Parameters for simulation.
Abstract
With the continuous improvement of user communication requirements and the rapid development of information services, optical wireless communication (OWC), which has unlimited bandwidth and precise positioning, is widely used in indoor scenes such as healthcare. For healthcare monitoring application, the optical wireless (OW) link using non-Lambertian emission pattern is investigated in the typical mobility scenario. Numerical results show that the potential gain could been provided by the concerned emission pattern to the OW performance uniformity.
Keywords
- optical wireless communications
- non-Lambertian beams
- B5G&6G
1. Introduction
With population aging is emphasized around the world, more attention is paid to the development of the healthcare application with new paradigm. Nevertheless, most of the current health application is based on conventional radio frequency (RF) techniques, such as WiFi (Wireless Fidelity) or UWB (Ultra-Wide Band), and the annoying interference issue frequently degrades the user experience. On the other side, the emerging solid source based optical wireless (OW) technology is consistently investigated to complement the wireless capacity for various healthcare application in EM (electromagnetic) sensitive scenarios [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Specifically, the validity is examined to achieve the diffuse OW communication between the on-body nodes [6, 7, 8, 9, 10].
Up to now, the works of OW healthcare system are still limited to the well-known Lambertian emission pattern which is quite consistent with the conventional solid state sources e.g. LED (Light Emitting Diodes) [11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. Nevertheless, there are a number of variations following non-Lambertian emission pattern is still waiting for discussion. In this paper, the typical non-Lambertian OW links is explored in typical healthcare scenario, as shown in Figure 1 for the first time. And the healthcare OW channel gains comparison are made between the Lambertian & the non-Lambertian configuration.
2. Indoor optical wireless application for healthcare scenario
In this part, the typical non-Lambertian OW links is explored in typical healthcare scenario, as shown in Figure 1 for the first time. And the healthcare OW channel gains comparison are made between the Lambertian & the non-Lambertian configuration.
2.1 Lambertian & non-Lambertian emission pattern
To the best of our knowledge, in the indoor medical related system shown in the radiation intensity of the transmitter is modeled by the generalized Lambertian pattern as [1, 2]:
where
Following the work of [3, 4], the radiant intensity of this non-Lambertian type could be expressed as:
where g11 = 0.76, g21 = 0°, g31 = 29°, g12 = 1.10, g22 = 45°, g32 = 21°. Obviously, like the Lambertian case, the intensity is independent of the azimuthal angle
2.2 Optical wireless link characteristics comparison
In typical indoor healthcare scenario, the OW channel gain form the optical transmitter on the patient to the optical receiver on the ceiling center could be expressed as [1, 2]:
where
For simplifying analysis, the orientation of the optical transmitter is set upward vertically. And the orientation of the optical receiver is set downward vertically. In such situation, emission angle of line of sight (LOS) optical signal equals to the incidence angle at the receiver, i.e.
On the other side, the expression of the non-Lambertian pattern channel gain could been simplified as well:
For fair comparison, the whole emitted optical power of the both emission patterns are normalized to 1 W. The main parameters for the following simulation are included in the Table 1. In this Lambertian pattern case, the mobile patient experiences up to 5.77 dB channel gain variation, specifically ranging from −58.71 to −52.94 dB, as shown in Figure 3a. Thanks to the intrinsic spatial emission characteristics of the concerned non-Lambertian pattern, the channel gain ranges from −57.79 to −55.26 dB with variation reduced to 2.53 dB. Accordingly, the performance uniformity brought by the pattern replacement could been observed by the probability distribution function (PDF) in Figure 3b as well.
Parameters | Value |
---|---|
Length of room | 4 [m] |
Width of room | 3 [m] |
Height of room | 2.5 [m] |
Height of optical receiver | 2.5 [m] |
Height of optical transmitter | 1.8 [m] |
Detection area of receiver | 1 cm2 |
Field of view | 85° |
3. Conclusion
The high bandwidth, abundant spectrum resources and high confidentiality of wireless optical communication are suitable for 5G and B5G communication systems. With the rapid development of OWC technology, discussions on different beam characteristics and active research will be unprecedentedly released. In this study, the potential channel gain induced by the non-Lambertian beam is investigated in typical healthcare scenario. The results show that the channel gain fluctuation could be reduced up to about 3.24 dB, with constant transmitted optical power.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 62061043), Natural Science Foundation of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (Grants No. 2019D01C020), High-level Talents Introduction Project in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (Grants No. 042419004), Tianchi Doctor Program of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (Grants No. 04231200728), Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang University (Grants No. 62031224624), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 61401420), and Tianshan Cedar Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (Grants No. 202101528).
References
- 1.
P. Toumieux, L. Chevalier, S. Sahuguède and A. Julien-Vergonjanne, “Optical wireless connected objects for healthcare,” Healthcare Technology Letters, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 118-122, 10 2015 - 2.
Torkestani S S, Sahuguede S, Julien-Vergonjanne A, Cances J P. Indoor optical wireless system dedicated to healthcare application in a hospital. IET Communications, 2012; 6(5):541-547. DOI: 10.1049/iet-com.2010.1116 - 3.
Moreno I, Sun C C. Modeling the radiation pattern of LEDs. Optics Express, 2008; 16(3): 1808-1819. DOI: 10.1364/OE.16.001808 - 4.
Ding J, I C, Xu Z. Indoor optical wireless channel characteristics with distinct source radiation patterns. IEEE Photonics Journal, 2016; 8(1): 1-15. DOI: 10.1109/JPHOT.2015.250842 - 5.
Pham T, Atsushi K, Keizo I, Toshimasa U, Naokatsu. Hybrid optical wireless-mmWave: ultra-high-speed indoor communications for beyond 5G. Processing of the IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2019, pp. 1003-1004 - 6.
Huang C, Hu S, Alexandropoulos G C, Zappone A, Yuen C, Zhang R, Renzo M D, Debbah M. Holographic MIMO surfaces for 6G wireless networks: opportunities, challenges, and trends. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2020; 27:118-125. DOI: 10.1109/MWC.001.1900534 - 7.
Khan M, Chakareski J. Neighbor discovery in a free-space-optical UAV network. Processing of the 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Waikoloa, HI, USA, 2019, pp. 1-6 - 8.
Nakamura K, Nakagawa S, Matsubara H, Tatsui D, Seki K, Haruyama S, Teraoka F. Development of broadband telecommunications system for railways using laser technology. Electrical Engineering, 2015, 132(5): 666-674. DOI: 10.1541/ieejeiss.132.666 - 9.
Mori K, Terada M, Yamaguchi D, Nakamura K, Kaneko K, Teraoka F, Haruyama S. Fast handover mechanism for high data rate ground-to-train free-space optical communication transceiver for internet streaming applications. IEICE Transactions on Communications, 2016; E99.B:1206-1215. DOI: 10.1587/transcom.2015EBP3326 - 10.
Cossu G, Sturniolo A, Messa A, Scaradozzi D, Ciaramella E. Full-fledged 10Base-T ethernet underwater optical wireless communication system. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2018; 36: 192-202. DOI: 10.1109/JSAC.2017.2774702 - 11.
Li Y, Yin H, Ji X, Wu B. Design and implementation of underwater wireless optical communication system with high-speed and full-duplex using blue/green light. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, 2018, pp. 99-103 - 12.
Du J, Hong X, Wang Y, Xu Z, Zhao W, Lv N, Fei C, He S. A comprehensive performance comparison of DFT-S DMT and QAM-DMT in UOWC system in different water environments. IEEE Photonics Journal, 2019; 13(1):7900211, DOI:10.1109/JPHOT.2020.3044905 - 13.
Mozaffari M, Saad W, Bennis M, Debbah M. Optimal transport theory for power-efficient deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles. Processing of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, 2016 - 14.
Zhang Y, Yang Y, Hu B, Yu L, Hu Z. Average BER and outage probability of the ground-to-train OWC link in turbulence with rain. Optics Communications, 2017, 68: 85-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2017.04.034 - 15.
Chowdhury M Z, Hasan M K, Shahjalal M, Hossan M T, Jang Y M. Optical wireless hybrid networks: trends, opportunities, challenges, and research directions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2020; 22:930-966. DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2020.2966855