Commonly prevalent diseases of tea plantation.
Abstract
Tea is one of the most popular beverages consumed across the world and is also considered a major cash crop in countries with a moderately hot and humid climate. Tea is produced from the leaves of woody, perennial, and monoculture crop tea plants. The tea leaves being the source of production the foliar diseases which may be caused by a variety of bacteria, fungi, and other pests have serious impacts on production. The blister blight disease is one such serious foliar tea disease caused by the obligate biotrophic fungus Exobasidium vexans. E. vexans, belonging to the phylum basidiomycete primarily infects the young succulent harvestable tea leaves and results in ~40% yield crop loss. It reportedly alters the critical biochemical characteristics of tea such as catechin, flavonoid, phenol, as well as the aroma in severely affected plants. The disease is managed, so far, by administering high doses of copper-based chemical fungicides. Although alternate approaches such as the use of biocontrol agents, biotic and abiotic elicitors for inducing systemic acquired resistance, and transgenic resistant varieties have been tested, they are far from being adopted worldwide. As the research on blister blight disease is chiefly focussed towards the evaluation of defense responses in tea plants, during infection very little is yet known about the pathogenesis and the factors contributing to the disease. The purpose of this chapter is to explore blister blight disease and to highlight the current challenges involved in understanding the pathogen and pathogenic mechanism that could significantly contribute to better disease management.
Keywords
- tea
- blister blight
- Exobasidium vexans
- Basidiospore
- defense
- control
1. Introduction
Tea is one of the most popular beverages worldwide, having gained popularity for its taste, stimulating effect, various medicinal properties, and related health benefits. Tea is processed from the leaves of evergreen, woody, and perennial tea plants (
Presently tea is cultivated worldwide across 61 countries of which China, India, Kenya, Sri Lanka, and Vietnam are the largest tea-producing countries, contributing 77% of world production and 80% of global exports (Figures 1 and 2). China is reported to produce 2700 million kg of tea of which 366.6 million Kg were exported for the year 2019 with one million hectares under tea cultivation. This was followed by India and Kenya with 1390.1 and 458.9 million kg of tea production. Recently, Kenya was listed with the highest exporter of tea for the year 2019 with 392.6 million kg of exports. India accounts for 23% of the total world tea production with an area of 400,000 hectares under tea cultivation. This contributes to about US $803 million to the Indian economy
Different forms of tea have been produced from the same tea plantations depending on the method of processing and plucking of leaves. Some of them are black tea, green tea, oolong tea, white tea, pure tea, and dark tea. Black tea is the most popular form of tea produced in all the major tea producing countries including India, Kenya, and Sri Lanka. Production of black tea in India accounts for 85% of total worldwide production and green tea is being produced by a few tea gardens. Green tea is the most popular form of tea in China followed by black tea.
Tea being a perennial and monoculture crop, the microclimate of tea plantations makes it prone to various pests and pathogens [4]. Chen and Chen recorded around 400 pathogens 507 species of fungi infecting tea plants [5, 6]. Although all the parts of the tea plant including leaf, stem, and root are prone to infection, the pathogens invading leaf parts are of great concern as the main source of commercial production of tea is the young and fresh leaves. The incidence of diseases in the leaves significantly affects the crop yield and quality of made tea. This also directly affects the economy of agronomic countries where tea is considered an important cash crop. The various diseases of tea can be categorized into primary and secondary diseases. In case of the primary diseases, the pathogens directly invade healthy tea bushes while secondary diseases are caused by weaker parasites infecting already diseased/infected tea bushes. In this context, some of the most important diseases infecting the leaf, stem, and root of tea plantations are listed in Table 1.
Blister blight disease is one of the most serious primary foliar tea diseases that significantly affects the crop yield and quality throughout various regions of tea-producing countries across the world. The causal organism of Blister blight disease is the biotrophic fungus
1.1 History
Balidon in his book ‘Tea in Assam’ has indicated the prevalence of blister blight disease on wild indigenous tea in Assam shortly after the beginning of tea cultivation during 1863 [12]. Shortly afterwards Peal in 1868 recognized the existence of blister blight disease of tea and Sir George Watt was the first to report the disease symptoms in Assam in the year 1895. [9, 13]. Later the confirmation of causative pathogen of blister blight as
1.2 Blister blight disease symptoms, pathogen, and life cycle
The causal organism of blister blight disease
Infection Site | Disease | Causal organism | References |
---|---|---|---|
Leaf | Blister blight | [7, 8] | |
Black rot | |||
Leaf red rust | |||
Brown blight | |||
Gray blight | |||
Stem | Poria Disease | ||
Nectria | |||
Black root rot | |||
Brown root rot | |||
Jew’s ear fungus | |||
Thorny blight | |||
Ganoderma | |||
Root | Red root rot | ||
Tarry root rot | |||
Purple root rot | |||
Charcoal stump rot | |||
Violet root rot | |||
Thorny blight |
Kingdom | Fungi |
---|---|
Phylum | Basidiomycota |
Class | Exobasidiomycetes |
Subclass | Exobasidiomycetidae |
Order | Exobasidiales |
Family | Exobasidiaceae |
Genus | |
Species |
A histological study of blister blight disease on tea leaves provided insights into the cellular alteration of host tissue during infection. The study revealed that during the first stage of infection, the enlargement of the translucent spots is a result of hypertrophy as the size of the cells in the mesophyll layer of the infected leaf was substantially higher as compared to the healthy leaf. In the lower epidermis of infected tea leaves with mature blisters, the development of hymenium was prominent in the second stage. This disrupts the lower epidermis completely and gets filled with networks of intercellular hyphae which subsequently develop into basidia that bear basidiospores. However, in tea leaves with blister infections localized in veins, the proliferation of hymenium was apparent in both the lower and upper epidermis. This results in the disruption of the sclerenchyma layer in the vein thereby rupturing xylem and phloem resulting in leaf curling and necrosis of infected leaf in the third stage. The hymenium consisting of bundles of hyphae on maturity forms the clavate to cylindrical basidia (46.98–86.42 μm × 4–5 μm) with normally two and rarely three to four sterigmata [24]. The basidiospores of
1.3 Epidemiology, occurrence, and disease severity
The weather condition plays a very important role in the epidemiology and severity of blister blight disease. Low temperature, high humidity, cloudy condition with moderate rainfall has been found to play a profound impact on the development of pathogen and disease incidence. As such the incidence of the disease is most favored in monsoon season and facilitated with relative humidity (RH) of more than 80% and availability of water on the leaf surface. In a study carried out by Huysmans (1952), blister blight incidence was recorded with a 5-day average of RH of greater than 83%. On the other hand, Homburg (1953) studied that RH below 80% over 5 days was unfavorable to blister infection. Venkata Ram has reported that the optimum period of leaf wetness to facilitate infection was 11 h and the maximum infection occurred at 13 h [33]. The requirement of moisture content for the germination of basidiospore is reported to be provided by approximately 0.1-inch rain per day while the optimal growth temperature was recorded to be 20–25°C with a maximum tolerance limit of 34°C [29, 34]. Sporulation was found to be inhibited at a temperature greater than 35°C and a temperature of 32°C was reported to be lethal for the basidiospores of
The spore liberation in the air over blister blight infested tea plantations follows a diurnal rhythm and resembles a nocturnal pattern of spore discharge of other basidiomycete pathogens. The maximum liberation of basidiospores was found to occur between midnight and 4.00 am [38]. The spore deposition on tea plants was found to be directly proportional to the number of spores in the atmosphere. However, the difference in spore deposition in different bushes was observed with higher spore deposition in susceptible hosts [39].
Blister blight disease, being a foliar disease, directly affect the quality and quantity of consumed tea. Severe disease incidence has been recorded after pruning of tea plantations owing to the abundance of young and tender leaf and stem. Also, during infection of tender stem the entire shoot withers and falls along with the curled infected leaf making it unusable for plucking [33]. As such along with enormous yield loss a quality deterioration below 35% disease threshold level is imposed due to blister blight infection [10, 40]. The percentage of crop loss varies with the geographical condition of different countries. In Sri Lanka, Loos reported 50% crop loss in tea plantation without protection, and 33% in plantations protected with copper fungicide [41]. Indonesia reported a loss of ~10 million kg of tea which is 20–25% between 1951 and 1952 [16]. In southern India, during the initial years of blister blight infection, enormous crop losses were observed with an annual loss of about 18 million kg of tea between 1948 and 1952 [42]. North-east India reported, crop loss up to 24% due to blister blight infection, the infection occurring mostly in the hilly region. Darjeeling has been reported with the worst effected tea plantations with blister blight, owing to the favorable climatic conditions. The onset of the disease has been recorded in June with the starting of monsoon and reaches its severity in August till October. In Assam, India blister blight incidence was associated with early rain in February and reaches its severity in the month of March–April [43].
Blister blight infection results in significant degradation of quality in made tea owing to changes in biochemical characteristics [44, 45]. Gulati in 1999 carried out the analysis of biochemical parameters in diseased leaf. In the infected leaves catechin content, total phenols, nitrogen, chlorophyll, amino acids, and polyphenol oxidase activity was recorded in decreasing concentration in comparison to healthy leaf. In orthodox tea processed from infected tea leaves theaflavins, caffeine, catechin polymer thearubgins, and aroma components were significantly found in reduced concentration [46]. Tea shoots with blister infection were also reported with a decrease in catechin content, flavor component 2-phenyl ethanol, and enzyme activity of prephenate dehydrase [47].
1.4 Blister blight disease control
Considering the severity of blister blight disease and its related agronomic and economic losses control of the disease is of utmost necessity. Various control measures have been adopted for the protection of tea plantations against the disease of which the use of therapeutic approaches at the field scale started around 40 years ago [48]. Over the last few years, the various control measures adopted against blister blight disease can be categorized into cultural, chemical, biological, and host tolerance approaches. Different studies have been carried out concerning control measures against
Treatment | Disease inhibition | References | |
---|---|---|---|
Chemical control | Copper oxychloride | 85.43% | [49] |
Hexaconazole | 78.10% | [49] | |
Tridemorph | 67.8 | [49] | |
Propiconazole | 78.50% | [49] | |
Bitertanol | 72.50% | [49] | |
Nickel Chloride | 84% | [50] | |
Biological control | 40% | [51] | |
PGPR | 83.94% | [48] | |
73.40% | [52] | ||
Azoto II-1, | 33% | [53] | |
Systemic acquired resistance | Acibenzolar-S-methyl and salicylic acid | 40.80% | [54] |
Calcium chloride (CaCl2) | 80% | [55] | |
Chitosan | 67.70% | [56] |
1.4.1 Cultural practice
1.4.2 Chemical control
The importance of chemical control of blister blight disease and the use of economically feasible chemical therapeutics dates back to 1960 when the disease incidence was recorded in southern India. Protectant fungicides, eradicant fungicides, and systemic fungicides are used as foliar sprays against blister blight disease. Bordeaux mixture and copper oxychloride are the two most commonly used protective fungicide formulations. The acceptance level of the use of copper in tea leaves to control blister blight was set at 150 ppm (Lamb, 1950) as copper-based fungicides also possess collateral damage of phytotoxicity and release of copper residues to environment causes human health hazard, effect soil microflora, and marine population. The formulation of copper oxychloride was able to control blister blight disease at a usage rate of 0.21 Kg metallic copper per hectare. The concentration of copper at 50% wettable powder was used in copper oxychloride formulations [59, 60, 61]. Eradicant fungicide nickel chloride hexahydrate was found effective in controlling blister blight disease by antisporulant activity. The reduction in infection was achieved from 84–24% post 3 weeks of treatment and up to 13% after 5 weeks. However, the treatment with nickel chloride was found severely phytotoxic which rejected its use as a potent fungicide [50]. Owing to the phytotoxicity and collateral health hazard from chemical fungicides, organic fungicides were introduced in Sri Lanka, Indonesia, and southern India. However, the disease resistance efficacy was lower in comparison to copper-based fungicides. Also, the high cost related to the processing of organic fungicides discarded its use for blister blight control [25, 60, 62, 63]. Two common brand names for organic fungicides used for blister blight control are Daconil and Difolatan [64].
Conventionally, around 26 rounds of spraying of these fungicides are carried out at 7-days intervals during the disease season to control blister blight incidence. However, since climatic conditions play a significant influence on the severity of blister blight incidence the spraying interval of fungicides differs from region to region. In Indonesia and Sri Lanka an extended period of spraying based on sunshine hours at a specific period of the disease season mediated the control of disease at the economic threshold. On the other hand, control of blister blight disease was not achieved even after a 7-day spraying interval in southern India [65]. Systemic fungicides are often used against plant pathogens owing to its sustained control of plant for example, blister blight could be controlled in southern India by administering pyracarbolid (Sicarol) over 3 weeks. This treatment exhibited strong antisporulant activity reducing the sporulation in mature blisters, while eradicating the latent blister lesions. Also, plant growth was found to be stimulated with the use of pyacarbolid [33]. In a different study with systemic fungicides ergosterol biosynthesis inhibiting (EBI) fungicides tridemorph, bitertanol, hexaconazole, and propiconazole were studied for its effect on physiological parameters of the tea plant and controlling blister blight disease in southern India. EBIs were found with antisporulant activity with a significant reduction in spore size, viability, and inhibited spore germination except for tridemorph treatment. As such, inhibition in spore germination reduced the viability of spore which mediated the reduction in spore load thereby controlling blister blight incidence. The effectiveness of treatment lasted for 7 days, with a reduction of the occurrence of the disease by half relative to untreated plants. Additionally, the EBIs were found with a positive effect on the physiological parameters of the tea plant. The stomatal conductance, total chlorophyll, carotenoids, and photosynthetic rates were found to be induced with EBIs treatment along with an increase in biometric parameters like dry weight and shoot length [49]. In North-East India, 2–3 rounds of systemic fungicides like propiconazole or hexaconazole has been used at 5% EC @ 1:1000 as a foliar spray at 14 days interval to control blister blight infection
1.4.3 Biological control
Besides showing appreciable control of blister blight disease with chemical therapeutics, the related phytotoxicity and health hazard have initiated the approach of biological control of blister blight disease. The use of biological control agents like
1.4.4 Host resistance against blister blight disease
In the context of blister blight disease, a variety of tea cultivars have been reported that are found to be resistant to
In line with understanding the basis for resistance of tea cultivar against blister blight disease transcriptome profiling of two cultivars P-1258 (resistant) and T-78 (susceptible) have been carried out to identify defense-related transcripts particularly in a resistant cultivar. cDNA-AFLP mediated the screening of differentially expressed candidate transcripts which mainly showed homology with an acyl-CoA binding protein, zinc finger family protein, ubiquitin, and proline-rich protein that were upregulated after infection. Suppression subtractive hybridization-based transcriptome analysis resulted in a comprehensive study of transcripts induced in resistant cultivar P-1258 after infection. The induced contigs showed similarity to proteins such as ubiquitin family protein, an iron–sulfur cluster scaffold protein, short-chain dehydrogenase, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase small subunit, thioredoxin, pathogenesis-related proteins (chitinase, endo-glucanase, beta-glucosidase, wound-induced protein, protease inhibitor, thaumatin-like protein, cystatin, blight associated protein p12, aspartic proteinase) and proteins with a function in defense signal transduction pathway (serine/threonine-protein kinase, oxo-phytodienoic acid reductase, mitogen-activated protein kinase, leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein kinase, salicylic acid-binding protein, calcium ion binding or calmodulin-related protein, hydrogen peroxide-induced protein, chitin-inducible gibberellin responsive protein, calreticulin). qRT-PCR based expression analysis of the genes showed greater than two-fold upregulation in P-1258 when compared to T-78 post-infection. Hence, the expression profiling mediated the molecular characterization of resistant tea cultivar involved in developing possible systemic acquired resistance against
Plants use various defense mechanisms to shield themselves from infection by pathogens. The cell wall itself acts as an insulation against invading pathogens. Pathogens invading plants breach the cell wall by releasing enzymes and the products get accumulated in the apoplastic region. These are termed elicitors and are capable of activating a complex array of defense signaling called pathogen triggered immunity. These elicitors also mediate the induction of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) in plants. In the last few years, various biotic and abiotic elicitors have been tested and found to mediate SAR in plants against the pathogen. Two chemical elicitors acibenzolar-S-methyl and salicylic acid were tested for their efficiency to induce SAR against blister blight in tea. Plants treated with 0.1% ASM provided 40.8% protection against blister blight. Salicylic acid was used at 250 ppm to achieve significant induction of resistance. Tea plants treated with elicitors were recorded with an induced level of β-1,3-glucanase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, and peroxidase activity thereby conferring resistance against blister blight disease [54]. In a similar study treatment of tea plant with abiotic elicitor calcium chloride (CaCl2), found to induce activities of defense enzymes like phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), polyphenol oxidase, peroxidase, and b-1,3-glucanase along with a higher accumulation of total phenolics, thaumatin, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase, flavonoid 30-hydroxylase when compared to control plants [55]. In this context, the use of chitosan as elicitors in tea plants to provide resistance against blister blight disease has been tested and the possible mechanism of resistance has been analyzed. Chitosan solution applied as a foliar spray at 0.01% concentration and 15 days interval reduced blister blight incidence for two seasons. The induced resistance was found to be facilitated by nitric oxide (NO) signaling and the level of total polyphenol content and expression of defense-related enzymes (peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, and b-1,3 glucanase) was induced [56].
Genetic improvement of tea has been made possible with transgenic technology started from the year 2000. Gene technology and the development in agrobacterium-mediated transformation mediated the incorporation of a foreign gene into crop plants for the development of cultivar with resistance against various diseases. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was used to develop a disease-resistant variety of tea against blister blight with the introduction of
2. Conclusion
Widespread research has been carried out so far on understanding the incidence of blister blight infection and on its control measures for the survival of the tea industry. However, to date identification of the pathogen is being carried out symptomatically and morphologically. In the context of molecular identification of
Acknowledgments
Author CC would like to acknowledge DST, Govt. of India for her DST INSPIRE Junior Research Fellowship (IF-150964).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known potential conflict of interest.
References
- 1.
Mandal, A. B., Basu, A. K., Roy, B., Sheeja, T. E., & Roy, T. (2004). Genetic Management for Increased Tolerance to Aluminium and Iron Toxicities in Rice—A Review - 2.
Harbowy ME, Balentine DA, Davies AP, Cai Y. Tea chemistry. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 1997; (5):415-48016 - 3.
Sharma RK, Negi MS, Sharma S, Bhardwaj P, Kumar R, Bhattachrya E, et al. AFLP-based genetic diversity assessment of commercially important tea germplasm in India. Biochemical Genetics. 2010; (7-8):549-56448 - 4.
Hazarika LK, Bhuyan M, Hazarika BN. Insect pests of tea and their management. Annual Review of Entomology. 2009; :267-28454 - 5.
Xuefen, C. Z. C. (1989). A world list of pathogens reported on tea plant [J]. Journal of Tea Science ,1 - 6.
Chen ZM, Chen XF. In the Diagnosis of Tea Diseases and their Control (Chinese). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers; 1990. p. 275 - 7.
Lehmann-Danzinger H. Diseases and pests of tea: Overview and possibilities of integrated pest and disease management. Journal of Agriculture in the Tropics and Subtropics. 2000; (1):13-38101 - 8.
Sarkar S, Kabir SE. A field survey of sucking tea Pest and their control measures in few tea Gartdens of Terai region, West Bengal, India. International journal of science and research. 2016; (3):1343-13455 - 9.
Peal, S.E. (1868). Blister blight. J. Agri, Hort. Soc. India. 1 (126) - 10.
Jayaswall K, Mahajan P, Singh G, Parmar R, Seth R, Raina A, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals candidate genes involved in blister blight defense in tea (Camellia sinensis (L) Kuntze). Scientific Reports. 2016; (1):1-146 - 11.
Sen S, Rai M, Das D, Chandra S, Acharya K. Blister Blight a Threatened Problem in Tea Industry: A Review. Journal of King Saud University-Science ; 2020 - 12.
Balidon, (1877). The tea industry in India. W.H.Allen 8 Co., London - 13.
Watt, G. and Mann, H.H. (1903). The pests and blights of the tea plant second edition, Office of the Superintendent, Govt. printing, Calcutta, India. 429 - 14.
Massee G. Tea blights. Kew Bull. 1898; :105-1121898 - 15.
McRae W. The outbreak of blister blight on tea in the Darjeeling districts in 1908-1909. Agric. J. India. 1910; :126-1375 - 16.
De Weille GA. Blister blight (Exobasidium vexans) in tea and its relationship with environmental conditions. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science. 1960; (3):183-2108 - 17.
Liau TL. Blister blight and its control. Taiwan Agric. 1966; :1-511 - 18.
Subba Rao, M.K. (1946). Blister blight of tea in South India. United Planters' Association of southern India, Coonoor. 4 , 14 - 19.
Tubbs FR. A leaf disease of tea new to Ceylon. Tea Quart. 1947; :43-5019 - 20.
Reitsma J, Van Emden JH. De Bladgallenziekte van de Thee in Indonesia. Arch. Voor. Thee Cult . 1950; :71-7617 - 21.
Gadd CH, Loos CA. The basidiospores of Exobasidium vexans. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 1948; :229-23331 - 22.
Punyasiri PN, Abeysinghe ISB, Kumar V. Preformed and induced chemical resistance of tea leaf against Exobasidium vexans infection. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2005; (6):1315-132431 - 23.
Ajay D, Balamurugan A, Baby UI. Survival of Exobasidium Vexans, the Incitant of blister blight disease of tea, during offseason. International Journal of Applied. 2009; (2):115-1234 - 24.
Mohktar N, Nagao H. Histological description of Exobasidium vexans infection on tea leaves (Camellia sinensis). Songklanakarin Journal of Science & Technology. 2019; (5)41 - 25.
Loss CA. Tea causative fungus. Tea Quart. 1951; (2):63-7222 - 26.
Huysmans CP. Control of blister blight (Exobasidium vexans) in tea on Sumatra. Bergcultures. 1952; :419-46421 - 27.
Gadd CH, Loos CA. Further observations on the spore growth of Exobasidium vexans. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 1950; (1-2)33 - 28.
Chaliha C, Kalita E, Verma PK. Optimizing In vitro culture conditions for the biotrophic Fungi Exobasidium vexans through response surface methodology. Indian Journal of Microbiology. 2020; (2):167-17460 - 29.
Sundstrom KR. Studies of the physiology, morphology and serology of Exobasidium. Symb Bot Ups. 1964; (3):1-8918 - 30.
Graafland W. Four species of Exobasidium in pure culture. Acta Botanica Neerlandica. 1953; :516-5221 - 31.
Ezuka A. Artificial culture of two species of Exobasidium, E. vexans Massee and E. japonicum Shirai. Bulletin of Tea Division, Tokai-Kinki Agricultural Experiment Station . 1955; :28-533 - 32.
Nagao H. Effect of aqueous vitamin B on the growth of blister blight pathogen, Exobasidium vexans . Songklanakarin Journal of Science & Technology. 2012;34 (6):601-606 - 33.
Venkata Ram CS. Calixin, a systemic fungicide effective against blister blight ( Exobasidium vexans ) on tea plants. Pesticides. 1974; :21-258 - 34.
Visser T, Shanmuganathan N, Sabanayagam JV. The influence of sunshine and rain on tea blister blight, Exobasidium vexans Massee, in Ceylon. Annals of Applied Biology. 1961; (2):306-31549 - 35.
Venkata Ram CS, Chandra Mouli B. Systemic fungicides for integrated blister blight control. UPASI Tea Sci. Pep. Bull. 1976; :70-8733 - 36.
Arulpragasam PV, Addaickan S, Kulatunga SM. Recent developments in the chemical control of blister blight leaf disease of tea - effectiveness of EBI fungicides. S.L.J . Tea Sci. 1987; :22-3456 - 37.
Gunasekera TS, Paul ND, Ayres PG. The effects of ultraviolet-B (UV-B: 290-320 nm) radiation on blister blight disease of tea (Camellia sinensis). Plant Pathology. 1997; (2):179-18546 - 38.
Shanmuganathan N, Arulpragasam PV. Epidemiology of tea blister blight (Exoba&idium vexanA) II. The diurnal and seasonal periodicity of spores in the air over a tea estate. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc . 1966; :219-22649 - 39.
Kerr A, Shanmuganathan N. Epidemiology of tea blister blight (Exoba6ldium ve.Xan.6) 1. Sporulation. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc . 1966; :139-14549 - 40.
Gulati A, Gulati A, Ravindranath SD, Chakrabarty DN. Economic yield losses caused by Exobasidium vexans in tea plantations. Indian Phytopathol. 1993; 46 :155-159 - 41.
Loos, C.A. 1954. Report of the Pathological Division for the Year 1954. Ann. Rep. Tea Res. Instt. of Ceylon Bull . No.36 - 42.
Venkata Ram CS. Blister blight through a decade. UPASI Tea Sci. Pep. Bull. 1961; :38-5320 - 43.
Mann H. Blister blight of tea. Bull Ind. TeaAsso . 1906; :1-133 - 44.
Satyanarayana G, Baruah GCS. Leaf and stem disease of tea in N.E. India with special reference to recent advances in control measures. J.Pl . Crops. 1983; (Suppl):27-3111 - 45.
Baby UI, Ravichandran R, Ganesan V, Parthiban R, Sukumar S. Effect of blister blight disease on the biochemical and quality constituents of green leaf and CTC tea. Tropical Agriculture. 1998; (4):452-45675 - 46.
Gulati A, Gulati A, Ravindranath SD, Gupta AK. Variation in chemical composition and quality of tea (Camellia sinensis) with increasing blister blight (Exobasidium vexans) severity. Mycological Research. 1999; 103 :1380-1384 - 47.
Sharma V, Joshi R, Gulati A. Seasonal clonal variations and effects of stresses on quality chemicals and prephenate dehydratase enzyme activity in tea (Camellia sinensis). European Food Research and Technology. 2011; 232 :307-317 - 48.
Saravanakumar D, Vijayakumar C, Kumar N, Samiyappan R. PGPR-induced defense responses in the tea plant against blister blight disease. Crop Protection. 2007; (4):556-56526 - 49.
Baby UI, Balasubramanian S, Ajay D, Premkumar R. Effect of ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors on blister blight disease, the tea plant and quality of made tea. Crop Protection. 2004; (9):795-80023 - 50.
Venkataram CS. Development of spraying technique and usage of fungicide against diseases of tea. Ann. Rep. UPASI Sci. Dept. Tea. Sect . 1967; :31-5668 - 51.
Premkumar R, Ajay D, Muraleedharan N. Biological Control of Tea Diseases-a Review. New Delhi :Research India Publications ; 2009. pp. 223-230 - 52.
Sowndhararajan K, Marimuthu S, Manian S. Biocontrol potential of phylloplane bacterium O chrobactrum anthropi BMO-111 against blister blight disease of tea. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2013; (1):209-218114 - 53.
Fauziah F, Setiawati MR, Pranoto E, Susilowati DN, Rachmiati Y. Effect of indigenous microbes on growth and blister blight disease of tea plant. Journal of Plant Protection Research. 2019:529-534 - 54.
Ajay D, Baby UI. Induction of systemic resistance to Exobasidium vexans in tea through SAR elicitors. Phytoparasitica. 2010; (1):53-6038 - 55.
Chandra S, Chakraborty N, Chakraborty A, Rai R, Bera B, Acharya K. Abiotic elicitor-mediated improvement of innate immunity in Camellia sinensis. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2014; (4):849-85933 - 56.
Chandra S, Chakraborty N, Panda K, Acharya K. Chitosan-induced immunity in Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze against blister blight disease is mediated by nitric-oxide. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2017; :298-307115 - 57.
De Weille GA. Blister blight Exobasidium vexans in tea and its relationship with environmental conditions. Netheriand J. Agile. Sti. 1960; (3):183-2108 - 58.
Venkata Ram, C.S. (1974b). Pruning for rejuvenation. Planters1 Chron. 69, 279-282 - 59.
Visser T, Shanmuganathan N, Sabanayagam TV. Blister blight control in 1957 with respect to fungicidal formulation application rates and yield. Tea Quart. 1958; 29 :9-20 - 60.
Jayaraman V, Venkataramani KS. Control of blister blight in tea in southern India. The 1956 field trials. Planters' Chron. 1957; 52 :35-39 - 61.
Jayaraman V, Venkata Ram CS. Control of blister blight of tea in southernIndia. The 1958 field trials. Ann. Rep. UPASI Sci. Pep. Tea Sect, for. 1959; 1958-59 :28-35 - 62.
Laoh JP. Fungiclden proeven bij. blister blight (Exobasidium vexans) op. thee. Arch, Voor . Thee Cult. 1955; :1-919 - 63.
Venkata Ram CS. Application of nickel chloride to tea plants (Cameltla &inw6i6) and control of blister blight. Current Science. 1960; 30 :57-58 - 64.
Venkata Ram CS. Systemic control of Exobasidium vexans on tea with 1, 4-Oxathiin derivatives. Phytopathology. 1969; :125-12659 - 65.
Ram CV, Mouli BC. Interaction of dosage, spray interval and fungicide action in blister blight disease control in tea. Crop Protection. 1983; (1):27-362 - 66.
Premkumar R. Report of the plant pathology division. Annual Report of UPASI Tea Research Foundation pp. 2001:32-33 - 67.
Premkumar R. Report of the plant pathology division. Annual Report of UPASI Tea Research Foundation pp. 2002:35-36 - 68.
Premkumar R. Report of the plant pathology division. Annual Report of UPASI Tea Research Foundation pp. 2003:38-39 - 69.
Balasubramanian S, Parathiraj S, Haridas P. Effect of vermicompost based Trichoderma (Vermiderma) on the recovery of pruned bushes and on the control of certain diseases in tea (Camellia sinensis (L) O. Kuntze). J . Plantation Crops. 2006; (3):524-52834 - 70.
Jeyaramraja PR, Pius PK, Manian S, Meenakshi SN. Certain factors associated with blister blight resistance in Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. 2005; (6):291-29567 - 71.
Nisha SN, Prabu G, Mandal AKA. Biochemical and molecular studies on the resistance mechanisms in tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze] against blister blight disease. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2018; (5):867-88024 - 72.
Hazra A, Dasgupta N, Sengupta C, Kumar R, Das S. On some biochemical physiognomies of two common Darjeeling tea cultivars in relation to blister blight disease. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection. 2018; (17-18):915-92651 - 73.
Bhorali P, Gohain B, Gupta S, Bharalee R, Bandyopadhyay T, Das SK, et al. Molecular analysis and expression profiling of blister blight defense-related genes in tea. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding. 2012; (2):22672 - 74.
Singh G, Singh G, Seth R, Parmar R, Singh P, Singh V, et al. Functional annotation and characterization of hypothetical protein involved in blister blight tolerance in tea (Camellia sinensis (L) O. Kuntze). Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2019; (4):447-45928 - 75.
Singh HR, Deka M, Das S. Enhanced resistance to blister blight in transgenic tea (Camellia sinensis [L.] O. Kuntze) by overexpression of class I chitinase gene from potato (Solanum tuberosum). Functional & Integrative Genomics. 2015; (4):461-48015 - 76.
Singh HR, Hazarika P, Agarwala N, Bhattacharyya N, Bhagawati P, Gohain B, et al. Transgenic tea over-expressing solanum tuberosum endo-1, 3-beta-D-glucanase gene conferred resistance against blister blight disease. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 2018; (1):107-12236