Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Airway Management in COVID-19 as Aerosol Generating Procedure

Written By

Nabil A. Shallik, Muhammad Firas Khader Alhammad, Yasser Mahmoud Hammad Ali Hammad, Elfert Amr, Shakeel Moideen and Mashael Abdulrahman M.S. Al Khelaifi

Submitted: 16 March 2020 Reviewed: 26 February 2021 Published: 30 March 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.96889

From the Edited Volume

Special Considerations in Human Airway Management

Edited by Nabil A. Shallik

Chapter metrics overview

492 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

2020 has seen the whole world battling a pandemic. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is primarily transmitted through respiratory droplets when in close contact with an infected person, by direct contact, or by contact with contaminated objects and surfaces. Aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) like intubation have a high chance of generating large concentrations of infectious aerosols. AGPs potentially put healthcare workers at an increased risk of contracting the infection, and therefore special precautions are necessary during intubation. The procedure has to be performed by an expert operator who uses appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Modifications of known techniques have helped to reduce the chances of contracting the infection from patients. The use of checklists has become standard safe practice. This chapter looks at the current knowledge we have regarding this illness and how we should modify our practice to make managing the airway both safer for the patient and the healthcare workers involved. It addresses the preparation, staff protection, technical aspects and aftercare of patients who need airway intervention. It recommends simulation training to familiarize staff with modifications to routine airway management.

Keywords

  • coronavirus
  • airway management
  • intubation
  • covid 19
  • novel virus
  • aerosol generating procedures

1. Introduction

The current outbreak of the novel coronavirus (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 – SARS CoV-2) (COVID-19) was first reported as a cluster of pneumonia cases on Dec 31st, 2019 from Wuhan, Hubei province, China. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 as a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on Jan 30th, 2020, and on March 11th, 2020 WHO characterized the spread of coronavirus as a pandemic.

We know that COVID-19 is primarily spread through respiratory droplets when in close contact with an infected person, or by contact with contaminated objects and surfaces. This puts healthcare workers attending to an infective patient at risk of contracting the illness, and airway management, being an AGP, would be the riskiest of all interventions. AGPs like intubation have a high chance of generating large concentrations of infectious aerosols. Therefore, special precautions are necessary during intubation. The procedure has to be performed by an expert operator who uses personal protective equipment (PPE) such as FFP3 or N95 masks, protective goggles, disposable long sleeved gowns, disposable double gloves and leg coverings. It is important to recognize mask ventilation and open suctioning of airways as AGPs. If possible, thorough preoxygenation and a rapid sequence induction and intubation (RSII) should be performed. Heat and moisture exchanger (HME) must be positioned between the mask and the breathing circuit or between the mask and the ventilation balloon. Personnel involved in the room should be kept to a minimum and this should be decided beforehand. Small changes to what we know as conventional airway management has been studied and improved upon to keep both COVID 19 patients and staff looking after them safe. This chapter looks at the details inside operating theater and kindly note that the airway management of COVID 19 patient in Intensive care settings are discussed in much details in other chapter in this book.

Advertisement

2. Epidemiology

Corona virus pandemic has evolved since December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Starting from Wuhan the novel virus named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) invaded all the over the globe [1], causing corona virus disease 2019 (COVID 19) [2]. As of July 2020, infected cases are increasing incredibly around the world. Based on current real-time reports, the estimated infected cases is fifteen million cases reported and more than 610.000 deaths worldwide [3]. The number of infected cases is expected to increase as the second peak is rising in most countries.

Advertisement

3. Transmission

COVID19 pandemic started as an outbreak in Wuhan with mainly transmission from animal to human. This theory was raised after most primarily infected people had visited or worked in seafood the market at Wuhan [4], and later on person to person transmission has been identified [5].

It is well known today that corona virus transmission is established by droplet. This is simply droplets with size 5–10 micron that can carry the virus. However till there is now no clear evidence to support airborne transmission (droplets size less than 5 micron which can carry the virus and able to remain in air for a period of time) but considering that this is still possible, the recommendation is to manage aerosols generating procedures as highly contaminating [6]. Experimental studies have revealed that the virus can be detected on different surfaces after these surfaces are exposed to the virus between 4 hours to 3 days depending on the surface type, the virus is more stable on plastic and stainless-steel surfaces [7].

Advertisement

4. Airway assessment

Airway assessment is recommended whenever there is airway management. Generally speaking the evidence behind airway assessment does not show high specificity nor sensitivity except for previous difficult intubation history, COVID 19 patients mostly need urgent or emergent interventions i.e. intubation. In these circumstances’ airway evaluation is not always practical It is worth mentioning that most of these patients are critically ill. COVID 19 is known to cause laryngitis and upper airway oedema is not uncommon in this population which could make intubation challenging [8]. In COVID 19 patient’s general recommendation for airway assessment will apply when it is possible and unanticipated difficult airway should be kept in mind.

COVID 19 patients are critically ill which preclude standard airway assessment.

The difficult airway is defined as:

The difficult airway is “the clinical situation in which a conventionally trained anaesthesiologist experiences difficulty with facemask ventilation, difficulty in supraglottic device ventilation, difficulty in tracheal intubation or all three” [9].

4.1 Steps for airway assessment

History: previous difficult intubation history, last meal, previous critical events, smoking, drooling, dysphagia, recent burn in face or upper respiratory system, head or neck trauma, OSA, snoring hoarse voice stridor.

Physical examination: mouth, face, neck, teeth, Mallampati score.

Investigations: X-Ray, USG (ultrasonography), CT, MRI, nasal endoscopy, 3D & Virtual Endoscopy (VE), can be used for airway assessment.

Many score systems and tools have been developed to predict difficult airway; useful tools might be used like:

The 6 D methods (Table 1): [10], LEMON score system (Table 2) [11] MMMMASK mnemonics (Table 3), or OBESE mnemonics (Table 4). (please refer to other book’s chapters for more details).

Sign of difficultyDescriptionQuantitative or qualitative findings
reported to be associated with
difficulty
Acceptable findings not usually
associated with difficulty
1. Disproportion• Increased size of tongue in relation to pharyngeal size• Mallampati class III or IV• Mallampati class I or II
• Airway swelling• Possibly difficult to assess
• Airway trauma (blunt or penetrating)• Blunt or penetrating airway trauma• Midline trachea
• Tissue consolidation (e.g., secondary to radiation)• Tracheal deviation• No contractures of the neck
• Neck asymmetry• No surgical airway scar
2. Distortion• Neck mass• Voice changes• Mobile laryngeal anatomy
• Neck hematoma• Subcutaneous emphysema• Easily palpated thyroid cartilage
• Neck abscess• Laryngeal immobility• Easily palpated cricoid cartilage
• Arthritic changes in the neck joints• Nonpalpable thyroid cartilage
Previous surgical airway• Nonpalpable cricoid cartilage
3.Decreased
thyromental distance
• Anterior larynx and decreased mandibular space• Thyromental distance
>7 cm (˜3 finger breadths) measured from the superior aspect of the thyroid cartilage to the tip of the chin
• Thyromental distance ≥7 cm
(−3 finger breadths)
• Receding chin• No receding chin
4.Decreased
Inter-incisor gap
• Reduced mouth opening• Distance between upper and lower incisors (i.e., inter-incisor gap) <4 cm (<2 finger breadths)
• Mandibular condyle fracture
• Rigid cervical spine collar
• Inter-incisor gap <4 cm
(−2 finger breadths)
5. Decreased range of motion in any or all of the joints of the airway
(i.e., atlanto-occipital joint, temporomandibular joints, cervical spine);
atlantooccipital range of motion is critical for assuming the sniffing position
• Limited head extension
secondary to arthritis,
diabetes, or other diseases
• Head extension <35°• Head extension
≥35° of atlanto-occipital extension
• Previous neck radiation and/or radical surgery• Neck flexion <35°• Cervical spine flexion ≥35°
Neck contractures secondary to burns or trauma• Short, thick neck• Long, thin neck
Cervical spine collar or cervical spine immobilization• No cervical spine collar or cervical spine
6. Dental overbite• Large angled teeth
disrupting the alignment of the airway axes and possibly
decreasing the inte-rincisor gap
• Dental overbite• No dental overbite

Table 1.

Shows 6 D methods for airway assessment: [11].

LEMONCriterionScore
LLook externally:
• facial trauma
• large incisors
• beard or mustache
• large tongue
(1–4)
1
1
1
1
EEvaluate:
• incisor distance
• hyoid-mental distance
• thyroid-to-mouth distance
(1–3)
1
1
1
MMallampati1
OObstruction1
NNeck mobility1

Table 2.

Shows LEMON score for airway assessment [12].

MMMMASKDescription
MMale gender
MMask seal which is affected by bread or being edentulous
MMallampati grade 3or4
MMandibular
AAge
SSnoring and OSA
KKilograms (weight)

Table 3.

Shows MMMMASK mnemonics difficult airway.

OBESEDescription
OObese (BMI >26 kg/m2)
BBearded
EEdentulous
SSnoring
EElderly (>55 years)

Table 4.

Shows OBESE mnemonics for difficult mask ventilation.

The most important recommendation for health care provider who will take a history or will do examination of the airway of suspected or infected COVID 19, is to wear full PPE to protect himself or herself from the infection.

Advertisement

5. Personal protection and optimal environment

Health care workers (HCW) are at a high risk to be infected with SARS-COV-2 (COVID 19) in particular during any aerosol generating procedures. As discussed before the main transmission route appears to be by respiratory droplets and contact transmission. Not surprisingly these droplets have very high virus load [13]. In view of this protecting personnel who are managing airways in COVID 19 patients must be at the most priority. Aerosol generating procedures vary in their ability to infect HCW but intubation tracheostomy, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and bag mask ventilation (BMV) appear to carry the highest risk [14].

All efforts should be made to protect HCW providing airway management this will include many aspects to keep in mind. We can summarize them as following:

  • Full PPE (personal protective equipment)

  • Surface decontamination

  • Equipment decontamination

  • Negative pressure room

  • Minimizing health care workers during active procedure

  • Waste management

It is well known today that use of full PPE reduces the risk of infection in corona virus family [15], Based on retrospective study published on March 2020, hospital acquired infection was 41.3% from those 29% were health care workers from different specialties [16].

Level 3 (enhanced) is recommended in COVID 19 suspected or confirmed cases airway management for better understanding it is worth to mention here in summary what are the level of PERSONAL protection for healthcare workers [17] (Table 5).

Level 1 SICPsStandard Infection Control Precaution
  • Disposable apron

  • Disposable gloves

Level 2 CONTACTDIRECT/INDIRECT CONTACT PRECAUTIONS
  • Fluid-resistant disposable gown

  • Disposable gloves

Level 2 DROPLETDROPLET (RESPIRATORY) PRECAUTIONS
  • Fluid-resistant disposable gown

  • Disposable gloves

  • Fluid-resistant Type IIR surgical face mask and goggle or visor

Level 2 AIRBORNEAIRBORNE (RESPIRATORY) PRECAUTIONS
  • Fluid resistant disposable gown

  • disposable gloves

  • Filtering face piece 3 (FFP3) respirator and eye protection or a powered hood respirator

Level 3 ENHANCEDENHANCED PRECAUTIONS
  • Reinforced fluid-resistant long-sleeved surgical gown

  • Disposable fluid-resistant hood (if wearing a gown without an attached hood)

  • Full length disposable plastic apron

  • FFP3 respirator or powered hood respirator

  • Disposable full-face visor

  • 2 sets of long or extended cuff non-sterile, non-latex disposable gloves

  • Surgical wellington boots or closed shoes

  • Disposable boot covers

Table 5.

Levels of personal protective equipment (PPE) for healthcare workers when providing patient care. (copied from health protection Scotland, “levels of personal protective equipment (PPE) for ward patient care”).

The person who is performing the intubation should wear a third pair of gloves and remove them immediately after intubation [18].

Minimizing number of people during intubation is preferred in order to reduce risk of exposure. The interval time after intubation should be taken into consideration. The required waiting period will vary between 15 and 30 minutes [19].

Negative pressure rooms with good rates of air exchange (> 12 exchanges per hour) is recommended to minimize risk of airborne exposure, in case not available portable HEPA filters or negative air flow, can be considered to reduce risk.

It is very important to have a clear plan for the airway management team. The plan should be discussed in detail with clarifying the rescue one in case unanticipated difficult airway management appear.

Staff who should avoid involvement in airway management: Immunocompromised or pregnant health care workers are advised not enroll in airway management for COVID 19 patients. Also, HCW above age of 60 years old mortality curve will increase remarkably in COVID 19 and patients with cardiac disease chronic respiratory disease; diabetes; recent cancer; and perhaps hypertension that is why it is recommended to exclude HCW who have any of these co-morbidities [20].

Advertisement

6. Non-invasive methods of ventilation in aerosol generating procedure

6.1 Nasal cannula

Low-flow nasal oxygen (nasal cannula) may provide some oxygenation during apnoea (apnoeic oxygenation) and might therefore delay or reduce the extent of hypoxemia during tracheal intubation [21] however, literature suggests this beneficial effect might be worthless in patients with primary respiratory failure like in COVID 19 patients [22]. Till now, there is no evidence that low flow nasal canula can generate aerosols, in COVID 19 patients so, it is not recommended to use it routinely during intubation [23].

6.1.1 High flow nasal cannula

Using high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) 30–70 L/min significantly increases the risk of spreading exhaled gas [24], debate around using HFNC in COVID 19 considering it prolong apnoea time remarkably however there is few predisposed disadvantage: when used in deteriorating patients it is delaying intubation in severely ill patients who really need intubation, exhausting hospital oxygen reserves as a results in very high demand [25], when used during intubation risk of generating aerosol that carrying the virus [26].

Important note: after a few hours of ventilation by high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), the oropharyngeal airway and trachea become extremely dry, due to a high oxygen flow reaching 60 L/min. Which leads to difficulty in passing the endotracheal tube (ETT). So, make sure that the tube and the intubation equipment are very well lubricated to allow the tube to go easily through the vocal cords. Our personal experience is to soak the pharyngeal cavity with 10 ml 0.9% saline and some gel to allow a sufficient lubrication for this purpose.

6.1.2 Non-invasive ventilation

Data regarding use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in COVID 19 patients is limited but based on recent systematic review published recently the evidence for using NIV in COVID 19 patient is currently low in quality however it might reduce mortality and increase risk of healthcare worker transmission [27]. Many centres recommend to use NIV in view of limited resources in pandemic regions or using hyperbaric oxygen therapy in preventing mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 in other centers [28, 29, 30].

Advertisement

7. Intubation

7.1 Introduction

Endotracheal intubation is considered a very high-risk procedure in COVID 19 patients. For many reasons usually COVID 19 patients who need intubation urgently are critically ill patients with severe hypoxemia and respiratory failure. Desaturation is very quick because of depleted oxygen reserve and high consumption with regards to severe inflammatory status also involvement of other organ failure makes airway management of these cases are challenging. Special attention to the previous mentioned points may provide avoidance of major complications and avoidable deaths ensuring the safety of healthcare workers involved. Sever hypoxemia during ICU intubation has been reported in 25% [31]. In general, physiologically and anatomically airway management in critically ill patients consider challenging.

7.2 Before intubation

All equipment should be prepared with tracheal intubation checklist (see Figure 1) [33] and preferably COVID 19 airway intubation trolley to be prepared figure [34], medications should be prepared in advance, crash trolley should be handy before progress to intubation.

Figure 1.

Checking list an example of emergency intubation checklist from safe airway society [32].

7.2.1 Communication

In operating theater or in ICU setting delegated person, an outside-room “runner” to provide additional outside-room equipment and medications.

The runner can communicate with the inside personnel using special pager or phone kept inside water seal cover.

Optimizing communication: wearing full PPE make communication is really difficult so it is very important to use clear language with loud voice repeating the order to make sure communication is efficient. As recognizing a person with full PPE is somewhat difficult so, it is recommended to put sticker with individual name on top of visor [35].

7.2.2 Virus filters

Using of heat moisture exchanger (HME filter) has been advised by many centers which can filter the viruses including Corona virus by 99 percent. HME filter should be attached most proximal to patient i.e. directly to ETT or between the mask and bag of Ambu, another alternative to HME filter that can be used is high efficiency particulate air filter (HEPA filter). Another HME filter is kept between expiratory limb of anesthesia circuit and anesthesia machine (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Ventilation circuits setup (image courtesy Dr. Nabil Shallik).

7.2.3 Video laryngoscope

In covid 19 pandamic Video laryngoscopy is recommended as first line option for airway management the rational be [44]:

Higher chance for ETT pass first attempt, reducing chance of infection for the intubator by increasing the distance between the patient airway and the incubators face also use of special drapes is possible and might increase the level of protection, better intubation view can be achieved especially in full PPE situation where the face shield and googles (with fog) are obstructing clear view.

Two pieces of video laryngoscope (display, single use probe) are better to be used to make sure the intubator’s face is far away from the patient’s mouth during the procedure [36] in addition, first pass success rate is much higher in experienced manager with video laryngoscope than direct laryngoscope.

7.2.4 Pre-oxygenation

Preoxygenation is crucial part before intubating covid 19 patients as these patients are ill and prone to very rapid desaturation due to the nature of the disease. When it is possible 3–5 minutes of preoxygenation is recommended using non rebreathing mask with 10–15 liter/O2 which provide 100% Fio2, if NRM is not enough modified non invasive ventilation might needed with close circuit and HEPA filter. If bagging the patient is inventible for preoxygenation this should be done with two hand technique with HEPA filter however avoiding bagging the patient is always recommended when it is possible [38].

Ideally pre-oxygenation could avoid necessity of bag mask ventilation but there is no guarantee especially in critical COVID 19 patients.

Keeping the patient in 45 degree (reverse Trendelenburg positioning)may help in increasing apnea time improving the preoxygenation .

7.2.5 Fibroscopic intubation

Flexible bronchoscope can be used in anticipated difficult airway however, it is not advised to be used routinely. But if you in real need in difficult case, better to shift to single use fibro scope [37].

7.3 During intubation

Endotracheal Tube (ETT) confirmation site should be confirmed by ETCO2 because full PPE will make auscultation much difficult and using stethoscope impractical. Clinically observing chest rising may help in precluding unilateral intubation. Also seeing the ETT passing through vocal cord and recording using video laryngoscopic screen is the best way of confirmation of endotracheal intubation.

As most of COVID 19 patients who need mechanical ventilation will have ARDS so, lung protective mechanical ventilation strategies should be used (target tidal volume less than 6 mL·kg − 1 predicted body weight, plateau pressure ≤ 30 cm H20, target SaO2 88–95% and pH ≥ 7.25 [38].

The most experience intubator should perform the intubation in order to achieve high first pass success [39] and reduce the contamination and the intubator should use a technique which he is familiar and comfortable with.

Many of novel devices have been introduced trying to achieve high level of protection during the intubation procedure itself, like novel intubation plastic box and plastic cover. Yet there is no definite evidence that such these devices could really protect the intubator from the aerosols [40], few articles suggested that and current studies are ongoing to prove it.

One of the common novel devices recently introduced is intubation novel box. First time had been described by Dr. Lai Hsien-yung [41], The device composed of a transparent plastic cube covering a patient’s head and shoulders, with access holes for the intubating procedure and additional hole for an assistance. These device have been discussed in medical literature [42]but more commonly on social media and medical education websites, often being praised for their ingenuity (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Plastic intubation box (image courtesy Dr. Nabil Shallik).

Brown et al., has created “Barrier System for Airway Management of COVID-19 Patients” it is simply a plastic drape attached to a plastic bag as a protective measure during end tracheal intubation and extubation [43].

7.4 Some tips and tricks during intubation

  • Modified Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation (RSII) is advised as it reduces the time to intubation as securing the airway, with or without cricoid pressure. Drugs of choice are discussed later [44]

  • Bag mask ventilation should be minimized unless there it is indicated 3–5 minutes of pre-oxygenation with 100% will help.

  • Optimizing the patient position for intubation is recommended as any other intubation tool as video-laryngoscope will be used straight line head which suppose make the intubation more convenient, in obese patient ramping position is recommended.

  • In cardiovascular instability induction agents should be chosen carefully for the best hemodynamic stability i.e. (Ketamine, Etomidate).

  • Regardless of the choice of induction agents, ensure that the patient is deep enough before starting intubation to prevent coughing and straining during intubation and this will lead to aerosolization of organisms.

  • As RSII is recommended, the rapid acting muscle relaxant should be used in a good dose to ensure complete relaxation that the patient will not cough for example (Succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg, Rocuronium1.2 mg/kg).

  • As many patients could have severe hypotension, loaded vasopressors should be immediately available for bolus or infusion. Phenylephrine, Ephedrine can be used as a first line.

  • Some experts recommended Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) with good sealing as this might help to delay desaturation with apneic oxygenation, using proper size oral airway after induction will help in maintaining the airway patency. If CPAP is not enough to prevent desaturation, then bag-mask ventilation should start with two hand technique and minimal oxygen flow and minimal airway pressure (Figure 4).

  • While video-laryngoscope is the best option to start yet using adjunctive is pretty helpful for C-MAC Macintosh blade and C-MAC D-blade (Karle Storz, Germany); it is a good idea to use Gum Elastic Bougie (GEB) in case needed. Also, stylet can be used to ease intubation with GlideScope (Verathon, Burnby, BC, Canada). If video laryngoscope is not available for any reason direct laryngoscopy could be other option using Macintosh blade with Gum Elastic Bougie (GEB) help.

  • Tube size should be reliable with patient condition and should be the biggest diameter size that fit the patient preferably supplied with subglottic suction port.

  • After tube insertion under direct vision, inflate the ETT cuff between 20–30 cmH2O then connect the circuit provided by HME/HEPA filter, anesthesia machine or mechanical ventilator should be in standby mode at this point, after making sure the ETT cuff is inflated well, we can start mechanical ventilation. Waiting for capnography waveform to confirm correct tube site and observing chest movement as mentioned before.

  • Please note that auscultation is not practical with full PPE and difficult to perform so, we have to rely on other parameters. Airway pressure can help the intubator or heath care provider to figure out a bronchial intubation as well as circuit leak. The reason of not using auscultation is not the impractibal procedure, the reason is not to increase the contamination risk)

  • During intubation if suction needed it is advised to use close loop suction, in line catheter suction.

  • Some procedure will increase the risk of circuit disconnection or ETT displacement so, attention during these procedures must be taken to avoid any complication and contamination: examples of these procedures are patient proning, nasogastric tube insertion, Trans Esophageal Echocardiography (TEE) procedure, or oral suctioning.

  • For ultimate reducing possible contamination during ventilation It is recommended by safe airway society to arrange the circuit in this order, i.e. keep the ETCO2 sample line always distal

  • to the patient.

  • Difficult airway management:

Figure 4.

(√): Two-handed two-person bag-mask technique with the VE hand position; the second person squeezes the bag. (X): The CE hand position, which should be avoided. (image courtesy Dr. Nabil Shallik).

Difficulty can happen in many aspects:

  1. Facemask ventilation is not adequate,

  2. Placement of a supraglottic airway (SGA) is difficult,

  3. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: inability to intubate the patient.

  4. Same consideration for non- COVID patients will be applied in COVID19 patients, nevertheless the reason of difficulty, the crucial part is to have a pre-prepared plan and being well ready in order to avoid any serious complications.

  5. COVID 19 intubation trolley should be ready.

  6. The cause of difficult airway actually is multifactorial including the effect of patient factors, the clinical setting, and the skills of the practitioner.

  7. There are many local institutional policies and algorithm to manage anticipated and unanticipated difficult airway (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

(a) Tracheal intubation adapted for COVID 19 patient & (b) CICO adapted for COVID 19 patients. Taken with permission from Difficult Airway Society (DAS) 2015 guidelines [45].

Declare the status clearly to team members is very important, in case FONA needed the recommended technique is the one to minimize aerosol generating i.e. The scalpel bougie-tube technique as using high flow oxygen could generate aerosols and contamination [46], Front neck kit should be available immediately in case needed however it is better keep nearby the room not inside to avoid contaminate it.

Advertisement

8. Tracheostomy

A lot of COVID 19 patients need long time ventilation that many cases will undergo tracheostomy, currently there is debate about the proper time case selection tracheostomy technique. The major indication for tracheostomy is to facilitate mechanical ventilation for a long period, while reducing complications from a trans-laryngeal endotracheal tube and weaning from ventilation. Airway obstruction, laryngeal oedema might be an emerging feature of COVID-19 which indicate urgent tracheostomy [47, 48].

When elective tracheostomy is done, an inflated tracheostomy tube cuff via which pressure support ventilation can be delivered affords a closed system for controlled weaning of respiratory support.

Tracheostomy in COVID 19 patients is like intubation a high risk for aerosol generating same consideration will apply for intuatbion however based on recent reports for tracheostomised COVID 19 patients it is recommended to use of enhanced PPE, with PAPRs(powered air-purifying respirators), eye protection, fluid-repellent disposable surgical gown, and gloves If a PAPR is not available, we advise the use of a fit-tested filtering face piece 3 (FFP3) or N95 mask with an additional fluid shield, minimizing number of people during the procedure is necessary.

Surgical tracheostomies were generally favored over percutaneous tracheostomies during the SARS outbreak, however, percutaneous techniques have subsequently advanced and no data are available to establish superiority of one approach over the other from the standpoint of infectious transmission or safety. Single-use bronchoscopes with a sealed ventilator circuit are preferable when doing percutaneous tracheostomies.

Good sedation should ensure during the procedure to avoid cough and muscle relaxant might be used.

Advertisement

9. Extubation

Like intubation, extubation is an aerosol generating procedure (AGPs) and need special attention in COVID 19 patients.

Specific considerations during extubation include [49]:

  1. Strategies for supporting respiration after extubation, such as noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNC), are relatively contraindicated because of their ability to aerosolize SARS-CoV-2

  2. Extubation should ideally take place in a negative pressure room, if available.

  3. All non-essential staff should exit the room before extubation.

  4. Personal protective equipment (PPE) with airborne precautions is required during extubation and for personnel entering the room for a variable period of time after extubation, dependent on room ventilation.

  5. Limit the need for subsequent staff interactions with:

    • Prophylactic and anti-emetics.

    • Adequate analgesia; consider regional anesthesia. (What kind of regional anesthesia for extubation? If it is an advice for surgery it should take place above???)

  6. Perform oropharyngeal suction with vigilance, as this may generate aerosols.

  7. Antitussive drugs, such as Remifentanil, Lidocaine, and Dexmedetomidine, reduce the risk of coughing and minimize agitation on extubation.

Ensure good sedation before extubation. Efforts to prevent cough during extubation should be implanted including possible use of medications like Dexmedetomidine, Lidocaine, and/or opioids if there is no contraindication.

Advertisement

10. Extubation technique

Many techniques have been described to minimize exposure to aerosols during extubation although no clear evidence behind them [50].

  • Extubation under plastic cover

  • Mask over tube technique with attached filter

  • Extubation with LMA as alternative to ETT (contraindicated; as it can generate aerosol and contact contamination,

  • Extubation with lightweight barrier hood device [51]

10.1 Endotracheal tube exchange

On the ICU there are times the ETT may need to be changed, either due to blockage or damage to the cuff. This is usually done with a tube exchanger, with the new ETT railroaded over the bougie. The lungs of a COVID-19 patient are diseased and more prone to trauma. It is advised to avoid blindly introducing a bougie into the trachea with the possibility of advancing it too deep, and thus damaging the airways, with a potential to cause a pneumothorax. If the airway is not predicted to be difficult, paralyzing the patient, preoxygenation, extubation and then reintubation with a fresh ETT using a video-laryngoscope would be the gentler way to do it.

11. Single vs. reusable equipment during COVID19 outbreak

  • Ideally single use equipment is the best option in such a huge pandemic like COVID 19 pandemic, however because of the high transmission rate, applying this does not look practical especially with enormous number of infected people. It is really advised to avoid reusable equipment that will guarantee patient and health care provider safety as well. Actually, this fact utmost true when invasive equipment is used [52, 53].

  • As a general rule any non-invasive equipment contaminated with patient secretions (blood, urine, vomit, or faces) or has been used with contact in suspected or confirmed COVID 19 patients must decontaminated with,1,000 parts per million available chlorine (ppm av. cl) [54]

  • The real concern in single use equipment is shortage of these devices, and in highly demand situation replacement will be quite difficult.

  • If re-usable equipment has been used special consideration should be taken in decontamination process following local and manufacture recommendation is a must.

12. Conclusion

Managing the airway in a patient who is potentially infective with a droplet infection needs thorough understanding of the disease process and the modifications to airway management technique, that have been seen to reduce harm to the patients and reduce spread to the airway operators. The COVID 19 pandemic has taught us better ways to manage the airway, which can be used in all aerosol generating procedures. Formulating a plan early with good preparation and using checklists, meticulous patient assessment, personal protection for staff, modification of technique and good after care are the cornerstones to achieving safe airway management in COVID19 patients and all AGPs in general.

(Best Practice Recommendations) Airway Management in Patient with Suspected Novel Coronavirus (COVID19): Permission from Qatar Difficult Airway Society (QMAD) (Figure 6)

Figure 6.

Qatar difficult airway society (QMAD)airway management in COVOD 19 patients.

Keep in your mind YOUR personal protection is the priority.

  1. Please review the material and use droplet/contact isolation precautions (PPE – face mask, long-sleeved gown, gloves, overhead, overshoes with eye protection and fit-tested particulate respirators (N95 or equivalent, or higher level of protection) when interacting with patients’ blood, body fluids, secretions (including respiratory secretions) and non-intact skin.

  2. Standard precautions should always be routinely applied in all areas of health care facilities. Standard precautions include: hand hygiene; prevention of needle-stick or sharps injury; safe waste management; cleaning and disinfection of equipment; and cleaning of the environment.

  3. Before intubation, review and practice wearing and removing the protective barrier mask, gloves and clothing of the infected patient. Pay close attention to avoid self-contamination.

  4. Most skilled anesthetists available to perform suitable airway management technique, if possible. Avoid junior intubation for sick patients.

  5. Check carefully the followings; standard ASA monitoring, I.V. access, equipment, drugs, ventilator and suction.

  6. Avoid awake fiberoptic intubation unless highly indicated. Atomized local anesthetic will aerosolize the virus. Consider disposable videolaryngoscopes.

  7. Plan for rapid sequence intubation and intubation (RSII) and ensure skilled assistant able to perform cricoid pressure if needed. RSI may need to be modified, if patient has very high alveolar-arterial gradient and is unable to tolerate short period of apnea or has a contraindication to succinylcholine. If manual ventilation is predicted, small tidal volumes should be applied.

  8. Three to five minutes of preoxygenation with oxygen 100% and RSI in order to avoid manual ventilation of patient’s lungs and potential aerosolization of virus from airways.

  9. Avoid THRIVE/HFNC because will aerosolize the virus and spread the infection inside and outside patient’s airway.

  10. Ensure high efficiency hydrophobic filter interposed between facemask and breathing circuit or between facemask and self-inflating (Ambo) bag.

  11. After intubation; confirm correct position of tracheal tube.

  12. Start mechanical ventilation and stabilize your patient.

  13. All airway equipment must be sealed in double zip-locked plastic bag and removed for decontamination and disinfection.

  14. Assigned personnel should then wipe down surfaces with appropriate disinfectant (as directed by our hospital infection control policy) after exiting the negative-pressure atmosphere.

  15. After removing your PPE, avoid touching your hair or face before washing hands.

  16. Hospital infection control department will provide additional updates regarding the management of patients at the various hospital facilities.

References

  1. 1. ‘Naming the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) and the Virus That Causes It’ <https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it> [accessed 17 June 2020].
  2. 2. Harapan Harapan and others, ‘Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Literature Review’, Journal of Infection and Public Health, 13.5 (2020), 667–73 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.03.019>.
  3. 3. ‘COVID-19 Map - Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center’ <https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html> [accessed 17 June 2020].
  4. 4. WHO, ‘Novel Coronavirus ( 2019-NCoV ) 22 January 2020’, WHO Bulletin, JANUARY, 2020, 1–7 <https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200122-sitrep-2-2019-ncov.pdf>.
  5. 5. Jasper Fuk Woo Chan and others, ‘A Familial Cluster of Pneumonia Associated with the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Indicating Person-to-Person Transmission: A Study of a Family Cluster’, The Lancet, 2020, 514–23 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9>.
  6. 6. ‘Modes of Transmission of Virus Causing COVID-19: Implications for IPC Precaution Recommendations’ <https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/modes-of-transmission-of-virus-causing-covid-19-implications-for-ipc-precaution-recommendations> [accessed 17 June 2020].
  7. 7. Neeltje Van Doremalen and others, ‘Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1’, New England Journal of Medicine (Massachussetts Medical Society, 2020), 1564–67 <https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2004973>.
  8. 8. B. A. McGrath, S. Wallace, and J. Goswamy, ‘Laryngeal Oedema Associated with <scp>COVID</Scp> −19 Complicating Airway Management’, Anaesthesia, 75.7 (2020), 972–972 <https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15092>.
  9. 9. Jeffrey L. Apfelbaum and others, ‘Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway’, Anesthesiology (The American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2013), 251–70 <https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b2>.
  10. 10. James M. Rich, ‘Recognition and Management of the Difficult Airway with Special Emphasis on the Intubating Lma-Fastrach/Whistle Technique: A Brief Review with Case Reports’, Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 18.3 (2005), 220–27 <https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2005.11928072>.
  11. 11. Rich, James M., ‘Recognition and Management of the Difficult Airway with Special Emphasis on the Intubating Lma-Fastrach/Whistle Technique: A Brief Review with Case Reports’, Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 18.3 (2005), 220–27 <https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2005.11928072>
  12. 12. Sunanda Gupta, Rajesh Sharma, and Dimpel Jain, ‘Airway Assessment: Predictors of Difficult Airway’, Indian J Anaesth, 49.4 (2005), 257–62.
  13. 13. Dawei Wang and others, ‘Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients with 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China’, JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 323.11 (2020), 1061–69 <https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1585>.
  14. 14. Khai Tran and others, ‘Aerosol Generating Procedures and Risk of Transmission of Acute Respiratory Infections to Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review’, PLoS ONE (Public Library of Science, 2012) <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035797>.
  15. 15. Mark Loeb and others, ‘SARS among Critical Care Nurses, Toronto’, Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10.2 (2004), 251–55 <https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1002.030838>.
  16. 16. Wang, Dawei, Bo Hu, Chang Hu, Fangfang Zhu, Xing Liu, Jing Zhang, and others, ‘Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients with 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China’, JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 323.11 (2020), 1061–69 <https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1585>.
  17. 17. health protection Scotland, ‘Levels of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Ward Patient Care’ <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:z2Ta_6e3Ch4J:www.nipcm.hps.scot.nhs.uk/media/1437/2019-02-11-aide-memoire-for-levels-of-personal-protective-equipment-ppe-for-healthcare-workers-for-patient-care.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=qa&client=fir> [accessed 22 June 2020].
  18. 18. Mengqiang Luo and others, ‘Precautions for Intubating Patients with COVID-19’, Anesthesiology (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2020), 1616–18 <https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003288>.
  19. 19. ‘COVID-19 and Anesthesia FAQ - Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation’ <https://www.apsf.org/covid-19-and-anesthesia-faq/#clinicalcare.> [accessed 22 June 2020].
  20. 20. Zunyou Wu and Jennifer M. McGoogan, ‘Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72314 Cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention’, JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association (American Medical Association, 2020), 1239–42 <https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2648>.
  21. 21. A. Higgs and others, ‘Guidelines for the Management of Tracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Adults’, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 120.2 (2018), 323–52 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.021>.
  22. 22. Joshua M. Gleason, Bill R. Christian, and Erik D. Barton, ‘Nasal Cannula Apneic Oxygenation Prevents Desaturation during Endotracheal Intubation: An Integrative Literature Review’, Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 19.2 (2018), 403–11 <https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2017.12.34699>.
  23. 23. ‘COVID-19 Transmission Assessment Report | Vapotherm - Mask-Free NIV’ <https://vapotherm.com/blog/transmission-assessment-report/> [accessed 23 July 2020] Chinese Medical Association Respiratory Branch Respiratory Therapy Group, ‘Expert Consensus on Respiratory Therapy Related to New Coronavirus Infection in Severe and Critical Patients’, Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Medicine, 2020.
  24. 24. Agarwal, Arnav, John Basmaji, Fiona Muttalib, David Granton, Dipayan Chaudhuri, Devin Chetan, and others, ‘High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Patients with COVID-19: Systematic Reviews of Effectiveness and Its Risks of Aerosolization, Dispersion, and Infection TransmissionLes Canules Nasales à Haut Débit Pour Le Traitement de l’insuffisance Respiratoire Hypoxémique Aiguë Chez Les Patients Atteints de La COVID-19: Comptes Rendus Systématiques de l’efficacité et Des Risques d’aérosolisation, de Dispersion et de Transmission de l’infection’, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal Canadien d’anesthésie, 2020, 1 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01740-2>
  25. 25. Will Loh NH, Tan Y, Taculod J, et al. The impact of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) on coughing distance: implications on its use during the novel coronavirus disease outbreak. Can J Anesth 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01634-3
  26. 26. Respiratory Therapy Group, Chinese Medical Association Respiratory Branch, ‘Expert Consensus on Respiratory Therapy Related to New Coronavirus Infection in Severe and Critical Patients’, Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Medicine, 2020
  27. 27. Holger J. Schünemann and others, ‘Ventilation Techniques and Risk for Transmission of Coronavirus Disease, Including COVID-19’, Annals of Internal Medicine, 2020 <https://doi.org/10.7326/m20-2306>.
  28. 28. M. A. Baugh, ‘HIV: Reactive Oxygen Species, Enveloped Viruses and Hyperbaric Oxygen’, Medical Hypotheses, 55.3 (2000), 232–38 <https://doi.org/10.1054/mehy.2000.1048>.
  29. 29. Stephen R. Thom, ‘Hyperbaric Oxygen: Its Mechanisms and Efficacy’, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 127.SUPPL. 1 S (2011), 131S <https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fbe2bf>.
  30. 30. Kerry Thibodeaux and others, ‘Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Preventing Mechanical Ventilation in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Case Series’, Journal of Wound Care, 29.Sup5a (2020), S4–8 <https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2020.29.Sup5a.S4>.
  31. 31. A. Higgs and others, ‘Guidelines for the Management of Tracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Adults’, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 120.2 (2018), 323–52 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.021>.
  32. 32. Brewster, David J, Nicholas Chrimes, Thy B T Do, Kirstin Fraser, Christopher J Groombridge, Andy Higgs, and others, ‘Consensus Statement: Safe Airway Society Principles of Airway Management and Tracheal Intubation Specific to the <scp>COVID</Scp>−19 Adult Patient Group’, Medical Journal of Australia, 212.10 (2020), 472–81 https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50598
  33. 33. safe airway society, ‘Safe Airway Society’, Infographic <https://www.safeairwaysociety.org/covid19/> [accessed 23 July 2020]
  34. 34. David J Brewster and others, ‘Consensus Statement: Safe Airway Society Principles of Airway Management and Tracheal Intubation Specific to the <scp>COVID</Scp> −19 Adult Patient Group’, Medical Journal of Australia, 212.10 (2020), 472–81 <https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50598>.
  35. 35. Saito, Tomoyuki, Asuka Taguchi, and Takashi Asai, ‘Videolaryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in Patients with COVID-19’, British Journal of Anaesthesia (Elsevier Ltd, 2020) <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.002>
  36. 36. D Hall and others, ‘Videolaryngoscopy Increases ‘Mouth-to-mouth’Distance Compared with Direct Laryngoscopy’, Anaesthesia, 75.6 (2020), 822–23.
  37. 37. Mengqiang Luo and others, ‘Precautions for Intubating Patients with COVID-19’, Anesthesiology (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2020), 1616–18 <https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003288>.
  38. 38. Randy S. Wax and Michael D. Christian, ‘Practical Recommendations for Critical Care and Anesthesiology Teams Caring for Novel Coronavirus (2019-NCoV) Patients’, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (Springer, 2020), 568–76 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01591-x>.
  39. 39. Louise Park, Irene Zeng, and Andrew Brainard, ‘Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of First-pass Success Rates in Emergency Department Intubation: Creating a Benchmark for Emergency Airway Care’, Emergency Medicine Australasia, 29.1 (2017), 40–47.
  40. 40. Clyde T. Matava, Julie Yu, and Simon Denning, ‘Clear Plastic Drapes May Be Effective at Limiting Aerosolization and Droplet Spray during Extubation: Implications for COVID-19’, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (Springer, 2020), 902–4 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01649-w>.
  41. 41. ‘Taiwanese Doctor Invents Device to Protect US Doctors against Coronavirus | Taiwan News’ <https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3902435> [accessed 11 July 2020].
  42. 42. Robert Canelli and others, ‘Barrier Enclosure during Endotracheal Intubation’, The New England Journal of Medicine (NLM (Medline), 2020), 1957–58 <https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2007589>.
  43. 43. Sarah Brown and others, ‘Barrier System for Airway Management of COVID-19 Patients’, Anesthesia & Analgesia, 131.1 (2020), e34–35 <https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000004876>.
  44. 44. T M Cook and others, ‘Consensus Guidelines for Managing the Airway in Patients with COVID-19: Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society, the Association of Anaesthetists the Intensive Care Society, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and the Royal College of Anaesthetist’, Anaesthesia, 75.6 (2020), 785–99.
  45. 45. Jeffrey L. Apfelbaum and others, ‘Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway’, Anesthesiology (The American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2013), 251–70 <https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b2>.
  46. 46. ‘Anesthesia in Patients with Positive COVID Status & Difficult Airway | Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine’ <https://www.anesthesia.utoronto.ca/anesthesia-patients-positive-covid-status-difficult-airway> [accessed 23 July 2020]
  47. 47. Brendan A. McGrath and others, ‘Tracheostomy in the COVID-19 Era: Global and Multidisciplinary Guidance’, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine (Lancet Publishing Group, 2020) <https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30230-7>.
  48. 48. B. A. McGrath, S. Wallace, and J. Goswamy, ‘Laryngeal Oedema Associated with <scp>COVID</Scp> −19 Complicating Airway Management’, Anaesthesia, 75.7 (2020), 972–972 <https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15092>.
  49. 49. David F. D’Silva and others, ‘Extubation of Patients with COVID-19’, British Journal of Anaesthesia (Elsevier Ltd, 2020), e192 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.016>.
  50. 50. Aaron W. Kangas-Dick and others, ‘Safe Extubation during the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Respiratory Medicine (W.B. Saunders Ltd, 2020), 106038 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106038>.
  51. 51. Choi, G.Y., Wan, W.T., Chan, A.K., Tong, S.K., Poon, S.T. and Joynt, G.M., 2020. Preparedness for COVID-19: in situ simulation to enhance infection control systems in the intensive care unit. British Journal of Anaesthesia.
  52. 52. Choi, G.Y., Wan, W.T., Chan, A.K., Tong, S.K., Poon, S.T. and Joynt, G.M., 2020. Preparedness for COVID-19: in situ simulation to enhance infection control systems in the intensive care unit. British Journal of Anaesthesia.
  53. 53. Wong, J., Goh, Q.Y., Tan, Z. et al. Preparing for a COVID-19 pandemic: a review of operating room outbreak response measures in a large tertiary hospital in Singapore. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth67, 732–745 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01620-9
  54. 54. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/877533/Routine_decontamination_of_reusable_noninvasive_equipment.pdf

Written By

Nabil A. Shallik, Muhammad Firas Khader Alhammad, Yasser Mahmoud Hammad Ali Hammad, Elfert Amr, Shakeel Moideen and Mashael Abdulrahman M.S. Al Khelaifi

Submitted: 16 March 2020 Reviewed: 26 February 2021 Published: 30 March 2021