Taxonomic traits of species in the genus of
1. The definition of acidophiles
Acidophiles are an important category of extremophiles that are defined by the environmental conditions in which they grow optimally. Acidophile is a broad definition that organisms can grow preferentially in environments with a pH at below 6. In 2007, Johnson proposed a generally accepted classification standard according to the optimal pH. The organisms with optimal pH at 3 or below are classified as extreme acidophiles, and those with an optimal pH of 3–5 are moderate acidophiles [1]. Although some organisms can grow at a pH lower than 5, they are recognized as acid-tolerant species because of their pH optima above 5. The research history of acidophiles started in the discovery of a sulfur-oxidizing bacteria isolated from a compost sample mixed with sulfur, rock phosphate, and soil by Waksman and Joffe in 1922 [2]. This bacterium has an optimal growth pH at 2.0–2.8 and is a strict autotroph that obtains energy by oxidizing inorganic sulfur substances (elemental sulfur, thiosulfate, and hydrogen sulfide). This bacterium was named as
2. The typical acidophilic bacteria and the applications of acidophiles
Trait | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gram stain | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Cell size (μm) | 1.0 × 0.5 | 2.4 × 0.5 | 1–2 | 1–2 | 1.0–2.0 × 0.5 | 1.2–1.9 × 0.7 | 1–2 × 0.4–0.6 |
Motility | +/− | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Growth pH (optimum) | 1.3–4.5 (2.0–2.5) | 1.9–3.4 (2.5) | 1.5– (2.0) | 1.4–3.0 (2.1) | 0.5–5.5 (2.0–3.0) | 1.0–3.5 (2.0–2.5) | 0.5–6.0 (3.5–4.0) |
Growth T/°C (optimum) | 10–37 (30–35) | 4–37 (28–33) | 5–33 (30) | 10–37 (29) | 10–37 (28–30) | 32–52 (40–45) | 10–40 (25–30) |
Oxidation of S0, S4O62−, S2O32− | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Oxidation of Fe2+ | + | + | + | + | — | — | — |
Growth on sulfide minerals | + | + | + | + | — | — | — |
Growth on hydrogen | + | (+) | — | + | — | + | NR |
Anaerobic growth with Fe3+ | + | + | + | + | — | — | — |
N2 fixation | + | + | NR | NR | — | — | — |
Mol% G + C | 58–59 | 55–56 | 57.4 | 58.4 | 52 | 63–64 | 61.5 |
Thiosulfate-metabolic pathways | TSD enzyme; S4I pathway. | Sox system; TSD enzyme; S4I pathway. | NR | TSD enzyme; S4I pathway. | Sox system; S4I pathway. | Sox system; S4I pathway. | Sox system; S4I pathway. |
Table 1.
+, positive; −, negative; +/−, the positive or negative result from different reports; (+), some strains have the ability to oxidize hydrogen; NR, not reported; Tm, temperature.
3. The physiological feature of chemoautotrophic acidophiles
Sulfur oxidation is a characteristic physiological feature for many acidophilic microorganisms and is an important biochemical process that promotes the generation of the acid environment and the formation of acidophilic microbial communities.

Figure 1.
The model of sulfur oxidation in

Figure 2.
The model of sulfur oxidation in
4. The significance of studying and understanding acidophiles
Acidophiles, as important extremophiles, have presented important scientific significance and industrial application values. Researches on acidophiles do not only help us understand the diversity and adaptation of life on earth, but also be conducive in developing various new biotechnologies to resolve the problems of resource exploitation, pollution treatment, and human health. This book provides some new breakthroughs and insights on the researches of acidophiles: the two-component system (TCS) in the regulation of sulfur metabolic process; the adaptation mechanisms of acidophiles to low pH; the regulation mechanism and the application strategy of quorum sensing in bioleaching bacteria;
References
- 1.
Johnson JD. Physiology and ecology of acidophilic microorganisms. In: Gerday C, Glansdorff N, editors. Physiology and Biochemistry of Extremophiles. Washington, DC, USA: American Society of Microbiology Press; 2007. pp. 255-270 - 2.
Waksman SA, Joffe J. Microorganisms concerned in the oxidation of sulfur in the soil: II. Thiooxidans , a new sulfur-oxidizing organism isolated from the soil. Journal of Bacteriology. 1922;7 (2):239 - 3.
Kelly DP, Wood AP. Reclassification of some species of Thiobacillus to the newly designated generaAcidithiobacillus gen. nov.,Halothiobacillus gen. nov. andThermithiobacillus gen. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2000;50 (2):511-516 - 4.
Schleper C et al. Picrophilus gen. nov., fam. nov.: A novel aerobic, heterotrophic, thermoacidophilic genus and family comprising archaea capable of growth around pH 0. Journal of Bacteriology. 1995;177 (24):7050-7059 - 5.
Harrison AP Jr. The acidophilic thiobacilli and other acidophilic bacteria that share their habitat. Annual Review of Microbiology. 1984; 38 (1):265-292 - 6.
Schrenk MO et al. Distribution of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans andLeptospirillum ferrooxidans : Implications for generation of acid mine drainage. Science. 1998;279 (5356):1519-1522 - 7.
Jones DS et al. Community genomic analysis of an extremely acidophilic sulfur-oxidizing biofilm. The ISME Journal. 2012; 6 (1):158 - 8.
Hua Z-S et al. Ecological roles of dominant and rare prokaryotes in acid mine drainage revealed by metagenomics and metatranscriptomics. The ISME Journal. 2015; 9 (6):1280 - 9.
Sharmin S et al. Characterization of a novel thiosulfate dehydrogenase from a marine acidophilic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium, Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans strain SH. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 2016;80 (2):273-278 - 10.
Nuñez H et al. Molecular systematics of the genus Acidithiobacillus : Insights into the phylogenetic structure and diversification of the taxon. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8 :30 - 11.
Wang R et al. Sulfur oxidation in the acidophilic autotrophic Acidithiobacillus spp. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;9 :3290 - 12.
Temple KL, Colmer AR. The autotrophic oxidation of iron by a new bacterium: Thiobacillus ferrooxidans . Journal of Bacteriology. 1951;62 (5):605 - 13.
Hallberg KB, Lindström EB. Characterization of Thiobacillus caldus sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic acidophile. Microbiology. 1994;140 (12):3451-3456 - 14.
Xia J-L et al. A new strain Acidithiobacillus albertensis BY-05 for bioleaching of metal sulfides ores. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China. 2007;17 (1):168-175 - 15.
Liljeqvist M, Rzhepishevska OI, Dopson M. Gene identification and substrate regulation provides insights into sulfur accumulation during bioleaching with the psychrotolerant Acidithiobacillus ferrivorans . Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2013;79 (3):951-957 - 16.
Falagán C, Johnson DB. Acidithiobacillus ferriphilus sp. nov., a facultatively anaerobic iron-and sulfur-metabolizing extreme acidophile. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2016;66 (1):206-211 - 17.
Rawlings D, Tributsch H, Hansford G. Reasons why ‘Leptospirillum’-like species rather than Thiobacillus ferrooxidans are the dominant iron-oxidizing bacteria in many commercial processes for the biooxidation of pyrite and related ores. Microbiology. 1999;145 (1):5-13 - 18.
Rawlings DE. Characteristics and adaptability of iron-and sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms used for the recovery of metals from minerals and their concentrates. Microbial Cell Factories. 2005; 4 (1):13 - 19.
Valdés J et al. Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans metabolism: From genome sequence to industrial applications. BMC Genomics. 2008;9 (1):597 - 20.
Valdés J et al. Comparative genome analysis of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ,A. thiooxidans andA. caldus : Insights into their metabolism and ecophysiology. Hydrometallurgy. 2008;94 (1-4):180-184 - 21.
Pathak A, Dastidar M, Sreekrishnan T. Bioleaching of heavy metals from sewage sludge. Journal of Environmental Management. 2009; 90 (8):2343-2353 - 22.
Bayat B, Sari B. Comparative evaluation of microbial and chemical leaching processes for heavy metal removal from dewatered metal plating sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010; 174 (1-3):763-769 - 23.
Arshadi M, Mousavi S. Simultaneous recovery of Ni and Cu from computer-printed circuit boards using bioleaching: Statistical evaluation and optimization. Bioresource Technology. 2014; 174 :233-242 - 24.
Nguyen VK et al. Bioleaching of arsenic and heavy metals from mine tailings by pure and mixed cultures of Acidithiobacillus spp. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2015;21 :451-458 - 25.
Rastegar S et al. Bioleaching of V, Ni, and Cu from residual produced in oil fired furnaces using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans . Hydrometallurgy. 2015;157 :50-59 - 26.
Azizan A, Najafpour G, Harun A. Microbial desulfurization of coal with mixed cultures of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans andThiobacillus thiooxidans . In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Strategic Technologies-ICAST; 2000 - 27.
Charnnok B et al. Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide in biogas using dissolved oxygen in the extreme acidic biofiltration operation. Bioresource Technology. 2013; 131 :492-499 - 28.
He H et al. Biodesulfurization of coal with Acidithiobacillus caldus and analysis of the interfacial interaction between cells and pyrite. Fuel Processing Technology. 2012;101 :73-77 - 29.
Suzuki I, Werkman C. Glutathione and sulfur oxidation by Thiobacillus thiooxidans . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1959;45 (2):239-244 - 30.
London J. Cytochrome in Thiobacillus thiooxidans . Science. 1963;140 (3565):409-410 - 31.
London J, Rittenberg S. Path of sulfur in sulfide and thiosulfate oxidation by thiobacilli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1964; 52 (5):1183-1190 - 32.
Suzuki I, Chan C, Takeuchi T. Oxidation of elemental sulfur to sulfite by Thiobacillus thiooxidans cells. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1992;58 (11):3767-3769 - 33.
Hallberg KB, Dopson M, Lindström EB. Reduced sulfur compound oxidation by Thiobacillus caldus . Journal of Bacteriology. 1996;178 (1):6-11 - 34.
Quatrini R et al. Extending the models for iron and sulfur oxidation in the extreme acidophile Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans . BMC Genomics. 2009;10 (1):394 - 35.
Chen L et al. Acidithiobacillus caldus sulfur oxidation model based on transcriptome analysis between the wild type and sulfur oxygenase reductase defective mutant. PLoS One. 2012;7 (9):e39470 - 36.
Yin H et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals novel insights into sulfur oxidation in the extremophile Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans . BMC Microbiology. 2014;14 (1):179 - 37.
Li L-F et al. The σ 54-dependent two-component system regulating sulfur oxidization (Sox) system in Acidithiobacillus caldus and some chemolithotrophic bacteria. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2017;101 (5):2079-2092 - 38.
Wang Z-B et al. The two-component system RsrS-RsrR regulates the tetrathionate intermediate pathway for thiosulfate oxidation in Acidithiobacillus caldus . Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7 :1755 - 39.
Wu W et al. Discovery of a new subgroup of sulfur dioxygenases and characterization of sulfur dioxygenases in the sulfur metabolic network of Acidithiobacillus caldus . PLoS One. 2017;12 (9):e0183668 - 40.
Yu Y et al. Construction and characterization of tetH overexpression and knockout strains of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans . Journal of Bacteriology. 2014;196 (12):2255-2264