Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Histological Hallmarks of Malignant Melanoma

Written By

Gerardo Cazzato, Anna Colagrande, Lucia Lospalluti, Giuseppe Ingravallo, Eliano Cascardi, Miriam Dellino, Saverio Capodiferro, Eugenio Maiorano, Caterina Foti and Leonardo Resta

Submitted: 25 June 2022 Reviewed: 19 July 2022 Published: 30 December 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.106638

From the Edited Volume

Melanoma - Standard of Care, Challenges, and Updates in Clinical Research

Edited by Sonia Maciá and Eduardo Castañón

Chapter metrics overview

128 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The histopathological diagnosis of malignant melanoma remains the gold standard to allow the patient to access the entire process of the diagnostic-therapeutic-assistance path. Despite the continuous search for markers that can assist in the diagnostic process, there are cases that remain complex to diagnose, and the presence of different criteria among dermatopathologists further complicates the issue. This section will focus on the state of the art of dermatopathological diagnostics of melanoma, starting from the morphological bases up to the latest acquisitions of immunohistochemistry for diagnostic purposes, and molecular biology for therapeutic purposes. Furthermore, we will focus on particularly “challenging” MM histotypes and on what are the current guidelines for a correct diagnosis.

Keywords

  • malignant melanoma
  • histopathology
  • skin
  • immunohistochemistry
  • diagnosis

1. Introduction

Malignant melanoma (MM) is known in the medical literature as the “Great Mime” of pathological anatomy, as it can simulate, in different ways, other neoplasms, both of an epithelial nature and of a mesenchymal nature [1]. From the point of view of the location, MM may originate de novo on healthy skin or represent the malignant transformation of a preexisting melanocytic nevus [2, 3]. In the vast majority of cases, MM represents a sporadic event, while in less than 10% it is linked to alterations of tumor suppressor genes (encoded by the chromosomal region 9p21) and shows a hereditary character, for this reason, it is defined as “familial” [4]. Histopathologically, the MM of the skin and/or mucous membranes consists of neoplastic melanocytic elements, fused or epithelioid, with the presence of atypia and, often, mitotic figures. An accurate histological diagnosis is the basis for a clinical management of the patient affected by MM since all the histopathological parameters reported in the report have important implications not only from a diagnostic but also from a prognostic point of view.

Advertisement

2. Histological report of malignant melanoma

In the first instance, it is very important to determine whether the lesion we are analyzing constitutes an MM and is properly differentiated from atypical pigmented lesions that can closely simulate MM [5]. Morphologically the cutaneous MM can be classified into four histological subtypes such as superficial spreading type, lentigo maligna, acral lentiginous, and nodular type. If at first we tended to think that this was a mere histological description, in fact, more recent studies have correlated (sometimes very exhaustively) histological subtypes with particular molecular signatures of MM. For example, you can easily appreciate from the last WHO blue book “Classification of Skin Tumour”2018, IARC, that melanomas on skin chronically exposed to the sun have different chromosomal aberration patterns than melanomas that arise on skin with intermittent exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays or in areas of acral skin or mucous membranes. Therefore, a correct histological recognition of the MM subtype is of great importance and must always be reported in the pathological report of an MM [6].

Figure 1 shows an example of MM with features consistent with “Spitzoid” MM. Note that the lesion is composed of nests of melanocytes with some mitotic figures; top left is possible to appreciate pagetoid spreading of single melanocytes (another useful clue to diagnosis of MM).

Figure 1.

Histological photomicrograph showing an example of MM (Haematoxylin-Eosin, Original Magnification 10×).

Thickness according to Breslow is the strongest and most reliable prognostic factor in MM and is defined as the measurement of the vertical thickness of the neoplasm [7]. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition criteria for staging accurately predict sentinel lymph node positivity in clinically melanoma-negative lymph node patients. In fact, when grouped by AJCC cutting points, there was an increased incidence of positive sentinel lymph nodes with increasing tumor thickness: 4% in melanomas below 1.00 mm, 12% in melanomas 1.01–2.00 mm, 28% in melanomas 2.01–4.00 mm and 44% in melanomas over 4.00 mm [8]. But it is important to consider that there are, however, cases in which the thickness of Breslow does not impact perfectly on the prognosis: it is the case of thin melanomas that are able not only to metastasize but also to bring the subject to death with some ease [9]. By convention, the thickness of Breslow is measured from the granulous layer to the last cell of MM, except in the case of ulcerated lesions, where the base of the ulceration is taken as a reference to the last point where the neoplasm is evident [10].

A parameter related to the thickness of Breslow is the Clark level, which, unlike the first, is a topographical criterion, which is based simply on the definition of which area of skin is affected by MM: superficial (or papillary) dermis, reticular, and subcutaneous. In recent years, the low reproducibility and repeatability of this parameter, due to its rather “subjective” nature of measurement, has in fact caused its disuse, until it is no longer considered mandatory to be included in a histopathological report of melanoma. However, we still consider it correct to include this finding in the MM report as an additional indicator parameter, never to be substituted for Breslow [11].

Another important element that can never be missing in the description of a melanoma is the number of mitoses/mmq. In fact, various studies have shown how the number of mitoses can be a rather reliable indicator of the biological behavior of a given MM (staging and prognosis). Although there is no universally accepted method for counting mitotic figures in melanoma, the AJCC 8′Edition recommends making this measurement in the “hot spot” areas of the lesion, so as to ensure a faithful count of the maximum number of mitoses present in Ref [12].

It is very important to consider one parameter on which there is still no precise agreement in the literature, which is the regression of melanoma. In fact, among the various theories, the most accredited considers the regression as a result of aggression of melanoma cells by the immune system with the substitution of the same with fibrosis, melanophages, lymphocytic infiltrate, and angiectasis. Regression phenomena can be from focal to extended until the complete disappearance of the primary lesion (so-called “burn-out melanoma”). The difficulty of reproducibility of this parameter consists in the variability of what is considered as regression: some studies have considered regression as the total absence of melanoma cells, whereas other studies have also considered more or less partial regression areas in the measurement of regression proper [13]. Regression is now considered to be an independent prognostic factor for worsening prognosis, and according to the College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines, regression is measured by a cutoff at 75% [14].

An integral part of a histological report of MM is the evaluation of ulceration, considered an independent prognostic factor for survival associated with melanoma. Ulceration is defined as a continuous “true” solution at full thickness, of the epidermis, with the presence of fibrin deposition or neutrophil granulocytes, and/or reactive hyperplasia of the surrounding epidermis in the absence of trauma or surgical manipulation prior to or in progress. In recent years, more and more evidence supports the need to express the radial extent of ulceration (in mm), as it would seem that more extensive ulcerations correspond to reduced survival values. It should also be remembered that it is necessary to be sure of the presence or absence of this parameter, as over-staging of the MM in question can affect the entire diagnostic-therapeutic-care path of the patient [15].

Lymph vascular invasion (LVI) is a very useful parameter in predicting possible disease diffusion in a metastatic setting. For example, now included in the AJCC 8′Edition, this parameter has been shown to significantly increase the risk of recurrence, lymph node involvement, distant metastases, and death, just like the ulceration parameter [16]. From a histopathological point of view, consideration should be given to the possibility that tissue artifacts can simulate and/or obscure the morphology of lymphatic and/or blood vessels, and, therefore, studies have been carried out [17], which have shown that the use of immunomarkers such as D2–40 (Podoplanin) can help to evaluate true lymph-vascular permeations that could otherwise give false-negatives.

Perineural invasion (PNI) is defined as the infiltration of nerve fibers by melanoma cells, resulting in an extension of the tumor along the surrounding nerves. This parameter is of some importance and should be included in the histological report of the MM, as it (from the literature examined) [18] is a pejorative prognostic factor. In addition, it is good to remember that there are some types of melanoma that are more easily neurotropic, such as desmoplastic melanoma or fused cell melanoma, and, therefore, this aspect is to be considered when diagnosing one of these types of lesions. Indeed, the high local recurrence rate of desmoplastic or fused-cell melanoma requires more aggressive surgery to reduce this risk [19].

Microsatellites are defined in the current CAP recommendations as microscopic and discontinuous cutaneous and/or subcutaneous metastases having a diameter larger or equal to 0.05 mm in the largest dimension, adjacent to a primary melanoma [14]. The presence of microsatellites increases from 4.6% in tumors less than 1.5 mm to 65% in those greater than 4 mm [20]. Furthermore, microsatellites are also associated with an increased frequency of regional lymph node metastasis in tumors greater than 1.5 mm [5, 20].

Lymphocytes infiltrating the tumor (TILs) are a type of lymphocytes capable of attacking neoplastic cells and, depending on the mode and distribution, are divided in ascending order into: absent, non-brisk, or brisk [14]. Several studies tend to point out that an increase in TLLs would be more correlated to an improvement in survival, but also in this area (similar to what we have seen for regression) inter-observer variability does not help to obtain a clearer concordance of studies.

Advertisement

3. Subtypes of malignant melanoma

Melanoma can be considered in the radial growth phase (when melanomatous cells grow in the horizontal plane without giving rise to a vertical growth phase) and in the vertical growth phase, in turn, divisible into tumorigenic (nests/cases deeper than the surface) or non-tumorigenic (melanocytes that do not form a net lesion). It is also very important to consider that melanoma in situ (by definition limited to the basal membrane, therefore, pTis according to AJCC 8′Edition) is different from melanoma in a radial growth phase that, if not called “in situ,” suggests the possibility of the presence of some melanocyte minutes present below the basal membrane (c.d. microinvasive).

3.1 Superficial spreading type melanoma (SSM)

Superficial spreading melanoma is the most frequent histotype in the Caucasian population (70–80% of all melanomas). Usually, it is localized to the back in men and to the lower limbs in women. It is the most common type of melanoma in patients with dysplastic nevus syndrome, with familial melanoma and multiple melanomas. Histologically it is characterized, in the intraepidermal component of the horizontal growth phase, by the presence of pagetoid cells (Figure 2) and by a proliferation, in the dermal area, of neoplastic cells frequently associated with epitheliod type often to other cytotypes. In many cases, it can observe a horizontal intraepithelial proliferation of the dysplastic nevus type. Atypical cells in single or in small nests can be observed throughout the thickness of the epidermis arranged in an irregular way up to the most superficial layers. In the beginning, the phase of horizontal growth is characterized by invasion of the papillary dermis by single cells or small cell nests. Parallel to the initial invasion, the appearance of a marked inflammatory lymphocytic reaction can be noted. There may be scattered macrophages mixed with inflammatory infiltrate, fibroplasia, and vascular neogenesis. The atypical cells present in the most superficial portion of the papillary dermis, in the horizontal growth phase, have the same cytological characteristics as the cells present in the epidermis, and also the nests of cells are similar in size to those present in the epidermis. In the horizontal growth phase, no cell nest is present in the dermal area, it presents prevailing characteristics compared to the other nests adjacent. The cells of the vertical component, on the other hand, have different cytological characteristics and are predominantly epithelioid-type cells aggregated in nests with cohesive characters. Often a prevailing and expansive type of growth with a tendency for cell proliferation is necessary to develop in a centrifugal direction. The nests of atypical cells, which form the vertical growth, are in size greater than intraepithelial ones. The nuclei are bulky, hyperchromatic, and polymorphic with prominent nucleoli and irregular nuclear membranes. An always evident feature is the lack of cellular maturation with cells with identical cytological features both in the most superficial portion and in the deepest portion of the vertical phase. Mitoses can be in number variable, sometimes even numerous, but above all mitosis is also present in the plus portion of deep melanoma. Isolated cells or groups of necrosing cells are often seen in the dermal component [21, 22].

Figure 2.

Histological photomicrograph that shows the features of pagetoid spreading, a major criteria for diagnosing MM (Haematoxylin-Eosin, Original Magnification 10×).

3.2 Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM)

ALM is defined as the presence of a horizontal proliferative component characterized by a proliferation of atypical melanocytes, often with dendritic aspects, mainly localized to the basal layer of the epidermis and extended to the skin appendages associated with a lentiginous appearance with a marked elongation of the spurs epithelial (Figure 3). The vertical proliferative component is characterized by a proliferation of atypical melanocytes often type epithelioid, spindle, or polymorphic; sometimes the cells can be arranged in bundles such as to simulate a Schwannian differentiation. More frequently it affects the plantar skin and the palmar skin, especially that of the thumb [23].

Figure 3.

Photomicrograph showing acral lentiginous MM with the characteristic disposition of melanocytes at the dermo-epidermal junction, with some aspects of pagetoid spreading (Haematoxylin-Eosin, Original Magnificaton 10×).

3.3 Nodular melanoma (NM)

The term nodular melanoma defines a tumor characterized by the appearance of a nodule that develops rapidly without a preexisting phase of horizontal growth (Figure 4). Nodular melanoma appears on apparently normal skin. Although no lesion is observed existing or a horizontal phase, however, there may be evidence of an association with a preexisting nevus. Nodular melanoma accounts for about 10–12% of all types of melanoma in Caucasian subjects. This neoplasm is, by definition, already growing vertically, is usually diagnosed at a fairly advanced stage, and has a worse prognosis than other melanomas [24].

Figure 4.

Example of nodular melanoma (Haematoxylin-Eosin, Original Magnification 10×).

3.4 Lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM)

LMM occurs most frequently on the face and sun-exposed upper extremities of elderly people. Macroscopically, there is great variation in color, with tan-brown, black, and even pink areas present. LMM can become an invasive malignancy (vertical growth phase) and it is characterized by thickening of the lesion with the development of elevated plaques or discrete nodules [25]. Histologically, LMM is characterized by an epidermal component of atypical melanocytes, singly and in nests, usually confined to the basal layer and with a little pagetoid invasion of the epidermis (Figure 5) [26].

Figure 5.

LMM characterized by some atypical melanocytes that conglomerate in a few atypical nests (Haematoxylin-Eosin, Original Magnification 10×).

Advertisement

4. Other histotypes of MM

4.1 Desmoplastic melanoma (DM)

DM is properly recognized as a variant of MM, with its distinct histological, immunophenotypic, and molecular characterization. The injury is usually considered “scar-like” because, often, the first impression you have at low (panoramic) magnification of this injury is that of a scar. At higher magnification, it is possible to recognize fused cells, immersed in a desmoplastic stroma and focal with myxoid aspects, endowed with mild cytological characteristics, even if at times presenting a “random” pleomorphism (Figure 6). Rather characteristically DM cells are quite rich in mast cells and have a tendency to infiltrate the surrounding nerves. This variant of MM prefers the head/neck of older subjects, thus disproving it as a high cumulative solar damage (H-CSD)-related melanoma. Molecular studies have also confirmed a much higher rate of mutations for this lesion histotype than common MM variants [27].

Figure 6.

Histological photomicrograph showing a bland-appereance proliferation that reveals a DM (Haematoxylin-Eosin, Original Magnification 10×).

4.2 Nevoid melanoma (NM)

Nevoid melanoma is classically referred to as the “tomb” of the dermatopathologist for its intrinsic ability, even in the eyes of a dermatopathologist with years of experience, to mimic a benign melanocytic nevus and, therefore, to pass as unknown. It is a rare type of MM, representing no more than 1% of all melanomas, which is commonly more frequent between the fourth and fifth decades of life, without a gender predominance. Clinically, NM presents as a slowly growing lesion, most commonly on the proximal extremities, trunk, neck, and head [28].

From a histological point of view, NM has an architectural pattern that looks very similar to that of a compound or intradermal nevus, with almost complete symmetry, good circumscription, and minimal or no pagetoid spreading. The most important morphological characteristic distinguishing an NM from a standard nevus is the presence of a monomorphic population of small nevus-like melanic cells, present both in the superficial and deep portions of the dermis. It is of absolute and indispensable importance to conduct a very careful research of mitotic figures, able to make us suspect that we are in front of an NM [29].

Advertisement

5. Immunohistochemical features of malignant melanoma

Melan-A/MART-1 is one of the most important markers of melanocytic differentiation, used in the dermatopathological field. This protein is expressed by melanoma cells and recognized by cytotoxic T cells. Its application is mainly intended for the differential diagnosis of melanocytic tumors, but also for particular other types of tumors, including metastatic since it is more sensitive than another marker, Human Melanoma Black-45 (HMB-45) [30].

HMB-45 is a monoclonal antibody that reacts with an antigen present in melanocytic tumors such as melanomas, hence it is full name of Human Melanoma Black. It is known in pathological anatomy as the best diagnostic marker for melanomas. HMB-45 was discovered in 1986 by doctors Allen M. Gown and Arthur M. Vogel and from then on, its diffusion has become widespread. The specific antigen recognized by HMB-45 is Pmel 17 and reacting positively to melanocytic tumors but not to others is configured for its high specificity and sensitivity.

Despite its high sensitivity HMB-45 has some negative aspects. HMB-45 can be detected only in 50–70% of melanomas. It does not react well to intradermal nevi, normal melanocytes of adult life, fused cell melanoma, and desmoplastic melanoma.

HMB-45 does not react to most malignant tumors that are not melanomas, except for tumors that show melanogenesis (example: pigmented schwannoma, clear-cell sarcoma, or tumors associated with the tuberous sclerosis complex (angiomyolipoma and lymphangiomyoma) [31].

S100 proteins are a family of low molecular weight proteins found in vertebrates, characterized by two binding sites for calcium with helix-loop-helix (EF-hand) structure. There are at least 21 types of S100 proteins and their name “S100” derives from the 100% solubility of these in ammonium sulfate at neutral pH. Most S100 have a homodimeric structure, that is, two identical polypeptides bound together by non-covalent bonds. Although S100 proteins are structurally similar to calmodulins, they differ from these in that they are cell-specific, expressed in particular cells at different levels depending on environmental factors. The calmodulins, on the other hand, are ubiquitous and universal Ca2+ receptors, present in many cells. S100 proteins are normally present in neural crest-derived cells (Schwann cells, melanocytes, and glia cells), chondrocytes, adipocytes, myoepithelial cells, macrophages, Langerhans cells, and dendritic cells.

S100 proteins are implicated in various intracellular and extracellular functions. They are also involved in the regulation of protein phosphorylation, transcription factors, Ca++ homeostasis, the dynamics of cytoskeleton constituents, enzyme activities, cell growth and differentiation, and the inflammatory response. Some members of the S100 family are useful as markers for certain tumors and for the differentiation of cells in the epidermal sense. They can be found in melanomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, schwannomas, paraganglioma stromal cells, and clear cell sarcomas [32].

p16 belongs to the family of CDKI, proteins that have the function of inhibiting the action of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and then block the cell cycle. The function of p16 as an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases configures it as a tumor suppressor gene since in its absence it is minus negative control over cell proliferation. It is currently considered another reliable but indicative parameter in differential diagnostics of ambiguous melanocytic lesions [33].

Finally, PRAME (preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma) is a tumor-associated antigen that was first identified through analysis of the specificity of tumor-reactive T-cell clones derived from a patient with metastatic cutaneous melanoma. It was subsequently found that PRAME is not only expressed in cutaneous melanoma but also in ocular melanoma and various nonmelanocytic malignant neoplasms, including non-small cell lung cancer, breast carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, leukemia, synovial sarcoma, and myxoid liposarcoma. Normal healthy tissues are not known to express PRAME except for testis, ovary, placenta, adrenals, and endometrium. Because of its expression profile, PRAME is a member of the family of cancer-testis antigens (CTA) and an attractive target for immunotherapy. A number of clinical trials are underway trying to exploit CTAs, including PRAME, for cancer treatment [34]. Although at the beginning there were high expectations of this marker in the dermatopathological diagnosis of malignant melanoma, in reality, with the development of the first studies and the first more numerous cases, the possibility that PRAME can be another indicator within other markers and the always essential morphology has been increasingly outlined, but that its positivity or negativity does not confirm and/or exclude a given diagnosis.

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the study of the micro-environment of MM [35]. Research has, in fact, led to the acquisition of new information about cells in the immune system that can control and potentially destroy cancer cells [36]. In this way, it was possible to study how T cells (labeled by the antibody anti-CD4 and/or CD8) were more or less capable of performing their own immunosurveillance functions. It has been possible, therefore, to find that the immune systems are able (as demonstrated earlier in other forms of cancer) to express a receptor, programmed cell death protein 1 or PD1, that binds its ligand called programmed cell death protein 1 ligand or PDL1, going to inhibit the functions of T lymphocyte cells against neoplastic cells [37]. These findings made it possible to formulate pharmacological principles that are known as Immunotherapy. Currently, in 2022, several adjuvant therapies in MM in clinical stage III-IV are considered unresectable. For example, it is important to mention the drug nivolumab, anti-PD1, which by blocking this receptor on T cells, prevents its inhibition mediated by PDL-1 binding and, therefore, enhances the antitumor response of the immune system [38].

Advertisement

6. Next generation sequencing in diagnosis of malignant melanoma

In recent years, the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has made important contributions in the field of pathology, and of neoplasms in general, but also, therefore, in the field of MM [39]. In the case of MM, NGS allowed to highlight molecular alterations that had not previously been discovered, or confirmed, and which had the merit of allowing a greater ability to develop drugs capable of targeting them (for example BRAF) [40]. Although they are mainly used for cancer therapy purposes, NGS can, in some selected cases, also contribute during the diagnostic workout of MM. It is not uncommon, as mentioned above, that the dermatopathological diagnosis of MM is challenging, complex, and not always adequately reachable. For this reason, molecular confirmation of a possible mutation for BRAF can further support a given diagnostic hypothesis, while recognizing that there are cases in which NGS are not of certain diagnostic aid [41].

Advertisement

7. Mucosal melanoma

The mucosal melanoma occurs in the mucosa (mouth, vagina, penis, and conjunctiva) and presents with a quite large, irregularly pigmented macula, representing the growth phase horizontal and with a corresponding nodule or plaque to the vertical growth phase [42]. From the macroscopic point of view, the macular component usually has irregular edges and fairly regular color, but sometimes with a set of brown and brown and bluish-black shades. Sometimes due to the presence of regression, areas of gray-whitish color are noted. The invasive component of vertical proliferation is characterized by a bluish-black nodule but if it is amelanotic it may appear red or whitish-pinkish [43]. From a histological point of view, in addition to the proliferation of uniformly atypical melanocytes placed close to each other along the junction dermo-epidermal, sometimes with elements with evident dendritic extensions, we can observe the presence of invasion by single cells or small nests. Single cells are often fusiform and may be erroneously interpreted as fibroblasts, especially in oral and vaginal seats. Melanoma presents an infiltrate inflammatory scattered, this aspect can be confused with an inflammatory lesion especially if there are macrophages without evidence of pigment. As soon as the proliferation begins vertical, begin to appear more voluminous nests of cells with cytological characters different from those of the proliferative component cells horizontal. Epithelioid cells may be noted as rather large or fused cells and sometimes the vertical component can assume characters desmoplastic. Neurotropism may be present with or without evidence of desmoplasia. These melanomas are almost never associated with or superimposed on a preexisting nevus [44].

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Advertisement

Notes/thanks/other declarations

In memory of Antonietta Cimmino (A.C.).

References

  1. 1. Cazzato G, Colagrande A, Cimmino A, Demarco A, Lospalluti L, Arezzo F, et al. The great mime: Three cases of melanoma with carcinoid-like and paraganglioma-like pattern with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Dermatopathology (Basel). 2021;8(2):130-134
  2. 2. Rosendahl CO, Grant-Kels JM, Que SK. Dysplastic nevus: Fact and fiction. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2015;73(3):507-512. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.029
  3. 3. Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, Pasquini P, Abeni D, Boyle P, et al. Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi. European Journal of Cancer. 2005;41(1):28-44
  4. 4. Hemminki K, Zhang H, Czene K. Familial and attributable risks in cutaneous melanoma: Effects of proband and age. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2003;120(2):217-223
  5. 5. Plaza JA, Prieto VG. Pathology of Pigmented Skin Lesions. New York City: Springer; 2017
  6. 6. WHO Classification of Skin Tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours. 4th ed. Geneve: WHO.
  7. 7. Boada A, Tejera-Vaquerizo A, Requena C, Manrique-Silva E, Traves V, Nagore E. Association between melanoma thickness and clinical and demographic characteristics. European Journal of Dermatology. 2021;31:514-520
  8. 8. Keung EZ, Gershenwald JE. The eighth edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging system: Implications for melanoma treatment and care. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy. 2018;18(8):775-784
  9. 9. Elder DE. Thin melanoma. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2011;135(3):342-346
  10. 10. Ge L, Vilain RE, Lo S, Aivazian K, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF. Breslow thickness measurements of melanomas around American Joint Committee on Cancer staging cut-off points: Imprecision and terminal digit Bias have important implications for staging and patient management. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2016;23(8):2658-2663
  11. 11. Lyth J, Hansson J, Ingvar C, Månsson-Brahme E, Naredi P, Stierner U, et al. Prognostic subclassifications of T1 cutaneous melanomas based on ulceration, tumour thickness and Clark's level of invasion: Results of a population-based study from the Swedish Melanoma Register. The British Journal of Dermatology. 2013;168(4):779-786
  12. 12. Available from: https://www.facs.org/media/jydly2ru/melanoma-8th-ed.pdf. [Accessed: June 23, 2022]
  13. 13. Paredes BE. Regression beim Melanom. Definition, Atiopathogenese, Morphologie und Differenzialdiagnose [Regression in malignant melanoma. Definition, etiopathogenesis, morphology and differential diagnosis]. Pathologe. 2007;28(6):453-463
  14. 14. Available from: https://documents.cap.org/protocols/Skin.Melanoma_4.3.0.0.REL_CAPCP.pdf. [Accessed: June 23, 2022]
  15. 15. Eggermont AM, Spatz A, Lazar V, Robert C. Is ulceration in cutaneous melanoma just a prognostic and predictive factor or is ulcerated melanoma a distinct biologic entity? Current Opinion in Oncology. 2012;24(2):137-140
  16. 16. Kashani-Sabet M, Sagebiel RW, Ferreira CM, Nosrati M, Miller JR 3rd. Vascular involvement in the prognosis of primary cutaneous melanoma. Archives of Dermatology. 2001;137(9):1169-1173
  17. 17. Petersson F, Diwan AH, Ivan D, Gershenwald JE, Johnson MM, Harrell R, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of lymphovascular invasion with D2-40 in melanoma correlates with sentinel lymph node status, metastasis and survival. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology. 2009;36:1157-1163
  18. 18. Quinn MJ, Crotty KA, Thompson JF, Coates AS, O'Brien CJ, McCarthy WH. Desmoplastic and desmoplastic neurotropic melanoma: Experience with 280 patients. Cancer. 1998;83(6):1128-1135
  19. 19. Lin D, Kashani-Sabet M, McCalmont T, Singer MI. Neurotropic melanoma invading the inferior alveolar nerve. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2005;53(2 Suppl 1):S120-S122
  20. 20. Karakousis GC, Gimotty PA, Leong SP, Pockaj BA, White RL, O'Donoghue C, et al. Microsatellitosis in patients with melanoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2019;26(1):33-41
  21. 21. Situm M, Buljan M, Kolić M, Vučić M. Melanoma--clinical, dermatoscopical, and histopathological morphological characteristics. Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica. 2014;22(1):1-12
  22. 22. Carli P, De Giorgi V, Palli D, Maurichi A, Mulas P, Orlandi C, et al. Patterns of detection of superficial spreading and nodular-type melanoma: A multicenter Italian study. Dermatologic Surgery. 2004;30:1371-1375
  23. 23. Goydos JS, Shoen SL. Acral Lentiginous Melanoma. Cancer Treatment and Research. 2016;167:321-329
  24. 24. Weiler L, Thomas L, Dalle S. Mélanome nodulaire pigmenté [Pigmented nodular melanoma]. Annals of Dermatology and Venereology. 2013;140:827-828
  25. 25. Patterson JW. Weedon's Skin Pathology. Amsterdam: Elselvier; 2020
  26. 26. DeWane ME, Kelsey A, Oliviero M, Rabinovitz H, Grant-Kels JM. Melanoma on chronically sun-damaged skin: Lentigo maligna and desmoplastic melanoma. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2019;81(3):823-833
  27. 27. Nicolson NG, Han D. Desmoplastic melanoma. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2019;119(2):208-215
  28. 28. Diwan AH, Lazar AJ. Nevoid melanoma. Surgical Pathological and Clinical. 2009;2(3):521-533
  29. 29. Mesbah Ardakani N, Singh S, Thomas C, Van Vliet C, Harvey NT, Calonje JE, et al. Mitotically active nevus and Nevoid melanoma: A clinicopathological and molecular study. The American Journal of Dermatopathology. 2021;43(3):182-190
  30. 30. Busam KJ, Jungbluth AA. A new melanocytic differentiation marker. Advances in Anatomic Pathology. 1999;6(1):12-18
  31. 31. Smoller BR, McNutt NS, Hsu A. HMB-45 recognizes stimulated melanocytes. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology. 1989;16(2):49-53
  32. 32. Ohsie SJ, Sarantopoulos GP,Cochran AJ, Binder SW. Immunohistochemical characteristics of melanoma. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology. 2008;35(5):433-444
  33. 33. Available from: https://snlg.iss.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/LG-411-SIAPEC-IAP.pdf. [Accessed: June 24, 2022]
  34. 34. Lezcano C, Jungbluth AA, Nehal KS, Hollmann TJ, Busam KJ. PRAME expression in melanocytic tumors. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2018;42(11):1456-1465. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001134
  35. 35. Neubert NJ, Schmittnaegel M, Bordry N, Nassiri S, Wald N, Martignier C, et al. T cell-induced CSF1 promotes melanoma resistance to PD1 blockade. Science Translational Medicine. 2018;11(10):436
  36. 36. Ralli M, Botticelli A, Visconti IC, Angeletti D, Fiore M, Marchetti P, et al. Immunotherapy in the treatment of metastatic melanoma: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Immunology Research. 2020;2020:9235638
  37. 37. Weiss SA, Wolchok JD, Sznol M. Immunotherapy of melanoma: Facts and hopes. Clinical Cancer Research. 2019;25:5191
  38. 38. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Rutkowski P, Lao CD, et al. Five-year survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;381(16):1535-1546
  39. 39. Serratì S, De Summa S, Pilato B, Petriella D, Lacalamita R, Tommasi S, et al. Next-generation sequencing: Advances and applications in cancer diagnosis. Oncotargets and Therapy. 2016;9:7355-7365
  40. 40. Reiman A, Kikuchi H, Scocchia D, Smith P, Tsang YW, Snead D, et al. Validation of an NGS mutation detection panel for melanoma. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):150
  41. 41. Luo Y, Zhang Z, Liu J, Li L, Xu X, Yao X, et al. Characterizations of gene alterations in melanoma patients from Chinese population. BioMed Research International. 2020;2020:6096814
  42. 42. Yde SS, Sjoegren P, Heje M, Stolle LB. Mucosal melanoma: A literature review. Current Oncology Reports. 2018;20(3):28
  43. 43. Olla D, Neumeister MW. Mucosal melanoma. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 2021;48(4):707-711
  44. 44. Lerner BA, Stewart LA, Horowitz DP, Carvajal RD. Mucosal melanoma: New insights and therapeutic options for a unique and aggressive disease. Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.). 2017;31:e23-e32

Written By

Gerardo Cazzato, Anna Colagrande, Lucia Lospalluti, Giuseppe Ingravallo, Eliano Cascardi, Miriam Dellino, Saverio Capodiferro, Eugenio Maiorano, Caterina Foti and Leonardo Resta

Submitted: 25 June 2022 Reviewed: 19 July 2022 Published: 30 December 2022