Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Point-of-Care: A Novel Approach to Periodontal Diagnosis

Written By

Nancy Srivastava and Shivendra Rana

Submitted: 07 August 2022 Reviewed: 30 August 2022 Published: 08 November 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.107517

From the Edited Volume

Periodontology - New Insights

Edited by Gokul Sridharan

Chapter metrics overview

106 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Being one of the prevalent oral diseases, periodontal disease is marked by the presence of gingival inflammation and periodontal tissue destruction. Recently, there is a paradigm shift in the understanding of periodontal disease; it is now believed to be episodic in nature, showing periods of activity and inactivity. Thereby, posing a challenge for clinicians to diagnose this. Conventional diagnostic methods basically measure past tissue destruction, arising the need for new diagnostic methods that should be able to detect active sites of destruction, predict future progression, and determine the response to the therapy thus, leading to early diagnosis and better cure for the patient. One such advance is the development of point-of-care devices, which are rapid chair-side testing methods. These devices are already in use in healthcare services, a common example being home-used pregnancy test strips. This point-of-care technology is now expanding its arms in periodontics as well, thus simplifying diagnosis and improving the therapeutic outcomes of the patient. In light of the above facts, this chapter throws light on periodontal diagnosis and various commercially available point-of-care devices.

Keywords

  • biomarkers
  • genetic testing
  • antigen-antibody reaction
  • gingivitis
  • body fluids

1. Introduction

Oral cavity is the home of numerous microorganisms. Exposed to the outer environment, the oral mucosa is under continuous attack from various pathogens. The immune inflammatory response, which arises due to these pathogens, causes inflammation [1].

Periodontitis, the inflammation of periodontium, is one of the leading oral problems affecting the world. And like any other disease, the earlier it is diagnosed, the better is the prognosis [2].

Traditionally, periodontitis has been diagnosed by probing depth, bleeding on probing, or bone loss by radiographs [3, 4]. All these procedures tell us only the destruction caused by the disease till date and reflect only the clinical phenotype and not the biological phenotype. Knowledge about biologic phenotypes helps in assessing the burden of microbial and inflammatory load, which further affects the progression of periodontitis [1].

With advances in sciences, it has become known that diagnostic processes need to reveal much more than just the disease. It needs to help in locating the sites of active disease, susceptibility of the patient to disease, future progression of the disease, long-term maintenance, patient response, and microbial challenge [5, 6, 7].

Point-of-care (POC) testing can be defined as testing performed close to the patient at the time care is required. POC can revolutionize both periodontal diagnostic and therapy. These tests rely on the detection of a plethora of biomarkers of disease activity. These markers present in saliva, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), plaque, or living tissue are quantifiable and indicate health and disease [8, 9]. This chapter covers all the latest POC diagnostics available (Table 1), which detect markers for periodontal diseases.

S. No.Oral fluidTestKit
1.SalivaBiochemical testOral fluid nano sensor test
Electronic taste chip
Ora quick
Integrated microfluidic platform for oral Diagnostics
Microbiological testMy periopath
OMNIgene
IAI pado test
2.Gingival crevicular fluidBiochemical testPeriogard
Pocket watch
Periocheck
Prognostic
MMP dipstick test
3.PlaqueMicrobiological testPerioscan (BANA)
Evalusite
Perio 2000
TOPAS
Genetic test kits
4.Living tissueGenetic testMyperioID
Periodontitis susceptibility trait test

Table 1.

Table showing various available point-of-care devices [10].

Advertisement

2. Point-of-care diagnostics

A good diagnostic marker should always have high specificity and sensitivity [11]. Saliva and GCF are vehicles with great potential to be used in diagnostic tests for various diseases. They are easy to collect and are rich in locally or systemically derived biomarkers of periodontal diseases [10].

2.1 Saliva

Saliva is a bio-fluid that is very useful and easily accessible and can be used to monitor oral and systemic health (Table 2) [8]. Most of the biomarkers found in blood are also present in saliva (Table 3). Moreover, unlike blood, it does not clot or easily spreads infections. However, a disadvantage of saliva is the lower concentration of biomarkers in comparison to serum, thus requires the test to be highly sensitive [12]. Moreover, saliva is also influenced by environmental and psychological factors.

Markers of periodontal soft tissue inflammationMarkers of alveolar bone lossCollagen breakdown products
Prostaglandin E2Alkaline phosphataseAspartate aminotransferase
β-glucuronidaseOsteoprotegerinAlanine aminotransferase
IL-1βOsteocalcinTIMPs
IL-6Collagen telopeptidaseMMPs
Tumor necrosis factor-αPyridinoline cross-links of type I collagenα2-macroglobulin
Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-8,9&13)RANKL
Osteonectin

Table 2.

demonstrating the biomarkers present in saliva [10].

Test kits
Oral Fluid Nano Sensor TestDetection of multiple salivary proteins and nucleic acids.
Electronic Taste ChipsSimultaneously monitor several biomarkers related to periodontal disease
OraQuickUsually detects HIV 1 and HIV 2
Integrated MicrofluidicQuantification of an oral disease biomarker
Platform for Oral Diagnostics

Table 3.

Commercially available salivary point-of-care diagnostics [10].

2.1.1 Biochemical tests done on saliva

2.1.1.1 Oral fluid nano sensor test (OFNASET)

It is an ultrasensitive and ultraspecific automated electrochemical detection system for salivary proteins and nucleic acids. This test is an oral cancer screening device that is developed by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) collaborative oral fluid diagnostic research laboratory, led by Dr. David Wong [8, 13]. Four salivary mRNA biomarkers (SAT, ODZ, IL-8, and IL-1b) and two salivary proteomic biomarkers (thioredoxin and IL-8) are detected in the system [14].

2.1.1.2 Electronic test chip

This microchip-based detection system is used for measuring analytes (acids, bases, electrolytes, and proteins) in the solution phase. Antigen-antibody reactions take place on the interior surface of microspheres. The microspheres, increase the surface area and thus, makes it more efficient than ELISA, where the reactions take place on a single layer on the bottom of the well [15].

2.1.1.3 OraQuick

It is the first FDA-approved oral swab in-home test for HIV-1 and HIV-2. It is a stick-like device with a fabric swab and provides results within 20 minutes [14].

2.1.1.4 Integrated microfluidic platform for oral diagnostics (IMPOD)

This kit rapidly measures MMP-8 a biomarker for detection of periodontal disease in saliva and other biomarkers by electrophoretic immunoassay [14].

2.1.2 Microbiological tests done on saliva

2.1.2.1 My periopath

My periopath is a commercially available POC device produced by oral DNA labs. It detects the pathogens causing periodontal disease in saliva samples. This test uses DNA polymerase chain reaction to detect the type and concentration of bacteria present in the salivary samples [16].

2.1.2.2 OMNIgene

This kit provides results in a short period and also these results can be mailed or faxed to the clinician. It can identify pathogens by either DNA probe or RNA probe. By DNA probes, it identifies Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Eikenella corrodens, Campylobacter rectus, Bacteroides forsythus, and Treponema denticola [17]. By RNA probe, it identifies Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema forsythia, and Treponema denticola [16].OMNIgene-ORAL is a commercial POC device produced by DNA Genotek company.

2.2 Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF)

GCF is a body fluid derived from serum, leukocytes, and cells of periodontium and oral microflora [18]. Its composition is influenced by both external environment and body physiology [19]. Therefore, GCF contains a variety of potential markers derived from the host and bacteria from supragingival and subgingival plaque (Table 4). These biomarkers can be categorized as (i) inflammatory and immune products, (ii) bacterial enzymes, (iii) host-derived enzymes, (iv) tissue breakdown products, and (v) bone-specific proteins.

Inflammatory and immune productsBacterial proteasesHost-derived enzymesTissue breakdown productsBone-specific proteins
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)Alkaline phosphataseAlkaline phosphataseGlycosaminoglycanPyridinium crosslink urine pyridinoline
CytokinesAminopeptidasesβ-GlucuronidaseHyaluronic acidPyridinium crosslink collagen peptide fragment
Antibacterial antibodiesChondroitin sulfataseElastaseChondroitin-4-sulfateTartrate-resistant acid phosphatase
Acute-phase proteinsCollagenaseCathepsinsChondroitin-6-sulfateHydroxyproline
ComplementFibrinolysinSerine proteinase (G)Dermatan sulfateGalactosyl hydroxylysine
Vasoactive intestinal peptideGlucosidasesNonspecific neutral proteinasesHydroxyprolineGlycosaminoglycans
Neurokinin aHemolysinMatrix metalloproteinase-l,3,8,13Fibronectin fragmentsOsteonectin and bone phosphoprotein
NeopterinHyaluronidaseAspartate amino transferaseConnective tissue and bone proteinsosteocalcin
Platelet-activating factorPhospholipaseMyeloperoxidasesType I collagen peptides
HydroxyprolineLactate dehydrogenasepolypeptide growth factor

Table 4.

Biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid [10].

Test kitsEnzymes
PeriogardAST
Pocket watchAST
PeriocheckCollagenase (neutral protease)
Prognostik (Dentsply), BioliseElastase (serine protease)
MMP dipstick methodMMP

Table 5.

Commercially available kits using GCF for detecting host-derived enzymes [10].

Markers present in dental biofilm
SpecificNonspecificSystemic
Immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG and IgM)MucinsC-reactive protein
Lysozyme
Lactoferrin
Histatin
Peroxidase

Table 6.

Biomarkers present in dental biofilm [10].

Test kitsBacteria and their products
Perioscan (BANA test)Trypsin like protease
Oral B lab
Evalusite (Kodak)P.gingivalis, P.intermedia, A.actinomycetemcomitans
Perioscan/ Diamond probe/Probe 2000 systemFor volatile sulfur compounds
TOPASBacterial toxins and protease

Table 7.

Other commercially available kits for detecting bacterial protease [10].

The biomarkers in GCF provide information regarding inflammation, loss of bone, patient susceptibility, detection of periodontal disease, prognosis of disease, and onset of disease (Table 5) [20, 21]. The disadvantages of GCF are that it requires multiple samples of individual tooth sites and extreme lab processing [22]. Moreover, the collection of samples is difficult, and easy contamination of GCF can occur [23]. This makes GCF a difficult medium for chair-side diagnosis.

2.2.1 Biochemical tests done on GCF

2.2.1.1 Periogard

It detects aspartate aminotransferase (AST), which is released on cell death due to periodontal diseases (Figure 1) [24]. Thus, periogard can easily locate sites with active disease processes [25]. The only disadvantage is the numerous steps required and difficulty in colour measurement [26].

Figure 1.

Principle of periogard.

2.2.1.2 Pocket watch

Pocket watch also analyzes AST levels but through a different method. AST acts as a catalyst in the exchange of an amino group of cysteine sulfuric acid by α-keto-gluteric acid to produce β-sulfinyl pyruvate in the presence of pyridoxal phosphate. Inorganic sulfite is released by the spontaneous decomposition of glutamate β-sulfinyl pyruvate. These sulfite ions produced react with malachite green to convert it into a colorless form, thereby showing the pink-colored rhodamine B dye. Thus, the rate of conversion assesses the AST concentration [27].

2.2.1.3 Periocheck

It detects neutral proteases in GCF, such as elastases, proteinases, and collagenases, and is a FDA-approved rapid chair-side test (Figure 2) [28].

Figure 2.

Principle of periocheck.

2.2.1.4 Prognostik

It was developed in 1993 and helped in identifying active sites by measuring elevated MMP (Figure 3). MMPs are host-derived proteinases, which play a major role in periodontitis and dental peri-implant health and disease. MMPs, such as elastases, are released by the lysosomes of polymorphonuclear leukocytes [29].

Figure 3.

Principle of prognostik.

2.2.1.5 MMP dipstick

MMP dipstick detects MMP-8, which differentiates sites having healthy gingiva, gingivitis, and periodontitis [30].

2.2.1.6 Plaque

Numerous studies have detected pathogens in dental plaque causing periodontal diseases (Table 6). Numerous commercially available kits have emerged, which detect these pathogens and help in diagnosis and treatment (Table 7) [10].

2.2.2 Microbial tests done on plaque

2.2.2.1 Perioscan (BANA)

It basically detects trypsin-like proteins, which are produced by various periopathogens, such as P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia (Figure 4) [31]. A major disadvantage of perioscan is that it cannot differentiate among these bacteria. Moreover, it cannot detect non-trypsin-like enzymes, thus limiting the number of pathogens [32].

Figure 4.

Principle of perioscan.

2.2.2.2 Evalusite

This kit uses membrane-based enzyme immunoassay and can detect A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, and P. intermedia (Figure 5). The major limitation is the ability to detect only these three pathogens. Moreover, the detection is done by assessing the change in color, which is always subjective and varies from person to person [24].

Figure 5.

Principle of evalusite.

2.2.2.3 Perio 2000

Similar to perioscan, this kit detects P. gingivali, P. intermedia, and T. forsythia. It measures volatile sulfide compounds (VSCs), which are produced by bacteria after degrading the serum proteins (cysteine and methionine), and displays it digitally. The main advantage is that there is no need to collect GCF as the probe tip can be inserted directly into the gingival sulcus.

2.2.2.4 Toxicity prescreening assay (TOPAS)

It directly detects bacterial toxins and bacterial proteins in GCF. Thus, it is able to locate active disease sites. It is a chair-side test kit that shows results by changing color intensity according to toxin concentration in the GCF [33].

2.2.3 Genetic tests

2.2.3.1 MyperioID

MyperioID does not identify any pathogens, but basically provides genetic susceptibility of the patient to periodontal diseases [16].

2.2.3.2 Periodontitis susceptibility trait test

The periodontitis susceptibility trait test (PST) is the test that identifies the genetic predisposition of the patient for periodontitis. It detects polymorphism in IL-1 gene, which has been linked with periodontal diseases [17].

2.3 Diagnostics-lab-on-chip

Lab-on-chip is a newer generation of POC technology still undergoing development [14]. It basically integrates and automates all the complexities of a laboratory procedure onto a computer chip [28]. This technology will thus measure multiple biomarkers in a small sample of plaque, GCF, or saliva [13, 16]. It will omit all the requirements of heavy expensive equipment or trained lab technicians. The result will be chair-side, instant, and not subjective.

Advertisement

3. Advantages of POC

It increases patient cooperation as no blood is drawn from the patient. Cost and inventory for shipping samples to a centralized laboratory are reduced. Large populations can be screened. Treatment can be started immediately as results are obtained rapidly. It requires lesser training and resources than current diagnostic methods. Patients with higher risk can be recognized and treated.

Advertisement

4. Disadvantages of POC

The use of POC diagnostics in periodontal surveillance looks promising; however, in the clinical setting, these approaches suffer from various obstacles. These tests still need validation and acceptance by dentists. Cost-effectiveness of the procedure and kit is another concern. Finally, the clinician needs to be abreast with the knowledge of diagnosis, disease risks, and prevention before diagnostics may be integrated into routine clinical periodontal practice.

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

The cornerstone for a successful periodontal treatment is an accurate initial diagnosis. The current existing diagnostic methods suffice the purpose but cannot achieve any more goals than this. Knowledge of patient susceptibility and active disease sites are desired by any clinician from the diagnostic methods. With the introduction of new chair-side test kits, which use the host and bacterial markers of periodontal disease, monitoring of specific sites is now possible. The various oral fluids easily available for test are under great amount of research and investigation. Though with various challenges, saliva, GCF, and plaque are promising mediums to be used for periodontal diseases. One of the latest clinical applications of POCT is in the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Although SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in nasopharyngeal swabs is reported to be the gold standard method but it is an invasive method, and therefore uncomfortable for the patient. Due to the limitations of this method, saliva is now suggested to be a better alternative because it is easy to collect the sample and is not uncomfortable for the patient [34]. SpeciMAX is the commercially available saliva collection kit for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.

The need of an hour is to develop POC devices for diseases, such as cancer and hyperthyroidism, so that these can be detected with the help of biomarkers at home leading to their early diagnosis and effective intervention at right time.

References

  1. 1. Hernández M, Vernal R, Sorsa T, Tervahartiala T, Mäntylä P, Gamonal J. The role of immuno-inflammatory response in the pathogenesis of chronic periodontitis and development of chair-side point of care diagnostics. In: Buduneli N, editor. Pathogenesis and Treatment of Periodontitis [Internet]. London: InTech Publishing Co; 2012 [cited 2022 Oct 09]. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/26476 doi: 10.5772/32658
  2. 2. Lee Y, Wong DT. Saliva: An emerging biofluid for early detection of disease. American Journal of Dentistry. 2009;22:241-248
  3. 3. Sahingur SE, Cohen RE. Analysis of host responses and risk for disease progression. Periodontology. 2000;34:57-83
  4. 4. Position paper: Diagnosis of periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontology. 2003;74:1237-1247
  5. 5. Offenbacher S. Periodontal diseases: Pathogenesis. Annals of Periodontology. 1996;1:821-878
  6. 6. Giannobile WV, Beikler T, Kinney JS, Ramseier CA, Morelli T, Wong DT. Saliva as a diagnostic tool for periodontal disease: Current state and future directions. Periodontology. 2000;2009(50):52-64
  7. 7. Chapple I. Periodontal disease diagnosis: Current status and future developments. Journal of Dentistry. 1997;25:3-15
  8. 8. Spielmann N, Wong DT. Saliva: Diagnostics and therapeutic perspectives. Oral Diseases. 2011;17:345-354
  9. 9. Wei F, Wong DT. Point-of-care platforms for salivary diagnostics. The Chinese Journal of Dental Research. 2012;15:7-15
  10. 10. Taba M Jr, Kinney J, Kim AS, Giannobile WV. Diagnostic biomarkers for oral and periodontal diseases. Dental Clinics of North America. 2005;49:551-572
  11. 11. Loos BG, Tjoa S. Host-derived diagnostic markers for periodontitis: Do they exist in gingival crevice fluid? Periodontology. 2000;39:53-72
  12. 12. Miller SM. Saliva testing: A non-traditional diagnostic tool. Clinical Laboratory Science. 1994;7:3944
  13. 13. Wong DT. Salivaomics. Journal of American Dental Association. 2012;143:19S-24S
  14. 14. Priyanka N, Kalra N, Shanbhag N, Kumar K, Seema BB, et al. Recent approaches in saliva as a credible periodontal diagnostic and prognostic marker. AOSR. 2012;2:40-46
  15. 15. Christodoulides N, Tran M, Floriano PN, et al. A microchip-based multianalyte assay system for the assessment of cardiac risk. Analytical Chemistry. 2002;74:3030-3036
  16. 16. Chepuri T, Gooty JR, Durvasala S, Palaparthi R. Chair side diagnostic test kits in periodontics. Indian Journal of Dental Advances. 2015;7:41-45
  17. 17. Pajnigara NG, Kolte AP, Kolte RA, Pajnigara NG. Chair side diagnostic kits in Periodontics. International Dental Journal Of Student’s Research. 2016;4:25-31
  18. 18. Uitto V-J. Gingival crevice fluid – an introduction. Periodontology. 2000;2003(31):9-11
  19. 19. Champagne CME, Buchanan W. Potential for gingival crevice fluid measures as predictors of risk for periodontal diseases. Periodontology. 2000;2003(31):167-180
  20. 20. Zia A, Khan S, Bey A, Gupta ND, Mukhtar-Un-Nisar S. Oral biomarkers in the diagnosis and progression of periodontal diseases. Biology and Medicine. 2011;3:45-52
  21. 21. Chapple I. Periodontal diagnosis and treatment -- where does the future lie? Periodontology. 2000;51:9-24
  22. 22. Patil PB, Patil BR. Saliva: A diagnostic biomarker of periodontal diseases. Journal of Indian Society Periodontology. 2011;15:310-317
  23. 23. Persson G, De Rouen T, Page R. Relationship between levels of aspartate aminotransferase in gingival crevicular fluid and active tissue destruction in treated chronic periodontitis patients. Journal of Periodontal Research. 1990;25:81-87
  24. 24. Mikx FH, Renggli HH. How sensible are bacteriological tests in periodontology? Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Tandheelkunde. 1994;101:484-488
  25. 25. Chambers D, Imrey P, Cohen R, Crawford J, Alves M, Mcswiggin T. A longitudinal study of aspartate aminotransferase in human gingival crevicular fluid. Journal of Periodontal Research. 1991;26:65-74
  26. 26. Persson GR, Alves M, Chambers D, et al. A multicentered clinical trial of PerioGard in distinguishing between diseased and healthy periodontal sites. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1995;22:794-803
  27. 27. Shimhadaka K, Mizuno T. Analysis of AST in gingival crevicular fluid assessed using Perio Watch: A longitudinal study with initial therapy. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2000;27:819-823
  28. 28. Chapple I, Matthews J, Thorpe G, Glenwright H, Smith J, Saxby M. A new ultrasensitive chemiluminescent assay for the site-specific quantification of alkaline phosphatase in gingival crevicular fluid. Journal of Periodontal Research. 1993;28:266-273
  29. 29. Armitage G, Jeffcoat M, Chadwick D, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of elastase as a marker for the progression of periodontitis. Journal of Periodontology. 1994;65:120
  30. 30. Sorsa T et al. Collagenase-2 (MMP-8) as a point-of-care biomarker in periodontitis and cardiovascular diseases. Therapeutic response to non-antimicrobial properties of tetracyclines. Pharmacological Research. 2011;63:108-113
  31. 31. Laughton B, Syned S, Loesche W. API ZYM system for identification of Bacteroides ssp., Capnocytophagia ssp., and spirochaetes of oral origin. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1982;15:97-127
  32. 32. Loesche W, Syed S, Stoll J. Trypsin-like activity in sub-gingival plaque: A diagnostic marker for spirochetes and periodontal disease? Journal of Periodontology. 1987;58:266-273
  33. 33. Puscasu CG, Dumitriu A, Dumitriu HT. Biochemical and enzymatic diagnosis aids in periodontal disease. OHDMBSC. 2005;4:19-25
  34. 34. Caixeta DC, Oliveira SW, et al. One-year update on salivary diagnostic of COVID-19. Frontiers in Public Health. 2021;9:589-564

Written By

Nancy Srivastava and Shivendra Rana

Submitted: 07 August 2022 Reviewed: 30 August 2022 Published: 08 November 2022