Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Quantum Theory of Reproduction – How Unique is an Individual?

Written By

Zouhair O. Amarin

Submitted: 24 May 2022 Reviewed: 08 June 2022 Published: 11 July 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.105769

From the Edited Volume

Studies in Family Planning

Edited by Zouhair Odeh Amarin

Chapter metrics overview

102 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Our understanding of nature’s way is founded on quantum mechanics. In its existence of over 80 years, quantum theory has been describing the physical world. The attraction of studying quantum mechanics is the perception of the conceptual structure of nature. This is aided by the mathematical structure that exposes the internal logic of the subject by inventing a notation that embeds the philosophy of the question. To describe how unique each individual is. A calculation method was applied. The uniqueness of an individual is one in two nonillion, octillion, septillion, sextillion, quintillion, quadrillion, trillion, billion, million and thousand. Individuals are indefinitely unique.

Keywords

  • quantum theory
  • reproduction
  • uniqueness
  • individualism

1. Introduction

The development of a human being begins with fertilization, a process by which two highly specialized cells, the spermatozoon from the male and the oocyte from the female, unite to give rise to a new organism, the zygote.

1.1 Oogenesis

In humans, the ovaries begin to form during embryonic formation in the first few weeks of the first trimester of pregnancy. It starts at the yolk sac, where the primordial germ cells originate, followed by migration along the hindgut to the gonadal ridge around the fifth and sixth week of the embryonic development [1, 2].

At around the sixth-week post-conception, the ovary contains around 26,000 oogonia. The number of oogonia increases by invasion and local proliferation, whereby the ninth week the number of oogonia would be around 250,000 in each ovary [3].

At around this stage of development, the first oogonia of the ovary enter meiosis, although most oogonia continue the mitotic cycle up to the time of the initiation of meiosis [4]. At the start of meiosis, the oogonia lose their ability to divide mitotically and will be described as oocytes [5]. The mitotic division of the oogonia finishes around the 20th week of gestation, where the formation of new oocytes ends [6].

The early development of the ovary and the relation between oogonia and somatic cells is a delicate process. Interfering with ovarian formation during this critical period may have consequences on the number of oocytes a girl is born with and thus on her fertility later on in life [7, 8, 9].

1.2 Spermatogenesis

From puberty to old age, male germ cells originate at the seminiferous tubules from a self-renewing stem cell pool. This spermatogenic process is a cascade of developmental stages that provide the mechanism of successful spermatogenesis [10].

There are intratesticular and extratesticular hormonal regulatory mechanisms for successful spermatogenesis in the testicular Leydig cells and the intertubular space, where thin septula divide the parenchyma into about 370 conical lobules. These lobules contain the seminiferous tubules, Leydig cells, and other cellular elements [10, 11].

The seminiferous tubules are coiled loops with two ends that open in the rete testis [11], where their secreted fluid is delivered to the epididymis. The seminiferous tubules consist of germinal epithelium and the peritubular tissue that include different developmental stages of germ cells, namely spermatogonia, primary and secondary spermatocytes, and spermatids that are located in the Sertoli cells [12].

The Sertoli cells have a specialized germinal epithelium in a basal and an adluminal zones, called “tight junctions” that form the blood-testis barrier of the testis. The germ cells pass through this barrier to the adluminal compartment, thus avoiding the possibly diffused nextraneous substances. With the advancement in age, Sertoli cells exhibit increasing amounts of lipid droplets as an indicator of the testicular “biological clock” [13].

Other functions that are attributed to Sertoli cells include nutrition of the germ cell, delivery of spermatids to the tubular lumen; a process that is described as spermiation; production of endocrine and paracrine factors that play a role in spermatogenesis, and secretion of androgen-binding protein to help maintain the duct system [14].

The process of germ cell development during spermatogenesis passes through various stages that include spermatogoniogenesis, meiosis, maturation of spermatocytes, spermiogenesis, and spermiation [15, 16, 17, 18, 19].

Spermatocytes go through meiosis with its associated change in chromatin configuration after spermatogonial division. These cells go through two divisions during meiosis and are called primary spermatocytes before the first division and secondary spermatocytes before the second division [20].

Spermiogenesis begins after spermatocytes complete two quick successive meiotic reductive divisions to produce haploid round spermatids. During cytodifferentiation of spermatids, there is condensation of the nuclear chromatin, formation of the acrosome cap, and the development of flagellum, to enable them to leave the germinal epithelium as the process of spermiation takes place [19, 20].

Leydig cells surround the testicular capillaries and secrete androgens, including testosterone. Testosterone activates the hypophyseal-testicular axis, masculinizes the brain, initiates and maintains spermatogenesis, and commands the differentiation of the male genital organs and secondary sexual characteristics [21].

Furthermore, Leydig cells have neuroendocrine activities added to their endocrine role as they express serotonin, catecholamine-synthesizing enzymes, neurohormones, cell adhesion molecules, components of the renin-angiotensin system, growth factors, and their receptors [19, 22].

In addition, Leydig cells are involved in autocrine and paracrine regulation mechanisms of the testes and are considered a part of the general neuroendocrine cell system, and their main regulator is the luteinizing hormone of the pituitary gland [22, 23].

The kinetics of spermatogenesis that exists throughout the reproductive life of man is due to the large reservoir of stem cell in the seminiferous tubules. The continuous process of spermatogenesis features cell differentiation and migration from the basal to the adlumin of the germinal epithelium [24, 25, 26].

In all parts of the germinal epithelium, there is a 16-day cycle of standard differentiation processes. This “space of time” is called “cycle of the seminiferous epithelium.” The production of an A type spermatogonium to become a mature spermatid requires 74 days. Mature spermatids leave the germinal epithelium as spermatozoa and pass through the epididymis. This additional transport takes another 12 days. Thus, the complete spermatogenetic cycle from spermatogonium to mature spermatozoa takes around 86 days [27, 28].

Spermatozoa, the products of spermatogenesis are unique in their shape and function making them capable of progression through the female genital tract to meet the oocyte at the lateral end of the Fallopian tubes. At this point, the acrosome reaction takes place. This enables the spermatozoon to pass through the zona pellucida of the female gamete and to get into the cytoplasm and merge with the pronucleus of the zygote [28].

The efficiency of spermatogenesis is questionable. Germ cell loss (oligozoospermia), percentage of malformed spermatozoa (teratozoospermia), and motility problems (asthenozoospermia) in the ejaculate can be extremely high. A high percentage of the developed germ cells are lost by apoptosis and degeneration. Only a fraction of the male germ cells reaches the ejaculation including a high percentage of malformed gametes. Thus, only around 10% of the spermatogenetic potential might serve the reproductive process [28].

The fecundability of the human race is compared poorly with laboratory animals. The mean elongate spermatid-Sertoli cell ratio is 3–4 for the human germinal epithelium versus 12 in rats [28]. The daily rate of spermatozoa production in humans is around 3–4 million per gram of testicular tissue. Accordingly, a higher number of ejaculate spermatozoa are expected in relation to the 20 million spermatozoa per ml as considered a normal value by the WHO [29].

Recent observations report a recent decline of sperm counts in the ejaculates of healthy individuals. This might be due to detrimental prenatal factors including hormones and their metabolites in the drinking water that may adversely affect the different internal and external processes of spermatogenesis in the seminiferous tubules [30].

The intrinsic factors include testosterone, neuroendocrine substances, and growth factors (IGF1, TGFβ, NGF) that represent an independent intratesticular regulation of spermatogenesis. The extrinsic influence is provided by the pulsatile secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone by the hypothalamus and the gonadotrophins of the pituitary gland. Other factors include nutrive substances, drugs, different toxic substances, and radiation that may adversely affect testicular function [30, 31, 32, 33, 34].

Advertisement

2. How unique is an individual?

Each human individual is unique to an extreme. Each zygote is the result of a certain probability. At around the fifth month of development, the ovaries of the fetus contain around 12 million oogonia [6]. A single man’s ejaculation contains around 422 million spermatozoa [35], only one of which may fertilize an ovum.

The probability of a certain spermatozoon fertilizing a certain oocyte follows the rule of statistically independent events. For example, if a coin and a dice are tossed at the same time, the probability of getting a head with the coin and a six with the dice are quite independent of each other. The probability of a head and a six at the same time = p (H) x p [6], that is:

P (H) x P (6) = 1/2 x 1/6 = 1/12.

Listing an array of possible results can check this:

H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6.

T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6.

P (H + 6) = 1/12.

This is known as the multiplication law of probability.

To extend this to the probability of a given spermatozoon fertilizing a given oocyte and resulting in the birth of a baby to a certain couple is as follows:

P (embryo) = P (oocyte) x P (spermatozoon).

= 112x106 x 1422x106x1.93x52x62

= 13.17x1020

= 3.17x1020

where 12 x 106: average number of oogonia [6], 422 x 106: average number of spermatozoa per ejaculate [35], 1.93: average frequency of sexual intercourse per week [36], 52: number of weeks per year, 62: mean male reproductive life span = average life span [37]—the average age of adolescence [38].

On one hand, the figure of (3.17 x 10–20) is only each individual’s chance of being the descendant of a given couple in our present time. On the other hand, each individual could have been born in a different period that may date back to a time that might be easily defined. The true figure for this notation should cover all possible combinations since human life started and between all men and women that have ever existed.

To evaluate this, it is necessary to estimate the total number of people who ever lived. The magnitude of present-day population is impressive. Yet, the inhabitants of the world today are only a certain percentage of the populations of earlier periods. It is necessary, therefore, to include the evolutionary and growth rate factors in the notation.

As to the evolutionary factor, in the past four decades, the phylogeny of the Hominidae has increasingly become the focus of investigation. On the Geologic Time Scale, early and modern humans existed in the late Pliocene Epoch of the Tertiary Period and in the Pleistocene and Recent Epoch of the Quaternary Period of Cenozoic Era (Age of Mammals).

Although the fossil record of the last 200,000 years presents an unmistakable well-defined picture of the evolution of our modern species, Homo sapiens, the final stages leading to contemporary humans present several unresolved problems. The grade of sapiens contains at least two contrastingly different anatomical types; the bulkily built and heavily muscled Neanderthals and the slim-bodied Cro-Magnons. Moreover, the traditional steps from the Homo erectus level of humans to the H. sapiens grade have yet to be disentangled [39].

The first undeniable hominid—Australopithecus—existed about 4 million years ago. The australopithecines shaded imperceptibly into Homo habilis, who integrated slowly into Homo erectus, with the latter ultimately transforming into modern H. sapiens. However, spirited debate exists over which of the australopithecines occupy a prominent place in the direct ancestry of humans.

It has been suggested that vegetarian Australopithecus robustus perished without leaving any descendants and that Australopithecus africanus was the forebear of a more advanced hominid. The discovery in 1972 of the “1470” skull and in 1975 of the fossil jaws and teeth that have been classified as the remains of Homo habilis and dating back between 1.8 and 3.8 million years, supposing that an older australopithecine gave rise to Homo habilis.

The candidate for such an ancestor appears to be the fossil hominid uncovered in 1973 that has been called “Lucy,” delineated as the new species Australopithecus aferensis. At present, it is safe to state that the A. aferensis remains, dating between 3 and 4 million years ago, constitute the earliest definitive members of the family hominidae [39].

The first undeniable hominid—Australopithecus—existed about 4 million years ago. The Australopithecus shaded imperceptibly into Homo habilis, who intern graded slowly into Homo erectus, with the latter ultimately transforming into modern H. sapiens. However, a spirited debate exists over which of the Australopithecines occupy a prominent place in the ancestry of humans.

It has been suggested that the vegetarian Australopithecus robustus perished without leaving any descendants and that Australopithecus africanus was the forbear of a more advanced hominid. The discovery in 1972 of the “1470” skull and 1975 of the fossil jaws and teeth that were between 1.8 and 3.8 million years, supposing that the older australopithecine gave rise to Homo habilis.

The candidate for such an ancestor appears to be the fossil hominid uncovered in 1973 that has been called “Lucy”, delineated as the new species Australopithecus aferensis. At present, it is safe to state that the A. aferensis, dating between 3 and 4 million years ago, constitute the earliest definitive members of the family hominidae [39].

As to the growth factor, the human population has undergone three phases of exponential growth. In the first phase of human history, from our species’ origin to about 10,000 years ago, the population grew slowly as people existed as hunter gatherers. Cultivation of plants and animal husbandry may have allowed our agricultural revolution and the second phase of exponential growth, from about 8000 B.C. to about 1750 A.D.

The industrial revolution, which occurred about 1850 A.D., promoted the third phase of exponential growth that continues today [40]. Generally, the human population growth since prehistoric times displays a classic J-shaped exponential curve. This curve suggests that the total number of people alive today is approximately equal to the total number who have ever lived and died before us. As the present global population totals 6.3 people, the total number of people who ever lived is over 12.6 billion [41].

To extend this to the probability of a given spermatozoon fertilizing a given oocyte and resulting in the birth of any baby that has ever lived is as follows:

= 13.17x1020x16.3x109

where 6.3 x 109: total number of males/females who ever lived [41].

= 15.04x1030

= 5.04x1030

Approximately= 5x1030

Or 1 in 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

A two nonillion, octillion, septillion, sextillion, quintillion, quadrillion, trillion, billion, million, and thousand is an indefinitely large statistic! Mathematics used this way is irreplaceable in the pursuit of meaning in which fascination lies. But meaning does not reside in the mathematical symbols. It resides in the cloud of thought enveloping these symbols. The most important dictum in quantum mechanics is that what you can measure is what you can know [42]. To perceive the aforementioned question as inherently meaningless is what quantum mechanics teaches us.

References

  1. 1. Witschi E. Migration of the germ cells of human embryos from the yolk sac to the primitive gonadal folds. Contributions Embryology. 1948;209:67-80
  2. 2. Mckay DG, Hertig AT, Ams EC, Danziger S. Histochemical observations on the germ cells of human embryos. The Anatomical Record. 1953;117:201-219
  3. 3. Bendsen E, Byskov AG, Andersen CY, Westergaard LG. Number of germ cells and somatic cells in human fetal ovaries during the first weeks after sex differentiation. Human Reproduction. 2006;21:30-35
  4. 4. Gondos B, Westergaard L, Byskov AG. Initiation of oogenesis in the human fetal ovary: Ultrastructural and squash preparation study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1986;155:189-195
  5. 5. Byskov AG. Differentiation of mammalian embryonic gonad. Physiological Reviews. 1986;66:71-117
  6. 6. Baker TG. A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in human ovaries. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - Series B: Biological Sciences. 1963;158:417-433
  7. 7. Byskov AG. Primordial germ cells and regulation of meiosis. Reproduction in Mammals: Germ Cells and Fertilization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p. 1-17
  8. 8. Byskov AG, Høyer PE. Embryology of mammalian gonads and ducts. The Physiology of Reproduction. 2nd ed. New York, US: Raven Press, Ltd; 1994. p. 487-540
  9. 9. Byskov AG, Faddy MJ, Lemmon JG, Andersen CY. Eggs forever? Differentiation. 2005;73:438-446
  10. 10. Holstein AF. Spermatogenese beim Menschen: Grundlagenforschung und Klinik. Annals of Anatomy. 1999;181:427-436
  11. 11. Roosen-Runge EC, Holstein AF. The human rete testis. Cell and Tissue Research. 1978;189:409-433
  12. 12. Davidoff MS, Breucker H, Holstein AF, Seidel K. Cellular architecture of the lamina propria of human seminiferous tubules. Cell and Tissue Research. 1990;262:253-261
  13. 13. Russell LD, Griswold MD. The Sertoli cell. Clearwater FL: Cache River Press; 1993
  14. 14. Holstein AF, Maekawa M, Nagano T, Davidoff MS. Myofibroblasts in the lamina propria of human seminiferous tubules are dynamic structures of heterogeneous phenotype. Archives of Histology and Cytology. 1996;59:109-125
  15. 15. Roosen-Runge EC. The Process of Spermatogenesis in Animals. Cambridge: Cambrodge University Press; 1977
  16. 16. Clermont Y. Renewal of spermatogonia in man. American Journal of Anatomy. 1966;118:509-529
  17. 17. Holstein AF, Roosen-Runge EC, Schirren C. Illustrated Pathology of Human Spermatogenesis. Berlin: Grosse; 1988
  18. 18. Holstein AF, Lauke H. Histologic diagnostics in early testicular germ-cell tumor. International Journal of Urology. 1996;3:165-172
  19. 19. Johannisson R, Schulze W, Holstein AF. Megalospermatocytes in the human testis exhibit asynapsis of chromosomes. Andrologia. 2003;35:146-151. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0272.2003.00551.x
  20. 20. Breucker H, Schaefer E, Holstein AF. Morphogenesis and fate of the residual body in human spermiogenesis. Cell and Tissue Research. 1985;240:303-309
  21. 21. Ergün S, Stingl J, Holstein AF. Microvasculature of the human testis in correlation to Leydig cells and seminiferous tubules. Andrologia. 1994;26:255-262
  22. 22. Payne AH, Hardy MP, Russell LD. The Leydig Cell. Vienna IL: Cache River Press; 1996
  23. 23. Davidoff MS, Schulze W, Middendorff R, Holstein AF. The Leydig cell of the human testis – A new member of the diffuse neuroendocrine system. Cell and Tissue Research. 1993;271:429-439
  24. 24. Davidoff MS, Middendorff R, Holstein AF. Dual nature of Leydig cells of the human testis. Biomedical Reviews. 1996;6:11-41
  25. 25. Niemi M, Sharpe RM, Brown WRA. Macrophages in the interstitial tissue of the rat testis. Cell and Tissue Research. 1986;243:337-433
  26. 26. Fawcett DW, Heidger PM, Leak LV. Lymph vascular system of the interstitial tissue of the testis as revealed by electron microscopy. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1969;19:109-119
  27. 27. Clermont Y. The cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in man. American Journal of Anatomy. 1963;112:35-51
  28. 28. Schulze W, Salzbrunn A. Spatial and quantitative aspects of spermatogenetic tissue in primates. In: Nieschlag E, Habenicht UF, editors. Spermatogenesis-Fertilization-Contraception, Berlin. Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 1992. pp. 267-283
  29. 29. Rowe PJ, Comhaire FH, Hargreave TB, Mellows HJ, editors. WHO Manual for the Standardized Investigation and Diagnosis of the Infertile Couple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993
  30. 30. Andersson AM, Grigor KM, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Leffers H, Skakkebaek NE. Hormones and Endocrine Disrupters in Food and Water: Possible Impact on Human Health. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 2001
  31. 31. Middendorff R, Müller D, Wichers S, Holstein AF, Davidoff MS. Evidence for production and functional activity of nitric oxide in seminiferous tubules and blood vessels of the human testis. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1997;82:4154-4161. DOI: 10.1210/jc.82.12.4154
  32. 32. Nieschlag E, Behre HM. Andrology. Male Reproductive Health and Dysfunction. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2001
  33. 33. Holstein AF, Schulze W, Breucker H. Histopathology of human testicular and epididymal tissue. In: Hargreave TB, editor. Male Infertility. London, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 1994. pp. 105-148
  34. 34. DeKretser DM, Holstein AF. Testicular biopsy and abnormal germ cells. In: ESE H, editor. Human Semen and Fertility Regulation in Men, St. Louis: Mosby; 1976. pp. 332-343
  35. 35. Fisch H, Goluboff ET, Olson GH, Feldshuh J, Broder SJ, Barad DH. Semen analysis from 1,283 men in the United States over 25-year period; no decline in quality. Fertility and Sterility. 1996;65:1009-1014
  36. 36. Winston RML. Age and Fertility. Update Postgraduate Center Series. Infertility. Guildford: Reed Business Publishing Group, 1991;17:20
  37. 37. Hayflick L. Theories of Biological Aging. Principles of Geriatric Medicine. New York: McGrow-Hill Book Company; 1985. pp. 9-22
  38. 38. Arfar JO, Arneil GC. Textbook of Paediatrics. 3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1984
  39. 39. Mader S. Inquiry into Life. 3rd ed. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Company Publishers; 1983. pp. 733-755
  40. 40. Peter Volpe E. Understanding Evolution. 5th ed. New Delhi: Universal Book Stall; 1996. pp. 211-233
  41. 41. Postlethwait J, Hopson J. The Nature of Life. 2nd ed. New York: McGrow-Hill Book Company; 1992. pp. 690-729
  42. 42. Chester M. Primer of Quantum Mechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1987. pp. 1-3

Written By

Zouhair O. Amarin

Submitted: 24 May 2022 Reviewed: 08 June 2022 Published: 11 July 2022