim H, Hitchinson B, Harijith A, Moon HG, et al. Novel peptide nanoparticle-biased antagonist of CCR3 blocks eosinophil recruitment and airway hyperresponsiveness. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2019; 143 :669-680 - 76.
Schuh JM, Blease K, Hogaboam CM. The role of CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) and RANTES/CCL5 during chronic fungal asthma in mice. The FASEB Journal. 2002; 16 :228-230 - 77.
Rojas-Dotor S, Segura-Mendez NH, Miyagui-Namikawa K, Mondragon-Gonzalez R. Expression of resistin, CXCR3, IP-10, CCR5 and MIP-1alpha in obese patients with different severity of asthma. Biological Research. 2013; 46 :13-20 - 78.
Gauthier M, Kale SL, Oriss TB, Scholl K, Das S, Yuan H, et al. Dual role for CXCR3 and CCR5 in asthmatic type 1 inflammation. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2022; 149 :113-124 - 79.
Saeki H, Tamaki K. Thymus and activation regulated chemokine (TARC)/CCL17 and skin diseases. Journal of Dermatological Science. 2006; 43 :75-84 - 80.
Luu QQ , Moon JY, Lee DH, Ban GY, Kim SH, Park HS. Role of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine in allergic asthma. Journal of Asthma Allergy. 2022; 15 :157-167 - 81.
Leung TF, Wong CK, Chan IH, Ip WK, Lam CW, Wong GW. Plasma concentration of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine is elevated in childhood asthma. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2002; 110 :404-409 - 82.
Leung TF, Wong CK, Lam CW, Li AM, Ip WK, Wong GW, et al. Plasma TARC concentration may be a useful marker for asthmatic exacerbation in children. The European Respiratory Journal. 2003; 21 :616-620 - 83.
Kalayci O, Sonna LA, Woodruff PG, Camargo CJ, Luster AD, Lilly CM. Monocyte chemotactic protein-4 (MCP-4; CCL-13): A biomarker of asthma. The Journal of Asthma. 2004; 41 :27-33 - 84.
Soliman NA, Abdel GM, El KR, Hafez YM, Abo ER, Atef MM. Cross talk between Hsp72, HMGB1 and RAGE/ERK1/2 signaling in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma in obese patients. Molecular Biology Reports. 2020; 47 :4109-4116 - 85.
Jiang XG, Yang XD, Lv Z, Zhuang PH. Elevated serum levels of TNF-alpha, IL-8, and ECP can be involved in the development and progression of bronchial asthma. The Journal of Asthma. 2018; 55 :111-118 - 86.
Rydell N, Nagao M, Moverare R, Ekoff H, Sjolander A, Borres MP, et al. Serum eosinophilic cationic protein is a reliable biomarker for childhood asthma. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology. 2022; 183 :744-752 - 87.
Refaat MM, El SE, Abd EW, Elbanna AH, Sayed H. Relationship between sputum periostin level and inflammatory asthma phenotypes in Egyptian patients. The Journal of Asthma. 2021; 58 :1285-1291 - 88.
Hwang YH, Lee Y, Paik MJ, Yee ST. Inhibitions of HMGB1 and TLR4 alleviate DINP-induced asthma in mice. Toxicological Research (Camb). 2019; 8 :621-629 - 89.
Baos S, Calzada D, Cremades L, Sastre J, Quiralte J, Florido F, et al. Biomarkers associated with disease severity in allergic and nonallergic asthma. Molecular Immunology. 2017; 82 :34-45 - 90.
Yildiz H, Alp HH, Sunnetcioglu A, Ekin S, Mermit CB. Evaluation serum levels of YKL-40, Periostin, and some inflammatory cytokines together with IL-37, a new anti-inflammatory cytokine, in patients with stable and exacerbated asthma. Heart & Lung. 2021; 50 :177-183 - 91.
Zhou T, Huang X, Ma J, Zhou Y, Liu Y, Xiao L, et al. Association of plasma soluble CD14 level with asthma severity in adults: A case control study in China. Respiratory Research. 2019; 20 :19 - 92.
Ogino K, Obase Y, Takahashi N, Shimizu H, Takigawa T, Wang DH, et al. High serum arginase I levels in asthma: Its correlation with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. The Journal of Asthma. 2011; 48 :1-7 - 93.
Ma SL, Zhang L. Elevated serum OX40L is a biomarker for identifying corticosteroid resistance in pediatric asthmatic patients. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2019; 19 :66 - 94.
Specjalski K, Niedoszytko M. MicroRNAs: Future biomarkers and targets of therapy in asthma? Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine. 2020; 26 :285-292 - 95.
Rial MJ, Canas JA, Rodrigo-Munoz JM, Valverde-Monge M, Sastre B, Sastre J, et al. Changes in serum MicroRNAs after Anti-IL-5 biological treatment of severe asthma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22 :1-9 - 96.
ElKashef S, Ahmad SE, Soliman Y, Mostafa MS. Role of microRNA-21 and microRNA-155 as biomarkers for bronchial asthma. Innate Immunity. 2021; 27 :61-69 - 97.
Yu Y, Men S, Zhang Y. miR-20a-5p ameliorates ovalbumin (OVA)-induced mouse model of allergic asthma through targeting ATG7-regulated cell death, fibrosis and inflammation. International Immunopharmacology. 2021; 95 :107342 - 98.
Trifunovic A, Dombkowski A, Cukovic D, Mahajan P. The potential of microRNAs as noninvasive biomarkers in acute pediatric asthma. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2020; 145 :1706-1708 - 99.
Tiwari A, Li J, Kho AT, Sun M, Lu Q , Weiss ST, et al. COPD-associated miR-145-5p is downregulated in early-decline FEV1 trajectories in childhood asthma. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2021; 147 :2181-2190 - 100.
Li X, Ye S, Lu Y. Long non-coding RNA NEAT1 overexpression associates with increased exacerbation risk, severity, and inflammation, as well as decreased lung function through the interaction with microRNA-124 in asthma. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 2020; 34 :e23023 - 101.
Weidner J, Ekerljung L, Malmhall C, Miron N, Radinger M. Circulating microRNAs correlate to clinical parameters in individuals with allergic and non-allergic asthma. Respiratory Research. 2020; 21 :107 - 102.
Rostami HS, Alizadeh Z, Mazinani M, Mahlooji RM, Fazlollahi MR, Kazemnejad A, et al. Exosomal MicroRNAs as Biomarkers in Allergic Asthma. Iranian Journal of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. 2021; 20 :160-168 - 103.
Zhang D, Wu Y, Sun G. miR-192 suppresses T follicular helper cell differentiation by targeting CXCR5 in childhood asthma. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 2018; 78 :236-242 - 104.
Wu C, Xu K, Wang Z, Chen Z, Sun Z, Yu W, et al. A novel microRNA miR-1165-3p as a potential diagnostic biomarker for allergic asthma. Biomarkers. 2019; 24 :56-63 - 105.
Wang W, Wang J, Chen H, Zhang X, Han K. Downregulation of miR-3934 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of asthmatic patients and its potential diagnostic value. BioMed Research International. 2021; 2021 :8888280 - 106.
Xu L, Yi M, Tan Y, Yi Z, Zhang Y. A comprehensive analysis of microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for asthma. Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease. 2020; 14 :1022250393 - 107.
Tian M, Ji Y, Wang T, Zhang W, Zhou Y, Cui Y. Changes in circulating microRNA-126 levels are associated with immune imbalance in children with acute asthma. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology. 2018; 32 :1680016491 - 108.
Dai B, Sun F, Cai X, Li C, Liu F, Shang Y. Long noncoding RNA PTTG3P/miR-192-3p/CCNB1 axis is a potential biomarker of childhood asthma. International Immunopharmacology. 2021; 101 :108229 - 109.
Ye S, Zhu S, Feng L. LncRNA ANRIL/miR-125a axis exhibits potential as a biomarker for disease exacerbation, severity, and inflammation in bronchial asthma. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 2020; 34 :e23092 - 110.
Wu D, Gu B, Qian Y, Sun Y, Chen Y, Mao ZD, et al. Long non-coding RNA growth arrest specific-5: A potential biomarker for early diagnosis of severe asthma. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2020; 12 :1960-1971 - 111.
Qiu YY, Wu Y, Lin MJ, Bian T, Xiao YL, Qin C. LncRNA-MEG3 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate Treg/Th17 balance in patients with asthma by targeting microRNA-17/ RORgammat. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2019; 111 :386-394 - 112.
Xia L, Wang X, Liu L, Fu J, Xiao W, Liang Q , et al. lnc-BAZ2B promotes M2 macrophage activation and inflammation in children with asthma through stabilizing BAZ2B pre-mRNA. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2021; 147 :921-932