Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Improving Hydrogen Production Yield in Hydrothermal Gasification Processes through Novel Metal Catalysts

Written By

Sibel Irmak

Submitted: 23 May 2022 Reviewed: 05 July 2022 Published: 28 July 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.106289

From the Edited Volume

Clean Energy Technologies - Hydrogen and Gasification Processes

Edited by Murat Eyvaz, Yongseung Yun and Ahmed Albahnasawi

Chapter metrics overview

112 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Catalysts are the most effective and economically feasible way to increase yield of the product(s) in various production processes. The catalysts prepared with innovative approaches could have novel catalytic properties such as increased number of active sites, highly selective to the target product, resistance to deactivation, and extended lifetime. The catalysts with these unique properties could provide significant economic benefits for the production of hydrogen which is currently very expensive. Gasification in hydrothermal conditions has considerable advantages over existing high energy-consuming conversion technologies. Hydrothermal conversion processes take place at mild conditions and wet feed materials such as biomass can be used with no need of drying. However, the absence of practical catalysts in hydrothermal conditions is a main challenge that impedes application of these technologies in large scales. This book chapter focused on the metal catalysts which can be used for hydrothermal gasification processes for high-yielding hydrogen gas production from biomass compounds. The effects of different type of carbon supports, incorporation of heteroatom(s) into catalyst support, different shell structure design, etc., were discussed for hydrogen production in hydrothermal gasification processes.

Keywords

  • hydrogen
  • hydrothermal
  • gasification
  • biomass
  • metal catalysts

1. Introduction

Catalysts are the most effective and economically feasible way to increase yield of the product(s) in various production processes. The catalysts prepared with innovative approaches could have novel catalytic properties such as increased number of active sites, highly selective to the target product, resistance to deactivation, and extended lifetime. The precious metal-based catalysts with these properties could provide significant economic benefits for the production of hydrogen which is currently expensive. The hydrothermal gasification technologies (sub- and supercritical water gasification and aqueous-phase reforming) have considerable economic, environmental, and technical advantages over other energy-extensive conversion technologies [1]. These processes are compatible with water-soluble feedstocks such as biomass and gasification reactions that take place at lower temperatures. However, the absence of practical catalysts in hydrothermal conditions is a main challenge that impedes upscaling of these technologies for hydrogen gas production. Increasing demand, limited supply, and undesirable byproducts due to current methods indicate the need for the development of innovative, economically feasible, highly active, and stable catalysts for hydrothermal conversion of biomass-derived compounds to hydrogen in higher yield and richer composition.

Advertisement

2. Catalysts for hydrogen gas production by hydrothermal gasification processes

Raney nickel and platinum-based catalysts are common catalysts that have been used for hydrogen gas production in various processes including hydrothermal gasification methods [2, 3]. Despite Raney nickel catalysts exhibit better activity than precious metals, the use of these catalysts in hydrothermal gasification processes is not the best because of the following reasons: (a) Raney nickel deactivates easily in hydrothermal conditions. The studies showed that oxidation of Raney-Ni surface caused the deactivation. The nickel metal particle size in Raney-Ni catalysts became larger, and surface area was significantly decreased during deactivation. To prevent oxidation and deactivation of Raney nickel catalysts, the gasification environment should be reductive as possible to keep Raney-Ni in metallic form and extend its activity [4, 5]. (b) Raney nickel catalysts contain significant amounts of hydrogen gas. Because of this, these catalysts can easily ignite when exposed to oxygen. To prevent ignition, Raney nickel catalysts are kept under nonreactive inert environments and stored in water or in a suitable organic solvent such as cyclohexane, ethanol, and dioxane [4]. (c) Nickel is not stable under high carbon-containing reaction environments [5]. Therefore, it is hard to keep nickel in its metallic form under organic-rich hydrothermal conditions.

On the other hand, precious metals also show high activities in the reformation of oxygenated hydrocarbons. Since these metals are expensive, they are widely used in the supported form on activated carbon, alumina, titanium dioxide, silica, etc., for recycling [2]. Dispersion of small metal particles on the support with high specific surface area is considered more advantageous. The decrease in the particle size of metals on the support could enhance metal-support interaction and increase the activity of the catalyst for hydrogen production [6]. Large metal particles could cause more severe carbon formation and deposition on the catalyst surface [7].

Advertisement

3. Supported metal catalysts

Dispersion of metals on the support, resistance of metal particles to sintering, and the accessibility of active sites to reactants are highly affected by physical and chemical properties of the catalyst support [8]. Numerous studies showed that catalyst support could significantly affect the catalytic performance of metal catalysts in the various reactions including hydrothermal processes [9, 10]. The catalyst support provides a physical surface for the dispersion of metal particles and affects the catalytic activity [11]. The catalytic activities of the catalysts can be increased by the selection of a novel supportive material for better catalytic action (more active sites) and excellent mechanical strength and high surface area. The supportive materials can be chemically modified to increase surface area and porosity and create specific functional groups on the surface.

3.1 Carbon materials as supportive materials for supported precious metal catalysts

Carbon materials have been recognized as the most active supports for aqueous-phase reforming of biomass-derived compounds for hydrogen-rich gas production [2]. The interaction between active metal component and support plays an important role in the catalytic reactions. Therefore, catalytic properties of supported catalysts depend on the combination of the type of metal and supportive material. The catalytic activity of these catalysts for hydrogen production has been significantly improved with recent research activities; however, they are still not good as Raney nickel catalysts. The activity of the supported precious metal catalysts reduce because of aggregation or poisoning of metal particles in reaction environment or coke deposition on active surfaces of the catalysts [12]. Leaching of the metal particles from support is another problem that causes decay of catalyst activity. Increasing the catalytic activity and stability of the catalysts is a challenge for high-yielding hydrogen gas production.

The porous structure and surface chemistry of activated carbon as a support material highly affect the activity of the catalyst. Porous carbon materials are of interest in many applications due to their high surface area and physicochemical properties. Those carbon materials can be categorized according to their pore sizes as microporous (pore size <2 nm), mesoporous (2 nm < pore size <50 nm), and/or macroporous (pore size >50 nm) [13]. Mesoporous carbons have large surface areas and are rich in oxygen-containing functional groups in the surfaces. They can enhance the affinity between the substrate molecules and the catalyst through abundant functional groups and large uniform pores. Those materials may offer great advantages over other carbon materials owing to their well-controlled pore structures in the mesopores, which might be favorable to the transportation of large molecules such as polysaccharides released from cellulose and hemicellulose structures in the biomass.

The oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface of carbons significantly influenced their performance in catalytic reactions [14]. Many different activating agents such as strong or weak acids and bases or oxidants (H2SO4, H3PO4, HNO3, CH3COOH, NH3, KOH, H2O2, O3, etc.) can be used in this process to introduce oxygen-containing functional groups on the carbon surface [15, 16]. The abundant oxygen groups in the supports facilitate the access of oxygenated biomass components to the surface of the catalyst; the open pore structure permits the molecules (solubilized biomass components) to effectively diffuse to the active sites and reacts with metal catalyst particles.

Hierarchical porous carbons (HPCs): HPCs are carbon structures with macropores and interconnected meso- and micropores. Porous carbons with large specific surface area and pore volume provide multiple sites for interfacial reaction, molecule retention, and catalytic activity. However, surface area itself is not sufficient for exhibiting exceptional performance because narrow and internal pores may not provide access for some reactants to react.

HPCs structured with micro-, meso-, and macropores can provide multi-active sites in the catalytic conversion processes and better accessibility for the feeds that are composed of different molecular weight organic compounds such as lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates. The mass transport of different sized biomass compounds can be easily facilitated by the macropores and micro−/mesopores that provide access to the metal catalysts deposited in HPC. Currently, HPC preparation methods are expensive and complex. Synthesis of HPCs by utilization of abundant and widely available waste materials can provide opportunity to develop such materials in a sustainable way for many applications including hydrogen production. Direct carbonization of biomass or any solid organic wastes for the synthesis of HPCs is not applicable because of heterogeneity and uncontrollability in morphology and pore structure of the resulted carbon products. It is almost impossible to produce same carbon materials continuously from direct carbonization of nonuniform solid precursors.

Hierarchical structures with uniform and controllable pore sizes can be prepared by carbonization of different precursors using various templates. Low-density HPCs are prepared from various carbon nanomaterials such as graphene, and the resulted HPCs are aerogel-type carbon materials with moderate surface areas and different sized micro−/mesopore structures [17]. Unfortunately, all these and other existing methods have various drawbacks such as using nonrenewable precursors or templates, long synthesis period (e.g., solvent exchange and supercritical drying in the case of aerogels), involving multiple steps that make the process more costly and time-consuming, etc. [18].

Carbon aerogels are another class of hierarchical porous carbon materials with remarkable physicochemical properties, including low density, large surface area, highly porous structure, and good chemical stability. They can be prepared in different forms (monoliths, beads, powders, or thin films). Different types of carbon aerogels with unique characteristics are suitable for different applications, and some carbon aerogels can exhibit promising catalytic performance in various reactions because of their well-developed and controlled porous structure and high specific surface area.

The most common carbon aerogels are prepared by sol–gel polymerization of resorcinol and formaldehyde mixtures followed with supercritical drying and carbonization that were first prepared by Pekala [19]. In addition to resorcinol-formaldehyde, various monomers can be used to prepare these materials, including melamine-formaldehyde, phenol-formaldehyde, cresol-formaldehyde, phenol-furfural, and some polymers such as polystyrenes and polyurethanes [20, 21, 22, 23].

A wide spectrum of different carbon aerogel materials with unique properties can be prepared depending on synthesis and processing conditions. Synthesis conditions of organic aerogel (e.g., resorcinol/formaldehyde ratio, catalysts, and pH), curing and drying methods, and carbonization conditions determine surface area, pore volume, and pore size distribution of final carbon aerogel [24].

Supercritical carbon dioxide and freeze-drying are preferable methods to dry the organic gel while retaining skeletal pore structure during drying stage. During carbonization, dried aerogel is heated under inert atmosphere to obtain carbon-rich structure by removing oxygen and hydrogen functionalities.

Different metal-doped carbon aerogels have been developed including W-, Ru-, Co-, Ni-, Pd-, and Pt-carbon aerogels for various catalytic reaction, and these catalysts can show good activity in hydrogen production processes as well (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Resorcinol-formaldehyde aerogel and its carbonized form (carbon aerogel).

Graphene-nanostructured carbon materials: Graphene has unique physicochemical properties such as great stability, high surface area, electron mobility, thermal conductivity, and mechanical strength. Graphene is an excellent catalyst support for metal-supported type of catalysts because of its great stability and chemical inertness that are important parameters for increasing lifetime of the catalysts. Graphene has a high theoretical surface area (approximately 2600 m2 g−1). However, large extent of van der Waals interactions between surfaces lead to graphene sheets to stack on top of each other. Surface area between graphene layers becomes inaccessible depending on the degree of stacking that changes its catalytic activity.

Reactivity of the graphene support can be increased by different approaches. Chemical doping is important approach to tailor the property of graphene that can change its surface reactivity and increase its performance as catalyst support. Introduction heteroatoms, such as nitrogen, boron, phosphorus, or sulfur atoms, into the carbon lattice of graphene by chemical doping can change the electronic properties of graphene [25].

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are cylindrical molecules that consist of rolled-up typical graphene sheets (Figure 2). Different CNTs (different rolling up direction of graphene layers or single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes) determine the mechanical, electrical, and structural properties of the nanotubes that affect their catalytic activities. Metal particles supported on CNT can poorly be affected from carbon monoxide poisoning than traditional catalyst systems [26], and for this reason CNTs are good candidates to be used as catalyst supports.

Figure 2.

Chemical structures of graphene, single-walled, and multi-walled carbon nanotubes.

A reported study showed that Pt on a single-walled carbon nanotubes catalyst were better catalysts in terms of hydrogen production activity and selectivity than Pt on a multi-walled carbon nanotube for hydrothermal gasification of biomass hydrolysates. Since the biomass hydrolysates tested were composed of large carbohydrate molecules (consisting of two carbohydrate fractions with 69,800 and 25,400 Da), these compounds were unable to enter narrow graphene sheets of multi-walled carbon nanotubes to react with Pt metals deposited inside the graphene layers. On the other hand, when the simplest biomass model compound, glucose, was used as feed solution, same catalytic activity was observed for both catalysts [27]. These results indicated that the catalytic activity of graphene-based carbon materials is strongly dependent on how the graphene sheet is shaped. Different shaped graphene-based structures with new properties could be promising supportive materials for Pt deposition, and resulting reforming catalysts could exhibit unique properties for hydrogen production (e.g., more active sites and suitable gaps between graphene sheets for the entrance of biomass molecules). The controlled graphene structure permits the small biomass molecules (oligo- and monosaccharides) to effectively diffuse the active sites and react with Pt particles to produce hydrogen gas.

Different graphene nanostructures can be prepared by growing graphene on presynthesized nanostructured metal templates by chemical vapor deposition and then etching away the metal to get a free-standing graphene nanostructure with novel properties to be used as catalyst support in hydrothermal gasification processes [28].

3.2 Heteroatoms-doped carbons as catalyst supports for hydrogen production

The introduction of heteroatom into carbon structure can change the physicochemical and electronic properties of the carbon material and enhance the catalytic functions [29]. Nitrogen atoms can create high positive charge distribution in the nearby C atoms due to its high electron withdrawing ability. Atomic sizes of nitrogen and carbon atoms are similar, and five available valence electrons in nitrogen can lead to the formation of valence bonds with C atoms and covalent bonding between N and C network of carbon results in more stable structure. Dual or multiple heteroatoms (B, N, P, S, F, etc.)-doped carbon catalysts enhance the activity of the catalysts [30, 31].

HPCs with heteroatom (e.g., nitrogen and sulfur)-doped carbon network are important carbon-based functional materials and have attracted great attentions because of their excellent properties [32]. Incorporation of nitrogen into the carbon improved the stability of precious metal particles by reducing sintering and leaching of the metals in aqueous-phase furfural hydrogenation reaction [33]. The studies showed that dual or multiple elements-doped carbon catalysts exhibited synergistic effects with enhanced activity in oxygen reduction reaction compared with mono heteroatom-doped carbon catalysts [31, 34], and similar effect can be expected for hydrothermal gasification reactions of biomass-derived carbons.

3.3 Increasing activity of the catalysts based on metals deposited on carbon supports

Carbon-supported precious metal (e.g., platinum) catalysts are active catalysts for hydrothermal conversion of biomass-derived compounds to hydrogen [2]. For better hydrogen production yield, Pt particles deposited on the support should be nanosized, uniform, and well dispersed that highly depend on the type of support, deposition method for metals including solvents and other active chemicals used during deposition process, type of metal precursors, reduction method for metal precursors, drying and calcination treatments, etc.

Catalysts can be deactivated during gasification process due to strong adsorption of feed impurities, aggregation or poisoning of metal particles in reaction medium, or coke deposition on active surfaces of the catalysts [12]. These drawbacks can be partially eliminated or lowered by integrating non-precious metals in precious metals containing catalyst system. Catalytic activity of supported Pt catalyst considerably improved when some certain metals deposited on the support along with Pt. It was reported that the activity of Pt catalysts could be improved by the addition of transition metals that have C-C bond breaking ability (Co, Ni, Fe, Sn, etc.) to a supported Pt catalyst. For instance, the addition of Fe to Pt at a 1:1 Pt:Fe atomic ratio significantly increased hydrogen production yield and selectivity [35]. Addition of a non-expensive metal in precious catalysts can reduce oxidation of precious metal particles by diluting them with non-expensive metals, reduce metal sintering, and favor water-gas shift reaction [36].

Catalytic activity of alumina nanofibers supported Pt catalyst considerably improved when Ni was deposited on the support along with Pt [9]. Kunkes et al. reported that addition of Re to Pt on carbon catalyst enhanced the Pt dispersion and favored water-gas shift reaction [37]. Pt-Co and Pt-Ni catalysts have been reported to be highly active catalysts with high hydrogen selectivity and low coking tendency [7, 38]. Co-deposition of Sn with Pt on to Al2O3 support caused dilution of Pt particles with Sn particles that improved activity and selectivity of the catalyst [39].

A recent study showed that performance of Pt-only catalyst could be considerably enhanced by replacing some of Pt particles with different non-expensive metals for hydrothermal conversion of biomass compounds to hydrogen-rich gas mixture. As can be seen in Figure 3, the gas mixture produced from hydrothermal gasification of glucose was composed of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide. As expected, monometallic Pt catalyst resulted in the highest conversion with highest hydrogen yield as this metal is known to be best catalyst for hydrogen production. Incorporating W and Ni metals to Pt-only catalyst showed promising activity despite replacing half amount of Pt with Ni and W metals [4].

Figure 3.

Comparison of activity of the catalysts prepared with different metals and combination of these metals with Pt for hydrothermal conversion of glucose to hydrogen-rich gas mixture [4].

Advertisement

4. Core-shell-type catalysts alternative to supported metal catalysts

Metal core-carbon shell catalysts have exhibited a great potential for various applications, and fabrication of these types of catalysts for specifically hydrogen gas production can be promising. Metal particles are encapsulated in hollow porous carbon shell or heteroatom-doped hollow porous carbon (shell) (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Core-shell-structured catalysts.

Metal nanoparticles that are made of various combinations of precious metal (e.g., Pt) and/or inexpensive metals (Ni, Sn, Co, and W) in different compositions (e.g., mono and bimetallic) can be used as core materials. It is possible to improve the catalytic activity in this core-shell approach due to increased surface area and the closed interfacial interaction between the core and the shell. Reactants/products can transfer through penetrable shell structure. The shell prevents sintering of the metal nanoparticles in the core. Because of heterogeneous nature, the catalysts can be reused in the process after collecting from aqueous reaction medium by simple separation methods (centrifugation, filtration, etc.).

The encapsulation of metal nanoparticles in a penetrable shell catalyst has recently become a new strategy in the catalyst design area. The encapsulation of precious metal nanoparticles in a stable protective shell can enhance the activity and extent lifetime of the catalyst by maintaining and protecting the size and shape of the precious metal nanoparticles. This core-shell-type catalyst exhibits high stability, catalytic activity, and selectivity in various reactions [40, 41]. For an example, Pt nanoparticles-mesoporous silica core-shell catalyst was reported to have excellent stability for alkene hydrogenation [42].

In the core-shell type of catalysts, the metal nanoparticles are embedded in a protective matrix with channels, which can avoid aggregation or sintering of the metal nanoparticles in the core even at high temperatures and enables transfer of reactants/products through the channels [41]. The metal nanoparticles in the core are mainly responsible for the catalytic activity for a specific reaction. The channels in the shell give access to organic compounds to react with metal particles in the core. This protects metal particles from unwanted reactions in the reaction medium. Ikeda et al. developed such a catalyst design for platinum catalyst for hydrogenation of nitrobenzene in liquid phase [43]. The core-shell catalyst showed very high activity and exhibited almost same activity even after reused. Various porous materials have been used as shell materials to develop such catalysts for a wide range of applications (e.g., mesoporous silica, mesoporous carbon, metal oxides, titanium dioxide, and polymers) [44, 45].

Hollow porous carbon materials have unique properties, such as low density, controllable morphologies, available cavities, high surface areas, tunable porosity, and good chemical stabilities. The encapsulation of metal nanoparticles in a such selectively penetrable shell, hollow porous carbon, can result in novel catalysts for hydrothermal conversion technologies. Hollow porous materials not only have pores in their shell but also contain a hollow core and have higher porosity. Porous carbon shell with hollow structure can enhance the overall activity of the catalysts by increasing the accessibility of the reactants to the active phase. These nanostructures have emerged as an important class of carbon materials in many fields including energy, catalysis, and nanomedicine.

Advertisement

5. Conclusions and future trends

Lack of economically feasible, highly active, and stable catalysts for hydrothermal conversion of biomass-derived compounds to hydrogen is a main challenge that impedes application of these technologies for large-scale hydrogen gas production systems. Choice of appropriate inexpensive metals with right combination of precious metal(s) could reduce catalyst cost and improve the catalytic activity of precious metal-based catalysts. However, the stability of these catalysts in an aqueous processing environment is an important issue that needs to be studied in detail.

Since protection of metal catalyst is a big challenge in hydrothermal condition in which organic-rich solutions/materials are used as feeds, the metal core-carbon shell catalysts could also be a solution. Hollow porous carbon materials can be synthesized in desirable morphologies, sizes, compositions, and pore structures depending on templating strategies used in the preparation steps. The physicochemical and electronic properties of the hollow porous carbon materials can be changed by the introduction of a heteroatom such as nitrogen into carbon shell that enhance the activity and stability of the catalyst.

Graphene-based carbons with controlled graphene nanostructures could show unique properties as catalyst support for metal particles and effectively diffuse the biomass compounds to the active sites and leave agglomeration byproducts and large-sized contaminants in the solution.

References

  1. 1. Bamaca Saquic BE, Irmak S, Wilkins M, Smith T. Effect of precursors on graphene supported platinum monometalic catalysts for hydrothermal gasification of biomass compounds to hydrogen. Fuel. 2021;290:120079. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.120079
  2. 2. Meryemoglu B, Hesenov A, Irmak S, Atanur OM, Erbatur O. Aqueous-phase reforming of biomass using various types of supported precious metal and raney-nickel catalysts for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2010;2010(35):12580-12587. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.046
  3. 3. Cortright RD, Davda RR, Dumesic JA. Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water. Nature. 2002;418:964-967. DOI: 10.1038/nature01009
  4. 4. Bamaca Saquic BE, Irmak S, Wilkins M. Enhancement of catalytic performance of graphene supported Pt catalysts by Ni and W for hydrogen gas production by hydrothermal gasification of biomass-derived compounds. Fuel. 2022;308:122079. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122079
  5. 5. Nguyen HT, Lu H, Kobayashi E, Ishikawa T, Komiyama M. Raney-nickel catalyst deactivation in supercritical water gasification of ethanol fermentation stillage and its mitigation. Topics in Catalysis. 2014;57:1078-1084. DOI: 10.1007/s11244-014-0272-x
  6. 6. Li S, Li M, Zhang C, Wang S, Ma X, Gong J. Steam reforming of ethanol over Ni/ZrO2 catalysts: Effect of support on product distribution. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37:2940-2949. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.009
  7. 7. Iulianelli A, Palma V, Bagnato G, Ruocco C, Huang Y, Veziroglu NT, et al. From bioethanol exploitation to high grade hydrogen generation: Steam reforming promoted by a Co–Pt catalyst in a Pd-based membrane reactor. Renewable Energy. 2018;119:834-843. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.050
  8. 8. Feng S, Li W, Shi Q , Li Y, Chen J, Ling Y, et al. Synthesis of nitrogen-doped hollow carbon nanospheres for CO2 capture. Chemical Communications. 2014;50:329-331. DOI: 10.1039/C3CC46492J
  9. 9. Tanksale A, Beltramini JN, Dumesic JA, Lu GQ. Effect of Pt and Pd promoter on Ni supported catalysts-A TPR/TPO/TPD and microcalorimetry study. Journal of Catalysis. 2008;258:366-377. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2008.06.024
  10. 10. Meryemoglu B, Irmak S, Hesenov A, Erbatur O. Preparation of activated carbon supported Pt catalysts and optimization of their catalytic activities for hydrogen gas production from the hydrothermal treatment of biomass-derived compounds. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37:17844-17852. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.09.024
  11. 11. Kaya B, Irmak S, Hasanoglu A, Erbatur O. Evaluation of various carbon materials supported Pt catalyts for aqueous-phase reforming of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysate. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39:10135-10140. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.180
  12. 12. Ren N, Yang Y-H, Shen J, Zhang Y-H, Xu H-L, Gao Z, et al. Novel, efficient hollow zeolitically microcapsulized noble metal catalysts. Journal of Catalysis. 2007;251:182-188. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2007.07.009
  13. 13. Liang C, Li Z, Dai S. Mesoporous carbon materials: Synthesis and modification. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2008;47:3696-3717. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200702046
  14. 14. Rodriguez-Reinoso F. The role of carbon materials in heterogeneous catalysis. Carbon. 1998;36:159-175. DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00173-5
  15. 15. Kyotani T, Nakazaki S, Xu WH, Tomita A. Chemical modification of the inner walls of carbon nanotubes by HNO3 oxidation. Carbon. 2001;39:782-785. DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00013-6
  16. 16. Chen Z, Hauge RH, Smalley RE. Ozonolysis of functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes. Journal of Nanotechnology. 2006;6:1935-1938. DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2006.336
  17. 17. Xu Y, Lin Z, Zhong X, Huang XQ , Weiss NO, Huang Y, et al. Holey graphene frameworks for highly efficient capacitive energy storage. Nature Communications. 2014;5:4554. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5554
  18. 18. Nishihara H, Kyotani T. Templated nanocarbons for energy storage. Advanced Materials. 2012;24:4473-4498. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201201715
  19. 19. Pekala RW. Low density, resorcinol-formaldehyde aerogels. US patent 1989, 4873218
  20. 20. Rasines G, Lavela P, Macias C, Zafra MC, Tirado JL, Parra JB, et al. N-doped monolithic carbon aerogel electrodes with optimized features for the electrosorption of ions. Carbon. 2015;83:262-274. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.11.015
  21. 21. Zhu YD, Hu HQ , Li WC, Zhang XY. Cresol-formaldehyde based carbon aerogel as electrode material for electrochemical capacitor. Journal of Power Sources. 2006;162:738-742. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.06.049
  22. 22. Wu DC, Fu RM. Synthesis of organic and carbon aerogels from phenol-furfural by two-step polymerization. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2006;96:115-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.06.022
  23. 23. Ma QL, Cheng HF, Fane AG, Wang R, Zhang H. Recent development of advanced materials with special wettability for selective oil/water separation. Small. 2016;12:2186-2202. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201503685
  24. 24. Moreno-Castilla C, Maldonado-Hodar FJ. Carbon aerogels for catalysis applications: An overview. Carbon. 2005;43:455-465. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.10.022
  25. 25. Fan M, Feng Z, Zhu C, Chen X, Chen C, Yang J, et al. Recent progress in 2D or 3D N-doped graphene synthesis and the characterizations, properties, and modulations of N species. Journal of Materials Science. 2016;51:10323-10349. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-016-0250-8
  26. 26. Lin Y, Cui X, Yen C, Wai CM. Platinum/carbon nanotube nanocomposite synthesized in supercritical fluid as electrocatalysts for low-temperature fuel cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B. 2005;109:14410-14415. DOI: 10.1021/jp0514675
  27. 27. Kaya B, Irmak S, Hesenov A, Erbatur O, Erkey C. Effect of support materials on supported platinum catalyst prepared using a supercritical fluid deposition technique and their catalytic performance for hydrogen-rich gas production from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology. 2012;123:723-726. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.098
  28. 28. Wilson PM, Mbah GN, Smith TG, Schmidt D, Lai RY, Hofmann T, et al. Three-dimensional periodic graphene nanostructures. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2014;C2:1879-1886. DOI: 10.1039/C3TC32277G
  29. 29. Li D, Li X, Gong J. Catalytic reforming of oxygenates: State of the art and prospects. Chemical Reviews. 2016;116:11529-11653. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00099
  30. 30. Higgins DC, Hoque MA, Hassan F, Choi JY, Kim B, Chen Z. Oxygen reduction on graphene–carbon nanotube composites doped sequentially with nitrogen and sulfur. ACS Catalysis. 2014;4:2734-2740. DOI: 10.1021/cs5003806
  31. 31. Sharma PP, Wu J, Yadav RM, Liu M, Wright CJ, Tiwary CS, et al. Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube arrays for high-efficiency electrochemical reduction of CO2: On the understanding of defects, defect density, and selectivity. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2015;54:13701-13705. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201506062
  32. 32. Jang JW, Lee CE, Lyu SC, Lee TJ, Lee C. Structural study of nitrogen-doping effects in bamboo-shaped multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters. 2004;84:2877-2879. DOI: 10.1063/1.1697624
  33. 33. Huo JJ, Duan P, Pham HN, Chan YJ, Datye AK, Schmidt-Rohr K, et al. Improved hydrothermal stability of Pd nanoparticles on nitrogen-doped carbon supports. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2018;8:3548-3561. DOI: 10.1039/C8CY00947C
  34. 34. Liang J, Jiao Y, Jaroniec M, Qiao SZ. Sulfur and nitrogen dual-doped mesoporous graphene electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction with synergistically enhanced performance. Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English). 2012;51:11496-11500. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201206720
  35. 35. Huber G, Shabaker J, Evans S, Dumesic J. Aqueous-phase reforming of ethylene glycol over supported Pt and Pd bimetallic catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2006;62:226-235. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.07.010
  36. 36. James OO, Maity S, Mesubi MA, Ogunniran KO, Siyanbola TO, Sahu S, et al. Towards reforming technologies for production of hydrogen exclusively from renewable resources. Green Chemistry. 2011;13:2272-2284. DOI: 10.1039/C0GC00924E
  37. 37. Kunkes EL, Simonetti DA, Dumesic JA, Pyrz WD, Murillo LE, Chen JGG, et al. The role of rhenium in the conversion of glycerol to synthesis gas over carbon supported platinum-rhenium catalysts. Journal of Catalysis. 2008;260:164-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2008.09.027
  38. 38. Palma V, Castaldo F, Ciambelli P, Iaquaniello G, Capitani G. On the activity of bimetallic catalysts for ethanol steam reforming. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38:6633-6645
  39. 39. Macleod N, Fryer JR, Stirling D, Webb G. Deactivation of bi and multimetallic reforming catalysts: Influence of alloy formation on catalyst activity. Catalysis Today. 1998;46:37-54
  40. 40. Tian H, Li X, Zeng L, Gong J. Recent advances on the design of group VIII base-metal catalysts with encapsulated structures. ACS Catalysis. 2015;5:4959-4977. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01221
  41. 41. Kondo T, Morimura T, Tsujimoto T, Aikawa T, Yuasa M. Platinum nanoparticle-embedded porous diamond spherical particles as an active and stable heterogeneous catalyst. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:8651. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08949-0
  42. 42. Lin KJ, Chen LJ, Prasad MR, Cheng CY. Core-shell synthesis of a novel, spherical, mesoporous silica/platinum nanocomposite: Pt/PVP@MCM-41. Advanced Materials. 2004;16:1845-1849. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200400349
  43. 43. Ikeda S, Ishino S, Harada T, Okamoto N, Sakata T, Mori H, et al. Ligand-free platinum nanoparticles encapsulated in a hollow porous carbon shell as a highly active heterogeneous hydrogenation catalyst. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2006;45:7063-7066. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200602700
  44. 44. Cargnello M, Grzelczak M, Rodriguez-Gonzalez B, Syrgiannis Z, Bakhmutsky K, La Parola V, et al. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes drive the activity of metal@oxide core-shell catalysts in modular nanocomposites. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012;134:11760-11766. DOI: 10.1021/ja304398b
  45. 45. Chou K-S, Lin M-Y, Wu H-H, Taiwan J. Adsorptive purification of crude glycerol by sewage sludge-derived activated carbon prepared by chemical activation. Institute of Chemical Engineering. 2013;44:228. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.120

Written By

Sibel Irmak

Submitted: 23 May 2022 Reviewed: 05 July 2022 Published: 28 July 2022