Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Lactobacillus Use for Plant Fermentation: New Ways for Plant-Based Product Valorization

Written By

Morgan Le Rouzic, Pauline Bruniaux, Cyril Raveschot, François Krier, Vincent Phalip, Rozenn Ravallec, Benoit Cudennec and François Coutte

Submitted: 17 December 2021 Reviewed: 15 April 2022 Published: 22 July 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.104958

From the Edited Volume

Lactobacillus - A Multifunctional Genus

Edited by Marta Laranjo

Chapter metrics overview

699 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Today, plant production is increasing, but most industrial processes generate a lot of waste and by-products for which, in the current context, it is a priority to recycle or valorize them. One of the cheapest valorization routes is fermentation, in particular lactic fermentation by Lactobacillus species, which produces lactic acid and other molecules of industrial interest such as bioactive compounds such as anthocyanin, organic acid, peptides, or phenol, which are widely found in the plant matrix, mainly in cereals, grass, fruits, and vegetables. Bioactive compounds may exert beneficial health effects, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, or prebiotic activities. In addition, lactic acid fermentation can improve existing products and lead to new applications in food, livestock feeding and biotechnology, such as the production of lactic acid, protein, or silage. This chapter reviews the use of Lactobacillus strains in the fermentation process of many plant bioresources or by-products through their different bioactivities, active molecules, and applications.

Keywords

  • lactobacillus genera
  • lactic acid fermentation
  • by-product valorization
  • bioactivities
  • health benefits

1. Introduction

The world's population of 7.6 billion people is still growing and is expected to reach 8.3 billion by 2025 and almost 10 billion by 2050 [1]. Concomitantly, the Earth’s resources are depleting. According to the different scenarios, global food demand is expected to increase by 40–68% by 2050 [2]. Among food resources, plants are of particular interests, as the global production of plant-based products is constantly increasing while producing significant waste. In this context, recycling or revalorizing these by-products is a priority [1].

The main objectives of using plant by-products are to revalorize wastes, reduce pollution, and limit resource depletion. Fermentation is one of the least polluting methods. Plant by-products fermentation contributes to sustainable development; in fact, this type of valorization is part of some objectives of the United Nations 2030 Agenda, notably the third objective: good health and well-being and the twelfth objective: responsible consumption and production. The consumption of fermented plant by-products therefore allows responsible consumption. The fermentation of plant by-product leads to bioactivities related to human health such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, or antimicrobial activities that contribute to good health and well-being [3]. Plant-based foods are sources of many bioactive compounds such as fibers, vitamins, minerals, or phenolic compounds. These nutrients are necessary for the survival and growth of organisms [4]. In many countries, the health benefits of certain plant and their traditional use have been recognized for decades [5]. Since industries have been exploiting plant-based foods, many agro-industrial by-products that still contain valuable compounds have been generated. Many companies are now seeking to recycle waste from their fruit and vegetable activities in order to address environmental and economic issues. For example, cereal waste reached about 40,000–45,000 tons per year in Europe [6]. The by-products are mainly used for livestock feed or methanisation but have great potential to generate food or dietary supplements for human use [6, 7]. Another example concerns the waste from the citrus industry, which amounts to 50 million tons per year and is the most important waste from fruits exploitation. The management of by-products represents a real food waste problem and raises major issues [8]. Therefore, in recent years, there has been a growing interest in the valorization of plant by-products.

In China, for 9000 years, humans have empirically exploited the fermentation process for numerous applications [9]. Studied since the nineteenth century, lactic acid fermentation has been an essential process for food processing and preservation for many millennia [10]. Humans took advantage of it for their food, notably by developing bread, beer, wine, cheese, or vinegar. Subsequently, fermentation with lactic acid bacteria has been largely studied to improve the nutritional and functional properties of plants. Due to their richness in nutrients, water, and natural ferments, plants such as fruits and vegetables represent an optimal substrate for Lactobacillus [11]. Lactic acid bacteria constitute a diverse group of Gram-positive, catalase-negative bacteria producing lactic acid as the main end product. Many food products fermented by lactic acid bacteria are obtained with organisms belonging to the genus Lactobacillus [12]. With more than 200 species of Lactobacillus bacteria [11], this genus is certainly the main and most diverse group of lactic acid bacteria. A study published in 2020 re-evaluated the genetic relatedness and phylogeny of Lactobacillus species. Based on a polyphasic approach such as whole-genome comparison, core genome phylogeny, physiological criteria, and ecology of the organisms, the genus Lactobacillus was reclassified into 25 genera (2 preexisting genus and 23 new genera). This work showed the great and extensive diversity of the Lactobacillaceae family [13]. Lactobacillus species are commonly used in fermented food. Depending on the species, their enzymatic activities including amylase, lactate dehydrogenase, peptidase, proteinase, α- and β-glucosidases, decarboxylase, lactate dehydrogenase, peptidase, phenolic acid decarboxylase, phenol reductase, proteinase or tannase are very useful in food fermentation [14]. These enzymes can degrade the plant cell wall matrix, resulting in the release of many bioactive compounds, which may or may not be modified structurally by the action of other enzymes in the bacteria.

Today, several ecological and economic issues are at the heart of lactic fermentation research. The optimization of yield, cost, and energy consumption and the valorization of plant-derived products represent challenges for the industry [15]. To meet this demand, the use of new substrates and the genetic engineering of fermentation strains are being studied as potential solutions [11]. Moreover, it is now known that lactic fermentation increases the content of bioactive compounds. Indeed, this fermentation process is well known to strengthen the immune and antioxidant (AO) effect of medicinal plants by increasing the bioavailability of active compounds, but also through the production (or the bioconversion) of plant metabolites into new bioactive molecules [16]. To increase the bioactivities and organoleptic characteristics of fermented products, Lactobacillus converts metabolizable molecules with their enzymes, in particular L. plantarum, which is one of the most used Lactobacillus as a fermentation starter. This degradation increases the bioavailability of molecules and improves their absorption [17]. A fermentation starter is usually a consortium of bacteria that helps the fermentation process to start. Today, the use of starter cultures in food fermentation is one of the necessary ingredients for good production. In addition, LAB used as starter in the food industry provide safe product with good nutritional and organoleptic qualities. LAB are used as starter for many products, including fruit, vegetables, and cereal [18]. As illustrated in Figure 1, the production of biomolecules by lactic fermentation of plant by-products can induce other bioactivities. This chapter refers to antioxidant (AO), anti-inflammatory (AI), antimicrobial, prebiotic activities, and others. These can be used in human food and beverage, livestock feeding, or biotechnology mainly to produce lactic acid. Those activities and applications will be detailed in this chapter.

Figure 1.

Summary of the biomolecules, bioactivities generated by the fermentation by Lactobacillus strains of plant products or by-products, and their application domains.

Advertisement

2. Bioactivities resulting from the fermentation of plant products or by-products by Lactobacillus genera

2.1 Antioxidant activity

Many Lactobacillus enzymes can generate compounds with strong AO activity from plant by-products. For example, β-galactosidase releases isoflavone and oleuropein aglycone while tannases generate propylgallate [16].

Glycosylated polyphenols such as tannins, lignans, isoflavones, flavonols, and anthocyanins are widespread in plant products. Absorption in the intestine depends mainly on their degree of glycosylation. Some strains of Lactobacillus, such as L. plantarum, possess glycosidases that are crucial for the absorption of glycosylated polyphenols and consequently for the resulting AO activity [19]. In most cases, the AO activity is studied with classical biochemical antioxidant assays such as 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), hydrolxyl or alkyl radical scavenging activities, the ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), superoxide dismutase (SOD) -like activity, β-carotene bleaching, and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC). In addition to in vitro biochemical tests, other studies have investigated the antioxidant capacity of fermented products with in vitro cell-based assays. Reference [16] demonstrated that the fermentation of L. plantarum increased the AO properties of a kiwi extract. They correlated this result with increased amounts of protocatechic and chlorogenic acid in the fermented products, which were less represented in the starting extract [20]. Gallic acid production was also observed with the fermentation of red chicory leaves by L. plantarum et L. hilgardi thanks to tannases [21]. In addition, co-fermentation by L. gassieri and Bifidobacterium animalis resulted in the release of caffeic acid and conjugated chlorogenic acid after fermentation of sunflower seeds through the action of cinnamoyl esterase. Tannins are also the product of biomass fermentation by Lactobacillus. Tannases hydrolyze the ester bond, and gallate decarboxylase converts gallic acid to pyrogallol; thus, Lactobacillus generates gallic acid, glucose, and pyrogallol [22].

Several studies have illustrated the fermentation of plants such as Indian chilli pepper, grape pomace, dandelion beverage, and cereal-based plant beverages by Lactobacillus spp., resulting in polyphenol compounds (caffeic acid, succinate, pyruvate, pyroglutamate) with AO capacity [23, 24, 25]. In [26], they evidenced that rice bran and wheat bran fermented with L. plantarum possessed AO capacity through their hydroxyl and oxygen radical scavenging activities. Furthermore, the purified fractions exerted reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging activity in HUVEC cells and decreased the senescence of the cultured cells, also conferring an antiaging activity to the fermented fractions. These activities were attributed to the acids and ketones [26]. Co-cultivation of L. johnsonii and Bacillus coagulans was undertaken in [27] to produce a soybean meal with improved AO properties. Interestingly, the co-cultivation resulted in a significant increase in total phenolic content [27]. Fruits are also an excellent matrix for fermentation due to their high content of dietary fiber, sugars, vitamins, minerals, and phenols. Furthermore, lactic fermentation preserves and improves food safety, nutritional value and preserves the organoleptic quality. In particular, when plants are fermented by Lactobacillus endophyte, it preserves of color, firmness, AO activity, growth of fermentation starters and inhibits pathogens in media. Many studies have been conducted on the lactic fermentation of polyphenol-rich berries and red fruits. L. casei has been studied for the fermentation of blueberry pulp [28]. In another example studied in [29], mulberry juice fermented in coculture by three different strains (L. plantarum, L. acidophilus, and L. paracasei) showed a higher AO capacity [29].

In reference [30], they investigated the fermentation of cherry silverberry fruits (Elaeagnus multiflora Thunb.) fermented with pure cultures of L. plantarum KCTC 33131 and L. casei KCTC 13086 alone or in mixed culture. In reference [31], they studied the fermentation by L. plantarum FNC 0027 of Jamaican cherry (Muntingia calabura Linn.), which induces the production of phenolic compounds and the inhibition of diabetic-related enzymes (α-glucosidase, α-amylase, and amyloglucosidase). They demonstrated the production of gallic acid, 5,7 dihydroxyflavone, and dihydrokaempferol [31].

The valorization of argan press cake was also carried out by lactic acid fermentation using a specifically isolated strain of L. plantarum Argan-L1. Argan press cake is a waste of oil production containing polyphenols and saponins. The authors demonstrated that sucrose from argan press cake was easily converted to lactic acid during the fermentation process. Furthermore, the fermented extract presented an increased AO capacity, but the total phenolic compound was slightly decreased [32].

L. plantarum KCCM 11613P isolated from Kimchi allowed the production of ginsenosides after fermentation of Korean red ginseng (Panax ginseng) [33]. In reference [34], it was shown that fermented soymilk products exhibited improved AO capacity associated with increased isoflavone aglycone content. In addition, fermented extracts inhibited the DNA oxidation induced by the Fenton reagent [34]. All these studies show the interest in using Lactobacillus to increase the antioxidant properties of fermented products. Moreover, this antioxidant activity is often associated with the anti-inflammatory activity of certain extracts. Fermentation of other plant matrices can induce antioxidant activity of the products, as shown in Table 1.

By-product usedLactobacillus spp.FPProduct generatedBio activityRemarkReference
Apple juiceL. plantarumLFPCAO[35]
Apple juiceSaccharomyces cerevisiae, then L. plantarumLFPC, OAAO[36]
Margosa (Momordica charantia L.)L. plantarum NCU116LFSCFA
LA
PC
AOJuice’s sterilization exerted adverse effects[37]
Porcelain plant (Graptopetalum paraguayense E. Walther)L. plantarum BCRC 10357LFPCAOAssayed during the maturity of the leaves[38]
Milled wheatL. plantarum+ Streptococcus thermophilusLFPCAO, AM, PBAnti-burning properties[39]
Co
Apple by-productsL. plantarumLFPCAO, barrier integrityCaco-2[40]
MangoL. plantarum + Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSBMango slurry, PCAO[41]
Co
Liquorice rootL. plantarumSBFPCAO[42]
Jussara pulp (Euterpe edulis)Lactobacillus and BifidobacteriumLF CoOA: protocatechic acidAOConversion of anthocyanins[43]
AcerolaL. acidophilus +Bifidobacterium longumBFbeveragePB↗resistance of PB to gastrointestinal digestion[44]
Cauliflower & white beans mixL. plantarum 299SBFRiboflavin, Folate, Vitamin B12, AANutritional value[45]
Wheat germL. plantarum + L. rossiaeLFBread rich in PC, phytasesAO↘ anti-nutritional factor, ↗ protein digestibility[46]
Date juiceL. casei subsp. rhamnosusLFLANitrogen source optimization[47]
Date juiceL. sp. KCP01LFLAMedium optimization[48]
Solid carobL. rhamnosusBFLAMany diseasesImmobilization in alginate beads[49]
Banana, papaya, pineapple, orangeL. plantarumBFLABest LA’s production for banana et pineapple[50]

Table 1.

Other studies that complement the in vitro examples cited in this chapter.

AI: Anti-inflammatory; AM: antimicrobial; AO: AO; BF: batch fermentation; Co: coculture; EPS: exopolysaccharides; FP: fermentation process; IL: interleukins; IM: immune-modulatory; LA: lactic acid; LF: liquid fermentation; NO: nitric oxide; OA: organic acids; PB: prebiotic effect; PC: phenolic compounds; SBF: solid batch fermentation; SCFA: short-chain fatty acid; and SF: solid fermentation.

2.2 Anti-inflammatory activity

Vegetables, fruits, and plants (tomato, cucumber, pear, apple, mandarin, parsley, carrot, celery, onion, burdock, kale, spinach, aloe vera, civet, grape, jujube, cabbage, and perilla) fermented by L. plantarum offer interesting AI molecules [51]. These molecules include organic acids (OAs) such as lactic acid, 3-phennyl-lactate, indole-3-lactate, β-hydroxybutyrate, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and glycerol. When investigating the AI (and AO) capacity of these compounds, the parameters studied werethe levels of nitric oxide (NO), IL-6 (interleukins) and tumor-necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and the DPPH test on RAW cells [52]. Another study showed the AI properties of a fermented plant extract (Artemisia capillaris) in RAW 264.7 cells, which stimulated NO and IL-10 secretion without cytotoxic effects [53]. Thus, the fermentation of Aronia melanocarpa extract by L. plantarum was investigated to produce GABA, polyphenol, and flavonoid compounds. The fermented extract was shown to exert AI effects inhibiting the production of proinflammatory cytokines in RAW 264.7 cells and modulating the immune response in mice [54]. Furthermore, several molecules derived from the fermentation of red fruit juices have been studied for their AI effects. For example, anthocyanins from these products are thought to produce the TNF-alpha and proinflammatory cytokines [23].

Fermented Asian products were highly investigated for their AI properties. For example, a specific strain of L. plantarum is involved in the fermentation of the traditional korean fermented vegetable food, the kimchi. It has been shown to secrete exopolysaccharides able to protect against rotavirus-induced diarrhea [55]. Turmeric, another plant originating from Asia, has been also extensively studied for its AI properties and particularly after fermentation. The development of turmeric extracts with potential health applications, particularly for inflammation, is increased.

The production of curcuminoid molecules, such as curcumin, has been enhanced by fermentation of turmeric (Curcuma longa) by L. johnsonii. The turmeric extracts showed AI and antiallergic effects in atopic dermatitis mice and induced a decrease in serum immunoglobulin E and proinflammatory cytokines in lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation (LPS) [56]. Supplementation of turmeric extract fermented by L. rhamnosus (GG-ATCC 53103) and Bifidobacterium animalis (BB12) strains maintained bacterial growth of the gut microbiota in case of inflammation.

It also reduced the inflammatory state by limiting the production of proinflammatory cytokines IL-8 [57]. Another study showed that the fermentation of turmeric by L. fermentum has increased the curcumin yield by 9.76%. The AI activity was demonstrated in RAW 264.7 cells by modifying the nitrite level, the expression of TNF-alpha and TLR-4, and the activation of the JNK pathway. These phenolic compounds also showed a protective effect against the activation of TLR-4 receptor cascade, TNF-alpha, and nitric oxide production. In addition, the extract limited the proinflammatory response and low-grade oxidative stress induced by LPS [58].

2.3 Antimicrobial activity

The molecules produced during the fermentation of plant biomasses by Lactobacillus can also exhibit antimicrobial activities. The production of antimicrobial molecules by Lactobacillus has already been described, including lactobrevin and lactobacillin [59]. For example, in [60], an interesting concept of valorization of okara by solid-state fermentation was presented with a coculture of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica and Lactobacullis casei. Okara is an oleaginous by-product of plant milk production. The authors used fermentation to generate molecules with antimicrobial activity (up to 33% reduction of Bacillus subtilis development and a modest effect on Aspergillus niger one)[60].

In reference [61], a metabolic study on Allium tuberosum to produce a food additive with antimicrobial activity against poultry pathogens was conducted. Endophytic Lactobacillus have been isolated from Chinese chives. Among those Lactobacillus strains, L. plantarum can produce flavonols with antimicrobial activity [61]. In [62], fermentation of quinoa by the strain L. plantarum CDL 778 leads to a higher production of antifungal compounds. It was also observed that during the fermentation of sweet lemon juice (Citrus limetta), the antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli and Salmonella Typhimurium was increased. These activities were correlated with the increase in lactic acid content and the decrease of citric acid, total phenolic compounds, and sugar content [63]. Moreover, fermentation of the red sorghum cereal allows the conversion of flavanones into eriodyctiol and naringenin, which have shown an interesting antimicrobial activity [22].

2.4 Prebiotic activity

Several studies have shown that fermented fruits and vegetables have prebiotic effects. The compounds produced by the fermentation of plants induce a modification of the intestinal microbiota. These fermented extracts offer great prospects. Studies highlighted their health potential for humans but also animals. Indeed, two fermented extracts obtained from algae and chicory, plantain, alfalfa, and broad leaf dock presented prebiotic and AO effects. This study was conducted on weaned lambs, and the results showed improved resistance to infection and survival for both extracts. Similar studies have shown the same effects for thyme and rosemary [64]. In reference [65], the prebiotic potential was determined, and the AI effect of chicory root and pulp compared with inulin, as a positive control, on the intestinal barrier on IPEC-J2 cells. These tests were performed with five fermented by-products (chicory roots, chicory and citrus pulp, rye bran, and soybean bark) by different Lactobacillus spp. An increase of Lactobacillus spp. was observed for all substrates except for chicory roots. The latter was very fermentable and produced a butyrate ratio similar to that of inulin, while chicory pulp had a higher ratio than inulin. For acetate, chicory and citrus pulp and soybean bark had a higher ratio than inulin. These short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) derived from dietary fiber fermentation contribute to maintain intestinal health. Rye bran caused a significant stimulation of the growth of Bifidobacterium spp. Rye bran and soybean bark have a positive effect on the gut microbiota. Fermented chicory roots and pulp promote the upregulation of tiny junction genes and maintain the integrity of the gut barrier. Finally, fermented chicory pulp inhibits proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-alpha and triggers the metabolic pathway that inhibits inflammatory cytokine production [65].

2.5 Other bioactivities related to medicine

Many bioactivities could result from the lactic fermentation of plant by-products. In reference [66], they associated the AO activity with potential hypoglycemic effects of Diospyros lotus fruit fermented by L. plantarum and Microbacterium flavum. They observed an inhibition of the α-glucosidase activity in vitro. In addition, the authors showed that catechinic, tannic, and ellagic acid levels were enhanced during fermentation [66]. Similarly, several studies were interested in the capacity of Lactobacillus fermented products to exert a positive effect in the prevention of obesity and associated metabolic diseases. In [67], cabbage-apple juice fermented by L. plantarum exerted anti-obesity and hypolipidemic effects in vivo in high-fat diet–fed rats was highlighted [67].

Moreover, soy products fermented with Lactobacillus spp. have interesting biomolecular contents and present antitumoral effects. Indeed, these fermented soybean extracts could inhibit, in vitro, the growth of several cancerous cell models: fibrosarcoma and adenocarcinoma of the breast. It also reduces the risk of breast cancer, significantly influencing survival, apoptosis, and tumor inhibition rates in mice. Clinical studies were also conducted to investigate the effects of fermented soybean extract on chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression. The results showed that the populations of immune cells with activity against tumor cells, the natural killer cells, are significantly increased [23]. Using cell-based experiments, other work has investigated putative health effects associated with AO activity. Indeed, the authors showed promising antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of the extracts on the HeLa cancer cell line. In another study, the authors showed that blueberries fermented by L. plantarum exhibited anticancer activities. Their results suggest that polyphenols, in high concentrations in blueberries, were metabolized during fermentation into active phenols such as catechol [68].

Advertisement

3. Applications

3.1 Food products

Product of the lactic fermentation, bread has been, for a longtime, an important foodstuff of the diet of many cultures. The bread fermentation process has often been optimized and revisited to better meet consumer needs or to address economic and social issues. The fermentation of wheat leaven by L. plantarum allows the conversion of ferulic acid into vinyl guaiacol, ethyl guaiacol, and dihydro ferulic acid. This conversion improves the quality of the final bread product [22].

Corn flour is another example of a bread raw material, and its application in bakery illustrates the potential of lactic fermentation. In addition to the different ingredients of wheat bread, maize meal improves the nutritional profile after being fermented with L. plantarum T6B10 and Weissella onfuse BAN8. Indeed, an increase in amino acid (AA) and protein content, AO activity, and inhibition of lipases and phytic acid were observed. This leads to an increase in dietary fiber, digestibility, and improves the texture, taste, and nutritional value of bread [69]. The same outcome was observed with the fermentation of brans from hullless barley, emmer and pigmented wheat varieties with the same Lactobacillus under the same conditions [70]. Another study highlighted the replacement of wheat flour substitute for breadmaking, a sourdough obtained from fermented djulis (Chenopodium formosanum) by L. casei. The bread produced contained higher levels of total phenolic and flavonoid compounds and increased hardness and chewiness compared with conventional bread. The addition of djulis sourdough also extended the shelf life by approximately 2 days [71].

A process to valorize semolina pasta with hemp flour, chickpea grains, and milling by-products by fermenting them with L. plantarum and L. rossiae has been proposed [72]. However, it is necessary to note that enzymatic pretreatment of the substrates must be carried out beforehand. This could affect the economic viability of the process. At a laboratory scale, they obtained extensive protein degradation and consequently digestibility, a 50% reduction in tannin concentration and also in phytic acid concentration [72]. L. plantarum, which has high proteolytic activities, was used for the fermentation of quinoa instead of wheat. Quinoa is an interesting cereal for celiac patients because it is gluten-free. The study revealed that quinoa is more easily fermented by lactic acid bacteria than wheat. These high proteolytic activities of the strain were evidenced by the increase of the total peptides and free AA contents from quinoa slurries compared with wheat slurries [62]. In reference [70], the potential use of oat extract from cereal processing with high protein content as an alternative to yoghurt was questioned. Fermentation of this by-product with L. delbrüchii subsp. Bulgaricus and Streptococcus themophilus followed by starch gelatinization by heating generated two kinds of gels with interesting rheological and organoleptic properties. Authors placed their studies in the context of plant-based products substituting dairy ones for health and environmental reasons. They discussed the consumer acceptance of these products but claimed that sensory descriptors such as soft, sweet, and smooth are highlighted by the sensory panel [73]. Another example of food products fermentation value is the fermentation of olive by L. plantarum. Kachouri et al. have shown that the phenolic content of olive oil increases after fermentation by this strain [74]. Other studies have shown that the fermentation of the common Spanish table olive improves preservation and the taste. Indeed, L. plantarum ferments olive brine, leading to a reduction in the oleuropein content of the olives [75, 76, 77, 78, 79]. In addition, wastewater from olive production, which is another olive coproduct, has been exploited in [80]. When fermented by L. plantarum, the content of phenolic compounds becomes more interesting. The antioxidant activity was tested by DPPH and ABTS assay. This coproduct has a 50% higher antioxidant activity after fermentation by L. plantarum [80].

In order to innovate in the food market, research is being carried out into the development of plant-based drinks rich in active compounds and with health benefits for consumers. Functional plant beverages fermented with Lactobacillus are being widely studied. Aqueous extracts of plants such as soy, pea, coconut, or rice represent alternatives to nondairy milk. Lactic acid fermentation of these beverages could improve the protein content, solubility, and availability of AA. Some strains of Lactobacillus are also responsible for the biosynthesis of vitamins during fermentation (vitamin K, vitamin B). Anti-nutritional compounds such as phytates are hydrolyzed during fermentation by some phytase-producing strains, which improves the digestibility and mineral content of the final product [81]. However, optimizing flavors and nutritional quality remains a challenge today because the latter are often criticized for their low nutritional quality and bland taste caused by their short shelf life. A color change has been observed by Do and Fan in fruit or carrot juices fermented by Lactobacillus strains, indicating that carotenoids are modified to cis-carotenoid isomers responsible for color change during fermentation by Lactobacillus [82]. Rheological studies have also been performed. Indeed, in [83], the effects of different Lactobacillus species on volatile and nonvolatile flavor compounds in juices fermentation were studied. The main objective of this research was to identify the marker metabolites generated by different species of Lactobacillus strains, which contribute to the flavor and reveal the roles of various Lactobacillus species in the formation of flavor compounds. The main markers were 2.3 butanedione, hexenal, acetic acid, formic acid as volatile compounds and lactic acid, malic acid, citric acid as nonvolatile compounds [83].

In another application for the beverage sector, one of the main ideas is to provide fermented products with prebiotic effects from a different matrix of vegetable juice as raw material. Consumers’ demand for non-dairy prebiotic foods is constantly increasing due to drawbacks related to dairy foods such as allergy, lactose intolerance, as well as lifestyle change or religious beliefs. In this context, reference [71] presents a development of a functional drink based on soy and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) obtained by fermentation by Lactobacillus casei LC-1. This drink presents a prebiotic effect stimulating the gut microbiota and reducing the following bacterial populations: Clostridium spp, Bacteroides spp, Enterobacteria, and Enterococcus spp [84]. Cabbage juice and fresh cabbage, fermented by Lactobacillus, are also being studied for the development of probiotic products. When mixed with other vegetables (carrots, onion, cucumber), white and red cabbage fermented with L. plantarum, L. casei , L. acidophilus, or L. delbrueckii shows a good fermentation profile and potential as a functional probiotic drink as demonstrated by Hyunah et al. [85, 86, 87, 88]. Dunkley and Hekmat evaluated the sensory properties and worked to assess the growth and viability of L. rhamnosus GR-1 in carrot juice, carrot apple juice, carrot orange juice, and carrot beetroot juice over 72 h of fermentation and 30 days of refrigerated storage at 4°C. The conclusion was that carrot, carrot apple, carrot orange, and carrot beetroot juice fermented with L. rhamnosus GR-1 proved to be a satisfactory alternative to dairy-based prebiotic products. All juices achieved viable counts above the minimum counts required to be classified as prebiotic. The results of sensory evaluation also indicated a market potential for prebiotic vegetable juice. The development of prebiotic vegetable juice using L. rhamnosus GR-1 as a probiotic agent will provide consumers a viable non-dairy alternative that can provide many health benefits [89]. Co- or triculture can be used to enhance activities. Bergamot juice was fermented by three Lactobacillus (L. plantarum 107 subsp plantarum PTCC 1896, L. plantarum AF1, L. plantarum LP3) in triculture. This combination resulted in a higher AO activity. Bergamot juice fermented could also be used as a functional drink [90].

Other by-products are recycled, especially in the brewery sector. One study aimed to produce a polyphenol-rich beverage from brewers’ spent grain. Fermentation by L. plantarum ATCC 8014 was realized, followed by tests on phenolic compound content and AO activity. Phenol content and AO have increased during fermentation. The beverage was more concentrated in phenolic compounds than before fermentation, and its bioactive compounds were more stable [91]. More recently, coffee cherry pulp has been used in infusion to obtain an AO drink called cascara. To improve the AO activity of this beverage, it was fermented by endophytic L. casei [92]. A turmeric-based functional drink was also obtained by co-fermentation with Enterococcus faecium, Lactococcus lactis subsp. Lacti, and L. plantarum. The AO capacity was measured by titration of total phenolic compounds, and the prebiotic effect was also highlighted by in vitro and in vivo tests.

Kombucha is a sweet infusion of green tea leaves usually fermented with Kombu, a fungus. One study shows that replacing Kombu with L. casei and L. plantarum, which are derived from kefir, enhances the production of glucuronic acid, leading to greater antimicrobial and antioxidant activities [93]. Another study showed that a mixture of LAB from kefir and kombucha (L. casei, L. plantarum, L. acidophilus. L. casei, and L. plantarum) increases the glucuronic acid concentration, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities and allows the use of Kombucha as a health drink [94]. Hou et al. demonstrated the link between antimicrobial activities of kombucha with polyphenols and LAB, especially against Escherichia coli, Salmonella tiphy, Vibrio cholerae, and Shigella dysenteriae [95]. Green tea used in Kombucha may have activity when fermented by L. plantarum. Indeed, fermented extract derived from Camellia sinensis is able to mitigate ethanol-induced liver damage. In vitro and in vivo tests on hepatic cells (HepG2,) and murin model exposed to fermented green tea extract show after exposure of ethanol a better viability and an increase of hepatic alcohol dehydrogenase [96].

3.2 Livestock feeding

The products of plant fermentation by Lactobacillus strains can be used in many fields ranging from livestock feeding, such as ruminant by decreasing gas production [97]. Lactobacillus strains can also be used for silage preparation. Silages are grass or other green fodder that is compacted and stored under airtight conditions, typically in a silo, for use as livestock feeding in the winter. Many studies focus on using Lactobacillus strains to improve the quality of the silage. In reference [98], the effect of L. brevis and L. parafarraginis used as inoculants and the microbial communities of corn stover silage were studied. After 20 days, the two Lactobacillus strains were predominant, and a reduction in lactic acid content coupled with an increase in acetic acid and 1.2-propanediol contents was observed. An improvement in the silage quality and reproducibility of the ensiling process were observed [98]. Recently in [99], the effect of L. plantarum addition on the nutritive value of dwarf elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum cv Mott) silage was presented. The aim was to examine the effects of different L. plantarum addition on the physical quality, pH, and nutritional value (dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, crude fiber). After incubation, a good silage quality (fresh and acidic odor, good texture, and no fungi) and a pH around 4 were observed. L. plantarum addition accelerates ensilage fermentation [99]. In [100], an increase in silage quality by adding waste molasses to L. plantarum MTD1 was observed. In the same context, the addition of cellulase was studied to evaluate the effects on the chemical composition, bacterial communities, stability of mixed silage made with high-moisture amaranth and rice straw fermented by L. plantarum.

Cellulases increased the abundance of Lactobacillus bacteria and reduced the abundance of other lactic acid bacteria. It decreased pH, acetic acid content, ammonia nitrogen content and increased lactic acid concentration after 7 days of ensiling [101]. In conclusion, silage treated with both Lactobacillus bacteria and cellulase showed the best silage quality. Optimizing the digestibility of feeds and thus increasing their nutritional value are a challenge for the livestock feeding industry. In another study, the fermentation product of a mixture of ginger and turmeric extract by Lactobacillus spp. was supplemented to chickens. Biological analyses of AO enzymes and analysis of gut microbiota and lymphoid organs showed a prebiotic effect, an AO effect, and an improvement in resistance to bacterial infections [102].

3.3 Lactic acid production from plant biomass

The use of low-cost by-products is of primary interest as it reduces production costs compared with the use of complex culture media made with pure and refined products. Consequently, many by-products have been tested in the last few years, in association with screening of the best microbial strains, the best fermentation process, and the best conditions to make them work together [103]. Lactic acid is one of the most widely used organic acids for a long time in various industries, such as food, cosmetics, pharmaceutical, and textile industries, and flavor, conservation, AO, and antimicrobial activity [104]. In the last decade, it has also become an essential platform molecule in the biomaterials sector to produce poly-lactic acid (PLA), a bio-based polymer. This new interest has led to an explosion in worldwide demand. One of the characteristics of polylactic acid is its thermal resistance, a critical parameter for manufacturing thermoformed materials (packaging, film, etc.). Lactobacillus have been traditionally used for lactic acid production [105, 106]. When using large-scale fermentation bioprocesses, the biomass feedstock must be carefully selected as it accounts for almost half of the biopolymers production costs [105]. To address this production cost issue, scientists and industrials have been focused on lignocellulosic biomass as a fermentation substrate for lactic acid production. Nevertheless, in order to be easily usable, saccharification pretreatments are needed to break down the cellulose into fermentable carbohydrates. Moreover, Lactobacillus are classified as either homofermentative or heterofermentative. L. delbrueckii is a homofermentative strain commonly used for the production of lactic acid [107]. Homofermentative strains of Lactobacillus cannot use pentose carbohydrates from hemicellulose, but heterofermentative ones, such as L. brevis, can use these carbohydrates through the phosphoketolase pathway [106].

In reference [105], the fermentation of 11 different carbohydrates from seaweed or plant biomass as a carbon source to produce L-lactic acid with seven different Lactobacillus species was investigated. A comparative analysis of the expected yield of lactic acid production revealed that seaweeds provided comparable production rates to lignocellulosic biomasses [105]. In another study, beet molasse was used to produce lactic acid using L. delbrueckii IFO 3202 during batch and continuous fermentation, dilution rate of 0.5 h−1 was determined to be the best one and allowed to reach a maximum productivity of 11 g L−1 h−1. Authors have demonstrated the importance of medium supplementation by yeast extract, as Lactobacilli are tedious microorganisms that require many substrates and substances to grow [108]. Nevertheless, it is estimated that the addition of yeast extract can contribute up to 30% of the cost of producing lactic acid [109]. Zhang & Vadlani studied the production of D-lactic acid by a homofermentative strain, L. delbrueckii ATCC 9649, through a sequential hydrolysis and fermentation process (SHF) and a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process (SSF). In this work, first, the saccharification of pulp and corn stover was done, and then carbohydrates generated from hydrolysis were used by L. delbrueckii and converted to D-lactic acid with high purity (99.8 %). The authors highlighted that the SHF process, compared with the SSF process, avoids substrate inhibition and increases the productivity and the yield of D-lactic acid [107]. The same researchers’ team has then engineered a strain of L. plantarum, introducing gene encoding isomerase and xylulokinase, for the overproduction of D-lactic acid from corn stover and soybean meal extract. In this work, the authors optimized the culture medium through response surface methodology using saccharified corn stover as carbon source and soybean meal extract as a nitrogen source to substitute YE in the medium to produce high purity of D-lactic acid (99%). A maximum productivity of 0.82 g L−1 h−1 of D-lactic acid was obtained in the optimized medium, 10% higher than with YE as the main nitrogen source [106].

Saccharification and fermentation could be performed at the same time (simultaneous saccharification and fermentation) and have been used for instance by Tu et al. for LA production. With L. plantarum, they obtained up to 65.6 g L−1 of lactic acid with a cellulose conversion of 69% [110]. Using inulin from chicory, in [111] they obtained a better performance by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation to produce D-lactic acid with L. bulgaricus. In their process, they obtained an optically pure molecule (99.9%), which could be interesting for further chemical processes. Productivity is also high with 123 g L−1 starting from 120 g L−1 of inulin treated by inulinase. The enzymatic treatment yielded inulin, which was used instead of glucose in MRS medium for fermentation [110, 111].

In another example, lactic acid production from fermented orange peels was evaluated by ion-exchange chromatography. The solid fermentations were in mono or coculture, with L. casei 2246, L. plantarum 285, and L. paracasei 4186. This study showed that fermentation resulted in higher lactic acid production with the monoculture L. casei 2246 and the coculture L. casei 2246 with L. plantarum 285. Glucose can also be converted to lactic acid by symbiotic relationship between different lactic acid bacteria. L. helveticus is an AA-producing strain (alanine, serine, aspartate, glutamate, aromatic AA, and histidine), whereas L. delbrueckii is a lactic-acid-producing strain but produces little of these AAs necessary for its growth. Thus, this co-fermentation optimized the lactic acid yield [104]. Before industrialization of such a process, scale-up has to be demonstrated and downstream processes (purification) to be implemented and considered. However, another technology could also be used for lactic acid production by microorganisms. Indeed, solid-state fermentation was used with cassava bagasse as substrate and L. delbruechii as microorganism [103, 112].

3.4 Other applications of active ingredients produced from fermented plant extracts

Another biotechnology application is the production of proteins, peptides, or AA such as GABA. Indeed, plant by-products are sources of different proteins, which can be hydrolyzed during fermentation by Lactobacillus species. These microorganisms, especially L. plantarum, have developed a proteolytic system to satisfy their nitrogen requirements. The proteolytic activities and protein hydrolysis patterns are very different from one strain to another. The resulting peptides displayed different biological functions such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, mineral binding, antidiabetic, satiating, immunomodulating, opioid, AO, or antimicrobial activities [12]. The L. plantarum LP-9 strain was used to coproduce GABA and lactic acid from agri-residues such as wheat bran, rice bran, corn bran. The results were compared with the use of cassava (starchy food crop), and the production yields were significant and comparable to this control condition [113]. Co-fermentation of Ginseng root and leaf extract always by L. plantarum EJ2014 and B. subtilis, also showed GABA production [114]. The fermentation of Kimchi by L. brevis BJ20 allows the conversion of glutamic acid into GABA. This process is particularly interesting because GABA has an AO activity demonstrated during the study of DPPH scavenging, superoxide scavenging, and xanthine oxidase inhibition tests [115]. Biotechnology also allows production of cosmetic or pharmaceutical products or surfactants. Biosurfactants production was investigated using L. paracasei on enzymatically hydrolyzed vineyard pruning waste. This study presented the complete process for this waste valorization using acid hydrolysis, delignification, and enzymatic hydrolysis steps. Authors have demonstrated the impact of the carbon source extraction process on the biosurfactant composition produced by the strain L. paracasei A20 [116].

Advertisement

4. Limitations and future challenges

Faced with environmental and societal problems such as pollution, global warming, and overpopulation, crop yields are increasingly challenging to sustain. Moreover, while demand is increasing in developed countries, poor populations are struggling to feed themselves, and undernutrition is high in these countries. This is why the food and agriculture industry must find solutions to meet the needs of all. Among these, better use of plant resources and better exploitation of their by-products are two solutions of interest. In addition, consumers are looking for more natural and healthy products, and industrials are looking for economically viable bio-based solutions. Fruit and vegetable waste and cereal by-products are likely to be reused because of their quantity and richness in nutrients and bacterial strains suitable for lactic fermentation.

When lactic acid bacteria ferment the nutrients in them, the functional and nutritional properties increase, representing significant opportunities for the agri-food, biotechnology, medical, nutraceutical, and cosmetic industries. As presented in this chapter, the fermentation of plant products by Lactobacillus allows the production of numerous bioactive molecules for the development of many applications. Nevertheless, to meet the demand, lactic acid fermentation by Lactobacillus requires optimization. First of all, the use of plant by-products requires a crucial design of the fermentation process according to the raw material (solid, liquid, semiliquid fermentations). This design could lead to the development and emergence of new processes that should be able to meet industrial viability, economic returns, and consumer needs. Therefore, much work is still needed on these processes to increase the commercialization of new bio-based products from plant by-products. On the other hand, Lactobacillus strains are fastidious bacteria in their nutritional requirements and are not necessarily well adapted metabolically for growth from any substrate, and the use of GMOs is a very limiting criterion for many applications (food, cosmetics, etc.). The growth parameters and enzymatic activities of Lactobacillus strains have a major impact on applications, particularly when the fermentation substrate is complex. It is therefore necessary to work on the culture conditions and metabolic adaptation of these strains in order to maximize the enzymatic activities and production rates of the molecules of interest. Therefore, many constraints exist, such as the lack of scientific data and hindsight, the control of culture conditions, and the separation and purification processes to recover bioactive compounds. Further efforts are urgently needed to overcome these problems. Nevertheless, one of the advantages of production with Lactobacillus is its ability to produce several types of molecules simultaneously, typically lactic acid and other molecules (derived or transformed from the substrate), which makes the fermentation process industrially interesting. Such multiproduct strategies should be promoted in the near future up to industrial scale.

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

Lactic acid fermentation is an ancestral process performed by numerous bacterial strains. Fermentation conditions, substrates, and potential additives represent challenges and constraints for yield optimization, process stabilization, and standardization. Indeed, lactic fermentation by Lactobacillus allows the production of many molecules of interest. When these bacteria ferment plant products, they induce biochemical conversions and the production of phenolic compounds, organic acids, and vitamins through their enzymatic activities. This review highlights the different applications related to the production of these compounds. The latter have bioactivities such as AO, AI, prebiotic, antimicrobial, and many others.

In addition, they are of growing interest to the food industry for their ability to increase nutritional value but also for their use as preservatives and modifiers of organoleptic properties. The different studies reviewed here are looking for alternatives to meet environmental and social consumer demand. In order to reduce production costs and the carbon footprint of the process, genetic engineering and the revalorization of plant by-products appear to be interesting avenues of research to improve the yield of compounds of interest. However, there is still a lack of scientific data on the control of fermentation by Lactobacillus. Further studies are needed to identify the biochemical reactions and metabolism of Lactobacillus involved in the production of bioactive compounds. In addition, studies are needed to further investigate the mechanisms involved in the bioactivities of interest.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the financial support for the Charles Viollette Industrial Chair provided by the Lille European Metropolis (MEL) and the Isite of the University of Lille.

Advertisement

Acronyms and abbreviations

AA

Amino acids

ABTS

Acid 2,2’-azino-bis(3-éthylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonique)

AI

Anti inflammatory

AM

Anti-microbial

AO

Antioxidant

BF

Batch fermentation

Co

Coculture

DNA

Deoxyribonucleic acid

DPPH

2,2-DiPhenyl-1-PicrylHydrazyl

EPS

Exopolysaccharides

FP

Fermentation process

FRAP

Ferric reducing antioxydant power

GABA

Gamma-aminobutyric acid

IL-6, Il-10

Interleukins

IM

Immuno-modulatory

LA

Lactic acid

LF

Liquid fermentation

LPS

Lipopolysaccharide

NO

Nitric oxide

OA

Organic acids

ORAC

Oxygen radical absorbance capacity

PC

Phenolic compounds

PB

Prebiotic effect

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

SBF

Solid batch fermentation

SF

Solid fermentation

SFCA

Short-chain fatty acid

TNF-alpha

Tumor-necrosis factor-alpha

References

  1. 1. Lugtenberg BJJ, Malfanova N, Kamilova F, Berg G. Plant growth promotion by Microbes. Molecular Microbial Ecology of the Rhizosphere. 2013;559-573
  2. 2. Hérault B. La demande alimentaire en 2050 : chiffres, incertitudes et marges de manœuvre. Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Alimentation, de la Pêche, de la Ruralité et de l’Aménagement du territoire; 2011. Report No.: 27
  3. 3. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Sustainable Development. THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development [Internet]. Organisation des Nations Unies. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/fr/goals
  4. 4. Septembre-Malaterre A, Remize F, Poucheret P. Fruits and vegetables, as a source of nutritional compounds and phytochemicals: Changes in bioactive compounds during lactic fermentation. Food Research International. 2018;104:86-99
  5. 5. Dogan K, Tornuk F. Improvement of bioavailability of bioactive compounds of medicinal herbs by drying and fermentation with Lactobacillus plantarum. Functional Foods in Health and Disease. 2019;9(12):735-748
  6. 6. Ravindran R, Jaiswal AK. Exploitation of food industry waste for high-value products. Trends in Biotechnology. 2016;34(1):58-69
  7. 7. Görgüç A, Gençdağ E, Yılmaz FM. Bioactive peptides derived from plant origin by-products: Biological activities and techno-functional utilizations in food developments—A review. Food Research International. 2020;136:109504
  8. 8. Bustamante D, Tortajada M, Ramón D, Rojas A. Production of D-lactic acid by the fermentation of orange peel waste hydrolysate by lactic acid bacteria. Fermentation. 2020;6(1):1
  9. 9. Wang J, Jiang L, Sun H. Early evidence for beer drinking in a 9000-year-old platform mound in southern China. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0255833
  10. 10. Capurso L. Thirty Years of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: A Review. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 2019;53(Supplement 1):S1-S41
  11. 11. Hill D, Sugrue I, Tobin C, Hill C, Stanton C, Ross RP. The lactobacillus casei group: History and health related applications. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9:2107
  12. 12. Raveschot C, Cudennec B, Coutte F, Flahaut C, Fremont M, Drider D, et al. Production of bioactive peptides by lactobacillus species: From gene to application. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018;9:2354
  13. 13. Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, Mattarelli P, et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2020;70(4):2782-2858
  14. 14. Muñoz R, de las Rivas B, de Felipe FL, Reverón I, Santamaría L, Esteban-Torres M, et al. Biotransformation of phenolics by lactobacillus plantarum in fermented foods. In Fermented Foods in Health and Disease Prevention. 2017. pp. 63-83
  15. 15. Carpinelli Macedo JV, de Barros Ranke FF, Escaramboni B, Campioni TS, Fernández Núñez EG, de Oliva Neto P. Cost-effective lactic acid production by fermentation of agro-industrial residues. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 2020;27:101706
  16. 16. Hur SJ, Lee SY, Kim Y-C, Choi I, Kim G-B. Effect of fermentation on the antioxidant activity in plant-based foods. Food Chemistry. 2014;160:346-356
  17. 17. Ruiz Rodríguez LG, Zamora Gasga VM, Pescuma M, Van Nieuwenhove C, Mozzi F, Sánchez Burgos JA. Fruits and fruit by-products as sources of bioactive compounds. Benefits and trends of lactic acid fermentation in the development of novel fruit-based functional beverages. Food Research International. 2021;140:109854
  18. 18. Bintsis T. Department of Agricultural Technology, TEI of West Macedonia, 53100 Florina, Greece. Lactic acid bacteria as starter cultures: An update in their metabolism and genetics. AIMS Microbiology. 2018;4(4):665-684
  19. 19. Landete JM, Rodriguez H, De Las RB, Munoz R. High-added-value antioxidants obtained from the degradation of wine phenolics by lactobacillus plantarum. Journal of Food Protection. 2007;70(11):2670-2675
  20. 20. Zhou Y, Wang R, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Sun X, Zhang Q , et al. Biotransformation of phenolics and metabolites and the change in antioxidant activity in kiwifruit induced by Lactobacillus plantarum fermentation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2020;100(8):3283-3290
  21. 21. Kagkli DM, Corich V, Bovo B, Lante A, Giacomini A. Antiradical and antimicrobial properties of fermented red chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) by-products. Annals of Microbiology. 2016;66(4):1377-1386
  22. 22. Leonard W, Zhang P, Ying D, Adhikari B, Fang Z. Fermentation transforms the phenolic profiles and bioactivities of plant-based foods. Biotechnology Advances. 2021;49:107763
  23. 23. Feng Y, Zhang M, Mujumdar AS, Gao Z. Turmeric Extract: Potential Use as a Prebiotic and Anti-Inflammatory Compound? Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2017;65:40-48
  24. 24. Pianpumepong P, Anal AK, Doungchawee G, Noomhorm A. Study on enhanced absorption of phenolic compounds of Lactobacillus-fermented turmeric (Curcuma longa Linn.) beverages in rats. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. 2012;47(11):2380-2387
  25. 25. Singhal B, Pundhir A, Maurya A. In vitro evaluation of functional attributes of LABs for the development of turmeric based probiotic beverage. American Journal of Research Communication. 2016;4:141-173
  26. 26. Wang M, Lei M, Samina N, Chen L, Liu C, Yin T, et al. Impact of Lactobacillus plantarum 423 fermentation on the antioxidant activity and flavor properties of rice bran and wheat bran. Food Chemistry. 2020;330:127156
  27. 27. Mukherjee R, Chakraborty R, Dutta A. Comparison of optimization approaches (response surface methodology and artificial neural network-genetic algorithm) for a novel mixed culture approach in soybean meal fermentation. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 2019;42(5):e13124
  28. 28. Cheng Y, Wu T, Chu X, Tang S, Cao W, Liang F, et al. Fermented blueberry pomace with antioxidant properties improves fecal microbiota community structure and short chain fatty acids production in an in vitro mode. LWT. 2020;125:109260
  29. 29. Kwaw E, Ma Y, Tchabo W, Apaliya MT, Wu M, Sackey AS, et al. Effect of lactobacillus strains on phenolic profile, color attributes and antioxidant activities of lactic-acid-fermented mulberry juice. Food Chemistry. 2018;250:148-154
  30. 30. Lizardo RCM, Cho HD, Won YS, Seo KI. Fermentation with mono- and mixed cultures of Lactobacillus plantarum and L. casei enhances the phytochemical content and biological activities of cherry silverberry (Elaeagnus multiflora Thunb.) fruit. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2020;100(9):3687-3696
  31. 31. Frediansyah A, Romadhoni F, Nurhayati R, Wibowo AT. Fermentation of jamaican cherries juice using lactobacillus plantarum elevates antioxidant potential and inhibitory activity against type II diabetes-related enzymes. Molecules. 2021;26(10):2868
  32. 32. Goto M, Kuda T, Shikano A, Charrouf Z, Yamauchi K, Yokozawa M, et al. Induction of superoxide anion radical-scavenging c. LWT. 2019;100:56-61
  33. 33. Jung J, Jang HJ, Eom SJ, Choi NS, Lee N-K, Paik H-D. Fermentation of red ginseng extract by the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum KCCM 11613P: ginsenoside conversion and antioxidant effects. Journal of Ginseng Research. 2019;43(1):20-26
  34. 34. Marazza JA, Nazareno MA, de Giori GS, Garro MS. Enhancement of the antioxidant capacity of soymilk by fermentation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Journal of Functional Foods. 2012;4(3):594-601
  35. 35. Li Z, Teng J, Lyu Y, Hu X, Zhao Y, Wang M. Enhanced antioxidant activity for apple juice fermented with lactobacillus plantarum ATCC14917. Molecules. 2019;24(1):51
  36. 36. Li H, Huang J, Wang Y, Wang X, Ren Y, Yue T, et al. Study on the nutritional characteristics and antioxidant activity of dealcoholized sequentially fermented apple juice with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus plantarum fermentation. Food Chemistry. 2021;363:130351
  37. 37. Gao H, Wen J-J, Hu J-L, Nie Q-X, Chen H-H, Nie S-P, et al. Momordica charantia juice with Lactobacillus plantarum fermentation: Chemical composition, antioxidant properties and aroma profile. Food Bioscience. 2019;29:62-72
  38. 38. Wu S-C, Su Y-S, Cheng H-Y. Antioxidant properties of Lactobacillus-fermented and non-fermented Graptopetalum paraguayense E. Walther at different stages of maturity. Food Chemistry. 2011;129(3):804-809
  39. 39. Reque PM, Pinilla CMB, Tinello F, Corich V, Lante A, Giacomini A, et al. Biochemical and functional properties of wheat middlings bioprocessed by lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 2020;44(7):e13262
  40. 40. Tlais AZA, Da Ros A, Filannino P, Vincentini O, Gobbetti M, Di Cagno R. Biotechnological re-cycling of apple by-products: A reservoir model to produce a dietary supplement fortified with biogenic phenolic compounds. Food Chemistry. 2021;336:127616
  41. 41. Jin X, Chen W, Chen H, Chen W, Zhong Q. Combination of Lactobacillus plantarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae DV10 as Starter Culture to Produce Mango Slurry: Microbiological. Chemical Parameters and Antioxidant Activity. Molecules. 2019;24(23):4349
  42. 42. Mousavi ZE, Mousavi M. The effect of fermentation by Lactobacillus plantarum on the physicochemical and functional properties of liquorice root extract. LWT. 2019;105:164-168
  43. 43. Braga ARC, de Mesquita LMS, PLG M, Habu S, de Rosso VV. Lactobacillus fermentation of jussara pulp leads to the enzymatic conversion of anthocyanins increasing antioxidant activity. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2018;69:162-170
  44. 44. Vieira ADS, Battistini C, Bedani R, Saad SMI. Acerola by-product may improve the in vitro gastrointestinal resistance of probiotic strains in a plant-based fermented beverage. LWT. 2021;141:110858
  45. 45. Thompson HO, Önning G, Holmgren K, Strandler HS, Hultberg M. Fermentation of Cauliflower and White Beans with Lactobacillus plantarum—Impact on Levels of Riboflavin, Folate, Vitamin B12, and Amino Acid Composition. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 2020;75(2):236-242
  46. 46. Rizzello CG, Nionelli L, Coda R, De Angelis M, Gobbetti M. Effect of sourdough fermentation on stabilisation, and chemical and nutritional characteristics of wheat germ. Food Chemistry. 2010;119(3):1079-1089
  47. 47. Nancib A, Nancib N, Meziane-Cherif D, Boubendir A, Fick M, Boudrant J. Joint effect of nitrogen sources and B vitamin supplementation of date juice on lactic acid production by Lactobacillus casei subsp. rhamnosus. Bioresource Technology. 2005;96(1):63-67
  48. 48. Chauhan K, Trivedi U, Patel KC. Statistical screening of medium components by Plackett–Burman design for lactic acid production by Lactobacillus sp. KCP01 using date juice. Bioresource Technology. 2007;98(1):98-103
  49. 49. Bahry H, Abdalla R, Pons A, Taha S, Vial C. Optimization of lactic acid production using immobilized Lactobacillus Rhamnosus and carob pod waste from the Lebanese food industry. Journal of Biotechnology. 2019;306:81-88
  50. 50. Ngouénam JR, Momo Kenfack CH, Foko Kouam EM, Kaktcham PM, Maharjan R, Ngoufack FZ. Lactic acid production ability of Lactobacillus sp. from four tropical fruits using their by-products as carbon source. Heliyon. 2021;7(5):e07079
  51. 51. Kim J, Choi K-B, Park JH, Kim KH. Metabolite profile changes and increased antioxidative and antiinflammatory activities of mixed vegetables after fermentation by Lactobacillus plantarum. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0217180
  52. 52. Shahbazi R, Sharifzad F, Bagheri R, Alsadi N, Yasavoli-Sharahi H, Matar C. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of fermented plant foods. Nutrients. 2021;13(5):1516
  53. 53. Chon H, Kim G, Kim S. Comparison of aqueous plant extracts before and after fermentation with lactobacillus paracasei LS-2 on cytokine induction and antioxidant activity. Natural Product Communications. 2010;5(8):1934578X1000500827
  54. 54. Ali MS, Lee E-B, Lee S-J, Lee S-P, Boby N, Suk K, et al. Aronia melanocarpa extract fermented by lactobacillus plantarum EJ2014 modulates immune response in mice. Antioxidants. 2021;10(8):1276
  55. 55. Kim K, Lee G, Thanh HD, Kim J-H, Konkit M, Yoon S, et al. Exopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus plantarum LRCC5310 offers protection against rotavirus-induced diarrhea and regulates inflammatory response. Journal of Dairy Science. 2018;101(7):5702-5712
  56. 56. Kim S-B, Kang B-H, Kwon H-S, Kang J-H. Antiinflammatory and antiallergic activity of fermented turmeric by lactobacillus johnsonii IDCC 9203. Microbiology and Biotechnology Letters. 2011;39(3):266-273
  57. 57. Ghiamati Yazdi F, Soleimanian-Zad S, van den Worm E, Folkerts G. Turmeric extract: Potential use as a prebiotic and anti-inflammatory compound? Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2019;74(3):293-299
  58. 58. Yong CC, Yoon Y, Yoo HS, Oh S. Effect of lactobacillus fermentation on the anti-inflammatory potential of turmeric. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2019;29(10):1561-1569
  59. 59. Ayivi RD, Gyawali R, Krastanov A, Aljaloud SO, Worku M, Tahergorabi R, et al. Lactic acid bacteria: Food safety and human health applications. Dairy. 2020;1(3):202-232
  60. 60. Cotârleț M, Stănciuc N, Bahrim GE. Yarrowia lipolytica and lactobacillus paracasei solid state fermentation as a valuable biotechnological tool for the Pork Lard and Okara’s biotransformation. Microorganisms. 2020;8(8):1098
  61. 61. Kothari D, Lee W-D, Jung ES, Niu K-M, Lee CH, Kim S-K. Controlled fermentation using autochthonous lactobacillus plantarum improves antimicrobial potential of chinese chives against poultry pathogens. Antibiotics. 2020;9(7):386
  62. 62. Dallagnol AM, Pescuma M, De Valdez GF, Rollán G. Fermentation of quinoa and wheat slurries by Lactobacillus plantarum CRL 778: Proteolytic activity. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2013;97(7):3129-3140
  63. 63. Hashemi SMB, Mousavi Khaneghah A, Barba FJ, Nemati Z, Sohrabi Shokofti S, Alizadeh F. Fermented sweet lemon juice (Citrus limetta) using Lactobacillus plantarum LS5: Chemical composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities. Journal of Functional Foods. 2017;38:409-414
  64. 64. Beck MR, Garrett K, Marshall CJ, Olejar K, Bunt CR, Maxwell TMR, et al. Lactobacillus fermented plant extracts provided to yearling ewes improves their lambs’ antioxidant status at weaning. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2021;281:115103
  65. 65. Uerlings J, Schroyen M, Bautil A, Courtin C, Richel A, Sureda EA, et al. In vitro prebiotic potential of agricultural by-products on intestinal fermentation, gut barrier and inflammatory status of piglets. British Journal of Nutrition. 2020;123(3):293-307
  66. 66. Zhang Z-P, Ma J, He Y-Y, Lu J, Ren D-F. Antioxidant and hypoglycemic effects of diospyros lotus fruit fermented with Microbacterium flavum and Lactobacillus plantarum. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2018;125(6):682-687
  67. 67. Park S, Son H-K, Chang H-C, Lee J-J. Effects of cabbage-apple juice fermented by lactobacillus plantarum EM on lipid profile improvement and obesity amelioration in rats. Nutrients. 2020;12(4):1135
  68. 68. Ryu J-Y, Kang HR, Cho SK. Changes over the fermentation period in phenolic compounds and antioxidant and anticancer activities of blueberries fermented by lactobacillus plantarum. Journal of Food Science. 2019;84(8):2347-2356
  69. 69. Pontonio E, Dingeo C, Gobbetti M, Rizzello CG. Maize milling by-products: From food wastes to functional ingredients through lactic acid bacteria fermentation. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:561
  70. 70. Pontonio E, Dingeo C, Di Cagno R, Blandino M, Gobbetti M, Rizzello CG. Brans from hull-less barley, emmer and pigmented wheat varieties: From by-products to bread nutritional improvers using selected lactic acid bacteria and xylanase. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2020;313:108384
  71. 71. Chen H-Y, Hsieh C-W, Chen P-C, Lin S-P, Lin Y-F, Cheng K-C. Development and optimization of djulis sourdough bread fermented by lactic acid bacteria for antioxidant capacity. Molecules. 2021;26(18):5658
  72. 72. Schettino R, Pontonio E, Rizzello CG. Use of fermented hemp, chickpea and milling by-products to improve the nutritional value of semolina pasta. Foods. 2019;8(12):604
  73. 73. Brückner-Gühmann M, Banovic M, Drusch S. Towards an increased plant protein intake: Rheological properties, sensory perception and consumer acceptability of lactic acid fermented, oat-based gels. Food Hydrocolloids. 2019;96:201-208
  74. 74. Kachouri F, Hamdi M. Use lactobacillus plantarum in olive oil process and improvement of phenolic compounds content. Journal of Food Engineering. 2006;77(3):746-752
  75. 75. Ruiz-Barba J, Brenes-Balbuena M, Jiménez-Díaz R, García-García P, Garrido-Fernández A. Inhibition of Lactobacillus plantarum by polyphenols extracted from two different kinds of olive brine. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 1993;74(1):15-19
  76. 76. Leal-Sánchez MV, Ruiz-Barba JL, Sánchez AH, Rejano L, Jiménez-Dı́az R, Garrido A. Fermentation profile and optimization of green olive fermentation using lactobacillus plantarum LPCO10 as a starter culture. Food Microbiology. 2003;20(4):421-430
  77. 77. Landete JM, Curiel JA, Rodríguez H, de las Rivas B, Muñoz R. Study of the inhibitory activity of phenolic compounds found in olive products and their degradation by Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Food Chemistry. 2008;107(1):320-326
  78. 78. Ciafardini G, Marsilio V, Lanza B, Pozzi N. Hydrolysis of Oleuropein by Lactobacillus plantarum Strains Associated with Olive Fermentation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1994;60(11):4142-4147
  79. 79. Ruiz-Barba JL, Cathcart DP, Warner PJ, Jiménez-Díaz R. Use of Lactobacillus plantaru LPCO10, a Bacteriocin Producer, as a Starter Culture in Spanish-Style Green Olive Fermentations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1994;60(6):2059-2064
  80. 80. Kachouri F, Setti K, Ksontini H, Mechmeche M, Hamdi M. Improvement of antioxidant activity of olive mill wastewater phenolic compounds by Lactobacillus plantarum fermentation. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016;57(56):27125-27137
  81. 81. Tangyu M, Muller J, Bolten CJ, Wittmann C. Fermentation of plant-based milk alternatives for improved flavour and nutritional value. Applied and Microbiology Biotechnology. 2019;103(23-24):9263-9275
  82. 82. Do TVT, Fan L. Probiotic viability, qualitative characteristics, and sensory acceptability of vegetable juice mixture fermented with lactobacillus strains. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2019;10(04):412
  83. 83. Cui S, Zhao N, Lu W, Zhao F, Zheng S, Wang W, et al. Effect of different Lactobacillus species on volatile and nonvolatile flavor compounds in juices fermentation. Food Science & Nutrition. 2019;7(7):2214-2223
  84. 84. Bianchi F, Rossi EA, Gomes RG, Sivieri K. Potentially synbiotic fermented beverage with aqueous extracts of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) and soy. Food Science and Technology International. 2015;21(6):403-415
  85. 85. Yoon KY, Woodams EE, Hang YD. Production of probiotic cabbage juice by lactic acid bacteria. Bioresource Technology. 2006;97(12):1427-1430
  86. 86. Lavinia BC, Manea I, Bratu MG, Avram D, Nicolescu CL. Evaluation of the cabbage and cucumber juices as substrate for Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5. Romanian Biotechnological Letters. 2012;17(4):12
  87. 87. Karovičová J, Drdák M, Greif G, Hybenová E. The choice of strains of Lactobacillus species for the lactic acid fermentation of vegetable juices. European Food Research and Technology. 1999;210(1):53-56
  88. 88. Jang H, Kim M. Characteristics of vegetable juice fermented with lactobacillus plantarum MKHA15 and leuconostoc mesenteroids MKSR. Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association. 2019;25(4):281-294
  89. 89. Dunkley KE, Hekmat S. Development of probiotic vegetable juice using Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GR-1. Nutrition & Food Science. 2020;50(5):955-968
  90. 90. Hashemi SMB, Jafarpour D. Fermentation of bergamot juice with Lactobacillus plantarum strains in pure and mixed fermentations: Chemical composition, antioxidant activity and sensorial properties. LWT. 2020;131:109803
  91. 91. Gupta S, Jaiswal AK, Abu-Ghannam N. Optimization of fermentation conditions for the utilization of brewing waste to develop a nutraceutical rich liquid product. Industrial Crops and Products. 2013;44:272-282
  92. 92. Oktaviani L, Astuti DI, Rosmiati M, Abduh MY. Fermentation of coffee pulp using indigenous lactic acid bacteria with simultaneous aeration to produce cascara with a high antioxidant activity. Heliyon. 2020;6(7):e04462
  93. 93. Nguyen NK, Dong NTN, Nguyen HT, Le PH. Lactic acid bacteria: promising supplements for enhancing the biological activities of kombucha. SpringerPlus. 2015;4(1):91
  94. 94. Nguyen NK, Dong NTN, Le PH, Nguyen HT. Evaluation of the glucuronic acid production and other biological activities of fermented sweeten-black tea by kombucha layer and the co-culture with different lactobacillus sp. strains. International Journal Of Modern Engineering Research. 2014;4(5):12-17
  95. 95. Hou J, Luo R, Ni H, Li K, Mgomi FC, Fan L, et al. Antimicrobial potential of kombucha against foodborne pathogens: A review. qas. 2021;13(3):53-61
  96. 96. Park JH, Kim Y, Kim SH. Green tea extract (camellia sinensis) fermented by lactobacillus fermentum attenuates alcohol-induced liver damage. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 2012;76(12):2294-2300
  97. 97. Cherdthong A, Suntara C, Khota W. Lactobacillus casei TH14 and additives could modulate the quality, gas kinetics and the in vitro digestibility of ensilaged rice straw. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2020;104(6):1690-1703
  98. 98. Xu Z, He H, Zhang S, Kong J. Effects of inoculants Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus parafarraginis on the fermentation characteristics and microbial communities of corn stover silage. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):13614
  99. 99. Irsyammawati A, Ndaru PH. The effect of lactobacillus plantarum addition and fermentation periods on nutritive value dwarf elephant grass (pennisetum purpureum cv mott) silage. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environmental Science. 2020;478:012049
  100. 100. Zhao J, Dong Z, Li J, Chen L, Bai Y, Jia Y, et al. Evaluation of Lactobacillus plantarum MTD1 and waste molasses as fermentation modifier to increase silage quality and reduce ruminal greenhouse gas emissions of rice straw. Science of The Total Environment. 2019;688:143-152
  101. 101. Mu L, Xie Z, Hu L, Chen G, Zhang Z. Lactobacillus plantarum and molasses alter dynamic chemical composition, microbial community, and aerobic stability of mixed (amaranth and rice straw) silage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2021;101(12):5225-5235
  102. 102. Risdianto D, Suthama N, Suprijatna E, Sunarso S. Inclusion effect of ginger and turmeric mixture combined with Lactobacillus spp. isolated from rumen fluid of cattle on health status and growth of broiler. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture. 2019;44(4):423
  103. 103. Dedenaro G, Costa S, Rugiero I, Pedrini P, Tamburini E. Valorization of agri-food waste via fermentation: Production of l-lactic acid as a building block for the synthesis of biopolymers. Applied Sciences. 2016;6(12):379
  104. 104. Ricci A, Diaz AB, Caro I, Bernini V, Galaverna G, Lazzi C, et al. Orange peels: From by-product to resource through lactic acid fermentation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2019;99(15):6761-6767
  105. 105. Hwang HJ, Lee SY, Kim SM, Lee SB. Fermentation of seaweed sugars by Lactobacillus species and the potential of seaweed as a biomass feedstock. Biotechnol Bioproc E. 2011;16(6):1231-1239
  106. 106. Zhang Y, Vadlani PV, Kumar A, Hardwidge PR, Govind R, Tanaka T, et al. Enhanced D-lactic acid production from renewable resources using engineered Lactobacillus plantarum. Applied and Microbiology Biotechnology. 2016;100(1):279-288
  107. 107. Zhang Y, Vadlani PV. d-Lactic acid biosynthesis from biomass-derived sugars via Lactobacillus delbrueckii fermentation. Bioprocess and Biosystem Engineering. 2013;36(12):1897-1904
  108. 108. Göksungur Y, Güvenç U. Batch and continuous production of lactic acid from beet molasses by lactobacillus delbrueckii IFO 3202. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology. 1997;69(4):399-404
  109. 109. Li Z, Ding S, Li Z, Tan T. L-lactic acid production by Lactobacillus casei fermentation with corn steep liquor-supplemented acid-hydrolysate of soybean meal. Biotechnology Journal. 2006;1(12):1453-1458
  110. 110. Tu W-L, Hsu T-C, Wang C-A, Guo G-L, Chao Y. Using novel lactobacillus plantarum to produce lactic acid from lignocellulosic biomass in an integrated simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process. BioResources. 2019;14(2):3873-3885
  111. 111. Xu Q , Zang Y, Zhou J, Liu P, Li X, Yong Q , et al. Highly efficient production of d-lactic acid from chicory-derived inulin by Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Bioprocess and Biosystem Engineering. 2016;39(11):1749-1757
  112. 112. John RP, Nampoothiri KM, Pandey A. Solid-state fermentation for l-lactic acid product. Process Biochemistry. 2006;41(4):759-763
  113. 113. Sharma P, Sharma A, Singh J, Singh N, Singh S, Tomar GS, et al. Co-production of gamma amino butyric acid (GABA) and lactic acid using Lactobacillus plantarum LP-9 from agro-residues. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2021;23:101650
  114. 114. Park J-H, Garcia CV, Lee S-P. Fortification of poly-γ-glutamic acid and γ-aminobutyric acid in homogenized hydroponic ginseng co-fermented by bacillus subtilis ha and lactobacillus plantarum EJ2014. Preventive Nutrition and Food Science. 2019;24(4):485-491
  115. 115. Lee B-J, Kim J-S, Kang YM, Lim J-H, Kim Y-M, Lee M-S, et al. Antioxidant activity and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) content in sea tangle fermented by Lactobacillus brevis BJ20 isolated from traditional fermented foods. Food Chemistry. 2010;122(1):271-276
  116. 116. Vecino X, Rodríguez-López L, Gudiña EJ, Cruz JM, Moldes AB, Rodrigues LR. Vineyard pruning waste as an alternative carbon source to produce novel biosurfactants by Lactobacillus paracasei. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2017;55:40-49

Written By

Morgan Le Rouzic, Pauline Bruniaux, Cyril Raveschot, François Krier, Vincent Phalip, Rozenn Ravallec, Benoit Cudennec and François Coutte

Submitted: 17 December 2021 Reviewed: 15 April 2022 Published: 22 July 2022