Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Demineralization and Remineralization Dynamics and Dental Caries

Written By

Aiswarya Anil, Wael I. Ibraheem, Abdullah A. Meshni, Reghunathan Preethanath and Sukumaran Anil

Submitted: 23 May 2022 Reviewed: 14 June 2022 Published: 26 September 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.105847

From the Edited Volume

Dental Caries - The Selection of Restoration Methods and Restorative Materials

Edited by Laura-Cristina Rusu and Lavinia Cosmina Ardelean

Chapter metrics overview

676 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Dental caries is a multifactorial disease caused by the interaction of dietary sugars, dental biofilm, and the dental tissue of the host. It results from repeated cycles of demineralization and remineralization at the interface of the biofilm and the tooth surface. Demineralization is the process of removing mineral ions from hydroxyapatite crystals in hard tissues, such as enamel, which can lead to dental caries if left unchecked. The remineralization process can reverse the lost mineral ions that occur during demineralization. The degree of demineralization and remineralization depends on several variables, including the amount of available calcium and phosphate and salivary pH levels. Over the past several decades, remineralizing or calcifying fluids with variable calcium, phosphate, and fluoride formulations have been developed. The management of early caries by remineralization has the potential to significantly advance the noninvasive clinical management of the disease. The chapter outlines the mechanisms by which the demineralization-remineralization process occurs and the use of remineralizing agents that reverse demineralization or enhance remineralization.

Keywords

  • demineralization
  • enamel
  • white lesions
  • remineralization
  • dentistry
  • dental caries

1. Introduction

Dental caries is one of the most significant public health issues and a highly prevalent disease worldwide. It is an irreversible, chronic, infectious disease that progresses as a dynamic, multifactorial process and affects the mineralized dental structures. Dental caries is a complex disease caused by the demineralization and remineralization of enamel in the presence of fermentable carbohydrates, saliva, and cariogenic oral flora. When exposed to carbohydrates, oral microorganisms can produce organic acids that lower the pH of dental plaque. Caries progresses through demineralization and remineralization phases on the tooth surface before invading deeper layers [1].

Enamel consists of hydroxyapatite, water, protein, and trace elements, such as fluoride. The organic matrix consists of noncollagenous protein, amelogenin, and inorganic components consists of enamel’s biological apatite. Enamel apatite has a hexagonal unit cell composed of prismatic crystals and contains more inorganic material than dentin, bone, and cementum [2]. Twenty percent of a tooth’s matrix consists of organic material, which makes up the majority of the tooth’s dentine. Most of the organic portion of dentine comprises Type I collagen, while the remainder consists of collagen types III and V [3]. The surface layer of enamel is composed of hydroxyapatite (HA) crystals that form the prism of enamel. HA is a crystalline form of calcium (CA++), hydroxyl (OH), and phosphate ions (PO43−) that compose the mineral structure of bones and teeth. The surface layer’s hardness is primarily the result of a high concentration of phosphate ions, fluorine, calcium, and chlorine. Enamel adjacent to dentine is softer due to its high magnesium, sodium, and potassium ion content [1, 4].

Advertisement

2. Demineralization

Demineralization refers to the process by which organic acids produced by plaque microorganisms destroy the mineral content from the surface of HA crystals. The most stable form of hydroxyapatite exists in an environment with a pH of 7.4. There is a constant chemical equilibrium between the hydroxyapatite in the enamel (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) and the dissolved hydroxyapatite in the plaque biofilm. Mineral crystal dissolution takes place when the pH level of the plaque falls below 5.5 [5, 6]. When the minerals are dissolved, the intercrystalline space expands, and the surface of the enamel becomes softer and more porous, leading to the formation of caries [6]. Due to the acid metabolism of cariogenic microorganisms in dental plaque biofilm, enamel demineralization occurs (Figure 1). The greatest degree of demineralization in enamel caries occurs at a subsurface level covered by a surface layer that appears relatively unaffected by the attack. This means that the majority of the mineral loss during the initial stages of demineralization occurs at a distance away from the enamel surface. This subsurface lesion is commonly referred to as “white spot lesions,” which refers to an opaque white area that can be distinguished from healthy enamel. This stage of the carious lesion is visible as a white spot (WS) during a routine dental clinical examination and is known as initial caries, which can turn brown due to the absorption of pigments into enamel pores.

Figure 1.

Diagrammatic representation showing the equilibrium between dynamic demineralization and remineralization at the plaque-enamel interface. Saliva is a source of mineral and fluoride ions that promote remineralization of lesions.

Earlier in vitro experiments using organic acid buffers as demineralizing media explained the presence of the unaltered surface enamel resistant to acid dissolution by adsorption of organic matter onto the enamel crystallites [1, 7, 8]. Later studies recognized the reprecipitation process with respect to saturation of calcium and phosphates occurring at the underlying enamel layer [9, 10, 11]. According to in vivo microscopic studies, a mineral loss is initiated in the interprismatic regions and later proceeds into the enamel prisms [12, 13]. However, under oral conditions enamel demineralization is affected by a number of factors, such as modification in the microbial activity and changes in the physicochemical properties of the enamel mineral content. Studies using a polarizing microscope revealed that the porous subsurface enamel is positively birefringent, whereas the surface zone retains its negative birefringence [14, 15]. This indicates that the subsurface enamel has a demineralized zone with a pore volume greater than 25%, whereas the surface enamel has a pore volume less than 5% [16].

Advertisement

3. Remineralization

Remineralization occurs as a process of restoring minerals in the form of mineral ions to the hydroxyapatite latticework structure. Remineralization is a natural repair process for non-cavitated lesions that utilizes calcium and phosphate ions to construct a new surface on existing crystal remnants in subsurface lesions that remain after demineralization. These acid-resistant remineralized crystals are considerably less soluble than the original mineral. The major protein in dentine is predominantly type I collagen, which constitutes 90% of the organic matrix. They provide a scaffold for the deposition of minerals in dentine remineralization. Earlier studies were based on ion-mediated crystallization [17, 18] where epitaxial growth occurs over existing apatite crystallites within the demineralized collagen matrix. Although in vitro studies with a solution containing calcium and phosphorus ions induced calcium phosphate crystal deposition on the collagen surface, other studies with a solution containing fluoride and mineral ions showed better dentine remineralization [19, 20, 21].

Advertisement

4. Modifying factors/variables

These variables may be intrinsic or extrinsic. Diet and medication are examples of extrinsic factors, whereas intrinsic factors are the underlying systemic diseases. Physicochemical changes in enamel surface are also affected by behavior (frequency of tooth brushing and consumption of soft drinks) and socioeconomic status. Modifiable behavioral factors include the types of drinks consumed, the method of drinking, and the frequency of drinking [22]. Several medications cause xerostomia by decreasing salivary flow and pH, thereby diminishing the buffering effect against endogenous and exogenous acids [23, 24]. Intrinsic factors, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease and bulimia nervosa, cause demineralization and erosion of tooth enamel. The pH of endogenous acids is below the critical pH for HA dissolution, resulting in demineralized enamel surface areas [25, 26]. These regions may eventually harbor acid-forming bacteria, resulting in caries formation [27, 28].

Advertisement

5. White spot lesions

The earliest visible symptom caused by the demineralization of enamel is the appearance of white spots. Here, the actual demineralization affects the subsurface layer, while the surface of enamel remains smooth. This defect in the enamel is due to modifications of the chemical composition of the substrate. The translucency of enamel depends on the presence of water around prisms. Demineralization causes the widening of interprismatic space, and the water gets replaced by air. The light scattering effect occurs when there is a difference in refractive index between the two phases. The refractive index of healthy enamel is the same as that of hydroxyapatite (1.62) and therefore, there are no interfaces in healthy enamel (Figure 2). In hypomineralized enamel, light passes through mineral and fluid phases with different refractive indices, resulting in a white optical phenomenon seen as a “white spot” on the enamel surface. During the initial phase, the surface of a tooth has to be dried up in order to see a carious lesion. Microscopic studies report that if the white spot appears only after the tooth surface was dried up with air, the lesion is small, whereas if it is visible even without drying, it means the lesion is more advanced [29, 30].

Figure 2.

White spot lesions after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.

The first stages of the carious disease are characterized by hypomineralization without cavity formation and are referred to as white spots (WS). During the initial carious formation, alternating phases of demineralization and remineralization cause the dissolution of mineral salts followed by reprecipitation of minerals on the enamel surface. This results in an intact surface layer, under which the body of the carious lesion extends in a half-moon shape or “cone shape” toward the demineralization zone [31]. The surface layer resembling healthy enamel is usually 20–50 μm deep. Hypomineralization of the subsurface causes enlargement of the enamel pores leading to mineral dissolution [32]. The central layer or body of the lesion is the most affected with 5% mineral loss in the peripheral part to 25% in the central part. The lesion becomes clinically visible when the mineral deficit in this layer compared to healthy enamel reaches 10%. The dark zone at the advancing front of the lesion is considered as a breakdown stage successional to the translucent zone and preceding the body of the lesion. In vitro studies [33, 34] reported large pores in the translucent zone, whereas in the dark zones, a micropore system is found in addition to the large pores, which was explained as areas of demineralization. The deeper translucent layer is seen close to healthy enamel and its occurrence is the first symptom of the pathological process [29]. In vitro studies on human enamel revealed the physical and chemical properties of surface enamel [35, 36]. One probability is the reprecipitation of calcium and phosphate ions released by subsurface dissolution or from the saturated solution in plaque biofilm into the surface enamel. The presence of fluoride ions in the surface enamel also helps in maintaining the surface zone from demineralization [33].

Advertisement

6. Dental caries

Dental caries is a cavity that forms on the tooth surface in the form of a small lesion that progresses and results in the loss of tooth structure (Figure 3). Demineralization causes initial changes at the ultrastructural level, which can only be observed with an electron microscope. Clinically, it cannot be detected in its earliest stages, but as the disease progresses, the dentist will notice a decrease in the enamel’s translucency, which can be detected during an intraoral examination of the patient. When bacteria accumulate in dental plaque and ferment dietary carbohydrates for an extended period of time and the locally produced acids cannot be neutralized by the buffering capacity of saliva, demineralization of the teeth occurs, leading to cavities [37]. Although the ability of low pH to demineralize enamel is well-established [38, 39], dental caries is a multifactorial disease caused by microbes and influenced by dietary habits, tooth characteristics, saliva-buffering capacity, and host immune system [40].

Figure 3.

Dental caries leads to the destruction of tooth structures.

The highly organized pellicle-covered dental plaque biofilm on the tooth surface contains live and dead bacterial cells, end products, desquamated epithelial cells, leukocytes, and glycoproteins from saliva. Cariogenic microorganisms metabolize carbohydrates from food to produce organic acid, primarily lactic or acetic acid. Dental caries initiates with surface roughness or subsurface demineralization, later progressing to cavitation. Initial studies indicated the presence of acidogenic streptococci mutans in dental caries [41, 42], and later lactobacilli species were also proposed to produce acid that causes dental caries [43, 44]. In vitro studies on bacterial species in caries lesions using PCR and specific DNA probes [45, 46] indicated that dental cavities are a complex ecosystem containing multiple cariogenic bacterial species, such as Veillonella or Corynebacterium [47].

Saliva mechanically cleanses the tooth surface of bacteria and food particles. Saliva’s composition and secretion also play a significant role in demineralization. Calcium and phosphorus, the inorganic components of saliva, contribute to maintaining the mineral balance between hydroxyapatite of enamel and saliva. If the acid metabolites of microbes are not neutralized by the buffering properties of saliva, the pH of dental plaque decreases, thereby fostering demineralization of enamel. To preserve tooth structure, it is essential to maintain a balance between demineralization and remineralization of enamel [48].

Advertisement

7. Role of saliva in demineralization and remineralization process

A variety of oral and systemic factors can have a positive or negative effect on the constant cycle of demineralization/remineralization processes. Assessing patients’ caries risk and recommending appropriate remineralization therapies for those deemed at high risk is critical for improving their oral health. Saliva is a critical factor in determining caries risk and remineralization. It is a critical biological and protective factor in the process of enamel remineralization [49]. The buffering capacity and secretion flow of saliva are proportional to the rate and extent of demineralization. Saliva can neutralize acids, form a protective membrane on tooth surfaces, and promote remineralization by providing enamel and dentin with calcium, phosphate, and fluoride [50]. The pH level of saliva directly affects remineralization through the amount of calcium and phosphate ions available to the enamel via saliva in times of acidic challenge [51]. Saliva can act as a replenishing agent and inhibit tooth demineralization during periods of low pH, while simultaneously promoting tooth remineralization once the pH returns to a neutral state. Systemic diseases, inherited disorders, a variety of medications, and other medical interventions can all have a detrimental effect on salivary production, buffering capacity, and the amount of calcium and phosphate available for remineralization [52, 53].

Saliva’s protective properties are volume dependent. These protective properties can be significantly enhanced or diminished based on the rate of secretion in unstimulated and stimulated conditions. Unstimulated, normal salivary secretion is greater than 0.3 ml/minute, ranging between 0.5 and 1.5 L per day, compared to 0.1–0.7 ml/minute in patients with decreased salivary production [50]. Demineralization causes the loss of mineral ions, but it is reversible via remineralization. Both processes occur on the surface of the tooth, but cavitation necessitates a substantial loss of mineral ions from hydroxyapatite. A number of factors, including the availability of calcium and phosphate ions and the pH of the saliva, determine the degree of demineralization and remineralization. Individuals with decreased salivary flow have more acidic saliva and biofilm, which increases the risk of additional demineralization [54]. Reduced salivary flow also creates an oral environment that is unable to neutralize acids effectively, resulting in prolonged increase in intraoral pH [55]. The remineralization process is frequently hampered in patients with decreased salivary production, and the use of fluoride may be limited due to a deficiency of calcium and phosphate ions [56]. Fluoride, calcium, and phosphate are necessary for remineralization following a cariogenic attack. The focus of remineralization is mainly on detecting early caries lesions when the disease is still reversible. This helps in identifying the patients at risk. Saliva, fluoride therapy, and probiotic bacteria are considered as common regimes for tooth remineralization [57, 58].

Advertisement

8. Remineralizing agents

Several topical remineralizing agents have been used to inhibit and remineralize enamel (Table 1). For decades, fluoride has been the cornerstone of enamel remineralization. It is known to prevent caries by inhibiting demineralization on the surface of the enamel through the formation of fluorapatite. Fluorapatite is less soluble than hydroxyapatite and increases the enamel’s resistance to dissolution during the acid attack. Varnishes, toothpastes, mouth rinses, solutions, gels, and orthodontic adhesives containing a fluoride source have been utilized as methods and formulations for fluoride delivery [59, 60].

Compounds increasing mineral saturation
Fluorides
Casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP)
Bioactive glass
Tricalcium phosphate (TCP)
Nano HAP particles
Beta tricalcium phosphate (TCP)
Biofilm modifiers
Arginine
Triclosan
Xylitol
Probiotics
Herbal compounds

Table 1.

The remineralizing and biofilm modifying agents.

8.1 Fluoride

The most common remineralizing agent is fluoride. When acid attacks the enamel surface, the pH begins to rise, and the presence of fluoride in the microenvironment stops enamel dissolution. As pH increases, new and larger fluoride crystals containing fluorhydroxyapatite form, reducing enamel demineralization and promoting remineralization [61, 62]. The fluoride acts on the enamel in several ways [61]. In the first mechanism, fluorapatite crystals have greater resistance to acid attack than hydroxyapatite crystals, which inhibits demineralization. Second, the combination of calcium and phosphate ions promotes remineralization by accelerating the formation of new fluorapatite crystals. It inhibits acid-producing carious bacteria by interfering with the synthesis of phosphoenol pyruvate, a crucial intermediate in the glycolytic pathway of bacteria. In addition, fluoride adheres to oral hard tissue, oral mucosa, and dental plaque, thereby preventing demineralization and promoting remineralization. Fluoride concentrations on the surface of teeth can increase resistance to dental caries and erosion. In contrast, numerous laboratory studies have demonstrated that low levels of fluoride, such as those detected after many hours in resting plaque and saliva and resulting from daily use of fluoride dentifrices, have a significant impact on enamel demineralization and remineralization. Fluoride in the mouth affects the natural dissolution and reprecipitation processes that occur at the interface between the tooth and oral fluid. Trace amounts of fluoride accelerate the remineralization of early carious lesions [63, 64]. Stannous fluoride contains both fluoride and stannous ions, which possess antibacterial properties. It is also capable of forming stannous phosphate fluoride precipitates, which halt the progression of caries but discolor the teeth. The most effective technique for remineralization of early caries was twice-daily use of a 0.5% NaF mouth rinse in conjunction with twice-daily use of fluoride toothpaste. These findings suggest that the efficacy of fluoride is determined by the frequency of rinsing and the ability of the fluoride mouth rinse to reach inaccessible areas, such as interproximal spaces [65].

Studies have shown that fluoride released from a glass-ionomer restoration inhibits bacterial acid production by incorporating it into the biofilm of plaque bacteria [66, 67], in the adjacent tooth enamel and saliva of patients. Conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer can be recharged from external sources, such as topical fluoride application. Compared to resin-modified glass ionomers, glass ionomers emit comparatively greater amounts of fluorides. For effective remineralization, the fluoride release must be maintained at approximately 2–3 g/mL per day; this can be accomplished through fluoride recharge. Micro porosities present in conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers may account for the recharging capacity of these materials [67]. Pit-and-fissure sealants commonly used in preventive dentistry consist of either resin- or glass-ionomer-based materials. They prevent bacteria from settling in deep pits and fissures, thereby playing an important role in preventing dental caries. The incorporation of fluorides into sealant fillers promotes remineralization [23].

Dentifrices containing fluoride are regarded as the most effective agents for preventing enamel demineralization. Studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of conventional toothpastes containing 1000 ppm fluoride and the evidence suggests that toothpaste containing 5000 ppm fluoride can further reduce demineralization and enhance remineralization [68].

8.2 Casein phosphopeptide: amorphous calcium phosphate

Casein, a milk-derived protein developed by Eric Reynolds, mainly interacts with calcium and phosphate. They are used alone or as CPP-ACP (casein phosphopeptides with amorphous calcium phosphate) or CPP-ACFP (casein phosphopeptides with amorphous calcium fluoride phosphate). CPP-ACP is a two-phase system that precipitates onto the tooth structure and elevates calcium levels in the plaque biofilm and tooth enamel. CPP stabilizes ACP, maintaining a state of supersaturation of calcium and phosphate. As the pH of the material increases, the bound form of amorphous calcium phosphate also increases, thereby facilitating remineralization. The incorporation of casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate (CCP-ACP) into sealants facilitates the release of supersaturated levels of calcium and phosphate ions, which promotes the formation of new hydroxyapatite crystals and the remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions [69]. The advantage of CPPACFP is the availability of calcium, phosphate, and fluoride in one product, which can bind up to 25 calcium ions, 15 phosphate ions, and five fluoride ions, which helps in the remineralization of subsurface lesions in enamel [70, 71, 72]. Studies have shown CPP–ACP incorporated fluoride to a level of 900 ppm in toothpastes, chewing gum, lozenges, and mouth rinses give additive effects in reducing caries [73, 74]. Another in situ study with chewing gum containing CPP-ACP also showed a significant increase in mineral precipitation of initial bovine enamel lesions [75]. A study by Walker et al. [76] reported that the addition of CPP-ACP to milk resulted in enhanced remineralization.

8.3 Bioactive glass

Bioactive glass is a multi-component inorganic compound composed of sodium, calcium, phosphorus, and silica (sodium-calcium phosphosilicate). It helps in the formation of hydroxycarbonateapatite (HCA) crystals when it comes into contact with water, saliva, or other body fluids [72]. It has low cytotoxicity for dental pulp cells and exerts remineralization effects on both enamel and dentin. Additionally, its antimicrobial activity against intraoral bacteria has been established. It demonstrated the ability to neutralize acid and absorb calcium (Ca) ions in physiological conditions via its functional groups. It is a promising remineralization agent due to its biomimetic mineralizing properties. NovaMin®, a product of NovaMin Technology Inc. (NTI) available in the market containing bioactive glass and calcium sodium phosphosilicate has antimicrobial activity toward Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and S. sanguis, and also helps in the remineralization of tooth [77].

8.4 Tricalcium phosphate (TCP)

A new remineralizing agent, tricalcium phosphate is incorporated in dentifrices, which release calcium, phosphate, and fluoride when it comes in contact with the enamel surface during tooth brushing [73]. Functionalized TCP is a low-dose calcium phosphate system that is incorporated into a single-phase aqueous or non-aqueous topical fluoride formulation, which facilitates a targeted delivery of TCP when applied to the teeth. Studies have shown that the combination of TCP with fluoride can provide greater enamel remineralization and more acid-resistant mineral than fluoride alone [73].

8.5 Xylitol

The application of xylitol, a sugar alcohol of the pentitol type, on a regular basis has been linked to a marked reduction in caries and tooth remineralization. Xylitol is a nonfermentable sugar alcohol that has been demonstrated to have both noncariogenic and cariostatic properties. Xylitol interferes with the growth and metabolism of S. mutans by inhibiting glycolysis in the mitochondria of these microorganisms. Due to the inability of caries-causing bacteria to ferment xylitol, the acid attack is diminished when xylitol is consumed. As a result, the growth of these bacteria and the concurrent production of acid are inhibited, and the oral pH remains elevated. At high pH, the hydrophilic molecule of xylitol can form complexes with calcium in solution, thereby stabilizing the calcium and phosphates present in saliva. The saturation of calcium ions in saliva stimulates the remineralization of dental tissues through calcium ion deposition [78].

Xylitol increases salivary clearance, buffering capacity, and calcium and phosphate saturation by neutralizing the decreased plaque pH/salivary pH. Increased salivary flow increases acid buffering capacity, and the high mineral content helps in the remineralization of the damaged enamel [78]. There are conflicting reports about the effectiveness of xylitol, especially when taken with fluoride. Fluoride varnish, which contains xylitol-coated calcium and phosphate, released 10 times more fluoride in the first 4 hours than other varnishes like Enamel Pro® (Premier Dental Products, PA, USA) and Duraphat® (Colgate Oral Care, NSW, Australia) [79].

8.6 Arginine

Arginine is a semi-essential amino acid found in various proteins and peptides in human saliva. Non-pathogenic bacteria, such as Streptococcus sanguinis, utilize the arginine deiminase system to generate energy, ammonia, and carbon dioxide. The production of ammonia raises the local pH and neutralizes the acidifying effects of sugar metabolism, thereby promoting a more alkaline environment that is unfavorable to cariogenic bacteria and reducing the carcinogenicity of oral biofilms. Research has confirmed that arginine can affect the pH and ecology of oral biofilms. Therefore, it was added to toothpaste (1.5% arginine) containing insoluble calcium and 1450 ppm sodium monofluorophosphate in order to enhance caries lesion prevention via enhanced remineralization [80]. A systematic review concluded that this formulation possesses the potential for a superior anticaries effect [81]. Clinical studies have revealed that the new arginine-containing compound provided significantly greater benefits than conventional fluoride toothpaste alone in halting and reversing caries lesions [82, 83].

8.7 Triclosan

Triclosan is an antibacterial agent that may influence biofilm production, resulting in increased saturation and remineralization. Triclosan binds to bacterial cells and increases the permeability of the cells. High bactericidal concentrations induce membrane lesions that allow cellular content to leak out. There is a linear correlation between acid production inhibition and triclosan adsorption by S. mutans cells. Consequently, the effect of triclosan is not dependent on the concentration of triclosan in solution, but rather on the ratio between the amount of triclosan and the number of cells to be inhibited [84]. Studies conducted have demonstrated that the addition of triclosan to toothpaste formulations can result in modest but statistically significant reductions of coronal and root caries [85]. Silva et al. [86] suggested that it could also have an effect on remineralization.

8.8 Probiotics

WHO defined probiotic bacteria as “live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” [87]. Probiotics is the idea of exploiting “good” bacteria to promote health. The concept is based on the theory of maintaining a healthy flora, which helps in eliminating pathogenic microbiota. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, which are part of normal oral flora, are common examples of probiotics with oral health benefits used in the treatment of dental caries and periodontal disease by reducing the quantity of pathogenic bacteria or inhibiting the virulence genes of S. mutans [88, 89].

8.9 Herbal compounds

Several herbal and other natural compounds have been investigated as potential remineralization agents. Depending on the specific compound, they may influence mineral saturation and precipitation, act as antimicrobials, or stabilize collagen, which may serve as a scaffold for mineral deposition. Proanthocyanidins and calcium phosphate-based compounds may have a synergistic effect when remineralizing in vitro artificial root caries lesions [90]. Ginger rhizome (Zingiber officinale Roscoe, Zingiberaceae) and rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L., Lamiaceae) are antimicrobial herbs derived from natural food sources. In addition, they exhibit no toxicity. Several polyphenolic ketones with multiple pharmacological activities are present in the pungent oils of these herbs. Studies documented their antifungal and antimicrobial effects on oral cavity pathogens [91, 92]. Honey is a possible antibacterial agent, and research indicates that manuka honey is probably noncariogenic [93].

An in vitro study revealed that the application of ginger, honey, and rosemary as herbal medicines inhibited demineralization and promoted remineralization of enamel [94].

Advertisement

9. Conclusions

Several topical remineralizing agents have been used to inhibit and remineralize enamel and white spot lesions specifically. For decades, fluoride has been the cornerstone of enamel remineralization. It is known to prevent caries by inhibiting demineralization on the surface of the enamel through the formation of fluorapatite. Currently, new mineralization agents have been developed to preserve enamel integrity and prevent the formation of carious cavities. Modern dentistry focuses on managing non-cavitated caries lesions noninvasively via remineralization in order to prevent disease progression and improve esthetics, strength, and function. The evidence suggests that initial non-cavitated lesions can be remineralized using appropriate technologies, and even non-fluoride remineralization strategies.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Abou Neel EA, Aljabo A, Strange A, Ibrahim S, Coathup M, Young AM, et al. Demineralization-remineralization dynamics in teeth and bone. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2016;11:4743-4763
  2. 2. Bigi A, Boanini E. Functionalized biomimetic calcium phosphates for bone tissue repair. Journal of Applied Biomaterials and Functional Materials. 2017;15(4):e313-e325
  3. 3. Depalle B, McGilvery CM, Nobakhti S, Aldegaither N, Shefelbine SJ, Porter AE. Osteopontin regulates type I collagen fibril formation in bone tissue. Acta Biomaterialia. 2021;120:194-202
  4. 4. Lacruz RS, Habelitz S, Wright JT, Paine ML. Dental enamel formation and implications for Oral health and disease. Physiological Reviews. 2017;97(3):939-993
  5. 5. Machiulskiene V, Campus G, Carvalho JC, Dige I, Ekstrand KR, Jablonski-Momeni A, et al. Terminology of dental caries and dental caries management: Consensus report of a workshop organized by ORCA and cariology research group of IADR. Caries Research. 2020;54(1):7-14
  6. 6. Robinson C, Shore RC, Brookes SJ, Strafford S, Wood SR, Kirkham J. The chemistry of enamel caries. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine. 2000;11(4):481-495
  7. 7. Holly FJ, Gray JA. Mechanism for incipient carious lesion growth utilizing a physical model based on diffusion concepts. Archives of Oral Biology. 1968;13(3):319-334
  8. 8. Onwubu SC, Mdluli PS, Singh S. Evaluating the buffering and acid-resistant properties of eggshell-titanium dioxide composite against erosive acids. Journal of Applied Biomaterials and Functional Materials. 2019;17(1):228
  9. 9. Moreno EC, Zahradnik RT. Chemistry of enamel subsurface demineralization in vitro. Journal of Dental Research. 1974;53(2):226-235
  10. 10. Mutahar M, Carpenter G, Bartlett D, German M, Moazzez R. The presence of acquired enamel pellicle changes acid-induced erosion from dissolution to a softening process. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):10920
  11. 11. Margolis HC, Kwak SY, Yamazaki H. Role of mineralization inhibitors in the regulation of hard tissue biomineralization: Relevance to initial enamel formation and maturation. Frontiers in Physiology. 2014;5:339
  12. 12. Brown WE. Physicochemical mechanisms of dental caries. Journal of Dental Research. 1974;53(2):204-216
  13. 13. Olek A, Klimek L, Bołtacz-Rzepkowska E. Comparative scanning electron microscope analysis of the enamel of permanent human, bovine and porcine teeth. Journal of Veterinary Science. 2020;21(6):e83
  14. 14. De Medeiros RC, Soares JD, De Sousa FB. Natural enamel caries in polarized light microscopy: Differences in histopathological features derived from a qualitative versus a quantitative approach to interpret enamel birefringence. Journal of Microscopy. 2012;246(2):177-189
  15. 15. Barbosa de Sousa F, Dias Soares J, Sampaio Vianna S. Natural enamel caries: A comparative histological study on biochemical volumes. Caries Research. 2013;47(3):183-192
  16. 16. Silverstone LM. The surface zone in caries and in caries-like lesions produced in vitro. British Dental Journal. 1968;125(4):145-157
  17. 17. Niederberger M, Colfen H. Oriented attachment and mesocrystals: Non-classical crystallization mechanisms based on nanoparticle assembly. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2006;8(28):3271-3287
  18. 18. Dai L, Liu Y, Salameh Z, Khan S, Mao J, Pashley DH, et al. Can caries-affected dentin be completely remineralized by guided tissue remineralization? Dental Hypotheses. 2011;2(2):74-82
  19. 19. Boanini E, Torricelli P, Gazzano M, Giardino R, Bigi A. Nanocomposites of hydroxyapatite with aspartic acid and glutamic acid and their interaction with osteoblast-like cells. Biomaterials. 2006;27(25):4428-4433
  20. 20. Kawasaki K, Ruben J, Stokroos I, Takagi O, Arends J. The remineralization of EDTA-treated human dentine. Caries Research. 1999;33(4):275-280
  21. 21. Xu Z, Neoh KG, Lin CC, Kishen A. Biomimetic deposition of calcium phosphate minerals on the surface of partially demineralized dentine modified with phosphorylated chitosan. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials. 2011;98(1):150-159
  22. 22. Shellis RP, Finke M, Eisenburger M, Parker DM, Addy M. Relationship between enamel erosion and liquid flow rate. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2005;113(3):232-238
  23. 23. Sivasithamparam K, Young WG, Jirattanasopa V, Priest J, Khan F, Harbrow D, et al. Dental erosion in asthma: A case-control study from south East Queensland. Australian Dental Journal. 2002;47(4):298-303
  24. 24. Kargul B, Tanboga I, Ergeneli S, Karakoc F, Dagli E. Inhaler medicament effects on saliva and plaque pH in asthmatic children. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 1998;22(2):137-140
  25. 25. Caufield PW, Griffen AL. Dental caries. An infectious and transmissible disease. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 2000;47(5):1001-1019
  26. 26. Douglass JM, Douglass AB, Silk HJ. A practical guide to infant oral health. American Family Physician. 2004;70(11):2113-2120
  27. 27. Lussi A, Jaeggi T. Erosion—Diagnosis and risk factors. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2008;12(Suppl. 1):S5-S13
  28. 28. Rios D, Honorio HM, Francisconi LF, Magalhaes AC, de Andrade Moreira Machado MA, Buzalaf MA. In situ effect of an erosive challenge on different restorative materials and on enamel adjacent to these materials. Journal of Dentistry. 2008;36(2):152-157
  29. 29. Fischer M, Skucha-Nowak M, Chmiela B, Korytkowska-Walach A. Assessment of the potential ability to penetrate into the hard tissues of the root of an experimental preparation with the characteristics of a dental Infiltratant, enriched with an antimicrobial component-preliminary study. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(19):53-57
  30. 30. Rocha Gomes Torres C, Borges AB, Torres LM, Gomes IS, de Oliveira RS. Effect of caries infiltration technique and fluoride therapy on the colour masking of white spot lesions. Journal of Dentistry. 2011;39(3):202-207
  31. 31. Silverstone LM. Structure of carious enamel, including the early lesion. Oral Sciences Reviews. 1973;3:100-160
  32. 32. Palamara J, Phakey PP, Rachinger WA, Orams HJ. Ultrastructure of the intact surface zone of white spot and brown spot carious lesions in human enamel. Journal of Oral Pathology. 1986;15(1):28-35
  33. 33. Darling AI, Mortimer KV, Poole DF, Ollis WD. Molecular sieve behaviour of normal and carious human dental enamel. Archives of Oral Biology. 1961;5(3-4):251-273
  34. 34. Paris S, Schwendicke F, Keltsch J, Dorfer C, Meyer-Lueckel H. Masking of white spot lesions by resin infiltration in vitro. Journal of Dentistry. 2013;41(Suppl 5):e28-e34
  35. 35. Besnard C, Harper RA, Salvati E, Moxham TEJ, Romano Brandt L, Landini G, et al. Analysis of in vitro demineralised human enamel using multi-scale correlative optical and scanning electron microscopy, and high-resolution synchrotron wide-angle X-ray scattering. Materials & Design. 2021;206:109739
  36. 36. Al-Obaidi R, Salehi H, Desoutter A, Bonnet L, Etienne P, Terrer E, et al. Chemical & nano-mechanical Study of artificial human enamel subsurface lesions. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):4047
  37. 37. Marsh PD. Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and disease. Advances in Dental Research. 1994;8(2):263-271
  38. 38. Kim MJ, Lee MJ, Kim KM, Yang SY, Seo JY, Choi SH, et al. Enamel demineralization resistance and remineralization by various fluoride-releasing dental restorative materials. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(16):223-230
  39. 39. Lussi A, Schlueter N, Rakhmatullina E, Ganss C. Dental erosion—An overview with emphasis on chemical and histopathological aspects. Caries Research. 2011;45(Suppl 1):2-12
  40. 40. ten Cate JM. The need for antibacterial approaches to improve caries control. Advances in Dental Research. 2009;21(1):8-12
  41. 41. Loesche WJ. The specific plaque hypothesis and the antimicrobial treatment of periodontal disease. Dental Update. 1992;19:70
  42. 42. Loesche WJ, Rowan J, Straffon LH, Loos PJ. Association of Streptococcus mutants with human dental decay. Infection and Immunity. 1975;11(6):1252-1260
  43. 43. Becker MR, Paster BJ, Leys EJ, Moeschberger ML, Kenyon SG, Galvin JL, et al. Molecular analysis of bacterial species associated with childhood caries. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2002;40(3):1001-1009
  44. 44. Munson MA, Banerjee A, Watson TF, Wade WG. Molecular analysis of the microflora associated with dental caries. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2004;42(7):3023-3029
  45. 45. Corby PM, Lyons-Weiler J, Bretz WA, Hart TC, Aas JA, Boumenna T, et al. Microbial risk indicators of early childhood caries. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005;43(11):5753-5759
  46. 46. Aas JA, Griffen AL, Dardis SR, Lee AM, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE, et al. Bacteria of dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in children and young adults. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2008;46(4):1407-1417
  47. 47. Belda-Ferre P, Alcaraz LD, Cabrera-Rubio R, Romero H, Simon-Soro A, Pignatelli M, et al. The oral metagenome in health and disease. The ISME Journal. 2012;6(1):46-56
  48. 48. Bowden GHW. The microbial ecology of dental caries. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease. 2009;12(3):138-148
  49. 49. Hara AT, Zero DT. The potential of saliva in protecting against dental erosion. Monographs in Oral Science. 2014;25:197-205
  50. 50. Navazesh M, Kumar SK. University of Southern California School of D: Measuring salivary flow: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2008;139(Suppl):35S-40S
  51. 51. Aiuchi H, Kitasako Y, Fukuda Y, Nakashima S, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Relationship between quantitative assessments of salivary buffering capacity and ion activity product for hydroxyapatite in relation to cariogenic potential. Australian Dental Journal. 2008;53(2):167-171
  52. 52. Miranda-Rius J, Brunet-Llobet L, Lahor-Soler E, Farre M. Salivary secretory disorders, inducing drugs, and clinical management. International Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015;12(10):811-824
  53. 53. Javaid MA, Ahmed AS, Durand R, Tran SD. Saliva as a diagnostic tool for oral and systemic diseases. Journal of Oral Biology Craniofacatory Research. 2016;6(1):66-75
  54. 54. Aranibar Quiroz EM, Alstad T, Campus G, Birkhed D, Lingstrom P. Relationship between plaque pH and different caries-associated variables in a group of adolescents with varying caries prevalence. Caries Research. 2014;48(2):147-153
  55. 55. Aykut-Yetkiner A, Wiegand A, Attin T. The effect of saliva substitutes on enamel erosion in vitro. Journal of Dentistry. 2014;42(6):720-725
  56. 56. Reynolds EC. Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate: The scientific evidence. Advances in Dental Research. 2009;21(1):25-29
  57. 57. Cagetti MG, Mastroberardino S, Milia E, Cocco F, Lingstrom P, Campus G. The use of probiotic strains in caries prevention: A systematic review. Nutrients. 2013;5(7):2530-2550
  58. 58. Chugh P, Dutt R, Sharma A, Bhagat N, Dhar MS. A critical appraisal of the effects of probiotics on oral health. Journal of Functional Foods. 2020;70:103985
  59. 59. Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Logan S, Sheiham A. Topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels or varnishes) for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003;(4):1-157, CD002782
  60. 60. Benson PE, Parkin N, Dyer F, Millett DT, Germain P. Fluorides for preventing early tooth decay (demineralised lesions) during fixed brace treatment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019;(11):1-66
  61. 61. Ten Cate JM, Buzalaf MAR. Fluoride mode of action: Once there was an observant dentist. Journal of Dental Research. 2019;98(7):725-730
  62. 62. Tasios T, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Tsapas A, Haidich AB. Prevention of orthodontic enamel demineralization: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2019;22(4):225-235
  63. 63. Philip N. State of the art enamel remineralization systems: The next frontier in caries management. Caries Research. 2019;53(3):284-295
  64. 64. Duckworth RM, Morgan SN. Oral fluoride retention after use of fluoride dentifrices. Caries Research. 1991;25(2):123-129
  65. 65. Songsiripradubboon S, Hamba H, Trairatvorakul C, Tagami J. Sodium fluoride mouthrinse used twice daily increased incipient caries lesion remineralization in an in situ model. Journal of Dentistry. 2014;42(3):271-278
  66. 66. Wang SP, Ge Y, Zhou XD, Xu HH, Weir MD, Zhang KK, et al. Effect of anti-biofilm glass-ionomer cement on Streptococcus mutans biofilms. International Journal of Oral Science. 2016;8(2):76-83
  67. 67. Trairatvorakul C, Techalertpaisarn P, Siwawut S, Ingprapankorn A. Effect of glass ionomer cement and fluoride varnish on the remineralization of artificial proximal caries in situ. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2009;34(2):131-134
  68. 68. Fernandez CE, Tenuta LMA, Del Bel Cury AA, Nobrega DF, Cury JA. Effect of 5,000 ppm fluoride dentifrice or 1,100 ppm fluoride dentifrice combined with acidulated phosphate fluoride on caries lesion inhibition and repair. Caries Research. 2017;51(3):179-187
  69. 69. Silva KG, Pedrini D, Delbem AC, Ferreira L, Cannon M. In situ evaluation of the remineralizing capacity of pit and fissure sealants containing amorphous calcium phosphate and/or fluoride. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2010;68(1):11-18
  70. 70. Reynolds EC. Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions by casein phosphopeptide-stabilized calcium phosphate solutions. Journal of Dental Research. 1997;76(9):1587-1595
  71. 71. Cross KJ, Huq NL, Palamara JE, Perich JW, Reynolds EC. Physicochemical characterization of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate nanocomplexes. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280(15):15362-15369
  72. 72. Burwell A, Jennings D, Muscle D, Greenspan DC. NovaMin and dentin hypersensitivity—in vitro evidence of efficacy. The Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2010;21(3):66-71
  73. 73. Arifa MK, Ephraim R, Rajamani T. Recent advances in dental hard tissue remineralization: A review of literature. International Journal of Clinical and Pediatrics Dental. 2019;12(2):139-144
  74. 74. Sitthisettapong T, Phantumvanit P, Huebner C, Derouen T. Effect of CPP-ACP paste on dental caries in primary teeth: A randomized trial. Journal of Dental Research. 2012;91(9):847-852
  75. 75. Prestes L, Souza BM, Comar LP, Salomao PA, Rios D, Magalhaes AC. In situ effect of chewing gum containing CPP-ACP on the mineral precipitation of eroded bovine enamel-a surface hardness analysis. Journal of Dentistry. 2013;41(8):747-751
  76. 76. Walker G, Cai F, Shen P, Reynolds C, Ward B, Fone C, et al. Increased remineralization of tooth enamel by milk containing added casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate. The Journal of Dairy Research. 2006;73(1):74-78
  77. 77. Kulal R, Jayanti I, Sambashivaiah S, Bilchodmath S. An In-vitro comparison of Nano hydroxyapatite, Novamin and Proargin desensitizing toothpastes—A SEM study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2016;10(10):ZC51-ZC54
  78. 78. Makinen KK. Sugar alcohols, caries incidence, and remineralization of caries lesions: A literature review. International Journal of Dental. 2010;2010:981072
  79. 79. Kusuma Eriwati Y, Putriani D, Geraldine K, Hermansyah H. Fluoride and calcium release from peppermint-flavored fluoride varnish containing dicalcium-phosphate-dihydrate coated with xylitol. Saudi Dental Journal. 2022;34(1):68-73
  80. 80. Cummins D. The superior anti-caries efficacy of fluoride toothpaste containing 1.5% arginine. The Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2016;27(2):27-38
  81. 81. Li J, Huang Z, Mei L, Li G, Li H. Anti-caries effect of arginine-containing formulations in vivo: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Caries Research. 2015;49(6):606-617
  82. 82. Cantore R, Petrou I, Lavender S, Santarpia P, Liu Z, Gittins E, et al. In situ clinical effects of new dentifrices containing 1.5% arginine and fluoride on enamel de- and remineralization and plaque metabolism. The Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2013;24:A32-A34
  83. 83. Wolff MS, Schenkel AB. The anticaries efficacy of a 1.5% arginine and fluoride toothpaste. Advances in Dental Research. 2018;29(1):93-97
  84. 84. Phan TN, Marquis RE. Triclosan inhibition of membrane enzymes and glycolysis of Streptococcus mutans in suspensions and biofilms. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2006;52(10):977-983
  85. 85. Riley P, Lamont T. Triclosan/copolymer containing toothpastes for oral health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013;2013(12):CD010514
  86. 86. Silva MF, Giniger MS, Zhang YP, DeVizio W. The effect of a triclosan/copolymer/fluoride liquid dentifrice on interproximal enamel remineralization and fluoride uptake. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2004;135(7):1023-1029
  87. 87. Twetman S. Are we ready for caries prevention through bacteriotherapy? Brazilian Oral Research. 2012;26(Suppl. 1(SPE1)):64-70
  88. 88. Saha S, Tomaro-Duchesneau C, Rodes L, Malhotra M, Tabrizian M, Prakash S. Investigation of probiotic bacteria as dental caries and periodontal disease biotherapeutics. Benefeciary Microbes. 2014;5(4):447-460
  89. 89. Cildir SK, Germec D, Sandalli N, Ozdemir FI, Arun T, Twetman S, et al. Reduction of salivary mutans streptococci in orthodontic patients during daily consumption of yoghurt containing probiotic bacteria. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2009;31(4):407-411
  90. 90. Epasinghe DJ, Kwan S, Chu D, Lei MM, Burrow MF, Yiu CKY. Synergistic effects of proanthocyanidin, tri-calcium phosphate and fluoride on artificial root caries and dentine collagen. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications. 2017;73:293-299
  91. 91. Bhalodia NR, Shukla VJ. Antibacterial and antifungal activities from leaf extracts of Cassia fistula l.: An ethnomedicinal plant. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research. 2011;2(2):104-109
  92. 92. Khalid GS, Hamrah MH, Ghafary ES, Hosseini S, Almasi F. Antibacterial and antimicrobial effects of Xanthorrhizol in the prevention of dental caries: A systematic review. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2021;15:1149-1156
  93. 93. Celik ZC, Yavlal GO, Yanikoglu F, Kargul B, Tagtekin D, Stookey GK, et al. Do ginger extract, natural honey and bitter chocolate remineralize enamel surface as fluoride toothpastes? An In-vitro study. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2021;24(9):1283-1288
  94. 94. Bilgin Gocmen G, Yanikoglu F, Tagtekin D, Stookey GK, Schemehorn BR, Hayran O. Effectiveness of some herbals on initial enamel caries lesion. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2016;6(10):846-850

Written By

Aiswarya Anil, Wael I. Ibraheem, Abdullah A. Meshni, Reghunathan Preethanath and Sukumaran Anil

Submitted: 23 May 2022 Reviewed: 14 June 2022 Published: 26 September 2022