Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Medical Therapy of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

By Raquel Lopes-Brás, Isabel Fernandes, Sandra Casimiro and Luís Costa

Submitted: December 17th 2020Reviewed: March 9th 2021Published: June 15th 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.97114

Downloaded: 76

Abstract

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is mostly a benign disease of the bone, although with high local recurrence rate and potential for metastatic spread, namely to the lungs. It is also a locally aggressive tumor, associated with severe morbidity and functional impairment due to bone destruction. Treatment is therefore required and should be offered at an early stage to allow complete resection, minimizing functional sequelae and local recurrence. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment, often followed by intralesional adjuvant therapy. GCTB has a particular biology, in which RANKL represents a key factor in tumor pathogenesis, thus making this molecule a valuable therapeutic target. Monthly administration of denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against RANKL, has been studied in several clinical trials and shown a high rate of local control with favorable safety profile. In this chapter, current medical management, ongoing studies, and future directions in GCTB will be discussed.

Keywords

  • denosumab
  • giant cell tumor of bone
  • RANKL
  • sarcoma
  • sarcomatoid transformation

1. Introduction

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a primary tumor of bone usually arising in the meta-epiphysis of long bones, although potentially also occur in other parts of the skeleton, such as the spine or pelvis [1]. GCTB more often affects young patients in the second to forth decades of life [1, 2] and those living in urban (rather than rural) areas [3]. It is also associated with Paget’s disease [4]. The condition presents with localized pain, tenderness to touch, palpable mass, and decreased range of motion, as well as mechanical pain and joint swelling in patients with presentation near joints [5]. Rarely, it may present with pathological fracture [4].

GCTB is mostly a benign disease, but local recurrence rates are high and there is a small risk of metastatic spread, namely to the lungs [1, 6]. Risk factors for pulmonary metastases include young age, Enneking stage 3, local recurrence, and axial disease, but not treatment modality [6, 7]. Pulmonary metastases most often appear three to four years after initial diagnosis and rarely are the cause of death [8]. However, when GCTB metastasizes, mortality rate rises to 14–25% [8, 9].

Despite being a rare event, GCTB can also undergo malignant sarcomatoid transformation [10]. In these cases, malignant GCTB can present with three histologic subtypes: osteosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, or undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. This usually occurs following multiple recurrent lesions (e.g. Paget’s disease) and/or radiation therapy [5].

Multicentric GCTB in another rare form of tumor presentation, characterized by two or more distant lesions of histologically confirmed disease [11]. These lesions can present as synchronous (more common) or metachronous. Although multicentric GCTB appears to have demographic differences (patients are young and more commonly female), disease behavior − including local recurrence rates, pulmonary metastases pattern, and malignant transformation − seems to be similar to solitary GCTB [11].

Radiologically, GCTB presents as an osteolytic lesion with characteristic radiolucent and geographic (well-circumscribed) appearance and fading cortical bone, rarely showing periosteal reaction. GCTBs are usually eccentric masses in the epiphyseal region extending to subchondral bone (sclerotic metaphyseal margin) [5, 12].

Besides a high degree of suspicion in radiological exams (plain films, computed tomography [CT], and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), GCTB diagnosis must be histologically confirmed by core-needle or open biopsy [5]. Still, plain radiographs, CT scan, and MRI are useful for diagnosis and local staging. MRI is often performed to delineate neoplasm extent, namely soft tissue extension. Additionally, bone scintigraphy helps ruling out other asymptomatic bone lesions and chest CT scan should be performed to exclude lung involvement and guide treatment.

Based on radiological findings and according to Enneking and later Campanacci grading systems, GCTB can be classified in three grades [7, 13]:

  • Grade I (latent): well-defined margin (thin rim of mature bone) and intact cortex (not deformed).

  • Grade II (active): relatively well-defined margins but no radiopaque rim; cortex is thinned and moderately expanded. Grade II lesions with fracture are graded separately.

  • Grade II (aggressive): indistinct borders and cortex destruction, suggesting rapid and permeated growth.

This surgical staging system allows preoperative planning. Post-operatively, GCTB can also be graded based on histological features in grade 1 (typical), grade 2 (aggressive), or grade 3 (malignant) [14].

Due to lack of long-term follow-up data, GCTB prognosis is not well established to date [15]. However, the overall prognosis of benign GCTB is generally favorable. Recurrence rates are estimated at 25% [15] and can be as high as 50% after curettage alone [16]. Systemic treatment with bisphosphonates or denosumab seems to lower these figures [17]. Although secondary lung involvement is rare in benign GCTB and very uncommonly the cause of death, mortality rate is higher in these patients (14–25%) [8, 9, 18]. Regarding malignant GCTB (either primary or secondary), overall survival at 5 years is about 85% and poorest in older patients and those with distant disease at diagnosis, according to a Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) study involving 117 cases of malignant GCTB [19]. Smaller studies may indicate worse survival rates [20].

Advertisement

2. GCTB biology and pathogenesis

2.1 Histopathology

GCTB is histologically characterized by diffuse growth of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL)-positive, round-to-oval polygonal or elongated mononuclear stromal cells, RANK-positive mononuclear cells of myeloid linage, and RANK-positive osteoclast-like giant cells, reflecting a physiopathology intimately linked to the RANKL/RANK pathway [17, 21, 22] (Figure 1). Small areas of osteoid matrix deposition, woven bone, and occasionally new bone are also observed in about 50% of GCTB samples, with different studies reporting an incidence between 22 and 52% [23].

Figure 1.

Representative images of RANKL (A) and RANK (B) immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded GCTB samples. (unpublished data).

The characteristic giant cells in GCTB are osteoclastic in nature [24, 25, 26, 27, 28] and represent the reactive component responsible for GCTB aggressive lytic behavior, leading to GCTB designation as osteoclastoma. These cells express RANK but not RANKL [26]. Profiling studies have shown that giant cells in GCTB are the result of CD33+ pre-osteoclast fusion that further fuse with CD14+ mononuclear cells [27] and express tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and vitronectin receptor, osteoclast markers, being capable of lacunar resorption [29].

However, in GCTB neoplastic cells are ovoid stromal cells, displaying markers of mesenchymal stem cells derived from the osteoblast lineage, but minimal expression of fully differentiated osteoblasts, like osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase, osteoprotegerin (OPG), and TRAIL [29, 30, 31, 32, 33]. Twist-mediated downregulation of RUNX2, a major osteogenic regulator, has been shown to interrupt osteoblastic differentiation and depress osteoblast lineage markers in GCTB [34].

GCTB stromal cells express high levels of RANKL [27] and also produce other osteoclastogenic cytokines, like interleukin (IL)-1, −6, −11, and − 17, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), through which osteoclast differentiation is stimulated from precursor cells [26]. Other characteristics supporting their neoplastic nature include dominance, increased proliferative potential, abundance of genetic alterations, and expression of more differentiation markers than multinucleated giant cells [22]. GCTBs are polyclonal in nature, with inconsistent chromosomal changes and telomere associations occurring in up to 72% of cases, although lacking prognostic value [35, 36, 37, 38]. Mononuclear stromal cell-exclusive mutation p.G34W (or p.G34L, p.G34M, p.G34R, or p.G34V in a small sub-set of cases) in the H3F3Agene, encoding histone 3.3 (H3.3) variant implicated in epigenetic reprogramming and memory, has been identified as GCTB-specific driver mutation [30].

Because G34W mutations occur more frequently than chromosomal abnormalities and can be causative risk factors for chromosomal structural remodeling in DNA synthesis, it has been hypothesized that this driver mutation causes chromosomal instability and defects, contributing to pleiotropic effects on cell cycle-related expression, immature osteoblastic differentiation, and chemokines, cytokines, and surface markers expression [22, 37]. Additionally, mutations in cyclin D1, p53, and MET have been linked to malignant transformation and GCTB recurrence [22].

Biologically, Wnt/β-catenin and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling pathways mediate the exacerbated proliferation of stromal cells in GCTB. β-catenin, cyclin D1, and p21 have been shown to be overexpressed in the nuclei of GCTB stromal cells [39]. Additionally, one study showed that protease activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) is also upregulated in GCTB downstream of TGF-β, via Smad3 and Smad4 [40]. In the study, PAR-1 knockout in GCTB stromal cells inhibited tumor growth, angiogenesis, and osteoclastogenesis in vitro and PAR-1 inhibition suppressed tumor growth and giant cell formation in vivo.

2.2 Physiopathology

GCTB physiopathology is not entirely understood, but there is compelling evidence that RANKL overexpression by mononuclear stromal cells plays a key role and elicits transformation of monocytic pre-osteoclast to osteoclast cells, ultimately resulting in osteolysis observed in these tumors [22, 41, 42, 43] (Figure 2). Accordingly, preclinical models have shown that OPG, a soluble decoy receptor for RANKL, inhibits monocyte activation and osteoclast differentiation [44].

Figure 2.

Simplified scheme of GCTB physiopathology. BMP-2, bone morphogenetic protein 2; CCR2, C-C chemokine receptor type 2; CXCR4, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4; DC-STAMP, dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein; IL-1, interleukin 1; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; MIP-1α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha; MMPs, matrix metalloproteases; OC-STAMP, osteoclast stimulatory transmembrane protein; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand; SDF-1, stromal cell-derived factor 1; TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor alpha; TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

In GCTB, stromal cell-derived monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2) recruits bone marrow-derived CCR2/CXCR4-expressing monocytic osteoclast precursors from peripheral blood [45, 46]. Other soluble factors within GCTB microenvironment are chemotactic for myelomonocytic cells, including stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1/CXCL12), macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha (MIP-1α/CCL3), and M-CSF1 [26, 47]. Osteoclast precursors localized at GCTB microenvironment differentiate into active, bone resorbing, osteoclasts.

Different pre-clinical studies have shown that GCTB stromal cells with circulating mononuclear cells co-culture induces differentiation of osteolytic giant cells [41, 42, 43]. For differentiation to occur, RANKL expression in stromal cells is regulated by CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPβ), found to be overexpressed in GCTB [48], and also by parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) in an autocrine manner [49]. Next, RANKL-induced cell fusion is co-stimulated by M-CSF and IL-34 [26] and enhanced by specific transmembrane proteins overexpressed in GCTB [50] and coupling components, like insulin-like growth factors (IGF) I and II [51].

RANK pathway activation in giant cells leads to up-regulation of nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (NFATc1), an auto-regulated key transcription factor responsible for regulating expression of important genes involved in bone resorption, like cathepsin K or β3-integrin [52]. Cathepsin K is involved in initial steps of bone resorption, degrading collagen type I and remodeling the bone matrix, allowing migration. As bone resorption starts, TGF-β entrapped in bone matrix is activated by matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), stimulating giant cell migration [46], which is mediated by αvβ3 integrin attachment to the bone matrix [53].

MMPs have an important role in GCTB physiopathology. Apart from the above-mentioned role in giant cell migration via TGF-β activation, MMPs influence other major aspects within the tumor microenvironment, like angiogenesis, invasion, and metastatic development. MMP-2 and MMP-9 are key in all these processes [22]. In GCTB, the extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) is responsible for inducing MMP expression. Higher EMMPRIN expression at multinuclear osteoclast-like giant cells has been observed in stage III GCTB, probably regulated by RANKL from stromal-like tumor cells [54].

As previously mentioned, metastases are extremely rare in GCTB and there are no clues on molecular or physiopathological events related with GCTB metastization to date.

2.3 Tumor markers

Pathophysiology of GCTB progression remains unclear and prognostic factors, treatment targets, and predictive biomarkers represent unmet needs.

Histologically, ambiguous giant cell-rich lesions − including benign GCTB, chondroblastoma, aneurysmal bone cyst, central giant cell granuloma of the jaw, and malignant giant cell–rich osteosarcoma − are often found, especially as small biopsy or curettage specimens [22]. In these cases, H3F3Agene p.G34W mutation can be used in the differential diagnosis, as it is almost GCTB-exclusive [30, 55]. Approximately 90% of GCTBs display the p.G34W mutation, with minor subsets (<2%) displaying p.G34L, p.G34M, p.G34R, or p.G34V variants. H3F3B p.K36M is the H3.3 mutation found in the vast majority (90–95%) of chondroblastomas [30].

H3.3 p.G34W mutant-specific immunohistochemistry (IHC; clone RM263, commercially available) is a highly sensitive and specific surrogate marker of H3F3A p.G34W mutation in GCTB [56, 57, 58], being useful for practical diagnosis in primary [58] or recurrent, metastatic, and secondary malignant GCTB [59]. Although denosumab therapy may decrease p.G34W expression [22], evidence shows that spindle cells and cells in and around immature bone in denosumab-treated GCTBs are H3.3 p.G34W-positive by IHC, with H3F3A mutations consistently detected in corresponding samples [56, 58, 60, 61], which may predict relapse risk [55].

Although rare, malignant GCTB may occur, and studies suggest that p.G34W mutation is preserved [55]. One report, however, showed loss of one H3F3Aallele (probably the mutant allele) in GCTB malignant component, leading to negative p.G34W IHC [62].

p63, a member of the p53 family of transcription factors, has also been studied as biomarker in GCTB diagnosis. p63 immunostaining has been used in diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma (negative for p63 in opposition to p63-positive benign prostatic tissue) [63], and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma [64]. p63 has also been shown to be highly expressed in GCTB mononuclear neoplastic cells [65, 66, 67], but its usefulness is still to be determined. A meta-analysis of eight different studies including 335 GCTB patients showed that p63 is a helpful marker for GCTB diagnosis in critically ill patients, although it cannot be recommended as a single definitive diagnostic marker [68].

Finally, it has been suggested that high RANKL, IL-6, TNFα, SDF-1, and MCP-1 expression may help predict GCTB metastatic potential and prognosis, warranting further studies [69].

3. Treatment overview

Treatment options for localized GCTB include en blocresection or curettage with or without local adjuvants, like phenol, liquid nitrogen, or polymethylmethacrylate [70]. Radiation therapy (RT) can also be used as an alternative to surgery for local control, with 5-year local control rates of 80% [71]. However, RT is associated with risk of malignant transformation into high-grade sarcoma, making surgery the preferred option when possible. Contrarily to palliative care in irresectable or distant disease, systemic neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy with the RANKL-binding fully human monoclonal antibody denosumab is still not established [70, 72]. A treatment algorithm is depicted in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Flowchart of GCTB treatment. Adapted from NCCN guidelines – Bone cancer [73]. CT, computorized tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; RT, radiation therapy; SC, subcutaneous.

4. Medical therapy

4.1 Denosumab

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody (IgG2) that binds with high affinity and specificity to RANKL [74], thereby inhibiting osteoclast-mediated osteolysis. Given GCTB pathophysiology and its association to RANKL/RANK pathway, denosumab has proven effective in this disease.

In patients with resectable GCTB, adjuvant denosumab at a 120 mg dosage administered subcutaneously every 28 days, with additional loading doses on days 8 and 15 on the first month, during 6 months after complete resection has been approved by both the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency [72, 75, 76]. However, this treatment is still debated. Studies supporting its use in the adjuvant setting are scarce and mostly rely in level IV evidence. Conversely, evidence from a systematic review by Luengo-Alonso [72] favored adjuvant denosumab, which showed a positive histological and clinical (pain relief) response. In patients with unresectable GCTB (either primary or recurrent) or when complete excision is possible but post-surgical severe morbidity and functional impairment is expected, neoadjuvant denosumab should be started (same dosing scheme as above) and response to treatment evaluated. Should the patient respond to denosumab and surgery be feasible with acceptable morbidity, then complete excision and possibly adjuvant denosumab for six months should be considered. On the other hand, the optimal denosumab duration is still debatable when treatment response is suboptimal or in cases of sacral or spinal GCTB, multiple lesions (including pulmonary metastases), or patient’s clinical ineligibility for surgery. Denosumab should be considered until progression or unacceptable toxicity (e.g., osteonecrosis of the jaw), provided at least partial response is achieved.

4.2 Bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and are used in cancer patients, especially in bone metastases setting. In GCTB patients, denosumab is the preferred systemic treatment option. However, evidence regarding the use of adjuvant denosumab is not consistent and some studies show lack of benefit in local recurrence rates [77, 78]. Bisphosphonates, like zoledronic acid (ZA), can be an option in the adjuvant setting. A recent meta-analysis of case–control studies showed that the use of adjuvant bisphosphonates in patients submitted to intralesional curettage may decrease local recurrence rates, independently of Campanacci staging [79]. In patients undergoing wide resection, bisphosphonates seem to have no benefit in local recurrence. A phase II non-randomized clinical trial of adjuvant ZA after extensive curettage in GCTB patients showed that ZA failed to prevent local recurrence [80]. Another phase II multicentric, randomized, open-label clinical trial showed no benefit with adjuvant ZA, although the study was terminated earlier due to poor accrual [81]. The use of adjuvant bisphosphonates should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. In unresectable or metastatic GCTB, clinical studies addressing the use of bisphosphonates are also scarce. Overall, the role of bisphosphonates in the treatment of patients with GCTB remains to be clearly defined.

4.3 Chemotherapy/systemic cytotoxic agents/interferon

Chemotherapy agents and interferon-α have also been used to treat GCTB, as reported in case reports and small series, but results were poor and there are no clinical trials to guide their use. Anecdotal small retrospective case series and case reports have documented the use of doxorubicin [82, 83], cyclophosphamide [84], cisplatin plus doxorubicin [85], combination therapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and actinomycin-D, followed by high-dose methotrexate and vincristine [86], interferon alpha 2a [87] and interferon alpha 2b [88], with mixed results.

5. Conclusions and future directions

GCTB is a primary and mostly benign tumor of bone usually arising in the meta-epiphysis of long bones and more often affecting young patients. Despite its frequent benign nature, local recurrence rate is high and there is a non-negligible risk of distant metastization, namely to the lungs. Therefore, treatment should provide the best chance of curative outcome with minimal functional sequelae and quality of life impairment.

The main pillar of treatment is surgery, but systemic therapy has a role in adjuvant and palliative settings. Regarding GCTB pathophysiology, RANKL/RANK pathway is central to tumor development and denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against RANKL, is the most studied and most effective systemic therapy for the disease. Its use is particularly established in the palliative setting, i.e., in cases of unresectable disease, patient ineligibility for surgery, or lung involvement. Although less studied, bisphosphonates can also be an option. However, their role in GCTB medical management needs to be better clarified.

GCTB rare nature, particularly malignant GCTB, hampers the development of clinical trials to investigate new drugs for second-line treatment and establish the optimal treatment sequence (neo- vs. adjuvant denosumab or adjuvant denosumab vs. after recurrence, etc.). Currently, one clinical trial (NCT04255576) is studying the use of JMT103, a novel fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody against RANKL, in GCTB [89]. Another clinical trial (NCT03449108) is using a different approach to address bone tumors, including GCTB [90], by studying the use of LN-145-S1, or autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, in treatment-refractory or relapsed disease. As discussed above, mutations in cyclin D1, p53, and MET have been associated with GCTB malignant transformation and recurrence. This raises the hypothesis that cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors (e.g., ribociclib, palbociclib) and MET inhibitors (e.g., crizotinib) may be useful in this disease. Although these therapies have been approved in other tumors (CDK inhibitors in breast cancer and crizotinib in lung cancer), no studies are in place in GCTB yet. Another promising target is MMPs, specially MMP-2 and MMP-9, that play an important role in GCTB physiopathology, namely regarding tumor microenvironment, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastatic development. Preclinical studies in breast cancer used ML115, a bone-seeking MMP inhibitor, to prevent bone metastases [91], with promising results. Although still far from use in the clinical practice, this could be another potential therapy worth studying in GCTB. Several other clinical trials continue to investigate the use of denosumab, bisphosphonates, and local therapy (surgery/RT) [92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97].

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

We thank Joana Cavaco Silva for her contribution as a medical writer. Authors acknowledge Joana Cavaco Silva for manuscript revision.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

BMP-2Bone morphogenetic protein 2
CCR2C-C chemokine receptor type 2
CXCR4C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4
C/EBPβCCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta
CTComputorized tomography
CDKCyclin-kinase inhibitors
DC-STAMPDendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein
EMMPRINExtracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer
FFPEFormalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded
GCTBGiant cell tumor of the bone
H3.3Histone 3.3
IgGImmunoglobulin G
IHCImmunohistochemistry
IGFInsulin-like growth factor
IL-1Interleukin 1
M-CSFMacrophage colony-stimulating factor
MIP-1αMacrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha;
MRIMagnetic resonance imaging
MMPMatrix metalloprotease
MCP-1Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
NFATc1Nuclear factor of activated T cells c1
OC-STAMPOsteoclast stimulatory transmembrane protein
PTHrPParathyroid hormone related peptide
RTRadiation therapy
RANKLReceptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand
RUNX2Runt-related transcription factor 2
SCSubcutaneous
SDF-1Stromal cell-derived factor 1
TRAPTartrate-resistant acid phosphatase
TRAILTNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand
TGF-βTransforming growth factor beta
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor-alpha
VEGFVascular endothelial growth factor
ZAZoledronic acid

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Raquel Lopes-Brás, Isabel Fernandes, Sandra Casimiro and Luís Costa (June 15th 2021). Medical Therapy of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone, Recent Advances in Bone Tumours and Osteoarthritis, Hiran Amarasekera, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.97114. Available from:

chapter statistics

76total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

Osteosarcoma

By Gottardo Bianchi, Leticia Gaiero, Nicolas Casales, Claudio Silveri and Ana C. Belzarena

Related Book

First chapter

Successful Knee Arthroscopy: Techniques

By Chia-Liang Ang

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us