Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Solid-State Synthesis of Organoclays: Physicochemical Properties and Application for Bisphenol A Removal from Aqueous Solutions

Written By

Issaka Garikoé and Boubié Guel

Submitted: 08 June 2022 Reviewed: 30 August 2022 Published: 20 October 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.107503

From the Edited Volume

Nanoclay - Recent Advances, New Perspectives and Applications

Edited by Walid Oueslati

Chapter metrics overview

79 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The solid-state intercalation of organoclays, by using surfactants bromide salts (n-C12H25(CH3)3NBr, n-C14H29(CH3)3NBr, n-C16H33(CH3)3NBr and n-C12H25)2(CH3)2NBr) at different levels of the cation exchange capacity (CEC), was reported. According to XRPD data, the basal spacing of the smectite phase unit cell increased systematically up to >38 Å at 2.0-CEC of surfactants loading, indicating that they entered into the smectite interlayers and were arranged parallel to the layers at low concentrations and nearly vertical at high ones. Organoclays FTIR spectra showed a drop in the water band intensities at around 1630 and 3400 cm−1, and new specific bands close to 2920 and 2850 cm−1 were assigned to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching of the surfactants CH2 groups, respectively. Various factors, impacting bisphenol A (BPA) removal from water, were estimated in batch studies. It is shown that both physisorption and chemisorption describe the BPA sorption, and the pseudo-second-order kinetics and Langmuir isotherm fit better the BPA sorption results. The adsorption capacities of the organoclays are ranged from 88 to 127 mg/g at ambient temperature and in acidic solution. The effect of pH on the adsorption showed a remarkable drop in the quantity of adsorbed BPA when the pH is greater than 10 (pH ≥ 10).

Keywords

  • organosmectites
  • surfactant
  • bisphenol A
  • adsorption
  • batch studies

1. Introduction

Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are chemical pollutants that can affect the endocrine (hormonal) system and intrude on important developmental processes in humans and wildlife (World Health Organization, 1996). EDCs include natural estrogens (estrone: E1, 17β-estradiol: E2, estriol: E3), synthesized estrogen (ethinylestradiol: EE2), and artificial composites (bisphenol A: BPA, polychlorinated biphenyls: PCBs, polybrominated biphenyls: PBBs, and dioxins). EDCs are dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) from pesticides and vinclozolin from fungicides [1, 2]. Among these chemicals that are cited, BPA is produced in high volumes than the other ones and it can be found worldwide. Centers for Disease Control reported that BPA is present in the urine of 92.6% of over 2500 Americans [3, 4] and this indicates a general exposure to this chemical. Stockholm Convention has regulated the manufacturing and the utilization of DDT, PCBs, PBBs, and dioxins (Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, 2009), and this agreement limited the exposition to these composites compared to BPA which is not regulated in all countries. A lot of studies reported that there was arising substantiation for adverse reproductive issues (fruitfulness, cancers, deformations) from exposure to EDCs, and there was also mounting substantiation of these chemicals on thyroid function, brain function, obesity and metabolism, and insulin and glucose homeostasis (Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, 2009). Former studies reported the presence of BPA in wastewater, surface and ground waters, and indeed drinking water [5]. This urged major enterprises over endocrine-disrupting chemicals by scientists in recent years. The pollution of the environment by these chemicals is mainly via industrial activities [5]. Predominantly, it’s used in the manufacturing of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins [6]. Also, dental securities, foods and potable barrels, polycarbonate tubes, cleansers, care products, etc., are listed as exposition sources (World Health Organization 1996). The United States Environmental Protection Agency has defined a daily dose of 50 mg of BPA/kg of body weight/day for BPA [6]. Although there is no database on BPA pollution in an aqueous environment in Burkina Faso, its presence could be supposed in wastewater, surface, and ground waters, due to numerous original factories and diligence whose products clearly lead to a general exposition of the population to BPA. The absence of legislation in many countries makes it urgent to develop simple and effective methods for BPA remediation in aqueous matrixes. Numerous procedures including adsorption, chemical advanced oxidation, membrane filtration, and electrochemical mineralization were utilized for BPA removal from water [2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Among the listed procedures, adsorption seems to be appropriate due to its high effectiveness, ease of implementation, and low cost of the process due to the usefulness of various adsorbents. Numerous adsorbents including organo-montmorillonites [7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15], inorganic-organoclays [16], surfactant modified vermiculites [17], surfactant modified sepiolite [18], surfactant modified palygorskite [19], polymer based on kaolinite [20], chitosan [21], surfactant modified zeolite [2, 22, 23], graphene [9], etc., have been used for BPA removal from water.

Clay modification is widely done in aqueous solution via cation exchange or solid-state reactions. Organic molecules are inserted in dried clay interlayers by solid-state responses without washing with solvent and this makes the synthesis environmentally friendly and more favorable for industrialization [24]. Generally, the publication in this topic reported the organoclays synthesis using various procedures and chemicals, numerous type of clays, and diverse surfactants as reviewed elsewhere [24]. To obtain organoclays with hydrophobic properties, quaternary alkylammonium salts are the most frequently used, but n-alkyl-pyrrolidones, maleic anhydride, biomolecules, polymeric quaternary alkylammonium, alkyl-imidazolium, and phosphonium salts are also employed to the accomplishment of this outcome [24]. The field of application of organoclays is very large and this includes nanocomposites, adsorbents of organic and inorganic pollutants in soil, water, air, etc. [8, 24, 25]. Clays and organically modified clays are considerably employed in adsorption processes for the removal of organic pollutants due to their low cost and environmental friendly [3, 7, 8, 10, 21, 26]. Smectites are generally utilized due to their high cation exchange capacity (CEC), swelling aptitude, and high specific surface areas leading to high adsorption/absorption capacities [3, 7, 8, 10]. From the literature, it is known that organoclays employed for BPA removal from water are synthesized by liquid-state insertion of surfactants into the clay layers [16, 21, 26]. In the present investigations, the organoclays utilized to study the BPA sorption from water have been synthesized via a solid-state insertion methodology. The synthesis occurs via solid-state intercalation reaction by using two natural local clays (denoted AH and DI) and four cationic surfactants (dodecyl trimethylammonium, n-C12H25(CH3)3N+ denoted C12; tetradecyltrimethyl-ammonium, n-C14H29(CH3)3N+ denoted C14; hexadecyltrimethylammonium, n-C16H33(CH3)3N+ denoted C16 and didodecyldimethylammonium, (n-C12H25)2(CH3)2N+ denoted 2C12).

The present work investigates: (i) the solid-state intercalation of three alkyltrimethyl-ammonium and one di-alkyldimethylammonium cation into two natural clays, and the subsequent changes in structure and physicochemical properties; (ii) the efficiency of organoclays prepared via solid-state methodology for BPA removal from water; (iii) various parameters such as kinetics (pseudo-first-order model and pseudo-second-order model), isotherm (Freundlich and Langmuir models) and thermodynamic parameters (standard enthalpy (ΔH), standard entropy (ΔS), and standard free energy (ΔG)) on BPA adsorption from water.

Advertisement

2. Characterization of synthesized organoclays

The organoclays synthesis and their characterization using various techniques have been published elsewhere [27].

2.1 X-ray diffraction of raw clays and organoclays

The Figures 1a, b and 2af show the XRPD diffractograms of the AH and DI raw clays and the organoclays loaded at various loading levels (0.5 CEC, 1.0 CEC, 1.5 CEC and 2.0 CEC) of the C12, C14, C16, and 2C12 surfactants. Figure 1 shows that AH and DI clays contain quartz, montmorillonite, kaolinite, hematite, rutile, orthoclase, and anorthite only for DI clay.

Figure 1.

X-ray powder diffraction patterns of AH, DI clays and C12-AH, C12-DI organoclays. Q = quartz, M = montmorillonite, K = kaolinite, H = hematite, R = rutile, O = orthoclase, and A = anorthite.

Figure 2.

X-ray powder diffraction patterns of AH, DI clays and C14-AH, C14-DI, C16-AH, C16-DI, 2C12-AH, and 2C12-DI organoclays. Q = quartz, M = montmorillonite, K = kaolinite, H = hematite, R = rutile, O = orthoclase, and A = anorthite.

From Figures 1 and 2, it can be seen that the d001 basal spacing raises when the surfactant loading level increases. This increase indicates that the surfactant molecules are inserted into the mineral clay layers. It is also seen that an increase in the length of the long alkyl chain (C12, C14, and C16) and the number of long alkyl chains (C12 and 2C12) provokes an increase in the d001 value (Figures 1 and 2). Furthermore, the increase in the d001 values seems to take place in steps with preferred intervals, Figures 1 and 2.

As a matter of fact, the d001 basal spacing value of the organoclays loaded at 2.0 CEC is 25 Å for the C12 surfactant (2.0 CEC-C12-AH and 2.0 CEC-C12- DI) < 32 Å and 28 Å for the C14 surfactant (2.0 CEC-C14-AH and 2.0 CEC-C14-DI, respectively) < 38 Å for the C16 and 2C12 surfactants (2.0 CEC-C16-AH and 2.0 CEC-C16-DI, 2.0 CEC-2C12-AH and 2.0 CEC-2C12- DI). In a previous study, Park reported that at 0.5 CEC loading level, a marginal increase of the basal spacing (d001) is observed when the long alkyl chain length increases: C12 (14.1 Å), C14 (14.3 Å), and C16 (14.4 Å) at a XRPD step size of 0.0167° for 2θ [28]. As a matter of principle, similar observation should be made in the present study for the d001 spacing for all prepared organoclays loaded at 0.5 CEC, Figures 1 and 2. This is related to the fact that at low loading level, the long alkyl chains are oriented parallel to the sheets, Figures 3a and b. The increase of the loading level, the length and the number of long alkyl chains in the quaternary alkylammonium cations increases the d001 basal spacing, Figures 1a, b and 2af. The obtained results indicate that the orientation of the inserted quaternary alkylammonium cations varies from being parallel with the sheets to turn to more and more upright when the loading level increases (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Surfactant molecules orientations into the interlayer space: Arrangements (a) monolayer, (b) bilayers, and (c, d) pseudo-trilayers and (e, f and g, h) paraffin-type for one and two long alkyl chains respectively.

The increase of the quaternary alkylammonium cations loading level from 0.5 CEC to 2.0 CEC levels causes the expansion of the montmorillonite interlayers to 6.8 Å, 8.3 Å, 10.0 Å, 12.1 Å, 14.8 Å, 18.1 Å, 22.4 Å and higher than 28.3 Å and these expansion values depend on the clays (AH or DI) and/or on the surfactants (C12, C14, C16, and 2C12) used (Figure 3). Regarding the quaternary alkylammonium cations sizes, 8.3 Å and 10.0 Å as interlayer’s expansions are attributed to a bilayer arrangement of the quaternary alkylammonium cations with an angle depending on the interaction between the quaternary alkylammonium cations and the clay layers, the chemical composition of the clay and the structure of the quaternary alkylammonium cations. This arrangement is expected for 18.0 Å and 19.7 Å as d001 basal spacing. The pseudo-trilayer arrangement is expected for 12.1 Å and 14.8 Å as basal spacing expansion and the long alkyl chain of the surfactants are orientated in an oblique plan. For 18.1 Å, 22.4 Å and 28.4 Å as expansions, the long alkyl chain are arranged in a paraffin-type and their orientation approaches to the alternate antiparallel packing in the clay interlayers as described in the crystal structures of the pure surfactants C12, C14 and C16 [29]. This paraffin-type arrangement is expected when the d001 basal spacing values reach 27.8 Å, 32.1 Å or are higher than 38 Å. Therefore, the angle between the clay layers and the plane of the surfactant long alkyl chains approaches 90°. These proposed arrangements of the long alkyl chains in the organically modified clays interlayers are analogous to the arrangements reported by Lagaly et al. [30].

2.2 Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of organoclays

Figures 47 represent the FTIR spectra of the raw clays, the organoclays loaded at 0.5 CEC, 1.0 CEC, 1.5 CEC and 2.0 CEC loading level of C12, C14, C16 and 2C12 surfactants, and pure surfactants.

Figure 4.

FTIR spectra of AH and DI raw clays, pure C12 surfactant and C12-AH and C12-DI organoclays.

Figure 5.

FTIR spectra of AH and DI raw clays, pure C14 surfactant and C14-AH and C14-DI organoclays.

Figure 6.

FTIR spectra of AH and DI raw clays, pure C16 surfactant and C16-AH and C16-DI organoclays.

Figure 7.

FTIR spectra of AH and DI raw clays, pure 2C12 surfactant and 2C12-AH and 2C12-DI organoclays.

The bending bands of the H-O appear at around 1600 cm−1 on the FTIR spectra of the raw and modified clays. The stretching vibrations of the structural hydroxyl (OH) is observed at 3622 cm−1 for the raw clays, and the band around 3420 cm−1 is attributed to the hydroxyl of water molecules contained in the clay layers. According to Madejová et al., the bands seen at around 3694 and 3620 cm−1 are associated to the stretching vibrations of the structural hydroxyl in AlMgO-H and Al2O-H of montmorillonite or kaolinite, respectively [31, 32]. In addition, the band observed at 3620 cm−1 on the spectra of raw clays and oganoclays are characteristic of smectites containing high amount of Al in the octahedra sheet [31]. The Si-O stretching band is observed at 1100 cm−1 and the Si-O in-plane bending appears at 470 cm−1 in all FTIR spectra [32]. The Al2OH bending vibration and the Al-O-Si deformations bands are observed at 913 and 536 cm−1, respectively [32]. The Fe-O or Al-O out of plane bending vibrations appear at around 694 cm−1 [33].

The asymmetric stretching bands of the CH2 group shift slightly from 2927 to 2920 cm−1 depending on AH or DI raw clays, and surfactant loading, 0.5 to 2.0 CEC level due to the insertion of the C12, C14, C16, and 2C12 surfactants. Likewise, the wavenumbers of the CH2 symmetric stretching vibrations shift from 2855 cm−1 to 2850 cm−1 with increasing surfactant loading levels (Figures 47). The wavenumbers of asymmetric and symmetric CH2 stretching bands of surfactants in the modified clays increase with the surfactant loading level’s increase and approach the wavenumbers of the pure surfactant. This further sustains that the long alkyl chains are packed identically in clay layers as in the pure quaternary alkylammonium bromide salts when the loading level tends to saturation. In fact, Kamitori et al. [29], Silva et al. [34] and Campanelli and Scaramuzza [35] reported that the surfactants (C12, C14, and C16) are arranged in parallel plans inside a sheet and antiparallel as layers which alternate in the pure surfactant compound. The IR spectra of the organoclays support that the long alkyl chains orientation in the montmorillonite clay interlayers evolves progressively from a parallel orientation with clay sheets at lower loading level of surfactant to a standing position at higher loading level as reported in the literature [28, 36, 37].

The CH2 asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibration bands frequencies in the pure surfactant molecules and the modified clays are summarized in Table 1. Contrary to the CH2 asymmetric and symmetric stretching frequencies, the CH2 scissoring and rocking vibrations frequencies observed at 1473 and 731 cm−1, respectively [33], seem to be independent of the length of alkyl chain and level of loading.

Surfactants and wavenumbers (cm−1) of symmetric and asymmetric CH2 stretching
Loading levelC12C14C162C12
CH2SymCH2AsymCH2SymCH2AsymCH2SymCH2AsymCH2SymCH2Asym
AC clay
0.5 CEC28552926285329232852292328542925
1.0 CEC28542926285229232851292128542924
1.5 CEC28542925285229222851292028532924
2.0 CEC28542925285129212850292028532921
DI clay
0.5 CEC28552926285429262852292328552927
1.0 CEC28552926285329242851292228552925
1.5 CEC28542924285229232851292128542925
2.0 CEC28542924285229222851292028542924
Pure surfactants28502918284929182849291928532921

Table 1.

Change in CH2 symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibration frequencies depending on the surfactant loading level and/or AH and DI clays.

Figures 47 show that the intensities of the band attributed to the hydroxyl of absorbed water seen at 3420 and 1635 cm−1 turn down progressively when the surfactant loading level increases and this behavior is certainly related to the change of the raw clay properties from hydrophilic to hydrophobic ones [33, 38]. The FTIR spectra support the model of insertion of the quaternary alkylammonium cations into mineral clay interlayers as described below, Figure 3.

Advertisement

3. Influence of various factors in batch studies of bisphenol A removal

In the present work, various factors such as the adsorbents dose (clays and organoclays), the agitation time, the initial concentration, the pH, the surfactants loading level, and the temperature have been studied in order to elucidate the BPA sorption process. The methodologies used for all adsorption experiences are described elsewhere [39].

3.1 Effect of the agitation time on the BPA adsorption and kinetics

3.1.1 Effect of the agitation time on the BPA adsorption

Figure 8ad represent the amount of BPA removed as a function of the agitation time for 200 mg as raw clays and organoclays dose. From Figure 8ad, the BPA sorption depends on the duration of the agitation. In fact, it is seen that the amount of BPA removed from the aqueous solution by the raw and modified clays increases during the first 10 minutes and attains the equilibrium concentration within 20 minutes (Figure 8ad).

Figure 8.

Effect of agitation time of BPA adsorption on the raw clays and organoclays: AH, DI, C12-AH, C12-DI (a), C14-AH, C14-DI (b), C16-AH, C16-DI (c) and 2C12-AH, 2C12-DI (d).

Moreover, after 20 minutes as duration of agitation, no significant difference is observed according to the types of surfactants, the surfactant loading levels and the clays types (Figure 8ad). This finding is unlike to those reported by Zheng et al. [10], where the quantity of BPA removed per unit of mass increases with the surfactant chain longer (C12 to C16). The agitation time required to reach the equilibrium is low and this suggests that the physisorption process is involved in the BPA removal [40]. It is also seen that the number of the surfactant long alkyl chain (C12 and 2C12) does not enhance the BPA adsorption and this results is unlike the results obtained by Park et al., where the quantity of BPA adsorbed increases with the increase of the number of long alkyl chain (C12 and 2C12) [8]. The ranking of the qe values are from 18.7 to 19.8 mg of BPA/g of adsorbent for 200 mg as adsorbent dosage and 100 mg/L as BPA initial concentration for all the organoclays after 120 min as agitation time.

3.1.2 Kinetics

The constants of the pseudo-first and the pseudo-second kinetics have been evaluated by using the result of the effect of agitation time on BPA sorption and the obtained parameters are summarized into Table 2 [39].

Clays or organoclaysPseudo-first orderPseudo-second order
K1 (min−1)qe1 (mg/g)R2K2 (min−1)qe2 (g/mg.min)R2
AH0.01450.9580.60420.055.740.9831
DI0.00650.6830.28350.075.770.9871
1.0 CEC-C12-AH0.00530.7010.50890.1419.340.9999
2.0 CEC-C12-AH0.00620.4270.36840.3019.340.9999
1.0 CEC-C12-DI0.00641.0550.59830.0519.720.9998
2.0 CEC-C12-DI0.01100.4120.62690.0619.570.9999
1.0 CEC-C14-AH0.00530.7010.68280.1719.491.0000
2.0 CEC-C14-AH0.00620.4270.76160.2019.721.0000
1.0 CEC-C14-DI0.00641.0550.24600.0819.230.9993
2.0 CEC-C14-DI0.01100.4120.26390.4219.380.9991
1.0 CEC-C16-AH0.02250.5540.28770.2619.760.9998
2.0 CEC-C16-AH0.03300.5710.76840.1519.961.0000
1.0 CEC-C16-DI0.00310.8540.29510.1719.340.9998
2.0 CEC-C16−DI0.03081.2630.44900.1319.650.9998
1.0 CEC-2C12-AH0.01221.4050.48700.0519.690.9999
2.0 CEC-2C12-AH0.00620.5980.84060.1619.691.0000
1.0 CEC-2C12 -DI0.00431.3770.37420.1318.760.9998
2.0 CEC-2C12 -DI0.01120.8480.45060.0619.340.9989

Table 2.

Kinetic constants of BPA removal on raw and modified clays.

According to the high determination coefficients obtained (R2 > 0.98) in the case of the pseudo-second order kinetic model when compared to those of the pseudo-first-order kinetic model ones (R2 < 0.85) (Table 2), it can be concluded that the removal of BPA is better described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model than the pseudo-first order kinetic model (Table 2). According to the literature, the pseudo-second-order kinetic model suggests that the chemisorption is the limiting step during the adsorption process [8, 16]. This result is like those reported previously on BPA removal using different adsorbents, such as graphene [9], C16-palygorskite [19], surfactant-modified zeolite [26], organo-montmorillonites [3, 7, 8, 10, 16]. Generally, BPA removal from water using organoclays is better described by the pseudo-secon- order kinetic than the pseudo-first order kinetic [7, 8, 10, 11, 16, 21].

3.2 Effect of pH on BPA adsorption

Figure 9 represents the amount of BPA removed when the pH increases from 2 to 12. It is seen that from acidic pH up to pH 8, the amount of BPA removed on all organoclays stays relatively constant (Figure 9ad). For pH values ranging from 2 to 8, the qe values ranged from 19.4 to 19.8 mg/g for all modified clays. This is followed by a decrease in the efficiency of organoclays in BPA sorption from aqueous solution having pH ≥ 8. In fact, the qe values decrease slightly from 19.8–19.4 mg/g to 19.6 – 16.6 mg/g when the pH value increases from 8 to 10. The qe values turn down remarkably when the pH becomes higher than 10 for all the organoclays with higher decrease for those loaded at 1.0 CEC. In fact, it is seen that the qe values for all modified clays are ranged between 18 to 9.0 mg /g when the pH varies from 10 to 12. For pH = 12, the organoclays loaded at 2.0 CEC loading level give higher qe values (9.2 to 18.5 mg/g) compared to those loaded at 1.0 CEC (9.0 to 13.9 mg/g). In addition, higher qe values are obtained for the organoclays based on AH clay loaded at 2.0 CEC than the ones based on DI clay loaded at 2.0 CEC and only for C14, C16 and 2C12 surfactants at a pH = 12. An opposite effect is observed for C12 surfactant because the C12-DI organoclays yielded high qe values than the C12-AH ones at 2.0 CEC loading level. This result which is obtained in the case of high pH value (pH = 12) seems to be linked to the high ability of AH clay to insert more quaternary alkylammonium cations than the DI clay one, due to the fact that AH clay has a high CEC value than the DI clay. The BPA molecules ionization degree depends on the pH of the aqueous solution and this seems to be another reason for the decrease in the qe values when the pH reached 8 [2, 8, 9]. In fact, BPA molecules remain predominantly in their neutral form when pH ≤ 8, in their mono-ionized form when 8 ≤ pH ≤ 10 (pKa1 = 9.6) and in the di-ionized form when pH ≥ 10 (pKa2 = 11.3). Thus, the adsorption capacity’s decrease of the modified clays seen in the case of alkaline pH range can be explained by the electrostatic repulsions existing between the negative charges of the clay’s surface and those bisphenolate anions [9]. In the present work, the efficiency of organoclays to sorb BPA in alkaline solution (pH ≥8) is less influenced for organoclays loaded at 2.0 CEC than those ones loaded at 1.0 CEC. This result sustains that the modified clays loaded at 2.0 CEC maintain high affinity toward the mono-ionized and the di-ionized forms of BPA at high pH values. Rathnayake et al. reported a possible retention of surfactant molecules onto the clays surface, which provides sites having hydrophobic character for BPA removal [16]. Figure 9 shows that in the case of a solution with pH ≤ 8, 1.0 CEC as loading level is sufficient to get organoclays having high removal capacities for BPA, whereas in the case of a solution with pH value ≥8, 2.0 CEC as loading level is required to get organoclays having high removal capacities toward BPA. Particularly, when the pH reaches 12, we recommend the employment of either 2.0 CEC-C14-AH, 2.0 CEC-C16-AH, 2.0 CEC-2C12-AH organoclays, or 2.0 CEC-C12-DI organoclay.

Figure 9.

Effect of pH on the adsorption of BPA by organoclays: C12-AH and C12-DI (a), C14-AH and C14-DI (b), C16-AH and C16-DI (c), 2C12-AH and 2C12-DI (d).

3.3 Effect of BPA initial concentration on BPA adsorption and isotherms

3.3.1 Effect of BPA initial concentration on BPA adsorption

Figure 10ad represent the amount of BPA removed as a function of the initial concentration for 12 hours as agitation duration.

Figure 10.

Initial concentration effect on BPA adsorption by organoclays: C12-AH and C12-DI (a), C14-AH and C14-DI (b), C16-AH and C16-DI (c), 2C12-AH and 2C12-DI (d).

It is seen that the quantity of BPA removed from the aqueous solution increases rapidly up to 200 mg/L as initial concentration. Figure 10ad show that the equilibrium adsorption capacity of BPA on modified clays increases when the initial concentration increases and this until to the saturation of available reactive sites [11]. As shown in Figure 10ad, all curves on the effect of initial concentration on BPA adsorption onto the organoclays are almost relatively linear up to 200 mg/L and become parabolic after that value. As a result, the removal of BPA onto the organoclays is affected by its initial concentration. This can be explained by the fact that before 200 mg/L is BPA initial concentration, there are more available active sites onto the organoclays which causes a better elimination rate of BPA. However, the number of active sites decrease gradually after 200 mg/L and this induces less efficient adsorption. As reported in previous studies, the present work shows that the increase of BPA initial concentration causes an increase in the qe value. For example, for 200 mg as adsorbent dose, when we increase the initial concentration from 25 to 1000 mg/L, the qe values increase from 4.8–4.9 mg/g to 88–127 mg of BPA/g of adsorbent for all the organoclays.

3.3.2 Isotherms of BPA adsorption

The effect of the initial concentration has been used to evaluate the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms parameters [39] and the obtained values are included in Table 3. Table 3 shows that the determination coefficient (R2) values are better in the case of the Langmuir isotherm (0.89 ≤ R2 ≤ 0.99) than the Freundlich isotherm (0.89 ≤ R2 ≤ 0.95) for all the organoclays and this corresponds to a monolayer adsorption of BPA. The above results resemble to those obtained on BPA adsorption using organically modified montmorillonite [7, 10] and amphoteric modified vermiculite [17].

OrganoclaysFreundlichLangmuir
KF (L/g)nR2KL (L/mg)qm (mg/g)R2
1.0 CEC-C12-AH13.23552.55880.91360.044114.90.9700
2.0 CEC-C12-AH12.44602.52080.91720.047108.70.9745
1.0 CEC-C12-DI10.99682.61990.91060.04492.60.9654
2.0 CEC-C12-DI10.24922.43370.89630.019113.60.8890
1.0 CEC-C14-AH12.09032.21880.92700.046125.00.9756
2.0 CEC-C14-AH10.64402.23110.94640.050125.00.9766
1.0 CEC-C14-DI11.00122.61000.90600.03897.10.9635
2.0 CEC-C14-DI10.87862.27500.91000.03696.10.9460
1.0 CEC-C16-AH12.15212.43840.94070.310126.60.9379
2.0 CEC-C16-AH11.48572.31800.88530.044119.10.9800
1.0 CEC-C16-DI10.50182.61570.88850.046112.40.9579
2.0 CEC-C16−DI10.75852.40500.92800.034111.10.9747
1.0 CEC-2C12-AH10.68672.42900.89200.05199.00.9900
2.0 CEC-2C12-AH10.17572.34300.88810.035108.70.9659
1.0 CEC-2C12 -DI11.21052.63020.92150.06087.70.9704
2.0 CEC-2C12-DI10.65152.55890.94820.031103.10.9680

Table 3.

Isotherm parameters of BPA adsorption on the organoclays.

3.4 Effect of surfactant loading level on BPA adsorption

The Figure 11ad represent the qe values of adsorbed BPA as a function of the surfactant loading level (aqueous solution pH around 5–6). Figure 11ad show high elimination rate of BPA onto AH and DI modified clays compared to the untreated ones. This result states that the intercalation of the quaternary alkylammonium into the clays’ interlayers induces a strong removal level of BPA from aqueous solution. As a result of the surfactants intercalation, the amount of BPA sorbed per mass of adsorbent (qe) increases remarkably from 1.4 and 2.5 mg/g for DI and AH raw clays, respectively, to qe values higher than 19.5 mg/g in the case of organoclays loaded at 2.0 CEC loading level. We notice that the efficiency of the modified clays to remove BPA from aqueous solution is not significantly affected when the surfactant loading level increases from 1.0 to 2.0 CEC for pH ≤ 8. The below result is unlike those reported by Park et al. who found that the amount of BPA adsorbed increases when the surfactant loading level increases [8]. According to Figure 11, a better elimination rate is obtained in acidic solution when the AH and DI raw clays are loaded at least at 1.0 CEC loading level of the C12, C14, C16, and 2C12 surfactants, which result is identical to the those obtained by studying the effect of the pH on the BPA sorption.

Figure 11.

The C12, C14, C16, and 2C12 surfactants loading level effect on the BPA adsorption.

3.5 Effect of temperature on BPA adsorption and thermodynamics

3.5.1 Effect of temperature on BPA adsorption

The temperature effect on BPA adsorption onto the organoclays was evaluated at different temperatures (303, 313 and 323 K) and the obtained results are presented in Figure 12ad.

Figure 12.

Effect of the temperature on BPA adsorption by the organoclays: C12-AH and C12-DI (a), C14-AH and C14-DI (b), C16-AH and C16-DI (c), 2C12-AH and 2C12-DI (d).

Figure 12 shows that the increase of the temperature from 30 to 50°C causes a slight drop of the amount of BPA removed on the organoclays. This result shows that BPA removal is more propitious for lower temperatures. In fact, the ranking of the qe values obtained are from 19.6 and 18.5 mg of BPA/g of organoclays and this occurs when the temperature increases from 30 to 50°C. This is due to the exothermic nature of the adsorption reaction [41, 42]. This means that the temperature affects weakly the uptake of BPA onto the organoclays. The organoclays maintain high removal level toward BPA molecules at a temperature up to 50°C (qe ≥ 18.5 mg/g).

3.5.2 Thermodynamics

Figure 12ad represent the quantities of BPA removed on the organoclays at different temperatures (303, 313, and 323 K). These figures show that the quantity of BPA removed on the organoclays drop weakly with the increase of the temperature from 30 to 50°C and this results means that the adsorption process is favored at lower temperature.

The results obtained by studying the effect of the temperature on BPA removal have been used to calculate the thermodynamic parameters such as Gibbs free energy (ΔG), enthalpies change (ΔH), and entropy change (ΔS) and the calculated values are included in Table 4. All enthalpies change values (Table 4) are less than zero (ΔH ≤ 0) and this suggests that the uptake of BPA from water using organoclays is exothermic, which is also sustained by the drop of the amount of BPA removed with the increase of the temperature. From the literature, it can be noted that when the values of ΔH are ranged from 2.1 to 20.9, a physisorption is involved in the adsorption process, but chemisorption intervenes for a value ranging from 80 to 200 kJ/mol [43]. In this work, the ΔH values evaluated from the experimental data of BPA sorption onto the organoclays are ranged from −76.5 to −13 kJ/mol. According to the ΔH values, different forces and interactions are supposed to be involved in the adsorption process [19]: between 4 and 10 kJ/mol for Van der Waals interactions, about 5 kJ/mol for hydrophobic interactions, between 2 and 40 kJ/mol for hydrogen bond interactions, around 40 kJ/mol for coordination exchange interactions, between 2 and 29 kJ/mol for dipole bond, and up to 60 kJ/mol for chemical bond. All ΔH values obtained in the present work are ranged from −76.5 to −13 kJ/mol and this suggests that the following interactions can intervene during the adsorption process: dipole-bonding, coordination exchange, hydrogen bonding and chemical bond. From the lower adsorption efficiency of the raw clays toward BPA molecules, we suggest that the hydrogen bonding contributes weakly to the BPA sorption in the present work [11]. From the obtained results, it can be postulated that both physisorption (Van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonding) and chemisorption (hydrophobic interactions, BPA phenolic rings and alkylammonium group interactions) intervene during BPA sorption onto the organically modified clays. The results obtained in the present work resemble to those reported previously on the adsorption of Rhodamine-B onto activated carbon [44]; adsorption of Acid Red G dye onto C18-montmorillonite [45], adsorption of carbofuran onto biochars [46]. According to previous reported results, adsorption can be due to the intervention of both physisorption and chemisorption and this coexistence is described as the following: (i) a first rapid chemisorption followed by a slow physisorption [47]; (ii) contributions of both processes [48]; (iii) simultaneous occurring of both physisorption and chemisorption with predominant chemisorption [46] or without any predominant process [49].

OrganoclaysThermodynamics constants
Temperature (K)ΔG (kJ/mol)R2ΔH (kJ/mol)ΔS (J/mol.K)R2
1.0 CEC-C12-AH303−8.6510.9899−31.382−80.7820.9830
313−8.936
323−9.222
2.0 CEC-C12-AH303−8.5250.9938−38.429−103.9580.9978
313−8.806
323−9.087
1.0 CEC-C12-DI303−7.5570.9927−27.847−72.4860.9838
313−7.806
323−8.055
2.0 CEC-C12-DI303−7.8610.9893−31.537−83.4390.9976
313−8.120
323−8.380
1.0 CEC-C14-AH303−8.0350.9941−23.714−57.7360.9927
313−8.300
323−8.566
2.0 CEC-C14-AH303−8.4450.9623−62.330−181.2780.9777
313−8.724
323−9.003
1.0 CEC-C14-DI303−6.7340.9756−49.269−144.4310.9993
313−6.956
323−7.179
2.0 CEC-C14-DI303−9.0180.9748−64.258−185.0110.9950
313−9.316
323−9.613
1.0 CEC-C16-AH303−7.8970.9583−69.123−205.3220.9666
313−8.158
323−8.418
2.0 CEC-C16-AH303−8.8540.9737−76.408−223.3720.9989
313−9.147
323−9.439
1.0 CEC-C16-DI303−6.4540.9984−13.375−30.3470.9811
313−6.666
323−6.881
2.0 CEC-C16-DI303−7.2160.9994−48.506−139.4670.9996
313−7.454
323−7.692
1.0 CEC-2C12-AH303−7.5140.9924−36.103−99.7260.9989
313−7.762
323−8.010
2.0 CEC-2C12-AH303−9.2370.9940−34.668−90.0320.9974
313−9.541
323−9.846
1.0 CEC-2C12-DI303−9.1770.9867−34.165−87.7290.9911
313−9.480
323−9.783
2.0 CEC-2C12-DI303−9.3980.9883−34.956−87.3050.9888
313−9.708
323−10.018

Table 4.

Thermodynamic constants of BPA adsorption on the modified clays.

Table 4 indicates that ΔG ≤ 0 and this suggests that the uptake of BPA molecules by the organoclays is spontaneous. The drop of the ΔG values with the increase of the temperature shows that the capacity of the organoclays to sorb BPA molecules is inversely dependent on the temperature [9, 19, 50], which also indicates a spontaneous process at low temperatures. In addition, ΔG decreases with the increase of the temperature (Table 4) and this shows that BPA sorption is thermodynamically favored at room temperature than at higher temperatures [51]. Gibbs free energy ranging from −20 to 0 kJ/mol corresponds to physisorption mechanism, while values ranging from −80 to −400 kJ/mol suggest chemisorption mechanism [52]. In the present work, the Gibbs free-energy values are ranged from −11 to −6 kJ/mol (Table 4) and this result means that the physisorption intervenes in BPA removal from water. According to previous literature results, when ΔS value is higher than zero (ΔS > 0) the interactions at the solid–liquid interface are aleatory, while value less than zero (ΔS < 0) suggests inverse interactions [50, 53]. In the present work, the ΔS values are all negative (−30 ≤ ΔS ≤ -205 J/mol) and this suggests a decrease of the disorder at the solid–liquid interface, while ΔG and ΔH negative values indicate spontaneous and exothermic processes of BPA sorption onto the organoclays [8].

Our study highlights the fact that the adsorption is spontaneous (ΔG < 0), exothermic (ΔH < 0) with negative entropy values (ΔS < 0) and these results are in agreement with those previously reported on the adsorption of BPA using organoclays [7, 8, 10], C16-modified palygorskite [19], and surfactant-modified zeolite [22, 54].

Advertisement

4. Conclusion

The solid-state reaction methodology was successfully used to intercalate three cationic alkyltrimethylammoniums (n-C12H25(CH3)3 N+, n-C14H29(CH3)3N+ and n-C16H33(CH3)3N+) and one di-alkyldimethylammonium ((n-C12H25)2(CH3)2N+) into two natural clays containing Ca-montmorillonite as main clay type. XRPD shows that the d001 basal spacing increases after the intercalation of the cationic surfactants and this proved the swelling of the clays layers. It is observed that at 2.0 CEC as surfactant loading level, the basal spacing (d001) of the prepared organoclays are 25 Å and 32 Å for those treated with C12 and C14 surfactants respectively and up to 38 Å for those treated with C16 and 2C12 surfactants. The appearance of the CH2 symmetric and asymmetric stretching bands on the IR spectra at around 2850 and 2920 cm−1, respectively, proves successful insertion of the surfactants into clays interlayers. The values of the frequencies related to the CH2 symmetric and asymmetric stretching bands of the surfactants in organoclays diminish and tend to those of the pure surfactants when the surfactant loading level increases. The hydrophilic and organophobic properties of the raw clays change to hydrophobic and organophilic ones upon the insertion of the surfactants into the clays interlayers. The present work shows that the organoclays synthetized by using AH and DI local clays lead to a high removal efficiency toward BPA molecules in aqueous solutions. In fact, higher values of qm (from 88 to 127 mg/g mg/g) were achieved for BPA adsorption onto organoclays based on AH and DI clays and n-C12H25(CH3)3N+, n-C14H29(CH3)3N+, n-C16H33(CH3)3N+ and (n-C12H25)2(CH3)2N+ surfactants. The BPA removal was influenced by the adsorbent dose, the initial concentration, and the agitation time, the surfactant loading level, the pH and the temperature. The organoclays efficiencies to sorb BPA molecules from water decrease significantly when the pH value reached 10. It is also noted that when the level of surfactants is 2.0 CEC, the efficiency of the organoclays to sorb BPA is less influenced in alkaline solution than the one of those loaded at 1.0 CEC. The present work indicates that organoclays loaded at 1.0 CEC level are efficient for BPA removal from acidic solution, and those loaded at 2.0 CEC level are useful to achieve high elimination rate of BPA in alkaline solution. The results obtained from the thermodynamic and kinetic investigations show that both physisorption and chemisorption intervene in the retention of BPA species. The present work strongly sustains that organoclays prepared via solid-state intercalation are effective adsorbents as those obtained via solid-liquid reactions for BPA removal from water.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

International Science Programme [ISP], Uppsala, Sweden financial support is gratefully acknowledged.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Nakada N, Shinohara H, Murata A, Kiri K, Managaki S, Sato N, et al. Removal of selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) during sand filtration and ozonation at a municipal sewage treatment plant. Water Research. 2007;41:4373-4382
  2. 2. Dong Y, Wu D, Chen X, Lin Y. Adsorption of bisphenol A from water by surfactant-modified zeolite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2010;348:585-590
  3. 3. Li Y, Jin F, Wang C, Chen Y, Wang Q, Zhang W, et al. Modification of bentonite with cationic surfactant for the enhanced retention of bisphenol A from landfill leachate. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 2015;22:8618-8628
  4. 4. Radwan M, Wielgomas B, Ziewirska ED, Radwan P, Kałużny P, Klimowska A, et al. Urinary bisphenol A levels and male fertility. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2018;12:2144-2151
  5. 5. Arnold SM, Clark KE, Staples CA, Klecka GM, Dimond SS, Caspers N, et al. Relevance of drinking water as a source of human exposure to bisphenol A. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 2013;23:137-144
  6. 6. Vom Saal FS, Welshons WV. Large effects from small exposures. II: The importance of positive controls in low-dose research on bisphenol A. Environmental Research. 2006;100:50-76
  7. 7. Yang Q, Gao M, Luo Z, Yang S. Enhanced removal of bisphenol A from aqueous solution by organo-montmorillonites modified with novel Gemini pyridinium surfactants containing long alkyl chain. Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2016;285:27-38
  8. 8. Park Y, Sun Z, Ayoko GA, Frost RL. Bisphenol A sorption by organo-montmorillonite: Implications for the removal of organic contaminants from water. Chemosphere. 2014;107:249-256
  9. 9. Xu J, Wang L, Zhu Y. Decontamination of bisphenol A from aqueous solution by graphene adsorption. Langmuir. 2012;28(22):8418-8425
  10. 10. Zheng S, Sun PZY, Ayoko GA, Frost RL. Removal of bisphenol A from wastewater by Ca-montmorillonite modified with selected surfactants. Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2013;234:416-422
  11. 11. Liu C, Wu P, Zhu Y, Tran L. Simultaneous adsorption of Cd2+ and BPA on amphoteric surfactant activated montmorillonite. Chemosphere. 2016;144:1026-1032
  12. 12. Cao F, Bai P, Li H, Ma Y, Deng X, Zhao C. Preparation of polyethersulfone-organophilic montmorillonite hybrid particles for the removal of bisphenol A. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2009;162:791-798
  13. 13. Murugananthan M, Yoshihara S, Rakuma T, Shirakashi T. Mineralization of bisphenol A (BPA) by anodic oxidation with boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrode. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2008;154:213-220
  14. 14. Wang ZM, Ooga H, Hirotsu T, Wang WL, Wu QY, Hu HY. Matrix-enhanced adsorption removal of trace BPA by controlling the interlayer hydrophobic environment of montmorillonite. Applied Clay Science. 2015;104:81-87
  15. 15. Bhatnagar A, Anastopoulos I. Adsorptive removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from aqueous solution: A review. Chemosphere. 2017;168:885-902
  16. 16. Rathnayake SI, Xi Y, Frost RL, Ayoko GA. Environmental applications of inorganic-organic clays for recalcitrant organic pollutants removal Bisphenol A. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2016;470:183-195
  17. 17. Liu S, Wu P, Chen M, Yu L, Kang C, Zhu N, et al. Amphoteric modified vermiculites as adsorbents for enhancing removal of organic pollutants: Bisphenol A and tetrabromo bisphenol A. Environmental Pollution. 2017;228:277-286
  18. 18. Cheng C, Ma L, Ren J, Li L, Zhang G, Yang Q, et al. Preparation of polyethersulfone-modified sepiolite hybrid particles for the removal of environmental toxins. Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2011;171:1132-1142
  19. 19. Zhao Z, Fu D, Ma Q. Adsorption characteristics of bisphenol A from aqueous solution onto HDTMAB-modified palygorskite. Separation Science and Technology. 2014;49:81-89
  20. 20. Guo W, Hu W, Pan J, Zhou H, Guan W, Wang X, et al. Selective adsorption and separation of BPA from aqueous solution using novel molecularly imprinted polymers based on kaolinite/Fe3O4 composites. Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2011;171:603-611
  21. 21. Dehghani MH, Ghadermazi M, Bhatnagar A, Sadighara P, Jahed-Khaniki G, Heibati B, et al. Adsorptive removal of endocrine disrupting bisphenol A from aqueous solution using chitosan. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2016;3:2647-2655
  22. 22. Li J, Zhan Y, Lin J, Jiang A, Xi W. Removal of bisphenol A from aqueous solution using cetylpyridinium bromide (CPB)-modified natural zeolites as adsorbents. Environment and Earth Science. 2014;72(10):3969-3980
  23. 23. Goyal N, Bulasara VK, Barman S. Surface modification of synthesized nanozeolite NaX with TEAOH for removal of bisphenol A. Chemical Engineering Communications. 2016;203(10):1374-1384
  24. 24. Betega de Paiva L, Morales AR, Valenzuela DFR. Organoclays: Properties, preparation and applications. Applied Clay Science. 2008;42:8-24
  25. 25. Mishra AK, Allauddin S, Narayan R, Aminabhavi TM, Raju KVSN. Characterization of surface-modified montmorillonite nanocomposites. Ceramics International. 2012;38:929-934
  26. 26. Wang H, Zhang H, Jiang JQ, Ma X. Adsorption of bisphenol A onto cationic-modified zeolite. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016;57:26299-26306
  27. 27. Garikoé I, Sorgho B, Guel B, Persson I. Solid-state synthesis and physicochemical characterization of modified smectites using natural clays from Burkina Faso. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia. 2021;35:43-59
  28. 28. Park Y. Synthesis, characterisation and application of organic surfactants modified clays for water purification. PhD diss., Queensland University of Technology. 2013
  29. 29. Kamitori S, Sumimoto Y, Vongbupnimit K, Noguchi K, Okuyama K. Molecular and crystal structures of dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide and its complex with P-phenyl-phenol. Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals. 1997;300:31-43
  30. 30. Lagaly G, Ogawa M, Dékány I. Handbook of Clay Science, Chap 7.3: Clay mineral organic interactions. Vol. 1. 1st ed. Developments in Clay Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2006. pp. 309-330
  31. 31. Madejová J. FTIR techniques in clay mineral studies. Vibrational Spectroscopy. 2003;31:1-10
  32. 32. Madejová J, Bujdak J, Janek M, Komadel P. Comparative FT-IR study of structural modifications during acid treatment of dioctahedral smectites and hectorite. Spectrochimica Acta. Part A, Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 1998;54:1397-1406
  33. 33. Cubuk O, Caglar B, Topcu C, Coldur F, Sarp G, Tabak A, et al. Structural characterization of hexadecyltrimethylammonium-smectite composites and their potentiometric electrode applications. Applied Surface Science. 2015;338:99-112
  34. 34. Silva MR, Beja AM, Paixao JA. Pseudosymmetry in tetradecyltrimethyl-ammonium bromide. Acta Crystallographica. 2003;E59:01151-01152
  35. 35. Campanelli AR, Scaramuzza L. Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide. Acta Crystallographica. 1986;C42:1380-1383
  36. 36. Li Z, Jiang W-T, Hong H. An FTIR investigation of hexadecyltrimethylammonium intercalation into rectorite. Spectrochimica Acta. Part A, Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2008;71:1525-1534
  37. 37. He H, Ma Y, Zhu J, Yuan P, Qing Y. Organoclays prepared from montmorillonites with different cation exchange capacity and surfactant configuration. Applied Clay Science. 2010;48:67-72
  38. 38. Caglar B, Topcu C, Coldur F, Sarp G, Caglar S, Tabak A, et al. Structural, thermal, morphological and surface charge properties of dodecyltrimethylammonium-smectite composites. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2016;1105:70-79
  39. 39. Garikoé I, Sorgho B, Yaméogo A, Guel B, Andala D. Removal of bisphenol A by adsorption on organically modified clays from Burkina Faso. Bioremediation Journal. 2021;25:2-47
  40. 40. Liu Y, Gao M, Gu Z, Luo Z, Ye Y, Lu L. Comparison between the removal of phenol and catechol by modified montmorillonite with two novel hydroxyl containing Gemini surfactants. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2014;267:71-80
  41. 41. Sarkar B, Megharaj M, Xi Y, Naidu R. Surface charge characteristics of organo-palygorskites and adsorption of p-nitrophenol in flow-through reactor system. Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2012;185-186:35-43
  42. 42. Özcan AS, Özcan A. Adsorption of acid dyes from aqueous solutions onto acid-activated bentonite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2004;276:39-46
  43. 43. Liu Y. Is the free energy change of adsorption correctly calculated? Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 2009;54:1981-1985
  44. 44. Ding L, Zou B, Gao W, Liu Q, Wang Z, Guo Y, et al. Adsorption of Rhodamine-B from aqueous solution using treated rice husk-based activated carbon. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2014;446:1-7
  45. 45. Tong DS, Zhou CH, Lu Y, Yu H, Zhang GF, Yu WH. Adsorption of acid red G dye on octadecyltrimethylammonium montmorillonite. Applied Clay Science. 2010;50:427-431
  46. 46. Vithanage M, Mayakaduwa SS, Herath I, Ok YS, Mohan D. Kinetics, thermodynamics and mechanistic studies of carbofuran removal using biochars from tea waste and rice husks. Chemosphere. 2016;150:781-789
  47. 47. Kubono A, Yuasa N, Shao H-L, Umemoto S, Okui N. Adsorption characteristics of organic long chain molecules during physical vapor deposition. Applied Clay Science. 2002;193:195-203
  48. 48. Vuković GD, Marinković AD, Škapin SD, Ristić M, Aleksić R, Perić-Grujić AA, et al. Removal of lead from water by amino modified multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chemical Engineer. 2011;173:855-865
  49. 49. Björklund K, Li LY. Adsorption of organic stormwater pollutants onto activated carbon from sewage sludge. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017;197:490-497
  50. 50. Yousef RI, El-Eswed B, Al-Muhtaseb AH. Adsorption characteristics of natural zeolites as solid adsorbents for phenol removal from aqueous solutions: Kinetics, mechanism, and thermodynamics studies. Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2011;171:1143-1149
  51. 51. Errais E, Duplay J, Darragi F, M’Rabet I, Aubert A, Huber F, et al. Efficient anionic dye adsorption on natural untreated clay: Kinetic study and thermodynamic parameters. Desalination. 2011;275:74-81
  52. 52. Yu Y, Zhuang YY, Wang ZH, Qiu MQ. Adsorption of water-soluble dyes onto modified resin. Chemosphere. 2004;54:425-430
  53. 53. Liu QS, Zheng T, Wang P, Jiang JP, Li N. Adsorption isotherm, kinetic and mechanism studies of some substituted phenols on activated carbon fibers. Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2010;157:348-356
  54. 54. Genç N, Kılıçoğlu Ö, Narci AO. Removal of Bisphenol A aqueous solution using surfactant-modified natural zeolite: Taguchi’s experimental design, adsorption kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic study. Environmental Technology. 2017;38:424-432

Written By

Issaka Garikoé and Boubié Guel

Submitted: 08 June 2022 Reviewed: 30 August 2022 Published: 20 October 2022