Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Magnetite Nanoparticles (Fe3O4) for Radio-Frequency and Microwave Applications

Written By

Poonam Lathiya and Jing Wang

Submitted: 24 February 2022 Reviewed: 13 April 2022 Published: 30 May 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.104930

From the Edited Volume

Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

Edited by Xiao-Lan Huang

Chapter metrics overview

318 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The size and shape dependent tunable electromagnetic (EM) properties of magnetite – Fe3O4 nanoparticles makes them an attractive material for various future electronics and biomedical device applications such as tunable attenuators, miniaturized isolators and circulators, RF antennas, EM shielding, and biomedical implants etc. The strategic design of RF devices requires specific dielectric and magnetic properties according to the applications, which in turn depends on the size and shape of the particles. At nanoscale, iron oxide’s magnetic and dielectric properties are very different from its bulk properties and can be tuned and enhanced by utilizing different synthesis approaches. In this chapter, we summarize electromagnetic properties of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanomaterials such as, complex permeability, complex permittivity, magnetic and dielectric loss tangents, saturation magnetization, temperature dependence, and ferromagnetic resonance; and how these properties can be optimized by varying different synthesis parameters. Finally, Fe3O4 nanocomposites will be explored by using different synthesis approaches for implementation of RF and microwave applications and we will conclude the chapter with future recommendations.

Keywords

  • Fe3O4 nanoparticles
  • morphology
  • magneto-dielectric properties
  • RF and microwave region
  • magnetic loss tangent

1. Introduction

Over the past few decades, nanotechnology has expanded its applications exponentially in all aspects of life ranging from biomedical, chemical, material engineering to integrated electronics [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. In nanotechnology, functional nanoparticles with size ranging from 1 to 100 nm have been widely studied [6]. The unique and specifically tailored structure and size dependent properties of the nanoparticles make them extensively important for research and development for various applications such as environment, healthcare, medical, defense, electronics, and so on [7, 8, 9]. Nanoparticles have different properties from their bulk counterparts because as the size of the particle decreases, surface effects (more atoms are exposed at the surface of particle, thus leading to highly sensitive and reactive surfaces) and other atomic effects such as quantum confinement effect in electronic structure comes into play [10, 11]. The key to achieve novel chemical, structural, magnetic, physical and mechanical properties of nanoparticles is the large surface to volume ratio [12].

Recently metal oxide nanoparticles such as iron oxide has garnered considerable attention due to its unique structural, electrical, and magnetic properties which, have numerous applications in areas such as data storage, memory devices, water purification, bioprocessing, drug delivery, hyperthermia, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), biosensors, electronic devices, aerospace applications, etc. [13, 14, 15, 16]. Iron oxide is a compound, which can be found in nature in different phases. The most common ones are hematite (α-Fe2O3), magnetite (Fe3O4) and maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) [17, 18]. All of these forms show promising properties such as biocompatibility and relatively low toxicity, high stability under the presence of magnetic field, superparamagnetic response when the particle sizes are kept below 50 nm, and ease of synthesis process and surface treatment [19]. Among them, the magnetite (Fe3O4) has been widely used in most practical applications, due to the coexistence of ferrous and ferric cations in Fe3O4, which results in fascinating magnetic and structural properties (e.g. high magnetic moment due to valence d electrons) [20]. The high demand and superb performance of magnetite – Fe3O4, is attributed to their microstructure, particle size, more active electronic sites, and high surface area to volume ratio [21, 22, 23, 24]. The performance of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticle properties strongly depends on the oxide phase, the particle morphology, the shape and size distribution, the internal composition (e.g., impurities, grain boundaries and the surface chemistry). Therefore, for a particular application, synthesis methods and procedures must be tailored and optimized [22]. Synthesis methods dictate the crystalline properties, size, shape, and quality of the magnetite nanoparticles. Hence, it greatly affects the magnetic, dielectric and loss properties. Meanwhile, sizes and shapes are also critical; shape change shows crystal facets, and the atomic arrangements in each facet have reflective effects on its electronic properties. There is a growing demand of novel magnetic materials in electronic industry. Here, we will overview and briefly discuss the synthesis methods while focusing on radio frequency (RF) and microwave electronic applications of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles.

Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles can be synthesized using different methods such as physical (laser ablation arc discharge, combustion, electrodeposition, and pyrolysis), chemical (sol–gel synthesis, microemulsion, hydrothermal, coprecipitation, Polyols, thermal decomposition) and biological methods (Protein mediated, plant mediated, bacteria mediated, fungi mediated). Different shapes and sizes of Fe3O4 (nanorod, porous nanospheres, nanocubes, distorted cubes, core shell and self-oriented flowers) can be synthesized using same synthesis procedures, by using the optimum synthesis parameters like particular precursor of iron salts, pH levels, and temperature variations etc. [25, 26]. These synthesis methods are easy to implement while playing a major role in controlling the morphology and electromagnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. In order to make Fe3O4 nanoparticles compatible with different applications, proper functionalization and surface modification of Fe3O4 is very important [27, 28]. Surface modification of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles using different stabilizing agents (PVP, oleic acid, sodium oleate etc.) is a necessary step after or during the synthesis process to make them both biocompatible and stable [29, 30].

For RF and microwave electronics, tunable or reconfigurable devices are becoming important to cause a growing interest of enabling nanotechnology in new wireless devices [31]. Magnetic materials have been used effectively for tunable and reconfigurable of components such as inductors, antennas, and phase shifters [32, 33]. By using tunable properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in these devices, one can control not only their frequency response but also helpful in improvement of electromagnetic behavior of these devices at a particular frequency [34, 35]. In this chapter, we will discuss the synthesis procedures of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles and their usage in RF and microwave applications. The development of sustainable synthesis approaches for these nanoparticles and investigations of how the structural properties including shape and size of magnetite nanoparticles can enable the tuning of electromagnetic properties for different device applications will be presented.

Advertisement

2. Synthesis methods

As mentioned above, there are different approaches to synthesize magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles, which includes physical, chemical, and biological methods. The properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles determine its field of applications. The most widely used synthesis approaches are chemical co-precipitation, thermal decomposition, hydrothermal method, Polyols method and microemulsion method [25].

As shown in the figure, chemical methods are mostly widely used as they are cost effective and easy to handle. Some of the most common synthesis methods are summarized below [25].

2.1 Co-precipitation methods

Co-precipitation synthesis is the most common technique for the synthesis of magnetic magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles because of its low cost, environment friendly precursors and simple experimental procedure that occurs at moderately low temperature (20°C - 90°C) [6]. This method is popular because of water based precursor solutions, where simultaneous precipitation of ferrous and ferric ions can occur due to the addition of base in the solution while sustaining a constant pH level. Fe (II) and Fe (III) salts are used in different basic aqueous solutions such as NaOH and NH4OH to form magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles. Nanoparticle size between 5 nm and 20 nm range can be synthesized using this method [11]. Experimental conditions such as Fe2+ and Fe3+ salt chlorides, sulphates, nitrates, ratio of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in the solution, ionic strength of the solution, pH value of the solution and reaction temperature are very critical parameters to achieve desired size, shape, microstructure, and magnetic properties. Key literature findings about the effects of some of these conditions on nanoparticles properties with a special focus on electronic properties will be detailed below. Figure 1 shows the typical co-precipitation technique experimental set-up using multistage flow reactor for continuous synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles [36].

Figure 1.

Co-precipitation method for the synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles using multistage flow reactor [36].

It is known that co-precipitation method typically results in low saturation magnetization and broad particle size range due to variation in magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles core size and agglomeration, which are the main drawbacks [37, 38]. In order to reduce agglomeration and oxidation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, different surface acting reagents and functional materials such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA), dextrin, Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) etc. can be added during the reaction [39, 40, 41, 42].

Radon et al. in 2017 studied effect of different organic modifiers (glycol, PVP, citrate and dextrin) on the structural and optical properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles [43]. It was observed that organic modifiers with an exception of glycol facilitate reduction of particle size. Particle size range of 2.9 nm to 12.9 nm was reported by modifying co-precipitation process. Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized with tartaric acid in the solution have the smallest mean particle size along with largest band gap energy [43]. The results showed that an increase in particle size leads to wider optical bandgaps. Figure 2 shows schematic representation of synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles along with organic modifiers using XRD, TEM and FTIR data [43].

Figure 2.

A schematic representation of synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles along with organic modifiers using XRD, TEM and FTIR data by showing (a) Fe3O4 and glycol; (b) Fe3O4 and PEG; (c) Fe3O4 and citrate; (d) Fe3O4 and tartrate; and (e) Fe3O4 and dextrin [43].

Similarly, Anbarasu et al. studied the effect of PEG on the crystallite size of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and saturation magnetization. With an increase in weight of PEG coating (1 g - 3 g) on Fe3O4 nanoparticles, crystallite size decreases from 14.96 nm to 10.85 nm, while saturation magnetization also decreases from 62 emu/g to 51 emu/g, accordingly [44].

Saragi et al. in 2018 studied the effect of reaction temperature variation on the structure and size of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles. They reported an increase in mean particle size from 10.14 nm to 11.66 nm with an increase in reaction temperature from 25 to 80°C [45]. It was reported that smaller crystallite size was measured for low temperature synthesis. It was observed that band gap energy for Fe3O4 nanoparticles has decreased from 1.76 eV to 1.14 eV with an increase in particle size. Figure 3 shows the variation of complex permittivity spectra and magnetization of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with respect to temperature variation [46]. There was a nonlinear relation between complex permittivity and temperature. Similar effects of temperature variation on dielectric and structural properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles have been reported by Radon et al. in 2018 [46]. The permittivity and dielectric loss as seen in Figure 3 exhibited a nonlinear behavior in response to temperature variation [45]. It is observed the dielectric property was mostly dominated by polarization process. The electromagnetic shielding mechanism of nanocomposites can be attributed to absorption process of low-reflection electromagnetic shielding composites.

Figure 3.

Variation of complex permittivity spectra and magnetization of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with respect to temperature variation [46].

Optimization of co-precipitation synthesis parameters in order to control the particle size and polydispersity can be quite challenging, extensive ongoing research have been carried out to understand the mechanism of particle formation so that particle structures/properties can be tailored for applications.

2.2 Thermal decomposition

Thermal decomposition is a synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles using decomposition of iron precursor at high temperature in organic phase solution [47]. In this method, precursors of iron (III) acetylacetonate, Fe(acac)3, iron nitro sophenylhydroxylamine or iron pentacarbonyl are used in oleic acid or lauric acid, which are oxidized at high temperature to make monodisperse Fe3O4 nanoparticles [6]. Figure 4 presents a conceptual illustration of experimental process to synthesize of monodisperse Fe3O4 nanoparticles [47].

Figure 4.

Conceptual illustration of synthesis process of monodisperse Fe3O4 nanoparticles using thermal decomposition method [47].

The thermal decomposition method can be used to synthesize monodisperse nanoparticles of up to 20 nm in size with a tight size distribution. Wetterskog et al. in 2015 have synthesized nanospheres and nanocubes shaped Fe3O4 nanoparticles using thermal decomposition method [48]. A size distribution between 5 nm and 27 nm was reported for both nanocubes and nanospheres. Their work demonstrated that size of nanoparticles can be tuned by reaction temperature and shape can also be tuned by addition of oleic acid or sodium oleate during the synthesis. Figure 5 shows variation of shape from nanocube to nanosphere with the addition of sodium oleate [48]. Similar effects of oleic acid or sodium oleate on the shape of Fe3O4 nanoparticles have been reported in the literature [49, 50, 51, 52]. Li et al. in 2010 fabricated oleic acid coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles heated at 320°C under nitrogen atmosphere with uniform shapes and sizes [53]. To address the stabilization issue, different stabilizing agents such as bilayer oleic acid, fatty acids, phenol etc. were studied in the past [47, 54, 55]. For example, Wang et al. in 2012 used phenol as a reducing agent and stabilizer for the formation of stable water soluble Fe3O4 nanoparticles [56]. The main disadvantage of this method is it requires nanoparticles to dissolve in nonpolar solution for storage and cannot be scaled up for industrial production [57]. Using thermal decomposition methods, high saturation magnetization values with low coercive fields can be achieved by using high reaction times in the process. Vuong et al. in 2015 showed high values of saturation magnetization up to 70 emu/g with reaction time of 120 mins [58].

Figure 5.

Variation of shape from nanocube to nanosphere vs. adjusted addition of sodium oleate [48].

2.3 Polyol method

Polyol method is a well-known technique to synthesize defined shape and size-controlled metallic, oxide, and semiconductor nanoparticles such as magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles [25]. This method involves chemical reduction of metal salts in polyols such as polyethylene glycol at high temperature. The average size of these nanoparticles can be controlled by reactive mediums and this method is widely used to obtained nanoparticles 0f size up to 100 nm [21]. The shape, size, particle growth and yield depend upon the type of polyols, salt ratio, concentration, and other physiological condition. Polyol and polyethylene glycol are normally used as solvents, which can dissolve inorganic compounds and offer a wide range of temperature for the reaction. Polyols act as both stabilizer and reducing agent in the reaction and help in prevention of agglomeration and control of particle growth [59]. Abbas et al. in 2013 studied the effect of polyethylene glycol as the stabilizer and reducing agent for the synthesis of hydrophilic, monodisperse superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles for biomedical applications [60]. Similar prior studies have been reported using different polyols such as ethylene glycol, di ethylene glycol, tri ethylene glycol, tetra ethylene glycol and propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol [61, 62, 63, 64, 65].

There are also a variety of prior works in the literature, which utilizes solvothermal polyols method to synthesize different Fe3O4 cluster sizes for better magnetic properties such as saturation, magnetization and coercivity. In solvothermal polyol method, Fe3O4 clusters can be prepared by change of reaction conditions of the solvothermal process and by utilizing sodium acetate [66]. Leung et al. in 2009 synthesize Fe3O4 clusters of different size by varying the reaction conditions [67]. They are the first group that studied the effect of solvent composition on Fe3O4 cluster size. Similar studies have been reported by different groups on controlling the size of Fe3O4 clusters [68], core/shell (Fe3O4/ZnO) submicron particles [69], PAA modified hydrophilic Fe3O4 nanoparticles [70] and Fe3O4 nanoparticles [71].

Sayed et al. in 2015 utilized microwave assisted solvothermal polyols to synthesize six different shaped Fe3O4 nanoparticles using different iron salt as precursors – nanorods, nanohusk, distorted nanocubes, nanocubes, porous spheres and self-oriented flowers [72]. These shapes of Fe3O4 were synthesized using KCC-1 synthesis protocol [73], which has involved various iron salts as precursors, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as a template, along with utilization of cyclohexane-water-pentanol as a reaction solvent and urea as hydrolyzing agent. Figure 6 shows the SEM images of different shaped of Fe3O4 nanoparticles [72].

Figure 6.

SEM images of six different shaped of Fe3O4 nanoparticles obtained by microwave assisted solvothermal polyol method by using KCC-1 synthesis protocol, including: (a) Nanorod, (b) Nanohusk, (c) distorted cubes, (d) Nanocubes, (e) porous spheres, and (f) self-oriented flowers [72].

2.4 Hydrothermal method

Hydrothermal synthesis is the most commonly used method for the preparation of nanomaterials. This is a solution reaction-based approach, which utilizes a wide temperature range from room temperature to high temperatures [74]. To control the morphology of the nanoparticles, low-pressure or high-pressure conditions can be used in the reaction. Pressures above 2000 psi needs to be maintained in hydrothermal synthesis method [25]. The compositions, morphology, particle size of nanomaterials to be synthesized can be well controlled by temperature variation in combination with right precursors in hydrothermal synthesis through liquid phase or multiphase chemical reactions. The particle size and size distribution can also be controlled with precursor concentration [21]. The main drawback of this method is that it needs expensive reactors [1].

Gomez et al. in 2019 studied the effect of temperature on the morphology of the hydrothermally synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The shape was controlled by the temperature of the reaction; at 120°C, 140°C, and 160°C, to obtain quasi-spheres, octahedrons, and cubes, respectively [75]. Figure 7 shows the SEM images of Fe3O4 nanoparticles obtained at different temperatures [75]. Similar studies were focused on controlling the shape and size of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles by controlling temperature, solvent, precursor salt, reducing agent, and so on, while using this hydrothermal method [76, 77, 78, 79, 80].

Figure 7.

SEM images of Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized using hydrothermal method at - (a) 120°C, (b) 140°C, (c) 160°C, where (d) to (f) are zoomed-in SEM photos of the nanoparticles at the corresponding temperatures [75].

2.5 Microemulsion method

Microemulsion is an isotropic and thermodynamically stable single phase formed by mixing oil, water and surfactants; where oil and water are immiscible, and surfactant has an amphiphilic behavior [81]. There are three main categories of microemulsions - oil in water, water in oil and bi-continuous [1]. Microemulsion method has been known to produce narrow particle size distribution between 4 and 15 nm with different shapes. Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with controlled size and shape can be carried out in water-oil microemulsion, which consists of cationic or non-ionic surfactant (Triton-X), a co-surfactant (n-hexanol, glycols, 1-butanol), oil phase (n-heptane, n-octane, cyclohexane) and aqueous phase. Microemulsion can be carried out through addition of aqueous solution with iron precursor to the surfactant mixture [6]. The major drawback of this method is that the scale up of this method from laboratory scale to mass production at industrial levels could be difficult; particle size and shape changes significantly at large scale despite maintaining the same reaction conditions as lab experiments.

Many prior studies have been reported on the controlled synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles using microemulsion method [82, 83, 84, 85]. In order to increase the stability of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and avoid agglomeration, they have been encapsulated with silica precursor, which significantly increase the stability of nanoparticles and protecting them from oxidation [79, 86, 87]. Asab et al. in 2020, reported silica coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles using water-in-oil microemulsion method for the application of antimicrobial activity. It was observed that silica-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles exhibited homogeneous distribution of particles with relatively less severe agglomerate of the particles [86]. Comparison among different synthesis methods is presented in Table 1.

MethodsSize (nm)ShapeSaturation Magnetization Ms. (emu/g)AdvantagesDisadvantages
Co-precipitation3–100Spherical20–80Low to mild temperature, high yield, scalable, inexpensive synthesis, simple purificationAgglomeration, polydispersity
Thermal decomposition3–80Spherical, 1D and 2DLess than 90Narrow size distribution, high crystallinity, size and shape controlLong reaction time, high temperature, organic medium, expensive, low yield
Polyols Method10–10000D,1D,2D,3D20–120size and shape control, less agglomeration, high yield,Broad particle size distribution
Hydrothermal2–10000D,1D,2D,3D20–110High purity nanoparticles, medium temperature, low cost, use stabilizers in reaction to control agglomeration, high yield, aqueous reaction mediumLong reaction time, broad particle size distribution
Microemulsion4–50Spherical and cubic30–110Low temperature, ambient atmosphere, narrow size distribution, controllable sizeLong reaction times, agglomeration, low yield, difficult to remove surfactants

Table 1.

Comparison between different synthesis methods of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles.

Advertisement

3. Application of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles

Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles are well suited for a wide variety of scientific and engineering applications in numerous fields, due to their strong superparamagnetic and surface properties. Detailed application areas are summarized in Table 2. We herein specifically focus on radio frequency (RF) and microwave applications.

AreaApplications
Biomedical and healthcareDrug delivery [88, 89, 90], magnetic hyperthermia [91, 92, 93, 94], MRI imaging [42, 95, 96], magnetic separation, controlled drug release, cellular therapy, cell separation and handling of cells [97, 98], purifying cell populations, diseases of the musculoskeletal system, severe inflammation, toxicity [99]
AgricultureNano fertilizers, nano fungicides, nano pesticides [100, 101]
EnvironmentWastewater treatment, catalyst coatings [102, 103, 104]
Recording and storageFerrofluids, external magnets [105]
IndustriesCatalyst [106, 107]
TextileNanofibers, sensors, smart materials [108, 109, 110]
DefenseSensors, nanocomposites, smart materials [111, 112]
ElectronicsPrinted electronics, spintronics and quantum dots [113, 114]

Table 2.

Scientific and engineering fields of applications for magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles.

Advertisement

4. Application of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles for RF and microwave region

With the continuous technological advancements and emerging applications in biomedical devices and electronics in RF and microwave regions, the strategic design of suitable electromagnetic materials requires controlled and well-tailored dielectric, magnetic and loss properties. There is a growing demand to increase the operating frequency of RF and microwave devices. Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles have recently shown great promises for these applications due to their exciting and superior magnetic properties at high operating frequencies [35]. Nevertheless, as an emerging research area with an aim to employ Fe3O4 nanoparticles for unique RF applications, there are relatively limited prior works at this stage.

Fe3O4 nanomaterial is the among the very few magnetic materials that exhibits excellent tunable properties using different synthesis approaches. Fe3O4 nanoparticles have attracted considerable attentions because of its shape and size tunability, which in turn impact the magnetic and loss properties. The tunable electromagnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles are uniquely suited for designing RF/microwave devices due to their structural and size dependent magnetic and dielectric properties, which can further tuned by external magnetic fields [115, 116]. Meanwhile, self-biased soft magnetic ferrites have been recently explored to exhibit unique properties by exploiting the anisotropy of magnetic material [117, 118, 119]. Fe3O4 nanoparticles polymer composites have exhibited unique attributes for biomedical device and electronic applications, which require tuned, light weight, robust, flexible and cost-effective devices such as antennas [120].

4.1 Tunable electromagnetic properties of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles for RF and microwave devices

In 2008, Kuanr et al. studied the size dependent magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles for microwave devices [121]. To study the electromagnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, nanoparticles fluid with oleic acid was spin-coated on a GaAs substrate equipped with a Cu coplanar waveguide (CPW). Figure 8 shows the transmission response and frequency shift with varied Fe3O4 nanoparticle sizes. They reported an increase in resonance frequency with an increase in particle size from 4 nm to 14 nm and then starts to decrease as shown in Figure 8 (c) [121]. Change in magnetization from Ms = 0.14, 0.19, 0.25, and 0.29 kG for the 4, 6, 8, and 10 nm nanoparticle samples, respectively, was reported. These values are consistent with other reported prior works. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles used were synthesized by thermal decomposition method.

Figure 8.

(a) Measured transmission responses vs. particle sizes under a 4 kOe of external magnetic field; (b) theoretical model-predicted transmission responses vs. particle sizes under a 4 kOe of external magnetic field; and (c) measured resonance frequency vs. Fe3O4 particle size [121].

Recently, Jadav et al. in 2020 studied the effect of particle size on the microwave behavior of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in RF region (250 MHz-3 GHz) [122]. It was observed that maximum loss tangent increases, and minimum reflection loss (RL) decreases with a increment of mean particle size. For instance, the maximum magnetic loss was increased by 55.6% and minimum RL was decreased by 34.5% by increasing the mean size of Fe3O4 nanoparticles from 11 nm to 16 nm. Figure 9 shows the magnetic loss tangent and return loss variation with frequency for 4 different nanoparticle sizes (MF1–10 nm to MF4–17 nm) in magnetic fluid [122]. The maximum loss tangent and minimum RL was achieved for 17 nm particle size (MF4) because of high magnetic permeability resulted from a large mean particle size. These properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticle are affected by an external magnetic field strength between 0 Oe and 380 Oe, while retaining particle size. For example, resonance frequency shifted form 1.28 GHz (0 Oe) to 2.03 GHz (368 Oe) by applying a 368 Oe magnetic field, accompanied by an increase in magnetic loss tangent for a 10 nm particle sized sample. This was attributed to the fact that shape and size distribution of nanoparticles leads to change in anisotropy constant, which in turn affect the magnetic permeability and magnetic losses. As the magnetic field strength increases, resonance frequency shifts to higher value. Also, the bandwidth increases for largest particle size. The magnetic loss tangent decreases with an increase in magnetic field strength for the largest particle size, while the field strength in the nanoparticle fluid reaches to the maximum and then drop to low value for small size particle. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles studied in this work were synthesized using co-precipitation method. Different pH variations were used to synthesize different size nanoparticles at constant temperature for the measurement of these microwave properties [122].

Figure 9.

(a) Variation of magnetic loss tangents vs. frequency for a variety of samples with varied sizes of Fe3O4 nanoparticles; (b) return loss variation vs. frequency for 4 samples with different nanoparticle sizes in magnetic fluid. MF1, MF2, MF3, MF4 are magnetic fluids with 10 nm, 12 nm, 16 nm, and 17 nm Fe3O4 nanoparticles, respectively [122].

Similarly, the effect of particle concentration, external magnetic field, frequency dependence of RF and microwave properties [35, 123, 124], agglomeration effects on the effective electromagnetic properties of composites with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles [125, 126] have been studied and reported in the literature. For example, Li et al. in 2015 reported water soluble Fe3O4 nanoparticles coated using surface double-layered self-assembly method. The sodium alpha-olefin sulfonate (AOS) was used as the coating material for better superparamagnetic properties [127]. It was confirmed that AOS double coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles showed less agglomeration as compared to Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Saturation magnetization value of about 44.45 emu/g and the blocking temperature TB 170 K were reported for Fe3O4-AOS capped nanoparticles which are ideal values for biomedical applications.

Fabrication of heterostructures is another way to tailor the magnetic properties of the soft magnetic ferrites such as the ones based on Fe3O4 nanoparticles for planar device applications (e.g., inductors and patch antennas) including multi-layer ferrite materials with isostructural and non-isostructural materials, (e.g., Fe3O4/NiO, Fe3O4/CoO, (Mn, Zn)Fe2O4/CoFe2O4, etc.). The combination of Fe3O4 soft magnetic ferrite layer and a piezoelectric layer can lead to new and exciting RF and microwave applications such as antenna, sensors etc. [20].

4.2 Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles composite for microwave absorption applications

With rapid advancements in science and technology, the use of RF and microwave electronics have increased many folds, which creates electromagnetic interference (EMI) to not only impact human health but also interfere with electronics nearby [128]. Thus, electromagnetic (EM) absorption materials at RF and microwave frequencies have garnered a great deal of attentions because of their application in wireless data communication, radar system and other area networks [126]. For good microwave absorption properties, impedance matching between air and absorbing material as well as reflection loss are very important. Materials that have both desired magnetic and dielectric properties serve this purpose well [129]. Currently, soft magnetic ferrites and nanomaterials have widely explored for microwave absorption because of their high magnetic, electric and loss properties [130, 131]. Fe3O4 is well known for its chemical stability and tailorable magnetic/dielectric losses at microwave regions. Developing low-density composites of high dielectric and magnetic losses as absorbing materials is an effective approach for fulfilling EM absorption performance.

In 2007, Zhou et al. reported microwave absorption properties of SiC@SiO2@Fe3O4 hybrids for the frequency range of 2–18 GHz for samples of different thickness [132]. SiC@SiO2 nanowires were synthesized using carbothermal reduction method. SiC@SiO2@Fe3O4 hybrids were produced by adding iron precursor, Fe(acac)3 to the SiC@SiO2 suspension in triethylene glycol, which is then heated to 280°C under an argon atmosphere. Microwave absorption properties were investigated for different SiC@SiO2 to Fe(acac)3 mass ratios. The EM absorption performance was enhanced by attaching Fe3O4 nanoparticles to SiC@SiO2 nanowires. Specially for 1:3 mass ratio of SiC@SiO2 to iron (III) acetylacetonate, the measured microwave absorption for a 2-mm thick sample exhibited a minimum reflection loss of −39.58 dB at 12.24 GHz. Figure 10 shows reflection loss of SiC@SiO2 and SiC@SiO2@Fe3O4 hybrids with different mass ratios [132].

Figure 10.

Calculated reflection loss of (a) SiC@SiO2 nanowires; (b) SiC@SiO2@Fe3O4 hybrids in ratio 1:1; (c) 1:2; (d) 1:3; (e) 1:4 [132].

In 2007, Qiao et al. studied nanochains yolk-shell Fe3O4@N-doped carbon as a novel microwave absorption material for the frequency range of 2–18 GHz [128]. First, the core-shell Fe3O4@P(EGDMA-MAA) were synthesized using magnetic field induced precipitation polymerization method, then core-double-shell Fe3O4@P(EGDMA-MAA)@PPy nanochains were synthesized using oxidant-directed vapor-phase polymerization process. Finally, yolk-shell Fe3O4@N-doped carbon nanochains were synthesized by carbonized Fe3O4@P(EGDMA-MAA)@PPy nanochains utilizing salt crystallization method. It was reported that 20% loading of yolk-shell Fe3O4@N-doped carbon with paraffin-based composites have exhibited strong absorption capability with a low reflection loss of −63.09 dB at 11.91 GHz. Figure 11 shows the complex permeability and permittivity for 10 wt % and 20 wt% loading yolk-shell Fe3O4@N-doped carbon samples and relative input impedance for samples with different layer thicknesses [128].

Figure 11.

Electromagnetic parameters of Fe3O4@N-doped carbon nanochains including: (a) complex permittivity; (b) dielectric and magnetic loss; (c) complex permeability; and (d) relative input impedance at different thickness layers [128].

The frequency dependent complex relative permeability is given by Eq. (1) [133],

μr=μ'jμ"E1

where μr is the ratio of the relative permeability of the material versus that of the free space (μ0). μ' and μ" are real and imaginary parts of the relative permeability, respectively.

The magnetic loss tangent is the ratio between the real and imaginary parts given by Eq. (2),

tanδm=μ"μ'E2

The frequency dependent relative complex permittivity can be given by Eq. (3) [133],

εr=εjεE3

where εr is known as ratio of the permittivity of the material versus that of the free space (ε0) and ε and ε are real and imaginary parts of the complex permittivity.

The dielectric loss tangent is given by Eq. (4),

tanδε=εεE4

The samples with 20 wt% loading showed the highest relative permittivity (real part) along with high dielectric loss tangent over the entire frequency range, which can be ascribed to the conductive loss inside the nanochain during the propagation of electromagnetic wave through the yolk-shell structure. Due to the geometry of yolk-shell structure, such as high porosity and void spaces, multiple scattering and reflections are generated through the interface polarization, which influences the dielectric loss of the nanochains [128]. It was concluded that high magnetic losses (due to natural resonance and eddy current effect) and dielectric losses (due to interfacial polarization) can be achieved by designing porous magnetic cores with proper yolk shell structure. Hence, better microwave absorption performance can be achieved even at low filler loadings.

Similar prior works using Fe3O4 nanoparticles as core material have reported recently. Table 3 tabulated the microwave absorption performance of Fe3O4 nanoparticles-based nanocomposites used with different structures.

AbsorbersAbsorber Thickness (mm)RLmin vs. (frequency)Absorption bandwidth (GHz)References
PANI/ Fe3O41.4−18 dB (8.6 GHz)[134]
ACV/Fe3O42−30.7 dB (16.4 GHz)8.2[131]
RGO/SiO2/Fe3O44.5−56.4 dB (8.1 GHz)7.1 (3 mm)[135]
Fe3O4/RGO3.5−45 dB (8.96 GHz)3.2[126]
Fe3O4/ZnO3.5−22.7 dB (13 GHz)5.9[136]
Fe3O4/Ppy/CNT3−25.9 dB (10.2 GHz)4.5[137]
Fe3O4/C2.9−46 dB (12.8 GHz)6.5[138]
Fe3O4/TiO22−23.3 dB (7 GHz)5.5[139]

Table 3.

Microwave absorption performance of Fe3O4 nanoparticles-based nanocomposites.

4.3 Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles composite for antennas in RF and microwave regions

Tunable electromagnetic properties of nanomaterial-based nanocomposite are key enabler for RF and microwave applications. Several reports have described the development of RF and microwave device applications, such as antennas, and inductors using commercially available dielectric and semiconductor-based substrates. For tunable electronic devices, magnetic nanocomposites can facilitate in designing of fully tunable and magnetically controllable devices. This kind of application requires antennas and other RF devices to be operating at different frequencies or meeting other performance needs such as antenna bandwidth and efficiency. RF devices that are frequency agile or dependent are highly desirable for biomedical and defense applications. Tuning of different parameters of device such as frequency can be achieved by various methods. One such method for controlling the performance of RF microwave devices is employing tunable magnetic materials such as Fe3O4 nanoparticles nanocomposite as the base substrates.

Morales et al. in 2011 and 2014 reported implementation of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles and -polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) magnetodielectric composite for RF and microwave applications [140, 141]. In this work, sub-10 nm Fe3O4 nanoparticles have been synthesized using thermal decomposition method. Negligibly low hysteresis losses were reported at room-temperature. Magnetic and dielectric properties of Fe3O4-PDMS nanoparticles composite were extracted using multilayer microstrip line test fixtures with and without an external magnetic field of varied levels. Three different concentrations (30, 50 and 80 wt%) of Fe3O4 nanoparticles filler in PDMS matrix were studied for both dielectric and magnetic measurements. A relative permeability of 2.5 along with a magnetic loss tangent of 0.15 at 4 GHz was reported for 80 wt% nanocomposite without the application of external magnetic field [141]. Similarly, a permittivity of 2.8 with a dielectric loss tangent of 0.18 were reported for sample with 80 wt% loading at 4 GHz. Figure 12 shows the room temperature magnetization (M-H) curve for Fe3O4 nanoparticles and Fe3O4-PDMS nanoparticle composites at three different nanoparticles loading (30, 50 and 80 wt%) [141]. No magnetic hysteresis was observed for all three concentrations of Fe3O4-PDMS nanoparticles composite, which is a desirable property for RF microwave antenna applications.

Figure 12.

Magnetization vs. magnetic field (M-H) curve for Fe3O4 nanoparticles and Fe3O4-PDMS nanoparticles composite at three different nanoparticles loading (30, 50 and 80 wt%) [141].

Enhanced permeability and permittivity values of 3.55 and 2.79 along with low magnetic and dielectric loss tangents of 0.02 and 0.019, respectively, were measured for samples with a high loading ratio (80 wt%) of Fe3O4 nanoparticles for the composite samples under an external applied field of 0.2Telsa. Based on the optimal magnetic and dielectric properties of nanocomposite under external field polarization, the Fe3O4-PDMS nanocomposites have been used to form the substrate for miniaturized multilayer patch antennas with a center frequency of 4GHz, which showed 58% bandwidth enhancement and 57% of size reduction as compared those of PDMS substrate based counterparts. Meanwhile, a return loss of −23 dB and an antenna gain of 2.12 dBi have been achieved. Figure 13 shows the schematic of multilayer microstrip patch antenna designed with a Fe3O4-PDMS composite substrate with a 80 wt% Fe3O4 filler loading [140].

Figure 13.

Real permeability of Fe3O4-PDMS nanoparticles composite at varied concentrations of Fe3O4 nanoparticles under application of external magnetic field [140].

In 2016, Alqadami et al. also reported similar results based on Fe3O4-PDMS nanoparticle composite as magneto-dielectric substrate for MIMO antenna array [142]. The reported antenna was designed with 35%- 65% Fe3O4 nanoparticles to PDMS polymer ratio over the frequency range of 5.33–7.70 GHz. The reported results showed a bandwidth enhancement of 40.8% and 57% enhancement in radiation efficiency along with an antenna gain of 9.95 dB gain and a return loss of −33 dB. Figure 14 shows the fabricated prototype of 2x4 MIMO antenna array [142].

Figure 14.

(a) Front view; (b) bending view; (c) rear view, and (d) front bending view for 2x4 MIMO antenna array [142].

Vaseem et al. in 2018 developed Fe3O4 nanoparticles based magnetic ink and screen-printed nanocomposite substrates for tunable radio frequency devices [31]. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized using co-precipitation method. Then, prepared Fe3O4 nanoparticles were mixed with SU8 polymeric resin, and the oleic acid was used for the functionalization of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the SU8 resin matrix for the compatibility. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles composite was printed by a manual screen-printing technique over a FR4 microwave laminate. Figure 15 shows the fabrication steps for the freestanding magnetic substrate and antenna [31]. To evaluate the electromagnetic properties of the nanocomposite, a tunable antenna was fabricated on the screen-printed magnetic composite substrate. Frequency tuning of the fabricated antenna in response to the application of magnetostatic fields was successfully demonstrated. For center frequency of 8 GHz, 12.5% tuning was achieved under a magnetic field strength of 3.7 kOe.

Figure 15.

Step-by-step fabrication process flow of magnetic substrate and printed antenna [31].

Recently, Menezes et al. in 2020 fabricated magneto-dielectric bio-composite Fe3O4 nanoparticles based flexible film for antenna devices [120]. The flexible film was developed using biopolymeric matrices chitosan (Ch), cellulose (BC) and collagen (Col). The thermal, dielectric, and magnetic properties of flexible film and their application as antenna were tested by fabricating a microstrip patch antenna. For Ch, BC and Col based Fe3O4 nanoparticles film, dielectric properties were measured in the range of 5.2–8.3, 6.7–8.4 and 5.9–9.1, respectively from 0 to 5 GHz frequency range. The resonance frequency shifted from 4.66 GHz to 5.89 GHz for different weight percentages of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in different polymer matrix. For example, the largest tunability in resonance frequency from 5.55 to 4.69 GHz was observed, by increasing Fe3O4 nanoparticles amount from 0 to 80% in Ch matrix with return loss lower than 10 dB for all antenna measurements. The enhancement in bandwidth from 3.37 to 6.34% was reported for all antennas. It was demonstrated in the report that the operating frequency of the devices, size and bandwidth can be modulated by varying the substrate composition, and by controlling the magnetic and dielectric losses of the substrate.

Similar works have been reported by Ghaffar et al. in 2018 [143], Cannamela et al. 2020 [144], Alqadami et al. in 2018 [34] Caprile et al. in 2012 [35] by fabricating and characterization of frequency tunable patch antennas using printable inks loaded with Fe3O4 nanoparticles.

4.4 Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles composite for circulators and inductors in RF and microwave regions

Ferrites and as magnetite nanoparticle composites have also been used extensively in RF and microwave applications like inductive component, isolators, or as circulators [145, 146]. These devices in electronic industry highly depend on the magnetic properties of the material used. The applications based on soft magnetic ferrite materials take advantage of the fact that spin rotation of these materials changes with the direction of external magnetic field. For one direction, ferrites will absorb the microwave field, and for opposite direction it will transmit the field. This non-reciprocal behavior is the basis of devices such as isolators and circulators [20]. Mostly, Ni-Zn and Mn-Zn ferrites are commonly used for such applications, since they are capable of providing high permeability, low magnetic loss tangent, high stability, and high resistivity. Nevertheless, they typically exhibit high magnetic losses at higher operating frequencies.

Fe3O4 nanoparticles based soft magnetic ferrites can be used for non-reciprocal device applications (e.g., isolators and circulators), because Fe3O4 nanoparticles with well controlled particle sizes can offer low magnetic and dielectric losses due to their superparamagnetic property at room temperature. In 2017, Sahasrabudhe et al. designed the wideband lumped element circulator based on Fe3O4 ferrite and reported 125% improvement in terms of bandwidth at 915 MHz center frequency [147]. There is still limited research on the use of Fe3O4 nanoparticles for circulator and inductor applications. Figure 16 shows use of ferrite material for the design and implementation of circulator along with location and functionality of a circulator within a front-end transmit and receiver module, respectively [148].

Figure 16.

(a) Design of circulator with use of ferrite in it; (b) electromagnetic simulation of circulator; (c) use of circulator in receiver and transmitter module; and (d) circulator as duplexer and isolator [148].

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

The chapter presents a review of the key synthesis techniques for magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles and their applications. Fe3O4 nanoparticles have a large area of applications in different fields such as magnetic separation, storage, biomedical applications, catalyst, water purification, electronics, and so on. It was concluded from the synthesis methods that their structural and magnetic properties are highly dependent on the shape and size of the nanoparticles. The morphology of the particles can be controlled by different synthesis parameters. Among the chemical methods, chemical co-precipitation method is the most advantageous due to the ease of the synthesis approach. Improvement in the stability of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with appropriate agents is also discussed in the article. With this regard, the current applications of Fe3O4 nanoparticles for RF and microwave applications have been discussed. It is important to tune and tailor control suitable particle size with optimized synthesis approach and applied field strength for the design of RF/microwave devices and other applications like hyperthermia and drug delivery. For future application of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in biomedical device and electronics applications, it is crucial to not only control the morphology and magnetic properties of the nanoparticle but also optimize synthesis methods to increase the yield on industrial scale. Though there are limited studies presently, applications of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in RF/Microwave devices is an emerging area, where new application will be discovered in near future. This will open up new avenues in many sectors including biomedical devices.

References

  1. 1. Samrot AV et al. A review on synthesis, characterization and potential biological applications of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Current Research in Green. 2021;4:100042
  2. 2. Bazard P et al. Nanoparticle-based plasmonic transduction for modulation of electrically excitable cells. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):1-13
  3. 3. Dúran N. Nanotecnologia: introdução, preparação e caracterização de nanomateriais e exemplos de aplicação. Artliber; 2006
  4. 4. Huber DL. Synthesis, properties, and applications of iron nanoparticles. Small. 2005;1(5):482-501
  5. 5. Salata OV. Applications of nanoparticles in biology and medicine. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2004;2(1):1-6
  6. 6. Campos EA et al. Synthesis, characterization and applications of iron oxide nanoparticles-a short review. Journal of Aerospace Technology. 2015;7:267-276
  7. 7. Damnjanovic R et al. Hybrid electro-plasmonic neural stimulation with visible-light-sensitive gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2020;14(9):10917-10928
  8. 8. Chaturvedi S, Dave PN, Shah NJ. Applications of nano-catalyst in new era. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society. 2012;16(3):307-325
  9. 9. Yetter RA, Risha GA, Son SF. Metal particle combustion and nanotechnology. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2009;32(2):1819-1838
  10. 10. Manish S et al. Investigation on size dependent structural and magnetic behaviour of nickel ferrite nanoparticles prepared by sol–gel and hydrothermal methods. Materials Chemistry. 2009;118(1):174-180
  11. 11. Gupta AK, Gupta M. Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2005;26(18):3995-4021
  12. 12. Issa B et al. Magnetic nanoparticles: Surface effects and properties related to biomedicine applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2013;14(11):21266-21305
  13. 13. Revia RA, Zhang M. Magnetite nanoparticles for cancer diagnosis, treatment, and treatment monitoring: Recent advances. Materials Today. 2016;19(3):157-168
  14. 14. Chen L, Bazylinski DA, Lower B. Bacteria that synthesize nano-sized compasses to navigate using earth’s geomagnetic field. Nature Education Knowledge. 2010;3(10):30
  15. 15. Teja AS, Koh P-Y. Synthesis, properties, and applications of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Progress in Crystal Growth Characterization of Materials. 2009;55(1-2):22-45
  16. 16. Wang C-T, Ro S-H. Nanocluster iron oxide-silica aerogel catalysts for methanol partial oxidation. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2005;285(1-2):196-204
  17. 17. Jolivet J-P, Tronc E, Chanéac C. Iron oxides: From molecular clusters to solid. A nice example of chemical versatility. Comptes Rendus Geoscience. 2006;338(6-7):488-497
  18. 18. Guo H, Barnard AS. Naturally occurring iron oxide nanoparticles: Morphology, surface chemistry and environmental stability. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2013;1(1):27-42
  19. 19. Ghazanfari MR et al. Perspective of Fe3O4 nanoparticles role in biomedical applications. Biochemistry Research International. 2016;2016:32. DOI: 10.1155/2016/7840161
  20. 20. Valenzuela R, Novel applications of ferrites. Physics Research International. 2012;2012:9. doi: 10.1155/2012/591839
  21. 21. Hasany F et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Chemical synthesis and applications review. Current Nanoscience. 2013;9(5):561-575
  22. 22. Machala L, Tucek J, Zboril R. Polymorphous transformations of nanometric iron (III) oxide: A review. Chemistry of Materials. 2011;23(14):3255-3272
  23. 23. Cornell RM, Schwertmann U. The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences, and Uses. Vol. 2. Federal Republic of Germany: Wiley-vch Weinheim; 2003
  24. 24. Babes L et al. Synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles used as MRI contrast agents: A parametric study. Journal of Colloid Interface Science. 1999;212(2):474-482
  25. 25. Ali A et al. Synthesis, characterization, applications, and challenges of iron oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnology, Science Applications. 2016;9:49
  26. 26. Sun S-N et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis and surface coating techniques for biomedical applications. Chinese Physics B. 2014;23(3):037503
  27. 27. Phan HT, Haes AJ. What does nanoparticle stability mean? The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2019;123(27):16495-16507
  28. 28. Xu L et al. Stability and reactivity: Positive and negative aspects for nanoparticle processing. Chemical Reviews. 2018;118(7):3209-3250
  29. 29. Leonel AG, Mansur AA, Mansur HS. Advanced functional nanostructures based on magnetic iron oxide nanomaterials for water remediation: A review. Water Research. 2021;190:116693
  30. 30. Boles J et al. Relationship selling behaviors: antecedents and relationship with performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2000;15:141-153
  31. 31. Vaseem M et al. Iron oxide nanoparticle-based magnetic ink development for fully printed tunable radio-frequency devices. Advanced Materials Technologies. 2018;3(4):1700242
  32. 32. Lee H et al. Inkjet printed high-Q RF inductors on paper substrate with ferromagnetic nanomaterial. IEEE Microwave Wireless Components Letters. 2016;26(6):419-421
  33. 33. Tan L-R et al. Magnetically tunable ferrite loaded SIW antenna. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letters. 2013;12:273-275
  34. 34. Alqadami AS et al. Fabrication and characterization of flexible polymer iron oxide composite substrate for the imaging antennas of wearable head imaging systems. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letters. 2018;17(8):1364-1368
  35. 35. Caprile A et al. Microwave behavior of polymer bonded iron oxide nanoparticles. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2012;48(11):3394-3397
  36. 36. Besenhard MO et al. Co-precipitation synthesis of stable iron oxide nanoparticles with NaOH: New insights and continuous production via flow chemistry. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2020;399:125740
  37. 37. Ahn T et al. Formation pathways of magnetite nanoparticles by coprecipitation method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2012;116(10):6069-6076
  38. 38. Lee S-J et al. Synthesis and characterization of superparamagnetic maghemite nanoparticles prepared by coprecipitation technique. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Materials. 2004;282:147-150
  39. 39. Araújo-Neto R et al. Monodisperse sodium oleate coated magnetite high susceptibility nanoparticles for hyperthermia applications. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Materials. 2014;364:72-79
  40. 40. Cheraghipour E, Javadpour S, and Mehdizadeh AR. Citrate capped superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles used for hyperthermia therapy. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering. 2012;5:715-719
  41. 41. Feng B et al. Synthesis of Fe3O4/APTES/PEG diacid functionalized magnetic nanoparticles for MR imaging. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects. 2008;328(1-3):52-59
  42. 42. Sanaeifar N et al. A novel electrochemical biosensor based on Fe3O4 nanoparticles-polyvinyl alcohol composite for sensitive detection of glucose. Analytical Biochemistry. 2017;519:19-26
  43. 43. Radoń A et al. Structure and optical properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation method with different organic modifiers. Materials Characterization. 2017;131:148-156
  44. 44. Anbarasu M et al. Synthesis and characterization of polyethylene glycol (PEG) coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles by chemical co-precipitation method for biomedical applications. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2015;135:536-539
  45. 45. Saragi T et al. The impact of synthesis temperature on magnetite nanoparticles size synthesized by co-precipitation method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018;1013(1):012190
  46. 46. Radoń A et al. Electrical conduction mechanism and dielectric properties of spherical shaped Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation method. Materials. 2018;11(5):735
  47. 47. Sun S, Zeng HJ. Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2002;124(28):8204-8205
  48. 48. Wetterskog E et al. Precise control over shape and size of iron oxide nanocrystals suitable for assembly into ordered particle arrays. Science Technology of Advanced Materials. 2014;15(5):055010
  49. 49. Kovalenko MV et al. Fatty acid salts as stabilizers in size-and shape-controlled nanocrystal synthesis: The case of inverse spinel iron oxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2007;129(20):6352-6353
  50. 50. Shavel A et al. Synthesis and characterization of iron/iron oxide core/shell nanocubes. Advanced Functional Materials. 2007;17(18):3870-3876
  51. 51. Bodnarchuk MI et al. Exchange-coupled Bimagnetic Wüstite/metal ferrite Core/Shell nanocrystals: Size, shape, and compositional control. Small. 2009;5(20):2247-2252
  52. 52. Shavel A, Liz-Marzán LM. Shape control of iron oxide nanoparticles. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2009;11(19):3762-3766
  53. 53. Li D et al. An easy fabrication of monodisperse oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Materials Letters. 2010;64(22):2462-2464
  54. 54. Wooding A et al. Studies of the double surfactant layer stabilization of water-based magnetic fluids. Journal of Colloid Interface Science. 1991;144(1):236-242
  55. 55. Zhao SY et al. Synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles of Fe 3 O 4 and CoFe 2 O 4 and their surface modification by surfactant adsorption. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society. 2006;27(2):237-242
  56. 56. Wang Y et al. One-pot reaction to synthesize superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles by adding phenol as reducing agent and stabilizer. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2012;14(4):1-7
  57. 57. Wu W, He Q , Jiang C. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis and surface functionalization strategies. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2008;3(11):397-415
  58. 58. Vuong TKO et al. Synthesis of high-magnetization and monodisperse Fe3O4 nanoparticles via thermal decomposition. Materials Chemistry Physics. 2015;163:537-544
  59. 59. Joseyphus RJ et al. Size controlled Fe nanoparticles through polyol process and their magnetic properties. Materials Chemistry Physics. 2010;123(2-3):487-493
  60. 60. Abbas M et al. Synthesis of high magnetization hydrophilic magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles in single reaction—Surfactantless polyol process. Ceramics International. 2013;39(7):7605-7611
  61. 61. Cai W, Wan JJ. Facile synthesis of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles in liquid polyols. Journal of Colloid Interface Science. 2007;305(2):366-370
  62. 62. Liu H-L et al. One-pot polyol synthesis of monosize PVP-coated sub-5 nm Fe3O4 nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Materials. 2007;310(2):e815-e817
  63. 63. Gonçalves RH, Cardoso CA, Leite ER. Synthesis of colloidal magnetite nanocrystals using high molecular weight solvent. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2010;20(6):1167-1172
  64. 64. Maity D et al. Polyol-based synthesis of hydrophilic magnetite nanoparticles. Journal of Applied Physics. 2010;107(9):09B310
  65. 65. Cheng C, Xu F, Gu H. Facile synthesis and morphology evolution of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in different polyol processes. New Journal of Chemistry. 2011;35(5):1072-1079
  66. 66. Bunge A et al. Correlation between synthesis parameters and properties of magnetite clusters prepared by solvothermal polyol method. Journal of Materials Science. 2019;54(4):2853-2875
  67. 67. Xuan S et al. Tuning the grain size and particle size of superparamagnetic Fe3O4 microparticles. Chemistry of Materials. 2009;21(21):5079-5087
  68. 68. Wang W et al. Size-controlled synthesis of water-dispersible superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoclusters and their magnetic responsiveness. RSC Advances. 2015;5(92):75292-75299
  69. 69. Choi K-H et al. A facile fabrication of Fe3O4/ZnO core-shell submicron particles with controlled size. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2011;47(10):3369-3372
  70. 70. Zhuang L et al. Hydrophilic magnetochromatic nanoparticles with controllable sizes and super-high magnetization for visualization of magnetic field intensity. Scientific Reports. 2015;5(1):1-9
  71. 71. Oh AH et al. Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles of various size via the polyol method. Ceramics International. 2020;46(8):10723-10728
  72. 72. Sayed FN, Polshettiwar V. Facile and sustainable synthesis of shaped iron oxide nanoparticles: Effect of iron precursor salts on the shapes of iron oxides. Scientific Reports. 2015;5(1):1-14
  73. 73. Polshettiwar V et al. High-surface-area silica nanospheres (KCC-1) with a fibrous morphology. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2010;49(50):9652-9656
  74. 74. Gan YX et al. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Nanomaterials. Hindawi: Journal of Nanomaterials; 2020;2020:3
  75. 75. Torres-Gómez N. et al. Shape tuning of magnetite nanoparticles obtained by hydrothermal synthesis: Effect of temperature. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2019:2019:15
  76. 76. Sun X et al. Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles coated with glucose and gluconic acid from a single Fe (III) precursor by a sucrose bifunctional hydrothermal method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2009;113(36):16002-16008
  77. 77. Xu Z et al. Oleylamine as both reducing agent and stabilizer in a facile synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. Chemistry of Materials. 2009;21(9):1778-1780
  78. 78. Hou L et al. Shape-controlled nanostructured magnetite-type materials as highly efficient Fenton catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2014;144:739-749
  79. 79. Li Y et al. Single-microemulsion-based solvothermal synthesis of magnetite microflowers. Ceramics International. 2014;40(3):4791-4795
  80. 80. Sato J et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of magnetite particles with uncommon crystal facets. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies. 2014;2(3):258-262
  81. 81. Lopez Perez J et al. Advances in the preparation of magnetic nanoparticles by the microemulsion method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 1997;101(41):8045-8047
  82. 82. Liu Z et al. Synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles in W/O microemulsion. Journal of Materials Science. 2004;39(7):2633-2636
  83. 83. Bumajdad A et al. Characterization of iron hydroxide/oxide nanoparticles prepared in microemulsions stabilized with cationic/non-ionic surfactant mixtures. Journal of Colloid Interface Science 2011;355(2):282-292
  84. 84. Maleki H et al. Size-controlled synthesis of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and their surface coating by gold for biomedical applications. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Materials. 2012;324(23):3997-4005
  85. 85. Lu T et al. Surfactant effects on the microstructures of Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized by microemulsion method. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects. 2013;436:675-683
  86. 86. Asab G, Zereffa EA, and Abdo Seghne T. Synthesis of silica-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles by microemulsion method: Characterization and evaluation of antimicrobial activity. International Journal of Biomaterials. 2020;2020:11
  87. 87. Liu W et al. One step-synthesis of monodispersed and fluorescent mesoporous mSiO2-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Glass Physics Chemistry. 2021;47(6):590-600
  88. 88. Teng Y et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-hollow mesoporous silica spheres: Fabrication and potential application in drug delivery. Current Applied Physics. 2020;20(2):320-325
  89. 89. Gonzalez-Rodriguez R, Campbell E, Naumov A. Multifunctional graphene oxide/iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic targeted drug delivery dual magnetic resonance/fluorescence imaging and cancer sensing. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0217072
  90. 90. Asgari M et al. A robust method for fabrication of monodisperse magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles with core-shell structure as anticancer drug carriers. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2019;292:111367
  91. 91. Simeonidis K et al. Controlling magnetization reversal and hyperthermia efficiency in core–shell iron–iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles by tuning the interphase coupling. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2020;3(5):4465-4476
  92. 92. Hedayatnasab Z et al. Polycaprolactone-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for in vitro magnetic hyperthermia therapy of cancer. European Polymer Journal. 2020;133:109789
  93. 93. Dadfar SM et al. Size-isolation of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles improves MRI, MPI and hyperthermia performance. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2020;18(1):1-13
  94. 94. Ranoo S et al. Enhancement in hyperthermia efficiency under in situ orientation of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in dispersions. Applied Physics Letters. 2019;115(4):043102
  95. 95. Gholipour N et al. Development of Ga-68 labeled, biotinylated thiosemicarbazone dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles as multimodal PET/MRI probe. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2020;148:932-941
  96. 96. Ansari MO et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles based cancer theranostics: A double edge sword to fight against cancer. Journal of Drug Delivery Science Technology. 2018;45:177-183
  97. 97. Khoshneviszadeh M et al. Evaluation of surface-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles to optimize bacterial immobilization for bio-separation with the least inhibitory effect on microorganism activity. Nanoscience Nanotechnology-Asia. 2020;10(2):166-174
  98. 98. Adams SA et al. Fe3O4@ SiO2 nanoparticles functionalized with gold and poly (vinylpyrrolidone) for bio-separation and sensing applications. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2018;1(3):1406-1412
  99. 99. Samrot AV et al. A study on influence of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) on green gram (Vigna radiata L.) and earthworm (Eudrilus eugeniae L.). Materials Research Express. 2020;7(5):055002
  100. 100. Singh AD et al. Impact of cobalt oxide nanoparticles on the morpho-physiological and biochemical response in plants. In: Plant Responses to Nanomaterials. Springer Nature. Switzerland AG: Springer; 2021. pp. 249-267
  101. 101. Ahmed B et al. Interplay between engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) and edible plants: A current perspective. In: Phytotoxicity of Nanoparticles. Springer International Publishing AG; 2018. pp. 63-102
  102. 102. Elazab HA. Hydrothermal synthesis of graphene supported Pd/Fe3O4 nanoparticles as efficient magnetic catalysts for Suzuki Cross–Coupling. Chemical Engineering. 2019:8
  103. 103. Wu W et al. Sensitive, selective and simultaneous electrochemical detection of multiple heavy metals in environment and food using a lowcost Fe3O4 nanoparticles/fluorinated multi-walled carbon nanotubes sensor. Ecotoxicology Environmental Safety. 2019;175:243-250
  104. 104. Zhang L et al. Magnetic solid-phase extraction based on Fe3O4/graphene oxide nanoparticles for the determination of malachite green and crystal violet in environmental water samples by HPLC. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 2018;98(3):215-228
  105. 105. Bahiraei M, Hangi M, Rahbari A. A two-phase simulation of convective heat transfer characteristics of water–Fe3O4 ferrofluid in a square channel under the effect of permanent magnet. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2019;147:991-997
  106. 106. Barakat M et al. Facile synthesis of muscovite–supported Fe3O4 nanoparticles as an adsorbent and heterogeneous catalyst for effective removal of methyl orange: Characterisation, modelling, and mechanism. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2021;119:146-157
  107. 107. Veisi H et al. Palladium nanoparticles anchored polydopamine-coated graphene oxide/Fe3O4 nanoparticles (GO/Fe3O4@ PDA/Pd) as a novel recyclable heterogeneous catalyst in the facile cyanation of haloarenes using K4 [Fe (CN) 6] as cyanide source. Journal of Industrial Engineering Chemistry. 2020;90:379-388
  108. 108. Sohouli E et al. Electrochemical sensor based on modified methylcellulose by graphene oxide and Fe3O4 nanoparticles: Application in the analysis of uric acid content in urine. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. 2020;877:114503
  109. 109. Basheer AA. Advances in the smart materials applications in the aerospace industries. Aircraft Engineering Aerospace Technology. 2020;92(7):1027-1035
  110. 110. Chatterjee S et al. Design of multifunctional fluorescent hybrid materials based on SiO2 materials and core–shell Fe3O4@ SiO2 nanoparticles for metal ion sensing. Small. 2019;15(44):1904569
  111. 111. Hashim A, Agool IR, Kadhim KJ. Novel of (polymer blend-Fe3O4) magnetic nanocomposites: Preparation and characterization for thermal energy storage and release, gamma ray shielding, antibacterial activity and humidity sensors applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. 2018;29(12):10369-10394
  112. 112. Du L et al. A fascinating metallo-supramolecular polymer network with thermal/magnetic/light-responsive shape-memory effects anchored by Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Macromolecules. 2018;51(3):705-715
  113. 113. Ansari MS et al. Reactively sputtered half-metallic Fe3O4 thin films at room temperature on polymethyl methacrylate: A perspective for flexible spintronics. Ceramics International. 2020;46(11):19302-19310
  114. 114. Martynenko IV et al. Magneto-fluorescent microbeads for bacteria detection constructed from superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles and AIS/ZnS quantum dots. Analytical Chemistry. 2019;91(20):12661-12669
  115. 115. Lathiya P, Wang J. Effects of the sintering temperature on RF complex permeability of NiCuCoZn ferrites for near-field communication applications. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2018;55(2):1-4
  116. 116. Vural M et al. Nanostructured flexible magneto-dielectrics for radio frequency applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2014;2(4):756-763
  117. 117. Yang G-M et al. Tunable miniaturized patch antennas with self-biased multilayer magnetic films. IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation. 2009;57(7):2190-2193
  118. 118. Feng S, et al. Hysteresis loss reduction in self bias FeSi/SrFe12O19 soft magnetic composites. Chinese Physics B. 2021;31:027503
  119. 119. Wu T et al. The low-frequency improvement with loading soft magnetic ferrite films for multiband antenna applications. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics Mechanics. 2021;66(2):359-368
  120. 120. de Menezes FL et al. From magneto-dielectric biocomposite films to microstrip antenna devices. Journal of Composites Science. 2020;4(4):144
  121. 121. Kuanr BK et al. Size dependent microwave properties of ferrite nanoparticles: Application to microwave devices. Journal of Applied Physics. 2009;105(7):07B522
  122. 122. Jadav M, Bhatnagar S. Particle size controlled magnetic loss in magnetite nanoparticles in RF-microwave region. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2020;56(7):1-8
  123. 123. Ganesan V et al. Size-controlled synthesis of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoclusters for heat generation in an alternating magnetic field. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2019;281:315-323
  124. 124. Raikher YL, Stepanov VI. Ferromagnetic resonance in a suspension of single-domain particles. Physical Review B. 1994;50(9):6250
  125. 125. Lalan V, Ganesanpotti SJ. Broadband electromagnetic response and enhanced microwave absorption in carbon black and magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles reinforced polyvinylidenefluoride composites. Journal of Electronic Materials. 2020;49(3):1666-1676
  126. 126. Zhu L et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4/graphene composites with good electromagnetic microwave absorbing performances. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Material. 2017;426:114-120
  127. 127. Li H et al. Preparation and characterization of highly water-soluble magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles via surface double-layered self-assembly method of sodium alpha-olefin sulfonate. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Materials. 2015;384:213-218
  128. 128. Qiao M et al. Application of yolk–shell Fe3O4@ N-doped carbon nanochains as highly effective microwave-absorption material. Nano Research. 2018;11(3):1500-1519
  129. 129. Song X et al. Study on large-scale spatial dynamic absorption of Fe3O4@ SiO2 Shell–Core and Nano-Fe3O4 magnetic particles. ACS Applied Electronic Materials. 2021;3(11):5066-5076
  130. 130. Lathiya P, Kreuzer M, Wang J. RF complex permeability spectra of Ni-Cu-Zn ferrites prepared under different applied hydraulic pressures and durations for wireless power transfer (WPT) applications. Journal of Magnetism Magnetic Materials. 2020;499:166273
  131. 131. Sun Q et al. Activated carbon fiber/Fe 3 O 4 composite with enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption properties. RSC Advances. 2018;8(61):35337-35342
  132. 132. Zhou P et al. Microwave absorption properties of SiC@ SiO2@ Fe3O4 hybrids in the 2-18 GHz range. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, Materials. 2017;24(7):804-813
  133. 133. Lathiya P, Wang J. Enhancement in magnetic permeability of Ni-Co-Zn ferrites using CuO doping for RF and microwave devices. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 2022;105(4):2678-2689
  134. 134. Hosseini SH, Asadnia AJ. Polyaniline/Fe3O4 coated on MnFe2O4 nanocomposite: Preparation, characterization, and applications in microwave absorption. International Journal of Physical Sciences. 2013;8(22):1209-1217
  135. 135. Xu Y et al. Preparation of a reduced graphene oxide/SiO2/Fe3O 4 UV-curing material and its excellent microwave absorption properties. RSC Advances. 2017;7(29):18172-18177
  136. 136. Wang Z et al. Enhanced microwave absorption of Fe 3 O 4 nanocrystals after heterogeneously growing with ZnO nanoshell. RSC Advances. 2013;3(10):3309-3315
  137. 137. Yang R-B et al. Synthesis and characterization of Fe3O4/polypyrrole/carbon nanotube composites with tunable microwave absorption properties: Role of carbon nanotube and polypyrrole content. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2016;285:497-507
  138. 138. Liu X et al. Enhanced microwave absorption properties in GHz range of Fe3O4/C composite materials. Journal of Alloys Compounds. 2015;649:537-543
  139. 139. Liu J et al. Microwave absorption enhancement of multifunctional composite microspheres with spinel Fe3O4 cores and anatase TiO2 shells. Small. 2012;8(8):1214-1221
  140. 140. Morales CA. Magneto-Dielectric Polymer Nanocomposite Engineered Substrate for RF and Microwave Antennas. University of South Florida. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 2011:3482482
  141. 141. Castro J et al. Synthesis and characterization of low-loss Fe 3 O 4-PDMS magneto-dielectric polymer nanocomposites for RF applications. In: WAMICON 2014. Tampa, Fl. USA: IEEE; 2014. pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/WAMICON.2014.6857768
  142. 142. Alqadami ASM et al. Polymer (PDMS-Fe3O4) magneto-dielectric substrate for a MIMO antenna array. Applied Physics A. 2016;122(1):1-7
  143. 143. Ghaffar FA et al. Design and fabrication of a frequency and polarization reconfigurable microwave antenna on a printed partially magnetized ferrite substrate. IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation. 2018;66(9):4866-4871
  144. 144. Cannamela M et al. Fabrication of magnetic polymer nanocomposites using inkjet 3D print technology. In: NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference. Vol. 2020, No. 1. Society for Imaging Science and Technology; 2020. pp. 1-5
  145. 145. Zaquine I, Benazizi H, Mage JJ. Ferrite thin films for microwave applications. Journal of Applied Physics. 1988;64(10):5822-5824
  146. 146. Batoo KM, Ansari MS. Low temperature-fired Ni-Cu-Zn ferrite nanoparticles through auto-combustion method for multilayer chip inductor applications. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2012;7(1):1-14
  147. 147. Sahasrabudhe M et al. Design of wideband lumped element circulator. In: 2017 Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium-Spring (PIERS). IEEE; 2017. pp. 3602-3608
  148. 148. Harris VG, Sokolov AS, Magnetism N. The self-biased circulator: Ferrite materials design and process considerations. Journal of Superconductivity Novel Magnetism. 2019;32(1):97-108

Written By

Poonam Lathiya and Jing Wang

Submitted: 24 February 2022 Reviewed: 13 April 2022 Published: 30 May 2022