Open access peer-reviewed chapter

XEFGM Fracture Analysis of Functionally Graded Materials under Mixed Mode and Asymmetric Loading

Written By

Nathera A. Saleh and Haider Khazal

Submitted: May 16th, 2021 Reviewed: June 7th, 2021 Published: February 23rd, 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.98765

Chapter metrics overview

69 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

This research describes crack analysis in the functionally graded materials (FGMs) by adopting the extended element free Galerkin method (XEFGM) under mixed mode and asymmetric loading. These loads are somewhat similar to fatigue loads because, numerically, they are load values from zero and then directly to the critical load. The meshfree method can be easily simulated the fracture problems against the traditional numerical method because it is not dependent on mesh. Triangles technique in the process of numerical integration at regions of discontinuity, functions of enrichment, and as well as the appropriate support field to contain numerical points and nodes to from the shape functions are used in this study. In addition, incompatible interaction integration technique has used to determine the stress intensity factors (SIFs). Two study cases with different crack positions were studied and compared with the experimental works of the relevant reference literature, where accurate and identical results were obtained.

Keywords

  • Crack propagation
  • incompatible interaction integration technique
  • meshfree method
  • functionally graded materials

1. Introduction

Functionally graded materials (FGMs) arose from the realization that it was necessary to meet ultra-high temperature and cryogenic requirements. The goals of strength, flexibility, and fatigue resistance inspired the early research. This aim in achieving a smooth and perfect spatial variation is most effectively met by gathering different materials with those favorable characteristics, thereby avoiding the detriment effect such as stress concentration and residual stress found in discrete interface. The gradual change in material properties from the original composite has been shown to increase efficiency by mitigating failure and maintaining the intended benefits of merging two or more different materials. Functionally graded materials are found in nature, for example in bones, teeth, wood, and bamboo [1]. As a result of the microstructure and mechanical properties of functionally graded materials (FGMs) that different from their corresponding from the conventional composites, they have to be used in many engineering, military, medical and space sciences applications. Numerical methods have been used and applied in the analysis of fracture problems in these materials because they have the ability to give realistic results [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. Popovich et al. [12], Zhao et al. [13] studied fatigue load that exerted on certain types of functionally graded materials. Most recently, digital image correlation technique was used with numerical verification on a stepwise functionally graded material made of glass and epoxy to find the path growth of the crack and the stress concentration values [14, 15]. On the other hand, the optical method was used to analyze the crack path in a material made continuously from the graded materials and the stress concentration factor and T-stress were also calculated [16]. One of these methods that have been adopted in this research is the extended weak Galerkin formulation-element free method (XEFGM). The element-free Galerkin method with the sub-triangle technique to enhance the accuracy of the Gauss squared near the crack to determine stress intensity factors in isotropic and anisotropic materials can give accurate results in analyzing fracture structures. The incompatible interaction integral technique is applied to extract stress intensity factors (SIFs). The method of sub-triangulation is used to hence the discontinuity terms. With low degrees of freedom, results can be obtained that are highly consistent with those of the relevant reference literature.

Advertisement

2. Field Equations

In elastic materials, Hooke’s law can be employed in the following equation that clears the relationship between the stresses and strains in specific material.

σ=E1

σand εare the stress and strain respectively; while Drepresents the material matrix that varied with the displacement xin the functionally graded materials can be find as:

D=Ex1ν21νx0ν10001νx/2Plane stressE2

and

D=Ex1νx1+νx12νx1νx1νx0νx1νx100012νx21νxPlane strainE3

Where E and νrepresent Young’s Modulus and Poisson’s ratio that varied with the displacement xrespectively, Eqs. (2) and (3) are useful because they give a change in the properties of the material at each point of the material in relation to the displacement.

Eq. (1) can be put as:

ε==C11C12C16C12C22C26C16C26C66σxxσyyσxyE4

where Crepresents the compliance matrix.

In FGM

E=Ex1x2=ExE5
υ=υx1x2=υxE6

In the above two equations, it is clear that the Young’s Modulus and Poisson’s ratio change with the displacement and this gives the impression for the behave of properties of the functionally graded materials as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

FGM body with crack,

The stresses and displacements in functionally graded materials near the crack tip can be obtained by depending on angular stress and displacement functions as [2]:

σ11=12πrKIf11Iθ+KIf11IIθE7
σ22=12πrKIf22Iθ+KIIf22IIθE8
σ12=12πrKIf12Iθ+KIIf12IIθE9
u1=1Gtipr2πKIg1Iθ+KIIg1IIθE10
u2=1Gtipr2πKIg2Iθ+KIIg2IIθE11
Gtip=Etip21+νtipE12

The mechanical properties in Eq. (11) to (13) will be extracted at the tip of crack.

fijIθ,fijIIθ,gijIθandgijIIθij=12represent the standard angular functions [17, 18]. Eqs. (7) to (13) can calculate the values of stresses and displacements at each point of the material supported by the enrichment functions.

Advertisement

3. XEFGM Structure

In the two-dimensional solid elasticodynamics as depicted in Figure 2, the equilibrium equation that gives the relationship between the stresses and traction load tcan be depicted in matrix form as:

Figure 2.

2D cracked body.

LTσ+b=0in problemd dmainΩE13

Where the following Eqs. (15) to (17) represent boundary equations.

σn=t¯onΓtE14
u=u¯onΓuE15
σn=0onΓeE16

And the differential operator matrix Lis

L=x00yyxE17

EFGM adopted the moving least squares (MLS) approximation [19] to find shape function of the numerical method. The governing equation of the relevant problem:

ΩLδuTDLuΩδuTbΓtδuTt¯dΓΓuδλTuu¯dΓΓuδuTλdΓ=0E18

where λrepresents the Lagrange multiplier variable. The MLS shape function ϕiat node ia point xcan be defined as [20]:

ϕix=pTxAx1wxxipxiE19

pxis the basis function

pTx=1xyE20

And Acan be extracted as

Ax=i=1nwxxipxipTxiE21

And

wr=234rs2+4rs3rs12434rs+4rs243rs312<rs10rs>1E22

Where rsis the size of the influence domain for node i.

The externally enriched displacement approximation uhof a model point x [21, 22, 23]:

uhx=i=1nϕixui+k=1mtϕkα=14QαxbkE23

For isotropic FGMs, enrichment functions are applied to enrich the MLS formulation [24, 25]:

Qrθ=rcosθ2rsinθ2rsinθ2sinθrcosθ2sinθE24

Therefore the final discretized system equations,

KQQT0Uλ=FqE25

The vectors in Eq. (26)

Q=ΓuNTϕdΓE26
q=ΓuNTu¯E27
λx=i=1nλNixλiE28

Uis the global displacement vector can be defined as:

U=ub1b2b3b4TE29

Where b1 to b4 represent the enrichment, function terms.

And

Kijn=KijuuKijubKijbuKijbbE30
Fin=FiuFib1Fib2Fib3Fib4TE31

where

Kijrs=ΩBirTDBjsrs=ubE32
Fiu=Ωϕitb+ΓtϕiTt¯E33
Fiba=ΩϕiTQab+ΓtϕiTQat¯a=1234E34

Biuand Bibare matrices of shape function derivatives:

Biu=ϕi,x00ϕi,yϕi,yϕi,xE35
Bib=Bib1Bib2Bib3Bib4E36
Biu=ϕiQα,x00ϕiQα,yϕiQα,yϕiQα,xE37
α=1,2,3,4E38
ε=LuhE39
σ=E40

Eq. (40) and (41) represent stress and strain for whole body of FG material calculated by numerical method.

Advertisement

4. Fracture Criteria

Incompatibility formulation is applied to extracted J-integral [26, 27].

σij=dijklxεkl,εij12ui,j+uj,i,σij,j=0E41

where

εij=Cijklxσklijkl=123E42

with

C=C11C12C16C12C22C26C16C26C66=C1111C11222C1112C2211C22222C22122C12112C12224C1212E43

From Figure 3:

Figure 3.

An integral contour at the tip of the crack.

J=Aσijui,1wδ1jq,jdA+Aσijui,1wδ1j,jqdAE44

wis the strain energy density:

w=12σijεijE45

The interaction integral and J integral can be defined [28, 29, 30]:

M=Aσijui,1aux+σijauxui,112σikuikaux+σikauxuiδ1jq,jdA+Aσijcijkltipcijklxσkl,1auxqdAE46
Jlocal=KI2+KII2/EtipE47
Jlocals=KI+KIaux2+KII+KIIaux2Etip=Jlocal+Jlocalaux+MlocalE48
Jlocalaux=KIaux2+KIIaux2/EtipE49

and Mlocal is given by

Mlocal=2KIKIaux+KIIKIIaux/EtipE50
KI=Mlocal1Etip/2,KIaux=1.0KIIaux=0.0,KII=Mlocal2Etip/2,KIaux=0.0KIIaux=1.0.E51

The Eq. (51) is used to calculate the stress intensity factors during the fracture analysis in functionally graded materials. The crack propagation criterion (Maximum hoop stress) was applied by the depend on procedure that was adopted by Erdogan and Sih [31].

Advertisement

5. Numerical examples

5.1 Example 1

The first example is that there is a crack in the FGM beam that undergoes a three-point bend as shown in Figure 4, and in this problem, the beams are homogeneous and gradient (along with the X2 direction). Figure 4a and b show the geometry of the sample and BCs for two different boundary conditions: the states (a) and (b), respectively. Also, this figure shows the complete nodal distributions, and the adaptive background cells visualize the distribution of Gauss points and fertilization nodes around the crack for Case (a). Note that the nodal and background cell distributions are valid for both conditions. The material properties (Table 1) of the monolithic beam used are as follows:

Figure 4.

Three-point bending cracked beam. (a) Case (a). (b) Case (b). (c) The nodal allocation. (d) back grid structure. (e) Gauss points allocation.

X2E (MPa)νKcr(Mpam)
017800.410.99
6040000.391.19

Table 1.

Material characteristics of the graduated beam.

E=2890MPa,ν=0.4,KIc=1.09MPam.

A 64 x 28 back grid and 1856 non-uniform distribution nodes are adopted in this case (Figure 5). 2875 nodes in finite element method was previously used by Kim and Paulino [3]. Figure 6 depicts the comparison of the crack path of a homogeneous case (b) beam obtained by current work with the experimental results reported by Galvez et al. [32] With numerical simulation by [3]. The reasonably well output between the numerical and experimental results are obtained. Note that in this case, the gradient of the material does not affect the path of the crack. Figure 7 shows the effect of increasing the slit length by current numerical simulations of (b) condition on the slit path compared to the experiment available for a gradient beam. Figures 8 and 9 depict results of KI and KII for the different relative size of the J-integral domain (rJ) respectively. The results of the proposed method remain accurate for a wide range of rJ values and the integral field size J (rJ) does not significantly influence the values of SIFs.

Figure 5.

Nodes of enrichment around the crack prior to the final step of crack propagation.

Figure 6.

Comparison of crack paths for a homogeneous beam (Case b).

Figure 7.

The effect of increasing the crack length by current numerical simulations of case (b) on the crack path in a graded beam.

Figure 8.

KI values for case (b) with different relative rJ.

Figure 9.

KII values for case (b) with different relative rJ.

5.2 Example 2

Figure 10 depicts the configuration and mechanical properties (Table 2) of the case study (2) that is bending four points with vertical cracks that perpendicular on the gradient of material.

Figure 10.

Bending four points with vertical cracks on the physical gradient.

ξE (MPa)νKcr(Mpam)
0≤30000.351.2
0.1733000.342.1
0.3353000.332.7
0.5873000.312.7
0.8383000.32.6
1≥86000.292.6

Table 2.

Material characteristics of the graduated beam.

Rousseau and Tippur [33] applied ξ that is zero on the left side of the stepping part, and one on the right side (Figure 10). In current work, A 64 x 28 back grid and 2070 non-uniform distribution nodes are adopted in this case (Figures 11 and 12), while more than 10,000 element and 30,000 nodes were adopted by [33] to study this case.

Figure 11.

(a) Distribution of 2070 irregular nodes, (b) Back grid structure, (c-d) Sub-triangulation technique upon initial fracture propagation.

Figure 12.

Nodes of enrichment around the crack.

The results of the current research work give high accuracy with related references as depicted in Tables 3 and 4. The consistent of present research can be depicted in Tables 35. Figure 13 gives a comparison of the effect of increasing the slit length on the slit path of the current work with experimental work [33] at ξ = 0.17, 0.58, and ξ = 1.00. Finally, Figures 14 and 15 appear the data of KI and KII for different relative rJ respectively. It is clear in this example that the growth of the crack is moving towards the soft side.

ξKI(Mpam)KII(Mpam)
Present workRef. [8]Ref. [4]Present workRef. [8]Ref. [4]
0.172.0872.0872.088−0.116−0.117−0.127
0.582.6892.6942.695−0.087−0.085−0.094
12.5882.598−0.010−0.013

Table 3.

Stress intensity factors rapprochement at dmax=2and rJ=1.2.

ξPcr (N)Crack initiation angle θ0 (deg.)
Present workRef. [8]Ref. [4]Present workRef. [8]Ref. [4]
0.17255250249.36.9017.0097
0.582983002984.0203.9984
1295289.90.6010.5

Table 4.

Critical load of and crack initiation angle rapprochement at dmax=2and rJ=1.2.

ξ = 0.17;rJ = 1.2dmax
1.722.3
KI(Mpam)2.0812.0872.091
KII(Mpam)−0.112−0.116−0.111

Table 5.

SIFs for different support domain size.

Figure 13.

Comparison of effect of increasing the crack length on the propagation path for current research and experimental work [33]. (∆a = 1 mm for red line, and ∆a = 3 mm for green line).

Figure 14.

KI values for case (2) vs. relative rJ.

Figure 15.

KII for case (2) vs. relative rJ.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

The work mentioned in this work submitted the development of the XEFGM method to simulate crack propagation and compute stress intensity factors in mixed-mode fracture analysis of FGM beams under mixed mode and asymmetric loading. It has been demonstrated that XEFGM needs much less DOF than traditional FEM and XFEM to give the same accuracy levels. The adopt of sub-triangle technique for numerical integration, proper support field, and enrichment functions at the crack site has been shown to significantly increase the resolution of the solution. In addition, numerical simulation showed little effect of increasing incision length on the propagation path compared to the available experimental and numerical results. It is clear in this example that the growth of the crack is moving towards the soft side. There is no effect for increasing the crack length on the propagation path for current research with experimental work.

Additionally, the gradation of materials has no effect on the incision path of bending cases. Use of incompatible interaction integration method provides very accurate results for SIFs values.

References

  1. 1. R. M. Mahamood and E.T. Akinlabi, “Functionally Graded Materials”, springer, 1 Ed, ISBN 978-3-319-53755-9.
  2. 2. B.N. Rao and S. Rahman, “Mesh-free analysis of cracks in isotropic functionally graded materials” Engineering Fracture Mechanics 70 (2003) 1–27.
  3. 3. J.-H. Kim and G.H. Paulino, “Simulation of crack propagation in functionally graded materials under mixed-mode and non-proportional loading” International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design 1: 63–94, 2004.
  4. 4. J.-H. Kim and G.H. Paulino, “On Fracture Criteria for Mixed-Mode Crack Propagation in Functionally Graded Materials”, Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 14:227–244, 2007.
  5. 5. B.N. Rao and Sharif Rahman, “A continuum shape sensitivity method for fracture analysis of orthotropic functionally graded materials”, Mechanics of Materials 37 (2005) 1007–1025
  6. 6. Rolf Mahnken, “Geometry update driven by material forces for simulation of brittle crack growth in functionally graded materials”, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng 2009; 77:1753–1788.
  7. 7. Sayyed Shahram Ghorashi, Soheil Mohammadi, Saeed-Reza and Sabbagh-Yazdi, “Orthotropic enriched element free Galerkin method for fracture analysisof composites”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics Volume 78, Issue 9, June 2011, 1906-1927
  8. 8. Hamid Bayesteh, Soheil Mohammadi, “XFEM fracture analysis of orthotropic functionally graded materials”, Composites: Part B 44 (2013) 8–25
  9. 9. Haider Khazal, Hamid Bayesteh, Soheil Mohammadi, Sayyed Shahram Ghorashi, and Ameen Ahmed, “An extended element free Galerkin method for fracture analysis of functionally graded materials” mechanics of advanced materials and structures 23 (2016)513-528.
  10. 10. N. Muthua,b,d, S.K.Maitib,n, B.G.Falzon c, WenyiYan, “Crack propagation in non-homogenous materials: Evaluation of mixed-mode SIFs, T-stress and kinking angle using a variant of EFG Method”, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 72(2016)11–26.
  11. 11. J.Li, J.Z.Liu, T.Korakianitis, P.H.Wen “Finite block method in fracture analysis with functionally graded materials”, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, Volume 82, September 2017, Pages 57-67
  12. 12. Popovich, V. A., et al. “Creep and thermomechanical fatigue of functionally graded Inconel 718 produced by additive manufacturing.” TMS annual meeting & exhibition. Springer, Cham, 2018.
  13. 13. Zhao, S., et al. “Compressive and fatigue behavior of functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V meshes fabricated by electron beam melting.” Acta Materialia 150 (2018): 1-15.
  14. 14. Farouq, Wafaa, Haider Khazal, and Abdul Kareem F. Hassan. “Fracture analysis of functionally graded material using digital image correlation technique and extended element-free Galerkin method.” Optics and Lasers in Engineering 121 (2019): 307-322.
  15. 15. H. Khazal, A. Hassan, W. Farouq, and H. Bayesteh, “Computation of Fracture Parameters in Stepwise Functionally Graded Materials Using Digital Image Correlation Technique,” Materials Performance and Characterization 8, no. 1 (2019): 344-354.
  16. 16. Abood, Ahmed M., Haider Khazal, and Abdulkareem F. Hasan. “Evaluation of mixed-mode stress intensity factor and T-stress in continuous epoxy glass functionally graded beam using digital image correlation.” Materials Today: Proceedings (2021).
  17. 17. Eischen JW. Fracture of nonhomogeneous materials. Int J Fract 1987; 34:3–22.
  18. 18. Anderson TL. Fracture mechanics––fundamentals and applications. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1995.
  19. 19. P. Lancaster and K. Salkauskas “Surfaces Generated by Moving Least Squares Methods”, Mathematics of Computation, Vol. 37, pp. 141-158, 1981
  20. 20. G.R. Liu “Meshfree methods moving beyond the finite element method”, second edition- 2010 by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
  21. 21. S. Mohammadi, “Extended finite element method for fracture analysis of structures” First Edition 2007-Blackwell Publishers, UK.
  22. 22. S. Mohammadi, “XFEM fracture analysis of composites”, 2012, A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Publication.
  23. 23. A. Asadpoure and S. Mohammadi, “Developing new enrichment functions for crack simulation in orthotropic media by the extended finite element method” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng 2007; 69:2150–2172.
  24. 24. S.S. Ghorashi, S. Mohammadi and S.R.S.Yazdi, “Orthotropic enriched element free Galerkin method for fracture analysis of composites” Engineering Fracture Mechanics-Volume 78, Issue 9, June 2011, Pages 1906–1927.
  25. 25. J. Dolbow “An extended finite element method with discontinuous enrichment for applied mechanics”, Ph.D. thesis. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA, 1999.
  26. 26. J.-H. Kim and G. H. Paulino, “Consistent Formulations of the Interaction Integral Method for Fracture of Functionally Graded Materials” Journal of Applied Mechanics, ASME- May 2005,Vol. 72, pp. 351-364.
  27. 27. S.S. Hosseini, H. Bayesteh and S. Mohammad,” Thermo-mechanical XFEM crack propagation analysis of functionally graded materials”, Materials Science and Engineering: A, Volume 561, 20 January 2013, Pages 285–302.
  28. 28. L. Guo, F. Guo, H. Yu and L. Zhang, “An interaction energy integral method for nonhomogeneous materials with interfaces under thermal loading” International Journal of Solids and Structures 49 (2012) 355–365.
  29. 29. J.-H. Kim and G.H. Paulino, “Mixed-mode fracture of orthotropic functionally graded materials using finite elements and the modified crack closure method”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 69 (14–16), 1557–1586, 2002.
  30. 30. J.-H. Kim and G. H. Paulino, “On fracture criteria for mixed-mode crack propagation in functionally graded materials”, Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 14:227–244, 2007.
  31. 31. Erdogan F, Sih GC. On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. ASME J Basic Eng 1963; 85(4):519–527.
  32. 32. Galvez, J., Elices, M., Guinea, G.V. and Planas, J. (1996). Crack trajectories under mixed mode and non-proportional loading. International Journal of Fracture 81(2), 171–193.
  33. 33. Rousseau C-E, Tippur HV. Compositionally graded materials with cracks normal to the elastic gradient. Acta Mater 2000; 48(16):4021–4033.

Written By

Nathera A. Saleh and Haider Khazal

Submitted: May 16th, 2021 Reviewed: June 7th, 2021 Published: February 23rd, 2022