Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Influence of Climatic Factors on the Abundance and Profusion of Mosquitoes in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia

Written By

Assad Al-Thukair, Yasin Jemal and Alexis Nzila

Submitted: 28 December 2021 Reviewed: 22 March 2022 Published: 07 July 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.104615

From the Edited Volume

Mosquito Research - Recent Advances in Pathogen Interactions, Immunity, and Vector Control Strategies

Edited by Henry Puerta-Guardo and Pablo Manrique-Saide

Chapter metrics overview

205 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the change in seasonal abundance and distribution of individual mosquito vectors (Culex, Anopheles, and Aedes) in relation to the climatic factors in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia, for the study period of 2014. The association between mosquito abundance and environmental parameters was investigated using bivariate and multivariate analysis. The study showed the range of temperature and relative humidity required for individual mosquito larvae abundance varies for Culex, Anopheles, and Aedes. However, no variation was observed in the range of temperature and relative humidity required for the abundance of adult Culex and Anopheles. The results revealed a negative relationship between mosquito larval/adult abundance and temperature (Total number of larva/adult is 671/11 in July, While it is 2462/221 in January). There is a link between relative humidity and rainfall, as the three climatic factors together were responsible for 33.1% (R2 = 0.331), 54.6% (R2 = 0.546), and 86.6% (R2 = 0.866) of the variance on Culex, Anopheles, and Aedes larvae, respectively. The effects of the three climatic parameters of temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall on mosquito larval and adult abundance were discussed. In addition, influences of other environmental factors on larval/adult mosquito distribution and abundance were also explained.

Keywords

  • mosquitoes
  • climate factors
  • Saudi Arabia

1. Introduction

Mosquitoes have a higher impact than any other bug because of the diseases they spread. Mosquito-borne infections are a substantial hazard to human health and are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. The mosquito vector, the human host, and the environment are all involved in the development of these diseases [6].

Over one billion people are affected and over one million people die each year because of vector-borne diseases, the majority of which are caused by mosquitos [5]. Zika virus, Malaria, Dengue Fever, Japanese Encephalitis, Yellow Fever, West Nile Virus, Filariasis, and Rift Valley Fever are the communal mosquito-borne diseases MBDs [5, 7, 8, 9]. In Saudi Arabia, dengue fever, malaria, and rift valley fever are among the MBDs reported by many researchers in many parts of the kingdom [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20].

Complex factors influence mosquito dispersal and abundance, including MBDs [21, 22]. Climate parameters such as temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall, on the other hand, are critical determinants of mosquito vector survival, production, growth, abundance, and dispersal [23, 24, 25, 26]. The temperature has been proven to have an impact on mosquito abundance, activity, and presence in both temporary and permanent habitats. It has an impact on the parasite’s development and the time it takes from egg to adult mosquito [27, 28, 29, 30, 31]. Rainfall has a similar effect on mosquito dispersion by giving or sustaining more breeding grounds. On the other hand, clearing out small breeding sites and lowering the temperature, has a detrimental impact [6, 31]. The number of females laying eggs, the number of eggs laid, the frequency of feeding, and the metabolic rate of adult mosquitos are all affected by changes in relative humidity. Aside from climatic considerations, mosquito distribution and abundance were substantially impacted by the spatial distribution of breeding regions, habitat, land use patterns, preferred hosts, and flight distance [32, 33]. The association between climatic parameters such as temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall has been studied in several research [34, 35, 36, 37]. However, no research has been done on the impact of climatic parameters (temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall) on mosquito abundance in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province.

The objective of this research is to determine how seasonal abundance and distribution of individual mosquito vectors (Culex, Anopheles, and Aedes) alter in connection to climatic parameters such as temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province.

Advertisement

2. Material and methods

2.1 Study area

The Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia is bordered to the north by the Northern Province, Kuwait to the northeast, and the Sultanate of Oman to the south by the Arabian Gulf. It has a variety of geographical characteristics, including sandy soil, coastal lowlands, industrialized areas, and agricultural areas. It is characterized by an arid climate with a temperature rising from 15°C in January to a maximum of about 42°C in the August-September period. The average annual rainfall ranges from around 100 mm in the north and northeast during winter to less than 10 mm in Rub al-Khali [38].

Several environmental factors influence the abundance and distribution of mosquitoes in the area. These factors include temperature, relative humidity, and precipitation, the presence of palm gardens/vegetables that hold a large volume of rainwater, widespread salt marshes, and irrigation ditches. Poor sanitary sewerage system in the areas also causes the accumulation of large volume of sewage water which serves as good breeding habitat for mosquitoes in the study area [18]. 322 larvae breeding sites were assessed for the presence of mosquito larvae in eight locations. However, only 206 sites (64.0%) found positive with mosquito larvae. Those locations include; Abu Main (5 sites), Umm As Sahik (19 sites), Safwa (10 sites), Al-Awjam (22 sites), Dammam (12 sites), Al-Qatif and its surrounding area (81 sites), Buqayq (32 sites) and Al-Sarar (25 sites). Those sites showed their diverse ecological characteristic and abundance of mosquito species Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Map showing study sites in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia [39].

2.2 Data collection

The larval and adult mosquito data was collected in collaboration with the Ministry of Health branch in Dammam. Data collection was carried out from January to December 2014. The monthly data collected were compiled for each study site for 2014. A sampling of mosquito larvae was carried out in various breeding habitats (ditches, sewages, stagnant and surface waters) by taking 3-5 scoops of water for each sampling location to check for the presence of larvae [18]. Mosquito larvae were identified using a dissecting microscope. Electric flycatchers and cow sheets with spray are applied to catch adult mosquitoes mainly from cattle barns.

The meteorological data of temperature, relative humidity, and precipitation were obtained from the Presidency of Meteorology and Environment (PME) Dammam for the period noted above. Temperature is defined as a mean average of minimum and maximum temperature, measured in degree Celsius (°C). Relative humidity (RH), expressed in percentage (%), is the average monthly humidity based on the daily records. Precipitation/rainfall is the amount of rainfall in the month, measured in millimeters.

2.3 Data analysis

Data was analyzed to determine the relationship between mosquito abundance and climatic factors. Bivariate analysis was carried out to determine the relationship between mosquito abundance and each climatic factor (temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify the overall effect of temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall in mosquito abundance. A descriptive analysis was carried out to determine the trends of mosquito abundance and climatic factors. The results of the bivariate analysis are expressed in Pearson correlation coefficient using sigma plot software (Systat Software Inc).

A systematic procedure was carried out to study mosquito distribution and abundance in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Diagram showing steps processes of the study.

Advertisement

3. Results

Table 1 shows the number of mosquito larvae and adult mosquitos collected in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia during the study year (2014). From January to December 2014, 31041 mosquito larvae and 2036 adult mosquitos were collected across all sites. Qatif and the surrounding area had the most adults and larvae, followed by Awjam and Umm As Sahik.

Stage typeMonthTotal
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Larval
Culex1525198727182303149315504101505148316801547214420345
Anopheles3874626435823685612032572982855045055055
Aedes55089663025027824758210100398100510195641
Total2462334539913135213923586711972188123633056366831041
Adult
Culex1692742731633844115536401652601528
Anopheles5211510729110042328157508
Aedes0000000000000
Total2213893801924944115938431934172036

Table 1.

Time-based dispersal and abundance of larvae and adult type in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia 2014.

Culex mosquito larvae accounted for 20345 (65.54%) of the total 31041 mosquito larvae collected, whereas Aedes and Anopheles mosquito larvae accounted for 5641 (18.17%) and 5055 (16.28%) respectively. In contrast, 1528 (75.05%) of the 2036 adult mosquitos collected were Culex, while 508 (24.95%) were Anopheles. Throughout the year, however, no adult Aedes mosquitos were collected at any of the sites. In each study site, Table 2 showed the relative distribution and number of larval and adult mosquitos. The larval and adult Culex were found in many habitats throughout the research area, according to the findings.

StageAreaCulexAedesAnophelesTotal
LarvalAbu-Main6902352421167
Umm As Sahik12753556682298
Safwa7702505571577
Al-Awjam11323436702145
Dammam91524801163
Al-Qatif and surrounding area131233215278819126
Buqayq885190481123
Al-Sarar1555805822442
Total203455641505531041
AdultAbu-Main59069128
Umm As-Sahik291081372
Safwa250328
Al-Awjam255086341
Dammam6006
Al-Qatif and surrounding area89202691161
Buqayq0000
Al-Sarar0000
Total152805082036

Table 2.

Spatial distribution and abundance of larvae and adult by mosquito type.

Some mosquito species were captured as larvae but not as adults in this investigation. In the study region, Aedes mosquitos were gathered as larvae but not as adults throughout the year. Adult Culex and Anopheles were also not collected throughout the year in Buqayq and Al-Sarar. During the study period, neither larval nor adult Anopheles were obtained from the Dammam area Table 2. The relationship between mosquito larvae (Culex, Anopheles and Aedes) abundance and climatic factors of temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall demonstrated in Figure 3. A high number of Culex larvae were observed throughout December, February, March, and April, whereas many Anopheles larvae were gathered during November, December, March, April, and June. The high number of Aedes larvae were observed during November, December, and February, as shown. Figure 3 also revealed that a significant number of total mosquito larvae were collected in the months of November, December, February, March, and April.

Figure 3.

The temporal relationship between climatic factors and mosquito larvae.

Figure 4 depicts the link between adult mosquito abundance (Culex and Anopheles) and climatic parameters (temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall). Specifically, throughout the months of December, February, and March, many adult Culex and Anopheles were gathered. This figure also shows that in November, December, January, February, March, and April, 2014 a large number of total adult mosquitos were seen. The statistical analyses performed between larval and adult mosquito abundance and climatic factors are given in Table 3. These statistical analyses were executed for Abu Main, Umm As-Sahik, Safwa, Al-Awjam, Dammam, and Al-Qatif, including Buqayq and Al Sarar for larvae, with the exception of Buqayq and Al Sarar for the adult since no adult mosquitoes were collected from these sites during field visits. Table 3 illustrated the negative correlation between temperature and Culex (except in Umm-As Sahik), Anopheles, and Aedes larvae. However, positive relationship between relative humidity and rainfall except in some sites. The multivariate regression analysis, on the other hand, explained that the three climatic factors together were responsible for 33.1% (R2 = 0.331), 54.6% (R2 = 0.546), and 86.6% (R2 = 0.866) of the variance on Culex, Anopheles and Aedes larvae, respectively, in Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.

Figure 4.

The temporal relationship between climatic factors and adult mosquitoes.

TypeCorrelation and significance associationAMUSSAAWDAQSBUASEP
Larvae
CulexCulex abundance and temperature−0.817**0.268−0.532−0.161−0.304−0.456−0.724**−0.350−0.538
Culex abundance and RH0.703*−0.0250.5220.1170.2040.3510.684*0.1590.424
Culex abundance and rainfall0.3510.0750.629*0.4310.244−0.1600.719**0.5370.059
AnophelesAnopheles abundance and temperature−0.749**−0.576−0.793**−0.698*a−0.242−0.655*−0.446−0.481
Anopheles abundance and RH0.600*0.3960.583*0.463a−0.0940.4980.3200.151
Anopheles abundance and rainfall0.1650.2000.3990.407a−0.1380.4870.3880.058
AedesAedes abundance and temperature−0.881**−0.523−0.898**−0.370−0.452−0.718**−0.498−0.202−0.848**
Aedes abundance and RH0.753**0.3890.720**0.2320.4530.5750.3240.1290.670*
Aedes abundance and rainfall0.753**0.3230.3840.0410.039−0.1020.610*0.1900.034
Adult
CulexCulex abundance and temperature−0.489−0.726**0.073−0.717**−0.186−0.850**aa−0.876**
Culex abundance and RH0.2120.716**−0.1920.773**0.0480.592*aa0.650*
Culex abundance and rainfall0.0680.057−0.1120.344−0.1520.174aa0.174
AnophelesAnopheles abundance and temperature−0.548−0.875**−0.472−0.848**a−0.633*aa−0.802**
Anopheles abundance and RH0.5090.688*0.602*0.772**a0.426aa0.627*
Anopheles abundance and rainfall−0.0310.238−0.9260.551a−0.078aa0.090

Table 3.

The correlation coefficient between climatic factors, and abundance of adult and larval.

Correlation is significant at 0.01 level.


Correlation is significant at 0.05 level.


Cannot be computed.


Note: AM = Abu Main, US = Umm As Sahik, SA = Safwa, AW = Awjam, DM= Dammam, QS = Qatif and its surrounding area, BU = Buqayq, AS = Al-Sarar, EP = Eastern Province.

Table 3 also clearly shows that adult Culex mosquito abundance had a negative correlation with temperature except in Safwa. Specifically, in Umm As Sahik, Awjam, and Qatif and the surrounding area, a strong negative correlation between adult Culex and the temperature was observed with correlation values of −0.726, −0.717, and −0.850, respectively. However, positive correlation with relative humidity, with highest correlation values of 0.716, 0.773, and 0.592 in Umm As Sahik, Awjam, and Qatif and surrounding area, respectively, but a negative correlation with relative humidity in Safwa site. It is also evident from Table 3 that adult Culex mosquito abundance had a moderate to low positive correlation with rainfall except (negative) in Safwa and Dammam.

Similarly, Table 3 clearly shows that adult Anopheles mosquito abundance had a strong negative correlation with temperature. The table also demonstrated a negative correlation between Adult Anopheles abundance and rainfall (except in Umm-As Sahik and Al-Awjam) while a strong positive correlation with relative humidity in all sites.

The current study also demonstrated the combined effect of the three climatic factors on the abundance of adult Culex and Anopheles mosquitoes. The multivariate regression model for three climatic factors (temperature, RH, and rainfall) explained 86% (R2 = 0.860) and 73.9% (R2 = 0.739) of the variance in adult Culex and Anopheles mosquito abundance, respectively. It showed also that the three climatic factors together were responsible for 33.1% (R2 = 0.331), 54.6% (R2 = 0.546) and 86.6% (R2 = 0.866) of the variance on Culex, Anopheles and Aedes larvae, respectively. This means that 86% and 73.9% of the variance are accounted for the three parameters and the remaining 14% and 26.1% are attributed to other factors such as the presence of the vegetation, waste materials, water reservoirs, ditches, and others. Comparing the two adults, the adult Anopheles mosquito was more influenced by other environmental factors than by climatic factors compared to the adult Culex mosquito which is more influenced by climatic factors than by other environmental factors in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.

Overall, both Culex and Anopheles larvae had a moderate negative association with temperature in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province, but Aedes larvae had a substantial negative correlation with temperature. On the other hand, low, moderate, and a strong positive correlation were observed between Anopheles, Culex, and Aedes larvae, and relative humidity, respectively. Rainfall and the three mosquito larvae types in the study area had a low positive link, according to the current study. Adult Culex and Anopheles both displayed a strong negative connection with temperature, with the highest values of −0.876 and −0.802, respectively, and a substantial positive correlation with relative humidity, with correlation values of 0.650 and 0.627, respectively. In Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia, both adult mosquitoes had a favorable link with rainfall in general.

Advertisement

4. Discussion

Understanding the impact of climatic conditions on mosquito distribution and abundance is critical for mosquito control efforts. The range and abundance of individual mosquito types are influenced by climatic conditions such as temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall [32, 34].

In the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, this study gave a clear explanation of the relationship between mosquito abundance and meteorological conditions. The response of larvae and adult mosquitoes to each climatic factors varied depending on season and site as shown in graphical Figures 3 and 4, and statistical analyses in Table 3. Other environmental factors, such as the presence of vegetation, irrigation activities, and poor environmental sanitation, were also shown to have an impact on the distribution and abundance of individual mosquito vectors in the study. In several ecosystems in the research region, the Culex mosquito was found to be the most abundant and widely spread. The reasons for the larval and adult Culex’s widespread range and abundance in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province are similar to prior investigations [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. Agricultural expansion, the presence of irrigation ditches/canals, ponds, and extensive farming, according to Alahmed [18], contribute to the wide dispersion and incidence of mosquitos in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province. Muturi et al. [40] observed that the presence of floating vegetation in the aquatic habitat, turbid/polluted water, and the presence of water reservoirs such as irrigation canals/dits in the area all influence the distribution of Culex larvae and have been linked to the presence of Culex larvae.

Calhoun et al. [41] reported a higher number of Culex larvae in oily/rusty water when compared to clean water. Similarly, Ohta and Kaga [42] found that substantial irrigation activities enhance mosquito growth, lengthen mosquito annual growing periods, and raise mosquito maximum generation numbers by altering natural water in their environment. It was also shown that irrigation systems not only aid mosquito growth during dry seasons but also help to stabilize growth during rainy seasons. Temperatures ranging from 16.4 to 27.7°C are ideal for Culex larvae’s growth and survival, while temperatures ranging from 17.5 to 35°C and 16.4 to 22.3°C are ideal for Anopheles and Aedes larvae development and survival, respectively. Temperatures of 16.4 to 22.4°C, on the other hand, support substantial growth and survival of adult Culex and Anopheles. On the other hand, the overall data of larvae/adult clearly indicate that temperatures ranging from 16.4 to 27.7°C are ideal for larvae development and survival, whereas temperatures ranging from 15 to 27.7°C promote a high abundance and spread of adult mosquito in Eastern province.

High environmental temperatures greater than 30°C decreases the survival of the Culex mosquito [43]. However, Hopp and Foley [44] and Tun et al. [27] reported that high temperatures speed up the growth and survival of larval and adult stages of the Culex mosquito. Similarly, the increase in environmental temperatures decreases the survival and development of larval and adult stages of Anopheles mosquito [45]. Bayoh and Lindsay [29] also found a decrease in Anopheles larvae survival as environmental temperature increases. However, Minakawa et al. [34] reported that the influence of temperature on Anopheles mosquito was significant. The influence of temperature on mosquito development, survival, and productivity is difficult to predict at a precise range, as evidenced by these and other studies [23]. During the summer, the average temperature in the research region exceeded 35oC, which is unfavorable for mosquito larval and adult growth. In July, when the temperature was 36.9°C, just a few larval and adult mosquitos were found, as shown in Figures 3 and 4. Overall, high larval and adult mosquitos were collected at temperatures ranging from 16.4 to 27.7°C and 15 to 27.7°C, respectively. Temperatures between 20 and 29°C have been found to be advantageous for mosquito growth in several studies [23, 36, 37, 46]. The study also demonstrated that moderate relative humidity influences the increase of the larval and adult stages of the mosquito. Abundant Culex and Anopheles larvae were observed at average relative humidity that ranges from 34 to 58%. Unlike to this, a high number of Aedes larvae was collected at mean relative humidity that ranges from 43 to 58%. On the other hand, a high number of both adult Culex and Anopheles mosquitoes were observed at a relative humidity that ranges between 44 and 58% (Figures 3 and 4).

The survival and developmental phases of mosquitoes are influenced by relative humidity, according to various research. The lifespan of mosquitos is shown to increase as humidity rises, while high humidity increases mosquito density and abundance [18, 23, 25, 35, 36, 37]. Costa et al. [30] observed that when the temperature and relative humidity are both lower, the number of female Aedes mosquitos depositing eggs and their egg production (oviposition) increases. In contrast, Hopp and Foley [44] reported that as temperature and humidity rise, the Aedes mosquito produces more eggs and larvae counts. Low humidity, on the other hand, was associated with a lower number of Culex, Anopheles, and Aedes larvae, as well as a lower abundance of adult Culex and Anopheles mosquitos, according to this study. As the relative humidity drops throughout the summer, only a small number of larval and adult mosquitos are gathered. In all study sites, the number of larval and adult mosquitos increased throughout the months of October, November, December, January, February, and March, 2014 when relative humidity was high (Figures 3 and 4).

The effect of rainfall on mosquito larvae was not seen in the current investigation Figure 3. Even though the fact that the average annual rainfall in Eastern Province is 5 mm, the influence of rainfall on adult mosquitos was visible in the number of adult mosquitos during the wet months. In comparison to the dry seasons, higher adult mosquito activity was recorded during the rainy months of January, February, March, and April Figure 4. Rainfall has a beneficial or negative impact on mosquito numbers, either by supplying more/maintaining breeding places or by flushing mosquito larvae from small breeding sites [25, 31, 35, 36, 37, 47, 48].

The bivariate analysis indicated that the response of the larval and adult mosquito vectors of Culex and Anopheles as well as Aedes larvae to each climatic factors such as temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall varied by site. As shown in Table 3, both stages of the larval and adult forms of an individual mosquito of Culex and Anopheles including Aedes larvae were found negatively correlated with temperature while positively correlated to relative humidity and rainfall.

Similarly, from the multivariate regression analysis, the response of the individual mosquito vectors of both stages that are the larval and adult Culex and Anopheles as well as Aedes larvae, to the combined effect of the three climatic factors varied, depending on the site. From the regression model, it is understood that Aedes larvae were more influenced by climatic factors than Culex and Anopheles larvae, which were more affected by other environmental factors. It seems that Culex and Anopheles larvae are more influenced by the presence of vegetation, waste material, water reservoirs, and ditches. The presence of floating and terrestrial vegetation, poor environmental sanitation, and extensive irrigation activities that create water reservoirs such as ditches are among the major environmental factors for mosquito abundance and their wide distribution in many habitats [39, 41, 42, 49].

The vast spread of Culex larvae could be attributable to favorable climatic conditions in the research area, as well as their capacity to develop and survive in a variety of aquatic breeding sites. They can also thrive in polluted and saline aquatic habitats. Aside from water quality, the presence of floating vegetation and waste materials (such as plastics, papers, old tires, and rags) in the aquatic habitat also contributed to the wide distribution and abundance of Culex larvae, as these environmental factors provide appropriate access for adult Culex mosquitos to lay their eggs and for their larvae to develop and survive. Irrigation activities in the study area also contribute to the larvae’s distribution and abundance by creating water reservoirs such as ditches where mosquito larvae can breed.

The presence of some mosquito types as larvae but not as an adult in some sites may be due to the differences in adult behavior such as feeding and resting behavior (as some mosquito species are indoor feeders and indoor resting while others are outdoor feeders and indoor resting) attributed to unavailability of adult mosquitoes and they did not come close to the trapping or sampling location placed outside houses during the data collection period [18]. The other reason for the unavailability of adult mosquitoes was limited access to the human residence since adult mosquitoes were collected from rooms of cattle during the morning time (day).

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

Mosquito control programs benefit greatly from an awareness of the effects of climatic conditions on mosquito vectors. Mosquito abundance can be predicted by anticipating temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall, and then present and future mosquito control measures can be planned and implemented. As a result, this research provides comprehensive information on the impact of climatic conditions on the abundance of specific mosquito vectors in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province. However, further research is needed to determine the impact of global warming, irrigation activities, land use, and the biological characteristics of mosquito breeding sites on mosquito distribution and abundance before large-scale control methods can be implemented.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) for the support to conduct the study. The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Health, Dammam Branch, and Presidency of Meteorological and Environment, Dammam, for providing required logistic support and meteorological data, for the study.

References

  1. 1. Pratt HD, Barnes RC, Littig KS. Mosquitoes of Public Health Importance and their Control: Training Guide. Atlanta, Georgia, USA: Insect Control Series; 1963
  2. 2. World Health Organization. Vector Control: Methods for use by individuals and communities. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1997
  3. 3. Gratz NG. Emerging and resurging vector-borne diseases. Annual Review Entomology. 1999;44:51-75
  4. 4. Gandhi G, Srinivasulu N, Naik KG, Naik BR. Original research article remote sensing and geographical information system application for mosquito intervention: A Case Study of Grater Hyderabad. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2013;2:560-568
  5. 5. World Health Organization. A Global Brief on Vector-borne Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014
  6. 6. Ceccato P, Connor SJ, Jeanne I, Thomson MC. Application of geographical information systems and remote sensing technologies for assessing and monitoring malaria risk. Parassitologia. 2005;47:81-96
  7. 7. Lehane M. The Biology of Blood-sucking Insects. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005
  8. 8. Matthews G. Integrated Vector Management: Controlling Vectors of Malaria and Other Insect Vector Borne Diseases. London, UK: Imperial College; 2011
  9. 9. World Health Organization. Current Zika Product Pipeline. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016
  10. 10. Bashwari LA, Mandil AM, Bahnassy AA, Al-Shamsi MA, Bukhari HA. Epidemiological profile of malaria in a university hospital in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal. 2001;22:133-138
  11. 11. Fakeeh M, Zaki AM. Dengue in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 1994-2002. Dengue Bulletin. 2003;27:13-18
  12. 12. Madani TA, Al-Mazzou YY, Al-Jeffri MH, Mishkhas AA, Al-Rabeah AM, Turkistani AM, et al. Rift Valley Fever Epidemic in Saudi Arabia: Epidemiological, clinical and laboratory characteristics. Oxford Journals. 2003;37:1084-1092
  13. 13. Flick R, Bouloy M. Rift Valley fever virus. Current Molecular Medicine. 2005;5:827-834
  14. 14. Al-Tawfiq JA. Epidemiology of travel-related malaria in a non-malarious area in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal. 2006;27:86-89
  15. 15. Al-Qabati AG, Al-Afaleq AI. Cross-sectional, longitudinal and prospective epidemiological studies of Rift Valley Fever in Al-Hasa Oasis, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2010;9:258-265
  16. 16. El-Gilany AH, Eldeib A, Hammad S. Clinico-epidemiological features of dengue fever in Saudi Arabia. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2010;3:220-223. DOI: 10.1016/S1995-7645 (10)60013-2
  17. 17. Ahmed AM, Shaalan EA, Aboul-Soud MAM, Tripet F, Al-Khedhairy AA. Mosquito vectors survey in the AL-Ahsaa District of Eastern Saudi Arabia. Journal of Insect Science. 2011;11:1-11. DOI: 10.1673/031.011.17601
  18. 18. Alahmed AM. Mosquito fauna (Diptera: Culicidae) of the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia and their seasonal abundance. Journal of King Saud University Science. 2012;24:55-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2010.12.001
  19. 19. Khormi HM, Kumar L. Using geographic information system and remote sensing to study common mosquito- borne diseases in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment. 2013;11:14-17
  20. 20. Aziz AT, Al-Shami SA, Mahyoub JA, Hatabbi M, Ahmad AH, Rawi CSM. An update on the incidence of dengue gaining strength in Saudi Arabia and current control approaches for its vector mosquito. Parasites & Vectors. 2014;7:258. DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-258
  21. 21. Craig M, Le Sueur D, Snow B. A climate-based distribution model of malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. Parasitology Today. 1999;15:105-111. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-4758(99)01396-4
  22. 22. Reisen WK, Cayan D, Tyree M, Baker MC, Eldridge B, and Dettinger M. Impact of climate variation on Mosquito abundance in California. Journal of Geographical Sciences. 2006;16:430-438. DOI: 10.1007/s11442-006-0406-6
  23. 23. Reiter P. Climate change and mosquito-borne disease. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2001;109:141-161. DOI: 10.2307/3434853
  24. 24. Zhou G, Munga S, Minakawa N. Spatial relationship between adult malaria vector abundance and environmental factors in western Kenya highlands. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2007;77:29-35
  25. 25. Bashar K, Tuno N. Seasonal abundance of Anopheles mosquitoes and their association with meteorological factors and malaria incidence in Bangladesh. Parasites & Vectors. 2014;7:442. DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-442
  26. 26. Palaniyandi M, Anand P, Maniyosai R. Spatial cognition: A geospatial analysis of vector-borne disease transmission and the environment, using remote sensing and GIS. International Journal of Mosquito Research. 2014;1:39-54
  27. 27. Tun-Lin W, Burkot TR, Kay BH. Effects of temperature and larval diet on development rates and survival of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in north Queensland, Australia. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 2000;14:31-37. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00207.x
  28. 28. Bayoh MN, Lindsay SW. Effect of temperature on the development of the aquatic stages of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (Diptera: Culicidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research. 2003;93:375-381. DOI: 10.1079/BER2003259
  29. 29. Bayoh MN, Lindsay SW. Temperature-related duration of aquatic stages of the Afrotropical malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae in the laboratory. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 2004;18:174-179. DOI: 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00495.x
  30. 30. Costa EAPDA, Santos EMDM, Correia JC, Albuquerque CMRD. Impact of small variations in temperature and humidity on the reproductive activity and survival of Aedes aegypti (Diptera, Culicidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia. 2010;54:488-493. DOI: 10.1590/S0085-56262010000300021
  31. 31. Byun R, Webb CE. Guidelines for Mosquito Risk Assessment and Management in Constructed Wetlands. Sydney, Australia: Sydney Western Region; 2012
  32. 32. Lindsay SW, Martens WJM. Malaria in the African highlands: Past, present and future. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1998;76:33-45
  33. 33. Gimnig J, Hightower A, Hawley W. Application of geographic information systems to the study of the ecology of mosquitoes and mosquito-borne diseases. In: Willem T, Pim M, Robert B, editors. Environmental Change and Malaria Risk: Global and Local Implications. Atlanta, USA: Frontis; 2005. pp. 27-39
  34. 34. Minakawa N, Sonye G, Mogi M, Githeko A, Yan G. The effects of climatic factors on the distribution and abundance of malaria vectors in Kenya. Journal of Medical Entomology. 2002;39:833-841. DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585-39.6.833
  35. 35. Murty US, Rao MS, Arunachalam N. The effects of climatic factors on the distribution and abundance of Japanese encephalitis vectors in Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Vector Borne Diseases. 2010;47:26-32
  36. 36. Alshehri MSA. Dengue fever outburst and its relationship with climatic factors. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2013;22:506-515. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.22.04.443
  37. 37. Tian H-Y, Bi P, Cazelles B, Zhou S, Huang S-Q , Yang J, et al. How environmental conditions impact mosquito ecology and Japanese encephalitis: An eco-epidemiological approach. Environment International. 2015;79:17-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.03.002
  38. 38. Thomas J. Eastern Saudi Arabia: Topography, Geography and Vegetation. 2012. Available from: http://www.onislam.net/content/english/hajj/services/01.shtml
  39. 39. Jemal Y, Al-Thukair AA. Combining GIS application and climatic factors for mosquito control in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2018;8:1593-1602. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.04.001
  40. 40. Muturi EJ, Shililu JI, Gu W, Jacob BG, Githure JI, Novak RJ. Larval habitat dynamics and diversity of Culex mosquitoes in rice agro-ecosystem in Mwea, Kenya. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2007;76:95-102
  41. 41. Calhoun LM, Avery M, Jones L, Gunarto K, King R, Roberts J, et al. Combined sewage overflows (CSO) are major urban breeding sites for Culex quinquefasciatus in Atlanta, Georgia. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2007;77:478-484
  42. 42. Ohta S, Kaga T. Effect of irrigation systems on temporal distribution of malaria vectors in semi-arid regions. International Journal of Biometeorology. 2014;58:349-359. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-012-0630-y
  43. 43. Westbrook CJ, Reiskind MH, Pesko KN, Greene KE, Lounibos LP. Larval environmental temperature and the susceptibility of Aedes albopictus Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae) to Chikungunya virus. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 2010;10:241-247. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2009.0035
  44. 44. Hopp MJ, Foley JA. Worldwide fluctuations in dengue fever case related to climate variability. Climate Research. 2003;25:85-94. DOI: 10.3354/cr025085
  45. 45. Christiansen-Jucht C, Parham PE, Saddler A, Koella JC, Basáñez M-G. Temperature during larval development and adult maintenance influences the survival of Anopheles gambiae s.s. Parasites and Vectors. 2014;7:489. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-014-0489-3
  46. 46. World Health Organization. Climate Change and Human Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1996
  47. 47. Koenraadt CJM, Githeko AK, Takken W. The effects of rainfall and evapotranspiration on the temporal dynamics of Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis in a Kenyan village. Acta Tropica. 2004;90:141-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2003.11.007
  48. 48. Hu W, Tong S, Mengersen K, Oldenburg B. Rainfall, mosquito density and the transmission of Ross River virus: A time-series forecasting model. Ecological Modelling. 2006;196:505-514. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.028
  49. 49. Chaikoolvatana A, Singhasivanon P, Haddawy P. Utilization of a geographical information system for surveillance of Aedes aegypti and dengue hemorrhagic fever in north-eastern Thailand. Dengue Bulletin. 2007;31:75-82

Written By

Assad Al-Thukair, Yasin Jemal and Alexis Nzila

Submitted: 28 December 2021 Reviewed: 22 March 2022 Published: 07 July 2022