Abstract
This chapter looks at how electrons propagate in a circular quantum dot (QD) of monolayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) that is exposed to an electric potential. Mathematical formulas for the eigenstates, scattering coefficients, scattering efficiency, and radial component of the reflected current and electron density are presented using the continuum model. As a function of physical characteristics such as incident electronic energy, potential barrier, and quantum dot radius, we discover two scattering regimes. We demonstrate the presence of scattering resonances for low-energy incoming electrons. We should also point out that the far-field dispersed current has unique favored scattering directions.
Keywords
- scattering
- monolayer molybdenum disulfide
- quantum dot
- electric potential
- electron density
1. Introduction
The hunt for novel two-dimensional materials has been sparked by graphene research [1, 2]. Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are among them. TMD (
A strong spin-orbit interaction characterizes the
Monolayer
The contours of the valence and conduction bands determine edge states, which are confined on the boundaries and have energies in the bandgap. The electrical behavior of
In this work, we investigate electron propagation in the presence of a potential barrier in a circular electrostatically defined quantum dot monolayer molybdenium disulfide
The following is the structure of the present study. We give a theoretical investigation of electron propagation wave plane in a circular quantum dot of monolayer molybdenium disulfide
2. Theoretical model
As shown in Figure 1, we investigate a quantum dot of radius
so the
where
We then investigate localized-state solutions in our system, which is characterized as a circularly symmetric quantum dot, utilizing the potential barrier
We conduct our research using the polar coordinates (r,
in which the two potentials and two operators have been established
The eigenvalue equation is used to determine the energy spectrum:
Because
where the two angular components are
and
To obtain the energy spectrum solutions, we must first solve the eigenvalue equation:
by taking into account two areas, as shown in Figure 1, outside (
The radial components
This may be solved by inserting (10) into (11) to get a second differential equation that
where the last equation’s solutions are the Bessel functions
as well as the reflected wave:
wherein
The radial functions
Expressing (15) as
By substituting the Eq. (17) in (16), we find a differential equation for
where
The solution of (18) can be worked out to get the transmitted wave as:
where the
Requiring the eigenspinors continuity at the boundary
to obtain the conditions
Solving these equations to get the scattering coefficients:
and the transmission coefficients by:
The density is described as
Angular scattering is described by the far-field radial component of the reflecting current, which giving by
the corresponding radial current can be written as:
where
By injecting the asymptotic behavior of the Hankel function of the first kind for
into the Eq. (29), the density of the system (28) may be simplified to the following form:
where
The scattering cross section
where
For the incident wave (13), we note that the incident flux is equal to
To go deeper into our investigation of the scattering problem for a plane Dirac electron at various sizes of the circular quantum dot, we define the scattering efficiency
3. Results and discussions
Figure 2a and b depict the scattering efficiency
Figure 2c and d present, respectively, the scattering efficiency
To study the scattering for
Figure 3a shows that for
Figure 3b indicates that for
Figure 3c and d represent
The square modulus of the scattering
For the
The radial component of the far-field scattered current
The electron density profile around the dot reflects the resonant scattering of a single mode. The density inside the quantum dot is described by:
For the modes
4. Summary
The scattering of a planar Dirac electron wave on a circular quantum dot defined electrostatically in the
In the regime
To find the resonances, we looked at the energy dependence of the square module of the scattering parameters
References
- 1.
Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Katsnelson MI, Grigorieva IV, et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature. 2005; 438 :197 - 2.
Geim AK, Novoselov KS. The rise of grapheme. Nature Materials. 2007; 6 :183 - 3.
Mak KF, He K, Shan J, Heinz TF. Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by optical helicity. Nature Nanotechnology. 2012; 7 :494 - 4.
Jones AM, Yu H, Ghimire NJ, Wu S, Aivazian G, Ross JS, et al. Optical generation of excitonic valley coherence in monolayer WSe2. Nature Nanotechnology. 2013; 8 :634 - 5.
Zaumseil J. Electronic control of circularly polarized light emission. Science. 2014; 344 :702 - 6.
Mak KF, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz TF. Atomically Thin MoS2: A New Direct-Gap Semiconductor. Physical Review Letters. 2010; 105 :136805 - 7.
Splendiani A, Sun L, Zhang Y, Li T, Kim J, Chim CY, et al. Emerging Photoluminescence in Monolayer MoS2. Nano Letters. 2010; 10 :1271 - 8.
Tongay S, Zhou J, Ataca C, Lo K, Matthews TS, Li J, et al. Thermally Driven Crossover from Indirect toward Direct Bandgap in 2D Semiconductors: MoSe2 versus MoS2. Nano Letters. 2012; 12 :5576 - 9.
Ross JS, Wu S, Yu H, Ghimire N, Jones A, Aivazian G, et al. Electrical control of neutral and charged excitons in a monolayer semiconductor. Nature Communications. 2013; 4 :1474 - 10.
Zeng H, Liu GB, Dai J, Yan Y, Zhu B, He R, et al. Optical signature of symmetry variations and spin-valley coupling in atomically thin tungsten dichalcogenides. Scientific Reports. 2013; 3 :1608 - 11.
Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nature Nanotechnology. 2011; 6 :147 - 12.
Lembke D, Kis A. Breakdown of High-Performance Monolayer MoS2 Transistors. ACS Nano. 2012; 6 :10070 - 13.
Lin MW, Liu L, Lan Q, Tan X, Dhindsa KS, Zeng P, et al. Mobility enhancement and highly efficient gating of monolayer MoS2 transistors with polymer electrolyte. Journal of Physics D. 2012; 45 :345102 - 14.
Bao W, Cai X, Kim D, Sridhara K, Fuhrer MS. High mobility ambipolar MoS2 field-effect transistors: Substrate and dielectric effects. Applied Physics Letters. 2013; 102 :042104 - 15.
Larentis S, Fallahazad B, Tutuc E. Field-effect transistors and intrinsic mobility in ultra-thin MoSe2 layers. Applied Physics Letters. 2012; 101 :223104 - 16.
Sallen G, Bouet L, Marie X, Wang G, Zhu CR, Han WP, et al. Robust optical emission polarization in MoS2 monolayers through selective valley excitation. Physical Review B. 2012; 86 :081301 - 17.
Xiao D, Yao W, Niu Q. Valley-contrasting physics in graphene: Magnetic moment and topological transport. Physical Review Letters. 2007; 99 :236809 - 18.
Yao W, Xiao D, Niu Q. Valley-dependent optoelectronics from inversion symmetry breaking. Physical Review B. 2008; 77 :235406 - 19.
Gunawan O, Shkolnikov YP, Vakili K, Gokmen T, De Poortere EP, Shayegan M. Valley susceptibility of an interacting two-dimensional electron system. Physical Review Letters. 2006; 97 :186404 - 20.
Wilcoxon J, Samara G. Strong quantum-size effects in a layered semiconductor: MoS2 nanoclusters. Physical Review B. 1995; 51 :7299 - 21.
Benson J, Li M, Wang S, Wang P, Papakonstantinou P. Microwave-Assisted Reactant-Protecting Strategy toward Efficient MoS2 Electrocatalysts in Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015; 7 :14113 - 22.
Ren X, Pang L, Zhang Y, Ren XD, Fan H, Liu SZ. One-step hydrothermal synthesis of monolayer MoS2 quantum dots for highly efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2015; 3 :10693 - 23.
Xu S, Li D, Wu P. One-Pot, Facile, and Versatile Synthesis of Monolayer MoS2/WS2 Quantum Dots as Bioimaging Probes and Efficient Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Advanced Functional Materials. 2015; 25 :1136 - 24.
Gopalakrishnan D, Damien D, Shaijumon M. MoS2 Quantum Dot-Interspersed Exfoliated MoS2 Nanosheets. ACS Nano. 2014; 8 :5297 - 25.
Gopalakrishnan D, Damien D, Li B, Gullappalli H, Pillai VK, Ajayan PM, et al. Electrochemical synthesis of luminescent MoS2 quantum dots. Chemical Communications. 2015; 51 :6293 - 26.
Li BL, Chen LX, Zou HL, Lei JL, Luo HQ, Li NB. Electrochemically induced Fenton reaction of few-layer MoS2 nanosheets: preparation of luminescent quantum dots via a transition of nanoporous morphology. Nanoscale. 2014; 6 :9831 - 27.
Oliveira D, Jiyong F, Villegas-Lelovsky L, Dias AC, Fanyao Q. Valley Zeeman energy in monolayer MoS2 quantum rings: Aharonov-Bohm effect. Physical Review B. 2016; 93 :205422 - 28.
Xiao D, Liu GB, Feng W, Xu X, Yao W. Coupled Spin and Valley Physics in Monolayers of MoS2 and Other Group-VI Dichalcogenides. Physical Review Letters. 2012; 108 :196802 - 29.
Schnez S, Ensslin K, Sigrist M, Ihn T. Analytic model of the energy spectrum of a graphene quantum dot in a perpendicular magnetic field. Physical Review B. 2008; 78 :195427 - 30.
Heinisch RL, Bronold FX, Fehske H. Mie scattering analog in graphene: Lensing, particle confinement, and depletion of Klein tunneling. Physical Review B. 2013; 87 :155409 - 31.
Berry MV, Mondragon RJ. Neutrino billiards: time-reversal symmetry-breaking without magnetic fields. Proceedings of the Royal Society. London A. 1987; 412 :53 - 32.
Grujic M, Zarenia M, Chaves A, Tadie M, Farias GA, Peeters FM. Electronic and optical properties of a circular graphene quantum dot in a magnetic field: influence of the boundary conditions. Physical Review B. 2011; 84 :205441 - 33.
Schulz C, Heinisch RL, Fehske H. Scattering of two-dimensional Dirac fermions on gate-defined oscillating quantum dots. Physical Review B. 2015; 91 :045130 - 34.
Belouad A, Zahidi Y, Jellal A, Bahlouli H. Electron scattering in gapped graphene quantum dots. EPL. 2018; 28002 :123 - 35.
Xue Wu Z, Long CY, Wu J, Z. Wen Long and T. Xu. Scattering in graphene quantum dots under generalized uncertainty principle. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 2019; 4 :1950212