Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Importance of Monitoring the Peripartal Period to Increase Reproductive Performance in Dairy Cattle

Written By

Ottó Szenci

Submitted: 15 January 2022 Reviewed: 21 June 2022 Published: 28 October 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.105988

From the Edited Volume

Animal Husbandry

Edited by Sándor Kukovics

Chapter metrics overview

165 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Parallel with the successful genetic selection for higher milk production in Holstein-Friesian cows, a dramatic decline in fertility rates has been observed around the world. Therefore, to achieve an optimum herd reproductive performance, we must focus on the first 100 days postpartum. During and after calving, a cow overcomes a series of physiological hurdles before becoming pregnant. By selecting accurate diagnostic devices and/or methods, such as predicting the onset of calving, monitoring activity and rumination time to determine cows for early treatment of clinical metritis and/or metabolic diseases, long-term measurement of reticuloruminal pH to monitor subclinical acidosis, perform metabolic profile tests to diagnose subclinical metabolic diseases at the herd level, estrous detectors and/or detection aids, on-farm/in-line P4 test to monitor specific events in the postpartum periods, diagnosis of early pregnancy and pregnancy loss using ultrasonography to correctly identify problems and their potential causes to enable these issues are to be rectified. Despite higher milk production, acceptable fertility results can be achieved, even on large-scale dairy farms, if the impacts of the above factors that contribute to reduced fertility can be moderated. The advantages and disadvantages of the different diagnostic methods are discussed to help the dairy select the most accurate method.

Keywords

  • calving
  • uterine diseases
  • metabolic disorders
  • estrous
  • artificial insemination
  • pregnancy diagnosis
  • diagnosis of pregnancy loss

1. Introduction

Since 1960 due to successful genetic selection of Holstein-Friesian cows for higher milk production, the average milk production in the United States has exceeded 11,000 kg/year. Parallel with this, the reproductive performance of dairy cows declined; however, only the conception rate was considered for the comparison to milk production [1, 2, 3]. Others could not confirm this antagonistic relationship between milk production and fertility [4, 5, 6]. LeBlanc [5] emphasizes that individual (age at first calving, parity, body condition, and diseases) and herd-level (herd size, nutrition, season, environment, herd/reproductive management, and skilled farm personnel) factors may substantially influence the production of a dairy farm. At the same time, any shortage in individual or herd-level factors in a dairy farm may increase the average number of days open (calving to conception), the number of services per conception, and the number of cows culled for infertility [2]. It is important to emphasize that reproductive performance in heifers was not affected [7]. It is essential to improve our reproductive management practices to decrease the longer lactations and the number of cows culled for reproductive reasons [7].

Concentrated management activities, especially during the first 100 days following calving, are needed to achieve an optimal calving interval (less than 400 days) with higher milk production per lactation and the birth of more calves [8]. Correct reproductive management can significantly contribute to reducing production costs.

The following diagnostic activities should be pursued during the early postpartum period to achieve or approach the optimal calving interval: prediction of the onset of calving, early diagnosis of postparturient uterine and metabolic diseases, accurate detection of estrus, determining the optimal time for artificial insemination (AI), and accurate diagnosis of early pregnancy and pregnancy losses.

Advertisement

2. Prediction of the onset of calving in dairy cows

One of the essential reproductive management goals is to reduce the number of calving assistances, which may negatively affect the acid-base balance of newborn calves and thus increase the number of stillbirths [9, 10, 11] and may subsequently affect the reproductive performance of the dam [12, 13]. Therefore, we must decrease the prevalence of neonatal asphyxia at calving, since instruments suitable for the reliable clearing of respiratory passages and artificial respiration of newborn calves are not yet widely available under farm conditions [14, 15].

In the case of dystocia, we must select the mode and time of calving assistance according to the profitability factors. Before applying traction, we must evaluate the soft birth canal, and it must be expanded nonsurgically or surgically (episiotomy lateralis). With using obstetric lubricants, we must avoid traction of longer than 2–3 min [16] and rib or vertebral fractures due to excessive traction [17, 18]. If prolonged traction is expected, we should perform a Cesarean section to save the calf and prevent maternal birth canal injuries. Previous studies have shown that before selecting the mode of calving assistance (traction or Cesarean section), it would also be essential to measure the acid-base balance of the fetus to be born [19, 20, 21]. The routine treatment of newborn calves with severe asphyxia may reduce postnatal calf losses [14, 15]. However, particular attention to the ingestion of sufficient qualities and quantities of colostrum must also be paid [22, 23], since an increased susceptibility accompanies poor colostrum uptake to Escherichia coli infections [24, 25].

While it is not possible to eliminate dystocia, adequate management of heifers during the development (adequate feeding, selection of a sire with a negative expected progeny difference for birth weight, or using sexed semen for AI) and close observation of calving heifers and cows are crucial for reducing the prevalence of stillbirth [14]. Since the behavioral signs of calving in some cases are not expressed, it is not easy to recognize the onset of calving, especially on large dairy farms. Inserting a vaginal thermometer into the vagina (e.g., Vel’Phone®) may help decrease the prevalence of stillbirth by sending an alarm about the imminent start of the second stage of labor with the rupture of the allantochorionic sac [26].

In our recent experiment, 241 single calvings were monitored using a vaginal thermometer (Vel’Phone®), which was inserted into the vagina by a vaginal applicator about 5 days before expecting to calve. The stillbirth rate was 1.7% for heifer and 0.5% for cow calvings, respectively [26]. Similar results were reported by others [27]. Imminent calving can be predicted without false alarms (Figure 1) [28], and in this way, it can minimize the time spent on standby by the workers [29].

Figure 1.

Accuracy of prediction of calving by an SMS message generated by using an intravaginal thermometer adapted from [28].

At the same time, it is essential to mention that in contrast to direct indicators (vaginal thermometers), calving predictors such as Ruminact® HR-tag or Moocall® calving sensor cannot inform about the exact time of calving; however, they can help optimize worker efficiency [29]. It is also essential to avoid birth injuries and infection of the reproductive tract, which may more likely develop in cows with inappropriately timed obstetrical assistance (less than 50 min after amniotic sac appearance) and dystocia [30]. Namely, premature obstetrical assistance may lead to a high prevalence of dystocia, impairs postpartum health of the dam, and poses a potential risk to calf survival [30]. At the same time, Villettaz Robichaud et al. [31] reported that systematic early obstetrical assistance at calving (15 min after the first sight of the calf’s two front hooves) that does not present signs of calving difficulties did not adversely affect calves’ likelihood of being stillborn, vigor at birth, or transfer of passive immunity. It is essential to mention that obstetrical lubricant was applied liberally to the cow’s vagina before performing the exam and providing assistance. Pumping copious amounts of sterile obstetrical lubricant around the fetus before each assisted delivery seems that the target prevalence of stillbirth (1–3%; [32]) can also be approached in the field [33].

Advertisement

3. Early diagnosis of postparturient uterine diseases in dairy cow

The aim of monitoring postparturient uterine diseases such as clinical metritis, clinical endometritis (pyometra), and subclinical endometritis (SCE) in a dairy farm is to diagnose [34, 35, 36, 37] and treat them as soon as possible after calving to decrease their negative effects on pregnancy rates, open days, and culling rates, which may increase economic losses in dairy farms [38, 39].

Besides minimizing stress and careful sanitation during calving, cows having dystocia, stillbirth, retained fetal membranes (RFMs), metabolic disorders (hypocalcemia, ketosis), or twins are more likely to contract uterine infections than cows calving normally. Although retained fetal membrane (RFM) is not a disease per se [39], its early treatment is greatly recommended to decrease the risk for the development of different uterine diseases.

Clinical metritis and endometritis should be diagnosed and treated as early and as intensively as possible to shorten the conception interval. Recently, new cow programs have been developed based on monitoring cow temperatures each morning for the first 10 (first 13 [40] or 14 [41]) days after calving, thus allowing for early treatment [42]. Monitoring milk production (calving milk deviation of more than 12%) or failure to increase milk yield by at least 4% (primiparous) or 7% (multiparous) per day in the first 20 days after calving [39], rumination time [43, 44, 45], cow activity [46, 47] and/or body temperature measured by ear tag, neck collar, vaginal-mounted type biosensors [48], or ventral tail base surface temperature sensors [49] may contribute to the early diagnosis of clinical metritis in the field.

Clinical endometritis can be diagnosed by transrectal palpation, transrectal ultrasonography, manual vaginal examination, vaginoscopy, and/or Metricheck® from Day 21 after calving. In the absence of a gold standard, it seems that vaginoscopy or Metricheck® is preferred as a cow-side diagnostic tool for diagnosing clinical endometritis in the field. Subclinical endometritis (SCE) is defined as an inflammation of the uterine endometrium that can be detected by histology (biopsy) or cytology (samples collected by uterine lavage, cytobrush, or cytotape techniques) in the absence of purulent material in the vagina [37, 50, 51, 52].

Routine treatment of clinical metritis with intrauterine antimicrobial agents (oxytetracycline; ampicillin; and cloxacillin), antiseptic chemicals (iodine solutions: 2% Lugol’s iodine immediately after calving and again 6 h later as a preventive measure), systemic antibiotics (penicillin or one of its synthetic analogs; ceftiofur/third-generation cephalosporin/for 3–5 days; a single dose of ceftiofur s.c. in the base of the ear within 24 h after abnormal calving), intrauterine ozone treatment [53], supportive therapy (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)) such as flunixin meglumine, fluid therapy in case of dehydration, therapy with calcium and energy supplements in case of depressed appetite, and/or hormone therapy (oxytocin, PGF, or its synthetic analogs) are very variable [52]. According to our present knowledge, since intrauterine antibiotics and antiseptics may irritate the endometrium, it is not recommended. Routine use of prostaglandins is also controversial and requires further confirmation. Presently, systemic antibiotics (ceftiofur) and supportive therapy can be recommended for dairy farms [54, 55].

Cows with clinical endometritis having a palpable CL, treated by intrauterine infusion of cephapirin or PGF, had no significant difference in time to pregnancy [56]. However, higher pregnancy rates were detected in the treated groups than in untreated cows. Several reports have suggested that PGF2α treatment for clinical endometritis is at least as effective as any other alternative therapies with Lugol, polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine, meta-cresol sulfuric acid, Lotagen, dextrose [57], or N-acetylcysteine combined with amoxicillin and clavulanic [58] and presents a minimal risk of harm to the uterus or presence of residues in milk or meat [52]. The treatment efficacy of clinical endometritis without an active corpus luteum, solely with prostaglandin, is limited; however, according to Lewis [59], such a treatment may be advantageous by stimulating the self-defense mechanism. The presence of bacteria in the uterus can be accurately diagnosed using an on-farm bacteriological culture system (Tri-plate). This way, we can contribute to our antibiotic use to be as rational as possible on our dairy farm [60].

Treatment of subclinical endometritis with antibiotics and/or PGF2a or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been tried. However, controversial results were achieved; further examinations are required [51, 61]. Intrauterine lavage with 500–600 ml of sterile physiological saline (35–40°C) on Day 30 after calving or intrauterine infusion with 50 ml of boiling sterile water (~100°C; “Samia-treat; SAT”) of repeat breeding cows may improve pregnancy rate; however, they require further large-scale confirmations [62, 63].

Advertisement

4. Early diagnosis of postparturient metabolic disease in dairy cow

Ruminal fluid is one of the essential sources of energy metabolism in dairy cattle because they can ferment volatile fatty acids (acetate, propionate, and butyrate), which may complete some 60–70% of the energy requirements. Dairy cattle are usually in a negative energy balance (NEBAL) in the initial weeks of lactation. The energy intake during this period is less than half the energy requirements for milk production. Therefore, dairy cattle, through increased nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) production, try to meet the gap between energy input and output during early lactation. The suppressed feed intake results in a lack of gluconeogenesis, which causes a lack of glucose for the complete oxidation of NEFA. The incomplete oxidation of fatty acids contributes to the increased production of ketone bodies (β-hydroxybutyrate/BHB/, acetone, and acetoacetate), which may cause ketosis and fatty liver [64, 65]. It is essential to mention that primiparous cows are more susceptible to metabolic stress during the transition period (3 weeks before to 3 weeks after calving) than multiparous cows [66]. According to Iwersen et al. [67], the electronic handheld BHBA measuring system using whole blood is a more valuable and practical tool for diagnosing subclinical ketosis than the commonly used chemical dipsticks, for example, Ketostix or Ketorolac. Szelényi et al. [68] reported that BHB concentrations measured at the farm by a portable handheld device (Precision Xtra, Abbot Laboratories) showed a significant correlation (r > 0.92, P < 0.001) with the results of samples evaluated in the laboratory before and after freezing.

More recently, metabolic health disorders (e.g., subclinical ketosis [69], subclinical hypocalcemia [70]) can be predicted with high accuracy during the transition period by using different wearable wireless biosensors such as ear-tag, halter (noseband), neck collar, or leg-tag-type sensors by measuring eating, ruminating, lying, and/or standing time reviewed recently by Cocco et al. [44] and Lee and Seo [48]. Paudyal et al. [71] suggested using “two indices that could identify different health disorders satisfactorily using animal level and pen level comparisons. The cow level index compared daily rumination with the 7-day rolling average of the same cow, and the pen level index compared daily rumination time with the average of the cows in the same herd. This approach utilized deviations in rumination, which accounts for variations in rumination time between the cows and daily variation within the same cow.” Cows can be treated before developing clinical diseases, and in this way, costs associated with prolonged treatment and reduced milk yield can be decreased. The importance of early treatment of different metabolic disorders can be emphasized by the fact that dairy cows, after calving, may sacrifice their immune function to maintain lactation [69]. Therefore, they are also more sensitive to different infectious diseases such as metritis and/or mastitis [44, 45, 72].

Acute or subacute ruminal acidosis may develop due to decreased salivation during calving due to reduced period and intensity of chewing, especially when the ratio of concentrate is not limited to the days surrounding calving. Rumen acidosis may also negatively affect rumen motility and appetite. It can be diagnosed by measuring the pH value of the rumen fluid collected by a stomach tube or by rumenocentesis in the field. However, the accuracy of diagnosing subacute ruminal acidosis is limited. Long-term measurement of reticuloruminal pH value using an indwelling and wireless data transmitting unit enables the evaluation of dietary composition. It allows for adjustments in feeding management in the field [73]. However, the currently available commercial bolus sensor systems with a pH sensor have an operational lifetime of no more than a few months; therefore, its general use in daily practice is presently limited [48].

As mentioned previously, a negative energy balance (NEBAL) can develop several days before calving and usually reaches its most negative level (nadir) about 2–3 weeks later and is used to be extended 10–12 weeks until the beginning of the usual breeding period [74]. A spontaneously NEBAL in dairy cows can represent a physiological state of undernutrition. The severity and duration of NEBAL are primarily related to differences in dry matter intake and its rate of increase during early lactation.

In the absence of precious livestock biosensors, it is essential to evaluate the body condition score (Table 1) using the 5-point condition scoring system (scale 0–5, in 0.25-point increments) to control nutritional management on the farm [75, 76]. Calving in moderate condition (3–3.5) and maintaining feed intake during the periparturient transition period are critical factors in reducing NEBAL and avoiding metabolic and reproductive disorders that are harmful to performance. Different levels of body condition score changes (ΔBCS) on fertility, milk yield, and survival of Holstein-Frieasian cows diagnosed with reproductive disorders (dystocia, twins, retained fetal membranes, metritis, and clinical endometritis), and other health disorders (subclinical ketosis, left displaced abomasum, lameness, clinical mastitis, and respiratory disease) between Days 5 ± 3 and Day 40 ± 3 after calving were examined in an extensive dataset involving almost 12 thousands dairy cows. It turned out that there were no significant interactions between body condition score changes and different health-related events. At the same time, excessive loss of BCS and reproductive diseases decreased reproductive performance and survival compared with other ΔBCS categories and health groups. It is essential to mention that excessive loss of BCS during early postpartum was characterized as having a higher milk yield [77].

Body regionBCS
2.002.252.502.753.003.253.503.754.004.254.504.755.00
Thurl"V” in appearance"U” in appearanceflatrounded
Ileal tuberosityAngularRoundedJust visibleNot visible
Ischial tuberosityAngularFat pad palpableRoundedNot visible
Transverse processes of lumbar vertebrae>0.5 visible0.25 to 0.50 visible0.10 to 0.25 visibleOnly tips visibleTips not visible
Coccygeal ligamentVisibleJust visibleNot visible
Sacral ligamentVisibleJust visibleNot visible

Table 1.

The decision chart for body condition score (BCS) suggested by Ferguson et al. [75].

Since body condition score is a strong predictor of subcutaneous fat reserves but, to a lesser degree, of skeletal muscle reserves, in periparturient dairy cows, a more precise evaluation of those reserves can be reached by separate ultrasonic examinations [78]. According to Schröder and Staufenbiel [79], backfat measurements can be done by placing a linear array transducer “lightly on the sacral area, vertically on an imaginary line connecting the pin (tuber ischii) and the hook (tuber coxa), at the point corresponding to the cranial end of the first coccygeal vertebra. The backfat measurements always include the skin thickness, and the profound fascia can be used as a landmark to distinguish backfat from the gluteal muscle.” According to van der Drift et al. [80], “longissimus dorsi muscle thickness measurements can be done by placing linear-array transducer perpendicularly to the vertebral column on the transverse process of the fourth lumbar vertebra, at the site of the larger diameter of the muscle between the fasciae corresponding to the lateral edge of the multifidus dorsi muscle.” The examination sites must be brushed to remove debris but not clip, and ultrasound gel must be applied to couple the probe surface with the skin [78]. Quantifying dairy cow body morphological traits by automatically processing images taken in a 3-D single-camera vision system makes it possible to predict body weight in dairy cows automatically. However, this model is unsuitable for monitoring short-term body weight variation or detecting anomalies in a cow’s health status [81]. According to a recent review, while current research shows promising results in dairy cattle, there are still many avenues to be explored for better automation of the whole-body weight estimation process [82].

Following parturition, regardless of NEBAL, a wave of follicular development begins 5–7 days after calving due to elevated plasma follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Three types of follicular development (Table 2) have been described and can be diagnosed in the field using ultrasonography [83]. The re-establishing pulsatile LH secretion can induce ovulation of a dominant follicle during early lactation [84]. Conversely, the developing NEBAL in early postpartum may suppress pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretions and reduce ovarian responsiveness to LH stimulation, thereby deterring ovulation. Non-ovulatory dominant or cystic follicles may prolong the interval for the first ovulation to 40–50 days after calving [84, 85]. It is important to mention that prolonged anovulatory anestrus may occur in 11–38% of dairy herds and can be associated with reduced fertility caused by NEBAL [86]. NEBAL can influence the timing of first postpartum ovulation, which negatively affects fertility [84, 87]. If a cow remains anovulatory for >50 days of lactation, it will be less likely to become pregnant during lactation and will be culled [88].

First dominant follicle (FDF)FDF will ovulate 16–20 days after calving
A turnover followes non-ovulation, and a new follicular wave will start
FDF fails to ovulate and becomes cystic

Table 2.

Three types of follicular developments can be found immediately after calving [83].

Plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations generally rise during the first two or three postpartum ovulatory cycles [89, 90]. NEBAL may reduce or moderate the rate of increase in P4 [89, 90]. Meanwhile, the metabolic clearance of P4 in high-yielding dairy cows can be increased by high energy and protein intake. As P4 plays an essential role in conceptus development and growth, a slower increase in P4 after ovulation may decrease embryo growth by Day 16 and may cause early embryonic mortality [91, 92].

Early postpartum NEBAL may adversely impact the quality of oocytes during the first 80–100 days after calving, which exerts another carryover effect on fertility [93, 94]. However, it is not easy to reconcile the impact of NEBAL on follicles and oocytes with the impact of high dietary energy on oocyte quality and the development of blastocysts in dairy cows [95, 96]. Extremes in BCS may negatively influence fertility [84].

Metabolic, endocrine, and postpartum health statutes may influence together fertility in dairy cows. Energy imbalance seems to be one of the most important factors, though we should consider the complex interactions of the factors mentioned earlier to improve fertility in our dairy farm [84]. Similarly, BCS, glucose, NEFA, or Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) concentration from calving to AI cannot explain the low fertility rate [97, 98]. In contrast, Saby-Chaban et al. [99] have found a significant correlation between the prevalence of biochemical ketosis (BHB >0.15 mmol/l) measured by in-line in milk and fertility.

To prevent metabolic disorders in the periparturient period, such as milk fever, ketosis, fat cow syndrome, or rumen acidosis is essential to provide challenge fed during the dry-off period and early lactation. These diseases can increase the prevalence of reproductive disorders and reduce reproductive performance. Therefore, prevention is preferable to treatment and requires close attention to nutrition and management. Treatment of different metabolic diseases (hypocalcemia and ketosis) has been reviewed recently by Oetzel [100] and Mann et al. [101]. In addition, maintaining good body condition at calving and providing a high-density energy diet that does not produce a fatty liver in early lactation are also essential in minimizing the detrimental effects of NEBAL on the return of the estrous cycle after calving.

Advertisement

5. Accurate detection of estrus in dairy cow

Estrous detection rate may contribute to low fertility results because of the low detection rate [102]. Van Vliet and Van Eerdenburg [103] reported that cow factors might also be contributing to low detection rates. Due to the relatively small size of the average dairy herds in several European countries (<50 cows) and the year-round calving pattern, the chances of having more than one cow in estrus simultaneously are somewhat limited. In this way, they cannot stimulate the intensity and length of each other estruses [103]. Another point of concern is the short duration of estrus. A previous study [103] showed that a substantial number of animals (40%) showed estrous signs for less than 12 h. The mean duration of estrus was 13.7 h in their study, in which they observed the cows every 2 h for 30 min. Others found that the high-yielding dairy cows (46.4 ± 0.4 kg milk/day) had a shorter duration of estrus (6.2 ± 0.5 h vs. 10.9 ± 0.7 h), fewer standing events (6.3 ± 0.4 vs. 8.8 ± 0.6), and shorter standing time (21.7 ± 1.9 s vs. 28.2 ± 1.9 s) than lower-producing dairy cows (33.5 ± 0.3 kg milk/day) measured at the same conditions [104].

The short duration of estrus on modern dairy farms emphasizes the importance of correctly determining the optimum time for artificial insemination [105]. Simple observation of the herd in the morning before and after milking, at midday, and late in the evening for 30 min is greatly recommended to determine estrus accurately under usual management circumstances. The use of traditional aids such as tailhead markings with chalk, paint, or crayon (the pin bones and the tailhead are painted), pressure-sensitive mount detectors using a colored fluid that fills a container when pressure is applied (these devices are fixed with adhesive to the hair over the midline just in front of the tailhead), camera-based recognition system for pressure-sensitive devices [106], estrous detection strip (applied to the sacrum) with a reflective strip which can be detected with an overhead camera [107], and/or detector animals (vasectomized or surgically altered bulls or androgenized nonlactating cull cows, heifers, or freemartin heifers with chin-ball marking harness) [108] may contribute to detect estrus accurately in the field. The recent development of a pressure-sensitive device is that when a certain threshold on mounts is reached, a light is activated on the device. Different flashing light patterns can determine whether a cow is in suspect heat, standing heat, or when it is ideal for AI [108]. Recently developed activity meters (activity behavior is classified as lying, standing, walking, active, or inactive/resting/) such as leg bracelets, neck collars, or ear tags [48], and/or electronic pressure-sensitive mount detectors [109] may improve the accuracy of estrous detection. The combined use of monitoring of estrous behavior and one or more estrous detection aids may enhance its efficiency. Similarly, combined use of biosensor data of animal activity with in-line monitoring of milk yield, milk flow rate, milk temperature, and electrical conductivity of milk [110, 111], in-line progesterone measurement [112, 113], and/or ruminating time and eating time (eating bouts) may increase the accuracy of estrous detection in the farm [48].

It is essential to emphasize that when standing heat is used as a predictor for ovulation (26.4 ± 5.2 h), only a limited number of cows display standing heat (58%), especially when few animals are in estrus at the same time. The onset of mounting behavior shown in 90% of estruses is the best predictor for ovulation (30.0 ± 5.1 h); however, its limitation is that it cannot yet be assessed by estrous detection aids [114].

There are several other methods to detect estrus, for example, direct electronic sensing of the odors of estrous pheromones [115, 116], continuous measurement of vaginal temperature and conductivity [117], ventral tail base skin surface temperature [118], rumen reticular temperature [119], or external auditory canal temperature [120]; however, they need further developments before introducing them into the daily practice.

Advertisement

6. Determining the optimal time for artificial insemination

The mean duration of an estrous cycle in dairy cows is 21 days (between 18 and 26 days), and ovulation occurs 25–32 h after the onset of standing heat [108]. According to Roelofs et al. [114], the duration between the onset of estrus and ovulation is 29.3 ± 3.9 h, while the onset of the first standing estrus and the time of ovulation is 27.6 ± 5.4 h [121]. Since the chances for pregnancy after artificial insemination (AI) are much higher when ovulation occurs within the survival time of sperm [105], it is essential to inseminate the cow within 12 h after the onset of estrus, namely during the last half of standing heat; therefore, the a.m./p.m. rule was developed as a guide for AI. This guideline recommends that cows observed in estrus in the morning should be inseminated in the afternoon, and cows observed in estrus during the afternoon should be inseminated the following morning [105]. In contrast, if we inseminate the cows at a similar time each day or employ an inseminator service, there is no need to follow the a.m./p.m. rule if heat detection is accurate, the insemination technique is good, and semen fertility is high on the farm [122, 123, 124].

The optimal time for artificial insemination (AI) after the onset of increased activity measured by pedometers is between 5 and 17 h [114], while according to Maatje et al. [125] and Yoshioka et al. [126], it is between 6–17 h and 10–18 h, respectively. When neck-mounted collars were used to detect estrus, the highest pregnancy rates were reached for primiparous and multiparous cows when they were inseminated between 13–16 h and 9–12 h after the onset of estrus, respectively [127]. At the same time, this difference between primiparous and multiparous cows could not be confirmed by Roelofs et al. [114]. When pressure sensing devices were used to detect estrus, the optimal time for AI felt between 4–12 h [109] and 12–18 h [128] after the onset of estrus, respectively. In comparison, artificial insemination had proven to be the most effective when cows were inseminated at 12 h after the onset of estrus [129].

According to Van Eerdenburg et al. [130], cows (n = 100) were detected with a scoring system in estrus. Of these animals, 50% showed standing heat (58% reported by Roelofs et al. [131]), and only 64 of the 100 cows achieving a score of >50 were presented for insemination; 98% did indeed ovulate. The other 36 were <45-day postpartum and were not inseminated [132]. The milk yield, parity, follicular size, and ovulation time were not correlated with the estrous behavior score. The animals that ovulated 0–24 h after the first ultrasonographic examination scored more than twice the number of points (188 versus 65 points) as those that ovulated 24–48 h after the first scan (P = 0.045). If ovulation occurred >48 h after AI, only 15% of the cows became pregnant (Figure 2). Cows that did not show overt signs of estrus and thus scored <100 points in the scoring system had a high chance of ovulating after 24 h and should therefore be inseminated again or given GnRH (or agonist) at the time of insemination [132].

Figure 2.

Pregnancy rates at Day 28 concerning ovulation time after AI. Ovulation time <0 indicates that the cow had ovulated before the initial ultrasonographic examination adapted from [132].

Ultrasonography can also detect ovulation, since it is characterized by the abrupt disappearance of the large ovulatory follicle [132, 133]. The duration between the onset of the increased number of steps and ovulation can be 29.3 ± 3.9 h. In contrast, the period between the end of the increased number of steps and ovulation is 19.4 ± 4.4 h, measured by a pedometer. Pedometers may detect estrus accurately (83%) and appear to be a promising tool for predicting ovulation in dairy cows [131], while monitoring P4 alone is not sufficient to predict ovulation [134].

A progesterone (P4) assay of plasma or milk as an indication of true estrus clearly demonstrated that 7–22% of cows showing estrus had abnormal levels of P4 at the time of AI [135]. Bulman and Lamming [136] found that 15% of cows were inseminated during inappropriate stages of the follicular phase. However, a further 15% were inseminated during the luteal phase, while according to O’Connor [137] up to 15% of the cattle presented for insemination are really not in heat. When such cows are inseminated, they do not conceive, or it leads to abortion if they have been pregnant [135]. The number of artificial inseminations performed at the wrong time in the practice can be reduced by performing ultrasonographic examination [132, 133] or by using different diagnostic kits such as on-farm milk progesterone tests [138], in-line progesterone measurements [113, 139], or on-farm heat detection kits for detecting lactoferrin in cervical mucus [140] or by measuring the electrical resistance of vaginal fluid [137].

To eliminate the requirement for estrous detection and to optimize the timing of insemination relative to ovulation, different fixed timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocols were introduced into daily practice (Table 3). The TAI protocols may provide similar pregnancy rates per AI when compared with those of classical reproductive management systems, based on estrous detection and hormonal therapy when necessary. However, before selecting any protocol, it is always very important to compare the results with the traditional methods used on the dairy farm. When estrous detection on the farm is good, PGF treatment and AI at the observed estrus are recommended [155], while when estrous detection is poor, TAI protocols may be recommended. Recently published reviews [156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161] and meta-analyses [162, 163, 164] may contribute to selecting from an economic and management point of view the most suitable and most effective TAI protocol(s) for our dairy farm.

Protocol namesTreatmentsTAIReferences
OvSynchDay 0: GnRH, Day 7: PGF, Day 9: GnRHDay 10Pursley et al. [141]
Modified OvSynch-1Day 0 a.m.: GnRH, Day 7 a.m.: PGF, Day 9 p.m. (30–36 h after PGF): GnRHDay 10 a.m. (16–20 h after GnRH)Pursley et al. [142]
Modified Ovsynch-2Day 0 a.m.: GnRH, Day 7 a.m.: PGF, Day 8 a.m.: PGF, Day 9 p.m. (30–36 h after PGF): GnRHDay 10 a.m. (13–16 h after GnRH)Rheinberger et al. [143]
Shortened OvsynchDay 0: PGF, Day 2: GnRHDay 3
(16–20 h after GnRH)
Stevenson et al. [144]
Double-OvsynchDay 0 a.m.: GnRH, Day 7 a.m.: PGF, Day 10 a.m.: GnRH, Day 17 a.m.: GnRH, Day 24 a.m.: PGF, Day 26 p.m.: GnRHDay 27 a.m.Ribeiro et al. [145]
CosynchDay 0 a.m.: GnRH, Day 7 a.m.: PGFDay 9 p.m.
+GnRH
Geary et al. [146]
Presynch-14 − Ovsynch 10Day 0: PGF, Day 14: PGF, Day 24: GnRH, Day 31: PGF, Day 33: GnRHDay 34Stevenson et al. [147]
Presynch-14 − Ovsynch-12Day 0 p.m.: PGF, Day 14 p.m.: PGF, Day 26 a.m.: GnRH, Day 33 a.m.: PGF, Day 35 p.m.: GnRHDay 36 a.m.Martínez et al. [148]
Presynch-14 − Ovsynch 14Day 0 p.m.: PGF, Day 14: PGF, Day 28: GnRH, Day 35 a.m.: PGF, Day 37 p.m.: GnRH (56 h after PGF)Day 38 a.m.
(16–20 h after GnRH)
Giordano et al. [149]
G-4-G − OvsynchDay 0: PGF, Day 2: GnRH, Day 6: GnRH, Day 13: PGF, Day 15: GnRHDay 16
(16 h after GnRH)
Bello et al. [150]
G-5-G − OvsynchDay 0: PGF, Day 2: GnRH, Day 7: GnRH, Day 14: PGF, Day 16: GnRHDay 17
(16 h after GnRH)
G-6-G − OvsynchDay 0: PGF, Day 2: GnRH, Day 8: GnRH, Day 15: PGF, Day 17: GnRHDay 18
(16 h after GnRH)
Modified G-6-G – OvsynchDay 0: PGF, Day 2: GnRH, Day 8: GnRH, Day 15: PGF, Day 17 p.m. (56 h after PGF): GnRHDay 18 a.m.
(16 h after GnRH)
Pursley and Martins [151]
PG-3-G − OvsynchDay 0: PGF, Day 3: GnRH, Day 10: GnRH, Day 17: PGF, Day 19: GnRHDay 20Stevenson et al. [147]
Ovsynch + PD: progesterone device (CIDR/PRID)Day 0: GnRH + PD, Day 7: PGF − PD, Day 9: GnRHDay 10
(16–20 h after GnRH)
El-Zarkouny et al. [152]
Cosynch-5 + PDDay 0: GnRH + PD, Day 5: PGF − PD, +6–8 h: PGFDay 8
+GnRH
Santos et al. [153]
Modified Cosynch-5 + PDDay 0: PD, Day 5: PGF − PDDay 8
+GnRH
Colazo and Amdrose [154]

Table 3.

Fixed-timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocols.

Advertisement

7. Accurate diagnosis of pregnancy and pregnancy loss in dairy cow

Pregnancy diagnosis plays an essential role in decreasing days open on dairy farms. Therefore, it is essential to select an accurate method for diagnosing early pregnancy and pregnancy loss (late embryonic and early fetal mortality) because the cost of each day open 100 days after calving may reach $4.00 [165] or €2.5–6.5 [166], respectively. Besides traditional pregnancy diagnosis (rectal palpation of the uterus or progesterone tests) [167, 168, 169], there are several new possibilities to diagnose early pregnancy on dairy farms. However, before introducing any new diagnostic test on our dairy farm, we must evaluate the accuracy of that particular test. Their results must be confirmed by the old diagnostic method to decrease the adverse effects of false-negative diagnoses. This can be caused by prostaglandin treatment to reduce the interval to the next AI service [167] or by using new resynchronization protocols in our dairy farm [170, 171, 172].

One of the most recent techniques for diagnosing early pregnancy on the dairy farm is B-mode ultrasonography. Under field conditions, ultrasonography may achieve accurate results from Days 25 to 30 after AI [173, 174, 175]. However, the accuracy of the transrectal ultrasonographic diagnoses greatly depends on the frequency of the transducer used, the surgeon’s skill, the criterion used for a positive pregnancy diagnosis, and the position of the uterus in the pelvic inlet [176]. For example, if during ulrasonographic examinations performed between Days 24 and 38 after AI, we can find a uterus far cranial to the pelvic inlet compared with those cases when the uterus is located within or close to the pelvic inlet, we can make more incorrect nonpregnancy diagnoses [177].

Nonpregnant animals can be selected accurately by evaluating blood flow in the corpus luteum around Day 20 after AI, meaning we can substantially improve the reproductive efficiency of our herd [169].

Pregnancy protein RIA assays such as pregnancy-specific protein B/PSPB/, pregnancy-associated glycoprotein/PAG/, and PSP60, commercial ELISA, or rapid visual ELISA tests may provide an alternative method to ultrasonography for determining early pregnancy and pregnancy loss in dairy cows. However, the relatively long half-life after calving and pregnancy loss may limit the effectiveness of these laboratory methods for early pregnancy diagnosis in the field, especially when compared with a direct method such as transrectal ultrasonography [176]. Linear array/sector B-mode [178] and Doppler ultrasonography [169] may exceed the other diagnostic methods in the amount of information collected from each animal during scanning. However, their accuracies greatly depend on the operator’s proficiency and availability [178].

A new technology (in-line milk analysis system) has already made the automatic collection of milk samples at milking robots or in the milking parlor to analyze progesterone to detect early pregnancy and pregnancy loss, respectively [113, 179, 180]. Bruinjé and Ambrose [113] reported high sensitivity (>95%) from Day 27 after AI, while the specificity was somewhat lower before Day 40 after AI. Any new biomarkers discovered for early pregnancy diagnosis may make it possible to diagnose pregnancy loss much earlier, which may significantly contribute to increasing reproductive efficiency in our dairy herds. The importance of this technology would also be emphasized by its ability to identify pregnant and nonpregnant animals on time with no animal handling because even a simple transrectal examination of dairy cows can lead to increased plasma and salivary cortisol concentrations and changes in heart rate, heart rate variability, and behavior that are indicative of pain [181].

Although fertilization in the cow can be detected by measuring the early pregnancy factor with the rosette inhibition test, it is not a practical method; therefore, it needs further development. Recently found biomarkers such as interferon-tau-stimulated genes or microRNAs may help us diagnose early pregnancy in dairy cows; however, these tests need further development before their general use in the dairy practice [176].

Advertisement

8. Conclusion

Besides providing high-quality food for milk production and preventing metabolic disorders, it is essential to pay special attention to the first 100 days after calving. This is because the aim of our activity during the transition period is to prevent calving complications and uterine diseases and, if it is not possible, to treat them accordingly as soon as possible. Furthermore, it is essential to emphasize that if we would like to select a new diagnostic method or treatment protocol, it is always necessary to compare the results with the previously used test or treatment protocol.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Butler WR. Nutritional interactions with reproductive performance in dairy cattle. Animal Reproduction Science. 2000;60-61:449-457. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00076-2
  2. 2. Royal MD, Darwash AO, Flint APF, Webb R, Wooliams JA, Lamming GE. Declining fertility in dairy cattle: Changes in traditional and endocrine parameters of fertility. Animal Science. 2000;70:487-501. DOI: 10.1017/S1357729800051845
  3. 3. Lucy MC. Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: Where will it end? Journal of Dairy Science. 2001;84:1277-1293. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70158-0
  4. 4. Bello N, Stevenson JS, Tempelman RJ. Invited review: Milk production and reproductive performance: Modern interdisciplinary insights into an enduring axiom. Journal of Dairy Science. 2012;95:5461-5475. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5564
  5. 5. LeBlanc S. Is a high level of milk production compatible with good reproductive performance in dairy cows? Animals Frontiers. 2013;3:84-91. DOI: 10.2527/af.2013-0038
  6. 6. Rearte R, LeBlanc SJ, Corva SG, de la Sota RL, Lacau-Mengido IM, Giuliodori MJ. Effect of milk production on reproductive performance in dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science. 2018;101:7575-7584. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13796
  7. 7. Silva JW. Addressing the decline in reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows: A researcher’s perspective. Veterinary Sciences Tomorrow. 2003;3:1-5
  8. 8. Britt JH. Early post partum breeding in dairy cows. A review. Journal of Dairy Science. 1975;58:266-271. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(75)84558-9
  9. 9. Szenci O. Effects of type and intensity of assistance on acid-base balance of newborn calves. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica. 1983;31:73-79
  10. 10. Bleul U, Götz E. The effect of lactic acidosis on the generation and compensation of mixed respiratoty-metabolic acidosis in neonatal calves. The Veterinary Record. 2013;172:528. DOI: 10.1136/vr.101192
  11. 11. Vannucchi CI, Rodrigues JA, Silva LCG, Lúcio CF, Veiga GAL. Effect of dystocia and treatment with oxytocin on neonatal calf vitality and acid-base, electrolyte and haematological status. The Veterinary Journal. 2015;203:228-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.12.018
  12. 12. Tenhagen B-A, Helmbold A, Heuwiser W. Effect of various degrees of dystocia in dairy cattle on calf viability, milk production, fertility and culling. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A. 2007;54:98-102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.2007.00850.x
  13. 13. Kim D-U, Lee S-C, Jeong J-K, Choi I-S, Moon S-H, Kang H-G, et al. Effects of dystocia on the postpartum complications, milk production and reproductive performance in dairy cows. Journal of Veterinary Clinics. 2016;33:87-92. DOI: 10.17555/jvc.2016.04.33.2.87
  14. 14. Szenci O. Role of acid-base disturbances in perinatal mortality of calves: Review. Veterinary Bulletin. 2003;73:7R-14R
  15. 15. Bleul U. Care of asphyxic neonate. In: Szenci O, Mee JF, Belul U, Taverne MAM, editors. Bovine Prenatal, Perinatal, and Neonatal Medicine. Budapest, Hungary: Hungarian Association for Buiatrics; 2021. pp. 199-202
  16. 16. Szenci O, Gálfy P, Lajcsák A. Comparison of carbonic anhydrase in neonatal and maternal red blood cells with different levels of acidosis in newborn calves. Zentralblatt Veterinarmedizin Reiche A. 1984;31:437-440. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1984.tb01302.x
  17. 17. Schuijt G. Iatrogenic fractures of ribs and vertebrae during delivery in perinataly dying calves: 235 cases (1978-1988). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 1990;197:1196-1202
  18. 18. Mee JF. Management of the difficult calving. In: Szenci O, Mee JF, Belul U, Taverne MAM, editors. Bovine Prenatal, Perinatal, and Neonatal Medicine. Budapest, Hungary: Hungarian Association for Buiatrics; 2021. pp. 149-154
  19. 19. Szenci O, Taverne MAM, Bakonyi S, Erdődi A. Comparision between pre- and postnatal acid-base status of calves and their perinatal mortality. Veterinary Quarterly. 1988;10:140-144. DOI: 10.1080/01652176.1988.9694161
  20. 20. Bleul U, Schwantag S, Kähn W. Blood gas analysis of bovine fetal capillary blood during stage II labor. Theriogenology. 2008;69:245-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.09.027
  21. 21. Szenci O, van der Weijden GC, Taverne MAM. Monitoring foetal/neonatal acid-base changes in the periparturient period. In: Szenci O, Mee JF, Belul U, Taverne MAM, editors. Bovine Prenatal, Perinatal, and Neonatal Medicine. Budapest, Hungary: Hungarian Association for Buiatrics; 2021. pp. 199-202
  22. 22. Boyd JW. Relationships between acid-base balance, serum composition and colostrum absorption in newborn calves. British Veterinary Journal. 1989;145:249-256. DOI: 10.1016/0007-1935(89)90077-8
  23. 23. Besser TE, Szenci O, Gay CC. Decreased colostral immunoglobulin absorption in calves with postnatal respiratory acidosis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 1990;196:1239-1243
  24. 24. Besser TE, Gay CC. The importance of colostrum to the health of the neonatal calf. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. 1994;10:107-117. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30591-0
  25. 25. Kaske M, Bleul U. Feeding of dairy calf until weaning. In: Szenci O, Mee JF, Belul U, Taverne MAM, editors. Bovine Prenatal, Perinatal, and Neonatal Medicine. Budapest, Hungary: Hungarian Association for Buiatrics; 2021. pp. 291-308
  26. 26. Choukeir AI, Kovács L, Szelényi Z, Kézér LF, Albert E, Abdelmegeid MK, et al. Effect of monitoring the onset of calving by a calving alarm thermometer on the prevalence of dystocia, stillbirth, retained fetal membranes and clinical metritis in a Hungarian dairy farm. Theriogenology. 2020;145:144-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.10.004
  27. 27. Paolucci M, Sylla L, Di Giambattista A, Palombi C, Elad A, Stradaioli G, et al. Improving calving management to further enhance reproductive performance in dairy cattle. Veterinary Research Communications. 2010;34(Suppl. 1):S37-S40. DOI: 10.1007/s11259-010-9397-y
  28. 28. Choukeir AI, Kovács L, Kézér LF, Buják D, Szelényi Z, Gáspárdy A, et al. Evaluation of a commercial intravaginal thermometer to predict calving in a Hungarian Holstein-Friesian dairy farm. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2020;55:1535-1540. DOI: 10.1111/rda.13803
  29. 29. Horváth A, Lénárt L, Csepreghy A, Madar M, Pálffy M, Szenci O. A field study using different technologies to detect calving at a large-scale Hungarian dairy farm. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2021;56:673-679. DOI: 10.1111/rda.13904
  30. 30. Kovács L, Kézér FL, Ruff F, Szenci O. Parturition progress, outcomes of calving and postpartum health of dairy cows underwent assisted and spontaneous calvings. Journal of Dairy Science. 2016;99:7568-7573. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11325
  31. 31. Villettaz Robichaud M, Pearl DL, Godden SM, LeBlanc SJ, Haley DB. Systematic early obstetrical assistance at calving: I. Effects on dairy calf stillbirth, vigor, and passive immunity transfer. Journal of Dairy Science. 2017;100:691-702. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11213
  32. 32. Heinrichs AJ, Radostits OM. Health management of dairy calves and replacement heifers. In: Radostits OM, editor. Heard Health. Food Animal Production Medicine. W.B ed. Philadelphia, USA: Saunders Company; 2001. pp. 333-396
  33. 33. Niles D. The modern dairy maternity ward. Magyar Állatorvosok Lapja. 2016;138(Suppl. 1):275-279
  34. 34. Földi J, Kulcsár M, Pécsi A, Huyghe B, de Sá CD, Lohuis J, et al. Bacterial complications of postpartum uterine involution in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science. 2006;96:265-281. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.006
  35. 35. Sheldon IM, Lewis GS, LeBlanc S, Gilbert RO. Defining postpartum uterine disease in cattle. Theriogenology. 2006;65:1516-1530. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.08.021
  36. 36. Sheldon IM, Owens SE. Postpartum uterine infection and endometritis in dairy cattle. Animal Reproduction. 2017;14:622-629. DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR1006
  37. 37. Molina-Coto R, Lucy MC. Uterine inflammation affects the reproductive performance of dairy cows: A review. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 2018;29:449-468. DOI: 10.15517/ma.v29i2.29852
  38. 38. Erb HN, Martin SW, Ison N, Swaminathan S. Interrelationships between production and reproductive disease in Holstein cows. Conditional relationships between production and disease. Journal of Dairy Science. 1981;64:272-281. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(81)82564-7
  39. 39. Galvão KN. Postpartum uterine diseases in dairy cows. Animal Reproduction. 2012;9:290-296
  40. 40. Benzaquen ME, Risco CA, Archbald LF, Melendez P, Thatcher MJ, Thatcher WW. Rectal temperature, calving-related factors, and the incidence of puerperal metritis in postpartum dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2007;90:2804-2814. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2006-482
  41. 41. Galvão KN, Greco LF, Vilela JM, Sá Filho MF, Santos JE. Effect of intrauterine infusion of ceftiofur on uterine health and fertility in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2009;92:1532-1542. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1615
  42. 42. Belschner A, Saltman R. The 100-day contract fresh cow program and its effect on milk production and reproduction. In: Proceedings of XXI. World Buiatrics Congress. Punta del Este, Uruguay; 2000. p. 36 (Abstract 268)
  43. 43. Liboreiro DN, Machado KS, Silva PR, Maturana MM, Nishimura TK, Brandao AP, et al. Characterization of peripartum rumination and activity of cows diagnosed with metabolic and uterine diseases. Journal of Dairy Science. 2015;98:6812-6827. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8947
  44. 44. Cocco R, Canozzi MEA, Fischer V. Rumination time as an early predictor of metritis and subclinical ketosis in dairy cows at the beginning of lactation: Systematic review-meta-analysis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2021;189:105309. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105309
  45. 45. Paudyal S. Using rumination time to manage health and reproduction in dairy cattle: A review. Veterinary Quarterly. 2021;41:292-300. DOI: 10.1080/01652176.2021.1987581
  46. 46. Titler M, Maquivar MG, Bas S, Gordon E, Rajala-Schultz PJ, McCullough K, et al. Effect of metritis on daily activity patterns in lactating Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2013;96(E-Suppl. 1):647 (Abstr.)
  47. 47. Stangaferro ML, Wijma R, Caixeta LS, Al-Abri MA, Giordano JO. Use of rumination and activity monitoring for the identification of dairy cows with health disorders. Part I. Metabolic and digestive disorders. Journal of Dairy Science. 2016;99:7395-7410. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-10907
  48. 48. Lee M, Seo S. Wearable wireless biosensor technology for monitoring cattle: A review. Animals. 2021;11:2779. DOI: 10.3390/ani11102779
  49. 49. Miwa M, Matsuyama S, Nakamura S, Noda K, Sakatani M. Prepartum change in ventral tail base surface temperature in beef cattle: Comparison with vaginal temperature and behavior indices, and effect of ambient temperature. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 2019;65:515-525. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2019-087
  50. 50. de Boer MW, LeBlanc SJ, Dubuc J, Meier S, Heuwieser W, Arlt S, et al. Invited review: Systematic review of diagnostic tests for reproductive-tract infection and inflammation in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2014;97:3983-3399. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7450
  51. 51. Arias LAQ , Fernández MV, González JJB, López MB, Herradón PJH, Martínez AIP. Subclinical endometritis in dairy cattle. New Insights into Theriogenology. 2018. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80229
  52. 52. Szenci O. Recent possibilities for diagnosis and treatment of post parturient uterine diseases in dairy cow. Journal of Fertilization: In Vitro—IVF-Worldwide, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics & Stem Cell Biology. 2016;4:170. DOI: 10.4172/2375-4508.1000170
  53. 53. Samardžija M, Turk R, Sobiech P, Valpotić H, Harapin I, Gračner D, et al. Intrauterine ozone treatment of puerperal disorders in domestic ruminants: A review. Veterinarski Arhives. 2017;87:363-375. DOI: 10.24099/vet.arhiv.160119a
  54. 54. Drillich M, Beetz O, Pfützner A, Sabin M, Sabin HJ, Kutzer P, et al. Evaluation of a systemic antibiotic treatment of toxic puerperal metritis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2001;84:2010-2017. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74644-9
  55. 55. Dubuc J, Duffield TF, Leslie KE, Walton JS, Leblanc SJ. Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic and prostaglandin treatments for uterine health and reproductive performance in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2011;94:1325-1338. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3757
  56. 56. Pécsi A, Földi J, Szabó J, Nagy P, Kulcsár M, Gy H. Efficacy of different antimicrobial therapeutic protocols for treatment of puerperal metritis and endometritis in dairy cows (in Hungarian with English summary). Magyar Állatorvosok Lapja. 2007;129:590-599
  57. 57. Brick TA, Schuenemann GM, Bas S, Daniels JB, Pinto CR, Rings DM, et al. Effect of intrauterine dextrose or antibiotic therapy on reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows diagnosed with clinical endometritis. Journal of Dairy Science. 2012;95:1894-1905. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4892
  58. 58. Tras B, Dinc DA, Uney K. The effect of N-acetylcysteine on the treatment of clinical endometritis and pregnancy rate in dairy cows. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2014;30:133-137. DOI: 10.15312/EurasianJVetSci.201436512
  59. 59. Lewis GS. Steroidal regulation of uterine immune defences. Animal Reproduction Science. 2004;82-83:281-294. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.026
  60. 60. Barbeau-Grégoire N, Boyer A, Rousseau M, Gauthier M-L, Dubuc J. Validation of on-farm bacteriological systems for endometritis diagnosis in postpartum dairy cows. Animals. 2021;11:2695. DOI: 10.3390/ani11092695
  61. 61. Wagener K, Gabler C, Drillich M. A review of the ongoing discussion about definition, diagnosis and pathomechanism of subclinical endometritis in dairy cows. Theriogenology. 2017;94:21-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.02.005
  62. 62. Dini P, Farhoodi M, Hostens M, van Eetvelde M, Pascottini OB, Fazeli MH, et al. Effect of uterine lavage on neutrophil counts in postpartum dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science. 2015;158:25-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.04.005
  63. 63. El-Rheem SMA, Ghallab RS, El-Sharkawy S. SAT, a new approach in understanding and treatment of subclinical endometritis in dairy cows. Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2019;9:109-119. DOI: 10.4236/ojvm.2019.98010
  64. 64. Oetzel GR. Monitoring and testing dairy herds for metabolic disease. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. 2004;20:651-674. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2004.06.006
  65. 65. Folnožić I, Turk R, Đuričić D, Vince S, Pleadin J, Flegar-Meštrić Z, et al. Influence of body condition on serum metabolic indicators of lipid mobilization and oxidative stress in dairy cows during the transition period. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2015;50:910-917. DOI: 10.1111/rda.12608
  66. 66. Folnožić I, Turk R, Đuričić D, Vince S, Flegar-Meštrić Z, Sobiech P, et al. The effect of parity on metabolic profile and resumption of ovarian cyclicity in dairy cows. Veterinarski Arhives. 2016;86:641-653
  67. 67. Iwersen M, Falkenberg U, Voigtsberger R, Forderung D, Heuwieser W. Evaluation of an electronic cowside test to detect subclinical ketosis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2009;92:2618-2624. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1795
  68. 68. Szelényi Z, Bérdi P, Bajcsy AC, Horváth A, Könyves L. Monitoring the occurrence of subclinical ketosis with a hand-held ketone measuring device in Hungarian dairy herds (in Hungarian with English summary). Magyar Állatorvosok Lapja. 2013;35:213-220. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3622.1607
  69. 69. Von Keyserlingk MAG, Rushen J, de Passille AMB, Weary DM. Invited review: The welfare of dairy cattle-key concepts and the role of science. Journal of Dairy Science. 2009;92:4101-4111. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2326
  70. 70. Goff JP, Hohman A, Timms LL. Effect of subclinical and clinical hypocalcemia and dietary cation-anion difference on rumination activity in periparturient dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2020;103:2591-2601. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-17581
  71. 71. Paudyal S, Maunsell FP, Richeson JT, Risco CA, Donovan DA, Pinedo PJ. Rumination time and monitoring of health disorders during early lactation. Animal. 2018;12:1484-1492. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731117002932
  72. 72. Stevenson JS, Banuelos S, Mendonca LG. Transition dairy cow health is associated with first postpartum ovulation risk, metabolic status, milk production, rumination, and physical activity. Journal of Dairy Science. 2020;103:9573-9586. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-18636
  73. 73. Gasteiner J, Boswerger B, Guggenberger T. Long-Term Measurement of Reticuloruminal pH-value in Dairy Cows under Practical Conditions by an Indwelling and Wireless Data Transmitting Unit. In: Szenci O, Brydl E, Jurkovich V (eds): Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress of the Hungarian Association for Buiatrics, Hungary; 2013. pp. 33-39
  74. 74. Butler WR, Smith RD. Interrelationship between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 1989;72:767-783. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79169-4
  75. 75. Mulvany PM. Dairy cow condition scoring. National Institute for research in dairying. Reading. 1977. Paper no. 4468
  76. 76. Ferguson JD, Galligan DT, Thomsen N. Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 1994;77:2695-2703. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77212-X
  77. 77. Manríquez D, Thatcher WW, Santos JEP, Chebel RC, Galvão KN, Schuenemann GM, et al. Effect of body condition change and health status during early lactation on performance and survival of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2021;104:12785-12799. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-20091
  78. 78. Siachos N, Oikonomou G, Panousis N, Banos G, Arsenos G, Valergakis GE. Association of body condition score with ultrasound measurements of backfat and longissimus dorsi muscle thickness in periparturient Holstein cows. Animals. 2021;11(3):818. DOI: 10.3390/ani11030818
  79. 79. Schröder UJ, Staufenbiel R. Invited review: Methods to determine body fat reserves in the dairy cow with special regard to ultrasonographic measurement of backfat thickness. Journal of Dairy Science. 2006;89:1-14. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72064-1
  80. 80. Van der Drift SGA, Houweling M, Schonewille JT, Tielens AGM, Jorritsma R. Protein and fat mobilization and associations with serum β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2012;95:4911-4920. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4771
  81. 81. Song X, Bokkers EAM, van der Tol PPJ, Groot Koerkamp PWG, van Mourik S. Automated body weight prediction of dairy cows using 3-dimensional vision. Journal of Dairy Science. 2018;101:4448-4459. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13094
  82. 82. Wang Z, Shadpour S, Chan E, Rotondo V, Wood KM, Tulpan D. ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: Applications of machine learning for livestock body weight prediction from digital images. Journal of Animal Science. 2021;99:1-15. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab022
  83. 83. Beam SW, Butler WR. Energy balance and ovarian follicle development prior to the first ovulation postpartum in dairy cows receiving three levels of dietary fat. Biology of Reproduction. 1997;56:133-142. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod56.1.133
  84. 84. Butler WR. Nutritional effects on resumption of ovarian ciclicity and conception rate in postpartum dairy cows. British Society Animal Science Occasional Publication. 2001;26:133-145. DOI: 10.1017/S0263967X00033644
  85. 85. Jolly PDS, McDougall S, Fitzpatrick LA, Macmillen KL, Entwistle KW. Physiological effects of undernutrition on postpartum anoestrus in cows. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Supplement. 1995;49:477-492. DOI: 10.1530/BIOSCIPROCS.3.036
  86. 86. Rhodes FM, Clark BA, Nation DP, Taufa VK, Macmillan KL, Day ML, et al. Factors influencing the prevalence of postpartum anoestrus in New Zealand dairy cows. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production. 1998;58:79-81
  87. 87. Darwash AO, Lamming GE, Royal MD. A protocol for initiating oestrus and ovulation early postpartum in dairy cows. Animal Science. 2001;72:539-546. DOI: 10.1017/S1357729800052073
  88. 88. Frajblat M. Metabolic State and Follicular Development in the Postpartum Lactating Dairy Cow. [PhD. thesis]. USA: Cornell University; 2000
  89. 89. Villa-Godoy A, Hughes TL, Emery RS, Chapin LT, Fogwell RL. Association between energy balance and luteal function in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 1988;71:1063-1072. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79653-8
  90. 90. Spicer LJ, Tucker WB, Adams GD. Insulin-like growth factors in dairy cows: Relationship among energy balance, body condition, ovarian activity and estrous behaviour. Journal of Dairy Science. 1990;73:929-937. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78749-8
  91. 91. Shelton K, Gayerie De Abreu MF, Hunter MG, Parkinson TJ, Lamming GE. Luteal inadequacy during the early luteal phase of subfertile cows. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1990;90:1-10. DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0900001
  92. 92. Butler WR, Calaman JJ, Beam SW. Plasma and milk urea nitrogen in relation to pregnancy rate in lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 1996;74:858-865. DOI: 10.2527/1996.744858x
  93. 93. Britt JH. Influence of nutrition and weight loss on reproduction and early embryonic death in cattle. Proceedings of the XVII World Buiatrics Congress, St. Paul, MN, USA; 1992. pp. 143-149. DOI: 10.21423/aabppro19926507
  94. 94. Kruip TAM, Wensing T, Vos PLAM. Characteristics of abnormal puerperium in dairy cattle and the rationale for common treatments. British Society Animal Science Occasional Publication. 2001;26:63-79. DOI: 10.1017/S0263967X00033590
  95. 95. Armstrong DG, Mcevoy TG, Baxter G, Robinson JJ, Hogg CO, Woad KJ, et al. Effect of dietary energy and protein on bovine follicular dynamics and embryo production in vitro: Associations with the ovarian insulin-like growth factor system. Biology of Reproduction. 2001;64:1624-1632. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod64.6.1624
  96. 96. Boland MP, Lonergan P, O’Callaghan D. Effect of nutrition on endocrine parameters, ovarian physiology, and oocyte and embryo development. Theriogenology. 2001;55:1323-1340. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00485-x
  97. 97. Snijders SEM, Dillon PG, O’Farrel KJ, Diskin M, Wylie ARG, O’Callaghan D, et al. Genetic merit for milk production and reproductive success in dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science. 2001;65:17-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00217-7
  98. 98. Abdelli A, Raboisson D, Kaidi R, Ibrahim B, Kalem A. Elevated non-esterified fatty acid and β-hydroxybutyrate in transition dairy cows and their association with reproductive performance and disorders: A meta-analysis. Theriogenology. 2017;93:99-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.01.030
  99. 99. Saby-Chaban C, Zhang W, Fournier R, Servien R, VillaVialaneix N, Corbière F, Chastant-Maillard S. Progesterone and betahydroxybutyrate in line measurements for a better description and understanding of Holstein cows fertility in field conditions. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming. 2017. Available from: https://nathalievialaneix.eu/doc/pdf/sabychaban_etal_ECPLF2017.pdf
  100. 100. Oetzel GR. Fresh cow metabolic diseases. Old myths and new data. In: American Association of Bovine Practitioners, Proceedings of the Annual Conference. 2017; Vol. 50:70-80. DOI: 10.21423/aabppro20173282
  101. 101. Mann S, McArt J, Abuelo A. Production-related metabolic disorders of cattle: Ketosis, milk fever and grass staggers. In Practice. 2019;41:205-219. DOI: 10.1136/inp.l3041
  102. 102. Reimers TJ, Smith RD, Newman SK. Management factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows in the North-Eastern United States. Journal of Dairy Science. 1985;68:963-972. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80916-4
  103. 103. Van Vliet JH, Van Eerdenburg FJCM. Sexual activities and oestrus detection in lactating Holstein cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 1996;50:57-69. DOI: 10.1016/0168-1591(96)01068-4
  104. 104. Lopez H, Satter LD, Wiltbank MC. Relationship between level of milk production and estrous behavior of lactating dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science. 2004;81:209-223. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.10.009
  105. 105. Trimberger GW. Breeding efficiency in dairy cattle from artificial insemination at various intervals before and after ovulation. Historical Research Bulletins of the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station. 1948;117:1913-1993. Available from: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ardhistrb/117
  106. 106. Hempstalk K, Harris BL, Lopdell TJ. Automatic reading of Kamars for heat detection in dairy herds. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production. 2009;7:8-12. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3574.4888
  107. 107. Alawneh JI, Williamson NB, Bailey D. Comparison of a camera-software system and typical farm management for detecting oestrus in dairy cattle at pasture. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 2006;54:73-77. DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2006.36615
  108. 108. Diskin MG, Sreenan JM. Expression and detection of oestrus in cattle. Reproduction Nutrition Development, EDP Sciences. 2000;40:481-491. DOI: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00900404
  109. 109. Dransfield MBG, Nebel RL, Pearson RE, Warnick LD. Timing of insemination for dairy cows identified in estrus by a radiotelemetric estrus detection system. Journal of Dairy Science. 1998;81:1874-1882. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75758-3
  110. 110. de Mol RMW, Ouweltjes GH, Kroeze MM, Hendriks WB. Detection of estrus and mastitis: Field performance of a model. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 2001;17:399-407. DOI: 10.13031/2013.6201
  111. 111. Firk R, Stamer E, Junge W, Krieter J. Automation of oestrus detection in dairy cows: A review. Livestock Production Science. 2002;75:219-232. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00323-2
  112. 112. Delwiche MJ, Tang X, BonDurant RH, Munro CJ. Estrus detection with a progesterone biosensor. Transactions of the ASAE. 2001;44:2003-2008. DOI: 10.13031/2013.6977
  113. 113. Bruinjé TC, Ambrose DJ. Validation of an automated in-line milk progesterone analysis system to diagnose pregnancy in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 2019;102:3615-3621. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15692
  114. 114. Roelofs JB, Van Eerdenburg FJCM, Soede NM, Kemp B. Various behavioural signs of estrous and their relationship with time of ovulation in dairy cattle. Theriogenology. 2005;63:1366-1377. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.07.009
  115. 115. Weigerinck W, Setkus A, Buda V, Borg-Karlson A-K, Mozuraitis R, de Gee A. BOVINOSE pheromone-based sensor system for detecting estrus in dairy cows. Procedia Computer Science. 2011;7:340-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2011.09.024
  116. 116. Göncü S, Koluman N. The sensor technologies for more efficient cow reproduction systems. MOJ Ecology & Environmental Sciences. 2019;4:128-131. DOI: 10.15406/mojes.2019.04.00144
  117. 117. Higaki S, Miura R, Suda T, Andersson LM, Okada H, Zhang Y, et al. Estrous detection by continuous measurements of vaginal temperature and conductivity with supervised machine learning in cattle. Theriogenology. 2019;123:90-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.09.038
  118. 118. Miura R, Yoshioka K, Miyamoto T, Nogami H, Okada H, Itoh T. Estrous detection by monitoring ventral tail base surface temperature using a wearable wireless sensor in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science. 2017;180:50-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.03.002
  119. 119. Burnett TA, Kaur M, Polsky L, Cerri RLA. Rumen-reticular temperature during estrus and ovulation using automated activity monitors in dairy cows. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2020;7:597512. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.597512
  120. 120. Randi F, McDonald M, Duffy P, Kelly AK, Lonergan P. The relationship between external auditory canal temperature and onset of estrus and ovulation in beef heifers. Theriogenology. 2018;110:175-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.01.001
  121. 121. Walker WL, Nebel RL, McGilliard ML. Time of ovulation relative to mounting activity in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 1996;79:1555-1561. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76517-7
  122. 122. Nebel RL, Walker WL, McGilliard ML, Allen CH, Heckman GS. Timing of artificial insemination of dairy cows: Fixed time once daily versus morning and afternoon. Journal of Dairy Science. 1994;77:3185-3191. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77261-1
  123. 123. Lynch CO, Kenny DA, Childs S, Diskin MG. The relationship between periovulatory endocrine and follicular activity on corpus luteum size, function, and subsequent embryo survival. Theriogenology. 2010;73:190-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.08.012
  124. 124. Diskin MG. Review: Semen handling, time of insemination and insemination technique in cattle. Animal. 2018;12(S1):s75-s84. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731118000952
  125. 125. Maatje K, Loeffler HSH, Engel B. Predicting optimal time of insemination in cows that show visual signs of estrus by estimating onset of estrus with pedometers. Journal of Dairy Science. 1997;80:1098-1105. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76035-1
  126. 126. Yoshioka H, Ito M, Tanimoto Y. Effectiveness of real-time radiotelemetric pedometer for estrus detection and insemination in Japanese black cows. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 2010;56:351-355. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.09-086t
  127. 127. Stevenson JS, Hill SL, Nebel RL, DeJarnette JM. Ovulation time and conception risk after automated activity monitoring in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2014;97:4296-4308. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00042-6
  128. 128. Xu ZZ, McKnight DJ, Vishwanath R, Pitt CJ, Burton LJ. Estrus detection using radiotelemetry or visual observation and tail painting for dairy cows on pasture. Journal of Dairy Science. 1998;81:2890-2896. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75849-7
  129. 129. Dalton JC, Nadir S, Bame JH, Noftsinger M, Nebel RL, Saacke RG. Effect of time of insemination on number of accessory sperm, fertilization rate, and embryo quality in nonlactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 2001;84:2413-2418. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74690-5
  130. 130. Van Eerdenburg FJCM, Loeffler HSH, Van Vliet JH. Detection of estrus in dairy cows: A new approach to an old problem. Veterinary Quarterly. 1996;18:52-54. DOI: 10.1080/01652176.1996.9694615
  131. 131. Roelofs JB, Van Eerdenburg FJCM, Soede NM, Kemp B. Pedometer readings for estrous detection as predictor for time of ovulation in dairy cattle. Theriogenology. 2005;64:1690-1703. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.04.004
  132. 132. Van Eerdenburg FJCM, Karthaus D, Taverne MAM, Merics I, Szenci O. The relationship between estrous behavioural score and time of ovulation in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 2002;85:1150-1156. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74177-5
  133. 133. Larsson B. Determination of ovulation by ultrasound examination and its relation to LH-peak in heifers. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin. Reihe A. 1987;34:749-754. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1987.tb00342.x
  134. 134. Roelofs JB, Van Eerdenburg FJCM, Soede NM, Kemp B. Relationship between progesterone concentrations in milk and time of ovulation in dairy cattle. Animal Reproduction Science. 2005;91:337-343. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.04.015
  135. 135. Appleyard WT, Cook B. The detection of estrus in dairy cattle. The Veterinary Record. 1975;99:143-146
  136. 136. Bulman DC, Lamming GE. Milk progesterone levels in relation to conception, repeat breeding and factors influencing acyclicity in dairy cows. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1978;54:447-458. DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0540447
  137. 137. O'Connor ML, editor. Heat Detection and Timing of Insemination for Cattle. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University; 1993. pp. 1-18. Available from: https://extension.psu.edu/heat-detection-and-timing-of-insemination-for-cattle
  138. 138. Nebel RL. On-farm milk progesterone tests. Journal of Dairy Science. 1988;71:1682-1690. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79733-7
  139. 139. Bruinjé TC, Colazo MG, Ribeiro ES, Gobikrushanth M, Ambrose DJ. Using in-line milk progesterone data to characterize parameters of luteal activity and their association with fertility in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2019;102:780-798. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-14654
  140. 140. Lee J, Lee S, Park Y, Lee S, Ha S, Han M, et al. The detection of bovine estrus by lactoferrin monoclonal antibody. Animals. 2021;11:1582. DOI: 10.3390/ ani11061582
  141. 141. Pursley JR, Mee MO, Wiltbank MC. Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2a and GnRH. Theriogenology. 1995;44:915-923. DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(95)00279-h
  142. 142. Pursley JR, Wiltbank MC, Stevenson JS, Ottobre JS, Garverick HA, Anderson LL. Pregnancy rates per artificial insemination for cows and heifers inseminated at a synchronized ovulation or synchronized estrus. Journal of Dairy Science. 1997;80:295-300. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75937-X
  143. 143. Rheinberger JM, Colson DD, Beggs DS, Mansell PD, Stevenson MA, Rheinberger RJ, et al. Effect of a second treatment of prostaglandin F during the Ovsynch program on fixed-time artificial insemination conception rates and luteolysis in split-calving, pasture-fed dairy cows. Australian Veterinary Journal. 2020;98:190-196. DOI: 10.1111/avj.12918
  144. 144. Stevenson JS, Cartmill JA, Hensley BA, El-Zarkouny SZ. Conception rates of dairy cows following early not-pregnant diagnosis by ultrasonography and subsequent treatments with shortened Ovsynch protocol. Theriogenology. 2003;60:475-483. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00042-6
  145. 145. Ribeiro ES, Cerri RLA, Bisinotto RS, Lima FS, Silvestre FT, Greco LF, et al. Reproductive performance of grazing dairy cows following presynchronization and resynchronization protocols. Journal of Dairy Science. 2011;94:4984-4996. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4225
  146. 146. Geary TW, Whittier JC, Hallford DM, MacNeil MD. Calf removal improves conception rates to the Ovsynch and Co-synch protocols. Journal of Animal Science. 2001;79:1-4. DOI: 10.2527/2001.7911
  147. 147. Stevenson JS, Pulley SL, Mellieon HI Jr. Prostaglandin F2a and gonadotropin-releasing hormone administration improve progesterone status, luteal number, and proportion of ovular and anovular dairy cows with corpora lutea before a timed artificial insemination program. Journal of Dairy Science. 2012;95:1831-1844. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4767
  148. 148. Martínez MF, Kastelic JP, Adams GP, Cook RB, Olson WO, Mapletoft RJ. The use of progestins in regimens for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle. Theriogenology. 2002;57:1049-1059. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00682-3
  149. 149. Giordano JO, Thomas MJ, Catucuamba G, Curler MD, Wijma R, Stangaferro ML, et al. Effect of extending the interval from Presynch to initiation of Ovsynch in a Presynch-Ovsynch protocol on fertility of timed artificial insemination services in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2016;99:746-757. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10083
  150. 150. Bello NM, Steibel JP, Pursley JR. Optimizing ovulation to first GnRH improved outcomes to each hormonal injection of Ovsynch in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2006;89:3413-3424. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72378-5
  151. 151. Pursley JR, Martins JP. Impact of circulating concentrations of progesterone and antral age of ovulatory follicle on fertility of high-producing lactating dairy cows. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 2012;24:267-271. DOI: 10.1071/RD11917
  152. 152. El-Zarkouny SZ, Cartmill JA, Hensley BA, Stevenson JS. Pregnancy in dairy cows after synchronized ovulation regimens with or without presynchronization and progesterone. Journal of Dairy Science. 2004;87:1024-1037. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73248-8
  153. 153. Santos JEP, Narciso CD, Rivera F, Thatcher WW, Chebel RC. Effect of reducing the period of follicle dominance in a timed AI protocol on reproduction of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2010;93:2976-2988. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2870
  154. 154. Colazo MG, Ambrose DJ. Pregnancy per AI in Holstein heifers inseminated with sexed semen after detected estrus or timed-AI. WCDS Advances in Dairy Technology. 2013;25:367 (Abstract). DOI: 10.13140/2.1.4834.5607
  155. 155. Mialot JP, Laumonnier G, Ponsart C, Fauxpoint H, Barassin E, Ponter AA, et al. Postpartum subestrus in dairy cows: Comparison of treatment with prostaglandin F2a or GnRH + prostaglandin F2a + GnRH. Theriogenology. 1999;52:901-911. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00181-8
  156. 156. Wiltbank MC, Souza AH, Carvalho PD, Bender RW, Nascimento AB. Improving fertility to timed artificial insemination by manipulation of circulating progesterone concentrations in lactating dairy cattle. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 2012;24:238-243. DOI: 10.1071/RD11913
  157. 157. Colazo MG, Mapletoft RJ. A review of current timed-AI (TAI) programs for beef and dairy cattle. The Canadian Veterinary Journal. 2014;55:772-780
  158. 158. Nowicki A, Barański W, Baryczka A, Janowski T. OvSynch protocol and its modifications in the reproduction management of dairy cattle herds—An update. Journal of Veterinary Research. 2017;61:329-336. DOI: 10.1515/jvetres-2017-0043
  159. 159. Baruselli PS, Ferreira RM, Colli MHA, Elliff FM, Sá Filho MF, Vieira L, et al. Timed artificial insemination: Current challenges and recent advances in reproductive efficiency in beef and dairy herds in Brazil. Animal Reproduction. 2017;14:558-571. DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR999
  160. 160. Pal P, Dar MR. Induction and Synchronization of Estrus. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2020:1-14. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.90769
  161. 161. Cardoso Consentini CE, Wiltbank MC, Sartori R. Factors that optimize reproductive efficiency in dairy herds with an emphasis on timed artificial insemination programs. Animals. 2021;11:301. DOI: 10.3390/ ani11020301
  162. 162. Bisinotto RS, Castro LO, Pansani MB, Narciso CD, Martinez N, Sinedino LDP, et al. Progesterone supplementation to lactating dairy cows without a corpus luteum at initiation of the Ovsynch protocol. Journal of Dairy Science. 2015;98:2515-2528. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-9058
  163. 163. Borchardt S, Pohl A, Heuwieser, W. Luteal presence and ovarian response at the beginning of a timed artificial insemination protocol for lactating dairy cows affect fertility: A meta-analysis. Animals. 2020;10:1551. DOI: 10.3390/ani10091551
  164. 164. Borchardt S, Pohl A, Carvalho PD, Fricke PM, Heuwieser W. Short communication: Effect of adding a second prostaglandin F2α injection during the Ovsynch protocol on luteal regression and fertility in lactating dairy cows: A meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science. 2018;101:8566-8571. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-14191
  165. 165. Des Coteaux L, Fetrow J. Does it pay to use an ultrasound machine for early pregnancy diagnosis in dairy cows? In: Proceedings of the 31st AABP Annual Meeting. Spokane, WA, USA: American Association for Bovine Practitioners; 1998. pp. 172-174. DOI: 10.21423/aabppro19985713
  166. 166. Fodor I, Ózsvári L. Early pregnancy diagnosis on large dairy farms and its role in improving profitability: Literature review. AWETH. 2018;14:22-36. DOI: 10.17205/SZIE.AWETH.2018.1.022
  167. 167. Fricke PM, Ricci A, Giordano JO, Carvalho PD. Methods for and implementation of pregnancy diagnosis in dairy cows. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. 2016;32:165-180. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2015.09.006
  168. 168. Reese ST, Pereira MC, Vasconcelos JLM, Smith MF, Green JA, Geary TW, et al. Markers of pregnancy: How early can we detect pregnancies in cattle using pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAGs) and microRNAs? Animal Reproduction. 2016;13:200-208. DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR878
  169. 169. Pohler KG, Reese ST, Franco GA, Oliveira Filho RV, Paiva R, Fernandez L, et al. New approaches to diagnose and target reproductive failure in cattle. Animal Reproduction. 2020;17(3):e20200057. DOI: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2020-0057
  170. 170. Silva E, Sterry RA, Kolb D, Mathialagan N, McGrath MF, Ballam JM, et al. Effect of interval to resynchronization of ovulation on fertility of lactating Holstein cows when using transrectal ultrasonography or a pregnancy-associated glycoptorein (PAG) ELISA to diagnose pregnancy status. Journal of Dairy Science. 2009;92:3643-3650. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1704
  171. 171. Green JC, Newsom EM, Lucy MC. Incorporation of a rapid pregnancy-associated glycoprotein ELISA into a CIDR-Ovsynch resynchronization program for a 28 day re-insemination interval. Theriogenology. 2011;75:320-328. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.09.002
  172. 172. Romano JE, Thompson JA, Forrest DW, Westhusin ME, Tomaszweski MA, Kraemer DC. Early pregnancy diagnosis by transrectal ultrasonography in dairy cattle. Theriogenology. 2006;66:1034-1041. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.02.044
  173. 173. Szenci O, Taverne MAM, Beckers JF, Sulon J, Varga J, Börzsönyi L, et al. Evaluation of false ultrasonographic diagnoses in cows measuring plasma levels of bovine pregnancy associated glycoprotein (bPAG). The Veterinary Record. 1998;142:304-306. DOI: 10.1136/vr.142.12.304
  174. 174. Pieterse MC, Szenci O, Willemse AH, Bajcsy AC, Dieleman SJ, Taverne MAM. Early pregnancy diagnosis in cattle by means of linear-array real-time ultrasound scanning of the uterus and a quantitative and qualitative milk progesterone test. Theriogenology. 1990;33:697-707. DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(90)90547-7
  175. 175. Szenci O, Beckers JF, Humblot P, Sulon J, Sasser G, Taverne MAM, et al. Comparison of ultrasonography bovine pregnancy-specific protein B, and bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein 1 tests for pregnancy detection in dairy cows. Theriogenology. 1998;50:77-88. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(98)00115-0
  176. 176. Szenci O. Recent possibilities for the diagnosis of early pregnancy and embryonic mortality in dairy cows. Animals. 2021;11(6):1666. DOI: 10.3390/ani11061666
  177. 177. Szenci O, Gy G, Nagy P, Kovács L, Varga J, Taverne MAM. Effect of uterus position relative to the pelvic inlet on the accuracy of early bovine pregnancy diagnosis by means of ultrasonography. Veterinary Quarterly. 1995;17:37-39. DOI: 10.1080/01652176.1995.9694528
  178. 178. Fricke PM. Scanning the future—Ultrasonography as a reproductive management tool for dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 2002;85:1918-1926. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74268-9
  179. 179. Saint-Dizier M, Chastant-Maillard S. Potential of connected devices to optimize cattle reproduction. Theriogenology. 2018;112:53-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.09.033
  180. 180. Antanaitis R, Malašauskienė D, Televičius M, Juozaitienė V, Žilinskas H, Baumgartner W. Dynamic changes on progesterone concentration in cow’s milk determined by the at-line milk analysis system herd navigator™. Sensors (Basel). 2020;20(18):5020. DOI: 10.3390/s20185020
  181. 181. Kovács L, Kézér FL, Kulcsár-Huszenicza M, Ruff F, Szenci O, Jurkovich V. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and cardiac autonomic responses to transrectal examination differ with behavioral reactivity in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2016;99:7444-7457. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10454

Written By

Ottó Szenci

Submitted: 15 January 2022 Reviewed: 21 June 2022 Published: 28 October 2022