Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Agricultural Machinery Corrosion

Written By

Gamal E.M. Nasr, Zeinab Abdel Hamid and Mohamed Refai

Submitted: 27 October 2022 Reviewed: 07 November 2022 Published: 04 January 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.108918

From the Edited Volume

Introduction to Corrosion - Basics and Advances

Edited by Ambrish Singh

Chapter metrics overview

130 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Agricultural machinery expose to wear and corrosion. This damage results from dealing with varying conditions, such as plant moisture, density of plants, soil types, and environmental condition in the field; therefore, this damage leads to an increase in energy consumption, production losses, and a decrease in the lifetime service of reciprocating mower knives. There are many studies that have identified solutions that can be used to increase the life span of agricultural machinery by reducing the chemical corrosion of agricultural machinery. The methods used to reduce chemical corrosion in agricultural machinery can be summarized by selecting new resistant materials, using paint, and using corrosion inhibitors.

Keywords

  • agricultural machinery
  • corrosion
  • pesticide
  • mineral fertilizer
  • animal wastes

1. Introduction

Agricultural mechanization plays an important role in achieving many United Nation’s sustainable development goals, especially the first goal (no poverty) and second goal (zero hunger) [1]. Agricultural mechanization can help the sustainable development of world food systems by increasing output production and reducing lost foods through the production chain [2]. Agricultural mechanization covers the manufacture, use, maintenance, and repair of machines used in agricultural production (crop and livestock) and postharvest process [3]. Agricultural machinery is working in special and hard conditions, where it deals with different kinds from the environment, soil, plants, pesticide, fertilizers, harvesting, and postharvest processing due to the reaction between agricultural machines and these conditions lead to exposure to wear, such as adhesive, abrasion, fatigue, erosion, chemical, and corrosion [4, 5].

1.1 Corrosion phenomena in agricultural machinery

Corrosion is the surface disintegration of metals/alloys within a specific environment. Some metals basically exhibit high corrosion resistance than others and this can be attributed to several factors like their chemical constituents, the nature of electrochemical reactions themselves, and others [6]. All machines and mechanical systems have moving parts from different materials, so wear is the biggest problem in the industry [7]. In addition, Figure 1 explained the effect of different conditions on agricultural machinery wear [8].

Figure 1.

Corrosion in agriculture machinery [8].

1.1.1 Corrosion cost in agricultural machinery

Hou [9] pinpoints the cost of corrosion in the world is about 2505 billion dollars and this represents 3.4% of the gross national product (GNP) as shown in Table 1. In addition, the effective control of corrosion (coatings, new materials, and preventative maintenance) is estimated to reduce this cost by 15–35% or as much as 875 billion dollars annually [10, 11]. The cost of wear and friction in Turkey is decreased by 337 million dollars due to improving the material used in the industry against corrosion and wear [12, 13].

Economic regionsCorrosion cost of agriculture US$ billionCorrosion cost of industry US$ billionCorrosion cost of services US$ billionTotal corrosion cost US$ billionTotal GNP US$ billion
United States2.0303.2146.0451.316,720
India17.720.332.370.31670
European Region3.5401297701.518,331
Arab World13.334.292.6140.12789
China56.2192.5146.2394.99330
Japan0.645.95.151.65002
Four Asian Tigers plus Macau1.529.927.358.62302
Rest of the world52.4382.5117.6552.516,057
Global15271446.7906.02505.474,314

Table 1.

Global cost of corrosion by region by sector [10].

There are about 1.9 million farms in the USA that produce livestock and crops. All these farms have a big problem with the cost of replacing machinery and equipment due to wear and corrosion. The cost of this problem in the agriculture sector was estimated to be 1.1 billion dollars, as shown in Figure 2 [14]. In addition, in China, the cost of corrosion in the agriculture machine sector was 1.38 billion dollars as 2.5% of the total estimated value of the agricultural machinery industry [9].

Figure 2.

The corrosion cost in production sectors [14].

Agricultural machinery refers to the machines used in plant production and husbandry production as seedbed preparation machines, plating machines, protection machines, harvesting machines, processing machines, livestock machinery, and agricultural transport machinery. At present, there are about 3500 kinds of agricultural machinery products in China [15]. Repair and maintenance are necessary for keeping machine parts with minimized effect wear, part failures, accidents, and natural deterioration. Moreover, the repair costs for a machine are highly variable and good management may keep costs low [16]. Wear in agriculture working parts leads to an increase in fuel consumption and decreases the lifetime of these parts [17]. Table 2 shows the readability of agriculture machines for corn and soybean breakdown time [16].

OperationBreakdown time (h/y)Breakdown probability Per 40 ha.Reliability per 40 ha.
Tillage13.60.1090.89
Planting corn5.30.1330.87
Planting soybeans3.70.1020.90
Row cultivation5.60.0450.96
Soybeans harvester8.20.3630.64
Corn harvester12.30.3230.68

Table 2.

Agricultural machinery reliability and breakdown probability [16].

1.1.2 Corrosion sources in agricultural machinery

Many studies stated that crop protection machine corrosion is caused by the effect of chemical pesticides and fertilizers used in farming. The metal elements of crop protection machines are exposed to the corrosive effects of pesticides. In addition, this corrosive effect is due to the direct connection among steel, brass, copper, and aluminum with pesticides [18, 19, 20, 21]. The sprayer content, especially the pump exposed to wear and corrosion, is due to corrosion and abrasive material used in crop production [22].

Moreover, there are studies indicating that when water is mixed with a pesticide in many stations from manufacturing, packaging, transportation, and usage increases the corrosion of metal surfaces of sprayers and it is a component, and due to that maintenance cost of machines is increasing [18, 21].

The key factors of fatigue and corrosion-fatigue failure of crop protection machines used in agricultural production determine the state of working surfaces, load parameters, environments aggressiveness degrees in consideration of the different kinds of fertilizer, and weather conditions. On examining the technical state of agricultural machinery after 3 years of operation, it is observed that corrosion contributes to approximately 80% of all mechanical failures of assembly units [6]. Many commercial chemicals are used in farming, including fertilizers, and chemicals for pests, disease, and weed control [23]. Corrosion is often more serious than the simple loss of a mass of metal. Corrosion may result in the reduction of metal thickness, leading to loss of mechanical strength and structural failure or breakdown (and structural failure or breakdown) [24].

Some fertilizers are more corrosive than others, especially if they decompose or react to produce aggressive substances such as ammonia or hydrogen sulfide; if chloride ions are present (including potassium or ammonium chloride), or if acidic conditions prevail. For example, dihydrogen ammonium phosphate or ammonium nitrate can lead to increased corrosion [18].

The most corrosive-active mineral fertilizers are nitrophosphate and ammonium sulfates, less aggressive is ammonia water, and humidity is a catalyst for corrosion processes. The relative ratios of the essential plant nutrients can influence the corrosiveness of compound liquid fertilizers, there being some evidence that the greatest effects occur with fertilizer solutions containing about 15% nitrogen, especially when half the free nitrogen is derived from urea and half from ammonium nitrate. Some typical reactions for liquid fertilizers are given in Table 3 [25].

Liquid fertilizersChemicalsReactions with steel
  • Nitrogenous solutions

Ammonium nitrate, ureaSlow reaction with steel can be more rapid at weds and bolt holes, etc.
  • Phosphate solutions

Ammonium phosphateTends to be less reactive, forms a protective phosphate coat, which can protect the metal from subsequent attack by nitrogenous solutions unless acid conditions prevail.

Table 3.

Corrosive reactions of liquid fertilizers.

Farm wastes and slurries are known to be considerably corrosive. Also, chemicals most significantly damaging to farming structures and machinery are acid preservatives, additives, some fertilizers, and manures/slurries. As regards acid-cleaning chemicals, these can be used along with eco-friendly and bio-degradable [26].

Silo has a consistency akin to chipboard; therefore, equipment used for conveying and unloading silage can be subjected to corrosive wear. Abrasion and acid attack are also particularly destructive to concrete as acids are known to react with lime, which causes the concrete to become friable. Thus, this encourages the concrete to crack and eventually spall further, exposing the internal structure to inclement weather. Plastics, chlorinated rubber, and epoxy-based coatings are resistant to acid attacks and will provide alternatives as floor coverings over concrete in agricultural environments [27].

1.2 Solutions for reducing wear in agricultural machinery

There are many ways to reduce corrosion and increase the lifetime of the machine, such as the selection of the material, adapting to environmental conditions and surface treatment. Most of the agricultural machinery working parts need surface engineering (coating process) that resists wearing conditions and corrosion conditions during all their applications. Surface engineering includes thermal spraying, hard facing, heat treatment, electroless, and electrodeposition coatings [21, 28, 29, 30].

1.2.1 Using new materials

New materials against corrosion are important to improving the agricultural machinery sector [18]. Ryabova et al. [28] mentioned that high-strength new carbon steels had been used for soil processing agricultural machines. This steel has a yield strength of 1200, 1500, and 1700 MPa with different carbon content of 0.30–0.45%, economically alloyed with manganese, nickel, chromium, copper, and molybdenum (in total from ~2 to ~4%) in combination with a set of microalloying strong carbide-forming elements (titanium, niobium, vanadium) and boron.

1.2.2 Surface coating

In general, the coating of the material has an extra cost, but it is considered to be more functional, in long-term applications, because it supplies large savings in the maintenance cost. Surface coating is a branch of surface engineering science and it is one effective solution for tribological problems. Moreover, surface coating methods are applicable to decrease the friction coefficient, change the surface roughness, increase the surface hardness, induce residual compressive stresses, and reduce corrosion effect. So, they extend the lifetime and improve the corrosion and wear resistance. The coating methods can be categorized into several types as the gaseous state, solution state, and molten state of deposition techniques [31].

The electrochemical deposition technique is attractive due to the low energy consumption for depositing a coating on the different substrates. This technique has many advantages, such as low cost, ease of operation, versatility, and high yield. Important properties for electrodeposits include wear resistance, hardness, ductility, coating layer adhesion to substrate, and corrosion resistance. All these properties and characteristics can be affected by many of variables such as temperature, species concentration, electrolyte pH, current density, electrolyte flow conditions, and the use of electrolyte additives [32]. There are many studies about increasing abrasion wear resistance and corrosion resistance for agricultural machinery working parts by using nickel and hard chromium electroplating [33, 34, 35].

Electroplating mechanics is an electrochemical reaction during which metal oxidation occurs in electrolyte and transfers to metal ions after that metal ions are reduced on an electrically conductive substrate. It consists of oxidation-reduction reactions. Oxidation reaction and reduction reaction occur at the anode and at the cathode respectively [36]. There are many metals coating materials, such as silver, nickel, copper, tin, chromium, and lead on substrate, whereas the coatings of zinc, aluminum, and cadmium belong to the latter group. The metal layer must have pores by increasing the coating thickness [37].

Electroplating of nickel occurred from electrolytes containing nickel salts (sulfate and chloride) to cause dissolution of Ni2+ ions in the anode to be deposited at the cathode. At anode, nickel is the main metal rod where oxidation reaction happened, while cathode is a coating substrate needed to produce and reduction reaction happened [38, 39].

There are many methods used to carry out direct current (DC), alternating current (AC), and periodic current reversal (PCR) as shown in (Figure 17). DC method is used continuously for electrical current and DC method is economical and simple technology. In AC, an electrodeposition negatively charged layer is formed by currents in a periodic manner and reaches zero. There are two main stages pulsed on time and pulse of time. In pulse-off time period, it is permissible transferring the ions toward the cathode surface. The PCR electrodeposition process is used for the reduction of ions until arriving at zero by a change in polarity another effect of the PCR method is the lowest internal stresses in the deposit [40, 41].

Composite coating is become a trend in surface coating due to improving mechanical properties, abrasion resistant, corrosion resistance, reducing friction between moving parts, malleability, and increasing surface hardness. In addition, recent years were new trends in using nanoparticles as the incorporation particles into metal coating [42, 43, 44].

There are many types of electrodepositing baths commonly used for electrodeposition of nickel as Watt’s bath, chloride baths, citrate bath, and sulfamate bath. Nickel electrodeposition from a Watt’s bath has been used in many functional applications to modify or improve the corrosion resistance and increase wear resistance to increase the lifetime of service parts and reduce worm parts [45]. The physical and mechanical properties of nickel deposited from a Watt’s bath are affected by the electrodeposition parameters, such as deposition time, current density, pH, cathode material, electrolyte agitation, and electrolyte temperature, among others [46]. Nickel as a metal base for composite coating is appropriate for wear resistance in industrial systems, gear systems, measuring tools, and abrasive tools [47, 48].

Nanocomposite coating technique is a new surface coating deposition process with physical and mechanical unique properties due to mixing two or more materials in the nanoscale [49]. Nanoparticle incorporation in the metal matrix can increase hardness, increase corrosion resistance, modify growth coating to deposit nanoparticles, and shift the reduction system of metal ions [32].

Table 4 shows a summary of the effect of Ni composite and Ni nanocomposite on improving the chemical and mechanical properties of steel. From this table, an improvement in mechanical and chemical properties of surfaces is evident due to adding micro- and nano-element to the nickel coating.

substrateCorr. rateWear rateHardness
Uncoated mild steel0.181 mm/y [27]0.018 mm3/N-m [50]180 HV [27]
Uncoated low-carbon steel0.310 mm/y [51]0.038 mm3/N-m [52]166 HV [51]
Steel coated with pure Ni0.049 mm/y
[27]
0.110*10−3mpy [53]
13.5 × 10−4 mm3/N-m
[47]
1.2 mg/h
[54]
5.596 × 10−5 mm3/m
[55]
243 HV
[27]
245 HV
[56]
280 HV
[54]
Composite coating
Steel coated with Ni-Cu0.170 mm/y [57]15.18*10−4 mm3/N-m [56]331 HV [57]
Steel coated with Ni-Cr0.038 mm/y [51]0.9 mg/h [54]385 HV [54]
Steel coated with Ni-Zn0.144 mm/y [58]6.83*10−3 mm3/N-m [59]253 HV [60]
Steel coated with Ni-W506 HV [61]
Nanocomposite coating
Steel coated with Ni-W/Cr2O30.00670 mm/y [62]498 HV [62]
Steel coated with Ni-GNS0.0180 mm/y [27]250 HV [27]
steel coated with Ni-GNS-TiO20.0004 mm/y [27]478 HV [27]
Steel coated with Ni-TiO20.051*10−3 mpy [53]2.99 × 10−5 mm3/m [55]480 HV [53]
Steel coated with Ni-SiO20.03784 mm/y [63]
Steel coated with Ni-W-SiO2823 HV [64]
Steel coated with Ni-Co-SiO24.14*10−6 mm/y [65]502 HV [65]
Steel coated with Ni-Al2O318.7 mg/min [66] 2.44*10−4 mm3/N-m [50]905.4 HV [66]
641 HV
[67]
Steel coated with Ni-Cu/ Al2O3570 HV
[56]
Steel coated with Ni/SiC5.29*10−4 mm3/N-m [68]495 HV [68]
Steel coated with Ni-SiC/Al2O34.95*10−4 mm3/N-m [68]525 HV [68]
Steel coated with Ni-Cr0.4 mg/h [54]550 HV [54]

Table 4.

Effect Ni-composite and nanocomposite coating on improving the steel surface.

1.2.3 Inhibitor

Inhibitors are chemicals used to protect metallic surfaces. Inhibitors often work by adsorbing themselves on the metallic surface, protecting the metallic surface by forming a film. Inhibitors are normally distributed from a solution or dispersion. Some are included in a protective coating formulation. Inhibitors slow corrosion processes by increasing the anodic or cathodic polarization behavior (Tafel slopes), reducing the movement or diffusion of ions to the metallic surface, and increasing the electrical resistance of the metallic surface [69].

Monticelli mentioned that the standardized definition of a corrosion inhibitor is a “chemical substance that, when presented in the corrosion system at a suitable concentration, decreases the corrosion rate, without significantly changing the concentration of any corrosive agent” [70]. Abbout [71] proposed several characteristics that need to be possessed by an effective corrosion inhibitor, namely, stability at a certain temperature, low cost, and, more importantly, adherence to environmental laws and standards [71].

The corrosion inhibitors can be chemicals either synthetic or natural and could be classified by the chemical nature as organic or inorganic, the mechanism of action as anodic, cathodic, or an anodic-cathodic mix, and by adsorption action, or as oxidants or not oxidants [70].

The cathodic corrosion inhibitors prevent the occurrence of the cathodic reaction of the metal. These inhibitors have metal ions able to produce a cathodic reaction due to alkalinity, thus producing insoluble compounds that precipitate selectively on cathodic sites. Deposit over the metal a compact and adherent film, which restricting the diffusion of corrosion action in these areas. Thus, increasing the impedance of the surface and the diffusion restriction of the reducible species, that is, the oxygen diffusion and electrons conductive in these areas. These inhibitors cause high cathodic inhibition [72].

The label “green,” or sometimes “eco-friendly,” is commonly added to the noun inhibitor if the molecule, in addition to meeting the previous definition of inhibitor, also has biocompatibility in nature. Part of this class of inhibitors is complex matrices like plant extracts due to their biological origin and, by extension, their single components, such as flavonoids, alkaloids, polyphenols, and glycosides [73].

The relative simplicity of many extraction procedures, combined with the plenty of vegetable sources available even at very low prices, made the exploitation of plant extracts a new “trend” in corrosion science. This “green turn” must surely receive praise, but it is to be worth noting also the other side of the medal. A critical revision of the open literature concerning green corrosion inhibitors brings up a constructive critique [74]. Table 5 summarizes different types of green inhibitors.

Plant nameAdditiveResultsAuthors
Apricot juicePhosphoric acida corrosion inhibitor of mild steel with maximum inhibition efficiency of 75% at 30°C[75]
AmberSuccinic acidSuccinic acid was used as an inhibitor of the corrosion process at a temperature of 25°C at pH values ranging between (8 and 2), where they studied the effect of the concentration of the inhibitor on iron corrosion and the results were good, as the highest percentage of inhibition was about 97% at a pH value of 8[76]
The garlicThe garlic extractGAE was shown to inhibit corrosion in both metals in the presence and absence of bacteria; inhibition efficiencies were about 81 ± 3% and 75 ± 3% for the abiotic system while 72 ± 3% and 69 ± 3% in the presence of mixed bacterial consortia for CS and SS, respectively.[77]
Ocimum basilicumsThe iodideWeight loss tests were utilized to assess the corrosion inhibition performance of Al alloy AA8011 in an alkaline environment using eco-friendly corrosion inhibitors.a decrease in the corrosion rate of the Al alloy from 0.407 mmpy to 0.106 mmpy in 0.25 M KOH was noted after a span of 5 h supporting the excellent inhibition performance of the extract.[78]

Table 5.

The different types of green inhibitors.

Advertisement

2. Conclusions

Agricultural machinery is considered one of the most important lines of defense for achieving global food sufficiency. Therefore, the sustainability of these machines is one of the important issues. One of the most important factors that lead to reducing the life span of agricultural machinery is corrosion. There are many scientific methods used to reduce the wear of agricultural machinery, such as modern coatings, corrosion inhibitors, and the selection of modern materials.

References

  1. 1. Sims B, Kienzle J. Making mechanization accessible to smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental - MDPI. 2016;3:11. DOI: 10.3390/environments3020011
  2. 2. Kienzle J, Ashburner JE, Sims BG. Mechanization for Rural Development: A Review of Patterns and Progress from Around the World. FAO: Rome; 2013
  3. 3. Kormawa P, Mrema G, Mhlanga N, Fynn M, Kienzle J, Mpagalile J. Sustainable Agricultural Mechanization. A Framework For Africa. Addis Ababa: FAO & AUC; 2018. Available from: https://www.sare.org/Grants/
  4. 4. Aliboev B. Performance characteristics and wear pattern of precision parts of cotton tractor hydraulics. Journal of Friction and Wear. 2016;37:83-85. DOI: 10.3103/S1068366616010025
  5. 5. Kostencki P, Stawicki T, Białobrzeska B. Durability and wear geometry of subsoiler shanks provided with sintered carbide plates. Tribology International. 2016;104:19-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2016.08.020
  6. 6. Popoola A, Olorunniwo OE, Ige OO. Corrosion resistance through the application of anti-corrosion coatings. In: Aliofkhazraei M, editor. Corros. Prot. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2014. DOI: 10.5772/57420
  7. 7. Wills R, Walsh F. Electroplating for protection against wear. In: Mellor B, editor. Surf. Coatings Prot. Against Wear. Abington Hall, Abington, Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2006. pp. 226-248. DOI: 10.1533/9781845691561
  8. 8. Refai GEM, Abdel Hamid M, El-kilani Z, Nasr RM. Reducing The wear and corrosion of the agricultural machinery by electrodeposition nanocomposite coatings – Review. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry. 2020;63:3075-3095
  9. 9. Hou B. Introduction to a study on corrosion status and control strategies in China. In: Hou B, editor. Cost Corros. China. Beijing: Jointly Published with Science Press; 2019. pp. 1-89. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-32-9354-0
  10. 10. Koch G, Varney J, Thompson N, Moghissi O, Gould M, Payer J. International Measures of Prevention, Application, and Economics of Corrosion Technologies Study. USA: NACE International; 2016. Available from: http://impact.nace.org/
  11. 11. McMahon ME, Santucci RJ, Glover CF, Kannan B, Walsh ZR, Scully JR. A review of modern assessment methods for metal and metal-oxide based primers for substrate corrosion protection. Frontiers in Materials. 2019;6:1-24. DOI: 10.3389/fmats.2019.00190
  12. 12. Zhang J, Kushwaha R. Wear and draft of cultivator sweeps with hardened edges. Canadian Agricultural Engineering. 1994;37:41-47
  13. 13. Bayhan Y. Reduction of wear via hardfacing of chisel ploughshare. Tribology International. 2006;39:570-574. DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2005.06.005
  14. 14. Gerhardus H, Michiel P, Neil G, Virmani Y, Gibson H, Putaud JA, et al. Corrosion Costs and Preventive Strategies In the United States. USA: NACE; 2002
  15. 15. Li X. Study on corrosion status and control strategies in manufacturing and public utilities field in China. In: Hou B, editor. Cost Corros. China. Singapore: Springer; 2019. pp. 765-941. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-32-9354-0
  16. 16. ASAE. Agricultural machinery management. In: Stand. Eng. Pract. Data. American Society of Agricultural Engineers; 2000. p. 9. DOI: 10.1126/science.118.3075.3
  17. 17. Cucinotta F, Scappaticci L, Sfravara F, Morelli F, Mariani F, Varani M, et al. On the morphology of the abrasive wear on ploughshares by means of 3D scanning. Biosystems Engineering. 2019;179:117-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.01.006
  18. 18. Eker B, Yuksel E. Solutions to corrosion caused by agricultural chemicals. Trakia Journal of Sciences. 2005;3:1-6
  19. 19. Mosavat SH, Bahrololoom ME, Shariat MH. Electrodeposition of nanocrystalline Zn-Ni alloy from alkaline glycinate bath containing saccharin as additive. Applied Surface Science. 2011;257:8311-8316. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.03.017
  20. 20. Li W, Hu L, Zhang S, Hou B. Effects of two fungicides on the corrosion resistance of copper in 3.5% NaCl solution under various conditions. Corrosion Science. 2011;53:735-745. DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.11.006
  21. 21. Brycht M, Skrzypek S, Kaczmarska K, Burnat B, Leniart A, Gutowska N. Square-wave voltammetric determination of fungicide fenfuram in real samples on bare boron-doped diamond electrode, and its corrosion properties on stainless steels used to produce agricultural tools. Electrochimica Acta. 2015;169:117-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.069
  22. 22. Wilkinson R, Balsari P, Oberti R. Pest control equipment. In: Stout B, Cheze B, editors. CIGR Handb. Agric. Eng. Vol. III Plant Prod. Eng. USA: ASAE; 1999
  23. 23. Odetola P, Popoola P, Popoola O, Delport D. Parametric variables in electro-deposition of composite coatings. In: Mohamed A, Golden T, editors. Electrodepos. Compos. Coatings. London, UK: InTech; 2016. pp. 39-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.12.014
  24. 24. Olabisi OT, Chukwuka A. Experimental Investigation of Pipeline Corrosion in a Polluted Niger Delta Experimental Investigation of Pipeline Corrosion in a Polluted. Niger Delta River; 2020. DOI: 10.11648/j.ogce.20200801.13
  25. 25. Popovych P, Poberezhny L, Shevchuk O, Murovanyi I, Poberezhna L, Hrytsanchuk A, et al. Corrosion-fatigue failure of tractor trailers metal materials in aggressive environments. Koroze a Ochrana Materialu. 2020;64:45-51. DOI: 10.2478/kom-2020-0007
  26. 26. Oki M, Anawe P. A review of corrosion in agricultural industries. Physical Science International Journal. 2015;5:216-222. DOI: 10.9734/psij/2015/14847
  27. 27. Khalil M, Salah Eldin T, Hassan H, El-Sayed K, Abdel Hamid Z. Electrodeposition of Ni-GNS-TiO2 nanocomposite coatings as anticorrosion film for mild steel in neutral environment. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2015;275:98-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.05.033
  28. 28. Ryabova V, Kniaziuk T, Mikhailova M, Motovilina G, Khlusova E. Structure and properties of new wear-resistant steels for agricultural machine building. Inorganic Materials: Applied Research. 2017;8:827-836. DOI: 10.1134/S2075113317060120
  29. 29. Mukhamedov AA, Tilabov BK. Effect of heat treatment on the wear resistance of cast irons. Materials Test. 2016;58:306-311. DOI: 10.3139/120.110853
  30. 30. Chernoivanov V, Ljaljakin V, Aulov V, Ishkov A, Krivochurov N, Ivanajsky V, et al. Features of wear of agricultural machinery components strengthened by FenB-Fe-B composite boride coatings. Journal of Friction and Wear. 2015;36:132-137. DOI: 10.3103/S106836661502004X
  31. 31. Dwivedi DK, Life E, Components T. Surface Engineering Enhancing Life of Tribological Components. India: Springer; 2018
  32. 32. Low C, Wills R, Walsh F. Electrodeposition of composite coatings containing nanoparticles in a metal deposit. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2006;201. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.11.123
  33. 33. Nalbant M, Tufan Palali A. Effects of different material coatings on the wearing of plowshares in soil tillage. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2011;35:215-223. DOI: 10.3906/tar-0904-30
  34. 34. Abed N, Ebrahim Bahrololoom M, Kasraei M. The effect of nano-structured nickel coating on reducing abrasive wear of tillage tine. Journal of Nanotechnology Research. 2019;01:59-74. DOI: 10.26502/jnr.2688-8521005
  35. 35. Abdel Hamid GEM, Refai Z, El-kilani M, Nasr RM. Use of a Ni-TiO2 nanocomposite film to enhance agricultural cutting knife surfaces by electrodeposition technology. Journal of Materials Science. 2021;56:14096-14113
  36. 36. Makhlouf A, Tiginyanu I. Nanocoatings and Ultra-thin Films Technologies and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2011
  37. 37. Schweitzer P. Paint and Coatings Applications and Corrosion Resistance. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC; 2006
  38. 38. Bari G. Electrodeposition of nickel. In: Schlesinger M, Paunovic M, editors. Mod. Electroplat. Fifth ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 2010. pp. 79-114
  39. 39. Malatji N, Popoola P. Tribological and corrosion performance of electrodeposited nickel composite coatings. In: Mohamed A, Golden T, editors. Electrodepos. Compos. Mater. London, UK: InTech; 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.12.014
  40. 40. Chandrasekar MS, Pushpavanam M. Pulse and pulse reverse plating-conceptual, advantages and applications. Electrochimica Acta. 2008;53:3313-3322. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.11.054
  41. 41. Torabinejad V, Aliofkhazraei M, Assareh S, Allahyarzadeh MH, Rouhaghdam AS. Electrodeposition of Ni-Fe alloys, composites, and nano coatings – A review. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2017;691:841-859. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.329
  42. 42. Srivastava M, Grips VK, Rajam KS. Influence of SiC, Si3N4 and Al2O3 particles on the structure and properties of electrodeposited Ni Meenu. Materials Letters. 2008;62:3487-3489. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.03.008
  43. 43. Tarkowski L, Indyka P, Bełtowska-Lehman E. XRD characterisation of composite Ni-based coatings prepared by electrodeposition. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B. 2012;284:40-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.07.108
  44. 44. Nawaz M, Yusuf N, Habib S, Rana A, Ubaid F, Ahmad Z, et al. Development and properties of polymeric nanocomposite coatings. Polymers (Basel). 2019;11. DOI: 10.3390/polym11050852
  45. 45. Rusu DE, Ispas A, Bund A, Gheorghies C, Cârâ G. Corrosion tests of nickel coatings prepared from a Watts-type bath. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research. 2012;9:87-95. DOI: 10.1007/s11998-011-9343-0
  46. 46. Tientong J, Thurber CR, D’Souza N, Mohamed A, Golden TD. Influence of bath composition at acidic pH on electrodeposition of nickel-layered silicate nanocomposites for corrosion protection. International Journal of Electrochemistry. 2013;2013:1-8. DOI: 10.1155/2013/853869
  47. 47. Bao H, Li Q , Jia H, Yang G. Mechanical properties comparison of Ni-diamond composite coatings fabricated by different methods. Materials Research Express. 2019;6:106425. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab3bee
  48. 48. Jiang ZW, Shen L, Qiu M, Xu M, Microhardness T. Wear, and corrosion resistance of Ni-SiC composite coating with magnetic-field-assisted jet electrodeposition. Materials Research Express. 2018;5:1-14
  49. 49. Abdel Hamid Z. Review article: Composite and nanocomposite coatings. International Journal of Metallurgical & Materials Engineering. 2014;3:29-42. DOI: 10.14355/me.2014.0301.04
  50. 50. Raghavendra CR, Basavarajappa S, Sogalad I. Optimization of wear parameters on Ni–Al2O3 nanocomposite coating by electrodeposition process. SN Applied Sciences. 2019;1. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-018-0135-3
  51. 51. Sheibani Aghdam A, Allahkaram SR, Mahdavi S. Corrosion and tribological behavior of Ni-Cr alloy coatings electrodeposited on low carbon steel in Cr (III)-Ni (II) bath. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2015;281:144-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.10.006
  52. 52. Akande IG, Fayomi OSI, Oluwole OO. Performance of composite coating on carbon steel – A Necessity. Energy Procedia. 2019;157:375-383. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.202
  53. 53. Baghery P, Farzam M, Mousavi AB, Hosseini M. Ni-TiO2 nanocomposite coating with high resistance to corrosion and wear. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2010;204:3804-3810. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.04.061
  54. 54. Zhao GG, Zhao YB, Zhang HJ. Sliding wear behaviors of electrodeposited Ni composite coatings containing micrometer and nanometer Cr particles. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China (English Ed.). 2009;19:319-323. DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60271-X
  55. 55. Aruna ST, Srinivas G. Wear and corrosion resistant properties of electrodeposited Ni composite coating containing Al2O3-TiO2 composite powder. Surface Engineering. 2015;31:708-713. DOI: 10.1179/1743294415Y.0000000050
  56. 56. Alizadeh M, Safaei H. Characterization of Ni-Cu matrix, Al2O3 reinforced nano-composite coatings prepared by electrodeposition. Applied Surface Science. 2018;456:195-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.095
  57. 57. Abdel Hamid Z, El-Etre AY, Fareed M. Performance of Ni-Cu-ZrO2 nanocomposite coatings fabricated by electrodeposition technique. Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials. 2017;64:315-325. DOI: 10.1108/ACMM-05-2016-1672
  58. 58. Rao VR, Bangera KV, Hegde AC. Magnetically induced electrodeposition of Zn-Ni alloy coatings and their corrosion behaviors. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 2013;345:48-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.06.014
  59. 59. Shourgeshty M, Aliofkhazraei M, Karimzadeh A, Poursalehi R. Corrosion and wear properties of Zn-Ni and Zn-Ni-Al2O3 multilayer electrodeposited coatings. Materials Research Express. 2017;4:096406. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aa87d5
  60. 60. Katamipour A, Farzam M, Danaee I. Effects of sonication on anticorrosive and mechanical properties of electrodeposited Ni-Zn-TiO2 nanocomposite coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2014;254:358-363. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.06.043
  61. 61. Yao Y, Yao S, Zhang L, Wang H. Electrodeposition and mechanical and corrosion resistance properties of Ni-W/SiC nanocomposite coatings. Materials Letters. 2007;61:67-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.04.007
  62. 62. Nyambura S, Kang M, Zhu J, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Ndiithi N. Synthesis and characterization of Ni-W/Cr2O3 nanocomposite coatings using electrochemical deposition technique. Coatings. 2019;9:815. DOI: 10.3390/coatings9120815
  63. 63. Kasturibai S, Kalaignan G. Physical and electrochemical characterizations of Ni-SiO2 nanocomposite coatings. Ionics (Kiel). 2013;19:763-770. DOI: 10.1007/s11581-012-0810-0
  64. 64. Wang Y, Zhou Q , Li K, Zhong Q , Bui QB. Preparation of Ni-W-SiO2 nanocomposite coating and evaluation of its hardness and corrosion resistance. Ceramics International. 2015;41:79-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.08.034
  65. 65. Atuanya CU, Ekweghiariri DI, Obele CM. Experimental study on the microstructural and anti-corrosion behaviour of Co-deposition Ni–Co–SiO2 composite coating on mild steel. Defence Technology. 2018;14:64-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2017.10.001
  66. 66. Ma CY, Zhao DQ , Xia FF, Xia H, Williams T, Xing HY. Ultrasonic-assisted electrodeposition of Ni-Al2O3 nanocomposites at various ultrasonic powers. Ceramics International. 2020;46:6115-6123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.075
  67. 67. Gül H, Kiliç F, Aslan S, Alp A, Akbulut H. Characteristics of electro-co-deposited Ni-Al2O3 nano-particle reinforced metal matrix composite (MMC) coatings. Wear. 2009;267:976-990. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.12.022
  68. 68. Dehgahi S, Amini R, Alizadeh M. Corrosion, passivation and wear behaviors of electrodeposited Ni–Al2O3–SiC nano-composite coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2016;304:502-511. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.07.007
  69. 69. Cicek V. Corrosion Engineering and Cathodic Protection Handbooke. Weinheim germeny: Willey; 2017
  70. 70. Monticelli C. Corrosion inhibitors. In: Wandelt K, editor. Encycl. Interfacial Chem. Elsevier; 2018. pp. 164-171
  71. 71. Abbout S. Green inhibitors to reduce the corrosion damage. In: Singh A, editors. Corrosion. InTech. 2020. pp. 1-14
  72. 72. Hart E. Corrosion inhibitors: Principles, mechanisms and applications. In: Aliofkhazraei M, editor. Dev. Corros. Prot. London, UK: InTech; 2016. pp. 1-161. DOI: 10.5772/57255
  73. 73. Kesavan D, Gopiraman M, Sulochana N. Green inhibitors for corrosion of metals: A review. Chemical Science Review and Letters. 2012;1:1-8
  74. 74. Marzorati S, Verotta L, Trasatti SP. Green corrosion inhibitors from natural sources and biomass wastes. Molecules. 2019;24. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24010048
  75. 75. Yaro AS, Khadom AA, Wael RK. Apricot juice as green corrosion inhibitor of mild steel in phosphoric acid. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2013;52:129-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2012.11.001
  76. 76. Amin MA, Abd El-Rehim SS, El-Sherbini EEF, Bayoumi RS. The inhibition of low carbon steel corrosion in hydrochloric acid solutions by succinic acid. Part I. Weight loss, polarization, EIS, PZC, EDX and SEM studies. Electrochimica Acta. 2007;52:3588-3600. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.10.019
  77. 77. Parthipan P, Elumalai P, Narenkumar J, Machuca LL, Murugan K, Karthikeyan OP, et al. Allium sativum (garlic extract) as a green corrosion inhibitor with biocidal properties for the control of MIC in carbon steel and stainless steel in oilfield environments. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation. 2018;132:66-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.05.005
  78. 78. Oguzie EE, Onuchukwu AI, Okafor PC, Ebenso EE. Corrosion inhibition and adsorption behaviour of Ocimum basilicum extract on aluminium. Pigment & Resin Technology. 2006;35:63-70. DOI: 10.1108/03699420610652340

Written By

Gamal E.M. Nasr, Zeinab Abdel Hamid and Mohamed Refai

Submitted: 27 October 2022 Reviewed: 07 November 2022 Published: 04 January 2023