Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Sports Motivation in Athletes in the Face of Psychosocial Risk and Pandemic Due to COVID 19

By Ericka Matus, Lorena Matus and Jay Molino

Submitted: April 13th 2021Reviewed: July 15th 2021Published: September 1st 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99475

Downloaded: 91

Abstract

In this chapter, the reader will discover the importance of motivation in general and sports through a tour of the most critical theories in the field. Furthermore, we present the experiences of a group of young athletes during the quarantine due to the covid-19 pandemic in the Republic of Panama. Also, the reader will be able to identify the psychosocial risk variables and how sports is a mitigation factor for covid-19.

Keywords

  • sports motivation
  • COVID-19
  • psychosocial risk
  • athletes

1. Introduction

Even before the Hellenic greatness of physical culture in Greece, motivation had already been studied and implemented, as shown in the historical records of the time. It is no accident that it had a predominant place in ancient society. Since then, motivation and sports activity have been a powerful combination in the achievement of athletic goals.

Sport is the purest activity where the best human qualities emerge; however, there are psychosocial risks such as poverty and violence, spatio-temporal factors, stress, work overload, poor coverage in education, physical and mental health, among many others, that affect motivation to varying degrees or levels, in this document, an alternative to mitigate some risks is presented.

This chapter also refers to the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that, since December 2019, disrupted all human activities worldwide, generating the collapse of small businesses, the cancelation of sports, artistic, and cultural activities. Educational, physical, recreational, and occupational. Only the priority tasks continued, although with radical changes, such as in the health sector, where all personnel continued to work with high biosecurity measures.

Advertisement

2. Motivation associated with sports environments

Motivation is a psychological process that has taken various paths according to the theory, paradigm, or model. This wealth has allowed it to be treated as a multidimensional concept to be not limited or adjusted to a given plane. For instance, Castro-Sánchez et al. [1] report that motivation is one of the most studied variables because it explains human behavior. In the context of recreational and professional physical activity, it provides an understanding of factors such as the choice of a sports modality, the persistence, performance, and intensity of a specific sports activity.

Of the motivation theories that stand out in sport psychology for their emphasis on social factors are the self-determination theory developed by Deci and Ryan in 1985 and the achievement goals theory formulated by Nicholls in 1989. These Proposals explain the training and competition situations towards success [1].

There are other proposals aimed at personal improvement, in which the perception of success or failure is a unique interpretation. In addition, other theories explain the search for pleasure, personal image, or social relationships when carrying out sports activities [1].

Likewise, the theory of intrinsic (for pleasure) and extrinsic (for benefits) motivation is used by athletes and coaches. In addition, the theory of attribution also explains the causes of success or failure through three dimensions: control, causality, and stability. Additionally, the expectation theory of value suggests that success depends on the value (evaluation of importance) and expectation (belief in one’s capacity) [2].

On the other hand, the motivational climate model is widely used, particularly by the technical team, to obtain higher performance from the athlete [3, 4]. Additionally, studies have been published on users’ motivation to sports centers and their psychological profiles [5].

A widely disseminated conception is the protection motivation theory (PMT) that was first developed by Roger [6] to understand the factors that motivate the intentions of individuals and behaviors related to managing the risk of a disease or protecting themselves from health problems.

According to Roger [6, 7], the motivation derives from an individual’s assessment and coping of threats in the face of assessing a risky situation. Thus, threat assessment is a process comprising perceived severity (the degree of perceived harm of a threat) and perceived vulnerability (the susceptibility to experiencing damage), while the coping assessment process includes the perception of effectiveness (possibility of preventing or reducing harm), perceived self-efficacy (confidence in carrying out protective measures), perceived costs (economic, temporary and physical), and adopt recommendations.

According to the protection motivation theory (PMT), the coping estimation involves:

  1. Verifying the effectiveness of protective behavior in dealing with the threat.

  2. Believe in one’s own ability to handle protective behaviors.

  3. Calculate the effort of the response.

Response effectiveness and self-efficacy are expected to strengthen coping assessment, while the expectation of response cost will reduce it [8]. Figure 1 shows the protection motivation theory.

Figure 1.

Protection motivation theory. Source: Own elaboration from Chambers et al. [9], Kothe et al. [10], and Ezati et al. [8].

PMT uses the combination of two cognitive processes: the intention to protect oneself from a potential threat and the response to a threatening situation that can be protective (adaptive) or risky (maladaptive). It is expected that there will be a balance between the two processes: threat assessment and coping assessment [9].

In short, research suggests that individuals’ intentions to perform a task influence real behaviors (cited in [11]), so that a diagnostic assessment of intentionality would allow the identification of actions, behaviors or conducts afterward, and that is the main reason why PMT has been used to develop risk-reduction interventions, for example, [8]) applied the protection motivation theory to predict behaviors during the covid-19 pandemic.

Concerning the theory of training motivation, Chung et al. [12] developed a model based on a meta-analysis in which they included variables that had not been considered in the work of Colquitt et al. [13], as shown in Table 1. From Table 1, there are five areas that benefit from the theoretical model which is shown in Table 2.

Personality traits:
  • Locus of control (+)

  • Anxiety for learning (−)

  • Openness (+)

  • Conscientiousness (+)

  • Extraversion (+)

  • Agreeableness (+)

  • Neuroticism (−)

Knowledge and skills:
  • Cognitive ability (+)

  • Education (+)

Individual motivation:
  • Valance (+)

  • Pretraining self-efficacy (+)

  • Learning goal orientation (+)

  • Performance goal orientation (+)

Job/career variables:
  • Organizational commitment (+)

  • Job involvement (+)

Climate variables:
  • Manager support (+)

  • Peer support (+)

  • Organizational support (+)

  • Learning culture (+)

Demographic information:
  • Age

  • Gender

Table 1.

Theoretical model of suggested effects of motivation to learn and its antecedents and outcomes.

Affective-based:
  • Posttraining self-efficacy (+)

  • Training reactions (+)

  • Learning satisfaction (+)

Cognitive-based:
  • Declarative knowledge (+)

Skill-based:
  • Learning performance (+)

Work attitudes:
  • Turnover intention (−)

  • Job satisfaction (+)

Distal outcomes:
  • Training transfer (+)

  • Job/task performance (+)

Table 2.

Theoretical model of suggested effects of motivation to learn.

Thus, since the end of the previous century, studies focused on motivation to learn (as is the case with the previous model) have been used as a basis in the theory of training motivation [12].

Many scholars have suggested a series of variables and correlations to explain motivation in general and sports in particular: Chung et al. [12], for example, Martinez-Cevallos et al. [5] published research to analyze the motivation for attending sports centers. Likewise, Quesada and Gómez-López [14] suggest that those starting a physical activity with high levels of intrinsic motivation attend the various physical activity sessions more frequently than those with higher levels of extrinsic motivation. Wolska et al. [15] suggest that motivation is one of the best predictors of human performance because it improves performance and seeks perfection in sports training; while Moradi et al. [16] point out that sport and physical activity have the potential to contribute to health, social and economic goals.

Through the work of Butt [17], the motivation for physical activity and sport can be understood when biological, psychological, social, and secondary enhancers are interconnected, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Butt’s motivation model. Source: [17].

For Butt, the origin of sports motivation is an energy or vital force that requires a strategy to win and survive, so the coach and psychologist must work with aggression, conflict, competence, competition, and cooperation.

Advertisement

3. Sports discipline

Sports activity represents a substantial economic revenue in almost every country in the world. Millions of dollars spent in equipment, uniforms, food supplements, technology, stadiums, television networks, sportswear, trainers, fitness trainers, sports medicine, physiotherapists, referees, sponsors. It is the world’s most lucrative human activity; physical culture usually begins in preschool and does not end in old age, so it is a way and lifestyle without forgetting non-professional and professional athletes.

Researchers dedicated to this activity have also proposed schemes, maps, and models to improve results, not only with the idea of motivation for achievement, intrinsic or extrinsic but by analyzing performance, cataloging behaviors, identifying attitudes, designing proposals, and testing them. An example of this is shown in Table 3.

Stages of trainingObjectiveActivitiesTechniques
SportsPsychological
Diagnostic evolutionDiagnostic evolutionStart of cycle.
Assess psychological skills
Psychometric tests
Observed games
  • Observation

  • Interview

Candidate selectionPsychological restIntegrate complementary experiences for both physical activity and mental preparationLeisure
Games
Other sports
Change of activity.
Parents’ meetings and code of ethics
Parent organization
Outcome
Locus of control
Behaviors that are tolerated
Behaviors that are not tolerated
Psychometric tests
  • Sociogram

  • Group-task integration

  • Group-society

  • Questionnaires

  • Communication

  • Trust

  • Member growth

  • Semantic differential

  • Operational group—define the task

  • Constructivism

Physical trainingGeneral psychological preparationSet daily goals.
Translate achievements at the time of the competition.
Psychological goals—good mood Games and personal challenges
No half measures while training
Plan for training
Fatigue resistance to pain
Relaxation for easy rest
Relaxation for weightlifting
Viewing energy images to control fatigue.
Modify “I cannot do it
Self-knowledge
Motivation
  • Training

  • Competition

Resistance
  • Fatigue

  • Pain

Self-confidence
  • Work assessment

Self-control
Psychometric tests
  • Relaxation

  • Thought control

  • Self-dialog

  • Energization

  • Visualization

Specific technical workSpecific psychological preparationFine motor skills optimization
Relearn about the sensory perception of each exercise.
Set internal control locus
Psychokinesthetic Preparation
Self-control
Self-confidence
Get a better multisensory image of the proper execution to achieve self-confidence and hence self-control.
Psychometric tests
  • Videos

  • Improvement Journal

  • Visual perception training

  • Biomechanics analysis

Pre-competitionControlImprove automatic response.
Minimize athlete decision making
Create routines.
  • When to eat.

  • What to eat.

  • Dialog and recommendations

  • Breathing

  • Rhythms

  • Competition behavior

  • Activity visualization

Routine assessment
Psychometric tests
Revaluation of:
  • Sports goals

  • Personal goals

  • Identify optimal activation level.

  • Air

  • Attention

CompetitionCompetitionPerformance assessmentReal adjustments and refinement to the competition area
Identifying new obstacles and objectives
Assessment
Psychometric tests
  • Visual feedback (videos, photos)

  • Group feedback (videos, photos and conversation)

  • Personal feedback

Post competitionPost competitionCycle Assessment
Self-assessment
Closing the cycle
Group assessment of set objectives
Self-assessment
Reformulation of individual objectives
Reformulation of group goals
Formal closing of the cycle
Psychometric tests
  • Establishing a closure

  • Group dynamics

Table 3.

Stages of a psychological training program within a sports cycle.

Matus [18].

Advertisement

4. Psychosocial risk

Psychosocial risk is considered to be all circumstances and adverse situations that prevent or violate biological, psychological, and social equilibrium, which can be prevented, adjusted, or improved through the economy, education, health, and in this case, sports. Under this definition, many associated concepts are found, such as nutrition, residence, and work situation, to name a few.

There are numerous stories of exemplary athletes from all sports disciplines who, despite living and interacting in contexts of psychosocial risk, managed to overcome those circumstances to become role models for children and youngsters from all corners of the world.

Many scales and questionnaires are allowing a psychosocial risk assessment, most of them are directed towards the workplace, i.e., for economically active adults, including burnout syndrome, stress, workplace harassment, alcohol, and drug use; this is because, since 1984, the International Labour Organization of the World Health Organization (WHO) presented in Geneva a paper on psychosocial factors at work: nature, incidence, and prevention.

Although WHO already contemplates sports health, the commitment made is relatively new. That is why our job is to generate a cluster of scientific knowledge that integrates motivation into sports to mitigate psychosocial risk in children and youth populations.

According to Đurović et al. [2], the role of coaches in the process of motivating athletes emphasizes psychology as a key factor, so it is the coach himself who makes the most effort since it requires a deep understanding of basic psychological processes, intrinsic and extrinsic commitment, and finally encourage, stimulate and inspire their athletes to achieve their goals.

Matus et al. [19] presented research involving young university students who wanted to join a soccer team. 72 men, enrolled in a public university in the Republic of Panama, attended the call for the men’s team, from all the university’s shifts and regional extensions, who were evaluated by the coach through various exercises, physical and endurance tests, forming the team with 25 students. The study aimed to evaluate the university’s soccer players’ motivation before and after an intervention program in psychology applied to sports.

The intervention program was based on self-knowledge, self-concept, self-esteem, proprioception, activities programming associated with the sport, group integration, emotions management, cooperation, and competition. It also includes preparatory work with the coach and coaching staff, who actively contributed at all stages [19].

The structure was built and founded on six stages: diagnostic assessment, psychological rest, general psychological preparation, specific psychological preparation, control, competitive, and post-competitive [17].

The scheduled activities were held one day before the weekly match. As a result, the team identified, assimilated, and adjusted each of the psychological interventions, which was evident in each game, as they remained undefeated until the final match, where they were crowned as the inter-university league champions.

During the 12 weeks of activity, there were some inconveniences. Among the problems were physical injuries, participants not attending due to transportation issues, living in a remote location, personal and family troubles, overload of school work, work-related issues since some youngsters, besides studying, had to work for a living, not having their own football field, the only football field they had to train was constantly flooded by heavy rains, among other obstacles.

Research carried out by Matus et al. [19] reveals that with psychological intervention programs, purposely structured, can lead a sports team not only to victory and win a championship but also to improve individual and group expectations, build an identity, gain self-confidence and, above all, reduce psychosocial risks.

Advertisement

5. Covid-19 contingency in sports

Covid forever changed the way children and youngsters practice organized sports. Physical distancing policies prevent the social experience that facilitated athletes’ participation and retention in sports clubs in their communities. As a result, more attention is now required in the psychology of motivation, stress, interpersonal relationships, and psychological exhaustion [20].

A pilot study was conducted on 42 Panamanian university athletes who practiced different sports (aerobics, baseball, cycling, CrossFit, physical training, soccer, gym, hapkido, Olympic wrestling, swimming, and running). From those, 85.7% were men and 14.3% women. They were surveyed about their motivation to do physical activity prior the COVID-19 pandemic compared to their motivation in April 2021 (considering the restrictions due to the pandemic). The participants answered a 42 item questionnaire with a Likert-type scale. The study showed that men were more motivated to engage in sports before the pandemic (X¯= 3.65, DS = 1.15), than after it (X¯= 3.49, DS = 1.07). As for women, the average motivation before the pandemic was higher before the pandemic (X¯= 2.79, DS = 1.45) than during the pandemic as well (X¯= 2.71, DS = 1.60). However, the difference is less than that of the men. When comparing the means between men and women, it was observed that men (X¯= 3.57, DS = 1.08) are more motivated than women (X¯= 2.75, DS = 1.50). Finally, statistically significant differences were found at 90% (p = 0.79) between the motivation of the athletes before the pandemic (X¯= 3.53, DS = 1.21), and in April 2021 (X¯= 3.39, DS = 1.15), with mobility and physical contact restrictions [21].

So far, no similar studies have been found. However, it is expected to continue with systematic research to identify the impact of COVID-19 in athletes.

For elite athletes, the challenges are greater due to lack of sponsorship, financial support from federations, laboratories specialized in sports science, performance bonuses, among other things, so that it could even lead to a generation of athletes frustrated by physical, psychological, social and economic loss [20].

Thus, under this circumstance, to resume sport activity, the 4Cs: Competence, Confidence, Connection, and Character; and the 3Ps: Performance, Participation, and Personal development are not enough. We should restart with the 4Rs: Recognition of emotional struggle, Reconnecting family units and social networks, Reinstating participants, and reimagining the purpose and meaning of youth sports [20].

For sports behavior and physical activity of elite volleyball players in Cameroon, Guessogo et al. [22] reported that covid confinement significantly affected physical and sports activity, particularly among women. They also demonstrated that athletes continued to train by personal motivation, but without supervision, so physical and technical deficiencies led to inadequate training and at risk of injury. Finally, they recommend specific individualized programs to reduce physical and psychological effects and promote a safe return to the sport.

The previous case is related to the contribution of Nikolaidis and Knechtle [23], in which they mention that the covid pandemic dramatically changed all human activities. Yet, people continued to exercise without specialized physical activity monitoring, wondering whether online videos or smart devices replaced sports and health sciences, experts. If so, this behavior will continue after overcoming confinement.

On the other hand, the individual consequences left by the pandemic are divided between those in which people who tested positive for covid recovered and those who remained with negative effects, in both cases with physical and psychological consequences as summarized in Table 4.

AftereffectsPositive for COVID and recoveredCOVID Negative
PhysicalMuscle pain
Joint pain
Headache
Fatigue
Low oxygen saturation
Sleep issues and waking up constantly
Sleep issues and waking up constantly
Nutrition issues
Issues related to a lack of physical activity
PsychologicalAntisocial emotional response
Bad mood
Stress
Anxiety
Exhaustion
Feeling worried all the time
Grief
Limited motivation
Stress
Anxiety
Frustration
Tension
Sadness
Anger
Grief
Limited motivation

Table 4.

Covid aftereffects.

Matus’s own elaboration [21].

For this reason, youth sports organizations are bound to provide mental wellbeing to all their members through follow-ups. There will undoubtedly be other catastrophes preventing the free development of sport, so emotional contingency plans and psychological intervention programs must be tested.

Advertisement

6. Conclusions

Playing a sport during childhood and youth reduces psychosocial risk factors. In addition, being part of a sports team promotes protective factors; among the most common are discipline, commitment, responsibility, confidence, resilience, frustration, and failure management.

As already mentioned, sports activity requires motivation as a sine qua non condition. It also requires adequate spaces, equipment, and funds for hiring professionals. Family and society play a role to support successful athletes but also to bolster a healthy generation of community-driven citizens.

We must consider that it is not just about beating records, reaction time, becoming a high-performance athlete, or being named the best. What is expected is a social change that transcends generations and will reduce the negative impact of the covid 19 pandemics through sports and physical activity.

Thus, we must promote academic, physical, and social spaces for young people to practice physical sports activities, not only in schools but also in family activities. Adults should be responsible for showing their children the variety of sports disciplines, and the many advantages of recreational sports between the ages of five and 12, which guarantees that children can discover the type of sport that amuses and motivates them.

Even though there is so much more to study regarding the effects of covid-19 in young patients who do sports, it is possible to venture to think that the habits acquired by them are maintained during confinement and situations of uncertainty to adapt their activities without leaving home.

In the words of Lao Tse “He who conquers others is strong; He who conquers himself is mighty.”

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Ericka Matus, Lorena Matus and Jay Molino (September 1st 2021). Sports Motivation in Athletes in the Face of Psychosocial Risk and Pandemic Due to COVID 19, Sport Psychology in Sports, Exercise and Physical Activity, Hilde G. Nielsen, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99475. Available from:

chapter statistics

91total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Psychological Factors as Predictor of Sport Participation among Japanese and Foreign Students in Sendai, Japan

By Akindele Abimibayo Adeoya, Adewale Olugbemiga Adeleye and Shinichi Egawa

Related Book

First chapter

Introductory Chapter: Outdoor Recreation - Physiological and Psychological Effects on Health

By Hilde Dorthea Grindvik Nielsen

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us