Access numbers in the NCBI of the
Abstract
Fishes of the genus Gymnotus have been suggested as a good model for biogeographic studies in the South American continent. In relation to heterochromatin, species of this genus have blocks preferably distributed in the centromeric region. The content of these regions has been shown to be variable, with description of transposable elements, pseudogenes of 5S rDNA and satellite sequences. In G. carapo Clade, although geographically separated, species with 2n = 54 chromosomes share the distribution of many 5S rDNA sites, a unique case within the genus. Here, repetitive DNA sequences from G. sylvius (2n = 40) and G. paraguensis (2n = 54) were isolated and mapped to understand their constitution. The chromosome mapping by FISH showed an exclusive association in the centromeres of all chromosomes. However, the cross-FISH did not show positive signs of interspecific hybridization, indicating high levels of heterochromatic sequence specificity. In addition, COI-1 sequences were analyzed in some species of Gymnotus, which revealed a close relationship between species of clade 2n = 54, which have multiple 5S rDNA sites. Possibly, the insertion of retroelements or pseudogenization and dispersion of this sequence occurred before the geographic dispersion of the ancestor of this clade from the Amazon region to the hydrographic systems of Paraná-Paraguay, a synapomorphy for the group.
Keywords
- FISH
- Biogeography
- Satellite DNA
- rDNA 5S
- C0t-1
1. Introduction
Repetitive DNA sequences are broadly distributed in eukaryotes genomes [1] and are classified into two categories: 1) repetitive sequences arranged in tandem as satellite, minisatellite, or microsatellite DNAs composed of hundreds of base pairs repeated a thousand times or more in each genome; and 2) moderately to highly repetitive sequences spread throughout the genome as retroelements or transposable mobile elements [2].
Copies of repetitive sequences are commonly associated with heterochromatin regions that can be visualized by C banding. These sequences are extremely important to the functional and structural organization of the eukaryote genome, composing, for example, the pericentromeric heterochromatin regions [3, 4]. The heterochromatin in fish chromosomes is largely located in pericentromeric regions and has structural functions [5, 6, 7].
The studies about the location of repetitive sequences on chromosomes has broadened the knowledge of the structural organization of chromatin in fish, revealing an association of ribosomal DNA, telomeric sequences, transposition elements and satellite sequences in chromosomal rearrangements and weak break points [8, 9], in the fixation of sex chromosomes [10, 11], in the expansion of heterochromatin [12, 13] and in gene regulation [14]. This advances in molecular cytogenetics have demonstrated that repetitive DNA sequences are useful as chromosomal markers in studies of species evolution and can provided valuable information about sex chromosome systems and chromosomal rearrangements [15]. The mapping of Non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposable elements, the Rex in the fish species, for example, demonstrated strong FISH signals in heterochromatin regions [16].
Neotropical electric fish species, order Gymnotiformes, have shown their heterochromatin to be preferentially distributed in the pericentromeric regions of their chromosomes [13, 17, 18].
The investigation of repetitive sequences in
The ribosomal DNA mapping can also provide new answers about chromosomal evolution in the genus, and even serve as a tool for understanding geographic distribution patterns [22]. In the species that had the 18S rDNA mapped, the proposal of only one pair carrying the conserved nucleolus organizing regions (NORs) is plausible [17, 18, 23, 24]. Regarding the 5S rDNA, the group behaves as an attractive model for evolutionary studies, showing a species-specific pattern. The evolution of this gene family receives special attention in the species that comprise the group
2. Biogeography of electric fish and repetitive DNA sequences
The complex history of the formation of the South American rivers is fundamental to explain the diversity and distribution of aquatic biota in this region. Successive continental geomorphological changes, such as the one that resulted in the formation of the Andes, associated with historic and biological factors allow the identification of patterns that led to the formation of the largest and most diverse freshwater ichthyofauna on the planet [25, 26]. Such changes alter the drainage scenario forming lakes, capture headwaters and basins of varying sizes, or even isolate populations for certain periods, favoring the diversification of biota by vicariance and allopatric, in addition to promoting subsequent drainage coalescence, leading to enrichment and contact of organisms [26, 27].
The Gymnotiformes order comprises electric fish or knifefishes. Endemic to the Neotropical region [28], which are widely distributed, from the Pampas in Argentina to Chiapas, Mexico and reach their greatest diversity and abundance in the Amazon basin [29, 30, 31]. Members of the Gymnotiformes order, are unique in their ability to produce and recognize electrical signals, never left the South America plate, since their electrosensory system is not capable of functioning in brackish or salt water [21].
Regarding the karyotype,
Among the
For
As a rule, studies investigating this ribosomal gene associate an increase in the number of 5S rDNA sites with the prese-nce of pseudogenes, which would originate through duplication of copies, resulting from the transposition or duplication of genomic DNA, which would be facilitated by the organization tandem of this rDNA family. In addition, locating these sequences in the terminal portion of the chromosomes would facilitate the process of pseudogenization and the association with transposable elements [39].
Although the mechanism of origin and dispersion of these sequences in the 2n = 54
Evidence of the connection between South American watersheds is reflected in the evolutionary history of the fish. Other species corroborate the hypothesis of interconnection between these two systems. Migratory species of the genus
In order to understand the relationships between
Species | Voucher | Locality | NCBI accession number |
---|---|---|---|
LBP7069 | Alto Paraná | GU.064995.1 | |
LBP31958 | Alto Paraná | GU.701779.1 | |
LBP7070 | Alto Paraná | GU.702209.1 | |
LBP8831 | Alto Paraná | GU.7017821 | |
LBP27380 | Alto Paraná | GU.701778.1 | |
LBP29096 | Alto Paraná | GU.702207.1 | |
LBP25852 | Alto Paraná | GU.701758.1 | |
LBP31933 | Alto Paraná | GU.701767.1 | |
LBP25853 | Alto Paraná | GU.701762.1 | |
LBPV27382 | Alto Paraná | JN.988881.1 | |
LBPV27381 | Alto Paraná | JN.988880.1 | |
LBP9823 | Alto Paraná | GU.701780.1 | |
MZUEL5644 | Alto Paraná | KF.359492.1 | |
LBP31929 | Alto Paraná | GU.701776.1 | |
LBP34742 | Alto Paraná | GU.701775.1 | |
LBP34743 | Alto Paraná | GU.701774.1 | |
LBP31927 | Alto Paraná | GU.701773.1 | |
LBP31932 | Alto Paraná | GU.701763.1 | |
GC7M | Bacia Costeira- Maranhão | XXXXXXXXX | |
GC9M | Bacia Costeira- Maranhão | XXXXXXXXX | |
GC11M | Bacia Costeira- Maranhão | XXXXXXXXX | |
GC18M | Bacia Costeira- Maranhão | XXXXXXXXX | |
GCAT11029 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GCAT 11028 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GCAT 11066 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GCAT 11477 | Amazonia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GC2006 | Peru Amazonas | KF533344 | |
GC2007 | Peru, Amazonas | KF533345.1 | |
GM11078 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GM11733 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GM11731 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GM10947 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GM10948 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GM10949 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GM11730 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
MZUEL5649 | Alto Paraná | KF.359490.1 | |
LBP26331 | Alto Paraná | GU.701766.1 | |
LBP31931 | Alto Paraná | GU.701764.1 | |
LBP25850 | Alto Paraná | GU.701760.1 | |
LBP7071 | Alto Paraná | GU.702210.1 | |
LBP29097 | Alto Paraná | GU.702208.1 | |
LBP34744 | Alto Paraná | GU.701781.1 | |
GU11575 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GU11802 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GU11701 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GU11698 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX | |
GU11574 | Amazônia Central | XXXXXXXXX |
Intraspecific genetic distance | |
---|---|
Gp 1 | 0.013526931 |
Gp 2 - | 0 |
Gp 3 - | 0.000893724 |
Gp 4 - | 0.000928937 |
Gp 5 - | 0.001858738 |
Gp 6 - | 0.001241471 |
Gp 7 - | 0.002136221 |
Gp 8 - | 0.003103677 |
Interspecific diversity | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gp- 1 | Gp-2 | Gp- 3 | Gp- 4 | Gp- 5 | Gp- 6 | Gp- 7 | |
Gp 1 | |||||||
Gp 2 | 0.062 | ||||||
Gp 3 | 0.168 | 0.156 | |||||
Gp 4 | 0.030 | 0.069 | 0.174 | ||||
Gp 5 | 0.028 | 0.071 | 0.171 | 0.002 | |||
Gp 6 | 0.048 | 0.077 | 0.055 | 0.053 | |||
Gp 7 | 0.046 | 0.074 | 0.178 | 0.053 | 0.051 | ||
Gp 8 | 0.179 | 0.159 | 0.051 | 0.183 | 0.181 | 0.178 | 0.174 |
The results with the mitochondrial DNA COI obtained here validate the species of
Cytogenetic data already pointed to the proximity between these two species, because in addition to sharing the same diploid number, both had many sites of 5S rDNA, a condition that is not common in fish. We suggest, by the results of diploid number and dispersion of 5S rDNAr, that the species
2.1 New repetitive sequences studies in the genus Gymnotus
The eukaryote genome is characterized by presenting nucleotide sequences with varied arrangements, generally forming two large groups, gene regions and repetitive DNA sequences. In fish of the genus
The prospection of repetitive sequences by the technique of DNA reassociation kinetics (C0t-1) proves to be a safe and fast technique for obtaining copies of highly and moderately repetitive DNA sequences [45]. Thus, it is possible to build libraries and screening repetitive DNAs, and has been used to isolate the highly repeated fraction of the plant genome [46] and animals [47] to significantly expand our knowledge of the organization of their chromosomes.
In the present study, repetitive DNA sequences were isolated by C0t-1 (Figure 3) and mapped in two species of electric fish,
The isolated probes from
The heterochromatin of
According to Charlesworth et al. [48] and Topp and Dave [49], the regions located nearest to the centromere show fast evolutionary rates due to low recombination, initiating the accumulation of repetitive DNA sequences, which explains its specificity. This association between heterochromatin and repetitive sequences is fundamental to the organization of important chromosomal structures such as the centromere. In a study with
The repetitive elements isolated from
Sequencing analyses showed exclusive sequences for both species, and although repetitive elements in the heterochromatin regions are present in distant eukaryotes groups such as
The Y chromosome of
In addition to the two species analyzed in the present study, two other species of Gymnotiformes have had their repetitive DNA sequences analyzed and described. Claro [57] isolated the repetitive sequences of
More recently, the publication of Satellitome results has been awaited, a global study by NGS and bioinformatics of all satellite sequences of
3. Conclusions
Molecular studies with the multigene family 5S rDNA in electric fish (Gymnotidae) have advanced a lot in recent years. The chromosomal location and distribution have been particularly interesting, since all species of the genus
Acknowledgments
The current study was supported in part by INCT ADAPTA II funded by CNPq - Brazilian National Research Council (465540/2014-7). The authors are grateful to Miguel Airton Carvalho for his field assistance. The author M.D.S. received a scholarship from the
A.1 Methodology for obtaining cytochrome oxidase sequences
For the Cytochrome oxidase I gene, five specimens of
Sequences of
The calculation of intra and interspecific distance was performed using the Mega 5 software [62] with the Kimura-2-parameters evolutionary model. The identification was carried out according to the protocol established by DNA barcoding through the Neighbor Joining (NJ) analysis [63], which consists of looking for the tree with the lowest total sum of branches, using Kimura-2-parameters as an evolutionary model (K2P) [64]. The topology confidence test was performed with bootstrap analysis, containing 1000 replicates. Such analyzes were performed using the Mega 5 software [62].
The sequences were aligned in the program Clustal W [65], using the editor BioEdit 7.0 [66], were submitted to BLAST in the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
A.2 Methodology for obtaining cytogenetic material
Mitotic chromosomes were obtained according to the protocol described by Bertollo et al. [67]. Genomic DNA extraction was performed using the chloroform-phenol method [61]. Repetitive DNA probes were obtained using the
The sequences were aligned and edited using the CLUSTAL W program [65] using the following parameters: weights 6.66 and 10.0 for opening and extension of gaps, respectively, for pairwise alignments, and weights 10.0 and 15.0 for opening and extension of gaps in the multiple alignments respectively. Clustering analysis was performed using the parsimony method on the PAUP program v. 4.0b10 [70]. The isolated fragments of repetitive DNA sequences (
References
- 1.
Heslop-Harrison JSP, Schwarzacher T. Organisation of the plant genome in chromosomes. Plant J. 2011;66:18-33. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04544.x - 2.
Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, Walichiewicz J. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet. Gen. Res. 2005; 110:462-467. DOI: 10.1159/000084979. - 3.
Grady DL, Ratliff RL, Robinson DL, McCanlies EC, Meyne J, Moyzis RK. Highly conserved repetitive DNA sequences are present at human centromeres. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992; 89:1695-1699. - 4.
Schueler MG, Higgins AW, Rudd MK, Gustashaw K, Willard H. Genomic and genetic definition of a functional human centromere. Science. 2001;294:109-115. DOI: 10.1126/science.1065042. - 5.
Garrido-Ramos MA, Jamilena M, Lozano R, Ruiz Rejón C, Ruiz Rejón M. Cloning and characterization of a fish centromeric satellite DNA. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 1994;65:233-237. DOI:10.1159/000133637. - 6.
Martins C, Ferreira IA, Oliveira C, Foresti F, Galetti Jr. PM. A tandemly repetitive centromeric DNA sequence of the fish Hoplias malabaricus (Characiformes: Erythrinidae) is derived from 5S rDNA. Genetica. 2006;127: 133-141. DOI: 10.1007/s10709-005-2674-y. - 7.
Mazzuchelli J, Martins C, Genomic organization of repetitive DNAs in the cichlid fish Astronotus ocellatus . Genetica. 2009;136: 461-469. DOI: 10.1007/s10709-008-9346-7. - 8.
CioffiMB, Martins C, Bertollo LAC. Evidence spreading of associated transposable elements and ribosomal DNA in the fish Erythrinus erythrinus . Implications for genome change and karyoevolution in fish. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2010;10: 271-280. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-271. - 9.
Silva M, Ribeiro ED, Matoso DA, Sousa LM, Hrbek T, Rapp Py-Daniel L. Feldberg, E. Chromosomal polymorphism in two species of Hypancistrus (Siluriformes: Loricariidae): an integrative approach forunderstanding their biodiversity. Genetica. 2014;142(2):127-139. DOI: 10.1007/s10709-014-9760-y. - 10.
Cioffi MB, Bertollo LAC. Initial steps in XY chromosome differentiation in Hoplias malabaricus and the origin of an X1X2Y sex chromosome system in this fish group. Heredity. 2010;105:554-561. DOI:10.1038/hdy.2010.18. - 11.
Borba RS, Silva EL, Parise-Maltempi PP. Chromosome mapping of retrotransposable elements Rex1 andRex3 inLeporinus Spix, 1829 species (Characiformes: Anostomidae) and its relationships among heterochromatic segments and W sex chromosome. Mobile Genet Elements. 2013;3(6):e27460. DOI: 10.4161/mge.27460. - 12.
Mariotto S, Centofante L, Artoni RF, Vicari MR, Moreira-Filho O. Chromosomal diversification in ribosomal DNA sites in Ancistrus species (Loricariidae: Ancistrini) from three hydrographic basins of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Comparative Cytogenetics. 2011;5:289-300. DOI:10.1007/s1116001192159. - 13.
Silva M, Matoso DA, Artoni RF, Feldberg E. Karyotypic diversity and evolutionary trends in Neotropical electric fish of the genus Gymnotus (Gymnotiformes: Gymnotidae). Zebrafish. 2019;16:308-320. DOI: 10.1089/zeb.2018.1716. - 14.
Vicari MR, Artoni RF, Moreira-Filho O, Bertollo LAC. Colocalization of repetitive DNAs and silencing of major rRNA genes. A case report of the fish Astyanax janeiroensis . Cytogenetics Genome Research. 2008;122:67-72. DOI: 10.1159/000151318. - 15.
Ferreira IA, Martins C. Physical chromosome mapping of repetitive DNA sequences in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus : evidences for a differential distribution of repetitive elements in the sex chromosomes. Micron. 2008;39:411-418. DOI:10.1016/j.micron. 2007.02.010 - 16.
Silva FA, Guimarães EC, Carvalho NDM, Ferreira AMV, Schneider CH, Carvalho-Zilse, GA, Feldberg E, Gross MC. Transposable DNA elements in amazonian fish: from genome enlargement to genetic adaptation to stressful Environments. Cytogenetics Genome Research. 2020;10. DOI: 10.1159/000507104 - 17.
Almeida-Toledo LF, Foresti F, Pe’Quignot EV, Daniel-Silva MFZ. XX/XY sex chromosome system with X heterochromatinization: an early stage of sex chromosome differentiation in the Neotropic electric eel Eigenmannia virescens . Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 2001;95:73-78. DOI: 10.1159/000057020. - 18.
Margarido VP, Bellafronte E, Moreira-Filho O. Cytogenetic analysis of three sympatric Gymnotus (Gymnotiformes, Gymnotidae) species verifies invasive species in the Upper Paraná River basin, Brazil. Journal of Fish Biology. 2007;70:155-164. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01365.x. - 19.
Milhomem SSR, Pieczarka JC, Crampton WGR, Silva DS, Souza ACP, Carvalho JR, Nagamachi CY. Chromosomal evidence for a putative cryptic species in the Gymnotus carapo species-complex (Gymnotiformes, Gymnotidae). BMC Genetics. 2008; 9:75. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-9-75. - 20.
Nagamachi CY, Pieczarka JC, Milhomem SSR, O’Brien PCM, Souza ACP, Ferguson-Smith MA. Multiple rearrangements in cryptic species of electric knifefish, Gymnotus carapo (Gymnotidae, Gymnotiformes) revealed by chromosome painting. BMC Genetics. 2010;11:2-9. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-28. - 21.
Utsunomia R, Melo S, Scacchetti PC, Oliveira C, Machado MA, Pieczarka JC, Nagamachi CY, Foresti F. Particular chromosomal distribution of microsatellites in five species of the genus Gymnotus (Teleostei, Gymnotiformes). Zebrafish. 2018;15:398-403. DOI:10.1089/zeb.2018.1570. - 22.
Silva M, Barbosa P, Artoni R F, Feldberg E. Evolutionarydynamics of 5S rDNA and recurrent association of transposable elementsinelectric fish of the family Gymnotidae (Gymnotiformes): the case of Gymnotus mamiraua . Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2016;149:297-303. DOI: 10.1159/000449431. - 23.
Fernades-Matioli FMC, Almeida-Toledo LF. A molecular phylogenetic analysis in Gymnotus species (Pisces: Gymnotiformes) with inferences on chromosome evolution. Caryologia 2001;54(1):23-30. - 24.
Silva EB, Margarido VP. An X1X1X2X2/X1X2Y multiple sex chromosome system in a new species of the genus Gymnotus (Pisces, Gymnotiformes). Environmental Biology of Fishes. 2005;73:293-297. DOI: 10.1007/s10641-005-2144-5. - 25.
Lundberg JG, Marsall LG, Horton B, Malabarba CSL, Wesselingh F. The stage for Neotropical fish diversification: A history of tropical South American rivers. In: Malabarba LR, Reis RE, Vari RP, Lucena CAS, Lucena ZMS. (eds) Phylogeny and classification of neotropical fishes. EDIPURCS, Porto Alegre, RS, 1998. p. 13-48. - 26.
Nelson, J. Fishes of the World. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley and Sons. 2006. - 27.
Crampton WGR, Thorsen DH, Albert JS. Three new species from a diverse and sympatric assemblage of the electric fish Gymnotus (Ostariophysi: Gymnotidae) in the lowland Amazon Basin, with notes on ecology. Copeia. 2005:82-99. - 28.
Campos-da-Paz R. Family Gymnotidae. In: Reis RE, Kullander SO, Ferraris Jr. CJ. (eds.). Check List of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central. EDIPURCS, Porto Alegre, 2003. p. 483-486. - 29.
Albert JS, Miller RR. Gymnotus maculosus : a new species of electric fish from Middle America (Teleostei: Gymnotoidei), with a key to the species ofGymnotus . Proceedings Biological Society Washington. 1995;108:662-678. - 30.
Albert JS, Campos-da-Paz R. Phylogenetic systematics of America knifefishs: a review of the available data. In: Malabarba L, Reis RE, Vari RP, Lucena CAS, Lucena ZMS. (ed) Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre, 1998. p. 419-446. - 31.
Oyakawa OT, Akama A, Mautari KC, Nolasco JC. Peixes de riachos da Mata Atlântica nas Unidades de Conservação do Vale do Rio Ribeira de Iguape no Estado de São Paulo. São Paulo. Ed. Neotrópica. 2006. - 32.
Alves-Gomes JA. The Mitochondrial Phylogeny of the South American Electric Fish (Teleostei: Gymnotiformes) and an Alternative Hypothesis for the Otophysan Historical Biogeography. In: Poyato-Ariza FJ, Grande T, Diogo R (ed.) Teleostean Fish Biology: Gonorynchiformes and Ostariophysan Relationships: A Comprehensive Review. Enfield, Science Publishers, 2009. p. 517-565. - 33.
Milhomem SSR, Crampton WGR, Pieczarka JC, Shetka GH, Silva DS Nagamachi, CY. Gymnotus capanema , a new species of electric knife fish (Gymnotiformes, Gymnotidae) from Eastern Amazonia, with comments on an unusual karyotype. Journal Fish Biology. 2012;80:802-815. DOI:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03219.x. - 34.
Milhomem SSR, Pieczarka JC, Crampton WR, Souza ACP, Carvalho Jr. JR, Nagamachi CY. Differences in karyotype between two sympatric species of Gymnotus (Gymnotiformes:Gymnotidae) from the eastern Amazon of Brazil. Zootaxa. 2007;1397:55-62. DOI:10.1186/1471-2156-9-75. - 35.
Silva M, Matoso DA, Vicari MR, Almeida MC, Margarido VP, Artoni RF. Repetitive DNA and meiotic behavior of sex chromosomes in Gymnotus pantanal (Gymnotiformes, Gmynotidae). Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 2011;135:143-149. DOI:10.1159/000330777. - 36.
Silva M, Matoso DA, Vicari MR, Almeida MC, Margarido VP, Artoni RF. 2011. Physical mapping of 5S DNAr in two species of Knifefishes: Gymnotus pantanal andGymnotus paraguensis (Gymnotiformes). Cytogenetic Genome Research. 2011;134:303-307. DOI:10.1159/000328998. - 37.
Scacchetti PC , Alves JC, Utsunomia R, Claro FL, Almeida-Toledo LF, Oliveira C, Foresti F. Molecular characterization and physical mapping of two classes of 5S rDNA in genomes ofGymnotus sylvius andG .inaequilabiatus (Gymnotiformes, Gymnotidae). Cytogenetics Genome Research. 2011;136:1-7. DOI:10.1159/000335658. - 38.
Scacchetti PC, Pansonato-Alves JC, Utsunomia R, Oliveira C, Foresti F. Karyotypic diversity in four species of the genus Gymnotus Linnaeus, 1758 (Teleostei, Gymnotiformes, Gymnotidae): physical mapping of ribosomal genes and telomeric sequences. Comparative Cytogenetics. 2012;5:223-235. DOI:10.3897/CompCytogen.v5i3.1375. - 39.
Sochorová J, Garcia S, Gálvez F. et al. Evolutionary trends in animal ribosomal DNA loci: introduction to a new online database. Chromosoma. 2018;127:141-150. DOI:10.1007/s00412-017-0651-8. - 40.
Sivasundar A, Eldregde B, Orti G. Population structure and biogeography of migratory freshwater fishes ( Prochilodus : Characiformes) in major South American rivers. Molecular Ecology. 2001;10:407-417. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01194.x. - 41.
Ribeiro AC, Jacob RM, Silva RRRS, Lima FCT , Ferreira DC, Ferreira KM, Mariguela TC, Pereira LHG, Oliveira C. Distribuitions and phylogeographic data of rheophilic freshwater fishes provide evidence on the geographic extension of a Central – Brazilian Amazonian palaeo plateau in the area of the present day Pantanal wetland. Neotropical Ichthyology.2013;11:319-326. DOI:10.1590/S1679-62252013000200010. - 42.
Hoorn, C.; Wessilingh, F.P. Introduction: Amazonia, landscape and species evolution. In: Hoorn, C.; Wessilingh, F.P. (Eds). Amazonia: landscape and species evolution. A look into the past. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2010. p.1-9. - 43.
Montoya-Burgos JI. Historical biogeography of the catfish genus Hypostomus (Siluriformes: Loricariidae), with implications on the diversification of Neotropical ichthyofauna. Molecular Ecology. 2003;12:1855-1867. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01857.x. - 44.
Silva M, Matoso DA, Vicari MR, Almeida MC, Margarido VP, Artoni RF. Physical mapping of 5S rDNA in two species of knifefishes: Gymnotus pantanal andGymnotus paraguensis (Gymnotiformes). Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 2011;134,303-307. DOI:10.1159/000328998. - 45.
Zwick MS, Hanson RE, McKnight TD, Islam-Faridi HM, Stelly DM, Wing RA, Price JH. A rapid procedure for the isolation of C0t-1 DNA from plants. Genome. 1997;40:138-142. - 46.
Hřibová E, Doleželová M, Town CD, Macas J, Doležel J. Isolation and characterization of the highly repeated fraction of the banana genome. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2007;119:268-274. DOI:10.1159/000112073. - 47.
Lorscheider CA, Oliveira JIN, Thais AD, Nogaroto V, Martins-Santos IC, Vicari MR. Comparative cytogenetics among three sympatric Hypostomus species (Siluriformes: Loricariidae): An evolutionary analysis in a high endemic region. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2018;61:14. DOI:10.1590/1678-4324-2018180417 - 48.
Chalesworth B, Sniegowski P, Stephan W. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature. 1994;371:215-220. - 49.
Topp CN, Dawe RK. Reinterpreting pericentromeric heterochromatin. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 2006;9:647-653. DOI:10.1016/j.pbi.2006.09.008. - 50.
Valente GT, Schneider CH, Gross MC, Feldeberg E, Martins C. Comparative cytogenetics of cichlid fishes through genomic in-situ hybridization (GISH) with emphasis on Oreochromis niloticus . Chromosome Resarch. 2009. DOI:10.1007/s10577-009-9067-5. - 51.
Oliveira C, Wright JM. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of heterochromatin in the chromosomes of tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Chromosome Research. 1998;6:205-211. - 52.
Oliveira C, Joyce S, Chew K, Porto-Foresti F, Dobson MJ, Wright JM. 1999. A LINE2 repetitive DNA sequence from the cichlid fish, Oreochromis niloticus: sequence analysis and chromosomal distribution. Chromosoma 1999;108:457-468. - 53.
Grewal SIS, Jia S. Heterochromatin revisited. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007;8:35-46. DOI:10.1038/nrg2008. - 54.
Pimpinelli S, Berloco M, Fanti L, Dimitri P, Bonaccors S, Marchettib E, Caizzi R. Transposable elements are stable structural components of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:3804-3808. - 55.
Presting GG, Malysheva L, Fuchs J, Schubert I. A Ty3/gypsy retrotransposon-like sequence localizes to the centromeric regions of cereal chromosomes. Plant. J. 1998;6:721-728. DOI:10.1046/ j.1365-313x.1998.00341.x - 56.
Henning F, Trifonov V, Almeida-Toledo LF. Use of chromosome microdissection in fish molecular cytogenetic. Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2008:31:279-281. DOI:10.1590/S1415-47572008000200022. - 57.
Claro FL. Gymnotus carapo eGymnotus sylvius (Teleostei: Gymnotidae): Uma abordagem Citogenética-Molecular. [Dissertation]. São Paulo - Brasil: Universidade de São Paulo; 2008. - 58.
Buldyrev SV, Goldberger AC, Harlin S, Mategna RN, Matsa ME, Peng CK, Simmons M, Stanley HE. Long-range correlation proprieties of coding and noncoding DNA sequences. Gene Bank. Analysis. Phys. Rev. E. 1995;51:5084-5091. - 59.
Melo S. Análises cromossômicas e genômicas aplicadas ao estudo evolutivo e estrutural dos satelitomas em espécies do gênero Gymnotus (Teleostei: Gymnotiformes). [Thesis]. Botucatu –SP: Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu; 2020. - 60.
Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. 2005;360:1847-1857. DOI: - 61.
Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York. 2001. p. 2-5. - 62.
Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007; 24, 1596-1599. DOI:10.1093/molbev/msm092. - 63.
Saitou N, Nei M. The Neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Evolution. 1987;4:406-425. - 64.
Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 1980;16:111-120. - 65.
Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research. 1994;22:4673-4680. - 66.
Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/96/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. 1999;41:95-98. - 67.
Bertollo LAC, Takahash CS, Moreira-Filho O. Cytotaxonomic considerations on Hoplias lacerdae (Pisces, Erythrinidae). Rev. Bras. Genet. 1978;1(2):103-120. - 68.
Vicari MR, Nogaroto V, Noleto RB, Cestari MM, Cioffi MB, Almeida MC, Moreira-Filho O, Bertollo LAC, Artoni RF. Satellite DNA and chromosomes in Neotropical fishes: methods, applications and perspectives. Journal of Fish Biology. 2010;76:1094-1116. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02564.x. - 69.
Pinkel D, Straume T, Gray JW. Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1986;83:2934-2938. - 70.
Swofford DL. PAUP Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. 2002. DOI:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00191.x