Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Application of Quantum Dots in Bio-Sensing, Bio-Imaging, Drug Delivery, Anti-Bacterial Activity, Photo-Thermal, Photo-Dynamic Therapy, and Optoelectronic Devices

Written By

Karunanithi Rajamanickam

Submitted: 19 July 2022 Reviewed: 10 August 2022 Published: 16 September 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.107018

From the Edited Volume

Quantum Dots - Recent Advances, New Perspectives and Contemporary Applications

Edited by Jagannathan Thirumalai

Chapter metrics overview

337 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Quantum dots (QDs) are of prevalent scientific and technological consideration because of their tunable size and thus frequency change (band-gap energy) in the NIR optical region. QDs have exceptional properties such as optical, physiochemical, electrical, and capacity to be bound to biomolecules. These selective size-dependent attributes of QDs assist them with having versatile applications in optoelectronic and biomedical fields. Their capacity to emit light at various frequencies because of an outer stimulus makes quantum dots perfect for use in imaging, diagnostics, tests for individual particles, and medication transportation frameworks. Ongoing advances in quantum dot design incorporate the potential for these nanocrystals to become therapeutic agents to restore numerous disease conditions themselves via bioconjugation with antibodies or medications. In this chapter, a few advances in the field of biomedical applications, such as bio-sensing, bio-imaging, drug loading capacity, targeted drug delivery, anti-stacking limit hostile to bacterial activity, photo-thermal treatment, photodynamic treatment, and optical properties for biomedical applications are presented, further to a short conversation on difficulties; for example, the biodistribution and harmful toxic effects of quantum dots is also discussed.

Keywords

  • quantum dots
  • bio-sensing
  • bio-imaging
  • drug-delivery
  • anti-bacterial activity
  • photo-thermal therapy
  • photodynamic therapy
  • optoelectronic devices
  • functional QDs

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology is a part of applied science and innovation that deals with the control of matter on a nuclear and sub-atomic scale, ranging from 1 to 100 nm. This is a profoundly interdisciplinary field that advantages from the endeavors and progressions of many disciplines, including applied physical science, materials science, point of interaction and colloid science, supramolecular science, compound designing, mechanical designing, organic designing, and electrical designing [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Nanotechnology has prospered since the introduction of group science and the development of the scanning tunneling microscope in the 1980s, with the capacity to gauge and imagine novel peculiarities, as well as control and production materials and gadgets with nanostructures of 100 nm or more modest. Semiconductor nanocrystals, otherwise called quantum dots, are a recently arising nanomaterial that has provoked the curiosity of numerous scientists. QDs are ordinarily synthesized from periodic table elements in groups III−V and II−VI [6, 7, 8]. Nonetheless, ongoing improvements in nanotechnology and biomedical utilization of nanomaterials have driven us to expand the meaning of QDs to incorporate more extensive classifications of nanoparticles (like carbon, silicon, and gold) which show the quantum-confinement occurrence related to a sensational alteration in electrons’ way of behaving at the limit of the Bohr radius. Because of their tiny size (contrasted with most cell structures or biomolecules), they can communicate with biological structures on the nuclear scale. However, a few scientists use “traditional” semiconductors III−V and II−VI nanocrystals, these are as yet the significant short utilized in research and biomedical applications for a few goal reasons. Firstly, they have remarkable physical characteristics that recognize them from different kinds of QDs; second, they have been effectively used in medical procedures, ultimately, proceeded with use by industry requirements the broad assessment of dangers related with exposure. Electrons are depicted by quantum confinement effects in terms of their energy levels, likely wells, valence band, conduction band, and electron energy band [9]. At the point when the molecule’s size is too little to possibly be similar to the frequency of the electron, the quantum confinement effect is noticed. Clearly, the confinement of an electron and a hole in nanocrystals is profoundly subject to material properties, explicitly the Bohr radius aB. These impacts rely upon material properties, [10] special to greater nanocrystals, and are Electrons in bulk dielectric materials can be portrayed by energy bands or electron energy levels (bigger than 10 nm). There are different energy levels or bands for electrons. These energy levels are suggested to as continuous since the energy difference is tiny in mass materials. The main part of electrons oscillates in the valence band under a prohibited energy level, known as the band gap, as they balance out at different energy levels. There are no electron states in this energy range. Fewer energy levels that are over the restricted hole make up the conduction band. The Bohr span is equivalent to 2.34 nm [11]. Materials’ electrical and optical qualities contrast emphatically with mass materials when they are at the nanoscale. As the material gets more uncertain until it comes to the nanoscale, the confining aspect normally gets more unassertive. The properties, in any case, are presently at the quanta level and consequently discrete as [12] opposed to arriving at the midpoint of by mass and accordingly constant. All in all, the energy range becomes discrete, estimated as quanta, as opposed to consistent, as in mass materials. The bandgap, or the small and limited space between energy levels, results thus. Discrete energy levels are the situation that is alluded to as quantum confinement. Electrons in mass dielectric materials can be described by energy groups or electron energy levels (bigger than 10 nm). There are different energy levels or groups for electrons. These energy levels are indicated as persistent since the energy distinction is little in bulk materials. The majority of electrons waver in valence groups under a forbidden energy level, known as the band gap, as they balance out at different energy levels. There are no electron states in this energy range.

Fewer energy levels that are over the restricted gap make up the conduction band. Moreover, disconnected islands of electrons that can shape at the designed connection point of two unique semiconducting materials make up quantum confinement distinctiveness. Normally, electrons are contained in plate molded regions called quantum dots. As was at that point referenced, electron control in these frameworks significantly changes how they collaborate with electromagnetic radiation. The bandgap limits are modified by the expansion or evacuation of a couple of iotas on the grounds that the electron energy levels of quantum spots are discrete instead of constant. Changes in the quantum dots surface shape additionally influence the bandgap energy as a result of the speck’s little size and the impacts of quantum confinement [13, 14].

Quantum dots, which have excitons bound in every one of the three spatial dimensions, offer attributes somewhere between those of discrete particles and bulk semiconductors. Quantum dots can have their structure and molecule size modified subsequent to being excited by a reasonable laser pulse by exploiting the notable impacts of the quantum size confinement effect. When contrasted with quantum dots, fluorophores, (for example, rhodamine 6G and fluorescein) have various disadvantages in biosensing applications [15, 16, 17]. High yields, broad absorption, restricted size-dependent emission spectra, and incredible photo quenching obstruction are a couple of advantages of QDs’ extraordinary optical elements [18]. The quantum confinement phenomenon gives an upsurge to the dimension-tunable absorbance and luminescence bands of QDs. At the point when the size of the semiconductor meets the material’s Exciton Bohr Radius (EBR), the discrete electron band-gap energy levels are denoted as being under quantum confinement. On the off chance that the size of the QDs diminishes, the absorption and photoluminescence will go through a hyperchromatic shift and the energy of the band-gap expands [19]. Subsequently, QDs of similar material composition yet different sizes can emit fluorescence at a pool of frequencies. With innumerable applications, this optoelectronic nature of QDs gives a higher multiplexing potential. These QDs can possibly carry out numerous roles subsequent to being altered with explicit affinity ligands (antibody, peptide, aptamers, etc.). Subsequently, they might have the option to fulfill the rules for the ideal theranostic framework, including yet not restricted to the characteristics mentioned beneath.

Targeting specific cell types, diminished cytotoxicity, effective intracellular trafficking, conquering intracellular boundaries, responding to external or internal stimuli, delivering curative agents, and bearing a symptomatic specialist (optical or MRI) all add to a medication’s capacity to treat a patient progressively. Thus, QDs can be utilized for drug delivery, biosensing, and bio-imaging. Creating QDs that are not poisonous to cells could have an enormous clinical effect. Given the adaptability of QDs, research is in the works to foster tests that can follow continuous cell processes, exhibiting selectivity and particularity towards cells and the capacity to beat excretory issues, for example, non-poisonousness. The examination into QD/drug nanoparticle plans will show huge development in different medical services-related regions, for example, diagnostics and therapeutics for conditions like malignant growth and heart and immune system problems/illnesses. In this chapter, the role of QDs in various medical applications like bio-sensing, bio-imaging, drug delivery applications, anti-bacterial activity, photo-thermal, photodynamic therapy, and optoelectronic devices were discussed in detail. Furthermore, their specific targeting abilities were also discussed when they are formulated with multifunctional moieties, they offer a versatile platform that is suitable for theranostics.

Advertisement

2. Quantum dots in medical applications

Researchers are excited up for new nano-theranostic stages including quantum dots in bio-detecting, as they can detect, picture, and treat simultaneously. Their benefit over old advancements lies in the control of conductive properties through crystal size. However, quantum dots enjoy many benefits, they have huge constraints. For instance, they are just comprised of a few molecules, and they are difficult to eliminate from the body. Researchers are attempting to take care of these issues so quantum dots can be utilized in additional clinical applications. The remarkable optical properties of QDs have prompted their utilization in various fields, including imaging, following, diagnostics, drug delivery, tissue designing, malignant growth treatment, multicolor optical coding, and single molecule probes. For example, quality treatment can fix infections brought about by hereditary anomalies, like malignant growth or diabetes. QDs can stop quality action, and furthermore track down application in RNA advancements. For instance, in situ hybridization (ISH) can utilize QDs to identify mRNA particles, and RNA mediation might join siRNAs with CdSSe/ZnS quantum dot—polyethylenimine (QDs-PEI) to really target qualities more successfully [20]. Various benefits of utilizing QDs are investigated by different research groups because of their adaptable properties that are featured in Table 1.

The advantages of using QDs
Large Stoke’s shift and sharp emission spectra
Novel optical and electronics properties—quantum confinement/electron and photons in nanostructure
High resistant to degradation
Easy to conjugate with variety of biomolecules
Many-fold brightness compared to other organic dyes
Easy moldability
High scattering and thus better contrast with electron microscope

Table 1.

The advantages of using QDs in various biomedical applications.

Radiotherapy (RT) is a typical malignant growth treatment technique, with a few incidental effects. Researchers have fostered nanozymes by doping Mn (II) and Silver Selenide quantum dots particles (Ag2Se QDs) transmitting in the second near-infrared window. These nanozymes are attached with cancer targeting arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) tripeptides and polyethylene glycol and built into in vivo nanoformulations for NIR-II imaging-directed radiation treatment of malignancy [21]. Tumor particularity and NIR-II radiating abilities of the nanoprobes empower exact confinement, giving exact RT. The ultra-stability of these nanoprobes in the living body likewise improves RT adequacy through persistent creation of oxygen and help from hypoxia of cancers. Nanoprobe-intervened RT supported by real-time, enhanced clarity imaging advances against growth invulnerability and altogether hinders cancers or fixes them totally. Another investigation discovered that Mercaptopropionic corrosive (MPA)-coated QDs were exceptionally biocompatible and enact the lysosomal pathway, which clears cell garbage. The decreased ROS could assist the cells with adapting to nanomaterial-initiated pressure, clearing the way for malignant growth treatment. Scientists fostered a new pseudo-homogeneous vector for gene delivery that uses the cationic CQDs got from chitosan to make a non-viral gene exchange framework [22]. This new vector shows better uptake in cells. Another sort of ZnO QDs nanoplatforms to deliver genes that assist with treating Parkinson’s illness has been grown as of late. Glutathione changed ZnO QDs composites stacked with quality and NGF to safeguard the brain and reverse the impacts of neurodegenerative issues, which are normal in Parkinson’s patients. QDs were utilized to address the reasons for later-stage nearsightedness (myopia). Carboxylated CuInS/ZnS QDs (ZCIS QDs) were added to intraocular lenses by a facial initiation-immersion technique to warm up the lenses and keep the cells from sticking to the lens surface. This technique could assist with regarding cataract development as well as posterior capsule opacification (PCO) [21].

Advertisement

3. Bio-sensing application

The utility of semiconductor QDs in biosensing applications has been growing, as they offer several advantages over other types of sensors. All the more significantly, it is not difficult to present nucleic acid enhancement methodologies or potentially nanomaterials to work on the conjugation of aptamer-based detecting structures. In this manner, the composite of QDs attached with aptamers acquires added open doors bioanalytical methods. QD-based fluorescent nanoformulations are generally utilized for bio-sensing for DNA and protein discoveries [23]. Heavy metal cytotoxicity was minimized or eliminated by developing metal-free quantum dots. QDs synthesized using silicon quantum dots (Si QDs), graphene quantum dots (GQDs), carbon dots (C-dots), and near-infrared (NIR) QDs (silver selenide, silver sulfide, (Ag2Se and Ag2S) are the alternate possibilities. Apart from this, metal nanoclusters have exhibited noticeable benefits as fluorescence probes for optical bio-sensing and imaging procedures in current biomedical research [24]. QD-based biosensors are molecular networks made of organic receptors and are proficient substitutes for conventional sensors [25]. These biosensors have gained significant attention, because of their function in bridging the gap between pure organic receptors and inorganic materials [25]. The physical properties of photo-sensors can be altered by the environment of surface-coated and biological ligand-attached quantum dots. This includes heat, ions, and pH of solution as well as confirms the use of QDs in bio-sensor development. The chemical sensors are receptor molecules that show selective responses to particular ions (cations/anions) or neutral groups. For the selection and accounting of the compounds present in biological environment, development of chemosensors is significant, particularly those specific ions that are possibly dangerous to surroundings and individuals.

3.1 Core-ligand interaction

Connecting biomolecules like ligands, antibodies, peptides, or nucleic acids with nanoparticles have drawn broad interest for researchers in the biosensing region as it offers practical bionanomaterials for targeting and drug delivery applications [26]. Semiconductor QDs are broadly utilized in the biosensing region due to their one-of-a-kind property, for example, confined and symmetric emission with colors that are adjustable, considerable quantum yield, appropriate stability, and very much directed shape and size [27]. Among these ligands, aptamers show a few advantages containing lesser aspects, great synthetic stability, and straightforward cycle in combination with high cluster to-bunch homogeneity and more flexibility. Further to this, it is not difficult to present nucleic acid intensification strategies and nanomaterials that can offer significantly better sensitivity. Subsequently, the mix of semiconductor quantum dots and aptamers gets added possibilities in bio examination. In this way, nanoformulation offers a few applications in different sign transducing components, including optical, electrochemical, and electro-produced discharge of light because of synthetic response (chemiluminescence) approaches. These two unique parts connect at this basic biomolecular-materials point of interaction and offer further developed action and promising qualities. The interactions are represented by different factors, for example, Förster reverberation energy move (FRET), the presence of electrostatic and other useful appealing powers (energy electron move) between the biomolecule and the QD surface.

A comprehension of these basic collaborations at this point of interaction can yield a bunch of methodologies that will allow the reasonable plan of ensuing researcher high-movement bionanocomposites and theranostic nanoformulations [28]. Four significant methodologies can be utilized to adjust aptamers onto ODs. (i) Self-gathering among DNA and QDs. (ii) Biospecific collaborations, e.g., biotin-avidin (or streptavidin) cooperation. (iii) Covalent interactions. (iv) Nucleic acid hybridization [29]. The blend of Quantum dots and aptamers will give different identification stages, including optical, electrochemical, and electrochemical luminescence (Figure 1). This takes into consideration the identification of an assortment of analytes like proteins, little particles, and cancer cells [30]. Advanced signal level intensification systems incorporate utilizing nanoscaled materials as devices for ultrasensitive bioanalysis. High-level sign enhancement procedures take into account ultrasensitive bioassays. These procedures likewise consider exceptionally unambiguous biosensing-recognizing follow measures of a wide assortment of analytes in clinical, ecological, or modern applications. The quick advancement in the utilization of other utilitarian materials for detecting and the clarification of their novel photosensitive qualities proposes that by conjugating the aptamer-QD with graphitic-carbon nanoformulation, novel detecting and identification stages might be planned. In what way to integrate these cross breeds into cells and complete in vivo detecting might be a test from here on out.

Figure 1.

QD based various biomolecule detection platforms [26].

Advertisement

4. Bio-imaging application

Water-soluble quantum dots (QDs) can be conjugated with various biological molecules like peptides, proteins, aptamers, drugs, and antibodies. The benefits of QD-based biomolecule conjugation help to deal with several immunohistochemistry, labeling and imaging the single-molecule and tracks that are well explored in numerous studies [31, 32, 33]. The exclusive wavelength tunable properties of QDs offer wide prospects for designing systems for numerous analyses by multi-colored imaging for the concurrent recognition of numerous targets. Linking drugs with QDs or their combination into QD-based drug delivery molecules marks it a potential candidate for monitoring the drug release and undertaking image-guided therapy. In light of the versatile nature of their photosensitive properties, QDs emanating in the NIR region have turned into an interesting device for intense tissue single photon and multi-photon in-vivo imaging. Conventional green fluorescent proteins and fluorescent biological dyes have several restrictions such as spectral crossing, low signal intensity, photo-bleaching when compared to QDs which have substantial benefits in chemosensors and biosensor development [34]. In recent times, QDs are demonstrated to have a significant candidate for fluorescent probes and tags in several organic procedures, ranging from molecular-level histopathological studies to whole-body diagnosis [35, 36]. While a small number of studies have tried the utility of QDs for in-vitro or in-vivo diagnostic imaging studies, the important restriction on possible harmfulness of group II–IV QDs (like cadmium telluride and cadmium selenide) have hampered their practical application in science and medication. The leakage of the ions belonging to the heavy metal present inside the core of these quantum dots by physiochemical reactions may contribute to the harmful toxic effect, which raises several questions about the utility and biocompatibility of these QDs [3738]. Furthermore, the long-term cumulative effects of these ions’ augmentation and prolonged periods within the body may produce unnecessary damage to tissues and organs. At the same time, the quick clearance by the reticuloendothelial system (RES) or getting into the liver and spleen can result in noise in the image and thus the quality may get affected. The application of quantum dots as contrast agents for in vivo imaging has been an area of high prospect since they were initially studied, and they have recently been granted repeated attention. The optical imaging system even at present utilizes these conventional fluorescent molecules for animal imaging. The NIR wavelengths (~730 nm) are significant, as they have reduced light scattering and low tissue absorption also relatively easy to detect with apparatuses [39]. Different types of quantum dots emit different wavelengths—one type emits red light (730 nm). QD bioconjugates are widely reported in several studies for their application in in-vitro imaging and diagnostics, like immuno-fluorescent labeling of tissues and cells, intracellular delivery of QDs, tracking of single-molecule in living cells, and in-vivo tracking by fluorescence labeling drug localization and biodistribution [29]. Hence, quantum dots hold great potential for molecular and cellular imaging both in vitro and in vivo conditions. In recent times, researchers have used QDs for imaging stem cells in mice embryo. This unlocks the opportunity to use quantum dots for imaging stem cell and stem cell therapy tracking in a fast and accurate manner (Figure 2). Stem cell therapy is the most common way of infusing stem cells into a living being with the expectation that they will separate and supplant harmed tissue or develop new organs.

Figure 2.

QDs plausible medical utility and cautiousness.

Advertisement

5. Drug delivery application

Targeted drug delivery using QDs has appeared to have potential applications in recent times. Since the enhanced efficacy of existing drugs and new developments in therapeutics are made possible by adopting various functionalized QDs for this purpose. Several preliminary and drug trials have demonstrated the potential application of this QD based on theranostic systems at the same time also to achieve reduced drug harmfulness, better quality in bio-compatibility [40] and bio-availability [41], enhanced circulation times [42], precise drug release [43] and targeting [44]. Nevertheless, translation of QDs vehicles from bench side to bedside requires a detailed understanding of the impact of these QDs in organic systems when their utility towards in vivo conditions. Recent development in the properties of QDs includes optimized brightness, diminished hydrodynamic dimensions, chemically inert to the environment, and functional groups attached to ligands that are site-specific. Recent studies have shown that Si QDs and fluorescent nanodiamonds are biocompatible, which positions them as excellent diagnostic imaging candidates. Song et al. [45]. Several preliminary and drug-trials have demonstrated the potential application of this QD based on theranostic systems at the same time also to achieve reduced drug harmfulness, better quality in bio-compatibility [40] and bio-availability [41], enhanced circulation times [42], precise drug release [43] and targeting [44]. Nevertheless, translation of QDs vehicles from bench side to bed side requires an in-depth understanding of the impact of these QDs in biological systems when their utility towards in vivo conditions [46]. Recent development in the properties of QDs includes optimized brightness, diminished hydrodynamic dimensions, chemically inert to the environment, and functional groups attached to ligands that are site-specific [47]. Recent studies have shown that Si QDs and fluorescent nanodiamonds are biocompatible, which positions them as excellent diagnostic imaging candidates. Song et al. [48] developed nanoparticles with dual modes of contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and fluorescence imaging, made of a combination of silica coated-gold nanoformulation/quantum dots (Au-SiO2-QDs). Several research groups are developing nanoparticle-based agents that can diagnose and treat a person through one product.

Quantum dots (QDs) can go about as the primary nanocarrier or be important for additional perplexing structures. Paclitaxel (PTX), cancer-battling drug, is frequently bundled with nanostructured lipid transporters intended to have a theranostic way to deal with malignant growth treatment [49]. It was found to have exemplification adequacy of ~80%. PTX could be supported and delivered in 12 h in mixture of silica nanocapsules that were stacked with ZnSe:Mn/ZnS. This core-shell nanoformulation with the anticancer medication PTX. Another study by Cai et al. used Doxorubicin (DOX) on pH-responsive Zinc Oxide quantum dots [50, 51]. In another study, very small QDs were synthesized by the group with a size of approximately 3 nanometer attached with a functional group of poly-ethylene-glycol (PEG) and hyaluronic acid to target glycoprotein CD44 that are overexpressed in malignant growth cells with DOX as the drug model [51]. Under acidic intracellular environment, this medication (DOX) will be delivered. In another study, Yang et al. worked on quercetin (QE) attached with cadmium selenide-zinc sulphide QDs as anticancer and antibacterial nanoformulation and exhibited that QE-attached CdSe-ZnS were more attractive contrary to drug-nontoxic Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis and subsequently quercetin attached cadmium selenide nanoformulation without ZnS [52]. The anti-cancer activity measure was centered around the multiplication and relocation of human gastric epithelial cell lines (BGC-823), which displayed an expansion in cellular toxicity of two-to six-times contrasted with crude Quercetin-CdSe QDs (Figure 3) [53].

Figure 3.

Quantitative multiplex imaging capability in live animals using QD. (A) 1 × 106 ES cells labeled with QD 525, 565, 605, 655 and 705 were subcutaneously injected on the back of nude mice right after labeling and the image was taken with a single excitation light source right after injection. The quantification of fluorescent signal intensity defined as total signal-background/exposure time in millisecond was shown in (B). (image reused under unrestricted reuse permission) [34].

Advertisement

6. Anti-bacterial activity

Antibiotics are the main drugs that are used for fighting bacterial contamination and have a significant responsibility in the maintenance of society’s well-being. Bacterial infections have risen to a public health crisis, with widespread resistance to antibiotics. Graphene or Carbon quantum dots may be used as a new form of antibiotic and could even be applied to biomedical research [54, 55, 56]. An increasing threat to the public from bacteria has raised concerns about the spread of drug resistance. A method to limit this development and fight bacterial infections has been found in the use of quantum dots [57]. Widespread bacterial infections—particularly of the hospital-acquired kind—and the spread of antibiotic-resistance plague the medical world. Carbon quantum dots, also known as CQDs, have been investigated for a variety of uses—including as an antibacterial agent.

Bacterial diseases and the spread of antibiotic obstruction address a developing danger to general wellbeing, and the blend of CQDs with antibodies could be a promising sort of antibacterial treatment. The spread of antibacterial-safe microbes is a developing danger to general wellbeing. Carbon quantum dots have turned into a promising antibacterial option since they are non-poisonous to people, they have no known obstruction mechanism. All Gram-positive, and Gram-negative bacteria were found to be inhibited by Carbon QDs [58, 59, 60, 61, 62]. Examination of the antibacterial component of positively charged carbon QDs (PC-CQDs) demonstrated that little estimated PC-CQDs functionalized with −NH2 and −NH prompted solid adherence manner on bacterial cell layers [63, 64, 65].

Additionally, the passage of PC-CQDs caused conformational changes in the gene and generation of receptive oxygen species in microscopic organisms. Safety assessment represented that PC-CQDs did not set off noticeable drug confrontation or hemolysis. Moreover, PC-CQDs really advanced injury recuperating in rats tainted with blended Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli by repressing bacterial development while advancing the arrival of inflammatory cytokines and development factors fundamental for tissue repair. A few examinations have revealed the expected antibacterial action of these QDs for genuine injury mending applications in complex bacterial contaminations and, surprisingly, safe microorganisms caused diseases [6366, 67, 68, 69]. Recent research showed the successful application of Quaternized carbon quantum dots (CQDs) which have excellent broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. These Q-CQDs contain electron-withdrawing hydroxyl group (−OH), and electron donating methyl (−OCH3), in addition to tri-methylamin (−N+(CH3)3) groups. Q-CQDs functionalized with −N+(CH3)3 displayed a strong attachment to the membrane of the bacterial cell. Hence it damages the bacterial cell by crossing the membrane and entering the cell. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) due to the permeation of Q-CQDs into these bacteria resulted and the efflux of the RNA and DNA in the cytoplasm, which ultimately kills the bacteria. Q-CQDs were also shown to have anti-bacterial activity in treating S. aureus, E. coli, and mixed S. aureus-co-E. coli diseased injuries by killing bacteria and stimulating septic wound therapeutic. Further functional groups can be attached to the surface of these QDs and chemical modifications can be done by effective surface engineering strategy to widen their utility to meet specific targeting and guiding needs in numerous disease treatments [70].

Advertisement

7. Photo thermal therapy

Recent years have seen a lot of interest in photo-thermal therapy (PTT), a negligibly invasive and possibly effective procedure [71, 72]. It is based on the generation of heat for the thermal melting of malignant tumors by activating photosensitizing chemicals by pulsed laser irradiation at near-infrared wavelengths. The main advantages of photothermal therapy over traditional radiotherapy or chemotherapy include the capacity to penetrate deep tissue layers and the little impact of unselected cell death on the healthy adjacent tissue. Large optical frequency absorption cross-sections, low toxicity, simplicity in functionalization, biocompatibility, and is highly soluble in organic solutions are all desirable characteristics of a photosensitizer. Recent years have seen the usage of QDs by researchers to accomplish PTT in malignant cells [73]. In vitro research on the PTT application of CQDs for malignancy treatment was reported by Zhang et al. [74]. When exposed to NIR light, PEGylated (stealth) Carbon-QDs were found to have an abundant capability for photo-thermal treatment with no harmful toxicity beside breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7). Advanced studies have succeeded by the combination of photo-thermal and chemotherapy by linking these CQDs silicon dioxide (SiO2) nanoformulation loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) in the treatment of cancer cells [75]. This study’s in vivo tests showed that tumor growth in mouse models might be efficiently controlled without causing cancer to return. Doxorubicin (DOX) administration using nanoplatforms in conjunction with PTT and chemotherapy has been investigated in a number of studies in cancer cell lines.

In addition to DOX, thermo-acoustic nanoplatforms (CdTs) were created that targeted cancer cells that contained lysosomes while also rapidly raising temperature in response to laser irradiation [76]. For targeted gene therapy to malignant cells for suppressing cancer both in vitro and in vivo, therapeutic genes were directly attached to CdTs via electrostatic interactions. Additionally, it was able to simultaneously use CdTs for photo-thermal ablation of cancer cells and photo-acoustic imaging based on the recognition of ultrasonic pulses [77, 78]. In order to create an effective system for image-guided positron treatment, it is crucial to strike a balance between radiative degeneration (fluorescence emission), and non-radiative degeneration (dissipated as heat). Intramolecular rotation restriction prevents non-radiative decay and makes it easier for brilliant emission to occur in the aggregation stage. On the contrary, the PTT effect got elevated as the result of heat released by the aggregation-induced emission (AIE) molecules.

Likewise, in a biological environment, more intramolecular communication in donor-acceptor (D-A) based coplanar NIR particles has obstructed all thermal intensity discharge pathways. Subsequently, controlling atomic movement in the collected state is one method for adjusting both heat intensity generation and emission for broadened accuracy in the analysis and exhaustion of cancer growths. In the making of novel photothermal treatment, researchers proved that boron quantum dots have shown potential for the treatment of growths [78]. These unique compounds exhibit great photoacoustic imaging performance, and are biocompatible, and are thought to be non-toxic. The safety of BQDs was established in vitro, and in vivo research demonstrated their potent photothermal conversion effect and photothermal ablative capability. It is safe to assume that these innovative formulations could provide a solid platform for upcoming cancer therapy research and development.

Advertisement

8. Photo dynamic therapy

Photodynamic treatment is an arising and promising helpful methodology for fighting a loathsome illness like malignant growth [79, 80]. Photodynamic treatment is a treatment methodology that joins the photophysical and photochemical cycles to achieve natural impact [81]. Photodynamic treatment utilizes natural photosensitizers that, when presented to light, produce singlet oxygen. QDs have broadly been utilized for this reason, and specialists have created water-dissolvable nanocomposites in view of CdSe/ZnS QDs and hydrophobic tetraphenylporphyrin particles passivated by chitosan. These nanocomposites showed a 45% typical productivity in creating singlet oxygen due to the intracomplex Förster reverberation energy move with TPP.

It incorporates the actual course of photochemically responding to an energized photosensitizer with either cell substrates or sub-atomic oxygen, which at last outcomes in the passing of disease cells. The photosensitizer has two electrons with contradicting spins in a low-energy sub-atomic orbital in its ground state. One of these electrons is excited to higher energy atomic orbitals without changing spins when light is ingested [82]. Because of the photodrug’s concise lifetime in this state, which is known as the singlet excited state, it cannot take part in responses with cell substrates (going from nano to picoseconds).

The excited photosensitizer can either go through fluorescence, which delivers light energy, to get back to its ground state, or non-radiative decay, which delivers heat energy through inward conversion (IC). The improvement of photosensitizers from the original to the ongoing third era, delivery systems, the development or suppression of immunity, combinational treatment, and other basic components of photodynamic treatment should be in every way completely talked about. The utilization of late made quantum dots is growing in photodynamic treatment (PDT). The primary benefits of utilizing these QDs are that they beat the downsides of conventional PDT compounds through having great photostability, high quantum yield, areas of strength for and as a result of their huge change dipole moment [83, 84].

Moreover, the photophysical qualities and fluid solvency of the core can be custom fitted to address specific issues by shifting their size and content, which offers a huge surface region for linkage to biomolecules like peptides and antibodies. Be that as it may, the results of QDs utilized freely in photodynamic treatment (PDT) were disappointing. They can notwithstanding, participate in fluorescence reverberation energy move (FRET) by filling in as energy benefactors, which various gatherings effectively utilized for PDT. The FRET interaction is shown by the contributor particles’ extinguished fluorescence and the acceptor atoms’ expanded fluorescence. QDs alone are not effective at creating singlet oxygen, however, when joined with normal dyes, the combination produces singlet oxygen with a high quantum yield. Their closeness, estimated in nanometers, is the principal essential for FRET from QD to PS. They can remain joined by noncovalent complexes or covalent bonds. The problem of QD instability in biological media has been addressed by a variety of surface modification techniques. Commonly, amphiphilic molecules are used to encase QDs. The hydrophobic cavity of the QD is encircled by the hydrophobic end of the molecule, which permits the QD to disperse in solution. This is a widely used encapsulation method because it addresses the issues of luminescence quantum yields and colloidal stability [85].

The size of the particle will determine whether or not effective QDs can be developed for diagnostic and therapeutic uses. A QD can pass through biological barriers like the alveolo-capillary, blood-brain barrier, gastric, and barriers in the dermis as well as the renal filtration barrier if its core material has a minimum diameter of 8–10 nm (which is typically increased with surface features) [86]. Before commercializing QDs for use in humans, we must conduct additional research on their potential toxicity, which will take time overall [87]. According to a recent study, the creation of noble carbon dots from curcumin and folic acid improved the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy in treating cancer cells. For nucleus-targeting PDT, conjugated carbon dots (CCDs), a novel two-photon active photosensitizer was proved to release lethal reactive oxygen species (ROS). Through a pathway mediated by folate-receptor, a combination of carbon dots, curcumin, and folic acid (CDcf) was discovered to interact with malignant cells, leading to significant localization within the nucleus. PDT efficiency eventually increased as a result of the increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in the nucleus brought on by two-photon excitation. As a result, by directly attacking cancer cells’ DNA, cancer cells were eliminated more successfully. The development of multi-functional dual-photon active nanoformulation on a solo stage for improved PDT in oral malignancy diagnosis and therapy was made possible by CDs’ inherent ROS generation and nucleus-targeting capacity. In order to aim and distribute PDT proxies accurately and efficiently, CDcf has developed a new approach. Furthermore, the technique can be easily expanded for better enactment in the nanoprobes with added malignant cell lines using targeted therapy and diagnosis [88].

Advertisement

9. Quantum dots in optoelectronic devices

Optoelectronic systems are very interested in quantum dots because of their unique characteristics [89, 90]. A new generation of semiconductor devices known as quantum dots has been the focus of the nanotechnology sector. Due to their ability to provide special properties, quantum dots, also known as “artificial atoms,” are now being used in a variety of high-performance devices. They have improved the performance of solar cells and lasers, for example. The adequacy and usefulness of these promising nanomaterials for cutting-edge optoelectronic gadgets in both modern and biomedical fields have been further developed through various endeavors made around the world [91]. Lasers, photo-detectors (photodiode), amplifiers, and solar cells are a few examples of optoelectronic devices. Researchers have developed quantum dot devices over the past two decades that outperform earlier devices based on quantum dots in terms of performance. Self-assembled nanoparticles have drawn a lot of attention for many years. A semiconductor can develop specific unique properties by reducing its size to the nanoscale. Nanometer-sized semiconductors can have their electrical and optical properties altered by manipulating their morphology. Similar to electrons, semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) are an intriguing nanoscale structure of confined carriers in all dimensions [92]. Zero-dimensional semiconductor nanostructures are more tunable and delicate to outer boundaries than customary mass semiconductors; furthermore, in light of the fact that QDs are zero-dimensional, their energy levels can be dense to an assortment of delta functions. The key advantages of low-layered semiconductors have produced a lot of interest. Early research established the wavelength tunability and threshold reduction capabilities of quantum-organized semiconductor lasers, which were subsequently theoretically supported. Since there was not a practical method for making QDs for several years after these groundbreaking studies, efforts to develop QDs and use them in devices were limited to experimental research. Quickly following the effective production of self-assembled quantum dot laser diodes (QD based 77 K operational diodes) were created [93, 94]. A worldwide drive was begun to further develop quantum dots development control after an exhibit of self-collected quantum dots and the main quantum dot laser. Indium arsenide/indium phosphide (InAs/InP) and gallium arsenide (In(Ga)As/GaAs) [92] are two instances of mismatched grids that definitely stand out from researchers [95]. Heteroepitaxial development modes in thin films are regularly made sense by utilizing thermodynamic justifications. Further developed QD self-gathering got prompt prizes. Lasers, as well as quantum dab enhancers, quantum dot solar cells (QDSCs), quantum dot infrared photodetectors (QDIPs), and quantum dot super-luminescent diodes (QDSLDs), have all been accounted for [96]. Between subband assimilation in QDs in the last part of the 1990s prompted the advancement of mid-frequency and long-frequency infra-red photo-detectors. Self-coordinated quantum dots optoelectronic gadgets have progressed essentially since these nanostructures were first created [97].

In terms of efficiency, quantum dot lasers are now on par with quantum well lasers. Inter-sublevel instruments have improved efficiency and unique properties, and they can be used as light sources and detectors. Future systems are predicted to heavily rely on quantum dot optoelectronic sensors. Additionally, high-performance QDIPs are made possible by active research in QDs [98]. The fact that QDIPs can operate at higher temperatures and have lower dark currents gives them a fundamental advantage over QWIPs. Efficiency of quantum-well IR photo-detectors (QWIPs) has been surpassed by QD-IR photo-detectors (QDIPs) [99]. Moreover, there are as yet various issues, including deficient quantum execution and the requirement for further developed QDIP engineering and creation to completely use their true capacity in third-age infrared detecting [100]. In the impending years, QDIPs with effectiveness tantamount to present state-of-the-art advancements like QWIPs and HgCdTe photodetector might be utilized [101]. Quantum wells are less developed than quantum dots (QDs) to the extent that optoelectronic systems plan on account of different head imperfections in QDs’ slow retention and the very thermal relationship between the intermediate and conduction band [102]. To accomplish high transformation productivity far in excess of the record worth of GaAs single-intersection solar cells, extra improvements in gadget physical science, plan, development, and portrayal of QDSCs would be required [103, 104]. QD-based biosensors are widely used in science, engineering, and technology to monitor many facets of contemporary life. To advance research in these fields, it is necessary to comprehend the various types of sensors, how to use them for different applications, as well as how to optimize and utilize them. Quantum dots (QDs), which are zero-dimensional semiconductors, exhibit optical gain, laser technology, strong light absorption, and intense narrow-band radiation over the visible and infrared bands. Imaging, solar energy deriving, display units, and signal transportation can all benefit from these qualities. One of the modest light-emitting technologies is the use of LECs (light-emitting electrochemical cells). Numerous LECs have been confirmed by means of a variety of biological materials, including fluorescent polymers. The understanding of LECs using materials of inorganic form, predominantly materials of low-dimensional is interesting to relate to light-emitting diodes/instruments, that have been made possible by recent advances in this QD device technologies. Recent developments in two-dimensional and low-dimensional materials, like chiral light-emitting devices and materials based on quantum dots, offer significant functionalities that hold promise for new optoelectronic applications based on emergent materials [105].

Advertisement

10. Challenges and future perspectives

Even though QDs have an extensive choice of applications, including in vivo biomedical imaging and detection, they also have the potential to be harmful to both human health and the environment. Typically, QDs can impair organism function and cause metabolic disability or death through at least three distinct pathways. The QDs’ composition comes first and is of utmost importance [106]. Toxic ions could be released from QDs and poison cells during internal corrosion. As the nanoparticles have a high surface-to-volume ratio, they are more prospective than bulk material to undergo partial decomposition and release ions [107, 108, 109]. Regardless of composition, QDs’ small size creates another potential drawback because particles can adhere to cell membranes or be ingested and retained inside cells, impairing organ function. It was discovered that many QDs have toxic effects, with earlier studies attributing the cause to the presence of hazardous metals. Commercial quantum dots frequently contain the toxic heavy metal core CDs cadmium, lead, mercury, and arsenic [110, 111]. According to reports, the Cd-core QDs were indeed cytotoxic, particularly when surface oxidation from air or UV exposure caused reduced Cd to form on the particle surface and the release of free Cd2+ ions. The cells were damaged after being cultured with CdSe QDs for seven days, showing diffused nuclei and ill-defined cell boundaries [112, 113]. Additionally, it was demonstrated that cadmium telluride (CdTe) QDs had negative effects on cellular functions, with the smaller ones emitting green light is more harmful than the larger ones emitting red light [114]. In imaging, clinical applications, and basic biomedical research, QDs hold great promise. To comprehend the potential of these new generation materials, a review of QD properties and general perception is conducted. The toxicity of these nanoparticles is one significant barrier, but it is not yet fully understood. Before commercializing QDs for use in humans, we must conduct additional research on their potential toxicity, which will take time overall [105, 115, 116, 117, 118].

11. Summary and conclusion

Numerous implications for celllabelling, biomedical imaging, diagnostics, and drug delivery are provided by quantum dots. They have benefits over traditional fluorescent dyes and green fluorescence proteins, including a size similar to antibodies that enables combined applications using these recognition molecules, narrow-emission and broad-excitation spectra, high intense photons, and anti-quenching ability, wavelength tunability making them suitable for multi-wavelength applications, and high brightness and photostability. Quantum dots might not be able to replace all of the other fluorophores currently employed in labeling and imaging, though. In addition to their excellent photophysical characteristics, quantum dots face some difficulties, such as restricted in vivo applications due to complex surface chemistry. Quantum dots are frequently used in conjunction with other kinds of fluorophores to great effect. They may be advantageous in some applications but disadvantageous in others. QDs must be small enough to penetrate biological barriers if they are to be used in routine clinical settings for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Additionally, they must have low toxicities. The theranostic applications of QDs-based biosensors are covered in detail in this chapter. Although there are opposing views on QDs’ biocompatibility and toxicity, they have made significant strides in the field of research thus far. The most recent article was published a few years ago, and now scientists are starting to realize how QDs can be used for therapeutic, diagnostic, and sensing purposes. Despite all of this, creating smart formulations using QDs still presents a number of difficulties.

References

  1. 1. Chaturvedi S, Dave PN. Nanotechnology: History and Future. 21st Century Nanoscience–A Handbook: Public Policy, Education, and Global Trends. 2020;10:4-1
  2. 2. Marzo JL, Jornet JM, Pierobon M. Nanonetworks in biomedical applications. Current Drug Targets. 2019;20(8):800-807
  3. 3. Hornyak GL, Moore JJ, Tibbals HF, Dutta J. Fundamentals of Nanotechnology. US: CRC Press; 2018
  4. 4. Khanna V. Nanosensors. US: CRC Press; 2016
  5. 5. Hatzikraniotis E, Kyratsi T. Materials Science: Trends, Material Properties and Educational Perspectives. In: Psillos D, Kariotoglou P, editors. Iterative Design of Teaching-Learning Sequences. Dordrecht: Springer; 2016
  6. 6. Xu S, Cui J, Wang L. Recent developments of low-toxicity NIR II quantum dots for sensing and bioimaging. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2016;80:149-155
  7. 7. Viana OS, Ribeiro MS, Fontes A, Santos BS. Quantum Dots in Photodynamic Therapy. In: Batinić-Haberle I, Rebouças J, Spasojević I, editors. Redox-Active Therapeutics. Oxidative Stress in Applied Basic Research and Clinical Practice. Cham: Springer; 2016
  8. 8. McHugh KJ, Jing L, Behrens AM, Jayawardena S, Tang W, Gao M, et al. Biocompatible semiconductor quantum dots as cancer imaging agents. Advanced Materials. 2018;30(18):1706356
  9. 9. Grushevskaya H, Krylov G, Kruchinin S, Vlahovic B, Bellucci S. Electronic properties and quasi-zero-energy states of graphene quantum dots. Physical Review B. 2021;103:235102
  10. 10. Pandey P. Role of nanotechnology in electronics: A review of recent developments and patents. Recent Patents on Nanotechnology. 2022;16(1):45-66
  11. 11. Leigh WB. Devices for Optoelectronics (1st ed.). US: CRC Press; 2021
  12. 12. Kambhampati P. Nanoparticles, nanocrystals, and quantum dots: What are the implications of size in colloidal nanoscale materials? Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2021;12(20):4769-4779
  13. 13. Ghasemi H, Mozaffari MH. Synthesis and optoelectronic properties of CdSe quantum dots. 18 May 2021. pp. 1-4
  14. 14. Duan L, Hu L, Guan X, Lin CH, Chu D, Huang S, et al. Quantum dots for photovoltaics: A tale of two materials. Advanced Energy Materials. 2021;11(20):2100354
  15. 15. Slavica B. Applicability of Quantum Dots in Biomedical Science. Djezzar B, editor. Ionizing Radiation Effects and Applications. IntechOpen;2017. DOI: 10.5772/ intechopen.71428
  16. 16. Bera D, Qian L, Tseng T-K, Holloway PH. Quantum dots and their multimodal applications: A review. Materials. 2010;3(4):2260-2345
  17. 17. Bakalova R, Zhelev Z, Gadjeva V. Quantum dots versus organic fluorophores in fluorescent deep-tissue imaging—Merits and demerits. General Physiology and Biophysics. 2008;27(4):231-242
  18. 18. Lee SF, Osborne MA. Brightening, blinking, bluing and bleaching in the life of a quantum dot: Friend or foe? ChemPhysChem. 2009;10(13):2174-2191
  19. 19. Sukhanova A, Devy J, Venteo L, Kaplan H, Artemyev M, Oleinikov V, et al. Biocompatible fluorescent nanocrystals for immunolabeling of membrane proteins and cells. Analytical Biochemistry. 2004;324(1):60-67
  20. 20. Lin G, Chen T, Zou J, Wang Y, Wang X, Li J, et al. Quantum Dots-siRNA Nanoplexes for Gene Silencing in Central Nervous System Tumor Cells. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 4 Apr 2017;8:182. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00182. PMID: 28420995; PMCID: PMC5378761
  21. 21. Wang M, Li H, Huang B, Chen S, Cui R, Sun ZJ, et al. An Ultra-Stable, Oxygen-Supply Nanoprobe Emitting in Near-Infrared-II Window to Guide and Enhance Radiotherapy by Promoting Anti-Tumor Immunity. Advanced Healthcare Materials. Jun 2021;10(12):e2100090. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202100090. Epub 2021 Apr 22. PMID: 33885213
  22. 22. Rezaei A, Hashemi E. A pseudohomogeneous nanocarrier based on carbon quantum dots decorated with arginine as an efficient gene delivery vehicle. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):13790
  23. 23. Zhang Y, Wang T-H. Quantum dot enabled molecular sensing and diagnostics. Theranostics. 2012;2(7):631-654
  24. 24. Xiao Y, Wu Z, Yao Q , Xie J. Luminescent metal nanoclusters: Biosensing strategies and bioimaging applications. Aggregate. 2021;2(1):114-132
  25. 25. Naresh V, Lee N. A review on biosensors and recent development of nanostructured materials-enabled biosensors. Sensors. 2021;21(4):1109
  26. 26. Wang J, Han S, Ke D, Wang R. Semiconductor quantum dots surface modification for potential cancer diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2012;2012:129041
  27. 27. Wen L, Qiu L, Wu Y, Hu X, Zhang X. Aptamer-modified semiconductor quantum dots for biosensing applications. Sensors, Basel. 2017;17(8):1-14. OI: 10.3390/s17081736. PMID: 28788080; PMCID: PMC5579848
  28. 28. Nienhaus K, Wang H, Nienhaus GU. Nanoparticles for biomedical applications: Exploring and exploiting molecular interactions at the nano-bio interface. Materials Today Advances. 2020;5:100036
  29. 29. Wen L, Qiu L, Wu Y, Hu X, Zhang X. Aptamer-Modified Semiconductor Quantum Dots for Biosensing Applications. Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jul 28;17(8):1-14. DOI: 10.3390/s17081736. PMID: 28788080; PMCID: PMC5579848
  30. 30. Freeman R, Girsh J, Willner I. Nucleic acid/quantum dots (QDs) hybrid systems for optical and photoelectrochemical sensing. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2013;5(8):2815-2834
  31. 31. Manzoor O, Soleja N, Mohsin MJ. Nanoscale gizmos—The novel fluorescent probes for monitoring protein activity. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2018;133:83-95
  32. 32. Gopalan D, Pandey A, Alex AT, Kalthur G, Pandey S, Udupa N, et al. Nanoconstructs as a versatile tool for detection and diagnosis of Alzheimer biomarkers. Nanotechnology. 2021;32(14):142002
  33. 33. Younis MR, He G, Qu J, Lin J, Huang P, Xia XH. Inorganic nanomaterials with intrinsic singlet oxygen generation for photodynamic therapy. Advanced Science. 2021;8(21):2102587
  34. 34. Konkar A, Lu S, Madhukar A, Hughes SM, Alivisatos AP. Semiconductor nanocrystal quantum dots on single crystal semiconductor substrates: High resolution transmission electron microscopy. Nano Letters. 2005;5(5):969-973
  35. 35. Xing Y, Chaudry Q , Shen C, Kong KY, Zhau HE, Chung LW, et al. Bioconjugated quantum dots for multiplexed and quantitative immunohistochemistry. Nature Protocols. 2007;2(5):1152-1165
  36. 36. Smith AM, Dave S, Nie S, True L, Gao X. Multicolor quantum dots for molecular diagnostics of cancer. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. 2006;6(2):231-244
  37. 37. Derfus AM, Chan WCW, Bhatia SN. Probing the cytotoxicity of semiconductor quantum dots. Nano Letters. 2004;4(1):11-18
  38. 38. Guo G, Liu W, Liang J, Xu H, He Z, Yang X. Preparation and characterization of novel CdSe quantum dots modified with poly (d, l-lactide) nanoparticles. Materials Letters. 2006;60(21):2565-2568
  39. 39. Hong G, Antaris AL, Dai H. Near-infrared fluorophores for biomedical imaging. Nature Biomedical Engineering. 2017;1(1):0010
  40. 40. Yang ST, Wang X, Wang H, Lu F, Luo PG, Cao L, et al. Carbon dots as nontoxic and high-performance fluorescence imaging agents. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Nanomaterials and Interfaces. 2009;113(42):18110-18114
  41. 41. Jackson B, Bugge D, Ranville J, Chen C. Bioavailability, toxicity, and bioaccumulation of quantum dot nanoparticles to the amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus. Environmental Science & Technology. 2012;46:5550-5556
  42. 42. Clift MJD, Stone V. Quantum dots: An insight and perspective of their biological interaction and how this relates to their relevance for clinical use. Theranostics. 2012;2(7):668-680
  43. 43. Jain NS, Somanna P, Patil BA. Application of quantum dots in drug delivery. Nanoscience & Nanotechnology-Asia. 2022;12(1):16-31
  44. 44. Probst CE, Zrazhevskiy P, Bagalkot V, Gao X. Quantum dots as a platform for nanoparticle drug delivery vehicle design. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2013;65(5):703-718
  45. 45. Matea CT, Mocan T, Tabaran F, Pop T, Mosteanu O, Puia C, et al. Quantum dots in imaging, drug delivery and sensor applications. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2017;12:5421-5431
  46. 46. Gidwani B, Sahu V, Shukla SS, Pandey R, Joshi V, Jain VK, et al. Quantum dots: Prospectives, toxicity, advances and applications. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2021;61:102308
  47. 47. Kairdolf BA, Smith AM, Stokes TH, Wang MD, Young AN, Nie S. Semiconductor quantum dots for bioimaging and biodiagnostic applications. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry. 2013;6(1):143-162
  48. 48. Song JT, Yang XQ , Zhang XS, Yan DM, Yao MH, Qin MY, et al. Composite silica coated gold nanosphere and quantum dots nanoparticles for X-ray CT and fluorescence bimodal imaging. Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England: 2003). 2015;44(25):11314-11320
  49. 49. Ranjbar-Navazi Z, Fathi M, Abdolahinia ED, Omidi Y, Davaran SJMS, et al. MUC-1 aptamer conjugated InP/ZnS quantum dots/nanohydrogel fluorescent composite for mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in MCF-7 cells. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2021;118:111469
  50. 50. Cai X, Luo Y, Yan H, Du D, Lin Y. pH-responsive ZnO nanocluster for lung cancer chemotherapy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2017;9(7):5739-5747
  51. 51. Cai X, Luo Y, Zhang W, Du D, Lin Y. pH-Sensitive ZnO quantum dots–doxorubicin nanoparticles for lung cancer targeted drug delivery. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016;8(34):22442-22450
  52. 52. Matea CT, Mocan T, Tabaran F, Pop T, Mosteanu O, Puia C, et al. Quantum dots in imaging, drug delivery and sensor applications. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2017;12:5421
  53. 53. Li Y, Liu B, Yang F, Yu Y, Zeng A, Ye T, et al. Lobaplatin induces BGC-823 human gastric carcinoma cell apoptosis via ROS-mitochondrial apoptotic pathway and impairs cell migration and invasion. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & Pharmacotherapie. 2016;83:1239-1246
  54. 54. Han W, Wu Z, Li Y, Wang Y. Graphene family nanomaterials (GFNs)—Promising materials for antimicrobial coating and film: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2019;358:1022-1037
  55. 55. Dong X, Liang W, Meziani MJ, Sun YP, Yang L. Carbon dots as potent antimicrobial agents. Theranostics. 2020;10(2):671-686
  56. 56. Al Awak MM, Wang P, Wang S, Tang Y, Sun YP, Yang L. Correlation of carbon dots' light-activated antimicrobial activities and fluorescence quantum yield. RSC Advances. 2017;7(48):30177-30184
  57. 57. McCollum C, Bertram J, Nagpal P, Chatterjee A. Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections Using Quantum Dots. The FASEB Journal. 2022;36. DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R4869
  58. 58. Rajendiran K, Zhao Z, Pei D-S, Fu AJ. Antimicrobial activity and mechanism of functionalized quantum dots. Polymers. 2019;11(10):1670
  59. 59. Shahshahanipour M, Rezaei B, Ensafi AA, Etemadifar Z. An ancient plant for the synthesis of a novel carbon dot and its applications as an antibacterial agent and probe for sensing of an anti-cancer drug. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2019;98:826-833
  60. 60. Elliott AG, Huang JX, Neve S, Zuegg J, Edwards IA, Cain AK, et al. An amphipathic peptide with antibiotic activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Nature Communications. 2020;11(1):1-13
  61. 61. Shaw Z, Kuriakose S, Cheeseman S, Dickey MD, Genzer J, Christofferson AJ, et al. Antipathogenic properties and applications of low-dimensional materials. Nature Communications. 2021;12(1):1-19
  62. 62. Shikha S, Chaudhuri SR, Bhattacharyya MS. Facile one pot greener synthesis of sophorolipid capped gold nanoparticles and its antimicrobial activity having special efficacy against gram negative vibrio cholerae. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):1463
  63. 63. Hao X, Huang L, Zhao C, Chen S, Lin W, Lin Y, et al. Antibacterial activity of positively charged carbon quantum dots without detectable resistance for wound healing with mixed bacteria infection. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2021;123:111971
  64. 64. Yang J, Zhang X, Ma YH, Gao G, Chen X, Jia HR, et al. Carbon dot-based platform for simultaneous bacterial distinguishment and antibacterial applications. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016;8(47):32170-32181
  65. 65. Lin F, Bao Y-W, Wu F-G. Carbon dots for sensing and killing microorganisms. Journal of Carbon Research. 2019;5(2):33
  66. 66. Machado GHA, Marques TR, de Carvalho TCL, Duarte AC, de Oliveira FC, Gonçalves MC, et al. Antibacterial activity and in vivo wound healing potential of phenolic extracts from Jaboticaba skin. Chemical Biology & Drug Design. 2018;92(1):1333-1343
  67. 67. Zhao C, Wang X, Yu L, Wu L, Hao X, Liu Q , et al. Quaternized carbon quantum dots with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity for the treatment of wounds infected with mixed bacteria. Acta Biomaterialia. 2022;138:528-544
  68. 68. Zmejkoski DZ, Marković ZM, Mitić DD, Zdravković NM, Kozyrovska NO, Bugárová N, et al. Antibacterial composite hydrogels of graphene quantum dots and bacterial cellulose accelerate wound healing. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, Applied Biomaterials. 2022;110(8):1796-1805
  69. 69. Chai S, Zhou L, Pei S, Zhu Z, Chen B. P-Doped Carbon Quantum Dots with Antibacterial Activity. Micromachines. 2021;12:1116. DOI: 10.3390/mi12091116
  70. 70. Wu L, Gao Y, Zhao C, Huang D, Chen W, Lin X, et al. Synthesis of curcumin-quaternized carbon quantum dots with enhanced broad-spectrum antibacterial activity for promoting infected wound healing. Biomaterials Advances. 2022;133:112608
  71. 71. Wagalgave SM, Birajdar SS, Malegaonkar JN, Bhosale SV. Chapter Eight - Patented AIE materials for biomedical applications. Bhosale RS, Singh V, editors. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, Academic Press; 2021;185:199-223
  72. 72. Fong JFY, Ng YH, Ng SM. Chapter 7 - Carbon dots as a new class of light emitters for biomedical diagnostics and therapeutic applications, Grumezescu AM, editor. Fullerens, Graphenes and Nanotubes. William Andrew Publishing; 2018:227-295. (Swinburne University of Technology Sarawak Campus, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia)
  73. 73. Dolatyari M, Aghdam FA, Rostami G, Rostami A, Amiri IS. Introducing new conjugated quantum dots for photothermal therapy in biological applications. Plasmonics. 2020;15(6):1565-1575
  74. 74. Zhang M, Zheng T, Sheng B, Wu F, Zhang Q , Wang W, et al. Mn2+ complex-modified polydopamine- and dual emissive carbon dots based nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo trimodality fluorescent, photothermal, and magnetic resonance imaging. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2019;373:1054-1063
  75. 75. Tu X, Wang L, Cao Y, Ma Y, Shen H, Zhang M, et al. Efficient cancer ablation by combined photothermal and enhanced chemo-therapy based on carbon nanoparticles/doxorubicin@SiO2 nanocomposites. Carbon. 2016;97:35-44
  76. 76. Xie H, Liu M, You B, Luo G, Chen Y, Liu B, et al. Photothermal Therapy: Biodegradable Bi2O2Se Quantum Dots for Photoacoustic Imaging-Guided Cancer Photothermal Therapy (Small 1/2020). Small, US. 2020;16:2070013
  77. 77. Ding D, Guo W, Guo C, Sun J, Zheng N, Wang F, et al. MoO(3-x) quantum dots for photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal/photodynamic cancer treatment. Nanoscale. 2017;9(5):2020-2029
  78. 78. Guo T, Tang Q , Guo Y, Qiu H, Dai J, Xing C, et al. Boron quantum dots for photoacoustic imaging-guided photothermal therapy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2021;13(1):306-311
  79. 79. Chilakamarthi U, Giribabu L. Photodynamic therapy: Past, present and future. The Chemical Record. 2017;17(8):775-802
  80. 80. Tabish TA, Scotton CJ, Ferguson J, Lin L, der Veen AV, Lowry S, et al. Biocompatibility and toxicity of graphene quantum dots for potential application in photodynamic therapy. Nanomedicine. 2018;13(15):1923-1937
  81. 81. Algorri JF, Ochoa M, Roldán-Varona P, Rodríguez-Cobo L, López-Higuera JM. Photodynamic therapy: A compendium of latest reviews. Cancers. 2021;13(17):4447
  82. 82. Niculescu A-G, Grumezescu AM. Photodynamic therapy—An up-to-date review. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(8):3626
  83. 83. Martynenko IV, Kuznetsova VA, Orlova AO, Kanaev PA, Maslov VG, Loudon A, et al. Chlorin e6–ZnSe/ZnS quantum dots based system as reagent for photodynamic therapy. Nanotechnology. 2015;26(5):055102
  84. 84. Lu D, Tao R, Wang Z. Carbon-based materials for photodynamic therapy: A mini-review. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering. 2019;13(2):310-323
  85. 85. Palui G, Aldeek F, Wang W, Mattoussi H. Strategies for interfacing inorganic nanocrystals with biological systems based on polymer-coating. Chemical Society Reviews. 2015;44(1):193-227
  86. 86. Volkov Y. Quantum dots in nanomedicine: Recent trends, advances and unresolved issues. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2015;468(3):419-427
  87. 87. Aizik G, Waiskopf N, Agbaria M, Ben-David-Naim M, Levi-Kalisman Y, Shahar A, et al. Liposomes of quantum dots configured for passive and active delivery to tumor tissue. Nano Letters. 2019;19(9):5844-5852
  88. 88. Nasrin A, Hassan M, Gomes VG. Two-photon active nucleus-targeting carbon dots: Enhanced ROS generation and photodynamic therapy for oral cancer. Nanoscale. 2020;12(40):20598-20603
  89. 89. Li X, Rui M, Song J, Shen Z, Zeng H. Carbon and graphene quantum dots for optoelectronic and energy devices: A review. Advanced Functional Materials. 2015;25(31):4929-4947
  90. 90. Kim J, Song S, Kim Y-H, Park SK. Recent progress of quantum dot-based photonic devices and systems: A comprehensive review of materials. Devices, and Applications. 2021;2(3):2000024
  91. 91. Yuan F, Li S, Fan Z, Meng X, Fan L, Yang S. Shining carbon dots: Synthesis and biomedical and optoelectronic applications. Nano Today. 2016;11(5):565-586
  92. 92. Wu J, Chen S, Seeds A, Liu H. Quantum dot optoelectronic devices: Lasers, photodetectors and solar cells. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2015;48(36):363001
  93. 93. Fang J, Zhou Z, Xiao M, Lou Z, Wei Z, Shen G. Recent advances in low-dimensional semiconductor nanomaterials and their applications in high-performance photodetectors. InfoMat. 2020;2(2):291-317
  94. 94. Benelmekki M. Zero-dimensional nanostructures. In: Nanomaterials [Internet]. Morgan & Claypool Publishers; 2019. pp. 3-1-3-18. DOI: 10.1088/2053-2571/ab126dch3
  95. 95. Gajjela RSR, Koenraad PM. Atomic-scale characterization of droplet epitaxy quantum dots. Nanomaterials. 2021;11(1):85
  96. 96. Mitin V, Antipov A, Sergeev A, Vagidov N, Eason D, Strasser G. Quantum dot infrared photodetectors: Photoresponse enhancement due to potential barriers. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2011;6(1):21
  97. 97. Bergeson J, Bommena R, Fahey S, Cowan V, Morath C, Velicu S. Mid and long wavelength infrared HgCdTe photodetectors exposed to proton radiation. In: Proceedings of SPIE. SPIE; 2014;9226:92260P-1-10
  98. 98. Blood P. Quantum Efficiency of Quantum Dot Lasers, in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics. 2017;23(6):1-8. Art no. 1900608, DOI: 10.1109/JSTQE.2017.2687039
  99. 99. Zhang W, Lim H-C, Taguchi M, Tsao S, Szafraniec J, Movaghar B, et al. High performance In As quantum dot infrared photodetectors (QDIP) on InP by MOCVD. In: Proceedings of SPIE 5732, Quantum Sensing and Nanophotonic Devices II. 25 Mar 2005. pp. 1-8
  100. 100. Rogalski A. Progress in quantum dot infrared photodetectors. In: Tong X, Wu J, Wang ZM, editors. Quantum Dot Photodetectors. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. pp. 1-74
  101. 101. Jiao H, Wang X, Chen Y, Guo S, Wu S, Song C, et al. HgCdTe/black phosphorus van der Waals heterojunction for high-performance polarization-sensitive midwave infrared photodetector. Science Advances. 2022;8(19):eabn1811
  102. 102. Chatterjee A, Jagtap A, Pendyala N, Rao K. HgCdTe quantum dot over interdigitated electrode for mid-wave infrared photon detection and its noise characterization. International Journal of Nanoscience. 2019;19:1950020
  103. 103. Song H, Lin Y, Zhang Z, Rao H, Wang W, Fang Y, et al. Improving the efficiency of quantum dot sensitized solar cells beyond 15% via secondary deposition. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2021;143(12):4790-4800
  104. 104. Kim Y, Ban K-Y, Honsberg CB. Multi-stacked InAs/GaAs quantum dots grown with different growth modes for quantum dot solar cells. Applied Physics Letters. 2015;106(22):222104
  105. 105. Pu J, Takenobu T. Recent advances in light-emitting electrochemical cells with low-dimensional quantum materials. Nihon Gazo Gakkaishi (Journal of the Imaging Society of Japan). 2021;60(6):656-672
  106. 106. Wu T, Zhang T, Chen Y, Tang M. Research advances on potential neurotoxicity of quantum dots. Journal of Applied Toxicology. 2016;36(3):345-351
  107. 107. Friehs E, AlSalka Y, Jonczyk R, Lavrentieva A, Jochums A, Walter J-G, et al. Toxicity, phototoxicity and biocidal activity of nanoparticles employed in photocatalysis. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. 2016;29:1-28
  108. 108. Casals E, Casals G, Puntes V, Rosenholm JM. 1 - Biodistribution, Excretion, and Toxicity of Inorganic Nanoparticles. Cui W, Zhao X, editors. In: Micro and Nano Technologies, Theranostic Bionanomaterials. USA: Elsevier; 2019:3-26
  109. 109. Liu J, Wang Y, Ma J, Peng Y, Wang A. A review on bidirectional analogies between the photocatalysis and antibacterial properties of ZnO. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2019;783:898-918
  110. 110. Wang Z, Tang M. The cytotoxicity of core-shell or non-shell structure quantum dots and reflection on environmental friendly: A review. Environmental Research. 2021;194:110593
  111. 111. Reshma VG, Mohanan PV. Quantum dots: Applications and safety consequences. Journal of Luminescence. 2019;205:287-298
  112. 112. Paydary P. Degradation of Quantum Dots in Aqueous Environments. Diss. Northeastern University, US. 2018
  113. 113. Pramanik Sunipa and Hill, Samantha KE. and Zhi, Bo and Hudson-Smith, Natalie V. and Wu, Jeslin J. and White, Jacob N. and McIntire, Eileen A. and Kondeti, V. S. Santosh K. and Lee, Amani L. and Bruggeman, Peter J. and Kortshagen, Uwe R. and Haynes, Christy L.”, Comparative toxicity assessment of novel Si quantum dots and their traditional Cd-based counterparts using bacteria models Shewanella oneidensis and Bacillus subtilis. Environmental science: Nano. 2018;5(8):1890-1901
  114. 114. Hlavata L, Striesova I, Ignat T, Blaskovisova J, Ruttkay-Nedecky B, Kopel P, et al. An electrochemical DNA-based biosensor to study the effects of CdTe quantum dots on UV-induced damage of DNA. Microchimica Acta. 2015;182(9):1715-1722
  115. 115. Rocha TL, Mestre NC, Sabóia-Morais SM, Bebianno MJ. Environmental behaviour and ecotoxicity of quantum dots at various trophic levels: A review. Environment International. 2017;98:1-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.09.021. Epub 2016 Oct 13. PMID: 27745949
  116. 116. Kubicek-Sutherland JZ, Makarov NS, Stromberg ZR, Lenz KD, Castañeda C, Mercer AN, et al. Exploring the biocompatibility of near-IR CuInSe x S2–x/ZnS quantum dots for deep-tissue. Bioimaging. 2020;3(12):8567-8574
  117. 117. Bayer M. Bridging two worlds: Colloidal versus epitaxial quantum dots. Advances in Physics of Semiconductors. 2019;531(6):1900039
  118. 118. Javanbakht S, Shaabani A. Stimuli-Responsive Bio-Based Quantum Dots in Biomedical Applications. In: Nanoengineering of Biomaterials, Jana S, Jana S, editors. 2022. DOI: 10.1002/9783527832095.ch28

Written By

Karunanithi Rajamanickam

Submitted: 19 July 2022 Reviewed: 10 August 2022 Published: 16 September 2022