Map of different theorizing approaches.
Abstract
Regarded as the future of management, leadership is becoming increasingly important, but one of the most serious challenges facing leaders today is the declining trend in job satisfaction, commitment, and work motivation in HR, making the current working environment less effective. Today, neuroscience provides a more precise definition and description of the human being, so many different sciences use neuroscience findings more effectively, and leadership is linked to neuroscience in the form of organizational neuroscience. New understandings of human concepts regarding human brain-directed thoughts, feelings, actions, and behaviors consider that almost all human activities are the result of interactions between the brain and chemistry. Founded upon the brain–directed man, the theory of brain-friendly workplace aims to introduce processes and activities, which can lead to a pleasant experience for employees’ brains, and it can help HR to experience favorable thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Conducted on the basis of qualitative research and implication research, the two contributions of brain structure and chemistry are considered as the source for calculating the effects of neuroscience on workplace design. Sampling and validity are also theoretically considered by examining valid sources and implications. This research is first about cognition and finally considers the conceptual extension of the brain-friendly workplace. Based on the theoretical framework and implications, seven processes and dimensions were counted: Communication, happiness and mobility, ability by self-awareness, respect, purposefulness & focus, security & relaxation, and sleep & rest. This brain-friendly workplace model was called CHARPSS, which is intended to help leaders create different and effective workplaces.
Keywords
- leadership
- organizational neurosciences (ON)
- brain–friendly workplace
- CHARPSS model
- implication study
1. Introduction
First of all, we want to consider the state of the existing workplaces, worrying levels of motivation, commitment, and human resource (HR) satisfaction. Organizational leaders need to know new human perceptions to become more effective because leadership is the future of management. A leader’s mission is to motivate his subordinates. Human resources (HR), which is the most vital element in the field of organizational management, have always received special attention in various eras by researchers in the field of leadership. However, the quality of employees’ performance have been found to be influenced by their motivation within and toward the organization. Leadership in an organization requires new but practical ideas. Creating an ideal work environment is an important investment for the company. Today, with the help of neuroscience, a more suitable workplace must be designed. There is an increasing trend of using neuroscience research results in different fields [1].
According to the prestigious journal of science in 2018, almost 24% of different sciences use neuroscience findings. Neuroscience may be able to make extremely important contributions to management sciences in terms of interdisciplinary studies [2]. In 2018, LinkedIn reported that 93% of employees want to stay longer with their organization, as long as their organization invests more in their workplace [3]. One of the most important responsibilities of a manager is to create a happy and positive environment in which employees feel safe and valued [4]. Leaders need to know that today the ability to create a motivating workplace and have motivated employees is a competitive advantage for an organization as it leads to developing organizational commitment and motivation [5]. The declining trend of commitment, motivation, and satisfaction in the workplace is a matter of serious concern. According to the Gallup Institute, about 20 percent of American employees are not committed and 50 percent are not very committed to their organizations. The annual cost of employee commitment reduction in the United States of America is approximately 300$ billion. This cost is greater than the GDP of countries like Portugal and Singapore and a quarter of the GDP of Iran. In some countries, fully committed employees account for about 3% of their total workforce [6]. Committed employees are 20% more productive and 87% less likely to leave the organization [7]. In a 2013 report by the Business Monitor Institute, about 90% of Iranian employees rated their organization’s incentive system as ineffective. On the other hand, about 75% of managers feel that their employees lack the necessary commitment and loyalty [8].
According to Gallup’s global study, approximately 13% of employees are completely satisfied with their jobs [9]. The Gallup Institute recently announced that by 2022, employee engagement and workplace belonging will be 21% globally and 15% in the Middle East. In another survey of 20,000 employees, only 36% said they felt positive and energized at work [10]. In another study of 20,000 employees, only 36% said they received positive feelings and energy in their workplace. It is estimated that many workplaces today reinforce the tendency of employees to quit because in today’s workplaces up to 30% of employees suffer from mild to severe anxiety disorders.
Another study by the Gallup Institute found that about 88% of employees tended to do their best, but workplace barriers did not allow it, and 55% of employees said they did not do their best in those workplaces. They should strive only to the extent that they will not be dismissed, and they should fulfill their common duties [11]. These examples are important signals and warnings for managers. They point to rethinking and revision at workplace. Leaders need to know that sticking to and insisting on the current workplace is a mistake and that a better and more accurate solution is to rethink and reshape the workplace based on neuroscience findings. This introduction explains the problem and clarifies the concerns.
2. Literature review
Neuroscience is helping improve leadership behaviors while making it easier for employees and, in turn, for organizations. In the light of contemporary research, the leadership training can be a personal, brain-based approach that helps individuals identify their problems and realize their true potential. While there are still many gaps in how the brain makes us better leaders, clear evidence now shows that the brain is the foundation for building effective leadership [12]. Science is just beginning to study the neurological mechanisms underlying these effects [13]. As I said at the beginning, there are many similar examples. This is evidence of the inefficiencies we see in the workplace.
Leaders need to know that existing workplaces are inefficient and boring. Unfortunately, the workplace plays a significant and undeniable role in altering the brain chemistry of employees within the organization. Thus, the quality of employees’ thoughts, feelings, and behaviors deteriorates. We need to create a new framework for the workplace design. This chapter introduces a brain-friendly workplace that is also highly efficient. Since our brains function under certain conditions, methods can be used to provide brain-compatible functionality. These are called brain-friendly strategies. You can transform your workplace to boost brain function for your employees, managers, and customers, which means the brain consumes less energy and imposes less tension on the brain. Knowing that the workplace alone cannot provide a brain-friendly environment, it must be provided [14]. According to Franklin Becker, a workspace is like body language, and every part of that environment conveys messages to the brains of employees, managers, and customers. When you talk about improving employee performance and satisfaction, the workplace needs to support it too [15]. When it comes to the evolution of organizational man, we adopt Taylor’s economic human theory and witness a new view of man as brain-driven human (Figure 1).
Understanding this change in the concept of organizational humans is resourceful and vital for leaders. Brain-directed man is a new conception of man that considers the brain as the basis of all human thoughts, feelings, wills, and behavior and the basis of all actions and reactions of the individual as the brain interacts with the environment. It is the chemical change in our brain that create our emotions and logic and guide our behavioral function. Simply put, hormones and neurotransmitters are quite effective in shaping our performance. This view may be a reinterpretation of the complex concept of man but with its own logic. This view is for the black box to explain the complexities of human thought, emotion, and behavior. Neuroscience translates and explains the black box of the complexity of human behavior. Neuroscience is giving a renewed and serious interest to the accuracy and depth of analysis of human behavior in personal, professional, and social life [16, 17]. Everything we do is a reflection of our brain. Even man, his death is completely under the control of the biological changes of his body, which underline the same concept of man as directed by the brain [18].
The purpose of the new perspective and knowledge resulting from the combination of management and neuroscience is to examine human reality to enhance managers’ perception of themselves and their employees [19]. The brain is one of the organs that fully involved in our temperament, character, consciousness, and every decision. The brain tells us to be cautious or reckless, to try or be indifferent, and considerate [20]. Neuroscience helps us gain valuable insights that are considered unknown and unanalyzable in the dark basements of behavioral science [21].
A brain-friendly workplace seeks to create satisfaction in HR and to create satisfaction within them. An important and guiding fact from neuroscience is that anything that is good for the brain is good for business [22], and this is good news for organizational leaders. The brain-friendly approach is a scientific and practical approach that provides the best working conditions for brain functioning in an organization. It seeks to provide things like convenience, happiness, and many other rewards from the employee’s brain’s point of view. The condition in which brain energy is consumed the least. Diligence and hard work are kept to a minimum degree. Leaders are advised to improve employee decisions and actions by establishing brain-friendly approaches in their organizations [23]. A brain-friendly workplace that strives to provide a maximum reward experience for the brains of employees, managers, and even customers or consumers, and the conditions under which they experience maximum and minimal threat to create inner satisfaction. Remember that for the brain, rewards and threats may be different from our previous perceptions. The brain needs very subtle stimuli to function properly. Brain-friendly workplaces seek to provide processes to provide a positive emotional experience during the workday for employees so that their brain awareness is one of the maximum rewards and minimum threats. We want to tell organizational leaders that a brain-friendly workplace is where employees’ brains are more rewarded and less threatened (Figure 2).
The whole point of organizational neuroscience (ON) is that the workplace should be designed to provide the maximum reward experience from the brain’s point of view for employees and managers and even customers or clients during the business day to further govern the trend-based approach to thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, and this is an important point that leaders need to keep in mind. Because it will make the workplace more satisfying and attractive. The biased approach in the brain is influenced by the release of hormones and neurotransmitters including serotonin, oxytocin, dopamine, and endorphins, and the avoidance approach in the brain is influenced by the hormones cortisol and even adrenaline or epinephrine, as well as sometimes testosterone. For example, an increase in testosterone is inversely associated with development of the prefrontal cortex (PFC). The PFC is one of the brain’s upstream systems. This lobe prevents immediate, impulsive, and even hostile actions. Cortisol plays an important role in the amygdala hyperactivity in our brain. The amygdala is one of the downstream systems in the brain that increase our anxious and negligent behaviors. HR brain chemicals, although highly impactful, can be influenced by changes in behavioral and structural conditions in the environment. This golden tip is the window into designing a brain-friendly workplace. ON helps leaders look at the factors that drive employee behavior and performance from a new angle.
3. Methodology
Methodology can determine how an idea and a theory form for us. To present a new point of view and theory, it is necessary to look at this Suddody matrix to see from what angle we are discussing (Table 1).
Theorizing within one literature | Theorizing across multiple bodies of literature | |
---|---|---|
Theorizing with implicit assumptions of the literature |
|
|
Theorizing with explicit constructs of the literature |
|
|
The lower right quadrant of Table 1 characterizes a theoretical approach that focuses on clear structures and incorporates some literary content. Oswick and colleagues suggest that mixing explicit structures from multiple knowledge domains can produce creative output, depending on the characteristics of the input domains. The higher the similarity between the input domains, the less likely the resulting theory is to be considered entirely new. In the model presented in this chapter, neuroscience was used to combine leadership topics and workplace design to make organizational leadership more effective. For theorizing, a new method of implication study has been used, and the steps of this method are presented in this methodology section. Oswick, Fleming and Hanlon make this observation most clearly, convincingly demonstrating that most (i.e., roughly two-thirds) of the research conducted in management is rooted in theories borrowed from other disciplines [25]. This research also seeks to combine the topics of leadership and workplace with neuroscience. This research is strategic, qualitative, and method-based participatory discovery study. The two contributions of brain structure and chemistry are considered to be the source for calculating the effects of neuroscience on workplace design.
Sampling and validity are also theoretically cited and reliable with valid sources and implications. In this study, the concept of a brain-friendly workplace is first defined and finally will be explained. Implied research is one of the popular strategies for adapting and borrowing knowledge from one field to extend knowledge in another. This approach introduces a new methodology and we can use the findings of one science in another. However, borrowing the sciences from each other was used and led to the creation of interdisciplinary. In fact, much of human progress is due to studies of this implication. In this study, the researcher extracts important implications that are consistent with the underlying theoretical framework.
In this study, the researcher extracts important implications that are consistent with the underlying theoretical framework. In this study, we identified and calculated significant implications in two areas of brain chemistry and brain structure to demonstrate the dimensions of the theoretical framework. The steps to conducting the research based on the implied research method are as follows:
Feasibility of the implied research method for the research topic based on the opinion of the researcher.
Introduce the contributions that brain chemistry and structure will make to this research.
Identify the basic conceptual framework.
Perform theoretical sampling to identify signs.
Validate and match meanings with conceptual frameworks.
Confirm the main and final implications.
Explain the conceptual model obtained [26].
4. Discussion of brain-friendly workplace
A golden tip for leaders to learn is that consider a brain plate that the brain can access during the day to optimize its performance. This study was carried out using the implication research method. Underground research is one of the popular strategies for adapting and borrowing knowledge from one discipline to refine and extend knowledge from another. The two contributions of brain chemistry and brain structure are considered to be the source for calculating the effects of neuroscience on workplace design. In fact, much of human progress owes much to this search for participation. In this approach, the researcher develops a basic conceptual framework in his or her science before borrowing contributions and other scientific implications. For each component of the conceptual framework, it computes the implication. Thus, the researcher derives a meaningful implication that matches the elements of the theoretical framework (Figure 3).
A plate for healthy brain human resources can be considered as the processes and conditions for forming a brain-friendly working environment as follows:
Provide conditions for effective communication in the workplace
Provide conditions for happiness and mobility in the workplace
Provide conditions for ability by self-awareness in the workplace
Provide conditions for respect in the workplace
Provide conditions for purposefulness and focus in the workplace
Provide conditions for security and relaxation in the workplace
Provide conditions for enough sleep and rest in the workplace
These seven factors can be considered as components of the theoretical framework and are known to be the source for finding implications. In this study, the contribution of neuroscience in the two areas of brain chemistry and brain structure was considered. Two main questions can be asked (Table 2):
what does neuroscience say about the subject of workplace?
What are the implications for designing or revising workplace?
Dimension 1 of theoretical framework | Neuroscience implications that confirm effective communication as a brain-friendly process in the workplace |
---|---|
Provide conditions for effective communication in the workplace (C) |
|
Based on current implications and evidence, it seems likely that providing the conditions and context for effective workplace communication and interaction as a brain-friendly process can be accepted. Therefore, it is an important task for leaders to establish effective communication and interaction in the workplace, as the findings of neuroscience see it as a reward for employees’ brains. By providing the right conditions for employee interactions, neuro leaders can truly claim that they have provided a brain-friendly workplace (Table 3).
Dimension 1 of theoretical framework | Components | Neuroscience implications for identifying brain-friendly components related to effective communication |
---|---|---|
Provide conditions for the effective communication in the workplace | Coaching-based relations | |
Emotionalizing work relationships |
| |
Familiarity and acquaintance |
|
Current evidence and existing findings suggest that coaching-based interactions create relationship emotionalization and provide familiarity in relationships as brain-friendly components in brain-friendly work relationships. Studies have revealed the significance of familiarity and we now know that leaders who profusely used social language in their vision and mission statements are more likely to have greater coherence in the right frontal part (PFC) of the brain than leaders with more self-language [12]. We have learned that effective work interactions and connections are rewarding for the HR brain. Leaders are encouraged to take seriously the impact of some behaviors and preparations that create the conditions for effective workplace communication on institutionalizing brain-friendly interactions.
Improve communication skills, effective listening, and empathy to increase oxytocin and estrogen
Have intimate two-person meetings over hot drinks during work hours to increase oxytocin
Use our pronouns instead of self-pronouns in business conversations, especially to increase oxytocin and cortisol or modify tissues to lower testosterone
to increase the hormone serotonin and reduce cortisol, respectfully demanding and even asking questions
Having a good coffee shop for short intimate meetings, off-duty hours, and during work to increase the oxytocin hormone
New organizational changes and decisions in the form of small changes to reduce cortisol in addition to previous decisions
In the image below you can see the relationship between the type of hormone and the activity state of the brain system. Some hormones and neurotransmitters cause more activity in the lower and posterior systems of the brain, and some other hormones cause more activity in the upper and front systems of the brain (Figure 4).
Analyzing the dimensions and components identified, it is important to know that anything that provides maximal activity of the upstream and cortical systems of the brain is considered brain-friendly (Table 4).
Dimension 2 of theoretical framework | Neuroscience implications that confirm happiness and mobility as a brain-friendly process in the workplace |
---|---|
Provide conditions for happiness and mobility in the workplace (H) |
|
From the current implications and evidence, it appears that providing conditions and a platform for happiness and mobility in the workplace as a brain-friendly process can be accepted and approved. Maybe before, organizational leaders did not consider happiness in the workplace to be so important, but neuroscience has shown that it is a pleasant reward for the brain, and it has a great effect on improving work performance. Happiness is one of the vital elements for the optimal functioning of the brain, so it will be considered one of the vital elements of brain-friendly workplaces. Creating a happy workplace is one of the characteristics of a neuroleader. A neuroleader is a leader who uses neuroscience as a benchmark to have a deeper and more accurate impact on employees (Table 5).
Dimension 2 | Components | Neuroscience implications for identifying brain-friendly components related to happiness and mobility |
---|---|---|
Provide conditions for happiness and mobility in the workplace | Provide sport conditions | |
Encourage laughter |
| |
Psychological moments (PM) | ||
Physical freshness |
|
The happiness and mobility of HR, as neuroscience implications have shown, are a reward for the human resource brain. A neuroleader understands the positive effects of happiness in the workplace so he tries to create it. Acts and actions and preparations that provide the conditions for happiness and mobility in the workplace are:
Enabling employees to exercise to increase endorphins and oxytocin and reduce cortisol
Promote humor and laughter as an organizational value to increase oxytocin and decrease cortisol
Review successes and happy memories to motivate colleagues to increase serotonin, dopamine, and oxytocin and decrease cortisol and even testosterone
Create a happy and positive surprise to increase the hormone dopamine
Efforts to create order and beautiful decoration of the workplace to increase serotonin hormone
Using appropriate colors in the environment, such as pink, tends to interact and reduce aggressive behavior in order to increase the hormones oxytocin and dopamine and decrease cortisol and testosterone (Table 6).
Dimension 3 | Neuroscience implications that confirm ability by self-awareness as a brain-friendly process in the workplace |
---|---|
Provide conditions for ability by self-awareness in the workplace (A) |
In a simple and superficial view, it may be thought that these implications are not for organizational issues, but the rewards of the brain are the same for all of us, and this inspiration and borrowing from neuroscience can be the basis of a new approach in leadership. Evidence and current evidence suggest that providing empowerment for self-awareness in the workplace as a brain-friendly process can be acceptable. Organizational leaders should know that the best kind of awareness is self-awareness, so they should try to make their employees self-aware in the workplace (Table 7).
Dimension 3 of theoretical framework | Components | Neuroscience implications for identifying brain-friendly components related to ability by self-awareness |
---|---|---|
Provide conditions for Ability by self-awareness in the workplace | Emotional memory | |
Work flow | ||
Independence | ||
Innovation and learning |
The implications, current evidence, and available findings suggest that providing conditions and contexts in the workplace for the emotionalization of memory, flow, independence, and learning are acceptable components of the workplace and activities within the workplace ability by self-awareness process. Any reflection, contemplation, and thinking on oneself or on different topics can cause the creation of new neural circuits in the brains of employees. Self-awareness and HR empowerment are considered a reward for their brains. Suggestion to organizational leaders and activities that provide the conditions to facilitate self-awareness and empowerment in the workplace are:
Utilizing coaching capabilities for self-awareness and internalizing motivation to increase serotonin and decrease cortisol
Identifying the values of employees and linking their values with their job responsibilities in order to increase the hormone serotonin
Holding friendly and informal job sessions to learn to increase dopamine and oxytocin
Voluntary and non-compulsory classes to increase dopamine and oxytocin and reduce cortisol and testosterone
Clarification of career path by observing the inner desire to work in order to increase the hormone serotonin or dopamine
Allowing employees to choose the time and amount of time allotted to tasks to increase serotonin and lower cortisol
Make organizational learning gradual and step-by-step to reduce cortisol
Respect is a vital and inseparable part of inner satisfaction. In a work environment where the priority is to respect the employees, in that work environment, the brain function of the employees can be much better and the organizational efficiency can be improved. So that both the employees reach inner satisfaction and the organization achieves efficiency. It has been proven that if we talk to people with behavioral abnormalities with respect, they will behave more reasonably and so, we should have respectful words and behavior with the employees so that their brains feel rewarded (Table 8).
Dimension 4 | Neuroscience implications that confirm respect as a brain-friendly process in the workplace |
---|---|
Provide conditions for respect in the workplace (R) |
|
Current implications and evidence suggest that providing a platform for respect and reverence in the workplace as a brain-friendly process can be accepted and endorsed. Respect has always been important, but leaders now know why and how to increase it. They learned the consequences of disrespect on the brains of employees therefore, conditions for increasing respect for employees should be provided (Table 9).
Dimension 4 | Components | Neuroscience implications for identifying brain-friendly components related to respect |
---|---|---|
Provide conditions for respect in the workplace | Gratitude | |
Compassion and empathy |
| |
Forgiveness |
| |
Respect for gender differences |
|
As an important point, we must mention that a neuroleader empathizes with his employees, not with sympathy. Because sympathy aggravates their pain and problems, sympathy strengthens the ability and self-confidence of employees. The neurological reason is that empathy causes the release of serotonin and sympathy causes the release of cortisol. From the implications, current evidence, and findings, it appears that providing conditions in the workplace to appreciate the efforts and actions, compassion and empathy for each other, forgiveness and sacrifice of colleagues toward each other, gender differences in delegating authority can be used as components are brain-friendly. These activities should be considered as part of the process of respect in the workplace. Suggestions to organizational leaders and activities that provide the conditions to facilitate respect in the workplace are:
To increase the serotonin hormone of the employees, the leaders among the colleagues should thank the employees.
To reduce harmful cortisol and testosterone hormones, do not criticize the employee among colleagues.
Congratulating colleagues’ successes, however small, to increase serotonin.
Kind and compassionate words and behavior with colleagues increase the hormone oxytocin and decrease testosterone and cortisol.
Finding out about the dreams and aspirations of colleagues in order to increase the hormone oxytocin.
Encouraging sacrificing behaviors in the organization to increase the hormone oxytocin (Table 10).
Dimension 5 | Neuroscience implications that confirm purposefulness and focus as a brain-friendly process in the workplace |
---|---|
Provide conditions for purposefulness and focus in the workplace (P) |
|
Having a purpose at work helps to build a sense of purpose in employees. The feeling of dignity and satisfaction among employees is increasing day by day. Concentration is important for creating purpose. From the meanings and evidence in the table above, it can be seen that providing the conditions and context to create purpose and focus for personnel in the workplace as a process of the brain-friendly paradigm sets can be accepted and verified. With these discoveries, wise leaders know they must provide the conditions and platforms to increase workplace focus and employee engagement like never before (Table 11).
Dimension 5 | Components | Neuroscience implications for identifying brain-friendly components related to purposefulness and focus |
---|---|---|
Provide conditions for purposefulness and focus in the workplace | Meaning and hope |
|
Mindfulness | ||
Lack of Multitasking |
| |
The physical environment |
|
From the implications, current evidence, and available findings, it seems that providing conditions and contexts in the workplace for meaning and hope, mindfulness, lack of multitasking, and appropriateness of workplace conditions as acceptable components and activities within the process of purposefulness and focus can be accepted and approved. Suggestion to organizational leaders, activities that provide the conditions to facilitate purposefulness and focus for HR in the workplace are:
Translating the organizational mission to the job duties of employees in order to understand the impact of their role to reduce cortisol hormone and increase serotonin
To increase focus, not allowing the use of mobile phones in business meetings
Not using partitions in the workplace as focus killers to reduce cortisol
Using the scents of live flowers in the corridors of the work environment to increase the hormone oxytocin
Using proper lighting for work rooms to increase serotonin hormone
Reviewing positive memories of the organization to create hope and increase the hormone serotonin and also dopamine (Table 12)
Dimension 6 | Neuroscience implications that confirm security and relaxation as a brain-friendly process in the workplace |
---|---|
Provide conditions for security and relaxation in the workplace (S) |
|
Based on the implications and current evidence, it seems acceptable to provide the conditions and context for safety and relaxation in the workplace as a brain-friendly process. Table 13 shows the components of the safety and relaxation in the workplace. Therefore, leaders should know that providing a quiet and safe environment can be a good brain reward for their employees.
Dimension 6 | Components | Neuroscience implications for identifying brain-friendly components related to security and relaxation |
---|---|---|
Provide conditions for security and relaxation in the workplace | Similarity | |
Simplicity |
| |
Support |
| |
Clarity |
| |
Certainty |
The implications, current evidence, and available findings suggest that providing conditions and contexts in the workplace to increase similarity, simplicity, support, transparency, and certainty as brain-friendly components and activities within the security and relaxation process are acceptable. It can only be said about the importance of similarity, results showed that in 80 percent of the 43 elections since 1901, the candidates who used the most collective-oriented language (we-or us-referencing) in their official election speech were the victors. Research findings showed that leaders’ words are inspiring when they convey a sense of commonality and us. gives some neuroscientific substance to claims that it is only when in-group leaders speak for “us” that followers embrace their pronouncements enthusiastically [13]. Accordingly, suggestion to organizational leaders, activities that provide the conditions to facilitate security and relaxation for HR in the workplace are:
Understand and assign labor to simplify work tasks to reduce cortisol
Implement SMART techniques in career and organizational goals to reduce cortisol
Promote empathy as an organizational value to increase oxytocin hormone and decrease cortisol
Know your subordinates’ personal and professional problems to increase endorphins and oxytocin hormones and reduce cortisol
Interact fairly with subordinates to increase serotonin and oxytocin and reduce cortisol
Use honesty in words and behavior to increase serotonin and oxytocin hormones and reduce cortisol
Organizational change plans should be represented by narratives and stories to increase the hormone oxytocin and decrease cortisol (Table 14).
Dimension 7 | Neuroscience implications that confirm enough sleep and rest as a brain-friendly process in the workplace |
---|---|
Provide conditions for enough sleep and rest in the workplace (S) |
|
Current implications and evidence suggest that providing conditions and contexts to improve the adequate sleep and rest in the workplace as a brain-friendly process can be accepted and approved. With these experimental and important findings, it is necessary for organizational leaders to pay special attention to the quality of sleep and rest of their subordinates (Table 15).
Dimension 7 | Components | Neuroscience implications for identifying brain-friendly components related to have enough sleep and rest |
---|---|---|
Provide conditions for enough sleep and rest in the workplace | Minimize shift work |
|
Compensate for staff’s insomnia on the night shift | ||
Prepare short rest packages |
Sleep is also an active state that is important for cognitive processes such as memory consolidation, semantic integration, learning, and emotional processing. Sleep is also important for the body, and evidence suggests it may be even more important for the brain. A study of working hours, sleep, and depression of 2643 full-time employed Japanese citizens found that participants worked more than 10 hours a day, slept less than 6 hours a day, and reported inadequate sleep 37 and 43, respectively, and also 97% were more likely to be depressed than those who worked 6–8 hours a day, slept 6–8 hours a day, and reported getting enough sleep. The study concluded that depression associated with long work hours is primarily a result of sleep deprivation [93]. The implications, current evidence, and available findings suggest that providing workplace conditions to minimize shift work, compensating for sleep deprivation in shift staff, and ultimately providing short restpackages during work are components of sleep and rest and having enough activities. As suggested to organizational leadership, the activities that provide the necessary conditions to facilitate adequate sleep and rest for personnel in the workplace are:
Planning to reduce night shifts of employees to increase serotonin hormone and reduce cortisol
Using enough light in the workplace for night shifts and increasing serotonin hormone
Providing rest time to compensate for insomnia
Allocating a resting place for female employees and reducing the complications of premenstrual syndrome. This means reducing cortisol and improving serotonin status
Allow employees to set aside time for “doing nothing.”
5. Conclusion
The findings and statements in this chapter help leaders execute their strategy more effectively in creating motivation. This model presented a valuable opportunity. A smart organizational leader knows when the current workplace is dysfunctional. This leader should find a way to design a new environment that is more appropriate. Due to the downward trend in job satisfaction, employee engagement, and motivation in different organizations, the need to renovate the current workplace is inevitable. Today, neuroscience offers more precise definitions and explanations of human beings, so many different sciences use the findings of neuroscience to have greater effect, and management knowledge is linked to neuroscience in the form of organizational neuroscience. Based on the brain-driven human, brain-friendly workplace theory suggest that workplace implementations bring pleasurable experiences for employees’ brains, ultimately introducing favorable processes and activities into employees’ thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. This research is first about cognition and finally considers the conceptual extension of the brain-friendly workplace. This is an important message for leaders. Based on the theoretical framework and implications, seven processes and dimensions were counted: Communication, happiness, and mobility, ability by self-awareness, respect, purposefulness and focus, security and relaxation, and sleep and rest. In addition, multiple ingredients are blended for each process, and a total of 27 types of brain-friendly ingredients are blended. This brain-friendly workplace model was called CHARPSS. The quality of employees’ thoughts, feelings, and actions is due to brain activity. Therefore, by introducing measures and actions to implement the components of the CHARPSS model, we can create a brain-friendly environment in the HR workplace. The CHARPSS model is able to maximize the satisfaction and rewards that an employee’s brain receives from the workplace, while also minimizing frustration and brain threats (Figure 5).
This model, derived from the effects of neuroscience on the two contributions of brain chemistry and brain structure, can provide leaders with new insights so they can provide additional motivation and job satisfaction. To create a mind-friendly workplace, a leader must make a list of what to add to the current workplace and a list of what to remove from the current workplace. Most of these changes including changes of values, beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors toward employees must happen within the leader himself. CHARPSS model can create very positive changes in brain chemistry and neural circuits of employees. In our brain, there are neurons called mirror neurons. These neurons are activated when we do something or when we observe or imagine the same thing. These neurons cause emotional transmission and the good feeling of the employees from the workplace, of the brain, will spread to the customers and clients and will have positive effects even in their families.
References
- 1.
Friedman R. The Best Place to Work. Publisher of Perigee; 2015 - 2.
Tracy B. Full Engagement: Inspire, Motivate and Bring Out the Best in Your People. Publisher of American Management Association; 2011 - 3.
Li L. 17 Surprising Statistics about Employee R. TINYpulse blog; 2020 - 4.
Mobbs D, Mcfarland W. The neuroscience of motivation. NeuroLeadership Journal. 2010; 3 - 5.
Pink D. Published in the Carol Stanford. 2010 - 6.
Fazli M, Amiran H. The Future and Position of HRM in Iran. Publisher of Amiran; 2011 - 7.
Valier K, Key HR. Metrics: Measure & leverage employee satisfaction. 2021 - 8.
Porath C. Creating a More Human Workplace Where Employees and Business Thrive. SHRM Fundation; 2016 - 9.
Ferreia F, Dacasta R, Pereira.L & Jeroimo. C. The relationship between chemical of stress, leadership, motivation and organizational trust. Journal of International Business and Economics. 2018; 6 (2) - 10.
Twyla D. How to Motivate People. Publisher of Kogan; 1989 - 11.
Montgomery C. Your level of generosity is related to the street you are walking on. Interpreter of Humanities Quarterly. 2018; 8 - 12.
Joy M. The Neurosience oF Leadership. Pallikkutam; 2018 - 13.
Molenberghs P, Prochilo G, Steffens N, Zacher H, Haslam S. The neuroscience of inspirational leadership: The importance of collective-oriented language and shared group membership. Journal of Management. 2017; 43 (7) - 14.
Zwaan L, Viljoen R. The role of Neuroleadership in work engagement. Journal of Human Resource Management. 2019 - 15.
Mundlein K, Zwart T. Business and the Brain. Lund University; 2013 - 16.
Ghadiri A, Habermacher A, Peters T. Neuroleadership: A Journey through the Brain for Business Leaders. Springer-Verlag Publishing; 2012 - 17.
Ahmadi K. The basics of Neuroleadership. Publisher of Termeh; 2016 - 18.
Amodio D. The social neuroscience of intergroup relations. European Review of Social Psyhology. 2008 - 19.
Karim A, Farid.M & Rafiq.S. NeuroManagement: Key to maintaining performance literature review. The lnternatioal Journal of Business Management and Technology. 2019 - 20.
Amen D. Use Your Brain to Change Your Age: Secrets to look, Feel and Think Younger Every Day. Publisher of Harmony; 2012 - 21.
Meacham M. Neuroscience IN corporate training: All hype or practical applications? Journal of L&D Talks. 2011 - 22.
Lanz K. How to build a brain-friendly work environment after COVID-19. 2020 - 23.
Affinwala S, Bandy O, Chugh A. How neuroscience transformed business. NHRD Network Journal. 2018; 2018 :4 - 24.
Ahmadi K. Organizational Neuroscience (ON). Publisher of Termeh; 2020 - 25.
Suddody R, Hardy C, Huy Q. Introduction to special topic forum where are the new theories of organization? 2011; 36 (2) - 26.
Danaeefard H. Methodology of implication studies in social and human sciences. Methodology of Human Sciences. 2016; 36 - 27.
Chirico F. Job stress models for burnout syndrome. Journal of Health and social sciences. 2016; 52 (3) - 28.
Jaaskelainen I. Introduction to cognitive neuroscience. 2014 - 29.
Lehmann S. The Science of Happiness. Published by Da Capo Press; 2006 - 30.
Zak P. The neuroscience of high trust organization consulting. Psychological Journal. 2018; 70 (1) - 31.
Ghosh SK. Happy hormones at work. NHRD Network Journal. 2018; 11 (4) - 32.
Swart T, Chisholm K, Brown P. Neuroscience for Leadership. Pub Palgrave Macmillan; 2015 - 33.
Leikomaa T. Coaching as a Tool for Performance Management. Tampere University; 2016 - 34.
Horne T, Wootton S. Training Your Brain. Hodder Education Group; 2007 - 35.
Madigan S. Narrative therapy. American Psychological Association; 2011 - 36.
Crawford J. The Brain-friendly Organization. Cascasdan; 2011 - 37.
Dispenza J. You Are the Placebo. Hay House Inc; 2014 - 38.
MacDonald M. Your Brain. O Reily Media Inc; 2008 - 39.
Garmes E. Big brain friendly workplace ideas for human resource executives. HREC. 2015 - 40.
Chopra D, Tanzi R. Super Brain. Publisher of Harmony; 2013 - 41.
PRISM. Coaching and neuroscience: The way ahead. 2018 - 42.
Dethmer J, Chapman D, Klemp K. T he 15 Commitments of Conscious Leadership: A New Paradigm for Sustainable Success. Chicago, IL: Conscious Leadership Group; 2014 - 43.
Hughes D, Baylin J. Brain – Based Parenting. W. W. Norton & Company; 2012 - 44.
Murphy C, Ozturgut O. Brain–wise leadership. Journal of International Education and Leadership. 2013 - 45.
Leviton R. Brain Builders: A Life Long Guide to Sharper Thinking. Prentice Hall; 1995 - 46.
Irimia A, Robles D, Rostowsky K, Maher A, Chowdhury M. Amazon indigenous group's lifestyle may hold a key to slowing down aging. Journals of Gerontology. 2021; 2021 :glab138 - 47.
Bnadkoki M. Ways to Increase Happiness Hormones: Dopamine, Serotonin, Oxytocin and Endorphins. Profitable Business Site; 2016 - 48.
Sophie M. Peace in the Workplace. Shamdoni; 2017 - 49.
Ahola S, Doston C. Psychological momentum. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016 - 50.
Leon Z. Neuromarketing: Exploring the Brain of Consumer. Springer; 2010 - 51.
Shams AH. Environmental Psychology. Samt; 2014 - 52.
Boghosian AJ. Rewire Your Brain: Think Your Way to a Better Life. John Wiley & Sons; 2009 - 53.
Ratey J. A User Guide to the Brain: Perception, Attention and four Theaters of the Brain. Vintage; 2002 - 54.
Pageup,People. The Neuroscience of Learning & Development. Pageup People; 2011 - 55.
Small G. The Memory Bible: An Innovative Strategy FOR Keeping your Brain Young, Hyperion. 2002 - 56.
Jansen E. Brain and Education, roshd. 2017 - 57.
Cheruvu R. The Neuroscience of Learning: An Introduction to Mind, Brain, Health and Education. Havard University; 2018 - 58.
Rippon G. The Gendered Brain. Pantheon; 2019 - 59.
Breuning LG. Habits of a Happy Brain. Publisher of Adams Media; 2015 - 60.
Danny R. Motivate to Win. Kogan Page; 2009 - 61.
Ruyle K. Neuroscience in Performance Management, Inventive Talent Consulting. 2015 - 62.
Decety J, Bartal I, Uzefovsky D. Empathy as a Driver Prosaically Behavior: Highly Conserved Neurobehavioral Mechanisms across Species. The Royal Society Publishing; 2015 - 63.
Deblauwe T. Awareness of employee stress response NHRD. Network Journal. 2018 - 64.
Locas.Marsha. Rewire your Brain for Love. Publisher of Hay House Inc; 2012 - 65.
Tylor B. My Stroke of Insight. Bloomington Inc; 2006 - 66.
Brizendine L. Woman Brain. Roshd; 2016 - 67.
Lombard J. The Mind of God: Neuroscience, Faith and a Search for the Soul. Harmony; 2018 - 68.
Hicks E. The Astonishing Power of Emotions. Hay House; 2008 - 69.
Church D. Mind to Matter: The Astonishing Science of How your Brain Material Reality. Publisher Hay House Inc; 2018 - 70.
Miendlarzewska E, Kometer M, Preuschoff N. Neurofinance. Journal of Organizational Research Methods. 2019 - 71.
Ariely D. Payoff the Hidden Logic That Shapes our Motivations. Simon & Schuster; 2017 - 72.
Waldman D, Berka C & Stikic M. Neuroscience and Team Processes, Organizational Neuroscience; 2015. 15 - 73.
Nori A. Neurological Foundations and Principles of Learning and Education. Samt; 2014 - 74.
Edrisi M. Heatwaves Dan’t Just Give You Sun Burn They Can Harm Your Mental Health Too. Science beta; 2020 - 75.
Kiran C, Tripathi P. Leadership development through change management. A Neuroscience Prospective. 2020 - 76.
Pitman C, Karle E. Rewire your anxious brain. New Harbinger Publications. 2015 - 77.
Elliott V, Horrigan K. Neuroscience: The brains behind behavior based safety. In: Proceedings 19 Triennial Congress of the IEA. Melbourn; 2015 - 78.
Bagozzi R, Lee N. Philosophical Foundation of Neuroscience in organizational Reaserch. Journal of Organizational Reaserch Methods. 2019 - 79.
Murphy C, Ozturgut O. Brain–wise leadership. Journal of International Education and Leadership. 2013 - 80.
Cheruvu R. The Neuroscience of Learning: An Introduction to Mind, Brain, Health and Education,Submission The Neuroscience of Flow. Havard University Extention School Handbook; 2018 - 81.
Synaptic, potential. Harnessing a brain friendly style of communication. 2015 - 82.
Hughes D, Baylin J. Brain – Based Parenting. W. W.W. Norton & Company; 2012 - 83.
Swart T. The role of organizational NeuroScience in human resources. 2019 - 84.
Ashkanasy N, Becker WJ, Waldman DA. Neuroscience and organizational behavior: Avoiding both neuro-Euphoria and neuro-phobia. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2014; 35 (7) - 85.
Beugre D. Exploring the neural basis of fairness: A model of neuro- organizational justice. Journal of organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proccess. 2009; 110 - 86.
Lieberman D. The Molecule of More: How a Single Molecule in Your Brain Drive Love. Ben Bella Books; 2018 - 87.
Blum F. Opportunities in Neuroscience for Future Army Applications. National Research Council; 2009 - 88.
Rampton J. The faster your brain moves, the more rest you need. Economic World Newspaper. 2017; 2017 :4118 - 89.
Doidge N. The Brain that Change Itself. Penguin; 2007 - 90.
Dispenza J. You Are the Placebo. Hay House Inc; 2014 - 91.
Schaufenbuel K. The neuroscience of leadership: Practical Applications. UNC Executive Development; 2014 - 92.
Alloway T, Parker T. Traning Your Brain for Dummies. Publisher of For Dummies; 2011 - 93.
Rock D, Siegel D, Poelmans S, Payne J. The healthy mind platter. NeuroLeadership Journal. 2015; 5