Genes associated with UC that affect the epithelial barrier.
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorder of the colon, related to a complex contribution of environmental and host factors that increase the susceptibility of individuals. Genetics, environmental factors, dysbiosis, and dysregulated immune system: all these components together are necessary to trigger IBD. The temporal sequence of events leading to UC is unknown. UC is not a classically transmitted genetic affliction. The risk of developing the disease is increased in first-degree relatives but there is no evidence that it is related to genetics or environmental factors exposure early in childhood. The environmental factors associated with ulcerative colitis development are diet, smoking, breastfeeding, use of antibiotics or NSAIDs, urban location, pollution exposure, appendectomy, and hypoxia. In normal intestinal homeostasis environment, both innate and adaptive immune systems are integrated with various mediators and immune cells to maintain tolerance to commensal organisms. In UC patients, the innate immune system is responsible for inducing inflammatory reactions, while the adaptive immune system is crucial in the evolution of chronic inflammatory events. With the shifting global burden of ulcerative colitis, more research is needed to better understand the illness’s etiology in order to prevent and find potential novel therapeutic targets or predictors of disease burden in the future.
Keywords
- ulcerative colitis
- inflammatory bowel disease
- etiology
- genetics
- environmental factors
- immune response
1. Introduction
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorder of the colon (IBD) that is hypothesized to be related to a complex contribution of environmental and host factors, that increase the susceptibility of individuals and events that damage the mucosal barrier, alter the gut microbiota’s healthy balance, and inappropriately enhance gut immune responses, are all known to promote illness onset [1, 2, 3].
Despite knowing the pathophysiology of the disease, the exact etiology is not so clear, but it is likely to be multifactorial. Genetics, environmental factors, dysbiosis, and dysregulated immune system: all these components together are necessary to trigger IBD. The temporal sequence of events leading to UC is unknown up to now.
2. Ulcerative colitis etiology
2.1 The role of genetics in UC
A number of genetic variables have been associated with ulcerative colitis. There are 163 susceptibility disease-associated loci associated with IBD. Thirty of them are associated with Crohn’s disease (CD), 23 with ulcerative colitis and most of the remaining ones are common to both CD and UC, as well as other conditions: psoriasis, celiac disease [4, 5]. The unique genes associated with UC can be divided into genes that affect epithelial barrier (ECM1, HNF4A, CDH1, LAMB1, and GNA12), genes that are immune-mediated (IL8RA / IL8RB, IL2 / IL21, IFNG / IL26, IL7R, TNFRSF9, TNFRSF14, IRF5, LSP1, FCGR2A) and others (OTUD3 / PLA2G2E, PIM3, DAP, CAPN10, JAK2). The genes that overlap with Crohn’s can also be divided into those that are immune-mediated: IL10, CARD9, MST1, ICOSLG, IL1R2, YDJC, PRDM1, TNFSF15, SMAD3, PTPN2, TNFRSF6B, HLA: DRB1*03 and others: ORMDL3, RTEL1/SLC2A4RG, PTGER4, KIF21B, NKX2-3, CREM, CDKAL1, STAT3, ZNF365, PSMG1, IL23R, IL12B, AK2, FUT2, and TYK2 [4, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Further details are presented in Tables 1–5 [4, 7, 9].
Gene | Locus | SNP | Protein name | Function |
---|---|---|---|---|
ECM1 | 1q21 | rs3737240 | Extracellular matrix protein 1 | Involved in cell proliferation |
HNF4A | 20q13 | rs6017342 | Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α | Regulates cellular differentiation along crypt-villus axis |
CDH1 | 16q22 | rs12597188 | E-cadherin | Involved in epithelial adherens junction |
LAMB1 | 7q31 | rs886774 | Laminin β1 | Protein involved in cell adhesion and differentiation |
GNA12 | 7p22 | rs798502 | guanine nucleotide-binding protein alpha 12 | Protein is involved as modulators or transducers in various transmembrane signaling systems |
Gene | Locus | SNP | Protein name | Function |
---|---|---|---|---|
IL8RA / IL8RB | 2q35 | rs11676348 | Interleukin 8 receptor alpha/ Interleukin 8 receptor beta | Activation of neutrophils |
IL2 / IL21 | 4q27 | rs17388568 | Interleukin 2/ Interleukin 21 | T-cell proliferation and other activities crucial to regulation of the immune response /Immunoregulatory activity. May promote the transition between innate and adaptive immunity |
IFNG / IL26 | 12q14 | rs7134599 | Interferon gamma protein/ Interleukin 26 | Cytokine is critical for innate and adaptive immunity/mucosal immunity, proinflammatory function |
IL7R | 5p13 | rs3194051 | Interleukin-7 receptor protein | Normal development of T cells |
TNFRSF9 | 1p36 | rs35675666 | Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily Member 9 | Co-stimulatory immune checkpoint molecule |
TNFRSF14 | 1p36 | rs10797432 | Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 14 | May mediate the signal transduction pathways that activate the immune response |
IRF5 | 7q32 | rs4728142 | Interferon regulatory factor 5 protein | Transcription factor that plays a critical role in innate immunity |
LSP1 | 11p15 | rs907611 | Lymphocyte-specific protein 1 | Mediate neutrophil activation and chemotaxis |
FCGR2A | 1q23 | rs1801274 | Low-affinity immunoglobulin gamma Fc region receptor II-a protein | By binding to IgG it initiates cellular responses against pathogens and soluble antigens. Promotes phagocytosis of opsonized antigens. |
Gene | Locus | SNP | Protein name | Function |
---|---|---|---|---|
OTUD3 / PLA2G2E | 1p36 | rs138347004 | OTU Domain-Containing Protein 3 /Phosphatidylcholine 2-Acylhydrolase 2E | Protein turnover/role in inflammation and the immune response |
PIM3 | 22q13 | rs5771069 | Serine/threonine-protein kinase pim-3 | Prevent apoptosis, promote cell survival and protein translation |
DAP | 5p15 | rs2930047 | Death-associated protein 1 | Negative regulator of autophagy. Involved in mediating interferon-gamma-induced cell death |
CAPN10 | 2q37 | rs4676410 | Calcium-Activated Neutral Proteinase 10 | Calcium-regulated non-lysosomal thiol-protease, which catalyzes limited proteolysis of substrates involved in cytoskeletal remodeling and signal transduction |
JAK2 | 9p24 | rs10758669 | Tyrosine-Protein Kinase JAK2 | Involved in cell growth, development, differentiation, or histone modifications. Mediates essential signaling events in both innate and adaptive immunity. |
Gene | Locus | SNP | Protein name | Function |
---|---|---|---|---|
IL10 | 1q32 | rs3024505 | Interleukin 10 | Downregulates the expression of Th1 cytokines, MHC class II antigens, and co-stimulatory molecules on macrophages. It also enhances B cell survival, proliferation, and antibody production. IL-10 can block NF-κB activity and is involved in the regulation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway |
CARD9 | 9q34 | rs10781499 | Caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 | Regulatory role in cell apoptosis |
MST1 | 3p21 | rs3197999 | Macrophage-stimulating protein | Stimulates macrophages |
ICOSLG | 21q22 | rs2838519 | ICOS ligand | Co-stimulatory signal for T-cell proliferation and cytokine secretion; induces also B-cell proliferation and differentiation into plasma cells |
IL1R2 | 2q11 | rs2310173 | Interleukin 1 receptor, type II | Binds interleukin alpha (IL1A), interleukin beta (IL1B), and interleukin 1 receptor, type I(IL1R1/IL1RA), and acts as a decoy receptor that inhibits the activity of its ligands |
YDJC | 22q11 | rs181359 | YdjC chitooligosaccharide deacetylase homolog | Predicted to enable deacetylase activity and magnesium ion binding activity. Predicted to be involved in carbohydrate metabolic process |
PRDM1 | 6q21 | rs6911490 | PR domain zinc finger protein 1 | Transcription factor regulating downstream cytokines. It is activated by TLRs and IRF-4 and is crucial in T cell, B cell, and myeloid lineage cell differentiations |
TNFSF15 | 9q32 | rs4246905 | TNF superfamily member 15 | It can activate both the NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways and acts as an autocrine factor to induce apoptosis in endothelial cells |
SMAD3 | 15q22 | rs17293632 | Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3 | Up-regulation of genes and TGF-β-induced repression of target genes |
PTPN2 | 18p11 | rs1893217 | Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 2 | Involved in cell growth, differentiation, mitotic cycle, and oncogenic transformation |
TNFRSF6B | 20q13 | rs6062504 | Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 6B | Regulatory role in suppressing FasL- and LIGHT-mediated cell death and T cell activation |
HLA:DRB1*03 | 6p21 | rs9268853 | Major histocompatibility complex, class II, DR beta 1 | Displays foreign peptides to the immune system to trigger the body’s immune response |
Gene | Locus | SNP | Protein name | Function |
---|---|---|---|---|
ORMDL3 | 17q12 | rs2872507 | ORMDL sphingolipid biosynthesis regulator 3 | Negative regulation of B cell apoptotic process |
RTEL1/SLC2A4RG | 20q13 | rs2297441 | Regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1/ SLC2A4 regulator | ATP-dependent DNA helicase is implicated in telomere-length regulation, DNA repair, and the maintenance of genomic stability. / transcription factor involved in SLC2A4 and HD gene transactivation |
PTGER4 | 5p13 | rs6451493 | Prostaglandin E2 receptor 4 | May play an important role in intestinal epithelial transport |
KIF21B | 1q32 | rs7554511 | Kinesin Family Member 21B | Plus-end-directed microtubule-dependent motor protein, which displays processive activity. Involved in delivery of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) receptor to the cell surface |
NKX 2-3 | 10q24 | rs6584283 | Homeobox protein Nkx-2.3 | Transcription factor |
CREM | 10p11 | rs12261843 | cAMP responsive element modulator | Bound to the -180 site of the IL-2 promoter to repress its transcription |
CDKAL1 | 6p22 | rs6908425 | Cdk5 regulatory associated protein 1-like 1 | Associated with adaptive immunity |
STAT3 | 17q21 | rs12942547 | Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 | Essential for the differentiation of the TH17 helper T cells |
ZNF365 | 10q21 | rs10761659 | Protein ZNF365 | Contributes to genomic stability by preventing telomere dysfunction |
PSMG1 | 21q22 | rs9977672 | Proteasome assembly chaperone 1 | Enables proteasome binding |
IL23R | 1p31 | rs11209026 | Interleukin-23 receptor | Associates constitutively with Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) and also binds to transcription activator STAT3 in a ligand-dependent manner |
IL12B | 5q33 | rs6871626 | Subunit beta of interleukin 12 | Sustain a sufficient number of memory/effector Th1 cells to mediate long-term protection against an intracellular pathogen |
AK2 | 1p35 | rs804427 | Adenylate Kinase 2 | Catalyzes the reversible transfer of the terminal phosphate group between ATP and AMP |
FUT2 | 19q13 | rs516246 | Galactoside 2-alpha-L-fucosyltransferase 2 | regulates several processes such as cell-cell interaction including host-microbe interaction, cell surface expression, and cell proliferation |
TYK2 | 19p13 | rs11879191 | Non-receptor tyrosine-protein kinase TYK2 | Tyk2 is activated by IL-10, and its deficiency affects the ability to generate and respond to IL-10. Involved in the regulation of the JAK–STAT pathway |
Recent studies have shown that the genes of the major histocompatibility complex are major genetic determinants of susceptibility to UC. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region on chromosome 6 is connected with the greatest genetic signals within UC-specific loci. Sixteen HLA allelic correlations for ulcerative colitis were revealed after further fine mapping genetic study, including HLA DRB1*01*03 for IBD colonic involvement [10, 11].
A unique yet rare missense mutation in the adenylate cyclase 7 gene (ADCY7) that doubles the risk of ulcerative colitis was discovered in a recent whole-genome sequencing study of over 2,000 ulcerative colitis patients. The ADCY7 gene has the strongest genetic connection with ulcerative colitis outside of the HLA area. ADCY7 is one of ten enzymes that convert ATP to cAMP. Additionally, numerous ulcerative colitis-specific genes are involved in epithelial barrier function regulation [12].
UC is not a classically transmitted genetic affliction. The risk of developing the disease is increased in first-degree relatives but there is no evidence that it is related to genetics or environmental factors exposure early in childhood or both conditions. Twin studies that compared the concordance rates of monozygotic and dizygotic twins backed up this conclusion. Monozygotic twins had a higher concordance (up to 17 percent in UC and up to 55 percent in CD) than dizygotic twins (6 percent in UC and 4 percent in CD), suggesting that the genetic trait is more important in Crohn’s disease than ulcerative colitis. Furthermore, in both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, genetic factors appear to differ across Western and Asian locations [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18].
Another study reported a concordance rate among monozygotic twins of 67% for CD and 13–20% for UC; in one study, a lower rate of concordance for CD has been reported among monozygotic twins [19].
The overall lifetime risk (absolute risk) of developing IBD for first-degree relatives of a UC patient is 1.6% in non-Jews and 5.2% in Jews. Similarly, the risk (age-corrected) for offspring of a UC patient developing IBD is 11 and 2.9–7.4% in non-Jews and Jews, respectively. There is an increased risk (33–52%) in offspring with both affected parents [20].
However, there are many individuals that, when assessed by a polygenic risk score, do not present a genetic predisposition that accounts for all of the susceptibility loci. Despite the significance of genetic predisposition, no single genetic mutation can account for the rapid progression of UC. It is also unclear why some people with UC-associated risk variations remain healthy while others develop UC or perhaps several immune-mediated diseases [21, 22].
IBD susceptibility and progression cannot be explained solely by genetics. This indicates that abnormal adaptive immune responses and epithelial barrier dysfunction play a crucial role in disease development. Nongenetic factors, notably epigenetics, may have a role to play [23, 24]. A summary of the genetic factors that are associated with UC can be seen in Table 6.
Genetic predisposing factors for UC |
---|
HLA |
ADCY7 |
67% of susceptibility loci are shared between UC and CD |
Low disease hereditability in UC |
2.2 Environmental factors in UC
The rapid growth in the incidence of ulcerative colitis in newly industrialized nations implies that environmental factors have a role in disease initiation [25].
Ulcerative colitis comes initially in urban locations, with a quick rise in incidence followed by a slowing period. After that period, Crohn’s disease grows in frequency, finally approaching that of UC. Industrialization is associated with a new urban lifestyle, pollution exposure, dietary changes, antibiotic access, improved cleanliness, and fewer infections, all of which are considered general contributory factors [26, 27]. Urbanization is no longer regarded as a risk factor, according to studies from both Western and developing jurisdictions [28, 29, 30].
2.2.1 Early life factors
Breast milk is often one of the first foods offered to babies. Breastfeeding has been shown in studies to help prevent the development of immune-mediated disorders by preserving the epithelial barrier, avoiding infections, and offering direct immunologic advantages [31, 32, 33]. A meta-analysis of 35 studies discovered a link between breastfeeding and the likelihood of developing ulcerative colitis later on [34].
Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), which are nondigestible molecules and free competitors to enteric pathogens, highly influence the composition of the infant gut microbiota. Formula-fed children’s fecal microbiota is poorer in bifidobacteria and lactobacilli (only 40 to 60%), whereas breastfed children have a higher proportion of bacteria (90%). It demonstrates the important role of breast milk oligosaccharides in the establishment of the infant gut microbiota. HMOs are digested by gut bacteria and produce a variety of metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), which are well-known for their immunomodulatory characteristics. SCFA boosts numerous activities of the epithelial barrier after being absorbed by colonic epithelial cells. The mucus layer that covers epithelial cells is necessary for the epithelial barrier to remain intact. SCFA increases mucus production by upregulating mucin 2 expression, protects against inflammatory insults, and fortifies the tight junction barrier. They also modulate the inflammatory immune response by interacting with DC and T cells [35, 36, 37, 38].
Hygiene hypothesis: evidence suggests an inverse relationship between the risk of UC and early childhood exposure to farm animals, pets, larger families, more siblings, and childbirth mode. As an internal environmental component, all of these early exposures are known to be major drivers for more diversified gut microbiota in early life. Although external variables are equally key determinants of health and disease, the positive relationship between the gut microbiota, host genetics, and immune system is an essential environmental factor in disease etiology [39, 40, 41, 42, 43].
Several studies have looked into whether antibiotic usage early in life predisposes to IBD in Western countries and have consistently shown this link [44]. According to a Canadian nested case-control study, 58 percent of juvenile IBD patients got antibiotics in their first year of life, compared to 39 percent of healthy controls. The number of antibiotic courses taken and the degree of the elevated risk of ulcerative colitis were also found to have a dose-response relationship [45]. Although the results of these studies are significant, other studies have failed to establish a relationship between the use of antibiotics and the risk of ulcerative colitis [46].
2.2.2 Adolescent influences
Quitting smoking has been linked to an increased risk of ulcerative colitis [47]. The pathophysiology of how smoking causes ulcerative colitis or protects a person from developing the condition is unknown. Active or passive smoking produces milder forms of the disease in the case of UC, requiring fewer surgeries throughout its development and less need for immunosuppressive drugs. It is unclear whether the rise in ulcerative colitis is related to smoking cessation patterns. Indian research shows that there is no link between quitting smoking and the development of ulcerative colitis. As for the association between active smoking and the incidence of Crohn’s disease, there is also no evidence in their studies [30, 48].
Studies proposed the divergent effect of appendectomy on UC suggesting inflammation of appendix might have protective interplay with the disease [49, 50].
The dietary habits of adolescents are characterized by excessive consumption of meat and fat and an insufficient intake of fiber, fruits, and vegetables. There is also a tendency to frequently consume processed food and high sugary or soft drinks that increase the risk of developing IBD [51]. This subject will be further discussed in the Diet chapter.
Stress and distress can cause depression and anxiety. Psychological comorbidity is three times higher in those with IBD than in the general population. More than a quarter of people with IBD will have depression at some point in their lives, and more than a third will experience anxiety. Not only does having this chronic disease cause an increase in anxiety and depression but it is also possible that having these psychiatric disorders makes you more likely to develop IBD. It is unclear how much depression and IBD have in common in terms of gene alterations, epigenetic changes, or immunological responses. When they coexist, it has a detrimental influence on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), regardless of which arrives first: impaired mental health or IBD [52, 53, 54].
2.2.3 Other factors
NSAIDs are among the most commonly used drugs, and their link to ulcers in the stomach or duodenum is well known. They have, however, been associated with the development of IBD. Several theories have been proposed as possible mechanisms for the link between NSAIDs and IBD. A prospective cohort study assessed the link between aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and the occurrence of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. A higher risk of both conditions was observed with the highest frequency of NSAID use [55].
In urban areas, air pollution has been related to a variety of health problems. In mice, acute exposure to high levels of airborne particulate matter increases gut permeability and heightens the innate immune response in the small intestine, while chronic exposure results in increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and changes in colon microbiota composition and function. Long-term exposure also aggravated colitis in an Il10/mouse model [56].
Particulate matter exposure has given inconsistent results in epidemiological studies evaluating the link between air pollution and ulcerative colitis, showing that when there is a link, other components of air pollution may play a role in disease development. People who lived in locations with greater SO2 concentrations were more likely to develop ulcerative colitis than people who lived in areas with lower SO2 concentrations [57]. In a European nested case-control study, airborne particulate matter interaction was found to be inversely related to the incidence of IBD, but not Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. In contrast, living near a high-traffic area was linked to a higher risk of disease, and other air pollutants such as nitrous oxides had a trend toward positive relationships with IBD [58].
Hypoxia has been shown to cause inflammatory responses in immune and endothelial cells, with a buildup of inflammatory cells in different organs and increased cytokines in experimental animal models after short-term exposure to low oxygen levels. Levels of circulating IL-6, IL-1ra, and C-reactive protein are elevated in human studies in response to hypobaric hypoxic settings such as high altitudes, and the systemic elevations in these inflammatory markers could reflect local inflammation in the intestine [59, 60].
Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), a transcription factor that is dormant when oxygen is available but activated in hypoxic situations, is required for cellular responses to hypoxia. Patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease have increased expression of HIF-1. Patients with IBD also have increased colonic mRNA expression of glycolytic enzymes, which is triggered by hypoxia through the transcription factor HIF-1 [59, 61].
Based on the hypothesis that hypoxia leads to intestinal inflammation, a small pilot proof-of-concept randomized trial that included 18 patients demonstrated hyperbaric oxygen therapy to be beneficial in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (Table 7) [62].
Environmental factors in UC |
---|
Smoking |
Appendectomy |
Breastfeeding |
Antibiotic usage in childhood |
NSAIDs |
Air pollution |
Hypoxia |
2.3 Diet
Multiple epidemiological researchers have concluded a link between nutrition and ulcerative colitis. In recent decades, significant changes in food intake have been related to an increase in the incidence of UC. Consumption of soft drinks and sucrose was linked to an increased chance of acquiring the condition. On the other hand, the consumption of fruits and vegetables was related to a decrease in UC development [63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68].
There is a significant association between red meat intake and ulcerative colitis risk [69]. Furthermore, whereas dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) were linked to a lower risk of UC (odds ratio: 0.56) [70], dietary arachidonic acid (an n-6 PUFA) assessed in adipose tissue was linked to a higher risk of UC (relative risk: 4.16) [71].
Although there is no evidence of the mechanisms involved in the diet role in IBD development, there are several plausible explanations such as the effects on composition of gut microbiota, the microbial metabolites produced, and alterations in mucosal barrier and immunity [72].
Diet plays a major role in the composition of gut microbiota. Several studies demonstrated that a change in the gut microbiome induced by diet can result in a disease-inducing entity that could either initiate or perpetuate inflammation in patients with IBD. Differences in food patterns between African and European children were related to increased Bacteroidetes and decreased Firmicutes and Enterobacteriaceae [73, 74].
A high fat/high sugar diet can result in intestinal mucosal dysbiosis characterized by an overgrowth of pro-inflammatory proteobacteria and a decrease in protective bacteria. Dietary factors have significant effects on microbial composition and can also affect the metabolic functions of gut microbiota. In both small and large intestines, commensal bacterial fermentation of indigestible food fibers produces short chain fatty acids (SCFA). SCFA changes gene expression, cellular differentiation, chemotaxis, proliferation, and apoptosis in epithelial and/or immunological cells [75]. Some UC patients have a lower amount of SCFA-producing bacteria such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, which is inversely connected to disease activity. Furthermore, experimental investigations have linked a western diet high in sugar and fat and low in dietary fiber to lower SCFAs and greater colitis susceptibility [76, 77, 78].
There have been demonstrated links between dietary PUFA content and inflammatory processes in IBD. Dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) intake has been linked to a lower risk of ulcerative colitis, while dietary n-6 PUFA intake has been linked to a higher risk of ulcerative colitis [71, 79, 80]. Dietary n-3 PUFAs reduced the clinical severity of spontaneous and NSAID-induced colitis in rats. Furthermore, TNF generated by splenic CD4+ T cells was inhibited. These findings are consistent with previous reports establishing the preventive impact of n-3 PUFAs on experimental colitis [81], as TNF plays a key role in IBD development.
Dietary variables may have a direct impact on the cells of the host. Some studies have demonstrated that luminal iron may affect the function of intestinal epithelial cells and T cells and also triggers the apoptosis of epithelial cell stress [82]. Zinc deficiency can also decrease the barrier integrity and increase the permeability in IBD patients and vitamin D has a role in reducing inflammation in experimental and human IBD [83, 84].
Several food additives, such as emulsifying agents, maltodextrin, and thickeners including carrageenan, carboxymethyl cellulose, and xanthan gum, have been shown to disrupt intestinal homeostasis [85]. Carrageenan is a type of sulfated polysaccharide derived from seaweed. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved it as “generally regarded as safe,” and it is utilized in the food industry for its gelling, thickening, and stabilizing characteristics. Reduced protein and peptide bioaccessibility, disturbance of normal epithelial function, and intestinal inflammation have all been associated with carrageenan [86]. Within one day, carboxymethyl cellulose and polysorbate80 were found to shift the gut microbiota into a pro-inflammatory state by raising bioactive flagellin levels. Changes in gene expression and the development of colitis have been linked to the pro-inflammatory microbiota [87, 88].
Other studies have found that complete dietary guidance, low FODMAP, or IgG-guided exclusion diets are useful in reducing disease activity in UC patients [89, 90, 91]. Although these findings are encouraging, one of the significant limitations of these studies is that they did not disclose their findings separately for patients with active disease and those in remission, making it difficult to make meaningful judgments (Table 8).
Increased risk | Decreased risk |
---|---|
Soft drinks | Fruits |
Sucrose | Vegetables |
Red meat | n-3 PUFAs |
n-6 PUFAs | Normal levels of vitamin D |
Food additives | Low FODMAP |
Zinc deficiency | Diet guidance |
Luminal iron exposure | IgG-guided exclusion diet |
2.4 Microbiome
Early gut microbial colonization is integral to the development of the immune system and intestinal homeostasis, providing a synergistic relationship between defensive and tolerant mechanisms [92]. Different studies from the literature have demonstrated that patients with ulcerative colitis have disturbances in the composition of their gut microbiota, coined “microbial dysbiosis,” with a reduction in bacterial diversity with lower proportions of Firmicutes (phylum) and Bacteroides (genus) and higher proportions of Enterobacteriaceae (family) [73, 93, 94, 95]. Short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae have been shown to be depleted, whereas pro-inflammatory microorganisms such as Enterobacteriaceae, especially Escherichia coli and Fusobacteriaceae have grown in number [96, 97].
It is unclear if dysbiosis is a result of or a cause of gut inflammation in ulcerative colitis. In ulcerative colitis, the virome and mycobiome are similarly less varied in this regard [98, 99, 100, 101]. There are four controlled positive faecal microbial transplantation clinical studies that confirm the therapeutic effect for ulcerative colitis patients [102, 103, 104, 105]. Microbial diversity restoration, particularly the bacterial species responsible for SCFA generation in donor stool, has been indicated as a key factor [102, 106].
In ulcerative colitis, one of the main impacts of dysbiosis is likely to be a decline in the epithelium health or a state of epithelial malfunction, which increases inherent sensitivity to disease. Faecal diversion away from the rectum worsens inflammation, resulting in “diversion colitis” in ulcerative colitis; on the other hand, faecal diversion decreases inflammation in Crohn’s disease [107].
The microbiome is the most unstable during childhood, and disturbances to the microbiota in the earliest years of life may alter gut immunity and, therefore, susceptibility to IBD [108]. Before, during, and after a 5-day treatment with oral ciprofloxacin, the variety, richness, and evenness of the faecal microbiota in healthy humans were reduced [109]. Because antibiotics are widely used in both developing and developed countries and are progressively used in poor countries, it is plausible to believe that antibiotic use is a fundamental predisposing factor in IBD etiology. Antibiotic misuse and abuse, as well as their usage in cattle, could aggravate the problem (Table 9).
Decreased diversity of UC gut microbiome, virome, and mycobiome over time |
dysbiosis: either a result or a cause of gut inflammation in ulcerative colitis |
Imbalance: ↓ protective microbes (Firmicutes and Bacteroides) / ↑ inflammatory microbes (Enterobacteriaceae and Fusobacteriaceae) |
Dysbiosis in the earliest years of life → alteration of gut immunity → ↑ susceptibility to IBD |
2.5 Epithelial barrier alteration
An increased population of effector T cells and increased production of proinflammatory cytokines (such as TNF- α, IL-6, and IFN- γ) are thought to be the cause of ulcerative colitis. The balance between proinflammatory and immunosuppressive forces can determine the progression of inflammation that is characteristic of IBD. Disruption of intestinal homeostasis can be determined by an epithelial barrier deficiency. This deficiency has multiple causes: a primary dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota, a defect in the mucus layer, a primary defect of the epithelium, or an inflamed state of the lamina propria [110].
An epithelial barrier deficiency is seen early in the etiology of UC. For example, in individuals with active UC, the thickness of the mucin-containing mucosal layer of the colon has been demonstrated to be reduced, primarily due to decreased mucin 2 synthesis. In addition, in the early stages of UC, although the epithelium looks normal endoscopically, apoptotic foci can already be observed. This weakened barrier function might be caused by a fundamental genetic deficiency or environmental influences such as changes in the microbiota [111].
Susceptibility polymorphisms in genes producing junctional proteins such as E-cadherin, guanine nucleotide-binding protein alpha 12, and Zonula occludens-1 have been found in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), suggesting that epithelial barrier abnormalities may be a major cause for UC. Furthermore, alterations in the expression of junctional proteins such as E-cadherin, b-catenin, and claudins have been detected in intestinal biopsies from patients with IBD, indicating that barrier disruption plays a role in IBD etiology [112, 113].
2.6 Immune response in UC
Because the human immune system is responsible for recognizing, responding to, and adapting to a wide range of self and foreign molecules, its integrity is vital for maintaining and recovering health. In the gastrointestinal system, there are two complicated mucosal immune processes that check the luminal contents on a regular basis, recognize microbial or dietary antigens, and activate immune pathways. During the active phase of gut diseases, such as UC, both innate and adaptive immune systems are integrated with various mediators and immune cells to maintain tolerance, manage low-grade inflammation, and upregulate [114].
Antigen-presenting cells (APCs) include dendritic cells, B cells, and macrophages, which are important in both innate and adaptive immunity and immune homeostasis because they can secrete cytokines and activate innate immunity while also presenting antigens to adaptive immune cells, thus linking adaptive and innate immunity pathways [115].
2.6.1 Innate immune response
Innate immunity consists of defense-related elements that are programmed or automatic, such as the mucosal barrier, epithelial cell tight junctions, and gut permeability control, as well as the secretion of antimicrobial enzymes like defensins and lysozyme to protect the lamina propria from microbial raids. The innate immune system is composed of macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, and other granulocytes, as well as natural killer cells (NKs), dendritic cells, mast cells, and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). Non-immune cells involved in the innate immunity system include intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), endothelial cells, transforming growth factor-releasing stromal cells, and mesenchymal cells [116].
Several types of innate immune cells have been implicated in the development of IBD. Neutrophils contribute to the persistence of intestinal inflammation by impairing epithelial barrier function and releasing numerous inflammatory mediators. To maintain homeostasis, dendritic cells (DCs) regulate crosstalk between innate and adaptive immunity. In IBD, however, inappropriate conditioning of DCs has been observed throughout both active and passive disease states as a result of decreased mucosal expression of TGF-b and TSLP, as well as downregulation of the retinoic acid signaling pathway [115].
Macrophages and DCs, as well as epithelial cells and myofibroblasts, maintain gut immunological homeostasis by continuously recognizing microbial antigens. Mucosal DCs and macrophages from IBD patients have higher levels of TLR2, TLR4, CD40, and the chemokine receptor CCR7, all of which contribute to and promote inflammation by stimulating the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF, IL-1b, IL-6, and IL-18 [114, 115, 116].
2.6.2 Adaptive immune response
Adaptive immunity is characterized by unique immunological responses triggered by antigen-specific activation of B cells or T cells. This immune system includes antibody-secreting B cells, cytotoxic T cells, effector T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and T helper lymphocytes that are all engaged in this process. Peyer’s patches of the small intestine, lymphoid follicles of the colon, and mesenteric lymph nodes are the places where adaptive immune cells differentiate. The human immune system’s basic function is determined by its interaction with the human microbiome [9].
Several types of innate immune cells have been implicated in the development of IBD. Neutrophils contribute to intestinal inflammation by impairing epithelial barrier function and secreting a variety of inflammatory mediators. To maintain homeostasis, dendritic cells (DCs) regulate crosstalk between innate and adaptive immunity. Intestinal epithelial cells that generate retinoic acid, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), and transforming growth factor (TGF)- β impact DCs, increasing the formation of IL-10-producing DCs and thus anti-inflammatory responses and tolerance. In both active and inactive IBD disease stages, decreased mucosal expression of TGF- β and TSLP, as well as downregulation of the retinoic acid signaling pathway, leads to improper conditioning of DCs. [117].
A complex inflammatory process involving innate and adaptive immune cells entering the lamina propria occurs during the active phase of UC. Neutrophils, the short-lived “first responder” cells, are recruited in large numbers with the histology of “crypt abscesses,” and they migrate over the epithelium before dying in the crypts. [118].
The survival of neutrophils is aided by the inflammatory environment (potentially via HIF-1 and hypoxia). As a result of this prolonged survivability, its inflammatory impact and tissue damage are intensified (via many means, including the release of serine and matrix metalloproteases, reactive oxygen species, and pro-inflammatory cytokines). Uncontrolled pro-inflammatory cell death (necrosis, necroptosis, and NETosis) occurs in a large proportion of neutrophils, amplifying and potentiating the pro-inflammatory milieu. High quantities of s100a8/9 proteins (or calprotectin) produced in blood and stool, as well as a strong serological response to self perinuclear anti p-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA), are both likely indirect indications of uncontrolled neutrophil cell death, corroborate this mechanism in UC. Extracellular traps (NETs) on neutrophils can operate as a net for immunogenic chemicals that keep the inflammatory response going. All of these changes support the rational paradigm that, following the onset of the disease, a wave of innate inflammatory neutrophils and monocytes (with their pro-inflammatory cytokine repertoire, such as IL-1 family, IL-6, and TNF- α) creates an inflammatory environment (nutritional, metabolic, and cytokine) that promotes a pathologic adaptive (likely T-cell) immune response [119, 120, 121].
All of these parameters will influence the host’s ability to resolve inflammation, restore homeostasis, and heal the UC mucosa, as well as newly incoming inflammatory monocytes, monocyte-macrophage activity, survival, and phenotype [122].
Because of UC’s significant genetic connections to HLA (mainly class II), defective antigen(s) drive the aberrant T-cell response, which subsequently shapes the pathologic cytokine milieu, and is considered to be a key causal component. The complete mechanism of how HLA affects commensal and/or self-antigen presentation to T cells, and then a downstream pathogenic T-cell response, is yet unknown and difficult to understand. Approaches to studying, screening, and defining T-cell epitopes have vastly improved, and further development is expected [123].
Naïve CD4+ T-cells activated by antigen-specific signals from APCs, influenced by the cytokine milieu, differentiate into effector T-helper cells; T-helper 1 (Th1), T-helper 2 (Th2), T-helper 17 (Th17) cells, T-helper 9 (Th9), or regulatory T-cells (Tregs). Previously, it was thought that the differentiation of naive CD4+ T-cells into effector T-cell lineages was an irreversible process; however, specific cytokine circumstances and stimuli may cause plasticity between T-cell subsets [124]. Treg and Th17 plasticity are most likely triggered by dynamic changes in the inflammatory environment. As a result, pro-inflammatory stimuli may stimulate the conversion of immune-suppressive regulatory T cells into pro-inflammatory Th17 cells, while inflammation resolution may induce or even necessitate the switch from Th17 to Treg [125].
UC is traditionally associated with a Th2 response characterized by high levels of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, whereas CD is characterized by a Th1/Th17 response. Previous research has linked UC to a nonclassical Th2 response, with CD1d-restricted natural killer T-cells releasing IL-13. This region has been overwhelmed by subsequent developments. The discovery of IL-23 as a critical driver of Th17 responses, genetic connections with IL-23 and associated genes and the presence of Th17 (and Th9) cells in UC are only a few examples. IL-9 is produced from Th9 cells, a new subtype of Th cells. Th9 cells develop from naïve T cells under the induction of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and IL-4. IL-9 is thought to disrupt gut barrier function by inhibiting intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and suppressing the expression of many tight-junction proteins such as claudin and occludin. Furthermore, greater IL-9 levels in UC patients with severe disease compared to patients with moderate disease and control patients may represent disease activity, as seen by the higher IL-9 levels reported in UC patients with severe disease compared to patients with mild disease and control patients [126, 127, 128].
Multiple pathways occur in the recruitment of mesenchymal cells and the formation of activated myofibroblasts, the major functional unit responsible for excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, during intestinal injury and repair. Multiple matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are significantly expressed in IBD tissues, with interstitial collagenase (MMP1) and MMP2 mediating collagen fiber breakdown, whereas fistula formation in Crohn’s disease has been linked to elevated expression of MMP3 and MMP9. A balance between MMPs and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase occurs, resulting in excessive deposition of certain ECM components. All of these anomalies are most likely the result of inflammation-derived soluble mediators that regulate ECM deposition.
Primary human intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) from normal mucosa may process and deliver antigens to primed peripheral blood CD8+ T lymphocytes that act as nonspecific suppressor cells. IBD-associated IECs have a reduced ability to induce CD8+ T suppressor cells, implying a deficiency in mucosal immunoregulation that predisposes to IBD [129].
Despite the fact that CD4 T cells are thought to have a larger role in IBD pathogenesis, CD8 T cell transcriptomic patterns have been identified to determine whether UC follows a more aggressive course. The recent discovery of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) as a further mediator of IL-23-driven inflammatory response in the colon is a further new dimension in UC [130, 131, 132].
While the innate immune system is responsible for inducing inflammatory reactions, the adaptive immune system is crucial in the evolution of chronic inflammatory events in UC (Table 10).
Pathogenic adaptive (presumably T-cell driven) responses: triggered by innate immune responses (neutrophils/macrophages) |
HLA allelic connections may influence antigen presentation |
Complex UC immunity:
|
2.7 New advances in the etiology
Recent studies suggest that mitochondria have a major role in inflammation. Mitochondrial dysfunction has long been linked to UC, but recent paper released in the last three years has re-emphasized this theory. Earlier colonic microarray investigations in UC revealed such dysregulation of genes that affect mitochondrial activity [133, 134, 135].
When mitochondrial homeostasis is disrupted, energy generation is impaired, mitochondrial oxidative stress rises, and mitochondrial products (mitochondrial DNA) are released as pro-inflammatory DAMPs. All of these factors play a role in core UC themes such as epithelial failure, the pro-inflammatory mucosal environment, and direct inflammatory triggers. As a result of this convergence of facts, novel techniques for targeting pro-inflammatory mitochondria have emerged, such as mitochondrial antioxidant therapy in active UC [136, 137].
Inflammation causes tissue damage and different forms of cell death (apoptosis, necrosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis), as well as the release of several cytosolic and nuclear products with intrinsic proinflammatory characteristics, as seen in IBD. DAMPs are the term used to describe those items. Proteins and peptides (High mobility group box 1 protein [HMGB1], defensins, heat-shock proteins, S100 proteins, IL1 and IL33, and so on), lipoproteins and fatty acids (such as serum amyloid A and oxidized low-density lipoproteins), ECM degradation products (for example, hyaluronan fragments), and nucleic acids are among the many different types of DAMPs. Through a DAMP-mediated mechanism, any agent, medicine, or virus that damages the epithelium can cause IBD flare-ups and clinical illness recurrence [138].
Exogenous, microbial, stress, and endogenous danger signals trigger inflammasomes, which activate caspase 1 and produce IL1 and IL18. Inflammasomes are members of the NLR or pyrin family, with members of the NOD-like receptor family, such as NLRP1a/b, NLRP3, NLRC4, and AIM2, regulating immunological responses, metabolism, and disease pathogenesis being the best known. The inflammasome’s function in regulating interaction between the mucosal immune system and the microbiota makes it particularly appealing and biologically relevant to IBD immunopathogenesis. Inflammasome activity appears to be higher in CD based on circumstantial data, but there is no information available for UC [139].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are single-stranded noncoding RNAs with key regulatory activities on gene expression, primarily via suppressing (silencing) genes via degradation of target RNAs or translation inhibition. Long noncoding RNAs and circular RNAs are two more forms of noncoding RNAs that have been discovered. These noncoding RNAs also have important regulatory activities, and how these functions may be involved in IBD pathogenesis is becoming a hot topic. Excessive immunological reactivity and inflammation, both of which are linked to IBD, could be caused by dysregulation or insufficient miRNA-mediated repression [140].
Single-cell profiling of the inflamed UC mucosa allows for a thorough examination and census of the cell populations. New research has discovered new and unusual cell kinds, as well as cell-type-specific expression and deep cell–cell interactions and cell lineage linkages. Mucosal compartments that have gotten less attention in the past, such as the colonic mesenchyme, are now being identified as major mediators of inflammation, but all of this needs to be confirmed in the future (Table 11) [141, 142, 143].
Disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis → alteration of energy production →↑ oxidative stress →release of pro-inflammatory damage-associated molecular patterns. |
Novel techniques in active UC: targeting pro-inflammatory mitochondria, (i.e. mitochondrial antioxidant therapy) |
Major mediators of inflammation: colonic mesenchyme |
3. Conclusion
Despite recent advances in our understanding of the role of environmental exposures, genetics, dysbiosis, and dysregulated immunity in disease development, the temporal sequence of events leading to IBD remains unknown. They are all important in triggering IBD/UC because none of the factors alone can cause IBD/UC. Immune system is the effector arm for inflammatory response. With the shifting global burden of ulcerative colitis, more research is needed to better understand the illness’s etiology in order to prevent and find potential novel therapeutic targets or predictors of disease burden in the future.
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my deep and sincere gratitude to my mentors MD, Ph.D. in gastroenterology and internal medicine, Chief of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Mircea Mihai Diculescu, and MD, Ph.D. in gastroenterology and internal medicine, Ioan-Alexandru Oproiu for their support and helpful feedback throughout the years.
References
- 1.
Abraham BP, Kane S. Fecal markers: Calprotectin and lactoferrin. Gastroenterology Clinical North America. 2012; 41 :483-495 - 2.
Ng SC, Bernstein CN, Vatn MH, et al. Geographical variability and environmental risk factors in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2013; 62 :630-649 - 3.
Porter RJ, Kalla R, Ho GT. Ulcerative colitis: Recent advances in the understanding of disease pathogenesis. F1000Res. 2020; 9 :294 - 4.
Jostins L, Ripke S, Weersma RK, et al. Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2012; 491 (7422):119-124 - 5.
Dobre M, Mănuc TE, Milanesi E, et al. Mucosal CCR1 gene expression as a marker of molecular activity in Crohn’s disease: Preliminary data. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology. 2017; 58 (4):1263-1268 - 6.
de Lange KM, Barrett JC. Understanding inflammatory bowel disease via immunogenetics. Journal of Autoimmunity. 2015; 64 :91-100 - 7.
Kaur A, Goggolidou P. Ulcerative colitis: Understanding its cellular pathology could provide insights into novel therapies. Journal of Inflammation. 2020; 17 :15 - 8.
Cho JH. The genetics and immunopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2008; 8 (6):458-466 - 9.
Anderson CA, Boucher G, Lees CW, et al. Meta-analysis identifies 29 additional ulcerative colitis risk loci, increasing the number of confirmed associations to 47. Nature Genetics. 2011; 43 (3):246-252 - 10.
Goyette P, Boucher G, Mallon D, et al. High-density mapping of the MHC identifies a shared role for HLA-DRB1*01:03 in inflammatory bowel diseases and heterozygous advantage in ulcerative colitis. Nature Genetics. 2015; 47 (2):172-179 - 11.
Ţieranu CG, Dobre M, Mănuc TE, et al. Gene expression profile of endoscopically active and inactive ulcerative colitis: Preliminary data. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology. 2017; 58 (4):1301-1307 - 12.
Luo Y, de Lange KM, Jostins L, et al. Exploring the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease by whole-genome sequencing identifies association at ADCY7. Nature Genetics. 2017; 49 (2):186-192 - 13.
Spehlmann ME, Begun AZ, Saroglou E, et al. Risk factors in German twins with inflammatory bowel disease: Results of a questionnaire-based survey. Journal of Crohn’s & Colitis. 2012; 6 (1):29-42 - 14.
Halfvarson J, Bodin L, Tysk C, Lindberg E, Järnerot G. Inflammatory bowel disease in a Swedish twin cohort: A long-term follow-up of concordance and clinical characteristics. Gastroenterology. 2003; 124 (7):1767-1773 - 15.
Ng SC, Woodrow S, Patel N, Subhani J, Harbord M. Role of genetic and environmental factors in British twins with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2012; 18 (4):725-736 - 16.
van Dongen J, Slagboom PE, Draisma HH, Martin NG, Boomsma DI. The continuing value of twin studies in the omics era. Nature Reviews. Genetics. 2012; 13 (9):640-653 - 17.
Yoshitake S, Kimura A, Okada M, Yao T, Sasazuki T. HLA class II alleles in Japanese patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Tissue Antigens. 1999; 53 (4 Pt 1):350-358 - 18.
Inoue N, Tamura K, Kinouchi Y, et al. Lack of common NOD2 variants in Japanese patients with Crohn’sdisease. Gastroenterology. 2002; 123 (1):86-91 - 19.
Yang H, McElree C, Roth MP, Shanahan F, Targan SR, Rotter JI. Familial empirical risks for inflammatory bowel disease: Differences between Jews and non-Jews. Gut. 1993; 34 (4):517-524 - 20.
Hedin C. Molecular genetics of inflammatory bowel disease. D’Amato M, Rioux JD, editors. Springer; 2013 - 21.
Manuc M, Ionescu EM, Milanesi E, et al. Molecular signature of persistent histological inflammation in ulcerative colitis with mucosal healing. Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases. 2020; 29 (2):159-166 - 22.
Lee HS, Cleynen I. Molecular profiling of inflammatory bowel disease: Is it ready for use in clinical decision-making? Cell. 2019; 8 (6):535 - 23.
Ventham NT, Kennedy NA, Nimmo ER, Satsangi J. Beyond gene discovery in inflammatory bowel disease: The emerging role of epigenetics. Gastroenterology. 2013; 145 (2):293-308 - 24.
Kalla R, Ventham NT, Kennedy NA. MicroRNAs: New players in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2015; 64 (6):1008 - 25.
Ng SC, Shi HY, Hamidi N, et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: A systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet. 2017; 390 (10114):2769-2778 - 26.
Kirsner JB. Historical aspects of inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 1998; 10 (3):286-297 - 27.
Kaplan GG, Ng SC. Understanding and preventing the global increase of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152 (2):313-321 - 28.
Wang YF, Ou-Yang Q , Xia B, et al. Multicenter case-control study of the risk factors for ulcerative colitis in China. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2013; 19 (11):1827-1833 - 29.
Benchimol EI, Kaplan GG, Otley AR, et al. Rural and urban residence during early life is associated with risk of inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based inception and birth cohort study. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017; 112 (9):1412-1422 - 30.
Amarapurkar AD, Amarapurkar DN, Rathi P, et al. Risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease: A prospective multi-center study. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2018; 37 (3):189-195 - 31.
Parigi SM, Eldh M, Larssen P, Gabrielsson S, Villablanca EJ. Breast milk and solid food shaping intestinal immunity. Frontiers in Immunology. 2015; 6 :415 - 32.
Renz H, Brandtzaeg P, Hornef M. The impact of perinatal immune development on mucosal homeostasis and chronic inflammation. Natural Review in Immunology. 2011; 12 :9 - 33.
Rogier EW, Frantz AL, Bruno ME, et al. Lessons from mother: Long-term impact of antibodies in breast milk on the gut microbiota and intestinal immune system of breastfed offspring. Gut Microbes. 2014; 5 (5):663-668 - 34.
Xu L, Lochhead P, Ko Y, Claggett B, Leong RW, Ananthakrishnan AN. Systematic review with meta-analysis: Breastfeeding and the risk of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacology Therapy. 2017; 46 (9):780-789 - 35.
Hegar B, Wibowo Y, Basrowi RW, et al. The role of two human milk oligosaccharides, 2’-Fucosyllactose and Lacto-N-Neotetraose, in infant nutrition. Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology Nutrition. 2019; 22 :330-340 - 36.
Harmsen HJ, Wildeboer-Veloo AC, Raangs GC, et al. Analysis of intestinal flora development in breast-fed and formula-fed infants by using molecular identification and detection methods. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2000; 30 :61-67 - 37.
Boudry G, Charton E, Le Huerou-Luron I, et al. The relationship between breast milk components and the infant gut microbiota. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2021; 8 :629740 - 38.
Zuurveld M, van Witzenburg NP, Garssen J, et al. Immunomodulation by human milk oligosaccharides: The potential role in prevention of allergic diseases. Frontiers in Immunology. 2020; 11 :801 - 39.
Bernstein CN, Rawsthorne P, Cheang M, Blanchard JF. A population-based case control study of potential risk factors for IBD. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006; 101 (5):993-1002 - 40.
Timm S, Svanes C, Janson C, et al. Place of upbringing in early childhood as related to inflammatory bowel diseases in adulthood: A population-based cohort study in Northern Europe. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2014; 29 (6):429-437 - 41.
Bager P, Simonsen J, Nielsen NM, Frisch M. Cesarean section and offspring’s risk of inflammatory bowel disease: A national cohort study. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2012; 18 (5):857-862 - 42.
Castiglione F, Diaferia M, Morace F, et al. Risk factors for inflammatory bowel diseases according to the “hygiene hypothesis”: A case-control, multi-centre, prospective study in Southern Italy. Journal of Crohn’s & Colitis. 2012; 6 (3):324-329 - 43.
Ng SC, Tang W, Leong RW, et al. Environmental risk factors in inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based case-control study in Asia-Pacific. Gut. 2015; 64 (7):1063-1071 - 44.
Ungaro R, Bernstein CN, Gearry R, et al. Antibiotics associated with increased risk of new-onset Crohn’s disease but not ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014; 109 (11):1728-1738 - 45.
Shaw SY, Blanchard JF, Bernstein CN. Association between the use of antibiotics in the first year of life and pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2010; 105 (12):2687-2692 - 46.
Meyer AM, Ramzan NN, Heigh RI, Leighton JA. Relapse of inflammatory bowel disease associated with use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2006; 51 (1):168-172 - 47.
Bernstein CN, Eliakim A, Fedail S, et al. Review Team: World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guidelines Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Update August 2015. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 2016; 50 (10):803-818 - 48.
Wang P, Hu J, Ghadermarzi S, et al. Smoking and inflammatory bowel disease: A comparison of China, India, and the USA. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2018; 63 (10):2703-2713 - 49.
Andersson RE, Olaison G, Tysk C, Ekbom A. Appendectomy and protection against ulcerative colitis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2001; 344 (11):808-814 - 50.
Andersson RE, Olaison G, Tysk C, Ekbom A. Appendectomy is followed by increased risk of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2003; 124 (1):40-46 - 51.
Kikut J, Skonieczna-Żydecka K, Sochaczewska D, Kordek A, Szczuko M. Differences in dietary patterns of adolescent patients with IBD. Nutrients. 2021; 13 (9):3119 - 52.
Bernstein CN. Psychological stress and depression: Risk factors for IBD? Digestive Diseases. 2016; 34 (1-2):58-63 - 53.
Graff LA, Walker JR, Bernstein CN. Depression and anxiety in inflammatory bowel disease: A review of comorbidity and management. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2009; 15 :1105-1118 - 54.
Guthrie E, Jackson J, Shaffer J, et al. Psychological disorder and severity of inflammatory bowel disease predict health-related quality of life in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2002; 97 :1994-1999 - 55.
Ananthakrishnan AN, Higuchi LM, Huang ES, et al. Aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, and risk for Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis: A cohort study. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2012; 156 (5):350-359 - 56.
Kish L, Hotte N, Kaplan GG, et al. Environmental particulate matter induces murine intestinal inflammatory responses and alters the gut microbiome. PLoS One. 2013; 8 (4):e62220 - 57.
Kaplan GG, Hubbard J, Korzenik J, et al. The inflammatory bowel diseases and ambient air pollution: A novel association. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2010; 105 (11):2412-2419 - 58.
Opstelten JL, Beelen RMJ, Leenders M, et al. Exposure to ambient air pollution and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease: A European Nested Case-Control Study. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2016; 61 (10):2963-2971 - 59.
Eltzschig HK, Carmeliet P. Hypoxia and inflammation. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2011; 364 (7):656-665 - 60.
Hartmann G, Tschöp M, Fischer R, et al. High altitude increases circulating interleukin-6, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and C-reactive protein. Cytokine. 2000; 12 (3):246-252 - 61.
Vermeulen N, Vermeire S, Arijs I, et al. Seroreactivity against glycolytic enzymes in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammation Bowel Diseases. 2011; 17 (2):557-564 - 62.
Dulai PS, Buckey JC Jr, Raffals LE, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is well tolerated and effective for ulcerative colitis patients hospitalized for moderate-severe flares: A phase 2A pilot multi-center, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2018; 113 (10):1516-1523 - 63.
Hou JK, Abraham B, El-Serag H. Dietary intake and risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review of the literature. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2011; 106 (4):563-573 - 64.
Nie JY, Zhao Q. Beverage consumption and risk of ulcerative colitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96 (49):e9070 - 65.
Wang F, Feng J, Gao Q , et al. Carbohydrate and protein intake and risk of ulcerative colitis: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Clinical Nutrition. 2017; 36 (5):1259-1265 - 66.
Li F, Liu X, Wang W, Zhang D. Consumption of vegetables and fruit and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2015; 27 (6):623-630 - 67.
Preda CM, Manuc T, Istratescu D, et al. Environmental factors in Romanian and Belgian patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Maedica (Bucur). 2019; 14 (3):233-239 - 68.
Preda CM, Manuc T, Chifulescu A, et al. Diet as an environmental trigger in inflammatory bowel disease: A retrospective comparative study in two European cohorts. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas. 2020; 112 (6):440-447 - 69.
Ge J, Han TJ, Liu J, et al. Meat intake and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: A meta-analysis. The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology. 2015; 26 (6):492-497 - 70.
John S, Luben R, Shrestha SS, Welch A, Khaw KT, Hart AR. Dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the aetiology of ulcerative colitis: A UK prospective cohort study. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2010; 22 (5):602-606 - 71.
de Silva PS, Olsen A, Christensen J. An association between dietary arachidonic acid, measured in adipose tissue, and ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2010; 139 (6):1912-1917 - 72.
Khalili H, Chan SSM, Lochhead P, Ananthakrishnan AN, Hart AR, Chan AT. The role of diet in the aetiopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Natural Review in Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2018; 15 (9):525-535 - 73.
Brown K, DeCoffe D, Molcan E, Gibson DL. Diet-induced dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota and the effects on immunity and disease. Nutrients. 2012; 4 (8):1095-1119 - 74.
De Filippo C, Cavalieri D, Di Paola M, et al. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy Science U S A. 2010; 107 (33):14691-14696 - 75.
Sun M, Wu W, Liu Z, Cong Y. Microbiota metabolite short chain fatty acids, GPCR, and inflammatory bowel diseases. Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017; 52 (1):1-8 - 76.
Agus A, Denizot J, Thévenot J, et al. Western diet induces a shift in microbiota composition enhancing susceptibility to Adherent-Invasive E. coli infection and intestinal inflammation. Scientific Reports. 2016;6 :19032 - 77.
Machiels K, Joossens M, Sabino J, et al. A decrease of the butyrate-producing species Roseburiahominis and Faecalibacteriumprausnitzii defines dysbiosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2014; 63 (8):1275-1283 - 78.
Koleva P, Ketabi A, Valcheva R, Gänzle MG, Dieleman LA. Chemically defined diet alters the protective properties of fructo-oligosaccharides and isomalto-oligosaccharides in HLA-B27 transgenic rats. PLoS One. 2014; 9 (11):e111717 - 79.
Ananthakrishnan AN, Khalili H, Konijeti GG, et al. Long-term intake of dietary fat and risk of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2014; 63 (5):776-784 - 80.
Chan SS, Luben R, Olsen A, et al. Association between high dietary intake of the n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid and reduced risk of Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacological Therapy. 2014; 39 (8):834-842 - 81.
Chapkin RS, Davidson LA, Ly L, Weeks BR, Lupton JR, McMurray DN. Immunomodulatory effects of (n-3) fatty acids: Putative link to inflammation and colon cancer. The Journal of Nutrition. 2007; 137 (Suppl. 1):200S-204S - 82.
Werner T, Wagner SJ, Martínez I, et al. Depletion of luminal iron alters the gut microbiota and prevents Crohn’s disease-like ileitis. Gut. 2011; 60 (3):325-333 - 83.
Sturniolo GC, Di Leo V, Ferronato A, D’Odorico A, D’Incà R. Zinc supplementation tightens “leaky gut” in Crohn’s disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2001; 7 (2):94-98 - 84.
Reich KM, Fedorak RN, Madsen K, Kroeker KI. Vitamin D improves inflammatory bowel disease outcomes: Basic science and clinical review. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014; 20 (17):4934-4947 - 85.
Ruemmele FM. Role of diet in inflammatory bowel disease. Ann NutrMetab. 2016; 68 (Suppl. 1):33-41 - 86.
Fahoum L, Moscovici A, David S, et al. Digestive fate of dietary carrageenan: evidence of interference with digestive proteolysis and disruption of gut epithelial function. Molecular Nutritional Food Research. 2017; 61 (3). DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201600545 - 87.
Chassaing B, Van de Wiele T, De Bodt J, Marzorati M, Gewirtz AT. Dietary emulsifiers directly alter human microbiota composition and gene expression ex vivo potentiating intestinal inflammation. Gut. 2017; 66 (8):1414-1427 - 88.
Chassaing B, Koren O, Goodrich JK, et al. Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2015; 519 (7541):92-96 - 89.
Kyaw MH, Moshkovska T, Mayberry J. A prospective, randomized, controlled, exploratory study of comprehensive dietary advice in ulcerative colitis: Impact on disease activity and quality of life. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2014; 26 (8):910-917 - 90.
Pedersen N, Ankersen DV, Felding M, et al. Low-FODMAP diet reduces irritable bowel symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017; 23 (18):3356-3366 - 91.
Jian L, Anqi H, Gang L, et al. Food exclusion based on IgG antibodies alleviates symptoms in ulcerative colitis: A Prospective Study. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2018; 24 (9):1918-1925 - 92.
Lathrop SK, Bloom SM, Rao SM, et al. Peripheral education of the immune system by colonic commensal microbiota. Nature. 2011; 478 (7368):250-254 - 93.
Morgan XC, Tickle TL, Sokol H, et al. Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment. Genome Biology. 2012; 13 (9):R79 - 94.
Nagalingam NA, Lynch SV. Role of the microbiota in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2012; 18 (5):968-984 - 95.
Spor A, Koren O, Ley R. Unravelling the effects of the environment and host genotype on the gut microbiome. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2011; 9 (4):279-290 - 96.
Duvallet C, Gibbons SM, Gurry T, Irizarry RA, Alm EJ. Meta-analysis of gut microbiome studies identifies disease-specific and shared responses. Nature Communications. 2017; 8 (1):1784 - 97.
Gevers D, Kugathasan S, Denson LA, et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn’sdisease. Cell Host & Microbe. 2014; 15 (3):382-392 - 98.
Norman JM, Handley SA, Baldridge MT, et al. Disease-specific alterations in the enteric virome in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell. 2015; 160 (3):447-460 - 99.
Zuo T, Lu XJ, Zhang Y, et al. Gut mucosal virome alterations in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2019; 68 (7):1169-1179 - 100.
Qiu X, Ma J, Jiao C, et al. Alterations in the mucosa-associated fungal microbiota in patients with ulcerative colitis. Oncotarget. 2017; 8 (64):107577-107588 - 101.
Ott SJ, Kühbacher T, Musfeldt M, et al. Fungi and inflammatory bowel diseases: Alterations of composition and diversity. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008; 43 (7):831-841 - 102.
Moayyedi P, Surette MG, Kim PT, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation induces remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis in a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2015; 149 (1):102-109 - 103.
Rossen NG, Fuentes S, van der Spek MJ, et al. Findings from a randomized controlled trial of fecal transplantation for patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2015; 149 (1):110-118 - 104.
Costello SP, Hughes PA, Waters O, et al. Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on 8-week remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2019; 321 (2):156-164 - 105.
Paramsothy S, Kamm MA, Kaakoush NO, et al. Multidonor intensive faecalmicrobiota transplantation for active ulcerative colitis: A randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017; 389 (10075):1218-1228 - 106.
Paramsothy S, Nielsen S, Kamm MA, et al. Specific bacteria and metabolites associated with response to fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2019; 156 (5):1440-1454 - 107.
Glotzer DJ, Glick ME, Goldman H. Proctitis and colitis following diversion of the fecal stream. Gastroenterology. 1981; 80 (3):438-441 - 108.
Penders J, Thijs C, Vink C, et al. Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota in early infancy. Pediatrics. 2006; 118 (2):511-521 - 109.
Dethlefsen L, Relman DA. Incomplete recovery and individualized responses of the human distal gut microbiota to repeated antibiotic perturbation. Proceedings of the National Academy Science U S A. 2011; 108 (Suppl. 1):4554-4561 - 110.
Friedrich M, Pohin M, Powrie F. Cytokine networks in the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Immunity. 2019; 50 (4):992-1006 - 111.
Na YR, Stakenborg M, Seok SH, Matteoli G. Macrophages in intestinal inflammation and resolution: A potential therapeutic target in IBD. Natural Reviews in Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2019; 16 (9):531-543 - 112.
Graham DB, Luo C, O’Connell DJ, et al. Antigen discovery and specification of immunodominance hierarchies for MHCII-restricted epitopes. Nature Medicine. 2018; 24 (11):1762-1772 - 113.
Zhou L, Chong MM, Littman DR. Plasticity of CD4+ T cell lineage differentiation. Immunity. 2009; 30 (5):646-655 - 114.
Reboldi A, Cyster JG. Peyer’s patches: Organizing B-cell responses at the intestinal frontier. Immunological Reviews. 2016; 271 (1):230-245 - 115.
Neurath MF. Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature Reviews. Immunology. 2014; 14 (5):329-342 - 116.
Van Klinken BJ, Van der Wal JW, Einerhand AW, Büller HA, Dekker J. Sulphation and secretion of the predominant secretory human colonic mucin MUC2 in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1999; 44 (3):387-393 - 117.
Teng MW, Bowman EP, McElwee JJ, et al. IL-12 and IL-23 cytokines: From discovery to targeted therapies for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Nature Medicine. 2015; 21 (7):719-729 - 118.
Kobayashi T, Okamoto S, Hisamatsu T, et al. IL23 differentially regulates the Th1/Th17 balance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2008; 57 (12):1682-1689 - 119.
Nalleweg N, Chiriac MT, Podstawa E, et al. IL-9 and its receptor are predominantly involved in the pathogenesis of UC. Gut. 2015; 64 (5):743-755 - 120.
Lee JC, Lyons PA, McKinney EF, et al. Gene expression profiling of CD8+ T cells predicts prognosis in patients with Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2011; 121 (10):4170-4179 - 121.
Hepworth MR, Monticelli LA, Fung TC, et al. Innate lymphoid cells regulate CD4+ T-cell responses to intestinal commensal bacteria. Nature. 2013; 498 (7452):113-117 - 122.
Pantazi E, Powell N. Group 3 ILCs: Peacekeepers or troublemakers? What’s your gut telling you?! Frontiers in Immunology. 2019; 10 :676 - 123.
UK IBD Genetics Consortium, Barrett JC, Lee JC, et al. Genome-wide association study of ulcerative colitis identifies three new susceptibility loci, including the HNF4A region. Nature Genetics. 2009; 41 (12):1330-1334 - 124.
Rimoldi M, Chieppa M, Salucci V, et al. Intestinal immune homeostasis is regulated by the crosstalk between epithelial cells and dendritic cells. Nature Immunology. 2005; 6 (5):507-514 - 125.
Ueno A, Ghosh A, Hung D, Li J, Jijon H. Th17 plasticity and its changes associated with inflammatory bowel disease. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2015; 21 (43):12283-12295 - 126.
Park S, Abdi T, Gentry M, Laine L. Histological disease activity as a predictor of clinical relapse among patients with ulcerative colitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2016; 111 (12):1692-1701 - 127.
Dinallo V, Marafini I, Di Fusco D, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps sustain inflammatory signals in ulcerative colitis. Journal of Crohn’s & Colitis. 2019; 13 (6):772-784 - 128.
Strober W, Fuss IJ. Proinflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2011; 140 (6):1756-1767 - 129.
de Souza HS, Fiocchi C. Immunopathogenesis of IBD: Current state of the art. Natural Review in Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2016; 13 (1):13-27 - 130.
Mann ER, Li X. Intestinal antigen-presenting cells in mucosal immune homeostasis: Crosstalk between dendritic cells, macrophages and B-cells. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014; 20 (29):9653-9664 - 131.
Kmieć Z, Cyman M, Ślebioda TJ. Cells of the innate and adaptive immunity and their interactions in inflammatory bowel disease. Advanced Medical Science. 2017; 62 (1):1-16 - 132.
Satsangi J, Landers CJ, Welsh KI, Koss K, Targan S, Jewell DP. The presence of anti-neutrophil antibodies reflects clinical and genetic heterogeneity within inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 1998; 4 (1):18-26 - 133.
West AP, Shadel GS. Mitochondrial DNA in innate immune responses and inflammatory pathology. Natural Review in Immunology. 2017; 17 (6):363-375 - 134.
Ho GT, Aird RE, Liu B, et al. MDR1 deficiency impairs mitochondrial homeostasis and promotes intestinal inflammation. Mucosal Immunology. 2018; 11 (1):120-130 - 135.
Boyapati RK, Dorward DA, Tamborska A, et al. Mitochondrial DNA is a pro-inflammatory damage-associated molecular pattern released during active IBD. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2018; 24 (10):2113-2122 - 136.
Bär F, Bochmann W, Widok A, et al. Mitochondrial gene polymorphisms that protect mice from colitis. Gastroenterology. 2013; 145 (5):1055-1063 - 137.
Boyapati RK, Tamborska A, Dorward DA, Ho GT. Advances in the understanding of mitochondrial DNA as a pathogenic factor in inflammatory diseases. F1000Res. 2017; 6 :169 - 138.
Piccinini AM, Midwood KS. DAMPening inflammation by modulating TLR signalling. Mediators of Inflammation. 2010; 2010 :672395 - 139.
Lamkanfi M, Dixit VM. Mechanisms and functions of inflammasomes. Cell. 2014; 157 (5):1013-1022 - 140.
Kalla R, Ventham NT, Kennedy NA, Quintana JF, Nimmo ER, Buck AH, et al. MicroRNAs: New players in IBD. Gut. 2015; 64 (3):504-517 - 141.
Parikh K, Antanaviciute A, Fawkner-Corbett D, et al. Colonic epithelial cell diversity in health and inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2019; 567 (7746):49-55 - 142.
Kinchen J, Chen HH, Parikh K, et al. Structural remodeling of the human colonic mesenchyme in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell. 2018; 175 (2):370-386 - 143.
West NR, Hegazy AN, Owens BMJ, et al. Oncostatin M drives intestinal inflammation and predicts response to tumor necrosis factor-neutralizing therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Nature Medicine. 2017; 23 (5):579-589