Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Rapeseed-Mustard Breeding in India: Scenario, Achievements and Research Needs

Written By

Subhash Chand, Om Prakash Patidar, Rajat Chaudhary, Ranjit Saroj, Kailash Chandra, Vijay Kamal Meena, Omkar M. Limbalkar, Manoj Kumar Patel, Priya P. Pardeshi and Prashant Vasisth

Submitted: October 28th, 2020 Reviewed: February 1st, 2021 Published: March 4th, 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.96319

From the Edited Volume

Brassica Breeding and Biotechnology

Edited by A. K. M. Aminul Islam, Mohammad Anwar Hossain and A. K. M. Mominul Islam

Chapter metrics overview

694 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Brassica spp., commonly known as rapeseed-mustard, plays a significant role in the Indian economy by providing edible oils, vegetables, condiments and animal feed. Globally, India holds second and third position in rapeseed-mustard area under cultivation and production, respectively. However, anthropogenically accelerated climate change thwarts yield potential of rapeseed-mustard by employing abiotic (drought, flood, temperature variation and salinity) and biotic (disease and insects) stresses. Various approaches such as molecular breeding, pre-breeding, −omics and biotechnological interventions have been used to develop varieties for improved yield and oil quality, climate resilient and resistance or tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses. In this context, this chapter highlighted the different cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) sources and their potential use for hybrid development. At the end, this chapter also enlisted salient achievement by the government and non-government institutes and briefly described the future perspective for improvement of rapeseed-mustard in India.

Keywords

  • rapeseed-mustard
  • hybrid breeding
  • oil quality
  • pre-breeding
  • biotic and abiotic stress

1. Introduction

Brassicaspp., commonly known as rapeseed-mustard, plays an important role in the Indian economy by providing edible oils, vegetables, condiments and animal feed [1]. Nine oilseeds are the primary sources of vegetable oil in India. Among them soybean (39%), groundnut (26%) and rapeseed-mustard (24%) contribute more than 88% of total oilseeds production in the country. However, rapeseed-mustard (31%) contributes maximum in terms of edible oil production followed by soybean (26%) and groundnut (25%) in the country [2].

Rapeseed-mustard is the third major edible oilseed crop of the world after soybean and palm oil. Globally, as per USDA during 2018-2019, it was grown over 36.6 million hectares and produced 72.4 MT with a productivity of 19.8 q/ha. Globally, India accounts 19.8% of total acreage and 9.8% of total production. Rapeseed-mustard (8.3 MT) is the third most important annual oilseed crop in India, next to soybean (13.6 MT) and groundnut (9.1 MT) [2]. In India, rapeseed-mustard is widely grown in diverse agro-climatic environments from North-East, North-West, Central to Southern states under different conditions such as sole crop/mixed crop, early/timely/late, rainfed/irrigated and saline or alkaline soils [3]. Based on average of 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 area and production data, major rapeseed-mustard growing states are Rajasthan (producing 44.9% of total rapeseed-mustard from 40.7% area), Madhya Pradesh (producing 11.3% from 11.9% area) and Uttar Pradesh (producing 10.6% from 11.2% area). Rapeseed-mustard crops in India comprise eight species viz., Indian mustard, toria, black mustard, yellow sarson, brown sarson, gobhi sarson, karan rai and taramira (Table 1).

SpeciesCommon nameType of PollinationChromosome No. (2n)GenomeGenome size (Mb)
B. juncea(L.) Czern.Indian mustardOften-self36AABB~922
B. carinataA. BraunKaran rai or Ethiopian mustardOften-self34BBCC
B. napusL.Gobhi sarsonSelf and cross38AACC~1130
B. nigra(L.) KochBlack mustardCross16BB~558
B. oleraceaL.Cabbage, cauliflower etc.Cross18CC~630
B. rapaL.var. brown sarsonLotni type: Cross
Tora type: Self
20AA~485
var. toriaCross
var. yellow sarsonSelf
Eruca sativaTaramiraSelf22EE
B. albaRab. (Syn. Sinapis alba)White mustardSelf24SS

Table 1.

List of limited and importantly cultivated species of Brassica species.

Advertisement

2. Origin

Historically, the cultivation of Brassicaspp. has been quoted in numerous ancient scriptures and believed to be cultivated on or prior to 5000 BC. It has also been reported that mustard crop had cultivated in Channhu-daro of Harrapan ancient civilization during 2300-1750 BC [4]. There is ambiguity in the history as the origin of B. junceais concerned. It had been believed that center of origin for B. junceais Middle-East, where putative parents i.e. B. nigraand B. rapawould have crossed with each other. Later on, it had been disseminated to other parts of the world such as Europe, Asia, and Africa etc. [5]. Today, there are two centers of diversity i.e.China and Eastern India based on the prevalence of their wild progenitors and relatives. At present, it has been proved that there are two geographical races i.e.Chinese and Indian of B. junceabased on molecular and biochemical studies [6].

In 1935, Nagaharu U [7] proposed a theory known as U’s triangle to show genetic relationships based on artificial inter-specific hybridization experiments among six species, namely; B. rapa, B. nigra, B. oleracea, B. carinata, B. napusand B. juncea. As per theory, three allotetrapolyploid species (B. napus, B. juncea and B. carinata) were derived by natural hybridization of three basic diploid species (B. rapa, B. nigraand B. oleracea) followed by genome doubling (Figure 1). Nowadays, with the accomplishments of genome sequencing of Brassicataxa, this hypothesis has been increasingly accepted. Furthermore, it has been scientifically proved that allotetraploid B. napusand B. junceahad been derived from their diploid parents based on comparative genomic analysis and the results were in accordance with ‘U’ triangle [8].

Figure 1.

U’s triangle showing genetic relationship among six Brassica species [7].

Advertisement

3. Distribution

Brassicasinclude large number of crops under cultivation. Among them, the Indian mustard occupies maximum area (> 90%) and predominantly cultivated in North-Western states followed by some nontraditional areas of Central and Southern states of the country [1]. The lotni (cross-pollinated) and tora (self-pollinated) are two different ecotypes of brown sarson. Earlier one is mainly cultivated in temperate regions of the country such as parts of Jammu, Kashmir and hilly areas of Himachal Pradesh, whereas later one is cultivated in parts of Eastern Uttar Pradesh [3]. However, yellow sarson is predominantly cultivated in parts of Bihar, West Bengal and Orissa. Toria is mainly used as short period crop in parts of Bihar, West Bengal, Orissa and Assam. Whereas, it is grown as a catch crop in Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand and Western Uttar Pradesh. Taramira, relatively more drought tolerant, is cultivated in drier parts of Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Haryana. However, karan rai and gobhi sarson have limited area under cultivation in India [1].

Advertisement

4. Breeding approaches in rapeseed-mustard

4.1 Abiotic stresses

Plant stress factors can be elucidated as any adverse condition or substance that affects the growth, reproduction, metabolism and development of the plant [3]. Acclimatization or hardening refers to exposure of unfavorable environmental circumstance to the plant and thereby results into physiological adjustment that protects it from injury or impaired growth which is mostly occurred due to environmental stresses [9]. There might be fixed genetic changes if plant faces several generations under constant stress condition by selective environmental pressure and thereby population show adaptation to changed environment. Abiotic factors are the main yield-limiting factors for crop plants including rapeseed-mustard. The major abiotic factors are- moisture variation (drought and flood), temperature variation (heat, cold and frost), salinity and heavy metal that adversely affect the metabolic pathways and thereby result into yield penalty.

4.1.1 Drought stress

Globally, rapid climate change under anthropogenic accelerated interventions crafts drought a major menace to the agricultural production system and consequently has a great challenge to the global food and nutritional security. Plants have different ways to synergies with drought stress such as modifications in plant growth, behavior, morphology, and physiology. In Brassica, drought tolerance is a complex trait and thereby associated with different traits; and can be evaluated by various indicators. Moreover, it is difficult to choose all the exiting indicators at a time to use in breeding programs for crop improvement. Drought can adversely affect plant growth at various stages from seed germination to reproduction and flowering to harvesting, and ultimately results into oil and yield penalty [3]. Prolonged drought reduces chlorophyll content mostly due to impaired functioning of thylakoid membrane and heavy loss of pigments [10]. In the context, the pattern of gene expression of those traits which are associated with osmotic balance, water transport, damage repair and oxidative stress will be altered by prolonged drought stress (Table 2). Thus, drought is one of the major factors to reduce potential yield of crop plants and introgression of traits from wild relatives can be used for the development of drought resilient cultivars in rapeseed-mustard.

SpeciesGene/sFunctionToleranceReferences
ArabidopsisDREB1ADehydration response element binding proteinDrought, salt and freezing[11]
SOS1Plasma membrane-bound Na+/H+ antiportsSalt[12]
AtNHX1Vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporterSalt[13]
AtHKT1Na + transporterSalt[14]
FTAFarnesyltransferaseDrought[15]
AtFTBβ-subunit of FarnesyltransferaseDrought[16]
Arthrobacter globiformiscodACholine oxidaseSalt[17]
B. rapaBrERF4Ethylene-responsive factorsDrought and salt[18]
BrGIReduced expression of GI, enhanced salt toleranceSalt[19]
B. napusAtDWF4Enhanced defense gene expressionDrought and heat[20]
BnNHX1and BnHKTSalt-responsive genesSalt[21]
BnLEA4-1Late-embryogenesis abundant proteins in group 4Salt[22]
BnLASTranscriptional regulator members in GRAS familyDrought[23]
DREBImproving the abiotic stress toleranceSalt[24]
BnSIP1-1Played roles in ABA synthesis and signalingSalt and Osmotic[25]
AnnBn1Membrane-binding proteins for Ca2+Drought[26]
B. oleraceavar. botrytisAPX, SODProtect from oxidative stressSalt[27]
B. junceacv. varunaGlyoxalase I LectinCatalyze the detoxification of a highly cytotoxic metabolite methylglyoxal to d-lactateDrought and salt[28]
B. junceaBrECSGlutamylcysteine synthetaseSalt[29]
AtLEA4-1AtLEA4-1 LEA4 proteinSalt[30]
Gly IDetoxification of methylglyoxalSalt[31]
AnnBj2Upregulated expression of ABA-dependent (RAB18) and ABA independent (DREB2B) genesSalt[32]

Table 2.

Brief summary of abiotic stress tolerance associated genes and their functions.

4.1.2 Salt stress

Recent advances in molecular breeding have been characterized and genetically mapped various salt related genes in plants. Gradual increase of the understanding of several biochemical, and physiological mechanisms and pathways of salt related genes has made it easy to develop genetically improved varieties which are more resilient and high yielding under salinity stress. In this context, transgenic approaches have also been used to know the effect of salt tolerant genes into the different genetic background by up-regulating or down-regulating genes under salt stress [33]. The progress under salt tolerance is great in major agricultural crops such as wheat, rice, mustard and tomato. A large number of gene (s)/QTLshave been mapped as well as cloned [33]. As Brassicacrops are concerned, there are limited studies on salt regulating genes or QTLsacross the world. In India, only limited salt tolerant varieties have been developed so far such as “CS56” and breeding approaches are not as much successful as to other stresses [3]. It is need of the hour to understand the mechanism of salt tolerance and to identify stable salt tolerance genotypes from available genetic resources by extensive screening methods to use them in breeding programs. Researchers have done excellent work on ion homeostasis and osmolytes regulation by using transgenic approach in Brassicacrops [34] and identified few candidate genes (Table 2).

Apparently, both drought and salinity stress have few similarities in plants. Both stresses are primarily responsible for cellular dehydration, which removes water from the cytoplasm into the intercellular space [35]. Based on the functional similarity of both the stresses in plants, it can be concluded that plants have almost identical mechanism to deal with both stresses. In the present scenario, researchers are extensively working on model plant i.e. A. thalianato understand the genetics of salt and drought stress tolerance, which can positively help to develop tolerance cultivars in Brassicaspp. and will improve agronomically important traits [36].

4.1.3 Heat stress

As the global warming is increasing due to unwarranted human activities, heat stress has become a major factor to hamper plant growth and development in agricultural crops including rapeseed-mustard. Early sowing of Indian mustard, have various advantages as enlisted by Kaur and coworkers [37] but high temperature during the germination stage leads to reduction in the plant emergence and poor plant stand. The yield potential of Indian mustard was significantly reduced under late sown condition compared to timely sown due to terminal heat stress [38]. The reduction in emergence of Indian mustard due to hot soils can lead to substantial economic losses [39]. Where irrigation is available and multiple cropping system followed, especially in Central and North-Western plain zones, sowing of the mustard crop is delayed up to end of November due to late vacation of Kharifcrop, leads to exposure of the crop to high temperature at maturity.

Rapeseed-mustard is adversely affected by heat stress (35/15 °C) at the early stage of flowering. Moreover, yield penalty can be avoided if high temperature occurs during early pod formation. In this context, B. rapais more sensitive to high temperature whereas B. junceaand B. napusare equally affected [40]. It has been reported that optimal temperature for B. napusis lower than B. junceaand B. rapa[41]. Generally, as temperature increased, the number of pods produced by the plants increased and seed weight decreased. High temperature has a direct effect on the formation of reproductive organs. More research is needed under controlled environments to identify the critical temperature, sensitive reproductive organ stage, source-sink relationship, and genotypic variations for heat stress tolerance and must be verified under natural conditions [42].

4.1.4 Low temperature stress

Freezing injury has adverse effect on plant growth and development, and thereby leads to yield penalty. Seed germination is seriously affected by low temperature. Plant stress hormones such as Brassinolide (BR) regulate plant physiological pathways and helps in plant protection to combat low temperature stress [43]. Exogenous application of BR increased cold stress tolerance in A. thalianaand B. napus[44]. In this context, BR increases chlorophyll content, PS-II, antioxidant enzymatic activities and protect photosynthetic membrane system from oxidative damage [45]. It has been reported that accumulation of reactive oxygen species such as superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, singlet oxygen and hydroxyl radical is high under cold stress, and thereby causes oxidative stress in plants which leads to cell death [46]. The B. rapahas been reported more cold tolerance than B. napus. The impact of heat stress is high than cold stress because of inactivation of RuBisCO and/or other associated enzymes under heat stress. Intriguingly, B. oleraceais cold tolerant due to its acclimatization in cold regions of Europe, where summer temperature is also low and crop had domesticated since long back.

Thus, acclimatization, domestication, adaptive trans-generational plasticity and genetic adaptation phenomenon can work simultaneously to abiotic stress tolerance in Brassicaspecies.

4.2 Biotic stresses

A number of biotic stresses adversely affect the yield potential of rapeseed-mustard in India. The major diseases are- Alternaria blight (Alternaria brassicaeand A. brassicicola), white rust (Albugo candida), stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum), Rhizoctonia rot and downy mildew (Peronospora brassicae); and major insect pests are- aphid (Lipaphis erysimi), mustard saw fly (Athalia proxima) and painted bug (Bagrada hilaris). There are several methods to control insect and disease incidence such as application of pesticides, fungicides, biological agents and other non-chemical techniques. However, the most economic, eco-friendly and cheap way to mitigate these menaces are to use of resistant or tolerant cultivars through convention and molecular breeding approaches.

4.2.1 Alternaria blight

The yield potential of Brassicaspp. is adversely affected by Alternaria blight [Alternaria brassicae(Berk) Sacc.] disease. The pathogen can affect the host plant at all stages of growth and highest disease severity was observed during rainy season. The B. junceaand B. rapaare more susceptible than B. carinataand B. napusto Alternaria blight. The researchers have reported several sources of disease tolerance such as B. junceacv. Divya, and wild species such as Sinapis albaL., B. maurorum, Diplotaxis berthautiiand D. erucoidesetc. [47]. Higher concentration of phenolic compounds (polyphenol peroxidase, oxidase and catalase), low N content, higher leaf sugar content, and more leaf wax deposition have been reported to deliver resistance to plants against Alternaria blight disease [48]. Pre and post fertilization barriers are major concern while using wild relatives and progenitors as donor source in rapeseed-mustard breeding programs. However, limited sources of B. juncea(PHR 2, RC781, Divya, PAB 9534, and EC 399301) have been reported tolerance against this disease and extensively being used in breeding programs [3].

4.2.2 White rust

White rust [Albugo candida(Pers.) Kuntze] is a destructive disease in B. junceaand B. rapa; and significantly reduces potential yield up to 60% in mustard [49]. Forty-nine races of A. candidahave been reported in India based on their infectivity on different Brassicaspp. and their cultivars [50]. Most of the varieties under Indian mustard are susceptible to white rust whereas B. carinataand B. napusdemonstrate high degree of resistance. Thus, gene introgression from B. carinataand B. napusto B. junceathrough interspecific hybridization is essential for development of resistant or tolerant cultivars in the country [51]. The varieties bred for disease tolerance are- JM-1, JM-2, DMH-1 and Basanti etc.

4.2.3 Sclerotinia rot

In rapeseed-mustard, Sclerotinia rot disease is triggered by Sclerotinia sclerotiorumand adversely affects plant growth and development. The disease has turned form minor significance to major one since last decade due to change in climatic condition. Pre-mature ripening is the cause of the disease. The pathogen has an array of alternate host therefore breeding for disease resistant is difficult [3].

4.2.4 Insect (Aphid)

Mustard aphid (Lipaphis erysimi) is one of the major insect pests in rapeseed-mustard and adversely affects plant growth, development, and reproduction; and thereby results into yield penalty. They are also act as vector for plant viral diseases such as turnip mosaic virus. There are several methods to identify resistant source for aphid resistance/tolerance in Brassicafamily such as based on seedling survival, aphid fecundity, and aphid infestation index etc. Some genotypes of B. junceasuch as Glossy B-85, RH 7847, and T 6343 were reported more tolerant to aphid infestation. B. campestris is more susceptible to aphid infestation than B. junceaand B. carinata[3].

4.3 Oil quality improvement

The oil quality for human consumption is determined by its fatty acid composition and concentration. Seed oil with high proportion of unsaturated fatty acid, particularly 16 and 18 carbon chain, is considered suitable for human consumption as edible oil. Rapeseed-mustard is mostly used as oilseed crop in India and its seed contain 35-45% oil content with 92-98% triacylglycerol of fatty acids (C16-C22). Seed oil contains lowermost saturated fat and possesses high proportion of essential fatty acid such as linoleic (C18:2) and linolenic (C18:3) which are not synthesized by human body. Linolenic acid is an essential dietary fatty acid; however, its higher concentration reduces shelf-life of oil because of auto-oxidation [3]. Erucic acid (C22:1) comprises almost 50% of total seed oil fatty acid in rapeseed-mustard and is undesirable for human consumption due to its adverse role in myocardial conductance and increase the level of blood cholesterol. The level of detrimental saturated fatty acid is less in rapeseed-mustard compared to other edible oilseed crops. The major constrains in seed oil are- erucic acid and glucosinolates [52]. Therefore, reduced concentration of glucosinolates and erucic acids is one of the important objectives in quality amelioration of Indian mustard seed oil. It has been reported that genetic inheritance of glucosinolates is complex and mostly are aliphatic (methionine derived) in nature in B. juncea. Genetic control of total glucosinolates in B. junceahas been reported to be under two major genes [53], multiple additive alleles at a single locus with maternal effects involved [54], six to seven genes [55] and up to five major QTLs [56] based on molecular mapping information.

The rapeseed-mustard varieties with low erucic (<2%) and glucosinolates (<30 μ mole/g of defatted cake) are termed as double zero (“00”). The term single zero (“0”) is used when variety contains only one factor either low erucic (<2%) or glucosinolates (<30 μ mole/g of defatted cake). In this context, several efforts have been made to improve oil quality of rapeseed-mustard in India since last three decades. In India, first low erucic acid (“0”) variety was LES-39 (Pusa Karishma) followed by LES-1-27 (Pusa Mustard 21), LET-18 (PM 24), and LET-17 (PM-22) in B. juncea,whereas double zero variety was Pusa Double Zero Mustard 31 (PDZM-1).

4.4 Hybrid breeding

Rapeseed-mustard exploits high level of heterosis but employ difficulty in seed production due to complex flower structure, presence of self-compatibility and thereby self-pollination in nature, however crop also enjoyed cross-pollination (30%) by pollinators such as honey bees. The extent of heterosis was reported by Sun [57] in rapeseed-mustard during early forties and was pioneer to begin with hybridization for exploitation of hybrid vigor. Subsequently, Ogura [58] had successfully transferred male sterile cytoplasm from radish (Raphanus sativusL.) to B. juncea. In this context, several cytoplasmic male sterility systems have been reported such as tour [59] in B. napus, oxyrrhina[59], siifolia[60], trachystoma[61], moricandia[62], catholica[63], alba[62], lyratus[64], canariense[65], erucoides[66], 126-1[67] and barthauti[68]. Transgenic male sterility (barnase-barstar system) system was also used for exploitation of heterosis and development of hybrid varieties [69, 70]. It has been reported that large number of sterile cytoplasm is available, however only few can be utilized in heterosis due to lack of adequate and efficient fertility restoration system. Therefore, ICAR sponsored project (1989) “Promotion of Research and Development Efforts on Hybrids in Crops” which aimed for systematic and coordinated efforts for hybrid development in rapeseed-mustard in India with two CMS systems (oguand tour)in B. junceawhile polimain B. napus.

In India, heterosis was first reported in brown sarson (B. rapa) by Singh and Mehta [71]. It has been reported that the extent of heterosis is 13 to 99% in B. juncea, 10 to 72% in B. napus, 25 to 110% in B. rapa. Generally, hybridization between genetically distinct groups exploits high level heterosis than within group. Exploitation of high level of heterosis in plants necessitates large and usable heterosis, effective pollination control mechanism, and profitability of seed production [70]. Thus, there is urgent need to improve genetic gain and heterosis in rapeseed-mustard; genetic variability, in terms of variety, can be tested for 2-3 years across the centers in the country through All India Coordinated Research Project [72] and by result of high yielding, stress tolerance and stable variety would be produced.

4.4.1 Cytoplasmic male sterility and hybrids

A large number of CMS systems are available in rapeseed-mustard such as Raphanus/ogu, tour, oxyrrhina, siifolia, trachystoma, moricandia, catholica, lyratus, canariense, erucoides, and barthauti(Table 3). All the CMS sources cannot be directly used in hybridization programme due to their negative effects on plant growth and development such as chlorosis (ogura, oxyrrhinaand moricandia), impaired flower opening (tour, trachystomaand lyratus), and also absence of fertility restoration. The chlorosis of three systems (ogu, oxyrrhina, moricandia) had been cured through somatic hybridization by fusing protoplast of chlorotic sterile and normal green plant [74]. The fertility restorer genes (Rfs) were identified in five CMS systems viz. trachystoma, moricandia, catholica, canarienseand lyratusin their respective cytoplasmic donor species and restorer can be isolated simultaneously during transfer of sterile cytoplasm.

CMS systemDiscovered byYearFertility restoration
Raphanus/oguOgura [58]1968Restorer gene is available in B. juncea
tourRawat and Anand [59]1979Available in B. napus
oxyrrhinaPrakash and Chopra [73]1988No restoration available
siifoliaRao and coworkers [60]1994No restoration available
trachystomaKirti and coworkers [61]1995Single dominant gene available for restoration
moricandiaPrakash and coworkers [62]1995Single dominant gene reported for restoration
catholicaKirti and coworkers [63]1995Reported but not in use
albaPrakash and coworkers [62]1995Available in B. napus
lyratusBanga and Banga [64]1997Reported but not in use
canariensePrakash and coworkers [65]2001Reported but not in use
erucoidesBhat and coworkers [66]2006Reported but not in use
126-1Sodhi and coworkers [67]2006Reported in B. napus
barthautiBhat and coworkers [68]2008Reported but not in use

Table 3.

Important sources of CMS in rapeseed-mustard for hybrid seed production.

The success of hybridization programme, by using CMS system, depends upon availability of efficient fertility restoration. In rapeseed-mustard, the utmost used CMS system in India are-Raphanus/oguCMS system, B. tournefortiiCMS system, Moricandia arvensisCMS system, and Erucastrum canarienseCMS system. In India, the first commercial hybrid PGSH 51 (B. napus) was released in 1994 based on tourCMS and yield was increased by 18% over the best hybrid check. The other hybrids are as follow- Hyola 401 hybrid (2000) was based on polCMS system, NRCHB-506 (2008) on moricytoplasm, DMH-1 (2008) on 126-1CMS, and PAC-432 (2009) on ogucytoplasm etc. The genetic engineering techniques had also utilized for the development of male sterile system to exploit the heterosis in rapeseed-mustard and develop the barnase-barstar male sterile system [69, 70]. Hybrid DMH-11 was developed by Delhi University in India which became India’s first transgenic hybrid through barnase-barstar system. But DMH-11 was not released for commercial cultivation due to resistance from environmental activist in thought of its harm to environment.

4.5 Pre-breeding

Wild progenitors and wild relatives are to be known as repository of valuable traits (quality, agronomic, biotic and abiotic stress tolerance) in crop plants but cannot be introgressed into the cultivated ones due to linkage drag, and cross-incompatibility barriers. Pre-breeding helps to identify the useful traits in wild germplasm and employ its use in breeding programs. The major objective of pre-breeding is to introduce new variation into the species of interest with minimum linkage drag. Molecular markers would play a great role to accelerate the breeding cycle, reduction in cost and time, and increase in the efficiency of introgression in pre-breeding programs [75].

Globally, India (15%) ranked second after China (17%) in terms of repository of Brassicagermplasm. In India, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR) has contributed 4095 indigenous and 3401 exotic rapeseed-mustard accessions from 1986-2006 [76]. All the efforts have resulted into the collection of a total of 14,722 accessions of cultivated, wild relatives, wild progenitors and related species [3]. There is a wide gap between available germplasm in gene banks and its utilization in the breeding programs due to lack of available identified traits. Thus, there is urgent need to broaden the plant genetic diversity to combat anthropogenically accelerated climate change in the near future.

Advertisement

5. Biotechnological approaches

Rapeseed (B. napus), cultivated in temperate climate, have been believed to originate by natural hybridization between B. oleraceaand B. rapa. B. napuswas resynthesized by protoplast fusion of B. oleraceaand B. rapato widen genetic diversity and alter oil content. The biotechnical intervention was used either to increase of genetic variability or transfer of desirable traits from other related species such wild relatives, wild progenitors or other unrelated crops to improve yield potential of crop which were not possible due to conventional or classical breeding methods.

5.1 Anther culture

Pollen culture can be used to develop stable homozygous lines by double haploid (DH) technique to improve agronomic traits in B. juncea. Improvement in culture condition and associated factors, which are limiting factor for embryo production, tend to increase efficiency of microspore culture or anther culture in B. juncea[77]. It has been reported that microspore culture is more successful than anther culture due to better response of genotypes for embryo culture. Microspore culture can be used for gene transfer, biochemical studies, and modification of fatty acid profile through mutagenesis [77]. The major factors which affect doubled haploid production are- isolation of microspore, culture media, embryo selection, plant regeneration, and chromosomal duplication. In India, there is no variety under cultivation of this technique.

5.2 Somaclonal variation

Somaclonal variation can be defined as genetic variation in somatic cells due to chromosomal rearrangement and regeneration of variable plants from callus by plant tissue culture. Furthermore, B. junceavariety Prakash produced multiple shoots in cotyledonary callus when high cytokinin and low IAA concentration was used in MS media [78]. A large genetic variation has been created in B. junceaby tissue culture through induced somaclonal, chemical mutagens, and gamma rays induced variation. For example, somaclone- SC-122 was developed with improvement of five traits which were associated with yield improvement [79]. In India, Pusa Jai Kisan (Bio-902) was first somaclonal derived variety in 1993 by using Varuna as a parent and yield was improved by 17.4% over the parent.

5.3 Protoplast culture

Protoplast, cell without cell wall, culture induces protoclonal variation and creates stable genetic variability in rapeseed-mustard by using tissue culture technique. This technique was used B. junceacv. RLM-198 by using V-47 media for production of somatic embryo and organogenesis. This method can be used for those Brassicaspecies where hybridization is not possible and will help to create genetic variability for betterment of crop improvement.

5.4 Transgenic plants

In crop species, transgenic plants have been developed by using the recombinant DNA technology. It has been widely used to transfer alien gene/chromosomal segment to the recipient parent where naturally gene of interest is absent for betterment of mankind. Various direct and indirect methods have been used for gene transfer in crop plants including rapeseed-mustard and mostly used direct method is Agrobacteriummediated gene transfer for seed yield, seed quality, biotic and abiotic stress tolerance and desirable agronomic traits [80]. As earlier mentioned, transgenic male sterility system was used for production of hybrids in India. Thus, these biotechnological interventions can solve the problems of conventional breeding which are mainly associated with hybridization and selection.

5.5 -Omics approaches

The world of –omics is vast and covers several disciplines such as genomics (total DNA content of organism), transcriptomics (deals with total RNA content), proteomics (deals with total proteins), and metabolomics (total metabolites of an individual). Being amphidiploid and tetraploid in nature, both B. junceaand B. napusneed -omics approaches to understand the trait based genetics for improvement of these crops.

5.6 Genomics

Linkage mapping and association studies were used to identify the genomic locations of a particular trait of interest. Genomic locations were identified based on molecular markers in Brassicaspp. For example, Mukherjee and coworkers [81] mapped genes governing white rust resistance using BSA in B. juncea. Padmaja and coworkers [82] mapped seed coat color gene and identified microsatellite markers, Ra2-A11, Na10-A08and Ni4-F11linked to seed coat color in B. juncea. Furthermore, Liu and coworkers [83] dissected genetic architecture for glucosinolates accumulation in seed and leaves using GWAS in B. napus. Kaur and coworkers [84] carried out genome wide association mapping and candidate gene analysis for pod shatter resistance in B.juncea. Comparative mapping was also used in rapeseed-mustard for different agronomic and quality traits. For example, Cai and coworkers [85] identified candidate gene- BnAP2for seed weight in B. napusby using comparative mapping with A. thaliana. Bisht and coworkers [86] identified candidate genes, BjuA.GSL-ELONG.a, BjuA.GSL-ELONG.c, BjuA.GSL-ELONG.d, BjuA.GSL-ALK.aand BjuA.Myb28.afor glucosinolates biosynthesis through comparative mapping among A. thaliana, B. oleraceaand B. juncea. Genomics has been extensively used for evolutionary studies in Brassicaspp. Couvreur and coworkers [87] used nad4 intron 1marker for phylogenetic analysis to study temporal diversification and establishment of evolutionary pattern in the mustard family. Furthermore, Augustine and coworkers [88] isolated four BjuCYB83A1genes from B. juncea, which involved in glucosinolates synthesis and through phylogenetic and divergence analysis they have revealed that these genes have evolved via duplication and hybridization of two diploid Brassica genomes i.e. B. rapaand B. nigra.

5.7 Transcriptomics

Transcriptomics contributes the comprehensive understanding about the gene expression, through which it is easy to allocate gene function and its effect on any organism. It has been used for expression studies, gene silencing, and genome editing in Brassicaspp. for example, Heng and coworkers [89] identified orf288gene associated with male sterility in B. junceathrough expression analysis of orf288transcript. Bhattacharya and coworkers [90] studied down regulation of BjAGPase and seed specific expression of AtWRI1gene of Arabidopsisin order to increase seed lipid content in B. juncea. Savadi and coworkers [91] increased seed weight and seed oil content in Indian mustard through seed specific overexpression of DGAT1gene of A. thaliana.Zhao and coworkers [92] carried out RNAi mediated gene silencing of mutS homolog1which results in male sterility in B. junceadue to sub-stoichiometric shifting in ORF220. Zheng and coworkers [93] carried out gene knockout experiment through CRISPR/Cas9 in BnaMAX1homologs of B. napus, which resulted in reduction in plant height and increase in branch number.

5.8 Proteomics

Proteins are the ultimate products which confer the gene function and govern the phenotypic expression to an individual. Proteomics approaches such as protein expression profiling and comparative proteomics analysis were used to study the gene function in Brassicaspp. For example, Mihr and coworkers [94] used “Tournefortii” CMS system of B. napusto study protein content of mitochondrial compartments in male sterile and fertile NILs. Mohammadi and coworkers [95] performed comparative proteome analysis in rapeseed seedlings for root traits under draught stress and concluded that proteins such as H+ ATPase, HSP 90 and EF2 play a key role in draught tolerance. Yousuf and coworkers [96] identified salt stress responsive proteins in the shoots of Indian mustard genotypes through comparative proteome analysis approach. Yousuf and coworkers [97] studied different protein expression profiles of N2 efficient and N2 inefficient Indian mustard in response to elevated CO2 and low N2.

5.9 Metabolomics

Recent efforts in metabolomics have been directed to improve quality and yield of any crop. An integration of metabolomics with other approaches establishes an important relevance in crop improvement. However, metabolomics has not exploited much in mustard breeding, so it would be an emerging field of research for Brassicaimprovement. Few studies have been carried out in B. juncea. For example, Sinha and coworkers [98] performed metabolic engineering of fatty acid biosynthesis in order to improve nutritional quality of seed oil in Indian mustard. Kortesniemi and coworkers [99] investigated seed metabolomics using NMR in B. napusand B. rapaand found that unsaturated fatty acids, sucrose and sinapine were most discriminating metabolites.

Advertisement

6. Achievements

In India, 189 rapeseed-mustard varieties (118 Indian mustard; 7 karan rai; 14 gobhi sarson; 24 toria; 15 yellow sarson; 3 brown sarson; 1 black mustard; 7 taramira) were developed and released and some of them are enlisted in Table 4. Several CMS based hybrids were developed by government and non-government institutes. A total of 7029 accessions comprising toria (508), Indian mustard (4,600), yellow sarson (548), gobhi sarson (146), brown sarson (108), karan rai (232), taramira (67), B. caudatus(04), R. caudates(01), B. rugose(30), B. nigra(22), S. alba(01), Crambespp. (02), and Lapidiumspp. (02) were maintained through appropriate mating system at various coordinated centers in the country [100]. As seed oil quality is concerned, low glucosinolates content was transferred from agronomically poor exotic genetic stock of B. juncea, BJ-1058 to the genetic background of high yielding mustard varieties. Genetics of fatty acid profile and glucosinolates content has been worked out and gene pool for high oil content and disease resistance were developed.

Stress/situation/conditionRecommended varieties
SalinityIndian mustard: CS-54, Pusa Vijay, NRCDR 2, CS 234-4, CS-52, Narendra Rai-1, NRCDR 601
High temperatureIndian mustard: Urvashi, RGN 13, Pusa Agrani, Kanti, PM 26, PM 27, DRMR 1165-40, NRCDR 2, NRCDR 601
High oil contentIndian mustard: Narendra Swarna Rai 8
EarlinessIndian mustard: Kanti, Narendra Ageti Rai 4, Pusa Agrani, Pusa Mahak, DRMR 150-35; Yellow sarson: NRCYS 05-01
IntercroppingIndian mustard: RH-30, RH781, Vardan
Non-traditional areasIndian mustard: Pusa Agrani, Pusa Jai kisan, Gujarat Mustard 2, Pusa Mahak (for north-east only)
Late sownIndian mustard: Ashirwad, RLM 619, SwaranJyoti, Vardan, Navgold, NRCHB 101
Frost toleranceRGN13, RH-781, SwaranJyoti
Drought (Rainfed)Indian mustard: RH-819, RH-781, GM1, Pusa Bahar, Pusa Bold, Aravali Mustard, Sej-2, JD-6, Geeta, RGN-48, RL-99-27, Shivani, PBR-9
Karan rai: Pusa Aditya, DRMR 150-35, Pusa Swarnim
IrrigatedIndian mustard: PM-28, DRMRIJ 31
Low erucic acid /glucosinolatesIndian mustard: Pusa Karishma, Pusa Mustard 21, PM 22
Gobhi Sarson: Hyola 401, GSC 5, GSC 6, NUDB 26-11, Teri Uttam Jawahar, PM 24
White rustIndian mustard: Basanti, JM 1, JM 2, Maya, Pusa Jagannath
Powdery mildew and Alternaria blightIndian mustard: DRMR 150-35, NRCDR 2, NRCDR 601
Wider adaptabilityIndian mustard: Pusa Bold

Table 4.

Improved varieties of Indian mustard for specific environmental conditions.

Advertisement

7. Future outlook and strategy

To fulfill the demand of edible oil for ever increasing population, constant efforts are needed for higher production and productivity by conventional, molecular or biotechnological approaches in the country. Genetic variability is the prerequisite for crop improvement program. Moreover, there is imperative need to diversify the genetic base of varieties by utilization of exotic germplasm as well as other wild and related species. In this context, combination of conventional plant breeding with biotechnological tools can be used for development of high yielding varieties with good oil quality and tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses. Global warming and the climate change are very critical challenges in the near future. Efforts to develop climate resilient crop cultivars are the need of the hour. Marker assisted selection (MAS), functional genomics, phenomics, proteomics and metabolomics are the next step to develop varieties for drought and heat tolerance and breeding programs must be reoriented to meet the future challenges. Nowadays, omics breeding has emerged as a novel concept in crop improvement and upcoming era will be dominated by this approach as it is more robust and rapid as compared to conventional breeding.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

“The authors declare no conflict of interest.”

References

  1. 1. Jat RS, Singh VV, Sharma P, Rai PK. OilseedBrassicain India: Demand, supply, policy perspective and future potential. OCL. 2019; 26: 8
  2. 2. MAFW. Annual report 2018-19 by Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. 2019; Retrieved fromhttp://agricoop.nic.in/sites/default/files/AR_2018-19_Final_for_Print.pdf
  3. 3. Chauhan JS, Singh KH, Singh VV, Kumar S. Hundred years of rapeseed-mustard breeding in India: accomplishments and future strategies. Indian J Agric Sci. 2011; 81 (12):1093-1109
  4. 4. Allchin FR. In the domestication and exploitation of plants and animals eds; P.J. Ucko and GW Dimbledy, London. 1969. pp. 323-329
  5. 5. Hemingway JS. Mustard:Brassicaspp. andSinapis alba(cruciferae). In Evolution of Crop Plants. Simmonds (Ed,), Longmans, London. 1979; pp. 56-59
  6. 6. Song KM, Osborn TC, Williams PH.Brassicataxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs). Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1988; 75(5): 784-794
  7. 7. Nagaharu U. Genome analysis inBrassicawith special reference to the experimental formation ofB. napusand peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn J Bot. 1935; 7(7): 389-452
  8. 8. Yang J, Liu D, Wang X, Ji C, Cheng F, Liu B, Hu Z, Chen S, Pental D, Ju Y, Yao P. The genome sequence of allopolyploidBrassica junceaand analysis of differential homoeolog gene expression influencing selection. Nature Genetics. 2016; 48(10): 1225-1232
  9. 9. Crisp PA, Ganguly D, Eichten SR, Borevitz JO, Pogson BJ.Reconsidering plant memory: Intersections between stress recovery, RNA turnover, and epigenetics. Science Advances. 2016; 2(2): e1501340
  10. 10. Champolivier L, Merrien A. Effects of water stress applied at different growth stages toBrassica napusL. var.oleiferaon yield, yield components and seed quality. European Journal of Agronomy. 1996; 5(3-4): 153-160
  11. 11. Kasuga M, Liu Q , Miura S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nat Biotechnol. 1999; 17(3): 287-291
  12. 12. Shi H, Ishitani M, Kim C, Zhu JK. TheArabidopsis thalianasalt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+antiporter. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 2000;97 (12): 6896-6901
  13. 13. Zhang HX, Hodson JN, Williams JP, Blumwald E. Engineering salt-tolerantBrassicaplants: characterization of yield and seed oil quality in transgenic plants with increased vacuolar sodium accumulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001; 98(22): 12832-12836
  14. 14. Berthomieu P, Conéjéro G, Nublat A, Brackenbury WJ, Lambert C, Savio C, Uozumi N, Oiki S, Yamada K, Cellier F, Gosti F. Functional analysis of AtHKT1 inArabidopsisshows that Na+ recirculation by the phloem is crucial for salt tolerance. The EMBO Journal. 2003; 22(9): 2004-2014
  15. 15. Wang Y, Ying J, Kuzma M, Chalifoux M, Sample A, McArthur C, Uchacz T, Sarvas C, Wan J, Dennis DT, McCourt P. Molecular tailoring of farnesylation for plant drought tolerance and yield protection. The Plant Journal. 2005; 43(3): 413-424
  16. 16. Wang Y, Beaith M, Chalifoux M, Ying J, Uchacz T, Sarvas C, Griffiths R, Kuzma M, Wan J, Huang Y. Shoot-specific down-regulation of protein farnesyltransferase (α-subunit) for yield protection against drought in canola. Molecular Plant. 2009; 2(1): 191-200
  17. 17. Wang QB, Xu W, Xue QZ, Su WA. TransgenicBrassica chinensisplants expressing a bacterialcodAgene exhibit enhanced tolerance to extreme temperature and high salinity. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B. 2010; 11(11): 851-861
  18. 18. Seo YJ, Park JB, Cho YJ, Jung C, Seo HS, Park SK, Nahm BH, Song JT. Overexpression of the ethylene-responsive factor gene BrERF4 fromBrassica rapaincreases tolerance to salt and drought inArabidopsisplants. Molecules and Cells. 2010; 30(3): 271-277
  19. 19. Kim JA, Jung HE, Hong JK, Hermand V, McClung CR, Lee YH, Kim JY, Lee SI, Jeong MJ, Kim J, Yun D. Reduction of GIGANTEA expression in transgenicBrassica rapaenhances salt tolerance. Plant cell reports. 2016; 35(9): 1943-1954
  20. 20. Maqbool S, Zhong H, El-Maghraby Y, Ahmad A, Chai B, Wang W, Sabzikar R, Sticklen M. Competence of oat (Avena sativaL.) shoot apical meristems for integrative transformation, inherited expression, and osmotic tolerance of transgenic lines containing hva1. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2002; 105(2-3): 201-218
  21. 21. Agarwal PK, Agarwal P, Reddy MK, Sopory SK. Role of DREB transcription factors in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Reports. 2006; 25 (12): 1263-1274
  22. 22. Dalal M, Tayal D, Chinnusamy V, Bansal KC. Abiotic stress and ABA-inducible Group 4 LEA fromBrassica napusplays a key role in salt and drought tolerance. Journal of Biotechnology. 2009; 139 (2): 137-145
  23. 23. Yang M, Yang Q , Fu T, Zhou Y. Overexpression of theBrassica napusBnLAS gene inArabidopsisaffects plant development and increases drought tolerance. Plant Cell Reports. 2011; 30(3): 373-388
  24. 24. Lata C, Prasad M. Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2011; 62(14): 4731-4748
  25. 25. Luo J, Tang S, Mei F, Peng X, Li J, Li X, Yan X, Zeng X, Liu F, Wu Y, Wu G. BnSIP1-1, a trihelix family gene, mediates abiotic stress tolerance and ABA signaling inBrassica napus. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017; 8: 44
  26. 26. Xiao QS, Zhang XK, Xu BB, Cheng Y, Zheng PY, Lu GY. Cloning and expression pattern ofAnnBn1gene inBrassica napus. Chinese journal of oil crop sciences. 2012; 34: 123-128
  27. 27. Ali N, Zada A, Ali M, Hussain Z. Isolation and identification ofAgrobacterium tumefaciensfrom the galls of peach tree. Journal of Pure and Applied Agriculture. 2016; 1(1): 39-48
  28. 28. Shinwari ZK, Nakashima K, Miura S, Kasuga M, Seki M, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. AnArabidopsisgene family encoding DRE/CRT binding proteins involved in low-temperature-responsive gene expression. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1998; 250 (1):161-170
  29. 29. Bae MJ, Kim YS, Kim IS, Choe YH, Lee EJ, Kim YH, Park HM, Yoon HS. Transgenic rice overexpressing theBrassica junceagamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase gene enhances tolerance to abiotic stress and improves grain yield under paddy field conditions. Molecular breeding. 2013; 31 (4): 931-945
  30. 30. Saha B, Mishra S, Awasthi JP, Sahoo L, Panda SK. Enhanced drought and salinity tolerance in transgenic mustard [Brassica juncea(L.) Czern&Coss.]overexpressingArabidopsisgroup 4 late embryogenesis abundant gene (AtLEA4-1). Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2016; 128: 99-111
  31. 31. Rajwanshi R, Kumar D, Yusuf MA, DebRoy S, Sarin NB. Stress-inducible overexpression of glyoxalase I is preferable to its constitutive overexpression for abiotic stress tolerance in transgenicBrassica juncea. Molecular Breeding. 2016; 36 (6):76
  32. 32. Ahmed I, Yadav D, Shukla P, Vineeth TV, Sharma PC, Kirti PB. Constitutive expression ofBrassica junceaannexin, AnnBj2 confers salt tolerance and glucose and ABA insensitivity in mustard transgenic plants. Plant Science. 2017; 265: 12-28
  33. 33. Ren ZH, Gao JP, Li LG, Cai XL, Huang W, Chao DY, Zhu MZ, Wang ZY, Luan S, Lin HX. A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nature Genetics. 2005; 37(10): 1141-1146
  34. 34. Zhang JZ, Creelman RA, Zhu JK. From laboratory to field. Using information fromArabidopsisto engineer salt, cold, and drought tolerance in crops. Plant physiology. 2004; 135(2): 615-621
  35. 35. Farooq S, Farooq-E-Azam. Co-Existence of Salt and Drought Tolerance inTriticeae. Hereditas. 2001; 135(2-3): 205-210
  36. 36. Rozema J, Flowers T. Crops for a salinized world. Science. 2008: 1478-1480
  37. 37. Kaur P, Ghai N, Sangha MK. Induction of thermotolerance through heat acclimation and salicylic acid inBrassicaspecies. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2009; 8 (4)
  38. 38. Patidar OP, Yadava DK, Singh N, Saini N, Vasudev S and Yashpal. Deciphering selection criteria for Indian mustard (Brassica junceaL.) encountering high temperature stress during post-reproductive phase. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2020: 8 (4): 2497-2502
  39. 39. Azharudheen TM, Yadava DK, Singh N, Vasudev S, Prabhu KV. Screening Indian mustard [Brassica juncea(L.) Czern and Coss)] germplasm for seedling thermo-tolerance using a new screening protocol. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2013; 8 (38): 4755-4760
  40. 40. Angadi SV, Cutforth HW, Miller PR, McConkey BG, Entz MH, Brandt SA, Volkmar KM. Response of threeBrassicaspecies to high temperature stress during reproductive growth. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2000; 80 (4): 693-701
  41. 41. Young LW, Wilen RW, Bonham-Smith PC. High temperature stress ofBrassica napusduring flowering reduces micro-and megagametophyte fertility, induces fruit abortion, and disrupts seed production. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2004; 55 (396): 485-495
  42. 42. Kumar S, Sairam RK, Prabhu KV. Physiological traits for high temperature stress tolerance inBrassica juncea. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2013; 18 (1): 89-93
  43. 43. Chen Z, Wang Z, Yang Y, Li M, Xu B. Abscisic acid and brassinolide combined application synergistically enhances drought tolerance and photosynthesis of tall fescue under water stress. Scientia Horticulturae. 2018; 228: 1-9
  44. 44. Kagale S, Divi UK, Krochko JE, Keller WA, Krishna P. Brassinosteroid confers tolerance inArabidopsis thalianaandBrassica napusto a range of abiotic stresses. Planta. 2007; 225 (2): 353-364
  45. 45. Zhang F, Lu K, Gu Y, Zhang L, Li W, Li Z. Effects of low-temperature stress and brassinolide application on the photosynthesis and leaf structure of tung tree seedlings. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020; 10: 1767
  46. 46. Marcec MJ, Gilroy S, Poovaiah BW, Tanaka K. Mutual interplay of Ca2+ and ROS signaling in plant immune response. Plant Science. 2019; 283: 343-354
  47. 47. Sharma G, Kumar VD, Haque A, Bhat SR, Prakash S, Chopra VL.Brassicacoenospecies: a rich reservoir for genetic resistance to leaf spot caused byAlternaria brassicae. Euphytica. 2002; 125 (3): 411-417
  48. 48. Kumar GO, Chakravarty NV. A simple weather based forewarning model for white rust inBrassica. Journal of Agrometeorology. 2008; 10 (1): 75-80
  49. 49. Dev D, Tewari AK, Upadhyay P, Daniel GR. Identification and nomenclature ofAlbugo candidapathotypes of Indian origin causing white rust disease of rapeseed-mustard. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2020; 158 (4): 987-1004
  50. 50. Chauhan SK, Sharma JB. Inheritance of white rust resistance in Indian mustard incorporated fromBrassica napus. Indian J. Genet. 2001; 61 (3): 250-252
  51. 51. Ramos MJ, Fernández CM, Casas A, Rodríguez L, Pérez Á. Influence of fatty acid composition of raw materials on biodiesel properties. Bioresource Technology. 2009; 100 (1): 261-268
  52. 52. Yoshie-Stark Y, Wada Y, Wäsche A. Chemical composition, functional properties, and bioactivities of rapeseed protein isolates. Food Chemistry. 2008; 107 (1): 32-39
  53. 53. Love HK, Rakow G, Raney JP, Downey RK. Development of low glucosinolate mustard. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 1990; 70 (2): 419-424
  54. 54. Love HK, Rakow G, Raney JP, Downey RK. Genetic control of 2-propenyl and 3-butenyl glucosinolate synthesis in mustard. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 1990; 70(2): 425-429
  55. 55. Sodhi YS, Mukhopadhyay A, Arumugam N, Verma JK, Gupta V, Pental D, Pradhan AK. Genetic analysis of total glucosinolate in crosses involving a high glucosinolate Indian variety and a low glucosinolate line ofBrassica juncea. Plant breeding. 2002; 121 (6): 508-511
  56. 56. Mahmood T, Ekuere U, Yeh F, Good AG, Stringam GR. Molecular mapping of seed aliphatic glucosinolates inBrassica juncea. Genome. 2003; 46 (5): 753-760
  57. 57. Sun FJ. Hybrid vigor inBrassica.J AgricAssoc China. 1943; 175: 35-58
  58. 58. Ogura H. Studies on the new male sterility in Japanese radish, with special references on the utilization of this sterility towards the practical raising of hybrid seeds.Mem. Fac. Agric. Kagoshima Univ. 1968; 6: 40-75
  59. 59. Rawat DS, Anand IJ. Male sterility in Indian mustard. Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 1979; 39: 412-414
  60. 60. Rao GU, Batra-Sarup V, Prakash S, Shivanna KR. Development of a New Cytoplasmic Male-Sterility System inBrassica junceathrough Wide Hybridization. Plant breeding. 1994; 112 (2): 171-174
  61. 61. Kirti PB, Mohapatra T, Khanna H, Prakash S, Chopra VL.Diplotaxis catholica+Brassica junceasomatic hybrids: molecular and cytogenetic characterization. Plant cell reports. 1995; 14 (9): 593-597
  62. 62. Prakash S, Kirti PB, Chopra VL. Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) systems other thanoguandpolimainBrassica: current status. In Proc 9th Int Rapeseed Conf. 1995; 1: 44-48
  63. 63. Kirti PB. Development of a stable cytoplasmic male sterile line ofBrassica junceafrom somatic hybridTrachystoma ballii+Brassica juncea. Plant Breed. 1995; 114: 434-438
  64. 64. Banga SS, Banga SK.Enarthrocarpus lyratuscytoplasm causes male sterility in oilseed rape. In International Symposium on Heterosis in Crops, Mexico City. 1997; 17-22
  65. 65. Prakash S, Ahuja I, Upreti HC, Kumar VD, Bhat SR, Kirti PB, Chopra VL. Expression of male sterility in alloplasmic BrassicajunceawithEruca strumcanariensecytoplasm and the development of a fertility restoration system. Plant Breeding. 2001; 120 (6): 479-482
  66. 66. Bhat SR, Vijayan P, Ashutosh, Dwivedi KK, Prakash S.Diplotaxis erucoides-induced cytoplasmic male sterility inBrassica junceais rescued by theMoricandia arvensisrestorer: genetic and molecular analyses. Plant breeding. 2006; 125 (2): 150-155
  67. 67. Sodhi YS, Chandra A, Verma JK, Arumugam N, Mukhopadhyay A, Gupta V, Pental D, Pradhan AK. A new cytoplasmic male sterility system for hybrid seed production in Indian oilseed mustardBrassica juncea. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2006; 114 (1): 93
  68. 68. Bhat SR, Kumar P, Prakash S. An improved cytoplasmic male sterile (Diplotaxis berthautii)Brassica juncea: identification of restorer and molecular characterization. Euphytica. 2008; 159(1-2): 145-152
  69. 69. Jagannath A, Arumugam N, Gupta V, Pradhan A, Burma PK, Pental D. Development of transgenic barstar lines and identification of a male sterile (barnase)/restorer (barstar) combination for heterosis breeding in Indian oilseed mustard (Brassica juncea). Current Science. 2002; 82 (1): 46-51
  70. 70. Chand S, Patidar OM, Meena VK, Shiv A. Barnase-barstar system: an indelible technique to produce hybrid seeds in self-pollinated crops. International Journal of Farm Sciences. 2018; 8 (2): 109-113
  71. 71. Singh D, Mehta R. Studies on breeding brown sarson. I. Comparison of F1’s and their parents. Indian J. Genet. Pl. Breed. 1954; 14: 74-77
  72. 72. Chand S, Chandra K, Khatik CL. Varietal Release, Notification and Denotification System in India. In Plant Breeding-Current and Future Views. 2020. IntechOpen
  73. 73. Prakash S, Chopra VL. Synthesis of alloplasmicBrassica campestrisas a new source of cytoplasmic male sterility. Plant breeding. 1988; 101 (3): 253
  74. 74. Kirti PB, Narasimhulu SB, Mohapatra T, Prakash S, Chopra VL. Correction of chlorophyll deficiency in alloplasmic male sterileBrassica junceathrough recombination between chloroplast genomes. Genetics Research. 1993; 62 (1): 11-14
  75. 75. Kumawat G, Kumawat CK, Chandra K, Pandey S, Chand S, Mishra UN, Lenka D, Sharma R. Insights into Marker Assisted Selection and Its Applications in Plant Breeding. In Plant Breeding-Current and Future Views. 2020; IntechOpen
  76. 76. Sharma SK and Singh R. Genetic resources of oilseed crops in India. In: Hegde DM (Ed).Changing Global Vegetable Oils Scenario: Issues and Challenges before India. Indian Society of Oilseed Research, DOR, Hyderabad. 2007; 1-16
  77. 77. Watts A, Sankaranarayanan S, Raipuria RK, Watts A. Production and Application of Doubled Haploid inBrassicaImprovement. In Brassica Improvement Springer, Cham. 2020; 67-84
  78. 78. Jain RK, Sharma DR, Chowdhury JB.High frequency regeneration and heritable somaclonal variation inBrassica juncea. Euphytica. 1989; 40 (1-2): 75-81
  79. 79. Anuradha G, Narasimhulu SB, Arunachalam V, Chopra VL. A comparative evaluation of somaclonal, gamma ray and EMS induced variation inBrassica juncea. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 1992; 1 (2): 105-108
  80. 80. Walden R, Koncz C, Schell J. The use of gene vectors in plant molecular biology. Methods Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990; 1: 175-194
  81. 81. Mukherjee AK, Mohapatra T, Varshney A, Sharma R, Sharma RP.Molecular mapping of a locus controlling resistance toAlbugo candidain Indian mustard. Plant Breeding. 2001; 120 (6): 483-497
  82. 82. Padmaja KL, Arumugam N, Gupta V, Mukhopadhyay A, Sodhi YS, Pental D, Pradhan AK. Mapping and tagging of seed coat colour and the identification of microsatellite markers for marker-assisted manipulation of the trait inBrassica juncea. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2005; 111 (1): 8-14
  83. 83. Liu S, Huang H, Yi X, Zhang Y, Yang Q , Zhang C, Fan C, Zhou Y. Dissection of genetic architecture for glucosinolate accumulations in leaves and seeds ofBrassica napusby genome-wide association study. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2020; 18 (6): 1472-1484
  84. 84. Kaur J, Akhatar J, Goyal A, Kaur N, Kaur S, Mittal M, Kumar N, Sharma H, Banga S, Banga SS. Genome wide association mapping and candidate gene analysis for pod shatter resistance inBrassica junceaand its progenitor species. Molecular Biology Reports. 2020; 1-2
  85. 85. Cai G, Yang Q , Yang Q , Zhao Z, Chen H, Wu J, Fan C, Zhou Y. Identification of candidate genes of QTLs for seed weight inBrassica napusthrough comparative mapping amongArabidopsisandBrassicaspecies. BMC genetics. 2012; 13 (1): 105
  86. 86. Bisht NC, Gupta V, Ramchiary N, Sodhi YS, Mukhopadhyay A, Arumugam N, Pental D, Pradhan AK. Fine mapping of loci involved with glucosinolate biosynthesis in oilseed mustard (Brassica juncea) using genomic information from allied species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2009; 118 (3): 413-421
  87. 87. Couvreur TL, Franzke A, Al-Shehbaz IA, Bakker FT, Koch MA, Mummenhoff K. Molecular phylogenetics, temporal diversification, and principles of evolution in the mustard family (Brassicaceae). MolBiolEvol. 2010; 27 (1): 55-71
  88. 88. Augustine R, Majee M, Pradhan AK, Bisht NC. Genomic origin, expression differentiation and regulation of multiple genes encoding CYP83A1, a key enzyme for core glucosinolate biosynthesis, from the allotetraploidBrassica juncea. Planta. 2015; 241 (3): 651-665
  89. 89. Heng S, Gao J, Wei C, Chen F, Li X, Wen J, Yi B, Ma C, Tu J, Fu T, Shen J. Transcript levels of orf288 are associated with the hau cytoplasmic male sterility system and altered nuclear gene expression inBrassica juncea. Journal of experimental botany. 2018; 69 (3): 455-466
  90. 90. Bhattacharya S, Das N, Maiti MK. Cumulative effect of heterologous AtWRI1 gene expression and endogenous BjAGPase gene silencing increases seed lipid content in Indian mustardBrassica juncea. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2016; 107: 204-213
  91. 91. Savadi S, Naresh V, Kumar V, Bhat SR. Seed-specific overexpression of Arabidopsi s DGAT1 in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) increases seed oil content and seed weight. Botany. 2016; 94 (3): 177-184
  92. 92. Zhao N, Xu X, Wamboldt Y, Mackenzie SA, Yang X, Hu Z, Yang J, Zhang M. MutS HOMOLOG1 silencing mediates ORF220 substoichiometric shifting and causes male sterility inBrassica juncea. Journal of experimental botany. 2016; 67 (1): 435-444
  93. 93. Zheng M, Zhang L, Tang M, Liu J, Liu H, Yang H, Fan S, Terzaghi W, Wang H, Hua W. Knockout of two Bna MAX 1 homologs by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis improves plant architecture and increases yield in rapeseed (Brassica napusL.). Plant biotechnology journal. 2020; 18 (3): 644-654
  94. 94. Mihr C, Baumgärtner M, Dieterich JH, Schmitz UK, Braun HP. Proteomic approach for investigation of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) inBrassica.Journal of plant physiology. 2001; 158 (6): 787-794
  95. 95. Mohammadi PP, Moieni A, Komatsu S. Comparative proteome analysis of drought-sensitive and drought-tolerant rapeseed roots and their hybrid F1 line under drought stress.Amino Acids. 2012; 43 (5): 2137-2152
  96. 96. Yousuf PY, Ahmad A, Ganie AH, Iqbal M. Salt stress-induced modulations in the shoot proteome ofBrassica junceagenotypes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2016a; 23 (3): 2391-2401
  97. 97. Yousuf PY, Ganie AH, Khan I, Qureshi MI, Ibrahim MM, Sarwat M, Iqbal M, Ahmad A. Nitrogen-efficient and nitrogen-inefficient Indian mustard showed differential expression pattern of proteins in response to elevated CO2 and low nitrogen. Frontiers in plant science. 2016b; 7: 1074
  98. 98. Sinha S, Jha JK, Maiti MK, Basu A, Mukhopadhyay UK, Sen SK. Metabolic engineering of fatty acid biosynthesis in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) improves nutritional quality of seed oil. Plant Biotechnology Reports. 2007; 1 (4): 185-197
  99. 99. Kortesniemi M, Vuorinen AL, Sinkkonen J, Yang B, Rajala A, Kallio H. NMR metabolomics of ripened and developing oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and turnip rape (Brassica rapa). Food chemistry. 2015; 172: 63-70
  100. 100. ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research,https://www.drmr.res.inaccessed on 07.01.2021

Written By

Subhash Chand, Om Prakash Patidar, Rajat Chaudhary, Ranjit Saroj, Kailash Chandra, Vijay Kamal Meena, Omkar M. Limbalkar, Manoj Kumar Patel, Priya P. Pardeshi and Prashant Vasisth

Submitted: October 28th, 2020 Reviewed: February 1st, 2021 Published: March 4th, 2021