Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Developments in Probiotic Use in the Aquaculture of Salmo Spp.

Written By

Alexander Dindial

Submitted: 10 July 2021 Reviewed: 15 July 2021 Published: 23 September 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99467

From the Edited Volume

Salmon Aquaculture

Edited by Qian Lu

Chapter metrics overview

469 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


While interest in probiotic use in aquaculture is not a new phenomenon, the past few years have seen great developments in probiotic research in Salmo spp. This review examines the corpus of literature surrounding the use of probiotics in some of the species of Salmo most important to modern aquaculture, including Salmo salar, S. coruhensis, S. trutta, and S. trutta caspius, with a particular emphasis on the most recent research. The use of many of these probiotics is associated with such host benefits as enhanced growth, nutrition, and immunity. These benefits and the potential applicability of these probiotics to the modern aquaculture of Salmo are reviewed herein.


  • Salmo
  • Atlantic salmon
  • brown trout
  • Coruh River trout
  • Caspian brown trout
  • S. salar
  • S. trutta caspius
  • S. coruhensis
  • S. trutta
  • fish probiotics
  • aquaculture probiotics

1. Introduction

As in other animals, the gut microbiome of fish is a dynamic, complex, organ-like system that may contain trillions of microorganisms. It is implicated in a number of functions critical to the animal’s health, including digestion, immunity, and nutrient absorption, which may in turn contribute to such things as development, growth and metabolism [1].

There are a few ways by which these salubrious phenomena are known to occur. In terms of immunity, some beneficial bacteria may produce such things as bacteriocins, peroxides, and acids in order to inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms, and have further been observed to mitigate damage caused to the intestines by pathogens [2, 3]. Furthermore, some bacteria have been known to promote the host fish’s immunity through such means as the enhanced infiltration of epithelial leukocytes, the modulation of cytokine and chemokine expression, enhanced leukocyte activity, and enhanced lysozyme activity in the cells of the mucosa [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. On the other hand, some bacteria have been known to enhance fish digestion and nutrient absorption through such things as increasing the length of microvilli, enhancing the fold length of the mucosa, secreting various digestive enzymes, and by fermenting non-digestible compounds (e.g., complex carbohydrates) to make them usable [4, 9, 10, 11].

In order to take advantage of some of these beneficial health effects, it is critically important that fish reared in aquaculture maintain healthy gut microbiota. This may help ensure the success of aquaculture operations by preventing the spread of disease and promoting the healthy growth of fish to market size. To this end, there has been a considerable amount of research on the fish microbiome and the use of probiotics in fish significant to the field of aquaculture. In general, the term “probiotic” typically refers to a sample of live microorganisms that is used in order to confer some kind of health benefit [12]. In many cases, probiotics are consumed in order to allow the microorganisms to enter the organism’s gut, from which point they can exert their salubrious effects. In some cases, probiotics are combined with prebiotics, which are compounds designed to bolster the growth of beneficial bacteria. In many cases, these oligosaccharides can be digested by the bacteria, but not the host. The combination of probiotics and prebiotics is sometimes referred to as synbiotics [12].

Of the aquaculturally significant fish in which probiotics have been studied, genus Salmo is perhaps among the most important. This genus contains a number of species relevant in modern aquaculture, including Salmo salar (the Atlantic salmon), Salmo trutta (the brown trout), S. trutta caspius (the Caspian trout/salmon) and S. coruhensis (the Coruh River trout), inter alias. Of these species, S. salar is perhaps the most important to global aquaculture. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, farmed S. salar comprises greater than 90% of all farmed salmon and greater than half of all salmon production worldwide [13].

Underscoring the importance of Salmo in modern aquaculture, there is a rapidly growing corpus of literature surrounding the use of probiotics in this genus. The benefits to fish immunity and growth that stem from this research may have the potential to greatly benefit the salmon aquaculture industry, thus necessitating further review of the recent pertinent literature.

1.1 Overview of the gut microbiota of Salmo spp.

To understand the use of probiotics in Salmo, it is important to first critically examine this genus’ gut microbiota. The intestinal mucosa of S. salar can harbor trillions of microorganisms, the majority of which are bacteria. Typically, the identity of these microorganisms may vary considerably depending on several variables, including diet, the bacteria present, biogeography and environmental factors, stress, captivity, disease, the host’s species, and life cycle stage [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. To further complicate matters, not all microorganisms in the salmon gut are permanent residents. While many bacteria are indeed capable of colonizing the intestinal mucosa in the long-term, the presence of others may only be transient [20]. Such transience may be due to a number of factors, including the inability to compete with bacteria that have already colonized the gut for such things as nutrients or space, direct inhibition by pre-existing bacteria (e.g., via the secretion of antimicrobial peptides), or even just the general inability to colonize the intestinal tract [2, 21].

Regardless of this dynamism and complexity, researchers have identified a diverse array of bacteria that may inhabit the digestive system of Salmo. In one study, the mid and distal intestinal mucosa of S. salar kept in seawater were found to contain bacteria from a number of phyla, including Proteobacteria (which comprised ~90% of all mucosal bacteria), Actinobacteria, Armatimonadetes, Spirochaetes, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes [20]. Furthermore, in the digesta of S. salar, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and Bacteroidetes (among other less abundant bacteria) were documented [20]. In another study, the digesta of S. salar parr reared in a freshwater loch or a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) were also found to contain representatives of other additional phyla, including Tenericutes and Acidobacteria, among others [22]. In a different study featuring wild S. salar at different life cycle stages, Nitrospirae were also found to be abundant in the digestive tracts of parrs, smolts, and adults. This study also found that Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes occur at far lower levels in marine adults than in freshwater life stages [18]. Overall, these phyla are represented by dozens of genera in the S. salar microbiome, notably including Carnobacterium, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Lactococcus, Vibrio, Pseudomonas, Aeromonas, Yersinia, and Mycoplasma, many of which will be discussed further in this review [18, 20].


2. Probiotic use in Salmo

In general, colonization is critically important to the establishment of probiotic bacteria within a fish’s digestive tract. There are a few main considerations behind this probiotic colonization. Firstly, the bacteria must not pose any danger to the host fish or be otherwise pathogenic. Instead, they should exhibit salubrious effects as described previously. Secondly, it is critical that the bacteria are able to reproduce successfully within the fish’s gut, such that their rate of multiplication exceeds the rate at which they are expelled [2]. Thirdly, the bacteria must be able to adhere to the intestinal mucosa. There are a few additional considerations to this third point. For example, the bacteria must be able to successfully compete with other bacteria for adhesion space. Some bacteria (including some lactic acid bacteria) are known to have specific adhesion sites on the intestinal epithelium, while others are known to adhere non-specifically [2, 23, 24]. These considerations are critically important to all potential fish probiotics.

Table 1 provides an overview of the bacterial genera that have been investigated as probiotics in genus Salmo:

2.1 Carnobacterium

Carnobacterium is a genus of Gram-positive lactic acid bacteria (LAB) within the phylum Firmicutes. They are ubiquitous in nature and can survive low temperatures and anaerobic conditions with elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide [35]. In terms of fish, some Carnobacteria (such as some strains of Carnobacterium maltaromaticum) have been known to be pathogenic in certain salmonids (e.g., Oncorhynchus mykiss), while others have been found to exhibit beneficial effects within the gut microbiome [9, 32, 35, 36]. Perhaps one of the most important benefits of probiotic Carnobacteria is their ability to inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria within the Salmo gut. This ability is most likely due to Carnobacteria’sability to produce antimicrobial bacteriocins, which may serve to both inhibit pathogenic bacteria and help the Carnobacteria to survive within the competitive environment of the gut microbiome [37]. However, the ability of probiotic Carnobacterium to inhibit different pathogenic species is known to vary by strain [32, 37]. As a type of LAB, Carnobacteria are also capable of lactic acid production, which may also have an inhibitory effect on pathogens. Further recent research has also suggested that the presence of Carnobacterium in the pyloric caeca of S. salar is associated with enhanced flesh color. While it is hypothesized that this may be related to the production of carotenoids by the Carnobacteria as well as their pro-immune effects, the true reason for this phenomenon remains unclear [38].

In an early study conducted in 2000, it was revealed that Carnobacterium strains isolated from the intestine of S. salar could inhibit a number of pathogenic bacteria, including Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas salmonicida, Vibrio ordalli, Vibrio anguillarum, Streptococcus milleri, Photobacterium damselae piscicida, and Flavobacterium psychrophilium in vitro [9]. In this study, it was also found that the administration of these Carnobacteria for at least fourteen days was able to promote the survival of O. mykiss in the context of infection by A. salmonicida, Yersinia ruckerii, and V. ordalli. This study also found that it took 28 days of probiotic administration to achieve the maximum intestinal Carnobacterium levels, and that the cessation of probiotic administration in fry and fingerlings resulted in the bacteria becoming undetectable in the gut in ten days or less [9]. It was further confirmed in another study the coincubation of C. divergens strain 6251 with the pathogenic A. salmonicida and V. anguillarum was able to prevent (but not alleviate) damage to S. salar microvilli [3]. A later study demonstrated that the administration of a commercial prebiotic (namely EWOS prebiosal) to help promote probiotic bacterial growth vastly enhanced the ability of C. divergens to adhere to the epithelia and mucosa of the proximal (but not distal) intestine of S. salar [32].

Overall, certain strains of genus Carnobacterium (such as the aforementioned C. divergens strain 6251) may have great potential as a probiotic for S. salar, with the ability to bolster the fish’s immunity and perhaps even flesh color. While it is possible that the probiotic may need to be frequently readministered, the use of a commercially available prebiotic may be beneficial in enhancing bacterial adhesion to the salmon gut.

2.2 Pediococcus

Pediococcus is a genus of Gram-positive LAB within the phylum Firmicutes. It is an acidophilic, facultative anaerobe with well-established probiotic properties, even in humans. Like Carnobacterium, Pediococcus acidilactici is known to produce bacteriocins and lactic acid, which are potentially useful in inhibiting the propagation of pathogens within the digestive tract [39].

P. acidilactici has been investigated as potential probiotic in both S. salar and S. trutta caspius. In both fish, much of this research has been conducted using Bactocell ®, a commercially available strain of P. acidilactici (strain MA 18/5 M) that is also used in other animals of agricultural significance [28, 29, 30]. It is one of the only aquacultural probiotics approved in the European Union [33]. Overall, Bactocell ® seems to exhibit some promise in promoting the immunity and growth of S. trutta caspius. In one study, Bactocell ® was found to significantly decrease the feed conversion ratio in S. trutta caspius following five treatments with the probiotic. Furthermore, white blood cell concentrations were noted to have increased, suggesting pro-immune effects related to the presence of the probiotic. Curiously, red blood cell counts were also found to be lowered relative to the control group that did not receive the Bactocell ® treatment [30]. In another study in which Bactocell ® was co-administered with iron, parameters like body weight gain and specific growth rate were also found to be enhanced relative to the control group [28].

This same strain of P. acidilactici (MA 18/5 M) has also been investigated as a probiotic in S. salar. In one such study, saltwater Atlantic salmon were administered P. acidilactici MA 18/5 M and short chain fructooligosaccharides (as a prebiotic) twice a day for 63 days. Among other things, the researchers noted that this synbiotic (a combination of a probiotic and prebiotic) modulated both local and systemic immunity. For example, it was found that synbiotic administration was associated with the increased expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor α, and interleukin in the intestinal tissue, in addition to increased expression of the antiviral molecules toll-like receptor 3 and myxovirus-resistant protein 1. Furthermore, the researchers observed increased epithelial leukocyte infiltration in the intestines and elevated serum lysozyme levels. Notably, the fish that received the synbiotic also exhibited greater villus length relative to the control and decreased but recoverable intestinal bacterial loads (without adverse health consequences) [11]. In another study, it was found that Bactocell ® was capable of modulating several parameters related to distal intestine inflammation, which overall helped to counteract the inflammation [40]. A later study further studied the administration of P. acidilacti MA 18/5 M to S. salar, in addition to also considering the effects on the gut microbiome that occur with the transition from the freshwater and saltwater stages. Overall, Pediococcus was found to significantly impact the Atlantic salmon microbiota, as in the previous study. Notably, among the fish that received the probiotic treatment, Pediococcus was present in greater abundance in both the digesta and mucosa in the freshwater salmon than in the saltwater salmon. In spite of this, the effect of the probiotic treatment on the composition of the gut microbiota was found to be the greatest among the saltwater fish [33].

In summary, there is some evidence to suggest that P. acidilactici MA 18/5 M may exhibit positive effects on the growth of Salmo spp., as well as significant immunomodulatory effects. Furthermore, its availability on the market may make this strain an enticing choice for those interested in using effective probiotics in their aquaculture systems.

2.3 Bacillus

Bacillus is a diverse genus of Gram-positive bacteria within the phylum Firmicutes. There are three main species of Bacillus that have been investigated as probiotics for Salmo, the two most notable of which are B. subtilis and B. licheniformis. While Bacillus species are not LAB, they have nevertheless been successfully implemented as probiotic agents in aquaculture, exhibiting the ability to enhance growth and immunity in a few species [41, 42].

In terms of Salmo, B. subtilis DSM 5749 and B. licheniformis DSM 5750 have been investigated as probiotics in S. trutta caspius in the form of the commercially available product known as BetaPlus ®. In one study, Caspian salmon fingerlings were administered a synbiotic composed of BetaPlus ® and galacto-oligosaccharides. In comparison to the control (which did not receive the synbiotic), the group that received the synbiotic exhibited superior performance in parameters relevant to growth and immunity (among other things). In terms of growth, this includes a lower feed conversion ratio and higher weight gain and protein efficiency ratios. As for immunity, the fish that received the probiotic exhibited increased serum levels of lysozyme, immunoglobulins, bactericidal peptides, agglutinins, lectins, and albumin [42]. In another, similar study with the same species, BetaPlus ® was used in conjunction with isomaltooligosaccharides as the prebiotic. In addition to some similar findings to the previous study, the synbiotic group was found to exhibit greater levels of monocytes, leukocytes, and neutrophils compared to the control, which is further suggestive of enhanced immunity in the context of synbiotic usage [25].

Overall, these findings suggest that the administration of BetaPlus® in conjunction with a prebiotic may be able to significantly enhance both growth and systemic immunity in S. trutta caspius. For those involved in the commercial aquaculture of Salmo spp., it may be beneficial to consider the use of BetaPlus® or similar probiotic formulations.

2.4 Lactobacillus

Lactobacillus is a genus of Gram-positive LAB within the phylum Firmicutes. Two species in this genus have been investigated as probiotics for species within Salmo, namely Lactobacillus delbrueckii in S. salar and L. plantarum in S. trutta caspius.

The use of Lactobacillus delbrueckii lactis as an aquacultural probiotic has been known to enhance the innate immune response in other fish, such as Sparus aurata [43]. In terms of the Atlantic salmon, one study examined this bacterium’s ability to remain on the surface of the intestines in an in vitro model containing intestinal tissue from an Atlantic salmon, as well as its ability to prevent damage in the context of an Aeromonas salmoncida salmoncida infection. Overall, it was found that the Lactobacillus was able to persist on the surface of the intestine, and further caused no damage to the tissue (in contrast to the Aeromonas). When the in vitro intestine model was co-incubated with both the Lactobacillus and Aeromonas, the former prevented damage to the tissue caused by the latter [34]. Overall, this is likely suggestive of the ability of L. delbruecki lactis to contribute to host innate immunity in S. salar.

Further work in S. trutta caspius provides some evidence for the ability of L. plantarum-based synbiotics to promote both host growth and immunity. In one study, Caspian salmon were assigned into eight groups, which featured combinations including the fishes’ basal diet, L. plantarum, and the prebiotics beta-glucan and mannan oligosaccharide. All groups featuring probiotics and/or prebiotics exhibited decreased feed conversion ratios and feed intake, as well as increased weight gain and protein efficiency ratios. These same groups also exhibited enhanced parameters relevant to immunity, including elevated levels of immunoglobulin M, and lysozyme (inter alia). It is also important to note that with the exception of the beta-glucan group, the groups featuring L. plantarum exhibited lower cortisol and glucose levels than the other experimental group, suggesting yet another physiological benefit of the use of L. plantarum as a probiotic [31].

In toto, while there are not many available studies focusing on the use of Lactobacillus spp. as a probiotic in Salmo on their own, the promising findings related to growth, immunity, and decreased feed intake associated with this bacterial genus may warrant further investigation as a probiotic in Salmo.

2.5 Other probiotics

In addition to the probiotics discussed above, there are some other probiotics that have been investigated in Salmo, including those with multi-genus or variable composition:

2.5.1 Kefir

There has been some research on the use of kefir as a probiotic for S. coruhensis. Kefir is a fermented, dairy-based beverage with origins in the North Caucasus and has been used as a probiotic in humans. Kefir is known to contain a variety of different microorganisms, including representatives of Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, and Leuconostoc, as well as other LAB, acetic acid bacteria, and even yeasts [44, 45, 46]. Overall, the use of kefir as a probiotic in this species seems to offer some promise. In one study, it was demonstrated that groups of Coruh trout administered kefir exhibited decreased activity of catalase, an enzyme with antioxidant activity, as well as decreased levels of the highly reactive compound malondialdehyde in hepatic tissue. This may suggest that the probiotics associated with kefir may have antioxidant activity [44]. In another study with the same species, kefir administration at a dose of ten or twenty grams per kilogram was associated with elevated immunoglobulin, which may suggest that kefir’s probiotics may also exhibit immunomodulatory effects in the Coruh trout. However, this same study did not find any difference in growth or survival rates between the control and experimental groups [45]. Finally, in another study, it was found that Coruh trout in the groups administered kefir also exhibited changes in digestive and hepatic enzyme expression and glucose levels relative to the control group. For example, it was found that serum amylase and lipase levels, as well as serum glucose decreased, suggesting that kefir administration may modulate digestion in S. coruhensis. Notably, glucose levels were also found to be lower in the kefir groups, which may be suggestive of decreased stress or decreased carbohydrate absorption in the intestines [46].

Overall, kefir may show some promise as a probiotic for S. coruhensis, especially considering the relative ease by which it may be acquired and its antioxidant and immunomodulatory properties. However, its inability to affect host growth or survival rates (unlike other previously discussed probiotics) may warrant careful consideration when choosing it as a probiotic for Salmo spp.

2.5.2 Other multi-species probiotic formulations

Other probiotic formulations featuring multiple species of microorganisms have also been investigated. One notable example of such a formulation is Bio-aqua ®, an aquacultural probiotic that is commercially available in Iran. In addition to the species enumerated in Table 2, Bio-aqua® further contains yeast extract and fructooligosaccharides as prebiotics. In the sole English language publication investigating this formulation, it was found that Bio-aqua did not produce any significant effects on the growth performance, activity of digestive enzymes, or intestinal histomorphology in juvenile S. trutta caspius when administered at a dose of 0.2 grams per kilogram at feeding times [50].

Salmo speciesBacterial genusBacterial speciesCitation
Salmo trutta caspiusBacillusB. subtilis & B. licheniformis*[25, 26, 27]
PediococcusP. acidilactici**[28, 29, 30]
LactobacillusL. plantarum[31]
Salmo salarCarnobacteriumCarnobacterium spp.[9]
C. divergens[3, 32]
PediococcusP. acidilactici**[11, 33]
LactobacillusL. delbrueckii[34]

Table 1.

An overview of different bacterial species investigated as probiotics in genus Salmo.

Asterisks denote the use of commercial probiotic formulations: one asterisk denotes BetaPlus ® and two asterisks denote Bactocell ®. These products are discussed in greater detail below. See Table 2 for an overview of other probiotic formulations.

Salmo speciesProbiotic formulationProbiotic microbesCitation
S. coruhensisKefirLactobacillus,
Leuconostoc, other lactic or acetic acid bacteria, and yeasts**
[44, 45, 46]
S. salar, S. trutta, & S. trutta caspiusFermented soymeal***Variable, but may include lactic acid bacteria, acetic acid bacteria, and/or yeasts**[21, 47, 48, 49]
S. trutta caspiusBio-aqua ® *Pediococcus acidilactici, Enterococcus faecium, Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus,Bifidobacterium bifidum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae**[50]
S. salarN/ABacillus velezensis, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa[51]

Table 2.

An overview of probiotic formulations featuring multiple bacterial species that have been investigated for use in Salmo.

One asterisk signifies a commercial probiotic formulation, whereas two asterisks signify a non-bacterial microorganism. Three asterisks denote a hypothetical probiotic source.

In another study, four experimental groups of juvenile S. salar reared in a RAS were administered combinations of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa CGMCC 1013 and Bacillus velezensis V4 CGMCC 10149 over a 62-day period. Relative to the control group, the experimental group fish exhibited significantly decreased feed conversion ratios and mortality, as well as increased weight gain ratios and specific growth rates. Furthermore, immunological and antioxidant parameters were suggestive of an enhanced immune response and antioxidant activity in the experimental groups in comparison with the control group. Curiously, however, cortisol levels were found to be elevated in the experimental groups relative to the control. Finally, in a challenge trial conducted with Aeromonas salmonicida, the experimental group fish exhibited far lower mortality rates than the control group, perhaps due to a combination of the enhanced immune response and the direct inhibition of the pathogen by the probiotic bacteria in the gut [51].

Overall, in spite of the lack of observed benefits in the study featuring Bio-aqua ®, the promising findings of the second study featuring R. mucilaginosa and B. velezensis suggest that the utilization of multiple species of bacteria in probiotics has the potential to be highly productive.

2.5.3 Fermented soybean meal

There has also been considerable research on the use of fermented plant meals (such as soybean meal) in the aquaculture of Salmo, including S. salar, S. trutta, and S. trutta caspius [47, 48, 49]. However, it is important to note that this usage of plant meal fermentation is often implemented to enhance the bioavailability of nutrients and energy in plant products that are not natural components of the salmonid diet [52]. Regardless, it is possible that some fermented plant meal products may exhibit probiotic or prebiotic effects in Salmo. In one study, the provision of fermented soybean meal to S. salar was found to be associated with an increase in the abundance of intestinal LAB (including Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, and Lactococcus) when compared with a group that was fed a fishmeal-based diet and another that received non-fermented soybean meal [21]. While it is unclear from the results of the study whether this increase in LAB abundance was due to prebiotic or probiotic effects, it is well-established that certain fermented foods (such as miso, which is also soybean-based) are associated with probiotic LAB populations [53, 54]. Therefore, it is plausible that at least some fermented soybean feeds for Salmo may exhibit probiotic effects. However, further research may be needed in order to investigate this hypothesis.


3. Conclusions

In general, the use of probiotics in the aquaculture of species within the genus Salmo has the potential to be highly productive, with the ability to promote fish immunity, nutrition, and growth as well as to decrease the likelihood of mortality. These beneficial effects are more important now than ever, with the increasing popularity of intensive aquaculture systems like RAS. In such crowded conditions, fish are constantly exposed to pathogens, underscoring the need for enhanced immunity. Furthermore, the enhanced growth and decreased mortality from certain diseases associated with the use of some probiotics may help the operators of salmon aquaculture systems to increase their profits and minimize the unnecessary loss of fish. The current market availability of such tested probiotic formulations as BetaPlus ® and Bactocell ® may also be instrumental in helping salmon aquaculturalists to achieve these outcomes.

In spite of the benefits that can be understood from the current corpus of literature pertaining to the use of probiotics in Salmo, many questions remain unanswered. Some of these questions are quite simple, and could consider such things as which probiotic species and strains (or perhaps combinations thereof) are the best at achieving particular outcomes in particular species of Salmo (e.g., which species and strains result in optimal growth rates in S. salar). The answers to such questions would likely necessitate the conduction of relatively large studies featuring multiple experimental groups that each receive different probiotics. Other questions concern the biochemical activity of probiotic bacteria within the host, including such things as how or why certain probiotics influence the host’s immune system (e.g., how does BetaPlus® cause elevated white blood cell levels in S. salar or, why does the administration of certain probiotics result in elevated immunoglobulin levels). It further remains unclear as to why some probiotic species and strains differ from others in certain effects on the host (e.g., why were host cortisol levels decreased relative to the control when Lactobacillus plantarum was used in S. trutta caspius, but elevated when Bacillus velezensis and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa were used in S. salar). The elucidation of answers to these (and related) questions may help us better understand the relationship between the salmon gut microbiota and fish health, as well as potentially inform future efforts to optimize the salmon gut microbiome with biotechnology.

Overall, while much remains to be explored in the use of probiotics in Salmo, recent findings have strongly indicated that they are associated with remarkable potential benefits that should warrant any Salmo aquaculturalist to consider their use.


  1. 1. Talwar, C., Nagar, S., Lal, R., & Negi, R. K. (2018). Fish Gut Microbiome: Current Approaches and Future Perspectives. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 58(4), 397-414.
  2. 2. Li, X., Ringø, E., Hoseinifar, S. H., Lauzon, H. L., Birkbeck, H., & Yang, D. (2019). The adherence and colonization of microorganisms in fish gastrointestinal tract. Reviews in Aquaculture, 11(3), 603-618.
  3. 3. Ringø, E., Salinas, I., Olsen, R. E., Nyhaug, A., Myklebust, R., & Mayhew, T. M. (2007). Histological changes in intestine of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) following in vitro exposure to pathogenic and probiotic bacterial strains. Cell and tissue research, 328(1), 109-116.
  4. 4. Picchietti, S., Fausto, A. M., Randelli, E., Carnevali, O., Taddei, A. R., Buonocore, F., … & Abelli, L. (2009). Early treatment with Lactobacillus delbrueckii strain induces an increase in intestinal T-cells and granulocytes and modulates immune-related genes of larval Dicentrarchus labrax (L.). Fish & shellfish immunology, 26(3), 368-376.
  5. 5. He, S., Zhang, Y., Xu, L., Yang, Y., Marubashi, T., Zhou, Z., & Yao, B. (2013). Effects of dietary Bacillus subtilis C-3102 on the production, intestinal cytokine expression and autochthonous bacteria of hybrid tilapia Oreochromis niloticus♀× Oreochromis aureus♂. Aquaculture, 412, 125-130.
  6. 6. Newaj-Fyzul, A., Adesiyun, A. A., Mutani, A., Ramsubhag, A., Brunt, J., & Austin, B. (2007). Bacillus subtilis AB1 controls Aeromonas infection in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). Journal of applied microbiology, 103(5), 1699-1706.
  7. 7. Balcázar, J. L., Vendrell, D., De Blas, I., Ruiz-Zarzuela, I., Gironés, O., & Muzquiz, J. L. (2006). Immune modulation by probiotic strains: quantification of phagocytosis of Aeromonas salmonicida by leukocytes isolated from gut of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) using a radiolabelling assay. Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases, 29(5-6), 335-343.
  8. 8. Lazado, C. C., & Caipang, C. M. A. (2014). Mucosal immunity and probiotics in fish. Fish & shellfish immunology, 39(1), 78-89.
  9. 9. Robertson, P. A. W., O’Dowd, C., Burrells, C., Williams, P., & Austin, B. (2000). Use of Carnobacterium sp. as a probiotic for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). Aquaculture, 185(3-4), 235-243.
  10. 10. Ray, A. K., Ghosh, K., & Ringø, E. J. A. N. (2012). Enzyme-producing bacteria isolated from fish gut: a review. Aquaculture Nutrition, 18(5), 465-492.
  11. 11. Abid, A., Davies, S. J., Waines, P., Emery, M., Castex, M., Gioacchini, G., … & Merrifield, D. L. (2013). Dietary synbiotic application modulates Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) intestinal microbial communities and intestinal immunity. Fish & shellfish immunology, 35(6), 1948-1956.
  12. 12. Aftabgard, M., Salarzadeh, A., Mohseni, M., Shabanipour, A. H. B., & Zorriehzahra, M. E. J. (2019). The combined efficiency of dietary isomaltooligosaccharides and Bacillus spp. on the growth, hemato-serological, and intestinal microbiota indices of caspian brown trout (Salmo trutta caspius Kessler, 1877). Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 11(1), 198-206.
  13. 13. FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture - Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme - Salmo salar (Linnaeus, 1758)
  14. 14. Uren Webster, T. M., Consuegra, S., Hitchings, M., & Garcia de Leaniz, C. (2018). Interpopulation variation in the Atlantic salmon microbiome reflects environmental and genetic diversity. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 84(16), e00691-18.
  15. 15. Uren Webster, T. M., Rodriguez-Barreto, D., Castaldo, G., Gough, P., Consuegra, S., & Garcia de Leaniz, C. (2020). Environmental plasticity and colonisation history in the Atlantic salmon microbiome: a translocation experiment. Molecular Ecology, 29(5), 886-898.
  16. 16. Llewellyn, M. S., Leadbeater, S., Garcia, C., Sylvain, F. E., Custodio, M., Ang, K. P., … & Derome, N. (2017). Parasitism perturbs the mucosal microbiome of Atlantic Salmon. Scientific reports, 7(1), 1-10.
  17. 17. Bozzi, D., Rasmussen, J. A., Carøe, C., Sveier, H., Nordøy, K., Gilbert, M. T. P., & Limborg, M. T. (2021). Salmon gut microbiota correlates with disease infection status: potential for monitoring health in farmed animals. Animal microbiome, 3(1), 1-17.
  18. 18. Llewellyn, M. S., McGinnity, P., Dionne, M., Letourneau, J., Thonier, F., Carvalho, G. R., … & Derome, N. (2016). The biogeography of the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) gut microbiome. The ISME journal, 10(5), 1280-1284.
  19. 19. Olsen, R. E., Sundell, K., Hansen, T., Hemre, G. I., Myklebust, R., Mayhew, T. M., & Ringø, E. (2002). Acute stress alters the intestinal lining of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.: An electron microscopical study. Fish physiology and biochemistry, 26(3), 211-221.
  20. 20. Gajardo, K., Rodiles, A., Kortner, T. M., Krogdahl, Å., Bakke, A. M., Merrifield, D. L., & Sørum, H. (2016). A high-resolution map of the gut microbiota in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): a basis for comparative gut microbial research. Scientific reports, 6(1), 1-10.
  21. 21. Catalán, N., Villasante, A., Wacyk, J., Ramírez, C., & Romero, J. (2018). Fermented soybean meal increases lactic acid bacteria in gut microbiota of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 10(3), 566-576.
  22. 22. Dehler, C. E., Secombes, C. J., & Martin, S. A. (2017). Environmental and physiological factors shape the gut microbiota of Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture, 467, 149-157.
  23. 23. Ren, P., Xu, L., Yang, Y., He, S., Liu, W., Ringø, E., & Zhou, Z. (2013). Lactobacillus planarum subsp. plantarum JCM 1149 vs. Aeromonas hydrophila NJ-1 in the anterior intestine and posterior intestine of hybrid tilapia Oreochromis niloticus♀× Oreochromis aureus♂: An ex vivo study. Fish & shellfish immunology, 35(1), 146-153.
  24. 24. Rinkinen, M., Westermarck, E., Salminen, S., & Ouwehand, A. C. (2003). Absence of host specificity for in vitro adhesion of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to intestinal mucus. Veterinary microbiology, 97(1-2), 55-61.
  25. 25. Balcázar, J. L., Vendrell, D., De Blas, I., Ruiz-Zarzuela, I., & Múzquiz, J. L. (2009). Effect of Lactococcus lactis CLFP 100 and Leuconostoc mesenteroides CLFP 196 on Aeromonas salmonicida infection in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Journal of molecular microbiology and biotechnology, 17(3), 153-157.
  26. 26. Asgarifar, S. A., Hedayatifard, M., & Khara, H. (2015). Improvement of Growth properties, Survival, hematological-humoral immunity factors and intestinal bacterial density of brown trout (Salmo trutta caspius Kessler, 1870) affected by different levels of Beta-Plus as probiotic. Aquatics Physiology and Biotechnology, 3(3), 1-28.
  27. 27. Ringø, E., Salinas, I., Olsen, R. E., Nyhaug, A., Myklebust, R., & Mayhew, T. M. (2007). Histological changes in intestine of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) following in vitro exposure to pathogenic and probiotic bacterial strains. Cell and tissue research, 328(1), 109-116.
  28. 28. Lashtoaghaei, G., Khara, H., & Sayyad, B. M. (2020). The effect of probiotic Bactocell (Pediococcus acidilactici) and iron on growth in Caspian Sea Salmon (Salmo trutta caspius).
  29. 29. Hosseini, A., Oraji, H., Yegane, S., & Shahabi, H. (2014). The effect of probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici on growth performance, blood and some serum parameters in Caspian salmon (Salmo trutta caspius).
  30. 30. Oraji, H., Yegane, S., & Shahabi, H. (2014). The effect of probiotic bactocell on growth performance, blood parameters and some serum parameters in Caspian salmon (Salmo caspius). ISFJ, 23(2), 35-44.
  31. 31. Jami, M. J., Kenari, A. A., Paknejad, H., & Mohseni, M. (2019). Effects of dietary b-glucan, mannan oligosaccharide, Lactobacillus plantarum and their combinations on growth performance, immunity and immune related gene expression of Caspian trout, Salmo trutta caspius (Kessler, 1877). Fish & shellfish immunology, 91, 202-208.
  32. 32. Kristiansen, M., & Ringø, E. (2011). Evaluation of prebiotic and probiotic effects on the intestinal gut microbiota and histology of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.).
  33. 33. Jaramillo-Torres, A., Rawling, M. D., Rodiles, A., Mikalsen, H. E., Johansen, L. H., Tinsley, J., … & Merrifield, D. L. (2019). Influence of dietary supplementation of probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici MA18/5M during the transition from freshwater to seawater on intestinal health and microbiota of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Frontiers in microbiology, 10, 2243.
  34. 34. Salinas, I., Myklebust, R., Esteban, M. A., Olsen, R. E., Meseguer, J., & Ringø, E. (2008). In vitro studies of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) foregut: tissue responses and evidence of protection against Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida epithelial damage. Veterinary microbiology, 128(1-2), 167-177.
  35. 35. Leisner, J. J., Laursen, B. G., Prévost, H., Drider, D., & Dalgaard, P. (2007). Carnobacterium: positive and negative effects in the environment and in foods. FEMS microbiology reviews, 31(5), 592-613.
  36. 36. Roh, H., Kim, B. S., Lee, M. K., Park, C. I., & Kim, D. H. (2020). Genome-wide comparison of Carnobacterium maltaromaticum derived from diseased fish harbouring important virulence-related genes. Journal of Fish Diseases, 43(9), 1029-1037.
  37. 37. Garcés, M. E., Olivera, N. L., Fernández, M., Riva Rossi, C., & Sequeiros, C. (2020). Antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin-producing Carnobacterium spp. isolated from healthy Patagonian trout and their potential for use in aquaculture. Aquaculture Research, 51(11), 4602-4612.
  38. 38. Nguyen, C. D., Amoroso, G., Ventura, T., & Elizur, A. (2020). Assessing the Pyloric Caeca and Distal Gut Microbiota Correlation with Flesh Color in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L., 1758). Microorganisms, 8(8), 1244.
  39. 39. Skrede, G., Storebakken, T., Skrede, A., Sahlstrøm, S., Sørensen, M., Shearer, K. D., & Slinde, E. (2002). Lactic acid fermentation of wheat and barley whole meal flours improves digestibility of nutrients and energy in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) diets. Aquaculture, 210(1-4), 305-321.
  40. 40. Porto, M. C. W., Kuniyoshi, T. M., Azevedo, P. O. S., Vitolo, M., & Oliveira, R. S. (2017). Pediococcus spp.: An important genus of lactic acid bacteria and pediocin producers. Biotechnology Advances, 35(3), 361-374.
  41. 41. Giri, S. S., Sukumaran, V., Sen, S. S., & Jena, P. K. (2014). Effects of dietary supplementation of potential probiotic Bacillus subtilis VSG 1 singularly or in combination with Lactobacillus plantarum VSG 3 or/and Pseudomonas aeruginosa VSG 2 on the growth, immunity and disease resistance of Labeo rohita. Aquaculture Nutrition, 20(2), 163-171.
  42. 42. Liu, C. H., Chiu, C. H., Wang, S. W., & Cheng, W. (2012). Dietary administration of the probiotic, Bacillus subtilis E20, enhances the growth, innate immune responses, and disease resistance of the grouper, Epinephelus coioides. Fish & shellfish immunology, 33(4), 699-706.
  43. 43. Aftabgard, M., Salarzadeh, A., & Mohseni, M. (2019). The effects of a synbiotic mixture of galacto-oligosaccharides and Bacillus strains in Caspian Salmon, Salmo trutta caspius Fingerlings. Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 11(4), 1300-1308.
  44. 44. Can, E., Kurtoğlu, İ. Z., Benzer, F., Erişir, M., Kocabaş, M., Kızak, V., … & Çelik, H. T. (2012). The effects of different dosage of kefir with different durations on growth performances and antioxidant system in the blood and liver tissues of Çoruh trout (Salmo coruhensis). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 12(2), 277-283.
  45. 45. Can, E., Kutluyer, F., Sonay, F. D., & Köse, Ö. (2012). The use of kefir as potential probiotic in Çoruh trout (Salmo coruhensis): Effects on growth performance and immunoglobulin (IgM) levels. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(30), 7775-7780.
  46. 46. Can, S. S., Kutluyer, F., Can, E., KAYIŞ, Ş., Delihasan Sonay, F., Köse, Ö., … & Kayim, M. (2014). Effect of dietary kefir on the digestive and liver enzymes activities and glucose level of Coruh trout, Salmo coruhensis (Actinopterygii: Salmoniformes: Salmonidae). Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 44(2).
  47. 47. Sotoudeh, E., Amiri Moghaddam, J., Shahhosseini, G., & Aramli, M. S. (2016). Effect of Dietary Gamma-irradiated and Fermented Soybean Meal on the Growth Performance, Body Composition, and Digestive Enzymes Activity of Caspian Brown Trout, Salmo trutta caspius, Juvenile. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 47(6), 830-842.
  48. 48. Voorhees, J. M., Barnes, M. E., Chipps, S. R., & Brown, M. L. (2018). Rearing performance of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) subjected to exercise and dietary bioprocessed soybean meal. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 8(3), 303-328.
  49. 49. Moghaddam, A., & Sadegh, M. (2016). Effect of Dietary Gammaâ irradiated and Fermented Soybean Meal on the Growth Performance, Body Composition, and Digestive Enzymes Activity of Caspian Brown Trout, Salmo trutta caspius, Juvenile. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society.
  50. 50. Kumazawa, T., Nishimura, A., Asai, N., & Adachi, T. (2018). Isolation of immune-regulatory Tetragenococcus halophilus from miso. PloS one, 13(12), e0208821.
  51. 51. Wang, C., Liu, Y., Sun, G., Li, X., & Liu, Z. (2019). Growth, immune response, antioxidant capability, and disease resistance of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) fed Bacillus velezensis V4 and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa compound. Aquaculture, 500, 65-74.
  52. 52. Salinas, I., Cuesta, A., Esteban, M.A., Meseguer, J., 2005. Dietary administration of Lactobacillus delbrueckii and Bacillus subtilis, single or combined, on gilthead seabream cellular innate immune responses. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 19, 67-77
  53. 53. Kiron, V., Kulkarni, A., Dahle, D., Lokesh, J., & Kitani, Y. (2015). A microbial feed additive abates intestinal inflammation in Atlantic salmon. Frontiers in immunology, 6, 409.
  54. 54. Allwood, J. G., Wakeling, L. T., & Bean, D. C. (2021). Fermentation and the microbial community of Japanese koji and miso: A review. Journal of Food Science.

Written By

Alexander Dindial

Submitted: 10 July 2021 Reviewed: 15 July 2021 Published: 23 September 2021