Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Navigating the Endoplasmic Reticulum: New Insights and Emerging Concepts

Written By

Sikander Ali and Maria Najeeb

Submitted: 18 May 2022 Reviewed: 07 June 2022 Published: 04 October 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.105737

From the Edited Volume

Updates on Endoplasmic Reticulum

Edited by Gaia Favero

Chapter metrics overview

55 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a membrane bound organelle adjacent to the nucleus in eukaryotic cells. It exists in the form of membranous sacs called “cisternae”. It was first discovered by Emilio Veratti in 1902 and later named as ‘Endoplasmic Reticulum’ in 1953 after visualization through electron microscopy. There are two types of endoplasmic reticulum based on the presence of ribosomes i.e., ‘rough’ ER and ‘smooth’ ER. Rough ER is the site for protein synthesis and modification by glycosylation. While the smooth ER is involved in the metabolism of lipids and carbohydrates. Recently, it has been classified on the basis of membrane structure rather than appearance. It physically interconnects with the mitochondria and these sites are named as mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs) that are crucial for Ca+2 homeostasis. Various mechanisms of ER signaling play vital role in physiology and the onset of disease. A thorough understanding of these mechanisms and their role in physiology and pathophysiology can be applied to develop new ER-targeted therapies.

Keywords

  • endoplasmic reticulum (ER)
  • mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs)
  • Ca+2 homeostasis
  • ER-targeted therapies
  • perturbic ER functions

1. Introduction

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a membrane bound subcellular organelle that appears as a network of tubules in the cytoplasm [1]. It was first observed in chicken fibroblast-like cells with the help of electron microscope. After 10 years, it was named by Porter in 1954 [2]. There are two types of ER based upon the presence or absence of ribosomes on its surface i.e., smooth endoplasmic reticulum SER and rough endoplasmic reticulum RER. Both of these could occur either interconnected or separately in compartments [3]. ER is a crucial site for various functions, including protein synthesis, storage and regulation of Ca2+ and lipid and glucose metabolism [3]. These range of functions indicate that ER plays important role in regulating metabolism and cell programming.

ER plays important role in protein synthesis and modification. After synthesis the proteins are translocated across the membrane of ER. Ribosomes attached to the RER membrane are involved in the synthesis of protein [4]. In addition, ER is also crucial for Ca2+ signaling and homeostasis. A storage and transport system for Ca2+ comprising of Ca2+ channels, ATPase pumps, sensors and storage proteins. This chapter highlights a new aspect for ER classification, its functions, ER phagy and role of ER signaling in health and disease [5].

Advertisement

2. Structure

There are two types of ER based upon the presence or absence of ribosomes on its surface i.e., smooth endoplasmic reticulum SER and rough endoplasmic reticulum RER [2]. Both of these could occur either interconnected or separately in compartments. Recently, a new classification has been introduced based on its membrane structure instead of appearance. According to this, ER carry a nuclear envelope, cisternae and three way connected tubules. The ER is interconnected with many organelles in the cell and it is connected with mitochondria through specific sites, called mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs), that are critical for maintaining Ca2+ homeostasis [6]. Its interaction with the plasma membrane is regulated by stromal interaction molecule 1 a protein-like structure and Calcium channel protein 1 [7]. Moreover, SEC22b a vesicle-trafficking also involved in the maintenance of this interaction [8]. ER interaction with endosomes is stabilized by lipid transfer protein 3, the protein involved in cholesterol maintenance in endosomes [9]. ER also play role in autophagy by interacting with endolysosomal system. These intracellular interactions are crucial for the functionality of the cell (Figure 1) [10].

Figure 1.

ER molecular machines and contact sites with other organelles. The ER forms multiple membrane contact sites with other organelles, including the endosomes and lysosomes (through STARD3, STARD3NL, Mdm1; panel 2), the mitochondria (through Mfn-2, Sig-1R, PERK; panel 3), and the PM (through ORAI1, STIM1, Sec22b, VAMP7; panel 4) with various functional implications.

Advertisement

3. Functions

ER is a crucial site for various functions, including protein synthesis, storage and regulation of Ca2+ and lipid and glucose metabolism. These range of functions indicate that ER plays important role in regulating metabolism and cell programming [3].

3.1 Protein modification

Secretory and transmembrane proteins are synthesized in ER. Their folding, maturation, quality control and degradation also occur in this organelle. As a result, only properly folded proteins are transported to their destination [4]. Approximately, 30% proteins are cotranslationally delivered to the ER, where chaperones are involved in their folding, packaging and post-translational modification [11]. Protein modification processes includes signal sequence cleavage, formation and breakage of disulfide bonds and lipid conjugation. Misfolded proteins are damaging to normal cellular functions and are tightly monitored. Protein misfolding is a regular process but aggravate during adverse conditions. In ER several regulatory systems ensure correction of misfolded proteins. Terminally misfolded secretory proteins are removed by ER associated degradation (ERAD) process [12]. Initially, proteins are encountered by an ER resident luminal and transmembrane protein machinery, then translocated into cytosol via channel called dislocon [13].

3.2 Lipid synthesis

ER is also crucial for synthesis of membrane constituents, lipid droplets fat accumulation as energy reservoir. Lipid synthesis takes place at membrane interfaces and organelle interaction sites. The ER membrane architecture dynamically altered according to cellular lipid concentration [14]. In order to maintain the cholesterol homeostasis in the body, ER carry a family of protein sensors. It also consists of various enzymes involved in synthesis of sterols and phospholipids (Figure 1) [15].

3.3 ER export

The proteins and lipids synthesized in the ER are delivered to their destined locations through secretory pathways. The export process is tightly controlled to maintain a steady anabolic flux because anomalies in secretion could lead to detrimental consequences to ER structure and functions [16]. Synthesis of ER COPII transport vesicles is crucial to this export process. Apart from COPII mediated transport several other mechanisms have been studied such as nonvesicular. For example, large lipoprotein cargo is transported out in another vesicle or stored in lipid droplets (Figure 1) [17].

3.4 Ca2+ homeostasis

Ca2+is a metallic ion plays key role as a secondary messenger in various intracellular and extracellular signaling events such as gene expression, translation, protein trafficking, and regulation of other cellular functions [6]. ER is the main reservoir of Ca2+ and important for its regulation. Myriad of cellular functions are regulated by Ca2+-dependent way in order to maintain the calcium level of entire cell. As a result, tight regulation of both ER and cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration is essential to maintain enhanced intraluminal Ca2+ concentration redox potential as compared to the cytoplasm. A variety of mechanism employed by ER to maintain the concentration of Ca2+ inside and outside the membrane [5]. (a) ER membrane ATP-dependent Ca2+ pumps for cytosol-to-lumen transport; (b) ER luminal Ca2+-binding chaperones for sequestering free Ca2+ and (c) ER membrane channels for the regulated release of Ca2+ into the cytosol. These mechanisms are supported by a controlled interaction between the ER and other organelles, i.e., PM and the mitochondria.

Advertisement

4. Perturbing ER functions

Disturbance in ER function results in condition commonly known as ‘ER stress’. In order to overcome ER stress and reestablish the homeostasis several adaptation mechanisms are activated inside the cell [18].

4.1 Intrinsic ER perturbations

In certain disease conditions such as cancer, diabetes and neurodegenerative diseases some cellular mechanisms lead to ER stress [19]. In case of cancer, rapid and uncontrolled cellular growth required high protein production that impact the ER system [20]. More specifically, in melanoma that has highest mutation rate the number of mutated proteins is increased that results in ER stress. In chronic myeloid leukemia, an oncoprotein is activated that promotes cell proliferation and disturbs Ca2+-dependent apoptotic response [21].

Many neurodegenerative diseases also disturb the ER homeostasis and lead to ER stress. For instance, motor neuron death is the consequence of mutations in the vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein B located in ER. It is mediated by the fluctuation of ER stress signaling [22, 23]. On the contrary, pancreatic beta cells involved in insulin production carry a complex and developed ER to control insulin production and use in response to high blood sugar level. Type 1 diabetes is associated with mutation induced ER stress, in this condition beta cells undergo apoptosis and insulin level reduced [24, 25]. Insulin mutation-related ER stress have also been observed in neonatal diabetes [26, 27].

4.2 Extrinsic ER perturbations

4.2.1 Microenvironmental stress

Microenvironmental ER stress occurs in tumorigenic cells. These cells rapidly proliferate that leads to deprivation of nutrients and oxygen in the microenvironment, resulting in local stress accompanied with hypoxia, starvation and acidosis, consequently ER stress, perturbation of protein and lipid biogenesis [28]. Nutrient scarcity, most importantly glucose distress facilitates ER stress by perturbing glycosylation.

4.2.2 Exposure to ER stressors

ER stressors are small molecules that stimulate ER stress mediated by a number of mechanisms [29]. These include molecules such as tunicamycin [30], or 2-deoxyglucose target the N-linked glycosylation of proteins. On the other hand, dithiothreitol prevents protein disulfide bond formation [31]. While Brefeldin A inhibits the ER to-Golgi trafficking, resulting in rapid and reversible inhibition of protein secretion [32].

4.2.3 Exposure to enhancers of ER homeostasis

Some molecules have been reported to stimulate and increase ER stress, such as peptides and proteostasis regulators. A most commonly used 4-phenylbutyric acid (4-PBA) prevents the aggregation of misfolded proteins in the ER [33]. In islet cells, to reduced ER stress a bile acid called Tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) is present [34]. FDA has approved TUDCA as a drug for patients diagnosed with primary biliary cirrhosis [35]. The precise mechanism of action of these proteostasis regulators is still unknown.

4.2.4 Temperature

Mammals normal body temperature is 36–37°C necessary for viability and normal bodily functions. Fluctuations in normal body temperature could perturb cellular homeostasis consequently protein denaturation and aggregation [36]. In addition, an acute elevation in temperature, such as heat shock leads to fragmentation of both ER and Golgi [36]. In some mammalian cells and animal models mild elevation in temperature (up to 40°C) cause the development of thermotolerance, which is linked with increased expression of heat shock proteins and ER stressors [37, 38]. Moreover, mild hypothermia (28°C) stimulates mild ER stress in human pluripotent stem cells [39].

4.2.5 Physiological ER stress signaling

In physiological stress conditions, for instance increased secretory level or pathological stress, induced by aggregation of mutant protein could lead to imbalance between requirement for folded protein and ER potential to fold protein, consequently causing ER stress [40]. In response to stress, eukaryotic cells have developed signal transduction pathways, known as unfolded protein response (UPR) (Figure 2). These pathways are regulated by a group of proteins that sense ER stress. These proteins generate stress signals that protect cell from damage or induce cell apoptosis. A strong link between UPR signaling and human diseases has been reported [41].

Figure 2.

A schematic of mammalian unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling. IRE1, PERK, and ATF-6 proteins reside at the ER membrane. In response to ER stress, they initiate a cascade of signal transduction outputs that control cell survival or death.

The main objective of the UPR is to restore homeostasis and inhibit ER stress by employing the following mechanisms: (a) increasing protein folding ability through expression of protein-folding chaperones (b) Inhibition of protein translation by downregulating the ER protein load and facilitating the denaturation of misfolded proteins. But in case of acute stress the UPR stimulates programmed cell death [40]. UPR-mediated cell death is responsible for the onset of many diseases (Table 1), including cancer, type 2 diabetes, neurodegeneration, and atherosclerosis (40).

DiseaseRole of ER stress
Alzheimer’s diseaseMutant presenilin 1 induces CHOP
Parkinson’s diseaseAccumulation of a substrate of Parkin in the ER activates ER stress
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosisMutant SOD1 aggregates and activates ER stress
Type 2 diabetesObesity induces ER stress
ATF6 interferes with gluconeogenesis
Free fatty acids and hyperglycemia induce beta cell death through CHOP
AtherosclerosisAtherosclerosis-relevant stimuli induce macrophage death via CHOP
Oxidized phospholipids, hyperhomocysteinemia, and cholesterol loading induce endothelial and smooth muscle cell death via CHOP
Nonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseER stress induces SREBP-1c
HCV and HBV infectionHCV suppresses IRE1-XBP1 pathway
Alcoholic liver diseaseAlcohol induces Grp78 and CHOP

Table 1.

Diseases related to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress.

4.2.6 Role of ER in metabolism

The ER plays crucial role in the regulation of metabolic reactions. More specifically, the UPR pathway is involved in the regulation of glycolysis and it was recently reported that a regulatory protein mediates a metabolic decrease upon decrease in glucose level in neurons, suggesting an important role for the UPR as an adaptive response mechanism in relation to energy metabolism [42]. In addition, another signaling molecule known as mTOR maintains protein synthesis.

To maintain lipid content in the body ER plays an important role. Hepatocytes, liver cells carry SER in abundance, because along with protein synthesis, these cells also produce bile acids, cholesterol and phospholipids. Lipid accumulation leads to lipotoxicity, which is the fundamental cause of metabolic diseases. ER carry various enzymes that are crucial for lipid metabolism. Cellular cholesterol level is regulated via signaling pathways. One of these pathways is SCAP/SREBP2, which converts cholesterol into oxysterols and eventually to bile acids. Similarly, level of intracellular fatty acid is controlled by ER by a bunch of enzymes including, desaturases, elongases, and beta oxidation cycles [43].

The UPR has also been reported important for amino acid metabolism. Amino acid synthesis is closely linked with demand for protein biogenesis during ER stress. In response to ER stress, amino acid biosynthetic genes are expressed.

4.2.7 Role of ER stress in age-related diseases

According to current studies, the process of aging and age-related disorders are interlinked with ER stress response [44]. With aging, the normal cellular functions are declined, particularly slow degradation of chaperones, which results in increased aggregation of misfolded proteins [45]. These misfolded proteins accumulated in various organs of the body, such as in case of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), an inflammatory neurodegenerative disease. In AD brains, ER stress responses have been observed, because ER is the site for synthesis of secretory and membranous proteins [46].

Aging disrupts the balance between UPR and pro-apoptotic signaling, leading to reduced protective response against ER-stress signaling [47]. Essential chaperons and enzymes, required for protein folding are functionally damaged with aging [48]. ER structure is also altered with aging. Hinds and McNelly reported dispersion in the highly organized ER cisternae [49].

Autophagy, a process activated by UPR system, remove the aggregation of misfolded proteins. Nevertheless, this process slows down with age, leading to neurodegeneration [50]. ER stress responses have been associated with certain neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS and Huntington’s disease. In neurodegenerative disorders, UPR activity is sustained, while apoptotic pathways are upregulated, encompassed by accumulation of aggregated proteins, hence neuronal death in old age [51].

It has been postulated that ER stress also plays role in the onset of metabolic disorders. For instance, in Type 2 Diabetes, a metabolic disease, caused by insulin resistance is regulated by various ER stress response mechanisms. The two main mechanisms that disrupt insulin activity are interlinked with ER stress [52].

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

ER is a complex and well-organized organelle, crucial for various cellular metabolic functions. ER homeostasis is maintained by a network of signaling pathways, collectively known as ER stress response, in order to deal with genetic, infectious and inflammatory stressors. With age, UPR, ER stress response mechanism, lost its activity thus less efficiently respond to these stressors. This results in onset of various age-related metabolic and neurodegenerative diseases. Advent of ER stress targeted therapeutics, particularly those improving protein folding and efficiency of associated regulatory mechanisms, promoting early detection of misfolded proteins could be useful in preventing and treating age-related disorders discussed in this chapter. Moreover, detection of anomalies in the ER stress response may led to development of therapeutics that could maintain ER homeostasis. This represents so far unexplored approach for disease prevention.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Schwarz DS, Blower MD. The endoplasmic reticulum: Structure, function and response to cellular signaling. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2016;73(1):79-94
  2. 2. Westrate LM, Lee JE, Prinz WA, Voeltz GK. Form follows function: The importance of endoplasmic reticulum shape. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2015;84:791-811
  3. 3. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th ed. New York: Garland Science; 2002
  4. 4. Stefan CJ, Manford AG, Baird D, Yamada-Hanff J, Mao Y, Emr SD. Osh proteins regulate phosphoinositide metabolism at ER-plasma membrane contact sites. Cell. 2011;144:389-401
  5. 5. Haustrate A, Prevarskaya N, Lehen’kyi VY. Role of the TRPV channels in the endoplasmic reticulum calcium homeostasis. Cells. 2020;28:317
  6. 6. Hayashi T, Rizzuto R, Hajnoczky G, Su TP. MAM: More than just a housekeeper. Trends in Cell Biology. 2009;19:81-88
  7. 7. Toulmay A, Prinz WA. Lipid transfer and signaling at organelle contact sites: The tip of the iceberg. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2011;23:458-463
  8. 8. Wilhelm LP, Tomasetto C, Alpy F. Touche! STARD3 and STARD3NL tether the ER to endosomes. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2016;44:493-498
  9. 9. Wilhelm LP, Wendling C, Vedie B, Kobayashi T, Chenard M, Tomasetto C, et al. STARD3 mediates endoplasmic reticulum-toendosome cholesterol transport at membrane contact sites. EMBO Journal. 2017;36:1412-1433
  10. 10. Uemura T, Yamamoto M, Kametaka A, Sou Y, Yabashi A, Yamada A, et al. A cluster of thin tubular structures mediates transformation of the endoplasmic reticulum to autophagic isolation membrane. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2014;34:1695-1706
  11. 11. Braakman I, Bulleid NJ. Protein folding and modification in the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2011;80:71-99
  12. 12. Meusser B, Hirsch C, Jarosch E, Sommer T. ERAD: The long road to destruction. Nature Cell Biology. 2005;7:766-772
  13. 13. Hebert DN, Bernasconi R, Molinari M. ERAD substrates: Which way out? Semin Frontiers in Developmental and Cell Biology. 2010;21:526-532
  14. 14. Lim CY, Davis OB, Shin HR, Zhang J, Berdan CA, Jiang X, et al. ER–lysosome contacts enable cholesterol sensing by mTORC1 and drive aberrant growth signalling in Niemann–Pick type C. Nature Cell Biology. 2019;21(10):1206-1218
  15. 15. Jo Y, DeBose-Boyd RA. Control of cholesterol synthesis through regulated ER-associated degradation of HMG CoA reductase. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2010;45:185-198
  16. 16. Gorur A, Yuan L, Kenny SJ, Baba S, Xu K, Schekman R. COPII-coated membranes function as transport carriers of intracellular procollagen I. Journal of Cell Biology. 2017;216(6):1745-1759
  17. 17. Siddiqi S, Saleem U, Abumrad NA, Davidson NO, Storch J, Siddiqi SA, et al. A novel multiprotein complex is required to generate the prechylomicron transport vesicle from intestinal ER. The Journal of Lipid Research. 2010;51:1918-1928
  18. 18. Hetz C. The unfolded protein response: Controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2012;13:89-102
  19. 19. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646-674
  20. 20. Holdereld M, Deuker MM, McCormick F, McMahon M. Targeting RAF kinases for cancer therapy: BRAF mutated melanoma and beyond. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2014;14:455-467
  21. 21. Piwocka K, Vejda S, Cotter TG, O’Sullivan GC, McKenna SL. Bcr-Abl reduces endoplasmic reticulum releasable calcium levels by a Bcl-2independent mechanism and inhibits calcium-dependent apoptotic signaling. Blood. 2006;107:4003-4010
  22. 22. Chen H-J, Anagnostou G, Chai A, Withers J, Morris A, Adhikaree J, et al. Characterization of the properties of a novel mutation in VAPB in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285:40266-40281
  23. 23. Nishimura AL, Mitne-Neto M, Silva HCA, RichieriCosta A, Middleton S, Cascio D, et al. A Mutation in the vesicle-trafficking protein VAPB causes late-onset spinal muscular atrophy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2004;75:822-831
  24. 24. Harding HP, Ron D. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the development of diabetes: A review. Diabetes. 2002;51:S455-S461
  25. 25. Oyadomari S, Koizumi A, Takeda K, Gotoh T, Akira S, Araki E, et al. Targeted disruption of the Chop gene delays endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated diabetes. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2002;109:525-532
  26. 26. Colombo C, Porzio O, Liu M, Massa O, Vasta M, Salardi S, et al. Seven mutations in the human insulin gene linked to permanent neonatal/infancy-onset diabetes mellitus. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2008;118:2148-2156
  27. 27. Støy J, Edghill EL, Flanagan SE, Ye H, Paz VP, Pluzhnikov A, et al. Insulin gene mutations as a cause of permanent neonatal diabetes. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2007;104:15040-15044
  28. 28. Giampietri C, Petrungaro S, Conti S, Facchiano A, Filippini A, Ziparo E. Cancer microenvironment and endoplasmic reticulum stress response. Mediators of Inflammation. 2015;2015:417281
  29. 29. Jin ML, Park SY, Kim YH, Oh J-I, Lee SJ, Park G. The neuroprotective effects of cordycepin inhibit glutamate-induced oxidative and ER stressassociated apoptosis in hippocampal HT22 cells. Neurotoxicology. 2014;41:102-111
  30. 30. Kim SH, Kwon DY, Kwak JH, Lee S, Lee YH, Yun J, et al. Tunicamycin-induced ER stress is accompanied with oxidative stress via abrogation of sulfur amino acids metabolism in the liver. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19(12):4114
  31. 31. Xiang XY, Yang XC, Su J, Kang JS, Wu Y, Xue YN, et al. Inhibition of autophagic flux by ROS promotes apoptosis during DTT-induced ER/oxidative stress in HeLa cells. Oncology Reports. 2016;35(6):3471
  32. 32. Gallagher CM, Walter P. Ceapins inhibit ATF6α signaling by selectively preventing transport of ATF6α to the Golgi apparatus during ER stress. Elife. 2016;20(5):e11880
  33. 33. Malo A, Krcuger B, Gcoke B, Kubisch CH. 4phenylbutyric acid reduces endoplasmic reticulum stress, trypsin activation, and acinar cell apoptosis while increasing secretion in rat pancreatic acini. Pancreas. 2013;42:92-100
  34. 34. Lee YY, Hong SH, Lee YJ, Chung SS, Jung HS, Park SG, et al. Tauroursodeoxycholate (TUDCA), chemical chaperone, enhances function of islets by reducing ER stress. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2010;397:735-739
  35. 35. Ozcan U, Yilmaz E, Ozcan L, Furuhashi M, Vaillancourt E, Krcuger B, et al. Chemical chaperones reduce ER stress and restore glucose homeostasis in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Science. 2006;313:1137-1140
  36. 36. Lepock JR. How do cells respond to their thermal environment? International Journal of Hyperthermia. 2005;21:681-687
  37. 37. Bettaieb A, Averill-Bates DA. Thermotolerance induced at a mild temperature of 40°C protects cells against heat shock-induced apoptosis. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2005;205:47-57
  38. 38. Liu Y, Sakamoto H, Adachi M, Zhao S, Ukai W, Hashimoto E, et al. Heat stress activates ER stress signals which suppress the heat shock response, an effect occurring preferentially in the cortex in rats. Molecular Biology Reports. 2005;39:3987-3993
  39. 39. Mollereau B. Cooling-induced ER stress is good for your brain. EBioMedicine. 2015;2:482-483
  40. 40. Tabas I, Ron D. Integrating the mechanisms of apoptosis induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress. Nature Cell Biology. 2011;13:184-190
  41. 41. Marciniak SJ, Ron D. Endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling in disease. Physiological Reviews. 2006;86:1133-1149
  42. 42. Van der Harg JM, van Heest JC, Bangel FN, Patiwael S, van Weering JRT, Scheper W. The UPR reduces glucose metabolism via IRE1 signaling. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2017;1864:655-665
  43. 43. Zhou H, Liu R. ER stress and hepatic lipid metabolism. Frontiers in Genetics. 2014;5:112
  44. 44. Höhn A, Tramutola A, Cascella R. Proteostasis failure in neurodegenerative diseases: Focus on oxidative stress. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2020;27:2020
  45. 45. Macario AJL, De Macario EC. Sick chaperones and ageing: A perspective. Ageing Research. 2002;1:295-311
  46. 46. Uddin M, Tewari D, Sharma G, Kabir M, Barreto GE, Bin-Jumah MN, et al. Molecular mechanisms of ER stress and UPR in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Molecular Neurobiology. 2020;57(7):2902-2919
  47. 47. Naidoo N, Ferber M, Master M, Zhu Y, Pack AI. Aging impairs the unfolded protein response to sleep deprivation and leads to proapoptotic signaling. Journal of Neuroscience. 2008;28:6539-6548
  48. 48. Nuss JE, Choksi KB, DeFord JH, Papaconstantinou J. Decreased enzyme activities of chaperones PDI and BiP in aged mouse livers. Biochemical Biophysical Research Communications. 2008;365:355-361
  49. 49. Hinds J, McNelly N. Dispersion of cisternae of rough endoplasmic reticulum in aging CNS neurons: A strictly linear trend. The American Journal of Anatomy. 2005;152:433-439
  50. 50. Doyle KM, Kennedy D, Gorman AM, Gupta S, Healy SJ, Samali A. Unfolded proteins and endoplasmic reticulum stress in neurodegenerative disorders. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2011;15:2025-2039
  51. 51. Xiang C, Wang Y, Zhang H, Han F. The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in neurodegenerative disease. Apoptosis. 2017;22(1):1-26
  52. 52. Hotamisligil GS. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and atherosclerosis. Nature Medicine, Nature Medicine. 2010;16:396-399

Written By

Sikander Ali and Maria Najeeb

Submitted: 18 May 2022 Reviewed: 07 June 2022 Published: 04 October 2023