Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Low-Cost Preparation Technologies for Titanium Alloys: A Review

Written By

Qisheng Feng and Chonghe Li

Submitted: 23 July 2022 Reviewed: 17 August 2022 Published: 16 September 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.107129

From the Edited Volume

Titanium Alloys - Recent Progress in Design, Processing, Characterization, and Applications

Edited by Ram Krishna

Chapter metrics overview

183 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The titanium industry has been developing for nearly 70 years since the birth of Ti-6Al-4 V alloy. Due to its high specific strength, high and low-temperature resistance, corrosion resistance and good biocompatibility, titanium alloy is used in aerospace, marine engineering, and biomedical fields. However, the high production cost of titanium alloys currently limits their widespread use like steel and aluminum alloys. Therefore, the low-cost preparation technology for titanium alloys becomes hot research in recent years. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of low-cost preparation technologies for titanium alloys from four aspects: raw materials, melting, hot working and machining, and advanced technologies. This review would be of interest to scholars in related fields.

Keywords

  • low-cost titanium alloys
  • alloying elements
  • low-cost melting
  • hot working
  • wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM)

1. Introduction

Although titanium (Ti) is the tenth amplest element on earth and the fourth most ample structural metal after aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), and magnesium (Mg), it took about 160 years from its discovery to the industrial application of Ti-6Al-4 V alloy in 1954 [1]. This is because, despite its large reserves, titanium is also defined as a rare metal due to its strong affinity for elements such as O, C, and N, which makes it difficult to extract from its ores [2]. In the past 70 years since the birth of Ti-6Al-4 V, titanium alloys have developed into hundreds of types and have been widely used in various industries due to their high specific strength, high and low-temperature resistance, corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility [3]. The strength of titanium is similar to steel, but its density is about half that of steel, and compared with aluminum, titanium is five times stronger [4]. The high specific strength of titanium alloys and their high tolerance to extreme operating conditions have led to their widespread use in aerospace (aircraft, spacecraft, engine, etc.) and military applications (helicopter, unmanned aerial vehicles, guided missiles, etc.) [5, 6, 7]. About 60% of titanium alloys are used in aerospace in Europe and the United States [8]. Nowadays, people are increasingly concerned about reducing CO2 emissions, and the light weighting of transportation is a key step in reducing CO2 emissions [9]. Therefore, the automotive industry is showing a strong interest in the use of titanium alloys for the light weighting of structural components, which offers the possibility of lower fuel consumption and reduced CO2 emissions, but are currently limited to racing cars and specialized vehicles [10, 11, 12]. Titanium alloy is also used in marine engineering as a corrosion-resistant and lightweight structural material (propeller, bathyscaph, etc.) [13, 14]. In addition, non-toxic, non-magnetic, and better biocompatibility make titanium alloy widely used in medical implants (joint prosthesis, skeletal repair, etc.) [15, 16, 17]. Based on the current industrial applications and foreseeable development potential, titanium and its alloys are gradually becoming the fourth generation of metal materials after copper (Cu), iron (Fe), and aluminum (Al), but its high application cost greatly limits its large-scale application like the previous three metal materials [4, 18, 19]. Therefore, for about the past 30 years, research has been driven by various industriesto make titanium alloys a common general-purpose metal by reducing their production costs [20, 21, 22, 23].

The traditional production and manufacturing process of titanium alloy components are roughly the same as for steel, including production of titanium sponge, addition of alloying elements, melting and pouring of alloy ingots, hot working to prepare different types of titanium materials (plate, tube, bar, etc.), and machining to prepare the final titanium alloy components. According to statistics, the percentage of each factor in the overall cost composition of titanium parts is shown in Figure 1 [24]. It can be seen that from titanium sponge to ingot accounts for about 30% of the total cost, which includes the preparation of titanium sponge, the addition of alloying elements, and the melting of ingots. The average prices of titanium metal and its alloyed elements are shown in Table 1 [25]. The price of titanium metal is much higher than the general metal iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al), while the application of more alloying elements, such as V, Nb, Mo, will again increase the cost of raw materials. In addition, the molten state of titanium alloy has a large viscosity and poor filling mobility, which makes it easy to produce defects such as porosity during the solidification process [26]. On the other hand, the hot working and machining accounts for about 70% of the total cost of titanium alloys, which is a hardly desirable percentage. Titanium alloys tend to react with oxygen under hot working and form a hardened oxide layer on the surface, making this process require specialized equipment [27]. At the same time, due to its low thermal conductivity, it will make the heat generated during the machining process cannot be dissipated quickly, and the higher heat accumulation will accelerate the tool wear [28]. Poor machinability and electrical conductivity have also led to the classification of titanium alloys as difficult to machine materials [29]. The low molding rate of titanium parts and the large amount of remaining scrap being wasted are also a factor in the overall high cost of titanium alloys applications [30]. After the above analysis, we understand the various factors affecting the total cost of titanium alloys and realize that there are great challenges in the development of low-cost titanium alloys.

Figure 1.

Percentage contribution of processing step to total cost of titanium alloys [24].

ElementPrice (USD/kg)Role in phase stability
Ti~11.9
Al~2.6α-stabilizer
Fe~0.6β-stabilizer
V~334.0β-stabilizer
Nb~96.5β-stabilizer
Mo~56.0β-stabilizer
Ta~534.4β-stabilizer
Ni~25.4β-stabilizer
W~16.2β-stabilizer
Cr~11.4β-stabilizer
Co~53.6β-stabilizer
Mn~3.5β-stabilizer

Table 1.

The average prices of titanium metal and its alloying elements [25].

This chapter firstly reviewed the latest progress of low-cost titanium alloys from three aspects: raw materials, melting of alloy ingots, and processing and forming. Then, several new techniques for the low-cost preparation of titanium alloys are discussed and analyzed. Finally, the future development of low-cost titanium alloys is prospected and some suggestions are put forward.

Advertisement

2. Raw materials

2.1 Production of titanium

In the history of titanium production, from the birth of the Hunter process to the improved Kroll process using recyclable magnesium instead of sodium, it is still the most common method used in industrial production [31]. However, it is known from practical applications that the product obtained by the Kroll process is titanium sponge, which is six times more expensive than stainless steel production process [32]. After this problem was recognized, researchers continued to develop several new processes to reduce the cost of titanium feedstock, such as the Fray-Farthing-Chen (FFC) process [33], the Armstrong process [34], the Ono and Suzuki (OS) process [35], etc. The development of new processes for the production of titanium has been reviewed by researchers [36, 37]. This section will categorize all processes and then provide a brief overview and analysis. These new processes can be divided into two categories according to the metallurgical process: thermochemical processes and electrochemical processes. A summary of the various titanium production processes is shown in Table 2, including Kroll process.

Processes classificationProcesses namePrecursorsAdvantagesDisadvantagesRefs.
Thermochemical processesKroll processTiCl4Product with less oxygen content and metallic impuritiesLow productivity; high cost of reductant; high energy consumption[31]
TiROTM processTiCl4Continuous productionEasy introduction of oxygen[38]
Vapor-phase reduction processTiCl4Continuous productionHigh oxygen content or high magnesium and chlorine content in Ti powder[39]
CSIR-Ti processTiCl4Continuous productionOxygen content is difficult to control[40]
Armstrong processTiCl4Continuous production; excellent compressibility and denseness of Ti powderIrregular powder morphology[34]
MHR processTiO2Single-step reactionHigh energy consumption and pollution[41]
PRP processTiO2Highly scalable; controllable purity of Ti powderHigh cost of reductant[42]
EMR processTiO2Continuous production; high purity of Ti powderComplicated process; difficult separation of metal and salt[43]
HAMR processTiO2Low oxygen of Ti powderHigh energy consumption[44]
HDH processTi sponge, Ti ingot, Ti mill products and Ti scrapHigh purity of Ti powder; relatively inexpensive processIrregular and angular powder morphology[45]
Electrochemical processesFFC processTiO2Semi-continuous production; low oxygen of Ti powderLow current efficiency; difficult separation of metal and salt[33]
OS processTiO2Semi-continuous production; low oxygen of Ti powderLow current efficiency; difficult separation of metal and salt[35]
USTB processTiCxO1-x (0 < x < 1)Semi-continuous production; low oxygen of Ti powderLow current efficiency[46]
SOM processTiO2-containing fluxSingle-step processHigh process temperature[47]

Table 2.

A summary of the various titanium production processes.

Note: CSIR: council of scientific and industrial research; MHR: metal-hydride Reduction; PRP: preform reduction process; EMR: electronically mediated reaction; HAMR: hydrogen-assisted magnesium reduction; HDH: hydride-dehydride; FFC: Fray-Farthing-Chen; OS: Ono and Suzuki; USTB: University of Science and Technology Beijing; and SOM: solid oxide membrane.

To date, the vast majority of the world’s titanium is produced by the Kroll process, which involves chlorination of titanium ore, purification of TiCl4, magnesiothermic reduction, vacuum distillation, and electrolytic regeneration of Mg and Cl2 [36]. We all know that the reduction of highly valence titanium compounds is a stepwise process. On the one hand, in order to minimize impurities in the final product, an excess of magnesium must be added to the magnesiothermic reduction process, which leads to a decrease in magnesium utilization. On the other hand, to ensure magnesium utilization leads to an increase of low valent titanium compounds in the final product and a longer production cycle, which requires a choice between production efficiency, energy consumption and product quality. Overall, the disadvantages of Kroll process, including the expensive reducing agent Mg, long process route, low production efficiency, and high energy consumption (71.61 kWh/kg), resulted in a high price of $7.4–$10.3 per kg for titanium [4, 36]. The TiRO™ process [38], the vapor-phase reduction process [39], and the CSIR-Ti process [40] can all be seen as improvements of the Kroll process, and the Armstrom process [34] can be seen as an improvement of the Hunter process, using the same precursors and reductants, and they all attempt to develop a continuous production process with low energy consumption. Although the main precursor for titanium production is TiCl4, there is also a class of processes that focus on TiO2. Because TiO2 can also be thermally reduced by metals, the commonly used reductants include Ca and Mg and are known as calciothermic and magnesiothermic methods, of which the MHR process [41], PRP process [42], EMR process [43], and HAMR process [44] are typical representatives. In addition to the thermochemical processes mentioned above, electrochemical processes have also received a great deal of attention, and typical representatives include FFC processes [33], OS processes [35], USTB processes [46], and SOM processes [47]. Table 2 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the various processes, and by looking at the corresponding references you can gain a deeper understanding of the principles and processes of each process. Although many new processes have been developed over the decades in the hope of producing titanium cost-effectively, unfortunately, none of them have yet been able to replace the Kroll process in commercial applications. In fact, if it is a mature cost-efficient new process, firstly it should reach industrial production, secondly, the quality of the titanium metal produced by this new process should be the same or even better than Kroll process, and finally, the production cost of this new process should be significantly lower than that of Kroll process. It is clear that all the new processes that have been developed so far do not meet the yield, quality, and cost targets simultaneously, and there is still a long way to go to prepare low-cost titanium alloys from this step in the production of titanium.

2.2 Addition of alloying elements

Alloying elements also have a place in the raw material cost of titanium alloys. At present, the core idea of reducing the cost of titanium alloys from alloying elements is to use Ti-6Al-4 V alloy as the target and use cheap alloying elements instead of expensive alloying elements to reduce the cost of titanium alloy, while its mechanical properties are not lower than Ti-6Al-4 V alloy. This is because Ti-6Al-4 V alloy is still the most widely used titanium alloy today [48]. A great deal of corresponding research has been conducted in the United States, Japan, and China, and many low-cost titanium alloys have been developed and some have found practical application. A summary of the low-cost titanium alloys that have been developed in various countries is shown in Table 3.

CountryAlloy designationChemical composition (wt %)Low-cost features
United StatesTimetal 62STi-6Al-1.7Fe-0.1SiReplace V with Fe
ATI-425Ti-4A1-2.5 V-1.5Fe-0.25OReplace V with Fe
Timetal LCBTi-1.5Al-6.8Mo-4.5FeReplace V with Fe-Mo alloy
RMI VMTi-6.4Al-1.2FeReplace V with Fe
Timetal CL4Ti-5Al-3 V-0.6Fe-0.17OReplace V with Fe
JapanTi-Fe-O-N alloysTi-1Fe-0.35O-0.01 N
Ti-1Fe-0.4O-0.045 N
Ti-1Fe-0.5O-0.05 N
Replace V with Fe; replace Al with O and N
SP-700Ti-4.5A1-3 V-2Mo-2FeReplace V with Fe-Mo alloy
TFCATi-4.3Fe-7.1Cr-3.0AlReplace V with Fe-Cr alloy
TFCTi-4.3Fe-7.1CrReduce Al; replace V with Fe-Cr alloy
KS Ti-531CTi-4.5Al-2.5Cr-1.2Fe-0.1CReplace V with Fe-Cr alloy
ChinaTi-8LCTi-6Al-1Mo-1FeReplace V with Fe-Mo alloy
Ti-12LCTi-4.5Al-1.5Fe-6.8MoReplace V with Fe-Mo alloy
Ti-35,421Ti-3Al-5Mo-4Cr-2Zr-1FeReplace V with Fe-Cr alloy
Ti-5322Ti-5Al-3 V-2Cr-2FePartially replace V with Fe-Cr alloy

Table 3.

A summary of the low-cost titanium alloys in various countries.

Depending on their influence on the β-transus temperature, the alloying elements are classified as α-stabilizers, β-stabilizers, and neutral [49]. Generally, different strengthening effects are exhibited due to different alloying elements types, but some alloying elements can be replaced by others. The α-stabilizing elements include Al, O, N, and C, with Al being the most commonly used in titanium alloy design. The β-stabilizing elements can be divided into isomorphous-stabilizing elements and eutectoid-stabilizing elements. The isomorphous-stabilizing elements include V, Mo, Nb, Ta, etc., while the eutectoid-stabilizing elements include Fe, Cr, Mn, Ni, etc. Zr and Sn are neutral elements. As can be seen in Table 1, eutectoid β-stabilizing elements are cheaper than isomorphous β-stabilizing elements, so people choose to use eutectoid β-stabilizing elements instead of isomorphous β-stabilizing elements for the design of low-cost titanium alloy. For example, in the early 1960s, the Ti185 (Ti-1Al-8 V-5Fe) alloy was developed through the addition of Fe [50]. Its high tensile and shear strength makes it an attractive fastening material. Since Fe is readily available and the cheapest, it is considered to be an ideal replacement element [51]. Fe is also one of the strongest β-stabilizing elements, and studies have shown that with the addition of Fe, the grain size of Ti-Fe system alloys decreases, which can improve the comprehensive properties of alloys [5253]. The use of Fe completely replaces V, such as the Timetal 62S (Ti-6Al-1.7Fe-0.1Si) alloy developed in the United States [54], and the addition of Si refines the grain. The cost of this alloy is reduced by 15–20% compared with Ti-6Al-4 V alloy without loss of strength and tensile properties, and has been used in military applications. In addition, the addition of Fe can facilitate hot working by reducing flow stresses, thus saving heat and power consumption [55]. Although you have many reasons to use Fe as an additive element for low-cost titanium alloys, it has been found that when Fe is added at more than 3%, segregation of Fe tends to occur, leading to the formation of intermetallic compounds (TiFe or Ti2Fe) and beta flecks [56]. The intermetallic compounds tend to cause the alloys to lose their plasticity and also reduce their mechanical properties, while the beta flecks are often the preferred location for fatigue failure of the alloys [57]. To avoid the above, people choose to use Fe to partially replace V and Mo as isomorphous β-stabilizing elements, such as ATI-425 alloy (Ti-4A1-2.5 V-1.5Fe-0.25O) [58], Timetal LCB alloy (Ti-1.5Al-6.8Mo-4.5Fe) [59], Ti-8LC alloy (Ti-6Al-1Mo-1Fe) [60], and Ti-12LC alloy (Ti-4.5Al-1.5Fe-6.8Mo) [60]. Timetal LCB alloy was originally developed to replace Ti-1023 (Ti-10 V-2Fe-3Al) alloy with a cheaper Fe-Mo intermediate alloy instead of V. This alloy has proven to have high strength and good formability, with mechanical properties comparable to Ti-1023 alloy while costing about 80% of Ti-6Al-4 V alloy. The Ti-8LC and Ti-12LC alloys developed by China also use a cheap Fe-Mo intermediate alloy and incorporate pure titanium scrap in the melting process. These two alloys are currently listed in the Chinese national standard, corresponding to the grades TC28 and TC29. Ti-Fe-O-N series alloy is a typical low-cost titanium alloy developed in Japan, replacing Al and V with O, N, and Fe [61]. This series of titanium alloys is generally used in civilian applications because of its low price, as well as its low plasticity and poor high temperature performance. In addition, these alloys are also considered as potential materials for biomedical applications [62]. Incidentally, low-cost biomedical titanium alloys are also being developed rapidly [16, 63]. Also as relatively inexpensive eutectoid β-stabilizing elements Cr and Mn are of course used in the development of low-cost titanium alloys, such as Ti-3Al-2Fe-8.5Cr [64], Ti-6.0Al-4.5Cr-1.5Mn [65], and Ti-4.5Al-6.9Cr-2.3Mn [66].

Because the proportion of alloying elements in titanium alloys is relatively low, compared with the main element Ti, this method is limited in terms of cost reduction. During the literature search, it is clear that although researchers in various countries have designed a large number of low-cost titanium alloys and claimed that they have good prospects for application, very few of them are actually used. The authors believe that it is time to conduct in-depth fundamental research on the process, organization, and property relationships of the already designed low-cost titanium alloys to bring them to the level of industrial application as far as possible. Take Ti-5321 (Ti-5Al-3Mo-3 V-2Zr-2Cr-1Nb-1Fe) alloy as an example, since it was designed, developers have conducted extensive research on the alloy in terms of plane strain fracture behavior, and impact toughness, fracture toughness, deformation mechanism, and mechanical properties, which can lay a good foundation for pilot scale and even industrial applications [67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73].

Advertisement

3. Melting of alloy ingots

3.1 Recycling of titanium scraps

The recycling and reuse of titanium scrap can reduce the production cost of titanium alloys, which means that the actual utilization rate of the material is improved. Titanium scraps are first generated from the production of titanium metal. For example, when titanium sponge is produced using the Kroll process, 10–20% of inferior titanium sponge is produced during the reduction and separation process [30]. In addition, a large amount of titanium scraps will be generated during the processing of titanium alloy parts, especially in the aircraft industry, the finished product rate of general aviation parts is only about 10% [20]. It is obvious that recycling of titanium scrap is necessary, and according to statistics, the cost of titanium alloy ingots will be reduced by 0.7% for every 1% of titanium added after the recycling process [20]. These reviews [30, 74, 75, 76, 77] are very useful for you to get a comprehensive understanding of the current technology and status of recycling of titanium scraps, and the authors will not repeat them here. Titanium scraps that meet the reuse criteria will be mentioned in Section 3.2.

3.2 Low-cost melting technologies

The low-cost melting of titanium alloy is mainly considered from two aspects, one is to increase the utilization of titanium scraps, and the other is to improve the melting efficiency and quality, while achieving the integration of meltage and refinement. The CHM (Cold Hearth Melting) technology developed in the United States basically solves both problems [20], including EBCHM (Electron Beam Cold Hearth Melting) technology and PACHM (Plasma Arc Cold Hearth Melting) technology. The biggest difference between the above two melting technology is the difference in heat source, and one is selected here for introduction. Compared with conventional vacuum arc remelting, EBCHM has the following outstanding advantages [20, 78]: (1) High-density impurities, low-density impurities, and volatile impurities can be removed to prepare pure titanium alloys; (2) low raw material requirements, 100% titanium scraps, and titanium alloys scraps can be utilized; (3) ingots can be produced by a single melting; and (4) the preparation of multiple forms of ingots can be achieved by adjusting the crystallizer to shorten the subsequent process flow. Since EBCHM works under high vacuum conditions, alloying elements (e.g., Al) are easily evaporated if their vapor pressure is higher than that of titanium. It is particularly important to control the content of aluminum, which is a key element in most titanium alloys. Using Langmuir equation and penetration theory, the evaporation process of Al during EBCHM of Ti64 alloy was calculated and the evaporation mechanism of Al was analyzed, and the results showed that the evaporation of Al is a double-controlled process, that is, surface evaporation and melt pool diffusion [78]. To control the evaporation of Al, the surface temperature of the alloys must be controlled. The influence of melting speed, electron beam output power, and other factors on ingot composition was determined by developing a mathematical model of Al evaporation kinetics during EBCHM, which provides a usable tool for melting ingots with specified compositions using EBCHM [79]. The aerospace materials standard of the United States requires aerospace structural parts made of titanium alloys must undergo an EBCHM melting. EBCHM is able to make full use of titanium scrap and obtain homogeneous titanium ingots by primary melting, thus reducing the production cost of titanium ingots in terms of both raw materials and energy, and has become the first choice of countries.

Advertisement

4. Hot working and machining

As shown in Figure 1, from titanium metal to alloy ingots accounts for 30% of the total cost of titanium alloy parts, which means that the savings from reducing the production cost of titanium metal, using cheap alloying elements instead of expensive alloying elements and using low-cost melting technology will only add up to much less than 30%. Correspondingly, the hot working and machining processes used for the final forming of titanium alloy parts account for approximately 70% of the total cost. Obviously, it is a big challenge to reduce the cost of hot working and machining. Researchers first thought of tackling this challenge by optimizing the process parameters. The appropriate hot working parameters for different titanium alloys need to be found accurately; otherwise, poorly performing titanium alloys will only increase the cost of their applications in disguise [80]. Temperature, strain rate, and strain are the most important parameters in the hot working. Titanium alloys are sensitive to the process parameters of hot working, and changes in parameters can alter their microstructural morphology, which in turn can lead to significant changes in actual alloys properties [81, 82]. In recent years, constitutive models [83] and processing maps [84] have gained more practical applications due to their accuracy in process parameter optimization. Table 4 summarizes some studies on constitutive models and processing maps of titanium alloys during hot working. From the different studies presented in Table 4, it can be concluded that the main challenge of this approach is to select the most suitable constitutive models to accurately describe the stress-strain behavior during the hot working. In addition, artificial neural networks based on machine learning have been applied to predict the hot deformation behavior [95], flow stress [96], microstructure evolution [97], and processing parameters [98] of titanium alloys. For example, a low-cost titanium alloy with bone-like Young’s modulus was designed using neural networks, as shown in Figure 2 [99]. And its Young’s modulus and Ms. temperatures were predicted, and further experiments proved its high tensile strength and better biocompatibility. The process of titanium alloys development can be accelerated through the use of artificial neural networks, while reducing research costs.

AlloysParametersRefs.
Temperature (°C)Strain rate (s−1)Strain (%)
Ti-6Al-4 V900–10500.1, 1 and 1080[85]
Ti60970–11200.01–1080[86]
CP-Ti400–7000.001–190[87]
IMI-834975–11000.1 and 180[88]
Ti2448750–8500.001–6370[89]
Ti-6Al-4 V800–11000.001–10100[90]
BT3-1800–10600.0003–160[91]
As-cast ATI 425950–11500.001–150[92]
Ti-3Al-3.7Cr-2Fe-0.1B800–9500.01–1070[93]
46Ti-46Al-4Nb-2Cr-2Mn850–10500.0001–1080[94]

Table 4.

A summary of some studies on constitutive models and processing maps of titanium alloys during hot working.

Figure 2.

Schematic diagram of artificial neural network assisted development of titanium alloys. (a) The operation process of alloy design is introduced in detail; and (b) prediction of low-cost titanium alloys by limiting high-cost elements to less than 20% [99].

If the cost of equipment is considered, steel and titanium co-production can be implemented [4], which can effectively use the existing mature equipment to greatly reduce the processing and manufacturing cost of titanium alloys.

Advertisement

5. Advanced low-cost preparation technologies

A large part of the high price of titanium alloys comes from the long and complex process from ingot to product. Advanced preparation technologies are dedicated to the preparation of titanium alloy products in a few simple steps, while achieving efficient manufacturing and improved raw material utilization. Table 5 summarizes some studies of advanced low-cost preparation techniques of titanium alloys. The advanced technologies in the table can be divided into three categories, namely AM, PM, and FAST-forge, as SLM and WAAM are included in AM [105, 106]. The feedstock used in all technologies is metal powders, except for WAAM, which uses metal wire as feedstock. Compared with titanium sponge powder and titanium powder prepared by other methods in Section 2.1, HDH titanium powder containing Ti mill products and Ti scrap is preferred due to its low cost, low chlorine content, and good mechanical properties [45]. We note that Fe remains an important alloying element in advanced technologies, due to the fact that Fe, in addition to the advantages mentioned in Section 2.2, and helps to improve the sinterability of titanium alloys, making it more advantageous in PM [24]. Although alloying elements such as Ni, Cr and Cu are also used in powder form, the attraction of using Fe powder in advanced technologies is still the greatest, and expensive alloying elements, complex hot working, and difficult machining can all be solved at once.

AlloysFeedstockTechnologiesRefs.
Ti-xCuTi and Cu spherical powdersAM[100]
Ti-xFeHDH Ti powder and Fe powderPM[101]
Ti-6Al-4 VTi-6Al-4 V HDH powderFAST-forge[102]
Ti-xFeTi and Fe powerPM[103]
Ti-xFeHDH Ti powder and AISI 430 LHC powderPM[104]
Ti-35NbTi and Nb powerSLM[105]
Ti-6Al-4 VTi-6Al-4 V wireWAAM[106]

Table 5.

A summary of some studies of advanced low-cost preparation techniques of titanium alloys.

Note: AM: additive manufacturing; PM: powder metallurgy; FAST: field-assisted sintering technology; SLM: selective laser melting; and WAAM: wire and arc additive manufacturing.

AM is a process of manufacturing parts layer by layer and is a promising method for manufacturing near final (net) shape parts [100], which focuses on reducing the production cost of titanium alloy parts in terms of both improving the utilization of raw materials and preparing the final product in a short process. In the following, WAAM will be discussed and analyzed as an example. A complete WAAM process consists of three main aspects: the planning of the target part by software, the deposition of metal materials using the WAAM system, and post-treatment [107]. The cost data for the production of titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4 V) parts using WAAM are shown in Table 6 [108]. The capital cost is a one-time cost of approximately $130,000 to make up the basic hardware of WAAM. Also, welding wire (Ti-6Al-4 V) is an inexpensive feedstock, with prices ranging from $120 per kg to $300 per kg (depending upon wire diameter). The advantages of WAAM are high deposition rates, low equipment costs, and high material utilization. Compared with conventional subtractive manufacturing, the WAAM process can reduce manufacturing time by 40–60% and post-machining time by 15–20%, and save approximately 78% of raw materials [109]. In aerospace, the “Buy-To-Fly” (BTF) ratio is used as a cost lever to refer to the ratio of materials purchased to materials in the final product, and it is clear that a lower BTF ratio is advantageous [110]. The researchers compared the BTF ratio using WAAM with conventional titanium machining and can conclude that the BTF ratio of WAAM is significantly lower compared with conventional titanium machining methods [111, 112, 113]. The applications of titanium alloy parts prepared by WAAM are shown in Figure 3 [107]. As an example, WAAM3D Company produced a full-scale sample of a Ti-6Al-4 V pressure container for space exploration that is approximately 1 meter high and 8.5 kg in weight. By using WAAM, 65% time was saved and 80% less raw material was used to meet performance requirements [107]. By far, WAAM products are the most commonly used in the aerospace and nuclear industries. The low processing accuracy and large surface roughness limit its application in the electronics and biomedical industries compared with other metal powder-based AM, such as SLM [114].

CostsItemsAmount of money (USD)
Capital costSix-axis robot~60,000
Power source and torch~36,000
Clamping tool~12,000
Enclosure~24,000
Software costWAAMsoft/
Material costWelding wire (Ti-6Al-4 V)~120–300/kg

Table 6.

A summary of cost data for the production of titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4 V) parts using WAAM [108].

Figure 3.

The applications of titanium alloy parts prepared by WAAM [107].

Advertisement

6. Emerging technologies and climate

The greenhouse effect caused by CO2 emissions is becoming increasingly evident. According to estimates, to achieve a global temperature rise limited to less than 2°C by 2100, CO2 emissions must be reduced to less than 500 million tons per year before 2050 [115]. In recent years, several countries have developed a series of policies to address CO2 emissions, such as carbon taxes and carbon trading schemes, all aimed at addressing the problem of climate degradation due to excessive CO2 emissions [116, 117, 118]. It is clear that these policies will lead to changes in the industry, making the future of industrial production cleaner and more efficient. For the main process used to produce titanium, the Kroll process, researchers compared the environmental impacts of advanced technology equipment before and after its application, such as multi-pole electrolytic cells and inverted U-shaped reduction distillation furnaces [119]. The results show that the application of advanced technologies significantly improved the Kroll process’ ability to save energy and reduce emissions, with 17% reduction in total electric power consumption, 90% reduction in particulate matter and CO gas emissions, and 21% reduction in overall environmental impact. In China, 74.4% of electricity is generated by coal, so a reduction in energy consumption in industrial production can also be seen as reducing carbon emissions [120]. Electrical discharge machining (EDM), which has the advantages of non-contact machining, non-macro-cutting force and high-machining hardness materials, has been maturely applied to the machining of titanium alloys [121]. According to the World Research Institute/World Business Council for Sustainable Development Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the total carbon emissions of the electricity used by an EDM machine are 23.57 tons of CO2 equivalent. In order to save energy and improve EDM productivity, researchers developed a magnetic field-assisted EDM process (MF-EDM), and experimental results showed 61.43% reduction in energy consumption when using MF-EDM, equivalent to 9.09 tons reduction in CO2 emissions [120]. Environmental friendliness is one of the major advantages of electrochemical methods. Unlike the preparation of titanium using electrochemical methods in Section 2.1, researchers used electrochemical methods to efficiently prepare Ti-Al alloy powders [122] and Ti-Al-V alloy powders [123] in one step, and at the same time, these titanium alloy powders can be directly used as raw materials for near-net forming of titanium alloy parts, such as powder metallurgy (PM) and additive manufacturing (AM). Through modeling and estimation, if the U.S. aircraft industry were to shift from conventional manufacturing (CM) to additive manufacturing (AM), cumulative energy savings of 1.2–2.8 billion GJ could be achieved in 2050, with associated cumulative greenhouse gases (GHG) reductions estimated at 92.1–215.0 million metric tons [112]. For any step of the full production process of titanium alloy parts, emerging technologies with environmental friendliness, low energy consumption, and low cost are the subjects of our research, and it is clear that we still have a long way to go.

Advertisement

7. Conclusions

In order to expand the application range of titanium and titanium alloys, the low-cost titanium alloys are one of the hot spots of research in the field of titanium alloys at present. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of low-cost preparation technologies for titanium alloys from four aspects: raw materials, melting, hot working and machining, and advanced technologies. Raw materials include the production of titanium metal and the addition of alloying elements. Although there are many improved or alternative processes for the production of titanium, the Kroll process is still the most used in industry. Therefore, using cheap alloying elements instead of expensive ones is currently an effective way to reduce raw material costs. On the melting side, the recycling of titanium scraps and the application of CHM melting technology are together influencing the cost of alloy ingots. The use of the constitutive model, processing maps, and artificial neural networks can make the process parameters of hot working more accurate, and the co-production of steel and titanium can reduce the production cost of titanium alloys from equipment. Advanced preparation techniques for titanium alloys, such as AM and PM, are highly attractive because they generally have simple steps and can address multiple factors that lead to high costs in traditional titanium alloy preparation processes at once. Only technological progress in many aspects will enable titanium alloys to be used more widely, like steel and aluminum alloys. In addition, some emerging technologies for the preparation of titanium alloys and their contribution to the reduction of CO2 emissions and energy consumption are presented.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Contract: U1860203), the Shanghai Rising-Star Program (19QA1403600), and the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning (TP2019041).

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Leyens C, Peters M. Titanium and Titanium Alloys: Fundamentals and Application. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2003. DOI: 10.1002/3527602119
  2. 2. Nie X, Dong L, Bai C, Chen D, Qiu G. Preparation of Ti by direct electrochemical reduction of solid TiO2 and its reaction mechanism. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China. 2006;16:723-727. DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(06)60288-4
  3. 3. Fashu S, Lototskyy M, Davids M, Pickering L, Linkov V, Sun T, et al. A review on crucibles for induction melting of titanium alloys. Materials & Design. 2020;186:108295. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108295
  4. 4. Qiu G, Guo Y. Current situation and development trend of titanium metal industry in China. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials. 2022;4:599-610. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-022-2455-y
  5. 5. Banerjee D, Williams J. Perspectives on titanium science and technology. Acta Materialia. 2013;61:844-879. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.043
  6. 6. Boyer R. Titanium for aerospace: Rationale and applications. Advanced Performance Materials. 1995;2:349-368. DOI: 10.1007/BF00705316
  7. 7. Boyer B. An overview on the use of titanium in the aerospace industry. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 1996;213:103-114. DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(96)10233-1
  8. 8. Gomez-Gallegos A, Mandal P, Gonzalez D, Zuelli N, Blackwell P. Studies on titanium alloys for aerospace application. Defect and Diffusion Forum. 2018;385:419-423. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.385.419
  9. 9. Raupach M, Marland G, Ciais P, Quere C, Canadell J, Klepper G, et al. Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions. PNAS. 2007;104:10288-10293. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700609104
  10. 10. Hartman A, Gerdemann S, Hansen J. Producing lower-cost titanium for automotive applications. Journal of Metals. 1998;50:16-19. DOI: 10.1007/S11837-998-0408-1
  11. 11. Takahashi K, Mori K, Takebe H. Application of titanium and its alloys for automobile parts. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2020;321:02003. DOI: 10.1051/MATECCONF/202032102003
  12. 12. Froes F, Friedrich H, Kiese J, Bergoint D. Titanium in the family automobile: The cost challenge. Journal of Metals. 2004;56:40-44. DOI: 10.1007/S11837-004-0144-0
  13. 13. Gorynin I. Titanium alloys for marine application. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 1999;263:112-116. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01180-0
  14. 14. Rohith K, Shreyas S, Appaiah K, Sheshank R, Ganesha B, Vinod B. Recent material advancement for marine application. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2019;18:4854-4859. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.476
  15. 15. Zhang L, Chen L. A review on biomedical titanium alloys: recent progress and prospect. Advanced Engineering Materials. 2019;21:1801215. DOI: 10.1002/adem.201801215
  16. 16. Sidhu S, Singh H, Gepreel M. A review on alloy design, biological response, and strengthening of β-titanium alloys as biomaterials. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2021;121:111661. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111661
  17. 17. Gepreel M, Niinomi M. Biocompatibility of Ti-alloys for long-term implantation. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 2013;20:407-415. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.11.014
  18. 18. Devaraj A, Joshi V, Srivastava A, Manandhar S, Moxson V, Duz V, et al. A low-cost hierarchical nanostructured beta-titanium alloy with high strength. Nature Communications. 2016;7:11176. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11176
  19. 19. Froes F, Gungor M, Imam M. Cost-affordable titanium: The component fabrication perspective. Journal of Metals. 2007;59:28-31. DOI: 10.1007/S11837-007-0074-8
  20. 20. Ogawa M. Research and development of low cost titanium alloys. Journal of Japan Institute of Light Metals. 2005;55:549-552. DOI: 10.2464/jilm.55.549
  21. 21. Barnes J, Peter W, Blue C. Evaluation of low cost titanium alloy products. Materials Science Forum. 2009;618-619:165-168. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.618-619.165
  22. 22. Niinomi M, Nakai M, Itsumi Y, Murakami S, Oyama H, Abe W, et al. Microstructural control and mechanical properties of low-cost titanium alloys for next generation aircrafts. In: Proceedings of the 8th Pacific Rim International Congress on Advanced Materials and Processing (PRICM-8). Hawaii, USA: Wiley-VCH; 2013. pp. 1131-1138
  23. 23. Niinomi M, Nakai M, Hieda J, Cho K, Akahori T, Hattori T, et al. Research and development of low-cost titanium alloys for biomedical applications. Key Engineering Materials. 2013;551:133-139. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.551.133
  24. 24. Bodunrin M, Chown L, Omotoyinbo J. Development of low-cost titanium alloys: A chronicle of challenges and opportunities. Materialstoday: Proceedings. 2021;38:564-569. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.978
  25. 25. Available from: https://www.ccmn.cn/ [Accessed: June 16, 2022]
  26. 26. Sung S, Kim Y. Melting and casting of titanium alloys. Materials Science Forum. 2007;539-543:3601-3606. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.539-543.3601
  27. 27. Zhang R, Wan Y, Ai X, Liu Z. Bioactive film generation during titanium alloy cutting in oxygen-enriched atmosphere. Materials Science Forum. 2014;800-801:37-41. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.800-801.37
  28. 28. Zanger F, Schulze V. Investigations on mechanisms of tool wear in machining of Ti-6Al-4V using FEM simulation. Procedia CIRP. 2013;8:158-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.082
  29. 29. Thomas M, Turner S, Jackson M. Microstructural damage during high-speed milling of titanium alloys. Scripta Materialia. 2010;62:250-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.11.009
  30. 30. Takeda O, Okabe T. Current status of titanium recycling and related technologies. Journal of Metals. 2018;71:1981-1990. DOI: 10.1007/S11837-018-3278-1
  31. 31. Zhang Y, Fang Z, Sun P, Zheng S, Xia Y, Free M. A perspective on thermochemical and electrochemical processes for titanium metal production. Journal of Metals. 2017;69:1861-1868. DOI: 10.1007/S11837-017-2481-9
  32. 32. Seetharaman S, Mclean A. Treatise on process metallurgy. In: Industrial Processes. Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014. DOI: 10.1016/c2010-0-67121-5
  33. 33. Chen G, Fray D, Farthing T. Direct electrochemical reduction of titanium dioxide to titanium in molten calcium chloride. Nature. 2000;407:361-364. DOI: 10.1038/35030069
  34. 34. Araci K, Mangabhai D, Akhtar K. Production of titanium by the Armstrong Process®. Titanium Powder Metallurgy. 2015;9:149-162. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800054-0.00009-5
  35. 35. Suzuki R, Ono K, Teranuma K. Calciothermic reduction of titanium oxide and in-situ electrolysis in molten CaCl2. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B. 2003;34:287-295. DOI: 10.1007/S11663-003-0074-1
  36. 36. Reddy R, Shinde P, Liu A. Review—The emerging technologies for producing low-cost titanium. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 2021;168:042502. DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ABE50D
  37. 37. Fang Z, Paramore J, Sun P, Chandran K, Zhang Y, Xia Y, et al. Powder metallurgy of titanium—Past, present, and future. International Materials Reviews. 2018;63:407-459. DOI: 10.1080/09506608.2017.1366003
  38. 38. Doblin C, Chryss A, Monch A. Titanium powder from the TiRO™ process. Key Engineering Materials. 2012;520:95-100. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.520.95
  39. 39. Hansen D, Gerdemann S. Producing titanium powder by continuous vapor-phase reduction. Journal of Metals. 1998;50:56-58. DOI: 10.1007/S11837-998-0289-3
  40. 40. Vuuren D, Oosthuizen S, Heydenrych M. Titanium production via metallothermic reduction of TiCl4 in molten salt: Problems and products. Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 2011;111:141-148. DOI: 10.1155/2011/464916
  41. 41. Froes F. The production of low-cost titanium powders. Journal of Metals. 1998;50:41-43. DOI: 10.1007/S11837-998-0413-4
  42. 42. Okabe T, Oda T, Mitsuda Y. Titanium powder production by preform reduction process (PRP). Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2004;364:156-163. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8388(03)00610-8
  43. 43. Park I, Abiko T, Okabe T. Production of titanium powder directly from TiO2 in CaCl2 through an electronically mediated reaction (EMR). Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 2005;66:410-413. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2004.06.052
  44. 44. Zhang Y, Fang Z, Xia Y, Sun P, Devener B, Free M, et al. Hydrogen assisted magnesiothermic reduction of TiO2. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2017;308:299-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.066
  45. 45. McCracken C, Barbis D, Deeter R. Key characteristics of hydride-dehydride titanium powder. Powder Metallurgy. 2011;54:180-183. DOI: 10.1179/174329011X13045076771849
  46. 46. Jiao S, Zhu H. Novel metallurgical process for titanium production. Journal of Materials Research. 2006;21:2172-2175. DOI: 10.1557/JMR.2006.0268
  47. 47. Suput M, Delucas R, Pati S, Ye G, Pal U, Powell A. Solid oxide membrane technology for environmentally sound production of titanium. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy. 2008;117:118-122. DOI: 10.1179/174328508X290911
  48. 48. Lu K. The future of metals. Science. 2010;328:319-320. DOI: 10.1126/science.1185866
  49. 49. Lu J, Ge P, Zhao Y. Recent development of effect mechanism of alloying elements in titanium alloy design. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering. 2014;43:775-779. DOI: 10.1016/S1875-5372(14)60082-5
  50. 50. Joshi V, Lavender C, Moxon V, Duz V, Nyberg E, Weil K. Development of Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-1Al-8V-5Fe alloys using low-cost TiH2 powder feedstock. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 2013;22:995-1003. DOI: 10.1007/s11665-012-0386-x
  51. 51. Esteban P, Ruiz-Navas E, Bolzoni L, Gordo E. Low-cost titanium alloys? Iron may hold the answers. Metal Powder Report. 2008;63:24-27. DOI: 10.1016/S0026-0657(09)70040-2
  52. 52. Hsu H, Hsu S, Wu S, Lee C, Ho W. Structure and mechanical properties of as-cast Ti-5Nb-xFe alloys. Materials Characterization. 2010;61:851-858. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2010.05.003
  53. 53. Lin D, Lin J, Ju C. Structure and properties of Ti-7.5Mo-xFe alloys. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1723-1730. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00233-2
  54. 54. Montgomery J, Wells M, Roopchand B, Ogilvy J. Low-cost titanium armors for combat vehicles. Journal of Metals. 1997;49:45-47. DOI: 10.1007/BF02914684
  55. 55. Liang Z, Miao J, Brown T, Sachdev A, Williams J, Luo A. A low-cost and high-strength Ti-Al-Fe-based cast titanium alloy for structural applications. Scripta Materialia. 2018;157:124-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.08.005
  56. 56. Zhu C, Peng G, Lin Y, Zhang X, Liu C, Zhou K. Effects of Mo and Cr contents on microstructures and mechanical properties of near β-Ti alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2021;825:141882. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141882
  57. 57. Ng C, Bermingham M, Yuan L, Dargusch M. Towards β-fleck defect free additively manufactured titanium alloys by promoting the columnar to equiaxed transition and grain refinement. Acta Materialia. 2022;224:117511. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117511
  58. 58. Boyer R, Williams J. Developments in research and applications in the titanium industry in the USA. In: Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Titanium (Ti-2011). Beijing, China: Science Press Beijing; 2012. pp. 10-19
  59. 59. Kosaka Y, Fox S, Faller K, Reichman S. Properties and processing of TIMETAL LCB. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 2005;14:792-798. DOI: 10.1361/105994905X75637
  60. 60. Abdalla A, Amrin A, Muhamad S, Hanim M. Development of iron (Fe) additions approach for cost reduction in Ti-alloy—A review. International Journal of Materials and Product Technology. 2017;55:56-73. DOI: 10.1504/IJMPT.2017.084975
  61. 61. Ikeda M, Ueda M. Development and research of low-cost titanium alloys, especially case of Japan. Materials Science Forum. 2016;879:119-124. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.879.119
  62. 62. Koike M, Ohkubo C, Sato H, Fujii H, Okabe T. Evaluation of cast Ti-Fe-O-N alloys for dental applications. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2005;25:349-356. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2005.04.002
  63. 63. Abd-elrhman Y, Gepreel M, Abdel-Moniem A, Kobayashi S. Compatibility assessment of new V-free low-cost Ti-4.7Mo-4.5Fe alloy for some biomedical applications. Materials & Design. 2016;97:445-453. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.110
  64. 64. Wang J, Qin Z, Xiong F, Wang S, Lu X, Li C. Design and preparation of low-cost α + β titanium alloy based on assessment of Ti-Al-Fe-Cr system. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2018;732:63-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.06.101
  65. 65. Wang H, Wang S, Gao P, Jiang T, Lu X, Li C. Microstructure and mechanical properties of a novel near-α titanium alloy Ti6.0Al4.5Cr1.5Mn. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2016;672:170-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.06.083
  66. 66. Zhu K, Gui N, Jiang T, Zhu M, Lu X, Zhang J, et al. The development of the low-cost titanium alloy containing Cr and Mn alloying elements. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2014;45:1761-1766. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-013-2080-5
  67. 67. Ren L, Xiao W, Chang H, Zhao Y, Ma C, Zhou L. Microstructural tailoring and mechanical properties of a multi-alloyed near β titanium alloy Ti-5321 with various heat treatment. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2018;711:553-561. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.029
  68. 68. Wang H, Xin S, Zhao Y, Zhou W, Zeng W. Plane strain fracture behavior of a new high strength Ti-5Al-3Mo-3V-2Zr-2Cr-1Nb-1Fe alloy during heat treatment. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2020;797:140080. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.140080
  69. 69. Wu C, Zhao Y, Huang S, Lei L, Zhao Q , Sun Q , et al. Microstructure tailoring and impact toughness of a newly developed high strength Ti-5Al-3Mo-3V-2Cr-2Zr-1Nb-1Fe alloy. Materials Characterization. 2021;175:111103. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111103
  70. 70. Wang H, Zhao Q , Xin S, Zhao Y, Zhou W, Zeng W. Microstructural morphology effects on fracture toughness and crack growth behaviors in a high strength titanium alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2021;821:141626. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141626
  71. 71. Wang H, Zhao Y, Zhao Q , Xin S, Zhou W, Zeng W. Microstructure evolution and fracture behavior of Ti-5Al-3Mo-3V-2Zr-2Cr-1Nb-1Fe alloy during BASCA heat treatments. Materials Characterization. 2021;174:110975. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.110975
  72. 72. Wu C, Zhao Q , Huang S, Zhao Y, Lei L, Ren J, et al. Deformation mechanisms in a β-quenched Ti-5321 alloy: In-situ investigation related to slip activity, orientation evolution and stress induced martensite. Journal of Materials Science & Technology. 2022;112:36-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.09.051
  73. 73. Wang H, Xin S, Zhao Y, Zhou W, Zeng W. Forging-microstructure-tensile properties correlation in a new near β high-strength titanium alloy. Rare Metals. 2021;40:2109-2117. DOI: 10.1007/s12598-020-01533-y
  74. 74. Takeda O, Ouchi T, Okabe T. Recent progress in titanium extraction and recycling. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B. 2020;51:1315-1328. DOI: 10.1007/s11663-020-01898-6
  75. 75. Xia Y, Zhao J, Tian Q , Guo X. Review of the effect of oxygen on titanium and deoxygenation technologies for recycling of titanium metal. Journal of Metals. 2019;71:3209-3220. DOI: 10.1007/S11837-019-03649-8
  76. 76. Poulsen E, Hall J. Extractive metallurgy of titanium: A review of the state of the art and evolving production techniques. Journal of Metals. 1983;35:60-65. DOI: 10.1007/BF03338304
  77. 77. Jiao H, Song W, Chen H, Wang M, Jiao S, Fang D. Sustainable recycling of titanium scraps and purity titanium production via molten salt electrolysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;261:121314. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121314
  78. 78. Zhang Y, Zhou L, Sun J, Han M, Zhao Y. Evaporation mechanism of aluminum during electron beam cold hearth melting of Ti64 alloy. International Journal of Materials Research. 2009;100:248-253. DOI: 10.3139/146.110007
  79. 79. Akhonin S, Trigub N, Zamkov V, Semiatin S. Mathematical modeling of aluminum evaporation during electron-beam cold-hearth melting of Ti-6Al-4V ingots. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B. 2003;34:447-454. DOI: 10.1007/S11663-003-0071-4
  80. 80. Balasundar I, Raghu T, Kashyap B. Modeling the hot working behavior of near-α titanium alloy IMI 834. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International. 2013;23:598-607. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2013.11.004
  81. 81. Zhou Y, Zeng W, Yu H. An investigation of a new near-beta forging process for titanium alloys and its application in aviation components. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2005;393:204-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.10.016
  82. 82. Lutjering G. Influence of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of (α+β) titanium alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 1998;243:32-45. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00778-8
  83. 83. Li C, Huang L, Li C, Hui S, Yu Y, Zhao M, et al. Research progress on hot deformation behavior of high-strength β titanium alloy: Flow behavior and constitutive model. Rare Metals. 2022;41:1434-1455. DOI: 10.1007/s12598-021-01861-7
  84. 84. Kumar B, Saxena K, Dey S, Pancholi V, Bhattacharjee A. Processing map-microstructure evolution correlation of hot compressed near alpha titanium alloy (TiHy 600). Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2017;691:906-913. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.301
  85. 85. Porntadawit J, Uthaisangsuk V, Choungthong P. Modeling of flow behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy at elevated temperatures. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2014;599:212-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.064
  86. 86. Peng W, Zeng W, Wang Q , Yu H. Characterization of high-temperature deformation behavior of as-cast Ti60 titanium alloy using processing map. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2013;571:116-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.01.008
  87. 87. Zeng Z, Jonsson S, Zhang Y. Constitutive equations for pure titanium at elevated temperatures. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2009;505:116-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.11.017
  88. 88. Vo P, Jahazi M, Yue S, Bocher P. Flow stress prediction during hot working of near-α titanium alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2007;447:99-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.032
  89. 89. Wang K, Zeng W, Zhao Y, Lai Y, Zhou Y. Hot working of Ti-17 titanium alloy with lamellar starting structure using 3-D processing maps. Journal of Materials Science. 2010;45:5883-5891. DOI: 10.1007/S10853-010-4667-1
  90. 90. Kim Y, Song Y, Lee S, Kwon Y. Characterization of the hot deformation behavior and microstructural evolution of Ti-6Al-4V sintered preforms using materials modeling techniques. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2016;676:15-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.146
  91. 91. Balasundar I, Ravi K, Raghu T. On the high temperature deformation behaviour of titanium alloy BT3-1. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2017;684:135-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.043
  92. 92. Qu Y, Wang M, Lei L, Huang X, Wang L, Qin J, et al. Behavior and modeling of high temperature deformation of an α + β titanium alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2012;555:99-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.06.039
  93. 93. Wang G, Hui S, Ye W, Mi X. Hot compressive behavior of Ti-3.0Al-3.7Cr-2.0Fe-0.1B titanium alloy. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China. 2012;22:2965-2971. DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61557-4
  94. 94. Rao K, Prasad Y, Suresh K. Hot working behavior and processing map of a γ-TiAl alloy synthesized by powder metallurgy. Materials & Design. 2011;32:4874-4881. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.06.003
  95. 95. Li C, Narayana P, Reddy N, Choi S, Yeom J, Hong J, et al. Modeling hot deformation behavior of low-cost Ti-2Al-9.2Mo-2Fe beta titanium alloy using a deep neural network. Journal of Materials Science & Technology. 2019;35:907-916. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.11.018
  96. 96. Luo J, Li M, Yu W. Prediction of flow stress in isothermal compression of Ti-6Al-4V alloy using fuzzy neural network. Materials & Design. 2010;31:3078-3083. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.005
  97. 97. Sun Z, Yang H, Tang Z. Microstructural evolution model of TA15 titanium alloy based on BP neural network method and application in isothermal deformation. Computational Materials Science. 2010;50:308-318. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.08.020
  98. 98. Sun Y, Zeng W, Han Y, Ma X, Zhao Y, Guo P, et al. Determination of the influence of processing parameters on the mechanical properties of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy using an artificial neural network. Computational Materials Science. 2012;60:239-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.03.047
  99. 99. Wu C, Chang H, Wu C, Chen S, Huang S, Huang M, et al. Machine learning recommends affordable new Ti alloy with bone-like modulus. Materials Today. 2020;34:41-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.08.008
  100. 100. Zhang D, Qiu D, Gibson M, Zheng Y, Fraser H, StJohn D, et al. Additive manufacturing of ultrafine-grained high-strength titanium alloys. Nature. 2019;576:91-95. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1783-1
  101. 101. Bolzoni L, Ruiz-Navas E, Gordo E. Understanding the properties of low-cost iron-containing powder metallurgy titanium alloys. Materials & Design. 2016;110:317-323. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.010
  102. 102. Weston N, Jackson M. FAST-forge − A new cost-effective hybrid processing route for consolidating titanium powder into near net shape forged components. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2017;243:335-346. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.12.013
  103. 103. Bolzoni L. Low-cost Fe-bearing powder metallurgy Ti alloys. Metal Powder Report. 2019;74:308-313. DOI: 10.1016/j.mprp.2019.01.007
  104. 104. Bolzoni L, Herraiz E, Ruiz-Navas E, Gordo E. Study of the properties of low-cost powder metallurgy titanium alloys by 430 stainless steel addition. Materials & Design. 2014;60:628-636. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.019
  105. 105. Wang J, Liu Y, Rabadia C, Liang S, Sercombe T, Zhang L. Microstructural homogeneity and mechanical behavior of a selective laser melted Ti-35Nb alloy produced from an elemental powder mixture. Journal of Materials Science & Technology. 2021;61:221-233. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.05.052
  106. 106. Baufeld B, Biest O, Gault R. Additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V components by shaped metal deposition: Microstructure and mechanical properties. Materials & Design. 2010;31:S106-S111. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.032
  107. 107. Lin Z, Song K, Yu X. A review on wire and arc additive manufacturing of titanium alloy. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2021;70:24-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.08.018
  108. 108. Williams S, Martina F, Addison A, Ding J, Pardal G, Colegrove. Wire + arc additive manufacturing. Materials Science and Technology. 2016;32:641-647. DOI: 10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000073
  109. 109. Wu B, Pan Z, Ding D, Cuiuri D, Li H, Xu J, et al. A review of the wire arc additive manufacturing of metals: properties, defects and quality improvement. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2018;35:127-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.08.001
  110. 110. Dinovitzer M, Chen X, Laliberte J, Huang X, Frei H. Effect of wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) process parameters on bead geometry and microstructure. Additive Manufacturing. 2019;26:138-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.12.013
  111. 111. Busachi A, Erkoyuncu J, Colegrove P, Martina F, Ding J. Designing a WAAM based manufacturing system for defence applications. Procedia CIRP. 2015;37:48-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.085
  112. 112. Huang R, Riddle M, Graziano D, Warren J, Das S, Nimbalkar S, et al. Energy and emissions saving potential of additive manufacturing: The case of lightweight aircraft components. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;135:1559-1570. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.109
  113. 113. McAndrew A, Rosales M, Colegrove P, Hönnige J, Ho A, Fayolle R, et al. Interpass rolling of Ti-6Al-4V wire+ arc additively manufactured features for microstructural refinement. Additive Manufacturing. 2018;21:340-349. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.006
  114. 114. Ali M, Batai S, Sarbassov D. 3D printing: a critical review of current development and future prospects. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2019;25:1108-1126. DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-11-2018-0293
  115. 115. Valluri S, Claremboux V, Kawatra S. Opportunities and challenges in CO2 utilization. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2022;113:322-344. DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2021.05.043
  116. 116. Jotzo F, Karplus V, Grubb M, Löschel A, Neuhoff K, Wu L, et al. China's emissions trading takes steps towards big ambitions. Nature Climate Change. 2018;8:265-267. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0130-0
  117. 117. Bakhtiari S. Coming out clean: Australian carbon pricing and clean technology adoption. Ecological Economics. 2018;154:238-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.004
  118. 118. Murray B, Rivers N. British Columbia's revenue-neutral carbon tax: A review of the latest “grand experiment” in environmental policy. Energy Policy. 2015;86:674-683. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.011
  119. 119. Gao F, Nie Z, Yang D, Sun B, Liu Y, Gong X, et al. Environmental impacts analysis of titanium sponge production using Kroll process in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;174:771-779. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.240
  120. 120. Zhang Z, Yu H, Zhang Y, Yang K, Li W, Chen Z, et al. Analysis and optimization of process energy consumption and environmental impact in electrical discharge machining of titanium superalloys. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;198:833-846. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.053
  121. 121. Gohil V, Puri Y. Turning by electrical discharge machining: A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2017;231:195-208. DOI: 10.1177/0954405415590560
  122. 122. Zhu F, Li L, Cheng X, Ma S, Jiang L, Qiu K. Direct electrochemical reduction of low titanium chlorides into titanium aluminide alloy powders from molten eutectic KCl-LiCl-MgCl2. Electrochimica Acta. 2020;357:136867. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136867
  123. 123. Zhu F, Li L, Song W, Zhang D, Ma S, Qiu K. Electrochemical synthesis of Ti-Al-V alloy by chlorination of Ti2O3 and V2O3 in AlCl3-containing molten chloride salt. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2021;13:1243-1253. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.05.063

Written By

Qisheng Feng and Chonghe Li

Submitted: 23 July 2022 Reviewed: 17 August 2022 Published: 16 September 2022