Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Sphincterotomy is the Gold-Standard Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: But How Should it be Done?

Written By

Bengi Balci, Sezai Leventoglu and Bulent Mentes

Submitted: 10 January 2022 Reviewed: 02 March 2022 Published: 30 December 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.104109

From the Edited Volume

Benign Anorectal Disorders - An Update

Edited by Alberto Vannelli and Daniela Cornelia Lazar

Chapter metrics overview

124 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

A chronic anal fissure is one of the most encountered anorectal diseases in the clinical practice of general surgery. After all the medical therapies have failed, lateral internal sphincterotomy is still the main-stay treatment for chronic anal fissure. The optimal and standardized sphincterotomy has the utmost importance in preventing postoperative incontinence and recurrence, which are consequences of either extreme or insufficient sphincterotomy. Therefore, the lateral internal sphincterotomy technique has been evolved within years with the initial proposition of controlled-sphincterotomy and improvement of this technique with the addition of sphincterotomy up to the dentate line. This chapter focuses on the chronic anal fissure in the era of spasm-controlled lateral internal sphincterotomy.

Keywords

  • acute anal fissure
  • chronic anal fissure
  • internal sphincterotomy
  • spasm-controlled
  • incontinence

1. Introduction

An anal fissure is one of the most encountered anorectal diseases by general surgeons, although the true prevalence is unknown [1]. It is described as a tear developing in the squamous epithelium of the anoderm and is located between the dentate line and the anal verge [2].

This condition is often related to chronic constipation and difficulty of defecation and rarely can result from Crohn’s disease, tuberculosis, and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). The most common location of the fissure is the posterior midline (90%), followed by the anterior midline (1–10%), and lateral (1%). Lateral fissures can be associated with an underlying disease and should be thoroughly investigated. Typical symptoms are anal pain during defecation, bleeding, pruritus, and soiling.

An anal fissure can be described as acute and chronic according to the duration of symptoms. An acute fissure is a superficial lesion that usually occurs after constipation/diarrhea and can be healed with conservative management in 4 to 6 weeks. In contrast, chronic anal fissure is a deeper lesion surrounded by scar tissue caused by chronic inflammation. Chronic inflammation can cause skin tags in the anoderm adjacent to the fissure and hypertrophic papilla in the anal canal. Medical treatment is often ineffective for chronic fissures, and the patient’s symptoms are prolonged to 6 to 8 weeks.

Advertisement

2. Pathogenesis

The triggering factor is usually thought to be trauma to the anoderm from the passage of hard stool or chronic irritation from diarrhea, but the exact etiology of anal fissure remains unclear. Two major hypotheses have been proposed regarding the development of chronic fissures: the presence of hypertonicity in the internal anal sphincter and relatively decreased tissue perfusion in the posterior midline [3, 4, 5] (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Operative image of a patient with chronic anal fissure shows the spasm in the sphincter complex even under sedation.

It has also been suggested that hypertonicity may result in pressure on the perpendicular vessels in the internal anal sphincter muscle and may compromise perfusion to the posterior midline even more [6]. Therefore, most of the medical and surgical treatments have been developed to decrease the internal sphincter’s tonicity. Regardless of these hypotheses, hypertonicity may not be found in all patients with chronic anal fissures. Also, constipation and hard bowel movements have only been reported in 13% of these patients [7, 8].

Advertisement

3. Clinical presentation and diagnosis

Patients usually present with moderate to severe anal pain, described as “like passing broken glass,” aggravated by defecation, and lasts several minutes to hours afterward [9]. Although bleeding occurs less commonly in anal fissures than hemorrhoidal diseases, patients may notice a small amount of bright-red blood on the toilet paper resulting from chronic ulceration in the epithelium (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Chronic anal fissure presenting with bleeding.

Based on these predominant symptoms, an acute or chronic anal fissure can be diagnosed during the first interrogation. Nevertheless, the clinician should always consider an underlying cause of chronic constipation related to the fissure, such as rectocele, diverticular disease, and colorectal cancer.

On physical examination, the location, depth, and the number of fissures should be noted in addition to the presence of skin tags and chronic inflammation surrounding the lesion (Figure 3). Initially, a digital rectal examination may not be performed due to severe pain in an acute anal fissure; in that case, a detailed examination under anesthesia with anoscope and rectosigmoidoscopy may be required [10].

Figure 3.

Physical examination involves the inspection of number of fissures and the presence of skin tags. a) Multiple skin tags b) multiple chronic fissures in the posterior, lateral, and anterior of the anal canal.

Advertisement

4. Non-operative management

Usual recommendations for acute anal fissure include increased fiber and fluid ingestion, the use of local anesthetic ointments, warm daily sitz-bath, and stool softeners. Although almost half of the acute fissures heal with these conservative treatments, the success rate is as low as 30% in chronic fissures [10, 11, 12]. Given the cost-effectiveness and potential risk of incontinence with surgery, international guidelines still recommend topical and botulinum toxin injection as first-line therapy.

4.1 Nitrates

The mechanism of nitrates is based on the release of nitric oxide, which influences the relaxation of the internal anal sphincter muscle [13, 14]. Its commonly used form is glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) in 0.2–0.4% doses, and it is applied topically two to three times a day. The topical application of GTN has been reported to decrease anal resting pressures and promote healing in anal fissure compared to placebo; however, 50% of patients’ disease has recurred in the long term [11]. Major side-effects and reasons for discontinuing the treatment are headaches and light-headedness [15, 16].

4.2 Calcium-channel blockers

Topical application of calcium-channel blockers has been proven to effectively heal anal fissures with a lower risk of side effects [17]. Topically applied 0.5% nifedipine has been found to have healing rates of 93% in a duration of 19-month follow-up [18]. Also, Khan et al. have proved significantly higher healing rates (80.4%) with 2% topical diltiazem compared to GTN application [19]. Similarly, 0.5% topical minoxidil has been shown as equally effective as diltiazem [20].

4.3 Botulinum toxin

Botulinum toxin is an exotoxin produced by Clostridium botulinum, and its injection prevents the release of acetylcholine from the presynaptic nerve terminals, thus results resulting in temporary muscle paralysis. The first use of botulinum toxin in treating anal fissure was described in 1993 by Jost and Schimrigk [21, 22].

Although there is no standardized treatment with botulinum toxin regarding the dose and injection site, it is commonly injected directly into the internal anal sphincter on either side of the midline, with doses varying from 5 to 100 units [23, 24]. Pilkington et al. have revealed no significant differences between unilateral and bilateral injections in healing and fissure pain relief in a randomized prospective study [25]. In a retrospective review of patients who have been treated with high-dose (80–100 IU) and low-dose (20–40 IU) botulinum toxin, recurrence rates have been found significantly lower in a high-dose group during a mean follow-up of 25 months [26]. However, a meta-analysis has demonstrated no dose-dependent efficiency [27].

Several comparative studies have investigated the healing rates and symptomatic relief after botulinum toxin and topical agents [28, 29, 30, 31, 32]. Sajid et al. have shown that botulinum toxin injection has had similar healing rates with GTN but fewer side effects [33]. Also, another study has demonstrated that overall cure rates have been similar between diltiazem (53%), GTN (54%), and botulinum toxin (51%) [34]. A guideline published in 2017 has stated that botulinum toxin injection has similar results with topical agents as first-line therapy and modest improvement in healing rates as second-line therapy following treatment with topical agents [10].

The significant drawbacks of botulinum toxin injection are the risk of incontinence and its temporary effectiveness that usually lasts 3–6 months [35, 36]. Moreover, there are still unanswered questions: the following step when botulinum toxin fails if the second injection should be performed, the interval for repeat injection, and the timing of surgery. A recent study has discussed some of those issues among colorectal surgeons on practice parameters of botulinum toxin treatment [37]. It has been shown that more than half of the clinicians perform the second injection in case of persistence of symptoms and recurrence, and the interval for repeat injection has usually been more than 2 months.

Advertisement

5. Surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure

Traditionally, lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) has been the gold-standard treatment for chronic anal fissure [38]. This technique decreases the pressure caused by the internal anal sphincter hypertonicity, normalizes the perfusion on the anoderm, alleviates the pain, and promotes fissure healing [3] (Figure 4). With trends toward topical agents and botulinum toxin injection, several studies have been conducted to compare the outcomes of these treatment methods [39, 40, 41, 42]. A randomized controlled trial by Mentes et al. has revealed that LIS is superior to botulinum toxin injection regarding healing and recurrence in the long term [43]. Similar results have been obtained by Arroyo et al., 1-year healing rates with botulinum toxin and LIS were 45% and 93%, respectively [44].

Figure 4.

Healing of the chronic anal fissure. a) Preoperative image, b) postoperative 6-month image.

5.1 Techniques of lateral internal sphincterotomy

The main issue with LIS has been the risk of incontinence [45]. Garg et al. have reported incontinence rates as 14% during a follow-up of 2 years [46]. In this study, most patients complained of flatus incontinence (9%), followed by soiling/seepage (6%), incontinence to liquid stool (0.91%), and solid stool (0.63%).

Determining risk factors for incontinence after LIS include the history of vaginal delivery, female patients, anteriorly located fissures, age over 40–50, concomitant anorectal procedures (hemorrhoidectomy), and presence of incontinence in preoperative setting [46]. The effects of LIS on quality of life have been evaluated by using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GQLI) and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQLS) in a 1-year follow-up [47]. Moreover, GQLI scores have significantly improved after LIS, and only three patients (1.2%) experienced deterioration in FIQLS scores.

Although LIS has been performing for over decades, there has not been a standardized technique, and with increased reporting of incontinence, the search for optimal sphincterotomy regarding the level and degree of sphincter division has commenced. In the following sections, variations in sphincterotomy techniques will be discussed.

5.1.1 Open lateral internal sphincterotomy

The open technique involves a radial incision made on the intersphincteric groove and the dissection and division of the internal sphincter muscle to the level of the dentate line. The incision is usually left open for drainage (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

The steps of open lateral internal sphincterotomy. a) the circumferential incision is made in the intersphincteric groove, b) deepening the dissection with the help of retractors, c) the division of the internal sphincter muscle.

In a prospective randomized study, delayed healing and higher postoperative pain scores have been found in the open technique group [48]. Similar results have been obtained by Pernkoft and Kortbeek et al., who have reported lower complication rates with the closed technique [49, 50].

5.1.2 Closed lateral internal sphincterotomy

The closed technique involves the digital palpation of the sphincter complex, simultaneously inserting a blade into the intersphincteric groove and dividing the internal sphincter by moving the blade medially. The expected rate of division is 1/3 to 1/2 of the internal sphincter muscle.

Many authors have reported that the closed technique is effective and safe with a similar cure and fewer complication rates [51, 52]. In contrast, Wiley et al. has demonstrated similar incontinence rates between open and closed techniques, although overall, 6.8% of incontinence rates have been detected during a follow-up of 52 weeks [53]. Based on these contradicted results, it has been suggested that rather than an open or closed approach, the extent of sphincterotomy may influence the rates of incontinence and healing [54].

5.1.3 Radial vs. circumferential incision in lateral internal sphincterotomy

According to the surgeons’ experience and preference, open sphincterotomy can be performed with radial or circumferential incisions. Ersoz et al. has reported that the circumferential incision is associated with shorter healing time and fewer itching sensations than radial incisions [55]. Similar results about reduced time for wound healing with circumferential incision have also been proven by Kang et al. [56]. Both authors have suggested that the fecal material creates an outward force vector resulting in dilatation of the anal canal associated with more dehiscence in the radial incision.

5.1.4 Extent of sphincterotomy

Another attempt to decrease incontinence rates has been the proposal of performing sphincterotomy up to the height of the fissure apex instead of to the dentate line [57]. This technique initially showed high healing rates with significantly lower incontinence rates [58]. However, long-term follow-up results have demonstrated higher rates of treatment failure and slower effects on healing [59]. In another study evaluating the recurrence/persistence of fissure and incontinence rates, endoanal ultrasonography was performed after percutaneous and open sphincterotomy [60]. It has been confirmed that open and complete sphincterotomy is associated with lower recurrence rates but increased incontinence, while partial and percutaneous sphincterotomy has resulted in persistence and recurrence of the fissure. These results have supported that sphincterotomy should be complete but shorter, whether percutaneous or open sphincterotomy is performed.

Furthermore, the extent of sphincterotomy and its association with incontinence have been investigated between female patients and the control group by performing three-dimensional anal ultrasonography [61]. The extent of sphincterotomy has been directly related to incontinence, and it should be less than 25% of the total sphincter length (less than 1 cm in females) (Figure 6). Interestingly, this study has also demonstrated a significant decrease in anal resting pressure, whereas the maximum squeeze pressure has remained similar to preoperative measurements. A recent study has also reported supporting findings for dividing the internal sphincter by about 20% in female patients [62].

Figure 6.

Measurement of sphincterotomy. a) Sphincterotomy is measured as 1 cm from the anal verge, b) the distance of sphincterotomy to the dentate line is shown as 2 cm.

5.1.5 Ultramodified internal sphincterotomy

Sungurtekin et al. has described a new technique called ultra-modified internal sphincterotomy, which involves an incision made in the base of the posterior fissure, identification of the internal and external sphincter under direct vision, division of previously measured 1 cm of internal sphincter bundle [63].

They have reported the results of this technique in comparison to the closed sphincterotomy. The anal resting pressures have decreased in both study groups; however, the decline in pressures has lasted for 24 months in closed technique and is attributed to iatrogenic damage in the internal anal sphincter. Moreover, the patient satisfaction and recovery rates have been higher in the ultramodified sphincterotomy group.

5.1.6 Spasm-controlled sphincterotomy

Previous findings have created a whole new perspective in the technique of sphincterotomy, suggesting that the sphincter division should be made in a tailored fashion by considering the differences in genders, anal calibers, and anal resting pressures.

A tailored, spasm-controlled sphincterotomy term by performing sphincterotomy according to the anal caliber was first proposed by Cho et al. [64]. A prospective comparative study has investigated the outcomes of spasm-controlled and up to the fissure apex sphincterotomy [65]. The spasm-controlled technique was performed by small serial sphincterotomies using an anal calibrator to achieve a 25–30 mm anal caliber, while fissure apex sphincterotomy was performed in a traditional way (Figure 7). Not surprisingly, the incontinence rates have been found significantly lower with described technique, and there was no significant difference in treatment failure (Figure 8).

Figure 7.

Anal calibrators are used to measure the anal caliber in the spasm-controlled technique. Small, medium and large calibrators are in the size of 5–15, 15–30, and 27–43 mm, respectively [65].

Figure 8.

In the spasm-controlled technique, anal calibrations are measured before and after sphincterotomy. a) Small anal calibrator is measured as 5–15 mm, b) anal caliber is measured about 12 mm in this patient with chronic anal fissure.

Advertisement

6. Tips and tricks

  • Local or regional anesthesia are preferred in combination with sedative drugs. Regional anesthesia may be required for patients with high body mass index considering the difficulties in respiration with the prone position.

  • Injecting local anesthetics consisting of lidocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline to the incision area enables a blood-free surgical area.

  • The prone jack-knife position provides good exposure to the anal canal and sphincter complex.

  • Anal caliber is measured with anal calibrators at the initial of the procedure.

  • A circumferential 1 cm incision made on the right lateral of the anal canal is the chosen approach. Subcutaneous dissection is performed in the intersphincteric groove with the help of small retractors.

  • The lateral internal sphincter muscle is divided under the direct vision as small bites at each time, and the anal caliber is repeatedly measured to obtain a predetermined anal caliber of 25–30 mm.

  • The incision is partially closed using continuous 4–0 absorbable sutures.

  • Fissurectomy might be performed in addition to sphincterotomy in patients with severe pain and soiling symptoms due to deep scar tissue.

  • Large skin tags can also be excised for cosmetic and hygiene issues, if so, one should be avoided to excise a large amount of anoderm.

Advertisement

7. Conclusions

Lateral internal sphincterotomy is still the gold-standard treatment for chronic anal fissures when the first-line and second-line therapies such as topical nitrates, calcium-channel blockers, and botulinum toxin have failed. It is associated with increased healing rates and improved quality of life in patients with anal fissures. Therefore, surgical intervention can even be offered in select patients without first confirming the failure of pharmacological therapies.

The technique of lateral internal sphincterotomy has been evolved over the years in terms of approaches (open/closed), the level of division of the internal sphincter (complete/partial), and the extent of sphincterotomy (to the dentate line/up to the fissure apex). A tailored-fashion sphincterotomy that is based on the individual characteristics of each patient has come upfront in recent years. As a tailored-fashion technique, the spasm-controlled sphincterotomy has been performed as a safe and effective method with low rates of incontinence and treatment failure.

Determining an individualized technique, which involves objective methods to measure the sufficient level of sphincterotomy either by calibrators and a surgical measure or anal ultrasonography and manometry, has the utmost importance in preventing postoperative incontinence, increasing healing rates, and improving quality of life.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Fleshman JW. Fissure-in-ano and anal stenosis. In: Becker DE, Wexner SD, editors. Fundamentals of Anorectal Surgery. London: W.B. Saunders; 1998. p. 557
  2. 2. Zaghiyan KN, Fleshner P. Anal fissure. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2011;24(1):22-30. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1272820
  3. 3. Schouten WR, Briel JW, Aurwerda JJ, De Graaf EJ. Ischaemic nature of anal fissure. The British Journal of Surgery. 1996;83:63-65
  4. 4. Utzig MJ, Kroesen AJ, Buhr HJ. Concepts in pathogenesis and treatment of chronic anal fissure: A review of the literature. Journal of Gastroenterology. 2003;98:968-974
  5. 5. Lund JN, Scholefield JH. Aetiology and treatment of anal fissure. The British Journal of Surgery. 1996;83:1335-1344
  6. 6. Klosterhalfen B, Vogel P, Rixen H, et al. Topography of the inferior rectal artery: A possible cause of chronic, primary anal fissure. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1989;32:43-52
  7. 7. Herzig DO, Lu KC. Anal fissure. The Surgical Clinics of North America. 2010;90:33-44
  8. 8. Beaty JS, Shashidharan M. Anal fissure. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2016;29(1):30-37. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1570390
  9. 9. Salati SA. Anal fissure - an extensive update. Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny. 2021;93(4):46-56. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.7879
  10. 10. Stewart DB Sr, Gaertner W, Glasgow S, Migaly J, Feingold D, Steele SR. Clinical practice guideline for the Management of Anal Fissures. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2017;60(1):7-14. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000735
  11. 11. Nelson RL, Thomas K, Morgan J, Jones A. Non surgical therapy for anal fissure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;2012(2):CD003431. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003431.pub3
  12. 12. Boland PA, Kelly ME, Donlon NE, Bolger JC, Larkin JO, Mehigan BJ, et al. Management options for chronic anal fissure: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2020;35(10):1807-1815. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03699-4
  13. 13. O'Kelly TJ. Nerves that say NO: A new perspective on the human rectoanal inhibitory reflex. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 1996;78:31-38
  14. 14. Fung HL. Clinical pharmacology of organic nitrates. The American Journal of Cardiology. 1993;72(8):9C-13C; discussion 14C-15C. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90249-c
  15. 15. Hyman NH, Cataldo PA. Nitroglycerin ointment for anal fissures: Effective treatment or just a headache? Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1999;42(3):383-385. DOI: 10.1007/BF02236358
  16. 16. Dorfman G, Levitt M, Platell C. Treatment of chronic anal fissure with topical glyceryl trinitrate. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1999;42(8):1007-1010. DOI: 10.1007/BF02236692
  17. 17. Jonas M, Speake W, Scholefield JH. Diltiazem heals glyceryl trinitrate-resistant chronic anal fissures: A prospective study. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2002;45(8):1091-1095. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6365-z
  18. 18. Katsinelos P, Papaziogas B, Koutelidakis I, Paroutoglou G, Dimiropoulos S, Souparis A, et al. Topical 0.5% nifedipine vs. lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: Long-term follow-up. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2006;21(2):179-183. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-005-0766-x
  19. 19. Khan MS, Akbar I, Zeb J, Ahmad S, Khan A. Outcome of 0.2% Glyceryltrinitrate cream versus 2% diltiazem cream in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad. 2017;29(2):280-284
  20. 20. Alvandipour M, Ala S, Khalvati M, Yazdanicharati J, Koulaeinejad N. Topical Minoxidil versus topical diltiazem for chemical Sphincterotomy of chronic anal fissure: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. World Journal of Surgery. 2018;42(7):2252-2258. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4449-x
  21. 21. Jost WH, Schimrigk K. Use of botulinum toxin in anal fissure. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1993;36(10):974. DOI: 10.1007/BF02050639
  22. 22. Jost WH. Ten years' experience with botulin toxin in anal fissure. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2002;17(5):298-302. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-002-0398-3
  23. 23. Maria G, Brisinda G, Bentivoglio AR, Cassetta E, Gui D, Albanese A. Botulinum toxin injections in the internal anal sphincter for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: Long-term results after two different dosage regimens. Annals of Surgery. 1998;228(5):664-669. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199811000-00005
  24. 24. Mínguez M, Melo F, Espí A, García-Granero E, Mora F, Lledó S, et al. Therapeutic effects of different doses of botulinum toxin in chronic anal fissure. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1999;42(8):1016-1021. DOI: 10.1007/BF02236694
  25. 25. Pilkington SA, Bhome R, Welch RE, Ku F, Warden C, Harris S, et al. Bilateral versus unilateral botulinum toxin injections for chronic anal fissure: A randomised trial. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2018;22(7):545-551. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1821-2
  26. 26. Ravindran P, Chan DL, Ciampa C, George R, Punch G, White SI. High-dose versus low-dose botulinum toxin in anal fissure disease. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2017;21(10):803-808. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1700-2
  27. 27. Bobkiewicz A, Francuzik W, Krokowicz L, Studniarek A, Ledwosiński W, Paszkowski J, et al. Botulinum toxin injection for treatment of chronic anal fissure: Is there any dose-dependent efficiency? A meta-analysis. World Journal of Surgery. 2016;40(12):3064-3072. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3693-9
  28. 28. Brisinda G, Cadeddu F, Brandara F, Marniga G, Maria G. Randomized clinical trial comparing botulinum toxin injections with 0.2 per cent nitroglycerin ointment for chronic anal fissure. The British Journal of Surgery. 2007;94(2):162-167. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5514
  29. 29. Fruehauf H, Fried M, Wegmueller B, Bauerfeind P, Thumshirn M. Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin a injection compared with topical nitroglycerin ointment for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: A prospective randomized study. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006;101(9):2107-2112. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00722.x
  30. 30. De Nardi P, Ortolano E, Radaelli G, Staudacher C. Comparison of glycerine trinitrate and botulinum toxin-a for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: Long-term results. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2006;49(4):427-432. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0287-2
  31. 31. Sahebally SM, Meshkat B, Walsh SR, Beddy D. Botulinum toxin injection vs topical nitrates for chronic anal fissure: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Disease. 2018;20(1):6-15. DOI: 10.1111/codi.13969
  32. 32. Samim M, Twigt B, Stoker L, Pronk A. Topical diltiazem cream versus botulinum toxin a for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Annals of Surgery. 2012;255:18-22
  33. 33. Sajid MS, Vijaynagar B, Desai M, Cheek E, Baig MK. Botulinum toxin vs glyceryltrinitrate for the medical management of chronic anal fissure: A meta-analysis. Colorectal Disease. 2008;10(6):541-546. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01387.x
  34. 34. Gil J, Luján J, Hernández Q, Gil E, Salom MG, Parrilla P. Screening for the effectiveness of conservative treatment in chronic anal fissure patients using anorectal manometry. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2010;25(5):649-654. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-0885-x
  35. 35. Smith M, Frizelle F. Long-term faecal incontinence following the use of botulinum toxin. Colorectal Disease. 2004;6(6):526-527. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00720.x
  36. 36. Brown SR, Matabudul Y, Shorthouse AJ. A second case of long-term incontinence following botulinum injection for anal fissure. Colorectal Disease. 2006;8(5):452-453. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00964.x
  37. 37. Bhama AR, Zoccali MB, Chapman BC, Davids JS, Eisenstein S, Fish DR, et al. Practice variations in Chemodenervation for anal fissure among American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons members. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2021;64(10):1167-1171. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002194
  38. 38. Nelson RL, Manuel D, Gumienny C, Spencer B, Patel K, Schmitt K, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment of anal fissure. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2017;21(8):605-625. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1664-2
  39. 39. Massoud BW, Mehrdad V, Baharak T, Alireza Z. Botulinum toxin injection versus internal anal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Annals of Saudi Medicine. 2005;25:140-142
  40. 40. Iswariah H, Stephens J, Rieger N, Rodda D, Hewett P. Randomized prospective controlled trial of lateral internal sphincterotomy versus injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of idiopathic fissure in ano. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2005;75:553-555
  41. 41. Valizadeh N, Jalaly NY, Hassanzadeh M, et al. Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: Randomized prospective controlled trial. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. 2012;397:1093-1098
  42. 42. Nasr M, Ezzat H, Elsebae M. Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: A randomized controlled trial. World Journal of Surgery. 2010;34:2730-2734
  43. 43. Mentes BB, Irko¨rucu O, Akin M, Leventoglu S, Tatlicioglu E. Comparison of botulinum toxin injection and lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2003;46:232-237
  44. 44. Arroyo Sebastian A, Perez F, Serrano P, Candela F, Lacueva J, Calpena R. Surgical versus chemical (botulinum toxin) sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: Long term results of a prospective randomized clinical and manometric study. American Journal of Surgery. 2005;189:429-434
  45. 45. Jin JZ, Bhat S, Park B, Hardy MO, Unasa H, Mauiliu-Wallis M, et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing treatments for anal fissure. Surgery. 2022;5:S0039-6060(21)01178-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.11.030
  46. 46. Garg P, Garg M, Menon GR. Long-term continence disturbance after lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Disease. 2013;15(3):e104-e117. DOI: 10.1111/codi.12108
  47. 47. Menteş BB, Tezcaner T, Yilmaz U, Leventoğlu S, Oguz M. Results of lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure with particular reference to quality of life. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2006;49(7):1045-1051. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0527-0
  48. 48. Gupta V, Rodrigues G, Prabhu R, Ravi C. Open versus closed lateral internal anal sphincterotomy in the management of chronic anal fissures: A prospective randomized study. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2014;37(4):178-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2014.01.009
  49. 49. Pernkoft BJ, Eisenstat TE, Oliver GC, Salvati EP. Reappraisal of partial lateral internal sphincterotomy. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1994;7:1291-1295
  50. 50. Kortbeek JB, Langevin JM, Khoo RE, Heine JA. Chronic fissurein-ano: A randomized study comparing open and subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1992;35:835-837
  51. 51. Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Lowry AC, Madoff RD. Open vs closed sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: Long term results. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1996;39:440-443
  52. 52. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Troilo VL, Marino F, Lobascio P, Puglisi F. Closed ambulatory lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissures. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2005;9:248-249
  53. 53. Wiley M, Day P, Rieger N, Stephens J, Moore J. Open vs. closed lateral internal sphincterotomy for idiopathic fissure-in-ano: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2004;47(6):847-852. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0530-2
  54. 54. Arroyo A, Pérez F, Serrano P, Candela F, Calpena R. Open versus closed lateral sphincterotomy performed as an outpatient procedure under local anesthesia for chronic anal fissure: Prospective randomized study of clinical and manometric longterm results. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2004;199(3):361-367. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.04.016
  55. 55. Ersoz F, Arikan S, Sari S, Bektas H, Ozcan O. Type of lateral internal sphincterotomy incision: Parallel or vertical? World Journal of Surgery. 2011;35:1137-1141
  56. 56. Kang WH, Lim CH, Choi DH, Shin HK, Lee YC, Jeong SK, et al. Comparison of skin incisions used for open lateral internal sphincterotomies--radial versus circumferential incisions: A retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Surgery. 2014;12(11):1141-1145. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.09.005
  57. 57. Littlejohn DR, Newstead GL. Tailored lateral sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 1997;40(12):1439-1442. DOI: 10.1007/BF02070709
  58. 58. Elsebae MM. A study of fecal incontinence in patients with chronic anal fissure: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy. World Journal of Surgery. 2007;31(10):2052-2057. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9177-1
  59. 59. Mentes BB, Ege B, Leventoglu S, Oguz M, Karadag A. Extent of lateral internal sphincterotomy: Up to the dentate line or up to the fissure apex? Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2005;48:365-370
  60. 60. García-Granero E, Sanahuja A, García-Botello SA, Faiz O, Esclápez P, Espí A, et al. The ideal lateral internal sphincterotomy: Clinical and endosonographic evaluation following open and closed internal anal sphincterotomy. Colorectal Disease. 2009;11(5):502-507. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01645.x
  61. 61. Murad-Regadas SM, Fernandes GO, Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV, Pereira Jde J, Regadas Filho FS, et al. How much of the internal sphincter may be divided during lateral sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure in women? Morphologic and functional evaluation after sphincterotomy. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2013;56(5):645-651. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827a7416
  62. 62. Brillantino A, Izzo D, Iacobellis F, Maglio M, Grillo M, Vicenzo L, et al. Safety and effectiveness of minimal sphincterotomy in the treatment of female patients with chronic anal fissure. Updates in Surgery. 2021;73(5):1829-1836. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00874-8
  63. 63. Sungurtekin U, Ozgen U, Sungurtekin H. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of ultra-modified internal Sphincterotomy vs closed lateral internal Sphincterotomy for chronic fissure-in-Ano. The American Surgeon. 2021;16:31348211011104. DOI: 10.1177/00031348211011104
  64. 64. Cho D-Y. Controlled lateral sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2004;48:1037-1041
  65. 65. Menteş BB, Güner MK, Leventoglu S, Akyürek N. Fine-tuning of the extent of lateral internal sphincterotomy: Spasm-controlled vs. up to the fissure apex. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2008;51(1):128-133. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9121-3

Written By

Bengi Balci, Sezai Leventoglu and Bulent Mentes

Submitted: 10 January 2022 Reviewed: 02 March 2022 Published: 30 December 2022