Descriptive statistics of growth parameters of
Abstract
The Chapter focuses on two crops namely Pongamia pinnata and Jatropha curcas, their germplasm collection, evaluation trials including progeny trials, identification of superior germplasm for maximum yield of oil per unit area, mass multiplication, on-farm trials, carbon sequestration capacity, and successful agro-forestry models. Since India’s edible oil consumption needs are heavily dependent on imports, the only feasible way to augment biofuel production is through utilisation of non -edible tree borne oils. Indian demography (population size and population density) coupled with food-fuel competition warrants the use of only wastelands for cultivation with crops tolerant/resilient to severe environmental stress. P. pinnata and J. curcas are proven, ideal candidates that fit in the narrative and hence the chapter encompasses a holistic, multi-dimensional approach on biodiesel production technologies using P. pinnata and J. curcas and along with their future prospects.
Keywords
- biodiesel
- production technologies
- tree-borne oilseeds (TBOs)
- agroforestry
- carbon sequestration potential
1. Introduction
Global warming and climate change has shifted the energy requirement paradigm from fossil fuels to biofuels. Among the differentbiofuels production technologies, Tree Borne Oilseeds (TBOs) provide a unique production substrate as it possesses 15–65% oil content from seeds of multi-purpose tree species, which are non-edible and can be utilised as a source of bio-diesel production. Moreover, TBOs has enormous potential in ensuring livelihood security because it involves participation of communities in growing trees as a component and processing of seeds for oil extraction. These oil tree species can be grown across the country under different agro-ecological regions ranging from forests, non-forest areas, degraded lands, barren lands, deserts and hilly landscapes.
Although biofuels derived from TBOs have proven to be ideal eco-friendly candidates for energy security, its mass production remains arduous due to several technological and economic issues ranging from commercial production and harvesting of TBOs at optimum maturity index. The primeimpediments in establishment of an integrated system of large-scale TBOs production are the non-availability of a robust marketing chain with horizontal and vertical linkages and lack of government aided monetary incentives.
India has an appreciablerepository of non-edible tree borne oilseeds as well as the required policies that render them amenable to increased biofuels production. There is also a large collection of germplasm accessions for important TBOs such as
Uncertainties brought about, by climate change as a result of continually rising greenhouse gas emission, coupled with fluctuating price of crude oil, tense relations among global nations, and rising energy needs, there has been a renewed focus on biofuels in recent years. Biofuels are clean, renewable sources of energy [1].
After being recognised as a greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) mitigation strategy under the Kyoto Protocol, global interest in carbon sequestered by agroforestry systems gained significant momentum. Comprehensive estimates of biomass and carbon stocks in plantations, including trees outside forests (TOFs), are required to prepare national roadmaps as a part of the commitment made under United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Furthermore, there is a growing interest in the market opportunities for forest carbon credits [5]. As plans are being implemented to expand
Biomass energy is a local energy source that can sufficiently meet the basic necessities of rural households. Though the contribution of biomass sources to the overall energy scenario is gradually decreasing, it still accounts for more than 40% of the country’s energy supply. In rural areas, fuel-wood accounts for 65% of biomass energy, agricultural waste accounts for 20%, and cow dung accounts for 15%. With the increased use of commercial energy sources, there has recently been a significant shift towards commercial sources. As a result, future energy projections in India do not show a proportionate increase in fuel-wood consumption with rising population. It is difficult to predict the fuel-mix shift at this juncture, but it is evident that it is happening in the right direction. Furthermore, in terms of global energy policy, the final form of energy is more important than the primary form. As a result, there has been a strong emphasis on how fuel-wood and other sources of energy can be converted into desirable forms, that are economically feasible, environmentally sound and energy efficient. This transformation is gradual but noticeable.
The Panchayat, or local self-government, is a body of elected citizens that work for the developmental goals and aspirations of the country at the grass root level (rural villages). According to the Eleventh Schedule of the Indian Constitution, certain developmental functions have been delegated to the Panchayats. The Panchayats are in charge of social forestry, farm forestry, land improvement, the implementation of land reforms, land consolidation and soil conservation, fuel and feed production, and non-conventional energy sources. To see how biomass production might be better regulated and regularised through local governance systems, one must analyse the energy policy and rural energy planning initiatives as well as the current programmes of the Indian government.
2. Current and future biofuels’ demands
2.1 Global scenario
Demand of biofuels in the global market show distinct diversions between pre-pandemic and post pandemic period. COVID 19 pandemic plummeted the use of biofuels by 8.7% in 2020 relative to 2019. International Energy Agency projects global demand of biofuels to grow by 28% during 2021–2026. Conductive national policies, international commitments to adhere to binding agreements on climate and environment followed by ethanol -fuel blending mandates are expected to boost global biofuel market for 2021–2030. The recent ban on palm oil exports imposed by Indonesia, world’s largest producer of palm oil, due to surge in domestic price and supply chain shock induced by Russia – Ukraine crisis have far-reaching ramifications in the demand, supply and use of biofuels by world nations. Nevertheless, demand of biofuels is expected to rise in long run due to the pertinent changes caused in the environment due to climate crisis, unfettered urbanisation at the cost of natural resources and socio-economic developmental goals of the nation states. International initiatives such as Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials (RSB), Sustainable Biofuels Consensus and Bonsucro also provide promising platforms to help take decisive actions to ensure both trade and use of biofuels.
2.2 State of biofuel requirement in India
India is ranked 3rd in the world for oil consumption, 20th for oil production globally, and imports nearly 87% of its oil consumption from different trade partners. India’s crude oil production has been declining consistently since 2011–2012. India’s crude oil imports dictated by expensive import bills coupled with national action plan to adhere to usage limits imposed by international climate agreements have righteously streamlined the fuel sector to develop sustainable alternatives to crude oil. Development of Indigenous Cellulolytic Enzyme for the production of biofuels, and development and transferring of 2G Ethanol technology to Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) by Department of Biotechnology in the Ministry of Science and Technology, Repurpose Used Cooking Oil (RUCO) launched by Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), Ethanol blending policy of the government to achieve 20% ethanol-blending and 5% biodiesel-blending by 2030 and reducing GST on ethanol for blending from 18–5% are steps mooted at different levels in the right direction to facilitate production, supply chain, sustainable trade and use of biofuels in the country. India’s requirement of biofuels is henceforth expected to rise significantly for the decades to come.
2.3 National strategies and policies
2.3.1 National mission on oil seeds
India, being the largest consumer of edible oil in the world, imports more than half of its annual edible oil requirements, primarily from Indonesia, Malaysia, Brazil, Argentina, Russia and Ukraine. With the aim of increasing the acreage and production of oil seeds and oil palm in the country, Government of India launched National Edible Oil Mission-Oil Palm (NMEO-OP) in 2014. The centrally sponsored scheme targets to augment palm oil production from 3.1 lakh tonnes (2021) to 11.20 lakh tonnes by 2025–2026 and to 28 lakh tonnes by 2029–2030. The scheme also targets to increase the acreage of oil palm cultivation by an additional 6.5 lakh hectares by 2025–2026. Oil palm is a tropical crop thriving best in alluvial and moist loamy soils rich in organic matter that requires evenly distributed rainfall of around 3000–4000 mm per annum. Hence NMEO-OP has laid special emphasis to increase the acreage and productivity of oil palm in India’s north-eastern states and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands due to favourable weather conditions. The mission is expected to copiously reduce our dependence on imports of oil palm and other oil seeds.
2.3.2 National policy on biofuels
National Policy on Biofuels, rolled out in 2018 streamlines India’s ambitious target of becoming self-reliant nation at multifarious levels. The policy expands the ambit of substrates that can be used for producing bio-ethanol by permitting the use of sugar containing substances such as sweet sorghum, sugar beet and sugarcane juice, starch containing cassava and corn, broken or damaged food grains, and potatoes, unfit for human conception. It also classifies biofuels into three different categories vis-à-vis “basic biofuels” or “first generation biofuels” (1G) encompassing bioethanol and biodiesel and “advanced biofuels” or “second generation Biofuels” (2G) that includes ethanol, Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) to drop-in fuels, and “third generation (3G) biofuels” consisting of bio-CNG. The policy also makes it amenable, the use of surplus food grains for bio-ethanol production, thereby encouraging various supply chain mechanisms to boost up the production of biofuels. Recent amendments in the National Policy on Biofuels 2018, make it amenable to increase the scope of feed stocks required for production of biofuels and advances the Ethanol Blending Target (EBT) of 20% of petrol containing ethanol by 2025–2026 instead of 2030. Promotion of use of biofuels in the transportation sector, not only reduces nation’s crude import bill but also aligns the country in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
2.3.3 National agroforestry policy
Agroforestry is the scientific practice of integrating trees and shrubs in farm lands for increasing productivity, sustainability and diversity of the ecosystem as a whole. The beginning of the new millennium posed innumerable challenges to the development of Agroforestry by way of lack of institutional mechanisms, insufficient market infrastructure and incoherent legal provisions, which catalysed India in becoming the first country in the world to adopt a National Agroforestry Policy in 2014. The policy envisages the establishment of National Agroforestry Board to synergize and coordinate the efforts of different stakeholders at national level and to strengthen the livelihood opportunities of rural households through Agroforestry. The policy also achieves significant momentum as Agroforestry is known for its role in carbon sequestration, and achieve global climate goals.
3. J. curcas and P. pinnata
Arboreal legume
4. Field experiments
The Hayatnagar Research Farm of the Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (17.27°N latitude, 78.35°E longitude, and approximately 515 m above sea level), Hyderabad in the Southern part of India, served as the site for all experiments relating to morpho- and genetic variability, growth and reproductive biology, yield, crop improvement, and carbon sequestration potential. The semi-arid climate in the experimental sitewas marked by warm summers and moderate winters. The typical maximum air temperature varies between 13.5 and 16.8 degrees Celsius in the winter and 35.6 to 38.6 degrees Celsius in the summer (March, April, and May). The site experiences roughly 746.2 mm of annual long-term precipitation, primarily from June to October. The soil has a medium texture, is red, and has a shallow depth (Typic Haplustalf as per USDA soil classification).
4.1 Morpho- and genetic-variability in J. curcas
32 high-yielding candidate plus trees (CPTs) of
The broad sense heritability was found to be high overall and exceeded 80% for all the examined seed attributes. Heritability for the female-to-male flower ratio was over 100%, followed by yield (83.61) and plant height (87.73). The path analysis showed that number of branches (0.612), days from fruiting tomaturity (0.612), and the ratio of female to male flowers (0.789) had the strongest positive direct correlation with seed output (0.431). The number of days from flowering to fruiting had a negative indirect effect on yield. Ward’s minimal variance cluster analysis’ hierarchical clustering revealed phylo-geographic patterns in the genetic diversity. K-means clusteringrevealed that trees from different geographic regions weregrouped together in a cluster and as were trees from thesame geographical area placed in different clusterssuggestingthat geographical diversity did not go hand in handwith genetic diversity. In addition, clustering identifiedpromising accession with favourable traits for futureestablishment of elite seedling seed orchard and clonal seed orchard for varietal and hybridization programmes (Table 1).
Parameters | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|---|---|
Plant Height (cm) | 24.30 | 257.30 | 152.69 | 80.81 |
C.D (cm) | 6.0 | 24.5 | 15.65 | 6.04 |
No. of Branches | 24.0 | 243.0 | 149.33 | 76.72 |
Crown width (cm) | 124.00 | 383.80 | 276.66 | 93.51 |
Crown depth (cm) | 142.33 | 262.33 | 215.73 | 42.58 |
4.2 Morpho- and genetic-variability in P. pinnata
In order to evaluate genetic association and variability in seed and growth characters, 50 high yielding candidate plus trees (CPTs) of
4.3 Evaluation trials of J. curcas
Ten elite lines of
Genotypes | Seed yield (g/plant) | Oil yield (g/plant) | Pod Weight (g/plant) | East West Canopy | No. of primary branches | North South Canopy | Plant height (cm) | Pods / plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRIDAJJ06 | 449.36 | 143.82 | 520.86 | 195.90 | 79.35 | 195.52 | 200.50 | 225.79 |
CRIDAJL06 | 424.48 | 132.92 | 664.16 | 223.65 | 70.63 | 216.98 | 200.31 | 314.53 |
CRIDAJR06 | 434.63 | 138.20 | 540.92 | 205.15 | 82.06 | 221.25 | 202.87 | 285.25 |
CSMCRIC1 | 305.85 | 100.04 | 491.60 | 139.28 | 36.46 | 164.29 | 145.46 | 238.18 |
CSMCRIC2 | 327.06 | 101.97 | 443.82 | 201.54 | 69.50 | 216.52 | 177.31 | 198.09 |
CSMCRIC4 | 416.29 | 122.66 | 542.25 | 157.24 | 49.63 | 176.29 | 185.24 | 273.41 |
FRIEL1 | 435.30 | 153.90 | 550.81 | 193.54 | 73.25 | 221.95 | 196.86 | 323.09 |
NBPGR0306 | 410.67 | 133.38 | 575.79 | 163.42 | 90.50 | 172.47 | 199.54 | 230.80 |
NBRIJ05 | 320.99 | 83.13 | 478.28 | 183.13 | 81.48 | 194.17 | 213.29 | 206.33 |
NBRIJ18 | 288.04 | 111.45 | 413.24 | 163.19 | 94.48 | 159.69 | 186.14 | 207.87 |
Grand mean | 381.27 | 122.15 | 522.17 | 182.60 | 72.73 | 193.91 | 190.75 | 250.33 |
CD (5%) | 38.30 | 12.36 | 48.13 | 20.60 | 7.05 | 17.23 | 13.18 | 29.90 |
CV (%) | 12.36 | 12.27 | 11.34 | 13.89 | 11.94 | 10.94 | 8.50 | 14.70 |
Studies from other research groups on evaluation trials of
Prakash et al. [19] evaluated fifteen enzyme systems for their efficacy in distinguishing different accessions of
Arolu [20] conducted similar evaluation trials in using 48 accessions of
4.4 Carbon sequestration potential and allometric equations
Periodic destructive sampling is one of the most accurate methods for measuring and tracking the above-ground biomass for a stand [12, 13]. Unfortunately, it takes a lot of time and effort to cut and weigh enough trees to accurately represent the size and species distribution in a system. Destructive harvesting is labour-intensive and cumbersome [16, 17]. Additionally, it is challenging to harvest trees destructively for research projects because they last longer and require ongoing monitoring of the trees being studied. In order to ascertain the above-ground biomass of different tree species used in agroforestry and forests, non-destructive approaches have been devised. These techniques are based on regression models that connect biomass to allometric growth factors [21, 22]. As they may be immediately linked to remotely sensed data for the calculation of biomass in wider regions, creating allometric connections using crown area and/or tree height as predictors of biomass is also gaining interest.
For the development of prediction equations, allometric equations in tree biomass are often coupled to easily observed predictor variables, such as collar diameter/DBH and tree height. An effective allometric equation predicts the biomass of a tree without the requirement of destructive sampling. A frequently used predictor is the diameter at ground level (collar diameter) or breast height [23, 24, 25]. According to Ghezehei et al. [25], a power function is typically employed to establish the relationship between several characteristics relevant to tree growth [26].
Where ‘X’is a predictor (collar diameter, tree height etc.)
b is a scaling exponent or allometric coefficient and a is an intercept.
In this study, the correlations between collar diameter and biomass, tree height and biomass, and branch number and biomass are established using the aforementioned power function. The biomass, crown depth, and crown breadth were linearized in the aforementioned model. For total above, total below, and total (above + below) dry biomass, allometric equations were created. This methodwas employed to enable comparison with already-existing equations and to assess which equation yields more trustworthy findings. Using both sides of the logarithmic transformation.
By applying linear regression in SPSS (version IBM SPSS Statistics 19), the parameters of the linearized allometric equations (b and log a) were computed. In the end, the antilog function was used to compute the original parameter “a”. The R2 value, the F-statistic, and a scatter plot of the residuals were used to assess the significance and validity of the established equations. Microsoft Excel was employed to visualise the equation graphs. An independent dataset containing the data from 320 trees of varying ages and under diverse management settings was used to validate the proposed equations.
4.4.1 Carbon sequestration potential of J. curcas
One of our studies involved developing allometric relationships in the Jatropha plant to forecast several biomass-related components (above ground and below ground) using easily quantifiable characteristics, such as collar diameter, tree height, number of branches, crown diameter, and crown depth. Additionally, it was intended to demonstrate the validity of these associations using a separate dataset collected from a variety of managerial scenarios. In 2011, during the wet season, destructive sampling was done on Jatropha plants that were 8 years old. When predicting different biomass components (above, below, and total) using easily observable variables, highly significant allometric associations (F values significant at 1% level) were found with R2values ranging from 0.89 to 0.98. Of all the predictors, collar diameter exhibited a highly significant relationship with total dry biomass per plant (R2 = 0.97). The allometric relationships developed were validated with an independent dataset.
An independent dataset comprising of 220 trees with a suitable dendro-chronological range (2 years to 8 years) and management settings (various fertiliser and irrigation regimes) was used to validate the allometric connections. For the 220 trees, allometric relationships using collar diameter as the explanatory variable were utilised to forecast the number of branches. The number of branches-collar diameter allometric equation was found to be valid since the observed and predicted values show a high degree of agreement. Power regressions accurately depict tree allometry in a number of trees [27]. They enable the use of conventional least squares regression analysis and give uniformity of variance over the sampled range after log translation [25]. After the log transformation, a correction factor was applied in some research to lessen the systematic bias, and equations based on the correction factor were developed. However, because the computed F ratios are very significant and the R2 values are greater than 0.90 at the 1% level of significance in our investigation, we did not utilise any correction factor. It implies that our study had little systematic bias. Estimates for some of the trees have become more accurate, thanks to the use of tree height and breast height diameter. However, as shown by collar diameter-based relationships, in the current study collar diameter alone was sufficient to reliably predict various tree development characteristics, including above ground, below ground, and total biomass.
In the current study, there is a consistent and significant allometric association between crown depth and the other growth characteristics. This went against several of the earlier findings [28]. Similar to this, animal browsing and seasonal deciduousness have an impact on some trees’ biomass of leaves. In Hyderabad’s semi-arid climate, we noticed that Jatropha trees lose their leaves in December and stay leafless from December through February. Beginning in the month of March, the leaves start to grow. Therefore, during periods when leaf drop does not occur, the equations for the estimate of leaf biomass are to be applied (Table 3).
Diameter Classes | Above dry ground dry biomass t/ha | Below ground dry biomass t/ha | Total dry t/ha (A + B) | Total C biomass t/ha (a + b) |
---|---|---|---|---|
D1 (5–10 cm) | 3.10 | 2.23 | 5.33 | 2.56 |
D2 (10–15 cm) | 14.28 | 4.28 | 18.56 | 7.84 |
D3 (15–20 cm) | 16.19 | 5.32 | 21.51 | 9.12 |
D4 (20–25 cm) | 18.44 | 5.56 | 24.00 | 10.08 |
Average | 13.00 | 4.35 | 17.35 | 7.36 |
4.4.2 Evaluation trials of P. pinnata
In a study, Sharma et al. [29] investigated the molecular genetic diversity of 46 accessions of
Patil et al. [30] conducted a comparative study on the biodiesel and bioproductive parameters of
4.4.3 Carbon sequestration potential of P. pinnata
Additionally, the study established allometric relationships in
Using the collar diameter (R2 > 0.96), plant height (R2 > 0.94), number of branches (R2 > 0.91), crown width (R2 > 0.96), and crown depth (R2 > 0.65), highly significant allometric associations (F values significant at 1% level) were developed. An independent dataset was used to validate the associations that were developed. Independent datasets from 320 trees with diverse age group (2 years to 9 years) and management (different fertilisation, irrigation, grafting, and seedling generated plants) circumstances were used to assess the allometric relationships. The correlation coefficient was high and positive (R2 > 0.917 and R2 > 0.978), indicating that the link was linear. As the independent data sets comprised a variety of ages, management situations, and development settings, the results substantially support the validity of the height-collar diameter and number of branches-collar diameter equations (Table 4).
Diameter Classes | Above dry ground dry biomass t/ha | Below ground dry biomass t/ha | Total dry t/ha (A + B) | Total C biomass t/ha (a + b) |
---|---|---|---|---|
D1 (0–5 cm) | 2.17 | 2.16 | 4.33 | 1.87 |
D2 (5–10 cm) | 11.36 | 11.40 | 22.76 | 9.80 |
D3 (10–15 cm) | 27.79 | 22.45 | 50.24 | 21.72 |
D4 (15–20 cm) | 42.31 | 38.49 | 80.81 | 34.85 |
Average | 20.91 | 18.63 | 39.54 | 17.06 |
For a number of tree species, species-specific allometric equations have been devised [31, 32]. Such Jatropha equations, however, are limited and unavailable, especially for Indian circumstances. Allometry places a lot of focus on quantifying above-ground biomass rather than below-ground biomass because the latter is laborious and time-consuming. There is a steady requirement to create allometric equations of Jatropha because it is suggested that the species be widely planted in semi-arid regions of India. In the absence of site-specific or generalised equations, equations created elsewhere may be taken into consideration for usage at a site [33]. However, for Jatropha, there are very few published equations, and even fewer for the quantification of below-ground biomass. For trees like Jatropha, the development of allometric correlations is particularly difficult due to their complicated form-function relationships, defoliation, and change in leaf phenology during dry seasons, which is especially noticeable in younger trees [34]. There is a knowledge gap regarding accurate and thorough estimates of Jatropha biomass, despite new scientific knowledge on utility features [35], genetic diversity assessment [36], and yield [37] being developed. As a result, research was done with the aim of developing allometric equations and validating them using a large, independent dataset that represented various management settings.
5. Successful agroforestry models
5.1 Pongamia: Macrotyloma uniflorum (horse gram) based agroforestry model
A study utilising
Both the main crop
The above results on intercropping with legume based biofuel tree and grain legume may be recommended in arid and semi-arid drought prone areas, watersheds and wastelands for sustainable realisation of the renewable source of energy through the biofuel oil yielding tree
5.2 J. curcas : Cajanus cajan (Redgram) based agroforestry model
Three best genotypes (Jabua, CRIDA-Utnoor& Raipur) based on seed yield and oil content in seed were selected from a total of 102 genotypes were selected for the study. These accessions were collected from the states of Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh during 2002–2003 and planted in 2003 July at Research farm of CRIDA, Hyderabad.
The date of sowing of main crop
The primary treatments of pruning were effected in January 2004, which was dormant stage. In each of the three test genotypes of
The study reaffirmed the fact that Jatropha is an easy to establish crop, grows relatively quickly and is hardy and drought tolerant [38]. Highest yield of legume intercrop was obtained in CRIDA-Utnoor genotype of
6. Sustainability model for addressing rural energy needs
6.1 Ecosystem subsidies
Nature has its own ways that determine the flow of nutrients, energy and organic matter among different ecosystems. All such resource flows which augment the population of consumers in the ecosystem are called ecological subsidies. Conventional sources such as fossil fuels and curated fuels such as petrol and diesel depreciate the natural energy flow of any ecosystem by polluting the environment and clogging sensitive physiological receptors of plants while biofuels present a sustainable alternative.
6.2 Restoration of wastelands
Restoration of degraded lands and combating desertification have been in the forefront of national priorities since 1980s, the significance of which have mounted due to inclement weather, climate crisis and the imminent threat of global warming. In 2003–2005, 94.53 million hectares (mha) of land underwent land degradation, which gradually increased to 96.40 mha in 2011–2013 and 97.85 million hectares in 2018–2019. Main reasons attributed to the degradation include loss of soil cover, vegetation loss, and wind and water erosion taken atop by climate crisis. India aims to restore 26 million hectares of degraded land by 2030 and is also working towards achieving its national commitment on Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN). National Afforestation Programme implemented since 2000, National Action Programme to Combat Desertification (2001), National Mission on Green India and commitment laid towards Bonn’s Challenge calls for immediate intervention to elbow out the crisis of land degradation.
Results of a study on carbon sequestration potential and greenhouse gas emissions in
6.3 Reducing carbon emission and working towards climate goals
Recently, at the 26th Conference of Parties (COP 26) Climate Summit held at Glasgow, India pledged to attain carbon neutrality by 2070 as part of a 5-point action plan that included reducing emissions to 50 percent by 2030. The role of vegetation (terrestrial and aquatic) in sequestering carbon and thereby reducing the emissions are widely acknowledged and taken forward through afforestation programmes. Certain plants such as
7. Conclusion
The policies for encouraging the plantation of tree-based biofuels are focused on the use of wastelands and less productive regions. In light of stagnant food crops production and burgeoning domestic demand for food grains, use of food crops for biofuels production remains as question, as it competes with the crops for scare land and water resources. Additionally, India’s policy of neither allowing nor encouraging the use of food or other feedstock for the production of biofuels is based on the fact that food inflation has been steadily rising over the past few years. As a result, the nation’s biofuel project must carefully navigate through sensitive local and international issues. Climate Financing is a major hurdle caught between bureaucratic red tapism and false promises made by developed countries. Without adequate finance and policy support, technologies cease to transfer from lab to land. India also urged the developed countries to deliver on their promises of climate financing at the recently concluded COP 26 Climate Summit at Glasgow. Biofuel subsidies are already in place in United States and European Union to facilitate farmers facing low prices for their crops. Subsidies in the form of incentives need to be provided for start-ups that venture into biofuel crops farming, biofuel production and supply. Such incentives not only boost up the green start-ups but also motivates entrepreneurs to invest in such businesses which synergizes our effort to attain carbon neutrality by 2070.
References
- 1.
Heller J. Physic nut, Jatropha curcas L. Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops. 1. Gatersleben, Rome: Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute; 1996 - 2.
Openshaw K. A review of Jatropha curcas: An oil plant of unfulfilled promise. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2000; 19 (1):1-5 - 3.
Zahawi. Establishment and growth of living fence species: An overlooked tool for the restoration of degraded areas in the tropics. Restoration Ecology. 2005; 13 (1):92-102 - 4.
Gubitz GM, Mittelbach M, Trabi M. Exploitation of the tropical oil seed plant Jatropha curcas L. Bioresource Technology. 1999;67 (1):73-82 - 5.
Hamilton K, Bayonr R, Turner G, Higgins D. State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets: Picking Up Steam. Washington, DC: New Carbon Finance, London and The Ecosystem Marketplace; 2007 - 6.
Spaan W, Bodnar F, Idoe O, Graaff JD. Implementation of contour vegetation barriers under farmer conditions in Burkina Faso and Mali. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture. 2004; 43 (1):21-38 - 7.
Cano-Asseleih LM, Plumbley RA, Hylands PJ. Purification and partial characterization of a hemagglutinin from seeds of Jatropha curcas. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 1989; 13 (1):1-20 - 8.
Foidl N, Kashyap A. Exploring the Potential of Jatropha curcas in Rural Development and Environmental Protection. New York: Rockefeller Foundation; 1999. p. 184 - 9.
Jongschaap REE, Corré WJ, Bindraban PS, Brandenburg WA. Claims and facts on Jatropha curcas L.: GlobalJatropha curcas evaluation. In: Breeding and Propagation Programme (No. 158). Wageningen, Netherlands: Plant Research International; 2007 - 10.
Bringi NV. Non-traditional Oilseeds and Oils in India. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co; 1987 - 11.
Sreedevi TK, Wani SP, Osman M, Singh SN. Participatory research and development to evaluate Pongamia seed cake as source of plant nutrient in integrated watershed management. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research. 2009; 7 (1):13-14 - 12.
Norries DN, Blair JM, Johnson LC, McKane RB. Assessing changes in biomass, productivity, and carbon stores following Juniperus virgiana forest expansion into tall grass prairie. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2001;31 :1940-1946 - 13.
Van TK, Rayachhetry MB, Centre D. Estimating aboveground biomass of melaleuca quinquenenervia in Florida. USA Journal Aqua Plant Management. 2000;38 :62-67 - 14.
Wadham-Gagnon B, Sharpe D. Estimating Carbon Stocks in Tropical Hardwood Plantations: Using Species-Specific and Non-destructive Parameters to Estimate Aboveground Biomass for Six Native Species in Panama. Internship Report. Panama, Republic of Panama: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute ENVR; 2006. p. 451 - 15.
Delitti WBC, Meguro M, Pausas JG. Biomass and mineral mass estimates in a “cerrado” ecosystem. Revista Brasil Bot. 2006; 29 (4):531-540 - 16.
Kale M, Sing S, Roy PS, Desothali V, Gholem VS. Biomass equations of dominant species of dry deciduous forests in Shivupuri district, Madhya Pradesh. Current Science. 2004; 87 (5):683-687 - 17.
Telenius B, Verwijs T. The influence of allometric variation, vertical biomass distribution and sampling procedure on biomass estimates in commercial short rotation forests. Bioresource Technology. 1995; 51 :247-253 - 18.
Kumar R, Das N. Survey and selection of Jatropha curcas L. germplasm: Assessment of genetic variability and divergence studies on the seed traits and oil content. Industrial Crops and Products. 2018;118 :125-130 - 19.
Prakash MS, Warrier RR, Anandalakshmi R. Assessment of genetic diversity of Jatropha curcas (l.) in India. Coimbatore, India: Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding; 2008 - 20.
Arolu IW. Genetic Diversity and Heritability Estimate of Jatropha Curcas L. Accessions Using Agro-Morphological and Molecular Markers [Thesis]. Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia; 2012 - 21.
FAO. Estimating Biomass and Biomass Change of Tropical Forests: A Primer. Rome: FAO; 1997 - 22.
Lott JE, Howard SB, Black CR, Ong CK. Allometric estimation of above-ground biomass and leaf area in managed Grevillea robusta agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems. 2000;49 :1-15 - 23.
Achten WMJ, Maes WH, Reubens B, Mathijs E, Singh VP, Verchot L, et al. Biomass production and allocation in Jatropha curcas L. seedlings under different levels of drought stress. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2010;34 (5):667-676 - 24.
Firdaus MS, Hanif AHM, Safiee AS, Ismail MR. Carbon sequestration potential in soil and biomass of Jatropha curcas . In: Presented at: 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World. Brisbane, Australia: Published on DVD; 2010. pp. 1-6 - 25.
Ghezehei SB, Annandale JG, Everson CS. Shoot allometry of Jatropha curcas . Southern Forest. 2009;71 (4):279-286 - 26.
Ong JE, Gong WK, Wong CH. Allometry and partitioning of the mangrove, Rhizophoraapiculata. Forest Ecology and Management. 2004; 188 (1–3):395-408 - 27.
Clough BF, Scott K. Allometric relationships for estimating above-ground biomass in six mangrove species. Forest Ecology and Management. 1989; 27 :117-127 - 28.
Ter-Mikaelian MT, Korzukhin M. Biomass equations of sixtyfive north American tree species. Forest Ecology and Management. 1997; 97 :1-24 - 29.
Sharma SS, Negi MS, Sinha P, Kumar K, Tripathi SB. Assessment of genetic diversity of biodiesel species Pongamiapinnata accessions using AFLP and three endonuclease-AFLP. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 2011; 29 (1):12-18 - 30.
Patil VK, Bhandare P, Kulkarni PB, Naik GR. Progeny evaluation of Jatropha curcas and Pongamiapinnata with comparison to bioproductivity and biodiesel parameters. Journal of Forestry Research. 2015;26 (1):137-142 - 31.
Levia DF. A generalized allometric equation to predict foliar dry weight on the basis of trunk diameter for eastern white pine ( Pinusstrobes L.). Forest Ecology and Management. 2008;255 :1789-1792 - 32.
Wang JR, Letchford T, Comeau P, Kimmins JP. Above and below-ground biomass and nutrient distribution of a paper birch and subalpine fir mixed species stand in the sub-boreal spruce zone of British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management. 2000; 130 :17-26 - 33.
Pastor J, Abet JD, Melillo J. Biomass prediction using generalized allometric regressions for some northeast tree species. Forest Ecology and Management. 1984; 7 :265-274 - 34.
Cole TG, Ewel JJ. Allometric equations for four valuable tropical tree species. Forest Ecology and Management. 2006; 229 (1–3):351-360 - 35.
Gunaseelan VN. Biomass estimates, characteristics, biochemical methane potential, kinetics and energy flow from Jatropha curcas on dry lands. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2009;33 :589-596 - 36.
Rao GR, Prasad YG, Prabhakar M, Srinivas I, Rao KV, Korwar GR, et al. Biofuel Crops for Drylands: Cultivation and Processing Issues, Technical Bulletin 1/2010. Hyderabad, India: Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture Hyderabad; 2008. p. 32 - 37.
Lapola DM, Priess JA, Bondeau A. Modelling the land requirements and potential productivity of sugarcane and Jatropha in Brazil and India using the LPJmL dynamic global vegetation model. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2009;33 :1087-1095 - 38.
Behera SK, Srivastava P, Tripathi R, Singh JP, Singh N. Evaluation of plant performance of Jatropha curcas L. under different agro-practices for optimizing biomass–a case study. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2010;34 (1):30-41