Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Mitigating Climate Change: The Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Maize Production and Food Security

Written By

Sílvia N.D. Maússe Sitoe and Joanna F. Dames

Submitted: 26 July 2022 Reviewed: 17 August 2022 Published: 04 November 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.107128

From the Edited Volume

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Agriculture - New Insights

Edited by Rodrigo Nogueira de Sousa

Chapter metrics overview

194 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Anthropogenic activities have contributed to the increased atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases, which are an important contributor to climate change. From 1940 to 2004, global emissions increased by 70%, and projections suggest a continual increase by 2050 due to agriculture, forestry, and other land uses. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are ubiquitous in undisturbed soils and form a symbiotic relationship with various plants. The relationship that enhances nutrient uptake and plant growth, among other benefits, is well known. Several soil management practices employed in agriculture adversely affect the symbiosis. Zea mays (maize) provides 30% of total caloric intake to 4.5 billion people worldwide and is an important staple crop, vulnerable to climate change. Higher temperatures can result in increased water demand, while changes in precipitation can result in crop failure. AM fungi can be applied as inoculants to maize. Resulting in improved plant growth, yield, and nutrient uptake and providing superior food quality properties, such as increased antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals. AM fungi are considered a crucial biotechnological tool in crop production. This review illustrates their essential role in sustainable maize production and emphasizes the need to maintain AM fungal communities in the soil to mitigate the effects of climate change.

Keywords

  • Zea may
  • symbiotic benefits
  • drought and salinity
  • soil management
  • sustainable agriculture

1. Introduction

Crop production is the primary source of staple foods and is particularly sensitive to climate change. Activities such as synthetic fertilizer use, livestock rearing, change in land-use patterns, deforestation, waste disposal, burning of fossil fuels, industrial manufacturing and transportation have contributed to the increased atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases, contributing to climate change [1]. Of the global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, approximately 13% are attributed to agricultural practices [2]. Predictions indicate that by 2030 these emissions will rise almost 40%, primarily due to increasing demand from a growing population and changing consumption patterns for food, including increasing demand for ruminant meats [3].

Between 1940 (pre-industrial) and 2004, global greenhouse emissions (GHG) increased by 70% [2]. Average temperatures have increased by 1.5–2°C. Urgent climate change mitigation is required to halt further increases. The effect on agriculture is severe, with adverse growing conditions such as drought and extreme weather events already evident [4]. Agriculture can reduce these negative effects, increasing carbon storage by improving cropping and land management practices [5].

Mitigation technologies may not be cheap and easy, but the cost and benefits will be less than the losses caused by climate change [6, 7]. The expected impacts of climate change will be most adverse in low- and middle-income countries, where millions of people depend on agriculture and are vulnerable to food insecurity [8, 9]. The impact on global food security will relate to food supply and food quality, food access and utilization, and the stability of food security resulting in reduced per capita calorie availability, childhood malnutrition, and child deaths [10]. Climate change may affect the nutritional properties of some crops. The concentrations of minerals in some crops (e.g., wheat, rice, and soybeans) were up to 8% lower under conditions of elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) levels [11]. Studies on yields (primarily wheat, maize, rice and soybeans) under different climate change conditions indicate that climate change may significantly reduce these in the long run [12].

Maize (Zea mays L.) is known globally as the queen of cereals because it can be grown throughout the year, is photo-thermo insensitive and has the highest genetic yield potential among cereal crops. Maize provides 30% of total caloric intake to 4.5 billion people worldwide [13]. The grain contains about 72% starch, 10% protein, 4.8% oil, 5.8% fiber, 3.0% sugar, and 1.7% ash [14]. The major maize-producing countries are the USA, China, Brazil, Argentina, Ukraine, Indonesia, India and Mexico [15]. Globally, maize is grown mainly for livestock feed, food, and industrial materials [16]. Regarded by most people as a breakfast cereal, maize is also a source of fuel (ethanol) and starch in processed form. Enzymatically maize starch is converted into products such as sorbitol, dextrin, sorbic and lactic acid and appears in household items such as beer, ice cream, syrup, shoe polish, glue, fireworks, ink, batteries, mustard, cosmetics, aspirin, and paint [17]. In South Africa, maize is the most important grain crop for feed and is a staple of most of the population [17]. Of the total maize produced in South Africa, approximately 60% is white (for human consumption), and 40% is yellow (mainly for animal feed) [18]. Adverse effects of climate change on agricultural production will be most severe in the global south, particularly South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, many regions of which remain underdeveloped [19]. Finding ways to improve the productivity of agriculture, particularly of staple crops such as maize, is one means of meeting these future challenges.

Advertisement

2. Improving nutrient uptake

Management technologies, crop species, and soil type play a significant role in soil microbial diversity [20]. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal diversity positively contributes to nutrient and water use efficiency [20]. The frequent use of soil amendments such as fertilizers, organic residues, and pH adjustments to improve crop yields can change the soil properties, which leads to variations in plant and fungal responses that can modify the outcome of the symbiosis [21].

In many soils worldwide, low phosphorus (P) availability can limit plant growth [22]. Availability and acquisition of P in terms of plant root architecture and mycorrhizal association is controlled by rhizospheric chemical and biological processes which compensate for this limitation [23]. Maize has a high requirement for nitrogen (N) and P nutrients, and these are applied in large quantities to realize high yields [24]. Not all applied fertilizer is absorbed. For example, maize absorbs only 55–60% N [25], around 20% P [26], 50–70% potassium (K) [27] and 33% sulfur (S) [28]. One strategy to reduce fertilizer usage, especially P, is to use AM fungi to improve maize nutritional status and growth [29].

AM colonized plants absorb more P (nearly 80% of the plant P uptake) at lower concentrations in the soil solution than non-mycorrhizal plants [30, 31, 32]. The AM fungi forms an extraradical mycelium (ERM) network that effectively exploits the soil environment in the search of nutrients [33, 34], providing access to more soluble forms of phosphate [35, 36], and promotes plant N uptake [37]. Acquisition of other soil nutrients such as copper (Cu), iron (Fe), K, zinc (Zn), calcium (Ca) and S, especially when plants are grown in nutrient deficient soils are also improved by the symbiosis [38, 39, 40, 41].

Different AM fungal species exhibit different levels of effectiveness. A study by Bi et al. [42] on maize’s growth and nutrient uptake showed that the effect of two AM fungi, Funneliformis mosseae and F. versiforme, increased plant growth when compared with non-inoculated controls. F. mosseae being the most effective. In a field experiment, commercial AM fungal inoculants applied to maize improved plant growth, yield, and P uptake under both un-fertilized and P-fertilized treatments [43]. Inoculation of maize with Glomus caledonium increased soil organic C content in maize straw-amended soils, likely due to enhanced rhizosphere acidification and increased nutrient (notably P) uptake in the seedling period.

Intercropping can also improve plant nutrient uptake [44] because intercropping systems can better use one or more agricultural resources both in time and in space [45]. He et al. [46] reported N transfer from N2 fixing legumes to maize and other crop species. Marzban et al. [47] demonstrated that intercropping maize and green bean could increase root growth of maize (about 7.2% more than in monocropping). Biological nitrogen fixation is heavily dependent on P, which provides energy for converting atmospheric N to useable N compounds. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi form a tripartite association with N-fixing rhizobia and legumes assisting in acquiring P [48].

Plant nutrient uptake involves two pathways, the direct pathway (DP) involves uptake of nutrients from the rhizosphere by the root epidermis and root hairs [49]. The mycorrhizal pathway (MP) develops behind the root hair zone and involves uptake of nutrients by the ERM, rapid translocation over many centimeters, delivery to the symbiotic interfaces, and transfer to the plants [34]. The two pathways are potentially independent and involve different cell types and different nutrient transporters, providing capacity for independent and coordinated regulation and nutrient access from different regions and volumes of soil [39, 41]. The conserved P-sensing pathway regulates the direct and indirect P acquisition pathways, centered on phosphate starvation response (PHR) transcription factors [50]. PHR transcription factor was characterized in many plant species [51, 52]. Xu et al. [53] identified 18 ZmPHR genes involved in relocating inorganic P across different maize plant tissues.

The mycorrhizal pathway involves the uptake of orthophosphate (Pi) by AM fungal high-affinity Pi transporters in the ERM, followed by translocation of P along the hyphae to intracellular structures in the root cortex and then transfers P to the root [34, 54, 55, 56]. Polyphosphate (polyP: linear chains of Pi residues linked by phosphoanhydride bonds) accumulate in the hyphae, where it buffers cytoplasmic Pi concentration, providing temporary P storage, and translocate P along hyphae [5057] resulting in rapid, long distance P translocation from sites of uptake in the ERM to sites of transfer to the plant [58]. Pi and polyP are known to carry negative charge, which cations must balance. In soil-grown plants, K+ and Mg2+ may play this role [5960]. H+-ATPases, which energize perifungal membranes surrounding arbuscules, are involved in all Pi-uptake steps [61, 62, 63].

The advantage of the AM symbiosis for plants in acquiring P is that AM fungi provide a very effective pathway, the AM pathway, for scavenging P from large volumes of soil and rapidly delivering to cortical cells within the root bypassing direct uptake [34]. Research by Smith and colleagues [34, 64] revealed that the AM pathway plays a significant role in P uptake, regardless of how an AM plant benefits in terms of increased growth or P uptake.

In addition, AM fungi can deliver substantial amounts of N to the host plant [65]. Researchers have different opinions on the mechanisms of N transfer to the host plant. Smith et al. [66] suggested that N might be transferred from the fungus to the host in the form of amino acids (AA) or amides. While Kaldorf et al. [67] suggested transfer in the form of NO3, Bago et al. [68] postulated that N is transferred to the host as NH4+. The allocation of C to the AM fungi has been reported to depend on the N status of the mycorrhizal root, which indicates that the stoichiometry of C and N regulates the nutrient exchange between the fungus and the host plant [69]. The ERM absorbs various forms of N with 21% of total N taken up by the fungal ERM transferred to roots in root organ culture [70]. Additionally it was demonstrated that 74% of the total N in the leaves of maize was derived from the slow-release urea added to the hyphal compartment [71].

Studies showed that the AM fungus Glomus hoi enhanced degradation of organic residues and N uptake by the host plant [72, 73]. Jin et al. [74] demonstrated that urea or NH4+ were absorbed more rapidly than NO3, amino acids (AA), and proteins when supplied as N sources for AM fungal uptake. Assimilation of NH4+ is the principal means of N absorption in AM fungal systems mediated by a specific carrier [75]. GintAMT1, which encodes the high-affinity NH4+ transporter in the AM fungus Rhizophagus intraradices [76] is one such carrier. The uptake of NO3 is linked to an H+ symporter that alkalinizes the external mycelium. It has been shown that mycorrhizal roots growing in a NO3 amended soil induced an initial (30 d) alkalinization of the mycorrhizosphere, which was followed (at 60 d) by strong acidification. This acidification of the mycorrhizosphere would be the consequence of the unmasking of other cation/anion balances involved in different nutrient uptake processes once the nitrate is depleted [77, 78].

Advertisement

3. Carbon sequestration

The AM symbiosis represents a significant link between atmospheric and soil-contained carbon (C). Soil is one of the planet’s largest C sinks. It stores at least twice as much C as currently occurs in the world’s vegetation plus atmosphere. The estimated total soil organic carbon (SOC) to 2-meter depth is 2400 Pg, which is three times the amount of CO2 currently in the atmosphere (~830 Pg C) and 240 times current annual fossil fuel emissions (~10 Pg) [79]. Carbon storage depends on the balance between carbon sequestration by plant photosynthesis and carbon release to the atmosphere through soil respiration [79, 80]. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations will reach 550 ppm by 2100, accompanied by an increase in global average annual temperature of 4.4 ± 0.5°C for 2070–2099 [81]. One of the consequences of this increase may be increased carbon availability to fungi to develop the mycorrhizal mycelium [82]. AM fungi receive increased levels of photosynthates under elevated CO2 before other soil microbes [83, 84], increasing AM fungal colonization [85, 86]. Treseder and Allen [87] reported that mycorrhizal dependent plants allocate 5–20% of the net photosynthate to maintain symbiosis [88] increasing the sink effect and movement of photo-assimilates from aerial parts to the roots [89]. CO2 enhancement of AM fungi might alter terrestrial ecosystem C dynamics by stimulating the decomposition of soil organic C in AM fungal active zones [90]. Globally forest soils release approximately 24Pg carbon per year into the atmosphere via CO2 efflux and generate CO2 from a wide variety of belowground organisms, with AM fungi as the dominant carbon source [91]. Elevated CO2 increases allocation to AM hyphae in the soil outside plant roots [86, 92] due to carbon sequestration [93]. Research conducted in a German grassland community reported that AM fungi stimulated soil respiration of pasture soil, leading to elevated CO2 levels and temperature, with most carbon sequestered in belowground parts [94, 95].

High-temperature stress negatively affects plant morphological, physiological, and biochemical growth, leading to reduced plant productivity [96, 97]. Hatfield et al. [98] showed that temperatures above 35°C affected maize vegetative and reproductive growth, from germination to grain filling. Temperature also regulates mycorrhizal fungal growth and metabolic activity [99], with colonization peaking during the growing season when temperatures are warm [100]. Changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration and temperature and resulting changes in soil physicochemical properties and microbial activity [101] can influence mycorrhizal symbiosis on various scales [102].

Crop growth and development are critical factors in determining the impact of a changing environment. Increasing temperatures affect all major grain crops [103]. Maize is one of the most important crops grown in tropical countries and tolerates temperatures up to 32–33°C. Beyond this range, crop growth and yield starts to decline [103]. Photosynthesis is one of the most heat-sensitive processes in plants and is essential to maintaining the mycorrhizal symbiosis [104, 105]. The AM fungal network provides the host plant with nutrients and water from the soils and enhances the plant’s tolerance to various abiotic stresses [106] and can thus alleviate additional stress placed on crop plants due to climate change.

Advertisement

4. Tolerance to drought, temperature and salinity

Environmental factors are stressors that impact plant growth [107]. Drought is a significant challenge [108] resulting from low precipitation and a high rate of evapotranspiration causing reduction in plant cell division and proliferation of roots, closure of stomatal pores, changes in plant and water uptake efficiency, and high production of abscisic acid, which further decreases evapotranspiration by controlling stomatal pores [109]. Plants have developed various mechanisms to retain water under these conditions.

The ability of AM fungi to exploit soil resources assists the host plants’ ability to grow under drought stress [110]. The AM fungal hyphae can absorb water by entering soil pores that are too small for root hairs to access [111, 112]. AM fungal mycelia can also improve soil moisture retention by enhancing soil aggregation [113]. Glomalin is a hydrophobic protein [113] present in AM fungal hyphal walls [114], which forms an insoluble glue with a strong cementing capacity that stabilizes soil aggregates [92115, 116, 117, 118, 119]. Glomalin is quantified by measuring several glomalin related soil-protein (GRSP) pools [92]. The glomalin compound contains 30–40% C, which protects the soil from drying out [120], 0.9–7.3% of N, 0.03–0.1% of P and metal ions [121]. Hyphae and glomalin contributed up to 15% of soil organic C in a grassland [122]. As a result, a considerable amount of C allocated to AM fungi is used in glomalin production, governed by plant productivity [122]. The regulation of plant nutrient uptake, stomatal conductance, leaf water potential, photosynthesis, and transpiration [123124] help plants to produce significantly higher yields under stressful conditions. The AM fungi modify the root hairs allowing plants to overcome drought [123]. They assist in maintaining high relative water content of the leaf, improving water use efficiency [125], increasing leaf area, delaying senescence [126] and maintaining ion balance [127]. Li et al. [128] observed that in the arbuscule-enriched cortical cells and ERM of maize roots, the expression of two functional aquaporin AM fungal genes i.e., GintAQPF1 and GintAQPF2, were enhanced under drought stress. Maize is sensitive to drought and heat stress, particularly at the reproductive stages of development reducing grain yield [129]. Some AM fungal species, such as Funneliformis mosseae, minimize the adverse effects of drought by the accumulation of AA, increase in trehalose content and higher trehalase activity [130]; Rhizophagus intraradices increased plant dry weight, uptake of P, N, K, and Mg in shoot, and water use efficiency [131].

In many parts of the world, maize production occurs in semi-arid environments where high temperatures and water scarcity [132, 133] are common challenges. In China 60% of crops in maize growing regions are often subjected to spells of heat and drought, resulting in 30% yield losses per year [133]. These climate change-induced stresses will significantly threaten maize yields and decrease world maize production by 15–20% annually [133, 134]. AM fungi play an essential role in improving drought tolerance. They mediate the increase in nutritional status by increasing the developing root surface area, enhancing the uptake of P [131135136], increasing resistance to withering [137], increasing proline accumulation levels in roots [138, 139] and by increasing photosynthetic activity as detected by the increase in chlorophyll [140, 141]. Temperature is another important environmental factor that determines the growth and productivity of crops [142]. Temperature stress (low and high temperature) can occur during the growing season [97, 143] resulting in the disruption of physiological and biochemical processes and functions. This results in injuries such as damage of cell membrane structure and lipid composition, cellular leakage of electrolytes and amino acids, peroxidation of membrane lipids, a diversion of electron flow to alternate pathways, denaturation and aggregation of proteins, redistribution of intracellular calcium ions, inactivation of enzymes in chloroplast and mitochondria, and production of toxic compounds and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [97, 136, 144, 145]. AM symbiosis can alter plant physiology to deal with these stress conditions [146].

Zhu et al. [136] reported that Claroideoglomus etunicatum could be used to reduce high temperature effects on maize by reducing membrane lipid peroxidation, membrane permeability and increasing accumulation of osmotic adjustment compounds and antioxidant activity. At 35°C and 40°C, positive net photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, relative water content and negative intercellular CO2 concentrations were recorded [136, 142].

Soil, water and the environment can influence crop salt tolerance [89]. Among abiotic stresses, soil salinization is probably one of the most important in the world [147]. Globally, arid and semi-arid soils are significant factors limiting agricultural productivity due to the high soil salinity [148]. More than 800 million hectares of land worldwide is affected by either salinity (397 million hectares) or sodicity (434 million hectares) [149]. The accumulation of soluble salts in the rhizosphere can reduce water potential and, consequently, water availability to plants. Under such circumstances, the uptake of these salts can affect the physiological processes of plants growing in these environments [150, 151] and poses the biggest challenge to food security [152]. Rhizophagus intraradices and Funneliformis geosporum increased leaf length, plant height, leaf number, chlorophyll a content, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate in maize [106]. Farooq et al. [153] found that AM fungal colonization and symbiosis improved salt resistance in maize due to better nutrient availability, increased potassium/sodium ratios in plant tissues, and better osmotic adjustment.

Increased temperatures and resultant drought and salinity are not the only legacies of climate change. Anthropogenic activities, which include industrial activities (mining, metal processing, fossil fuel combustion) and agricultural practices (application of fertilizers, fungicides, and sewage sludge disposal), have been described as the primary contaminants of the environment with heavy metals and are not included in this review [154, 155], however these and other growth benefits to maize are illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of the effect of AM fungi on maize crop: (a) extensive roots on plant colonized by AM fungi, (b) reduced roots on plant with no colonization. (17/02/2021 - Biorender.com).

Advertisement

5. Soil management for enhanced maize production

Severely disturbed land is a global concern because changes in land use are one of the biggest threats to biodiversity and ecosystem services worldwide. This is exacerbated by increased demand for agricultural production. Studies conducted have shown that disturbance not only reduces AM fungal abundance, diversity and infectivity but can also result in drastic shifts in the AM fungal community [156]. AM fungal hyphae and root litter are the most abundant carbon source in the soil [157], providing energy for other soil microbes to flourish [92]. They may increase the diversity and abundance of microorganisms beneficial to plant growth and health [157]. Hyphae are highly susceptible to disturbance and disturbance results in reduced infective potential of AM fungi [157]. As the scale of degradation increases, the abundance and diversity of AM fungi reduces [158].

Tillage management plays a central role in ecological and biological stability, which is closely related to soil quality, by influencing the activities of soil microbial communities [159, 160, 161]. Soil disturbance, caused by tillage or plowing, decrease AM fungal colonization, disrupt AM hyphal networks [162, 163, 164, 165, 166], reducing spore numbers [167, 168], AM fungal species richness [156, 169] and glomalin production [170].

Conventional or conservation tillage are soil management methods employed [171]. Conservation tillage results in less disturbance when compared with conventional tillage and tends to benefit the soil by conserving aggregate stability and organic matter content [172]. Other reported benefits include higher microbial biomass in conservation tillage due to less disruption and preservation of the hyphal network, contributing to aggregate stability [173, 174]. Reduced tillage increased the abundance of AM fungal and saprotrophic fungal lipids in shallow soil layers [175].

Soil disturbance reduced P uptake from the soil by maize plants, while the uptake of P by canola was not affected [176]. Canola, a non-mycorrhizal host plant, supports the hypothesis that soil disturbance reduces the effectiveness of the mycorrhizal association. McGonigle et al. [177] found that tillage reduced colonization of maize, and the P and Zn contents of maize shoots. The alteration of AM fungal communities by tillage has been reported under field conditions [178]. They demonstrated that colonization by AM fungi from the genus Scutellospora was depressed by intensive tillage, while members of the genus Glomus were not affected. Fairchild and Miller [179] demonstrated improved AM colonization of maize growing in the undisturbed soil compared to the disturbed soil when amended with P.

Globally, the prevalence of low fertility soils requires amendment with large amounts of inorganic fertilizers and application of pesticides to achieve maximum plant growth and crop yield [180, 181]. The excessive and inappropriate application of chemical fertilizers can cause a series of environmental problems and soil degradation. Balzergue et al. [182] found that the high P concentrations in plants induced by high P fertilization inhibited mycorrhizal symbiosis. Symbiosis modulating compounds in root exudates such as strigolactone are also reduced under high P conditions [183]. Under these conditions plants are less reliant on mycorrhizal mediated P uptake and reduce carbohydrate sharing [184, 185, 186], this results in a decreased supply of soluble carbohydrate in roots reducing appressorial formation and new colonization [183, 184]. These phenomenal impact AM colonization, arbuscule formation and active P transfer to plants [187]. Some AM fungi can be relatively susceptible to fungicides, particularly when applied to the seed or the soil [188] while other fungicides can also stimulate mycorrhizal growth [189]. Fungicides such as flutolanil, azoxystrobin, fenpropimorph and fenhexamid can inhibit spore germination of Rhizophargus irregularis [190, 191]. The insecticide, oxamyl reduced root colonization by a commercial Funneliformis mosseae inoculum [192], and azadirachtin inhibiting Claroideoglomus etunicatum in the field causing a significant shift in the AM fungal community [193].

The response of AM fungi to agrochemicals is both substance- and dose-dependent. A field experiment showed that most AM fungi belonging to the Glomus group were sensitive to high levels of herbicide nicosulfuron which accumulated in soil due to repeated applications in later culture cycles [194]. Atrazine has been used as an agricultural herbicide worldwide, mostly on maize, sorghum, and sugarcane. Studies on maize showed a significant reduction in AM fungal spores [181] and AM colonization [195]. Makarian et al. [196] found a significant effect of the herbicide (metribuzin) on maize dry weight where an increase in herbicide concentration resulted in a decrease in the maize dry weight. Low herbicide concentrations resulted in increased shoot height of AM plants than when applied at high concentrations suggesting that mycorrhizal fungi can alleviate crop stress under lower doses of the herbicide [196].

The extensive use of agrochemicals reduces ecosystem functioning, contributing to soil and water degradation [197]. It also exerts deleterious effects on human health, mainly through the exposure of workers [198, 199, 200] and the intake of contaminated food crops [201]. Therefore, increasingly, the enhancement of more biologically based cultivation for safer and healthier food is a rising need, along with finding alternatives to replace agrochemicals in plant production [202, 203, 204]. The use of biofertilizers appears to be a natural option, particularly in low agrochemical input systems, because of their capacity to maintain long term soil fertility and sustainability by improving the uptake efficiency and availability of nutrients to plants [205]. Plants inoculated with AM fungi not only have improved growth but also have superior food quality properties, such as increased antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals [206]. AM fungal benefits related to maize are summarized in Table 1.

Parameter (p/f)*BenefitsReference
Nutrient uptake (p)Increased - N; P; K; Ca; Mg; Na[37, 186, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223]
Nutrient uptake (f)Increased - P; K; Ca; Mg; Fe[221, 224, 225, 226]
Vegetative growth (p)Increased - shoot and root biomass; root length; plant, leaf and tassel length; stem girth[186, 203, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 211, 213, 214, 216, 219, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229]
Vegetative growth (f)Increased - shoot and root biomass; root length; plant height; leaf mass and area[217, 221, 224, 226, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234]
Yield (p)Increased - cob and grain yield; number of grains per cob[215, 221, 235, 236, 237]
Yield (f)Increased - cob and grain yield; number of grains per cob; silage yield[226, 231, 233, 234, 238]
Salinity tolerance (p)Increased - shoot and root biomass; K+; Na+; root volume and diameter; Reduced Cl and Na in shoots;[208, 211, 239]
Salinity tolerance (f)Increased – soil macroaggregates; soil bacterial diversity; nutrient uptake; photosynthesis and chlorophyll; K+; Na+[217, 240]

Table 1.

Compendium of studies showing effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi on maize.

p/f indicates whether the experiment was conducted under pot (p) trial or field (f) trial conditions.


Monoculture is the cultivation of a single crop over a large area over consecutive years [241] and was adopted as a means to increase production [242]. Cultivated crops usually have identical genetic similarities, uniform growth patterns, and resistance to certain common diseases in monoculture. This system includes crop varieties uniquely suited to the specific conditions of a particular location [243]. This approach is criticized for its environmental impacts and is known as one of the major causes of soil degradation due to nonrotational cropping [244].

Hijri et al. [243] found that in continuous maize monoculture diversity of AM fungi decreased but found high diversity in long term field experiments where low-input agriculture involving crop rotation provided better conditions for their preservation. Sangabriel-conde et al. [245] investigated the AM fungal symbioses in native maize landraces at different levels of phosphorus fertilization. They showed a high diversity of AM fungi, most of which colonized several maize varieties, was best achieved at a moderate P level.

One of the most important soil properties is its structure [246]. Soil structure results from the iterations of the soil’s chemical, physical and biological factors [247248]. Soil management practices, especially tillage systems, affect almost all soil properties, including AM fungi activity, diversity, and glomalin production [248].

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi have essential functions in the construction of the soil structure by acting on the formation and stabilization of the aggregates [247249, 250, 251]. The effect of AM fungi on soil aggregation is a result of ERM growth into the soil matrix creating the skeletal structure that physically entangles soil particles which along with roots enable microaggregates to form in the soil. Microaggregates form larger aggregated [251] via the production of a soil glycoprotein, glomalin [247252, 253, 254].

AM fungi account for 5–50% of the biomass of soil microbes [255]. Approximately 10–100 m mycorrhizal mycelium per cm root has been estimated [164], the biomass of the ERM may amount to 54–900 kg/ha [256]. Rilling et al. [120] estimated that pools of organic carbon such as glomalin produced by AM fungi might even exceed soil microbial biomass by a factor of 10–20. Glomalin is present in the soil in large amounts. The concentration of glomalin in soil depends on the vegetation cover and the manner of soil management [257] and ranges from 1.6 to 2.3 mg/g soil [258]. Some examples of glomalin concentration in diverse ecosystems include; Agricultural land 0.3–0.7 mg/g [114, 259]; Boreal forest 1.1 mg/g [260]; Desert 0.003–0.13 mg/g [170, 261]; Temperate forest 0.60–5.8 mg/g [170, 262, 263]; Temperate grassland 0.23–2.5 mg/g [263, 264, 265]; Tropical rainforest 2.6–13.5 mg/g [170, 266] and Antarctic region 0.007–0.15 mg/g [267]. For example, in the top 10 cm of a tropical rain forest in Costa Rica up to 12.5 mg of glomalin cm−3was reported [266] and up to 60 mg of glomalin cm−3 in a chrono sequence of Hawaiian soils [120]. Glomalin has a longer residence time in soil than hyphae, allowing for a long persistent contribution to soil aggregate stabilization. For hyphae, the residence time varies from days to months [86, 266], while for glomalin, it varies from 6 to 42 years [120]. The effects of AM fungi on soil aggregation are probably more easily detected in nutrient-poor soils with neutral or alkaline soil pH [268]. The management of mycorrhizal fungi and diversity in the soil can be considered a biological approach to improving soil structure [269, 270]. Improved soil structure results in improved water infiltration and can mitigate raindrop impact through higher soil stability, increasing resistance to slaking and reduced particles detachment [271]. Significant decreases in AM fungi hyphae and GRSP concentrations have been correlated to losses of C and N protected in macroaggregates as a result of reduced aggregate stabilization [272].

Maize is an obligatory mycorrhizal species (Table 1) readily colonized by many non-host-specific AM fungi [273]. Agricultural techniques employing direct sowing and reduced tillage interfere as little as possible with the soil structure and do not cause tearing of the trunks of mycorrhizal fungi [273, 274] resulting in an increase and activity of soil microorganisms and enzymes, especially in the top 20 cm layer. Roldán et al. [275] examined the effect of different management practices on the soil profile distribution of organic matter and physical and microbiological soil quality indicators in a maize field under subtropical conditions. They concluded that the tillage system significantly affected aggregate stability and glomalin. The increases in glomalin suggested that the proliferation of AM fungi could have mediated the improvement in soil aggregate stability under no-tillage. Investigating the influence of tillage and no-tillage on the mycorrhizal status of a field cultivated with maize or bean [276] revealed that GRSP was greater under no-tillage Maize plants (with a root mass of 450 g m−3) had a more marked effect on improving soil aggregate stability than bean plants (with a smaller root mass of 42 g m−3).

Advertisement

6. Conclusions and recommendations

Adoption of good agriculture management practices can increase productivity, reduce erosion, increase soil fertility, and increase the soil’s water-holding capacity. For farmers, it is often easier to use the agricultural systems that they are familiar with and that are supported by existing research and existing industries rather than search for the necessary solutions. Some of these systems do not consider the differences of the agroecological zones, cultures and resource limitations which tend to fail in most of the areas where they are applied. Improved soil fertility is critical. Therefore, strategies must include biologically based systems to rebuild soil fertility. Populations and space pressures are forcing farmers to use land more intensely. Reducing land degradation and replenishing soil fertility requires an integrated sustainable approach that promotes agricultural management practices that enhance AM fungal diversity. AM fungi are a key ecosystem partner that relates to sustainable management in their activity contributing to many ecosystem functions, including soil aggregation, reduced nutrient losses, and improved plant nutrient acquisition, which may reduce the amounts of fertilizer required to achieve elevated yields. Because mycorrhizal networks can create indefinitely large numbers of fungal linkages connecting many plants in a community, AM fungal formation could be a critical element in the plant succession of ecosystems and reducing greenhouse gases. The distribution pattern of AM fungi and glomalin are helpful components in monitoring desertification and soil degradation [277].

Mitigating of climate change cannot ignore the role of AM fungi and their symbiotic interaction with important crops such as maize. Adoption of soil management approaches that sustain AM fungal populations whether indigenous or introduced are therefore essential.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Foundational Biodiversity Information Programme – National Research Foundation, German Academic Exchange Service and Rhodes University. We sincerely thank Mrs. Margot Brooks for the English language review of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1. Houghton J, Meira Pilho L, Callander B, Harris N, Kattonberg A, Maskeel K. In: Lakeman J, editor. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climatic Change. First ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996
  2. 2. Metz B, Davidson O, Bosch P, Dave R, Meyer L. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Vol. 9780521880. Cambridge; 2007
  3. 3. Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P, et al. Agriculture. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA, editors. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. pp. 498-540
  4. 4. Tubiello F, Salvatore M, Golec CR, Ferrara A, Rossi S, Biancalani R, et al. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks: 1990-2011 Analysis. Vol. 2. Italy: FAO, ESS/14-02; 2014
  5. 5. IRRI Rice farming: Saving water through Alternate Wetting Drying (AWD) method, Indonesia; 2013. pp. 1-3
  6. 6. Kasterine A, Vanzetti D. The effectiveness, efficiency and equity of market-based and voluntary measures to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from the Agri-food sector. Trade and Environment Review. 2010;2010:1-37
  7. 7. Uprety D, Dhar S, Hongmin D, Kimball B, Garg A, Upadhyay J. Technologies for Climate Change Mitigation: Agriculture Sector. In: Haggar J, editor. New Delhi: Magnum Custom; 2012. ISBN 2013206534
  8. 8. FCCC Adoption of the Paris Agreement. In: Proceedings of the Conference of the Parties, Twenty-first session. Durban: United Nations; 2015
  9. 9. FAO. The future of food and agriculture Trends and challenges. Rome: Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); 2017. ISBN 9789251095515
  10. 10. Porter J, Xie L, Challinor A, Cochrane K, Howden S, Iqbal M, et al. Food security and food production systems. In: Field C, Barros V, Dokken D, Mach K, Mastrandrea M, Bilir P, Chatterjee M, Ebi K, Estrada Y, Genova R, Girma B, Kissel E, Levy A, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea P, White L, editors. Climate Change 2014 Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Part a: Global and Sectoral Aspects. United Kingdom and New York: Cambridge University Press; 2014. pp. 485-533 ISBN 9781107415379
  11. 11. FAO. Climate change and food systems: Global assessments and implications for food security and trade. In: Elbehri A, editor. Rome: Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); 2015. ISBN 9789251086995
  12. 12. FAO. Climate change and food security: Risks and responses. Rome: Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); 2015. ISBN 9789251089989
  13. 13. Zhao J, Yang X. Distribution of high-yield and high-yield-stability zones for maize yield potential in the main growing regions in China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2018;248:511-517. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.016
  14. 14. Chaudhry A. Maize in Pakistan. Faisalabad: Punjab Agricultural Research Coordination Board; 1983
  15. 15. Erenstein O, Jaleta M, Sonder K, Mottaleb K, Prasanna B. Global maize production, consumption and trade: Trends and R&D implications. Food Security. 2022:1-25. DOI: 10.1007/s12571-022-01288-7
  16. 16. Lv Y, Liang Z, Ge M, Qi W, Zhang T, Lin F, et al. Genome-wide identification and functional prediction of nitrogen-responsive intergenic and intronic long non-coding RNAs in maize (Zea mays L.). BMC Genomics. 2016;17:1-15. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2650-1
  17. 17. du Plessis J. Maize Production. Pretoria: Department of Agriculture and ARC-Grain Crops Institute; 2003
  18. 18. DAFF. Trends in the Agricultural Sector 2011. Pretoria: Department of Agriculture; 2012
  19. 19. Ludwig F, van Scheltinga C, Verhagen J, Kruijt B, van Ierland E, Dellink R, et al. Climate change impacts on Developing Countries - EU Accountability. Netherlands: Wageningen University and Research Centre; 2007
  20. 20. Brussaard L, de Ruiter PC, Brown GG. Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2007;121:233-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.013
  21. 21. Carrenho R, Trufem SFB, Bononi VLR, Silva ES. The effect of different soil properties on arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of peanuts, sorghum and maize. Acta Botanica Brasilica. 2007;21:723-730. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-33062007000300018
  22. 22. Lynch JPT, review no. Roots of the second green revolution. Australian Journal of Botany. 2007;55:493-512. DOI: 10.1071/BT06118
  23. 23. Rai A, Rai S, Rakshit A. Mycorrhiza-mediated phosphorus use efficiency in plants. Environmental and Experimental Biology. 2013;11:107-117
  24. 24. Bojtor C, Illés Á, Mohammad S, Mousavi N, Széles A, Oth BT, et al. Evaluation of the nutrient composition of maize in different NPK fertilizer levels based on multivariate method analysis. International Journal of Agronomy. 2021;2021:1-13. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5537549
  25. 25. Jamal Z, Hamayun M, Ahmad N, Chaudhary F. Effects of soil and foliar application of different concentrations of NPF and foliar application of (NH4)2SO4 on different yield parameters in wheat. Agronomy. 2006;5:251-256
  26. 26. Zhang W, Ma W, Ji Y, Fan M, Oenema O, Zhang F. Efficiency, economics, and environmental implications of phosphorus resource use and the fertilizer industry in China. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2008;80:131-144. DOI: 10.1007/s10705-007-9126-2
  27. 27. Bukhsh M, Ahmad R, Ishaque M, Malik A. Response of maize hybrids to varying potassium application in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2009;46:179-184
  28. 28. Cooke G. Fertilizing for Maximum Yield. London: Granada Publishing Lmt5; 1985
  29. 29. Almagrabi O, Abdelmoneim T. Using of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to reduce the deficiency effect of phosphorous fertilization on maize plants (Zea mays L.). Life Science Journal. 2012;9:1648-1654
  30. 30. Lynch JP, Brown KM. Topsoil foraging - an architectural adaptation of plants to low phosphorus availability. Plant and Soil. 2001;237:225-237. DOI: 10.1023/A:1013324727040
  31. 31. Douds D, Nagahashi G, Reider C, Hepperly P. Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increases the yield of potatoes in a high P soil. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture. 2007;25:67-78. DOI: 10.1080/01448765.2007.10823209
  32. 32. Rakshit A, Bhadoria PS. Role of VAM on growth and phosphorus nutrition of maize with low soluble phosphate fertilization. Acta Agronómica. 2010;59:119-123
  33. 33. Plenchette C, Clermont-Dauphin C, Meynard J, Fortin J. Managing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in cropping systems. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2005;85:31-40. DOI: 10.4141/P03-159
  34. 34. Smith S, Read D. Mycorrhizal Simbiosos. Third ed. Great Britain: Elsevier Ltd.; 2008 ISBN 9780123705266
  35. 35. Barea J, Azcón R, Azcón-Aguilar C. Mycorrhizosphere interactions to improve plant fitness and soil quality. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. International Journal of General and Molecular Microbiology. 2002;81:343-351. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020588701325
  36. 36. Lecomte J, St-Arnaud M, Hijri M. Isolation and identification of soil bacteria growing at the expense of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2011;317:43-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02209.x
  37. 37. Corkidi L, Rowland D, Johnson N, Allen E. Nitrogen fertilization alters the functioning of arbuscular mycorrhizas at two semiarid grasslands. Plant and Soil. 2002;240:299-310. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015792204633
  38. 38. Ortas I, Ortakçi D, Kaya Z. Various mycorrhizal fungi propagated on different hosts have different effect on citrus growth and nutrient uptake. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2002;33:259-272. DOI: 10.1081/CSS-120002392
  39. 39. Ortas I, Varma A. Field trials of bioinoculants. In: Varma A, Oelmuller R, editors. Advanced techniques in soil microbiology. New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2007. pp. 397-412. ISBN 9783540708643
  40. 40. Smith F, Smith S. What is the significance of the arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation of many economically important crop plants? Plant and Soil. 2011;348:63-79. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-0865-0
  41. 41. Ortas I, Akpinar C. Response of kidney bean to arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation and mycorrhizal dependency in P and Zn deficient soils. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B Soil and Plant Science. 2006;56:101-109. DOI: 10.1080/09064710510029196
  42. 42. Bi Y, Li X, Christie P, Hu Z, Wong M. Growth and nutrient uptake of arbuscular mycorrhizal maize in different depths of soil overlying coal fly ash. Chemosphere. 2003;50:863-869. DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00231-X
  43. 43. Lu K, Yang X, Gielen G, Bolan N, Ok Y, Niazi N, et al. Effect of bamboo and rice straw biochars on the mobility and redistribution of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) in contaminated soil. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017;186:285-292. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.068
  44. 44. Li L, Zhang F, Li X, Christie P, Sun J, Yang S, et al. Interspecific facilitation of nutrient uptake by intercropped maize and faba bean. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2003;65:61-71. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021885032241
  45. 45. Rodrigo VHL, Stirling CM, Teklehaimanot Z, Nugawela A. Intercropping with banana to improve fractional interception and radiation-use efficiency of immature rubber plantations. Field Crops Research. 2001;69:237-249. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00147-7
  46. 46. He X, Xu M, Qiu G, Zhou J. Use of 15N stable isotope to quantify nitrogen transfer between mycorrhizal plants. Journal of Plant Ecology. 2009;2:107-118. DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtp015
  47. 47. Marzban Z, Faryabi E, Torabian S. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium on ion content and root characteristics of green bean and maize under intercropping. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica. 2017;109:79-88. DOI: 10.14720/aas.2017.109.1.08
  48. 48. Xavier L, Germida J. Bacteria associated with Glomus clarum spores influence mycorrhizal activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2003;35:471-478. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00003-8
  49. 49. Gordon-Weeks R, Tong Y, Davies TGE, Leggewie G. Restricted spatial expression of a high-affinity phosphate transporter in potato roots. Journal of Cell Science. 2003;116:3135-3144. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.00615
  50. 50. Ezawa T, Smith S, Smith F. P metabolism and transport in AM fungi. Plant and Soil. 2002;244:221-230. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020258325010
  51. 51. Wang J, Sun J, Miao J, Guo J, Shi Z, He M, et al. A phosphate starvation response regulator Ta-PHR1 is involved in phosphate signalling and increases grain yield in wheat. Annals of Botany. 2013;111:1139-1153. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct080
  52. 52. Zhou J, Jiao F, Wu Z, Li Y, Wang X, He X, et al. OsPHR2 is involved in phosphate-starvation signaling and excessive phosphate accumulation in shoots of plants. Plant Physiology. 2008;146:1673-1686. DOI: 10.1104/pp.107.111443
  53. 53. Xu Y, Liu F, Han G, Cheng B. Genome-wide identification and comparative analysis of phosphate starvation-responsive transcription factors in maize and three other gramineous plants. Plant Cell Reports. 2018;37:711-726. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-018-2262-0
  54. 54. Bucher M. Functional biology of plant phosphate uptake at root and mycorrhiza interfaces. The New Phytologist. 2007;173:11-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01935.x
  55. 55. Ferrol N, Barea J, Azcón-Aguilar C. The plasma membrane H+-ATPase gene family in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Current Genetics. 2000;37:112-118. DOI: 10.1007/s002940050017
  56. 56. Javot H, Pumplin N, Harrison MJ. Phosphate in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: Transport properties and regulatory roles. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2007;30:310-322. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01617.x
  57. 57. Hijikata N, Murase M, Tani C, Ohtomo R, Osaki M, Ezawa T. Polyphosphate has a central role in the rapid and massive accumulation of phosphorus in extraradical mycelium of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. The New Phytologist. 2010;186:285-289. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03168.x
  58. 58. Viereck N, Hansen P, Jakobsen I. Phosphate pool dynamics in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices studied by in vivo 31P NMR spectroscopy. The New Phytologist. 2004;162:783-794. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01048.x
  59. 59. Ryan MH, McCully ME, Huang CX. Location and quantification of phosphorus and other elements in fully hydrated, soil-grown arbuscular mycorrhizas: A cryo-analytical scanning electron microscopy study. The New Phytologist. 2003;160:429-441. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00884.x
  60. 60. Ryan MH, McCully ME, Huang CX. Relative amounts of soluble and insoluble forms of phosphorus and other elements in intraradical hyphae and arbuscules of arbuscular mycorrhizas. Functional Plant Biology. 2007;34:457-464. DOI: 10.1071/FP06242
  61. 61. Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Arnould C, Oufattole M, Arango M, Gianinazzi S. Differential activation of H+-ATPase genes by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus in root cells of transgenic tobacco. Planta. 2000;211:609-613. DOI: 10.1007/s004250000323
  62. 62. Krajinski F, Hause B, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Franken P. Mtha1, a plasma membrane H+-ATPase gene from Medicago truncatula, shows Arbuscule-specific induced expression in mycorrhizal tissue. Plant Biology. 2002;4:754-761
  63. 63. Rosewarne G, Smith F, Schachtman D, Smith S. Localization of proton-ATPase genes expressed in arbuscular mycorrhizal tomato plants. Mycorrhiza. 2007;17:249-258. DOI: 10.1007/s00572-006-0101-6
  64. 64. Smith S, Smith F. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant nutrition and growth: New paradigms from cellular to ecosystem scales. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2011;62:227-250. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103846
  65. 65. Jin HR, Liu J, Liu J, Huang XW. Forms of nitrogen uptake, translocation, and transfer via arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A review. Science China. Life Sciences. 2012;55:474-482. DOI: 10.1007/s11427-012-4330-y
  66. 66. Smith S, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Koide R, Cairney J. Nutrient transport in mycorrhizas: Structure, physiology and consequences for efficiency of the symbiosis. Plant and Soil. 1994;159:103-113. DOI: 10.1007/BF00000099
  67. 67. Kaldorf M, Schmelzer E, Bothe H. Expression of maize and fungal nitrate reductase genes in arbuscular mycorrhiza. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 1998;11:439-448. DOI: 10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.6.439
  68. 68. Bago B, Pfeffer P, Shachar-Hill Y. Could the urea cycle Be translocating nitrogen in the arbuscular mycorrhizal Symbiosis ? The New Phytologist. 2001;149:4-8
  69. 69. Olsson P, Burleigh S, Van Aarle I. The influence of external nitrogen on carbon allocation to Glomus intraradices in monoxenic arbuscular mycorrhiza. The New Phytologist. 2005;168:677-686. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01532.x
  70. 70. Toussaint J, St-Arnaud M, Charest C. Nitrogen transfer and assimilation between the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices Schenck & Smith and Ri T-DNA roots of Daucus carota L. in an in vitro compartmented system. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2004;50:251-260. DOI: 10.1139/w04-009
  71. 71. Tanaka Y, Yano K. Nitrogen delivery to maize via mycorrhizal hyphae depends on the form of N supplied. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2005;28:1247-1254. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01360.x
  72. 72. Leigh J, Hodge A, Fitter AH. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can transfer substantial amounts of nitrogen to their host plant from organic material. The New Phytologist. 2009;181:199-207. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02630.x
  73. 73. Hodge A, Fitter AH. Substantial nitrogen acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic material has implications for N cycling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:13754-13759. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1005874107
  74. 74. Jin H, Pfeffer P, Douds D, Piotrowski E, Lammers P, Shachar-Hill Y. The uptake, metabolism, transport and transfer of nitrogen in an arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. The New Phytologist. 2005;168:687-696. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01536.x
  75. 75. Botton B, Chalot M. Nitrogen assimilation: Enzymology in Ectomycorrhizas. In: Varma A, Hock B, editors. Mycorrhiza: Structure, Function, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1995. pp. 325-363 ISBN 9783662088999
  76. 76. López-Pedrosa A, González-Guerrero M, Valderas A, Azcón-Aguilar C, Ferrol N. GintAMT1 encodes a functional high-affinity ammonium transporter that is expressed in the extraradical mycelium of Glomus intraradices. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 2006;43:102-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.10.005
  77. 77. Subramanian KS, Charest C. Acquisition of N by external hyphae of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and its impact on physiological responses in maize under drought-stressed and well-watered conditions. Mycorrhiza. 1999;9:0069-0075. DOI: 10.1007/s005720050289
  78. 78. NSAC. Agriculture and Climate Change: Policy Imperatives and Opportunities to Help Producers Meet the Challenge. Washington D.C.; 2019
  79. 79. Hu H, Wang Z, Liu G, Fu B. Vegetation carbon storage of major shrublands in China. Journal of Plant Ecology. 2006;30:539-544
  80. 80. Zhang F, Zhao H, Song Y, Chen L. The effect of coal-mining subsidence on water environment in the shenfu-dongsheng mining area. Acta Geoscientia Sinica. 2007;28:521-527
  81. 81. Beyene T, Lettenmaier DP, Kabat P. Hydrologic impacts of climate change on the Nile River basin: Implications of the 2007 IPCC scenarios. Climatic Change. 2010;100:433-461. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-009-9693-0
  82. 82. Rouhier H, Read DJ. Plant and fungal responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 in mycorrhizal seedlings of Betula pendula. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 1999;42:231-241. DOI: 10.1016/S0098-8472(99)00039-8
  83. 83. Drigo B, Pijl A, Duyts H, Kielak A, Gamper H, Houtekamer M, et al. Shifting carbon flow from roots into associated microbial communities in response to elevated atmospheric CO2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:10938-10942. DOI: 10.1073/PNAS.0912421107
  84. 84. Drigo B, Kowalchuk G, Knapp B. Impacts of 3 years of elevated atmospheric CO 2 on rhizosphere carbon flow and microbial community dynamics. Global Change Biology. 2013;19:621-636. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12045
  85. 85. Alberton O, Kuyper T, Gorissen A. Taking mycocentrism seriously : Responses mycorrhizal fungal and elevated CO. The New Phytologist. 2005;167:859-868
  86. 86. Treseder K. A meta-analysis of mycorrhizal responses to nitrogen, phosphorus, and atmospheric CO2 in field studies. The New Phytologist. 2004;164:347-355. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01159.x
  87. 87. Treseder K, Allen M. Mycorrhizal fungi have a potential role in soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition. The New Phytologist. 2000;147:189-200. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00690.x
  88. 88. Luo Y, Zhou X. Soil Respiration and Environment. Burlington: Elsevier; 2006 ISBN 9780120887828
  89. 89. Begum N, Qin C, Ahanger M, Raza S, Khan M, Ashraf M, et al. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal Fungi in plant growth regulation: Implications in abiotic stress tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;10:1-15. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01068
  90. 90. Yu CH, Huang CH, Tan CS. A review of CO2 capture by absorption and adsorption. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2012;12:745-769. DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2012.05.0132
  91. 91. Qi Y, Xu M, Wu J. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration and its effects on ecosystem carbon budget.Pdf. Ecological Modelling. 2002;153:131-142
  92. 92. Rillig M. Arbuscular mycorrhizae, glomalin, and soil aggregation. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 2004;84:355-363. DOI: 10.4141/S04-003
  93. 93. Wang Z, Bi Y, Jiang B, Zhakypbek Y, Peng S, Liu W, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance soil carbon sequestration in the coalfields, Northwest China. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:1-11. DOI: 10.1038/srep34336
  94. 94. Friedlingstein P, Cox P, Betts R, Bopp L, von Bloh W, Brovkin V, et al. Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. Journal of Climate. 2006;19:3337-3353. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3800.1
  95. 95. Bahn M, Rodeghiero M, Anderson-Dunn M, Dore S, Gimeno C, Drösler M, et al. Soil respiration in European grasslands in relation to climate and assimilate supply Europe PMC funders group. Ecosystems. 2008;11:1352-1367. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-008-9198-0
  96. 96. Rykaczewska K. Impact of heat and drought stresses on size and quality of the potato yield. Plant, Soil and Environment. 2017;63:40-46. DOI: 10.17221/691/2016-PSE
  97. 97. Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007;61:199-223. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011
  98. 98. Hatfield JL, Boote KJ, Kimball BA, Ziska LH, Izaurralde RC, Ort D, et al. Climate impacts on agriculture: Implications for crop production. Agronomy Journal. 2011;103:351-370. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2010.0303
  99. 99. Gavito M, Schweiger P, Jakobsen I. P uptake by arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae: Effect of soil temperature and atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Global Change Biology. 2003;9:106-116. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00560.x
  100. 100. Soudzilovskaia N, Douma C, Akhmetzhanova A, van Bodegom P, Cornwell W, Moens E, et al. Global patterns of plant root colonization intensity by mycorrhizal fungi explained by climate and soil chemistry. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2015;24:371-382. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12272
  101. 101. Sun H, Santalahti M, Pumpanen J, Köster K, Berninger F, Raffaello T, et al. Fungal community shifts in structure and function across a boreal forest fire chronosequence. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2015;81:7869-7880. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02063-15
  102. 102. Leppälammi-Kujansuu J, Ostonen I, Strömgren M, Nilsson LO, Kleja DB, Sah SP, et al. Effects of long-term temperature and nutrient manipulation on Norway spruce fine roots and mycelia production. Plant and Soil. 2013;366:287-303. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-012-1431-0
  103. 103. Hatfield JL, Prueger JH. Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather and Climate Extremes. 2015;10:4-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
  104. 104. Bagyaraj D, Sharma M, Maiti D. Phosphorus nutrition of crops through arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Current Science. 2015;108:1288-1293. DOI: 10.18520/cs/v108/i7/1288-1293
  105. 105. Millar N, Bennett A. Stressed out symbiotes: Hypotheses for the influence of abiotic stress on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Oecologia. 2016;182:625-641. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3673-7
  106. 106. Mathur S, Sharma M, Jajoo A. Improved photosynthetic efficacy of maize (Zea mays) plants with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) under high temperature stress. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2018;180:149-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.02.002
  107. 107. Schluter D. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2001;16:372-380. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02198-X
  108. 108. da Silva E, Nogueira R, da Silva M, de Albuquerque M. Drought stress and plant nutrition. Plant Stress. 2011;5:32-41
  109. 109. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2006;57:781-803. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105444
  110. 110. Tian C, Feng G, Li X, Zhang F. Different effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal isolates from saline or non-saline soil on salinity tolerance of plants. Applied Soil Ecology. 2004;26:143-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.10.010
  111. 111. Hardie K. The effect of removal of Extraradical hyphae on water uptake by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. The New Phytologist. 1985;101:677-684. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb02873.x
  112. 112. Hammer E, Balogh-Brunstad Z, Jakobsen I, Olsson P, Stipp S, Rillig M. A mycorrhizal fungus grows on biochar and captures phosphorus from its surfaces. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2014;77:252-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.06.012
  113. 113. Bedini S, Pellegrino E, Avio L, Pellegrini S, Bazzoffi P, Argese E, et al. Changes in soil aggregation and glomalin-related soil protein content as affected by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2009;41:1491-1496. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.04.005
  114. 114. Wright S, Anderson R. Aggregate stability and glomalin in alternative crop rotations for the central Great Plains. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2000;31:249-253. DOI: 10.1007/s003740050653
  115. 115. Wright S, Upadhyaya A. Extraction of an abundant and unusual protein from soil and comparison with hyphal protein of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Science. 1996;161:575-586. DOI: 10.1097/00010694-199609000-00003
  116. 116. Wright S, Upadhyaya A. A survey of soils for aggregate stability and glomalin, a glycoprotein produced by hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant and Soil. 1998;198:97-107. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004347701584
  117. 117. Rillig M, Wright S, Eviner V. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and glomalin in soil aggregation. Plant and Soil. 2002;238:325-333
  118. 118. Driver J, Holben W, Rillig M. Characterization of glomalin as a hyphal wall component of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2005;37:101-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.06.011
  119. 119. Borie F, Rubio R, Morales A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal Fungi and soil aggregation. Revista de la Ciencia del Suelo y Nutrición Vegetal. 2008;8:9-18. DOI: 10.4067/s0718-27912008000200003
  120. 120. Rillig M, Wright S, Nichols K, Schmidt W, Torn M. Large contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to soil carbon pools in tropical forest soils. Plant and Soil. 2001;233:167-177. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010364221169
  121. 121. Huang Y, Wang D, Cai J, Zheng W. Review of glomalin-related soil protein and its environmental function in the rhizosphere. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology. 2011;35:232-236. DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1258.2011.00232
  122. 122. Treseder and Turner 2007 Glomalin in Ecosystems
  123. 123. Li T, Lin G, Zhang X, Chen Y, Zhang S, Chen B. Relative importance of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Rhizophagus intraradices) and root hairs in plant drought tolerance. Mycorrhiza. 2014;24:595-602. DOI: 10.1007/s00572-014-0578-3
  124. 124. Yang Y, Tang M, Sulpice R, Chen H, Tian S, Ban Y. Arbuscular mycorrhizal Fungi Alter fractal dimension characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings through regulating plant growth, leaf water status, photosynthesis, and nutrient concentration under drought stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2014;33:612-625. DOI: 10.1007/s00344-013-9410-0
  125. 125. Meddich A, Jaiti F, Bourzik W, Asli A, El; Hafidi, M. Use of mycorrhizal fungi as a strategy for improving the drought tolerance in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera). Scientia Horticulturae (Amsterdam). 2015;192:468-474. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.06.024
  126. 126. Beltrano J, Ronco M. Improved tolerance of wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.) to drought stress and rewatering by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus claroideum: Effect on growth and cell membrane stability. Brazilian. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2008;20:29-37. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-04202008000100004
  127. 127. Giri B, Kapoor R, Mukerji K. Improved tolerance of Acacia nilotica to salt stress by arbuscular mycorrhiza, Glomus fasciculatum may be partly related to elevated K/Na ratios in root and shoot tissues. Microbial Ecology. 2007;54:753-760. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-007-9239-9
  128. 128. Li T, Hu Y, Hao Z, Li H, Chen B. Aquaporin genes GintAQPF1 and GintAQPF2 from Glomus intraradices contribute to plant drought tolerance. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2013;8:1-3. DOI: 10.4161/psb.24030
  129. 129. Hussain H, Men S, Hussain S, Chen Y, Ali S, Zhang S, et al. Interactive effects of drought and heat stresses on morpho-physiological attributes, yield, nutrient uptake and oxidative status in maize hybrids. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:1-12. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40362-7
  130. 130. Schellenbaum L, Müller J, Boller T, Wiemken A, Schüepp H. Effects of drought on non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal maize: Changes in the pools of non-structural carbohydrates, in the activities of invertase and trehalase, and in the pools of amino acids and imino acids. The New Phytologist. 1998;138:59-66. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00892.x
  131. 131. Zhu X, Song F, Xu H. Arbuscular mycorrhizae improves low temperature stress in maize via alterations in host water status and photosynthesis. Plant and Soil. 2010;331:129-137. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-009-0239-z
  132. 132. Zhao F, Zhang D, Zhao Y, Wang W, Yang H, Ta F, et al. The difference of physiological and proteomic changes in maize leaves adaptation to drought, heat, and combined both stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:1-19. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01471
  133. 133. Lobell DB, Bänziger M, Magorokosho C, Vivek B. Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials. Nature Climate Change. 2011;1:42-45. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1043
  134. 134. Chen J, Xu W, Velten J, Xin Z, Stout J. Characterization of maize inbred lines for drought and heat tolerance. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 2012;67:354-364. DOI: 10.2489/jswc.67.5.354
  135. 135. Karti PDMH. Pengaruh Pemberian Cendawan Mikoriza Arbuskula terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Rumput Setaria splendida Stapf yang Mengalami Cekaman Kekeringan. Media Peternak. 2004;27:51-55
  136. 136. Zhu X, Song F, Xu H. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme activity of maize plants under temperature stress. Mycorrhiza. 2010;20:325-332. DOI: 10.1007/s00572-009-0285-7
  137. 137. Pebriansyah A, Karti P, Permana A. Effect of drought stress and addition of Arbuscula mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on growth and productivity of tropical grasses (Chloris gayana, Paspalum dilatatum, and Paspalum notatum). Pastura: Journal of Tropical Forage Science. 2012;2:41-48. DOI: 10.24843/Pastura.2012.v02.i01.p10
  138. 138. Porcel R, Ruiz-Lozano J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation, and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2004;55:1743-1750. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erh188
  139. 139. Bhaskara GB, Yang TH, Verslues PE. Dynamic proline metabolism: Importance and regulation in water limited environments. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015;6:1-7. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00484
  140. 140. Zai X, Zhu S, Qin P, Wang X, Che L, Luo F. Effect of Glomus mosseae on chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, and chloroplast ultrastructure of beach plum (Prunus maritima) under NaCl stress. Photosynthetica. 2012;50:323-328. DOI: 10.1007/s11099-012-0035-5
  141. 141. Talaat N, Shawky B. Protective effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants exposed to salinity. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2014;98:20-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.10.005
  142. 142. Zhu X, Song F, Liu S, Liu T. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on photosynthesis and water status of maize under high temperature stress. Plant and Soil. 2011;346:189-199. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-0809-8
  143. 143. Theocharis A, Clément C, Barka EA. Physiological and molecular changes in plants grown at low temperatures. Planta. 2012;235:1091-1105. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-012-1641-y
  144. 144. Ruelland E, Zachowski A. How plants sense temperature. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2010;69:225-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.05.011
  145. 145. Matteucci M, D’Angeli S, Errico S, Lamanna R, Perrotta G, Altamura MM. Cold affects the transcription of fatty acid desaturases and oil quality in the fruit of Olea europaea L. genotypes with different cold hardiness. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2011;62:3403-3420. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/err013
  146. 146. Miransari M, Bahrami H, Rejali F, Malakouti M. Using arbuscular mycorrhiza to alleviate the stress of soil compaction on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2008;40:1197-1206. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.12.014
  147. 147. Zhu J. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2003;6:441-445. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00085-2
  148. 148. FAO. How to Feed the World 2050. High-Level Expert Forum. 2009
  149. 149. Munns R. Genes and salt tolerance. The New Phytologist. 2005;167:645-663
  150. 150. Rogers M, Craig A, Munns R, Colmer T, Nichols P, Malcolm C, et al. The potential for developing fodder plants for the salt-affected areas of southern and eastern Australia: An overview. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 2005;45:301-329. DOI: 10.1071/EA04020
  151. 151. Akbarimoghaddam H, Galavi M, Ghanbari A, Panjehkeh N. Salinity effects on seed germination and seedling growth of bread wheat cultivars. Trakia Journal of Sciences. 2011;9:43-50
  152. 152. Rajkumar M, Prasad MNV, Swaminathan S, Freitas H. Climate change driven plant-metal-microbe interactions. Environment International. 2013;53:74-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.12.009
  153. 153. Farooq M, Hussain M, Wakeel A, Siddique KHM. Salt stress in maize : Effects , resistance mechanisms , and management. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2015;35:461-481. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-015-0287-0
  154. 154. Ma Y, Prasad MNV, Rajkumar M, Freitas H. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and endophytes accelerate phytoremediation of metalliferous soils. Biotechnology Advances. 2011;29:248-258. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.12.001
  155. 155. Nagajyoti PC, Lee KD, Sreekanth TVM. Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2010;8:199-216. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-010-0297-8
  156. 156. Schnoor T, Lekberg Y, Rosendahl S, Olsson P. Mechanical soil disturbance as a determinant of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in semi-natural grassland. Mycorrhiza. 2011;21:211-220. DOI: 10.1007/s00572-010-0325-3
  157. 157. Asmelash F, Bekele T, Birhane E. The potential role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the restoration of degraded lands. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7:1-15. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01095
  158. 158. Cardozo Júnior F, Carneiro R, Goto B, Bezerra A, Araújo A, Nunes L. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in degraded lands in Northeast Brazil. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2012;6:7198-7205
  159. 159. Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G. Microbial diversity and soil functions. European Journal of Soil Science. 2003;54:655-670. DOI: 10.1046/j.1351-0754.2003.0556.x
  160. 160. Griffiths BS, Philippot L. Insights into the resistance and resilience of the soil microbial community. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2013;37:112-129. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00343.x
  161. 161. Xiao D, Xiao S, Ye Y, Zhang W, He X, Wang K. Microbial biomass, metabolic functional diversity, and activity are affected differently by tillage disturbance and maize planting in a typical karst calcareous soil. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2019;19:809-821. DOI: 10.1007/s11368-018-2101-5
  162. 162. Allison VJ, Miller RM, Jastrow JD, Matamala R, Zak DR. Changes in soil microbial community structure in a tallgrass prairie Chronosequence. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2005;69:1412-1421. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0252
  163. 163. Drijber RA, Doran JW, Parkhurst AM, Lyon DJ. Changes in soil microbial community structure with tillage under long-term wheat-fallow management. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2000;32:1419-1430
  164. 164. McGonigle T, Miller M. Winter survival of extraradical hyphae and spores of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the field. Applied Soil Ecology. 1999;12:41-50. DOI: 10.1016/S0929-1393(98)00165-6
  165. 165. Miller M, Mcgonigle T, Addy H. Functional ecology of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizas as influenced by phosphate fertilization and tillage in an agricultural ecosystem. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 1995;15:241-255. DOI: 10.3109/07388559509147411
  166. 166. Mozafar A, Anken T, Ruh R, Frossard E. Tillage intensity, mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal fungi, and nutrient concentrations in maize, wheat, and canola. Agronomy Journal. 2000;92:1117-1124. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2000.9261117x
  167. 167. Castillo CG, Rubio R, Rouanet JL, Borie F. Early effects of tillage and crop rotation on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal propagules in an Ultisol. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2006;43:83-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00374-005-0067-0
  168. 168. Galvez L, Douds D, Drinkwater L, Wagoner P. Effect of tillage and farming system upon VAM fungus populations and mycorrhizas and nutrient uptake of maize. Plant and Soil. 2001;228:299-308. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004810116854
  169. 169. Antunes P, Koch A, Dunfield K, Hart M, Downing A, Rillig M, et al. Influence of commercial inoculation with Glomus intraradices on the structure and functioning of an AM fungal community from an agricultural site. Plant and Soil. 2009;317:257-266. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-008-9806-y
  170. 170. Treseder K, Turner K. Glomalin in ecosystems. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2007;71:1257-1266. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0377
  171. 171. South S, Qi J, Lusch DP. Optimal classification methods for mapping agricultural tillage practices. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2004;91:90-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.03.001
  172. 172. Al-Kaisi M, Yin X. Tillage and crop residue effects on soil carbon and carbon dioxide emission in corn-soybean rotations. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2005;34:437-445. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0437
  173. 173. Curaqueo G, Barea J, Acevedo E, Rubio R, Cornejo P, Borie F. Effects of different tillage system on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal propagules and physical properties in a Mediterranean agroecosystem in Central Chile. Soil and Tillage Research. 2011;113:11-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2011.02.004
  174. 174. Liu X, Zhang J, Gu T, Zhang W, Shen Q , Yin S, et al. Microbial community diversities and taxa abundances in soils along a seven-year gradient of potato monoculture using high throughput pyrosequencing approach. PLoS One. 2014;9:1-10. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086610
  175. 175. van Groenigen K, Bloem J, Bååth E, Boeckx P, Rousk J, Bodé S, et al. Abundance, production and stabilization of microbial biomass under conventional and reduced tillage. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2010;42:48-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.09.023
  176. 176. Halloran I, Miller M, Arnold G. Absorption of P by corn (Zea mays L.) as influenced by soil disturbance. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 1986;66:287-302
  177. 177. McGonicle T, Evans D, Miller M. Effect of degree of soil disturbance on mycorrhizal colonization and phosphorus absorption by maize in growth chamber and field experiments. The New Phytologist. 1990;116:629-636. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00548.x
  178. 178. Jansa J, Mozafar A, Kuhn G, Anken T, Ruh R, Sanders IR, et al. Soil tillage affects the community structure of mycorrhizal fungi in maize roots. Ecological Applications. 2003;13:1164-1176. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)13[1164,STATCS]2.0.CO;2
  179. 179. Fairchild M, Miller G. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas and the soil-disturbance-induced reduction of nutrient absorption in maize. III. Influence of P amendments to soil. The New Phytologist. 1990;114:641-650. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00435.x
  180. 180. Wilson C. Environmental and human costs of commercial agricultural production in South Asia. International Journal of Social Economics. 2000;27:816-846. DOI: 10.1108/03068290010335244
  181. 181. Fawole O, Alori E. Impact of chemical inputs on arbuscular mycorrhizal spores in soil :Response of AM spores to fertilizer and herbicides. Albanian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2017;16:10-13
  182. 182. Balzergue C, Chabaud M, Barker D, Bécard G, Rochange S. High phosphate reduces host ability to develop arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis without affecting root calcium spiking responses to the fungus. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2013;4:1-15. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00426
  183. 183. López-Ráez J, Shirasu K, Foo E. Strigolactones in plant interactions with beneficial and detrimental organisms: The Yin and Yang. Trends in Plant Science. 2017;22:527-537. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.03.011
  184. 184. García-Caparrós P, Lao M, Preciado-Rangel P, Sanchez E. Phosphorus and carbohydrate metabolism in green bean plants subjected to increasing phosphorus concentration in the nutrient solution. Agronomy. 2021;11:1-16. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11020245
  185. 185. Kiers E, Duhamel M, Beesetty Y, Mensah J, Franken O, Verbruggen E, et al. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science (80-. ). 2011;333:880-882. DOI: 10.1126/science.1208473
  186. 186. Willmann M, Gerlach N, Buer B, Polatajko A, Nagy R, Koebke E, et al. Mycorrhizal phosphate uptake pathway in maize: Vital for growth and cob development on nutrient poor agricultural and greenhouse soils. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2013;4:1-15. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00533
  187. 187. Kobae Y, Ohmori Y, Saito C, Yano K, Ohtomo R, Fujiwara T. Phosphate treatment strongly inhibits new arbuscule development but not the maintenance of arbuscule in mycorrhizal rice roots. Plant Physiology. 2016;171:566-579. DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.00127
  188. 188. Jin H, Germida JJ, Walley FL. Suppressive effects of seed-applied fungicides on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) differ with fungicide mode of action and AMF species. Applied Soil Ecology. 2013;72:22-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.05.013
  189. 189. Murillo-Williams A, Pedersen P. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization response to three seed-applied fungicides. Agronomy Journal. 2008;100:795-800. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0142
  190. 190. Buysens C, Dupré de Boulois H, Declerck S. Do fungicides used to control Rhizoctonia solani impact the non-target arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis? Mycorrhiza. 2015;25:277-288. DOI: 10.1007/s00572-014-0610-7
  191. 191. Zocco D, Fontaine J, Lozanova E, Renard L, Bivort C, Durand R, et al. Effects of two sterol biosynthesis inhibitor fungicides (fenpropimorph and fenhexamid) on the development of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Mycological Research. 2008;112:592-601. DOI: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.11.010
  192. 192. Marin M, Ybarra M, Fé A, García-Férriz L. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and pesticides on Cynara cardunculus growth. Agricultural and Food Science. 2002;11:245-251. DOI: 10.23986/afsci.5728
  193. 193. Ipsilantis I, Samourelis C, Karpouzas DG. The impact of biological pesticides on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2012;45:147-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.08.007
  194. 194. Karpouzas DG, Papadopoulou E, Ipsilantis I, Friedel I, Petric I, Udikovic-Kolic N, et al. Effects of nicosulfuron on the abundance and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi used as indicators of pesticide soil microbial toxicity. Ecological Indicators. 2014;39:44-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.004
  195. 195. Demir S, Celebi SZ, Kaya I, Korhan Sahar A. The applications of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) and atrazine on silage maize (Zea mays L.) at different irrigation regimes. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment. 2011;9:629-633
  196. 196. Makarian H, Poozesh V, Asghari HR, Nazari M. Interaction effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza Fungi and soil applied herbicides on plant growth. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2016;47:619-629. DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2016.1146744
  197. 197. Power AG. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2010;365:2959-2971. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
  198. 198. Meyer A, Koifman S, Koifman R, Moreira J, de Chrisman JR, Abreu-Villaça Y. Mood disorders hospitalizations, suicide attempts, and suicide mortality among agricultural workers and residents in an area with intensive use of pesticides in Brazil. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues. 2010;73:866-877. DOI: 10.1080/15287391003744781
  199. 199. Alavanja M, Bonner M. Occupational pesticide exposures and cancer risk: A review. The Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B, Critical Reviews. 2012;15:238-263. DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2012.632358
  200. 200. Freire C, Koifman RJ, Koifman S. Hematological and hepatic alterations in brazilian population heavily exposed to organochlorine pesticides. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues. 2015;78:534-548. DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2014.999396
  201. 201. Carvalho FP. Agriculture, pesticides, food security and food safety. Environmental Science & Policy. 2006;9:685-692. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.08.002
  202. 202. Skevas T, Oude Lansink AGJM, Stefanou SE. Designing the emerging EU pesticide policy: A literature review. NJAS - Wageningen. Journal of Life Science. 2013;64-65:95-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.njas.2012.09.001
  203. 203. Lim WM, Yong JLS, Suryadi K. Consumers’ perceived value and willingness to purchase organic food. Journal of Global Marketing. 2014;27:298-307. DOI: 10.1080/08911762.2014.931501
  204. 204. Oliveira R, Ma Y, Rocha I, Carvalho M, Vosátka M, Freitas H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are an alternative to the application of chemical fertilizer in the production of the medicinal and aromatic plant Coriandrum sativum L. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues. 2016;79:320-328. DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2016.1153447
  205. 205. Rocha I, Ma Y, Carvalho M, Magalhães C, Janoušková M, Vosátka M, et al. Seed coating with inocula of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for nutritional enhancement of maize under different fertilisation regimes. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2019;65:31-43. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2018.1479061
  206. 206. Baslam M, Garmendia I, Goicoechea N. Enhanced accumulation of vitamins, nutraceuticals and minerals in lettuces associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Amf): A question of interest for both vegetables and humans. Agriculture. 2013;3:188-209. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture3010188
  207. 207. Bouzeriba T, Mehjin A, Mikaeel Y, Dennis S, Ahmed A, Peter D. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and phosphorus uptake of maize (Zea mays L.) at different levels of soil phosphorus and soil moisture. Journal of Dryland Agriculture. 2021;7:22-33. DOI: 10.5897/joda2020.0063
  208. 208. Selvakumar G, Shagol CC, Kim K, Han S, Sa T. Spore associated bacteria regulates maize root K+/Na+ ion homeostasis to promote salinity tolerance during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. BMC Plant Biology. 2018;18:1-13. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1317-2
  209. 209. Zhang T, Yang X, Guo R, Guo J. Response of AM fungi spore population to elevated temperature and nitrogen addition and their influence on the plant community composition and productivity. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:1-12. DOI: 10.1038/srep24749
  210. 210. Abdelmoneim T, Moussa T, Almaghrabi O, Alzahrani H, Abdelbagi I. Increasing plant tolerance to drought stress by inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Life Science Journal. 2013;10:3273-3280
  211. 211. Othira JO. Effectiveness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in protection of maize (Zea mays L.) against witchweed (Striga hermonthica Del Benth) infestation. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development. 2012;4:37-44. DOI: 10.5897/jabsd12.007
  212. 212. Yang Y, Shuzhen Z, Honglin H, Lei L, Bei W. Arsenic accumulation and speciation in maize as affected by inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus glomus mosseae. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2009;57:3695-3701. DOI: 10.1021/jf900107y
  213. 213. Bai J, Lin X, Yin R, Zhang H, Junhua W, Xueming C, et al. The influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on As and P uptake by maize (Zea mays L.) from As-contaminated soils. Applied Soil Ecology. 2008;38:137-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.10.002
  214. 214. Wang F, Lin X, Yin R. Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Acaulospora mellea decreases Cu phytoextraction by maize from Cu-contaminated soil. Pedobiologia (Jena). 2007;51:99-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2007.02.003
  215. 215. Wu S, Cao Z, Li Z, Cheung K, Wong M. Effects of biofertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth: A greenhouse trial. Geoderma. 2005;125:155-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.07.003
  216. 216. Karasawa T, Takebe M, Kasahara Y. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) effects on maize growth and AM colonization of roots under various soil moisture conditions. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition. 2000;46:61-67. DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2000.10408762
  217. 217. Liu W, Zhang Y, Jiang S, Deng Y, Christie P, Murray P, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil and roots respond differently to phosphorus inputs in an intensively managed calcareous agricultural soil. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:1-11. DOI: 10.1038/srep24902
  218. 218. Hussain H, Qingwen Z, Hussain S, Hongbo L, Waqqas A, Li Z. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal Fungi on maize growth, root colonization, and root exudates varied with inoculum and application method. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2021;21:1577-1590. DOI: 10.1007/s42729-021-00463-7
  219. 219. Qin Z, Zhang H, Feng G, Christie P, Zhang J, Li X, et al. Soil phosphorus availability modifies the relationship between AM fungal diversity and mycorrhizal benefits to maize in an agricultural soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2020;144:107790. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107790
  220. 220. El-Samad HMA, El-Hakeem KNSA. Strategy role of mycorrhiza inoculation on osmotic pressure, chemical constituents and growth yield of maize plant gown under drought stress. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2019;10:1102-1120. DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2019.106080
  221. 221. Hu J, Cui X, Wang J, Lin X. The non-simultaneous enhancement of phosphorus acquisition and mobilization respond to enhanced arbuscular mycorrhization on maize (Zea mays L.). Microorganisms. 2019;7:1-13. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7120651
  222. 222. Polcyn W, Paluch-Lubawa E, Lehmann T, Mikuła R. Arbuscular mycorrhiza in highly fertilized maize cultures alleviates short-term drought effects but does not improve fodder yield and quality. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;10:1-16. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00496
  223. 223. Hi A, Orluchukwu J. Response of three varieties of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) to arbuscular mycorrhizal Fungi (Gigaspora gigantea) in the humid tropics. International Journal of Agriculture and Earth Science. 2018;4:30-36
  224. 224. Liu A, Hamel C, Elmi A, Costa C, Ma B, Smith D. Concentrations of K, Ca and Mg in maize colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under field conditions. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 2002;82:271-278. DOI: 10.4141/s01-022
  225. 225. Qian L, Zhang W, Yan J, Han L, Gao W, Liu R, et al. Effective removal of heavy metal by biochar colloids under different pyrolysis temperatures. Bioresource Technology. 2016;206:217-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.065
  226. 226. Davaran Hagh E, Mirshekari B, Ardakani MR, Farahvash F, Rejali F. Optimizing phosphorus use in sustainable maize cropping via mycorrhizal inoculation. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2016;39:1348-1356. DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2015.1086797
  227. 227. Priyadharsini P, Muthukumar T. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus influence maize root growth and architecture in rock phosphate amended tropical soil. Anales de Biologia. 2017;39:211-222. DOI: 10.6018/analesbio.39.22
  228. 228. Zhang W, Cao J, Zhang S, Wang C. Effect of earthworms and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the microbial community and maize growth under salt stress. Applied Soil Ecology. 2016;107:214-223. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.06.005
  229. 229. Al-Qarawi A, Al-Rowaily S, Al-Oud S. Interaction effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal Fungi and heavy metals on maize plants grown in cadmium, Lead and arsenic contaminated soil. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology. 2009;34:8571-8586. DOI: 10.21608/jacb.2009.99282
  230. 230. Dymytrov S, Sabluk V, Tanchyk S, Gumentyk M, Balagura O. Increasing maize productivity by presowing usage of biologies Mycofriend. In: Mikovital and Florobacillin. E3S Web Conf. Vol. 255. 2021. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202125501006
  231. 231. Lino IAN, Da Silva DKA, Martins JCR, Sampaio EVSB, Maia LC. Mycorrhizal inoculation and application of cattle manure in field-grown maize in semiarid conditions. Experimental Agriculture. 2019;55:866-874. DOI: 10.1017/S0014479718000443
  232. 232. Brito ODC, Hernandes I, Ferreira JCA, Cardoso MR, Alberton O, Dias-Arieira CR. Association between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Pratylenchus brachyurus in maize crop. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 2018;78:521-527. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-58392018000400521
  233. 233. Berta G, Copetta A, Gamalero E, Bona E, Cesaro P, Scarafoni A, et al. Maize development and grain quality are differentially affected by mycorrhizal fungi and a growth-promoting pseudomonad in the field. Mycorrhiza. 2014;24:161-170. DOI: 10.1007/s00572-013-0523-x
  234. 234. Celebi SZ, Demir S, Celebi R, Durak ED, Yilmaz IH. The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) applications on the silage maize (Zea mays L.) yield in different irrigation regimes. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2010;46:302-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2010.06.002
  235. 235. Usharani G, Sujitha D, Sivasakthi S, Saranraj P. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi (Glomus fasciculatum L.) for the improvement of growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Central European Journal of Experimental Biology. 2014;3:30-35
  236. 236. Olawuyi OJ, Odebode AC, Olakojo SA, Popoola OO, Akanmu AO, Izenegu JO. Host-pathogen interaction of maize (Zea mays L.) and aspergillus Niger as influenced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus deserticola). Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2014;60:1577-1591. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2014.902533
  237. 237. Olawuyi O, Odebode A, Olakojo S, Adesoye A. Variation in maize tolerance to Striga lutea (lour) and influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. International Journal of Basic, Applied and Innovative Research. 2012;1:1-5
  238. 238. Ramírez-Flores M, Perez-Limon S, Li M, Barrales-Gamez B, Albinsky D, Paszkowski U, et al. The genetic architecture of host response reveals the importance of arbuscular mycorrhizae to maize cultivation. Plant Biology. 2020;9:1-18. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.61701
  239. 239. Sheng M, Tang M, Chen H, Yang B, Zhang F, Huang Y. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on the root system of maize plants under salt stress. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2009;55:879-886. DOI: 10.1139/W09-031
  240. 240. Zhang W, Wang C, Lu T, Zheng Y. Cooperation between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and earthworms promotes the physiological adaptation of maize under a high salt stress. Plant and Soil. 2018;423:125-140. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-017-3481-9
  241. 241. Miller G, Spoolman S. In: Julet M, editor. Living in the Environment: Concepts, Connections, and Solutions. Sixteenth ed. California: Yolanda Cossio; 2009 ISBN 9780495556718
  242. 242. Evans A. The Feeding of the Nine Billion: Global Food Securuty for the 21st Century. UK; 2009
  243. 243. Hijri I, Sýkorová Z, Oehl F, Ineichen K, Mäder P, Wiemken A, et al. Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in arable soils are not necessarily low in diversity. Molecular Ecology. 2006;15:2277-2289. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02921.x
  244. 244. Bennett A, Bending G, Chandler D, Hilton S, Mills P. Meeting the demand for crop production : The challenge of yield decline in crops grown in short rotations. Biological Reviews. 2012;87:52-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00184.x
  245. 245. Sangabriel-conde W, Maldonado-mendoza I, Mancera-lópez M, Cordero-ramírez J, Trejo-aguilar D, Negrete-yankelevich S. Glomeromycota associated with Mexican native maize landraces in Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Applied Soil Ecology. 2015;87:63-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.10.017
  246. 246. Rabot E, Wiesmeier M, Schlüter S, Vogel HJ. Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review. Geoderma. 2018;314:122-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.009
  247. 247. Lehmann E, Leifheit A, Rillig M. Mycorrhizas and soil aggregation. In: Johnson N, Gehring C, Jansa J, editors. Mycorrhizal Mediation of Soil. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 241-262 ISBN 9780128043127
  248. 248. Cornejo P, Rubio R, Borie F. Mycorrhizal propagule persistence in a succession of cereals in a disturbed and undisturbed Andisol fertilized with two nitrogen sources. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 2009;69:426-434. DOI: 10.4067/s0718-58392009000300016
  249. 249. Rubin JGKR, Stürmer SL. Potencial de inóculo micorrízico e importância do comprimento do micélio para a agregação de solos de ambiente fluvial. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo - SCI Journal. 2015;39:59-68. DOI: 10.1590/01000683rbcs20150466
  250. 250. Marinho F, Oehl F, da Silva I, Coyne D, Veras J, Maia L. High diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in natural and anthropized sites of a Brazilian tropical dry forest (Caatinga). Fungal Ecology. 2019;40:82-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2018.11.014
  251. 251. Miller R, Jastrow J. The role of mycorrhizal Fungi in soil conservation. In: Bethlenfalvay G, Linderman R, editors. Mycorrhizae in Sustainable Agriculture. Madison: American Society of Agronomy; 1992. pp. 29-44
  252. 252. Rillig M, Mummey D. Mycorrhizas and soil structure. The New Phytologist. 2006;171:41-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01750.x
  253. 253. Wright S, Green V, Cavigelli M. Glomalin in aggregate size classes from three different farming systems. Soil and Tillage Research. 2007;94:546-549. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2006.08.003
  254. 254. Rillig M, Muller L, Lehmann A. Soil aggregates as massively concurrent evolutionary incubators. The ISME Journal. 2017;11:1943-1948. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2017.56
  255. 255. Olsson P, Thingstrup I, Jakobsen I, Bååth E. Estimation of the biomass of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a linseed field. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1999;31:1879-1887. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00119-4
  256. 256. Zhu Y, Miller R. Carbon cycling by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil-plant systems. Trends in Plant Science. 2003;8:407-409. DOI: 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00192-4
  257. 257. Mirás-Avalos JM, Antunes PM, Koch A, Khosla K, Klironomos JN, Dunfield KE. The influence of tillage on the structure of rhizosphere and root-associated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Pedobiologia (Jena). 2011;54:235-241. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2011.03.005
  258. 258. Bedini S, Turrini A, Rigo C, Argese E, Giovannetti M. Molecular characterization and glomalin production of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonizing a heavy metal polluted ash disposal island, downtown Venice. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2010;42:758-765. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.01.010
  259. 259. Wuest S, Caesar-Tonthat T, Wright S, Williams J. Organic matter addition, N, and residue burning effects on infiltration, biological, and physical properties of an intensively tilled silt-loam soil. Soil and Tillage Research. 2005;84:154-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2004.11.008
  260. 260. Treseder K, Mack M, Cross A. Relationships among fires, fungi, and soil dynamics in Alaskan boreal forests. Ecological Applications. 2004;14:1826-1838
  261. 261. Rillig M, Maestre F, Lamit L. Microsite differences in fungal hyphal length, glomalin, and soil aggregate stability in semiarid Mediterranean steppes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2003;35:1257-1260. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00185-8
  262. 262. Steinberg P, Rillig M. Differential decomposition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal hyphae and glomalin. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2003;35:191-194. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00249-3
  263. 263. Nichols K, Wright S. Comparison of glomalin and humic acid in eight native U.S. soils. Soil Science. 2005;170:985-997. DOI: 10.1097/01.ss.0000198618.06975.3c
  264. 264. Batten K, Six J, Scow K, Rillig M. Plant invasion of native grassland on serpentine soils has no major effects upon selected physical and biological properties. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2005;37:2277-2282. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.04.005
  265. 265. Lovelock C, Wright S, Clark D, Ruess R. Soil stocks of glomalin produced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi across a tropical rain forest landscape. 2004;92:278-287
  266. 266. Pohanka M, Vlcek V. Assay of Glomalin using a quartz crystal microbalance biosensor. Electroanalysis. 2018;30:453-458. DOI: 10.1002/elan.201700772
  267. 267. Langley JA, Hungate BA. Mycorrhizal controls on belowground litter quality. Ecology. 2003;84:2302-2312. DOI: 10.1890/02-0282
  268. 268. Leifheit E, Veresoglou S, Lehmann A, Morris E, Rillig M. Multiple factors influence the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil aggregation-a meta-analysis. Plant and Soil. 2014;374:523-537. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-013-1899-2
  269. 269. Se S, Dj R. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. London: Second Ed; 1997
  270. 270. Krishnamurthy K, Biswavas Misra B, Davis Bagyaraj J, Abd E, Hashem A, Alqarawi A, et al. The interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal Fungi and endophytic Bacteria enhances plant growth of Acacia gerrardii under salt stress. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7:1-15. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01089
  271. 271. Barthès B, Roose E. Aggregate stability as an indicator of soil susceptibility to runoff and erosion; validation at several levels. Catena. 2002;47:133-149. DOI: 10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00180-1
  272. 272. Wilson G, Rice C, Rillig M, Springer A, Hartnett D. Soil aggregation and carbon sequestration are tightly correlated with the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Results from long-term field experiments. Ecology Letters. 2009;12:452-461. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01303.x
  273. 273. Gillespie AW, Farrell RE, Walley FL, Ross ARS, Leinweber P, Eckhardt KU, et al. Glomalin-related soil protein contains non-mycorrhizal-related heat-stable proteins, lipids and humic materials. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2011;43:766-777. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.12.010
  274. 274. Gałązka A, Gawryjołek K, Perzyński A, Gałązka R, Księżak J. Changes in enzymatic activities and microbial communities in soil under long-term maize monoculture and crop rotation. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2017;26:39-46. DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/64745
  275. 275. Roldán A, Salinas-García JR, Alguacil MM, Caravaca F. Changes in soil enzyme activity, fertility, aggregation and C sequestration mediated by conservation tillage practices and water regime in a maize field. Applied Soil Ecology. 2005;30:11-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.01.004
  276. 276. Roldán A, Salinas-García JR, Alguacil MM, Caravaca F. Soil sustainability indicators following conservation tillage practices under subtropical maize and bean crops. Soil and Tillage Research. 2007;93:273-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2006.05.001
  277. 277. Guo H, He X, Li Y. Spatial distribution of arbuscular mycorrhiza and glomalin in the rhizosphere of Caragana korshinskii Kom. in the Otindag sandy land, China. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2012;6:5745-5753. DOI: 10.5897/ajmr11.1560

Written By

Sílvia N.D. Maússe Sitoe and Joanna F. Dames

Submitted: 26 July 2022 Reviewed: 17 August 2022 Published: 04 November 2022