Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Left Ventricular Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy: From Clinical Features to Animal Modeling

Written By

Enkhsaikhan Purevjav, Michelle Chintanaphol, Buyan-Ochir Orgil, Nelly R. Alberson and Jeffrey A. Towbin

Submitted: July 1st, 2021Reviewed: October 5th, 2021Published: October 31st, 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.101085

Chapter metrics overview

112 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Cardiomyopathy or disease of the heart muscle involves abnormal enlargement and a thickened, stiff, or spongy-like appearance of the myocardium. As a result, the function of the myocardium is weakened and does not sufficiently pump blood throughout the body nor maintain a normal pumping rhythm, leading to heart failure. The main types of cardiomyopathies include dilated hypertrophic, restrictive, arrhythmogenic, and noncompaction cardiomyopathy. Abnormal trabeculations of the myocardium in the left ventricle are classified as left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC). Myocardial noncompaction most frequently is observed at the apex of the left ventricle and can be associated with chamber dilation or muscle hypertrophy, systolic or diastolic dysfunction, or both, or various forms of congenital heart disease. Animal models are incredibly important for uncovering the etiology and pathogenesis involved in this disease. This chapter will describe the clinical and pathological features of LVNC in humans and present the animal models that have been used for the study of the genetic basis and pathogenesis of this disease.

Keywords

  • animal models
  • noncompaction
  • cardiomyopathy
  • mutation
  • cardiac development

1. Introduction

Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a unique form of cardiomyopathy that is distinguished by a distinctive (“spongy”) morphological appearance of the left ventricle (LV) myocardium [1]. This “spongy” appearance encompasses hypertrabeculation, deep intertrabecular recesses or sinusoids, and a bilayered ventricular myocardium with a noncompacted endocardium and compacted epicardium [2]. Although LVNC is rare, the prevalence of LVNC is reported to be <0.3% in adults and < 0.0001% in children. It is the third most common form of inherited cardiomyopathies and accounts for 9% of all pediatric cardiomyopathy cases [3]. Prevalence was reported as 0.014–1.3% in adult patients who underwent echocardiography. In heart failure patients, the prevalence of LVNC is estimated at 3–4% [4]. LVNC is characterized as genetic, primary cardiomyopathy by the 2006 American Heart Association classification model, whereas the European Society of Cardiology has not classified LVNC as distinct cardiomyopathy due to its phenotypic heterogeneity [5, 6].

Clinical presentation of LVNC is variable, and Towbin et al. have described nine distinct subtypes: 1) benign, 2) arrhythmogenic, 3) dilated, 4) hypertrophic, 5) mixed hypertrophic and dilated, 6) restrictive, 7) right ventricular with the normal left ventricle, 8) biventricular, and 9) associated with congenital heart disease [7]. Some of the LVNC phenotypes are shown in Figure 1. Complications of LVNC include chronic heart failure, arrhythmias, cardioembolism, chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death (SCD) [8]. Patients with LVNC associated with neuromuscular disease may present with exercise intolerance, fatigue, muscle pain, muscle stiffness, and muscle weakness. Heart failure associated with LVNC is often due to either systolic or diastolic ventricular dysfunction. Electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities are very common (88–94% and 88%, respectively) in both adult and pediatric cases. Common arrhythmias are atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and atrioventricular block. Heart failure and arrhythmias are the greatest cause of concern for mortality in LVNC patients [9].

Figure 1.

Echocardiographic images of heterogeneous forms of left ventricular noncompaction phenotype. A. Parasternal short-axis view of a dilated form of LVNC with trabeculations noted at the apex. B. An apical 4-chamber view with trabeculations noted at the right side of the image. C-G, Heterogeneous phenotypes associated with LVNC. LVNC with normal LV size, thickness, and function (C), dilated form of LVNC (D), hypertrophic form of LVNC (E), restrictive form of LVNC (F), biventricular LVNC (G). LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; LA, left atrium, RA, right atrium.

The etiology, pathogenesis, and natural history of LVNC are not clearly understood. The genetic causes of LVNC are heterogeneous [10, 11], involving final common pathways initiated by primary (the sarcomere) and developmental (NOTCH pathway) genetic abnormalities, often viaa disturbance of protein–protein binding caused by the primary genetic mutation [12]. Doppler echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, or LV angiography are used for the diagnosis. Due to heritable nature, patients with LVNC and at-risk first-degree relatives are recommended to undergo genetic screening and counseling [13, 14]. Clinical symptoms associated with myocardial dysfunction, significant arrhythmias, congenital heart disease, or neuromuscular disease combined with the results of genetic testing dictate the outcome and therapeutic management of LVNC [15]. Family studies and animal models are incredibly important for uncovering the genetic basis and pathways involved in this disease. In this chapter, we describe trabeculation and compaction events during cardiogenesis, morphopathological features of LVNC, and possible genetic mechanisms of LVNC. We will also describe the animal models that have been used for the study of LVNC.

Advertisement

2. Embryonic development of compacted myocardium

The underlying mechanisms for LVNC remain largely unknown, but many studies associate it with the failure of compaction of trabecular myocardium during embryogenesis [16]. The development of the functionally competent, compacted, and multilayered myocardial wall is a two-part process consisting of trabeculation followed by a compaction process set at the midgestational period of cardiogenesis [17]. When the myocardial spiral system enfolds, myocyte recruitment and proliferation lead to myocardial maturation with the development of protrusions into the lumen. Endocardial cells invaginate, and cardiomyocytes in specific regions along the inner wall of the heart form sheet-like protrusions into the lumen to give rise to the trabecular myocardium [16]. The intertrabecular recesses communicate with the blood-filled cavity of the heart tube to increase the surface area for gas exchange and blood. This mechanism favors the concomitant increase in myocardial mass despite the absence of a distinct epicardial coronary circulation [18].

The trabecular myocardium starts undergoing compaction between weeks 5 and 8 of human embryonic development and coincides with the invasion of the developing coronary vasculature from the epicardium. Compaction is gradual, from the epicardial to the endocardial surface and from the basal segments of the ventricle moving toward the apex [19]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin-1 may be involved with triggering compaction [2]. As a result of the compaction process, the intertrabecular recesses disappear almost entirely leaving a smooth endocardial ventricular surface. Compaction is more pronounced in the LV than in the right ventricle (RV), therefore the RV endomyocardial surface is more heavily trabeculated (Figure 2) [19]. On the other hand, noncompaction indicates failure of compact myocardium formation, leaving spongy myocardium and deep intertrabecular recesses [20].

Figure 2.

Gross morphopathologic appearance of LVNC. a. Heart from a individual with left ventricular noncompaction. Note the spongy appearance of the ventricular wall, caused by ‘holes’ in the myocardium, which represent deep trabeculations. The heart is thick and has a dilated chamber (that is, hypertrophic and dilated). In life this ventricle functioned poorly. LV, left ventricle; LVNC, trabeculations of left ventricular noncompaction. b. Numerous excessive prominent trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses is noted by arrows. The trabecular zone (noncompacted layer, X) in the LV is at least twice thick as the compact layer (Y) of the ventricular wall. (Adopted from Towbin and Bowles, Nature 415, 227–233. 2002).

2.1 Etiopathophysiology of LVNC and genotype: phenotype correlation

While the etiology of LVNC is not clearly understood, it is largely considered that hypertrabeculation or noncompaction in LVNC has a genetic origin with typically autosomal dominant inheritance if the implicated genes encode components of the sarcomere, Z-disc, or cytoskeleton [21]. Autosomal recessive, X-linked, and mitochondrial inheritance patterns have also been found [3, 22]. One large retrospective multicenter study showed that nearly one-third of the LVNC patients had genetic variants in at least one cardiomyopathy-causative gene [14]. LVNC has also been reported in many complex syndromes [23, 24] and neuromuscular disorders [25, 26, 27]. LVNC can also be considered congenital or acquired, and several hypotheses have been proposed for the development of LVNC [28]. The primary hypothesis for congenital LVNC is the embryonic hypothesis, which attributes the hypertrabeculation of LVNC to the arrest in normal ventricular compaction during myocardial embryogenesis [29]. The etiology of LVNC can be described as having two components, congenital and modifier factors.

Genetically, LVNC is heterogeneous and has been associated with chromosomal defects and genetic mutations in myosin heavy chain 7 (MYH7) [21, 30], LIM domain-binding protein 3 (ZASP), α-dystrobrevin (DTNA), tafazzin (TAZ/G4.5), ion channels, and proteins found in the sarcomere, cytoskeleton, and mitochondria. Alterations in the NOTCH signaling pathway, associated with morphological development, and WNT pathway signaling, embryonically involved in body axis patterning and cell polarity, are also linked to LVNC [20, 31]. In some categories of LVNC, the genotype–phenotype correlation is identifiable. Tafazzin mutations, one of the first mutations linked to LVNC, are characteristic of Barth syndrome, an X-linked genetic disorder that commonly presents with LVNC. Tafazzin, an inner mitochondrial membrane protein, catalyzes phospholipid cardiolipin synthesis, which is essential for mitochondrial integrity and energy production in cardiomyocytes [29, 32]. Family studies have identified mutations in hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 4 (HCN4), sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5 (SCN5A), and ankyrin 2 (ANK2) as genetic abnormalities underlying sinus bradycardia-associated LVNC [33]. Lamin A/C (LMNA) mutations, which are also found in dilated cardiomyopathies, are associated with the early onset of advanced atrioventricular block [34]. A 6.8-megabase locus on chromosome 11p15, containing muscle LIM protein (MLP/CSRP3) and SOX6, was implicated in an autosomal dominant pedigree of LVNC [35]. The V470I variant in bone morphogenetic protein 10 (BMP10) and W143X variant in neuregulin (NRG1) were identified in two unrelated LVNC probands and their affected family members [36]. Impaired BMP receptor binding ability, perturbed proliferation and differentiation processes, and intolerance to stretch in mutant cardiomyoblasts may underlie myocardial noncompaction in these families.

The causal nature of genetic defects is further complicated by the overlap of genetic mutations in distinct cardiomyopathies. LVNC can be categorized based on its association with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and other forms of heart muscle disease. Using next-generation sequencing, several groups revealed a wide range of pathogenic variants in LVNC patients and an association between pathogenic variants and poor prognoses, especially in those patients harboring multiple pathogenic variants [10, 11, 37, 38]. Variants in MYH7were associated with HCM, DCM, and restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM). Patients with sarcomeric genes variants had more frequent findings of trabeculations and likelihood fibrosis in the interventricular septum of the myocardium [11]. Variants in mindbomb homolog 1 (MIB1), LMNA,and MLPwere linked to LVNC associated with DCM. Myosin-binding protein C (MYBPC3) mutations are associated with LVNC-hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, while SCN5Aand DSPvariants are reported causative for arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM), DCM, and cardiac conduction system dysfunction disorders including Brugada syndrome and long QT syndrome. Interestingly, truncating variants in the LAMP2gene that is causative for Danon disease were identified in LVNC patients by Li et.al [37]. In addition, mitochondrial genome mutations [39], chromosomal abnormalities such as 1p36 deletion, 7p14·3p14·1 deletion, 18p subtelomeric deletion, 22q11·2 deletion, distal 22q11·2, 8p23·1 deletion trisomies 18 and 13, and tetrasomy 5q35·2–5q35 have been associated with syndromic LVNC [40, 41, 42, 43, 44]. Patients with Coffin–Lowry syndrome (RPS6KA3mutation), Sotos syndrome (NSD1mutation), and Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 1A (PMP22duplication) have also been reported to manifest clinical signs of LVNC [23, 45, 46, 47]. Titin encoded by the TTNgene with 364 exons is the largest protein, expressed in striated muscles [48]. A missense variant TTNA178D identified by high throughput next-generation whole-genome sequencing techniques that have been implicated in clinical genetics practice over the last decade has recently been associated with autosomal dominant LVNC and DCM [49]. Nonetheless, a genotype–phenotype correlation may not be identifiable for all mutations and variants. Genetic defects may have incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity or have no causal relationship between genotype and phenotype [2].

The embryonic hypothesis does not explain acquired LVNC that presents after birth, some forms of which are potentially reversible. Acquired LVNC, has been identified in athletes, pregnant women, and patients with sickle cell anemia, myopathies, and chronic renal failure [50]. The etiology of acquired LVNC is merely speculative. One such hypothesis argues that mild LVNC can remain undetected until transient LV dilation allows LVNC to become visible under precise and accurate imaging [51]. It is also speculated that acquired LVNC may be due to cardiac remodeling from increased preload and altered hemodynamics [29]. Ventricular trabeculation in athletes, particularly in the LV apex, allows for increased compliance which reduces wall stress and strain [52]. Given the high risk of possible cardiac embolic events from thrombus formation in the intertrabecular recesses, clinical trials for thromboembolic events in isolated LVNC have been suggested [53, 54, 55].

2.2 Diagnosis and therapeutic strategy

The clinical manifestations of LVNC vary widely, including no symptoms, thromboembolic events (ventricular or systemic arterial), LV dilation, impaired contractility with heart failure leading to pulmonary edema, arrhythmia including ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation, and sudden cardiac death. Patients with neuromuscular disorder and LVNC may present with elevation in muscle form of creatine kinase, CK-MM (creatine kinase, muscle isoform) consistent with skeletal myopathy [7].

Echocardiography is the first-line diagnostic routine and an accessible technique to detect abnormal trabeculations or a “spongy” appearance of the myocardium. Several diagnostic criteria have been developed to define LVNC through echocardiographic analysis. A ratio of >2:1 in thickness of noncompacted to compacted layers during diastole is deemed diagnostic for LVNC [56, 57]. Compared with echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging offers more in-depth anatomic and functional features of the noncompacted myocardium. Late gadolinium enhancement specifically provides detection of cardiac fibrosis. CMR criteria developed by Petersen et al. to accurately diagnose pathologic noncompaction is based on a noncompaction to compaction ratio at end-diastole of >2.3 [58]. Quantitative CMR criteria by Jacquier et al. define LV noncompacted mass > 20% of the total mass for accurate LVNC diagnosis [59], while Grothoff et al. propose LV mass > 25% of the total mass as well as a noncompacted mass > 15 g/m2 [60]. Despite all these proposed criteria, there are wide inconsistencies and poor specificity, and it remains difficult to accurately differentiate normal variants in trabeculations from pathological LVNC [61]. Therefore, data matrices 0f echocardiography and CMR imaging measurements, electrocardiogram features, and clinical genetics of the patient and relatives are helpful for confirming the clinical diagnosis [7].

Genetic testing in patients with LVNC and family members has been important in identifying genetic causes of cardiac dysfunction. Testing can be done on genes known to be associated with LVNC and other forms of cardiomyopathy as well as genes involved in syndromic diseases such as metabolic abnormalities, mitochondrial dysfunction, Barth syndrome, and storage diseases. Identification of pathogenic variants in probands and family members can be followed by segregation studies in the family [15].

Treatment strategy in LVNC depends on clinical presentations and complications, and clinical needs are managed according to corresponding guidelines [62]. The key targets of clinical management are the treatment of heart failure (including beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-II receptor blockers, aldosterone antagonists, diuretics, and heart transplantation), arrhythmias (including ablation and implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with life-threatening events), and oral anticoagulation. In patients with congenital heart disease and LVNC, surgery for the congenital abnormalities takes precedence when feasible. In many cases, palliative surgery ultimately fails because of the myocardial abnormality, and cardiac transplantation is required [63].

Advertisement

3. Animal models of LVNC

LVNC is an overlap disorder and it appears that any of these “final common pathways” can be involved depending on the specific form of LVNC [64]. Combining information about disease-causing genes with murine models is crucial in identifying pathways involved in ventricular noncompaction. For instance, Barth syndrome is caused by tafazzin mutations, and tafazzin knockdown mice were engineered using a short-hairpin RNA-inducible transgenic approach. These mice demonstrated hypertrabeculation and noncompaction, and the knockdown mice died prenatally at E12.5–14.5 [65]. New powerful cutting-edge gene-editing technologies using transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) have been used for modeling LVNC [66, 67, 68, 69]. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived cardiomyocytes have emerged as a useful tool for investigating pathological mechanisms of many cardiovascular diseases including LVNC [70, 71]. Several signaling pathways such as the Dll4-NOTCH [72], MIB1 [73], BMP [74], and TGF-β [71] have been demonstrated to regulate myocardial trabecular compaction as well as to be involved in the development of LVNC. While zebrafish and Drosophilahave been used to study LVNC in addition to patient-specific iPSCs derived cardiomyocytes, mice are more commonly used to genetically engineer LVNC phenotypes as shown in Table 1 [75, 76].

GeneAnimal modelSignalingRef #
FKBP12KO mouseDecrease in Notch1 activity, increase in BMP10[79]
BMP10KO E9.0–13.5 mouseTGF-b[80]
BMP10Overexpression adult mouseTGF-b[81]
NUMB/NUMBLDouble KO mouseInhibition of Notch1, Smad6 and Smad7, WNT[82]
SMAD7Mutant mouseBMP10, TGF-b[86]
TBX20Overexpression mouseT-box family, TBX1[87]
MIB1Mutant zebrafishReduces Notch1[89]
MIB1Decifient zebrafishReduces Notch1[89]
VEGFOverexpression mouseNotch1, Flk-1[90]
Daam1Decifient mousePCP and WNT[92]
NKX2–5KO mouseMEF2, HAND1, HAND2, GATA, BMP10[96]
NFATC1Mutant mouseNFAT[99]
TAZInducible knockdownCardiolipin remodeling[102]
TAZKO mouseCardiolipin remodeling[65]
TTNMutant mouseTelethonin loss[104]

Table 1.

Animal models of LVNC.

3.1 Animal models related to the Notch signaling pathway

The Notch signaling pathway is a highly conserved intercellular pathway involved with multisystem differentiation. Particularly in the cardiovascular system, Notch1 mediates ventricular morphogenesis, coronary vessel development, and communication between the endocardium and myocardium for cardiomyocyte proliferation and differentiation. Mutations in the Notch signaling pathway cause congenital heart disease [77]. Mammals have Notch 1–4, a group of transmembrane receptors with an extracellular domain and an intracellular domain. The Notch extracellular domain (NECD) interacts with ligands of the Delta and Jagged family, and these receptor-ligand interactions are modulated by manic fringe (Mfng) glycosyltransferase. Delta and Jagged ligands are ubiquitinated by Mib1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, and trigger endocytosis of the ligand. Mib1 activity exposes the receptor to ADAM metalloproteases for Notch cleavage. In response, the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) translocates to the nucleus and acts as a transcription factor. The NICD is comprised of the RBPJ domain and ANK repeats [77].

The first murine model for LVNC was the Fkbp1a (or FKBP12)-deficient mouse. Deficiency in FKBP1a, a binding protein of the immunophilin family, causesventricular noncompaction, thin ventricular walls, hypertrabeculation, and ventricular septal defects [20, 78]. Fkbp1a is a negative modulator of activated Notch 1. In Fkbp1a-deficient mice, activated Notch1 is upregulated. In Fkb1a-deficient mice, Fkbp1a overexpression significantly reduced activated Notch1 [79]. Fkbp1a deficiency upregulates BMP10, a peptide growth factor in the TGF-β family involved in the cardiac compaction process. BMP10 upregulation in Fkbp1a-deficient mice indicates the importance of this gene in the trabeculation and compaction process.

In mouse embryogenesis, Bmp10 is transiently expressed in ventricular myocardium at E9.0–13.5 during myocardial maturation and in the atria E16.5–18.5 [74]. BMP10-deficient mice embryos appear unaffected at E8.5–9.0, arrest at E9.0–9.5, and die at E10.5. Immunostaining of mutant embryos exhibited thin ventricular walls and primitive trabecular ridges. The localization of BMP10 to the ventricular myocardium for the brief period at E9.0–13.5 suggests that BMP10 is crucial for continued myocardial development. Postnatal cardiac-specific BMP10 overexpression compromised cardiac growth, caused subaortic narrowing and concentric myocardial thickening [80]. Human atrial natriuretic factor (hANF) promoter can be used to overexpress BMP10 in mice. Overexpression of BMP10 demonstrated hypertrabeculation and severe heart failure [81]. Like in Fkbp1a-deficient mice and cardiac overexpression models, BMP10 is also upregulated in NUMB/NUMBL-deficient mice (myocardial double-knockout mice) [82]. NUMB and NUMBL proteins of the NUMB family are cell fate determinants for hemopoietic stem cells, muscle satellite cells, cancer stem cells, and hemangioblast progenitor cell types and maintain the fate of neural stem cells as well as regulate their differentiation [83]. Both NUMB and NUMBL inhibit Notch1 signaling and are crucial for trabeculation, cardiomyocyte proliferation and differentiation, and trabecular thickness [84]. On the other hand, inhibitory intracellular transducers such as Smad6 and Smad7 negatively regulate the BMP/ TGF-β signaling pathway [85]. Smad7 is expressed by endothelial cells in the major arteries in mice, and Smad7 deficiency causes increased Smad 1, 5, and 8 in the endocardial endothelium [81, 86]. Unsurprisingly, Smad7 mutant mice demonstrate ventricular noncompaction, thin ventricular walls, and ventricular septal defect. One of the key mediators of BMP10 signaling in ventricular myocardial development and maturation is TBX20, a member of the TBX1 subfamily of the T-box family transcription factors [87]. In murine embryos, Tbx20 can be detected in the cardiac precursor cells at E7·5 and the developing myocardium and endocardium at E8·0 [88]. Cardiac-specific overexpression of TBX20 results in severe DCM, ventricular hypertrabeculation, and abnormal muscular septum, consistent with the DCM type of LVNC [87].

Another Notch pathway element, Mib1, is associated with the LVNC phenotype of biventricular noncompaction with dilation and heart failure [20]. Genetic sequencing of 100 European patients revealed two autosomal dominant mutations—V943F and R530X. Injection of Mib1-mutated mRNA, corresponding to the V943F and R530X mutations, into zebrafish embryos disrupts Notch signaling [89]. Inactivation of Mib1 reduces Notch1 signaling and myocardial arrest. Mutant Mib1 mice produce an LVNC phenotype of immature trabeculae and noncompaction [89].

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is produced by the myocardium and plays a role in endocardium-myocardium communication by binding to endocardial receptor Flk-1 [20]. Overexpression of VEGF-A in mice causes hypertrabeculation, abnormalities in cardiac morphology and coronary vessels, and embryonic lethality at E12.5–14.0 [90].

3.2 Animal models related to the WNT signaling pathway

The planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway is a β-catenin-independent Wnt pathway that was first studied in Drosophila. The PCP pathway plays a role in the epithelial orientation of hair and sensory bristles, apical-basolateral polarity, gastrulation, and neurulation [31, 91]. Disheveled-associated activator of morphogenesis I (Daam1) is a mediator of the PCP pathway and a formin protein found in the plasma membrane and cytoplasmic vesicles. Daam1 is involved with cardiac morphogenesis and is highly expressed in murine cardiac tissue. Daam1-deficient mice have been shown to cause an LVNC phenotype with ventricular noncompaction and the thin ventricular wall. It is likely that the abnormalities seen in Daam1-deficient mice are due to cytoskeletal dysfunction since Daam1 is involved with F-actin assembly and sarcomere organization. Interestingly, the absence of Daam1 does not alter BMP10 expression nor cardiomyocyte proliferation, which offers another pathogenic model of LVNC through disruption in myofibrillogenesis, cytoskeleton organization, and cardiomyocyte polarization [31, 92].

NUMB is also a component of the adherens junction by forming complexes with β-catenin to regulate cellular adhesion viaWnt signaling [82]. It also interacts with integrin-β subunits to regulate cell migration and promote their endocytosis for directional cell migration. Deletion of NUMB and NUMBL from mouse hearts results in LVNC with congenital heart disease with atrioventricular septal defects, truncus arteriosus, and double outlet right ventricle in vivo[82]. This model shows that NUMB family proteins regulate trabecular thickness by inhibiting Notch1 signaling and control cardiac morphogenesis in a Notch1-independent manner.

3.3 Animal models related to other signaling pathways

NKX2–5, a cardiac homeobox gene, is a transcription factor that regulates heart development, working along with MEF2, HAND1, and HAND2 transcription factors to direct heart looping during early heart development [93]. Genetic variants in NKX2–5are associated with progressive cardiomyopathy and conduction defects in humans [94, 95]. Ventricular-muscle-cell-restricted knockout of NKX2–5in mice leads to progressive atrioventricular block with conduction system cell dropout and fibrosis [96]. LVNC is a prominent feature in neonatal mice, with progressive biventricular dilation and heart failure developing early. It directly activates MEF2to control cardiomyocyte differentiation and operates in a positive feedback loop with GATA transcription factors to regulate cardiomyocyte formation. A high-level BMP10 expression in the adult ventricular myocardium has been also observed.

The expression of early response genes in lymphocytes is regulated by NFAT transcription factors [97]. NFATC1mutant mouse embryos have cardiac abnormalities including myocardial developmental abnormalities, narrowing or occlusion of the ventricular outflow tract, defective septum morphogenesis, and underdevelopment of valves [98, 99]. Ventricular hypertrophy and noncompaction with hypertrabeculation were seen in 40% of mutant mice, suggesting that NFAT signaling pathways are important for hypertrabeculation and noncompaction as well as the development of valves and the septum.

Barth syndrome is caused by mutations in the X-linked TAZand is associated with LVNC and abnormal cardiolipin remodeling [12, 100]. Tafazzin catalyzes cardiolipin maturation reactions at the final stage of cardiolipin biosynthesis [101]. Inducible knockdown of TAZ(TAZKD) in murine models using short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) exhibited an adult-onset LVNC associated with abnormal cardiolipin profiles and mitochondrial structural abnormalities [102]. Knockout of TAZat the embryonic stage leads to unique developmental cardiomyopathy characterized by ventricular myocardial hypertrabeculation and noncompaction and early lethality, suggesting that mitochondrial function is important for proper myocardial development [65].

Cytoskeletal and sarcomeric proteins encoding gene mutations have been shown to account for 20% or more of LVNC [7]. Truncating variants in TTNare well-documented to cause skeletal myopathies and cardiomyopathies including LVNC [48, 49, 103]. Homozygous mouse model carrying titin A178D mutation created by using CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing displayed features of mild DCM, but not LVNC phenotype [104]. These mice showed complete loss of telethonin from the Z-disc and induction of a proteo-toxic response in the heart upon aging and adrenergic stress.

Advertisement

4. Conclusions

The pathogenesis of LVNC, a recently classified cardiomyopathy, remains largely unclear. With over 40 genes linked to LVNC, both genotype variation and phenotype variation are vast. Genetic testing in families and individuals with LVNC shas proved useful in identifying disease-causing variants. While the Notch signaling pathway is implicated in the pathogenesis of LVNC, there may be other pathways leading to congenital and acquired forms of LVNC. Identifying specific pathway elements is crucial for diagnosis and treatment. Modeling LVNC variants can help us to determine the genetic basis and pathogenesis of the disease.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.Maron BJ et al. Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation. 2006;113(14):1807-1816
  2. 2.Finsterer J, Stöllberger C, Towbin JA. Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy: Cardiac, neuromuscular, and genetic factors. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2017;14(4):224-237
  3. 3.Towbin JA, Jefferies JL. Cardiomyopathies due to left ventricular noncompaction, mitochondrial and storage diseases, and inborn errors of metabolism. Circulation Research. 2017;121(7):838-854
  4. 4.Goud A, Padmanabhan S. A rare form of cardiomyopathy: Left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives. 2016;6(1):29888
  5. 5.Maron BJ. The 2006 American Heart Association classification of cardiomyopathies is the gold standard. Circulation: Heart Failure. 2008;1(1):72-76
  6. 6.Elliott P et al. Classification of the cardiomyopathies: A position statement from the european society of cardiology working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases. European Heart Journal. 2007;29(2):270-276
  7. 7.Towbin JA, Lorts A, Jefferies JL. Left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 2015;386(9995):813-825
  8. 8.Brescia ST et al. Mortality and sudden death in pediatric left ventricular noncompaction in a tertiary referral center. Circulation. 2013;127(22):2202-2208
  9. 9.Finsterer J. Cardiogenetics, neurogenetics, and pathogenetics of left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction. Pediatric Cardiology. 2009;30(5):659-681
  10. 10.Wang C et al. A wide and specific spectrum of genetic variants and genotype-phenotype correlations revealed by next-generation sequencing in patients with left ventricular noncompaction. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2017;6(9):e006210
  11. 11.Miszalski-Jamka K et al. Novel genetic triggers and genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with left ventricular noncompaction. Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics, 2017;10(4):e001763
  12. 12.Towbin JA. Left ventricular noncompaction: A new form of heart failure. Heart Failure Clinics, 2010;6(4):453-469
  13. 13.Hoedemaekers YM et al. The importance of genetic counseling, DNA diagnostics, and cardiologic family screening in left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy. Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics. 2010;3(3):232-239
  14. 14.van Waning JI et al. Cardiac phenotypes, genetics, and risks in familial noncompaction cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019;73(13):1601-1611
  15. 15.Towbin JA, Jefferies JL. Cardiomyopathies due to left ventricular noncompaction, mitochondrial and storage diseases, and inborn errors of metabolism. Circulation Research. 2017;121(7):838-854
  16. 16.Zhang W et al. Molecular mechanism of ventricular trabeculation/compaction and the pathogenesis of the left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC). American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics. 2013;163C(3):144-156
  17. 17.Sedmera D et al. Developmental patterning of the myocardium. The Anatomical Record. 2000;258(4):319-337
  18. 18.Sedmera D et al. Developmental patterning of the myocardium. The Anatomical Record. 2000;258(4):319-337
  19. 19.Engberding R, Yelbuz TM, Breithardt G. Isolated noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium - a review of the literature two decades after the initial case description. Clinical Research in Cardiology. 2007;96(7):481-488
  20. 20.Ichida F. Left ventricular noncompaction − risk stratification and genetic consideration . Journal of Cardiology. 2020;75(1):1-9
  21. 21.Sasse-Klaassen S et al. Isolated noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium in the adult is an autosomal dominant disorder in the majority of patients. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A. 2003;119A(2):162-167
  22. 22.Xing Y et al. Genetic analysis in patients with left ventricular noncompaction and evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 2006;88(1):71-77
  23. 23.Martinez HR et al. Left ventricular noncompaction in Sotos syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A. 2011;155A(5):1115-1118
  24. 24.Saccucci P et al. Isolated left ventricular noncompaction in a case of sotos syndrome: A casual or causal link? Cardiology Research and Practice. 2011;2011:824095
  25. 25.Finsterer J et al. Acquired noncompaction in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. International Journal of Cardiology. 2006;106(3):420-421
  26. 26.Hofer M, Stollberger C, Finsterer J. Acquired noncompaction associated with myopathy. International Journal of Cardiology. 2007;121(3):296-297
  27. 27.Stollberger C et al. Neuromuscular and cardiac comorbidity determines survival in 140 patients with left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction. International Journal of Cardiology. 2011;150(1):71-74
  28. 28.Okumura T, Murohara T. Unsolved issue in left ventricular noncompaction: is the strange form of myocardium congenital or acquired? Cardiology. 2019;143(3-4):105-106
  29. 29.Wengrofsky P et al. Left ventricular trabeculation and noncompaction cardiomyopathy: A review. EC Clinical and Experimental Anatomy. 2019;2(6):267-283
  30. 30.Villard E et al. Mutation screening in dilated cardiomyopathy: Prominent role of the beta myosin heavy chain gene. European Heart Journal. 2005;26(8):794-803
  31. 31.Liu Y, Chen H, Shou W. Potential common pathogenic pathways for the left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC). Pediatric Cardiology. 2018;39(6):1099-1106
  32. 32.Phoon CKL et al. Tafazzin knockdown in mice leads to a developmental cardiomyopathy with early diastolic dysfunction preceding myocardial noncompaction. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2012;1(2):jah3-e000455
  33. 33.Milano A et al. HCN4 mutations in multiple families with bradycardia and left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;64(8):745-756
  34. 34.Saga A et al. Lamin A/C gene mutations in familial cardiomyopathy with advanced atrioventricular block and arrhythmia. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2009;218(4):309-316
  35. 35.Sasse-Klaassen S et al. Novel gene locus for autosomal dominant left ventricular noncompaction maps to chromosome 11p15. Circulation. 2004;109(22):2720-2723
  36. 36.Hirono K et al. Familial left ventricular non-compaction is associated with a rare p.V407I variant in bone morphogenetic protein 10. Circulation Journal. 2019;83(8):1737-1746
  37. 37.Li S et al. Genotype-positive status is associated with poor prognoses in patients with left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2018;7(20):e009910
  38. 38.van Waning JI et al. Genetics, clinical features, and long-term outcome of noncompaction cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;71(7):711-722
  39. 39.Tang S et al. Left ventricular noncompaction is associated with mutations in the mitochondrial genome. Mitochondrion. 2010;10(4):350-357
  40. 40.Digilio MC et al. Syndromic non-compaction of the left ventricle: Associated chromosomal anomalies. Clinical Genetics. 2013;84(4):362-367
  41. 41.Beken S et al. A neonatal case of left ventricular noncompaction associated with trisomy 18. Genetic Counseling. 2011;22(2):161-164
  42. 42.Blinder JJ et al. Noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium in a boy with a novel chromosome 8p23.1 deletion. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A. 2011;155A(9):2215-2220
  43. 43.Yukifumi M et al. Trisomy 13 in a 9-year-old girl with left ventricular noncompaction. Pediatric Cardiology. 2011;32(2):206-207
  44. 44.Sellars EA et al. Ventricular noncompaction and absent thumbs in a newborn with tetrasomy 5q35.2-5q35.3: An association with Hunter-McAlpine syndrome? American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A. 2011;155A(6):1409-1413
  45. 45.Martinez HR et al. Coffin-Lowry syndrome and left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy with a restrictive pattern. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A. 2011;155A(12):3030-3034
  46. 46.Zechner U et al. Familial Sotos syndrome caused by a novel missense mutation, C2175S, in NSD1 and associated with normal intelligence, insulin dependent diabetes, bronchial asthma, and lipedema. European Journal of Medical Genetics. 2009;52(5):306-310
  47. 47.Corrado G et al. Left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction with PMP22 duplication-based Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Cardiology. 2006;105(3):142-145
  48. 48.Labeit S, Kolmerer B, Linke WA. The giant protein titin. Emerging roles in physiology and pathophysiology. Circulation Research. 1997;80(2):290-294
  49. 49.Hastings R et al. Combination of whole genome sequencing, linkage, and functional studies implicates a missense mutation in titin as a cause of autosomal dominant cardiomyopathy with features of left ventricular noncompaction. Circulation. Cardiovascular Genetics. 2016;9(5):426-435
  50. 50.Arbustini E et al. Left ventricular noncompaction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2016;68(9):949-966
  51. 51.Angelini P. Can left ventricular noncompaction be acquired, and can it disappear? Texas Heart Institute Journal. 2017;44(4):264-265
  52. 52.Abela M, D'Silva A. Left ventricular trabeculations in athletes: Epiphenomenon or phenotype of disease? Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2018;20(12):100-100
  53. 53.Lestienne F et al. Ischemic stroke in a young patient heralding a left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy. Case Reports in Neurology. 2017;9(2):204-209
  54. 54.Kulhari A, Kalra N, Sila C. Noncompaction cardiomyopathy and stroke: Case report and literature review. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2015;24(8):e213-e217
  55. 55.Finsterer J, Stollberger C. Stroke due to Chagas' cardiomyopathy or noncompaction. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. 2011;96(5):427 author reply 428
  56. 56.Ichida F. Left ventricular noncompaction—Risk stratification and genetic consideration. Journal of Cardiology. 2020;75(1):1-9
  57. 57.Jenni R et al. Echocardiographic and pathoanatomical characteristics of isolated left ventricular non-compaction: A step towards classification as a distinct cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2001;86(6):666-671
  58. 58.Petersen SE et al. Left ventricular non-compaction: Insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2005;46(1):101-105
  59. 59.Jacquier A et al. Measurement of trabeculated left ventricular mass using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of left ventricular non-compaction. European Heart Journal. 2010;31(9):1098-1104
  60. 60.Grothoff M et al. Value of cardiovascular MR in diagnosing left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy and in discriminating between other cardiomyopathies. European Radiology. 2012;22(12):2699-2709
  61. 61.Rhee JW, Grove ME, Ashley EA. Navigating genetic and phenotypic uncertainty in left ventricular noncompaction. Circulation. Cardiovascular Genetics, 2017;10(4):e001857
  62. 62.Yancy CW et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;62(16):e147-e239
  63. 63.Yu WZ et al. Congenital heart surgery in patients with ventricular noncompaction. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2015;30(2):179-184
  64. 64.Towbin JA. Inherited cardiomyopathies. Circulation Journal. 2014;78(10):2347-2356
  65. 65.Phoon CK et al. Tafazzin knockdown in mice leads to a developmental cardiomyopathy with early diastolic dysfunction preceding myocardial noncompaction. Journal of the American Heart Association, 2012;1(2):jah3-e000455
  66. 66.Doudna JA, Charpentier E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014;346(6213):1258096
  67. 67.Gaj T et al. Genome-editing technologies: Principles and applications. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2016;8(12):a023754
  68. 68.German DM et al. Therapeutic genome editing in cardiovascular diseases. JACC Basic Translational Science. 2019;4(1):122-131
  69. 69.Nishiga M, Qi LS, Wu JC. Therapeutic genome editing in cardiovascular diseases. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2021;168:147-157
  70. 70.Kim C et al. Studying arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia with patient-specific iPSCs. Nature. 2013;494(7435):105-110
  71. 71.Kodo K et al. iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes reveal abnormal TGF-beta signalling in left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy. Nature Cell Biology. 2016;18(10):1031-1042
  72. 72.D'Amato G, Luxan G, de la Pompa JL. Notch signalling in ventricular chamber development and cardiomyopathy. The FEBS Journal. 2016;283(23):4223-4237
  73. 73.Luxan G et al. Mutations in the NOTCH pathway regulator MIB1 cause left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy. Nature Medicine. 2013;19(2):193-201
  74. 74.Chen H et al. BMP10 is essential for maintaining cardiac growth during murine cardiogenesis. Development. 2004;131(9):2219-2231
  75. 75.Arbustini E, Weidemann F, Hall JL. Left ventricular noncompaction: A distinct cardiomyopathy or a trait shared by different cardiac diseases? Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;64(17):1840-1850
  76. 76.Purevjav E. Animal Models of Cardiomyopathies. Eva T, Sarat Chandra Y, (Eds). Animal Models in Medicine and Biology. IntechOpen; 15th October 2019. Available from:https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/68936 2020. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89033
  77. 77.D'Amato G, Luxán G, De La Pompa JL. Notch signalling in ventricular chamber development and cardiomyopathy. The FEBS Journal. 2016;283(23):4223-4237
  78. 78.Towbin JA, Lorts A, Jefferies JL. Left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy. The Lancet. 2015;386(9995):813-825
  79. 79.Chen H et al. Fkbp1a controls ventricular myocardium trabeculation and compaction by regulating endocardial Notch1 activity. Development. 2013;140(9):1946-1957
  80. 80.Chen H et al. Overexpression of bone morphogenetic protein 10 in myocardium disrupts cardiac postnatal hypertrophic growth. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281(37):27481-27491
  81. 81.Chen H et al. Analysis of ventricular hypertrabeculation and noncompaction using genetically engineered mouse models. Pediatric Cardiology. 2009;30(5):626-634
  82. 82.Yang J et al. Inhibition of Notch2 by Numb/Numblike controls myocardial compaction in the heart. Cardiovascular Research. 2012;96(2):276-285
  83. 83.Dho SE et al. Characterization of four mammalian numb protein isoforms. Identification of cytoplasmic and membrane-associated variants of the phosphotyrosine binding domain. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274(46):33097-33104
  84. 84.Zhao C et al. Numb family proteins are essential for cardiac morphogenesis and progenitor differentiation. Development. 2014;141(2):281-295
  85. 85.Lin SJ et al. The structural basis of TGF-beta, bone morphogenetic protein, and activin ligand binding. Reproduction. 2006;132(2):179-190
  86. 86.Chen Q et al. Smad7 is required for the development and function of the heart. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284(1):292-300
  87. 87.Zhang W et al. Tbx20 transcription factor is a downstream mediator for bone morphogenetic protein-10 in regulating cardiac ventricular wall development and function. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011;286(42):36820-36829
  88. 88.Shelton EL, Yutzey KE. Tbx20 regulation of endocardial cushion cell proliferation and extracellular matrix gene expression. Developmental Biology. 2007;302(2):376-388
  89. 89.Luxán G et al. Mutations in the NOTCH pathway regulator MIB1 cause left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy. Nature Medicine. 2013;19(2):193-201
  90. 90.Miquerol L, Langille BL, Nagy A. Embryonic development is disrupted by modest increases in vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression. Development. 2000;127(18):3941-3946
  91. 91.Komiya Y, Habas R. Wnt signal transduction pathways. Organogenesis. 2008;4(2):68-75
  92. 92.Li D et al. Dishevelled-associated activator of morphogenesis 1 (Daam1) is required for heart morphogenesis. Development. 2011;138(2):303-315
  93. 93.Lints TJ et al. Nkx-2.5: A novel murine homeobox gene expressed in early heart progenitor cells and their myogenic descendants. Development. 1993;119(3):969
  94. 94.Jhaveri S, Aziz PF, Saarel E. Expanding the electrical phenotype of NKX2-5 mutations: Ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and complete heart block within one family. HeartRhythm Case Report. 2018;4(11):530-533
  95. 95.Benson DW et al. Mutations in the cardiac transcription factor NKX2.5 affect diverse cardiac developmental pathways. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1999;104(11):1567-1573
  96. 96.Pashmforoush M et al. Nkx2-5 pathways and congenital heart disease; loss of ventricular myocyte lineage specification leads to progressive cardiomyopathy and complete heart block. Cell. 2004;117(3):373-386
  97. 97.Aramburu J et al. Selective inhibition of NFAT activation by a peptide spanning the calcineurin targeting site of NFAT. Molecular Cell. 1998;1(5):627-637
  98. 98.Liu J et al. Calcineurin is a common target of cyclophilin-cyclosporin A and FKBP-FK506 complexes. Cell. 1991;66(4):807-815
  99. 99.de la Pompa JL et al. Role of the NF-ATc transcription factor in morphogenesis of cardiac valves and septum. Nature. 1998;392(6672):182-186
  100. 100.Ichida F et al. Novel gene mutations in patients with left ventricular noncompaction or Barth syndrome. Circulation. 2001;103(9):1256-1263
  101. 101.Xu Y et al. The enzymatic function of tafazzin. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281(51):39217-39224
  102. 102.Acehan D et al. Cardiac and skeletal muscle defects in a mouse model of human Barth syndrome. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011;286(2):899-908
  103. 103.Peled Y et al. Titin mutation in familial restrictive cardiomyopathy. International Journal of Cardiology. 2014;171(1):24-30
  104. 104.Jiang H et al. Functional analysis of a gene-edited mouse model to gain insights into the disease mechanisms of a titin missense variant. Basic Research in Cardiology. 2021;116(1):14

Written By

Enkhsaikhan Purevjav, Michelle Chintanaphol, Buyan-Ochir Orgil, Nelly R. Alberson and Jeffrey A. Towbin

Submitted: July 1st, 2021Reviewed: October 5th, 2021Published: October 31st, 2021