Open access peer-reviewed chapter

An Overview of Poultry Meat Quality and Myopathies

Written By

Basheer Nusairat, Guillermo Tellez-Isaias and Rasha Qudsieh

Submitted: 23 November 2021 Reviewed: 11 March 2022 Published: 17 May 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.104474

From the Edited Volume

Broiler Industry

Edited by Guillermo Tellez-Isaias, Juan D. Latorre and Yordan Martínez-Aguilar

Chapter metrics overview

508 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The increased demand for poultry meat and the shift toward portioned and further processed products has been accompanied by genetic improvement and progress in nutrition and management to increase growth rates and improve feed efficiency. Animal protein continues to be the most demanded and expensive protein source worldwide. Poultry is an animal protein commonly accepted among different faith groups and relatively more affordable than other animal protein sources. In addition, poultry meat has lower fat, cholesterol, and sodium content compared to red meat. This review aims at summarizing the available information about skeletal muscle structure, conversion of muscle to meat and how it affects poultry meat quality, the different myopathies historically been identified and other emerging myopathies, then discussing how meat quality affects consumer perception and consumption trends, and finally discussing few of the proposed solutions to overcome the issues of decreased meat quality, including nutritional strategies.

Keywords

  • meat quality
  • nutrition
  • muscle myopathies
  • color
  • poultry

1. Introduction

The poultry industry has witnessed significant improvements over the past several decades achieving higher market weight with improved feed efficiency, thus reducing production cost. During the past 60 years, the amount of time and quantity of feed per pound of meat required to reach broiler market weight had been reduced by 50% [1]; furthermore, according to the National Chicken Council [2], modern broiler chickens can achieve market weight 16 days earlier with 35% higher weight compared to the 1960s broiler chicken. These improvements have resulted from a combination of genetic improvement and progress in nutrition and poultry management.

The U.S. is considered the world’s largest producer of poultry meat; the U.S. provides approximately 17% of the global poultry meat output, followed by Brazil and China, mainly dominated by broiler meat followed by turkey meat and a small fraction for other poultry meat. The production and consumption of poultry meat have increased rapidly worldwide and are expected to continue to grow [3] due to its relatively low price compared to other meats, the absence of cultural or religious obstacles, and its dietary and nutritional properties as it has lower fat, cholesterol, and sodium content [4] with an increased preference of white chicken meat [5, 6].

Additionally, consumers have shifted from the consumption of whole chicken toward portioned (especially breast fillets) and further processed products [7, 8]. These changes were driven by the need for convenience with meal preparation in a fast-paced industrialized era and meeting consumer preference of specific carcass parts. The poultry industry has responded to these changing demands by further enhancing genetic selection for increased breast yield, faster growth rate, and improved feed efficiency. Meanwhile, feed cost has increased, and ethanol production has forced producers to use alternative feed ingredients such as the distiller's dried grains with solubles (DDGS) produced as byproducts of ethanol production. However, since the selection of broiler chickens initially focused on increasing growth performance and improving body composition [9], this has led to indirect and often deleterious effects on meat quality traits, such as excessive deposition of abdominal fat, the formation of which represented the inefficient use of feed [10, 11]. Coincidently, several studies have shown an increased incidence of abnormalities, mainly in breast muscles [12, 13]. In the early 1980s, Wight and Siller [14] recognized an abnormal condition in the pectoralis minor, in which the muscle is basically “suffocated” leading to ischemic necrosis; this condition known as deep pectoral muscle myopathy is only the first in a list of fast-growth-related muscle abnormalities that eventually affect meat quality and its functional properties.

In poultry meat, appearance and texture have been considered the two most important attributes responsible for initial consumer meat evaluation and final product acceptance [15], so consumers are expected to reject meat with observed defects such as bruises and hemorrhages. Several appearance defects have been reported in the poultry industry, such as pinking of raw and cooked meat, bone darkening, red/bloody discoloration, white striping, wooden breast, spaghetti meat, and pale, soft, exudative appearance of breast meat. However, many of the underlying causes of appearance defects have not been fully explained. Understanding the structural organization of the muscle fibers and physiology can help in explaining some of these defects.

Advertisement

2. Overview of skeletal muscle structure

The basic structural unit of a muscle has been defined as the muscle fiber, which is constituted of several myofibrils (contractile units). Each muscle fiber is surrounded by a connective tissue called the endomysium; muscle fibers are then grouped into fascicles and surrounded by another layer of connective tissue called the perimysium. Then, the whole muscle is made up of a group of fascicles and surrounded by epimysium that connected the muscle to bones. Collagen is the major constituent of these connective tissues. These connective tissues influenced muscle development and subsequent meat quality.

Skeletal muscles growth was achieved by increasing the size of preexisting muscle fibers (hypertrophy). The number, size, and type of fibers vary with the function and anatomical location of the muscle. Meat quality is also affected by these factors. A muscle that contained high proportion of oxidative fibers tends to have red color due to a greater amount of myoglobin (e.g., thigh muscles) as compared to glycolytic fibers, which tended to appear white in color, which affected the appearance of muscle/meat (e.g., chicken breast muscle). Glycolytic fibers are larger and have lower rate of protein turnover. Therefore, the white muscles are larger and more efficient. In poultry, genetic selection for increased breast yield resulted in pale breast meat color in broilers [16], ducks [17], and turkeys [18], which could result in poor meat quality.

Collagen is the most abundant protein in the body and in connective tissues. The structure of collagen supports its function of providing strength to muscle and other tissues with more than 20 different types of collagen identified in vertebrates [19]. Glycine constitutes about one-third of all the amino acids found in collagen, while proline, which has been classified as an imino acid, and its analog hydroxyproline also constituted about one-third of all amino acids in collagen [20]. Lysine has been considered to be another constituent of collagen where both proline and lysine are covalently modified to hydroxyproline and hydroxylysine, respectively. A collagen molecule (tropocollagen) is composed of three left-handed polypeptide helices coiled around each other to form a right-handed supercoil where glycine is found at every third residue [19].

The strength of the collagen fibrils is due to the covalent bonds formed between and within tropocollagen triple helices, where collagen is cross-linked by lysine side chains that contribute to the strength of the collagen in meat, which has an essential role in the development of meat tenderness [21]. Furthermore, in a recent study, it has been shown that muscle with spaghetti meat abnormality had an altered immunoreactivity to specifically procollagen type III (precursor of collagen type III) suggesting a possible defect in the collagen turnover and synthesis process [22], while Sanden et al. [23] reported that spaghetti meat has poorly packed thin, loose, and immature collagen fiber bundles.

2.1 Conversion of muscle to meat

The process of converting muscle to meat in poultry starts immediately upon sacrificing the bird. Exsanguination results in blood/oxygen supply removal, during which the muscle tries to maintain its functions even after oxygen depletion through the anaerobic glycolysis of its glycogen reserves to produce adenosine triphosphate (ATP), but in the absence of blood supply to remove waste, the accumulated heat and lactic acid in the muscle decreases the pH. Owing to ATP depletion, the muscle remains contracted due to actin and myosin binding that leads to muscle stiffness (rigor mortis). This marks the onset of rigor mortis and the conversion of muscle to meat, where muscle proteins start to denature due to high temperature and low pH. Temperature and pH are the main postmortem factors influencing meat quality through affecting the onset and progression of rigor mortis and subsequent resolution [24, 25, 26, 27]. During resolution, the proteolysis of Z-disk proteins takes place, and myofibrillar proteins degrade into myofibrillar fragments by proteolytic enzymes that affect meat tenderness. In chickens, the process of converting muscle to meat has been found to start immediately after slaughter and be resolved within 2–4 h. The extent of meat tenderization postmortem could be altered by the conditions under which the meat is processed. Factors include temperature and chilling duration, deboning time, postchill aging/holding duration, and marination.

2.2 Poultry meat quality

Meat quality is a collective term used to describe the indicators of a meat product wholesomeness and freshness, such as color, texture, flavor, pH, and juiciness. The two most important quality attributes for poultry meat are appearance and texture since they influence the initial consumer selection of a product as well as final satisfaction [15]. Appearance quality attributes include skin color, meat color, and appearance defects such as bruises and hemorrhages. Any deviation from a normal appearance would result in meat product rejection, subsequently leading to consumer complaints. Despite the importance of these quality attributes, the poultry grading system used is still based on aesthetic attributes, such as conformation, presence or absence of carcass defects, bruises, missing parts, and skin tears, without taking into consideration the functional properties of meat [28], which have been important for the further processing industry that was mainly interested in the functional properties of meat; the importance of incorporating functional properties and quality indicators is becoming increasingly important as the recent muscle myopathies not only affect consumer acceptance based on appearance but also the quality of further processed meat manufactured using meat with such defects.

Many factors influence poultry meat quality, including sex, strain, age, environmental factors, exercise, diet, and processing practices mainly focused on chilling, deboning time, marination, and electrical stunning [29, 30, 31, 32].

Another important quality attribute that influences customer perception is the tenderness of the meat. This attribute comes second after appearance; consumers usually correlate acceptable appearance with better quality and tenderness. Tenderness development is a function of myofibrillar protein denaturation, connective tissue content, and juiciness. Deboning time, age, and strain are some of the major factors that affect poultry meat tenderness [31, 33]. Lyon and Lyon [34] reported that as the time before deboning increased from 0 to 24 h postmortem, consumer acceptability of the meat texture increased, with fillets deboned at 0 and 2 h postmortem considered tough by a consumer panel, and samples deboned at 6 and 24 h postmortem considered slightly tender to moderately tender. Liu et al. [35] reported a decreased shear force of chicken breast as deboning time increased from 2 to 24 h postmortem. Similar results were also reported by Cavitt et al. [33].

Furthermore, Mehaffey et al. [8] reported that fillets deboned 2 or 4 h postmortem from broilers raised to 7 weeks were significantly tougher than those raised to 6 weeks, indicating that age affected tenderness when deboning was performed shortly after harvest. Northcutt et al. [31] reported that breast fillets harvested at less than 2 h postchill aging were tenderer when taken from broilers slaughtered at 42 or 44 days of age than those harvested from birds 49 or 51 days of age, irrespective of any sex effect. On the other hand, Young et al. [36] reported that females had greater fillet yields than males.

Connective tissue content has been reported to increase with age and is correlated with tenderness; as mentioned earlier, collagen is the most abundant protein in the body, making up the majority of the connective tissue proteins [37, 38]. In young broilers (6–8 weeks), it is expected that connective tissue would not affect tenderness since mature cross-links should have not yet formed between tropocollagen molecules, which are the structural units of the collagen fibril. On the other hand, the contraction of myofibrillar protein, which depends upon time and rate of rigor mortis development after the bird is sacrificed, is related to processing rather than intrinsic factors [15]. Furthermore, tenderness, indirectly associated with connective tissue, is one of the quality attributes that are negatively affected by the emerging muscle myopathies emphasizing the importance of further investigating and attempting to mitigate the negative impacts.

Another important meat quality attribute is meat juiciness, or water-holding capacity, which refers to the ability of raw meat to retain its inherent water during force application and/or processing [39]. Water in muscle has been divided into three general types: bound, immobilized, and free. Bound water is held tightly via myofibrillar protein charges and represents 4–5% of water in muscle [39, 40]; it is resistant to freezing and could only be removed by severe drying processes, not including conventional cooking [41]. Immobilized water is found within the muscle ultrastructure (within the space between actin and myosin), but it is not bound to myofibrillar proteins as in the case of bound water. Immobilized water accounts for the largest portion of muscle-bound water (88–95%). Finally, free water is held within muscle by weak capillary forces [42].

2.3 Poultry meat color

Poultry has been determined to be the only species known to have muscles/parts with apparent differences in color, as meat from poultry has been classified as either white or dark. In chicken, fresh raw breast meat is expected to have a pale pink color, while the raw thigh and leg meat are darker and redder. Meat color plays a significant role in consumer purchase decisions [43, 44, 45]. Consumers tend to associate color with flavor, tenderness, safety, storage time, nutritional value, and satisfaction level [46], and as an indicator of freshness and wholesomeness.

Meat color is what the human eye sees as light is reflected from the meat surface. Poultry meat absorbs most blue and green color spectra and reflects most of the yellow, orange, and red color spectra, which is what the human eye perceives.

The most commonly used colorimetric scale is the CIE Lab [47], even though other color scales have been used, such as the Hunter L, a, b, and YXZ space. However, the accuracy of these instruments has depended upon thickness, background color, and illuminant wavelengths [48, 49].

The CIE Lab system components measures include L* that refers to lightness and has a range from 0 to 100 (black to white), component a* had a range from –60 to +60 (green if negative to red if positive), and b* has the same range as a* (blue if negative to yellow if positive) [50, 51]. Another more recent system used for color measurement is the computer vision system, which has been shown to give reproducible results with the ability to measure the color of the entire sample instead of specific spots, as has been the case with widely used colorimeters [52]; in fact, Tomasevic et al. [53] recommended using computer vision program as a superior approach for poultry color determination.

Meat color is mainly related to the myoglobin pigment present in the muscle fibers. Myoglobin consists of a protein (globin) and a nonprotein heme ring, which has an iron molecule in its center. Iron can bind one of several ligands (e.g., oxygen, carbon monoxide, and nitric oxide) on its sixth coordination site. The forms of myoglobin (deoxymyoglobin, oxymyoglobin, carboxymyoglobin, and metmyoglobin) differ depending upon the ligand bound to iron and on the redox state of the iron. Thus, myoglobin and iron states are the two main ways through which meat color changes.

Myoglobin (or deoxymyoglobin) has a red-purple color in its nature when not bound to any ligands; the state of myoglobin changes to oxymyoglobin when oxygen is present and to carboxymyoglobin when carbon dioxide is present. In both the forms, the color is bright red (bloom), and iron is in the reduced ferrous form (Fe++). The oxidation of myoglobin changes the form to metmyoglobin and the iron to the oxidized ferric form (Fe+++), which has a brown color. These myoglobin color changes are reversible; however, if heat-treated, metmyoglobin becomes denatured and color changes irreversibly to grayish-brown. Curing with nitrites/nitrates causes an irreversible color change to red color that, upon heating, converts to pink. The replacement of iron with zinc results in a stable red color of myoglobin due to the formation of Zn-protoporphyrin IX (ZPP), which has been shown to give Parma ham its stable, bright red color [54, 55]. Within a chicken carcass, chicken breast muscles are mainly composed of white fibers (glycolytic) that have low myoglobin content. Thus, breast meat appears white, while thigh muscles are composed of red fiber (oxidative) and appears darker. Fleming et al. [56] reported a myoglobin concentration of 0.16 and 0.30 mg/g in broiler breast and thigh muscles, respectively. Furthermore, Miller [57] said a lower myoglobin content of 0.01 and 0.40 mg/g in white and dark meat of 8-week-old broilers, respectively.

Froning [58] classified the factors influencing meat color into three main categories (Table 1). Smith et al. [59] investigated the effect of age, diet (carbohydrate source), and feed withdrawal on broiler meat color by slaughtering birds each day from 42 to 45 and 49 to 52 days of age with a carbohydrate source that was either corn, milo, or wheat, with feed withdrawal times of either 0 or 8 h. Color was not affected by age. Still, feed withdrawal increased fillet lightness (L*) from an average of 46.1 to 48.9, decreased redness (a*) from 4.1 to 3.1, and increased yellowness (b*) from 2.8 to 3.7. Fillets from the birds fed the wheat diet were lighter than fillets from the corn or milo fed birds. The milo diet resulted in redder fillets than corn or wheat diets, while the corn diet produced more yellow fillets than milo or wheat diets.

Heme pigments
  • Myoglobin, hemoglobin, cytochrome c, and their derivatives

  • Presence of ligands complexing with heme pigments

Preslaughter factors
  • Genetics (fast growing strains)

  • Feed (e.g., moldy feed)

  • Feed withdrawal time

  • Hauling and handling stress

  • Heat and cold stress

  • Preslaughter gaseous environment of the bird

Slaughter, chilling, and further processing
  • Stunning techniques

  • Presence of nitrates

  • Additives and pH (e.g., phosphates, salt)

  • End-point cooking temperature

  • Reducing conditions

  • Washing surimi-like processing of mechanically

  • deboned poultry meat (MDPM)

  • Irradiation

Table 1.

Factors influencing poultry meat color [58].

In addition to meat color, skin color has been considered a critical quality attribute, mainly in a whole carcass and skin-on cuts sale. The color of poultry skin has varied from cream-colored to yellow. This variation is primarily the result of genetic variation and natural pigments in feed. Birds had differed in their ability to deposit the black melanin pigment in the epidermis and dermis layers of the skin and varied in their ability to deposit carotenoids from the feed as the combinations of different amounts of melanin and carotenoids produced different skin colors. However, in commercial strains, the ability to deposit melanin has been eliminated through genetic selection. Different skin colors as adopted from [60] are illustrated in Table 2.

Skin colorDermisEpidermis
WhiteNoneNone
BlackMelaninMelanin
YellowNoneXanthophyll
GreenMelaninXanthophyll
Blue (Slate)MelaninNone

Table 2.

Combination of possible skin colors due to dietary xanthophyll deposition in epidermis or melanin production in either dermis or epidermis [60].

However, considerable variation in color and discoloration of poultry meat has occurred and remains of great concern for the industry. Discoloration may occur in the entire muscle or only in a portion of a muscle due to bruising or broken blood vessels [58]. Possible poultry color defects are presented in Table 3.

DefectDescriptionPossible causes
Bruises and hemorrhagesClassic bruises, pin-point blood spots in meat, blood accumulation along bones and in jointsPhysical trauma, nutrient deficiencies, mycotoxins, stunning
OverscaldingIncomplete removal of epidermis, cooked discoloration on surface of meatToo high scalding temperature, too long in scalder
Surface dryingMottled appearance of skin or meat due to surface dehydrationIncomplete removal of epidermis, exposed meat, poor packaging, freezer burn
Heme reactionsNormal color ranges from raw pink meat, tan to brown raw meat, grey to brown cooked meat, pink cooked meat, cured meat colorOxidative or redox state of the myoglobin, myoglobin complexing with nitrates/nitrites or other compounds such as carbon monoxide
Dark meatDarker than normal appearing meat, possible mottlingHigh muscle pH due to antemortem depletion of muscle glycogen
Light meatPale breast meatLow muscle pH (PSE-like condition)
Dark bonesDark brown to black bonesFreezing, blood accumulation around bone

Table 3.

Summary of poultry color defects [60].

2.4 Poultry meat color defects

2.4.1 Pink discoloration of cooked white meat

The pinking of cooked white meat has been an undesirable color defect found in poultry; its occurrence was noticed sporadically and has negatively influenced consumer purchasing decisions (Maga, I994). According to Maga [61], pink color might have resulted from the presence of high levels of myoglobin that were not completely denatured during heat processing, incidental nitrate/nitrite contamination either in feed or water or during processing. The presence of carbon monoxide and nitric oxide gases in oven gas while roasting has caused pink color on the surface of turkey meat, with carcasses from younger turkeys more susceptible than older ones [62]. The proposed mechanism for pink color development of fully cooked is related to the ligands to which the denatured myoglobin was bound, such as amino acids, denatured proteins, and nitrogen-containing compounds that form denatured hemochromes globin. Therefore, depending on the ligand to which the denatured heme will bind, different pink shades would result.

Binding of nitric oxide to myoglobin from preslaughter contamination (feed and water and gases from the truck exhaust) or during/after processing (processing water, ice, spice mix, and oven gas) has formed the pink nitric oxide myoglobin that, upon cooking, was converted to pink nitrosohemochrome. Furthermore, carbon monoxide binding to myoglobin has led to pink carboxymyoglobin developing upon cooking in oven gases or during irradiation.

Cooking meat harvested from birds before rigor mortis resolution could also cause pink color when meat is cooked when pH was higher than 6.0. At this high pH, myoglobin is not denatured, and cytochrome C (electron transport protein), which is heat stable, increases and contributes to the delayed denaturation of myoglobin since cytochrome C is still able to deliver electrons to myoglobin. Ahn and Maurer [63] showed that a pH above 6.4 leads to binding of myoglobin and hemoglobin with most naturally present ligands, such as histidine, cysteine, methionine, nicotinamide, and solubilized proteins, which leads to pink color of the meat. At high pH, amino acids and protein ligands can donate electrons to Fe, resulting in stable pink ferrohemochrome. High pH also reduces the susceptibility of meat pigments and lipids to oxidation resulting in a cooked pink color [64].

2.4.2 Bone darkening or discoloration

Bone darkening has been described as a dark reddish brown or black discoloration on the surface of bone and muscle adjacent to the bone after cooking. The darkening was due to bone marrow passing from inside the bone onto the bone surface and adjacent tissue, usually after freezing the meat [65, 66] and after cooking of the frozen meat [67]. Lyon and Lyon [30] described the variation in bone discoloration due to different preparation methods (precook, freeze, and reheat). They found that freezing before cooking increased the severity of discoloration more than cooking followed by freezing and reheating. Lyon et al. [65] demonstrated that meat and bone darkening of thigh pieces was related to pigment migration from the femur to muscle tissue. The commercial further processing industry has reported that redness was usually accompanied by blood in bone-in chicken carcasses and parts, which consumers could reject as the product appears undercooked and unsafe for consumption [59].

The migration of pigments from the femur to muscle tissues has created darkening that was more prevalent in younger birds since their bones were less calcified, were more porous, and had more red marrow than older birds. The epiphysis of long bones in older birds is more calcified than young birds, so the pigment is more difficult to escape from bones onto surrounding tissue. However, bone darkening only affects the appearance and not the organoleptic properties of the meat product [67].

Smith and Northcutt [59] studied discoloration prevalence in commercially fully cooked breasts, thighs, and drumsticks from various market sources. They speculated that about 11% of products could face consumer complaints or rejection since they were severely discolored. Furthermore, cooking chicken breast samples with bone marrow collected from femurs increased the darkness and redness of both raw and cooked broiler meat [68].

2.4.3 Red discoloration of white meat

Red and/or bloody discoloration of poultry meat, raw or cooked, has been a chronic yet sporadic problem for the poultry industry. Raw breast meat with red discoloration is objectionable to many customers, and cooked white or dark meat with red defect is unacceptable to consumers due to the perception that it is undercooked. Red discoloration of white meat is closely related to bone darkening but with higher redness. Little research has been available concerning this red discoloration defect in poultry meat [59]. According to Smith and Northcutt [66], bone marrow is an effective inducer of red, bloody discoloration in breast meat samples. In a previous investigation conducted concerning the color of different parts of chicken, Lyon et al. [65] reported that the initial color of breast was lighter and less red than thighs because breasts had a lower proportion of total bone area to muscle mass, fewer large, calcified bones, a lower proportion of blood vessels per muscle mass (less hemoglobin), or lower myoglobin content than thighs or drums [66].

The bright red color development has been investigated in Parma ham, where this north Italian traditional dry-cured ham “Prosciutto di Parma (Parma ham)” has been made from only the legs of fattened pigs and was salted with sea salt, dried, and matured over 1 year [69]. It was initially postulated that sea salt used was contaminated with nitrate/nitrite. However, that was later investigated, and results showed that this pigment was also formed in a nitrate/nitrite-free environment and that endogenous enzymes as well as microorganisms were involved in this pigment formation [54, 55]. These results suggested that the bright red color in Parma ham is caused by Zn-protoporphyrin IX (ZPP), in which the iron in heme was substituted by zinc heme separated from the native heme protein. Investigations on this lipophylic myoglobin derivative showed that it was a stable red pigment that increased with aging [70]. This process has now been patented for producing red pigments for food use that were heat-stable [71]. The addition of salt accelerated the reaction and increased redness [72]. The process has also occurred in live animals, including humans, as lead poisoning and iron deficiency caused an increase of ZPP in blood as zinc replaced the iron in hemoglobin. The level of ZPP can be evaluated with a simple screening test using a hematofluorometer. The measurement of ZPP has been used with ducks to test for lead poisoning [73]. An increased ZPP/heme ratio indicates that Zn has replaced Fe in the heme, thus changing the color of hemoglobin and myoglobin. Based on findings in Parma ham, ZPP may be responsible for the red discoloration in poultry meat, which could be formed in myoglobin found in muscles or hemoglobin stored in bone marrow. Thus, ZPP leaking out of the bones could cause the increased stable redness observed in white meat.

2.4.4 Green discoloration

Green discoloration of live muscles, raw meat, and cooked deli products can be produced by various mechanisms that lead to condemnation by the industry and consumers. In live muscles, green muscle disease (deep muscle myopathy) is caused by the lack of blood supply to the deep pectoral muscle that results in the death of the muscle fibers, thus giving the muscle a green appearance. The bruising of live birds has caused a rupture of blood capillaries and blood accumulation under the skin or in the meat. The color of the bruise subsequently developed over time and turned either yellow or green depending upon heme degradation. Using lactic acid as a decontamination approach resulted in the greening of chicken skin color [74]. The irradiation of fresh beef and pork meat has been thought to affect the stability of iron in the myoglobin and cause the breakdown of the porphyrin molecule and/or the formation of sulfmyoglobin that caused green pigments to appear [75].

In cooked meat, contamination with microorganisms such as Pseudomonas fluorescens has produced a shiny transparent greenish exudate on the meat surface due to microbial degradation of the heme pigment. In sausage-type products, the presence of green rings is an indicator of microbial contamination where the microorganisms oxidized the heme pigment before applying thermal treatment.

Iridescence, which is the appearance of a green-orange color on the surface of meat products such as deli meat, is mainly associated with the meat surface microstructure that could be interpreted as a color diffraction problem related to the ability of certain muscles to split the white light into its component. Thus, the reflection of the meat surface would appear in green-orange. If a sharp knife was used to cut the meat, the smooth surface resulting from the cut causes this color diffraction, but if a dull knife was used instead, this problem would be eliminated.

Advertisement

3. Existing and emerging muscle myopathies

3.1 Breast muscle myopathy

Deep pectoral muscle myopathy, also known as green muscle disease and Oregon disease, was first identified in turkeys [76] and later in broiler breeders [77] and 7-week-old broiler chickens [78]. This disease affected the wing elevating muscle (M. supracoracoideus or pectoralis minor) and was characterized by the death of the muscle (tenders) but did not cause the death of the bird. Dead muscle decay, while the bird was still alive, resulted in the appearance of a yellowish-green color due to the breakdown of hemoglobin and myoglobin to bile salts; muscle myopathy could affect just one (unilateral) or both (bilateral) pectoralis minor muscles. Since affected tenders were located deep in the breast, this defect resulted in consumer complaints when the carcasses were sold as a whole.

The pectoralis minor muscle is confined in a tight space between the sternum and the pectoralis major muscle (large breast fillet). It is also encased in a rigid fibrous sheath that restricts any increase in muscle volume in response to any physiological changes caused by muscle exercise such as wing-flapping [79] which requires increased blood flow to supply the oxygen and nutrients needed by the muscles. The incidence of green muscle disease has also been reported to be higher in high yielding crosses, especially males.

On the other hand, the incidence of focal pectoral myopathy has increased, and it has been associated with increased growth rate and muscle size [12, 80]. Further investigation is required to determine the causes of this muscular defect since focal myopathy has an even more detrimental effect on the poultry industry. It has affected the pectoralis major muscle leading to consumer complaints and industry economic loss.

3.2 Pale, soft, and exudative-like condition in poultry muscles

The incidence of pale, soft, and exudative (PSE) meat has been well-documented in swine, where meat has a very light gray color, soft texture, and cannot hold water [81, 82]. This condition has been associated with heavy muscling [83]. In poultry, similar PSE characteristics have been reported in turkey meat [84, 85], chickens [86, 87], and ostriches [88]. However, it is more difficult to distinguish and identify these characteristics in poultry meat compared to pork. This condition has been referred to as PSE since characteristics were similar to PSE in pork, which is misleading since both conditions were not exactly the same. Poultry researchers have preferred to refer to the condition in poultry as “PSE-like” or “Pale poultry muscle syndrome” [86, 89]. The PSE and PSE-like conditions are detrimental to the industry profitability since it affects important meat quality attributes involved in the production of value-added products and further processed meat. Affected muscles have been reported to lose their rheological properties and become unable to hold water. For example, mortadella prepared with PSE-like chicken meat has reduced water-holding capacity, altered texture, diminished emulsion stability, and required additives to restore the functional properties of normal meat [90]. In addition, poultry processors have been concerned with the appearance of PSE-like meat in fresh tray packs. The pale color affected color uniformity within the package and, thus, consumer acceptance. The occurrence of PSE-like in poultry meat has been believed to be the result of accelerated postmortem glycolysis (rapid pH decline), while the carcass was still warm [91]. In poultry, normal pH values at 15 min postmortem (pH15) are around 6.2–6.5 [92, 93], whereas normal ultimate pH (pHu) values are approximately 5.8 [60, 88, 94]. If the pH15 value is low (below 6.0) when the muscle is still warm, the proteins are subject to denaturation, which leads to a decreased water-holding capacity and a lighter color of the meat.

The reasons for PSE-like condition have remained unclear, but up to 30% of broiler breast meat and up to 40% of turkey breast meat have shown this defect in commercial processing plants [95, 96, 97]. Furthermore, it has been reported that the occurrence of PSE-like meat in birds may be affected by alteration to the intracellular calcium homeostasis caused by a mutation in the ryanodine receptor gene, which is different from the ryanodine receptor gene in swine, and also depends upon the several aspects of preslaughter and postslaughter management practices [98, 99]. It is thought that the application of “snow chilling” with carbon dioxide intensified meat quality abnormalities [100]. In addition, other factors have been thought to contribute to this problem, such as heat stress during the finisher period or the preslaughter period [86], and stress and struggling before slaughter [101].

Differentiating PSE-like meat from normal meat has been based on the instrumental or visual assessment of color lightness (L*). However, the cutoff value for classifying meat as PSE-like has differed among researchers. Petracci et al. [102] considered an L* value of 56 as the cutoff, while Barbut [28, 103, 104] suggested classifying turkey breast meat as PSE-like when L* values were greater than 52 at 24 h postmortem. Fraqueza et al. [105] classified breast meat as PSE-like when the L* was greater than 50 and pHu was less than 5.8, while Woelfel et al. [106] used L* values greater than 54 in broilers as their standards.

Using L* per se as an indicator of PSE-like condition has not been considered accurate and could be misleading because several factors influence poultry meat color. Feed ingredients used in poultry have been reported to change breast meat color (e.g., wheat-based versus corn-based diets). In addition, it has been shown that genetic selection for increased growth and breast meat yield resulted in a marked increase in muscle fiber size [107, 108] with a shift toward a greater proportion of white fibers (glycolytic) and reduced dark fibers (oxidative), which produced meat that appears pale but still has a high pHu. Muscle thickness [48, 49] and color measurement position on the fillet [109] also affects color measurement. Therefore, color, pHu, and water-holding capacity should be considered when classifying poultry as PSE-like meat.

3.3 White striping, woody breast, and spaghetti meat

White striping, woody breast, and spaghetti meat can be collectively referred to as the myopathies of modern broiler. These nomenclatures were simply based on the appearance of the defective muscles. White striping is a condition described in broiler chickens and characterized by white striations parallel to the direction of muscle fibers on both breast fillets and thighs of broilers. White striping is considered to be an emerging issue by the poultry meat industry that could be associated with enhanced growth rate and heavier body weight in birds [110, 111, 112], especially in the age of 6–8 weeks [110], and higher fat content in broiler breast fillets [111]. The incidence of white striping was evaluated under commercial conditions, and the overall incidence in broiler breast meat was 12.0%, of which 3.1% had severe striping [113]. It is possible that the intense selection for rapid growth rate in birds could have accidentally been accompanied by the selection for inadequate capillary/fascial growth or muscle fiber defects leading to myopathic changes referred to as growth-induced myopathy [13], under which these three different myopathies can be classified.

The precise etiology of white striping has not been defined yet [114]; however, several speculations have been reported. In turkeys, Wilson et al. [80] reported that rapid growth rate may have led to the limited ability of muscle support systems leading to a condition called focal myopathy, which affected the major pectoral muscle.

Ischemia could also result from a rapid growth rate and lead to muscular damage in turkeys [115]. It is also possible that reduced oxygen supply to breast muscle resulted from lower capillary density in fast-growing chickens [116]. A higher growth rate could also lead to defective cation regulation in muscles leading to an increased sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium in muscle tissue [117]. An increased level of calcium in muscle tissue could initiate several tissue changes, including the activation of intracellular proteases or lipases resulting in myopathic changes [13, 118, 119, 120]. Kuttappan et al. [114] reported that breast fillets showing severe white striping had reduced protein content and myopathic lesions, while Petracci et al. [113] observed poor cohesion beneath the striation area.

Poultry producers started noticing and complaining about woody breast in the late 1990s [12, 121]. The woody breast muscle is usually characterized by increased firmness in all or parts of the pectoralis major muscle that can start in the live birds and can be detected by palpating the breast muscle. Sihvo et al. [121] reported that woody breast might result from fibrosis, which leads to an accumulation of interstitial connective tissue. This myopathy affects consumer acceptability and meat quality; even when trying to mitigate by diverting to further processed poultry products, woody breast meat is still required to be mixed with normal meat to maintain the quality of the further processed product [122, 123].

Spaghetti meat, or previously known as mushy breast, is the most recent emerging myopathy of breast meat in poultry. As the name implies, the breast muscle loses its structure and firmness. One distinct feature the spaghetti meat has that would differentiate it from white striping and woody breast is the loss of endomysial and perimysial connective tissue that compromises the fiber bundles cohesion, coupled with a loose connective tissue deposition [124] leading to the separation of the fascicles into “spaghetti” strings.

Sanden et al. [23] investigated the collagen of muscles with either woody breast or spaghetti meat abnormalities. They showed that collagen in woody breast muscle was a mix of thin and thick fibers, whereas spaghetti meat had thinner, fewer, and shorter. However, both myopathies generally resulted in a higher content in connective tissue (mainly in perimysium) compared to normal muscle.

Several researchers have investigated these myopathies to understand their etiology and effect on meat products quality [114, 121, 124, 125]. It is believed that cellular stress and hypoxia (ischemia) caused by muscle hypertrophy are the main triggering factors behind white striping and woody breast, in addition to being strapped within a relatively rigid connective tissue that limits the hypertrophy capabilities. However, what is interesting is that spaghetti meat, where the opposite issue is faced concerning connective tissue, started appearing. It is possible that geneticist, while trying to reduce the rigidness of the connective tissue, led to the emergence of the most recent abnormality of spaghetti meat, which is worth investigating in the future with poultry strain companies.

Advertisement

4. Nutrition and muscle myopathies

Researchers have investigated multiple factors that may have either contributed or helped in eliminating the emerging myopathies starting at different incubation conditions [126] all the way to management during growing [127, 128] and nutritional manipulations [129, 130, 131, 132, 133].

Several white muscle defects and myopathy have been reported. According to the literature, these problems spiked in the 1970s and 2000s concurrent with increased feed prices. It was suggested that producers were driven to use less expensive feed and use alternative feed ingredients (e.g., DDGS) to control costs. One significant consequence of feeding less expensive feed was that the essential amino acids (e.g., lysine and methionine) became a primary concern when formulating these diets, while the nonessential amino acids (e.g., arginine, glycine, and proline) were neglected despite their essential role in connective tissue formation, which may have contributed to the emerging of muscle defects as genetics for enhanced growth and muscle accretion were improved even further.

The spectacular advancements in genetics witnessed by the broiler industry have resulted in broilers with a higher growth rate, while the role of nutrition has become even more critical in supporting the increased growth demands of what may have become a relatively fragile animal. Profit-driven decisions about formulating feed in a least-cost manner while neglecting the essentiality of nonessential amino acids in nutrition would eventually be evidenced by increased condemnation at the processing plant and increased consumer complaints.

References

  1. 1. Anthony NB. A review of genetic parameters in poultry: Efforts to improve meat quality. Journal of Muscle Foods. 1998;9:25-33
  2. 2. NCC 2019. National Chicken Council. Available from: https://www.nationalchickencouncil.org/ [Accessed: 20 December 2019]
  3. 3. Cavani C, Petracci M, Trocino A, Xiccato G. Advances in research on poultry and rabbit meat quality. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2009;8:741-750
  4. 4. Magdelaine P, Spiess MP, Valceschini E. Poultry meat consumption trends in Europe. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 2008;64:53-63
  5. 5. OECD-FAO, 2017. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2017. Agric. Outlook2017-2026 Spec. Focus Southeast Asia
  6. 6. Okinda C, Lu M, Liu L, Nyalala I, Muneri C, Wang J, et al. A machine vision system for early detection and prediction of sick birds: A broiler chicken model. Biosystems Engineering. 2019;188:229-242
  7. 7. Abdullah AY, Al-Beitawi NA, Rjoup MMS, Qudsieh RI, Abu Ishmais MA. Growth performance, carcass and meat quality characteristics of different commercial crosses of broiler strains of chicken. The Journal of Poultry Science. 2010;47:13-21
  8. 8. Mehaffey JM, Pradhan SP, Meullenet JF, Emmert JL, McKee SR, Owens CM. Meat quality evaluation of minimally aged broiler breast fillets from five commercial genetic strains. Poultry Science. 2006a;85:902-908
  9. 9. Berri C, Wacrenier N, Millet N, Le Bihan-Duval E. Effect of selection for improved body composition on muscle and meat characteristics of broilers from experimental and commercial lines. Poultry Science. 2001;80:833-838
  10. 10. Abasht B, Pitel F, Lagarrigue S, Le Bihan-Duval E, Le Roy P, Demeure O, et al. Fatness QTL on chicken chromosome 5 and interaction with sex. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 2006;38:297-311
  11. 11. Nadaf J, Gilbert H, Pitel F, Berri CM, Feve K, Beaumont C, et al. Identification of QTL controlling meat quality traits in an F2 cross between two chicken lines selected for either low or high growth rate. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:155-162
  12. 12. Dransfield E, Sosnicki A. Relationship between muscle growth and poultry meat quality. Poultry Science. 1999a;78:743-746
  13. 13. Mahon M. Muscle abnormalities: Morphological aspects. In: Richardson RI, Mead GC, editors. Poultry Meat Science. UK: CABI Publishing; 1999. pp. 19-64
  14. 14. Wight PA, Siller WG. 1980. Pathology of deep pectoral myopathy of broilers. Veterinary Pathologica. 1980;17:29-39
  15. 15. Fletcher DL. Poultry meat quality. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 2002a;58:131-145
  16. 16. Le Bihan-Duval E, Millet N, Remingnon H. Broiler meat quality: Effect of selection for increased carcass quality and estimates of genetic parameters. Poultry Science. 1999;78:822-826
  17. 17. Baeza E, De Carville H, Salichon MR, Marche G, Leclerq B. Effect of selection, over three or four generations, on meat yield and fatness in Muscovy ducks. British Poultry Science. 1997;38:359-365
  18. 18. Sante V, Bielicki G, Renerre M, Lacourt A. Post mortem evaluation in Pectoralis Superficialis muscle from two turkey breeds: A relationship between pH and color. In: 37th Int. Cong. Meat Sci., Kulmbach, Germany. 1999. pp. 465-468
  19. 19. Shoulders MD, Raines RT. Collagen structure and stability. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2009;78:929-958
  20. 20. Ramachandran GN, Bansal M, Bhatnagar RS. A hypothesis on the role of hydroxyproline in stabilizing collagen structure. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta-Protein Structure. 1973;322:166-171. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(73)90187-6
  21. 21. Alnaqeeb MA, Al Zaid NS, Goldspink G. Connective tissue changes and physical properties of developing and ageing skeletal muscle. Journal of Anatomy. 1984;139(4):677-689
  22. 22. Mazzoni M, Soglia F, Petracci M, Sirri F, Lattanzio G, Clavenzani P. Fiber metabolism, procollagen and collagen type III immunoreactivity in broiler pectoralis major affected by muscle abnormalities. Animals. 2020;10:1081. DOI: 10.3390/ani10061081
  23. 23. Sanden KW, Bocker U, Ofstad R, Pedersen ME, Host V, Afseth NK. Characterization of collagen structure in normal, wooden breast and spaghetti meat chicken fillets by FTIR microspectroscopy and histology. Food. 2021;10:548
  24. 24. Cavitt LC, Sams AR. Evaluation of physical dimension changes as nondestructive measurements for monitoring rigor mortis development in broiler muscles. Poultry Science. 2003;82:1198-1204
  25. 25. Jensen WK, Devine CD, Dikeman M. Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences. 1st ed. Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004
  26. 26. White A, O’Sullivan A, O’Neill EE, Troy DJ. Manipulation of the pre-rigor phase to investigate the significance of proteolysis and sarcomere length in determining the tenderness of bovine M. longissimus dorsi. Meat Science. 2006;73:204-208
  27. 27. Wulf DM, Page JK. Using measurements of muscle color, pH, and electrical impedance to augment the current USDA beef quality grading standards and improve the accuracy and precision of sorting carcasses into palatability groups. Journal of Animal Science. 2000;78:2595-2607
  28. 28. Barbut S. Estimates and detection of the PSE problem in young turkey breast meat. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 1996a;76:455-457
  29. 29. Braxton D, Dauchel C, Brown WE. Association between chewing efficiency and mastication patterns for meat, and influence on tenderness perception. Food Quality and Preference. 1996;7:217-223
  30. 30. Lyon CE, Wilson RL. Effects of sex, rigor condition, and heating method on yield and objective texture of broiler breast meat quality. Poultry Science. 1986;65:907-914
  31. 31. Northcutt JK, Buhr RJ, Young LL, Lyon CE, Ware GO. Influence of age and postchill carcass aging duration on chicken breast fillet quality. Poultry Science. 2001;80:808-812
  32. 32. Poole GH, Lyon CE, Buhr RJ, Young LL, Alley A, Hess JB, et al. Evaluation of age, gender, strain, and diet on the cooked yield and shear values of broiler breast fillets. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 1999;8:170-176
  33. 33. Cavitt LC, Meullenet JF, Xiong R, Owens CM. The correlation of razor blade shear, Allo–Kramer shear, Warner–Bratzler shear, and sensory tests to changes in tenderness of broiler breast fillets. Journal of Muscle Foods. 2005;16:223-242
  34. 34. Lyon BG, Lyon CE. Texture profile of broiler Pectoralis major by postmortem deboning time and heat method. Poultry Science. 1990;69:329-340
  35. 35. Liu Y, Lyon BG, Windham WR, Lyon CE, Savage EM. Principal component analysis of physical, color, and sensory characteristics of chicken breasts deboned at two, four, six, and twenty-four hours postmortem. Poultry Science. 2004;83:101-108
  36. 36. Young LL, Northcutt JK, Buhr RJ, Lyon CE, Ware GO. Effects of age, sex, and duration of post-mortem aging on percentage yield of parts from broiler chicken carcasses. Poultry Science. 2001;80:376-379
  37. 37. Bechtel PJ. Muscle development and contractile proteins. In: Bechtel PJ, editor. Muscle as Food. New York: Academic Press; 1986. pp. 1-35
  38. 38. Hultin HO. Characteristics of muscle tissue. In: Fennema OR, editor. Food Chemistry. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1995. pp. 725-790
  39. 39. Hamm R. Biochemistry of meat hydration. Advances in Food Research. 1960;10:355-463
  40. 40. Cooke R, Wein R. The state of water in muscle tissue as determined by proton nuclear magnetic resonance. Biophysical Journal. 1971;11:1002-1017
  41. 41. Fennema OR. Water and ice. In: Fennema OR, editor. Food Chemistry. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1961. pp. 17-94
  42. 42. Lawrie RA. Chemical and biochemical constitution of muscle. In: Meat Science. 5th ed. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1991. pp. 58-94
  43. 43. Mancini RA, Hunt MC. Current research in meat color. Meat Science. 2005;71:100-121
  44. 44. Mitsumoto M, O'Grady MN, Kerry JP, Buckley DJ. Addition of tea catechins and vitamin C on sensory evaluation, color and lipid stability during chilled storage in cooked or raw beef and chicken patties. Meat Science. 2005;69:773-779
  45. 45. Ramirez R, Cava R. The crossbreeding of different Duroc lines with the Iberian pig affects color and oxidative stability of meat during storage. Meat Science. 2007;77:339-347
  46. 46. Pedreschi F, Leon J, Mery D, Moyano P. Development of a computer vision system to measure the color of potato chips. Food Research International. 2006;39:1092-1098
  47. 47. Commission International de l’Eclairage. Colorimetry. 2nd Edition. Wien: Commission International de l’Eclairage (CIE), Publication CIE 15.2; 1986
  48. 48. Bianchi M, Fletcher DL. Effects of broiler breast meat thickness and background on color measurements. Poultry Science. 2002a;81:1766-1769
  49. 49. Sandusky CL, Heath JL. Effect of background color, sample thickness, and illuminant on the measurement of broiler meat color. Poultry Science. 1996a;75:1437-1442
  50. 50. Papadakis SE, Abdul-Malek S, Kamdem RE, Yam KL. A versatile and inexpensive technique for measuring color of foods. Food Technology. 2000;5:48-51
  51. 51. Yam KL, Papadakis SE. A simple digital imaging methods for measuring and analyzing color of food surfaces. Journal of Food Engineering. 2004;61:137-142
  52. 52. Girolami A, Napolitano F, Faraone D, Braghieri A. Measurement of meat color using a computer vision system. Meat Science. 2013;93:111-118
  53. 53. Tomasevic I, Tomovic V, Ikonić P, Lorenzo JM, Barba FJ, Djekic I, et al. Evaluation of poultry meat colour using computer vision system and colourimeter: Is there a difference? British Food Journal. 2019a;121:1078-1087
  54. 54. Wakamatsu J, Okui J, Ikeda Y, Nishimura T, Hattori A. Establishment of a model experiment system to elucidate the mechanism by which Zn–protoporphyrin IX is formed in nitrite-free dry-cured ham. Meat Science. 2004b;68:313-317
  55. 55. Wang HC, Wang H, Hayakawa T, Hayakawa T, Kumura H, Kumura H, et al. Water-extractable zinc protoporphyrin IX in Parma ham predominantly exists as complexes with hemoglobin and myoglobin. Food Bioscience. 2021;40:100870. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100870
  56. 56. Fleming BK, Froning GW, Beck MM, Sosnicki AA. The effect of carbon dioxide as a preslaughter stunning method for turkeys. Poultry Science. 1991;70:2201-2206
  57. 57. Miller RK. Quality characteristics. In: Kinsman DM, Kotula AW, Breidenstein BC, editors. Muscle Foods, Meat, Poultry, and Seafood Technology. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1994. pp. 296-332
  58. 58. Froning GW. Color of poultry meat. Poultry Avian Biology Reviews. 1995;6:83-93
  59. 59. Smith DP, Northcutt JK. Red discoloration of fully cooked chicken products. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2003a;12:515-521
  60. 60. Fletcher DL. Broiler breast meat color variation, pH, and texture. Poultry Science. 1999;78:1323-1327
  61. 61. Maga JA. Pink discoloration in cooked white meat. Food Review International. 1994;10:273-286. DOI: 10.1080/87559129409541003
  62. 62. Pool MF. Why does some cooked turkey turn pink? Turkey World. 1956;31:72-74
  63. 63. Ahn DU, Maurer AJ. Poultry meat color: pH and the heme-complex forming reaction. Poultry Science. 1990;69:2040-2050
  64. 64. Holownia K, Chinnan MS, Reynolds AE. Pink color defect in poultry white meat as affected by endogenous conditions. Journal of Food Science. 2003;68:742-747
  65. 65. Lyon CE, Townsend WE, Wilson RL. Objective color values of nonfrozen and frozen broiler breasts and thighs. Poultry Science. 1976;55:1307-1312
  66. 66. Smith DP, Northcutt JK. Induced red discoloration of broiler breast meat: II. Effect of cook temperature and freezing. International Journal of Poultry Science. 2004;3:253-258
  67. 67. Koonz CH, Ramsbottom JM. Influence of freezing on color of bones and adjacent tissues. Journal of Food Science. 1947;12:393-399
  68. 68. Smith DP, Northcutt JK. Induced red discoloration of broiler breast meat: Effect of blood, bone marrow, and marination. International Journal of Poultry Science. 2004;3:248-252
  69. 69. Wakamatsu J, Nishimura T, Hattori A. A Zn-porphyrin complex contributes to bright red color in Parma ham. Meat Science. 2004a;67:95-100
  70. 70. Parolari G, Gabba L, Saccani G. Extraction properties and absorption spectra of dry cured hams made with and without nitrate. Meat Science. 2003;64:483-490
  71. 71. Numata M, Wakamatsu J. Natural red pigment and food product and food material containing the pigment. 2009. US Patent 7507428, issued March 24, 2009
  72. 72. Adamsen CE, Moller JKS, Laursen K, Olsen K, Skibsted LH. Znporphyrin formation in cured meat products: Effect of added salt and nitrite. Meat Science. 2006;72:672-679
  73. 73. Roscoe DE, Nielsen SW. A simple, quantitative test for erythrocytic protoporphyrin in lead-poisoned ducks. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 1979;15:127-136
  74. 74. Deumier F. Pulsed-vacuum immersion of chicken meat and skin in acid solutions. Effects on mass transfers, color and microbial quality. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2004;39:277-286
  75. 75. Brewer S. Irradiation effects on meat color – a review. Meat Science. 2004;68:1-17
  76. 76. Dickinson EM, Stevens JO, Helfer DH. A degenerative myopathy in turkeys. In: 17th Western Poultry Disease Conf. University of California, Davis, CA, USA. 1968
  77. 77. Harper JA, Heifer DH, Dickinson EM. Hereditary myopathy in turkeys. In: 20th Western Poult. Disease Conf., Davis, CA, USA. 1971. p. 76
  78. 78. Richardson JA, Burgener J, Winterfield RW, Dhillon AS. Deep pectoral myopathy in seven-week-old broiler chickens. Avian Diseases. 1980;24:1054-1059
  79. 79. Jordan FTW, Pattison M. Deep pectoral myopathy of turkeys and chickens. In: Poultry Diseases. London, UK: Saunders Elsevier; 1998. pp. 398-399
  80. 80. Wilson BW, Nieberg PS, Buhr RJ. Turkey muscle growth and focal myopathy. Poultry Science. 1990;69:1553-1562
  81. 81. Cassens RG. Historical perspectives and current aspects of pork meat quality in the USA. Food Chemistry. 2000;69:357-363
  82. 82. Wismer-Pedersen J. Quality of pork in relation to rate of pH change post mortem. Journal of Food Science. 1959;24:711-727
  83. 83. Judge MD, Forrest JC, Sink JD, Briskey EJ. Endocrine related stress responses and muscle properties of swine. Journal of Animal Science. 1968;27:1247
  84. 84. Owens CM, Hirschler EM, McKee SR, Martinez-Dawson R, Sams AR. The characterization and incidence of pale, soft, exudative turkey meat in a commercial plant. Poultry Science. 2000;79:553-558
  85. 85. Sosnicki AA, Greaser ML, Pietrzak M, Pospiech E, Sante V. PSE-like syndrome in breast muscle of domestic turkeys: A review. Journal of Muscle Foods. 1998;9:13-23
  86. 86. Petracci M, Bianchi M, Cavani C. The European perspective on pale, soft, exudative conditions in poultry. Poultry Science. 2009;88:1518-1523
  87. 87. Swatland HJ. How pH causes paleness or darkness in chicken breast meat. Meat Science. 2008;80:396-400
  88. 88. Van Laack RL, Liu CH, Smith MO, Loveday HD. Characteristics of pale, soft, exudative breast meat. Poultry Science. 2000;79:1057-1061
  89. 89. Smith DP, Northcutt JK. Pale poultry muscle syndrome. Poultry Science. 2009;88:1493-1496
  90. 90. Kissel C, Soares AL, Rossa A, Shimokomaki M. Functional properties of PSE (pale, soft, exudative) broiler meat in the production of mortadella. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2009;52:213-217
  91. 91. Pietrzak M, Greaser ML, Sosnicki AA. Effect of rapid rigor mortis processes on protein functionally in pectoralis major muscle of domestic turkeys. Journal of Animal Science. 1997;75:2106-2116
  92. 92. Berri C, Debut M, Sante-Lhoutellier C, Arnould B, Boutten B, Sellier N, et al. Variations in chicken breast meat quality: A strong implication of struggle and muscle glycogen level at death. British Poultry Science. 2005;46:572-579
  93. 93. Kijowski J, Niewiarowicz A. Emulsifying properties of proteins and meat from broiler breast muscles as affected by their initial pH values. Journal of Food Technology. 1978;13:451-459
  94. 94. Fletcher DL. Poultry meat color. In: Richardson RI, Mead GC, editors. Poultry Meat Science. UK: CABI Publishing; 1996. pp. 159-175
  95. 95. Barbut S. Occurrence of pale soft exudative meat in mature turkey hens. British Poultry Science. 1997b;38:74-77
  96. 96. Barbut S. Problem of pale soft exudative meat in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science. 1997a;38:355-358
  97. 97. Zhang L, Barbut S. Effect of regular and modified starches on cooked PSE, normal and DFD chicken breast meat batters. Poultry Science. 2005;84:789-796
  98. 98. Chiang W, Allison C, Linz J, Strasburg G. Identification of two αRYR alleles and characterization of αRYR transcript variants in turkey skeletal muscle. Gene. 2004;330:177-184
  99. 99. Oda SHI, Nepomuceno AL, Ledur MC, Oliveira MCN, Marin SRR, Ida EI, et al. Quantitative differential expression of alpha and beta ryanodine receptor genes in PSE (Pale, Soft, Exudative) meat from two chicken lines: Broiler and layer. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2009;52:1519-1525
  100. 100. Wynveen EJ, Bowker BC, Grant AL, Demos BP, Gerrard DE. Effects of muscle pH and chilling on development of PSE-like turkey breast meat. British Poultry Science. 1999;40:253-256
  101. 101. Ma RTI, Addis PB. The association of struggle during exsanguinations to glycolysis, protein solubility and shear in turkey pectoralis muscle. Journal of Food Science. 1973;38:995-997
  102. 102. Petracci M, Bianchi M, Betti M, Cavani C. Color variation and characterization of broiler breast meat during processing in Italy. Poultry Science. 2004;83:2086-2092
  103. 103. Barbut S. Color measurements for evaluating the pale soft exudative (PSE) occurrence in turkey meat. Food Research International. 1993;26:39-43
  104. 104. Barbut S. Estimating the magnitude of the PSE problem in poultry. Journal of Muscle Foods. 1998;9:35-49
  105. 105. Fraqueza MJ, Cardoso AS, Ferreira MC, Barreto AS. Incidence of pectoralis major turkey muscles with light and dark color in a Portuguese slaughterhouse. Poultry Science. 2006;85:1992-2000
  106. 106. Woelfel RL, Owens CM, Hirschler EM, Martinez-Dawson R, Sams AR. The characterization and incidence of pale, soft, and exudative broiler meat in a commercial processing plant. Poultry Science. 2002;81:579-584
  107. 107. Guernec A, Berri C, Chevalier B, Wacrenier-Cere N, Le Bihan-Duval E, Duclos MJ. Muscle development, insulin-like growth factor-I and myostatin mRNA levels in chickens selected for increased breast muscle yield. Growth Hormone & IGF Research. 2003;13:8-18
  108. 108. Remignon H, Gardahaut MF, Marche G, Ricard FH. Selection for rapid growth increases the number and the size of muscle fibers without changing their typing in chickens. Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility. 1995;16:95-102
  109. 109. Goshaw DR, Marquette LP, Buttles TJ, Walters BS. Broiler breast meat color evaluation. In: Proc. XXI World’s Poultry Congress, Montreal, Canada. 2000
  110. 110. Bauermeister LJ, Morey AU, Moran ET, Singh M, Owens CM, McKee SR. Occurrence of white striping in chicken breast fillets in relation to broiler size. Poultry Science. 2009;88(Suppl. 1):88
  111. 111. Kuttappan VA, Brewer VB, Waldroup PW, Owens CM. Influence of growth rate on the occurrence of white striping in broiler breast fillets. Poultry Science. 2012a;91:2677-2685
  112. 112. Kuttappan VA, Goodgame S, Bradley D, Mauromoustakos A, Hargis B, Waldroup P, et al. Effect of different levels of dietary vitamin E (dl-α-tocopherol acetate) on the occurrence of three degrees of white striping on broiler breast fillets. Poultry Science. 2012b;91:3230-3235
  113. 113. Petracci M, Mudalal S, Bonfiglio A, Cavani C. Occurrence of white striping under commercial conditions and its impact on breast meat quality in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2013;92:1670-1675
  114. 114. Kuttappan VA, Shivaprasad HI, Shaw DP, Valentine BA, Hargis BM, Clark FD, et al. Pathological changes associated with white striping in broiler breast muscles. Poultry Science. 2013;92:331-338
  115. 115. Sosnicki AA, Cassens RG, Vimini RJ, Greaser ML. Histopathological and ultrastructural alterations of turkey skeletal muscle. Poultry Science. 1991;70:349-357
  116. 116. Hoving-Bolink AH, Kranen RW, Klont RE, Gerritsen CLM, de Greef KH. Fibre area and capillary supply in broiler breast muscle in relation to productivity and ascites. Meat Science. 2000;56:397-402
  117. 117. Sandercock DA, Barker ZE, Mitchell MA, Hocking PM. Changes in muscle cell cation regulation and meat quality traits are associated with genetic selection for high body weight and meat yield in broiler chickens. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 2009;41:8-15
  118. 118. Jackson MJ, Jones DA, Edwards RHT. Experimental skeletal muscle damage: The nature of the calcium-activated degenerative processes. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1984;14:369-374
  119. 119. Millay DP, Goonasekera SA, Sargent MA, Maillet M, Aronow BJ, Molkentin JD. Calcium influx is sufficient to induce muscular dystrophy through a TRPC-dependent mechanism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 2009;106:19023-19028
  120. 120. Mitchell MA, Sandercock DA. Spontaneous and stress induced myopathies in modern meat birds: A cause for quality and welfare concerns. Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium. 2004;16:100-107
  121. 121. Sihvo HK, Immonen K, Puolanne E. Myodegeneration with fibrosis and regeneration in the pectoralis major muscle of broilers. Veterinary Pathology. 2014;51:619-623
  122. 122. Caldas-Cueva JP, Owens CM. Instrumental texture analysis of chicken patties elaborated with broiler breast fillets exhibiting Woody Breast characteristics. Poultry Science. 2018;97:4
  123. 123. Sanchez Brambila G, Chatterjee D, Bowker B, Zhuang H. Descriptive texture analyses of cooked patties made of chicken breast with the woody breast condition. Poultry Science. 2017;96:3489-3494
  124. 124. Baldi G, Soglia F, Mazzoni M, Sirri F, Canonico L, Babini E. Implications of white striping and spaghetti meat abnormalities on meat quality and histological features in broilers. Animal. 2018;12:164-173. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731117001069
  125. 125. Petracci M, Soglia F, Madruga M, Carvalho L, Ida E, Estévez M. Wooden-breast, white striping, and spaghetti meat: Causes, consequences and consumer perception of emerging broiler meat abnormalities. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2019;18:565-583. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12431
  126. 126. Oviedo-Rondón EO, Velleman SG, Wineland MJ. The role of incubation conditions in the onset of avian myopathies. Frontiers in Physiology. 2020;11:545045. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.545045
  127. 127. Gratta F, Birolo M, Sacchetto R, Radaelli G, Xiccato G, Ballarin C, et al. Effect of feed restriction timing on live performance, breast myopathy occurrence, and muscle fiber degeneration in 2 broiler chicken genetic lines. Poultry Science. 2019;98:5465-5476
  128. 128. Trocino A, Piccirillo A, Birolo M, Radaelli G, Bertotto D, Filiou E, et al. Effect of genotype, gender and feed restriction on growth, meat quality and the occurrence of white striping and wooden breast in broiler chickens. Poultry Sciences. 2015;94:2996-3004
  129. 129. Guetchom B, Venne D, Sonia C, Chorfi Y. Effect of extra dietary vitamin E on preventing nutritional myopathy in broiler chickens. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2012;21:548-555
  130. 130. Joardar D, Livingston KA, Edens FW, Nusairat B, Qudsieh R, Livingston ML, et al. Effect of limestone particle size and potassium supplementation on growth performance, blood physiology, and breast muscle myopathy of male broiler chickens. Frontiers in Veterinary Sciences. 2020;7:603284. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.603284
  131. 131. Kuttappan VA, Manangi M, Bekker M, Chen J, Vazquez-Anon M. Nutritional intervention strategies using dietary antioxidants and organic trace minerals to reduce the incidence of wooden breast and other carcass quality defects in broiler birds. Frontiers in Physiology. 2021;12:663409. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.663409
  132. 132. Livingston ML, Ferket PR, Brake J, Livingston KA. Dietary amino acids under hypoxic conditions exacerbates muscle myopathies including wooden breast and white stripping. Poultry Science. 2019;98:1517-1527
  133. 133. Meloche KJ, Fancher BI, Emmerson DA, Bilgili SF, Dozier WA. Effects of reduced digestible lysine density on myopathies of the Pectoralis major muscles in broiler chickens at 48 and 62 days of age. Poultry Science. 2018;97:3311-3324

Written By

Basheer Nusairat, Guillermo Tellez-Isaias and Rasha Qudsieh

Submitted: 23 November 2021 Reviewed: 11 March 2022 Published: 17 May 2022