Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Functional Roles of Estradiol in the Olfactory and Vomeronasal Mucosae of Mammals: A Working Hypothesis

Written By

Shigeru Takami and Sawa Horie

Submitted: 14 July 2022 Reviewed: 19 July 2022 Published: 07 September 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.106662

From the Edited Volume

Estrogens - Recent Advances

Edited by Courtney Marsh

Chapter metrics overview

77 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

It has been known that androgens and estrogens, which are referred to as sex steroids, make many effects on two major nasal chemosensory mucosae such as olfactory mucosa and vomeronasal organ. Our studies conducted in rodents have demonstrated that two of the constituent cells in the olfactory mucosa, sustentacular cells and acinar cells in the associated glands of the olfactory mucosa, Bowman’s glands, express four different enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of estradiol-17β (E2). Furthermore, our ongoing study has shown that olfactory sensory cells contain immunoreactivity for an estrogen receptor (beta-type). In case of vomeronasal organ, vomeronasal sensory cells express two enzymes that catalyze conversion of E2 and estrone, and that of testosterone and androstenedione. In addition, vomeronasal sensory cells contain an estrogen receptor (alpha-type). These results strongly suggest that de novo synthesis of E2 and metabolism of E2 take place in the olfactory mucosa and vomeronasal organ, respectively. With special emphasis of subcellular characteristics of steroid-producing cells, such as presence of large amount of smooth endoplasmic reticulum and vesicular mitochondria, we will introduce our findings and present working hypotheses for E2 functions in the olfactory mucosa and vomeronasal organ.

Keywords

  • olfactory sensory cell
  • olfactory sustentacular cell
  • Bowman’s glands
  • smooth vomeronasal sensory cell
  • smooth endoplasmic reticulum
  • estradiol-17β
  • estrogen receptor

1. Introduction

The major chemosensory mucosa in mammalian species is olfactory mucosa (OM). Olfactory sensory cells (OSCs) that detect odorants and are housed in the OM share not only common physiological and morphological features of sensory cells but also those of bipolar neurons [1, 2, 3, 4]. Electrical signals induced by odorants are conducted through axons to the surface of main olfactory bulb (MOB) and transmitted into olfactory bulbar neurons, such as mitral and tufted cells via chemical synapses [3]. In addition to the OM, many land-living mammals contain vomeronasal organs (VNOs) that are bilaterally located at the base of the nasal septum [5, 6, 7, 8]. Sensory cells of the VNO, vomeronasal sensory cells (VSCs), which are bipolar neurons as well, mainly detect species-specific odorants including pheromones and transmit their odorant information to projection neurons in the accessory olfactory bulb, so-called mitral/tufted cells [9]. Other than the OM and VNO, septal organ and Gruenberg ganglion [8] contain chemosensory cells that have been found at least rodent species [10]. Locations of these four chemosensory mucosae and their primary brain centers are schematically shown in Figure 1A. In this chapter, we will focus on two of them, OM and VNO, to demonstrate experimental data using rats to suggest de novo synthesis of estradiol-17β (E2) in the OM and metabolizing of E2 in the VNO.

Figure 1.

Schematic drawing showing four chemosensory nasal mucosae (A), transmission electron microscopic (TEM) images of a Leydig cell in the rat testis (B–D). A. Schematic drawing showing the location of Greuenberg ganglion (GG), vomeronasal organ (VNO), olfactory mucosa (OM), and septal organ (SO) and their brain centers. Axon bundles originating from the GG, OM, and SO make their terminals in the main olfactory bulb (MOB), whereas those from the VNO end in the accessory olfactory bulb. Adapted from [10] with permission (partially changed). B. Low magnification of a Leydig cell that contains cell nucleus (N) and cytoplasm (Cyp). C. The area of smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER) in the Cyp of the Leydig cell in B. D. Mitochondrion (Mi) with vesicular inner structures (arrowheads) and SER. Note that single cisterna of SER (asterisk) is closely associated with the outer membrane of a Mi. Ly, lysosome.

By a radioautographic technique, Stumpf and Sar [11] demonstrated the incorporation of 3H-labeled estradiol into cell nuclei of OSCs, duct cells of Bowman’s glands, and mitral cells in the main olfactory bulb where synaptic terminals of OSCs are present. They suggested that these cells contain estrogen receptors and are influenced by estradiol. In ferrets, sex steroids including estradiol increased ferrets’ responsiveness to low concentrations of odors emitted from anal scent glands [12]. Conspecific odor preference by male rats was influenced by estradiol [13]. Bakker et al. [14] demonstrated in aromatase knockout male mice that exogenous estrogens restore male olfactory investigation of volatile body odors. On the other hands, it has been reported that estradiol makes various effects on the VNO. The volume of VNO in male rats was reported to be significantly larger that of female rats. This sexual dimorphism in rat VNO is established in the perinatal days when estradiol is converted from gonadal testosterone and makes an organization effect on VSCs [15, 16]. Estradiol induced increased immunoreactivity (IR) for immediate early gene in specific population of VSCs in mice [17]. Expression of VNO receptors is sexually dimorphic and influenced by estradiol and testosterone [18].

Steroid hormones are produced and secreted by endocrine cells in the adrenal cortex [19], Leydig cells or intestinal cells of Leydig in the testis [20], granulosa cells of the ovulatory follicle and cells of the corpus luteum in the ovary [21], and brain cells [22]. One of the subcellular properties of steroid-producing cells is the presence of extremely developed smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER, [23, 24, 25]). Images of rat Leydig cells that were obtained by transmission electron microscope (JEM1230, JEOL, Akishima-shi, Tokyo, Japan) are shown in Figures 1D. In addition to tubular cisternae of SER (Figure 1C), swollen vesicular mitochondria are seen and associated with cisterna of SER (Figure 1D). In fact, Al-Amri et al. [26] demonstrated in Leydig cells in the house gecko, hemidactylus flaviviridis, that swollen vesiculated mitochondria are associated between SER. Lysosomes, which are described in the cytoplasm of Leydig cells [27], are frequently seen in the rat Leydig cells (Figure 1D).

All of steroid-producing cells express the cholesterol side chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc), which converts cholesterol into pregnenolone [28]. In Leydig cells of the testes, for example, pregnenolone is eventually converted into testosterone, which is the most potent androgen, via metabolic pathways containing 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (HSDs). Based on several references [19, 20, 29, 30, 31], the main pathway of steroidogenesis from cholesterol to E2 is shown in Figure 2. The terminal enzyme in the sex-steroid-producing pathway is aromatase (CYP19 or P450arom). Granulosa cells of the ovulatory follicle and cells of the corpus luteum in the ovary, for instance, express aromatase (P450arom, [21]). Aromatase converts testosterone to E2, an active type of estrogen [20]. The above enzymes are expressed by the cells in the ovary [21]. Mindnich et al. [29] introduced two major roles of 12 17β-HSDs; one, for example, 17β-HSD type 1 (17β-HSD-1) is involved in conversion of an inactivated estrogen, estrone, into an activated estrogen, estradiol, and 17β-HSD type 2 (17β-HSD-2) is involved in its opposite reaction.

Figure 2.

Biosynthetic pathways of sex-steroids based on [20, 21, 29, 30, 31]. Enzymes involved in catalyzed changes are highlighted in blue color. P450scc, cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme; HSD, hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; P450c17, steroid 17alpha-hydroxylase: CYP19, cytochrome P450 family 19.

Among constituent cells of the OM, olfactory sustentacular cells (SCs) surrounding OSCs are rich in SER [1, 2, 3, 32, 33]. Also, Frisch [32] reported in mice as experimental models that acinar cells (ACs) of the Bowman’s glands (BGs), which are associated glands of the OM, contained large amount of SER. Before describing our findings relating to E2 in the OM, we will briefly introduce constituent cells of the rat OM, and ultrastructure of olfactory SCs and ACs.

Advertisement

2. Anatomy of olfactory SCs and ACs of BGs

A schematic drawing showing constituent cells of the rodent OM is shown in Figure 3A. The olfactory epithelium (OE) contains olfactory SCs mature and immature OSCs, globose and horizontal basal cells, and microvillar cells. Olfactory SCs and dendrites of mature OSCs are located side by side. Although duct cells of BGs penetrate into the OE and reach the epithelial surface, ACs are exclusively located in the lamina propria (LP) below the basement membrane. Using a field-emitted scanning microscope (FE-SEM, JSM6700F, JEOL), we were able to understand relationships between olfactory dendrites and SCs three-dimensionally. For example, a cylindrical dendrite between two SCs goes up to the epithelial surface to make a dendritic terminal (DT) can be seen (Figure 3B).

Figure 3.

Morphology of rodent olfactory mucosa(OM). A. Schematic drawing of constituent cells and tissue components in the olfactory epithelium (OE) and in the lamina propria (OE) of the OM. mOSC, mature olfactory sensory cell; iOSC, immature OSC; SC, olfactory sustentacular cell; GBC, globose basal cell, HBC, horizontal basal cell; MvC, microvillar cell; BM, basement membrane: BV, blood vessel; ONB, olfactory nerve bundle; DC, duct cell of a Bowman’s gland (BG); AC, acinar cell of a BG. Adapted from [10] with permission (partially changed). B. Field-emitted scanning microscopic (FE-SEM) image of an apical part of the OE, lateral view. A dendrite (De) extends upward between two olfactory sustentacular cells (SCs), reach the epithelial surface to form a terminal, dendritic terminal (Dt). C, D. TEM images of the apical part of the OE at same, with a scale bar indicated in C. adapted from reference [10] with permission (slightly changed). At longitudinal plane, proximal portion of olfactory cilia (OC-P) extending from a DT is seen, whereas microvilli (SC-mv) extend from the apical membrane of a SC (C). At tangential plane of the epithelial surface, OC-Ps extending radially from DTs and one of them continued to a thinner distal cilium (OC-D) are seen (D).

By transmission electron microscopy (TEM), cilia originating from dendritic terminals of OSCs are clearly seen (Figure 3C and D). Olfactory cilia are divided into a short proximal portion (about 400 nm at maximal width/diameter) and long distal one (100–50 nm at diameter). The proximal cilia tend to extend diagonally upward from the dendritic terminal and begin to narrow at around 1–1.5 μm and shift to the distal portion of cilia. By contrast, microvilli (about 100 nm at maximal width) extend substantially straight from the apical membranes of olfactory SCs (Figure 3C). At cross-sectional plate, proximal cilia extend radically from the dendritic terminals and distal cilia run approximately parallel to the epithelial surface (Figure 3D, [10]).

Using mice as experimental models, Makino et al. [33] classified the SER of olfactory SCs into two types, stacked lamellar and reticular-shaped SER. Using adult Sprague–Dawley rats (Rattus norvegicus) as experimental animals, we reported that the supranuclear region of olfactory SCs contained well-developed SER with a reticular form and myeloid bodies (MBs) [34]. The MBs are generally seen in retinal pigment epithelial cells of many species [35, 36, 37, 38, 39]. The MBs in olfactory SCs are composed of rows of narrow cisternae bounded by flat membranes, which were narrower than the cisternae of the SERs. They were stacked from 5 to 20 rows, ranging between 200 and 700 nm in width, and arranged mainly parallel to the lateral membrane of the olfactory SCs. The supranuclear region of the OE and SERs and MBs are shown in Figure 4A and B, respectively. Each cisterna of a MB, averaging 11 nm in width, frequently contains electron-dense material. We demonstrated that MBs and SERs are interchangeable (see Figure 5a of [34]). Vesicular mitochondria and associated cisternae, which are shown in Leydig cell (Figure 2C), are seen in the olfactory SCs as well (Figure 4C). In combination with the osmium-DMSO-osmium procedure [40] and FE-SEM technique, we can see internal structures and relationships between MB, SER, and rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) three-dimensionally (Figure 4D). Our ongoing study conducted in the OM of Suncus (Suncus murinus) has demonstrated the large amount of SER and characteristic mitochondria (Figure 4E).

Figure 4.

TEM images (A, B, C, E) and FE-SEM image (D) of olfactory sustentacular cells. (SCs). A. Low-magnified TEM image of the apical part of rat olfactory epithelium (OE), showing olfactory SCs, dendrites (De), cross sectioned olfactory cilia (OC), and microvilli of SC (SC-mv). Enlargement of a box is shown in B. B. Enlargement of the box in A, TEM image. Next to well-developed SER, myeloid bodies (MB) that characterize pigment epithelial cells in the retina are seen. C. TEM image of a rat OE showing mitochondria (Mi). Granular structures near the Mi are glycogen particles. D. FE-SEM image of partially digested cytoplasm of a rat SC. Adjacently located rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), SER, and MB drawn by different colors are seen. E. TEM image of the Suncus OE showing two olfactory SCs and one dendrite (De) filled in-between them. Well-developed SER and swollen and vesicular Mi characterize the cytoplasm of SCs.

Figure 5.

Light microscopic (A) and TEM (BF) images of Bowman’s glands of rats. A. Toluidine blue-stained semi-thin Epon-Araldite section showing olfactory epithelium (OE) and underlying lamina propria containing a Bowman’s gland (BG). Acinar cells (ac) of the BG are located below the basement membrane (arrowheads) of the OE. B. Acinar cells that contain nuclei (N) and secretory granules (sg). Note that some of secretory granules line adjacent to the lumen (L). Collagen fibers (cf) are seen near the basal membrane of the acinar cells. C. The cytoplasm of a acinar cell that is close to the cell nucleus (N). Close association between the nucleus and cisternae of rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) are seen. The cisternae of the RER appear to be continued to those of smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER). Some of cisternae of the SER are closely associated of the outer membrane of mitochondria (Mi) that contain intenral microtubular structures (small arrows). D. Close association of cisternae of SER and mitochondria (Mi). Double or triple-layered cisternae of SER are attached to the outer membrane of Mi. E. Apical region of two acinar cells (AC) showing an aggregation of secretory granules (SG). The enlargement of the box area is shown in F. F. Close association of cisternae of SER, are even mitochondria (Mi), and secretory granules (SG). Note that cisternae of SER are even attached to the membrane of secretory granules.

BGs (Figure 3A) are called attached glands of the OE and provide serous and mucous products. The secretions from these glands provide most of the mucus covering the olfactory epithelial surface, which protects the epithelial surface from drying and temperature extremes and helps to prevent damage caused by infectious agents and noninfectious particles [3]. Thus, it does make sense that BGs secrete secretory immunoglobulin A and J chain, lactoferrin, and lysozyme [41]. It has been demonstrated that secretory products of rodent BGs contain sulfated carbohydrate substances [42, 43]. By lectin histochemical technique, we demonstrated that secretory granules of rat BGs contain glycoconjugates with internal N-acetyl glucosamine (GlcNAc) residues [44].

Our ongoing study on rat BGs has indicated that ultrastructural characteristics of ACs of BGs are very similar to those in steroid-producing cells [23, 24, 25, 26]. For example, light and transmission electron microscopic images of rat BGs are shown in Figure 5. ACs of a BG are located in the lamina propria below the basement membrane of OE (Figure 5A). Secretory granules (SGs) are seen in the supranuclear region of an AC (Figure 5B). The rough endoplasm reticulum (RER) that contains double- or triple-layered cisternae attached with ribosomes is easily seen in the perikaryal region and is connected with SER (Figure 5C). The presence of considerably well-developed RER may be a reflection of GlcNAc-containing glycoconjugates present in SGs of rat BG-ACs [44], because addition of GlcNAc residues to the backbone proteins of GlcNAc-containing glycoconjugates takes place in the RER [45, 46]. In contrast to SER in olfactory SCs, cisternae of SER of ACs appear to be filled with considerably high-dense materials (Figure 5C and D). Also, Mi containing internal microtubular structures are prominently seen (Figure 5C). Furthermore, inner cisterna of double- or triple-layered SER cisternae is attached to the outer membrane of Mi (Figure 5D). SGs are not homogenous in electron density (Figure 5E and F) and appear to be fused in the juxtaluminal region. In addition, cisternae of SER are even attached to the membrane of SGs (Figure 5F). Therefore, we would make a statement that we have extended Frisch’s observation [32] on mouse ACs of BGs in that they contain well-developed SER and provided new ultrastructural characteristics of rat ACs.

Advertisement

3. Expression of P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, 17β-HSD -2, and aromatase in the rat OM

Using RT-PCR analyses, we demonstrated that P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, 17β-HSD -2, and aromatase are expressed in the nasal mucosae of both sexes of adult rats that contain the OM and respiratory mucosa [34]. These results strongly suggest that OM cells express mRNA for P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, 17β-HSD-2, and aromatase. Specific antisera against P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, and 17β-HSD-2 were used for Western blot (WB), a combination of multi-labeling immunofluorescence (IF) and confocal laser-scanning microscopic (CLSM) techniques, and immunoelectron microscopic (IEM) analyses. By WB analyses on nasal tissue specimens of both male and female adult rats, we detected single band at 49 kDa for anti-P450scc antiserum, that at 34.5 kDa for anti-17β-HSD-1, and that at ~43 kDa for anti-17β-HSD-2 antiserum 17β-HSD -2 [34]. These results strongly suggest that the OM cells produce proteins for P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, and 17β-HSD-2.

Antiserum to olfactory marker protein (OMP) equivocally immunostains mature OSCs [47, 48]. Using antiserum to OMP and one of the antisera of the above three enzymes, we determined that both olfactory SCs and cells in BGs contain IF for P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, and 17β-HSD -2. However, no IF was detected in mature OSCs, immature OSCs, basal cells, and olfactory nerve bundles (Figure 6) [34]. By IEM analyses conducted on OE cells, we demonstrated that immunoreactivity (IR) for P450scc is mainly localized in mitochondria of olfactory SCs, whereas SERs and MBs of these cells contain IR for 17β-HSD-1 and 17β-HSD-2 [34]. Similar subcellular immunolocalization of P450scc and HSDs were reported in the adrenal gland and gonads [49, 50, 51].

Figure 6.

Images obtained from rat OM sections by a CLSMF (A-C) and a scheme showing OM cells exhibiting immunofluorescence (IF) for P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, 17β-HSD-2, and olfactory marker protein (OMP, D). A. Section double-labeled with antisera to OMP (red) and P450scc (green). IF for OMP is seen in somata and dendrites of mOSCs within the OE and ONB in the LP, whereas prominent IF for P450scc is seen in the apical region of the OE that is corresponding to the supranuclear cytoplasm of olfactory SCs, and cells in the BGs in the LP. B. Section double-labeled with antisera to OMP (red) and 17β-HSD-1 (green). Localization of IF for OMP and 17β-HSD-1 is similar to that for OMP and P450scc in A. C. Section double-labeled with antisera to OMP (red) and 17β-HSD-2 (green). Localization of IF for OMP and 17β-HSD-2 is similar to that for OMP and P450scc in A. D. Scheme of OM in which cells containing IF for P450scc, 17β-HSD-1, and 17β-HSD-2 are indiated in green on OMP in pink. See abbreviations for the nomenclature of cell types and tissues components in Figure 3A.

Advertisement

4. Expression of estrogen receptor β (ERβ) in the OM

The above findings strongly suggest that olfactory SCs and ACs of BGs produce E2. It is known that E2 utilizes three types of receptors, such as estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), and G-protein coupled estrogen receptor 1(GPER1). Both ERα and ERβ exist as cell membrane associated form and intracellular form, whereas GPER1 exists as a transmembrane receptor [52]. Based on the results of pilot experiments, we first examined expression and cellular localization of ERβ in adult rats of both sexes. The outline of gene structure of ERβ, which is composed of eight exons, is shown in Figure 7A. Forward and reverse primers of 35 bases for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were chosen from cDNA sequences between exon 7and 8. By RT-PCR, ERβ was expressed in nasal mucosae of both sexes as well as ovaries as a positive control (Figure 7B). By WB analysis using a commercially available antiserum against rabbit ERβ, ERβ protein was detected from nasal mucosae of both sexes as well as ovaries (Figure 7C). These results strongly suggest that OM cells in both sexes express and produce ERβ. Using antisera against OMP and ERβ, and 4′6-diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) that binds to cell nucleus, triple-labeling IF technique was applied to cryostat-cut sections of OMs. Observation by a confocal laser-scanning fluorescence microscope (CLSFM, FLUOVIEW FV500-IX-UV, Olympus, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan) indicated that mature OSCs contained very intense IF for ERβ in DTs and moderately intense IF in their supranuclear cytoplasm. Furthermore, dendrites of mature OSCs were ERβ-immunoreactive (Figure 8AC). However, olfactory SCs were immune-negative for ERβ. At subcellular level, post-embedding immunogold TEM technique demonstrated that gold particles that are reflection of ERβ immunoreactivity were localized on cell membranes of both proximal and distal portions of olfactory cilia (Figure 8DF). The above results [53] strongly suggest that mature OSCs, at least, contain both membranous and cytosolic ERβ.

Figure 7.

A. Brief locations of 8 exons within rat estrogen beta (ERβ) gene, and sequences of primers for RT-PCR analyses conducted in [53]. B. Expression of ERβ in nasal mucosae from males and females, and ovaries of adult rats, by a RT-PCR analysis. Note that bands with the same size are seen in nasal mucosae and ovaries as positive control tissues. C. Representative data by Western blot (WB) analysis using an antiserum to ERβ. Note that two bands detected from nasal mucosae from male and female adult rats, and rat ovaries as positive controls are the same in protein size.

Figure 8.

A–C. CLSMF images of a rat OM section triple-labeled with antisera to OMP and ERβ, and DAPI. Somata and dendritic terminals of OSCs that exhibit intense IF for OMP (A) contain intense IF for ERβ (B, C). DF. TEM images of the apical part of the rat OE. D. Gold particles surrounded in orange, which are reflection of immunoreactivity for ERβ, are localized mainly in membranes of the proximal portion of olfactory cilia (oc-p) that are projected from a dendritic terminal (DT), by a post-embedding immunogold procedure. Gold particles surrounded in orange. E. A result of a negative control experiment in which the primary antiserum was omitted from staining protocol. No gold particles are found in the entire part of this image. F. In the distal portion of olfactory cilia (oc-d), gold particles are present in ciliary membranes and their vicinity.

Advertisement

5. E2 actions in the OM

Based on the above results, we present our working hypothesis in Figure 9. Since our unpublished study have demonstrated that olfactory SCs are immunoreactive for cholesterol receptor (low-density lipoprotein receptor), it is likely that the SCs take up cholesterol via capillary just beneath the basement membrane of the OE. They convert it to pregnenolone using P450scc. Since the SCs produce 17β-HSD-1, and probably aromatase as well, SCs finally produce E2 that makes biological effects on OSCs via the ERs, although the presence and cellular localization of at least two enzymes used from pregnenolone to androstenedione need to be determined (see Figure 2).

Figure 9.

Hypothetical pathway of estradiol formation and its function in the OE. A. Schematic view of the olfactory mucosa showing major cellular components. Olfactory sensory cell (OSC) is located in-between sustentacular cell (SC). Foot process of SC (SC-FP) lies down the basement membrane (BM). Blood vessel (BV) is present in the LP just beneath the BV. B. Apical part of the OE. Cilia (ci) and dendrite of the ORC (ORC-De) are seen. Major molecules in the box area is schematically shown in C. C. Estardiol-17β (E2) is produced in the mitochondria (Mi), SER and MB and secreted and reacted with estrogen receptors (ER) that are located on the lateral membrane of ORC. D. Basal part of the OE. Major molecules in the box area is schematically shown in E. E. Low density lipoprotein receptors (LDLR) are circulated within the blood vessel (BV) just beneath the basement membrane (BM) and provided to the cytoplasm of the SC-FP.

Advertisement

6. Morphological features of SER in VSCs

Presence of large amount of SER was described for the first time by Altner et al. [54]. Since then, this ultrastructural feature has been confirmed in many VNO-possessing animals such as amphibians [55, 56], reptiles [55, 57, 58, 59, 60], rodents [61, 62, 63, 64], and prosimian primates [65]. However, bioactive molecules produced by SER in VSCs had not been determined.

In each VSC soma located in the basal part of the vomeronasal sensory epithelium (VNSE) of adult rats, the area occupied by SER is very large (Figure 10A). Clusters of SER appear to be present in both supra- and infra-nuclear cytoplasm. An example of supranuclear region of a VSC soma is shown in Figure 10B. By TEM tomography (for details see [64]) using 200–300-thick sections, a unit volume of 700 x 700 x 150 nm of each SER area was analyzed to demonstrate microstructures of SER. Some parts of SER cisternae contained arc- and circle-like units that are complicated each other. Furthermore, some of them appeared to form tiny loops (Figure 10BE).

Figure 10.

TEM images (AC) of VSCs and results by TEM tomography (D, E). A. Low-magnified TEM image showing longitudinally-cut somata of VSCs. SERs are colored in green, nuclei in blue, and cell boundaries in magenta. Note that the cytoplasm of VSCs is largely occupied by SER. B. Conventional TEM image of a supranuclear region in a VSC. Enlargement of box C within the SER area is shown in C. C. Higher magnification of box C in panel B. Arc-and circle-like units that are numbered 1–6 in box D are clearly seen. Reconstructions of the image in box D by TEM tomography are shown in D and E. D. reconstruction of the image in box D in panel C by TEM tomography showing units 1–6. E. Reconstruction of image in box D in panel C in partially transparent mode. Complex 3D structures of units 1–6 and their looped characteristics are visible. Adapted from [64] with permission.

Advertisement

7. Localization of 17β-HSD-1 in VSCs

By immunohistochemical techniques utilizing three antisera against 17β-HSD-1, specific staining was detected in the VNSE of adult rats (Figure 11A and B). In particular, intense immunoreactivity was seen in the perikaryal region of VSCs and in the apical region of the VNSE (Figure 11C). However, no specific staining was seen when the primary antiserum was omitted from the immunostaining protocol (Figure 11D). Using digoxigenin (Dig)-labeled cDNA antisense and sense probes for 17β-HSD-1, in situ hybridization (ISH) technique demonstrated that some of VSCs express 17β-HSD-1 gene (Figure 11E and F; [66]).

Figure 11.

Expression of 17β-HSD-1 in VNSE of adult rats. AD. Immunolocalization of 17β-HSD-1 in the VNSE and vomeronasal non-sensory epithelium (VNNE). At low magnification, intense immunoreactivity (IR) is detectable in the VNSE (A), whereas no staining is found in negative control section in which the primary antiserum was omitted from the staining protocol (B). At higher magnification, prominent IR is present in the apical part c (arrowhead) and the perikaryal region (arrow) of VSCs (C), E, F. Expression of 17β-HSD-1 in the VNSE of a rat. Using an anti-sense probe, prominent staining is seen in the perikaryal region of VSCs (E), whereas no staining is seen in a section when a sense probe was used (F). G, H. subcellular immunolocalization of 17β-HSD-1 in a VSC SER. G. Low magnification showing the location of SER. Boxed area is enlarged in H. N. nucleus. Insert. WB analysis for 17β-HSD-1 in a male VNO, female VNO, testis, and ovary. All tissues, thick bands of about 34–35 kDa are detected (indicated by an arrowhead). H. Higher magnification of the box in panel G showing the localization of gold particles (arrows), which reflect IR for 17β-HSD-1, localized in cisternae membranes of the SER. AF are adapted from [66] and G and H from [64] with permission.

After confirming the presence of 17β-HSD-1 protein in the VNO by WB analyses (Figure 11G, insert), subcellular localization of its immunoreactivity was examined by a post-embedding immunogold TEM technique [64]. We demonstrated that gold particles, which are reflection of 17β-HSD-1 immunoreactivity, were localized in narrow cisternae of SER. Two representative images are shown in Figure 11G and H. The region shown by these images is equivalent to that analyzed by TEM tomography (Figure 10BE).

In summary, it is most likely that VSCs of adult rats express 17β-HSD-1 that catalyzes conversion from androstenedione to testosterone, and that from estrone to E2. Since 17β-HSD-1immunoreactivity seems to be more intense in basally located somata of VSCs, it would be important to assess if regional difference for expression of 17β-HSD-1 is present in the VNSE.

Advertisement

8. VSCs express estrogen receptor α (ERα)

The VNO is known to be a pheromone-detecting sensory apparatus in rodents [5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 67]. Hatanaka and Kiura [68] demonstrated that sensitivity of VSCs to pheromones was much more decreased in castrated mice, when compared to control mice. This data indicate that gonadal sex steroids modify physiological activities of VSCs. Setting a hypothesis that modification of sex steroids is mediated by steroid receptor, we first examined the presence of ERα in the VNO of adult rats.

Representative images from an immunohistochemical study are shown in Figure 12. Intense immunoreactivity for ERα is seen in the surface of the VNSE, whereas moderately intense immunoreactivity is seen in the inside of the epithelium (Figure 12A and B). Uterine glands, which are positive control tissues, contain intense immunoreactivity in cell nucleus (Figure 12C). It is interesting to point out that immunoreactivity is also seen in the apical part of vomeronasal non-sensory epithelium (VNNE, Figure 12B). No specific staining is seen both in the VNSE and VNNE, when the primary antiserum was omitted from the immunostaining protocol (Figure 12D).

Figure 12.

Immunolocalization of ERα in the VNO (A, B, D) and uterine glands (C) as positive control. A. At lower magnification, intense IR is seen in the surface of VNSE (arrows) and its inside (asterisk). B. At higher magnification, it is clear that the surface of the VNSE contains very intensely stained loci (arrows) and less intensely stained ones. Moderated IR is also seen in somata. C. Uterine glandular cells exhibiting IR for ER. Most intense IR is seen in cell nucleus (arrows) of these cells. D. Negative control section adjacent to B. Omission of the primary antibody from the staining protocol resulted in no staining in both VNSE and VNNE.

Representative CLSFM images from an IF study in which antisera against OMP and ERα, and DAPI were used are shown in Figure 13. Since dendrites and dendritic terminals (DTs) of VSCs exert intense IF for OMP (Figure 13A), it is apparent that DTs contain IF for Erα (Figure 13B). Optical sections containing apical dendrites show that intense IF for ERα is seen in DTs and apical dendrites just below the DTs (Figure 13CH).

Figure 13.

CLSMF images showing colocalization of IF of OMP and ERα. A. Optical section obtained by opening a channel for OMP IF. Intense IF is seen in dendrites (De) and dendritic terminals (DT) of VSCs. B. The same section in A, obtained by opening channels for both OMP and ERα. Colocalized loci in yellow (double arrowheads) are DTs in this image. C, D, E. three serial optical sections with 0.5 μm-interval along the Z-axis, obtained by opening the channels for both OMP and ERα. Colocalized loci in yellow are continuously seen in Des and DTs. F, G, H. The same optical sections in C, D, E, obtained by opening the channel for ERα and shown in intensity-coded mode/see intensity-coded scale bar).

Representative data from a WB analysis is shown in Figure 14. Bands at 66 kDA that is equivalent to the size of ERα protein are detected both pellet and supernatant (sup.) specimens of VNOs and uteri that contain uterine glands.

Figure 14.

Representative data by WB analysis using antiserum to ERα. A band at 66kDA, which is corresponding to molecular weight of ER protein, is detected from VNO and uterus pellet specimens that contain cell nuclei, and from their supernatants (sup.) that contain cell membranes and internal unit membrane structures, as well.

Advertisement

9. Actions of sex steroids in the VNO

TEM and FE-SEM images of VSCs are shown in Figure 15. In contrast to OSC, many microvilli extend from the DT (Figure 15A and B). Microvilli extending from the apical membrane of vomeronasal sustentacular cells (SCs) are thicker than those of VSC (Figure 15B). Since intense IF for ERα was detected the apical surface of VNSE (Figure 13), it is most likely the both membranes and cytoplasm of microvilli.

Figure 15.

A. TEM image showing the apical part of the VNSE. A dendrite (De) of a VSC reaches a lumen (L) to form a dendritic terminal (DT) from which microvilli (vmc) are extended. Adjacently located sustentacular cells (SC) have microvilli (SC-mv), as well. B. FE-SEM image of the surface of the VNSE showing DT, vm, and SC-mv. Note that short microvilli are extending radially from the DT. Adapted from [10] permission (slightly changed).

Using digoxigenin Dig-labeled cDNA antisense and sense probes for 17β-HSD-2, ISH technique demonstrated that some of VSCs express 17β-HSD-2 gene (Figure 16 [66]). Thus, it is most likely that VSCs of adult rats produce 17β-HSD-2.

Figure 16.

Expression of 17β-HSD-2 in the VNSE of an adult rat by ISH histochemistry. VSC perikarya containing intense staining are seen in the peripheral region of the VNSE.

Also, we have examined immunolocalization of E2 in the rat VNSE. Antiserum to protein gene product 9.5 (PGP) is an excellent marker for both mature and immature VSCs (iVSC) [5, 69]. Using antiserum to E2, PGP, and DAPI, triple-labeling IF technique was applied to cryostat-cut sections of VNOs, and then, these sections were observed by the CLSFM. As demonstrated in Figure 17, intense IF for E2 is present in somata and dendrites of VSCs in a granular fashion. By contrast, moderately intense IF was diffusely seen in the supranuclear region of vomeronasal SCs. These findings would provide supporting evidence that E2 per se is present in both VSCs and SCs.

Figure 17.

CLSMF images of a section triple labeled with antisera to protein gene product 9.5 (PGP) and E2, and DAPI. A. Optical section by opening the channels for both PGP and DAPI. Intense IF for PGP are seen in the perikaryal regions of VSCs (VSC-P), dendrites (De) above the layer of sustentacular cell nuclei (N-SC), and dendritic terminals (arrows). B. Optical section by opening the channels for both E2 and DAPI. Both SCs and VSCs contains E.

A hypothetic scheme showing origins and actions of E2 in the VNSE is presented in Figure 18. Since rodent VNSE contains intraepithelial capillaries [5, 62], a mature VSC (mVSC) can uptake E2 or estrone from intraepithelial capillary and give E2 to immature VSC (iVSC) via ERα. Conversion between E2 and estrone takes place in SER where both 17β-HSD-1 and 17β-HSD-2 work as catalytic enzymes. It would happen that E2 from mVSC bind to growing dendritic terminal. Since brain centers of the vomeronasal system express aromatase and other steroidogenic enzymes [70], E2 may be retrogradely transported to the mVSC via neural connections.

Figure 18.

Hypothetical scheme showing the metabolism of E2 in the VNSE. Since some somata of VSCs (VSC-A) are located in the close association with intraepithelial capillaries (IEC), these cells are able to take up estrone and E2 from the blood stream if they express estrogen receptors. Since VSCs express both 17β-HSD-1 and 17β-HSD-2 in their SER, they are able to convert estrone to E2, and E2 to estrone depended on physiological conditions. Also, it is likely that E2 in VSC-A is transported into other VSC, such as VSC-B at the levels of somata, and/or dendritic terminal (DT) and microvilli (mv) after transportation via dendrite (DE). It is possible that E1 is provided form via retrograde neuronal transport.

Advertisement

10. Conclusions

Although our studies suggest that both OM and VNO are greatly influenced by E2, relationships between cell types and enzymes/estrogen receptors are different from each other (Table 1) and further experiments remain to be carried out to identify cells expressing other E2-related molecules. However, at least two conclusions could be proposed here; (1) both OM and VNO are capable for producing E2, and (2) it is most likely that OSCs and VSCs contain both membrane-bound and cytosolic E2 receptors. Thus, it is most likely that cross-talk between membrane- and nuclear-initiated estrogen signaling takes place in the OM and VNO, as demonstrated in hypothalamus [71].

Olfactory mucosaVomeronasal organ
Sensory cellSustentacular cellAcinar cellSensory cellSustentacular cell
P450scc++
17β-HSD-1+++
17β-HSD-2+++
ERα+
ERβ+

Table 1.

Cellular localization of E2-related molecules in the olfactory mucosa and vomeronasal organ of adult rats.

Abbreviations: P450scc, cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme; 17β-HSD-1, 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1; 17β-HSD-2, 17β-HSD type 2; ERα, estrogen receptor alpha-type; ERβ, ER beta-type.

OSCs and VSCs are very special sensory cells, because they are bipolar neurons, but replaced by newly developed cells throughout life [3, 4, 5, 72, 73]. It is known that E2 promotes neurogenesis [74, 75], axonal [74, 75, 76], and dendritic growth [77, 78], rescues neurons [79], and promotes neuroregeneration [74, 75]. Therefore, rodent OM and VNSE are excellent experimental models for studying actions of E2, because differentiation from neuroblasts, dendritic and axonal growth, and neuronal death continuously occur in these neuroepithelia even at adult years.

Rodent OSCs share many cytochemical properties with those of human OSCs [80, 81, 82, 83, 84]. Thus, it is likely that E2-related enzymes and E2 receptors are expressed by human OM cells, although new studies need to be initiated to examine if these molecules are present in human OM tissues. A common but striking feature in adult human OE is that patches of respiratory epithelium often appear in what was thought to be a purely olfactory region [85, 86]. Nakashima et al. [85] reported that the size of these patches varied case to case. Differential sizes of these respiratory patches may depend on differential supply of E2 on human OSCs. Parallel studies utilizing both rodent and human OMs would give us new knowledge about E2 functions, as well as new questions to be solved.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Keiichi Tonosaki, former Professor of Department of Physiolosy, Meikai University, for his critical reading of this manuscript. Research projects whose results are presented here were partially supported by grants from The Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan to S,T, (2008-2009 collaborative grant, and C105320018).

References

  1. 1. Graziadei PPC. The olfactory mucosa of vertebrates. In: Beidler LM, editor. Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Vol. IV. Chemical Senses 1, Olfaction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1971. pp. 27-58
  2. 2. Graziadei PPC. The ultrastructure of vertebrates olfactory mucosa. In: Friedmann I, editor. The Ultrastructure of Sensory Ograns. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1973. pp. 267-305
  3. 3. Farbman AI. Structure of olfactory mucous membrane. In: Barlow PW, Bray D, Green PB, Slack JMW, editors. Cell Biology of Olfaction, Developmental and Cell Biology Series 27. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992. pp. 24-74
  4. 4. Schwob JE. Neural regeneration and the peripheral olfactory system. The Anatomical Record. 2002;269(1):33-49. DOI: 10.1002/ar.10047
  5. 5. Takami S. Recent progress in the neurobiology of the vomeronasal organ. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2002;58(3):228-250. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.10094
  6. 6. Halpern M, Martínez-Marcos A. Structure and function of the vomeronasal system: An update. Progress in Neurobiology. 2003;70(3):245-318. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0082(03)00103-5
  7. 7. Mombaerts P. Genes and ligands for odorant, vomeronasal and taste receptors. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2004;5(4):263-278. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1365
  8. 8. Munger SD, Leinders-Zufall T, Zufall F. Subsystem organization of the mammalian sense of smell. Annual Review of Physiology. 2009;71:115-140. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.70.113006.10060
  9. 9. Takami S, Graziadei PP. Light microscopic Golgi study of mitral/tufted cells in the accessory olfactory bulb of the adult rat. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1991;311(1):65-83. DOI: 10.1002/cne.903110106
  10. 10. Takami S. Morphological features of nasal chemosensory mucosae of mammals —Olfactory mucosa and vomeronasal organ. Clinical Neuroscience. 2016;34(12):1299-1302 (Published by Chugai-Igakusha, in Japanese)
  11. 11. Stumpf WE, Sar M. The olfactory system as a target organ of steroid hormones. In: Breipohl W, editor. Olfaction and Endocrine Regulation. London: IRL Press; 1982. pp. 11-21
  12. 12. Woodley SK, Baum MJ. Effects of sex hormones and gender on attraction thresholds for volatile anal scent gland odors in ferrets. Hormones and Behavior. 2003;44(2):110-118. DOI: 10.1016/s0018-506x(03)00126-0
  13. 13. Xiao K, Kondo Y, Sakuma Y. Sex-specific effects of gonadal steroids on conspecific odor preference in the rat. Hormones and Behavior. 2004;46(3):356-361. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.05.008
  14. 14. Bakker J, Honda S, Harada N, Balthazart J. Restoration of male sexual behavior by adult exogenous estrogens in male aromatase knockout. Hormones and Behavior. 2004;46(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.02.003
  15. 15. Segovia S, Guillamón A. Effects of sex steroids on the development of the vomeronasal organ in the rat. Brain Research. 1982;281(2):209-212. DOI: 10.1016/0165-3806(82)90160-2
  16. 16. Segovia S, Paniagua R, Nistal M, Guillamon A. Effects of postpuberal gonadectomy on the neurosensorial epithelium of the vomeronasal organ in the rat. Brain Research. 1984;316(2):289-291. DOI: 10.1016/0165-3806(84)90315-8
  17. 17. Halem HA, Baum MJ, Cherry JA. Sex difference and steroid modulation of pheromone-induced immediate early genes in the two zones of the mouse accessory olfactory system. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2001;21(7):2474-2480. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-07-02474.2001
  18. 18. Alekseyenko OV, Baum MJ, Cherry JA. Sex and gonadal steroid modulation of pheromone receptor gene expression in the mouse vomeronasal organ. Neuroscience. 2006;140(4):1349-1357. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.03.001
  19. 19. Goodman HM. Adrenal glands. In: Basic Medical Endocrinology. 4th ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2009a. pp. 61-99
  20. 20. Goodman HM. Hormonal control of reproducttion in the male. In: Basic Medical Endocrinology. 4th ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2009b. pp. 239-256
  21. 21. Goodman HM. Hormonal control of reproducttion in the female: The menstrual cycle. In: Basic Medical Endocrinology. 4th ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2009c. pp. 257-275
  22. 22. Do Rego JL, Seong JY, Burel D, Leprince J, Luu-The V, Tsutsui K, et al. Neurosteroid biosynthesis: Enzymatic pathways and neuroendocrine regulation by neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 2009;30(3):259-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.05.006
  23. 23. Fawcett DW. Smooth endoplasmic reticulum. In: The Cell. Second ed. Philadelphia, London, Toronto: W. B Sannders Co.; 1981a. pp. 344-345 pp. 346-349, pp. 360-361
  24. 24. Dym M. The male reproductive system. In: Weiss L, editor. Histology, Cell and Tissue Biology. 5th ed. New York: Elsevier; 1983. pp. 1000-1053
  25. 25. Long JA. The adrenal gland. In: Weiss L, editor. Histology. Cell and Tissue Biology. 5th ed. New York: Elsevier Science Pub. Co. Inc.; 1983. pp. 1116-1133
  26. 26. Al-Amri IS, Mahmoud IY, Waring CP, Alkindi AY, Khan T, Bakheit C, et al. The reproductive cycle of the male house gecko, Hemidactylus flaviviridis, in relation to plasma steroid concentrations, progesterone receptors, and steroidogenic ultrastructural features, in Oman. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 2013;187:23-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.02.040
  27. 27. Fawcett DW. Peroxisomes. In: The Cell. Second ed. Philadelphia, London, Toronto: W. B Sannders Co; 1981b. pp. 520-521
  28. 28. Miller WL, Bose HS. Early steps in steroidogenesis: Intracellular cholesterol trafficking. Journal of Lipid Research. 2011;52(12):2111-2135. DOI: 10.1194/jlr.R016675
  29. 29. Mindnich R, Möller G, Adamski J. The role of 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2004;218(1-2):7-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2003.12.006
  30. 30. Sasano H, Suzuki T, Miki Y, Moriya T. Intracrinology of estrogens and androgens in breast carcinoma. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2008;108(3-5):181-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.09.012
  31. 31. Miki Y, Suzuki T, Sasano H. Controversies of aromatase localization in human breast cancer—Stromal versus parenchymal cells. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2007;106:97-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.05.007
  32. 32. Frisch D. Ultrastructure of mouse olfactory mucosa. The American Journal of Anatomy. 1967;121(1):87-120. DOI: 10.1002/aja.1001210107
  33. 33. Makino N, Ookawara S, Katoh K, Ohta Y, Ichikawa M, Ichimura K. The morphological change of supporting cells in the olfactory epithelium after bulbectomy. Chemical Senses. 2009;34(2):171-179. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjn074
  34. 34. Horie S, Yamaki A, Takami S. Presence of sex steroid-metabolizing enzymes in the olfactory mucosa of rats. The Anatomical Record. 2017;300(2):402-414. DOI: 10.1002/ar.23497
  35. 35. Yamada E. The fine structure of the pigment epithelium in the turtle eye. In: Smeiser GK, editor. Proceedings of the Symposium Held April 11-13, during the Seventh International Congress of Anatomists, New York, New York. New York, London: Academic Press; 1960. pp. 73-84
  36. 36. Porter KR, Yamada E. Studies on the endoplasmic reticulum. V. Its form and differentiation in pigment epithelial cells of the frog retina. The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology. 1960;8:181-205. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.8.1.181
  37. 37. Kuwabara T. Cytologic changes of the retina and pigment epithelium during hibernation. Investigative Ophthalmology. 1975;14(6):457-467 PMID: 166050
  38. 38. Braekevelt CR. Fine structure of the retinal epithelium (RPE) of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). Tissue & Cell. 1998;30(2):149-156. DOI: 10.1016/s0040-8166(98)80063-3
  39. 39. Braekevelt CR, Smith SA, Smith BJ. Fine structure of the retinal pigment epithelium of Oreochromis niloticus L. (Cichlidae; Teleostei) in light- and-dark adaptation. The Anatomical Record. 1998;252(3):444-452. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199811)252:3<444::AID-AR12>3.0.CO;2-4
  40. 40. Ogata T, Yamasaki Y. High-resolution scanning electron microscopic studies on the tree-dimensional structure of the transverse-axial tubular system, sarcoplasmic reticulum and intercalated disc of the rat myocardium. The Anatomical Record. 1990;228(3):277-287. DOI: 10.1002/ar.10922280307
  41. 41. Getchell TV, Margolis FL, Getchell ML. Perireceptor and receptor events in vertebrate olfaction. Progress in Neurobiology. 1984;23(4):317-345. DOI: 10.1016/0301-0082(84)90008-x
  42. 42. Cuschieri A, Bannister LH. Some histochemical observations on the mucosubstances of the nasal glands of the mouse. The Histochemical Journal. 1974;6(5):543-558. DOI: 10.1007/BF01003270
  43. 43. Kondo K, Watanabe K, Sakamoto T, Suzukawa K, Nibu K, Kaga K, et al. Distribution and severity of spontaneous lesions in the neuroepithelium and Bowman's glands in mouse olfactory mucosa: Age-related progression. Cell and Tissue Research. 2009;335(3):489-503. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-008-0739-9
  44. 44. Takami S, Getchell ML, Getchell TV. Lectin histochemical localization of galactose, N-acetylgalactosamine, and N-acetylglucosamine in glycoconjugates of the rat vomeronasal organ, with comparison to the olfactory and septal mucosae. Cell and Tissue Research. 1994;277(2):211-230. DOI: 10.1007/BF00327769
  45. 45. Ogawa M, Sawaguchi S, Furukawa K, Okajima T. N-acetylglucosamine modification in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2015;1850(6):1319-1324. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.03.003
  46. 46. Zhang J, Wu J, Liu L, Li J. The crucial role of Demannosylating asparagine-linked Glycans in ERADicating misfolded glycoproteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;11:625033. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.625033
  47. 47. Farbman AI, Margolis FL. Olfactory marker protein during ontogeny: Immunohistochemical localization. Developmental Biology. 1980;74(1):205-215. DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90062-7
  48. 48. Monti Graziadei GA, Stanley RS, Graziadei PP. The olfactory marker protein in the olfactory system of the mouse during development. Neuroscience. 1980;5(7):1239-1252. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(80)90197-9
  49. 49. Hanukoglu I, Suh BS, Himmelhoch S, Amsterdam A. Induction and mitochondrial localization of cytochrome P450scc system enzymes in normal and transformed ovarian granulosa cells. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1990;111(4):1373-1381. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.111.4.1373
  50. 50. Pelletier G, Li S, Luu-The V, Tremblay Y, Bélanger A, Labrie F. Immunoelectron microscopic localization of three key steroidogenic enzymes (cytochrome P450(scc), 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and cytochrome P450(c17)) in rat adrenal cortex and gonads. The Journal of Endocrinology. 2001;171(2):373-383. DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1710373
  51. 51. Miller WL. Steroid hormone synthesis in mitochondria. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2013;379(1-2):62-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.04.014
  52. 52. Pillerová M, Borbélyová V, Hodosy J, Riljak V, Renczés E, Frick KM, et al. On the role of sex steroids in biological functions by classical and non-classical pathways. An update. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 2021;62:100926. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2021.100926
  53. 53. Takami S, Tateno K, Horie S, Hasegawa R. Immunolocalization of an estrogen receptor in the rat olfactory mucosa. In: The 34th Kanto-shibu’s Annual Branch Meeting of Jap Soc of Microscopy. Poster Presentation (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: The Japanese Society of Microscopy; 2010
  54. 54. Altner H, Müler W, Brachner I. The ultrastructure of the vomero-nasal organ in Reptilia. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie. 1970;105(1):107-122. DOI: 10.1007/BF00340567
  55. 55. Kolnberger I. Vergleichende Untersuchungen am Rüechepitel, insbesondere des Jacobsonshen Organs von Amphibien, Reptilien und Säugetieren. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie. 1971;122(1):53-67 PMID: 4330717
  56. 56. Franceschini F, Sharbati A, Zancanaro C. The vomeronasal organ in the frog, Rana esculenta. An electron microscopy study. Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology and Pathology. 1991;23(2):221-231 PMID: 2070348
  57. 57. Graziadei PPC, Tucker D. Vomeronasal receptors in turtles. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie. 1970;105(4):498-514. DOI: 10.1007/BF00335424
  58. 58. Kratzing J. The fine structure of the olfactory and vomeronasal organ of a lizard (Tiliqua scincoides scincoides). Cell and Tissue Research. 1975;156(2):239-252. DOI: 10.1007/BF00221807
  59. 59. Wang RT, Halpern M. Light and electron microscopic observations on the normal structure of the vomeronasal organ of garter snakes. Journal of Morphology. 1980;164(1):47-67. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051640105
  60. 60. Takami S, Hirosawa K. Electron microscopic observations on the vomeronasal sensory epithelium of a crotaline snake, Trimeresurus flavoviridis. Journal of Morphology. 1990;205(1):45-61. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1052050106
  61. 61. Ciges M, Lavella T, Gayaso M, Sanchez G. Ultrastructure of the organ of Jacobson and comparative study with olfactory mucosa. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 1977;83(1-2):47-58. DOI: 10.3109/00016487709128812
  62. 62. Breipohl W, Bhatnager KP, Blank M, Mendoza AS. Intraepithelial blood vessels in the vomeronasal neuroepithelium of the rat. Cell and Tissue Research. 1981;215(3):465-473. DOI: 10.1007/BF00233523
  63. 63. Taniguchi K, Mocnhizuki K. Morphological studies on the vomeronasal organ in the golden hamster. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1982;44(3):419-426. DOI: 10.1292/jvms1939.44.419
  64. 64. Takami S, Hasegawa R, Shima Y, Horie S, Sato Y, Koyama S, et al. Analyses of smooth endoplasmic reticulum in vomeronasal receptor cells. Journal of the Kyorin Medical Society. 2009;40(3):24-33
  65. 65. Loo SK, Kanagasuntheram R. The vomeronasal organ in tree shrew and slow loris. Journal of Anatomy. 1972;112(2):165-172 PMID: 5077189. PMCID: PMC1271190
  66. 66. Akamine Y. Study on distribution of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases in the vomeronasal organ. In: [Bachelor’s Thesis Written in Japanese] Department of Medical Technology. Tokyo, Japan: Kyorin University Faculty of Health Sciences; 2006
  67. 67. Takami S, Hasegawa R, Nishiyama F. A study for the distribution of an estrogen receptor in the vomeronasal organ. The Japanese Journal of Taste and Smell Research. 2006;13(3):575-578
  68. 68. Hatanaka T, Kiura H. Effects of sex steroid hormones on the sensitivity of vomeronasal receptor neurons in mice. In: 14th Inter Symp on Olfaction and Taste/ 38th Jap Assoc for Study of Taste and Smell. Osaka, Japan: The Japanese Association of the Study of Taste and Smell; 2004 Abstracts 83
  69. 69. Takami S, Getchell ML, Yamagishi M, Albers KM, Getchell TV. Enhanced extrinsic innervation of nasal and oral chemosensory mucosae in keratin 14-NGF transgenic mice. Cell and Tissue Research. 1995;282(3):481-491. DOI: 10.1007/BF00318880
  70. 70. Do Rego JL, Seong JY, Burel D, Leprince J, Luu-The V, Tsutsui K, et al. Neurosteroid biosynthesis: Enzymatic pathways and neuroendcrine regulation by neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 2009;30(3):259-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.05.006
  71. 71. Roepke AT, Qiu J, Bosch MA, Rønnekleiv OK, Kelly MJ. Cross-talk between membrane-initiated and nuclear-initiated oestrogen signalling in the hypothalamus. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 2009;21(4):263-270. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2009.01846.x
  72. 72. Graziadei PPC. Functional anatomy of the mammalian chemoreceptor system. In: Müler-Schwarze D, Mozell M, editors. Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. New York: Plenum Press; 1977. pp. 435-454
  73. 73. Graziadei PPC. Olfactory development. In: Coleman JR, editor. Development of Sensory Systems in Mammals. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1990. pp. 519-566
  74. 74. Azcoitia I, Arevalo MA, Garcia-Segura LM. Neural-derived estradiol regulates brain plasticity. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy. 2018;89:53-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2017.04.004
  75. 75. Azcoitia I, Barreto GE, Garcia-Segura LM. Melecular mechanisms and cellular events involved in the neuroprotective actions of estradiol. Analysis of sex differences. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 2019;55:100787. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2019.100787.Epub 2019 Sep 9
  76. 76. Carrer HF, Cambiasso MJ. Brito B Gorosito S. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2003;1007:306-316. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1286.029
  77. 77. Tsutsui K. Neurosteroids in the Purkinje cell: Biosynthesis, mode of action and functional significance. Molecular Neurobiology. 2008;37(2-3):116-125. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-008-8024-1.Epub 2008 Jun 3
  78. 78. Haraguchi S, Sasahara K, Shikimi H, Honda S, Harad N, Tsutui K. Estradiol promotes purkinje dendritic growth, spinogenesis, and synaptogenesis during neonatal life by inducing the expression of BDNF. Cerebellum. 2012;11(2):416-417. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-011-0342-6
  79. 79. Lebesgue D, Chevaleyre V, Zukkin RS, Etgen AM. Estradiol rescues neurons from global ischemia-induced cell death: Multiple cellular pathways of neuroprotection. Steroids. 2009;74(7):555-561. DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2009.01.003.Epub 2009 Jan 20
  80. 80. Chen Y, Getchell ML, Ding X, Getchell TV. Immunolocalization of two cytochrome P450 isozymes in rat nasal chemosensory tissue. Neuroreport. 1992;3(9):749-752. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199209000-00007
  81. 81. Takami S, Getchell ML, Chen Y, Monti-Bloch L, Berliner DL, Stensaas LJ, et al. Vomeronasal epithelial cells of the adult human express neuron-specific molecules. Neuroreport. 1993;4(4):375-378. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199304000-00008
  82. 82. Yamagishi M, Takami S, Getchell TV. Ontogenetic expression of spot 35 protein (calbindin-D28k) in human olfactory receptor neurons and its decrease in Alzheimer's disease patients. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology. 1996;105(2):132-139. DOI: 10.1177/000348949610500208
  83. 83. Yamagishi M, Getchell ML, Takami S, Getchell TV. Increased density of olfactory receptor neurons immunoreactive for apolipoprotein E in patients with Alzheimer's disease. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology. 1998;107(5 Pt 1):421-426. DOI: 10.1177/000348949810700511
  84. 84. Nibu K, Li G, Zhang X, Rawson NE, Restrepo D, Kaga K, et al. Olfactory neuron-specific expression of NeuroD in mouse and human nasal mucosa. Cell and Tissue Research. 1999;298(3):405-414. DOI: 10.1007/s004419900098
  85. 85. Nakashima T, Kimmelman CP, Snow JB Jr. Structure of human fetal and adult olfactory neuroepithelium. Archives of Otolaryngology. 1984;110(10):641-646. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1984.00800360013003
  86. 86. Morrison EE, Costanzo RM. Morphology of olfactory epithelium in humans and other vertebrates. Microscopy Research and Technique. 1992;23(1):49-61. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.1070230105

Written By

Shigeru Takami and Sawa Horie

Submitted: 14 July 2022 Reviewed: 19 July 2022 Published: 07 September 2022