Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Screening for Antenatal Depression by Midwives in Low Resource Settings in Primary Care Settings in Malawi

Written By

Genesis Chorwe-Sungani

Submitted: March 18th, 2021 Reviewed: March 25th, 2021 Published: July 1st, 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.97411

From the Edited Volume

Healthcare Access

Edited by Amit Agrawal and Srinivas Kosgi

Chapter metrics overview

164 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Depression significantly contributes to the disease burden of pregnant women. However, depression is often under diagnosed by health professionals especially in antenatal clinics. This is the situation in Malawi where there is no routine screening for depression in antenatal clinics. Nonetheless, screening can enable the effective management of pregnant women with depression at antenatal clinics. There is therefore a need to integrate screening for depression into routine antenatal services to enhance the early identification of antenatal depression and intervention to improve and maintain the well-being of pregnant women and contribute towards achieving the efforts of the Government of Malawi in scaling up the treatment of depression.

Keywords

  • depression
  • antenatal
  • screening
  • midwives
  • pregnancy

1. Introduction

Depression affects pregnant women during all stages of their pregnancy [1]. Currently, there is no reliable comprehensive epidemiological statistics about the prevalence of depressive disorders during pregnancy in Malawi, though one study in a rural district reported prevalence of depression as 10.7% (major depression) and 21.1% (minor depression) [2]. These figures fall within prevalence range of depressive disorders during pregnancy (8.3–41%) reported in sub-Saharan Africa [3] with highest prevalence (47%) registered in rural parts of South Africa [4]. There are numerous risk factors which are linked to antenatal depression. In Malawi, a previous study found that lower social support and intimate partner violence were linked with antenatal depression [2]. Similarly, another study revealed that being single, poverty, stressful life events, unplanned pregnancy, childhood trauma, and intimate partner violence predicted antenatal depression [5].

Evidence indicates that antenatal depression and its associated risk factors may be addressed through psychosocial interventions including screening to reduce burden they may cause on an individual [2, 6]. Depression is often under diagnosed by treating health professionals [7] which leads to poorer prognosis of co-morbid physical health conditions in primary healthcare settings [8]. This is likely to put pressure on the poor resources available in antenatal clinics in low resource settings and add an additional burden to pregnant women themselves. The lack of routine screening can also delay identification and treatment of women who are affected by antenatal depression. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of antenatal depression may lead to the early disruption of mother-infant relationships and prolong distress for a mother [6].

Antenatal depression thus causes adverse effects on the mother, family, and community which necessitate interventions of health professionals. Screening for depression can help in timely detection of pregnant women with depression [9]. Currently, there are many instruments for the screening of antenatal depression that are validated in low resource settings [10, 11, 12]. Some of these instruments were not specifically developed for use during pregnancy but have been used in these settings. Nevertheless, screening instruments for depression must be accurate (be sensitive and specific) in identifying individuals who have a condition [sensitivity (Se)] and those without a condition [specificity (Sp)] [13].

Currently, pregnant women are not routinely screened for depression in antenatal clinics in Malawi. However, mental health is integrated in general healthcare system at policy level in Malawi [14], so that people could have increased access to mental health services. This means that pregnant women should also receive mental healthcare at antenatal clinics along with the usual antenatal care as needed. Services at antenatal clinics in Malawi include history taking, physical and laboratory examination, antenatal drugs and vaccines and antenatal education [15]. This is similar to what happens in South Africa where antenatal care generally focuses on physical examinations [16].

Integrating mental health with antenatal care requires midwives to assess and deal with mental health problems affecting pregnant women in antenatal care settings in Malawi. Nonetheless, some policy makers fear that mental health interventions may deter midwives from concentrating on other ‘priority’ interventions [9]. Furthermore, many general healthcare workers, including midwives, in Malawi are not confident and competent enough deal with mental health problems [17]. Research studies have asserted that midwives may lack skills and confidence in screening and treating antenatal depression [18]. This is corroborated by Mathibe-Neke, Rothberg [19] who asserted that midwives from sub-Saharan Africa are not skilled enough to assess and treat common perinatal mental disorders even though they encounter many pregnant women with psychosocial problems. Nonetheless, there is evidence that nurses and midwives can effectively intervene to reduce depressive symptoms during pregnancy [6].

Dealing with antenatal depression can assist in achieving the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly, goal number three which focuses on ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all ages [20]. The government of Malawi is already making efforts to achieve SDG 3 (good health and well-being) through the Essential Health Package (EHP) [21] which includes mental disorders as priority conditions for the first time. The government has gone a step further in the Malawi Health Sector Strategic Plan II 2017–2022 to emphasise the first line treatment of depression for the entire population at community, primary and secondary levels of care [22]. It is estimated that there are 847 767 people who are in need of treatment for depression, and the Government has targeted providing access to treatment for 27 822 people by 2022 [22]. In this regard, the Government of Malawi has prioritised research on mental health in the National Health Research Agenda for Malawi (2012–2016) to promote the development of innovative and appropriate treatment strategies for mental health problems affecting the population [23].

1.1 Antenatal care

Antenatal care includes the health assessment of pregnant women, encouraging good health habits, addressing pregnancy related complications and providing social and psychological support [24]. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends the implementation of new focused antenatal care which consists of a minimum of eight contacts between the pregnant woman and the healthcare providers with their first contact during the first 12 weeks’ gestation, then following contacts taking place at 20, 26, 30, 34, 36, 38 and 40 weeks’ gestation [25]. Malawi adopted focused antenatal care more than a decade ago [15, 26] with the aim of helping women to maintain normal pregnancies through identification of pre-existing health conditions, early detection of complications arising during pregnancy, health promotion, disease prevention, birth preparedness and complication readiness planning [27]. It encourages careful identification of pregnant women with special health conditions or risk factors for complications [28]. As described in literature, detection and treatment of diseases, is one of the essential elements of care during pregnancy [29].

In Malawi midwives are frequently the first health professionals who could identify antenatal depression, or to whom a pregnant woman with antenatal depression or any other common perinatal mental disorders may go to seek for help. The country has low mental health specialists to patients ratios (0.01 psychiatrists per 100 000 and 0.22 psychiatric nurses per 100 000) [30] for more than16 million people. This shows that pregnant women attending antenatal clinics may have limited access to mental health specialists. Despite a gross shortage of mental health specialists in the country, midwives therefore could participate in the detection of pregnant women with depression when providing antenatal care.

1.2 Clinical and public health significance of antenatal depression

The lancet series on maternal mental health have established the clinical and public health importance of antenatal depression [31, 32, 33, 34]. There is evidence that antepartum depression is highly prevalent in low resource settings [31]. Literature show that antenatal depression is associated with increased rates of adverse child outcomes in low resource settings where pregnant women have increased exposure to risk factors for depression [35]. The adverse mental health outcomes for the child include an increased risk of anxiety, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and conduct disorder [35]. It is documented that pregnant women with untreated depression have a higher likelihood of obstetric complications, premature deliveries, and low birthweight infants [34].

Antenatal depression and HIV infection form a vicious cycle, whereby the symptoms of each disease worsen the status of the other, and each needs to be sufficiently treated for the pregnant woman to become healthy [32]. It is of public health concern that pregnant women with co-morbidity of depression and HIV infection are less likely to adhere to antiretroviral therapy, which is critical for her survival and prevention of HIV transmission to the child [33]. Stringer, Meltzer-Brody [32] recommended integration depression-screening technique in antenatal services that could identify a large proportion of affected women to break the cycle of depression and HIV infection interaction. It is documented that integrating mental health services into primary care may be the most viable way of closing treatment gap for mental health in low resource settings [31]. An important step in this direction is the incorporation of the capacity to prevent, recognise, and treat depression within antenatal care [36]. This may help to meet the immediate mental health needs of a pregnant woman, ensure better maternal and child outcomes, and contribute towards success of HIV/AIDS services [32].

Integrated antenatal services aimed at identifying and treating women with antenatal depression are needed because antenatal care is typically the first and only time of interaction with the healthcare system for many women in low resource settings [31]. As such, antenatal care visits provide critically important opportunities for mental health interventions to occur. There is a need to develop protocols for early identification, treatment and preventing the adverse effects of antenatal depression in low resource settings because they do not exist [31]. There is also a need to develop, refine and rigorously evaluate the predictive validity and reliability of instruments for screening of antenatal depression in low resource settings [31].

Advertisement

2. Screening for depression

Screening is the application of an instrument to identify people at risk of a specific condition among people who have not sought medical attention because of symptoms of that condition to warrant further investigation or direct prevention [37]. Literature suggests that it is reasonable to consider screening when the condition in question is significant and prevalent, can be effectively treated and cannot be readily detected without screening [38]. Screening for depression encompasses the use of instruments for measuring symptoms of depression to identify patients who may have depression but who have not sought treatment and whose depression has not already been detected by clinicians [38].

For screening to be successful, it must detect a substantial number of individuals with undiagnosed depression and provide treatment to obtain sufficiently positive results to justify the costs and potential harms associated with screening [38]. It is documented that screening for depression in primary care requires the availability of a lot of resources [9]. In low resource settings, allocation of resources to screening activities could lead to a decline in the quality of care received by patients with more severe depression and who are more clearly in need [38]. More importantly, it is recommended that the WHO minimum criteria for screening should be met before screening is implemented [39].

According to Andermann et al. [39], the following is the aforementioned recommended minimum criteria for screening: [1] the screening programme should respond to a recognised need; [2] the objectives of screening should be defined at the outset; [3] there should be a defined target population; [4] there should be scientific evidence of screening programme effectiveness; [5] the programme should integrate education, testing, clinical services and programme management; [6] there should be quality assurance, with mechanisms to minimise potential risks of screening; [7] the programme should ensure informed choice, confidentiality and respect for autonomy; [8]; the programme should promote equity and access to screening for the entire target population; [9]; programme evaluation should be planned from the outset; and [10] the overall benefits of screening should outweigh the harm. This criteria clearly focuses at improving clinical outcomes of individuals who participate in screening programmes, including pregnant women.

This study complied with the minimum criteria for implementing screening in many ways. Firstly, the aim of this study to develope a screening protocol was response to a need for detecting antenatal depression and associated risk factors. Secondly, the study clearly indicated that pregnant women attending antenatal clinic as target population for the screening of depression. Thirdly, the evidence about effectiveness of the proposed screening protocol for antenatal depression was locally generated by this study some of it was gathered from literature. Fourthly, this study minimised harm and ensured quality by submitting the proposal for review to two research and ethics committees, allowing participants to give consent for their voluntary participation in the study and ensuring privacy by not collecting personal details that could identify them during data collection. Pregnant women who were diagnosed as having depression were refered to a psychiatric unit. Finaly the protocol will be piloted to assess its clinical application and benefits and cost before it is adopted for clinical use. It is hoped that the proposed screening protocol will be used for screening depression in all pregnant women after its adoption.

Screening for depression is useful if it improves patient outcomes beyond those of standard care [38]. However, the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care asserted that there is insufficient evidence about the benefits of screening to recommend routine screening of depression in adults in primary care settings [40]. The fact that there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening of depression does not change the importance of depression as a condition that negatively affects quality of life [41]. As such, clinicians in primary care settings should be alert to the possibility of depression in patients with characteristics that may increase their risk of depression [40, 41]. The American College of Preventive Medicine upholds the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) proposal that all adults should be screened for depression in primary care settings and that there should be collaboration between primary care providers and mental health specialists to ensure accurate diagnosis and treatment of depression [42].

2.1 Screening for depression in antenatal clinics

During antenatal care, midwives have a duty to screen pregnant women for various conditions [15]. Midwives are expected to routinely screen depression in all pregnant women [43] to improve detection of antenatal depression [44]. There is evidence that screening for depression during pregnancy may reduce depressive symptoms among these women [45]. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists recommended that pregnant women should be screened for antenatal depression using a standardised and validated instrument [46].

For the routine screening for depression in antenatal care to occur, there is a need for standardised instruments for screening of depression to be designated for use in antenatal clinics in Malawi. Internationally there is evidence that midwives can effectively use instruments for screening of depression during antenatal care [16]. Currently, there are reports which show that EPDS and SRQ are used in research to screen depression during antenatal care in low resource settings [10]. However, screening instruments such as EPDS and SRQ are considered to be too long and time consuming for routine screening [47]. This could present a problem in busy antenatal clinics. In Malawi, antenatal clinics are usually staffed by one or two midwives who attend to a multitude of pregnant women. Literature indicates that antenatal clinics in low resource settings are understaffed, lack infrastructure and do not have adequate instruments for assessing antenatal depression [19]. Screening protocols for antenatal depression could help midwives to implement effective interventions systematically without adding to their workload [9] in these busy antenatal clinics. Routine antenatal visits by pregnant women could provide an appropriate time for antenatal depression screening [48]. Protocols for screening antenatal depression which include instruments that are accurate, acceptable and easy to use in busy, low resource settings therefore are needed [49].

However, midwives may consider screening for antenatal depression to be too demanding and requiring too much effort and this may result in a decreased frequency of screening [50]. The ideal timing and interval for screening for depression is not known [51]. However, Wisconsin Association for Perinatal Care recommends that screening of depression should be done at first antenatal visit and the third trimester of pregnancy [52].

2.2 Treatment for depression

Literature indicates that treatment for antenatal depression exists [53, 54]. A systematic review found that drug therapy, acupuncture, the use of morning light, individual psychotherapy, cognitive behavioural therapy, counselling and end psychodynamic therapy are forms of depression treatment that are used during pregnancy [55]. In addition, systematic reviews and controlled clinical trials found that various forms of psychotherapy [45, 54, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62], massage therapy [54, 61], exercise [63, 64], and drug therapy [55] may be effective in treating depression during pregnancy. This is supported by Whooley [65] who asserted that exercise and other self-management strategies, behavioural activation, structured psychotherapy, and/or pharmacotherapy are effective treatments for depression.

However, some authors of systematic reviews have argued that there is no conclusive evidence on the effectiveness of these treatments for depression during pregnancy [54, 55, 56]. All in all one can argue that the lack of evidence on effectiveness of some treatments for depression during pregnancy does not mean that antenatal depression cannot be treated but simply means that evidence is not available.

2.3 Instruments for screening of depression

Screening for depression during pregnancy can be done using various instruments such as EPDS [66], Hopkins Symptoms Checklist 15 (HSCL-15) [67], SRQ [68] and Whooley’s Questions [69]. Most of these screening instruments were not specifically developed for use during antenatal periods [66, 67, 68]. However, there are also numerous instruments for screening antenatal depression that were also validated for use in low resource settings [70] (Table 1).

S.NoScreening InstrumentAUCSeSp
1Beck Depression Index.87.87.74
2Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale 20.82.73.79
3Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.97.87.92
4Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.86.88.75
5Hopkins Symptoms Checklist 25.86.89.8
6Kessler Psychological Distress Scale 10.951.81
7Self-Reporting Questionnaire.83.76.81

Table 1

Summary of screening instruments that were validated in low resource settings.

Source: Chorwe-Sungani and Chipps [70].

Screening instruments which were validated in specific settings have a high likelihood of generating accurate results [71] and may reduce the under-detection of depression in those settings. However, screening instruments are generally limited in their accuracy [72] and their performance varies with populations or settings [73]. For instance, previous studies found that EPDS had different levels of accuracy and validity in antenatal clinics in various countries [10, 70, 74, 75, 76].

2.4 Validity of screening instruments

The performance of screening instruments may vary with settings [73]. A concern is that most instruments for the screening of depression were validated in high income countries (HICs) whose contexts are dissimilar from those of low resource settings [77]. For example, there is evidence that the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale’s (EPDS) discriminant ability in detecting antenatal depression varies according to settings [74, 75, 76]. The two most commonly used instruments in low resource settings, namely the EPDS and the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ), were reported to be easy to administer to pregnant women by interviewers in Malawi [10]. However, evidence is emerging that some health professionals may find screening instruments which have 5 or more items as long, cumbersome and time consuming for routine screening [47]. Ultra-brief screening instruments (having 4 or less items) can promote screening for depression in busy antenatal clinics [78] and screening instruments with binary questions such as Whooley’s questions are less time consuming and easy to score [49].

It is documented that screening instruments which require individuals to choose more than 2 responses for each question may not be easy to apply among illiterate pregnant women in Malawi [10]. These screening instruments should be valid to assist health professionals to effectively detect antenatal depression [38, 79]. A validation process through the application of a gold standard (a clinical diagnostic assessment) is required to confirm a diagnosis of depression among pregnant women who test positive on a screening instrument.

Midwives should use valid screening instruments for them to effectively detect pregnant women with antenatal depression. A valid instrument should have an ability to measure what it is supposed to measure [80] and this is determined by its Se, Sp, PPV and NPV [81]. The sensitivity of a screening instrument refers to the proportion of people with disease that are correctly identified (true positives) by the instrument while specificity is the proportion of people without the disease who will have a negative result (true negatives) [71]. Sensitivity and specificity of a screening instrument are determined by comparing the results of the instrument against the outcomes of a gold standard. A gold standard is the single instrument (or a combination of instruments) that is considered the current preferred method of diagnosing a particular condition [82]. A good screening instrument should have both high sensitivity and specificity [83]. Nevertheless, sensitivity and specificity of a screening instrument are often in balance (trade off) and can vary with optimum cut off scores which are determined through using a Youden index [84, 85].

Both sensitivity and specificity are equally important although a screening instrument can be very specific without being sensitive, or it can be very sensitive without being specific [83]. It is recommended that a suitable screening instrument should have a minimum acceptable balance of Se/Sp (.8/.7) [86]. However, the sensitivity and specificity of a screening instrument has limited use in clinical practice when compared to PPV and NPV because they do not help clinicians to estimate the probability of disease in individual patients [71]. PPV and NPV measure the likelihood that a positive or negative screening result is accurate for an individual [53]. PPV and NPV of a screening instrument depend on the prevalence of disease in a population so that PPV increases with increasing prevalence of disease and NPV decreases with increasing prevalence [82].

These predictive values are more useful measures of diagnostic accuracy in routine clinical practice because they assist a clinician to know the probability of a correct diagnosis being made [71]. An instrument which has high sensitivity and NPV ‘rules OUT’ the disease while the one with high specificity and PPV ‘rules IN’ the disease [82]. Thus a highly sensitive screening instrument is most helpful to the clinician when the result is negative because an individual who screens negative is very unlikely to have the disease [71]. Similarly, a screening instrument with high specificity is also most helpful to the clinician when the result is positive because an individual who screens positive is likely to have the disease. Literature indicates that a screening instrument cannot be valid without it reliably and consistently measuring what it is supposed to measure [87]. This suggests that for effective screening of depression in antenatal clinics, clinicians must utilise accurate screening instruments. Screening for antenatal depression using valid instruments can assist health professionals to accurately identify pregnant women who need mental health interventions [79].

Accuracy refers to the degree to which a measurement represents the true value of the attribute being measured, and can be determined by comparing results from a screening instrument with results generated by a gold standard using scores for area under curve (AUC) [88], sensitivity and specificity [89]. In this context validity and accuracy may be used synonymously. AUC scores are used to categorise the accuracy of a screening instrument as low (0.5–0.7), moderate (>0.7–0.9) and high (>0.9) [90]. The higher the AUC score, the more accurate a screening instrument is in detecting individuals with or without the condition being tested [83]. As such, highly accurate instruments are necessary for the screening of depression in antenatal clinics [70]. In addition, these screening instruments should be quick and easy to use in low resource settings [8, 78].

Advertisement

3. Ethics of screening

Health professionals, including midwives, are required to deal with diverse ethical issues when new intervention strategies are developed because they may be unfamiliar with the ethical standards associated with the new practice [91]. It is documented that screening may do more harm than good and it is ethical for clinicians to ensure that the benefits from the screening of each individual must outweigh the harm [39]. Potential harms from routine screening for depression include the treatment of depression in individuals who are incorrectly identified as having the condition, and the treatment of mild symptoms that would often resolve without intervention [38]. As such, clinicians must be open and honest in telling their clients about the accuracy of screening instruments [91] in detecting antenatal depression. According to Sjögren [72], screening instruments are generally limited in their accuracy and interpretation of their results may lead to incorrect conclusions such that if the result is falsely negative, the individuals will consider themselves healthy, when they are actually ill, or if the result is falsely positive, a healthy individual will leave the practice with a false diagnosis.

3.1 Ethics of screening for depression

Screening for depression should include the provision of depression care support apart from those targeted at improving the effectiveness of treatment [92]. It should also ensure that an individuals’ rights to informed choice, confidentiality and autonomy are respected by clinicians [39]. It is important that individuals should provide fully informed consent and be assured of confidentiality before they are screened for [91] depression. Literature suggests that screening and referral for depression within the clinical settings makes it difficult for clinicians to maintain confidentiality [93] about a client’s information. Clinicians have an ethical responsibility to ensure that the findings of screenings are not misunderstood or misused in manner that is detrimental to their client’s well-being by the clients themselves, their families, community, other clinicians or policymakers [91].

3.2 Ethics of screening for depression in antenatal clinics

Screening for depression during pregnancy may evoke a lot of ethical questions that need to be answered before midwives start implementing screening programmes. For instance, false positives may be of ethical concern because they may add a burden to pregnant women and to clinical services. Screening may result in the use of medications, many of which can cause adverse effects [94] in pregnant women who are falsely detected as having depression. As such, a screening programme must be socially acceptable and must be at an acceptable cost [95] to pregnant women and their families. It is possible that some pregnant women may be placed on anti-depressant medications unnecessarily and will consequently be exposed to the negative side effects associated with these drugs [38]. However, when screening for antenatal depression, a higher level of false positives may be considered acceptable as, ethically, it would seem better not to miss a pregnant woman who needs treatment and support. As described in literature, it is possible for clinicians to exclude false positives from unnecessary treatment by conducting a further diagnostic assessment (gold standard) on all individuals, who screened positive, to confirm the presence of the disorder [94, 96, 97]. This is corroborated by Thombs, Coyne [38] who asserted that individuals who screen positive for depression need further assessment and, if confirmed, should be offered treatment.

A drawback is that the infrastructure and human resources required to implement an effective screening programme can be so costly that allocation of scarce resources demand the appropriate application of ethical principles of justice and equity [39]. It is documented that it is unethical to screen individuals without providing them with relevant interventions because it deprives them of rights to control their own lives and access to treatment [91]. Pregnant women who are diagnosed with depression may be discriminated or socially rejected by society [98]. It is an ethical concern that after screening, a substantial proportion of women diagnosed with false positives may experience discrimination, self-stigma, and stress for unjustifiable reasons [91]. Although little is known about the possible “nocebo effect” of telling individuals who are otherwise not specifically concerned about their mental health that they have depression [38], a label of antenatal depression may negatively affect personal identity, relationships and the self-esteem of pregnant women [91]. The “nocebo effect” occurs when verbal suggestions of an adverse outcome can lead to the onset or exacerbation of symptoms [99].

The new label of having antenatal depression may influence the future goals of individuals and the type of support they may receive from significant others [91]. It is documented that individuals labelled with mental illness may lose their sense of entitlement to participation in community activities [98]. It is possible that pregnant women, who screen positive for depression, may start distancing themselves from others, in anticipation of the associated stigma of depression, and this may negatively impact on their utilisation of antenatal and other social services. There is evidence which shows that stigmas due to a diagnosis of depression is one of the barriers to treatment among women [100]. However, opposing evidence showed that pregnant women who participated in screening for antenatal depression did not feel stigmatised, labelled or distressed by the screening process [101]. This is corroborated by Siu, Bibbins-Domingo [51] who asserted that the negative effects of screening for depression in adults is small or sometimes non-existent.

Advertisement

4. Cultural aspects of depression and treatment in Malawi

In Malawi, all communities have their own explanations for illness. It is believed that mental disorders such as depression is caused by witchcraft, possession by spirits and ‘evil eye’ (punishment directed at a person by another person or a supernatural being) [102]. In addition, ‘Chauta’ (God) may punish wrongdoers who violate taboos [102]. Mental disorders may be caused by parents performing culturally disapproved forms of sexual intercourse such as not abstaining from sexual activity from seventh month of pregnancy until six months after delivery to prevent the child from suffering from mental disorder [103]. This shows that cultural beliefs should be considered as one of important factors which influence mental health interventions [104].

People may have negative cultural beliefs about mental disorders embedded in their community. Cultural beliefs related to mental disorders may affect the way the mentally ill person is handled locally [102]. Explanations of mental disorders, be it witchcraft, angry ancestors, will of God determine the acceptance of affected person’s condition [103]. People who believe in witchcraft as a cause of mental disorders may have no hope about recovery in the absence of traditional medicine [104]. It is believed that pregnant women should avoid conflict with others because they may bewitch her to cause delay and complications in labour [105]. It is documented that people who fear witchcraft avoid offending other people who might use magical charms to retaliate [102]. Stewart, Umar [105] found that witchcraft was considered as a very real danger that makes a pregnant woman and her unborn baby vulnerable to illness.

Traditional healers use charms, herbs or mental suggestions to treat mental disorders [102]. However, stigma towards mental disorders exists in Malawi [106] such that treatment may not be sought for an individual with depression who is not causing any trouble [102]. Furthermore, when people are sick, they want to know cultural explanations of their sickness such that they consult traditional healers before going for western medicine, or use both to be on the safe side [102]. This may suggest the need for developing culturally appropriate mental health interventions [106] for screening and treating of depression in pregnant women and other populations in the country.

There is evidence that the pathway to psychiatric care for patients with psychological problems in Malawi is comparable to other developing countries whereby traditional healers and paramedics play a significant role [107]. However, many cultural beliefs related to mental disorders are being challenged [102] and there is high utilisation of health services for people with common mental disorders in the local Primary Health Care settings [108]. This may suggest that screening for depression in local antenatal clinics may be feasible despite the prevailing cultural beliefs on mental disorders. In Malawi, mental health services are provides in all health centres, district hospitals and central hospitals across the country [17].

Advertisement

5. Task shifting in screening of antenatal depression in low resource settings

Mental disorders are underdiagnosed by primary care health workers in low resource settings, where mental health specialists are scarce [31]. This poses a challenge to integration of screening of depression into antenatal care. However, literature suggests task shifting approaches could be used to effectively deliver mental healthcare in primary health care settings [109]. Task shifting refers to the rational redistribution of tasks among health workforce teams, with specific tasks moved from highly qualified health workers to health workers with shorter training and fewer qualifications in order to make efficient use of the available human resources [110]. In task shifting, tasks are shifted from health workers with more general training to workers with specific training for a particular task [111]. For instance, non-specialist health professionals or lay workers able to detect, diagnose, treat, and monitor individuals with mental disorders after receiving brief training and appropriate supervision by mental health specialists [109]. This may help to mitigate the impact of health worker shortages an may provide an opportunity for establishing equitable and sustainable health systems in low resource settings [110].

Task shifting aims at increasing the number of healthcare services provided at a given quality and cost, or providing the same level of healthcare services at a given quality at a lower cost [111]. As such, task shifting may be of essence in this study because it proposes the inclusion of screening of depression in antenatal services which requires midwives to take up new tasks of detecting and treating of antenatal depression. In Uganda, nurses who run health centres diagnose and prescribe in addition to their usual nursing and midwifery duties [110]. Similarly, anecdote reports indicate that task shifting makes nurses/midwives in Malawi, especially those deployed in health centres, to operate beyond their scope of practice because circumstances demand that they do patient assessment, diagnosis and prescribing. This underscores the importance of having relevant policies and legislations to regulate the implementation of task shifting without compromising quality of care [110] in antenatal clinics.

In line with task shifting, the WHO recommended that the provision of mental health services in primary care should be the responsibility of primary care workers such as nurses and midwives who must receive ongoing training and supervision from specialist mental health specialists [112]. This is corroborated by Honikman, van Heyningen [16] who found that midwives were able to screen for depression and refer pregnant women appropriately after receiving some training in South Africa. Non-specialist health workers can effectively detect, diagnose, treat, and prevent common and severe mental disorders [109]. It is documented that task-shifting mental health interventions from specialised to non-specialised health workers to treat common mental disorders could expanding access to mental healthcare [112]. Furthermore, task shifting can substantially reduce the expected number of healthcare providers otherwise needed to close mental health service gaps at primary health care level in low resource settings [113].

However, task-sharing should not be viewed as an “outright solution” to the human resource crisis in low resource settings because specialist services will always be required regardless of the innovativeness and effectiveness of task shifting approaches in reducing the mental health treatment gap [112]. Considering that midwives in antenatal clinics in low resource settings are overburdened with increased workload [19], there is a need to ensure that task shifting happens in a team, based on which cadres are available, which tasks need to be undertaken and who has which competencies [110]. This study proposed that midwives who are readily available in antenatal clinics and mental health specialists-though scarce- should collaborate when screening for antenatal depression.

In Malawi task sharing initiative which involved lay health workers in providing mental health services led to the establishment of a new service within the community which increased access to mental health services [114]. The lay health workers received mental health training and were supervised by health professionals. There was increase in detection of people with severe mental illness by lay health workers. Lay health workers were also able to treat or refer patients with distress based on their assessment. However, the decision to refer patients to a district hospital was made by professional health workers. This is a local mental health initiative on which may inform successful implementation of the proposed screening protocol for antenatal depression in the country.

Best-buy interventions may be another approach of implementing mental health services in antenatal clinics. These interventions emphasise cost effectiveness, feasibility, affordability and scalability [115]. Implementation of buy-in interventions depends on appropriateness of setting, capacity of system to deliver a given intervention to a targeted group of people, technical complexity of intervention and acceptability. It is hoped that screening of depression using the proposed screening protocol would be best-buy interventions because it will be integrated in usual antenatal care provided by midwives. However, mental health specialists remain key in screening of antenatal depression due to complexity of its diagnostic assessments and treatments. This may suggest the importance of utilising task sharing when providing best buy-interventions.

Mantal health services have traditionally been offered in psychiatric institutions. Nonetheless, the proposed screening protocol for antenatal depression suggests provision of mental healthcare to pregnant women in unconventional settings of care. Interventions in unconventional settings model focuses on expanding care beyond traditional locales of service into settings where individuals attend [115]. Provision of care in unconventional settings open multiple opportunities to reach out to individuals or populations not otherwise served. However, implementation of this approach in local antenatal clinics may increase workload for midwives who are already burdened.

Advertisement

6. Screening algorithm

This section present a screening algorithm that can facilitate provision of maternal mental healthcare that is not readily accessible to pregnant women in Malawi [116]. It is underpinned by the proposition that routine screening in antenatal clinics improves detection of pregnant women with depression and that midwives can be trained to effectively screen for antenatal depression, offer psychoeducation and, make appropriate referrals. The aim of the algorithm is to improve the health of pregnant women and the child they are expecting. The algorithm includes aim, rationale, scope, objectives, principles underpinning algorithm, and components of algorithm.

6.1 Rationale for the algorithm

The algorithm will ensure a standardised and quality assured approach for detecting and dealing with pregnant women who have or are at risk of developing depression. It will make it possible for midwives to detect pregnant women with depression at an early stage and be able to put in place appropriate support systems for these women. In addition, the algorithm allows for the involvement of the pregnant women and their families in discussions about their care and treatment options. Furthermore, it ensures that information about pregnant women with depression is documented and shared appropriately with all relevant practitioners providing care. Collaborative care for adults with depression which produces substantial clinical improvements and has a high prospect of long-term cost savings is recommended. Collaborative care of depression includes a systematic, multicomponent, and team-based approach that strengthens and supports self- care, while assuring that effective medical, preventive, and health maintenance interventions take place to improve the quality and outcome of patient care. Therefore, the Algorithm recommends effective collaboration of antenatal services and mental health services for effective screening of antenatal depression.

6.2 Scope of the algorithm

The Algorithm is specifically designed for pregnant women with depression and it is not intended to cover the whole spectrum of pregnant women with other mental disorders. It focuses on improving the quality and accessibility of maternal mental healthcare by integrating routine screening for depression into antenatal services so that pregnant women with, or at risk of, depression are timeously detected, and the appropriate treatment can commence. The Algorithm is intended to reflect optimum practice in routine screening for depression and the management of pregnant women at risk or with depression in antenatal clinics in Malawi.

6.3 Objectives of the algorithm

The objectives of the Algorithm are to:

  1. Detect pregnant women who have or are at risk of depression in local antenatal clinics;

  2. Refer pregnant women, who have been detected with depression, to the relevant mental health services.

6.4 The principles underpinning algorithm

The following principles will enable the Algorithm to be useful in the context of antenatal clinics in Malawi:

  1. The Algorithm should facilitate human rights based screening for depression which will ensure early identification and treatment.

  2. The Algorithm should be based on the clinical needs of pregnant women and clinicians involved in the provision of health services in antenatal clinics.

  3. The Algorithm should be owned by the midwifery profession which should take a leading role in lobbying for the integration of routine screening for depression into antenatal services and policy.

  4. An implementation plan for the Algorithm need to be developed.

6.5 Algorithm for screening

The Algorithm, to ensure an effective and multidisciplinary approach to routine screening of depression in antenatal clinics, is diagrammatically presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Algorithm for screening of antenatal depression.

6.6 Components of the algorithm

The components of the Algorithm include: antenatal services and antenatal care assessment; midwives’ functions, screening instruments and mental health assessment.

6.6.1 Antenatal services and antenatal assessment

Midwives provide antenatal services to the majority of women in Malawi. These services include antenatal assessment, encouraging good health habits, addressing pregnancy related complications and provision of psychosocial support. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends that antenatal care should consists of four visits for normal pregnancies with the first visit in the first trimester (before 12 weeks but not later than16 weeks) and subsequently at 24–28 weeks, 32 weeks and 36 weeks. An antenatal assessment includes taking a psychosocial, medical and obstetric history; a complete general and obstetrical examination; screening for HIV and Syphilis; and testing for proteinuria, blood/rhesus group and bacteriuria. History taking provides the midwife with an opportunity to screen for depression during the antenatal assessment.

6.6.2 Midwives functions

The functions of a midwife in screening for antenatal depression include:

Screening for depression of all pregnant women attending antenatal clinics and to facilitate the management of those detected with depression;

  • Appropriately referring pregnant women with probable depression for mental health assessment using Algorithm pathway;

  • To be a resource person for other healthcare professionals in the care of pregnant women undergoing screening for antenatal depression;

  • To provide information about the screening for antenatal depression and available specialist support services to pregnant women and their families;

  • To liaise with the relevant members of the multidisciplinary team to facilitate the effective screening for depression; and provision of appropriate care and support for pregnant women with depression in antenatal clinics;

  • To maintain a knowledge base in screening for antenatal depression by attending in-service training, undergoing continuous professional development sessions and attending relevant conferences;

  • To provide education and training related to screening for depression to all staff in antenatal clinics;

  • To maintain a register of results, of the screening for depression done, in antenatal clinics and produce reports to relevant authorities;

  • To participate in the development of policies, procedures and guidelines related to screening for depression in antenatal clinics; and

  • To monitor quality and effectiveness of screening for depression inantenatal and take effective action to address issues and promote quality.

6.6.3 1Screening instruments

Algorithm recommends the use of the 3-item screener and the SRQ to screen for antenatal depression in the local setting.

6.6.3.1 The 3-item screener

6.6.3.1.1 Instructions

Remember - The 3-item screener is a screening instrument and should never override clinical judgement. A Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ) should be administered to confirm caseness of pregnant women who screen positive on the 3-item screener.

6.6.3.1.2 Administration

  1. Administer either Chichewa or English versions of the 3-item screener depending on the language which a client can easily understand.

  2. Read the questions aloud to the pregnant woman and ask her to respond ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ depending on how she is feeling now or has been feeling in the past month.

  3. Circle the response given by a woman against the corresponding question

  4. All the 3 items in the 3-item screener must be completed.

  5. Care should be taken to avoid the possibility of the pregnant woman discussing her answers with others. (Answers should come directly from the pregnant woman)

6.6.3.1.3 Scoring

  1. Each question is scored with a 0 for ‘No’ (AYI) or 1 for ‘Yes’ (EYA).

  2. The higher a score is, the more likely the woman is experiencing some level of antenatal depression.

  3. When validating the 3-item screener in antenatal clinics in the Blantyre district, optimum cut off score of greater than 1 was used.

  4. Administer SRQ to all pregnant women who score 2 or more on the 3- item screener. If the 3-item screener score is 1 or less, stop.

6.6.3.2 Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ)

6.6.3.2.1 Instructions

Remember - The SRQ is a screening instrument and should never override clinical judgement. A diagnostic mental health assessment should be done to confirm presence or absence of depression.

6.6.3.2.2 Administration

  1. Administer either Chichewa or English versions of the SRQ depending on the language which a client can easily understand.

  2. Read the questions aloud to the pregnant woman with low literacy and ask her to respond ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ depending on how she has been feeling in the previous 4 weeks.

  3. Circle the response given by a woman against the corresponding question

  4. All the 20 items in the SRQ must be completed.

  5. Care should be taken to avoid the possibility of the pregnant woman discussing her answers with others. (Answers should come directly from the pregnant woman)

6.6.3.2.3 Scoring

  1. Each question is scored with a 0 for ‘No’ or 1 for ‘Yes’.

  2. The higher a score is, the more likely the woman is experiencing some level of antenatal depression.

  3. Standard cut off score of 10 or greater is recommended as an indicator of possible depression [117]

  4. When validating SRQ in antenatal clinics in the Blantyre district, optimum cut off score of greater than 9 was used.

  5. Refer for diagnostic mental health assessment all pregnant women who score 10 or more on SRQ.

  6. If a pregnant woman scores 1 specifically on questions 16 or 17, immediate action is needed. An immediate emergency referral to a mental health professional may be the most appropriate next step if a patient has suicidal ideation.

Advertisement

7. Conclusion

Depression significantly affects women during pregnancy and may lead to adverse outcomes. Screening for depression does not usually form part of antenatal care in low resource settings. Midwives in these settings may often have limited consultation time to screen for depression due to inadequate human and material resources. Antenatal depression is highly prevalent among pregnant women living with HIV. Antenatal depression also remains an important condition which negatively affects pregnant women’s quality of life, but one that may respond to treatment. Numerous instruments are validated for screening antenatal depression in low resource settings although they were developed in high income countries. When screening, a short screening instrument can be used for initial screening with only positives screens being referred for more detailed screening. This would allow for a distributed workload in busy antenatal clinics. For effective screening for depression to be achieved in antenatal clinics, screening protocols for depression should be integrated into standard antenatal care. Successful implementation of the proposed screening would require implementation of relevant task shifting approaches that to effectively deliver mental healthcare in local settings. Ethical questions may arise around screening for depression during pregnancy as there is the potential that it may cause harm. However, the extent of harm from screening for depression is negligible or at times non-existent. Despite the prevailing cultural beliefs on mental disorders, screening for depression in local antenatal clinics may be feasible. Antenatal care contacts provide opportunities for screening depression and there is a need to develop protocols for early detection, treatment and preventing the adverse effects of antenatal depression in low resource settings.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

None.

Advertisement

Notes/thanks/other declarations

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1. Kaaya S, Mbwambo J, Fawzi MS, Van Den Borne H, Schaalma H, Leshabari M. Understanding women’s experiences of distress during pregnancy in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Tanzania journal of health research. 2010;12(1):36–46
  2. 2. Stewart RC, Umar E, Tomenson B, Creed F. A cross-sectional study of antenatal depression and associated factors in Malawi. Arch Women's Ment Health. 2014;17(2):145–154
  3. 3. Stewart RC, Kauye F, Umar E, Vokhiwa M, Bunn J, Fitzgerald M, et al. Validation of a Chichewa version of the self-reporting questionnaire (SRQ) as a brief screening measure for maternal depressive disorder in Malawi, Africa. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2009;112(1):126–134
  4. 4. Rochat TJ, Tomlinson M, Bärnighausen T, Newell M-L, Stein A. The prevalence and clinical presentation of antenatal depression in rural South Africa. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2011;135(1):362–373
  5. 5. Brittain K, Myer L, Koen N, Koopowitz S, Donald KA, Barnett W, et al. Risk factors for antenatal depression and associations with infant birth outcomes: Results from a South African birth cohort study. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2015;29(6):505–514
  6. 6. Clarke K, King M, Prost A. Psychosocial interventions for perinatal common mental disorders delivered by providers who are not mental health specialists in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2013;10(10):e1001541
  7. 7. Vahter L, Kreegipuu M, Talvik T, Gross-Paju K. One question as a screening instrument for depression in people with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21(5):460–464
  8. 8. Hanlon C, Medhin G, Selamu M, Breuer E, Worku B, Hailemariam M, et al. Validity of brief screening questionnaires to detect depression in primary care in Ethiopia. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2015;186:32–39
  9. 9. Rahman A, Surkan PJ, Cayetano CE, Rwagatare P, Dickson KE. Grand challenges: Integrating maternal mental health into maternal and child health programmes. PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001442
  10. 10. Stewart RC, Umar E, Tomenson B, Creed F. Validation of screening tools for antenatal depression in Malawi-A comparison of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Self Reporting Questionnaire. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2013;150(3):1041–1047
  11. 11. Natamba BK, Achan J, Arbach A, Oyok TO, Ghosh S, Mehta S, et al. Reliability and validity of the center for epidemiologic studies-depression scale in screening for depression among HIV-infected and-uninfected pregnant women attending antenatal services in northern Uganda: a cross-sectional study. BMC psychiatry. 2014;14(1):1
  12. 12. Fernandes MC, Srinivasan K, Stein AL, Menezes G, Sumithra R, Ramchandani PG. Assessing prenatal depression in the rural developing world: A comparison of two screening measures. Archives of women's mental health. 2011;14(3):209–216
  13. 13. Pilowsky DJ, Wu LT. Screening instruments for substance use and brief interventions targeting adolescents in primary care: A literature review. Addict Behav. 2013;38(5):2146–2153
  14. 14. MOH. Malawi National Mental Health Policy. In: Health Mo, editor. Lilongwe: Ministry of Health; 2020
  15. 15. Mgawadere FM. Assessing the Quality of Antenatal Care at Lungwena Health Centre in Rural Malawi. Blantyre: University of Malawi; 2009
  16. 16. Honikman S, van Heyningen T, Field S, Baron E, Tomlinson M. Stepped care for maternal mental health: A case study of the perinatal mental health project in South Africa. PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):e1001222
  17. 17. Kauye F. Management of mental health services in Malawi. Int Psychiatry. 2008;5:29–31
  18. 18. Rollans M, Schmied V, Kemp L, Meade T. ‘We just ask some questions…’ the process of antenatal psychosocial assessment by midwives. Midwifery. 2013;29(8):935–942
  19. 19. Mathibe-Neke JM, Rothberg A, Langley G. The perception of midwives regarding psychosocial risk assessment during antenatal care. Health SA Gesondheid (Online). 2014;19(1):01–09
  20. 20. Izutsu T, Tsutsumi A, Minas H, Thornicroft G, Patel V, Ito A. Mental health and wellbeing in the Sustainable Development Goals. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(12):1052–1054
  21. 21. MOH. Malawi Health Sector Strategic Plan 2011–2016: Moving Towards Equity and Quality. In: Health Mo, editor. Lilongwe: Ministry of Health; 2011
  22. 22. MOH. Health Sector Strategic Plan II 2017-2022: Towards Universal Health Coverage. Lilongwe: Ministry of Health; 2017
  23. 23. MOH. National Health Research Agenda 2012-2016. In: Health Mo, editor. Lilongwe: Ministry of Health; 2012
  24. 24. Akhund S, Avan BI. Development and pretesting of an information, education and communication (IEC) focused antenatal care handbook in Pakistan. BMC Research Notes. 2011;4(1):91
  25. 25. Tunçalp Ӧ, Pena-Rosas JP, Lawrie T, Bucagu M, Oladapo OT, Portela A, et al. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience—going beyond survival. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2017;124(6):860–862
  26. 26. Banda C. Barriers to Utilization of Focused Antenatal Care Among Pregnant Women in Ntchisi District in Malawi. Tampere: University of Tampere; 2013
  27. 27. Ejigu T, Woldie M, Kifle Y. Quality of antenatal care services at public health facilities of Bahir-Dar special zone, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Health Services Research. 2013;13(1):443
  28. 28. Villar J, Bergsjo P, World Health Organization. WHO Antenatal Care Randomized Trial: Manual for the Implementation of the New Model. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2002
  29. 29. WHO. Provision of effective antenatal care: Integrated management of pregnancy and childbirth (IMPAC). Geneva: Department of making pregnancy safer; 2006
  30. 30. WHO. Mental Health Atlas 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011
  31. 31. Gelaye B, Rondon M, Araya R, Williams MA. Epidemiology of maternal depression, risk factors, and child outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(10):973–982
  32. 32. Stringer EM, Meltzer-Brody S, Kasaro M, Stuebe AM, Wiegand S, Paul R, et al. Depression, pregnancy, and HIV: the case to strengthen mental health services for pregnant and post-partum women in sub-Saharan Africa. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2014;1(2):159–162
  33. 33. Howard LM, Piot P, Stein A. No health without perinatal mental health. The Lancet. 2014;384(9956):1723–1724
  34. 34. Rondon MB, Stewart DE. Disentangling the heterogeneity of perinatal depression. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(6):432–433
  35. 35. Herba CM, Glover V, Ramchandani PG, Rondon MB. Maternal depression and mental health in early childhood: an examination of underlying mechanisms in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;3(10):983–992
  36. 36. Herrman H. Protecting the mental health of women in the perinatal period. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(2):116–118
  37. 37. Wald NJ. Guidance on terminology. J Med Screen. 2008;15(1):50
  38. 38. Thombs BD, Coyne JC, Cuijpers P, De Jonge P, Gilbody S, Ioannidis JP, et al. Rethinking recommendations for screening for depression in primary care. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2012;184(4):413–418
  39. 39. Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Déry V. Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: A review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2008;86(4):317–319
  40. 40. Joffres M, Jaramillo A, Dickinson J, Lewin G, Pottie K, Shaw E, et al. Recommendations on screening for depression in adults. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2013;185(9):775–782
  41. 41. Thombs BD, Ziegelstein RC. Does depression screening improve depression outcomes in primary care? BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online). 2014;348
  42. 42. Nimalasuriya K, Compton MT, Guillory VJ. Screening adults for depression in primary care: A position statement of the American College of Preventive Medicine. Journal of Family Practice. 2009;58(10):535–539
  43. 43. Choi SK, Kim JJ, Park YG, Ko HS, Park IY, Shin JC. The simplified Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for antenatal depression: Is it a valid measure for pre-screening? International journal of medical sciences. 2012;9(1):40
  44. 44. Jones CJ, Creedy DK, Gamble JA. Australian midwives’ awareness and management of antenatal and postpartum depression. Women and Birth. 2012;25(1):23–28
  45. 45. O’Connor E, Rossom RC, Henninger M, Groom HC, Burda BU. Primary care screening for and treatment of depression in pregnant and postpartum women: Evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016;315(4):388–406
  46. 46. Committee on Obstetric Practice. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Opinion no. 630. Screening for perinatal depression. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;125(5):1268
  47. 47. Lombardo P, Vaucher P, Haftgoli N, Burnand B, Favrat B, Verdon F, et al. The 'help' question doesn't help when screening for major depression: external validation of the three-question screening test for primary care patients managed for physical complaints. BMC medicine. 2011;9:114
  48. 48. Lancaster CA, Gold KJ, Flynn HA, Yoo H, Marcus SM, Davis MM. Risk factors for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: A systematic review. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;202(1):5–14
  49. 49. van Heyningen T, Baron E, Field S, Lund C, Myer L, Tomlinson M, et al. Screening for common perinatal mental disorders in low-resource, primary care, antenatal settings in South Africa. CPMH Policy Brief. Cape Town: Centre for Public Mental Health; 2014
  50. 50. Mitchell A, Coyne J. Screening for postnatal depression: Barriers to success. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2009;116(1):11–14
  51. 51. Siu AL, Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Baumann LC, Davidson KW, Ebell M, et al. Screening for depression in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2016;315(4):380–387
  52. 52. Wisconsin Association for Perinatal Care. Position statement: Screening for prenatal and postpartum depression 2016 [Available from:http://www.perinatalweb.org/assets/cms/uploads/files/PPD%20Position%20Statement_FINAL.pdf
  53. 53. Vanderheyden AM. Technical adequacy of response to intervention decisions. Exceptional Children. 2011;77(3):335–350
  54. 54. Dennis CL, Dowswell T. Interventions (other than pharmacological, psychosocial or psychological) for treating antenatal depression. The Cochrane Library, . 2013(7)
  55. 55. Syka A. Depression in pregnancy and ways of dealing. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2015;8(1):231
  56. 56. Dennis CL, Ross LE, Grigoriadis S. Psychosocial and psychological interventions for treating antenatal depression. The Cochrane Library, . 2007(3)
  57. 57. Sockol LE, Epperson CN, Barber JP. A meta-analysis of treatments for perinatal depression. Clinical Psychology Review. 2011;31(5):839–849
  58. 58. Spinelli MG, Endicott J. Controlled clinical trial of interpersonal psychotherapy versus parenting education program for depressed pregnant women. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2003;160(3):555–562
  59. 59. van Ravesteyn LM, Lambregtse-van den Berg MP, Hoogendijk WJ, Kamperman AM. Interventions to treat mental disorders during pregnancy: A systematic review and multiple treatment meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173397
  60. 60. Sockol LE. A systematic review of the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for treating and preventing perinatal depression. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2015;177:7–21
  61. 61. Field T, Diego M, Hernandez-Reif M. Prenatal depression effects and interventions: A review. Infant behavior & development. 2010;33(4):409–418
  62. 62. Lavender TJ, Ebert L, Jones D. An evaluation of perinatal mental health interventions: An integrative literature review. Women and Birth. 2016;29(5):399–406
  63. 63. Daley A, Foster L, Long G, Palmer C, Robinson O, Walmsley H, et al. The effectiveness of exercise for the prevention and treatment of antenatal depression: systematic review with meta-analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2015;122(1):57–62
  64. 64. Robledo-Colonia AF, Sandoval-Restrepo N, Mosquera-Valderrama YF, Escobar-Hurtado C, Ramirez-Velez R. Aerobic exercise training during pregnancy reduces depressive symptoms in nulliparous women: A randomised trial. Journal of physiotherapy. 2012;58(1):9–15
  65. 65. Whooley MA. Screening for depression-A tale of two questions. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(4):436–438
  66. 66. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1987;150(6):782–786
  67. 67. Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 1974;19(1):1–15
  68. 68. Beusenberg M, Orley JH, World Health Organization. A User's Guide to the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ). Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1994
  69. 69. Whooley MA, Avins AL, Miranda J, Browner WS. Case-finding instruments for depression. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(7):439–445
  70. 70. Chorwe-Sungani G, Chipps J. A systematic review of screening instruments for depression for use in antenatal services in low resource settings. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):112
  71. 71. Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 1: Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Acta Paediatrica. 2007;96(3):338–341
  72. 72. Sjögren P. Ethics of health screening. BDJ. 2012;213(9):434
  73. 73. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, et al. STARD 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology. 2015;277(3):826–832
  74. 74. Martins CdSR, Motta JVdS, Quevedo LA, de Matos MB, Pinheiro KAT, Souza LDdM, et al. Comparison of two instruments to track depression symptoms during pregnancy in a sample of pregnant teenagers in Southern Brazil. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2015;177:95–100
  75. 75. Rubertsson C, Börjesson K, Berglund A, Josefsson A, Sydsjö G. The Swedish validation of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during pregnancy. Nord J Psychiatry. 2011;65(6):414–418
  76. 76. e Couto TC, Brancaglion MYM, Cardoso MN, Protzner AB, Garcia FD, Nicolato R, et al. What is the best tool for screening antenatal depression? Journal of affective disorders. 2015;178:12–7
  77. 77. Akena D, Joska J, Obuku EA, Amos T, Musisi S, Stein DJ. Comparing the accuracy of brief versus long depression screening instruments which have been validated in low and middle income countries: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12(1):1
  78. 78. Tsai AC, Scott JA, Hung KJ, Zhu JQ, Matthews LT, Psaros C, et al. Reliability and validity of instruments for assessing perinatal depression in African settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82521
  79. 79. Ajinkya S, Jadhav PR, Srivastava NN. Depression during pregnancy: Prevalence and obstetric risk factors among pregnant women attending a tertiary care hospital in Navi Mumbai. Industrial psychiatry journal. 2013;22(1):37
  80. 80. Bannigan K, Watson R. Reliability and validity in a nutshell. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2009;18(23):3237–3243
  81. 81. Wong HB, Lim GH. Measures of diagnostic accuracy: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV. Proc Singapore Healthcare. 2011;20(4):316–318
  82. 82. Parikh R, Mathai A, Parikh S, Sekhar GC, Thomas R. Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008;56(1):45
  83. 83. Zhu W, Zeng N, Wang N. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, associated confidence interval and ROC analysis with practical SAS implementations. NESUG 2010: Health care and life sciences; 27th May 2015; Baltimore2010. p. 1–9
  84. 84. Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B. Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biom J. 2005;47(4):458–472
  85. 85. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3(1):32–35
  86. 86. Pettersson A, Boström KB, Gustavsson P, Ekselius L. Which instruments to support diagnosis of depression have sufficient accuracy? A systematic review. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 2015;69(7):497–508
  87. 87. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53
  88. 88. Hajian-Tilaki K. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Caspian J Intern Med. 2013;4(2):627
  89. 89. Henderson M. Predicting Performance on High Stakes Testing: Validity and Accuracy of Curriculum-based Measurement of Reading and Writing [Doctoral Thesis]. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University; 2009
  90. 90. Fischer JE, Bachmann LM, Jaeschke R. A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: Clinical example of sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(7):1043–1051
  91. 91. Cassetta BD, Goghari VM. Ethical considerations of screening and early intervention for clinical high-risk psychosis. Ethics & Behavior. 2015;25(1):1–20
  92. 92. O'Connor EA, Whitlock EP, Gaynes B, Beil TL. Screening for depression in adults and older adults in primary care. Evidence Syntheses, . 2009(75)
  93. 93. Boyd RC, Mogul M, Newman D, Coyne JC. Screening and referral for postpartum depression among low-income women: A qualitative perspective from community health workers. Depress Res Treat. 2011;2011
  94. 94. Cook CR, Volpe RJ, Livanis A, Chafouleas SM, Kilgus SP, Wallach N. Ethical Dilemmas in School-based Behavioral Screening. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2010
  95. 95. Reynolds TM. The Ethics of Antenatal Screening: Lessons from Canute. The Clinical Biochemist Reviews. 2009;30(4):187
  96. 96. Maurer DM. Screening for depression. Depression. 2012;100:23
  97. 97. Trikalinos TA, Balion CM, Coleman CI, Griffith L, Santaguida PL, Vandermeer B, et al. Meta-analysis of test performance when there is a “gold standard”. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(1):56–66
  98. 98. Williams CC. Insight, stigma, and post–diagnosis identities in schizophrenia. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes. 2008;71(3):246–256
  99. 99. Benedetti F, Lanotte M, Lopiano L, Colloca L. When words are painful: Unraveling the mechanisms of the nocebo effect. Neuroscience. 2007;147(2):260–271
  100. 100. Ko JY, Farr SL, Dietz PM, Robbins CL. Depression and treatment among US pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age, 2005–2009. Journal of Women's Health. 2012;21(8):830–836
  101. 101. Leigh B, Milgrom J. Acceptability of antenatal screening for depression in routine antenatal care. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007;24(3):14
  102. 102. Wilkinson M, Mbuluma EL, Masache TG, Robins A. Mental Health Handbook for Malawi. Limbe: Assemblies of God Literature Centre Press; 1991
  103. 103. Steinforth AS. Troubled Minds: On the Cultural Construction of Mental Disorder and Normality in Southern Malawi. Frankfurt: Perter Lang; 2009
  104. 104. Sefasi A, Crumlish N, Samalani P, Kinsella A, O’Callaghan E, Chilale H. A little knowledge: caregiver burden in schizophrenia in Malawi. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2008;43(2):160–164
  105. 105. Stewart RC, Umar E, Gleadow-Ware S, Creed F, Bristow K. Perinatal distress and depression in Malawi: an exploratory qualitative study of stressors, supports and symptoms. Archives of Women's Mental Health. 2015;18(2):177–185
  106. 106. Crabb J, Stewart RC, Kokota D, Masson N, Chabunya S, Krishnadas R. Attitudes towards mental illness in Malawi: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):541
  107. 107. Kauye F, Udedi M, Mafuta C. Pathway to care for psychiatric patients in a developing country: Malawi. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2014;61(2):121–128
  108. 108. Udedi M, Swartz L, Stewart RC, Kauye F. Health service utilization by patients with common mental disorder identified by the Self-Reporting Questionnaire in a primary care setting in Zomba, Malawi: A descriptive study. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2014;60(5):454–461
  109. 109. Kakuma R, Minas H, van Ginneken N, Dal Poz MR, Desiraju K, Morris JE, et al. Human resources for mental health care: current situation and strategies for action. The Lancet. 2011;378(9803):1654–1663
  110. 110. Dambisya YM, Matinhure S. Policy and programmatic implications of task shifting in Uganda: a case study. BMC Health Services Research. 2012;12(1):61
  111. 111. Fulton BD, Scheffler RM, Sparkes SP, Auh EY, Vujicic M, Soucat A. Health workforce skill mix and task shifting in low income countries: A review of recent evidence. Human Resources for Health. 2011;9(1):1
  112. 112. Spedding M, Stein D, Sorsdahl K. Task-shifting psychosocial interventions in public mental health: A review of the evidence in the South African context. South African Health Review. 2014;15:73–87
  113. 113. Petersen I, Lund C, Bhana A, Flisher AJ, Health M, Consortium PRP. A task shifting approach to primary mental health care for adults in South Africa: human resource requirements and costs for rural settings. Health policy and planning. 2011;27(1):42–51
  114. 114. Wright J, Chiwandira C. Building capacity for community mental health care in rural Malawi: findings from a district-wide task-sharing intervention with village-based health workers. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2016;62(6):589–596
  115. 115. Kazdin AE, Rabbitt SM. Novel models for delivering mental health services and reducing the burdens of mental illness. Clinical Psychological Science. 2013;1(2):170–191
  116. 116. Chorwe-Sungani G. Development of a screening protocol for depresion in antenatal clinics in Malawi [Doctoral]. Bellville: University of the Western Cape; 2017
  117. 117. Kumbhar UT, Dhumale GB, Kumbhar UP. Self Reporting Questionnaire as a tool to diagnose psychiatric morbidity. Natl J Med Res, 2012;2:51-54

Written By

Genesis Chorwe-Sungani

Submitted: March 18th, 2021 Reviewed: March 25th, 2021 Published: July 1st, 2021