Comparison between different synthesis methods of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles.
Abstract
The size and shape dependent tunable electromagnetic (EM) properties of magnetite – Fe3O4 nanoparticles makes them an attractive material for various future electronics and biomedical device applications such as tunable attenuators, miniaturized isolators and circulators, RF antennas, EM shielding, and biomedical implants etc. The strategic design of RF devices requires specific dielectric and magnetic properties according to the applications, which in turn depends on the size and shape of the particles. At nanoscale, iron oxide’s magnetic and dielectric properties are very different from its bulk properties and can be tuned and enhanced by utilizing different synthesis approaches. In this chapter, we summarize electromagnetic properties of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanomaterials such as, complex permeability, complex permittivity, magnetic and dielectric loss tangents, saturation magnetization, temperature dependence, and ferromagnetic resonance; and how these properties can be optimized by varying different synthesis parameters. Finally, Fe3O4 nanocomposites will be explored by using different synthesis approaches for implementation of RF and microwave applications and we will conclude the chapter with future recommendations.
Keywords
- Fe3O4 nanoparticles
- morphology
- magneto-dielectric properties
- RF and microwave region
- magnetic loss tangent
1. Introduction
Over the past few decades, nanotechnology has expanded its applications exponentially in all aspects of life ranging from biomedical, chemical, material engineering to integrated electronics [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. In nanotechnology, functional nanoparticles with size ranging from 1 to 100 nm have been widely studied [6]. The unique and specifically tailored structure and size dependent properties of the nanoparticles make them extensively important for research and development for various applications such as environment, healthcare, medical, defense, electronics, and so on [7, 8, 9]. Nanoparticles have different properties from their bulk counterparts because as the size of the particle decreases, surface effects (more atoms are exposed at the surface of particle, thus leading to highly sensitive and reactive surfaces) and other atomic effects such as quantum confinement effect in electronic structure comes into play [10, 11]. The key to achieve novel chemical, structural, magnetic, physical and mechanical properties of nanoparticles is the large surface to volume ratio [12].
Recently metal oxide nanoparticles such as iron oxide has garnered considerable attention due to its unique structural, electrical, and magnetic properties which, have numerous applications in areas such as data storage, memory devices, water purification, bioprocessing, drug delivery, hyperthermia, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), biosensors, electronic devices, aerospace applications, etc. [13, 14, 15, 16]. Iron oxide is a compound, which can be found in nature in different phases. The most common ones are hematite (
Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles can be synthesized using different methods such as physical (laser ablation arc discharge, combustion, electrodeposition, and pyrolysis), chemical (sol–gel synthesis, microemulsion, hydrothermal, coprecipitation, Polyols, thermal decomposition) and biological methods (Protein mediated, plant mediated, bacteria mediated, fungi mediated). Different shapes and sizes of Fe3O4 (nanorod, porous nanospheres, nanocubes, distorted cubes, core shell and self-oriented flowers) can be synthesized using same synthesis procedures, by using the optimum synthesis parameters like particular precursor of iron salts, pH levels, and temperature variations etc. [25, 26]. These synthesis methods are easy to implement while playing a major role in controlling the morphology and electromagnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. In order to make Fe3O4 nanoparticles compatible with different applications, proper functionalization and surface modification of Fe3O4 is very important [27, 28]. Surface modification of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles using different stabilizing agents (PVP, oleic acid, sodium oleate etc.) is a necessary step after or during the synthesis process to make them both biocompatible and stable [29, 30].
For RF and microwave electronics, tunable or reconfigurable devices are becoming important to cause a growing interest of enabling nanotechnology in new wireless devices [31]. Magnetic materials have been used effectively for tunable and reconfigurable of components such as inductors, antennas, and phase shifters [32, 33]. By using tunable properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in these devices, one can control not only their frequency response but also helpful in improvement of electromagnetic behavior of these devices at a particular frequency [34, 35]. In this chapter, we will discuss the synthesis procedures of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles and their usage in RF and microwave applications. The development of sustainable synthesis approaches for these nanoparticles and investigations of how the structural properties including shape and size of magnetite nanoparticles can enable the tuning of electromagnetic properties for different device applications will be presented.
2. Synthesis methods
As mentioned above, there are different approaches to synthesize magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles, which includes physical, chemical, and biological methods. The properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles determine its field of applications. The most widely used synthesis approaches are chemical co-precipitation, thermal decomposition, hydrothermal method, Polyols method and microemulsion method [25].
As shown in the figure, chemical methods are mostly widely used as they are cost effective and easy to handle. Some of the most common synthesis methods are summarized below [25].
2.1 Co-precipitation methods
Co-precipitation synthesis is the most common technique for the synthesis of magnetic magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles because of its low cost, environment friendly precursors and simple experimental procedure that occurs at moderately low temperature (20°C - 90°C) [6]. This method is popular because of water based precursor solutions, where simultaneous precipitation of ferrous and ferric ions can occur due to the addition of base in the solution while sustaining a constant pH level. Fe (II) and Fe (III) salts are used in different basic aqueous solutions such as NaOH and NH4OH to form magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles. Nanoparticle size between 5 nm and 20 nm range can be synthesized using this method [11]. Experimental conditions such as Fe2+ and Fe3+ salt chlorides, sulphates, nitrates, ratio of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in the solution, ionic strength of the solution, pH value of the solution and reaction temperature are very critical parameters to achieve desired size, shape, microstructure, and magnetic properties. Key literature findings about the effects of some of these conditions on nanoparticles properties with a special focus on electronic properties will be detailed below. Figure 1 shows the typical co-precipitation technique experimental set-up using multistage flow reactor for continuous synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles [36].
It is known that co-precipitation method typically results in low saturation magnetization and broad particle size range due to variation in magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles core size and agglomeration, which are the main drawbacks [37, 38]. In order to reduce agglomeration and oxidation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, different surface acting reagents and functional materials such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA), dextrin, Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) etc. can be added during the reaction [39, 40, 41, 42].
Radon
Similarly, Anbarasu
Saragi
Optimization of co-precipitation synthesis parameters in order to control the particle size and polydispersity can be quite challenging, extensive ongoing research have been carried out to understand the mechanism of particle formation so that particle structures/properties can be tailored for applications.
2.2 Thermal decomposition
Thermal decomposition is a synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles using decomposition of iron precursor at high temperature in organic phase solution [47]. In this method, precursors of iron (III) acetylacetonate, Fe(acac)3, iron nitro sophenylhydroxylamine or iron pentacarbonyl are used in oleic acid or lauric acid, which are oxidized at high temperature to make monodisperse Fe3O4 nanoparticles [6]. Figure 4 presents a conceptual illustration of experimental process to synthesize of monodisperse Fe3O4 nanoparticles [47].
The thermal decomposition method can be used to synthesize monodisperse nanoparticles of up to 20 nm in size with a tight size distribution. Wetterskog
2.3 Polyol method
Polyol method is a well-known technique to synthesize defined shape and size-controlled metallic, oxide, and semiconductor nanoparticles such as magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles [25]. This method involves chemical reduction of metal salts in polyols such as polyethylene glycol at high temperature. The average size of these nanoparticles can be controlled by reactive mediums and this method is widely used to obtained nanoparticles 0f size up to 100 nm [21]. The shape, size, particle growth and yield depend upon the type of polyols, salt ratio, concentration, and other physiological condition. Polyol and polyethylene glycol are normally used as solvents, which can dissolve inorganic compounds and offer a wide range of temperature for the reaction. Polyols act as both stabilizer and reducing agent in the reaction and help in prevention of agglomeration and control of particle growth [59]. Abbas
There are also a variety of prior works in the literature, which utilizes solvothermal polyols method to synthesize different Fe3O4 cluster sizes for better magnetic properties such as saturation, magnetization and coercivity. In solvothermal polyol method, Fe3O4 clusters can be prepared by change of reaction conditions of the solvothermal process and by utilizing sodium acetate [66]. Leung
Sayed
2.4 Hydrothermal method
Hydrothermal synthesis is the most commonly used method for the preparation of nanomaterials. This is a solution reaction-based approach, which utilizes a wide temperature range from room temperature to high temperatures [74]. To control the morphology of the nanoparticles, low-pressure or high-pressure conditions can be used in the reaction. Pressures above 2000 psi needs to be maintained in hydrothermal synthesis method [25]. The compositions, morphology, particle size of nanomaterials to be synthesized can be well controlled by temperature variation in combination with right precursors in hydrothermal synthesis through liquid phase or multiphase chemical reactions. The particle size and size distribution can also be controlled with precursor concentration [21]. The main drawback of this method is that it needs expensive reactors [1].
Gomez
2.5 Microemulsion method
Microemulsion is an isotropic and thermodynamically stable single phase formed by mixing oil, water and surfactants; where oil and water are immiscible, and surfactant has an amphiphilic behavior [81]. There are three main categories of microemulsions - oil in water, water in oil and bi-continuous [1]. Microemulsion method has been known to produce narrow particle size distribution between 4 and 15 nm with different shapes. Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with controlled size and shape can be carried out in water-oil microemulsion, which consists of cationic or non-ionic surfactant (Triton-X), a co-surfactant (n-hexanol, glycols, 1-butanol), oil phase (n-heptane, n-octane, cyclohexane) and aqueous phase. Microemulsion can be carried out through addition of aqueous solution with iron precursor to the surfactant mixture [6]. The major drawback of this method is that the scale up of this method from laboratory scale to mass production at industrial levels could be difficult; particle size and shape changes significantly at large scale despite maintaining the same reaction conditions as lab experiments.
Many prior studies have been reported on the controlled synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles using microemulsion method [82, 83, 84, 85]. In order to increase the stability of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and avoid agglomeration, they have been encapsulated with silica precursor, which significantly increase the stability of nanoparticles and protecting them from oxidation [79, 86, 87]. Asab
Methods | Size (nm) | Shape | Saturation Magnetization Ms. (emu/g) | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Co-precipitation | 3–100 | Spherical | 20–80 | Low to mild temperature, high yield, scalable, inexpensive synthesis, simple purification | Agglomeration, polydispersity |
Thermal decomposition | 3–80 | Spherical, 1D and 2D | Less than 90 | Narrow size distribution, high crystallinity, size and shape control | Long reaction time, high temperature, organic medium, expensive, low yield |
Polyols Method | 10–1000 | 0D,1D,2D,3D | 20–120 | size and shape control, less agglomeration, high yield, | Broad particle size distribution |
Hydrothermal | 2–1000 | 0D,1D,2D,3D | 20–110 | High purity nanoparticles, medium temperature, low cost, use stabilizers in reaction to control agglomeration, high yield, aqueous reaction medium | Long reaction time, broad particle size distribution |
Microemulsion | 4–50 | Spherical and cubic | 30–110 | Low temperature, ambient atmosphere, narrow size distribution, controllable size | Long reaction times, agglomeration, low yield, difficult to remove surfactants |
3. Application of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles
Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles are well suited for a wide variety of scientific and engineering applications in numerous fields, due to their strong superparamagnetic and surface properties. Detailed application areas are summarized in Table 2. We herein specifically focus on radio frequency (RF) and microwave applications.
Area | Applications |
---|---|
Biomedical and healthcare | Drug delivery [88, 89, 90], magnetic hyperthermia [91, 92, 93, 94], MRI imaging [42, 95, 96], magnetic separation, controlled drug release, cellular therapy, cell separation and handling of cells [97, 98], purifying cell populations, diseases of the musculoskeletal system, severe inflammation, toxicity [99] |
Agriculture | Nano fertilizers, nano fungicides, nano pesticides [100, 101] |
Environment | Wastewater treatment, catalyst coatings [102, 103, 104] |
Recording and storage | Ferrofluids, external magnets [105] |
Industries | Catalyst [106, 107] |
Textile | Nanofibers, sensors, smart materials [108, 109, 110] |
Defense | Sensors, nanocomposites, smart materials [111, 112] |
Electronics | Printed electronics, spintronics and quantum dots [113, 114] |
4. Application of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles for RF and microwave region
With the continuous technological advancements and emerging applications in biomedical devices and electronics in RF and microwave regions, the strategic design of suitable electromagnetic materials requires controlled and well-tailored dielectric, magnetic and loss properties. There is a growing demand to increase the operating frequency of RF and microwave devices. Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles have recently shown great promises for these applications due to their exciting and superior magnetic properties at high operating frequencies [35]. Nevertheless, as an emerging research area with an aim to employ Fe3O4 nanoparticles for unique RF applications, there are relatively limited prior works at this stage.
Fe3O4 nanomaterial is the among the very few magnetic materials that exhibits excellent tunable properties using different synthesis approaches. Fe3O4 nanoparticles have attracted considerable attentions because of its shape and size tunability, which in turn impact the magnetic and loss properties. The tunable electromagnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles are uniquely suited for designing RF/microwave devices due to their structural and size dependent magnetic and dielectric properties, which can further tuned by external magnetic fields [115, 116]. Meanwhile, self-biased soft magnetic ferrites have been recently explored to exhibit unique properties by exploiting the anisotropy of magnetic material [117, 118, 119]. Fe3O4 nanoparticles polymer composites have exhibited unique attributes for biomedical device and electronic applications, which require tuned, light weight, robust, flexible and cost-effective devices such as antennas [120].
4.1 Tunable electromagnetic properties of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles for RF and microwave devices
In 2008, Kuanr
Recently, Jadav
Similarly, the effect of particle concentration, external magnetic field, frequency dependence of RF and microwave properties [35, 123, 124], agglomeration effects on the effective electromagnetic properties of composites with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles [125, 126] have been studied and reported in the literature. For example, Li et al. in 2015 reported water soluble Fe3O4 nanoparticles coated using surface double-layered self-assembly method. The sodium alpha-olefin sulfonate (AOS) was used as the coating material for better superparamagnetic properties [127]. It was confirmed that AOS double coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles showed less agglomeration as compared to Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Saturation magnetization value of about 44.45 emu/g and the blocking temperature TB 170 K were reported for Fe3O4-AOS capped nanoparticles which are ideal values for biomedical applications.
Fabrication of heterostructures is another way to tailor the magnetic properties of the soft magnetic ferrites such as the ones based on Fe3O4 nanoparticles for planar device applications (e.g., inductors and patch antennas) including multi-layer ferrite materials with isostructural and non-isostructural materials, (e.g., Fe3O4/NiO, Fe3O4/CoO, (Mn, Zn)Fe2O4/CoFe2O4, etc.). The combination of Fe3O4 soft magnetic ferrite layer and a piezoelectric layer can lead to new and exciting RF and microwave applications such as antenna, sensors etc. [20].
4.2 Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles composite for microwave absorption applications
With rapid advancements in science and technology, the use of RF and microwave electronics have increased many folds, which creates electromagnetic interference (EMI) to not only impact human health but also interfere with electronics nearby [128]. Thus, electromagnetic (EM) absorption materials at RF and microwave frequencies have garnered a great deal of attentions because of their application in wireless data communication, radar system and other area networks [126]. For good microwave absorption properties, impedance matching between air and absorbing material as well as reflection loss are very important. Materials that have both desired magnetic and dielectric properties serve this purpose well [129]. Currently, soft magnetic ferrites and nanomaterials have widely explored for microwave absorption because of their high magnetic, electric and loss properties [130, 131]. Fe3O4 is well known for its chemical stability and tailorable magnetic/dielectric losses at microwave regions. Developing low-density composites of high dielectric and magnetic losses as absorbing materials is an effective approach for fulfilling EM absorption performance.
In 2007, Zhou
In 2007, Qiao
The frequency dependent complex relative permeability is given by Eq. (1) [133],
where
The magnetic loss tangent is the ratio between the real and imaginary parts given by Eq. (2),
The frequency dependent relative complex permittivity can be given by Eq. (3) [133],
where
The dielectric loss tangent is given by Eq. (4),
The samples with 20 wt% loading showed the highest relative permittivity (real part) along with high dielectric loss tangent over the entire frequency range, which can be ascribed to the conductive loss inside the nanochain during the propagation of electromagnetic wave through the yolk-shell structure. Due to the geometry of yolk-shell structure, such as high porosity and void spaces, multiple scattering and reflections are generated through the interface polarization, which influences the dielectric loss of the nanochains [128]. It was concluded that high magnetic losses (due to natural resonance and eddy current effect) and dielectric losses (due to interfacial polarization) can be achieved by designing porous magnetic cores with proper yolk shell structure. Hence, better microwave absorption performance can be achieved even at low filler loadings.
Similar prior works using Fe3O4 nanoparticles as core material have reported recently. Table 3 tabulated the microwave absorption performance of Fe3O4 nanoparticles-based nanocomposites used with different structures.
Absorbers | Absorber Thickness (mm) | RLmin vs. (frequency) | Absorption bandwidth (GHz) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
PANI/ Fe3O4 | 1.4 | −18 dB (8.6 GHz) | — | [134] |
ACV/Fe3O4 | 2 | −30.7 dB (16.4 GHz) | 8.2 | [131] |
RGO/SiO2/Fe3O4 | 4.5 | −56.4 dB (8.1 GHz) | 7.1 (3 mm) | [135] |
Fe3O4/RGO | 3.5 | −45 dB (8.96 GHz) | 3.2 | [126] |
Fe3O4/ZnO | 3.5 | −22.7 dB (13 GHz) | 5.9 | [136] |
Fe3O4/Ppy/CNT | 3 | −25.9 dB (10.2 GHz) | 4.5 | [137] |
Fe3O4/C | 2.9 | −46 dB (12.8 GHz) | 6.5 | [138] |
Fe3O4/TiO2 | 2 | −23.3 dB (7 GHz) | 5.5 | [139] |
4.3 Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles composite for antennas in RF and microwave regions
Tunable electromagnetic properties of nanomaterial-based nanocomposite are key enabler for RF and microwave applications. Several reports have described the development of RF and microwave device applications, such as antennas, and inductors using commercially available dielectric and semiconductor-based substrates. For tunable electronic devices, magnetic nanocomposites can facilitate in designing of fully tunable and magnetically controllable devices. This kind of application requires antennas and other RF devices to be operating at different frequencies or meeting other performance needs such as antenna bandwidth and efficiency. RF devices that are frequency agile or dependent are highly desirable for biomedical and defense applications. Tuning of different parameters of device such as frequency can be achieved by various methods. One such method for controlling the performance of RF microwave devices is employing tunable magnetic materials such as Fe3O4 nanoparticles nanocomposite as the base substrates.
Morales
Enhanced permeability and permittivity values of 3.55 and 2.79 along with low magnetic and dielectric loss tangents of 0.02 and 0.019, respectively, were measured for samples with a high loading ratio (80 wt%) of Fe3O4 nanoparticles for the composite samples under an external applied field of 0.2Telsa. Based on the optimal magnetic and dielectric properties of nanocomposite under external field polarization, the Fe3O4-PDMS nanocomposites have been used to form the substrate for miniaturized multilayer patch antennas with a center frequency of 4GHz, which showed 58% bandwidth enhancement and 57% of size reduction as compared those of PDMS substrate based counterparts. Meanwhile, a return loss of −23 dB and an antenna gain of 2.12 dBi have been achieved. Figure 13 shows the schematic of multilayer microstrip patch antenna designed with a Fe3O4-PDMS composite substrate with a 80 wt% Fe3O4 filler loading [140].
In 2016, Alqadami
Vaseem
Recently, Menezes
Similar works have been reported by Ghaffar
4.4 Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles composite for circulators and inductors in RF and microwave regions
Ferrites and as magnetite nanoparticle composites have also been used extensively in RF and microwave applications like inductive component, isolators, or as circulators [145, 146]. These devices in electronic industry highly depend on the magnetic properties of the material used. The applications based on soft magnetic ferrite materials take advantage of the fact that spin rotation of these materials changes with the direction of external magnetic field. For one direction, ferrites will absorb the microwave field, and for opposite direction it will transmit the field. This non-reciprocal behavior is the basis of devices such as isolators and circulators [20]. Mostly, Ni-Zn and Mn-Zn ferrites are commonly used for such applications, since they are capable of providing high permeability, low magnetic loss tangent, high stability, and high resistivity. Nevertheless, they typically exhibit high magnetic losses at higher operating frequencies.
Fe3O4 nanoparticles based soft magnetic ferrites can be used for non-reciprocal device applications (e.g., isolators and circulators), because Fe3O4 nanoparticles with well controlled particle sizes can offer low magnetic and dielectric losses due to their superparamagnetic property at room temperature. In 2017, Sahasrabudhe
5. Conclusion
The chapter presents a review of the key synthesis techniques for magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles and their applications. Fe3O4 nanoparticles have a large area of applications in different fields such as magnetic separation, storage, biomedical applications, catalyst, water purification, electronics, and so on. It was concluded from the synthesis methods that their structural and magnetic properties are highly dependent on the shape and size of the nanoparticles. The morphology of the particles can be controlled by different synthesis parameters. Among the chemical methods, chemical co-precipitation method is the most advantageous due to the ease of the synthesis approach. Improvement in the stability of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with appropriate agents is also discussed in the article. With this regard, the current applications of Fe3O4 nanoparticles for RF and microwave applications have been discussed. It is important to tune and tailor control suitable particle size with optimized synthesis approach and applied field strength for the design of RF/microwave devices and other applications like hyperthermia and drug delivery. For future application of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in biomedical device and electronics applications, it is crucial to not only control the morphology and magnetic properties of the nanoparticle but also optimize synthesis methods to increase the yield on industrial scale. Though there are limited studies presently, applications of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in RF/Microwave devices is an emerging area, where new application will be discovered in near future. This will open up new avenues in many sectors including biomedical devices.
References
- 1.
Samrot AV et al. A review on synthesis, characterization and potential biological applications of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Current Research in Green. 2021; 4 :100042 - 2.
Bazard P et al. Nanoparticle-based plasmonic transduction for modulation of electrically excitable cells. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7 (1):1-13 - 3.
Dúran N. Nanotecnologia: introdução, preparação e caracterização de nanomateriais e exemplos de aplicação. Artliber; 2006 - 4.
Huber DL. Synthesis, properties, and applications of iron nanoparticles. Small. 2005; 1 (5):482-501 - 5.
Salata OV. Applications of nanoparticles in biology and medicine. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2004; 2 (1):1-6 - 6.
Campos EA et al. Synthesis, characterization and applications of iron oxide nanoparticles-a short review. Journal of Aerospace Technology. 2015; 7 :267-276 - 7.
Damnjanovic R et al. Hybrid electro-plasmonic neural stimulation with visible-light-sensitive gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2020; 14 (9):10917-10928 - 8.
Chaturvedi S, Dave PN, Shah NJ. Applications of nano-catalyst in new era. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society. 2012; 16 (3):307-325 - 9.
Yetter RA, Risha GA, Son SF. Metal particle combustion and nanotechnology. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2009; 32 (2):1819-1838 - 10.
Manish S et al. Investigation on size dependent structural and magnetic behaviour of nickel ferrite nanoparticles prepared by sol–gel and hydrothermal methods. Materials Chemistry. 2009; 118 (1):174-180 - 11.
Gupta AK, Gupta M. Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2005; 26 (18):3995-4021 - 12.
Issa B et al. Magnetic nanoparticles: Surface effects and properties related to biomedicine applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2013; 14 (11):21266-21305 - 13.
Revia RA, Zhang M. Magnetite nanoparticles for cancer diagnosis, treatment, and treatment monitoring: Recent advances. Materials Today. 2016; 19 (3):157-168 - 14.
Chen L, Bazylinski DA, Lower B. Bacteria that synthesize nano-sized compasses to navigate using earth’s geomagnetic field. Nature Education Knowledge. 2010; 3 (10):30 - 15.
Teja AS, Koh P-Y. Synthesis, properties, and applications of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Progress in Crystal Growth Characterization of Materials. 2009; 55 (1-2):22-45 - 16.
Wang C-T, Ro S-H. Nanocluster iron oxide-silica aerogel catalysts for methanol partial oxidation. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2005; 285 (1-2):196-204 - 17.
Jolivet J-P, Tronc E, Chanéac C. Iron oxides: From molecular clusters to solid. A nice example of chemical versatility. Comptes Rendus Geoscience. 2006; 338 (6-7):488-497 - 18.
Guo H, Barnard AS. Naturally occurring iron oxide nanoparticles: Morphology, surface chemistry and environmental stability. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2013; 1 (1):27-42 - 19.
Ghazanfari MR et al. Perspective of Fe3O4 nanoparticles role in biomedical applications. Biochemistry Research International. 2016; 2016 :32. DOI: 10.1155/2016/7840161 - 20.
Valenzuela R, Novel applications of ferrites. Physics Research International. 2012; 2012 :9. doi: 10.1155/2012/591839 - 21.
Hasany F et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Chemical synthesis and applications review. Current Nanoscience. 2013; 9 (5):561-575 - 22.
Machala L, Tucek J, Zboril R. Polymorphous transformations of nanometric iron (III) oxide: A review. Chemistry of Materials. 2011; 23 (14):3255-3272 - 23.
Cornell RM, Schwertmann U. The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences, and Uses. Vol. 2. Federal Republic of Germany: Wiley-vch Weinheim; 2003 - 24.
Babes L et al. Synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles used as MRI contrast agents: A parametric study. Journal of Colloid Interface Science. 1999; 212 (2):474-482 - 25.
Ali A et al. Synthesis, characterization, applications, and challenges of iron oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnology, Science Applications. 2016; 9 :49 - 26.
Sun S-N et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis and surface coating techniques for biomedical applications. Chinese Physics B. 2014; 23 (3):037503 - 27.
Phan HT, Haes AJ. What does nanoparticle stability mean? The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2019; 123 (27):16495-16507 - 28.
Xu L et al. Stability and reactivity: Positive and negative aspects for nanoparticle processing. Chemical Reviews. 2018; 118 (7):3209-3250 - 29.
Leonel AG, Mansur AA, Mansur HS. Advanced functional nanostructures based on magnetic iron oxide nanomaterials for water remediation: A review. Water Research. 2021; 190 :116693 - 30.
Boles J et al. Relationship selling behaviors: antecedents and relationship with performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2000; 15 :141-153 - 31.
Vaseem M et al. Iron oxide nanoparticle-based magnetic ink development for fully printed tunable radio-frequency devices. Advanced Materials Technologies. 2018; 3 (4):1700242 - 32.
Lee H et al. Inkjet printed high-Q RF inductors on paper substrate with ferromagnetic nanomaterial. IEEE Microwave Wireless Components Letters. 2016; 26 (6):419-421 - 33.
Tan L-R et al. Magnetically tunable ferrite loaded SIW antenna. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letters. 2013; 12 :273-275 - 34.
Alqadami AS et al. Fabrication and characterization of flexible polymer iron oxide composite substrate for the imaging antennas of wearable head imaging systems. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letters. 2018; 17 (8):1364-1368 - 35.
Caprile A et al. Microwave behavior of polymer bonded iron oxide nanoparticles. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2012; 48 (11):3394-3397 - 36.
Besenhard MO et al. Co-precipitation synthesis of stable iron oxide nanoparticles with NaOH: New insights and continuous production via flow chemistry. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2020; 399 :125740 - 37.
Ahn T et al. Formation pathways of magnetite nanoparticles by coprecipitation method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2012; 116 (10):6069-6076 - 38.
Lee S-J et al. Synthesis and characterization of superparamagnetic maghemite nanoparticles prepared by coprecipitation technique. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Materials. 2004; 282 :147-150 - 39.
Araújo-Neto R et al. Monodisperse sodium oleate coated magnetite high susceptibility nanoparticles for hyperthermia applications. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Materials. 2014; 364 :72-79 - 40.
Cheraghipour E, Javadpour S, and Mehdizadeh AR. Citrate capped superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles used for hyperthermia therapy. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering. 2012; 5 :715-719 - 41.
Feng B et al. Synthesis of Fe3O4/APTES/PEG diacid functionalized magnetic nanoparticles for MR imaging. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects. 2008; 328 (1-3):52-59 - 42.
Sanaeifar N et al. A novel electrochemical biosensor based on Fe3O4 nanoparticles-polyvinyl alcohol composite for sensitive detection of glucose. Analytical Biochemistry. 2017; 519 :19-26 - 43.
Radoń A et al. Structure and optical properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation method with different organic modifiers. Materials Characterization. 2017; 131 :148-156 - 44.
Anbarasu M et al. Synthesis and characterization of polyethylene glycol (PEG) coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles by chemical co-precipitation method for biomedical applications. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2015; 135 :536-539 - 45.
Saragi T et al. The impact of synthesis temperature on magnetite nanoparticles size synthesized by co-precipitation method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018; 1013 (1):012190 - 46.
Radoń A et al. Electrical conduction mechanism and dielectric properties of spherical shaped Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation method. Materials. 2018; 11 (5):735 - 47.
Sun S, Zeng HJ. Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2002; 124 (28):8204-8205 - 48.
Wetterskog E et al. Precise control over shape and size of iron oxide nanocrystals suitable for assembly into ordered particle arrays. Science Technology of Advanced Materials. 2014; 15 (5):055010 - 49.
Kovalenko MV et al. Fatty acid salts as stabilizers in size-and shape-controlled nanocrystal synthesis: The case of inverse spinel iron oxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2007; 129 (20):6352-6353 - 50.
Shavel A et al. Synthesis and characterization of iron/iron oxide core/shell nanocubes. Advanced Functional Materials. 2007; 17 (18):3870-3876 - 51.
Bodnarchuk MI et al. Exchange-coupled Bimagnetic Wüstite/metal ferrite Core/Shell nanocrystals: Size, shape, and compositional control. Small. 2009; 5 (20):2247-2252 - 52.
Shavel A, Liz-Marzán LM. Shape control of iron oxide nanoparticles. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2009; 11 (19):3762-3766 - 53.
Li D et al. An easy fabrication of monodisperse oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Materials Letters. 2010; 64 (22):2462-2464 - 54.
Wooding A et al. Studies of the double surfactant layer stabilization of water-based magnetic fluids. Journal of Colloid Interface Science. 1991; 144 (1):236-242 - 55.
Zhao SY et al. Synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles of Fe 3 O 4 and CoFe 2 O 4 and their surface modification by surfactant adsorption. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society. 2006; 27 (2):237-242 - 56.
Wang Y et al. One-pot reaction to synthesize superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles by adding phenol as reducing agent and stabilizer. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2012; 14 (4):1-7 - 57.
Wu W, He Q , Jiang C. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis and surface functionalization strategies. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2008; 3 (11):397-415 - 58.
Vuong TKO et al. Synthesis of high-magnetization and monodisperse Fe3O4 nanoparticles via thermal decomposition. Materials Chemistry Physics. 2015; 163 :537-544 - 59.
Joseyphus RJ et al. Size controlled Fe nanoparticles through polyol process and their magnetic properties. Materials Chemistry Physics. 2010; 123 (2-3):487-493 - 60.
Abbas M et al. Synthesis of high magnetization hydrophilic magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles in single reaction—Surfactantless polyol process. Ceramics International. 2013; 39 (7):7605-7611 - 61.
Cai W, Wan JJ. Facile synthesis of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles in liquid polyols. Journal of Colloid Interface Science. 2007; 305 (2):366-370 - 62.
Liu H-L et al. One-pot polyol synthesis of monosize PVP-coated sub-5 nm Fe3O4 nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Materials. 2007; 310 (2):e815-e817 - 63.
Gonçalves RH, Cardoso CA, Leite ER. Synthesis of colloidal magnetite nanocrystals using high molecular weight solvent. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2010; 20 (6):1167-1172 - 64.
Maity D et al. Polyol-based synthesis of hydrophilic magnetite nanoparticles. Journal of Applied Physics. 2010; 107 (9):09B310 - 65.
Cheng C, Xu F, Gu H. Facile synthesis and morphology evolution of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in different polyol processes. New Journal of Chemistry. 2011; 35 (5):1072-1079 - 66.
Bunge A et al. Correlation between synthesis parameters and properties of magnetite clusters prepared by solvothermal polyol method. Journal of Materials Science. 2019; 54 (4):2853-2875 - 67.
Xuan S et al. Tuning the grain size and particle size of superparamagnetic Fe3O4 microparticles. Chemistry of Materials. 2009; 21 (21):5079-5087 - 68.
Wang W et al. Size-controlled synthesis of water-dispersible superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoclusters and their magnetic responsiveness. RSC Advances. 2015; 5 (92):75292-75299 - 69.
Choi K-H et al. A facile fabrication of Fe3O4/ZnO core-shell submicron particles with controlled size. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2011; 47 (10):3369-3372 - 70.
Zhuang L et al. Hydrophilic magnetochromatic nanoparticles with controllable sizes and super-high magnetization for visualization of magnetic field intensity. Scientific Reports. 2015; 5 (1):1-9 - 71.
Oh AH et al. Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles of various size via the polyol method. Ceramics International. 2020; 46 (8):10723-10728 - 72.
Sayed FN, Polshettiwar V. Facile and sustainable synthesis of shaped iron oxide nanoparticles: Effect of iron precursor salts on the shapes of iron oxides. Scientific Reports. 2015; 5 (1):1-14 - 73.
Polshettiwar V et al. High-surface-area silica nanospheres (KCC-1) with a fibrous morphology. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2010; 49 (50):9652-9656 - 74.
Gan YX et al. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Nanomaterials. Hindawi: Journal of Nanomaterials; 2020; 2020 :3 - 75.
Torres-Gómez N. et al. Shape tuning of magnetite nanoparticles obtained by hydrothermal synthesis: Effect of temperature. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2019: 2019 :15 - 76.
Sun X et al. Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles coated with glucose and gluconic acid from a single Fe (III) precursor by a sucrose bifunctional hydrothermal method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2009; 113 (36):16002-16008 - 77.
Xu Z et al. Oleylamine as both reducing agent and stabilizer in a facile synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. Chemistry of Materials. 2009; 21 (9):1778-1780 - 78.
Hou L et al. Shape-controlled nanostructured magnetite-type materials as highly efficient Fenton catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2014; 144 :739-749 - 79.
Li Y et al. Single-microemulsion-based solvothermal synthesis of magnetite microflowers. Ceramics International. 2014; 40 (3):4791-4795 - 80.
Sato J et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of magnetite particles with uncommon crystal facets. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies. 2014; 2 (3):258-262 - 81.
Lopez Perez J et al. Advances in the preparation of magnetic nanoparticles by the microemulsion method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 1997; 101 (41):8045-8047 - 82.
Liu Z et al. Synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles in W/O microemulsion. Journal of Materials Science. 2004; 39 (7):2633-2636 - 83.
Bumajdad A et al. Characterization of iron hydroxide/oxide nanoparticles prepared in microemulsions stabilized with cationic/non-ionic surfactant mixtures. Journal of Colloid Interface Science 2011; 355 (2):282-292 - 84.
Maleki H et al. Size-controlled synthesis of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and their surface coating by gold for biomedical applications. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Materials. 2012; 324 (23):3997-4005 - 85.
Lu T et al. Surfactant effects on the microstructures of Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized by microemulsion method. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects. 2013; 436 :675-683 - 86.
Asab G, Zereffa EA, and Abdo Seghne T. Synthesis of silica-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles by microemulsion method: Characterization and evaluation of antimicrobial activity. International Journal of Biomaterials. 2020; 2020 :11 - 87.
Liu W et al. One step-synthesis of monodispersed and fluorescent mesoporous mSiO2-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Glass Physics Chemistry. 2021; 47 (6):590-600 - 88.
Teng Y et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-hollow mesoporous silica spheres: Fabrication and potential application in drug delivery. Current Applied Physics. 2020; 20 (2):320-325 - 89.
Gonzalez-Rodriguez R, Campbell E, Naumov A. Multifunctional graphene oxide/iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic targeted drug delivery dual magnetic resonance/fluorescence imaging and cancer sensing. PLoS One. 2019; 14 (6):e0217072 - 90.
Asgari M et al. A robust method for fabrication of monodisperse magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles with core-shell structure as anticancer drug carriers. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2019; 292 :111367 - 91.
Simeonidis K et al. Controlling magnetization reversal and hyperthermia efficiency in core–shell iron–iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles by tuning the interphase coupling. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2020; 3 (5):4465-4476 - 92.
Hedayatnasab Z et al. Polycaprolactone-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for in vitro magnetic hyperthermia therapy of cancer. European Polymer Journal. 2020; 133 :109789 - 93.
Dadfar SM et al. Size-isolation of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles improves MRI, MPI and hyperthermia performance. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2020; 18 (1):1-13 - 94.
Ranoo S et al. Enhancement in hyperthermia efficiency under in situ orientation of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in dispersions. Applied Physics Letters. 2019; 115 (4):043102 - 95.
Gholipour N et al. Development of Ga-68 labeled, biotinylated thiosemicarbazone dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles as multimodal PET/MRI probe. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2020; 148 :932-941 - 96.
Ansari MO et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles based cancer theranostics: A double edge sword to fight against cancer. Journal of Drug Delivery Science Technology. 2018; 45 :177-183 - 97.
Khoshneviszadeh M et al. Evaluation of surface-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles to optimize bacterial immobilization for bio-separation with the least inhibitory effect on microorganism activity. Nanoscience Nanotechnology-Asia. 2020; 10 (2):166-174 - 98.
Adams SA et al. Fe3O4@ SiO2 nanoparticles functionalized with gold and poly (vinylpyrrolidone) for bio-separation and sensing applications. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2018; 1 (3):1406-1412 - 99.
Samrot AV et al. A study on influence of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) on green gram (Vigna radiata L.) and earthworm (Eudrilus eugeniae L.). Materials Research Express. 2020; 7 (5):055002 - 100.
Singh AD et al. Impact of cobalt oxide nanoparticles on the morpho-physiological and biochemical response in plants. In: Plant Responses to Nanomaterials. Springer Nature. Switzerland AG: Springer; 2021. pp. 249-267 - 101.
Ahmed B et al. Interplay between engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) and edible plants: A current perspective. In: Phytotoxicity of Nanoparticles. Springer International Publishing AG; 2018. pp. 63-102 - 102.
Elazab HA. Hydrothermal synthesis of graphene supported Pd/Fe3O4 nanoparticles as efficient magnetic catalysts for Suzuki Cross–Coupling. Chemical Engineering. 2019:8 - 103.
Wu W et al. Sensitive, selective and simultaneous electrochemical detection of multiple heavy metals in environment and food using a lowcost Fe3O4 nanoparticles/fluorinated multi-walled carbon nanotubes sensor. Ecotoxicology Environmental Safety. 2019; 175 :243-250 - 104.
Zhang L et al. Magnetic solid-phase extraction based on Fe3O4/graphene oxide nanoparticles for the determination of malachite green and crystal violet in environmental water samples by HPLC. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 2018; 98 (3):215-228 - 105.
Bahiraei M, Hangi M, Rahbari A. A two-phase simulation of convective heat transfer characteristics of water–Fe3O4 ferrofluid in a square channel under the effect of permanent magnet. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2019; 147 :991-997 - 106.
Barakat M et al. Facile synthesis of muscovite–supported Fe3O4 nanoparticles as an adsorbent and heterogeneous catalyst for effective removal of methyl orange: Characterisation, modelling, and mechanism. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2021; 119 :146-157 - 107.
Veisi H et al. Palladium nanoparticles anchored polydopamine-coated graphene oxide/Fe3O4 nanoparticles (GO/Fe3O4@ PDA/Pd) as a novel recyclable heterogeneous catalyst in the facile cyanation of haloarenes using K4 [Fe (CN) 6] as cyanide source. Journal of Industrial Engineering Chemistry. 2020; 90 :379-388 - 108.
Sohouli E et al. Electrochemical sensor based on modified methylcellulose by graphene oxide and Fe3O4 nanoparticles: Application in the analysis of uric acid content in urine. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. 2020; 877 :114503 - 109.
Basheer AA. Advances in the smart materials applications in the aerospace industries. Aircraft Engineering Aerospace Technology. 2020; 92 (7):1027-1035 - 110.
Chatterjee S et al. Design of multifunctional fluorescent hybrid materials based on SiO2 materials and core–shell Fe3O4@ SiO2 nanoparticles for metal ion sensing. Small. 2019; 15 (44):1904569 - 111.
Hashim A, Agool IR, Kadhim KJ. Novel of (polymer blend-Fe3O4) magnetic nanocomposites: Preparation and characterization for thermal energy storage and release, gamma ray shielding, antibacterial activity and humidity sensors applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. 2018; 29 (12):10369-10394 - 112.
Du L et al. A fascinating metallo-supramolecular polymer network with thermal/magnetic/light-responsive shape-memory effects anchored by Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Macromolecules. 2018; 51 (3):705-715 - 113.
Ansari MS et al. Reactively sputtered half-metallic Fe3O4 thin films at room temperature on polymethyl methacrylate: A perspective for flexible spintronics. Ceramics International. 2020; 46 (11):19302-19310 - 114.
Martynenko IV et al. Magneto-fluorescent microbeads for bacteria detection constructed from superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles and AIS/ZnS quantum dots. Analytical Chemistry. 2019; 91 (20):12661-12669 - 115.
Lathiya P, Wang J. Effects of the sintering temperature on RF complex permeability of NiCuCoZn ferrites for near-field communication applications. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2018; 55 (2):1-4 - 116.
Vural M et al. Nanostructured flexible magneto-dielectrics for radio frequency applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2014; 2 (4):756-763 - 117.
Yang G-M et al. Tunable miniaturized patch antennas with self-biased multilayer magnetic films. IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation. 2009; 57 (7):2190-2193 - 118.
Feng S, et al. Hysteresis loss reduction in self bias FeSi/SrFe12O19 soft magnetic composites. Chinese Physics B. 2021; 31 :027503 - 119.
Wu T et al. The low-frequency improvement with loading soft magnetic ferrite films for multiband antenna applications. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics Mechanics. 2021; 66 (2):359-368 - 120.
de Menezes FL et al. From magneto-dielectric biocomposite films to microstrip antenna devices. Journal of Composites Science. 2020; 4 (4):144 - 121.
Kuanr BK et al. Size dependent microwave properties of ferrite nanoparticles: Application to microwave devices. Journal of Applied Physics. 2009; 105 (7):07B522 - 122.
Jadav M, Bhatnagar S. Particle size controlled magnetic loss in magnetite nanoparticles in RF-microwave region. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2020; 56 (7):1-8 - 123.
Ganesan V et al. Size-controlled synthesis of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoclusters for heat generation in an alternating magnetic field. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2019; 281 :315-323 - 124.
Raikher YL, Stepanov VI. Ferromagnetic resonance in a suspension of single-domain particles. Physical Review B. 1994; 50 (9):6250 - 125.
Lalan V, Ganesanpotti SJ. Broadband electromagnetic response and enhanced microwave absorption in carbon black and magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles reinforced polyvinylidenefluoride composites. Journal of Electronic Materials. 2020; 49 (3):1666-1676 - 126.
Zhu L et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4/graphene composites with good electromagnetic microwave absorbing performances. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Material. 2017; 426 :114-120 - 127.
Li H et al. Preparation and characterization of highly water-soluble magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles via surface double-layered self-assembly method of sodium alpha-olefin sulfonate. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Materials. 2015; 384 :213-218 - 128.
Qiao M et al. Application of yolk–shell Fe3O4@ N-doped carbon nanochains as highly effective microwave-absorption material. Nano Research. 2018; 11 (3):1500-1519 - 129.
Song X et al. Study on large-scale spatial dynamic absorption of Fe3O4@ SiO2 Shell–Core and Nano-Fe3O4 magnetic particles. ACS Applied Electronic Materials. 2021; 3 (11):5066-5076 - 130.
Lathiya P, Kreuzer M, Wang J. RF complex permeability spectra of Ni-Cu-Zn ferrites prepared under different applied hydraulic pressures and durations for wireless power transfer (WPT) applications. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Materials. 2020; 499 :166273 - 131.
Sun Q et al. Activated carbon fiber/Fe 3 O 4 composite with enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption properties. RSC Advances. 2018; 8 (61):35337-35342 - 132.
Zhou P et al. Microwave absorption properties of SiC@ SiO2@ Fe3O4 hybrids in the 2-18 GHz range. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, Materials. 2017; 24 (7):804-813 - 133.
Lathiya P, Wang J. Enhancement in magnetic permeability of Ni-Co-Zn ferrites using CuO doping for RF and microwave devices. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 2022; 105 (4):2678-2689 - 134.
Hosseini SH, Asadnia AJ. Polyaniline/Fe3O4 coated on MnFe2O4 nanocomposite: Preparation, characterization, and applications in microwave absorption. International Journal of Physical Sciences. 2013; 8 (22):1209-1217 - 135.
Xu Y et al. Preparation of a reduced graphene oxide/SiO2/Fe3O 4 UV-curing material and its excellent microwave absorption properties. RSC Advances. 2017; 7 (29):18172-18177 - 136.
Wang Z et al. Enhanced microwave absorption of Fe 3 O 4 nanocrystals after heterogeneously growing with ZnO nanoshell. RSC Advances. 2013; 3 (10):3309-3315 - 137.
Yang R-B et al. Synthesis and characterization of Fe3O4/polypyrrole/carbon nanotube composites with tunable microwave absorption properties: Role of carbon nanotube and polypyrrole content. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2016; 285 :497-507 - 138.
Liu X et al. Enhanced microwave absorption properties in GHz range of Fe3O4/C composite materials. Journal of Alloys Compounds. 2015; 649 :537-543 - 139.
Liu J et al. Microwave absorption enhancement of multifunctional composite microspheres with spinel Fe3O4 cores and anatase TiO2 shells. Small. 2012; 8 (8):1214-1221 - 140.
Morales CA. Magneto-Dielectric Polymer Nanocomposite Engineered Substrate for RF and Microwave Antennas. University of South Florida. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 2011:3482482 - 141.
Castro J et al. Synthesis and characterization of low-loss Fe 3 O 4-PDMS magneto-dielectric polymer nanocomposites for RF applications. In: WAMICON 2014. Tampa, Fl. USA: IEEE; 2014. pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/WAMICON.2014.6857768 - 142.
Alqadami ASM et al. Polymer (PDMS-Fe3O4) magneto-dielectric substrate for a MIMO antenna array. Applied Physics A. 2016; 122 (1):1-7 - 143.
Ghaffar FA et al. Design and fabrication of a frequency and polarization reconfigurable microwave antenna on a printed partially magnetized ferrite substrate. IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation. 2018; 66 (9):4866-4871 - 144.
Cannamela M et al. Fabrication of magnetic polymer nanocomposites using inkjet 3D print technology. In: NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference. Vol. 2020, No. 1. Society for Imaging Science and Technology; 2020. pp. 1-5 - 145.
Zaquine I, Benazizi H, Mage JJ. Ferrite thin films for microwave applications. Journal of Applied Physics. 1988; 64 (10):5822-5824 - 146.
Batoo KM, Ansari MS. Low temperature-fired Ni-Cu-Zn ferrite nanoparticles through auto-combustion method for multilayer chip inductor applications. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2012; 7 (1):1-14 - 147.
Sahasrabudhe M et al. Design of wideband lumped element circulator. In: 2017 Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium-Spring (PIERS). IEEE; 2017. pp. 3602-3608 - 148.
Harris VG, Sokolov AS, Magnetism N. The self-biased circulator: Ferrite materials design and process considerations. Journal of Superconductivity Novel Magnetism. 2019; 32 (1):97-108