Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Interferon Therapy for Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids

Written By

Amalorpava Mary Loordhuswamy and Santhini Elango

Reviewed: 24 February 2021 Published: 23 March 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.96789

From the Edited Volume

Recent Advances in Wound Healing

Edited by Shahin Aghaei

Chapter metrics overview

459 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Interferons (IFNs) belong to the family of cytokines are widely used to treat keloids owing to their ability to increase collagenase activity thereby reducing the production of collagen and other extracellular matrix (ECM). Intralesional injection of IFN-α – 2b increases the collagenase level by inhibiting the secretion of metalloproteinases, an inhibitor of collagenase. Moreover, the anti-fibrotic activity of IFNs, interfere with fibroblast mediated collagen synthesis. On the other hand, combinatorial therapy has been preferred recently along with IFN due to its side effects observed in various clinical trials conducted only with IFN. Triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) and CO2 lasers along with IFNs are found to be the potential therapy for the treatment of scars and keloids. In this chapter, IFN mediated therapy for the treatment of scars and keloids, its benefits and limitations and the advantages of combinatorial therapy with the appropriate literature support are discussed.


  • hypertrophic scars
  • keloids
  • interferon
  • collagen synthesis
  • combinatorial therapy

1. Introduction

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are the most common skin disease associated with aesthetically disfiguring morphology, pain, itching, discomfort as well as psychological stress and affect individual life style [1]. This disease is characterized by over production of extracellular matrix collagen and proteoglycans [2]. The development of keloids involves unpredictable irregular arrangement of collagen and other extra cellular proteins in the milieu of wound healing. Wound healing is a well orchestrated sequential process happening through the four distinct steps such as hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation and tissue remodeling [3]. In hemostasis, immediately after an injury, platelet degranulation and activation of compliments initiates blood clotting and forms fibrin network at the site of injury which act as a scaffold for wound repair [4]. Platelet degranulation is crucial step for the release and activation of cytokines including epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin like growth factor (IGF-I), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β). These cytokines acts as chemotactic agents for the recruitment of neutrophils, macrophages, epithelial cells, mast cells, endothelial cells and fibroblasts [5, 6, 7]. The recruited fibroblast, synthesis granulation tissue made up of procollagen, elastin, proteoglycans, hyaluronic acid and forms a structural repair framework to bridge the wound and allow vascular in growth. At that time, myofibroblast which contain actin filament initiates wound contraction. Once the wound is closed, the abundant Extra Cellular Matrix (ECM) is then degraded and the immature type III collagen of the early wound is modified into mature type I collagen. Proper balance between ECM protein deposition and degradation is required for wound healing with minimal scarring. Once this balance is disrupted, abnormalities in scarring appear, resulting in the formation of either hypertrophic scar or keloids [8, 9]. The mechanism of Hypertrophic scar and keloid formation is given in the Figure 1. Both lesions are formed by the occurrence of imbalance between anabolic and catabolic process of wound healing, however keloids seems to be more aggressive fibrotic disorder compared to hypertrophic scars [10]. Keloids are more prevalent in Dark skinned individuals of Africa, Asia and Hispanic descents compared to Caucasians [11]. The occurrence of keloids in these population is found to be in the range of 5–16%. The risks of developing keloids are equal in both male and females. Due to the cosmetic procedures such as ear and nose piercing and physiological conditions like puberty and pregnancy, females have more risk for developing keloids compared to male. Persons with the age around 10 to 30 are more prone to develop keloids compared to other age groups [12, 13]. Apart from sex and age, additional risk factor include having blood group A, hyper-IgE and hormonal peaks during pregnancy and puberty also play a role in developing keloids [14]. In recent days, numbers of gene and gene loci associated with keloid development have been identified. Single nucleotide polymorphism has identified in certain loci of NEDD4 genes by genome wide association studies and admixture mapping studies which is genetically linked to keloid development. In addition to that, several human leucocyte antigen (HLA) alleles, p53, bcl-2 and fas genes have also involved in keloid development [15, 16, 17]. Studies have also reported that people with rare genetic disorders including Dubowitz syndrome, Bethlem myopathy, Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, Noonan syndrome and Geominne syndrome have the risk of developing keloids [15].

Figure 1.

Mechanism of Hypertrophic scars and keloid formation.


2. Currently available treatments

At present, various forms of treatment for keloids are available but no single therapeutic modality is best for all keloids. The size, location, depth of lesion, age, response to the previous treatment determines the type of therapy need to cure keloids. Treatments including corticosteroids, surgical exsition, pressure therapy, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, laser therapy, 5- flurouracil, stem cell therapy, mitomycin C application, Verapamil, Bleomycin, Botulinum toxin type A and ACE inhibitors are available [18]. The current and emerging therapy for hypertrophic scars and keloids are briefly discussed in Table 1.

S. NoCurrent and emerging therapies available for hypertrophic scars and keloid treatmentsTypesMode of actionLimitations
1.Corticosteroids [19, 20, 21, 22]Triamcinolone acetonide (TAC), hydrocortisone acetate, dexamethasone and methyl prednisoloneInhibit the growth of fibroblast, attenuate the synthesis of procollagen and glycosaminoglycan, reduce endothelial budding and enhance the degeneration of collagen and fibroblast, inhibit TGF - β1 expression in fibroblast, inhibit VEGF and alphaglobulins.Telangiectasis, atrophy, steroid acne, pigmentary changes, necrosis, ulcerations
2.Surgical exsition [23, 24, 25]Linear closure and flap coverage, excision with grafting, W-plasty and Z-plastySurgical removal of excessive fibrous tissue growthHigher recurrence rate, needs additional treatments like intralesional injection of TAIL, Interferon, pressure therapy etc.
3.Silicone based products [19, 26, 27, 28]Creams, sprays, gel cushion and liquidEnhance hydration and provide an occlusive environment which regulates proliferation of fibroblast there by decreases collagen synthesis.Local irritation and lack of clinical trials.
4.Pressure therapy [29, 30, 31]Variety of materials are used to apply pressure such as adhesive plaster moulds, pressure earrings and custom-fitted splintsApplying pressure to the scar surface reduces perfusion and oxygen supply which in turn reduces collagen synthesis and angiogenesis.Depends on patients compliance, site specific and discomfort to the patients
5.Radiotheraphy [32, 33, 34]X ray radiationReduce fibroblast proliferation, induce cell senescence and apoptosis there by reducing collagen production and suppress keloid formationOedema, necrosis, ulceration, desquamation, erythema, pigmentary changes, atrophy, telangiectasis and alopecia
6.Cryotherapy [35, 36, 37]Low temperature treatment including spray and contact probes, or Intralesional-needle cryoprobe methodDestroying the core of the keloid by sparing the surface epithelial cells including melanocytes there by reducing the volume of keloids.Hypopigmentation, blistering, pain, delayed healing and infection
7.Laser therapy [38, 39, 40]Ablative laser: 2940-nm erbium doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG)
laser and the 10,600-nm carbon dioxide (CO2)
Non ablative laser: 585-nm or 595-nm PDLs, 1064-nm neodymium-
doped:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser, 532-nm neodymiumdoped-vanadate (Nd:Van) laser and 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser with low fluence
Laser beam is absorbed by water present in the skin leading to local tissue destruction and reduction of lesion volumeItching, pigmentary changes, blister formation and postoperative purpura
8.Anti cancer drugs [41, 42, 43]5-FlurouracilPyrimidine analogue that inhibits thymidylate synthase enzyme leading to suppression of nucleic acid synthesis and inhibits fibroblast proliferationSkin erythema, pain and ulceration
9Stem cell therapy [44, 45, 46]Exposure of adipose derived stem cells (ASCs) by fat grafting methodModulating fibrogenesis through increased collagen production and inhibiting fibroblast proliferationMechanism is not clear
10.Anti cancer drugs [47, 48, 49]Mitomycin C (MMC)MMC inhibits nucleic acid and protein synthesis thereby decrease the proliferation of fibroblastLarger randomized clinical trials are needed to elucidate the efficacy of MMC towards keloid treatment.
11.Anticancer drugs [50, 51, 52]BleomycinDiminish TGF-β1-induced collagen expression, decrease the levels of lysyl-oxidase, a cross-linking enzyme involved in collagen maturation and increase apoptosisPain at injection site, hyperpigmentation, ulceration and dermal atrophy
12Drugs that lowers blood pressure and angina [53, 54, 55]VerapamilInducing pro collaginase secretion. Alters fibroblast shape, induces TGF-β1 apoptosis, reduces ECM production and depolymerises actin filamentsCombinational therapy such as pressure therapy, PDL, TAIL and nifedipine is needed to effectively treat keloids.
13Botulinum toxin type A [56, 57, 58]Intralesional InjectionDecreasing tension at the wound edge while contraction, accumulating fibroblasts in GO and G1 of the cell cycle, reducing TGF-β1 expressionExtensive studies need to prove the efficacy towards keloid treatment.
14ACE inhibitors [59, 60, 61]Intraleisional injection.Reduce the expression of Ang II, TGF-β1, PDGF-BB, heat shock protein and inhibit fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis.Extensive Clinical investigation is needed.

Table 1.

Current and emerging therapies available, mode of action and their limitations.


3. Interferons

In 1957, Isaacs and Lindeman identified a new substance which has the capacity to interfere with viral replication and coined the term “Interferon”. Interferons are the group of naturally occurring cytokines produced by the cells upon exposure to various stimuli such as viruses, double – standard RNA and Polypeptides. Owing to its immunomodulatory, antiviral, antiangiogenic, anti-proliferative and antitumor activities, interferons are used to treat various diseases including Hairy Cell Leukemia, Follicular Lymphoma, Renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, chronic hepatitis, AIDS-related Kaposi Sarcoma etc. In addition to their therapeutic properties, it is used to study the mechanism of mammalian signal transduction and transcriptional regulation.


4. Types of interferons

Currently, interferons are categorized in to four types namely alpha (α), beta (ß), gamma (ɣ) and Lambda (λ) interferon [62]. More recently, IFNs were divided into three major subgroups by virtue of their ability to bind to common receptor types namely type I, type II and type III. Type I IFNs bind to a type I IFN receptor and IFN-α, IFN-β belongs to type I IFN family. IFN-γ is the sole type II IFN, and binds to a distinct type II receptor. IFN-λ belongs to Type III IFN and binds to – IFNλR receptor [63, 64, 65]. Various types of IFN and their receptors and biological properties are given in the Table 2.

Interferon TypeInterferon categoriesReceptor TypeCell of originproperties
Type IAlpha (α)
Beta (β)
Type ILeukocyte
Direct anti proliferative effects on cells, Stimulation of MHC Class I expression and activation of Natural Killer (NK) Cells
Type IIGamma (γ)Type IIT cells and NK cellsDirect anti proliferative effects on cells, Stimulation of MHC Class I & II expression, delayed activation of NK cells.
Type IIILamda (λ)Type IIIIntestinal epithelial cellsAnti tumor activity and amplify the induction of anti viral activity of type I IFN, Up regulation of MHC Class I expression

Table 2.

Interferon Classification and properties.

Alpha interferons are also called as ‘leukocyte interferon’ is a cytokine produced by innate immune system in response to external stimuli including viral infections [65, 66, 67, 68]. Alpha interferons are categorized under type I interferons which processes antiviral, immunomodulatory as well as anti-proliferative properties. It was reported that at least 20 copies of genes which encodes alpha interferons in human genome and standard recombinant interferons alfa-2a, alfa-2b and alfa-con1 (“consensus” interferon) have been produced [69].

Beta interferons (IFN β) are type I interferon produced by fibroblasts and possesses anti viral, anti proliferative and immunomodulatory effects. There are two forms of IFN β, IFN β- 1a and, IFN β- 1b both are used therapeutically. INF β -1b SC is produced by bacterial expression system and this was the first developed recombinant interferon for clinical use [63, 70].

Gamma interferon (IFN γ) is the only interferon categeroized under type II IFNs. IFN γ is produced by CD4T helper cell type 1 (Th1) lymphocytes, CD8 cytotoxic lymphocytes, NK cells, B cells and professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs). INF γ is acid liable where as other interferons are acid stable. IFN γ involved in various biological activity such as promotes natural killer (NK) cell activity, increase APS and lysosome activity of macrophages, activates inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), induces the production of IgG2a and IgG3 from activated plasma B cells, Promotes adhesion and binding required for leukocyte migration [71, 72, 73].

Interferon lamda (IFN λ) was discovered in early 2003 and were categorized under type III interferon. There are three different interferon genes encodes and produce three different interferon λ proteins namely IFN λ1, INF λ2 and INF λ3. These proteins are also called as interleukin – 29 (IL-29), IL- 28 A and IL-28 B respectively [74]. IFN λ differ from other type I and type II interferon by signaling mechanism. IFN λ, signals through heterodimeric acceptor complex. IFN λ is responsible for the development of anti tumor immune response and amplify the induction of antiviral activity of type I interferon. IFN λ processes anti viral activity and up regulate major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I antigen expression on many cell types [75].


5. Interferon therapy for hypertrophic scars and keloids

Keloid is benign fibrous growth that extends outside the original wound and invades adjacent dermal tissue due to the excessive production of extra cellular matrix, especially collagen. Histologically, keloids are characterized by disorganized deposition of thick collagen fibers along with abundant lymphocytes, eosinophils and macrophages [76]. Although numerous attempts made to understand the pathophysiology and molecular abnormalities behind keloid formation, the exact pathogenesis of keloid formation is yet to be understood. Literature reports revealed that keloid shows an elevated expression of collagen mRNA, upregulation of TGF-β genes which results in excessive production of collagen and other ECM components especially fibronectin. TGF-β, especially the TGF-β1 isoform, is a key mediator of variety of processes including cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and responsible in many fibrotic diseases including keloids through its role in promoting extracellular matrix (ECM) production and tissue fibrosis [77]. TGF-β belongs to the member of cytokine family which binds and activates dimerization of TGF-β type II receptors and the subsequent phosphorylation of TGF-β type I receptors, which phosphorylate and activate Smad2/3 leading to the translocation of Smad4 to the nucleus and activate the expression of target genes [78]. TGF-β receptors and Smad proteins are over expressed in keloids and hypertrophic scars compared to normal skin.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) or matrix metallopeptidases are calcium dependent zinc containing endopeptidases that plays a critical role in ECM formation. The major function of MMPs is to catabolize ECM and cleave regulate the activity of many other extracellular bioactive substrates [79]. MMPs are classified into 4 subsets namely collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins, and membrane type. The collagenases including MMP-1, MMP-8, and MMP-13, cleave types I and III collagens present in scar tissue. The activity of MMPs is regulated by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) including TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4, which inhibit MMPs. MMPs participate in inflammation, proliferation and remodeling phase of wound healing and MMPs involved in scars and keloid formation are also secreted by fibroblasts itself. An imbalance between MMP and TIMP leads to cause disturbance in collagen synthesis and degradation resulting in keloid and hypertrophic scar development [80, 81, 82].

Fibroblasts derived MT1-MMP and active MMP-2 play crucial roles in keloid formation and tumor invasion. Excessive synthesis and deposition of collagen contribute to the development of keloids with prolonged and excessive presence of TGFβ-1. Downregulation of TIMP-2 leads to the progression of keloids because of relative increase of MT 1-MMP activity. MT 1-MMP increases the activity of TGFβ-1 lead to collagen synthesis and collagen deposition in keloid development [83]. Schematic of keloid formation with respect to TGFβ-1 and MMP and role of interferon therapy in preventing TGFβ-1 and MMP mediated keloid development is given in the Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Mechanism of IFN therapy.

Although many treatments and therapies are available for treating hypertrophic scars and keloids, the most efficient and successful treatment is yet to be achieved. Interferon therapy is one of the emerging therapies which have potential therapeutic effect against keloids by decreasing the synthesis of collagen types I and III and increasing collagenase activity [84]. It has been reported that Interferon alpha and gamma decrease procollagen messenger RNA levels of fibroblasts both in normal and scleroderma patients and enhance collagenase activity. Interferon not only influences collagen synthesis in skin but also reduces the inflammatory reaction. Generally, Transforming Growth Factor (TGF) which is released by platelets at the site of injury is highly chemotactic to macrophages and monocytes during the inflammatory reaction. TGF also induces collagen and fibronectin production. Interferon antagonizing the effects of TGF-β and histamine there by reducing inflammatory reaction. Among the three isoforms of interferons, IFN-α and IFN-γ have been found to be very effective for keloid treatment since it decreases collagen and other ECM expression and increasing collagenase activity [85, 86].

Specifically, IFN - α2b is widely used in the treatment of keloids owing to its anti-proliferative property and reduce dermal fibrosis directly or antagonizing the effects of TGF-β and histamine. In addition, it was reported that IFN - α2b, increase collagenase levels and to inhibit the secretion of collagenase inhibitors such as metalloproteinases. Anti proliferative properties of IFN-α2b was demonstrated by Berman and Duncan. They have intralesionally injected 1.5 million IU IFN α-2b, twice over 4 days and found that size of the keloid was reduced to 50%. Post operative injection of IFN α-2b reduce the rate of recurrence to 19% as compared with that of intralesional steroid, where the rate of recurrence was 51% [87].

Injection of IFN into the suture line of keloid excision may be prophylactic for reducing recurrences. Post operative IFN- α2b injection treatment (5 million U, 1 million U injected per cm of scar) into keloid excision sites in 124 patients, fewer keloid recurrence rate (18%) was observed compared to excision site alone (51.1%) [88].

Subcutaneous injection of human recombinant IFN- α2b (1x106 units) for 7 days on a daily basis to patients with hypertrophic scars and then 2x106 units for 24 weeks in 3 times per week basis showed significant increase in the rate of scar improvement with control. Scar assessment and scar volume also improved after 3 months of treatment and no recurrences were observed after stopping IFN therapy.

Pittet et al. reported that intralesional injections of human recombinant IFN-γ 200 mcg (6 X 106 U) per injection for 4 weeks to 7 patients with hypertrophic scar and observed that 7 of 7 patients showed decrease in redness, swelling, firmness, and lesion area. In addition to that, the reappearance of symptoms was minimal in only 2 of 7 patients and a small increase in the lesion area occurred in 4 of 7 patients, although these lesions remained smaller than the original area was observed in 16th week [89].

IFN-γ play an important role in reducing fibrosis by inhibiting TGF-β via initial activation of Jak1, which in turn stimulates the negative regulator of collagen YB-1 (Y-box protein-1), which activates Smad7, eventually leading to TGF-β1 suppression. Intralesional injection of IFN-γ has been shown to be effective in improving the appearance of keloids and hypertrophic scars, and also reducing keloid recurrence after excision along with variable treatment regimens [85].


6. Source and production of interferons

Commercially available interferons are human interferons manufactured by using recombinant DNA technology. There are many forms of interferons commercialized including interferon alfa-2a (Roferon-A), interferon alfa-2b (Intron-A), interferon alfa-n3 (Alferon-N), peginterferon alfa-2b (PegIntron, Sylatron), interferon beta-1a (Avonex), interferon beta-1b (Betaseron), interferon beta-1b (Extavia), interferon gamma-1b (Actimmune), peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys ProClick), peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin (Peginterferon), peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin, (PegIntron/Rebetol Combo Pack), peginterferon beta-1a (Plegridy). Among these interferons, interferon alfa-2b (Intron-A) and interferon gamma-1b (Actimmune) is used in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids [90].

Interferon alfa-2b is commercialized under the trade name INTRON® A. It is a recombinant IFN available in the form of injection and molecular formula is C16H17Cl3I2N3NaO5S. The structure of this recombinant IFN is given in Figure 3. This IFN is water soluble proteins produced by recombinant DNA technology and possess molecular weight around 19000 Daltons. It is obtained from bacterial fermentation of E.coli bearing genetically engineered plasmid containing an interferon alfa2b gene from human leukocytes. The specific activity of this recombinant IFN (INTRON® A) is approximately 2.6 x 108 IU/mg [91].

Figure 3.

Structure of human recombinant interferon (a) INTRON® A (b) ACTIMMUNE®. (Reproduced from pubchem and EMBL-EBI respectively).

Interferon Gamma is commercialized under the trade name ACTIMMUNE®. It is a recombinant interferon produced by cloning of hIFNγ cDNA and expressed the recombinant in E.coli. Production and purification of recombinant IFNγ is cost effective. Molecular weight of the recombinant IFNγ in monomeric form is around 17 kDa and dimeric form is around 35 kDa. The specific activity of this recombinant IFNγ is 3x106 IU/mg [92].


7. Combinatorial therapy

The most commonly employed treatment for keloid is Triamcinolone acetonide intralesional injection (TAIL). Major disadvantage of this therapy is limited success and adverse effects such as atrophy, telangiectasia, depigmentation, ulceration, and systemic effects, including cushingoid changes. In order to increase the success rate, TAIL is injected along with IFN – α 2 b. Twenty lesions (combined TAIL + IFN – α 2 b group) and 20 control lesions (TAIL-only group) were studied in 19 patients. Both groups were treated with TAIL once in 2 weeks. The combined TAIL + IFN-alpha2b group was treated with intralesional injection of IFN – α 2 b, twice a week. Lesion measurements were noted. Statistically significant decreases in depth (81.6%, P = 0.005) and volume (86.6%, P = 0.002) were observed in lesions of the combined TAIL IFN – α 2 b group. In the TAIL-only group, the decreases in depth (66.0%, P = 0.281) and volume (73.4%, P = 0.245) were less statistically significant. Hence, injection of IFN – α 2 b enhances the healing potential of TAIL [93].

Combinatorial therapy of laser ablation in conjugation with IFN – α 2 b injection, showed better healing and reduction in recurrence rate towards keloid treatment. 30 patients with keloids were chosen for the study. Among them, 16 patients have keloids on the ear and 14 patients on trunk. The duration of the study was 12 to 24 months and the size of the keloids was ranged from 1 to 3 cm in diameter. Keloids were ablated using ultra pulse carbon dioxide laser followed by sublesional and perilesional injections of 3 million IU of IFN-α 2b three times per week. By this combinatorial therapy, the recurrence rate was reduced and observed that 66% of lesions did not recur after three years. In particular, no recurrence was observed in the auricular area [94].

Though IFN therapy is successful, treatment associated adverse effects including fever, headache, arthralgias, fatigue, chills, and confusion were observed and the treatment is expensive.


8. Summary and conclusion

Keloids are problematic disfiguring scars arises due to abnormal wound healing and excessive fibrosis. Un controlled proliferation of fibroblast results in over production and deposition of collagen and other ECM components responsible for keloid development. There are many treatments available for hypertrophic scars and keloids including corticosteroid injections, surgical excision, pressure therapy, radiotherapy, laser therapy etc. Efficient and successful treatment for keloids is yet to be developed. Interferon therapy is one of the emerging therapies which have potential therapeutic effect against keloids by decreasing the synthesis of collagen types I and III and increasing collagenase activity. Recombinant IFN-α2b (INTRON® A) and IFN-γ (ACTIMMUNE®) is commercially available and used for the treatment of keloids. Significant improvement in rate of scar reduction and recurrence % was also decreased. In order to further improve the efficacy of IFN treatment, combinatorial therapy was attempted. IFN-α2b along with TAIL injection and CO2 laser ablation showed higher success rate. Hence, IFN and/or the combinatorial therapy would be a better treatment options to the patients with hypertrophic scars and keloids.



The authors are thankful to Dr. Prakash Vasudevan, Director, SITRA and Shri. S. Sivakumar, Head, Centre of Excellence for Medical Textiles, SITRA for providing permission to write the book chapter.


  1. 1. Bayat A, McGrouther D.A,Ferguson M.W.J. Skin scarring. Bmj. 2003; 326:88-92. Doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7380.88
  2. 2. Gauglitz G.G, Korting H.C, Pavicic T, Ruzicka T,Jeschke M.G. Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Molecular medicine. 2011; 17:113-125. Doi: 10.2119/molmed.2009.00153
  3. 3. Berman B, Maderal A, Raphael B. Keloids and hypertrophic scars: pathophysiology, classification, and treatment. Dermatologic Surgery. 2017; 43:3-18. Doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000819
  4. 4. Tredget E.E, Nedelec B, Scott P.G, Ghahary A. Hypertrophic scars, keloids, and contractures: the cellular and molecular basis for therapy. Surgical Clinics of North America. 1997; 77: 701-730.
  5. 5. Slemp A.E, Kirschner R.E. Keloids and scars: a review of keloids and scars, their pathogenesis, risk factors, and management. Current opinion in paediatrics. 2006; 18:396-402. Doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000236389.41462.ef
  6. 6. Niessen F.B, Spauwen P.H, Schalkwijk J, Kon M. On the nature of hypertrophic scars and keloids: a review. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1999;104:1435-1458
  7. 7. Gong Z.H, Ji J.F, Yang J, Xiang T, Zhou C.K, Pan X.L, Yao J. Association of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and vitamin D receptor expression with the risk of keloid disease in a Chinese population. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017; 33:24-29.
  8. 8. Tanriverdi-Akhisaroglu S, Menderes A, Oktay G. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and-9 activities in human keloids, hypertrophic and atrophic scars: a pilot study. Cell Biochemistry and Function: Cellular biochemistry and its modulation by active agents or disease. 2009;27: 81-87.
  9. 9. Zhu Z, Ding J Tredget E.E. The molecular basis of hypertrophic scars. Burns & trauma. 2016; 4:
  10. 10. Brown J.J, Bayat A. Genetic susceptibility to raised dermal scarring. British Journal of Dermatology, 2009;161:8-18.
  11. 11. Coppola M.M, Salzillo R, Segreto F, Persichetti P.Triamcinolone acetonide intralesional injection for the treatment of keloid scars: patient selection and perspectives. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology. 2018;11:387. Doi: 10.2147/CCID.S133672
  12. 12. Shih B, Bayat A. Genetics of keloid scarring. Archives of dermatological research, 2010; 302:319-339. DOI: 10.1007/s00403-009-1014-y
  13. 13. Bayat A, Arscott G, Ollier W.E.R, Mc Grouther D.A, Ferguson M.W.J. Keloid disease: clinical relevance of single versus multiple site scars. British journal of plastic surgery. 2005; 58:28-37.
  14. 14. Arno A. I, Gauglitz G.G, Barret J.P, Jeschke M.G. Up-to-date approach to manage keloids and hypertrophic scars: a useful guide. Burns. 2014:40;1255-1266.
  15. 15. Glass II D.A.2017, October. Current understanding of the genetic causes of keloid formation. In Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings (Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. S50-S53). Elsevier
  16. 16. Fujita M, Yamamoto Y, Jiang J.J, Atsumi T, Tanaka Y, Ohki T, Murao N, Funayama E, Hayashi T, Osawa M T. NEDD4 is involved in inflammation development during keloid formation. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2019: 139: 333-341.
  17. 17. Lu M.Z, Ang Q .Q , Zhang X, Zhang L.F, Ya X.H, Lv H, Zheng X.D, Lu W.S. Genomic risk variants at 3q22. 3 are associated with keloids in a Chinese Han population. American journal of translational research, 2018:10;554
  18. 18. Ojeh N, Bharatha A, Gaur U, Forde A.L. Keloids: Current and emerging therapies. Scars, Burns & Healing. 2020;6:2059513120940499.
  19. 19. Ud-Din S, Bayat A. New insights on keloids, hypertrophic scars, and striae. Dermatologic clinics. 2014; 32;193-209.
  20. 20. Arno A.I, Gauglitz G.G, Barret J.P, Jeschke M.G. Up-to-date approach to manage keloids and hypertrophic scars: a useful guide. Burns. 2014: 40;1255-1266. Doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.02.011
  21. 21. Hochman B, Locali R.F, Matsuoka P.K, Ferreira L.M. Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide for keloid treatment: a systematic review. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2008;32: 705-709. DOI 10.1007/s00266-008-9152-8
  22. 22. Roques C, Téot L. The use of corticosteroids to treat keloids: a review. The international journal of lower extremity wounds, 2008; 7:137-145.
  23. 23. McGoldrick R.B, Theodorakopoulou E, Azzopardi E.A, Murison M. Lasers and ancillary treatments for scar management Part 2: Keloid, hypertrophic, pigmented and acne scars. Scars, burns & healing. 2017; 3:2059513116689805
  24. 24. Park T.H, Rah D.K. Successful eradication of helical rim keloids with surgical excision followed by pressure therapy using a combination of magnets and silicone gel sheeting. International wound journal. 2017:14;302-306.
  25. 25. Reish R.G, Eriksson E. Scar treatments: preclinical and clinical studies. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2008: 206; 719-730.
  26. 26. Mustoe T.A, Cooter R.D,Gold M.H, Hobbs F.R, Ramelet A.A, Shakespeare P.G, Stella M, Téot L, Wood F.M, Ziegler U.E. International clinical recommendations on scar management. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2002; 110: 560-571.Doi: 10.1097/00006534-200208000-00031
  27. 27. Puri N, Talwar A, The efficacy of silicone gel for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery. 2009; 2: 104. Doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.58527
  28. 28. Katz B.E. Silicone gel sheeting in scar therapy. Cutis. 1995;56:65-67
  29. 29. Trace A.P, Enos C.W, Mantel A, Harvey V.M. Keloids and hypertrophic scars: a spectrum of clinical challenges. American journal of clinical dermatology. 2016; 17:201-223.Doi: 10.1007/s40257-016-0175-7
  30. 30. Goldenberg G, Luber A.J. Use of intralesional cryosurgery as an innovative therapy for keloid scars and a review of current treatments. The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2013; 6;23
  31. 31. Macintyre L, Baird M. Pressure garments for use in the treatment of hypertrophic scars—a review of the problems associated with their use. Burns. 2006; 32; pp.10-15.Doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.06.018
  32. 32. Klumpar D.I, Murray J.C, Anscher M, Keloids treated with excision followed by radiation therapy. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1994;31: 225-231.Doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(94)70152-0
  33. 33. Ji J, Tian Y, Zhu Y.Q , Zhang L.Y, Ji S.J, Huan J, Zhou X.Z, Cao J.P. Ionizing irradiation inhibits keloid fibroblast cell proliferation and induces premature cellular senescence. The Journal of dermatology. 2015; 42:56-63.
  34. 34. Lee K.S, Jung J.B, Ro Y.J, Ryoo Y.W, Kim O.B, Song J.Y. Effects of x-irradiation on survival and extracellular matrix gene expression of cultured keloid fibroblasts. Journal of Dermatological Science. 1994; 8:33-37.
  35. 35. Har-Shai Y, Amar M, Sabo E. Intralesional cryotherapy for enhancing the involution of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2003;111:1841-1852. Doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000056868.42679.05
  36. 36. Har-Shai Y, Zouboulis C.C. Intralesional cryotherapy for the treatment of keloid scars: a prospective study. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2015;136: 397e-398e. Doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001511
  37. 37. Rusciani L, Rossi G, Bono R. Use of cryotherapy in the treatment of keloids. The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology. 1993; 19:
  38. 38. Mamalis AD, Lev-Tov H, Nguyen DH, Jagdeo JR. Laser and light-based treatment of Keloids–a review. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2014:28;689-699.
  39. 39. Forbat E, Ali F.R, Al-Niaimi F. Treatment of keloid scars using light-, laser-and energy-based devices: a contemporary review of the literature. Lasers in Medical Science, 2017; 32:2145-2154.
  40. 40. Anderson R.R,Parrish J.A. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983; 220: 524-527. DOI: 10.1126/science.6836297
  41. 41. Bijlard E, Steltenpool S, Niessen F.B. Intralesional 5-fluorouracil in keloid treatment: a systematic review. Acta dermato-venereologica, 2015; 95: 778-782.
  42. 42. Hietanen K.E, Järvinen T.A, Huhtala H, Tolonen T.T,Kuokkanen,H.O, Kaartinen I.S. Treatment of keloid scars with intralesional triamcinolone and 5-fluorouracil injections–a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2019: 72; 4-11.
  43. 43. Mari W, Alsabri S.G, Tabal N, Younes S, Sherif A, Simman R. Novel insights on understanding of keloid scar: article review. Journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists. 2015; 7:1-7.
  44. 44. SILVA V.Z.D, Albacete Neto A, Horacio G.D.S, ANDRADE G.A, Procopio L.D, Coltro P.S,Farina Junior J.A. Evidences of autologous fat grafting for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira. 2016;62:862-866.
  45. 45. Lee G, Hunter-Smith D.J, Rozen W.M. Autologous fat grafting in keloids and hypertrophic scars: a review. Scars, burns & healing. 2017: 3; p.2059513117700157.
  46. 46. Williams E.A, Thaller S.R, The role of fat grafting in the treatment of keloid scars and venous ulcers. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2019; 30:696-697.Doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005208
  47. 47. Shin J.Y, Yun S.K, Roh S.G, Lee N.H, Yang K.M. Efficacy of 2 representative topical agents to prevent keloid recurrence after surgical excision. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2017; 75:401.
  48. 48. Sewall G.K, Robertson K.M, Connor N.P, Heisey D.M, Hartig G.K. Effect of topical mitomycin on skin wound contraction. Archives of facial plastic surgery. 2003; 5: 59-62
  49. 49. Stewart IV C.E, Kim J.Y. Application of mitomycin-C for head and neck keloids. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 2006;135: 946-950.
  50. 50. Hendriks T, Martens M.F.M.W, Huyben C.M.L.C, Wobbes T. Inhibition of basal and TGF β-induced fibroblast collagen synthesis by antineoplastic agents. Implications for wound healing. British journal of cancer. 1993;67: 545-550
  51. 51. Templeton S.F, Solomon A.R, Swerlick R.A. Intradermal bleomycin injections into normal human skin: a histopathologic and immunopathologic study. Archives of dermatology.1994; 130:577-583. doi:10.1001/archderm.1994.01690050045006
  52. 52. Camacho-Martínez F.M, Rey E.R, Serrano F.C, Wagner A. Results of a combination of bleomycin and triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. 2013;88:387-394.
  53. 53. Alexandrescu D, Fabi S, Yeh L.C, Fitzpatrick R.E, Goldman M.P. Comparative Results in Treatment of Keloids With Intralesional 5-FU/Kenalog, 5-FU/Verapamil, Enalapril Alone, Verapamil Alone, and Laser: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Journal of drugs in dermatology. 2016;15:1442-1447
  54. 54. Boggio R.F, Boggio L.F, Galvão B.L, Machado-Santelli G.M. Topical verapamil as a scar modulator. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2014; 38:968-975
  55. 55. Kant S.B, Van den Kerckhove E, Colla C, Tuinder S, Van der Hulst R.R.W.J. de Grzymala,A.P. A new treatment of hypertrophic and keloid scars with combined triamcinolone and verapamil: a retrospective study. European journal of plastic surgery, 2018;41:69-80. DOI 10.1007/s00266-014-0400-9
  56. 56. Gassner H.G, Sherris D.A, Otley C.C. Treatment of facial wounds with botulinum toxin A improves cosmetic outcome in primates. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2000;105: 1948-1953. Doi:10.1097/00006534-200005000-00005
  57. 57. Xiao Z, Zhang F, Lin W, Zhang M, Liu Y. Effect of botulinum toxin type a on transforming growth factor β1 in fibroblasts derived from hypertrophic scar: a preliminary report. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2010: 34;424-427. DOI 10.1007/s00266-009-9423-z
  58. 58. Freshwater M.F. Botulinum toxin for scars: Can it work, does it work, is it worth it? . Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2013:66; 92-93.
  59. 59. Colafella K.M.M, Bovée D.M, Danser A.J. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and its therapeutic targets. Experimental eye research. 2019: 186; 107680.
  60. 60. Iannello S, Milazzo P, Bordonaro F, Belfiore F. Low-dose enalapril in the treatment of surgical cutaneous hypertrophic scar and keloid-two case reports and literature review. Medscape General Medicine. 2006; 8:60
  61. 61. Buscemi C.P, Romeo C. Wound healing, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, and collagen-containing products: a case study. Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing. 2014; 41:611-614. Doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000074
  62. 62. Jonasch E, Haluska F.G, Interferon in oncological practice: review of interferon biology, clinical applications, and toxicities. The oncologist. 2001; 6:34-55. Doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.6-1-34
  63. 63. Isaacs A, Lindenmann J, Virus interference I. The interferon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B-Biological Sciences, 1957: 147; 258-267.
  64. 64. Pestka S. 1997, June. The human interferon-alpha species and hybrid proteins. In Seminars in oncology (Vol. 24, No. 3 Suppl 9, p. S9)
  65. 65. Haque S.J, Williams B.R. 1998, February. Signal transduction in the interferon system. In Seminars in oncology (Vol. 25, No. 1 Suppl 1, pp. 14-22)
  66. 66. Aguet M, Gröbke M, Dreiding P. Various human interferon a subclasses cross-react with common receptors: their binding affinities correlate with their specific biological activities. Virology, 1984:132; 211-216.
  67. 67. Merlin G, Falcoff E, Aguet M. 125I-labelled human interferons alpha, beta and gamma: comparative receptor-binding data. Journal of general virology. 1985:66;1149-1152.
  68. 68. Pfeffer L.M, Dinarello C.A, Herberman R.B, Williams B.R, Borden E.C, Bordens R., Walter M.R, Nagabhushan T.L, Trotta P.P, Pestka, S. Biological properties of recombinant α-interferons: 40th anniversary of the discovery of interferons. Cancer research. 1998; 58:2489-2499
  69. 69. Sang Y, Bergkamp J, Blecha F. Molecular evolution of the porcine type I interferon family: subtype-specific expression and antiviral activity. PLoS One. 2014; 9:112378.
  70. 70. Lopušná K, Režuchová I, Betakova T, Skovranova L, Tomašková J, Lukáčiková L, Kabat P. Interferons lambda, new cytokines with antiviral activity. Acta Virol. 2013; 57: 171-179. Doi:10.4149/av_2013_02_171
  71. 71. Zaidi M.R, Merlino, G. The two faces of interferon-γ in cancer. Clinical cancer research. 2011; 17:6118-6124. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0482
  72. 72. Tau G, Rothman P. Biologic functions of the IFN-γ receptors. Allergy. 1999; 54: 1233
  73. 73. Kim K, Cho S.K, Sestak A, Namjou B, Kang C, Bae S.C. Interferon-gamma gene polymorphisms associated with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus. Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2010; 69:1247-1250.
  74. 74. Ank N, West H, Bartholdy C, Eriksson K, Thomsen A.R, Paludan S.R. Lambda interferon (IFN-λ), a type III IFN, is induced by viruses and IFNs and displays potent antiviral activity against select virus infections in vivo. Journal of virology, 2006; 80: 4501-4509. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.80.9.4501-4509.2006
  75. 75. Vilcek J. Novel interferons. Nature immunology. 2003; 4:8-9
  76. 76. Bayat A, Arscott G, Ollier W.E.R, Ferguson M.W.J. Mc Grouther D.A. Description of site-specific morphology of keloid phenotypes in an Afrocaribbean population. British journal of plastic surgery. 2004;57:122-133.
  77. 77. Jagadeesan J, Bayat A. Transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) and keloid disease. International journal of surgery, 2007; 5:278-285.
  78. 78. Zhang T, Wang X.F, Wang Z.C, Lou D, Fang Q .Q , Hu Y.Y, Zhao W.Y, Zhang L.Y, Wu L.H, Tan W.Q . Current potential therapeutic strategies targeting the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway to attenuate keloid and hypertrophic scar formation. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2020;129: 110287.
  79. 79. Gill S.E,Parks W.C. Metalloproteinases and their inhibitors: regulators of wound healing. The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology, 2008: 40; 1334-1347.
  80. 80. Armstrong D.G, Jude E.B.The role of matrix metalloproteinases in wound healing. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 2002; 92: 12-18.
  81. 81. Wolfram D, Tzankov A, Pülzl P, PIZA-KATZER H.I.L.D.E.G.U.N.D.E. Hypertrophic scars and keloids—a review of their pathophysiology, risk factors, and therapeutic management. Dermatologic surgery, 2009: 35;171-181. Doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34406.x
  82. 82. Eto H, Suga H, Aoi N, Kato H, Doi K, Kuno S, Tabata Y, Yoshimura K. Therapeutic potential of fibroblast growth factor-2 for hypertrophic scars: upregulation of MMP-1 and HGF expression. Laboratory investigation. 2012: 92;214-223
  83. 83. Dohi T, Miyake K, Aoki M, Ogawa R, Akaishi S, Shimada T, Okada T, Hyakusoku H. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 suppresses collagen synthesis in cultured keloid fibroblasts. Plastic and reconstructive surgery Global open. 2015; 3:9. Doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000503
  84. 84. Granstein R.D, Flotte T.J, Amento E.P. Interferons and Collagen Production. Journal of investigative dermatology. 1990: 95; 75-80
  85. 85. Dooley S, Said H.M, Gressner A.M, Floege J, En-Nia A. Mertens P.R. Y-box protein-1 is the crucial mediator of antifibrotic interferon-γ effects. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2006;281:1784-1795. Doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510215200
  86. 86. Berman B. Biological agents for controlling excessive scarring. American journal of clinical dermatology, 2010;11:31-34. Berman, B. (2010).Doi:10.2165/1153419-s0-000000000-00000
  87. 87. Berman B. Duncan M.R. Short-term keloid treatment in vivo with human interferon alfa-2b results in a selective and persistent normalization of keloidal fibroblast collagen, glycosaminoglycan, and collagenase production in vitro. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1989: 21;694-702.
  88. 88. Berman B.Flores F. Recurrence rates of excised keloids treated with postoperative triamcinolone acetonide injections or interferon alfa-2b injections. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1997:37; 755-757.
  89. 89. Pittet B, Rubbia-Brandt L, Desmoulière A, Sappino A.P, Roggero P, Guerret S, Grimaud J.A, Lacher R, Montandon D, Gabbiani G. Effect of gamma-interferon on the clinical and biologic evolution of hypertrophic scars and Dupuytren's disease: an open pilot study. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1994;93:1224-1235. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199405000-00018
  90. 90. Panahi Y, Davoudi S.M, Madanchi N, Abolhasani E. Recombinant human interferon gamma (Gamma Immunex) in treatment of atopic dermatitis. Clinical and experimental medicine. 2012;12 :241-245. DOI 10.1007/s10238-011-0164-3
  91. 91. Volberding P.A, Mitsuyasu R.T, Golando J.P, Spiegel R.J. Treatment of Kaposi's sarcoma with interferon alfa-2b (Intron® A). Cancer. 1987:59;620-625.
  92. 92. Green D.S, Nunes A.T, Tosh K.W. David-Ocampo V, Fellowes V.S, Ren J, Jin J. Frodigh S.E, Pham C, Procter J,Tran C. Production of a cellular product consisting of monocytes stimulated with Sylatron®(Peginterferon alfa-2b) and Actimmune®(Interferon gamma-1b) for human use. Journal of translational medicine, 2019;17:82. Doi:10.1186/s12967-019-1822-6
  93. 93. Lee J.H, Kim S.E, Lee A.Y. Effects of interferon-α2b on keloid treatment with triamcinolone acetonide intralesional injection. International journal of dermatology, 2008; 47;183-186. Doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2008.03426.x
  94. 94. Conejo-Mir J.S, Corbi R, Linares M. Carbon dioxide laser ablation associated with interferon alfa-2binjections reduces the recurrence of keloids. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1998:39;1039-1040.Doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70295-6

Written By

Amalorpava Mary Loordhuswamy and Santhini Elango

Reviewed: 24 February 2021 Published: 23 March 2021