Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Breeding Strategy for Improvement of Omega-3 Fatty Acid through Conventional Breeding, Genetic Mapping, and Genomics in Soybean

Written By

Krishnanand P. Kulkarni, Rupesh Tayade, Hyun Jo, Jong Tae Song and Jeong-Dong Lee

Submitted: August 19th, 2020 Reviewed: November 19th, 2020 Published: January 19th, 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.95069

Chapter metrics overview

446 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Plant-derived omega (ω)-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid is an essential fatty acid in human and animal diets and is a precursor of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, which exists as α-linolenic acid (ALA, ω-3) in plant oil. Several epidemiological studies have revealed the health benefits of regular consumption of ω-3 fatty acid-containing diets. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is one of the major oil crops in the world and has around 8% ALA (ω-3) in seed oil. Soybean-derived ω-3 can be potential alternative sources of ω-3 fatty acids for populations living in countries with high risks of inadequate ω-3 intake. Therefore, increasing ω-3 concentration became an important goal in soybean breeding. Conversely, higher content of ω-3 fatty acids makes seed oil rancid, necessitating chemical hydrogenation, which generates trans fats. Since trans fats have been associated with the heart and other diseases, demand for soybeans with reduced ALA content is growing. In this book chapter, we described the importance of ω-3 fatty acid and consumption of diets with balanced ω-6/ω-3 ratio and discussed breeding and biotechnological means (and integrated approaches) for altering the ω-3 fatty acid content to avoid the need for chemical hydrogenation as well as to improve the ω-6/ω-3 ratio.


  • soybean
  • fatty acid
  • omega-3
  • omega-6
  • breeding

1. Introduction

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], an important oil crop, accounted for 28% of the total vegetable oil consumption in the world in 2019 [1]. The last 7 years have seen 22.5% increases in soybean oil consumption worldwide (Figure 1) and soybean oil production is expected to rise in the future. Commodity soybean seed contains 20% oil, 40% protein, and 12% soluble carbohydrates on a dry weight basis [2]. Fatty acid compositions of food and oil have received considerable attention in the past few decades for human nutrition and health concerns. Hence, improving the FA composition of the soybean oil is crucial to reduce the risks of associated coronary heart and other diseases.

Figure 1.

Soybean oil consumption worldwide from 2013/14 to 2019/20 (in million metric tons). Retrieved from

1.1 Fatty acid composition of important oil crops

Oil and fatty acids are essential elements for the development and growth of all the creatures. These elements are the structural components of the cellular membrane, as well as play a pivotal role in storing energy and involved in the cellular signaling processes. Known natural resources of oil and fatty acids are plants, animals, and oleaginous microorganisms. Oil and fatty acids played a crucial role in human life in several ways as food and fuel resource, mostly as a nutritional element of the diet. Edible oilseed crops (palm, olive, rapeseed, canola, sunflower, and soybean) primarily contain five fatty acids: palmitic acid (16:0), stearic acid (18:0), oleic acid (18:1), linoleic acid (ω-6, 18:2), and α-linolenic acid (ALA, ω-3, 18:3) in their seed oil. The fatty acid composition varies with the oilseed plant species as given in Table 1. Fatty acids accumulated in plants as a form of triacylglyceride, which consists of three fatty acids linked to glycerol as a backbone through ester bond [4, 5]. The triacylglyceride is a key source of renewable energy in the form of reduced carbon used as food, feedstock, and fuel.

CropsSaturated fatty acids (Palmitic and stearic acid) (%)Unsaturated fatty acids (%)
Oleic acidLinoleic acidα-linolenic acid

Table 1.

Fatty acid composition of major oilseed crops.

Data retrieved from Kim [3].

In the plant fatty acids, basic biosynthetic pathways are well established but FA/lipid operating between the plastid and the endoplasmic reticulum remains to be determined [6, 7]. The fatty acid biosynthesis takes place in the chloroplast stroma of leaves and proplastids of seeds by de novo and further incorporation of triacylglyceride occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum [8]. Besides, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) synthesis in higher plants takes place by both prokaryotic and eukaryotic enzymatic pathways [7, 9]. These pathways are regulated through diverse sets of genes.

1.2 Polyunsaturated fatty acids in soybean

Soybean seed primarily contains two saturated fatty acids, which are palmitic acid, and stearic acid, and three unsaturated fatty acids, which are oleic acid, linoleic acid, and ALA. The relative ratio of these fatty acids commonly found in cultivated soybean are, 11% of palmitic acid, 4% of stearic acid, 23% of oleic acid, 55% of linoleic acid, and 8% of ALA [10]. However, wide variation for fatty acids content has been reported in several studies [11, 12, 13]. Commonly, the proportion ratio of fatty acids in soybean is influenced by the genotypes as well as the environmental factors which are very crucial to determine the entire quality of the oil.

Linoleic acid and ALA are the PUFA, also termed essential fatty acids (EFA), present in the soybeans. Due to the presence of two or more double bonds between the carbons of fatty acid chains, PUFA are distinguished from saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids. The EFA is primarily classified into two forms, ω-6 and ω-3, which are metabolically interlinked but functionally diverse. ω-6 and ω-3 comprise long chains of carbon atoms with a carboxyl group at one end of the chain and a methyl group at the other end.

ω-3 fatty acids have a carbon–carbon double bond located between the third and fourth carbon atoms from the methyl end of the chain. ω-3 fatty acids exhibit cis-trans isomerism with its extension to E-Z configuration [14]. ALA, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are the three important ω-3 fatty acids. The carbon backbone of these contains 18 carbon atoms, 20, and 22 for ALA, EPA, and DHA, respectively. Their structures are shown in Figure 2. ALA is the precursor of DHA and EPA, which are essential for the growth and development of the brain and retina in humans [15].

Figure 2.

Major three ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid structure: Three unsaturated fatty acids are shown with the cis configuration of the double bonds with a methyl end and a carboxyl (acidic) end represented with commonly followed nomenclature numerical scheme.

1.3 Sources of ω-3 fatty acids

Seafood products such as fish are the main sources of ω-3 fatty acids (ALA, EPA, and DHA). However, they are not a routine part of the traditional diet in many countries. The ω-3 fatty acid is abundantly available in nature and found in most of the oilseed crops. The ALA is also synthesized in the plants found in green leafy vegetables, and in the seeds of flax, as rapeseeds (Brassica campestris), chia (Salvia hispanica), perilla (Perilla frutescens), walnut (Juglans sinensis), and soybean. The ω-3 is dietary EFA for humans; however, because of the absence of delta-12 and delta-15 desaturase enzymes, humans and other animals are unable to synthesize ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acids. Therefore, these EFAs need to acquire through diet or dietary supplements [16].

1.4 Importance of ω-3 fatty acid and ω-6/ω-3 ratio

Several studies reported the nutritional and health benefits of ω-3 in humans [17]. Besides, ω-3 fatty acids are known for therapeutic uses and to offer protection against numerous diseases [15]. Thus, the nutritional value of ω-3 fatty acids is now widely accepted. Earlier diets comprised meat, plants, eggs, fish, nuts, and berries, which contained substantial amounts of ω-3 fatty acid [17, 18]. With the changes in dietary habits, consumption of ω-6 fatty acid was enhanced, which consequently reduced the level of ω-3 fatty acids in human. Thus, the contemporary diets are now comprised of a high intake of saturated and ω-6 fatty acids, decreased ω-3 fatty acid intake, and an overuse of salt and refined sugar [19]. These dietary changes led to diets with an undesirable ω-6/ω-3 ratio up to 20:1 [20]. Ultimately, an altered ratio of ω-6/ω-3 is considered unhealthy and reported to be the prevalent cause of prothrombotic and proinflammatory diseases, such as atherosclerosis, obesity, and diabetes [16, 21, 22, 23]. Several studies have reported a positive correlation between lower ω-6/ω-3 ratio and reduced risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, including breast, colon, prostate, liver, and pancreatic cancers, inflammation, favor apoptosis and exert antiproliferative effects cancers [24].

The balanced ω-6/ω-3 ratio is an important determinant in decreasing the risk for CVD [17]. Increased intake of linoleic acid is known to interfere with the incorporation of EPA and DHA (which have the most potent inflammatory effects) in cell membrane lipids, and causes platelet aggregation and oxidation of low-density lipoprotein. Intake of ω-3 fatty acids may help in preventing the development of CVD as well as other associated diseases. Therefore, it is highly essential to increase the intake of ω-3 fatty acids and to reduce the consumption of ω-6 fatty acids. It has been estimated that the present Western diets have a ω-6/ω-3 ratio of 15-20:1, which is highly imbalanced. Several studies in animals, such as Caenorhabdtis elegans, rats, mice, and pigs have shown the importance of balanced ω-6/ω-3 ratio [25, 26, 27]. Experimental studies suggested the changes in mucosal inflammation and reduced the patient suffering from an increased ratio of ω-6/ω-3. The combination of rheumatoid arthritis drug treatment and an adequate ω-6/ω-3 ratio has been suggested to cause significant changes in inflammatory markers [24]. Such studies have provided evidence for the need to have a balanced ratio of ω-6/ω-3 (1:1 to 2:1) [20, 24]. Besides, ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acids are involved differentially in the cellular process. It was reported that ω-6 fatty acids increase triacylglyceride content in the cell through altering membrane permeability; whereas, ω-3 fatty acids lower fat deposition in adipose tissues by suppressing lipogenic enzymes and increasing β-oxidation [28].


2. Breeding goals for improvements in the ω-3 fatty acid content of soybean seeds

ALA (ω-3) in soybean oil is unstable and has undesirable flavors. Due to the presence of a double bond at the 12th carbon in the fatty acid hydrocarbon chain, the ALA is oxidized easily, which causes unwanted odor and off-flavors [29, 30, 31]. Ultimately, this reduces the functional quality of fry food or soy food items [31, 32]. Hence, ALA content is negatively associated with the stability and shelf life of soybean oil. To improve the shelf life, stability, desirable flavor, and palatability, soybean oil is chemically hydrogenated, which leads to the formation of trans fats. The trans fatty acids are linked to coronary heart diseases, and hence it is desirable to reduce the consumption of foods containing trans fats. Nearly 13 million Americans are reported to suffer from coronary heart disease, and over 500,000 die annually from causes related to coronary heart disease. For these reasons, the addition of trans fat labels to food nutrition labels directly under the line for saturated fat was started in 2006. This resulted in a change in the narrative of food industries to promote and explore substitutions for hydrogenated soybean oils. In the past few decades, soybean geneticists and breeders have shown that oil with reduced trans-fat content can be obtained by decreasing the content of ω-3, and ω-6 fatty acids through conventional and modern breeding approaches. Soybean oils derived from cultivars with reduced ω-3 fatty acid content are shown to increase stability, lower hydrogenation, and comprise reduced trans-fat levels [29, 33, 34]. This shifted the breeder’s focus to develop soybeans with reduced ω-3 fatty acid content [35, 36]. In this section, the genetic basis of ALA (ω-3) content and breeding approaches fro altering ALA content are discussed.

2.1 Genetic basis of PUFA in soybean

The biosynthesis of PUFAs in soybean involves a variety of pathways, which are catalyzed by a complex series of desaturation and elongation steps [37]. Fatty acid desaturases introduce double bonds into the hydrocarbon chains of fatty acids to produce unsaturated fatty acids [38]. The delta-12 fatty acid desaturase-2 enzyme (FAD2) catalyzes the conversion of oleic acid to linoleic (ω-6) in the developing soybean seeds [39]. The microsomal ω-3 fatty acid desaturases (FAD3) catalyze the transformation of linoleic into ALA [36]. Thus, the genes coding for these fatty acid desaturases may act together to control the ALA content in soybean.

Two identical copies of FAD2 enzymes (FAD2-1, and FAD2-2) have been identified in the soybean. Five FAD2 gene family members (two FAD2-1 members: FAD2-1A and FAD2-1B, and three FAD2-2 members: FAD2-2A, FAD2-2B, and FAD2-2C) are present in the soybean genome [39, 40]. Through syntenic, phylogenetic, and in silico analysis, Lakhssassi et al. [41] revealed two additional members of the FAD2 gene family: FAD2-2D and FAD2-2E, positioned on chromosomes 9 and 15, respectively. Of these FAD-2 genes, FAD2-1A is highly expressed in developing soybean seeds [41]. The chromosomal locations and gene model names of these genes are given in Table 2. Mutations in one or more of these genes have been utilized to alter the fatty acid content of the soybean seeds.

Gene familyGene/paralogsGene model (Wm82.a1.v1)Gene model (Wm82.a2.v1)Chromosome (Linkage group)
FAD2FAD2-1AGlyma10g42470Glyma.10g27800010 (O)
FAD2-1BGlyma20g24530Glyma.20g11100020 (I)
FAD2-2AGlyma19g32930Glyma.19g14730019 (L)
FAD2-2BGlyma19g32940Glyma.19g14740019 (L)
FAD2-2CGlyma03g30070Glyma.03g1445003 (N)
FAD2-2DGlyma09g17170Glyma.09g1119009 (K)
FAD2-2EGlyma15g23200Glyma.15g19520015 (E)
FAD3FAD3AGlyma14g37350Glyma.14g19430014 (B2)
FAD3BGlyma02g39230Glyma.02g2272002 (D1b)
FAD3CGlyma18g06950Glyma.18g06200018 (G)
FAD3DGlyma11g27190Glyma.11g17410011 (B1)

Table 2.

Chromosomal location and gene model information of FAD2 and FAD3 genes in the soybean genome.

The genetic basis ω-3 fatty acid trait in soybean has been identified based on the experimental study of gene information from the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. and screening of lower ω-3 fatty acid mutant soybean lines. Arabidopsis contains a single gene encoding a microsomal ω-3 fatty acid desaturase and two chloroplast targeted enzymes (FAD7 and FAD8). At least three independent loci (fan, fan2, and fan3), influencing the ALA content have been identified [42]. Genes underlying all the three loci have been identified as homologous genes of FAD3 [43]. In soybeans, the level of ALA is controlled by three FAD3 genes: FAD3A (Glyma.14g194300 for Wm82.a2.v1 assembly), FAD3B (Glyma.02g227200), and FAD3C (Glyma.18g062000). Of these, FAD3A has been reported to show consistent high expression in developing seed, and hence have the greatest effect in controlling the accumulation of ALA contents [42, 44]. These three loci have a greater effect on ALA concentration, as combining mutant alleles of these genes resulted in soybean oil having ~1% ALA [45, 46, 47, 48].

The full-length genomic DNA sequences for FAD3A, FAD3B, FAD3C, and FAD3D genes were found to share 78 to 95% similarity, and have similar structure, and contain eight exons [49]. These eight exons of FAD3 genes are highly conserved in soybean and correspond to the sizes of exons in Arabidopsis. However, significant variation is found among the introns of FAD3 genes. Based on the structure and similarity, the four FAD3 genes could be separated into two groups: FAD3A/FAD3B, and FAD3C/FAD3D.

2.2 Reducing ω-3 fatty acid content to avoid the need for chemical hydrogenation

Initial breeding efforts were made by the USDA-ARS in 1952 to identify soybean germplasm with lower ω-3 content to replace chemical hydrogenation of soybean oil [50]. During that period, the cultivars with lower ω-3 levels were identified but no cultivar having <4% ω-3 were found. In 1981, USDA-ARS and North Carolina State University collaborated and developed the line N79-2245 having a reduced ω-3 content of 4.2% by recurrent selection approach [32]. The major cultivars/lines with low ω-3 content developed using conventional breeding, germplasm screening, mutation breeding, and recurrent selection [44, 51, 52, 53] are given in Table 3.

Lines/CultivarsSelection Typeα-linolenic acid (%)Reference
N79-2245Recurrent selection4.2[32]
C1640Mutant3.4[55, 56]
RG10Mutant< 2.5[60]
PI123440Germplasm< 4.0[61, 62, 63]
PI361088BGermplasm4[61, 62, 63]
A16Mutant< 2.5[58]
A17Mutant< 2.5[58]
MOLLRecurrent selection< 3.0[64, 65]
LOLLRecurrent selection< 3.0[65, 66]
A29Mutant3.0[67, 68]
PE1690Mutant3.7[51, 58]
RCAT 0716LMutant3.0[45]

Table 3.

List of soybean mutants and germplasm lines with low levels of α-linolenic acid in the seed oil.

The natural accessions reported with the low ω-3 level in the USDA germplasm is known as PI 123440 and PI 361088B with allelic variant at fan locus. This mutation was reported as allelic or identical to the initial single recessive allele derived from the C1640 genotype [57, 61, 62, 63]. Burton et al. [71] used the PI 123440 as a parent source to develop a low ω- trait known as Soyola and Satelite.

Through the EMS and X-ray mutagenesis approach, several mutants were previously reported for the lower ω-3 fatty acid content ranging from <2.5% to 5.6% that are linked with the Fan loci such as C1640 (fan), A5 (fan), A23 (fan2), KL-8 (fanx), M-5 (fan), M-24 (fanxa) and RG10 (fan-b) [54, 58, 60, 64, 66, 67, 72]. Besides, mutants A16, A17, A29, MOLL, and LOLL with reduced ω-3 acid content showed allelic variation at fan loci [58, 64, 66, 67]. The RG10 line was developed from the mutagenesis of 4% ω-3 line C1640 [55, 60]. Several studies used the RG10 line to develop the novel lines (GmFAD3aabbcc) with low ω-3 fatty acid content and also used for mapping and validating the quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and FAD3 genes [45, 49, 73]. The EMS mutant line PE1690 with the reduced ω-3 fatty acid was reported to have a single base mutation in the FAD3A gene, resulting in the desaturase enzyme being nonfunctional [51]. Recently, Held et al. [69] identified a novel mutant allele of the FAD3C gene in a screen of a N-nitroso-N-methylurea (NMU)-mutagenized population. This allele resulted in 2 to 3% reduction in ω-3 FA levels.

2.3 Increasing ω-3 fatty acid content for improving ω-6/ω-3 ratio in soybean

Soybean production focuses on providing high protein meals for livestock and the manufacture of vegetable oils in both Western and Asian countries, while soybean has traditionally been used as a staple food in many Asian countries [2, 74]. The consumption of soy foods has been increasing in North America, following the recognition of the health benefits of soy foods.

Since the shortage of resources in cultivated soybean with elevated ALA content [75], researchers tried to find suitable genetic resources to develop new cultivars with high ALA concentrations in soybean breeding programs. Wild soybean can be a possible resource to achieve the goal to increase ALA concentration because those soybeans have an average of 15% ALA concentration, which is almost twice the ALA concentration present in the cultivated soybean [76]. Cultivated soybeans have an ω-6/ ω-3 ratio of 6–7:1, whereas wild soybeans have an ω-6/ ω-3 ratio of 3–4:1, which has better health benefits [76, 77, 78]. Thus, wild soybean can be exploited as a genetic resource to develop soybean lines with high ALA concentrations, although exploiting wild soybeans in breeding programs is challenging due to their poor agronomic traits. Several studies reported soybean lines with elevated ALA from wild soybean using conventional breeding methods. Asekova et al. [77] reported that three recombinant inbred lines with elevated ALA concentrations from an interspecific cross between G. max and G. soja were stable for the accumulation of ALA across the environments. Also, since G. soja as donor plant was backcrossed with three different cultivars, new genotypes with elevated ALA concentration and agronomically similar to the cultivated soybeans have been developed [78]. These soybean lines developed by classical breeding could be exploited as genetic resources for the development of novel soybean cultivars with high levels of ALA concentration, which could be sources of ω-3 fatty acids.

To date, there have been few genetic mapping studies with high ALA concentration in soybean. Shibata et al. [79] identified four QTLs controlling ALA concentration in the wild soybean accession Hidaka 4. Also, Ha et al. [80] identified nine putative QTLs controlling ALA concentration in a wild soybean accession PI 483463. According to these studies, high ALA concentrations in wild soybean were controlled by multiple QTLs. Besides, Pantalone et al. [81] suggested that high ALA concentration in wild soybean was controlled by a different set of desaturase alleles from cultivated soybean. Recently, the application of gamma-ray irradiation has generated new mutant soybeans with a high level of ALA concentration [82]. They concluded that the phenotype of high ALA concentration in these mutant lines was related to FAD3 gene expression levels, although they observed no direct relationship between elevated gene expression level and gene sequence variations. Taken together, we assume that increased expression levels of FAD3 genes during seed development may be associated with the gene expression regulators.

Since FAD2 genes play an important role in regulating ω-6/ω-3 ratio in soybean, FAD2 mutant alleles were found to increase in oleic acid and decrease in linoleic acid contents [40, 83, 84]. Populations segregating for FAD2–1A and FAD2–1Bmutant alleles have been investigated for increases in oleic acid content [40]. By combining either of a mutant allele in M23 (the deletion of the FAD2–1A gene) or 17D (FAD2–1A S117N) with either of a missense mutant allele in FAD2-1B from PI 283327 (FAD2-1B P137R) or PI 567189A (FAD2-1B I143T), soybean genotypes with 77.3–82.2% oleic acid content were developed [84]. The ω-6/ω-3 ratio in these lines ranged from 0.6 to 1.3. Similarly, progenies containing FAD2-1A allele from the 17D lines, and FAD2-1B allele from S08-14788 were found to show an ω-6/ ω-3 ratio in the range of 0.62-0.97 [85]. These soybean genotypes had high oleic acid content (~80%) and lower ω-6/ω-3 ratio, but the overall ω-3 acid content (~5%) was also very low [86]. Kulkarni et al. [87] suggested the genetic improvement of the system to increase ALA concentration with a balanced ω-6/ω-3 ratio. Soybean containing either of the FAD2-1 mutant alleles with ALA-related alleles from wild soybean reduced the seed ω-6/ω-3 ratio as well as increased ω-3 fatty acid concentration. Among FAD2 genes, soybean genotypes with a mutant allele of the FAD2-1A gene had higher oleic acid and ALA content in soybean oil than one with FAD2-1B mutant allele. Further genetic improvements in the FA biosynthetic pathways were made by combining mutant alleles of either of FAD2-1A or FAD2-1B genes with alleles governing ALA in wild soybeans to develop soybean genotype with lower ω-6 and higher ω-3, resulting in low ω-6/ ω-3 ratio (Figure 3; [87]). Similar genetic improvements involving new sources of ALA-controlling alleles from the wild soybeans can guide development of soybeans with a balanced ω-6/ω-3 ratio in their seed oils.

Figure 3.

Schematic representation of the genetic improvements in the steps that result in significant reductions in ω-6/ω-3 ratio in soybean. The mutant alleles of FAD2-1A or FAD2-1B increase the oleic and reduce linoleic acid content, whereas, various alleles of FAD3 cause increases in the α-linolenic acid contents. These improvements significantly alter the ω-6/ω-3 ratio in soybean seed oil.


3. Biotechnological approaches for improving the fatty acid composition

3.1 Transgenic soybeans with improved fatty acid profile

Soybean is widely recognized as a dual-use crop because of its high protein and oil content [29], and several loci controlling both the traits have been identified. The negative correlation between these two traits [88] pose a challenge in genetic improvement programs. Introducing a transgene that can specifically modulate one pathway without disrupting the other can be useful to overcome the linkage between oil and protein. Several transgenic approaches have been tried to improve seed oil content in oilseed crops, In Arabidopsis, transcription factor gene, WRI1, and metabolic enzyme, acetyl-CoA carboxylase have been targeted [89, 90]. In soybean, Lardizabal et al. [91] first reported the development of a transgenic soy crop with increased oil that shows no major impact on protein content or yield. They achieved an increase in oil by 1.5% (by weight) in the mature seed by expressing a codon-optimized version of a diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT)-2A from the soil fungus Umbelopsis ramanniana in soybean seed during development. Later, increased oil content of soybean seeds by an average of 3% was also reported with the use of an improved variant of soybean type 1 DGAT [92].

In recent years, RNA interference (RNAi) has gained significant attention due to its success for efficient metabolic engineering across the plant species. RNAi uses small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) to mediate the degradation of mRNA to regulate the expression of a desired plant gene. Using this approach, Flores et al. [93] showed that silencing of GmFAD3 by siRNA caused a reduction in the ALA contents in fad3-mutant. A similar approach was used by Wagner et al. [94] for simultaneous suppression of soybean FAD2 and fatty acyl-ACP thioesterase (FATB) genes to produce soybean seed with low-saturated, low-polyunsaturated oil phenotype.

Many studies in the recent past have demonstrated the role of GmFAD2 family members in metabolically engineered oilseed plants. Using antisense RNA mediated posttranscriptional gene silencing approach, Zhang et al. [95] were successful in inhibiting the expression of Gmfad2-1b to develop transgenic soybean lines with increased oleic acid contents up to 51.7%. To simultaneously elevate stearic acid and reduce PUFA content in soybean, Park et al. [96] introduced the mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana) stearoyl-ACP thioesterase into soybean and subsequently stacked it with a soybean event that is down-regulated in both palmitoyl-ACP thioesterase activity and Δ12 fatty acid desaturase activity in a seed-specific fashion. This approach generated soybeans with a seed lipid phenotype of approximately 11–19% stearic acid and approximately 70% oleic acid. Recently, the introduction of the PfFAD3-1 gene from Lesquerella (Physaria fendleri) into soybean resulted in an increase in the ALA content up to 42% in the seeds of T2 homozygous plants [97].

It is important to note that the transgenes expressing RNAi constructs are subject to variation in transgene expression, and hence a large number of events need to be screened to select the candidate providing stable expression. They also need to go through the regulation process, which is not only expensive but also time-consuming. Nevertheless, these approaches are expected to guide further improvement in the fatty acid composition without largely affecting the other traits, mainly the protein content and yield.

3.2 Targeted mutagenesis to improve ω-3 fatty acid contents

Targeted genome engineering (also known as genome editing) using designed nucleases has emerged as an alternative to conventional plant breeding and transgenic means to improve crop plants [98]. The discovery of sequence-specific nucleases (SSNs) such as TAL effector nucleases (TALENs) and CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas 9, made it possible to introduce targeted knockout mutations within gene/s of interest [99, 100]. These SSNs make DNA double-stranded breaks at defined genomic loci, which are subsequently repaired by two main DNA repair pathways, which result in frameshift mutations that often create genetic knockouts. Such knockout lines have been generated across the plant species, making genome editing an emerging tool for trait improvement.

Using genome editing approach, Haun et al. [101] engineered TALENs to recognize and cleave conserved DNA sequences in FAD2–1A and FAD2–1B genes. In the plants that carried homozygous mutations in both FAD2–1A and FAD2–1B genes, oleic acid was increased from 20% to 80% and linoleic acid was reduced from 50% to 4%. Further reduction in the linoleic acid (up to 2.5%) was achieved by stacking mutations within FAD2–1A and FAD2–1B with mutations in FAD3A [44]. Such an approach of TALENs-mediated targeted mutagenesis of FAD2 was found to be effective in the development of the high oleic peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties [102]. The low to average mutagenic frequency by TALENs has been observed in the genome editing studies done so far in peanut and soybeans. The efficiency of genome editing can further be enhanced by using the CRISPR/Cas system.

In recent years, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has revolutionized functional genomics due to its simplicity, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and versatility [103]. The CRISPR system has two components: a nuclear-localized CRISPR-associated (Cas) 9 protein and a guide RNA (gRNA). Cas9 is a large protein containing two nuclease domains, whereas the gRNA is a synthetic 100 nucleotide RNA molecule, of which the first ~20 nucleotides are the targeting site, and the 3′ end forms a hairpin structure that interacts with the Cas9 protein [104]. The Cas9 and the gRNA interact to identify DNA sequences complementary to the gRNA and generate a DNA double-strand break, which, after a repair result in genomic insertion or deletion (indel) mutations.

In plants, the CRISPR-Cas9 system has been effectively used in many species such as Arabidopsis thaliana, Nicotiana benthamiana, rice, tobacco, sorghum, wheat, and maize [105]. In soybean, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing has been successful in targeting DNA mutations in genes for soybean hairy roots and flowering [106, 107, 108, 109], plant architecture and yield [110], plant height [111], and seed storage protein genes [112]. However, researchers have started using this system to improve fatty acid composition. Do et al. [113], designed two gRNAs to guide Cas9 to simultaneously cleave two sites, spaced 1Kb apart, within the second exons of GmFAD2–1A and GmFAD2–1B to yield a high-oleic, low-linoleic, and low-ALA phenotype in soybean. In this study, dramatic increases in oleic acid content to >80%, and decreases of 1.3–1.7% in linoleic acid were observed in the T1 seeds derived from CRISPR-edited plants homozygous for both GmFAD2 genes. In a similar study, increases in oleic acid from 17.10% to 73.50%, and decreases in the linoleic acid content from 62.91% to 12.23% have been reported by inserting mutations in GmFAD2–1A and GmFAD2–2A soybean fatty acid desaturase mutants based on CRISPR/Cas9 Technology [114]. Overall, these studies demonstrated the CRISPR/Cas9 system as a rapid and highly efficient method to simultaneously edit homeologous soybean genes to facilitate gene discovery and breeding programs.


4. Conclusions and perspectives

Altering the ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acid profile of the soybean seed/oil has been an important goal for soybean breeders. While low-ALA oils are better-suited for vegetable oil, genotypes with high ALA can be suited in food products that use whole soybeans in various fermented/non-fermented recipes. Therefore, breeding strategies according to the specific requirements are required. For these reasons, three major breeding strategies need be considered to achieve improvement in ω-3 fatty acid content in soybean. 1. To reduce ω-3 fatty acid for soybean oil, which is being achieved with the use of available several mutant lines with reduced ALA concentration in breeding programs. 2. To increase ω-3 fatty acid for soybean foods, which can be achieved by finding new alleles in wild soybeans, and introgressing such alleles in desired cultivars. However, there are many difficulties in this breeding process. Generating mutants with increased ω-3 fatty acid could be very crucial in achieving this goal. Wild soybeans [76] and some mutants [82] have relatively higher ω-3 fatty acid; however, there is still a lack of clarity and research information on the genes that regulate FAD3 genes. Therefore, studies investigating the regulators controlling ω-3 fatty acid in soybean need to be carried out. 3. To increase ω-3 fatty acid along with decreasing ω-6/ω-3 ratio, which can be achieved by combining mutant alleles of either of FAD2-1A or FAD2-1B genes with alleles (genes) governing elevated ALA in wild and cultivated soybeans. The success of these three strategies rely on the availability of genetic and genomic information governing ALA content, which at the moment is limited. Hence, an integrated approach (Figure 4) comprising genetic dissection, breeding, and biotechnological approaches is necessary to develop soybeans with desired fatty acid profile.

Figure 4.

Schematic representation of the integrated approach involving genomic, biotechnological, and breeding approaches for the improving α-linolenic acid in soybean cultivars.

In last two decades, advances in the genomic and DNA sequencing technologies facilitated the genetic discovery of fatty acid biosynthesis in soybean and other oilseed crops [115]. It is now feasible to screen a large germplasm and mutant collections in quick time using high-density genotyping platforms (such as Axiom SoyaSNP array; [116]), and use the data for genetic and association mapping. Several wild and cultivated soybean genotypes with varied seed fatty acid contents are already known and have been used to develop improved cultivars. Also, many artificial mutant lines have been used in developing segregating mapping populations to identify novel alleles, for which genotyping assays have been developed and used for introgression of desired fatty acid trait in a soybean cultivar. Besides, the recent success of gene-editing technologies in targeting selected sites in the genes regulating fatty acid composition traits has shown the potential to selectively insert mutations in target genes. TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas9 has shown a great potential in soybean for many agronomic traits, and need to be exploited for improving the seed fatty acid composition.



This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1C1C1008759).


  1. 1. SoyStats. The American Soybean Association. 2020
  2. 2. Liu K. Chemistry and nutritional value of soybean components. Soybeans: Springer; 1997. p. 25-113
  3. 3. Kim M. Identification of a new candidate gene controlling α–linolenic acid concentration in soybean. Kyungpook National University, Daegu; 2019
  4. 4. Drexler H, Spiekermann P, Meyer A, Domergue F, Zank T, Sperling P, et al. Metabolic engineering of fatty acids for breeding of new oilseed crops: Strategies, problems and first results. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2003;160(7):779-802
  5. 5. Voelker T, Kinney AJ. Variations in the biosynthesis of seed-storage lipids. Lipids. 2001;42:358-365
  6. 6. Guerra DJ, Holbrook L. Proceedings: world conference on biotechnology for the fats and oils industry. American Oil Chemists’ Society; 1988. p. 364
  7. 7. He M, Qin CX, Wang X, Ding NZ. Plant Unsaturated Fatty Acids: Biosynthesis and Regulation. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;11(April):1-13
  8. 8. Ohlrogge J, Browse J. Lipid Biosynthesis. plant metabolism and biotechnology. 1995;7(July):957-970
  9. 9. Browse J, Warwick N, Somerville C, Slack C. Fluxes through the prokaryotic and eukaryotic pathways of lipid synthesis in the ‘16: 3’ plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochemical Journal. 1986;235(1):25-31
  10. 10. Fehr WR. Breeding for modified fatty acid composition in soybean. Crop Science. 2007;47:S-72-S-87
  11. 11. Fernandez-Martinez J, Del Rio M, De Haro A. Survey of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) germplasm for variants in fatty acid composition and other seed characters. Euphytica. 1993;69(1-2):115-122
  12. 12. Johnson R, Bergman J, Flynn C. Oil and meal characteristics of core and non-core safflower accessions from the USDA collection. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 1999;46(6):611-618
  13. 13. Rebetzke GJ, Burton JW, Carter Jr TE, Wilson RF. Changes in agronomic and seed characteristics with selection for reduced palmitic acid content in soybean. Crop Science. 1998;38(2):297-302
  14. 14. Chatgilialoglu C, Ferreri C, Melchiorre M, Sansone A, Torreggiani A. Lipid geometrical isomerism: From chemistry to biology and diagnostics. Chemical Reviews. 2014;114(1):255-284
  15. 15. Wang J, Maldonado MA. The ubiquitin-proteasome system and its role in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Cellular & Molecular Immunology. 2006;3(4):255-261
  16. 16. Simopoulos AP. An increase in the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio increases the risk for obesity. Nutrients. 2016;8(3):1-17
  17. 17. Simopoulos AP. Omega-3 fatty acids in wild plants, nuts and seeds. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2002;11(SUPPL. 6)
  18. 18. Crawford MA. Fatty acid ratios in free-living and domestic animals: Possible Implications for Atheroma. The Lancet. 1968;291(7556):1329-1333
  19. 19. Lee D-H, Kulkarni KP, Kim B-O, Seok YM, Song JT, Lee J-D. Comparative assessment of quality characteristics of Chungkookjang made from soybean seeds differing in oleic acid concentration. Journal of Functional Foods. 2019;52:529-536
  20. 20. Simopoulos AP. The importance of the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio in cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2008;233(6):674-688
  21. 21. Del Gobbo LC, Imamura F, Aslibekyan S, Marklund M, Virtanen JK, Wennberg M, et al. ω-3 Polyunsaturated fatty acid biomarkers and coronary heart disease: Pooling project of 19 cohort studies. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2016;176(8):1155-1166
  22. 22. Mallick H, Franzosa EA, McLver LJ, Banerjee S, Sirota-Madi A, Kostic AD, et al. Predictive metabolomic profiling of microbial communities using amplicon or metagenomic sequences. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1):1-11
  23. 23. Shahidi F, Ambigaipalan P. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and their health benefits. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology. 2018;9:345-381
  24. 24. Simopoulos AP. Evolutionary aspects of diet, the omega-6/omega-3 ratio and genetic variation: nutritional implications for chronic diseases. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2009;100:1-21
  25. 25. Kang J. Balance of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids is important for health. World review of nutrition and dietetics. 2005;95(R):93
  26. 26. Kang ZB, Ge Y, Chen Z, Cluette-Brown J, Laposata M, Leaf A, et al. Adenoviral gene transfer of Caenorhabditis elegans n− 3 fatty acid desaturase optimizes fatty acid composition in mammalian cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001;98(7):4050-4054
  27. 27. Lai L, Kang JX, Li R, Wang J, Witt WT, Yong HY, et al. Generation of cloned transgenic pigs rich in omega-3 fatty acids. Nature Biotechnology. 2006;24(4):435-436
  28. 28. Ukropec J, Reseland JE, Gasperikova D, Demcakova E, Madsen L, Berge RK, et al. The hypotriglyceridemic effect of dietary n-3 FA is associated with increased β-oxidation and reduced leptin expression. Lipids. 2003;38(10):1023-1029
  29. 29. Clemente TE, Cahoon EB. Soybean oil: Genetic approaches for modification of functionality and total content. Plant physiology. 2009;151(3):1030-1040
  30. 30. Prabakaran M, Lee KJ, An Y, Kwon C, Kim S, Yang Y, et al. Changes in soybean (Glycine max L.) flour fatty-acid content based on storage temperature and duration. Molecules. 2018;23(10)
  31. 31. Reinprecht Y, Luk-Labey S-Y, Peter K. A versatile soybean recombinant inbred line population segregating for low linolenic acid and lipoxygenase nulls - molecular characterization and utility for soymilk and bioproduct production. Soybean - Molecular Aspects of Breeding. 2011
  32. 32. Wilson RF, Burton JW, Brim CA. Progress in the selection for altered fatty acid composition in soybeans. Crop Science. 1981;21(5):788-791
  33. 33. Liu HR, White PJ. Oxidative stability of soybean oils with altered fatty acid compositions. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society. 1992;69(6):528-532
  34. 34. Mounts T, Warner K, List G, Kleiman R, Fehr W, Hammond E, et al. Effect of altered fatty acid composition on soybean oil stability. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 1988;65(4):624-628
  35. 35. Lee J-D, Bilyeu KD, Shannon JG. Genetics and breeding for modified fatty acid profile in soybean seed oil. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology. 2007;10:201-210
  36. 36. Yadav NS, Wierzbicki A, Aegerter M, Caster CS, Perez-Grau L, Kinney AJ, et al. Cloning of higher plant omega-3 fatty acid desaturases. Plant Physiology. 1993;103(2):467-476
  37. 37. Cardinal AJ. Molecular genetics and breeding for fatty acid manipulation in soybean. Plant Breeding Reviews. 2007;30:259-294
  38. 38. Singh SC, Sinha RP, Hader D-P. Role of lipids and fatty acids in stress tolerance in cyanobacteria. Acta protozoologica. 2002;41(4):297-308
  39. 39. Schlueter JA, Vasylenko‐Sanders IF, Deshpande S, Yi J, Siegfried M, Roe BA, et al. The FAD2 gene family of soybean: insights into the structural and functional divergence of a paleopolyploid genome. Crop Science. 2007;47:S-14-S-26
  40. 40. Pham A-T, Lee J-D, Shannon JG, Bilyeu KD. Mutant alleles of FAD2-1A and FAD2-1B combine to produce soybeans with the high oleic acid seed oil trait. BMC Plant Biology. 2010;10(1):195
  41. 41. Lakhssassi N, Zhou Z, Liu S, Colantonio V, AbuGhazaleh A, Meksem K. Characterization of the FAD2 gene family in soybean reveals the limitations of gel-based TILLING in genes with high copy number. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:324
  42. 42. Bilyeu K, Palavalli L, Sleper D, Beuselinck P. Three microsomal omega‐3 fatty‐acid desaturase genes contribute to soybean linolenic acid levels. Crop Science. 2003;43(5):1833-1838
  43. 43. Anai T, Yamada T, Kinoshita T, Rahman SM, Takagi Y. Identification of corresponding genes for three low-α-linolenic acid mutants and elucidation of their contribution to fatty acid biosynthesis in soybean seed. Plant Science. 2005;168(6):1615-1623
  44. 44. Demorest ZL, Coffman A, Baltes NJ, Stoddard TJ, Clasen BM, Luo S, et al. Direct stacking of sequence-specific nuclease-induced mutations to produce high oleic and low linolenic soybean oil. BMC plant biology. 2016;16(1):1-8
  45. 45. Bilyeu K, Gillman JD, LeRoy AR. Novel FAD3 mutant allele combinations produce soybeans containing 1% linolenic acid in the seed oil. Crop Science. 2011;51(1):259-264
  46. 46. Bilyeu K, Palavalli L, Sleper D, Beuselinck P. Mutations in soybean microsomal omega‐3 fatty acid desaturase genes reduce linolenic acid concentration in soybean seeds. Crop Science. 2005;45(5):1830-1836
  47. 47. Bilyeu K, Palavalli L, Sleper DA, Beuselinck P. Molecular genetic resources for development of 1% linolenic acid soybeans. Crop Science. 2006;46(5):1913-1918
  48. 48. Reinprecht Y, Luk-Labey SY, Larsen J, Poysa VW, Yu K, Rajcan I, et al. Molecular basis of the low linolenic acid trait in soybean EMS mutant line RG10. Plant Breeding. 2009;128(3):253-258
  49. 49. Reinprecht Y, Pauls KP. Microsomal omega-3 fatty acid desaturase genes in low linolenic acid soybean line RG10 and validation of major linolenic acid QTL. Frontiers in Genetics. 2016;7(MAR):1-16
  50. 50. White HB, Quackenbush FW, Probst AH. Occurrence and inheritance of linolenic and linoleic acids in soybean seeds. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society. 1961;38(3):113-117
  51. 51. Kim M, Song JT, Bilyeu KD, Lee JD. A new low linolenic acid allele of GmFAD3A gene in soybean PE1690. Molecular Breeding. 2015;35(8):1-6
  52. 52. Lee J-D, Kim M, Kulkarni KP, Song JT. Agronomic traits and fatty acid composition of high–oleic acid cultivar Hosim. Plant Breeding and Biotechnology. 2018;6(1):44-50
  53. 53. Yamada T, Takagi K, Ishimoto M. Recent advances in soybean transformation and their application to molecular breeding and genomic analysis. Breeding Science. 2011;61(5):480-494
  54. 54. Rahman SM, Takagi Y, Kumamaru T. Low linolenate sources at the Fan locus in soybean lines M-5 and IL-8. Japanese Journal of Breeding. 1996;46(2):155-158
  55. 55. Wilcox J, Cavins J. Inheritance of low linolenic acid content of the seed oil of a mutant in Glycine max. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1985;71(1):74-78
  56. 56. Wilcox J, Cavins J, Nielsen N. Genetic alteration of soybean oil composition by a chemical mutagen. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 1984;61(1):97-100
  57. 57. Rennie BD, Tanner JW. Fatty acid composition of oil from soybean leaves grown at extreme temperatures. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society. 1991;68(2):1622-1624
  58. 58. Fehr WR, Welke GA, Hammond EG, Duvick DN, Cianzio SR. Inheritance of reduced linolenic acid content in soybean genotypes A16 and A17. Crop Science. 1992;32(4):903-906
  59. 59. Rahman SM, Kinoshita T, Anai T, Arima S, Takagi Y. Genetic relationships of soybean mutants for different linolenic acid contents. Crop Science. 1998;38(3):702-706
  60. 60. Stijšin D, Luzzi BM, Ablett GR, Tanner JW. Inheritance of low linolenic acid level in the soybean line RG10. Crop Science. 1998;38(6):1441-1444
  61. 61. Howell RW, Brim CA, Rinne RW. The plant geneticist’s contribution toward changing lipid and amino acid composition of soybeans. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 1972;49(1):30-32
  62. 62. Rennie B, Zilka J, Cramer M, Beversdorf W. Genetic analysis of low linolenic acid levels in the soybean line PI 361088B. Crop Science. 1988;28(4):655-657
  63. 63. Rennie BD, Tanner JW. Mapping a second fatty acid locus to soybean linkage group 17. Crop Science. 1989;29(4):1081-1083
  64. 64. Rahman S, Takagi Y. Inheritance of reduced linolenic acid content in soybean seed oil. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1997;94(3-4):299-302
  65. 65. Wasala SK, T. Kinoshita, S. Arima and Y. Takagi. Agronomic performances of low linolenic acid soybean mutant lines developed from cultivar Bay. Bulletin of Faculty of Agriculture, Saga University. 1997;82:29-36
  66. 66. Rahman SM, Kinoshita T, Anai T, Takagi Y. Combining ability in loci for high oleic and low linolenic acids in soybean. Crop Science. 2001;41(1):26-29
  67. 67. Ross AJ, Fehr WR, Welke GA, Cianzio SR. Agronomic and seed traits of 1%‐linolenate soybean genotypes. Crop Science. 2000;40(2):383-386
  68. 68. Chae J-H, Dhakal KH, Asekova S, Song JT, Lee J-D. Variation of Fatty Acid Composition in Soybean ‘Pungsannamul’ Mutation Population from EMS Treatment. Current Research on Agriculture and Life Science. 2013;31(1):45-50
  69. 69. Held JP, Carrero‐Colón M, Hudson KA. Combination of novel mutation in FAD3C and FAD3A for low linolenic acid soybean. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment. 2019;2(1):1-4
  70. 70. Thapa R, Carrero‐Colón M, Addo‐Quaye C, Held J, Dilkes B, Hudson KA. New alleles of FAD3A lower the linolenic acid content of soybean seeds. Crop Science. 2018;58(2):713-8
  71. 71. Burton J, Wilson R, Novitzky W, Carter T. Registration of ‘Soyola’ soybean. Crop Science. 2004;44(2):687-a-8
  72. 72. Hammond EG, Fehr WR. Oil Quality Improvement in Soybeans‐Glycine max (L.) Merr. Fette Seifen Anstrichmittel. 1975;77(3):97-101
  73. 73. Reinprecht Y, Poysa VW, Yu K, Rajcan I, Ablett GR, Pauls KP. Seed and agronomic QTL in low linolenic acid, lipoxygenase-free soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) germplasm. Genome. 2006;49(12):1510-1527
  74. 74. Watanabe T. Science of Tofu. Food Journal Co. Ltd, Kyoto, Japan. 1997
  75. 75. Dhakal KH, Lee J-D, Jeong Y-S, Kim H-S, Shannon JG, Hwang Y-H. Stability of linolenic acid in seed oil of soybean accessions with elevated linolenic acid concentration. The Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment. 2013;11:80-85
  76. 76. Chae JH, Ha BK, Chung G, Park JE, Park E, Ko JM, et al. Identification of environmentally stable wild soybean genotypes with high alpha‐linolenic acid concentration. Crop Science. 2015;55(4):1629-1636
  77. 77. Asekova S, Chae J-H, Ha B-K, Dhakal KH, Chung G, Shannon J, et al. Stability of elevated α-linolenic acid derived from wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. & Zucc.) across environments. Euphytica. 2014;195(3):409-418
  78. 78. Jo H, Kim M, Ali L, Tayade R, Jo D, Le DT, et al. Environmental stability of elevated α-linolenic acid derived from a wild soybean in three Asian countries. Agriculture. 2020;10(3):70
  79. 79. Shibata M, Takayama K, Ujiie A, Yamada T, Abe J, Kitamura K. Genetic relationship between lipid content and linolenic acid concentration in soybean seeds. Breeding Science. 2008;58(4):361-366
  80. 80. Ha B-K, Kim H-J, Velusamy V, Vuong TD, Nguyen HT, Shannon JG, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling linolenic acid concentration in PI483463 (Glycine soja). Theoretical and applied genetics. 2014;127(7):1501-1512
  81. 81. Pantalone V, Rebetzke G, Burton J, Wilson R. Genetic regulation of linolenic acid concentration in wild soybean Glycine soja accessions. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 1997;74(2):159-163
  82. 82. Hong MJ, Jang YE, Kim DG, Kim JM, Lee MK, Kim JB, et al. Selection of mutants with high linolenic acid contents and characterization of fatty acid desaturase 2 and 3 genes during seed development in soybean (Glycine max). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2019;99(12):5384-5391
  83. 83. Hoshino T, Takagi Y, Anai T. Novel GmFAD2-1b mutant alleles created by reverse genetics induce marked elevation of oleic acid content in soybean seeds in combination with GmFAD2-1a mutant alleles. Breeding science. 2010;60(4):419-425
  84. 84. Pham A-T, Lee J-D, Shannon JG, Bilyeu KD. A novel FAD2-1A allele in a soybean plant introduction offers an alternate means to produce soybean seed oil with 85% oleic acid content. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2011;123(5):793-802
  85. 85. Kulkarni KP, Patil G, Valliyodan B, Vuong TD, Shannon JG, Nguyen HT, et al. Comparative genome analysis to identify SNPs associated with high oleic acid and elevated protein content in soybean. Genome. 2018a;61(3):217-222
  86. 86. Pham AT, Shannon JG, Bilyeu KD. Combinations of mutant FAD2 and FAD3 genes to produce high oleic acid and low linolenic acid soybean oil. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2012;125(3):503-515
  87. 87. Kulkarni KP, Kim M, Song JT, Bilyeu KD, Lee J-D. Genetic improvement of the fatty acid biosynthesis system to alter the ω-6/ω-3 ratio in the soybean seed. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 2017;94(11):1403-1410
  88. 88. Patil G, Mian R, Vuong T, Pantalone V, Song Q, Chen P, et al. Molecular mapping and genomics of soybean seed protein: a review and perspective for the future. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2017;130(10):1975-1991
  89. 89. Baud S, Mendoza MS, To A, Harscoët E, Lepiniec L, Dubreucq B. WRINKLED1 specifies the regulatory action of LEAFY COTYLEDON2 towards fatty acid metabolism during seed maturation in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. 2007;50(5):825-838
  90. 90. Cernac A, Benning C. WRINKLED1 encodes an AP2/EREB domain protein involved in the control of storage compound biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. 2004;40(4):575-585
  91. 91. Lardizabal K, Effertz R, Levering C, Mai J, Pedroso M, Jury T, et al. Expression of Umbelopsis ramanniana DGAT2A in seed increases oil in soybean. Plant Physiology. 2008;148(1):89-96
  92. 92. Roesler K, Shen B, Bermudez E, Li C, Hunt J, Damude HG, et al. An improved variant of soybean type 1 diacylglycerol acyltransferase increases the oil content and decreases the soluble carbohydrate content of soybeans. Plant Physiology. 2016;171(2):878-893
  93. 93. Flores T, Karpova O, Su X, Zeng P, Bilyeu K, Sleper DA, et al. Silencing of GmFAD3 gene by siRNA leads to low α-linolenic acids (18: 3) of fad3-mutant phenotype in soybean [Glycine max (Merr.)]. Transgenic research. 2008;17(5):839-850
  94. 94. Wagner N, Mroczka A, Roberts PD, Schreckengost W, Voelker T. RNAi trigger fragment truncation attenuates soybean FAD2‐1 transcript suppression and yields intermediate oil phenotypes. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2011;9(7):723-728
  95. 95. Zhang L, Yang X-d, Zhang Y-y, Yang J, Qi G-x, Guo D-q, et al. Changes in oleic acid content of transgenic soybeans by antisense RNA mediated posttranscriptional gene silencing. International Journal of Genomics. 2014;2014
  96. 96. Park H, Graef G, Xu Y, Tenopir P, Clemente TE. Stacking of a stearoyl‐ACP thioesterase with a dual‐silenced palmitoyl‐ACP thioesterase and∆ 12 fatty acid desaturase in transgenic soybean. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2014;12(8):1035-1043
  97. 97. Yeom WW, Kim HJ, Lee K-R, Cho HS, Kim J-Y, Jung HW, et al. Increased production of α-linolenic acid in soybean seeds by overexpression of Lesquerella FAD3-1. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;10:1812
  98. 98. Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Nekrasov V. Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods. 2013;9(1):1-10
  99. 99. Lee J, Chung JH, Kim HM, Kim DW, Kim H. Designed nucleases for targeted genome editing. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2016;14(2):448-462
  100. 100. Malzahn A, Lowder L, Qi Y. Plant genome editing with TALEN and CRISPR. Cell & Bioscience. 2017;7(1):21
  101. 101. Haun W, Coffman A, Clasen BM, Demorest ZL, Lowy A, Ray E, et al. Improved soybean oil quality by targeted mutagenesis of the fatty acid desaturase 2 gene family. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2014;12(7):934-940
  102. 102. Wen S, Liu H, Li X, Chen X, Hong Y, Li H, et al. TALEN-mediated targeted mutagenesis of fatty acid desaturase 2 (FAD2) in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) promotes the accumulation of oleic acid. Plant Molecular Biology. 2018;97(1-2):177-185
  103. 103. Chen K, Wang Y, Zhang R, Zhang H, Gao C. CRISPR/Cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture. Annual review of plant biology. 2019;70:667-697
  104. 104. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA–guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. science. 2012;337(6096):816-821
  105. 105. Sun X, Hu Z, Chen R, Jiang Q, Song G, Zhang H, et al. Targeted mutagenesis in soybean using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Scientific Reports. 2015;5(1):1-10
  106. 106. Cai Y, Chen L, Liu X, Sun S, Wu C, Jiang B, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in soybean hairy roots. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136064
  107. 107. Cai Y, Chen L, Sun S, Wu C, Yao W, Jiang B, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of large genomic fragments in soybean. International journal of molecular sciences. 2018;19(12):3835
  108. 108. Han J, Guo B, Guo Y, Zhang B, Wang X, Qiu L. Creation of Early Flowering Germplasm of Soybean by CRISPR/Cas9 Technology. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;10:1446
  109. 109. Jacobs TB, LaFayette PR, Schmitz RJ, Parrott WA. Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. BMC biotechnology. 2015;15(1):1-10
  110. 110. Bao A, Chen H, Chen L, Chen S, Hao Q, Guo W, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmSPL9 genes alters plant architecture in soybean. BMC plant biology. 2019;19(1):1-12
  111. 111. Cheng Q, Dong L, Su T, Li T, Gan Z, Nan H, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmLHY genes alters plant height and internode length in soybean. BMC plant biology. 2019;19(1):1-11
  112. 112. Li C, Nguyen V, Liu J, Fu W, Chen C, Yu K, et al. Mutagenesis of seed storage protein genes in Soybean using CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Research Notes. 2019;12(1):176
  113. 113. Do PT, Nguyen CX, Bui HT, Tran LT, Stacey G, Gillman JD, et al. Demonstration of highly efficient dual gRNA CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the homeologous GmFAD2-1A and GmFAD2-1B genes to yield a high oleic, low linoleic and α-linolenic acid phenotype in soybean. BMC plant biology. 2019;19(1):311
  114. 114. Wu N, Lu Q, Wang P, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Qu J, et al. Construction and analysis of GmFAD2-1A and GmFAD2-2A soybean fatty acid desaturase mutants based on CRISPR/Cas9 technology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(3):1104
  115. 115. Kulkarni KP, Tayade R, Asekova S, Song JT, Shannon JG, Lee J-D. Harnessing the potential of forage legumes, alfalfa, soybean, and cowpea for sustainable agriculture and global food security. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018b;9:1314
  116. 116. Lee YG, Jeong N, Kim JH, Lee K, Kim KH, Pirani A, et al. Development, validation and genetic analysis of a large soybean SNP genotyping array. The Plant Journal. 2015;81(4):625-636

Written By

Krishnanand P. Kulkarni, Rupesh Tayade, Hyun Jo, Jong Tae Song and Jeong-Dong Lee

Submitted: August 19th, 2020 Reviewed: November 19th, 2020 Published: January 19th, 2021