Open access

Introductory Chapter: Citrus for a Healthy Life

Written By

Muhammad Sarwar Khan

Published: 03 November 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99355

From the Edited Volume

Citrus - Research, Development and Biotechnology

Edited by Muhammad Sarwar Khan and Iqrar Ahmad Khan

Chapter metrics overview

499 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. An overview

Citrus is an extensively produced fruit crop and is cultivated predominantly in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. The genus Citrus and related genera (Fortunella, Poncirus, Eremocitrus, and Microcitrus) belong to the family Rutaceae. Of these genera, Citrus is the widely grown genus and is well known for fruits like oranges, mandarins, lemons, limes, and grapefruits [1]. The classification of citrus is complexed however, the genus Citrus consists of more than 100 species. The number of species is variable and this species variation in a single genus is due to the admixture of wide morphological diversity, intra- and interspecific sexual compatibility, apomixis, and spontaneous mutations. However, intergenic hybrids such as citranges, citrumelos, and citrandarins, citremons, citradias, and citrumquats are also reported and are getting increasing importance. Several indigenous varieties are developed and consumed locally in specific regions. The citrus fruits are tangy with pleasant flavor and taste, a combination of sweet and sour flavors. Oranges and mandarins are predominant species of genus Citrus, marketed as fresh or processed juice [2].

The citrus plants in the orchards are confronted worldwide with increasing biotic and abiotic factors due to the changing climate. Amongst abiotic factors, fluctuating temperature and unexpected frosts are the main limiting factors whereas, bacteria, viruses, viroids, nematodes, fungi, and phytoplasmas are major biotic factors. Some factors result in a massive reduction in production and quality while others may destroy altogether the citrus industry. Citrus improvement through conventional approaches is discouraged due to the genetic and reproductive characteristics of the plant. The omics and biotechnology-based interdisciplinary interventions may allow combating such external factors and improving the health, nutritional quality of the fruit. The book, Citrus: Research and Development describe the citrus plant, the biotic as well as abiotic challenges, nutrients, and nutritional value, and nutraceutical applications to improve human health. Citrus production, management, detection, and documentation of citrus pathogens and their management, fruit nutritional quality, and potential use as nutraceutical is an interdisciplinary endeavor; therefore, it is difficult to cover all aspects of this subject in a single book. The editor of the book is conscious of the fact that there is considerable scope for improving citrus production and controlling the diseases and benefitting from the availability of chemicals of nutritional and nutraceutical importance, novel approaches for detection of such chemicals, enriching the genetic information through next-generation sequencing and improving the genome by incorporating new genes through genetic engineering and knocking out genes using CRISPR/Cas technology, and hence the information relevant to the topics is covered in the book.

Advertisement

2. Citrus genealogy

Citrus domesticated in Southeast Asia started several thousand years ago and was distributed to different regions of the world through ancient land and sea routes. The genealogy of the modern cultivated citrus is controversial because these are either selections from or hybrids of wild progenitors (Figure 1). The biological features and cultivation of Citrus have further complicated the lineage of modern species. Citrus is being cultivated either through clonal grafting or by asexual means of propagation to maintain the identified superior traits however, diversity within such populations is due to somatic mutations. Further, spontaneous mutants have been reported and are occasionally selected from limb sports or nucellar seedlings. The genetic diversity in citrus is the major impediment in the classification of the ever-increasing number of varieties. Several methods have been used to classify the citrus varieties however the methods proposed by Swingle [3] and Tanaka [4] are commonly adopted. Swingle’s classification is based on native varieties rather than cultivated, and he placed two subgenera Papeda with six species and Citrus with ten species in the genus Citrus [3], and the rest as natural hybrids of native species. Whereas Tanaka [4] classified both indigenous and cultivated varieties as species and placed two subgenera namely; Archicitrus with 111 species and Metacitrus with 48 species, the list of species was swelled to 159 [5]. The intervention of biotechnology approaches like RAPD, RFLP, AFLP, SSR, SRAP, and more recently the next-generation sequencing and pan-genomics has made it easier to determine the genealogy of citrus, extensively reviewed elsewhere [6]. The genomes of clementines, mandarins, pummelos, sweet oranges, and sour oranges have been sequenced using Sanger whole-genome sequencing method [7]. The sequence data together with earlier similar work was a step forward in elucidating the phylogenetic history of citrus domestication and highlights the genetic basis of the diversity in the colors, flavors, sizes, and aromas of citrus fruits, which could be introduced in novel varieties [8]. Another exciting and challenging work has been published, again by Wu et al. [9], where they worked out that distant genera i.e., Fortunella, Eremocitrus, and Microcitrus are a part of the citrus monophyletic group, whereas a related genus Poncirus, originally believed to be a part of Citrus group, is declared as a distinct clade based on whole-genome phylogeny. These findings have challenged the earlier taxonomic and phylogenetic developments and have warranted reformulation of the genus Citrus.

Figure 1.

The genealogy and evolution of citrus fruits. Four ancestral species namely; Citrus reticulata, Citrus maxima, Citrus medica, and Citrus micrantha, depicted in the central circle, have contributed to the evolution of cultivated species. The figure is derived from Velasco and Licciardello, 2014 [8] and other published articles.

Advertisement

3. Citrus production and management

Worldwide, citrus is cultivated for consumption as fresh or processed fruit. Major citrus-producing countries are; China, Brazil, USA, Mexico, India, Spain, Iran, Italy, Nigeria, and Turkey. Production and consumption trends are diverse in different regions and countries however, variably 147 million tones citrus is produced, annually [10]. As citrus is grown from subtropical to tropical and the Mediterranean regions of the world, hence, its production is dependent on soil and climate conditions. The global orange production is projected to grow 3.6 million metric tons from the previous year due to favorable weather in Brazil and Mexico. Only a slight increase in production, as well as consumption, is expected for mandarins/tangerines. Unexpectedly, global grapefruit consumption and exports will rise to their highest levels in three years due to favorable weather conditions and expanded areas in China and Mexico. More than 80% of the fruit is being processed for juice production in developed countries, and the juice demand is increasing day by day. The market and consumption trends of major types of citrus fruit as well as of juice are not affected even by the COVID-19 pandemic, this is perhaps due to the perception of the consumers that citrus fruits are immunity boosters being rich in vitamin C.

In addition to climate, plant–soil interaction affects citrus production by affecting the availability of nutrients to the plants [11]. For efficient nutrient availability, the practices of controlled release of fertilizers are preferred [12]. The published data confirm that the nitrogen uptake is greater by using controlled means, compared to conventional approaches, resultantly, the plant growth is improved [13]. Hence, technology-based precision management of orchards including the application of balanced fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides is required for sustainable citrus production. However, there are several biotic and abiotic factors including diseases that affect the citrus industry. Amongst diseases, bacterial, fungal, and viral are constant threats and cause substantial economic impact in all growing areas around the world. Citrus greening is an extremely dangerous disease, caused by different species of the bacterium Candidatus Liberibacter including Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, Candidatus Liberibacter americanus, and Candidatus Liberibacter africanus. Of these three species, the Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas) has become a serious threat to the citrus industry. The disease was reported from Brazil in 2004, from Florida, the USA in 2005, in 2007 from Cuba, and molecularl detection of the disease has been reported in 2007 from Pakistan, in 2008 from the Dominican Republic; in 2010 from Mexico [14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. However, the disease has been reported and described in China since 2019. The disease is transmitted by the psyllid Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), commonly called Asian citrus psyllid. As CLas is difficult to culture on artificial media hence its detection is possible through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and particularly by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) targeting the 16S rDNA gene [14]. Recently, chloroplasts provide opportunities for pathogens to directly or indirectly target ‘chloroplast immunity’ as these organelles are the main sites for the synthesis of precursors of phytohormones, hence are coordinating plant defense responses. As hormonal crosstalk between host and pathogens is well established. The identification of chloroplast genes targeted by the CLas effectors will open the window to control this disease. The pathogen genome has been sequenced from Diaphorina citri from America [19] and the genome is composed of 1231639 bp with GC 36.5% contents. The pathogen genome has been sequenced from two strains from Pakistan. The CLas genomes of two strains (PA19 and PA20) were sequenced that is comprised of 1224156 bp and 1226225 bp, respectively with an average GC content of 36.4% [20]. The genome sequence of CLas from Thailand has also been reported with total GC contents of 36.4% and 1230623 bp genome. Several genes from the Candidatus spp. have been identified that interact with the genes of the plant defense system and scientists are working to identify the plant genes regulated by these pathogen effectors. The chloroplast being the main site of phytohormone precursor synthesis provides opportunities for pathogens to target, directly or indirectly, the ‘chloroplast immunity’. As hormonal crosstalk between host and pathogens is now well established hence identification and editing of chloroplast genes using CRISPR/Cas technologies hold promise to control the disease. Similarly, the canker susceptibility gene, CsLOB1, of Duncan grapefruit has been knockout. The infection by Xanthomonas citri was significantly reduced with no disease development on plants [21].

Advertisement

4. Citrus nutritional and nutraceutical importance

Citrus fruits, diverse in color and size, are highly nutritious. They are beneficial for health, due to the presence of bioactive compounds such as carotenoids, flavonoids, and ascorbic acid [22]. These compounds have antioxidant, antitumor, anti-inflammatory and blood clotting inhibiting characteristics [23, 24]. These fruits are also a rich source of vitamins and minerals like vitamin C, A, and B-complex [25, 26, 27], vitamin A benefits skin and vision whereas vitamin B-complex like thiamin, folates, and pyridoxine are required as external sources to replenish. Of minerals, potassium, magnesium, calcium, and sodium are present in citrus from very high to low levels in citrus fruits [28]. However, zinc, iron, and manganese are present in trace amounts (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

The citrus, a source of nutrients and nutraceuticals. Citrus species are a rich source of carotenoids, flavonoids, minerals, and vitamins that function as antioxidants, antitumor, and anti-inflammatory compounds.

Nutraceutical is a combination of two words; ‘nutrition’ and ‘pharmaceutical’, hence the word infers that the nutraceuticals could be regulated as dietary supplements, medicine, and food ingredients. The word, ‘nutraceutical’ was first coined by Stephen L. DeFelice in 1989 who explained nutraceuticals as; “Food, or parts of food, that provide medical or health benefits, including the prevention and treatment of disease” [29, 30]. However, the government of Japan started approving foods with proven benefits for the general public in the 1980s, reviewed elsewhere [31]. Nutraceuticals protect against diseases developed due to nutrient deficiencies and also have physiological benefits. These are used as dietary supplements and food ingredients. Being dietary supplements, these may contain vitamins, minerals, botanical extracts, essential amino acids, Poly Unsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFA), and enzymes that are probably deficient in most of our diets. Another category of nutraceuticals is nutrient-fortified food. For example, the iron-fortified wheat flour protects the wheat-dependent population from diseases that develop due to iron deficiency. A salient example is iron deficiency anemias. Other examples include purple cauliflower and purple potatoes, having additional anthocyanin content. Golden rice and Golden potatoes as well as Provitamin-A-fortified maize are the rich sources of Provitamin-A and carotenoids. These crops could reduce the disease development in humans caused by Vitamin A deficiency diseases e.g. night blindness, xerophthalmia, prevalent in Africa and Asia. Similarly, Quinoa is of great nutritional value. Laden with fiber, vitamins, and minerals, this plant also is rich in lysine, hence its proteins are nutritionally more complete than many vegetables [32]. Thus, quinoa holds great potential as a Nutraceutical, to curb the malnutrition rampant in many third-world countries, the likes of Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bangladesh, and several African nations.

Several plants, including food crops, have been reported that contain compounds to prevent diseases. Even in this era of rapid medicine evolution, cancer remains a major threat to the population and a leading cause of mortality in developed nations. Introduction of plants into lifestyle at an early age could reduce cancer risk up to 33%. For instance, blue maize is useful in preventing different types of cancers, such as colon cancer [33]. Several chemotherapeutic agents such as Taxol, Vincristine, and Vinblastine are derived from plants such as Taxus brevifolia and alkaloids of Vinca species. Nutraceuticals have also been shown to reduce the toxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents and radiation therapies [34].

Bacterial infections and the growing resistance to synthetic antibiotics is a serious concern. It has been proven experimentally that medicinal plants are effective against bacterial infections. In this era of technology development, the introduction of medicinal and nutritional traits transgenically into food crops is on the top priority of biotechnologists, hence engineering the citrus genome will be a better choice.

Advertisement

5. Citrus improvement through biotech approaches

Citrus fruits are highly nutritious and are beneficial for health, due to the presence of bioactive compounds such as carotenoids, flavonoids, and ascorbic acid. However, citrus production and quality are challenged with several biotic and abiotic problems. Biotech interdisciplinary interventions including transgenesis, genome editing, and OMICS could offer solutions to the issues of this fruit crop. Genetic transformation has been established in many citrus species thereby transgenic plants have been developed against bacterial, viral, and fungal pathogens. Equally, OMICS approaches; genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, interactomics, and phenomics are exploited to improve the citrus fruits. Since, first attempt to manipulate the citrus genome remained unsuccessful hence, the protocols for efficient regeneration from explants like seeds, embryogenic cells, epicotyls, callus, nodal stem segments, and protoplasts, followed by transformation and selection have been optimized for different citrus species. Maximum regeneration potential has been observed in explant ‘epicotyl’ hence, the epicotyl has been used as an explant for the genetic transformation of citrus plants. Transgenically stable plants were recovered from Agrobacterium treated Duncan grapefruit epicotyls. The recovered plants were confirmed for transgene presence using PCR and Southern blotting techniques. Similarly, transgenic plants using epicotyl tissues as explants were developed from sweet orange, and citrange. The transformation efficiency remained as high as 93%. Hence, transgenic technology is proven as one of the most reliable interventions to genetically improve tolerance/resistance to abiotic/biotic factors in citrus [35, 36].

Using the technology, the nutrition and medicine-related traits have been successfully tailored in citrus fruits. For example, the expression of genes that encode enzymes like phytoene synthase, lycopene-β-cyclase, and phytoene desaturase of the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway have been modulated to supplement human nutrition with vitamin A and antioxidants. The Valencia orange is majorly grown for its juice but the quality of the juice is deteriorated due to the degradation of an enzyme, named thermostable pectin methylesterase (TSPME). Hence, the gene (CsPME4) that encodes TSPME was downregulated to improve the juice quality [37]. Further, an environmentally friendly technology named, ‘chloroplast transformation’ is available to develop transgenic plants [38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46]. This technology offers several superior advantages like overexpression of transgenes up to 70% due to polyploidy at organelle and genome (plastome) levels, accumulation of functional proteins, and natural containment of transgenes since plastids are transmitted to the next generation through ovary, rather than pollens that cause horizontal gene transfer, in most of the cultivated plant species. The chloroplast genome of several citrus species has been sequenced [47, 48, 49, 50, 51], thus necessary genetic information of the subcellular organelle is available to develop chloroplast transformation vectors and achieve chloroplast transformation, successfully. Therefore, the development of transgenic plants through chloroplast genome engineering is a promising way forward for cost-effective production of nutraceuticals.

Advertisement

6. Conclusions

Conventional research has played a pivotal role in the improvement of citrus. Enhanced heterozygosity has helped in the development of genetically diverse germplasm in most of the citrus species and numerous varieties have been released for commercial cultivation. However, with the advent of modern biotechnological tools, the period involved in crop improvement through indirect mutagenesis and polyploidization could be further reduced and enhance cost-effectiveness. Transgenic technology and OMICS have great potential to improve this fruit crop.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Miss Rimsha Riaz, a Ph.D. scholar for her contribution to the graphical presentations in the chapter.

References

  1. 1. Scora RW. On the history and origin of Citrus. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 1975; 102(6): 369-375
  2. 2. Raveh E, Goldenberg L, Porat R, Carmi N, Gentile A, La Malfa S. Conventional breeding of cultivated Citrus varieties. In: Gentile A., La Malfa S., Deng Z. (eds.) The Citrus Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer, Cham. 2020; p 33-48 DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-15308-3_4
  3. 3. Swingle WT. The botany of Citrus and its wild relatives. In: Reuther W., Webber H. J., Batchelor L. D. (eds.). The Citrus Industry. California: University of California; 1967; p. 190-430
  4. 4. Tanaka T. Species problem in citrus: a critical study of wild and cultivated units of citrus, based upon field studies in their native homes (Revisio Aurantiacearum IX). Tokyo: Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science. 1954; p 152
  5. 5. Tanaka T. Misunderstanding with regards citrus classification and nomenclature. Bull Univ Osaka Prefect Ser. B, Agriculture and biology. 1969; 21:139-145
  6. 6. Shimizu T, Kitajima A, Nonaka K, Yoshioka T, Ohta S, Goto S, et al. Hybrid Origins of Citrus Varieties Inferred from DNA Marker Analysis of Nuclear and Organelle Genomes. PLoS ONE. 20 16;11: e0166969. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0166969
  7. 7. Wu GA, Prochnik S, Jenkins J, Salse J, Hellsten U, Murat F, et al. Sequencing of diverse mandarin, pummelo and orange genomes reveals complex history of admixture during citrus domestication. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32: 656-662
  8. 8. Velasco R, Licciardello C. A genealogy of the citrus family. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32: 640-642
  9. 9. Wu G, Terol J, Ibanez V. et al. Genomics of the origin and evolution of Citrus. Nature. 2018;554: 311-316
  10. 10. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Data. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
  11. 11. Mattos-Jr D, Kadyampakeni DM, da Silva JR, Vashisth T, Boaretto M. Reciprocal effects of huanglongbing infection and nutritional status of citrus trees: A review. Trop. plant Patho. 2020;45: 586-596
  12. 12. Vashisth T, Kadyampakeni D. Diagnosis and Management of Nutrient Constraints. 2020; p 723-737
  13. 13. Dou H, Alva A. Nitrogen uptake and growth of two citrus rootstock seedlings in a sandy soil receiving different controlled-release fertilizer sources. Biol Fertil Soils. 1998;26: 169-172
  14. 14. Teixeira DC, Dane JL, Eveillard S, Martins EC, Jesus Junior WC, Yamamoto PT, et al. Citrus huanglongbing in São Paulo state, Brazil: PCR detection of the “Candidatus” Liberibacter species associated with the disease. Mol. Cell. Probes. 2005;19:173-179
  15. 15. Halbert S. The discovery of huanglongbing in Florida. In: Gottwald, T.R., Graham, J., Dixon, W.N., LaVigne, A. and Berger P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Citrus Canker and Huanglongbing Research Workshop. Orlando, FL. 2005; p 50
  16. 16. Gottwald TR, Parnell S, Taylor E, Poole K, Hodge J, Ford A, Therrien L, Mayo S, Irey M. Within-tree distribution of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus. In: Gottwald TR, Graham JH (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Research Conference on Huanglongbing. Florida Citrus Mutual, Orlando, FL, USA. 2008; p 310-313
  17. 17. Matos L, Hilf ME, Camejo J. First report of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ associated with citrus huanglongbing in the Dominican Republic. Plant Dis. 2009;93:668 DOI:10.1094/PDIS-93-6-0668
  18. 18. Yaqub MS, Khan IA, Usman M, Rana IA. Molecular detection of Candidatus liberibacter asiaticus, the causal organism of huanglongbing (Citrus greening) in Faisalabad, Pakistan for Huanglongbing management. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 2017;54:21-26
  19. 19. Wang Y, Kondo T, He T, Zhou Z, Lu J. Genome sequence resource of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ from Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae) in Colombia. Plant Dis. 2021;105: 193-195
  20. 20. Liu Z, Ge XX, Wu XM. et al. Genome-wide analysis of the citrus B3 superfamily and their association with somatic embryogenesis. BMC Genomics. 2020;21:305 DOI:10.1186/s12864-020-6715-9
  21. 21. Jia H, Zhang Y, Orbović V, Xu J, White FF, Jones JB, Wang N. (2017). Genome editing of the disease susceptibility gene CsLOB1 in citrus confers resistance to citrus canker. Plant Biotechnol J. 15:817-823. DOI:10.1111/pbi.12677
  22. 22. Ma G, Zhang L, Sugiura M, Kato M. Citrus and health. In: Talon M. et al. (eds.) The Genus Citrus. 2020; p 495-511 DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-812163-4.00024-3
  23. 23. Cha JY, Cho YS, Kim I, Anno T, Rahman SM, Yanagita T. Effect of hesperetin, a citrus flavonoid, on the liver triacylglycerol content a phosphatidate phosphohydrolase activity in orotic acid-fed rats. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2001;56(4):349-358
  24. 24. Rehman SU, Abbasi KS, Haq NU, Ahmad Q , Taran NU, et al. Comparative nutraceutical properties of seeds of eight citrus varieties grown in Rawalpindi region. Pure and Applied Biology. 2020;9:1-9 DOI:10.19045/bspab.2020.90001
  25. 25. Etebu E, Nwauzoma AB. A review on sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L Osbeck): Health, diseases and management. American Journal of Research Communication. 2014; 2: 33-70
  26. 26. Tsuda H, Ohshima Y, Nomoto H, Fujita KI, Matsuda E, Iigo M, Moore MA. Cancer prevention by natural compounds. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2004;19: 245-263
  27. 27. Lee SE, Hwang HJ, Ha JS, Jeong HS, Kim J. Screening of medicinal plant extracts for antioxidant activity. Life sci. 2003;73:167-179
  28. 28. De Moraes Barros HR, de Castro Ferreira TAP, Genovese MI. Antioxidant capacity and mineral content of pulp and peel from commercial cultivars of citrus from Brazil. Food Chem. 2012;134:1892-1898
  29. 29. Kalra EK. Nutraceutical-definition and introduction. AAPS PharmSci. 2003;5:2-3
  30. 30. De Felice L Stephen. The nutraceutical revolution, its impact on food industry. Trends in Food Sci. and Tech. 1995;6:59-61
  31. 31. Pandey M, Verma RK, Saraf A. Nutraceuticals: New era of medicine and health. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2010;3:11-15
  32. 32. Maradini-Filho AM. Quinoa: Nutritional aspects J Nutraceuticals Food Sci. 2015;2:1
  33. 33. Guzmán-Gerónimo RI. Blue maize as a potential Nutraceutical in the prevention of Colon Cancer and metabolic syndrome. J Nutraceuticals Food Sci. 2017;2:2
  34. 34. Martinotti S, Ranzato E. 3 – Natural compounds and anticancer effects: The whole is greater than the sum of its parts. In: Kabir Y. (ed.) Functional Foods in Cancer Prevention and Therapy. 2020;p 47-58
  35. 35. Cervera M, Ortega C, Navarro A, Navarro L, Pena L. Generation of transgenic citrus plants with the tolerance-to-salinity gene HAL2 from yeast. J. Hort. Sci. and Biotechnol. 2000;75:26-30
  36. 36. Caserta R, Teixeira-Silva NS, Granato LM, Dorta SO, Rodrigues CM, Mitre LK, Yochikawa JT, Fischer ER, Nascimento CA, Souza-Neto RR, Takita MA. Citrus biotechnology: What has been done to improve disease resistance in such an important crop?. Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 2020;3:95-109
  37. 37. Guo WW, Duan YX, Olivares-Fuster O, Wu ZC, Arias CR, Burns JK and Grosser JW. Protoplast transformation and regeneration of transgenic Valencia sweet orange plants containing a juice quality related pectin methylesterase gene. Plant Cell Rep. 2005;24:482-486
  38. 38. Svab Z, Maliga P. High-frequency plastid transformation in tobacco by selection for a chimeric aadA gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:913-917
  39. 39. Khan MS, Maliga P. Fluorescent antibiotic resistance marker for tracking plastid transformation in higher plants. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:910-915
  40. 40. Daniell H, Khan MS, Allison L. Milestones in chloroplast genetic engineering: An environmentally friendly era in biotechnology. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:84-91
  41. 41. Bock R, Khan MS. Taming plastids for a green future. Trends Biotechnol. 2004;22:311-318
  42. 42. Khan MS, Joyia FA, Mustafa G. Seeds as economical production platform for recombinant proteins. Protein and Peptide Letters. 2019;27:1-16
  43. 43. Khan MS. Utilizing heterologous promoters to express green fluorescent protein from jellyfish in tobacco chloroplasts. Pak J Bot. 2001;33:43-52
  44. 44. Khan MS. Engineering photorespiration in chloroplasts: A novel strategy for increasing biomass production. Trends in Biotechnology. 2007;25:437-440
  45. 45. Khan MS. Engineered male sterility. Nature. 2005; 436:783-785
  46. 46. Mustafa G, Khan MS. Transmission of engineered plastids in sugarcane, a C4 monocotyledonous plant, Reveals that Sorting of Preprogrammed Progenitor Cells Produce Heteroplasmy. Plants. 2021;10: 26 DOI:10.3390/plants10010026
  47. 47. Kiwoung Yang, Jonghoon Lee, Sang-Choon Lee, Tae-Jin Yang, Hoyteak Kim, Mi-Young Chung, Ill-Sup Nou. The complete chloroplast genome of Korean popular Citrus hybrid Hallabong mandarin [(Citrus unshiu×C. sinensis)×C. reticulate] (Rutaceae), Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 2016;1(1):29-30 DOI:10.1080/23802359.2015.1137805
  48. 48. Su H-J, Hogenhout SA, Al-Sadi AM, Kuo C-H. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Omani lime (Citrus aurantiifolia) and comparative analysis within the Rosids. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e113049 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0113049
  49. 49. Shi-Rong Xu, Chang-Yue Huang, Ya-ting Deng, Lin-Li Zhou, dong-Ming Pan, He-Li Pan. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Citrusmaxima (Burm.) Merr. ‘Guanximiyou’, Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2020;5(1):482-483 DOI:10.1080/23802359.2019.1704661
  50. 50. Bausher MG, Singh ND, Lee SB, Jansen RK, Daniell H. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck var 'Ridge Pineapple': Organization and phylogenetic relationships to other angiosperms. BMC Plant Biol. 2006;30(6):21 DOI:10.1186/1471-2229-6-21
  51. 51. Lee M, Park J, Lee H. et al. Complete chloroplast genomic sequence of Citrus platymamma determined by combined analysis of sanger and NGS data. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2015;56:704-711 DOI:10.1007/s13580-015-0061-x

Written By

Muhammad Sarwar Khan

Published: 03 November 2021