Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Program Cell Death (Apoptosis) and the Therapy of Cancer

Written By

Hilal Kalkan

Submitted: February 15th, 2021Reviewed: March 17th, 2021Published: April 13th, 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.97289

Chapter metrics overview

219 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Apoptosis plays many vital roles in maintaining organ homeostasis and represents type I programmed cell death. Programmed cell death happens when the DNA damage is irremediable and has two important pathways, the intrinsic death pathway also known as the mitochondrial pathway, and the extrinsic programmed cell death pathway. Any defects in the regulation of these crucial pathways have been associated with many disorders, most importantly cancer. Therefore, understanding the molecular basis of apoptosis is essential for the treatment of incurable cancer. To date, several anti-cancer drugs have been developed by targeting anti-apoptotic proteins, which are upregulated in many cancers. Nonetheless, a disease progression often time warranted due to the deregulation of several anti or pro-apoptotic proteins which also contribute to drug resistance. Hence, it is important to understand the maintenance and counteraction of apoptosis and improve successful new pharmacological applications of cell death mechanisms for future therapies. This chapter discusses the mechanism of apoptosis and emerging principles of drug resistance in cancer.

Keywords

  • Apoptosis
  • Caspases
  • Cell death pathways
  • Drug resistance
  • Cancer

1. Introduction

Apoptosis is a type of programmed cell death that is a genetically controlled process of self-destruction. Upon appropriate internal and external stimulus, apoptosis is activated to eliminate the unwanted cells. Hence, damaged cells undergo DNA condensation, membrane blebbing, and cell shrinkage which is the result of activated caspases and proteases [1]. Programmed cell death (PCD) or apoptosis plays an important role to maintain tissue homeostasis. The major aspect of the PCD mechanism is the removal of infected, damaged, or mutation carrying cells (that cause cell-cycle defects). Apoptosis or type I programmed cell death is a well-defined regulated mechanism for the elimination of unwanted cells in the later-period of life. Apoptosis happens in a silent-manner, without causing any damaging effect on the neighboring cells, tissues, and so extinguish stimulation of immunological response [2]. Although, unregulated or deficit form of apoptosis can lead to disease conditions such as cancer and autoimmune diseases [3]. Therefore, understanding the physiological control of apoptosis is crucial for the development of novel approaches to target various diseases. In this chapter, we will provide a brief introduction of apoptosis, the program cell death pathways, the role of caspases, the role of PCD in cancer, and anti-cancer therapy.

Advertisement

2. Apoptosis: type 1 program cell death

Apoptosis (will be referred to as PCD) as the name suggest is the targeted killing of cells that occurs as a part of homeostasis, development, and pathogenic processes throughout life. PCD is well-operated in the physiological processes in an orchestrated manner to eliminate any defect in cells or tissues [2, 4]. The three well-recognized apoptotic cell disassembly are (i) cell shrinkage, (ii) membrane blebbing, and (iii) the formation of membrane protrusions and fragmentation [2]. Apoptosis can be triggered via two ways; i) the extrinsic pathway where the cell death receptors such as Fas, TNFαR, and Death receptors (DR3, DR4, and DR5) bind to their ligands ii) the intrinsic pathway when Bcl-2 family pro-apoptotic proteins lead to permeabilization of the mitochondrial outer membrane. Both extrinsic and intrinsic pathways are converged on the activation of the caspase family, which is responsible for the removal of the damaged cell [5, 6]. The stimulation of apoptosis via the extrinsic pathway requires classic ligand-cell-surface receptor interaction. Death-receptors-induced extrinsic cell death is mainly critical for the function of the immune system [7]. The intrinsic apoptotic cell death starts in a cell-autonomous manner. Cellular defects and stresses, such as DNA damage (due to toxic agents or defect s in the cell-cycle process) or endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress (caused by accumulated unfolded proteins), leads to apoptosis when the damage is further than repair [8].

2.1 The activation of caspases, functions, and regulation

The initiation of apoptosis requires the activation of caspases, which then promote a cascade of events culminating in the death of a cell. Caspases are a family of cysteine proteases, very well conserved proteins playing many vital roles. Caspases can be divided into two categories (i) involved in immunity and (ii) the ones facilitating apoptotic cell death. These enzymes are expressed inactively inside the cell and activated to cleave for specific target substrates [9]. Pro-apoptotic caspases cleave a much broader subset of intracellular proteins to intercede cell death via apoptosis, on contrary, the caspases those involved in immunity can remove the cells via other non-apoptotic mechanisms. Pro-apoptotic caspases are fundamental for the development, and maintenance of tissue homeostasis [10]. Although many different caspases are found in mammals, here attention will be given to those which are very well characterized. During program cell death, the activation of caspases leads to biochemical and structural changes such as condensation of chromatin, mitochondria permeabilization, and membrane blebbing which are characteristic of apoptotic cell bodies. These essential processes display two important functions, firstly, the promotion of cell death and secondly, the elimination of damaged cells. Caspase-dependent program cell death generally ends with cell death [11]. On the contrary, the failure of apoptosis or non-complete process cause many disorders, most importantly, cancer. Nonetheless, cells have many other regulators that positively or negatively maintaining the activation and/or function of caspases [12]. The expression of caspases differs with stimuli type and expression level. While some caspases are expressed following a death trigger, the others are expressed constantly but being in an inactive state [13, 14]. Once the cell senses a death signal and/or being damaged the initiator caspases are being activated and recruited to the plasma membrane or in the cytoplasm. Upon the cleavage of initiator caspases, they activate the destructor caspases. The activation of destructor caspases in turn cleave important cellular substrates during program cell death. The initiator caspases (caspase −8, −9, and − 10) and destructor caspases (caspase −3, −6, and − 7) prefer different cleavage sites [15]. Many of the destructor caspases include a cleavage site that is consistent with the peptide substrate specificity. Even though, caspase −3 and − 7 contain identical peptide substrate preferences they cleave different substrates. Such as Bid, Caspase −6 and − 9, Bid, XIAP, and gelsolin are cleaved by caspase −3, while p23 is cleaved by caspase-7 [16]. The destructor caspases can cleave more than thousands of substrates to enable program cell death. Also, the initiator caspases have many additional important mediators for program cell death. The activation of initiator caspase-8 is through the extrinsic program cell death pathway which is mediated via death receptors [17]. The other initiator caspase-9 is activated by the intrinsic program cell death pathway which is regulated by the apoptosome complex. The active initiator caspases (both −8, and − 9) can cleave downstream destructor caspases (caspase −3, −6, and − 7) [18]. The activation of initiator caspases can be via several cell-death signaling complexes. These different signaling complexes respond to many intra- and extracellular events, which induce the recruitment of initiator caspases for the activation process [19, 20]. It is important to mention that the interactions of caspase-activation platforms and those caspases indicate a death-fold domain in the proteins. These sorts of forms are existing in caspases and adaptor proteins: the caspase-recruitment domain (CARD) and death effector domain (DED). There are also different other death domains, such as the death domain (DD), and pyrin domain (PYR), which are included in some of the activations of caspases but absent on caspases [21]. Indeed, death fold domains generally intervene in interactions between proteins via homotypic interaction. For example, some extracellular ligands are tumor-necrosis factor (TNF) family, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), and FasL. These specific ligands bind to different TNF receptor (TNFR) family, so, upon their binding stimulating conformational changes. The specific signaling complex that is linked with Fas is DISC (death-inducing signaling complex) and contains FADD (Fas-associated death domain), which is a small adaptor protein. TNFR induces the activation of several cell-death signaling complexes [22]. Complex IIa involves FADD and TRADD, and the other complex IIb involves FADD, and RIPK1, RIPK3 (receptor-interacting serine–threonine kinases). Both complexes can activate caspase-8 and program cell death [23]. Once caspase-9 is activated, the cell death stimuli induce Bcl-2 family proteins Bax or Bak and lead to mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) [24]. Later, MOMP is freeing cytochrome-c (Cyt-c) and other pro-death factors from the mitochondrial membrane to the cytosol [25]. The electrons are carried by Cyt-c in the respiratory chain of healthy cells, which function as a co-factor of Apaf-1 in the apoptotic cell’s cytosol. The Cyt-c and ATP bind to Apaf-1 to form the apoptosome complex, which results in the recruitment and activation of caspase-9 [26]. The active caspase-9 cleaves, and in turn, induces the activation of caspase-3. Importantly, this intrinsic program cell death pathway is related to a death-receptor pathway through Bcl-2 family member, Bid. The cleavage of Bid through death-receptor activated caspase-8 leads to truncated Bid, which in turn causes the activation of Bax/Bak-induced MOMP [27]. Hence, result in the activation of caspase-9. Caspase-2 activation induced by the PIDDosome protein complex involves the Rip-associated protein with a death domain (RAIDD) and p53-induced protein with a death domain (PIDD) [28]. The activation of caspase-1 in turn cleaves pro-IL-1b to cause inflammation [23]. Different inflammasomes form particular responses to different stimuli such as Nod-like receptors (NLRs) including NLRP1, NLRP3, and NLRC4 [29, 30, 31]. The NLR inflammasome protein contains an adapter binding domain and adaptor apoptosis-associated speck-like protein (adaptor ASC) containing CARD. Once ASC oligomerizes, it, in turn, leads to the recruitment of caspase-1 and activates caspase-1 [23]. The activation process of caspases has many violent consequences. Thus, the regulation is tightly managed. The cFLIP (cellular FLICE inhibitory protein), which is caspase-8’s inactive mimic, binds to signaling complexes that are associated with death receptors to repress caspase-8 [32]. XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis) is the only active site inhibitor of caspases and contains three BIR (baculovirus IAP repeat) motifs. The region BIR2 inhibits the activation of destructor caspases, caspase-3 and -7 via two different mechanisms. The first one, by binding the catalytic side of caspase-3 and -7, and the second one is by binding the newly cleaved protein terminus [33]. Also, the BIR3 motif inhibits the caspase-9 and blocks the dimerization of caspase-9. Of note, the regulation of caspases can be post-transcriptionally by phosphorylation. Several studies reported to inhibit the activity of caspase-2, −8, and − 9 [34]. Besides, caspases can play roles in diverse signaling pathways by their constant activation, for example, some of the specific morphological features of apoptotic cells are due to caspase-intervened activation of some actin cytoskeleton modulators such as p21-activated kinase 2 (PAK2), Rho-associated kinase I (ROCKI) and gelsolin [35, 36, 37] (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

The caspase family proteases and apoptosis. The initial signal on the cell membrane or from the mitochondria activates the initiator caspases (caspase-2, caspase-8, and caspase-9), which act on execution caspases. The initiator caspases are produced inactively and composed of a pro-domain (containing a CARD or a death effector domain [DED]) and, a large and small subunit. On contrary, executioner caspases (caspase-3, caspase-6, and caspase-7) are activated by cleavage of the initiator caspases. Thus, dependent on initiator signaling. The active caspases including two small and large subunits.

2.2 The mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis (the intrinsic pathway)

The intrinsic pathway contains the let off of cytochrome c from the mitochondria to the cytoplasm in response to cellular stress [26]. The cellular stress by the variety of factors such as DNA damage, deprivation of growth factors, defective ER, and several developmental factors activate the intrinsic pathway. In the mitochondrial pathway, the cleavage and activation of caspases begin with caspase-9, which leads to apoptosome machinery activation [19, 20]. The apoptosis protease-activating factor1 (APAF1) is a key molecule in the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis, besides, an important target for its pro-survival member, and scaffolding the assembled apoptosome [38]. In the Intrinsic apoptosis pathway, firstly, cytochrome c is discharged from mitochondria and enters into the cytosol, by ending with its interaction to APAF1 [39, 40]. The cytochrome c, together with APAF1 forms the apoptosome, which leads to inactive caspase-9 monomers into active auto-process [26]. The active caspase-9, in turn, leads to activation of downstream effector caspases. Further, the mitochondria let off pro-apoptotic proteins includes apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) and endonuclease-G [41]. Cytochrome c is only present in the mitochondrial intermembrane in healthy cells, to interact with APAF1, the apoptotic stimuli trigger the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) permeabilization (MOMP) [27]. Hereby, the MOMP conduce to discharge of the entire soluble proteins from mitochondrial intermembrane space to the cytosol. Additionally, rather than cytochrome c, two important pro-apoptotic proteins which are Smac and Omi, were also released meanwhile the above-mentioned procedure. These two proteins are crucial for increasing the potential of apoptosome via antagonizing the caspase inhibitor called X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) [26, 42]. In the lack of Smac and/or Omi, XIAP binding to caspase-9, and inhibits its catalytic activity in which also affects the caspase-3 and caspase-7 [42]. The intrinsic apoptotic pathway is regulated by the Bcl-2 family of proteins [5, 43]. The regulation of MOMP is tightly controlled by the Bcl-2 family proteins, they share BH region homology with their sequence, function, and structure. The Bcl-2 family can be sub-grouped into three categories: the pro-apoptotic proteins, Bax and Bak, play a key role for MOMP regulation; the anti-apoptotic proteins, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Mcl-1, these are the blockers of MOMP; and the BH3-only proteins, Bid, Bim, Bad and Noxa, which are activators of pro-apoptotic proteins and neutralizers for Bcl2 anti-apoptotic proteins. Anti-apoptotic Bcl2 proteins control many other cellular processes such as autophagy and mitochondrial fusion [24, 44]. Bax and Bak are in charge of the loss of mitochondrial outer membrane integrity. Over their activation, they form broad oligomers, and by disturbing MOM enduing their entry into MOM. The disturbing process still unknown, but this lets off the release of entire intermembrane space proteins [45, 46]. Bax and Bak are acting on MOMP involuntarily but importantly at least one of them is needed for re-permeabilization of mitochondria. These proteins are generally being at an inactive state, and gets activated upon upstream stimuli [47, 48, 49]. The BH3-only proteins, at least two of them, Bim and active Bid activate Bax and Bak via their transient interaction [25, 50, 51, 52]. The antagonization of MOMP accrued by the Bcl2 anti-apoptotic proteins in which they bind and inhibit both Bax and Bak, also BH3-only proteins via interacting with their BH3-only domains [53]. The Bcl2 proteins are regulated both transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally. Especially, via the ubiquitin-proteasome system, the degradation of Mcl-1 involve in apoptosis due to many cellular stresses. Over DNA damage, Mcl1 ubiquitin ligase E3 (MULE) binds to Mcl1 and initiates it catalyzes [54]. Mcl1 is phosphorylated via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) upon cellular stress conditions [55]. Also, Mcl1 is degraded with growth factors stimuli such as IL3 and the deficiency of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT signaling. This important process eases glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) from AKT inhibition. Then, GSK3 leads to phosphorylation of Mcl1 and its subsequent degradation [55, 56]. Intrinsic pathway signaling with pro-and anti-apoptotic proteins maintain many signaling processes in the important point of life and death decision. BH3-only proteins are essential upstream sensors of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. The regulation of several signaling pathways converge on the BH3-only proteins, and therefore, control and regulate their expression levels and activity [57, 58]. Such as the activation of Bid over cleavage by caspase-8 follow up DR ligation [59, 60]. Hereby, the Bid mediates the cross-regulation of both extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways. Also, the response to genotoxic stress can be given with Puma and Noxa, which are the direct target of p53 [61, 62, 63, 64]. Also, the primary apoptotic factor Bim similarly can be up-regulated via forkhead transcription factor FOXO3A over cytokine deficiency or due to ER stress to unbind the accumulated proteins [65, 66, 67]. To this end, the activity of Bad regulated via several kinases’ phosphorylation including AKT, which leads to its sequestration through 14–3-3- proteins [68, 69]. Also, when Bad is released, it acts against Bcl2 anti-apoptotic proteins over growth factor deficiency and/or lacking the AKT signaling [68, 70]. It is noteworthy that MOMP is obliged the cell to death even though the caspase activation is hindered which might be the conclusion of the loss of mitochondrial function, which causes the failure of energy [26, 71]. Some cells can survive under these conditions though [26]. Nevertheless, the MOMP activation through its downstream is an important point in the regulation of caspases and might be settled. Finally, mitochondrial apoptosis can be harassed through the phosphorylation and inhibition of caspase-9 by acting downstream of MOMP [72].

2.3 The extrinsic pathway of apoptosis

The extrinsic pathway of apoptosis can be initiated through the binding of ligands to the death receptors such as tumor necrosis factor receptors (TNFRs) and Fas receptor (FasR) on the cell surface [7, 17, 73]. These receptors possess death domains at the cytosolic side, which helps in recruiting adaptor proteins such as FAS associated via death domain (FADD), and also, for some receptors, TNFRSF1A is associated via death domain (TRADD) [74, 75]. The recruitment of these adaptor proteins occurs through the interaction of death domains present in both receptors and adaptors. The death effector domains of these adaptor proteins have different upstream procaspases such as caspase-8 and caspase-10 to form a death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), which then promote activation of these caspases [17, 76]. The downstream executioner caspases such as caspase-3, caspase-6, and caspase-7 activated through their upstream caspases to execute cell death [77]. The main feature of apoptosis is the lack of systemic damage to neighboring cells during its initiation and clearance of the dead cells. This feature of apoptosis is provided by the attentive wrapping of the cell membrane around the fragmented cell by forming apoptotic bodies. The release of ATP (adenosine 5′-triphosphate) and UTP (uridine- 5′-triphosphate) from apoptotic bodies display a signal for macrophages, leads to the migration of macrophages to the apoptotic site [78]. Besides, apoptotic cells also expose the eat me signal most likely phosphatidylserine (PtdSer) on their surface, which initiates phagocytes to engulf the must-remove cells [79].

Advertisement

3. Apoptosis and cancer

Cancer is a multi-complex disease arising from mutation of tumor suppressor or oncogenes, which can be due to impairment of several signaling pathways and associated with apoptosis [80]. The evasion of apoptosis is an important sign of cancer, which mostly results in a very high level of resistance to many chemotherapeutic agents. Therefore, attention has been given to apoptotic proteins and became the most attractive anti-cancer target for effective treatment. The resistance against apoptosis is seen in many types of cancers, and required much higher doses of drugs to overcome the resistance, which increases the risk of “off-target” negative effects [81]. Apoptosis is also a very complex system with its regulation and/or function via several proteins, kinases, and links with several pathways might provide important therapeutic benefit for novel approaches to treat cancer. A better understanding of apoptotic pathways and their alteration in cancer cells had the attention of the development of pro-apoptotic agents. In cancer cells, cell death has been reported for a long time and associated with cancer therapy due to the designation of killing malignant cells by chemo- and/or radiotherapy. Unfortunately, this also leads to the death of normal cells along with cancer cells [80]. Kerr et al. reported that radiation increases the rate of apoptosis in cancer cells. Therefore, apoptosis-associated directly with the development of cancer cells in humans. Most importantly, it can also promote resistance to the therapies which aim to kill cancer cell by targeting apoptosis [2]. In healthy cells, the recognition of damage leads to activation of program cell death, which ending up with their elimination by killing themselves. Such as the activation of tumor suppressor p53 can activate apoptosis inducers including Puma and Noxa, in normal cells [61, 62, 64]. Thus, the un-endowed cells which are not able to eliminate themselves may cause an accumulation of genetic damage. The oncogenes (e.g. Myc) induced apoptosis is a very crucial protective mechanism against cancer development, controlled by a p53-dependent pathway, activated in response to abnormal mitogenic signals. Such as the cells overexpressing the apoptosis inhibitor Bcl2 or have damage in the p53 gene are incapable of this removal process including cancer cells. The loss of function mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene causes defection in the apoptotic mechanism and also impacts its tumor-suppressive functions, which involving DNA repairment, cell-cycle arrest, and cell senescence [82, 83]. Also, the incapable cells with an additional mutation can lead to atypical cell proliferation. Such as chromosome translocation which ends up with over-expression of c-Myc, then will lead to quick malignant cell growth. Of note, this explains that the defects in apoptotic mechanism such as over-expression of apoptosis inhibitor Bcl-2 and unregulated cell proliferation due to c-Myc overexpression in the development of lymphoma [82, 84, 85].

Understanding of extrinsic apoptotic pathway on death receptors especially on TRIAL signaling, including TRAIL-1 and -2, shown to lower toxicity compared to TNF or FAS signaling were targeted. The lowering expression levels of TRAIL receptors via recombinant human TRAIL-R1 and -R2 opened up an important therapeutic window. The tumor cells pre-dominantly signal via TRAIL-R1 and -R2, and the expression of these receptors displayed that they do not behave as an indicator of favored receptor signaling [86]. The higher expression levels of these receptors have been found on brain tissue and hepatocytes [87, 88]. However, these findings opened up several windows about the use of TRIAL in the clinic which has been reported notable apoptotic cell death in primary hepatocytes. These findings underlining the importance of selective models to evaluate appropriate drug combinations and their potential on- and/or off-target adverse effects. A study by Von Karstedt et al. in KRAS mutant cancers, known to have an elevated level of TRAIL-R2 expression shown that triggering TRAIL signaling is worsen the development of cancer, and metastasis [89, 90]. Several other studies in different cancers such as pancreatic cancer also shown that TRIAL-R2 signaling interacts with the miRNA processing complex and leads to the inhibition of the maturation of mRNA, called let-7. The result of TRAIL R2-miRNA interaction displayed an up-regulated level of let-7 transcriptional target genes which also prompt cancer development [91]. The sublethal concentrations of TRAIL were shown to induce the activation of caspase-8 dependent apoptotic nucleases, which leads to increased mutations caused by DNA damage in surviving cells [92].

The IAP proteins which are downstream of DRs and Bcl2 family proteins are excessively expressed in cancer cells, therefore associated with cancer development and as well as resistance to therapies. The involvement of cIAPs has also been associated with the regulation of the NF-KB pathway. The lack of cIAPs leads to an increase of inflammatory cytokines including TNF family and IL6, IL8, IL10, and Mcl1, which are effectively involved in systemic inflammation [93]. Nevertheless, these cytokines have also been reported to be increased in cancer progression due to their link with inflammation which causes to include immune cells to the cancer site and prompt the tumor development (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Molecular mechanisms of intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathways activation.a.the activation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway through cellular stress (ER), and deprivation of growth factor (DNA damage). This alteration promoting the activation of pro-apoptotic members of the BCL-2 family, including BIM, PUMA, BAD, or NOXA. The BH3-only proteins bind and therefore, neutralize BCL-2 pro-survival proteins, involving BCL-2, BCL- XL, MCL-1, and BCL-2- related protein A1. Thus, releasing the important effectors of apoptosis signaling, such as BAK and BAX, which then unite into big complexes and lead to incompliance in the mitochondrial outer membrane. Afterward, this results in the free off cytochrome c and SMAC, which are apoptogenic factors. Some of BH3- only proteins (BIM and PUMA) recently have been reported to bind and promote the activation of MOMP. Also, cytochrome c binding to APAF1 leads to the formation of the apoptosome complex. Caspase-9 is activated in this apoptosome complex, and later proteolytically causes the activation of both caspase- 3 and caspase-7. The caspase inhibitor XIAP activity is blocked by SMAC.b.Extrinsic apoptotic signaling is stimulated through the activation of DRs, for example, the activation of FAS via FAS ligand (FASL). This cause the pro-caspase 8 recruitment to the death receptor by the adaptor protein FADD, and ending up with the formation of the DISC, which is an important catalyzer for the caspase-8 activation. The activation of caspase 8 promotes cell killing, in two ways: i) via direct activation of caspases 3 and 7, or ii) by indirect activation of the BH3 only protein BID into tBID, thus linking with the intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway. Effector caspases can be activated in two ways, either by cleavage of hundreds of intracellular proteins to promote the conventional apoptotic morphology and to avoid the efflux of intracellular DAMPs which can result in inflammatory responses. In addition, effector caspases either directly or indirectly can lead to activation of ROCK-1 kinase, which is important for plasma membrane blebbing by actin contraction and caspase-activated DNAse (CAD), which cause inter-nucleosomal DNA cleavage and thus chromatin condensation. These effector caspases also can proteolytically lead to the inactivation of lipid flippases including ATP11, and also can activate the lipid scramblase such as XKR8. Altogether, this results in the exposure of PtdSer on the cell membrane. Therefore, this is called an ‘eat me signal’ for phagocytic cells and ending up with the engulfment of cells that are undergoing apoptosis [94].

3.1 p53 phosphorylation: is it a driver to cell death?

DNA damage comprises different causes that involve cell stress, mutations, toxic agents, or genomic lesions. Upon damage, the confrontation of cells to damage lead to their potential responses to repair the damage or eliminate the harmed cells by apoptosis. Usually, the response of the damaged cell fate differs from strength to the content of DNA damage, and different signaling pathways are activated. The different cellular decision-making process is guided with specific signaling molecules at the molecular level [95]. The tumor suppressor p53 plays a key role in response to DNA damage and involve in the cellular decision-making process, in turn, found to prompt DNA repair by shutoff the cell cycle to allow time for the repairment and restore genome stability [96]. However, it remains unknown still that how p53 does different cell-fate decisions, activate different target genes, and at a non-transcriptional level have an effect in the cytoplasm of MOMP [97]. The phosphorylation of p53 at Ser15 and Ser20 occurs over immense DNA damage and these are critical sites for stabilization of p53 [98]. Importantly, there is a specific phosphorylation site which is Ser46 and selectively associated with the activity of cell killing caused by genotoxic stress. These crucial different phosphor-sites of p53 might improve the understanding of the function of specific phosphorylation sites. Many studies focused on the phosphorylation of p53 at Ser46 which modulates the target gene transactivation and it has been implicated to potentiate cell death transcriptionally and also, non-transcriptionally [95]. The transactivation of significant pro-apoptotic p53 target genes including BAX, NOXA, p53AIP1, PTEN, and AKT kinase, which are all up-regulated over p53 Ser46 phosphorylation [63, 99, 100, 101]. How this different transcriptional effect occurs and which mechanisms are evolved is an open question? The specific role of the p53 Ser46 phosphorylation site in making a cell-fate decision upon cell death leads to the thought of its disturbed regulation might cause cancer cell resistance to therapy. The deregulation of p53 Ser46 kinases in cancer cells could be caused by many factors involving mutations, mis-localization, lower expression level, and disturbed kinase activity. The mutations of p53 at Ser46 have been reported with 1.4–1.6% rates in different human cancer types including breast, colorectal, lung, and stomach. Besides, the down-regulation of several p53 Ser46 kinases are reported such as ATM, DYRK2, HIPK2, and p38𝛼 in different tumor types [63, 102, 103, 104]. Although, since the regulation of the kinase relies on p53 Ser46 activity, their specific potentials and activities is a challenging task.

3.2 The pro-oncogenic roles of apoptosis

The deregulation of apoptosis is a feature of cancer cells. Apoptosis is a tumor suppressor mechanism in cancer cells. Hence, the dysregulation of apoptosis causing uncontrollable cancer cell-survival [105]. Besides, the tumor-suppressive effects of apoptosis, also, suggested having pro-oncogenic functions. The maintenance of aggressive tumors by apoptosis has been described in the literature. The term tumor aggressiveness defined with increased proliferation, and metastatic features of cancer cells. Such as apoptotic stresses are maybe the reason for aggressive tumor development. Therefore, have pro-oncogenic roles in cancer development and aggressiveness [106, 107]. Importantly, this opens several questions about the beneficial effects of apoptosis in cancer therapy, since strategies aim to trigger apoptosis [108]. Apoptosis-induced proliferation (AIP) is an important compensatory proliferation form, which helps to eliminate damaged cells and maintain tissue homeostasis. Caspase-dependent inflammation and repressed AIP activity might lead to tumor development. One important mediator of AIP is Prostaglandin-E2 (PGE-2), and functioning as a trigger of tumor proliferation in apoptotic cells [109]. The regulation of tumor cells by PGE-2 through caspase-3 dependent manner is an important strategy to treat melanoma. Here, the dying cells trigger the growth of living-cells after cytotoxic therapy [110, 111]. Therefore, targeting PGE-2 to enhance the response to therapy might help to overcome the resistance in cancer cells, when designing cancer therapies [112].

3.3 The oncogenic roles of apoptosis

Apoptotic cells release the “eat-me” signal which is a signal for phagocytosis. These dynamic signals are including fractalkine (FTK), phosphatidylserine (PS), nucleotides ATP, and UTP [113, 114]. These signals are responsible for immune cell activation. Such as the effects of FTK associated with cell migration, and angiogenesis. Also, these signals by apoptotic cells are thought to induce inflammation. Somehow, in the occurrence of normal apoptotic cell death, inflammation is prevented by efferocytosis. The mechanism of efferocytosis is to eliminate the apoptotic cells by immune cells, macrophages. Importantly, it also plays a key role in cancer cells by creating an immunosuppressive effect to organize several signalization events between tumor cells [115]. For example, a study by Ford and colloquies, in 2015, showed that apoptotic cancer cells induce tumor growth and angiogenesis in B-cell lymphoma and also, malignant melanoma [116]. In conclusion, the effects of apoptotic cells in their microenvironment is changed upon their features. The studies that suggest apoptotic cell involvement might play important role in signaling events due to their environment and features. Of note, it remains unknown how they do these roles, therefore, more studies are needed to clarify this point.

Advertisement

4. The therapeutic approaches to cancer

The question what happens when apoptotic machinery is impaired? The answer is impairment of apoptosis results in uncontrolled cell proliferation, tumor development and progression, and resistance to anticancer therapeutics [117, 118]. The deregulation of apoptosis is not only causing the development and progression of the tumor but also lead to resistance to therapeutic approaches [80]. Cancer cells can promote drug resistance to several treatments, which target several different molecular signaling. So many cancers present an internal resistance to chemotherapy, without previous exposure to anti-cancer agents. Therefore, the beginning response to cancer treatment is weak. Furthermore, several tumors might also gain drug resistance because of chemotherapy [119, 120, 121, 122]. Among many intrinsic and gained drug resistance are increased drug leakage, defective inflow transporters, changes in the function of drugs and their targets, drug inactivation metabolically, drug compartmentalization, increased activity of DNA repairment [120, 123, 124, 125, 126]. To improve therapeutically new approaches, the understanding of these signaling pathways is required to progress cancer therapy and more importantly get over the resistance. Besides, targeting the apoptotic signaling events that are involved in resistance may improve a valid strategy to increase the cell sensitivity of cancer cells to apoptosis and overcome the failure of therapeutic difficulties.

4.1 The role of Bcl2 family proteins in cancer and drug resistance

The Bcl-2 family proteins contains at least one Bcl-2 homology (BH) domain [127, 128, 129]. The different BH-domains exist, but especially BH-3 is crucial to form several BCL-2 protein complexes that govern the result between survival and death [130, 131, 132, 133]. These interactions between BH3-BH3 are also important to antagonize pro-survival complexes. The increased level of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins is associated with carcinogenesis. Such as the transgenic mice model that overexpress Bcl-2 shown to develop tumors spontaneously [134]. However, the high expression of Bcl-2 was also reported to cause a shift in the balance of cancer cells through survival and also lead to resistance to chemotherapy [135]. Overexpression of Bcl-xL, another member of the Bcl2-family is also associated with colorectal cancer [136]. This unbalanced expression of Bcl-2 family proteins confers failure of apoptosis and resistance to cancer therapies [137]. Especially, overexpression of anti-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL is correlated with several cancers including ovarian and breast cancer [138, 139]. On the other side, an increased ratio of Bcl-2/Bax is associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [140].

4.2 The role of BH3-mimetics as a potential therapeutic option for cancer

Bcl-2 family proteins control the intrinsic apoptosis pathway toward protein–protein interactions, which including all BH-3 domains [141, 142]. Currently, the therapeutic approaches mostly focused on mimicking and target the BH-3 only proteins. BH-3 mimetics are small molecule compounds and bind to anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. Therefore, inhibit their activity and promotes apoptosis [133, 143]. Of note, BH-3 mimetics can start apoptosis by leading to activation of Bax/Bak or by inhibiting anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins [142]. Between a variety of BH-3 mimetics that have been generated, ABT-737 and ABT-263 (Navitoclax) showed the most promising antitumor efficacy by engaging anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins. Both drugs are shown to engage to Bcl-2, Bcl-Xl, and Bcl-w. Somehow, the use of Navitoclax showed to cause thrombocytopenia by inhibition of Bcl-xl, as a major adverse effect [144, 145]. These side effects lead to exclusion of Navitoclax as an effective chemotherapeutic drug and required new findings more selective for Bcl-2 inhibitors, so can induce cell death without causing critical side effects. Indeed, ABT-199 (Navitoclax) was subsequently developed to replace Navitoclax, as a highly selective Bcl-2 inhibitor. Venetoclax binds with high affinity to Bcl-2 and a lesser extent to other Bcl-2 family proteins including Bcl-xl and Bcl-w. Also, Venetoclax lacks off-target effects on BCL-XL [146]. Altogether, the pre-clinical experience with venetoclax and together with combining BCR signaling inhibitors were shown to be very promising with significant efficacy in the patient population Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). The study by Binu Sasi et al., in 2019, showed that fostamatinib and ibrutinib can sensitize DLBCL cell lines to venetoclax, which marks the importance of combination approaches. In conclusion, the findings provided a rational explanation for testing the use of combination therapy with venetoclax and selective BCR inhibitors in clinical use in DLBCL [147]. The progress of research is underlying the continuous role of Bcl-2 family inhibitors as promising and effective anticancer therapeutic agent. However, another small molecule BDA-366 (BH4 domain inhibitor) is also recently described as a promising approach in anticancer treatment. The potent effects of BDA-366 have been experimentally validated in both in vitro and in vivo, by showing significant anticancer activity [148]. Lastly, a very innovative strategy again comes from Bcl-2, the Bcl-2 gene is known to be rich with GC sequence which is placed in the promoter region, and has the potential to form G-quadruplex structures. Thus, is playing a role as a transcriptional repressor element and these G-quadruplex-specific ligands are capable of regulating Bcl-2 transcriptionally [149, 150].

4.3 Up-regulation of Bcl-2 (pro-apoptotic) family proteins to overcome resistance in cancer cells

The up-regulated expression level of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins might be possible be neutralized by increasing the expression of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. Puma is an important BH-3 protein, having a key role in mediating pro-apoptotic p53 function and help to release p53 from inactive forms with Bcl-Xl. Hereby, freed cytosolic p53 can activate Bax and Bak, which results in stimulation of apoptotic signaling through MOMP [44, 151]. p53 increases the expression of pro-apoptotic protein level, called ARTS, and counteracts Bcl-xl to induce apoptosis [152]. Hence, the inhibition of p53 antagonists such as Mdm-2 can cause an increased level of p53, induce pro-apoptotic protein expressions. Additionally, reduction of pro-apoptotic BH-3 only protein levels can also lead to drug resistance. This effect might be due to its interaction with BCL-2 anti-apoptotic proteins in cancer cells [153].

4.4 Therapeutic approach to target death receptor

There are different reasons and ways cause the failure of apoptosis or leading to resistance. Including altered death receptor signaling, an unbalanced level of pro-and anti-apoptotic proteins lowered caspase role and disrupted p53 function. Impairment of the death receptor signaling pathway is associated with many sorts of tumors, showing the importance of the Fas–FasL system and/or the abnormal level of cytosolic components of this pathway such as FADD can improve the tumor conversion [154, 155]. Transcriptionally silencing of Fas is familiar with oncogenic events in the epithelial conversion, the mutation in this gene linked with B-cell germinal center-derived lymphomas [156]. However, the lack of expression level of FADD is a common sign in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) which leads to chemotherapy resistance [154, 155, 157]. Furthermore, the low and/or lack of caspase-8 expression have been reported in numerous other cancers including neuroblastoma and small cell lung cancer [158, 159, 160]. However, the induction of apoptosis by triggering the death receptor pathway might be an important promising approach to overcome the resistance to therapeutic agents. An important therapeutic approach that confers the TRAIL ligand which induces apoptosis in many different cancer cell lines [161]. TRAIL-induced apoptosis, an important mechanistic strategy that has a harmful effect against cancer cells and leads to several different approaches to develop agonistic-featured antibodies against TRAIL death receptors and/or several soluble recombinant derivatives of TRAIL [162, 163]. On the other side, increasing the sensitivity of malignant tumors to TRAIL-induced apoptosis is crucial to design new promising molecules to target and activate caspase-8 [164]. Importantly, the validation of in silico screening some small molecules which promote caspase-8 activation have been reported. In many different cancer cell lines including leukemic cells, the CaspPro molecule is shown to be very promising, and shown to induce not only caspase-8 activation but also caspase 3 activation, and leading to apoptosis in the presence of TRAIL [163, 164, 165].

Among other therapeutic approaches, another important strategy is targeting IAPs. Through the use of antisense oligonucleotides and small-molecule inhibitors very potential anticancer therapeutic approach has been developed. In ovarian cancer, the supplementation of antisense agents targeting XIAP through an adenoviral vector was displayed to reduce the expression level of XIAP and underlined its remarkable effect to induce apoptosis [166]. Besides, in lung cancers also its effect has been proven by showing that it increases cell sensitivity to radiation treatment [167]. In this regard, by inhibition of XIAP through the use of specifically designed oligomers also displayed to promote the activation of caspase-3, increasing the apoptotic effect of TRIAL in different cancers such as prostate cancer [168]. Furthermore, the SMAC mimetics are also shown to trigger apoptosis and/or increase the sensitivity of cancer cells to different therapies. These molecules induce caspase activation through the neutralization of XIAP-mediated caspase inhibition [169]. The successful therapeutic approach relies on the capability of the tool to trigger apoptosis mainly by two approaches, i) targeting overexpressed anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins, or ii) triggering the activation of pro-apoptotic molecules.

Advertisement

5. Conclusion remark

In conclusion, the main hallmark of cancer is the intrinsic or requisite resistance to apoptosis, and the evasion of apoptotic cell death can be part of cellular response to stressful stimuli. Based on our understanding of how the dysregulation of the apoptosis pathway leads to cancer, approaches to target anti-apoptosis Bcl-2 family proteins have proven to be effective in the treatment of cancers, especially lymphatic cancers. However, cancer cells often outsmart these therapeutic interventions by modulating the expression of other molecules of apoptosis. Novel combination approaches are warranted to overcome this drug-induced resistance. More importantly, the new perspective and pieces of evidence are needed for powerful approaches to overcome drug resistance in cancer cells in clinical use. Therefore, the current knowledge needs a further understanding of how different cellular stresses trigger anti-apoptotic mechanisms, and how these effects lead to apoptotic resistance in cancer cells.

References

  1. 1.Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Vandenabeele P, Abrams J, Alnemri ES, Baehrecke EH, Blagosklonny MV, El-Deiry WS, Golstein P, Green DRet al.2009 Classification of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2009. Cell Death and Differentiation163-11. (doi:10.1038/cdd.2008.150)
  2. 2.Kerr JF, Wyllie AH & Currie AR 1972 Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. British Journal of Cancer26239-257. (doi:10.1038/bjc.1972.33)
  3. 3.Testa U & Riccioni R 2007 Deregulation of apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica9281-94. (doi:10.3324/haematol.10279)
  4. 4.Wyllie AH, Kerr JF & Currie AR 1980 Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. International Review of Cytology68251-306. (doi:10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62312-8)
  5. 5.Elmore S 2007 Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicologic Pathology35495-516. (doi:10.1080/01926230701320337)
  6. 6.Sayers TJ 2011 Targeting the extrinsic apoptosis signaling pathway for cancer therapy. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy601173-1180. (doi:10.1007/s00262-011-1008-4)
  7. 7.Locksley RM, Killeen N & Lenardo MJ 2001 The TNF and TNF Receptor Superfamilies: Integrating Mammalian Biology. Cell104487-501. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00237-9)
  8. 8.Iurlaro R & Muñoz-Pinedo C 2016 Cell death induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress. The FEBS Journal2832640-2652. (doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.13598)
  9. 9.Teng X & Hardwick JM 2015 Apoptosis: The extrinsic pathway.Molecular Oncology:Causes of Cancer and Targets for Treatment353-366. (doi:10.1017/CBO9781139046947.031)
  10. 10.Puthalakath H & Strasser A 2002 Keeping killers on a tight leash: transcriptional and post-translational control of the pro-apoptotic activity of BH3-only proteins. Cell Death and Differentiation9505-512. (doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4400998)
  11. 11.Green DR & Llambi F 2015 Cell Death Signaling. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology7. (doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006080)
  12. 12.Fulda S 2009a Exploiting apoptosis pathways for the treatment of pediatric cancers. Pediatric Blood & Cancer53533-536. (doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.21922)
  13. 13.Creagh EM, Conroy H & Martin SJ 2003 Caspase-activation pathways in apoptosis and immunity. Immunological Reviews19310-21. (doi:10.1034/j.1600-065x.2003.00048.x)
  14. 14.Nicholson DW 1999 Caspase structure, proteolytic substrates, and function during apoptotic cell death. Cell Death and Differentiation61028-1042. (doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4400598)
  15. 15.Stennicke HR & Salvesen GS 1998 Properties of the caspases. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology138717-31. (doi:10.1016/S0167-4838(98)00133-2)
  16. 16.Walsh JG, Cullen SP, Sheridan C, Luthi AU, Gerner C & Martin SJ 2008 Executioner caspase-3 and caspase-7 are functionally distinct proteases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences10512815-12819. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0707715105)
  17. 17.Dickens LS, Powley IR, Hughes MA & MacFarlane M 2012 The ‘complexities’ of life and death: Death receptor signalling platforms. Experimental Cell Research3181269-1277. (doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.04.005)
  18. 18.Crawford ED & Wells JA 2011 Caspase substrates and cellular remodeling. Annual Review of Biochemistry801055-1087. (doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-061809-121639)
  19. 19.Bratton SB & Salvesen GS 2010 Regulation of the Apaf-1-caspase-9 apoptosome. Journal of Cell Science1233209-3214. (doi:10.1242/jcs.073643)
  20. 20.Bratton SB, Walker G, Srinivasula SM, Sun XM, Butterworth M, Alnemri ES & Cohen GM 2001 Recruitment, activation and retention of caspases-9 and -3 by Apaf-1 apoptosome and associated XIAP complexes. The EMBO Journal20998-1009. (doi:10.1093/emboj/20.5.998)
  21. 21.Malladi S, Challa-Malladi M, Fearnhead HO & Bratton SB 2009 The Apaf-1•procaspase-9 apoptosome complex functions as a proteolytic-based molecular timer. The EMBO Journal281916-1925. (doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.152)
  22. 22.Bodmer JL, Holler N, Reynard S, Vinciguerra P, Schneider P, Juo P, Blenis J & Tschopp J 2000 TRAIL receptor-2 signals apoptosis through FADD and caspase-8. Nature Cell Biology2241-243. (doi:10.1038/35008667)
  23. 23.Berghe TV, Linkermann A, Jouan-Lanhouet S, Walczak H & Vandenabeele P 2014 Regulated necrosis: the expanding network of non-apoptotic cell death pathways. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology15135-147. (doi:10.1038/nrm3737)
  24. 24.Cosentino K & García-Sáez AJ 2018 MIM through MOM: the awakening of Bax and Bak pores.The EMBO Journal37e100340. (doi:10.15252/embj.2018100340)
  25. 25.Kuwana T, Mackey MR, Perkins G, Ellisman MH, Latterich M, Schneiter R, Green DR & Newmeyer DD 2002 Bid, Bax, and Lipids Cooperate to Form Supramolecular Openings in the Outer Mitochondrial Membrane. Cell111331-342. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01036-X)
  26. 26.Tait SWG & Green DR 2010 Mitochondria and cell death: outer membrane permeabilization and beyond. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology11621-632. (doi:10.1038/nrm2952)
  27. 27.Suzuki M, Youle RJ & Tjandra N 2000 Structure of Bax: Coregulation of Dimer Formation and Intracellular Localization. Cell103645-654. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00167-7)
  28. 28.Park HH & Wu H 2006 Crystal structure of RAIDD death domain implicates potential mechanism of PIDDosome assembly. Journal of Molecular Biology357358-364. (doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.12.082)
  29. 29.Kanneganti T-D, Lamkanfi M & Núñez G 2007 Intracellular NOD-like Receptors in Host Defense and Disease. Immunity27549-559. (doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2007.10.002)
  30. 30.Mariathasan S, Newton K, Monack DM, Vucic D, French DM, Lee WP, Roose-Girma M, Erickson S & Dixit VM 2004 Differential activation of the inflammasome by caspase-1 adaptors ASC and Ipaf. Nature430213-218. (doi:10.1038/nature02664)
  31. 31.Martinon F 2008 Detection of immune danger signals by NALP3. Journal of Leukocyte Biology83507-511. (doi:https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0607362)
  32. 32.Budd RC, Yeh W-C & Tschopp J 2006 cFLIP regulation of lymphocyte activation and development.Nature Reviews. Immunology6196-204. (doi:10.1038/nri1787)
  33. 33.Riedl SJ, Renatus M, Schwarzenbacher R, Zhou Q, Sun C, Fesik SW, Liddington RC & Salvesen GS 2001 Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Caspase-3 by XIAP. Cell104791-800. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00274-4)
  34. 34.Parrish AB, Freel CD & Kornbluth S 2013 Cellular Mechanisms Controlling Caspase Activation and Function. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology5a008672. (doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a008672)
  35. 35.Coleman ML, Sahai EA, Yeo M, Bosch M, Dewar A & Olson MF 2001 Membrane blebbing during apoptosis results from caspase-mediated activation of ROCK I. Nature Cell Biology3339-345. (doi:10.1038/35070009)
  36. 36.Rudel T & Bokoch GM 1997 Membrane and morphological changes in apoptotic cells regulated by caspase-mediated activation of PAK2. Science (New York, N.Y.)2761571-1574. (doi:10.1126/science.276.5318.1571)
  37. 37.Sebbagh M, Renvoizé C, Hamelin J, Riché N, Bertoglio J & Bréard J 2001 Caspase-3-mediated cleavage of ROCK I induces MLC phosphorylation and apoptotic membrane blebbing. Nature Cell Biology3346-352. (doi:10.1038/35070019)
  38. 38.Zhou P, Qian L, Kozopas KM & Craig RW 1997 Mcl-1, a Bcl-2 family member, delays the death of hematopoietic cells under a variety of apoptosis-inducing conditions. Blood89630-643
  39. 39.Yu X, Acehan D, Ménétret J-F, Booth CR, Ludtke SJ, Riedl SJ, Shi Y, Wang X & Akey CW 2005 A Structure of the Human Apoptosome at 12.8 Å Resolution Provides Insights into This Cell Death Platform. Structure131725-1735. (doi:10.1016/j.str.2005.09.006)
  40. 40.Yuan S, Yu X, Topf M, Ludtke SJ, Wang X & Akey CW 2010 Structure of an Apoptosome-Procaspase-9 CARD Complex. Structure18571-583. (doi:10.1016/j.str.2010.04.001)
  41. 41.Toné S, Sugimoto K, Tanda K, Suda T, Uehira K, Kanouchi H, Samejima K, Minatogawa Y & Earnshaw WC 2007 Three distinct stages of apoptotic nuclear condensation revealed by time-lapse imaging, biochemical and electron microscopy analysis of cell-free apoptosis. Experimental Cell Research3133635-3644. (doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.06.018)
  42. 42.Eckelman BP, Salvesen GS & Scott FL 2006 Human inhibitor of apoptosis proteins: why XIAP is the black sheep of the family. EMBO Reports7988-994. (doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400795)
  43. 43.Edlich F 2018 BCL-2 proteins and apoptosis: Recent insights and unknowns. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications50026-34. (doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.06.190)
  44. 44.Chipuk JE, Fisher JC, Dillon CP, Kriwacki RW, Kuwana T & Green DR 2008 Mechanism of apoptosis induction by inhibition of the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences10520327-20332. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0808036105)
  45. 45.Goldstein JC, Waterhouse NJ, Juin P, Evan GI & Green DR 2000 The coordinate release of cytochrome c during apoptosis is rapid, complete and kinetically invariant. Nature Cell Biology2156-162. (doi:10.1038/35004029)
  46. 46.Muñoz-Pinedo C, Guío-Carrión A, Goldstein JC, Fitzgerald P, Newmeyer DD & Green DR 2006 Different mitochondrial intermembrane space proteins are released during apoptosis in a manner that is coordinately initiated but can vary in duration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences10311573-11578. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0603007103)
  47. 47.Dewson G, Kratina T, Sim HW, Puthalakath H, Adams JM, Colman PM & Kluck RM 2008 To trigger apoptosis, Bak exposes its BH3 domain and homodimerizes via BH3:groove interactions. Molecular Cell30369-380. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.005)
  48. 48.Dewson G, Kratina T, Czabotar P, Day CL, Adams JM & Kluck RM 2009 Bak activation for apoptosis involves oligomerization of dimers via their alpha6 helices. Molecular Cell36696-703. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.008)
  49. 49.Eskes R, Desagher S, Antonsson B & Martinou JC 2000 Bid induces the oligomerization and insertion of Bax into the outer mitochondrial membrane. Molecular and Cellular Biology20929-935. (doi:10.1128/mcb.20.3.929-935.2000)
  50. 50.Kuwana T, Bouchier-Hayes L, Chipuk JE, Bonzon C, Sullivan BA, Green DR & Newmeyer DD 2005 BH3 Domains of BH3-Only Proteins Differentially Regulate Bax-Mediated Mitochondrial Membrane Permeabilization Both Directly and Indirectly. Molecular Cell17525-535. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.003)
  51. 51.Letai A, Bassik MC, Walensky LD, Sorcinelli MD, Weiler S & Korsmeyer SJ 2002 Distinct BH3 domains either sensitize or activate mitochondrial apoptosis, serving as prototype cancer therapeutics. Cancer Cell2183-192. (doi:10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00127-7)
  52. 52.Wei T, Ni Y, Hou J, Chen C, Zhao B & Xin W 2000 Hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative damage and apoptosis in cerebellar granule cells: protection by Ginkgo biloba extract. Pharmacological Research41427-433. (doi:10.1006/phrs.1999.0604)
  53. 53.Llambi F, Moldoveanu T, Tait SWG, Bouchier-Hayes L, Temirov J, McCormick LL, Dillon CP & Green DR 2011 A unified model of mammalian BCL-2 protein family interactions at the mitochondria. Molecular Cell44517-531. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.10.001)
  54. 54.Warr MR, Acoca S, Liu Z, Germain M, Watson M, Blanchette M, Wing SS & Shore GC 2005 BH3-ligand regulates access of MCL-1 to its E3 ligase. FEBS Letters5795603-5608. (doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.09.028)
  55. 55.Wertz IE, Kusam S, Lam C, Okamoto T, Sandoval W, Anderson DJ, Helgason E, Ernst JA, Eby M, Liu Jet al.2011 Sensitivity to antitubulin chemotherapeutics is regulated by MCL1 and FBW7. Nature471110-114. (doi:10.1038/nature09779)
  56. 56.Ulrich Maurer, Ce´line Charvet, Allan S. Wagman, Emmanuel Dejardin, and Douglas R. Green. Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Regulates Mitochondrial Outer Membrane Permeabilization and Apoptosis by Destabilization of MCL-1. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.009)
  57. 57.Huang T, Song C, Zheng L, Xia L, Li Y & Zhou Y 2019a The roles of extracellular vesicles in gastric cancer development, microenvironment, anti-cancer drug resistance, and therapy. Molecular Cancer1862. (doi:10.1186/s12943-019-0967-5)
  58. 58.Singh R, Letai A & Sarosiek K 2019 Regulation of apoptosis in health and disease: the balancing act of BCL-2 family proteins. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology20175-193. (doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0089-8)
  59. 59.Li J, Simpson L, Takahashi M, Miliaresis C, Myers MP, Tonks N & Parsons R 1998 The PTEN/MMAC1 Tumor Suppressor Induces Cell Death That Is Rescued by the AKT/Protein Kinase B Oncogene. Cancer Research585667-5672
  60. 60.Luo X, Budihardjo I, Zou H, Slaughter C & Wang X 1998 Bid, a Bcl2 interacting protein, mediates cytochrome c release from mitochondria in response to activation of cell surface death receptors. Cell94481-490. (doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81589-5)
  61. 61.Jeffers JR, Parganas E, Lee Y, Yang C, Wang J, Brennan J, MacLean KH, Han J, Chittenden T, Ihle JNet al.2003 Puma is an essential mediator of p53-dependent and -independent apoptotic pathways. Cancer Cell4321-328. (doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00244-7)
  62. 62.Nakano K & Vousden KH 2001 PUMA, a novel proapoptotic gene, is induced by p53. Molecular Cell7683-694. (doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00214-3)
  63. 63.Oda K, Arakawa H, Tanaka T, Matsuda K, Tanikawa C, Mori T, Nishimori H, Tamai K, Tokino T, Nakamura Yet al.2000 p53AIP1, a potential mediator of p53-dependent apoptosis, and its regulation by Ser-46-phosphorylated p53.Cell102849-862. (doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00073-8)
  64. 64.Villunger A, Michalak EM, Coultas L, Müllauer F, Böck G, Ausserlechner MJ, Adams JM & Strasser A 2003 p53- and Drug-Induced Apoptotic Responses Mediated by BH3-Only Proteins Puma and Noxa. Science3021036-1038. (doi:10.1126/science.1090072)
  65. 65.Dijkers PF, Medema RH, Lammers JW, Koenderman L & Coffer PJ 2000 Expression of the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family member Bim is regulated by the forkhead transcription factor FKHR-L1. Current Biology: CB101201-1204. (doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00728-4)
  66. 66.Puthalakath H, O’Reilly LA, Gunn P, Lee L, Kelly PN, Huntington ND, Hughes PD, Michalak EM, McKimm-Breschkin J, Motoyama Net al.2007 ER Stress Triggers Apoptosis by Activating BH3-Only Protein Bim. Cell1291337-1349. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.027)
  67. 67.Urbich C, Knau A, Fichtlscherer S, Walter DH, Brühl T, Potente M, Hofmann WK, de Vos S, Zeiher AM & Dimmeler S 2005 FOXO-dependent expression of the proapoptotic protein Bim: pivotal role for apoptosis signaling in endothelial progenitor cells. FASEB Journal: Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology19974-976. (doi:10.1096/fj.04-2727fje)
  68. 68.Datta SR, Dudek H, Tao X, Masters S, Fu H, Gotoh Y & Greenberg ME 1997 Akt Phosphorylation of BAD Couples Survival Signals to the Cell-Intrinsic Death Machinery. Cell91231-241. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80405-5)
  69. 69.del Peso L, González-García M, Page C, Herrera R & Nuñez G 1997 Interleukin-3-induced phosphorylation of BAD through the protein kinase Akt.Science (New York, N.Y.)278687-689. (doi:10.1126/science.278.5338.687)
  70. 70.Zha J, Harada H, Yang E, Jockel J & Korsmeyer SJ 1996 Serine phosphorylation of death agonist BAD in response to survival factor results in binding to 14-3-3 not BCL-X(L). Cell87619-628. (doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81382-3)
  71. 71.Lartigue L, Kushnareva Y, Seong Y, Lin H, Faustin B & Newmeyer DD 2009 Caspase-independent Mitochondrial Cell Death Results from Loss of Respiration, Not Cytotoxic Protein Release. Molecular Biology of the Cell204871-4884. (doi:10.1091/mbc.e09-07-0649)
  72. 72.Allan LA & Clarke PR 2009 Apoptosis and autophagy: Regulation of caspase-9 by phosphorylation. The FEBS Journal2766063-6073. (doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07330.x)
  73. 73.Nagata S 1997 Apoptosis by death factor. Cell88355-365. (doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81874-7)
  74. 74.Kischkel FC, Hellbardt S, Behrmann I, Germer M, Pawlita M, Krammer PH & Peter ME 1995 Cytotoxicity-dependent APO-1 (Fas/CD95)-associated proteins form a death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) with the receptor. The EMBO Journal145579-5588. (doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00245.x)
  75. 75.Newton K & Dixit VM 2012 Signaling in innate immunity and inflammation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology4. (doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006049)
  76. 76.Boatright KM & Salvesen GS 2003 Mechanisms of caspase activation. Current Opinion in Cell Biology15725-731. (doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2003.10.009)
  77. 77.Billen LP, Kokoski CL, Lovell JF, Leber B & Andrews DW 2008 Bcl-XL Inhibits Membrane Permeabilization by Competing with Bax. PLOS Biology6e147. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060147)
  78. 78.Medina CB & Ravichandran KS 2016 Do not let death do us part: ‘find-me’ signals in communication between dying cells and the phagocytes. Cell Death & Differentiation23979-989. (doi:10.1038/cdd.2016.13)
  79. 79.Nagata S 2018 Apoptosis and Clearance of Apoptotic Cells. Annual Review of Immunology36489-517. (doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053010)
  80. 80.Hanahan D & Weinberg RA 2011 Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell144646-674. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013)
  81. 81.Fox JL & MacFarlane M 2016 Targeting cell death signalling in cancer: minimising “Collateral damage.”British Journal of Cancer1155-11. (doi:10.1038/bjc.2016.111)
  82. 82.Janic A, Valente LJ, Wakefield MJ, Di Stefano L, Milla L, Wilcox S, Yang H, Tai L, Vandenberg CJ, Kueh AJet al.2018 DNA repair processes are critical mediators of p53-dependent tumor suppression. Nature Medicine24947-953. (doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0043-5)
  83. 83.Vousden KH & Lane DP 2007 p53 in health and disease. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology8275-283. (doi:10.1038/nrm2147)
  84. 84.Strasser A, Harris AW, Bath ML & Cory S 1990 Novel primitive lymphoid tumours induced in transgenic mice by cooperation between myc and bcl-2. Nature348331-333. (doi:10.1038/348331a0)
  85. 85.Vaux DL, Cory S & Adams JM 1988 Bcl-2 gene promotes haemopoietic cell survival and cooperates with c-myc to immortalize pre-B cells. Nature335440-442. (doi:10.1038/335440a0)
  86. 86.MacFarlane M, Kohlhaas SL, Sutcliffe MJ, Dyer MJS & Cohen GM 2005 TRAIL Receptor-Selective Mutants Signal to Apoptosis via TRAIL-R1 in Primary Lymphoid Malignancies. Cancer Research6511265-11270. (doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2801)
  87. 87.Jo M, Kim TH, Seol DW, Esplen JE, Dorko K, Billiar TR & Strom SC 2000 Apoptosis induced in normal human hepatocytes by tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. Nature Medicine6564-567. (doi:10.1038/75045)
  88. 88.Leverkus M, Neumann M, Mengling T, Rauch CT, Bröcker E-B, Krammer PH & Walczak H 2000 Regulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand Sensitivity in Primary and Transformed Human Keratinocytes. Cancer Research60553-559
  89. 89.von Karstedt S, Conti A, Nobis M, Montinaro A, Hartwig T, Lemke J, Legler K, Annewanter F, Campbell AD, Taraborrelli Let al.2015 Cancer cell-autonomous TRAIL-R signaling promotes KRAS-driven cancer progression, invasion, and metastasis.Cancer Cell27561-573. (doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2015.02.014)
  90. 90.Volkmann X, Fischer U, Bahr MJ, Ott M, Lehner F, Macfarlane M, Cohen GM, Manns MP, Schulze-Osthoff K & Bantel H 2007 Increased hepatotoxicity of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in diseased human liver.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)461498-1508. (doi:10.1002/hep.21846)
  91. 91.Haselmann V, Kurz A, Bertsch U, Hübner S, Olempska–Müller M, Fritsch J, Häsler R, Pickl A, Fritsche H, Annewanter Fet al.2014 Nuclear Death Receptor TRAIL-R2 Inhibits Maturation of Let-7 and Promotes Proliferation of Pancreatic and Other Tumor Cells.Gastroenterology146278-290. (doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.009)
  92. 92.Lovric MM & Hawkins CJ 2010 TRAIL treatment provokes mutations in surviving cells. Oncogene295048-5060. (doi:10.1038/onc.2010.242)
  93. 93.Infante JR, Dees EC, Olszanski AJ, Dhuria SV, Sen S, Cameron S & Cohen RB 2014 Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of LCL161, an Oral Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology323103-3110. (doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.52.3993)
  94. 94.Bedoui S, Herold MJ & Strasser A 2020 Emerging connectivity of programmed cell death pathways and its physiological implications.Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology21678-695. (doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0270-8)
  95. 95.Liebl MC & Hofmann TG 2019 Cell Fate Regulation upon DNA Damage: p53 Serine 46 Kinases Pave the Cell Death Road. BioEssays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology41e1900127. (doi:10.1002/bies.201900127)
  96. 96.Liu J-R, Wu Y-M, Xu G-M, Gao L-G, Ma Y, Shi X-M & Zhang G-J 2019 Low-temperature plasma induced melanoma apoptosis by triggering a p53/PIGs/caspase-dependent pathwayin vivoandin vitro. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics52315204. (doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ab1ca9)
  97. 97.Hafner A, Bulyk ML, Jambhekar A & Lahav G 2019 The multiple mechanisms that regulate p53 activity and cell fate.Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology20199-210. (doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0110-x)
  98. 98.Kruse J-P & Gu W 2009 MSL2 promotes Mdm2-independent cytoplasmic localization of p53.The Journal of Biological Chemistry2843250-3263. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M805658200)
  99. 99.Di Stefano V, Rinaldo C, Sacchi A, Soddu S & D’Orazi G 2004 Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 activity and p53 phosphorylation are critical events for cisplatin-mediated apoptosis.Experimental Cell Research293311-320. (doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2003.09.032)
  100. 100.Ichwan SJA, Yamada S, Sumrejkanchanakij P, Ibrahim-Auerkari E, Eto K & Ikeda M-A 2006 Defect in serine 46 phosphorylation of p53 contributes to acquisition of p53 resistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Oncogene251216-1224. (doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209158)
  101. 101.Okamura S, Arakawa H, Tanaka T, Nakanishi H, Ng CC, Taya Y, Monden M & Nakamura Y 2001 p53DINP1, a p53-inducible gene, regulates p53-dependent apoptosis. Molecular Cell885-94. (doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00284-2)
  102. 102.D’Orazi G, Cecchinelli B, Bruno T, Manni I, Higashimoto Y, Saito S, Gostissa M, Coen S, Marchetti A, Del Sal Get al.2002 Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 phosphorylates p53 at Ser 46 and mediates apoptosis.Nature Cell Biology411-19. (doi:10.1038/ncb714)
  103. 103.Hofmann TG, Möller A, Sirma H, Zentgraf H, Taya Y, Dröge W, Will H & Schmitz ML 2002 Regulation of p53 activity by its interaction with homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2. Nature Cell Biology41-10. (doi:10.1038/ncb715)
  104. 104.Taira N, Nihira K, Yamaguchi T, Miki Y & Yoshida K 2007 DYRK2 is targeted to the nucleus and controls p53 via Ser46 phosphorylation in the apoptotic response to DNA damage. Molecular Cell25725-738. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.007)
  105. 105.Pfeffer CM & Singh ATK 2018 Apoptosis: A Target for Anticancer Therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences19. (doi:10.3390/ijms19020448)
  106. 106.La Porta CAM & Zapperi S 2017 Complexity in cancer stem cells and tumor evolution: Toward precision medicine.Seminars in Cancer Biology443-9. (doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.02.007)
  107. 107.Thoma C 2017 Bladder cancer: The promise of liquid biopsy ctDNA analysis.Nature Reviews. Urology14580-581. (doi:10.1038/nrurol.2017.138)
  108. 108.Labi V & Erlacher M 2015 How cell death shapes cancer. Cell Death & Disease6e1675–e1675. (doi:10.1038/cddis.2015.20)
  109. 109.Fogarty CE & Bergmann A 2017 Killers creating new life: caspases drive apoptosis-induced proliferation in tissue repair and disease. Cell Death and Differentiation241390-1400. (doi:10.1038/cdd.2017.47)
  110. 110.Donato AL, Huang Q, Liu X, Li F, Zimmerman MA & Li C-Y 2014 Caspase 3 promotes surviving melanoma tumor cell growth after cytotoxic therapy. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology1341686-1692. (doi:10.1038/jid.2014.18)
  111. 111.Huang Q, Li F, Liu X, Li W, Shi W, Liu F-F, O’Sullivan B, He Z, Peng Y, Tan A-Cet al.2011 Caspase 3–mediated stimulation of tumor cell repopulation during cancer radiotherapy. Nature Medicine17860-866. (doi:10.1038/nm.2385)
  112. 112.Huang K, O’Neill KL, Li J, Zhou W, Han N, Pang X, Wu W, Struble L, Borgstahl G, Liu Zet al.2019b BH3-only proteins target BCL-xL/MCL-1, not BAX/BAK, to initiate apoptosis. Cell Research29942-952. (doi:10.1038/s41422-019-0231-y)
  113. 113.Segawa K & Nagata S 2015 An Apoptotic ‘Eat Me’ Signal: Phosphatidylserine Exposure. Trends in Cell Biology25639-650. (doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2015.08.003)
  114. 114.Wang H, Cai J, Du S, Guo Z, Xin B, Wang J, Wei W & Shen X 2017 Fractalkine/CX3CR1 induces apoptosis resistance and proliferation through the activation of the AKT/NF-κB cascade in pancreatic cancer cells. Cell Biochemistry and Function35315-326. (doi:10.1002/cbf.3278)
  115. 115.Werfel TA & Cook RS 2018 Efferocytosis in the tumor microenvironment. Seminars in Immunopathology40545-554. (doi:10.1007/s00281-018-0698-5)
  116. 116.Ford CA, Petrova S, Pound JD, Voss JJLP, Melville L, Paterson M, Farnworth SL, Gallimore AM, Cuff S, Wheadon Het al.2015 Oncogenic properties of apoptotic tumor cells in aggressive B cell lymphoma.Current Biology: CB25577-588. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.059)
  117. 117.Fulda S 2009b Tumor resistance to apoptosis. International Journal of Cancer124511-515. (doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24064)
  118. 118.Plati J, Bucur O & Khosravi-Far R 2008 Dysregulation of apoptotic signaling in cancer: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry1041124-1149. (doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.21707)
  119. 119.Gacche RN & Assaraf YG 2018 Redundant angiogenic signaling and tumor drug resistance. Drug Resistance Updates3647-76. (doi:10.1016/j.drup.2018.01.002)
  120. 120.Gottesman MM, Fojo T & Bates SE 2002 Multidrug resistance in cancer: role of ATP-dependent transporters. Nature Reviews. Cancer248-58. (doi:10.1038/nrc706)10.1038/nrc706)
  121. 121.Leonetti A, Sharma S, Minari R, Perego P, Giovannetti E & Tiseo M 2019 Resistance mechanisms to osimertinib in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. British Journal of Cancer121725-737. (doi:10.1038/s41416-019-0573-8)
  122. 122.Robey RW, Pluchino KM, Hall MD, Fojo AT, Bates SE & Gottesman MM 2018 Revisiting the role of ABC transporters in multidrug-resistant cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer18452-464. (doi:10.1038/s41568-018-0005-8)
  123. 123.Assaraf YG, Brozovic A, Gonçalves AC, Jurkovicova D, Linē A, Machuqueiro M, Saponara S, Sarmento-Ribeiro AB, Xavier CPR & Vasconcelos MH 2019 The multi-factorial nature of clinical multidrug resistance in cancer. Drug Resistance Updates: Reviews and Commentaries in Antimicrobial and Anticancer Chemotherapy46100645. (doi:10.1016/j.drup.2019.100645)
  124. 124.Goler-Baron V & Assaraf YG 2011 Structure and function of ABCG2-rich extracellular vesicles mediating multidrug resistance. PloS One6e16007. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016007)
  125. 125.Mansoori B, Mohammadi A, Davudian S, Shirjang S & Baradaran B 2017 The Different Mechanisms of Cancer Drug Resistance: A Brief Review.Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin. (doi:10.15171/apb.2017.041)
  126. 126.Sherlach KS & Roepe PD 2014 Drug resistance associated membrane proteins. Frontiers in Physiology5108. (doi:10.3389/fphys.2014.00108)
  127. 127.Adams JM & Cory S 1998 The Bcl-2 protein family: arbiters of cell survival.Science (New York, N.Y.)2811322-1326. (doi:10.1126/science.281.5381.1322)
  128. 128.Kale J, Osterlund EJ & Andrews DW 2018 BCL-2 family proteins: changing partners in the dance towards death. Cell Death & Differentiation2565-80. (doi:10.1038/cdd.2017.186)
  129. 129.Lomonosova E & Chinnadurai G 2008 BH3-only proteins in apoptosis and beyond: an overview. Oncogene27Suppl 1S2-19. (doi:10.1038/onc.2009.39)
  130. 130.Delbridge ARD, Pang SHM, Vandenberg CJ, Grabow S, Aubrey BJ, Tai L, Herold MJ & Strasser A 2016 RAG-induced DNA lesions activate proapoptotic BIM to suppress lymphomagenesis in p53-deficient mice. The Journal of Experimental Medicine2132039-2048. (doi:10.1084/jem.20150477)
  131. 131.Glab JA, Doerflinger M & Puthalakath H 2017 BH3-only proteins: the thorny end of the ER stress response. Cell Death & Disease8e2889. (doi:10.1038/cddis.2017.283)
  132. 132.Huang DC & Strasser A 2000 BH3-Only proteins-essential initiators of apoptotic cell death. Cell103839-842. (doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00187-2)
  133. 133.Suvarna V, Singh V & Murahari M 2019 Current overview on the clinical update of Bcl-2 anti-apoptotic inhibitors for cancer therapy. European Journal of Pharmacology862172655. (doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172655)
  134. 134.Maji S, Panda S, Samal SK, Shriwas O, Rath R, Pellecchia M, Emdad L, Das SK, Fisher PB & Dash R 2018 Chapter Three - Bcl-2 Antiapoptotic Family Proteins and Chemoresistance in Cancer. InAdvances in Cancer Research, pp 37-75. Eds KD Tew & PB Fisher. Academic Press. (doi:10.1016/bs.acr.2017.11.001)
  135. 135.Quinn BA, Dash R, Azab B, Sarkar S, Das SK, Kumar S, Oyesanya RA, Dasgupta S, Dent P, Grant Set al.2011 Targeting Mcl-1 for the therapy of cancer.Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs201397-1411. (doi:10.1517/13543784.2011.609167)
  136. 136.Krajewska M, Moss SF, Krajewski S, Song K, Holt PR & Reed JC 1996 Elevated expression of Bcl-X and reduced Bak in primary colorectal adenocarcinomas. Cancer Research562422-2427
  137. 137.Minn AJ, Rudin CM, Boise LH & Thompson CB 1995 Expression of bcl-xL can confer a multidrug resistance phenotype. Blood861903-1910
  138. 138.Williams J, Lucas PC, Griffith KA, Choi M, Fogoros S, Hu YY & Liu JR 2005 Expression of Bcl-xL in ovarian carcinoma is associated with chemoresistance and recurrent disease. Gynecologic Oncology96287-295. (doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.10.026)
  139. 139.Yang D, Chen M-B, Wang L-Q, Yang L, Liu C-Y & Lu P-H 2013 Bcl-2 expression predicts sensitivity to chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research32105. (doi:10.1186/1756-9966-32-105)
  140. 140.Pepper C, Hoy T & Bentley DP 1997 Bcl-2/Bax ratios in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and their correlation with in vitro apoptosis and clinical resistance. British Journal of Cancer76935-938. (doi:10.1038/bjc.1997.487)
  141. 141.Czabotar PE, Lessene G, Strasser A & Adams JM 2014 Control of apoptosis by the BCL-2 protein family: implications for physiology and therapy. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology1549-63. (doi:10.1038/nrm3722)
  142. 142.Jeng L-B, Kumar Velmurugan B, Chen M-C, Hsu H-H, Ho T-J, Day C-H, Lin Y-M, Padma VV, Tu C-C & Huang C-Y 2018 Fisetin mediated apoptotic cell death in parental and Oxaliplatin/irinotecan resistant colorectal cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Cellular Physiology2337134-7142. (doi:10.1002/jcp.26532)
  143. 143.Chen W, Li N, Chen T, Han Y, Li C, Wang Y, He W, Zhang L, Wan T & Cao X 2005 The lysosome-associated apoptosis-inducing protein containing the pleckstrin homology (PH) and FYVE domains (LAPF), representative of a novel family of PH and FYVE domain-containing proteins, induces caspase-independent apoptosis via the lysosomal-mitochondrial pathway. The Journal of Biological Chemistry28040985-40995. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M502190200)
  144. 144.Roberts AW, Davids MS, Pagel JM, Kahl BS, Puvvada SD, Gerecitano JF, Kipps TJ, Anderson MA, Brown JR, Gressick Let al.2016 Targeting BCL2 with Venetoclax in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.New England Journal of Medicine374311-322. (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1513257)
  145. 145.Wilson WH, O’Connor OA, Czuczman MS, LaCasce AS, Gerecitano JF, Leonard JP, Tulpule A, Dunleavy K, Xiong H, Chiu Y-Let al.2010 Navitoclax, a targeted high-affinity inhibitor of BCL-2, in lymphoid malignancies: a phase 1 dose-escalation study of safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumour activity. The Lancet. Oncology111149-1159. (doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70261-8)
  146. 146.Mason KD, Vandenberg CJ, Scott CL, Wei AH, Cory S, Huang DCS & Roberts AW 2008 In vivo efficacy of the Bcl-2 antagonist ABT-737 against aggressive Myc-driven lymphomas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America10517961-17966. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0809957105)
  147. 147.Sasi BK, Martines C, Xerxa E, Porro F, Kalkan H, Fazio R, Turkalj S, Bojnik E, Pyrzynska B, Stachura Jet al.2019 Inhibition of SYK or BTK augments venetoclax sensitivity in SHP1-negative/BCL-2-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leukemia332416-2428. (doi:10.1038/s41375-019-0442-8)
  148. 148.Han B, Park D, Li R, Xie M, Owonikoko TK, Zhang G, Sica GL, Ding C, Zhou J, Magis ATet al.2015 Small-Molecule Bcl2 BH4 Antagonist for Lung Cancer Therapy. Cancer Cell27852-863. (doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.010)
  149. 149.Dexheimer TS, Sun D & Hurley LH 2006 Deconvoluting the structural and drug-recognition complexity of the G-quadruplex-forming region upstream of the bcl-2 P1 promoter. Journal of the American Chemical Society1285404-5415. (doi:10.1021/ja0563861)
  150. 150.Sun H, Xiang J, Shi Y, Yang Q, Guan A, Li Q, Yu L, Shang Q, Zhang H, Tang Yet al.2014 A newly identified G-quadruplex as a potential target regulating Bcl-2 expression.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects18403052-3057. (doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.07.014)
  151. 151.Follis AV, Chipuk JE, Fisher JC, Yun M-K, Grace CR, Nourse A, Baran K, Ou L, Min L, White SWet al.2013 PUMA binding induces partial unfolding within BCL-xL to disrupt p53 binding and promote apoptosis.Nature Chemical Biology9163-168. (doi:10.1038/nchembio.1166)
  152. 152.Hao Q, Chen J, Liao J, Huang Y, Larisch S, Zeng SX, Lu H & Zhou X 2020 p53 induces ARTS to promote mitochondrial apoptosis. BioRxiv 2020.05.14.096982. (doi:10.1101/2020.05.14.096982)
  153. 153.Adams JM & Cory S 2018 The BCL-2 arbiters of apoptosis and their growing role as cancer targets. Cell Death and Differentiation2527-36. (doi:10.1038/cdd.2017.161)
  154. 154.Müschen M & Beckmann MW 2000 CD95 ligand expression as a criterion of malignant transformation in breast cancer. The Journal of Pathology191468-470. (doi:10.1002/1096-9896(200008)191:4<468::AID-PATH647>3.0.CO;2-J)
  155. 155.Tourneur L, Buzyn A & Chiocchia G 2005 FADD adaptor in cancer.Medical Immunology (London, England)41. (doi:10.1186/1476-9433-4-1)
  156. 156.Müschen M, Rajewsky K, Krönke M & Küppers R 2002 The origin of CD95-gene mutations in B-cell lymphoma. Trends in Immunology2375-80. (doi:10.1016/s1471-4906(01)02115-9)
  157. 157.Tourneur L, Delluc S, Lévy V, Valensi F, Radford-Weiss I, Legrand O, Vargaftig J, Boix C, Macintyre EA, Varet Bet al.2004 Absence or low expression of fas-associated protein with death domain in acute myeloid leukemia cells predicts resistance to chemotherapy and poor outcome. Cancer Research648101-8108. (doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2361)
  158. 158.Shivapurkar N, Toyooka S, Eby MT, Huang CX, Sathyanarayana UG, Cunningham HT, Reddy JL, Brambilla E, Takahashi T, Minna JDet al.2002 Differential inactivation of caspase-8 in lung cancers.Cancer Biology and Therapy165-69. (doi:10.4161/cbt.1.1.43)
  159. 159.Teitz T, Wei T, Valentine MB, Vanin EF, Grenet J, Valentine VA, Behm FG, Look AT, Lahti JM & Kidd VJ 2000 Caspase 8 is deleted or silenced preferentially in childhood neuroblastomas with amplification of MYCN. Nature Medicine6529-535. (doi:10.1038/75007)
  160. 160.Zhang L, Zhu H, Teraishi F, Davis JJ, Guo W, Fan Z & Fang B 2005 Accelerated Degradation of Caspase-8 Protein Correlates with TRAIL Resistance in a DLD1 Human Colon Cancer Cell Line. Neoplasia7594-602. (doi:10.1593/neo.04688)
  161. 161.Almasan A & Ashkenazi A 2003 Apo2L/TRAIL: apoptosis signaling, biology, and potential for cancer therapy. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews14337-348. (doi:10.1016/S1359-6101(03)00029-7)
  162. 162.Amarante-Mendes GP & Griffith TS 2015 Therapeutic applications of TRAIL receptor agonists in cancer and beyond. Pharmacology & Therapeutics155117-131. (doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.09.001)
  163. 163.Bucur O, Gaidos G, Yatawara A, Pennarun B, Rupasinghe C, Roux J, Andrei S, Guo B, Panaitiu A, Pellegrini Met al.2015 A novel caspase 8 selective small molecule potentiates TRAIL-induced cell death. Scientific Reports59893. (doi:10.1038/srep09893)
  164. 164.Ashkenazi A, Pai RC, Fong S, Leung S, Lawrence DA, Marsters SA, Blackie C, Chang L, McMurtrey AE, Hebert Aet al.1999 Safety and antitumor activity of recombinant soluble Apo2 ligand.The Journal of Clinical Investigation104155-162. (doi:10.1172/JCI6926)
  165. 165.LeBlanc HN & Ashkenazi A 2003 Apo2L/TRAIL and its death and decoy receptors. Cell Death and Differentiation1066-75. (doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401187)
  166. 166.Sasaki H, Sheng Y, Kotsuji F & Tsang BK 2000 Down-Regulation of X-linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein Induces Apoptosis in Chemoresistant Human Ovarian Cancer Cells. Cancer Research605659-5666
  167. 167.Holcik M, Yeh C, Korneluk RG & Chow T 2000 Translational upregulation of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) increases resistance to radiation induced cell death. Oncogene194174-4177. (doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1203765)
  168. 168.Amantana A, London CA, Iversen PL & Devi GR 2004 X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein inhibition induces apoptosis and enhances chemotherapy sensitivity in human prostate cancer cells. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics3699-707
  169. 169.Fulda S 2015 Promises and Challenges of Smac Mimetics as Cancer Therapeutics. Clinical Cancer Research: An Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research215030-5036. (doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0365)

Written By

Hilal Kalkan

Submitted: February 15th, 2021Reviewed: March 17th, 2021Published: April 13th, 2021