Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Silver Nanoparticles for Photocatalysis and Biomedical Applications

Written By

William Leonardo da Silva, Daniel Moro Druzian, Leandro Rodrigues Oviedo, Pâmela Cristine Ladwig Muraro and Vinícius Rodrigues Oviedo

Submitted: 18 September 2020 Reviewed: 08 January 2021 Published: 27 January 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.95922

Chapter metrics overview

493 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The present chapter aims to overview the application of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) in photocatalysis and biomedical field. Firstly, the relevance of AgNPs will be addressed. Then, the discussion about the photocatalytic activity of the AgNPs (either in suspension or impregnation), and correlation with your properties and its potential application to organic pollutants degradation under UV and visible/solar radiation will be described. Thus, applications of the AgNPs as antimicrobial agents, such as Escherichia coli, Schizophyllum commune, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus and Enterobactor faecalis, and in the development of biosensors will be discussed. Therefore, the present work will be important to contextualize different scenarios to AgNPs mainly to wastewater treatment and diagnosis/therapeutic applications.


  • nanotechnology
  • metallic nanoparticles
  • heterogeneous photocatalysis
  • antimicrobial properties
  • biosensors

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology involves the manipulation of materials at nanometric scale (10−9 m) and have evolved to novel solutions for water/wastewater treatment as well as biomedical applications [1]. These applications fields are possible due to the unique properties of nanomaterials, such as high surface area, high reactivity and considerable porosity and morphological, electrical, magnetic and/or optical properties, which turn them into useful materials in catalysis, adsorption, sensing and optic-electronic applications [2]. Succinctly, nanomaterials can be divided into 2D, 1D, 0D, according to the number if dimensions the electrons are confined [3]. Metallic nanoparticles are 0D materials, that is, they have the three dimensions within the nanoscale [4]. Among metallic nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are largely investigated due to versatility in synthesis, easy processing, fast kinetic reaction rate, high thermal and chemical stability and so forth [5]. Both related to water/wastewater treatment and biomedical applications, AgNPs features allows them to control the interaction with bacteria and, in the case of wastewater treatment, this control can be applied to several pollutants (dyes, hydrocarbons, pesticides, pathogens, and so forth) [6]. Based on that, AgNPs can be applied to photocatalysis and to biomedical applications, such as antimicrobial agents and biosensing [7, 8]. Figure 1 shows the number of published papers involving AgNPs applied to photocatalysis and biomedical applications.

Figure 1.

Number of published papers involving AgNPS in photocatalysis and biomedical applications [7, 8].

According to the Figure 1, it is possible to notice an increasing tendency of works related to application of AgNPs in the last 5 five years, mainly due to great efficiency of these nanoparticles in sensing applications.


2. Photocatalysis applications with AgNPs

2.1 Water quality deterioration

Mainly due to industrial expansion, climate change, population growth and anthropogenic activities, wastewater quality deterioration has been increased along the years [9]. Wastewater contaminants can be either organic or inorganic [10]. Therefore, the application of an adequate wastewater treatment technology has become a need for minimizing the pollution and the adverse environmental impact as well as for preserving the environment and attending to legal policies of water management [11].

Some of the inorganic ones are well known since ancient times such as chromium, copper, lead, nickel, cadmium, arsenic, mercury and others heavy metals. Theses pollutants pose a serious threat to human health and to environment due to their high toxicity [12]. Meanwhile, organic contaminants, such as benzene, toluene, xylene and natural organic matter (measured by the dissolved or total organic carbon content), are of great concern wastewater management [13]. Usually, the natural organic matter removal from wastewater is challenging and plays a crucial role in defining the treatment technology to be used [14].

In addition, emergent pollutants had been identified in wastewaters all around the world. Most of these contaminants have low biodegradability, high chemical stability, water solubility and are resistant against the conventional wastewater treatment processes [15]. Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) and organic dyes belong to this class of contaminants [16].

Similarly, bacteria commonly pose a threat to humans and to the ecosystem. Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Fusarium solani are the most contaminants found in wastewater and are of great public concern [17]. Even though they are inactivated by conventional technologies (eg.: chlorination), secondary toxic pollutants are generally found after the treatment, which demonstrate the relatively low-efficiency of the traditional methods of disinfection [18]. Therefore, sophisticated technologies for their inactivation are required, and at same time, it is expected that they do not result in secondary pollutants generation [19].

For these reasons, emergent pollutants (such as pharmaceuticals and dyes), as well as heavy metals, are difficult to remove from wastewater due to either the cost of sophisticated technologies or low efficiency in removing them [20]. In this view, nanotechnology-enable processes seem to be promising to solve the wastewater deterioration quality problem [21]. Therefore, the use of nanoparticles (iron, silver, titanium and zinc oxides) in wastewater applications has been increased due to the unique features of these nanomaterials, requiring treatments with relative low cost and reduction on labor time [22].

Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) have proved to be highly efficient in the degradation of various contaminants like pharmaceuticals, dyes, hydrocarbons, pesticides, and pathogen [23, 24, 25]. AOPs are divided into two systems, being [26]: (a) homogeneous, where there are no solid catalysts and the degradation of the organic compound can happen with or without irradiation (direct photolysis), using strong oxidizers (such as hydrogen peroxide, H2O2 and ozone, O3) with or without irradiation, such as photocatalytic ozonolysis and photo-Fenton and, (b) heterogeneous that are characterized by the presence of semiconductor catalysts with or without irradiation, such as heterogeneous photocatalysis and electro-Fenton. Among them, there are processes which are either based on the use of ozone or hydrogen peroxide, decomposition of hydrogen peroxide in acidic media or semiconductors such as titanium dioxide (TiO2) [27]. The latter one is referred to as a heterogeneous process due to the ease of operation and to sustainable character. Also, it is promising in treating wastewater containing resistant contaminants, once a high percentage of refractory organic contaminants degradation can be achieved [28].

2.2 Heterogeneous photocatalysis

Heterogeneous photocatalysis is an Advanced Oxidation Process (AOPs) useful in the degradation of various contaminants, such as dyes, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, herbicides, hydrocarbons and microorganism inactivation. It can use either UV radiation or visible light to activate a metal-based photocatalyst (generally a semiconductor), promoting oxi-reduction reactions on the catalytic surface with considerable application in wastewater treatment [29]. In this initial step, an electron moves from valence band (VB) to conduction band (CB) of the semiconductor and an electron–hole pair is generated (eCB and h+VB) [30]. Moreover, in this process the water molecules as well as the dissolved oxygen are used as precursors of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation [31].

Therefore, ROS (HO• and O2–•, mainly) tend to react non-selectively with the organic matter and to mineralize it altogether [32]. Thus, heterogeneous photocatalysis is a light-induced catalytic process that reduces or oxidizes organic molecules through redox reactions, which are activated through the electron–hole pairs generated on the surface of the catalyst beyond band gap light irradiation, according to the Eqs. (1)(8) [33]:


Thus, the Eq. (1) represents the metal-based photocatalyst (semiconductor) activation yielding to electron–hole pair. Eqs. (2), (3), (6), and (7) are related to ROS generation, which are responsible for organic matter degradation. Eqs. (4) and (5) are undesirable recombination that takes place in the process. Meanwhile, Eq. (4) represents the spontaneous reaction of electron–hole pair recombination, which reduces the photocatalytic degradation efficiency, and Eq. (5) indicates hydrogen peroxide production. Eq. (8) holds for degradation of the organic matter by hydroxyl radicals. Thus, the great advantage of AOPs is that, during the treatment of organic compounds, they are destroyed and not just transferred from one phase to another, as occurs in some conventional homogeneous treatment processes.

Low human toxicity, high stability and relatively low cost are some of the advantages of the heterogeneous photocatalysis process [34]. Moreover, there is a possibility of the complete mineralization of organic pollutants, generating CO2 and H2O [35]. In this view, heterogeneous photocatalysis can be applied to degradation of a great number of recalcitrant and non-biodegradable organic pollutants [36, 37].

Moreover, this process can be combined with other processes (either pre-treatment or post-treatment), being performed in situ, making use of high oxidative potential agents with fast kinetic reaction and without to need for after-treatment or disposal [38]. In addition, high-quality organoleptic characteristics of water can be achieved, with less energy consumption and low-cost of operation. It is important to mention that the absorbed energy by the semiconductor (and in its photoactivation) is related to the catalyst photocatalytic efficiency, which depends on the competition between the removal of the electron from the semiconductor surface and the recombination of electron–hole pair [39].

2.3 AgNPs-based supported photocatalysts

Individually applied to wastewater treatment, AgNPs proved to be extremely toxic to humans and aquatic life [40]. Moreover, AgNPs can access various organs which most part of the substances cannot [34]. For this reason, AgNPs have been associated to catalytic supports used in heterogeneous photocatalysis [41]. In fact, AgNPs possess considerable photocatalytic activity and when they are impregnated in a less active material, labeled catalytic support, toxicity issues can be fixed [42]. It is noteworthy that the main catalytic supports are metallic oxides, since they have favorable characteristics for applicability in heterogeneous photocatalysis, such as photoactivity within a UV–vis radiation range, redox potential of the positive conduction band high enough to promote the mineralization of the organic pollutant, high physical–chemical stability and efficiency in the oxygen reduction reaction. Table 1 shows some scientific papers found during the 2015–2020, which apply supported AgNPs as heterogeneous photocatalysis.

Ag@MGO-TA/Fe3+Methylene Blue (MB)Excellent stability of the photocatalyst in the aqueous media, high reduction rate (0.054 s−1) for MB, under the dosage of 0.05 mg mL−1. 100% inactivation of E. coli using 20 μg.mL−1 of photocatalyst[43]
nAgFeO2Imidaclopride (IMI)80% degradation Imidaclopride under UV radiation[44]
Ag/woodMethylene Blue and oil separationThe filter can separate selectively the oil from water and dye (about 99%). AgNPs incorporated to filter wood can improve the photocatalytic activity for MB degradation (94.03%)[45]
Ag@AgBr/Bi2MoO6Reactive Blue-19Excellent photodegradation of Reactive Blue 19 (98.7%) under visible light after 120 minutes[46]
C@CoFe2O4@AgRed and Methyl OrangeFast kinetic of degradation (7 min) for Red Orange and for Methyl Orange (10 min)[47]
Ag/ZnO/PMMAMethylene Blue, Paracetamol and Sodium Lauryl Sulfate90% degradation for the target pollutants after 4 hours under UV radiation[48]
Ag@CAF and Ag@TiO24-nitrophenol (4-NP), 2-nitrophenol (2-NP), 2-nitroaninile (2-NA), trinitrophenol (TNP), Rhodamine B (RhB) and Methyl Orange (MO)Nanomaterials exhibited high photocatalytic activity (95%) efficiency was achieved after 10 min[49]
glass/AgTextile wastewaterThe coat glass (with AgNPs) yields to about 95% of dye removal after 5 h. In addition, the reusability was studied, targeting microbes found in wastewater. After 2 h, 80% of microbes were inactivated[50]
Chitosan/AgSodium Fluoresceine48% dye degradation under anaerobic condition after 2,5 hours. About 51% degradation was achieved under aerobic condition. Chitosan/AgNPs nanocomposite showed antimicrobial activity for gram-positive (E. coli) and gram-negative bacteria (G. bacillus).[51]
Fe3O4@PPy-MAA/Ag4-nitrophenol (4-NP), Methylene Blue and Methyl OrangeExcellent catalytic activity towards 4-Nitrophenol, Methyl Orang and Methylene Blue. Good reusability of the nanophotocatalyst[52]
rGO-AgMB and RhBDegradation of 95% is observed, which is significantly greater that the pristine nanophotocatalyst AgNPs (78%) and rGO (55%)[53, 54, 55]

Table 1.

Paper that apply supported AgNPs as heterogeneous photocatalyst.

In addition, the main drawbacks of the metallic nanoparticles, such as nanoparticle agglomeration, can be solved with the application of the Ag-based supported photocatalysts [56]. Thus, impregnation of AgNPs onto ZnO photocatalyst results in better photocatalytic activity, when compared to the use of unsupported ZnO for degradation of Methylene Blue dye. In addition, associations of AgNPs to AuNPs in a core-shell structure leads to a photocatalytic activity comparable with the commonly used TiO2 photocatalyst. As can be seen, about 80% Methylene Blue degradation can be achieved, when AgNPs supported onto bismuth vanadate (BiVO4) are used [57].

Moreover, with respect to inactivation of bacteria, efficient inactivation degrees for E. Coli, F. Solani, and E. faecalis are reported by means of heterogeneous photocatalysis [58]. Additionally, the efficiency of supported AgNPs for inactivating some pathogens in real wastewaters has been confirmed, resulting in about 80% inactivation [59].

Meanwhile, the utilization of AgNPs as for potentializing the metal-based catalyst and others materials applied to the degradation of organic pollutants or the discoloration of the wastewater is considered an efficient technology, accounting for up to 90% after 180 minutes under UV radiation.


3. Biomedical applications with AgNPs

Silver nanoparticles have been the most investigated, among other metallic nanoparticles for biomedical applications, such as antimicrobial agents and biosensing due their unique physicochemical and biological properties [60]. However, the effective application of AgNPs in the biomedical field is strictly related to their morphology, that is, size and shape [61].

Moreover, one of the main applications of AgNPs, within the biomedical area, consists of acting as an antimicrobial agent, capable of inhibiting the growth of pathogenic microorganisms, being indicated for the treatment of bacterial infections [62]. There are several proposed mechanisms that explain the antimicrobial activity of AgNPs, and all of them lead to applications in wound healing [63], bone tissue [64], and surface coatings [65]. Besides that, optical, electrical and plasmonic properties of AgNPs turn them into interesting nanostructured materials to be used in chemical and biological sensing [66].

Despite being effective against several pathogens and showing promising potential in biosensing, safety concerns are yet a challenge nowadays [67]. In spite of their outstanding properties to biomedical applications, it is known that AgNPs can be toxic to humans depending on the concentration [68] or due to toxic chemicals involved during the synthesis process [69]. To overcome this, nanotechnology has been used together with green chemistry [70], leading to the synthesis of AgNPs by using alternative sources/materials, such as plant extracts, biopolymers and microorganisms (e.g. bacteria and fungi) [71]. Thus, particular interest in evaluating the biocompatibility of green-synthesis derived AgNPs have also been attracting the attention of the scientific community [72]. In the following subsections, both AgNPs applications as antimicrobial agents and as biosensors are discussed.

3.1 Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents

The pathogenic microorganisms are constantly evolving, with a wide genetic diversification, being capable of eliciting several diseases [73]. Although, there are various antimicrobial therapies commercially available, the use of conventional therapies led to the gain of resistance by these pathogenic bacteria [74].

The emerging resistance of bacteria against the conventional antibiotics and metallic ions increased the research in the field of applied nanotechnology, with the AgNPs being among the most potent compounds due to their high specific surface area and number of atoms available to interact with the surroundings, resulting in exhibiting unique properties (electronic, bactericide, magnetic, and optical), since these favorable properties favor the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which they cause changes in the structure of proteins and nucleic acids, and in the permeability of the cell wall, culminating in the lysis of the bacterial cell [75].

The biosynthesis (both intracellular and extracellular) uses microorganisms and show advantages compared to chemical processes: (i) easy strain manipulation, supporting the synthesis process, (ii) easy scaling-up, and (iii) no generation of toxic substances to the environment. However, as the main disadvantages of the biosynthesis using microorganisms is the need to use of the ultrasound to unbind the AgNPs [76, 77].

It is known that the AgNPs have great potential against several gram-negative, gram-positive and antibiotics-resistant bacterial strains [74]. The antimicrobial activity depends on the nanoparticle size and concentration, where low particle sizes with low concentrations can kill bacterial strains and, in the case of green-synthesis derived nanoparticles, this is allied to the advantage of showing lower toxicity to human health and to the environment, leading to a high interest in developing them to combat pathogenic bacteria [78].

The antimicrobial activity of AgNPs against pathogenic bacteria follows two action mechanisms: according to the first one (i), the nanoparticles adhere to the cellular membrane and penetrate the bacteria, promoting alterations on their cellular membrane (due to interactions of silver ions with proteins, sulfur, and phosphorous within the cell, avoiding the electron transport) and, then, resulting in bacterial growth suppression [79]; the other mechanism (ii) involves the silver ions releasing and the production of reactive oxygen species which generates an antimicrobial effect [80].

Moreover, the bacteria are generally unable to develop resistance against AgNPs, which are specially formulated due to their particle size and that allows them to attack a wide range of targets present in the microorganisms, such as proteins, thiol groups and cellular walls [81]. In fact, AgNPs have a huge potential to be used as antimicrobial agents depending on the physicochemical characteristics of these nanoparticles. Therefore, the synergistic effect of these properties, associated with low production cost, good thermal and radiation stability (UV and visible), doing AgNPs effective against pathogenic microorganisms, being promising in biomedical applications to reduce infections. Table 2 shows the different results of AgNPs against several pathogenic bacteria.

NanoparticleAntimicrobial agentCommentsReference
Green AgNPsEscherichia coli and Schizophyllum communeGreen synthesis using Eucalyptus camaldulensis (EC). Moreover, High antimicrobial activity due to the high surface are, which supports better cellular interactions with pathogenic microbes[82]
Green AgNPsEscherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzaeGreen synthesis using Artemisia vulgaris leaves extract (AVLE). In addition, antimicrobial activity with mechanisms involving penetration in the bacteria and silver ions releasing, leading to bacterial growth suppression.[83]
Green AgNPsBacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureusGreen synthesis using Acorus calamus rhizome extract. Moreover, nanoparticles exhibited antimicrobial activity when adhering to the bacterial cellular membrane, inhibiting the cellular growth[84]
Green AgNPsEscherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureusGreen synthesis using Vitex negundo L. AgNPs showed antimicrobial activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria[85]
AgNPsEscherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureusSynthesis by chemical reduction and by using Petroselinum crispum plant, and showed antimicrobial activity by penetrating the cellular wall of bacteria[86]

Table 2.

Results of antimicrobial activity of AgNPs against pathogenic bacteria.

3.2 Silver nanoparticles applied to biosensing

AgNPs have been investigated for chemical and biological sensing. It was already found in literature that the AgNPs present better results than gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) when related to biosensor sensitivity, despite the AuNPs being more investigated for biosensing applications [87]. In addition, AgNPs are plasmonic nanostructures, which means that they can absorb and scatter light [88]. Thus, AgNPs could be used to provide a colorimetric/plasmonic method to detect several biomolecules (including eye-naked verification) due to their light absorption bands - around 400–500 nm [89] - being within the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum. It is worth pointing out that there are two types of colorimetric/plasmonic biosensors: the aggregation-based and the LSPR-based [90] - some of them are summarized in Table 3. Nevertheless, control over morphology during the synthesis of AgNPs is crucial, as anisotropic AgNPs can display various light absorption bands rather than just one [100].

BiosensorApplicationBiosensor typeCommentReference
AgNPs-based SPR biosensorMicroRNA (miRNA) detectionLSPR-basedGood sensitivity and selectivity. Excellent reliability. No need for modification procedures to amplify biosensing[91]
AuNPs/AgNPs biosensorCyclin A2Aggregation-basedSimplicity, high sensitivity, and selectivity. Eye-naked verification allied to quantitative detection. No need for functionalization of the AuNPs/AgNPS. Suitable for peptide-based protein detection. Detection limit: 30 nM.[92]
Citrate capped silver nanoparticles (Cit-AgNPs)Acinetobacter baumannii detectionAggregation-basedAccurate and quick detection (about 2 min); low detection limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1zM.[93]
Carbon quantum dots (CQDs)/AgNPs nanocompositeMelamine detectionAggregation-basedHigh sensitivity, simple method of detection, and eye-naked verification allied to quantitative detection. Detection limit: 65.3 pmol.L−1.[94]
Glutathione-coated AgNPsVitamin B1 (thiamine) detectionLSPR-basedProvides both qualitative (colorimetric) and quantitative sensing. High sensitivity and selectivity; low-cost, quick, and simple detection. Worked well with real samples, such as blood and urine.[95]
Grown-AgNPs on AuNSAlkaline phosphatase (ALP) detectionLSPR-basedProvides both qualitative (colorimetric) and quantitative sensing. Could be extended to a general device for immunosensors/aptasensors designs.[96]
SiOx/AgNPs/GrapheneDNA hybridization detectionLSPR-basedOther applications may involve enzyme detection, medical diagnostics, food safety, and environmental monitoring. Sensitivity improvement of 304.60% compared to pure AgNPs.[97]
Ag@AgCl nanotubes loaded onto reduced graphene oxide (RGO)Ochratoxin A (OTA) detectionLSPR-basedGood accuracy, high sensitivity, and good reproducibility. High stability and photocurrent response under visible light irradiation. Range of detection: 0.05 to 300 n mol L−1, limit of detection (LOD): 0.01 n mol L−1 (4.0 pg. mL−1).[98]
AgNPs-based aptasensorAdenosine detectionLSPR-basedHigh sensitivity and selectivity. Simple and specific design, low-cost, and quick detection. Linear range of detection: 200 n mol L−1 to 200 μ mol L−1, detection limit: 48 n mol L−1.[99]

Table 3.

AgNPs-based biosensors for biomedical applications.

Moreover, Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR) phenomenon of AgNPs have turned them into interesting nanomaterials for applications, which involve interaction with light [101]. Thus, when a metallic nanoparticle is irradiated, superficial electrons oscillate collectively, and these generate an electromagnetic field around the nanostructure, called Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) [102]. If an external electromagnetic field is applied, in such a way that it is in resonance with the generated electromagnetic field around the metallic nanoparticle, LSPR phenomenon takes place [103]. Thus, the LSPR is possible due to the confinement of the resulting electromagnetic field within the metallic nanoparticle [104, 105].

Moreover, the aggregation-based AgNPs biosensors are considered low-cost, and high-sensitivity biosensing devices, as the aggregation of AgNPs depending on induced changes on the solution medium can be applied to detect DNA molecules, proteins (recognizing) [106]. In this case, aggregation phenomenon and chemical instability of AgNPs is desirable, once it is the working principle of the biosensor [107]. LSPR-based ones are established on changes in the occurring refractive index now that photons are directed to the nanoparticles, leading them to oscillation [108], being used in biomolecules detection [109]. It is also important to mention that AgNPs are normally functionalized before applying them as biosensors to overcome chemical stability and toxicity aspects [110]. Therefore, coating AgNPs with organic or inorganic materials are the common approaches. Furthermore, polymeric coatings are also used to functionalize AgNPs by using either synthetic polymers, such as (poly)-ethylene glycol (PEG) [111], (poly)-vinyl alcohol (PVA) [112] and (Poly)-vinylpyrrolidone (PVP) [113], or natural polymers such as starch [114], sodium alginate [115] and chitosan [116]. Functionalization with polymeric blends that uses both synthetic and natural polymers is also an interesting approach (e.g. PVA/Chitosan-coated AgNPs [117]). The inorganic coating involves the functionalization of AgNPs with silicon dioxide [118], while organic coating involves citrates mainly [119]. Furthermore, there are plenty of electrochemical-based AgNPs biosensors [120, 121], however, they will not be covered here as the focus is on the plasmonic ones. Another possible application of AgNPs is the surface enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS), which involves the adsorption of molecules on the AgNPs to achieve a high-quality spectroscopy technique. The applications of SERS focus on disease diagnosis caused by microbial infections or cancer [122].

Therefore, AgNPs-based biosensors are good alternatives against conventional sensing devices, as nanostructured biosensors show greater sensibility, reliability, wide limits of detection, precision, speed and provides eye-naked colorimetric assays together with quantitative analysis [123], among other unique characteristics that are shown in the papers summarized in Table 3.


4. Conclusion

Regarding the use AgNPs in heterogeneous photocatalysis, it can be proved highly efficient in the degradation a large amount of organic pollutants and inactivation of bacteria and pathogens, under either UV radiation or visible light. Moreover, when supported AgNPs-based nanophotocatalysts are used in wastewater not only the photocatalytic activity is enhanced, but also some operational problems (nanoparticles agglomeration) can be fixed. With respect to the use of AgNPs as antimicrobial agents, it is a current alternative against common pathogens and multi-resistant bacteria due to the toxicity to microorganisms compared to antibiotics and conventional approaches. In addition, AgNPs-based biosensors are resulting in high sensitivity and selectivity aligned to wide detection limits, which turns them suitable for clinical practice. It is worth to point out that the green synthesis of AgNPs is increasing along the years, and when combined with photocatalytic and biomedical applications, contributes to sustainable development and biocompatibility aspects.



This work received financial support from the Foundation for Research of the State of Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS – Project 19/2551-0001362-0), so all thanks.


Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.


  1. 1. Wen M, Li G, Liu H, Chen J, An T, Yamashita H. Metal–organic framework-based nanomaterials for adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of gaseous pollutants: recent progress and challenges. Environmental Science: Nano. 2019;6(4):1006-1025. DOI: 10.1039/c8en01167b
  2. 2. Das R, Ali ME, Hamid SBA, Ramakrishna S, Chowdhury ZZ. Carbon nanotube membranes for water purification: A bright future in water desalination. Desalination. 2014;336:97-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.026
  3. 3. Zhang B, Sun JY, Ruan MY, Gao PX. Tailoring two-dimensional nanomaterials by structural engineering for chemical and biological sensing. Sensors and Actuators Reports. 2020;2(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.snr.2020.100024
  4. 4. Varshney S, Kumar M, Gowda A, Kumar S. Soft discotic matrix with 0-D silver nanoparticles: Impact on molecular ordering and conductivity. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2017;238:290-295. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.05.008
  5. 5. Nagaraju G, Udayabhanu, Shivaraj, Prashanth SA, Shastri M, Yathish KV, Anupama, C; Rangappa, D, Nagaraju, G. Electro-chemical heavy metal detection, photocatalytic, photoluminescence, biodiesel production and antibacterial activities of Ag–ZnO nanomaterial. Materials Research Bulletin. 2017;94:54-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.05.043
  6. 6. Qu X, Brame J, Li Q , Alvarez PJJ. Nanotechnology for a Safe and Sustainable Water Supply: Enabling Integrated Water Treatment and Reuse. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2012;46(3):834-843. DOI: 10.1021/ar300029v
  7. 7. Kamarudin NS, Jusoh R, Setiabudi HD, Sukor NF, Shariffuddin JH. Potential nanomaterials application in wastewater treatment: Physical, chemical and biological approaches. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020:1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.221
  8. 8. Shen T, Wang J, Xia Z, Dai X, Li B, Feng Y. Ultraviolet sensing characteristics of Ag-doped ZnO micro-nano fiber. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 2020;307:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2020.111989
  9. 9. Zhang S, Liu Y, Gu P, Ma R, Wen T, Zhao G, Li L, Ai Y, Hu C, Wang X. Enhanced photodegradation of toxic organic pollutants using dual-oxygen-doped porous g-C3N4: Mechanism exploration from both experimental and DFT studies. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2019;248:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.02.008
  10. 10. Tahir MB, Nawaz T, Nabi G, Sagir M, Khan MI, Malik N. Role of nanophotocatalysts for the treatment of hazardous organic and inorganic pollutants in wastewater. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 2020:1-25. DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2020.1723570
  11. 11. Hernández-Chover V, Castellet-Viciano L, Hernández-Sancho F. Preventive maintenance versus cost of repairs in asset management: An efficiency analysis in wastewater treatment plants. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2020;141:215-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.035
  12. 12. Ali I. New Generation Adsorbents for Water Treatment. Chemical Reviews. 2012;112(10):5073-5091. DOI: 10.1021/cr300133d
  13. 13. Mello JMM, Brandao HL, Valério A, de Souza AAU, de Oliveira D, da Silva A, et al. Biodegradation of BTEX compounds from petrochemical wastewater: Kinetic and toxicity. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2019;32:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100914
  14. 14. Matilainen A, Gjessing ET, Lahtinen T, Hed L, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpaää M. An overview of the methods used in the characterization of natural organic matter (NOM) in relation to drinking water treatment. Chemosphere. 2011;83(11):1431-1442. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.018
  15. 15. Bernabeu A, Vercher RF, Santos-Juanes L, Simon PJ, Lardíın C, Martíınez MA, Vicente JA, González R, Llosá C, Amant AM. Solar photocatalysis as a tertiary treatment to remove emerging pollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluents. Catalysis Today. 2011;161(1):235-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.09.025
  16. 16. Mohapatra DP, Brar SK, Tyagi RD, Picard P, Surampalli RY. Analysis and advanced oxidation treatment of a persistent pharmaceutical compound in wastewater and wastewater sludge-carbamazepine. Science of the Total Environment. 2014;470-471:58-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.034
  17. 17. Yan Y, Zhou X, Yu P, Li Z, Zheng T. Characteristics, mechanisms and bacteria behavior of photocatalysis with a solid Z-scheme Ag/AgBr/g-C3N4 nanosheet in water disinfection. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2020;590:1-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2019.117282
  18. 18. Meng Y, Wang Y, Han Q , Xue N, Sun Y, Gao B, Li Q . Trihalomethane (THM) formation from synergic disinfection of biologically treated municipal wastewater: Effect of ultraviolet (UV) irradiation and titanium dioxide photocatalysis on dissolve organic matter fractions. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2016;303:252-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.141
  19. 19. Madhura L, Singh S, Kanchi S, Sabela M, Bisetty K, Inamuddin. Nanotechnology-based water quality management for wastewater treatment. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2018;17(1):65-121. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-018-0778-8
  20. 20. Shah AI, Dar MUD, Bhat RA, Singh JP, Singh K, Bhat SA. Perspectives and challenges of wastewater treatment technologies to combat contaminants of emerging concerns. Ecological Engineering. 2020;152:105882. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105882
  21. 21. Theron J, Walker JA, Cloete TE. Nanotechnology and Water Treatment: Applications and Emerging Opportunities. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 2008;34(1):43-69. DOI: 10.1080/10408410701710442
  22. 22. Kanchi S. Nanotechnology for Water Treatment. Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 2014;01(02):1-3. DOI: 10.4172/JREAC.1000e102
  23. 23. Kosera VS, Cruz TM, Chaves ES, Tiburtius ERL. Triclosan degradation by heterogeneous photocatalysis using ZnO immobilized in biopolymer as catalyst. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2017;344:184-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.05.014
  24. 24. Nobre FX, Mariano FAF, Santos FEP, Rocco MLM, Manzato L, de Matos JME, Couceiro P, Brito W. Heterogeneous photocatalysis of Tordon 2, 4-D herbicide using the phase mixture of TiO2. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2019;7(6):1-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103501
  25. 25. Castaneda-Juáarez M, Martínez-Miranda V, Almazan-Sánchez PT, Linares-Hernández I, Santoyo-Tepole F, Vázquez-Mejía G. Synthesis of TiO2 catalysts doped with Cu, Fe, and Fe/Cu supported on clinoptilolite zeolite by an electrochemical-thermal method for the degradation of diclofenac by heterogeneous photocatalysis. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2019;380:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.04.045
  26. 26. Nie G, Xiao L. New insight into wastewater treatment by activation of sulfite with photosensitive organic dyes under visible light irradiation. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2020;389:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123446
  27. 27. Pandoli O, Rosso TD, Santos VM, de Siqueira Rezende R, Marinkovic BA. Prototyping of photocatalytic microreactor and testing of photodegradation of organic dye. Química Nova. 2015;38(6):859-863. DOI: 10.5935/0100-4042.20150079
  28. 28. Pereira VJ, Fernandes D, Carvalho G, Benoliel MJ, Romão MVS, Crespo MTB. Assessment of the presence and dynamics of fungi in drinking water sources using cultural and molecular methods. Water Research. 2010;44(17):4850-4859. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.018
  29. 29. Díez AM, Moreira FC, Marinho BA, Espíındola JCA, Paulista LO, Sanroman MA, Pazos M, Boaventura RAR, Vilar VJP. A step forward in heterogeneous photocatalysis: Process intensification by using a static mixer as catalyst support. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2018;343:597-606. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.041
  30. 30. Gonçalves NPF, Paganini MC, Armillotta P, Cerrato E, Calza P. The effect of cobalt doping on the efficiency of semiconductor oxides in the photocatalytic water remediation. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2019;7(6):1-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103475
  31. 31. Cambrussi ANCO, de Sena Neto LR, da Silva Filho EC, Osajima JAF, Ribeiro AB. Heterogeneous photocatalysis using TiO2 in suspension applied to antioxidant activity assays. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2019;14:648-655. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.02.002
  32. 32. Zerjav G, Albreht A, Vovk I, Pintar A. Revisiting terephthalic acid and coumarin as probes for photoluminescent determination of hydroxyl radical formation rate in heterogeneous photocatalysis. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2020;598:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117566
  33. 33. Gaya UI, Abdullah AH. Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: A review of fundamentals, progress and problems. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews. 2008;9(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2007.12.003
  34. 34. Kunduru KR, Nazarkovsky M, Farah S, Pawar RP, Basu A, Domb AJ. Nanotechnology for water purification: applications of nanotechnology methods in wastewater treatment. In: Grumezescu AM, editor. Water Purification. Amsterdan: Elsevier; 2017. 33-74. DOI: 4.00002-2
  35. 35. Patel SG, Yadav NR, Patel SK. Evaluation of Degradation Characteristics of Reactive Dyes by UV/Fenton, UV/Fenton/Activated Charcoal, and UV/Fenton/TiO2 Processes: A Comparative Study. Separation Science and Technology. 2013;48(12):1788-1800. DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2012.756035
  36. 36. Da Silva WL, Lansarin MA, Stedlie FC, Dos Santos JH. The potential of chemical industrial and academic wastes as a source of supported photocatalysts. Journal of Molecular Catalysis. A, Chemical. 2014; 393: 125-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2014.05.040
  37. 37. Apostila do Curso da Escola Piloto: Técnicas de Controle Ambiental em efluentes líquidos – Processos Oxidativos Avançados. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; 1993
  38. 38. Gehrke I, Geiser A, Somborn-Schulz A. Innovations in nanotechnology for water treatment. Nanotechnology, Science and Applications. 2015;8:1-17. DOI: 10.2147/NSA.S43773
  39. 39. Lazar M, Varghese S, Nair S. Photocatalytic Water Treatment by Titanium Dioxide: Recent Updates. Catalysts. 2012;2(4):572-601. DOI:
  40. 40. Aani SA, Gomez V, Wright CJ, Hilal N. Fabrication of antibacterial mixed matrix nanocomposite membranes using hybrid nanostructure of silver coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2017;326:721-736. DOI:
  41. 41. Zabihi-Mobarakeh H, Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh A. Application of supported TiO2 onto Iranian clinoptilolite nanoparticles in the photodegradation of mixture of aniline and 2, 4-dinitroaniline aqueous solution. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2015;26:315-321. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.12.003
  42. 42. Zou Y, Huang H, Li S, Wang J, Zhang Y. Synthesis of supported Ag/AgCl composite materials and their photocatalytic activity. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2019;376:43-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.03.00
  43. 43. Yang W, Hu W, Zhang J, Wang W, Cai R, Pan M, Huang C, Chen X, Yan B, Zeng H. Tannic acid/Fe3+functionalized magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposite with high loading of silver nanoparticles as ultra-efficient catalyst and disinfectant for wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021;405:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126629
  44. 44. Kan Q , Lu K, Dong S, Shen D, Huang Q , Tong Y, Wu W, Gao S, Mao L. Transformation and removal of imidacloprid mediated by silver ferrite nanoparticle facilitated peroxymonosulfate activation in water: Reaction rates, products, and pathways. Environmental Pollution. 2020;267:1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115438
  45. 45. Cheng Z, Guan H, Meng J, Wang X. Dual-Functional Porous Wood Filter for Simultaneous Oil/Water Separation and Organic Pollutant Removal. ACS Omega. 2020;5(23):14096-14103. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01606
  46. 46. Yang R, Zhao Q , Liu B. Two-step method to prepare the direct Z-scheme heterojunction hierarchical flowerlike Ag@AgBr/Bi2MoO6 microsphere photocatalysts for wastewater treatment under visible light. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. 2020;31(7):5054-5067. DOI: 10.1007/s10854-020-03040-3
  47. 47. Bodaghi Z, Pakpour F, Ghanbari D. Carbon@CoFe2O4@Ag and hollow CoFe2O4@Ag nanocomposite: green synthesis of a photocatalyst and magnetic adsorbent for antibiotic removal from aqueous solutions. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10854-020-04439-8
  48. 48. Mauro AD, Farrugia C, Abela S, Refalo P, Grech M, Falqui L, Nicotra G, Sfuncia G, Mio A, Buccheri MA, Rappazzo G, Brundo MV, Scalisi EM, Pecoraro RP, Iaria C, Privitera V, Impellizzeri G. Ag/ZnO/PMMA Nanocomposites for Efficient Water Reuse. ACS Applied Bio Materials. 2020;3(7):4417-4426. DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.0c00409
  49. 49. Albukhari SM, Ismail M, Akhtar K, Danish EY. Catalytic reduction of nitrophenols and dyes using silver nanoparticles @ cellulose polymer paper for the resolution of wastewater treatment challenges. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2019;577:548-561. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.05.058
  50. 50. Mazumder JA, Perwez M, Noori R, Sardar M. Development of sustainable and reusable silver nanoparticlecoated glass for the treatment of contaminated water. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2019;26(22):23070-23081. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05647-4
  51. 51. Al-Sherbini ASA, Ghannam HEA, El-Ghanam GMA, El-Ella AA, Youssef AM. Utilization of chitosan/Ag bionanocomposites as eco-friendly photocatalytic reactor for Bactericidal effect and heavy metals removal. Heliyon. 2019;5(6):e01980. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01980
  52. 52. Das R, Sypu VS, Paumo HK, Bhaumik M, Maharaj V, Maity A. Silver decorated magnetic nanocomposite (Fe3O4@PPy-MAA/Ag) as highly active catalyst towards reduction of 4-nitrophenol and toxic organic dyes. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2019;244:546-558. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.073
  53. 53. Pratheesya T, Harish S, M N, Sohila S, Ramesh R. Enhanced antibacterial and photocatalytic activities of silver nanoparticles anchored reduced graphene oxide nanostructure. Materials Research Express. 2019;6(7):1-25. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab1567
  54. 54. Rasool K, Lee DS. Inhibitory Effects of silver nanoparticles on removal of organic pollutants and sulfate in an anaerobic biological wastewater treatment process. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2016;16(5):4456-4463. DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2016.10984
  55. 55. Casa M, Sarno M, Cirillo C, Ciambelli P. Reduced graphene oxide-based silver nanoparticle-containing natural hydrogel as highly efficient catalysts for nitrile wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Transactions. 2016;47:307-312. DOI: 10.3303/CET1647052
  56. 56. Chen X, Cen C, Tang Z, Zeng W, Chen D, Fang P, Chen Z. The key role of pH value in the synthesis of titanate nanotubes-loaded manganese oxides as a superior catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2013;2013:1-7. DOI: 10.1155/2013/871528
  57. 57. Mahardika T, Putri NA, Putri AE, Fauzia V, Roza L, Sugihartono I, Herbani Y. Rapid and low temperature synthesis of Ag nanoparticles on the ZnO nanorods for photocatalytic activity improvement. Results in Physics. 2019;13:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102209
  58. 58. Booshehri AY, Goh SCK, Hong J, Jiang R, Xu R. Effect of depositing silver nanoparticles on BiVO4in enhancing visible light photocatalytic inactivation of bacteria in water. J Mater Chem A. 2014;2(17):6209-6217. DOI: 10.1039/c3ta15392d
  59. 59. Radhu S. Photocatalytic degradation of textile dye molecules by Ag@Au core–shell nanoparticles. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020;25:285-288. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.413
  60. 60. Burdusel AC, Gherasim O, Grumezescu AM, Mogoanta L, Ficai A, Andronescu E. Biomedical Applications of Silver Nanoparticles: An Up-to-Date Overview. Nanomaterials. 2018;8(9):681. DOI: 10.3390/nano8090681
  61. 61. Nedelcu IA, Ficai A, Sonmez M, Ficai D, Oprea O, Andronescu E. Silver Based Materials for Biomedical Applications. Current Organic Chemistry. 2014;18(2):173-184. DOI: 10.2174/13852728113176660141
  62. 62. Ivask A, Juganson K, Bondarenko O, Mortimer M, Aruoja V, Kasemets K, et al. Mechanisms of toxic action of Ag, ZnO and CuO nanoparticles to selected ecotoxicological test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: A comparative review. Nanotoxicology. 2013;8(sup1):57-71. DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2013.855831
  63. 63. Kumar SSD, Rajendran NK, Houreld NN, Abrahamse H. Recent advances on silver nanoparticle and biopolymer-based biomaterials for wound healing applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2018;115:165-175. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.003
  64. 64. Brennan SA, Fhoghlú CN, Devitt BM, O’Mahony FJ, Brabazon D, Walsh A. Silver nanoparticles and their orthopaedic applications. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2015;97-B(5):582-589. DOI: 10.1302/0301- 620x.97b5.33336
  65. 65. Marassi V, Cristo LD, Smith SGJ, Ortelli S, Blosi M, Costa AL, Reschiglian P, Volkov Y, Prina-Melo A. Silver nanoparticles as a medical device in healthcare settings: a five-step approach for candidate screening of coating agents. Royal Society Open Science. 2018;5(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.171113
  66. 66. Pala R, Zeng Y, Pattnaik S, Busi S, Alomari N, Nauli SM, Liu G. Functionalized silver nanoparticles for sensing, molecular imaging and therapeutic applications. Current Nanomedicine. 2019;8(3):234-250. DOI: 10.2174/2468187308666180508144919
  67. 67. Mao BH, Chen ZY, Wang YJ, Yan SJ. Silver nanoparticles have lethal and sublethal adverse effects on development and longevity by inducing ROS-mediated stress responses. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20728-z
  68. 68. Pauksch L, Hartmann S, Rohnke M, Szalay G, Alt V, Schnettler R, Lips KS. Biocompatibility of silver nanoparticles and silver ions in primary human mesenchymal stem cells and osteoblasts. Acta Biomaterialia. 2014;10(1):439-449. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.037
  69. 69. Ibrahim EH, Kilany M, Ghramh HA, Khan KA, Ul Islam S. Cellular proliferation/cytotoxicity and antimicrobial potentials of green synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using Juniperus procera. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2019;26(7):1689-1694. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.08.014
  70. 70. Elia P, Zach R, Hazan S, Kolusheva S, Porat Z, Zeiri Y. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using plant extracts as reducing agents. International journal of nanomedicine. 2014;9:4007-4021. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S57343
  71. 71. Tarannum N, Divya D, Gautam YK. Facile green synthesis and applications of silver nanoparticles: a state-of-the-art review. RSC Advances. 2019;9(60):34926-34948. DOI: 10.1039/c9ra04164h
  72. 72. Srikar SK, Giri DD, Pal DB, Mishra PK, Upadhyay SN. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: A review. Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 2016;06(01):34-56. DOI: 10.4236/gsc.2016.61004
  73. 73. Kyriacou SV, Brownlow WJ, Xu XHN. Using nanoparticle optics assay for direct observation of the function of antimicrobial agents in single live bacterial cells. Biochemistry. 2004;43(1):140-147. DOI: 10.1021/bi0351110
  74. 74. Kim JS, Kuk E, Yu KN, Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee HJ, Kim SH, Park YK, Park, YH, Hwang C, Kim Y, Lee Y, Jeong H, Cho M. Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology. Biology and Medicine. 2007;3(1):95-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2006.12.001
  75. 75. Sahar MO. Some Nanoparticles effects on proteus sp. and klebsiella sp. isolated from water. American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology. 2014;2(1):4-10. DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-2-1-2
  76. 76. Jain D, Daima H, Kachhwala S, Kothari S. Synthesis of plant-mediated silver nanoparticles using papaya fruit extract and evaluation of their Anti Microbial Activities. Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures. 2009;4:557-563
  77. 77. Kvítek L, Panácek A, Soukupová J, Kolár M, Vecerovpa R, Prucek R, Holecová M, Zbořil R. Effect of surfactants and polymers on stability and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles (NPs). The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2008;112(15):5825-5834. DOI: 10.1021/jp711616v
  78. 78. Khan SU, Anjum SI, Ansari MJ, Khan MHU, Kamal S, Rahman K, Shoaib M, Man S, Khan AJ, Khan SU, Khan D. Antimicrobial potentials of medicinal plant’s extract and their derived silver nanoparticles: A focus on honey bee pathogen. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2019;26(7):1815-1834. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.02.010
  79. 79. Sanjivkumar M, Vaishnavi R, Neelakannan M, Kannan D, Silambarasan T, Immanuel G. Investigation on characterization and biomedical properties of silver nanoparticles synthesized by an actinobacterium Streptomyces olivaceus (MSU3). Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 2019;17:151-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcab.2018.11.014
  80. 80. Scheringer M, MacLeod M, Behra R, Sigg L, Hungerbühler K. Environmental risks associated with nanoparticulate silver used as biocide. Household Pers Care Today. 2010;1:34-37
  81. 81. MubarakAli D, Thajuddin N, Jeganathan K, Gunasekaran M. Plant extract mediated synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles and its antibacterial activity against clinically isolated pathogens. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2011;85(2):360-365. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.03.009
  82. 82. Munir H, Mumtaz A, Rashid R, Najeeb J, Zubair MT, Munir S, Bilal M, Cheng H. Eucalyptus camaldulensis gum as a green matrix to fabrication of zinc and silver nanoparticles: Characterization and novel prospects as antimicrobial and dye-degrading agents. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2020;9(6):15513-15524. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.026
  83. 83. Rasheed T, Bilal M, Iqbal HMN, Li C. Green biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using leaves extract of Artemisia vulgaris and their potential biomedical applications. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2017;158:408-415. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.07.020
  84. 84. Nakkala JR, Mata R, Gupta AK, Sadras SR. Biological activities of green silver nanoparticles synthesized with Acorous calamus rhizome extract. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2014;85:784-794. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.08.024
  85. 85. Zargar M, Hamid AA, Bakar FA, Shamsudin MN, Shameli K, Jahanshiri F, Farahani F. Green Synthesis and antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles using vitex negundo L. Molecules. 2011;16(8):6667-6676.doi:10.3390/molecules16086667
  86. 86. Khan ZUH, Shah NS, Iqbal J, Khan AU, Imran M, Alshehri SM, et al. Biomedical and photocatalytic applications of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles: Ecotoxicology study of brilliant green dye and its mechanistic degradation pathways. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2020;319:114114. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114114
  87. 87. Unser S, Bruzas I, He J, Sagle L. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensing: Current Challenges and Approaches. Sensors. 2015;15(7):15684-15716. DOI: 10.3390/s150715684
  88. 88. Cao Z, He P, Huang T, Yang S, Han S, Wang X, Ding G. Plasmonic Coupling of AgNPs near Graphene Edges: A Cross-Section Strategy for High-Performance SERS Sensing. Chemistry of Materials. 2020;32(9):3813-3822. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b05293
  89. 89. Ashraf JM, Ansari MA, Khan HM, Alzohairy MA, Choi I. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and characterization of their inhibitory effects on AGEs formation using biophysical techniques. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1). DOI: 10.1038/srep20414
  90. 90. Loiseau A, Asila V, Boitel-Aullen G, Lam M, Salmain M, Boujday S. Silver-Based Plasmonic Nanoparticles for and Their Use in Biosensing. Biosensors. 2019;9(2):78. DOI: 10.3390/bios9020078
  91. 91. Wang X, Hou T, Lin H, Lv W, Li H, Li F. In situ template generation of silver nanoparticles as amplification tags for ultrasensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensing of microRNA. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2019;137:82-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.05.006
  92. 92. Wang X, Wu L, Ren J, Miyoshi D, Sugimoto N, Qu X. Label-free colorimetric and quantitative detection of cancer marker protein using noncrosslinking aggregation of Au/Ag nanoparticles induced by target-specific peptide probe. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2011;26(12):4804-4809. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.06.012
  93. 93. Bahavarnia F, Pashazadeh-Panahi P, Hasanzadeh M, Razmi N. DNA based biosensing of Acinetobacter baumannii using nanoparticles aggregation method. Heliyon. 2020;6(7):1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04474
  94. 94. Wang WF, Qiang Y, Meng XH, Yang JL, Shi YP. Ultrasensitive colorimetric assay melamine based on in situ reduction to formation of CQDs-silver nanocomposite. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2018;260:808-815. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.108
  95. 95. Rajamanikandan R, Ilanchelian M. Simple and visual approach for highly selective biosensing of vitamin B1 based on glutathione coated silver nanoparticles as a colorimetric probe. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2017;244:380-386. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.12.129
  96. 96. Guo Y, Wu J, Li J, Ju H. A plasmonic colorimetric strategy for biosensing through enzyme guided growth of silver nanoparticles on gold nanostars. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2016;78:267-273. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.11.056
  97. 97. Barghouti ME, Akjouj A, Mir A. Design of silver nanoparticles with graphene coatings layers used for LSPR biosensor applications. Vacuum. 2020;180:1-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109497
  98. 98. Tang J, Xiong P, Cheng Y, Chen Y, Peng S, Zhu ZQ . Enzymatic oxydate-triggered AgNPs etching: A novel signal-on photoelectrochemical immunosensing platform based on Ag@AgCl nanocubes loaded RGO plasmonic heterostructure. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2019;130:125-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.01.014
  99. 99. Wang Y, Li Z, Li H, Vuki M, Xu D, Chen HY. A novel aptasensor based on silver nanoparticle enhanced fluorescence. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2012;32(1):76-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.11.030
  100. 100. Sangappa Y, Latha S, Asha S, Sindhu P, Parushuram N, Shilpa M, Byrappa K, Narayana B. Synthesis of anisotropic silver nanoparticles using silk fibroin: characterization and antimicrobial properties. Materials Research Innovations. 2017;23(2):79-85. DOI: 10.1080/14328917.2017.1383680
  101. 101. Wu Q , Si M, Zhang B, Zhang K, Li H, Mi L, et al. Strong damping of the localized surface plasmon resonance of Ag nanoparticles by Ag2O. Nanotechnology. 2018;29(29):1-18. DOI: 10.1088/1361- 6528/aac031
  102. 102. Mlalila N, Swai H, Hilonga A, Kadam D. Antimicrobial dependence of silver nanoparticles on surface plasmon resonance bands against Escherichia coli. Nanotechnology, Science and Applications. 201610:1-9. DOI: 10.2147/nsa.s123681
  103. 103. Ribeiro MS, de Melo LSA, Farooq S, Baptista A, Kato IT, Núñez SC, et al. Photodynamic inactivation assisted by localized surface plasmon resonance of silver nanoparticles: In vitro evaluation on Escherichia coli and Streptococcus mutans. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2018;22:191-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.04.007
  104. 104. Louis C, Pluchery O. Gold Nanoparticles for Physics, Chemistry and Biology. 1st ed. London: Imperial College Press; 2012. 308 p. DOI: 10.1142/p815
  105. 105. Ahn H, Song H, ryul Choi J, Kim K. A localized surface plasmon resonance sensor using double-metal-complex nanostructures and a review of recent approaches. Sensors. 2017;18(2):1-20. DOI: 10.3390/s18010098
  106. 106. Caro C, M P, Klippstein R, Pozo D, P A. Silver Nanoparticles: Sensing and Imaging Applications. In: Perez DP, editor. Silver Nanoparticles. London: InTech; 2010. p. 201-223. DOI: 10.5772/8513
  107. 107. Liu B, Zhuang J, Wei G. Recent advances in the design of colorimetric sensors for environmental monitoring. Environmental Science: Nano. 2020;7(8):2195-2213. DOI: 10.1039/d0en00449a
  108. 108. Anker JN, Hall WP, Lyandres O, Shah NC, Zhao J, Van Duyne RP. Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. In: Rodgers P, editor. Nanoscience and Technology: A Collection of Reviews from Nature Journals. CoPublished with Macmillan Publishers Ltd, UK; 2010. p. 308-319. DOI: 10.1142/9789814287005 0032
  109. 109. Oh SY, Heo NS, Bajpai VK, Jang SC, Ok G, Cho Y, et al. Development of a Cuvette-Based LSPR Sensor Chip Using a Plasmonically Active Transparent Strip. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2019;7:1-11. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00299
  110. 110. Bastos V, de Oliveira JMPF, Brown D, Jonhston H, Malheiro E, da Silva ALD, et al. The influence of Citrate or PEG coating on silver nanoparticle toxicity to a human keratinocyte cell line. Toxicology Letters. 2016;249:29-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2016.03.005
  111. 111. Pinzaru I, Coricovac D, Dehelean C, Moacã EA, Mioc M, Baderca F, et al. Stable PEG-coated silver nanoparticles – A comprehensive toxicological profile. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2018;111:546-556. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.11.051
  112. 112. Devi JM, Umadevi M. Synthesis and Characterization of Silver–PVA Nanocomposite for Sensor and Antibacterial Applications. Journal of Cluster Science. 2013;25(2):639-650. DOI: 10.1007/s10876-013- 0660-6
  113. 113. Haberl N, Hirn S, Wenk A, Diendorf J, Epple M, Johnston BD, et al. Cytotoxic and proinflammatory effects of PVP-coated silver nanoparticles after intratracheal instillation in rats. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology. 2013;4:933-940. DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.4.105
  114. 114. Ban DK, Paul S. Rapid colorimetric and spectroscopy based sensing of heavy metal and cellular free oxygen radical by surface functionalized silver nanoparticles. Applied Surface Science. 2018;458:245-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.069
  115. 115. Faghiri F, Ghorbani F. Colorimetric and naked eye detection of trace Hg2+ ions in the environmental water samples based on plasmonic response of sodium alginate impregnated by silver nanoparticles. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2019;374:329-340. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.052
  116. 116. Ranjani B, Pandian K, Kumar GA, Gopinath SCB. D-glucosamine chitosan base molecule-assisted synthesis of different shape and sized silver nanoparticles by a single pot method: A greener approach for sensor and microbial applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019;133:1280-1287. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.196
  117. 117. Rezaei ZB, Rastegarzadeh S, Kiasat A. In-situ decorated silver nanoparticles on electrospun poly (vinyl alcohol)/chitosan nanofibers as a plasmonic sensor for azathioprine determination. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2018;559:266-274. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.09.047
  118. 118. Yilmaz H, Cobandede Z, Yilmaz D, Cinkilic A, Culha M, Demiralay EC. Monitoring forced degradation of drugs using silica coated AgNPs with surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Talanta. 2020;214:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120828
  119. 119. Sharma VK, Yngard RA, Lin Y. Silver nanoparticles: Green synthesis and their antimicrobial activities. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2009;145(1-2):83-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2008.09.002
  120. 120. Kurbanoglu S, Ozkan SA, Merkoc¸i A. Nanomaterials-based enzyme electrochemical biosensors operating through inhibition for biosensing applications. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2017;89:886-898. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.102
  121. 121. Meng F, Sun H, Huang Y, Tang Y, Chen Q , Miao P. Peptide cleavage-based electrochemical biosensor coupling graphene oxide and silver nanoparticles. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2019;1047:45-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.09.053
  122. 122. Chisanga M, Muhamadali H, Ellis D, Goodacre R. Enhancing Disease Diagnosis: Biomedical Applications of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Applied Sciences. 2019;9(6):1163. DOI: 10.3390/app9061163
  123. 123. Kucherenko IS, Soldatkin OO, Kucherenko DY, Soldatkina OV, Dzyadevych SV. Advances in nanomaterial application in enzyme-based electrochemical biosensors: a review. Nanoscale Advances. 2019;1(12):4560-4577. DOI: 10.1039/c9na00491b

Written By

William Leonardo da Silva, Daniel Moro Druzian, Leandro Rodrigues Oviedo, Pâmela Cristine Ladwig Muraro and Vinícius Rodrigues Oviedo

Submitted: 18 September 2020 Reviewed: 08 January 2021 Published: 27 January 2021