Cellular localization of E2-related molecules in the olfactory mucosa and vomeronasal organ of adult rats.
Abstract
It has been known that androgens and estrogens, which are referred to as sex steroids, make many effects on two major nasal chemosensory mucosae such as olfactory mucosa and vomeronasal organ. Our studies conducted in rodents have demonstrated that two of the constituent cells in the olfactory mucosa, sustentacular cells and acinar cells in the associated glands of the olfactory mucosa, Bowman’s glands, express four different enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of estradiol-17β (E2). Furthermore, our ongoing study has shown that olfactory sensory cells contain immunoreactivity for an estrogen receptor (beta-type). In case of vomeronasal organ, vomeronasal sensory cells express two enzymes that catalyze conversion of E2 and estrone, and that of testosterone and androstenedione. In addition, vomeronasal sensory cells contain an estrogen receptor (alpha-type). These results strongly suggest that de novo synthesis of E2 and metabolism of E2 take place in the olfactory mucosa and vomeronasal organ, respectively. With special emphasis of subcellular characteristics of steroid-producing cells, such as presence of large amount of smooth endoplasmic reticulum and vesicular mitochondria, we will introduce our findings and present working hypotheses for E2 functions in the olfactory mucosa and vomeronasal organ.
Keywords
- olfactory sensory cell
- olfactory sustentacular cell
- Bowman’s glands
- smooth vomeronasal sensory cell
- smooth endoplasmic reticulum
- estradiol-17β
- estrogen receptor
1. Introduction
The major chemosensory mucosa in mammalian species is olfactory mucosa (OM). Olfactory sensory cells (OSCs) that detect odorants and are housed in the OM share not only common physiological and morphological features of sensory cells but also those of bipolar neurons [1, 2, 3, 4]. Electrical signals induced by odorants are conducted through axons to the surface of main olfactory bulb (MOB) and transmitted into olfactory bulbar neurons, such as mitral and tufted cells via chemical synapses [3]. In addition to the OM, many land-living mammals contain vomeronasal organs (VNOs) that are bilaterally located at the base of the nasal septum [5, 6, 7, 8]. Sensory cells of the VNO, vomeronasal sensory cells (VSCs), which are bipolar neurons as well, mainly detect species-specific odorants including pheromones and transmit their odorant information to projection neurons in the accessory olfactory bulb, so-called mitral/tufted cells [9]. Other than the OM and VNO, septal organ and Gruenberg ganglion [8] contain chemosensory cells that have been found at least rodent species [10]. Locations of these four chemosensory mucosae and their primary brain centers are schematically shown in Figure 1A. In this chapter, we will focus on two of them, OM and VNO, to demonstrate experimental data using rats to suggest de novo synthesis of estradiol-17β (E2) in the OM and metabolizing of E2 in the VNO.
By a radioautographic technique, Stumpf and Sar [11] demonstrated the incorporation of 3H-labeled estradiol into cell nuclei of OSCs, duct cells of Bowman’s glands, and mitral cells in the main olfactory bulb where synaptic terminals of OSCs are present. They suggested that these cells contain estrogen receptors and are influenced by estradiol. In ferrets, sex steroids including estradiol increased ferrets’ responsiveness to low concentrations of odors emitted from anal scent glands [12]. Conspecific odor preference by male rats was influenced by estradiol [13]. Bakker et al. [14] demonstrated in aromatase knockout male mice that exogenous estrogens restore male olfactory investigation of volatile body odors. On the other hands, it has been reported that estradiol makes various effects on the VNO. The volume of VNO in male rats was reported to be significantly larger that of female rats. This sexual dimorphism in rat VNO is established in the perinatal days when estradiol is converted from gonadal testosterone and makes an organization effect on VSCs [15, 16]. Estradiol induced increased immunoreactivity (IR) for immediate early gene in specific population of VSCs in mice [17]. Expression of VNO receptors is sexually dimorphic and influenced by estradiol and testosterone [18].
Steroid hormones are produced and secreted by endocrine cells in the adrenal cortex [19], Leydig cells or intestinal cells of Leydig in the testis [20], granulosa cells of the ovulatory follicle and cells of the corpus luteum in the ovary [21], and brain cells [22]. One of the subcellular properties of steroid-producing cells is the presence of extremely developed smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER, [23, 24, 25]). Images of rat Leydig cells that were obtained by transmission electron microscope (JEM1230, JEOL, Akishima-shi, Tokyo, Japan) are shown in Figures 1–
All of steroid-producing cells express the cholesterol side chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc), which converts cholesterol into pregnenolone [28]. In Leydig cells of the testes, for example, pregnenolone is eventually converted into testosterone, which is the most potent androgen, via metabolic pathways containing 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (HSDs). Based on several references [19, 20, 29, 30, 31], the main pathway of steroidogenesis from cholesterol to E2 is shown in Figure 2. The terminal enzyme in the sex-steroid-producing pathway is aromatase (CYP19 or P450arom). Granulosa cells of the ovulatory follicle and cells of the corpus luteum in the ovary, for instance, express aromatase (P450arom, [21]). Aromatase converts testosterone to E2, an active type of estrogen [20]. The above enzymes are expressed by the cells in the ovary [21]. Mindnich et al. [29] introduced two major roles of 12 17β-HSDs; one, for example, 17β-HSD type 1 (17β-HSD-1) is involved in conversion of an inactivated estrogen, estrone, into an activated estrogen, estradiol, and 17β-HSD type 2 (17β-HSD-2) is involved in its opposite reaction.
Among constituent cells of the OM, olfactory sustentacular cells (SCs) surrounding OSCs are rich in SER [1, 2, 3, 32, 33]. Also, Frisch [32] reported in mice as experimental models that acinar cells (ACs) of the Bowman’s glands (BGs), which are associated glands of the OM, contained large amount of SER. Before describing our findings relating to E2 in the OM, we will briefly introduce constituent cells of the rat OM, and ultrastructure of olfactory SCs and ACs.
2. Anatomy of olfactory SCs and ACs of BGs
A schematic drawing showing constituent cells of the rodent OM is shown in Figure 3A. The olfactory epithelium (OE) contains olfactory SCs mature and immature OSCs, globose and horizontal basal cells, and microvillar cells. Olfactory SCs and dendrites of mature OSCs are located side by side. Although duct cells of BGs penetrate into the OE and reach the epithelial surface, ACs are exclusively located in the lamina propria (LP) below the basement membrane. Using a field-emitted scanning microscope (FE-SEM, JSM6700F, JEOL), we were able to understand relationships between olfactory dendrites and SCs three-dimensionally. For example, a cylindrical dendrite between two SCs goes up to the epithelial surface to make a dendritic terminal (DT) can be seen (Figure 3B).
By transmission electron microscopy (TEM), cilia originating from dendritic terminals of OSCs are clearly seen (Figure 3C and D). Olfactory cilia are divided into a short proximal portion (about 400 nm at maximal width/diameter) and long distal one (100–50 nm at diameter). The proximal cilia tend to extend diagonally upward from the dendritic terminal and begin to narrow at around 1–1.5 μm and shift to the distal portion of cilia. By contrast, microvilli (about 100 nm at maximal width) extend substantially straight from the apical membranes of olfactory SCs (Figure 3C). At cross-sectional plate, proximal cilia extend radically from the dendritic terminals and distal cilia run approximately parallel to the epithelial surface (Figure 3D, [10]).
Using mice as experimental models, Makino et al. [33] classified the SER of olfactory SCs into two types, stacked lamellar and reticular-shaped SER. Using adult Sprague–Dawley rats (
BGs (Figure 3A) are called attached glands of the OE and provide serous and mucous products. The secretions from these glands provide most of the mucus covering the olfactory epithelial surface, which protects the epithelial surface from drying and temperature extremes and helps to prevent damage caused by infectious agents and noninfectious particles [3]. Thus, it does make sense that BGs secrete secretory immunoglobulin A and J chain, lactoferrin, and lysozyme [41]. It has been demonstrated that secretory products of rodent BGs contain sulfated carbohydrate substances [42, 43]. By lectin histochemical technique, we demonstrated that secretory granules of rat BGs contain glycoconjugates with internal N-acetyl glucosamine (GlcNAc) residues [44].
Our ongoing study on rat BGs has indicated that ultrastructural characteristics of ACs of BGs are very similar to those in steroid-producing cells [23, 24, 25, 26]. For example, light and transmission electron microscopic images of rat BGs are shown in Figure 5. ACs of a BG are located in the lamina propria below the basement membrane of OE (Figure 5A). Secretory granules (SGs) are seen in the supranuclear region of an AC (Figure 5B). The rough endoplasm reticulum (RER) that contains double- or triple-layered cisternae attached with ribosomes is easily seen in the perikaryal region and is connected with SER (Figure 5C). The presence of considerably well-developed RER may be a reflection of GlcNAc-containing glycoconjugates present in SGs of rat BG-ACs [44], because addition of GlcNAc residues to the backbone proteins of GlcNAc-containing glycoconjugates takes place in the RER [45, 46]. In contrast to SER in olfactory SCs, cisternae of SER of ACs appear to be filled with considerably high-dense materials (Figure 5C and D). Also, Mi containing internal microtubular structures are prominently seen (Figure 5C). Furthermore, inner cisterna of double- or triple-layered SER cisternae is attached to the outer membrane of Mi (Figure 5D). SGs are not homogenous in electron density (Figure 5E and F) and appear to be fused in the juxtaluminal region. In addition, cisternae of SER are even attached to the membrane of SGs (Figure 5F). Therefore, we would make a statement that we have extended Frisch’s observation [32] on mouse ACs of BGs in that they contain well-developed SER and provided new ultrastructural characteristics of rat ACs.
3. Expression of P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, 17β-HSD -2, and aromatase in the rat OM
Using RT-PCR analyses, we demonstrated that P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, 17β-HSD -2, and aromatase are expressed in the nasal mucosae of both sexes of adult rats that contain the OM and respiratory mucosa [34]. These results strongly suggest that OM cells express mRNA for P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, 17β-HSD-2, and aromatase. Specific antisera against P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, and 17β-HSD-2 were used for Western blot (WB), a combination of multi-labeling immunofluorescence (IF) and confocal laser-scanning microscopic (CLSM) techniques, and immunoelectron microscopic (IEM) analyses. By WB analyses on nasal tissue specimens of both male and female adult rats, we detected single band at 49 kDa for anti-P450scc antiserum, that at 34.5 kDa for anti-17β-HSD-1, and that at ~43 kDa for anti-17β-HSD-2 antiserum 17β-HSD -2 [34]. These results strongly suggest that the OM cells produce proteins for P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, and 17β-HSD-2.
Antiserum to olfactory marker protein (OMP) equivocally immunostains mature OSCs [47, 48]. Using antiserum to OMP and one of the antisera of the above three enzymes, we determined that both olfactory SCs and cells in BGs contain IF for P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, and 17β-HSD -2. However, no IF was detected in mature OSCs, immature OSCs, basal cells, and olfactory nerve bundles (Figure 6) [34]. By IEM analyses conducted on OE cells, we demonstrated that immunoreactivity (IR) for P450scc is mainly localized in mitochondria of olfactory SCs, whereas SERs and MBs of these cells contain IR for 17β-HSD-1 and 17β-HSD-2 [34]. Similar subcellular immunolocalization of P450scc and HSDs were reported in the adrenal gland and gonads [49, 50, 51].
4. Expression of estrogen receptor β (ERβ) in the OM
The above findings strongly suggest that olfactory SCs and ACs of BGs produce E2. It is known that E2 utilizes three types of receptors, such as estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), and G-protein coupled estrogen receptor 1(GPER1). Both ERα and ERβ exist as cell membrane associated form and intracellular form, whereas GPER1 exists as a transmembrane receptor [52]. Based on the results of pilot experiments, we first examined expression and cellular localization of ERβ in adult rats of both sexes. The outline of gene structure of ERβ, which is composed of eight exons, is shown in Figure 7A. Forward and reverse primers of 35 bases for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were chosen from cDNA sequences between exon 7and 8. By RT-PCR, ERβ was expressed in nasal mucosae of both sexes as well as ovaries as a positive control (Figure 7B). By WB analysis using a commercially available antiserum against rabbit ERβ, ERβ protein was detected from nasal mucosae of both sexes as well as ovaries (Figure 7C). These results strongly suggest that OM cells in both sexes express and produce ERβ. Using antisera against OMP and ERβ, and 4′6-diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) that binds to cell nucleus, triple-labeling IF technique was applied to cryostat-cut sections of OMs. Observation by a confocal laser-scanning fluorescence microscope (CLSFM, FLUOVIEW FV500-IX-UV, Olympus, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan) indicated that mature OSCs contained very intense IF for ERβ in DTs and moderately intense IF in their supranuclear cytoplasm. Furthermore, dendrites of mature OSCs were ERβ-immunoreactive (Figure 8A–C). However, olfactory SCs were immune-negative for ERβ. At subcellular level, post-embedding immunogold TEM technique demonstrated that gold particles that are reflection of ERβ immunoreactivity were localized on cell membranes of both proximal and distal portions of olfactory cilia (Figure 8D–F). The above results [53] strongly suggest that mature OSCs, at least, contain both membranous and cytosolic ERβ.
5. E2 actions in the OM
Based on the above results, we present our working hypothesis in Figure 9. Since our unpublished study have demonstrated that olfactory SCs are immunoreactive for cholesterol receptor (low-density lipoprotein receptor), it is likely that the SCs take up cholesterol via capillary just beneath the basement membrane of the OE. They convert it to pregnenolone using P450scc. Since the SCs produce 17β-HSD-1, and probably aromatase as well, SCs finally produce E2 that makes biological effects on OSCs via the ERs, although the presence and cellular localization of at least two enzymes used from pregnenolone to androstenedione need to be determined (see Figure 2).
6. Morphological features of SER in VSCs
Presence of large amount of SER was described for the first time by Altner et al. [54]. Since then, this ultrastructural feature has been confirmed in many VNO-possessing animals such as amphibians [55, 56], reptiles [55, 57, 58, 59, 60], rodents [61, 62, 63, 64], and prosimian primates [65]. However, bioactive molecules produced by SER in VSCs had not been determined.
In each VSC soma located in the basal part of the vomeronasal sensory epithelium (VNSE) of adult rats, the area occupied by SER is very large (Figure 10A). Clusters of SER appear to be present in both supra- and infra-nuclear cytoplasm. An example of supranuclear region of a VSC soma is shown in Figure 10B. By TEM tomography (for details see [64]) using 200–300-thick sections, a unit volume of 700 x 700 x 150 nm of each SER area was analyzed to demonstrate microstructures of SER. Some parts of SER cisternae contained arc- and circle-like units that are complicated each other. Furthermore, some of them appeared to form tiny loops (Figure 10B–E).
7. Localization of 17β-HSD-1 in VSCs
By immunohistochemical techniques utilizing three antisera against 17β-HSD-1, specific staining was detected in the VNSE of adult rats (Figure 11A and B). In particular, intense immunoreactivity was seen in the perikaryal region of VSCs and in the apical region of the VNSE (Figure 11C). However, no specific staining was seen when the primary antiserum was omitted from the immunostaining protocol (Figure 11D). Using digoxigenin (Dig)-labeled cDNA antisense and sense probes for 17β-HSD-1, in situ hybridization (ISH) technique demonstrated that some of VSCs express 17β-HSD-1 gene (Figure 11E and F; [66]).
After confirming the presence of 17β-HSD-1 protein in the VNO by WB analyses (Figure 11G, insert), subcellular localization of its immunoreactivity was examined by a post-embedding immunogold TEM technique [64]. We demonstrated that gold particles, which are reflection of 17β-HSD-1 immunoreactivity, were localized in narrow cisternae of SER. Two representative images are shown in Figure 11G and H. The region shown by these images is equivalent to that analyzed by TEM tomography (Figure 10B–E).
In summary, it is most likely that VSCs of adult rats express 17β-HSD-1 that catalyzes conversion from androstenedione to testosterone, and that from estrone to E2. Since 17β-HSD-1immunoreactivity seems to be more intense in basally located somata of VSCs, it would be important to assess if regional difference for expression of 17β-HSD-1 is present in the VNSE.
8. VSCs express estrogen receptor α (ERα)
The VNO is known to be a pheromone-detecting sensory apparatus in rodents [5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 67]. Hatanaka and Kiura [68] demonstrated that sensitivity of VSCs to pheromones was much more decreased in castrated mice, when compared to control mice. This data indicate that gonadal sex steroids modify physiological activities of VSCs. Setting a hypothesis that modification of sex steroids is mediated by steroid receptor, we first examined the presence of ERα in the VNO of adult rats.
Representative images from an immunohistochemical study are shown in Figure 12. Intense immunoreactivity for ERα is seen in the surface of the VNSE, whereas moderately intense immunoreactivity is seen in the inside of the epithelium (Figure 12A and B). Uterine glands, which are positive control tissues, contain intense immunoreactivity in cell nucleus (Figure 12C). It is interesting to point out that immunoreactivity is also seen in the apical part of vomeronasal non-sensory epithelium (VNNE, Figure 12B). No specific staining is seen both in the VNSE and VNNE, when the primary antiserum was omitted from the immunostaining protocol (Figure 12D).
Representative CLSFM images from an IF study in which antisera against OMP and ERα, and DAPI were used are shown in Figure 13. Since dendrites and dendritic terminals (DTs) of VSCs exert intense IF for OMP (Figure 13A), it is apparent that DTs contain IF for Erα (Figure 13B). Optical sections containing apical dendrites show that intense IF for ERα is seen in DTs and apical dendrites just below the DTs (Figure 13C–H).
Representative data from a WB analysis is shown in Figure 14. Bands at 66 kDA that is equivalent to the size of ERα protein are detected both pellet and supernatant (sup.) specimens of VNOs and uteri that contain uterine glands.
9. Actions of sex steroids in the VNO
TEM and FE-SEM images of VSCs are shown in Figure 15. In contrast to OSC, many microvilli extend from the DT (Figure 15A and B). Microvilli extending from the apical membrane of vomeronasal sustentacular cells (SCs) are thicker than those of VSC (Figure 15B). Since intense IF for ERα was detected the apical surface of VNSE (Figure 13), it is most likely the both membranes and cytoplasm of microvilli.
Using digoxigenin Dig-labeled cDNA antisense and sense probes for 17β-HSD-2, ISH technique demonstrated that some of VSCs express 17β-HSD-2 gene (Figure 16 [66]). Thus, it is most likely that VSCs of adult rats produce 17β-HSD-2.
Also, we have examined immunolocalization of E2 in the rat VNSE. Antiserum to protein gene product 9.5 (PGP) is an excellent marker for both mature and immature VSCs (iVSC) [5, 69]. Using antiserum to E2, PGP, and DAPI, triple-labeling IF technique was applied to cryostat-cut sections of VNOs, and then, these sections were observed by the CLSFM. As demonstrated in Figure 17, intense IF for E2 is present in somata and dendrites of VSCs in a granular fashion. By contrast, moderately intense IF was diffusely seen in the supranuclear region of vomeronasal SCs. These findings would provide supporting evidence that E2 per se is present in both VSCs and SCs.
A hypothetic scheme showing origins and actions of E2 in the VNSE is presented in Figure 18. Since rodent VNSE contains intraepithelial capillaries [5, 62], a mature VSC (mVSC) can uptake E2 or estrone from intraepithelial capillary and give E2 to immature VSC (iVSC) via ERα. Conversion between E2 and estrone takes place in SER where both 17β-HSD-1 and 17β-HSD-2 work as catalytic enzymes. It would happen that E2 from mVSC bind to growing dendritic terminal. Since brain centers of the vomeronasal system express aromatase and other steroidogenic enzymes [70], E2 may be retrogradely transported to the mVSC via neural connections.
10. Conclusions
Although our studies suggest that both OM and VNO are greatly influenced by E2, relationships between cell types and enzymes/estrogen receptors are different from each other (Table 1) and further experiments remain to be carried out to identify cells expressing other E2-related molecules. However, at least two conclusions could be proposed here; (1) both OM and VNO are capable for producing E2, and (2) it is most likely that OSCs and VSCs contain both membrane-bound and cytosolic E2 receptors. Thus, it is most likely that cross-talk between membrane- and nuclear-initiated estrogen signaling takes place in the OM and VNO, as demonstrated in hypothalamus [71].
Olfactory mucosa | Vomeronasal organ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensory cell | Sustentacular cell | Acinar cell | Sensory cell | Sustentacular cell | |
P450scc | − | + | + | − | − |
17β-HSD-1 | − | + | + | + | − |
17β-HSD-2 | − | + | + | + | − |
ERα | − | − | − | + | − |
ERβ | + | − | − | − | − |
OSCs and VSCs are very special sensory cells, because they are bipolar neurons, but replaced by newly developed cells throughout life [3, 4, 5, 72, 73]. It is known that E2 promotes neurogenesis [74, 75], axonal [74, 75, 76], and dendritic growth [77, 78], rescues neurons [79], and promotes neuroregeneration [74, 75]. Therefore, rodent OM and VNSE are excellent experimental models for studying actions of E2, because differentiation from neuroblasts, dendritic and axonal growth, and neuronal death continuously occur in these neuroepithelia even at adult years.
Rodent OSCs share many cytochemical properties with those of human OSCs [80, 81, 82, 83, 84]. Thus, it is likely that E2-related enzymes and E2 receptors are expressed by human OM cells, although new studies need to be initiated to examine if these molecules are present in human OM tissues. A common but striking feature in adult human OE is that patches of respiratory epithelium often appear in what was thought to be a purely olfactory region [85, 86]. Nakashima et al. [85] reported that the size of these patches varied case to case. Differential sizes of these respiratory patches may depend on differential supply of E2 on human OSCs. Parallel studies utilizing both rodent and human OMs would give us new knowledge about E2 functions, as well as new questions to be solved.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Keiichi Tonosaki, former Professor of Department of Physiolosy, Meikai University, for his critical reading of this manuscript. Research projects whose results are presented here were partially supported by grants from The Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan to S,T, (2008-2009 collaborative grant, and C105320018).
References
- 1.
Graziadei PPC. The olfactory mucosa of vertebrates. In: Beidler LM, editor. Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Vol. IV. Chemical Senses 1, Olfaction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1971. pp. 27-58 - 2.
Graziadei PPC. The ultrastructure of vertebrates olfactory mucosa. In: Friedmann I, editor. The Ultrastructure of Sensory Ograns. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1973. pp. 267-305 - 3.
Farbman AI. Structure of olfactory mucous membrane. In: Barlow PW, Bray D, Green PB, Slack JMW, editors. Cell Biology of Olfaction, Developmental and Cell Biology Series 27. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992. pp. 24-74 - 4.
Schwob JE. Neural regeneration and the peripheral olfactory system. The Anatomical Record. 2002; 269 (1):33-49. DOI: 10.1002/ar.10047 - 5.
Takami S. Recent progress in the neurobiology of the vomeronasal organ. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2002; 58 (3):228-250. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.10094 - 6.
Halpern M, Martínez-Marcos A. Structure and function of the vomeronasal system: An update. Progress in Neurobiology. 2003; 70 (3):245-318. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0082(03)00103-5 - 7.
Mombaerts P. Genes and ligands for odorant, vomeronasal and taste receptors. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2004; 5 (4):263-278. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1365 - 8.
Munger SD, Leinders-Zufall T, Zufall F. Subsystem organization of the mammalian sense of smell. Annual Review of Physiology. 2009; 71 :115-140. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.70.113006.10060 - 9.
Takami S, Graziadei PP. Light microscopic Golgi study of mitral/tufted cells in the accessory olfactory bulb of the adult rat. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1991; 311 (1):65-83. DOI: 10.1002/cne.903110106 - 10.
Takami S. Morphological features of nasal chemosensory mucosae of mammals —Olfactory mucosa and vomeronasal organ. Clinical Neuroscience. 2016; 34 (12):1299-1302 (Published by Chugai-Igakusha, in Japanese) - 11.
Stumpf WE, Sar M. The olfactory system as a target organ of steroid hormones. In: Breipohl W, editor. Olfaction and Endocrine Regulation. London: IRL Press; 1982. pp. 11-21 - 12.
Woodley SK, Baum MJ. Effects of sex hormones and gender on attraction thresholds for volatile anal scent gland odors in ferrets. Hormones and Behavior. 2003; 44 (2):110-118. DOI: 10.1016/s0018-506x(03)00126-0 - 13.
Xiao K, Kondo Y, Sakuma Y. Sex-specific effects of gonadal steroids on conspecific odor preference in the rat. Hormones and Behavior. 2004; 46 (3):356-361. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.05.008 - 14.
Bakker J, Honda S, Harada N, Balthazart J. Restoration of male sexual behavior by adult exogenous estrogens in male aromatase knockout. Hormones and Behavior. 2004; 46 (1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.02.003 - 15.
Segovia S, Guillamón A. Effects of sex steroids on the development of the vomeronasal organ in the rat. Brain Research. 1982; 281 (2):209-212. DOI: 10.1016/0165-3806(82)90160-2 - 16.
Segovia S, Paniagua R, Nistal M, Guillamon A. Effects of postpuberal gonadectomy on the neurosensorial epithelium of the vomeronasal organ in the rat. Brain Research. 1984; 316 (2):289-291. DOI: 10.1016/0165-3806(84)90315-8 - 17.
Halem HA, Baum MJ, Cherry JA. Sex difference and steroid modulation of pheromone-induced immediate early genes in the two zones of the mouse accessory olfactory system. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2001; 21 (7):2474-2480. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-07-02474.2001 - 18.
Alekseyenko OV, Baum MJ, Cherry JA. Sex and gonadal steroid modulation of pheromone receptor gene expression in the mouse vomeronasal organ. Neuroscience. 2006; 140 (4):1349-1357. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.03.001 - 19.
Goodman HM. Adrenal glands. In: Basic Medical Endocrinology. 4th ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2009a. pp. 61-99 - 20.
Goodman HM. Hormonal control of reproducttion in the male. In: Basic Medical Endocrinology. 4th ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2009b. pp. 239-256 - 21.
Goodman HM. Hormonal control of reproducttion in the female: The menstrual cycle. In: Basic Medical Endocrinology. 4th ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2009c. pp. 257-275 - 22.
Do Rego JL, Seong JY, Burel D, Leprince J, Luu-The V, Tsutsui K, et al. Neurosteroid biosynthesis: Enzymatic pathways and neuroendocrine regulation by neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 2009; 30 (3):259-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.05.006 - 23.
Fawcett DW. Smooth endoplasmic reticulum. In: The Cell. Second ed. Philadelphia, London, Toronto: W. B Sannders Co.; 1981a. pp. 344-345 pp. 346-349, pp. 360-361 - 24.
Dym M. The male reproductive system. In: Weiss L, editor. Histology, Cell and Tissue Biology. 5th ed. New York: Elsevier; 1983. pp. 1000-1053 - 25.
Long JA. The adrenal gland. In: Weiss L, editor. Histology. Cell and Tissue Biology. 5th ed. New York: Elsevier Science Pub. Co. Inc.; 1983. pp. 1116-1133 - 26.
Al-Amri IS, Mahmoud IY, Waring CP, Alkindi AY, Khan T, Bakheit C, et al. The reproductive cycle of the male house gecko, Hemidactylus flaviviridis, in relation to plasma steroid concentrations, progesterone receptors, and steroidogenic ultrastructural features, in Oman. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 2013; 187 :23-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.02.040 - 27.
Fawcett DW. Peroxisomes. In: The Cell. Second ed. Philadelphia, London, Toronto: W. B Sannders Co; 1981b. pp. 520-521 - 28.
Miller WL, Bose HS. Early steps in steroidogenesis: Intracellular cholesterol trafficking. Journal of Lipid Research. 2011; 52 (12):2111-2135. DOI: 10.1194/jlr.R016675 - 29.
Mindnich R, Möller G, Adamski J. The role of 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2004; 218 (1-2):7-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2003.12.006 - 30.
Sasano H, Suzuki T, Miki Y, Moriya T. Intracrinology of estrogens and androgens in breast carcinoma. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2008; 108 (3-5):181-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.09.012 - 31.
Miki Y, Suzuki T, Sasano H. Controversies of aromatase localization in human breast cancer—Stromal versus parenchymal cells. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2007; 106 :97-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.05.007 - 32.
Frisch D. Ultrastructure of mouse olfactory mucosa. The American Journal of Anatomy. 1967; 121 (1):87-120. DOI: 10.1002/aja.1001210107 - 33.
Makino N, Ookawara S, Katoh K, Ohta Y, Ichikawa M, Ichimura K. The morphological change of supporting cells in the olfactory epithelium after bulbectomy. Chemical Senses. 2009; 34 (2):171-179. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjn074 - 34.
Horie S, Yamaki A, Takami S. Presence of sex steroid-metabolizing enzymes in the olfactory mucosa of rats. The Anatomical Record. 2017; 300 (2):402-414. DOI: 10.1002/ar.23497 - 35.
Yamada E. The fine structure of the pigment epithelium in the turtle eye. In: Smeiser GK, editor. Proceedings of the Symposium Held April 11-13, during the Seventh International Congress of Anatomists, New York, New York. New York, London: Academic Press; 1960. pp. 73-84 - 36.
Porter KR, Yamada E. Studies on the endoplasmic reticulum. V. Its form and differentiation in pigment epithelial cells of the frog retina. The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology. 1960; 8 :181-205. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.8.1.181 - 37.
Kuwabara T. Cytologic changes of the retina and pigment epithelium during hibernation. Investigative Ophthalmology. 1975; 14 (6):457-467 PMID: 166050 - 38.
Braekevelt CR. Fine structure of the retinal epithelium (RPE) of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). Tissue & Cell. 1998; 30 (2):149-156. DOI: 10.1016/s0040-8166(98)80063-3 - 39.
Braekevelt CR, Smith SA, Smith BJ. Fine structure of the retinal pigment epithelium of Oreochromis niloticus L. (Cichlidae; Teleostei) in light- and-dark adaptation. The Anatomical Record. 1998; 252 (3):444-452. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199811)252:3<444::AID-AR12>3.0.CO;2-4 - 40.
Ogata T, Yamasaki Y. High-resolution scanning electron microscopic studies on the tree-dimensional structure of the transverse-axial tubular system, sarcoplasmic reticulum and intercalated disc of the rat myocardium. The Anatomical Record. 1990; 228 (3):277-287. DOI: 10.1002/ar.10922280307 - 41.
Getchell TV, Margolis FL, Getchell ML. Perireceptor and receptor events in vertebrate olfaction. Progress in Neurobiology. 1984; 23 (4):317-345. DOI: 10.1016/0301-0082(84)90008-x - 42.
Cuschieri A, Bannister LH. Some histochemical observations on the mucosubstances of the nasal glands of the mouse. The Histochemical Journal. 1974; 6 (5):543-558. DOI: 10.1007/BF01003270 - 43.
Kondo K, Watanabe K, Sakamoto T, Suzukawa K, Nibu K, Kaga K, et al. Distribution and severity of spontaneous lesions in the neuroepithelium and Bowman's glands in mouse olfactory mucosa: Age-related progression. Cell and Tissue Research. 2009; 335 (3):489-503. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-008-0739-9 - 44.
Takami S, Getchell ML, Getchell TV. Lectin histochemical localization of galactose, N-acetylgalactosamine, and N-acetylglucosamine in glycoconjugates of the rat vomeronasal organ, with comparison to the olfactory and septal mucosae. Cell and Tissue Research. 1994; 277 (2):211-230. DOI: 10.1007/BF00327769 - 45.
Ogawa M, Sawaguchi S, Furukawa K, Okajima T. N-acetylglucosamine modification in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2015; 1850 (6):1319-1324. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.03.003 - 46.
Zhang J, Wu J, Liu L, Li J. The crucial role of Demannosylating asparagine-linked Glycans in ERADicating misfolded glycoproteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020; 11 :625033. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.625033 - 47.
Farbman AI, Margolis FL. Olfactory marker protein during ontogeny: Immunohistochemical localization. Developmental Biology. 1980; 74 (1):205-215. DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90062-7 - 48.
Monti Graziadei GA, Stanley RS, Graziadei PP. The olfactory marker protein in the olfactory system of the mouse during development. Neuroscience. 1980; 5 (7):1239-1252. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(80)90197-9 - 49.
Hanukoglu I, Suh BS, Himmelhoch S, Amsterdam A. Induction and mitochondrial localization of cytochrome P450scc system enzymes in normal and transformed ovarian granulosa cells. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1990; 111 (4):1373-1381. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.111.4.1373 - 50.
Pelletier G, Li S, Luu-The V, Tremblay Y, Bélanger A, Labrie F. Immunoelectron microscopic localization of three key steroidogenic enzymes (cytochrome P450(scc), 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and cytochrome P450(c17)) in rat adrenal cortex and gonads. The Journal of Endocrinology. 2001; 171 (2):373-383. DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1710373 - 51.
Miller WL. Steroid hormone synthesis in mitochondria. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2013; 379 (1-2):62-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.04.014 - 52.
Pillerová M, Borbélyová V, Hodosy J, Riljak V, Renczés E, Frick KM, et al. On the role of sex steroids in biological functions by classical and non-classical pathways. An update. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 2021; 62 :100926. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2021.100926 - 53.
Takami S, Tateno K, Horie S, Hasegawa R. Immunolocalization of an estrogen receptor in the rat olfactory mucosa. In: The 34th Kanto-shibu’s Annual Branch Meeting of Jap Soc of Microscopy. Poster Presentation (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: The Japanese Society of Microscopy; 2010 - 54.
Altner H, Müler W, Brachner I. The ultrastructure of the vomero-nasal organ in Reptilia. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie. 1970; 105 (1):107-122. DOI: 10.1007/BF00340567 - 55.
Kolnberger I. Vergleichende Untersuchungen am Rüechepitel, insbesondere des Jacobsonshen Organs von Amphibien, Reptilien und Säugetieren. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie. 1971; 122 (1):53-67 PMID: 4330717 - 56.
Franceschini F, Sharbati A, Zancanaro C. The vomeronasal organ in the frog, Rana esculenta. An electron microscopy study. Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology and Pathology. 1991; 23 (2):221-231 PMID: 2070348 - 57.
Graziadei PPC, Tucker D. Vomeronasal receptors in turtles. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie. 1970; 105 (4):498-514. DOI: 10.1007/BF00335424 - 58.
Kratzing J. The fine structure of the olfactory and vomeronasal organ of a lizard (Tiliqua scincoides scincoides). Cell and Tissue Research. 1975; 156 (2):239-252. DOI: 10.1007/BF00221807 - 59.
Wang RT, Halpern M. Light and electron microscopic observations on the normal structure of the vomeronasal organ of garter snakes. Journal of Morphology. 1980; 164 (1):47-67. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051640105 - 60.
Takami S, Hirosawa K. Electron microscopic observations on the vomeronasal sensory epithelium of a crotaline snake, Trimeresurus flavoviridis. Journal of Morphology. 1990; 205 (1):45-61. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1052050106 - 61.
Ciges M, Lavella T, Gayaso M, Sanchez G. Ultrastructure of the organ of Jacobson and comparative study with olfactory mucosa. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 1977; 83 (1-2):47-58. DOI: 10.3109/00016487709128812 - 62.
Breipohl W, Bhatnager KP, Blank M, Mendoza AS. Intraepithelial blood vessels in the vomeronasal neuroepithelium of the rat. Cell and Tissue Research. 1981; 215 (3):465-473. DOI: 10.1007/BF00233523 - 63.
Taniguchi K, Mocnhizuki K. Morphological studies on the vomeronasal organ in the golden hamster. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1982; 44 (3):419-426. DOI: 10.1292/jvms1939.44.419 - 64.
Takami S, Hasegawa R, Shima Y, Horie S, Sato Y, Koyama S, et al. Analyses of smooth endoplasmic reticulum in vomeronasal receptor cells. Journal of the Kyorin Medical Society. 2009; 40 (3):24-33 - 65.
Loo SK, Kanagasuntheram R. The vomeronasal organ in tree shrew and slow loris. Journal of Anatomy. 1972; 112 (2):165-172 PMID: 5077189. PMCID: PMC1271190 - 66.
Akamine Y. Study on distribution of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases in the vomeronasal organ. In: [Bachelor’s Thesis Written in Japanese] Department of Medical Technology. Tokyo, Japan: Kyorin University Faculty of Health Sciences; 2006 - 67.
Takami S, Hasegawa R, Nishiyama F. A study for the distribution of an estrogen receptor in the vomeronasal organ. The Japanese Journal of Taste and Smell Research. 2006; 13 (3):575-578 - 68.
Hatanaka T, Kiura H. Effects of sex steroid hormones on the sensitivity of vomeronasal receptor neurons in mice. In: 14th Inter Symp on Olfaction and Taste/ 38th Jap Assoc for Study of Taste and Smell. Osaka, Japan: The Japanese Association of the Study of Taste and Smell; 2004 Abstracts 83 - 69.
Takami S, Getchell ML, Yamagishi M, Albers KM, Getchell TV. Enhanced extrinsic innervation of nasal and oral chemosensory mucosae in keratin 14-NGF transgenic mice. Cell and Tissue Research. 1995; 282 (3):481-491. DOI: 10.1007/BF00318880 - 70.
Do Rego JL, Seong JY, Burel D, Leprince J, Luu-The V, Tsutsui K, et al. Neurosteroid biosynthesis: Enzymatic pathways and neuroendcrine regulation by neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 2009; 30 (3):259-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.05.006 - 71.
Roepke AT, Qiu J, Bosch MA, Rønnekleiv OK, Kelly MJ. Cross-talk between membrane-initiated and nuclear-initiated oestrogen signalling in the hypothalamus. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 2009; 21 (4):263-270. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2009.01846.x - 72.
Graziadei PPC. Functional anatomy of the mammalian chemoreceptor system. In: Müler-Schwarze D, Mozell M, editors. Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. New York: Plenum Press; 1977. pp. 435-454 - 73.
Graziadei PPC. Olfactory development. In: Coleman JR, editor. Development of Sensory Systems in Mammals. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1990. pp. 519-566 - 74.
Azcoitia I, Arevalo MA, Garcia-Segura LM. Neural-derived estradiol regulates brain plasticity. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy. 2018; 89 :53-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2017.04.004 - 75.
Azcoitia I, Barreto GE, Garcia-Segura LM. Melecular mechanisms and cellular events involved in the neuroprotective actions of estradiol. Analysis of sex differences. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 2019; 55 :100787. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2019.100787.Epub 2019 Sep 9 - 76.
Carrer HF, Cambiasso MJ. Brito B Gorosito S. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2003; 1007 :306-316. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1286.029 - 77.
Tsutsui K. Neurosteroids in the Purkinje cell: Biosynthesis, mode of action and functional significance. Molecular Neurobiology. 2008; 37 (2-3):116-125. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-008-8024-1.Epub 2008 Jun 3 - 78.
Haraguchi S, Sasahara K, Shikimi H, Honda S, Harad N, Tsutui K. Estradiol promotes purkinje dendritic growth, spinogenesis, and synaptogenesis during neonatal life by inducing the expression of BDNF. Cerebellum. 2012; 11 (2):416-417. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-011-0342-6 - 79.
Lebesgue D, Chevaleyre V, Zukkin RS, Etgen AM. Estradiol rescues neurons from global ischemia-induced cell death: Multiple cellular pathways of neuroprotection. Steroids. 2009; 74 (7):555-561. DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2009.01.003.Epub 2009 Jan 20 - 80.
Chen Y, Getchell ML, Ding X, Getchell TV. Immunolocalization of two cytochrome P450 isozymes in rat nasal chemosensory tissue. Neuroreport. 1992; 3 (9):749-752. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199209000-00007 - 81.
Takami S, Getchell ML, Chen Y, Monti-Bloch L, Berliner DL, Stensaas LJ, et al. Vomeronasal epithelial cells of the adult human express neuron-specific molecules. Neuroreport. 1993; 4 (4):375-378. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199304000-00008 - 82.
Yamagishi M, Takami S, Getchell TV. Ontogenetic expression of spot 35 protein (calbindin-D28k) in human olfactory receptor neurons and its decrease in Alzheimer's disease patients. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology. 1996; 105 (2):132-139. DOI: 10.1177/000348949610500208 - 83.
Yamagishi M, Getchell ML, Takami S, Getchell TV. Increased density of olfactory receptor neurons immunoreactive for apolipoprotein E in patients with Alzheimer's disease. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology. 1998; 107 (5 Pt 1):421-426. DOI: 10.1177/000348949810700511 - 84.
Nibu K, Li G, Zhang X, Rawson NE, Restrepo D, Kaga K, et al. Olfactory neuron-specific expression of NeuroD in mouse and human nasal mucosa. Cell and Tissue Research. 1999; 298 (3):405-414. DOI: 10.1007/s004419900098 - 85.
Nakashima T, Kimmelman CP, Snow JB Jr. Structure of human fetal and adult olfactory neuroepithelium. Archives of Otolaryngology. 1984; 110 (10):641-646. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1984.00800360013003 - 86.
Morrison EE, Costanzo RM. Morphology of olfactory epithelium in humans and other vertebrates. Microscopy Research and Technique. 1992; 23 (1):49-61. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.1070230105