Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Innate Immunity Modulation during Zika Virus Infection on Pregnancy: What We Still Need to Know for Medical Sciences Breakthrough

Written By

Tamiris Azamor, Amanda Torrentes-Carvalho, Zilton Vasconcelos, Ana Paula Dinis Ano Bom and Juliana Gil Melgaço

Submitted: July 27th, 2020 Reviewed: October 30th, 2020 Published: January 4th, 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.94861

Chapter metrics overview

344 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV), an arthropod-borne flavivirus, was classified as reemerging infectious disease and included as neglected tropical disease. During the recent ZIKV outbreak in South America, it has been demonstrated that ZIKV infection during pregnancy is strongly associated with fetal loss, malformations and neurological disorders in newborns. Despite the first line of host immune defense is related to innate immunity activation, the immunological homeostasis is essential for pregnancy success. Although the dynamic changes in maternal-fetal immunity is not completely understood and poorly investigated, the knowledge of immune responses during gestation is very important for infectious disease prevention and control, as ZIKV. Here, we put together more and new information about the innate immunity during gestation, highlighting three parts probably involved with clinical outcome and/or not well explored in literature: 1) type III interferon; 2) innate regulatory cells; and 3) cell death pathways modulation. Additionally, we will be focused on discussing how the dynamic responses of innate immune system during pregnancy and its effects in newborns, could be modulated by ZIKV, as well as how efforts on development of new/old drugs and vaccines could be effective for ZIKV prevention and control to provide a successful pregnancy.

Keywords

  • innate immunity
  • pregnancy
  • zika
  • technological development

1. Introduction

Zika virus (ZIKV) is an arthropod-borne flavivirus, considered a reemerging infectious disease as well as a neglected tropical disease [1]. Moreover, ZIKV was also classified as sexually transmitted disease (STD), since viral RNA and infectious particles were detectable in reproductive organs and others described some cases related to sexual transmission [2, 3]. Although the major concern about ZIKV infection is the intrauterine transmission [4, 5, 6].

Innate immunity during pregnancy still needs attention when some infection compromises pregnancy success. Recently, the world testified a huge public health problem during Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak in Latin American countries [7, 8, 9], in which poor outcomes were observed firstly in Brazilian newborns from mothers infected on early pregnancy phase (1st -2nd trimester) [7, 8]. Consequences of viral infections on newborns are irreversible and public health and social costs are immensurable [10], making World Health Organization consider Zika infection a public health emergency in 2016 February [11].

Due to its neurotropic features, the infection caused by ZIKV has been evidenced [12, 13, 14], which show a correlation between clinical manifestations based on its tropism by brain neuronal cells of fetuses and neonates born from infected pregnant women, with a strong association to neurological damage, including microcephaly and other fetal neurological disorders, collectively named as Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS) or Zika Associated with Birth Defect (ZABD) [15, 16, 17, 18].

The immune system is composed of a set of flexible mechanisms that are fundamental to maintain homeostasis, allowing many interactions and coexistence between different populations of microorganisms and the host. The imbalance of homeostasis can be caused by a microorganism because of its pathogenic behavior. With the establishment of an active infection and consequent immune response, inflammatory mediators, produced initially, collaborate to activate cellular populations of the innate immunity, promoting antiviral and cytotoxic responses, for example. At first, these effector responses would influence the viremia resolution with the re-establishment of homeostasis. However, the loss or dysfunction of this immune response can generate a harmful environment that triggers an uncontrolled damage inflammation and consequent cell death due to a direct cytopathic effect caused by the microorganism [19].

Some studies were conducted to understand the mechanisms involved in vertical transmission. During pregnancy, the transfer of ZIKV to the placenta occurs after an infection of decidua, the placenta maternal region, since studies have shown that decidua cells are permissive to ZIKV infection and remain permissive throughout pregnancy [20, 21]. From the infection of the decidua, there are two routes by which ZIKV reaches the fetus: infection of syncytiotrophoblasts (SBTs) through capillaries containing maternal blood or infection of Extravilous Trophoblast (EVTs) by cell-to-cell propagation [4]. In vitro studies have shown that ZIKV can infect first-trimester cytotrophoblasts CTBs and EVTs [4, 20, 21]. On the other hand, STBs are high producers of type III interferon and remain relatively resistant to viral infection throughout pregnancy, therefore, the main route hypothesis for transplacental transmission of ZIKV is that of the spread of decidua to EVTs [21, 22]. Additionally, infection of placental macrophages, the Hofbauer cells by ZIKV may contribute to both intrauterine transmission and immunomodulation [23, 24]. Further, transplacental transfer of ZIKV is more likely to occur in the pro-inflammatory environment and tolerant to placental immunity in the first trimester.

Histopathological and immunological studies in placentas have shown that infections by ZIKV lead to an increase in important inflammation markers such as TNF, CCL5, and altered vascular permeability such as metalloproteinases [25]. In addition, in vitro experiments demonstrate that trophoblastic cells become progressively more resistant to infection by ZIKV during pregnancy, partly through the secretion of IFNs [26]. In this context, a lot of efforts were raised to provide funds to deeply investigate how to avoid another spread of Zika virus infection, as well as drugs tests and vaccine development based on viral proteins, DNA vaccines, Virus Like Particles (VLP), chimeric viruses, among other strategies [27, 28, 29, 30]. Therefore, there are few studies to investigate the pregnancy immunity and how the immune interface mother-to-child could contribute to infection spread with drastic consequences to fetus [21, 31, 32, 33, 34]. To our knowledge, the imbalance of normal pregnancy immunity is already cause of metabolic disorders and the poor outcome is related to abortion [35, 36, 37]. Then, a viral infection can make this picture worst and tragic [8, 13, 15, 38, 39].

Like other Flaviviruses, ZIKV life cycle modulates machinery and functions of target immune host cells, making essential virus-cells interactions for pathogenesis development. Moreover, while several human and animal models’ studies have argued and proved ZIKV neurotropism, there are still many answers regarding viral pathogenesis in mother and its influence the fetal neural system and persistence, and clinical outcome. In this chapter we will put together the information about innate immunity during gestation, highlighting three parts probably involved with clinical outcome: 1) interferon type III; 2) innate regulatory cells; and 3) cell death pathways modulation. Additionally, we will focus on discussing how the dynamic responses of innate immune system during pregnancy and its effects in newborns, could be modulated by ZIKV, as well as how efforts on development of new/old drugs and vaccines could be effective to help pregnancy success.

Advertisement

2. Type III interferon

The success of pregnancy is dependent on a coordinated balance between the “invading” fetal trophoblast and a receptive maternal decidua in the placenta, maintaining a dynamic and responsive immune system. The longest period of the pregnancy, fetal growth, demands a symbiotic and tolerogenic environment, but congenital viral infections can disrupt this equilibrium. In order to avoid infection severity placenta actively modulates the immunologic profile of the maternal-fetal interface [40, 41]. In this context, recent studies demonstrated that placenta responds to ZIKV infection by production of the newest interferon group type III interferons [21, 42, 43].

Type III interferon (IFN-λ 1–4) comprising a group of cytokines with action pathways under strengthen discovery [44, 45, 46], basically acting with shared inflammatory regulation and antiviral properties [47]. IFN-λs receptor was identified as a complex composed of two subunits: IFN-λR1 and IL-10R2, which is also a receptor subunit of the regulatory cytokines IL10, IL22, and IL26 [48]. In contrast with the classical pro-inflammatory type I interferons which receptors are expressed in almost all cell types, the IFNLR1/IL10RB complex is expressed primarily in cells of epithelial origin and few immune cells conferring selective IFN-λ responsiveness to them: neutrophils [49], myeloid dendritic cells (DCs) [50, 51] and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) [52]. Because of the restricted cell types producing IFN-λs, this cytokine acts locally as an immunologic barrier in organs with suppressing innate pro-inflammatory responses and limiting host damaging effects associated with inflammation [53]. Moreover, IFN-λs utilize mechanisms to suppress viral infections which induce a strong antiviral state following receptor binding with non-translational and translational processes [49, 54].

Between the different inflammatory regulation actions already described for IFN-λs, the suppression of neutrophil gains prominence because they are the immune cells that present higher expression.

of IFN-λR1 at the steady-state [55, 56, 57]. Neutrophils contribute to various stages of the reproductive process since conception and implantation, ensuring fetal wellbeing during pregnancy and finally contributing to parturition and postpartum maternal health. On the other hand, aberrant neutrophil activity is associated with severe pregnancy-related disorders such as pre-eclampsia, recurrent fetal loss or gestational diabetes mellitus [58, 59, 60]. In murine models, it was demonstrated that neutrophil exposed to IFN-λ can induce antiviral interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs); and IFN-λ (but not IFN-β) specifically activated a translation-independent signaling pathway that diminished the production of reactive oxygen species and degranulation in neutrophils, which might permit a controlled development of the inflammatory process [49].

Studies utilizing a cellular model of collagen-induced arthritis demonstrated that IFN-λ2 was protective and could stop the progression of the disease, diminishing infiltration of neutrophils to the inflamed joints as well as the production of IL-1β upon treatment with pegylated recombinant IFN-λ2 [57]. Ex vivoexperiments with cardiopathic patients’ cells demonstrated that IFN-λ inhibits Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) [61]. NETosis has been appointed as critical agents during pregnancy, particularly involved an auto-inflammatory process involving the release of placental micro-debris in preeclampsia and recurrent fetal loss [62]. In collagen-induced arthritis murine models, it was demonstrated that IFN-λ exerts its anti-inflammatory effect by restricting recruitment of IL-1β–expressing neutrophils, which are important for amplification of inflammation, and reducing IL-17–producing Th17 and γδ T cells in the joints and inguinal lymph nodes, without affecting T cell proliferative responses [57].

IFN-λ is strongly associated with DCs activity inducing an effector adaptive immunity response [63, 64]. Studies with a mice model of influenza A virus infection demonstrated that IFN-λ directed acts in the migration and function of CD103(+) dendritic cells, also regulating DC IL-10 network [65]. Migratory CD103(+) DCs derived from skin, lung, and intestine, efficiently present exogenous antigens in their corresponding draining lymph nodes to specific CD8(+) T cells through a mechanism known as cross-presentation, demonstrating the IFN-λ importance for the development of specific CD8+ T cell responses [65, 66]. Moreover, IFN-λ contributes to the formation of tolerogenic DCs cell, contributing to control inflammatory responses and homeostasis by fostering the conversion of naive T cells into induced Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells [66]. In vitro studies demonstrated that IFN- λ directs DCs to a regulatory phenotype with diminished capacity to stimulate T cell proliferation in a PD-1/PD-L1 dependent manner with contribution from the imbalanced cytokine milieu, such as low IL-12 and IL-2 and/or high IL-10 production [50]. Another study using mixed lymphocyte cultures demonstrated that IFN- λ -treated DCs specifically induced IL-2-dependent proliferation of a CD4(+) CD25(+) Foxp3(+) T-cell subset with contact-dependent suppressive activity on T-cell proliferation initiated by fully mature DCs [51].

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) are rare cells found in peripheral blood and lymphoid tissues, considered to be “professional” type I IFN-producing cells and produce 10- to 100-fold more IFN-α than other cell types in response to enveloped viruses. However, in vitro IFN-λ treatment of pDC resulted in increased virus-induced expression of both IFN-α and IFN-λ, indicating that pDC are high producers of IFN-λ1 and -λ2 in response to viral stimulation and the consequences of this high IFN-λ production by pDC should be further explored [52].

In human congenital ZIKV infections, it was demonstrated that ZIKV infection leads to a typical inflammatory response in the placenta, including the expression of anti-viral Type I interferon genes (IFIT5, IFNA1, and IFNB), type II interferon (IFI16), cytokine signaling (IL22RAand IP10), and interferon regulatory factors (IRF7and IRF9). Furthermore, the CZS cases present a gene expression profile with impaired IFNL2response, accompanied by an exacerbated type I IFN response; with an increased expression of IFIT5, parallel to a decrease in ISG15mRNA [67], which was already identified as negative modulator of type I IFN and protective against ZIKV ocular manifestations [68]. These results are corroborated by in vitrostudies that showed induction of IFNL1expression by susceptible placental cells after ZIKV infection, acting as an antiviral agent [43], reinforcing that IFN-λs are protective factors in ZIKV congenital infections. Studies with ex vivoplacental 3D cultures from a different trimester of healthy pregnant volunteers showed that IFN-λs are expressed mostly by deciduous (the maternal portion of the placenta), already indicating that mothers are the agents on the immunoregulation of CZS outcome (Figure 1) [21].

Figure 1.

Summary of Interferon lambda (IFN-λ) function during normal pregnancy (A), Healthy Congenital Zika infection (B), and Zika-Associated Birth Defects (C). (A) In normal pregnancy, trophoblasts exhibit a constitutive IFN-λ production, contributing to the general tolerogenic environment demanded by pregnancy (A1); Considering the peripheral blood tissue IFN-λ Interact with: (A2) neutrophils leading to a decrease in ROS and IL1β, and (A3) migratory CD103+Dendritic cells (DC) that present low levels of PD1, IL2 and IL12 together with high IL10. These CD103+DC foster the conversion of naive T cells into induced Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells (Treg) (A4). In the placenta, the constitutive IFN-λ is accompanied by decreased type I IFN pathway: low expression of IFIT5, IFNA, and IFNB, and high expression of type I IFN the negative regulator ISG15 (A5). In the lack of viral infection, the interferon regulatory factors IRF7 and IRF9 present low expression levels (A7). (B) In healthy congenital Zika infections, the placenta expresses high levels of IFN-λ to protect the fetus from congenital defects (B1). In this low damage antiviral response, high levels of IFN-λ elicits the production of ISGs and the decrease of ROS and IL1β by circulating neutrophils (B2), meanwhile the CD103+ DC presents an accented regulatory profile (B3), with induction of high specific anti-ZIKV response by Treg (B4) and TCD8+ cells (B5). In the placental level type, I interferon pathway shows a slight increase, together with the enhance of IRF7 and IRF9, forming a balanced antiviral response. (C) In Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS) the lack of IFN-λ contributes to a damaging outcome (C1). Diminished levels of IFN-λ could not control the neutrophil activity, culminating in augmented ROS and IL1β (C2), and presence of aberrant activation forms as well as degranulation, migration, and NETosis (C3). Without IFN-λ the Dendritic Cells (DC) present a prό-inflammatory profile, with augmented PD1, IL2, and IL12 and diminished IL10 (C4). The placenta shows an exacerbated type I interferon response, which together with low IFN-λ levels (C5), leads to an imbalanced damaging antiviral response. Grey arrows represent the production or expression levels (up = high, down = low). Double arrows represent a high magnitude of production or expression. Red dashed arrows represent the direction of function/induction events that have been known and those suggested. Figure created using Biorender software (https://www.biorender.com).

Advertisement

3. Innate regulatory cells - myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC)

Immunity during pregnancy is very important to be explored since successful pregnancy requires that immunoregulatory mechanisms are triggered to suppress activated fetal-specific T cells lymphocytes [36, 37]. Maternal immune cells can recognize paternal antigens on fetus. Thus, it has been very well described that dysfunction of immune cells during pregnancy can lead to immunologic fetal rejection by mother, in which the consequences are related to abortion, preterm delivery, or other severe complications [35, 36, 37].

Then, maternal-fetal tolerance involves the regulation of mother’s immune system to tolerate the semi allogeneic fetus expressing paternal antigens without immune rejection. Even though, some studies showed that regulatory T cells are the main cells which plays an important role in suppressing activated T cells during gestation; since then innate immunity system is poorly investigated [69, 70, 71].

Considering infections during pregnancy, it is also important to know that changes on maternal immune responses are required to induce limited immunosuppression without loss of host defense, in which a balance between activated and immunosuppressed cells needs to be regular [35].

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are a heterogeneous mixture of immature myeloid cells, been part of innate immune cells, having a crucial role in immunomodulatory mechanisms during pregnancy [36, 72, 73]. There are two subtypes of MDSC, a monocytic and granulocytic. Phenotype is characterized by expression of CD33 and CD11b in humans, CD14 by monocytic MDSC and CD15 by granulocytic MDSC cells but lacks the maturation marker HLA-DR. But both subtypes share the characteristic of immune-suppressive function inhibiting activated NK and T cell expansion [73, 74].

Normally, immature myeloid cells as MDSC are scarcely found in peripheral blood, and their maturation includes macrophages, dendritic cells, and granulocytes formation. Nevertheless, the MDSC are also recognized by their role in some pathological conditions, like cancer, sepsis, stress, autoimmune disorders and infectious diseases [38, 75, 76].

Several studies have been reported that a decrease of MDSC during pregnancy may lead to poor outcomes, as miscarriage [77]. Also, it has been shown that progesterone levels increase MDSC during pregnancy in mice, as well as high levels of TNF and IL-1β, pro-inflammatory cytokines [38, 78].

In murine models, it was demonstrated that MDSC can produce TGF-β and IL-10, as immunosuppressive cytokines, similarly to regulatory T cells. Adding to that, MDSC can suppress T cell activation and function by arginase-1 (Arg-1) secretion, as well as nitric oxide synthase and indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase aimed to deplete nutrients for T cell proliferation, as I-arginine (I-Arg). According to Ismail 2018, arginine is also involved in replication, and virulence of several agents, as viruses and bacteria. Then, it is suggested that an accumulation of MDSC in placenta could influence an increase of arginase activity, and it would serve for a dual purpose, inhibiting the adaptive immune system whilst also providing potential protection against infection by arginine auxotrophic pathogens [79].

Nitric oxide (NO) has been related to embryo successful implantation during early pregnancy, but excessive NO production by decidual macrophages seems to be harmful and was linked with early pregnancy loss [37, 80, 81]. Another study suggests that in early pregnancy in decidua CD33+ cells express nitric oxide synthase, playing an important role to maintained pregnancy during this phase, while in later pregnancy CD33+ cells lose the expression of this enzyme [35, 37].

Kostlin-Gille et al2019 showed that hypoxia condition is important to normal placenta development and its driven by a hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), a key regulator responsible for initiate transcription of several genes. The subunit HIF-1α is highly expressed in placenta during early gestation period, characterized by low oxygen pressure conditions. This study used myeloid HIF-1 knockout mice to evaluate the role of HIF-1α on myeloid-derived suppressor cell function, showing that HIF-1α deficiency in myeloid cells leads to diminished suppressive activity of MDSC in uterus from pregnant mice, but the expression of chemokine receptor or integrins was not altered. Despite MDSC recruitment to uterus was not altered, it was observed a lower MDSC accumulation as well as an increase of MDSC apoptosis, contributing to an elevated abortion rate in knockout mice [73].

Regarding Zika virus, there are few studies showing the presence of MDSC on women blood and during pregnancy, and considering the facts, it will be very important to know any relationship of their presence with congenital syndrome, as observed in 2016, Brazil [82, 83]. A study with 10 non-pregnant women with Zika infection showed that frequencies of circulating MDSC did not change over time [84]. Another study with pregnant monkeys infected with Zika virus showed that an imbalance on blood frequencies of MDSC and activated CD8 T cells in the acute phase may lead to poor outcome to the fetus. Adding to that, the high frequency of MDSC on placenta from pregnant monkeys showed a positive effect on pregnancy outcome, even more if a drug antiviral treatment was used [85].

Furthermore, it is worth to note that immune signature, sometimes is the key factor to explain some diseases progressions. Despite Dengue viruses is more related to signals and symptoms with Zika virus infection [86, 87], some similarities with hepatitis C virus (HCV) were also noted, and mechanisms of immune evasion have been described, as inhibition of interferon pathway, allowing virus life cycle for a long-term period, up to 100 days [88, 89]. To note, ZIKV infection is also classified as an immune-mediated viral disease, like Dengue and other viruses [86, 87, 90]. Disease progression in HCV patients to chronic infection has been associated to an increase of MDSC phenotype in peripheral blood mediated by viral proteins [38]. Wang et al., 2017 examined Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) infection leading acute encephalopathy depending on suppression of adaptive immune response, especially T follicular helper cells, mediated by enhanced MDSC populations, such as an involvement of MDSC on splenic B cells reduction, and in lower levels of total IgM JEV-specific neutralizing antibodies in mice models [39]. Burrack et al., also suggests that MDSC has an important suppressive T cells activity and may contribute to reduce the immune-mediated disease during Chikungunya infection [90].

Otherwise, the immunosuppressive activity triggered by RNA viruses, MDSC has been associated with metabolic regulation of immunopathology induced by DNA viruses, like hepatitis B virus (HBV) [91]. Pallett et al., 2015 showed that frequencies of MDSC on liver from HBV patients without liver damage, monitored by levels of liver transaminase enzymes, were higher in comparison with patients with liver damage, showing a protective effect for patients with immune-mediated viral disease, as hepatitis B [91].

In the new coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), the MDSC have been reported to play an important role in the early phase of symptoms, increasing their frequency on blood in the first days of signals and symptoms, and it was related to poor outcome in severe acute respiratory syndrome in hospitalized patients. Pregnancy is a risk factor for COVID-19 severity, given the Brazilian high mortality rate of 12.7% in June 2020 withing pregnant, which may be associated with the change of the immunity [92, 93, 94].

Although few studies involving MDSC frequencies on blood during Zika infection were published yet, those cell type needs to be investigated, even though in animal models for medical science breakthroughs. The technique to characterize this cell phenotype is simpler than to characterize regulatory T cells, once the procedure does not require intracellular staining [95].

If those MDSC are crucial to maintaining a healthy pregnancy, any adverse effects, as Zika virus infection could trigger an imbalance between MDSC and T cells. This dysfunction may induce a deactivation of functional MDSC on blood and placenta with failure to attempt to eliminate viral infection. In addition, T cell function during ZIKV infection is known to be delayed throughout interferences on interferon pathway, as described above. Then, this scenario may contribute to immune evasion of ZIKV, in which viral replication on maternal-fetal environment is unavoidable, inducing poor outcomes during pregnancy: fetal death, congenital syndrome, abortion, neurological disorders, etc. (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) activation and regulation triggered by normal pregnancy and by Zika virus infection. Summary of MDSC functionality during normal pregnancy (A) and during acute phase of Zika virus infection (B) as suggested by others into an innate immunity dysregulation observed in abnormal pregnancies on monkeys [35,37,38,73,77,78,79,80,81,85]. Hormone and cytokines produced in normal pregnancy induce an equilibrium in peripheral blood maintaining frequency of MDSC elevated (1.A), as well as levels of IL-10 and TGF-beta. Meanwhile, circulating levels of T cell frequencies are reduced and controlled. In placenta, Hofbauer cells (macrophages) are responsible for immune surveillance also intermediating the cross-talking between fetus-maternal interface, with equilibrium of MDSC and T cells to maintain a healthy pregnancy. In abnormal pregnancy, also suggestive for Zika virus infection during pregnancy of non-human primates, the equilibrium is broken. Once ZIKV is circulating, there is a reduction of MDSC frequency (B), compromising pregnancy immunosuppression, with elevation of activated T cells, attempting to virus elimination. In the placental parenchyma, MDSC has a reduction in their frequency. This scenario also suggests an immune dysfunction in fetus-maternal environment, diminishing functional macrophages (Hofbauer cells), which are infected by virus. All events together can induce several poor outcomes (abortion, neurological disorders). Black arrows filled with white color represent the frequency of cells (up = high, down = low). Grey arrows represent levels of cytokines (up = high, down = low). Red dashed arrows represent the direction of function/induction events that have been known during Zika infection during pregnancy. Figure was created using Biorender software (https://www.biorender.com).

Advertisement

4. Programmed cell death: A host innate immune protection or a virus evasion strategy

It has been described that a protective response by innate immune cells to viruses is triggered by several distinct mechanisms including apoptosis, necrosis, paraptosis, pyroptosis, autophagy cell death, and others. Each one is depending on several aspects of infection, including where the microorganism was detected, susceptible target-cells, through signaling systems discharging the death signal, and its intensity. During the innate immune response to infections, programmed cell death may occur as a direct pathogenic mechanism of viral spread and escape from the immune system or represents an appropriate host response to limit pathogen replication. Apoptosis of lymphocytes and monocytes also plays an important role in the control of inflammatory responses, as well as in the development of maternal-fetal tolerance [96, 97, 98, 99].

Type 1 programmed cell death, also known as apoptosis, is defined by internucleosomal DNA fragmentation, marked irreversible apoptotic characteristic indicating chromatin condensation, degradation of cytoskeleton and nuclear proteins, protein crosslinking, apoptotic bodies’ formation baring ligands for receptors of phagocytic cells and, finally, the uptake by these phagocytes [97, 98, 99]. Type 2, or autophagic cell death, presents unique characteristics organelles formation including autophagosomes and autophagolysosomes in the dying cell, sources of self-degradation, and recycling [100].

Two pathways can regulate the apoptosis program in different aspects: extrinsic and intrinsic. Extrinsic pathway is activated by a transduction signal through death receptors, in which TNF, Fas ligand, or TRAIL bind to their respective receptors, such as TNF receptor family: TNFR1, Fas (CD95/APO-1) and TRAIL-R1/2. A complex signal mediated by this binding leads to an enzymatic cascade of cell degradation, and at this point caspase-3 is activated promoting DNA damage [101]. Intrinsic pathway involves intracellular mitochondria, which its membrane is the local for many Bcl-2 family members and their activity in inducing / inhibiting the mitochondrial apoptosis program implies in those proteins lead to membrane collapse as well as a transition from mitochondrial permeability promoting apoptosis process [96, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105].

Taking together, type 2, or autophagic cell death, consists of a conserved catabolic process that contributes to degradation and recycling of many intracellular substances, through lysosome activity. In this sense, many studies have shown its importance in immune responses, including degradation of microbes, direct viral peptides MHC class I presentation [106] and even altering T-cell signaling and tolerance [107, 108]. At first, autophagy is necessary to keep the cell alive under stress conditions that precede their demise. Such kind of cell death could be achieved by several mechanisms, including prolonged hypoxia or digestion of vital factors, regulatory molecules or essential organelles. In a stress situation, caused by virus, an infected cell can induce intracellular signals of autophagy, inhibiting cell proliferation, arresting cell cycle and eventually leading to cell death [106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111].

In the acute ZIKV infection during pregnancy, macrophages and dendritic cells are involved in inflammatory cytokines production, in which CARD9 expression, an important regulator of caspase activity playing an important role in cell apoptosis regulation, is elevated allowing that pattern recognition receptors (PRR) induce pro-inflammatory cytokines cascade, as the first step on CZS, as suggested [67]. According to Quicke et al., Hofbauer cells infected with ZIKV in placenta induces IFN type I activation, reactive oxygen species production, as well as pro-inflammatory cytokines, but with minimal cell death, showing a scape of innate immune response [23]. Recently, Cao et al., showed that ZIKV could activate and increase an autophagic process in pregnant mice, suggesting an imbalance of trophoblastic cells in placenta, and relation with fetal loss [112]. Corroborating, Ribeiro et al. using a human model of placenta explants for in vitro infection demonstrated tissue injury as consequence of the association between fetal pro-inflammatory responses mediated by IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF and extrinsic caspase 3 dependent apoptosis (TNF-TNFR pathway). Together data suggest that ZIKV infection corroborates to placenta innate immune and hormonal dysfunction, increasing loss barrier integrity [42]Thus, this inflammatory status could trigger cell death and barrier loss, allowing ZIKV cross placenta and infect fetuses’ neural stem cells (Figure 3) [23, 113, 114, 115]. Interesting, autophagosomes are present in neural stem cells and it could facilitate ZIKV replication [116], although inflammation generated as well as the cytopathic effect itself culminate in extensive caspase-dependent neuronal cell death.

Figure 3.

Programmed cell death activation during normal pregnancy and abnormal pregnancy induced by Zika virus. Normal pregnancy equilibrium is driven by regulation of number of innate immune cells in placenta leading by programmed cell death. In this situation, caspase activity starts on CARD9 expression with cytokines production by Hofbauer cells (1.A), which oxide nitric (NO) regulates trophoblasts autophagy (2.A, 3.A). Products of Hofbauer cells activity in the surveillance in placental parenchyma contributing to extrinsic (Fas/Fas-L) and intrinsic pathway (BCL2/BAX) activation in fetus brain with low expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, regulating number of neural stem cells and microglia by apoptosis (4.A), maintaining the healthy pregnancy. Acute ZIKV infection during pregnancy suggests that macrophages and DCs are involved in pro-inflammatory cytokines production, in which CARD9 is upregulated, increasing caspase activity, allowing pro-inflammatory cytokines and reactive species cascade (1.B, 2.B), exacerbating autophagy in placenta (3.B). Taking together this innate immune dysfunction, fetus brain is affected by high activation of apoptosis pathway (4.B), provoking a cascade of cell death with an abrupt reduction of neural cells, causing severe damage [113,114,115]. Grey arrows represent the production or expression levels (up = high, down = low). Double arrows represent a high magnitude of production or expression. Red dashed arrows represent the direction of function/induction events that have been known and those suggested. Figure created using Biorender software (https://www.biorender.com).

Corroborating, Lum et al. has shown that ZIKV mainly infects fetal microglia and induces high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines that could be harmful to the fetus [117]. In addition, the analysis of in vitro culture, fetal brain histology and ex vivostudies with children presenting evidence of congenital infections demonstrated that, in fact, ZIKV promotes microglial activation, suggesting viral disseminating, neuronal death and an abnormal increase of astrocytes due to neurons destruction [117].

Thus, once in fetus central nervous system, ZIKV may contribute to extrinsic (Fas/Fas-L) and intrinsic (Bcl-2) pathways activation for programmed cell death, reducing number of neuronal cells. Thus, the risk of congenital syndrome is eminent, mainly in the first trimester, as well documented (Figure 3) [67, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123]. Some studies with fetuses’ autopsies and infants with microcephaly have been demonstrated a broad spectrum of microscopic neuropathological abnormalities and brain damage, with direct virus cytopathic effects in neural glial cells. In this way, these data support the strong association with apoptotic cell death and microcalcifications [13, 23, 124].

Advertisement

5. Prevention and control of ZIKV infection: Potential candidates in pregnant women

In general, pregnancy is a challenge for prevention and control infectious diseases regard to a safe drug or vaccine development to do not disturb the innate/adaptive immunity homeostasis, however, there were no drugs approved for ZIKV infection treatment [28, 29, 30]. Here, drugs and vaccines candidates tested in animal models or in newborns will be described with details (Table 1).

TherapyclassificationMechanism of actionImmune effectPregnancy safetyReferences
Peg Interferon-λ2Not approvedAntiviral immunobiologicalEnhance IFNL-λ pathway activityYes/Mice modelsJagger et al., 2017 [26]
SofosbuvirCategory B/Approved for hepatitis C treatmentDirect-acting antiviral drugsNot exploredYes/Mice modelsMesci et al., 2018 [136]
NITD008Not approvedDirect-acting antiviral drugsNot exploredYes/Mice modelsWatanabe et al., 2019 [27]
HydroxycloroquineCategory C/Approved for malaria and autoimmune diseases therapyCell membrane interaction to induce cell deathReduction of autophagy activityYes/Pregnant womenCao et al., 2017 [112]
rVSV vaccineNot approvedRecombinant viral vector vaccineIncreases in CD8+/CD44high/IFN-γ + T cell populations on spleenYes/Mice modelsBetancourt et al., 2017 [147]
VRC5283Clinical trial phase II (VRC-ZKADNA090–00-VP)DNA plasmid vaccineInduce antigen-specific antibody production/ induce of CD8+ T cells responseYes/Mice modelsRichner et al.,2017 [155]
mRNA-LNP vaccineClinical trial phase I (NCT03014089)mRNA vaccineInduce antigen-specific antibody production/ induce of CD8+ T cells response/Minimizes ADEYes/Mice modelsRichner et al.,2017 [156]

Table 1.

Therapeutic agents or vaccine candidates targeting virus or immunity with promisor potential to use during ZIKV infection in pregnant women.

5.1 Type III interferon: Potential efficacy and safety for immunotherapy

Type III interferon has been emerging as an efficient and low damaging therapeutic agent not only directed for the virus but also for fungal and bacterial infections, as well as cancer, autoimmune, and vascular diseases [54]. The more restricted expression of IFNLR1 likely contributes to the improved safety profile of IFN-λl in clinical studies compared to type I IFN. Pegylated IFN-λ1 have already been tested in phase 2b clinical trial to chronic hepatitis C treatment and hepatitis B, associated with improved rates of virologic response with fewer extrahepatic adverse events compared to pegylated IFN-α [125]. Even though it was deemed less effective than alternative treatments for these infections, pegylated- IFN- λ can be potential candidate ready for deployment if new indications are identified [126]. There are other viral targets for IFN- λ therapy been tested in murine models: norovirus [127], and influenza virus [128], and west nile virus – last one is another member of Flaviviridae family. It is noteworthy the effect of IFN-λ on infection with west nile virus, an encephalitic flavivirus: Treatment of IFNLR1 knockout mice with pegylated IFN-λ2 resulted in decreased blood–brain barrier permeability, reducing west nile virus infection in the brain without affecting viremia, and improved survival against lethal virus challenge [129].

The effectiveness and low damage treatments for other correlated viral infections, combined with the protagonist of IFN-λs as immunoregulatory and antiviral agent in ZIKV raise the idea of IFN-λs as ZIKV therapy, and some groups already achieve exciting good results. Concerning ZIKV infections, Jagger, et al., (2017) suggest that IFN-λ2 treatment could be a safe solution to minimize Congenital Zika Syndrome severe outcomes. Using a type III interferon-deficient mouse model, authors showed that these animals had an increase of ZIKV replication in the placenta under ZIKV infection, and treatment of pregnant mice with IFN-λ2 reduced ZIKV viremia [26]. Considering the vaginal epithelium as the first line of defense against sexually transmitted ZIKV, treatment of primary human vaginal and cervical epithelial cells lineages with IFN-λ induces host defense transcriptional signatures with augmented expression of ISGs (IFI44L, OASL, OAS1, and MX1) and inhibition of ZIKV replication. Female mice submitted to treatment with IFN-λ and intravaginal ZIKV transmission showed low levels of virus replication in the female reproductive tract with a hormonal stage-dependent role [130].

5.2 Direct-acting antiviral therapy based on RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors

Some studies were driving to evaluate effects of independent direct-acting antiviral drugs on Zika virus infection (Table 1), as sofosbuvir, an FDA-approved nucleotide analog inhibitor of the hepatitis C (HCV) RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) [131, 132]. In vitro and in vivostudies have been demonstrated effectiveness of sofosbuvir as antiviral drugs to treat Zika and Dengue virus infection [133, 134, 135]. Mesci et al., 2018 reported that sofosbuvir was promisor to block vertical transmission of Zika virus in pregnancy using mice models [136]. Again, sofosbuvir shows to play a role in virus replication inhibition. Another flaviviral inhibitor NITD008, an adenosine analog inhibiting the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity through chain-termination [137], has been shown to reduce the Zika virus replication in placenta, and fetal infection, thus minimizing the risk of maternal-fetal transmission of ZIKV [27].

There are few studies investigating innate immunity during antiviral therapy, especially when its concern to Flaviviridae family [38, 135, 138, 139]. Scarce literature revealed knowledge about antiviral therapy immune effects only during hepatitis C infection [138, 139]. Antiviral drugs, as pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN), ribavirin, and direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) have been related with a reduction of innate regulatory cells, as MDSC, in peripheral blood from hepatitis C chronic patients, in which T cells were increased and immune function was reestablished [138, 139]. Nevertheless, all those drugs are aimed to interrupt viral replication and any dysregulation of immune cells during pregnancy is not safe, then those drugs are not recommended to be used during gestational period [140]. Besides no immune response evaluation was related to DAA therapy, it has been known that small molecules with specific activity should not induce any immune alterations in maternal-fetal immunity [140].

Safety and effectiveness of sofosbuvir on Zika virus infection should be addressed to immune response evaluation, which is poorly explored, even more in pregnant animal models. More studies and investments are needed for non-clinical and clinical studies, to get safety therapeutic protocols aimed to pregnant women with Zika virus or other flavivirus infection.

5.3 Cell death modulation during antiviral therapy

Genetic manipulation has been proven to be a promising tool for vaccine and therapy development. Considering the type 2 of programmed death, autophagy is activated by ZIKV in placental parenchyma and is involved in poor outcome during pregnancy, this cell death pathway has been a target for therapies [112, 141, 142, 143].

Recently, a study showed the role of an autophagy gene (Atg16I1) during ZIKV infection in pregnant mice model, in which inducing a deficiency in this gene limited ZIKV vertical transmission, as well fetal damage, improving placental and fetal outcomes [112]. In addition, an antiviral compound approved to be used by pregnant women for malaria and autoimmune diseases [141], hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), has been used to dampen autophagic activity in vivo[142]. Thus, Cao et al., showed that HCQ administered with a dose of 40 mg/kg/day has in vivoinhibitory effects on autophagy sustained lower levels of ZIKV RNA compared with saline buffer treatment [112].

Based on the knowledge of ZIKV infection that can trigger a caspase-3 activation contributing to cell death of neural progenitor cells during pregnancy, it is an extremely relevant approaches targeting cell death pathways for antiviral treatments even though for therapeutic vaccines.

5.4 Recombinant viral vectors as vaccine candidate

Recombinant viral vectors have been highlighted as therapeutic alternatives to prevent and treat infectious disease [144, 145], considering its specificity and the adverse effects of antiviral drugs and some vaccines [140, 146]. Betancourt et al., 2017 showed that a recombinant viral vector from vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV) anti-ZIKV vaccine increased IFN-γ production by splenic CD8+ T cells as well as high neutralizing anti-ZIKV antibody titers from pregnant mice. This study also demonstrates that neonatal mouse from vaccinated dams was partially protected against neurological manifestations of ZIKV infection following wild-type virus challenge [147]. This rVSV using pre membrane and envelope region together obtained from a ZIKV strain as reference had the potential to protect from ZIKV infection during prenatal and neonatal development, likely through the transmission of maternal IgG. Despite rVSV vaccine induces IFN-γ production in pregnant mice, this vaccine needs to be evaluated for other types of interferon, mainly its effects on placental tissues .

5.5 Potential DNA and mRNA vaccines

mRNA vaccines as well as DNA-based vaccines represent a versatile vaccine platform and an alternative to conventional vaccine approaches because of their high potency, capacity for rapid development and potential for low-cost manufacture and safe administration [148]. Recent technological advances have allowed mRNA vaccines to demonstrate encouraging results in both animal and human models. Regarding prophylactic mRNA vaccines, a number of reports have demonstrated the potency and versatility of mRNA to elicited protective immunity against a variety of infectious agents in animal models against, including influenza virus, Ebola virus, Zika virus, Human Immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1), herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, hepatitis C and respiratory syncytial virus [149, 150, 151]. It has been noted that approximately ten mRNA vaccines programs have entered clinical trials [152].

The importance of mRNA-based vaccines and therapies is emphasized when mRNA-based biopharmaceuticals are entering the market with guidance of new biopharmaceutical companies. Modern Therapeutics, an mRNA therapy company evaluated various mRNA vaccine technologies to identify immunogenic and scalable candidates. The pipeline of this company shows different investigative stages mRNA vaccines of the following vaccines Respiratory Syncytial virus (RSV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), human metapneumovirus (hMPV) + Parainfluenza virus Type 3 (PIV3), Influenza A subtypes H10N8, and H7N9, Zika, and Chikungunya. Curevac is the first biopharmaceutical company that developed the first prophylactic mRNA vaccine in the clinics, recently they showed that RNActive® vaccines induced long-lived and protective immunity to influenza A virus infections in various animal models [153].

Thus, big pharmaceutic companies, such as Merck & Co., have been invested in Modern Therapeutics aiming to expand the field of mRNA vaccine (https://www.modernatx.com/). Indeed, nucleic acid vaccine platform has been presented to combat the emergence of acute viral diseases, mainly to rapidly contain emerging outbreaks before they spread out of control. In this context, two vaccines were developed to combat the ZIKV outbreak (1) DNA plasmid vaccine encoding the prM-E genes of ZIKV and (VRC5283) (2) mRNA vaccine (mRNA-LNP), both vaccines mediate protection from ZIKV infection in mouse models. The DNA plasmid vaccine is in phase 2 human clinical trials (VRC-ZKADNA090–00-VP) and vaccine mRNA-LNP is in phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03014089) [154, 155, 156].

Considering that vaccine trials might not be performed in pregnant women and have not yet tested vaccines against ZIKV vertical transmission, there is a need for establishing the efficacy of ZIKV vaccines against mother-to-child transmission in animal models. In order to address those questions, it has been shown that vaccination with DNA plasmid encoding Zika virus prM-E and a lipid-encapsulated mRNA vaccine-elicited antigen-specific antibody and CD8+ T cell responses in mice, being able to generate a high level of protection against vertical transmission. Moreover, the mRNA-LNP vaccine not only inhibited vertical transmission but also ensured that fetuses are protected therefore, reinforcing its potential as promising vaccine for pregnant women [155]. Since there are few studies in the field of ZIKV vaccine candidates that evaluated vertical transmission, intrinsic maternal factors as well as fetal health, nucleic acid vaccines are pointed as a great opportunity to contain ZIKV infection.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

Considering the normal pregnancy, the innate immunity balance is conduct by downregulation of effector T cells and NK cells leading by innate regulatory cells (MDSC) and upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This innate immune modulation that occurs mainly at the placenta, includes interferon pathway and cell death modulation as shown in Figure 4A. Gestation has its own difficulties to successful outcomes regarding maternal immune tolerance. Zika virus infection becomes classified as disease-causing birth defects, developing an abnormal pregnancy, as consequence of immune dysregulation (Figure 4B). Thus, antiviral therapy is the key to control this immune imbalance showing positive effects in innate immunity on pregnant mice models. It has been known that efforts through vaccines development targeting pregnant women will be the solution for ZIKV prevention, as well as for other arboviral infections, to maintain immune homeostasis and generate healthy babies. Finally, this chapter brings some new thoughts that help for targeted improvements in medical science considering Zika infection on pregnancy, and innate immune system linked to therapies previewing the prevention and control.

Figure 4.

Summary of innate immunity functionality during normal pregnancy and in Zika virus infection focus on interferon III, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and programmed cell death activities. During pregnancy, initial signal is dependent on nidation process and placenta formation leading by trophoblasts expansion and activation. Following this process, innate cells, such as neutrophils, DCs, and cytokines are activated (1.A, 2.A) with IL10 and TGF-beta production in periphery, allowing immunosuppressive functionality triggered by regulatory cells (MDSC and Treg) (3.A). This condition facilitates suppression of effector cells (NK and lymphocytes) in peripheral blood and in placenta triggered by MDSC (4.A), whereas Hofbauer cells maintain reactive species (NO) balanced (5.A) as well as the IFN-λ downregulation, IFN type I upregulation, and trophoblast autophagy (6.A), contributing to the cross-linking in the fetus-maternal interface. Adding to that, programmed cell death contributes to control the accelerated growth of neural cells in fetus brain (7.A), corroborating with a successful pregnancy. Zika virus has been related to abnormal pregnancy, leading to massive innate immune alteration, causing severe brain damage to fetus. Given that, when the virus is in the blood, there is a gross activation of innate cells, elevation of cytokines and chemokines (1.B, 2.B), and suppressive activity by regulatory cells is compromised (3.B), generating early activation of NK and T cells in blood (4.B) and macrophages in placenta (5.B). Virus invasion in placenta through Hofbauer and trophoblast cells results in high autophagy activity with interferon type I gene highly expressed combined with super downregulation of interferon type III (6.B). This imbalance also contributes to fetal brain damage, orchestra by high activation of apoptosis pathway, avoiding neural cells growing progress. Thus, Zika provides severe damage to fetus, in which drugs, vaccines and immunotherapies have been designed suggesting a modulation of three important keys of innate immunity to control virus replication and spread into fetus-maternal interface: interferon type III expression, MDSC frequency, and autophagy process (highlighted with red rectangles) to avoid severe fetus brain damage, allowing a healthy pregnancy. This figure was made based on the information fromFigures 13. Figure created using Biorender software (https://www.biorender.com).

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Directory of Technological Development from Immunobiological Technology Institute, Biomanguinhos, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for founding support.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

Authors to declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1. Petersen LR, Jamieson DJ, Powers AM, Honein MA. Zika Virus. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1552-63.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1602113
  2. 2. D’Ortenzio E, Matheron S, de Lamballerie X, Hubert B, Piorkowski G, Maquart M, et al. Evidence of Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus. N Engl J Med 2016;374:2195-8.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1604449
  3. 3. Counotte MJ, Kim CR, Wang J, Bernstein K, Deal CD, Broutet NJN, et al. Sexual transmission of Zika virus and other flaviviruses: A living systematic review. PLoS Med 2018;15:e1002611.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002611
  4. 4. Tabata T, Petitt M, Puerta-Guardo H, Michlmayr D, Wang C, Fang-Hoover J, et al. Zika Virus Targets Different Primary Human Placental Cells, Suggesting Two Routes for Vertical Transmission. Cell Host & Microbe 2016;20:155-66.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2016.07.002
  5. 5. Pereira L. Congenital Viral Infection: Traversing the Uterine-Placental Interface. Annu Rev Virol 2018;5:273-99.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-virology-092917-043236
  6. 6. Gregory CJ, Oduyebo T, Brault AC, Brooks JT, Chung K-W, Hills S, et al. Modes of Transmission of Zika Virus. J Infect Dis 2017;216:S875-83.https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jix396
  7. 7. Brasil P, Pereira JP, Moreira ME, Ribeiro Nogueira RM, Damasceno L, Wakimoto M, et al. Zika Virus Infection in Pregnant Women in Rio de Janeiro. New England Journal of Medicine 2016;375:2321-34.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602412
  8. 8. Jaenisch T, Rosenberger KD, Brito C, Brady O, Brasil P, Marques ET. Risk of microcephaly after Zika virus infection in Brazil, 2015 to 2016. Bull World Health Organ 2017;95:191-8.https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.178608
  9. 9. Campos GS, Bandeira AC, Sardi SI. Zika Virus Outbreak, Bahia, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis 2015;21:1885-6.https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2110.150847
  10. 10. Freitas P de SS, Soares GB, Mocelin HJS, Lacerda LCX, Prado TN do, Sales CMM, et al. Síndrome congênita do vírus Zika: perfil sociodemográfico das mães. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública 2018;43:1.https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2019.24
  11. 11. WHO. WHO statement on the first meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR 2005) Emergency Committee on Zika virus and observed increase in neurological disorders and neonatal malformations 2016
  12. 12. Watrin L, Ghawché F, Larre P, Neau J-P, Mathis S, Fournier E. Guillain–Barré Syndrome (42 Cases) Occurring During a Zika Virus Outbreak in French Polynesia: Medicine 2016;95:e3257.https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003257
  13. 13. Martines RB, Bhatnagar J, de Oliveira Ramos AM, Davi HPF, Iglezias SD, Kanamura CT, et al. Pathology of congenital Zika syndrome in Brazil: a case series. The Lancet 2016;388:898-904.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30883-2
  14. 14. Sarno M, Aquino M, Pimentel K, Cabral R, Costa G, Bastos F, et al. Progressive lesions of central nervous system in microcephalic fetuses with suspected congenital Zika virus syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;50:717-22.https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17303
  15. 15. de Araújo TVB, Ximenes RA de A, Miranda-Filho D de B, Souza WV, Montarroyos UR, de Melo APL, et al. Association between microcephaly, Zika virus infection, and other risk factors in Brazil: final report of a case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:328-36.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30727-2
  16. 16. Roma JHF, Alves RC, Silva VS da, Ferreira MJ, Araújo C de, Pavoni JHC. Descriptive study of suspected congenital Zika syndrome cases during the 2015-2016 epidemic in Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2019;52:e20190105.https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0105-2019
  17. 17. Mlakar J, Korva M, Tul N, Popović M, Poljšak-Prijatelj M, Mraz J, et al. Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly. N Engl J Med 2016;374:951-8.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1600651
  18. 18. Pool K-L, Adachi K, Karnezis S, Salamon N, Romero T, Nielsen-Saines K, et al. Association Between Neonatal Neuroimaging and Clinical Outcomes in Zika-Exposed Infants From Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e198124.https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8124
  19. 19. Kollmann TR, Kampmann B, Mazmanian SK, Marchant A, Levy O. Protecting the Newborn and Young Infant from Infectious Diseases: Lessons from Immune Ontogeny. Immunity 2017;46:350-63.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2017.03.009
  20. 20. El Costa H, Gouilly J, Mansuy J-M, Chen Q, Levy C, Cartron G, et al. ZIKA virus reveals broad tissue and cell tropism during the first trimester of pregnancy. Sci Rep 2016;6:35296.https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35296
  21. 21. Weisblum Y, Oiknine-Djian E, Vorontsov OM, Haimov-Kochman R, Zakay-Rones Z, Meir K, et al. Zika Virus Infects Early- and Midgestation Human Maternal Decidual Tissues, Inducing Distinct Innate Tissue Responses in the Maternal-Fetal Interface. J Virol 2017;91:e01905-16, /jvi/91/4/e01905-16.atom.https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01905-16
  22. 22. Yockey LJ, Iwasaki A. Interferons and Proinflammatory Cytokines in Pregnancy and Fetal Development. Immunity 2018;49:397-412.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2018.07.017
  23. 23. Quicke KM, Bowen JR, Johnson EL, McDonald CE, Ma H, O’Neal JT, et al. Zika Virus Infects Human Placental Macrophages. Cell Host & Microbe 2016;20:83-90.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.015
  24. 24. Simoni MK, Jurado KA, Abrahams VM, Fikrig E, Guller S. Zika virus infection of Hofbauer cells. Am J Reprod Immunol 2017;77:e12613.https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12613
  25. 25. Rabelo K, de Souza LJ, Salomão NG, Machado LN, Pereira PG, Portari EA, et al. Zika Induces Human Placental Damage and Inflammation. Front Immunol 2020;11:2146.https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.02146
  26. 26. Jagger BW, Miner JJ, Cao B, Arora N, Smith AM, Kovacs A, et al. Gestational Stage and IFN-λ Signaling Regulate ZIKV Infection In Utero. Cell Host Microbe 2017;22:366-376.e3.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.08.012
  27. 27. Watanabe S, Tan NWW, Chan KWK, Vasudevan SG. Assessing the utility of antivirals for preventing maternal-fetal transmission of zika virus in pregnant mice. Antiviral Res 2019;167:104-9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2019.04.013
  28. 28. McArthur MA. Zika Virus: Recent Advances towards the Development of Vaccines and Therapeutics. Viruses 2017;9.https://doi.org/10.3390/v9060143
  29. 29. Bernatchez JA, Tran LT, Li J, Luan Y, Siqueira-Neto JL, Li R. Drugs for the Treatment of Zika Virus Infection. J Med Chem 2020;63:470-89.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00775
  30. 30. Fontes-Garfias CR, Baker CK, Shi P-Y. Reverse genetic approaches for the development of Zika vaccines and therapeutics. Current Opinion in Virology 2020;44:7-15.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2020.05.002
  31. 31. Khaiboullina SF, Lopes P, de Carvalho TG, Real ALCV, Souza DG, Costa VV, et al. Host Immune Response to ZIKV in an Immunocompetent Embryonic Mouse Model of Intravaginal Infection. Viruses 2019;11.https://doi.org/10.3390/v11060558
  32. 32. Heffron AS, Mohr EL, Baker D, Haj AK, Buechler CR, Bailey A, et al. Antibody responses to Zika virus proteins in pregnant and non-pregnant macaques. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018;12:e0006903.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006903
  33. 33. Ornelas AMM, Pezzuto P, Silveira PP, Melo FO, Ferreira TA, Oliveira-Szejnfeld PS, et al. Immune activation in amniotic fluid from Zika virus-associated microcephaly. Ann Neurol 2017;81:152-6.https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24839
  34. 34. Rau C-S, Wu S-C, Chen Y-C, Chien P-C, Hsieh H-Y, Kuo P-J, et al. Stress-Induced Hyperglycemia, but Not Diabetic Hyperglycemia, Is Associated with Higher Mortality in Patients with Isolated Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Analysis of a Propensity Score-Matched Population. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111340
  35. 35. Köstlin N, Kugel H, Spring B, Leiber A, Marmé A, Henes M, et al. Granulocytic myeloid derived suppressor cells expand in human pregnancy and modulate T-cell responses. Eur J Immunol 2014;44:2582-91.https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201344200
  36. 36. Köstlin N, Ostermeir A-L, Spring B, Schwarz J, Marmé A, Walter CB, et al. HLA-G promotes myeloid-derived suppressor cell accumulation and suppressive activity during human pregnancy through engagement of the receptor ILT4. Eur J Immunol 2017;47:374-84.https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201646564
  37. 37. Ghaebi M, Nouri M, Ghasemzadeh A, Farzadi L, Jadidi-Niaragh F, Ahmadi M, et al. Immune regulatory network in successful pregnancy and reproductive failures. Biomed Pharmacother 2017;88:61-73.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.01.016
  38. 38. Goh C, Narayanan S, Hahn YS. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: the dark knight or the joker in viral infections? Immunol Rev 2013;255:210-21.https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12084
  39. 39. Wang C, Zhang N, Qi L, Yuan J, Wang K, Wang K, et al. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Inhibit T Follicular Helper Cell Immune Response in Japanese Encephalitis Virus Infection. J Immunol 2017;199:3094-105.https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1700671
  40. 40. Mor G, Aldo P, Alvero AB. The unique immunological and microbial aspects of pregnancy. Nat Rev Immunol 2017;17:469-82.https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2017.64
  41. 41. Aluvihare VR, Kallikourdis M, Betz AG. Regulatory T cells mediate maternal tolerance to the fetus. Nat Immunol 2004;5:266-71.https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1037
  42. 42. Ribeiro MR, Moreli JB, Marques RE, Papa MP, Meuren LM, Rahal P, et al. Zika-virus-infected human full-term placental explants display pro-inflammatory responses and undergo apoptosis. Arch Virol 2018;163:2687-99.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-018-3911-x
  43. 43. Bayer A, Lennemann NJ, Ouyang Y, Bramley JC, Morosky S, Marques ETDA, et al. Type III Interferons Produced by Human Placental Trophoblasts Confer Protection against Zika Virus Infection. Cell Host & Microbe 2016;19:705-12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2016.03.008
  44. 44. Vilcek J. Novel interferons. Nat Immunol 2003;4:8-9.https://doi.org/10.1038/ni0103-8
  45. 45. Kotenko SV, Gallagher G, Baurin VV, Lewis-Antes A, Shen M, Shah NK, et al. IFN-λs mediate antiviral protection through a distinct class II cytokine receptor complex. Nat Immunol 2003;4:69-77.https://doi.org/10.1038/ni875
  46. 46. Sheppard P, Kindsvogel W, Xu W, Henderson K, Schlutsmeyer S, Whitmore TE, et al. IL-28, IL-29 and their class II cytokine receptor IL-28R. Nat Immunol 2003;4:63-8.https://doi.org/10.1038/ni873
  47. 47. Andreakos E, Zanoni I, Galani IE. Lambda interferons come to light: dual function cytokines mediating antiviral immunity and damage control. Curr Opin Immunol 2019;56:67-75.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2018.10.007
  48. 48. Kotenko SV, Langer JA. Full house: 12 receptors for 27 cytokines. Int Immunopharmacol 2004;4:593-608.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2004.01.003
  49. 49. Broggi A, Tan Y, Granucci F, Zanoni I. IFN-λ suppresses intestinal inflammation by non-translational regulation of neutrophil function. Nat Immunol 2017;18:1084-93.https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3821
  50. 50. Dolganiuc A, Kodys K, Marshall C, Saha B, Zhang S, Bala S, et al. Type III Interferons, IL-28 and IL-29, Are Increased in Chronic HCV Infection and Induce Myeloid Dendritic Cell-Mediated FoxP3+ Regulatory T Cells. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e44915.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044915
  51. 51. Mennechet FJD, Uzé G. Interferon-λ–treated dendritic cells specifically induce proliferation of FOXP3-expressing suppressor T cells. Blood 2006;107:4417-23.https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-10-4129
  52. 52. Yin Z, Dai J, Deng J, Sheikh F, Natalia M, Shih T, et al. Type III IFNs Are Produced by and Stimulate Human Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells. JI 2012;189:2735-45.https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1102038
  53. 53. Kotenko SV, Durbin JE. Contribution of type III interferons to antiviral immunity: location, location, location. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2017;292:7295-303.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R117.777102
  54. 54. Wells AI, Coyne CB. Type III Interferons in Antiviral Defenses at Barrier Surfaces. Trends in Immunology 2018;39:848-58.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2018.08.008
  55. 55. Ericson JA, Duffau P, Yasuda K, Ortiz-Lopez A, Rothamel K, Rifkin IR, et al. Gene Expression during the Generation and Activation of Mouse Neutrophils: Implication of Novel Functional and Regulatory Pathways. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e108553.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108553
  56. 56. Rivera A. Interferon Lambda’s New Role as Regulator of Neutrophil Function. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2019.https://doi.org/10.1089/jir.2019.0036
  57. 57. Blazek K, Eames HL, Weiss M, Byrne AJ, Perocheau D, Pease JE, et al. IFN-λ resolves inflammation via suppression of neutrophil infiltration and IL-1β production. J Exp Med 2015;212:845-53.https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20140995
  58. 58. Giaglis S, Stoikou M, Grimolizzi F, Subramanian BY, van Breda SV, Hoesli I, et al. Neutrophil migration into the placenta: Good, bad or deadly? Cell Adhesion & Migration 2016;10:208-25.https://doi.org/10.1080/19336918.2016.1148866
  59. 59. Hahn S, Hasler P, Vokalova L, van Breda SV, Lapaire O, Than NG, et al. The role of neutrophil activation in determining the outcome of pregnancy and modulation by hormones and/or cytokines. Clin Exp Immunol 2019;198:24-36.https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.13278
  60. 60. Stoikou M, Grimolizzi F, Giaglis S, Schäfer G, van Breda SV, Hoesli IM, et al. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Is Associated with Altered Neutrophil Activity. Front Immunol 2017;8:702.https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00702
  61. 61. Chrysanthopoulou A, Kambas K, Stakos D, Mitroulis I, Mitsios A, Vidali V, et al. Interferon lambda1/IL-29 and inorganic polyphosphate are novel regulators of neutrophil-driven thromboinflammation. J Pathol 2017;243:111-22.https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4935
  62. 62. Hahn S, Giaglis S, Hoesli I, Hasler P. Neutrophil NETs in reproduction: from infertility to preeclampsia and the possibility of fetal loss. Front Immun 2012;3.https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00362
  63. 63. Ye L, Schnepf D, Staeheli P. Interferon-λ orchestrates innate and adaptive mucosal immune responses. Nature Reviews Immunology 2019:1.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-019-0182-z
  64. 64. Finotti G, Tamassia N, Cassatella MA. Interferon-λs and Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells: A Close Relationship. Front Immunol 2017;8:1015.https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01015
  65. 65. Hemann EA, Green R, Turnbull JB, Langlois RA, Savan R, Gale M. Interferon-λ modulates dendritic cells to facilitate T cell immunity during infection with influenza A virus. Nat Immunol 2019;20:1035-45.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-019-0408-z
  66. 66. del Rio M-L, Bernhardt G, Rodriguez-Barbosa J-I, Förster R. Development and functional specialization of CD103 + dendritic cells. Immunological Reviews 2010;234:268-81.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-2896.2009.00874.x
  67. 67. Azamor T, Cunha DP, da Silva AMV, de Lima Bezerra OC, Ribeiro-Alves M, Calvo TL, et al. Congenital Zika Syndrome is associated with maternal genetic background. Genetics; 2019.https://doi.org/10.1101/715862
  68. 68. Singh PK, Guest J-M, Kanwar M, Boss J, Gao N, Juzych MS, et al. Zika virus infects cells lining the blood-retinal barrier and causes chorioretinal atrophy in mouse eyes. JCI Insight 2017;2:e92340.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.92340
  69. 69. Salvany-Celades M, van der Zwan A, Benner M, Setrajcic-Dragos V, Bougleux Gomes HA, Iyer V, et al. Three Types of Functional Regulatory T Cells Control T Cell Responses at the Human Maternal-Fetal Interface. Cell Rep 2019;27:2537-2547.e5.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.109
  70. 70. Robertson SA, Green ES, Care AS, Moldenhauer LM, Prins JR, Hull ML, et al. Therapeutic Potential of Regulatory T Cells in Preeclampsia-Opportunities and Challenges. Front Immunol 2019;10:478.https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00478
  71. 71. Tsuda S, Nakashima A, Shima T, Saito S. New Paradigm in the Role of Regulatory T Cells During Pregnancy. Front Immunol 2019;10:573.https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00573
  72. 72. Zhao A-M, Xu H-J, Kang X-M, Zhao A-M, Lu L-M. New insights into myeloid-derived suppressor cells and their roles in feto-maternal immune cross-talk. J Reprod Immunol 2016;113:35-41.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2015.11.001
  73. 73. Köstlin-Gille N, Dietz S, Schwarz J, Spring B, Pauluschke-Fröhlich J, Poets CF, et al. HIF-1α-Deficiency in Myeloid Cells Leads to a Disturbed Accumulation of Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSC) During Pregnancy and to an Increased Abortion Rate in Mice. Front Immunol 2019;10:161.https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00161
  74. 74. Zhang Y, Qu D, Sun J, Zhao L, Wang Q, Shao Q, et al. Human trophoblast cells induced MDSCs from peripheral blood CD14(+) myelomonocytic cells via elevated levels of CCL2. Cell Mol Immunol 2016;13:615-27.https://doi.org/10.1038/cmi.2015.41
  75. 75. Marigo I, Dolcetti L, Serafini P, Zanovello P, Bronte V. Tumor-induced tolerance and immune suppression by myeloid derived suppressor cells. Immunol Rev 2008;222:162-79.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00602.x
  76. 76. Makarenkova VP, Bansal V, Matta BM, Perez LA, Ochoa JB. CD11b+/Gr-1+ myeloid suppressor cells cause T cell dysfunction after traumatic stress. J Immunol 2006;176:2085-94.https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.176.4.2085
  77. 77. Nair RR, Sinha P, Khanna A, Singh K. Reduced Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells in the Blood and Endometrium is Associated with Early Miscarriage. Am J Reprod Immunol 2015;73:479-86.https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12351
  78. 78. Spallanzani RG, Dalotto-Moreno T, Raffo Iraolagoitia XL, Ziblat A, Domaica CI, Avila DE, et al. Expansion of CD11b(+)Ly6G (+)Ly6C (int) cells driven by medroxyprogesterone acetate in mice bearing breast tumors restrains NK cell effector functions. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2013;62:1781-95.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-013-1483-x
  79. 79. Ismail AQT. Does placental MDSC-mediated modulation of arginine levels help protect the foetus from auxotrophic pathogens? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018;31:1667-9.https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1319935
  80. 80. Sengupta J, Dhawan L, Lalitkumar PGL, Ghosh D. Nitric oxide in blastocyst implantation in the rhesus monkey. Reproduction 2005;130:321-32.https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00535
  81. 81. Kang X, Zhang X, Liu Z, Xu H, Wang T, He L, et al. CXCR2-Mediated Granulocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells’ Functional Characterization and Their Role in Maternal Fetal Interface. DNA Cell Biol 2016;35:358-65.https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2015.2962
  82. 82. Sousa AQ, Cavalcante DIM, Franco LM, Araújo FMC, Sousa ET, Valença-Junior JT, et al. Postmortem Findings for 7 Neonates with Congenital Zika Virus Infection. Emerging Infect Dis 2017;23:1164-7.https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2307.162019
  83. 83. Brady OJ, Osgood-Zimmerman A, Kassebaum NJ, Ray SE, de Araújo VEM, da Nóbrega AA, et al. The association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly in Brazil 2015-2017: An observational analysis of over 4 million births. PLoS Med 2019;16:e1002755.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002755
  84. 84. Tonnerre P, Melgaço JG, Torres-Cornejo A, Pinto MA, Yue C, Blümel J, et al. Evolution of the innate and adaptive immune response in women with acute Zika virus infection. Nat Microbiol 2020;5:76-83.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0618-z
  85. 85. Gardinali NR, Marchevsky RS, Oliveira JM, Pelajo-Machado M, Kugelmeier T, Castro MP, et al. Sofosbuvir shows a protective effect against vertical transmission of Zika virus and the associated congenital syndrome in rhesus monkeys. Antiviral Research 2020;182:104859.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104859
  86. 86. Noorbakhsh F, Abdolmohammadi K, Fatahi Y, Dalili H, Rasoolinejad M, Rezaei F, et al. Zika Virus Infection, Basic and Clinical Aspects: A Review Article. Iran J Public Health 2019;48:20-31
  87. 87. Mehta R, Soares CN, Medialdea-Carrera R, Ellul M, da Silva MTT, Rosala-Hallas A, et al. The spectrum of neurological disease associated with Zika and chikungunya viruses in adults in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: A case series. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018;12:e0006212.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006212
  88. 88. Paz-Bailey G, Rosenberg ES, Doyle K, Munoz-Jordan J, Santiago GA, Klein L, et al. Persistence of Zika Virus in Body Fluids - Final Report. N Engl J Med 2018;379:1234-43.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1613108
  89. 89. Huits R, De Smet B, Ariën KK, Van Esbroeck M, Bottieau E, Cnops L. Zika virus in semen: a prospective cohort study of symptomatic travellers returning to Belgium. Bull World Health Organ 2017;95:802-9.https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.17.181370
  90. 90. Burrack KS, Tan JJL, McCarthy MK, Her Z, Berger JN, Ng LFP, et al. Myeloid Cell Arg1 Inhibits Control of Arthritogenic Alphavirus Infection by Suppressing Antiviral T Cells. PLoS Pathog 2015;11:e1005191.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005191
  91. 91. Pallett LJ, Gill US, Quaglia A, Sinclair LV, Jover-Cobos M, Schurich A, et al. Metabolic regulation of hepatitis B immunopathology by myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Nat Med 2015;21:591-600.https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3856
  92. 92. Agrati C, Sacchi A, Bordoni V, Cimini E, Notari S, Grassi G, et al. Expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Cell Death Differ 2020.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-020-0572-6
  93. 93. Reis HLB dos, Boldrini NAT, Caldas JVJ, Paz APC da, Ferrugini CLP, Miranda AE. Severe coronavirus infection in pregnancy: challenging cases report. Rev Inst Med Trop S Paulo 2020;62:e49.https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-9946202062049
  94. 94. Takemoto MLS, Menezes M de O, Andreucci CB, Nakamura-Pereira M, Amorim MMR, Katz L, et al. The tragedy of COVID-19 in Brazil: 124 maternal deaths and counting. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2020:ijgo.13300.https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13300
  95. 95. Rodríguez-Perea AL, Arcia ED, Rueda CM, Velilla PA. Phenotypical characterization of regulatory T cells in humans and rodents. Clin Exp Immunol 2016;185:281-91.https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12804
  96. 96. Czabotar PE, Lessene G, Strasser A, Adams JM. Control of apoptosis by the BCL-2 protein family: implications for physiology and therapy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014;15:49-63.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3722
  97. 97. Vaux DL, Haecker G, Strasser A. An evolutionary perspective on apoptosis. Cell 1994;76:777-9.https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90350-6
  98. 98. Cohen GM. Caspases: the executioners of apoptosis. Biochemical Journal 1997;326:1-16.https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3260001
  99. 99. Rai NK, Tripathi K, Sharma D, Shukla VK. Apoptosis: A Basic Physiologic Process in Wound Healing. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds 2005;4:138-44.https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734605280018
  100. 100. Klionsky DJ. Autophagy as a Regulated Pathway of Cellular Degradation. Science 2000;290:1717-21.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5497.1717
  101. 101. Feig C, Peter ME. How apoptosis got the immune system in shape. Eur J Immunol 2007;37:S61-70.https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.200737462
  102. 102. Chinnaiyan AM. The Apoptosome: Heart and Soul of the Cell Death Machine. Neoplasia 1999;1:5-15.https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.neo.7900003
  103. 103. Hill MM, Adrain C, Duriez PJ, Creagh EM, Martin SJ. Analysis of the composition, assembly kinetics and activity of native Apaf-1 apoptosomes. EMBO J 2004;23:2134-45.https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600210
  104. 104. van Loo G, Saelens X, van Gurp M, MacFarlane M, Martin SJ, Vandenabeele P. The role of mitochondrial factors in apoptosis: a Russian roulette with more than one bullet. Cell Death Differ 2002;9:1031-42.https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401088
  105. 105. Li LY, Luo X, Wang X. Endonuclease G is an apoptotic DNase when released from mitochondria. Nature 2001;412:95-9.https://doi.org/10.1038/35083620
  106. 106. English L, Chemali M, Duron J, Rondeau C, Laplante A, Gingras D, et al. Autophagy enhances the presentation of endogenous viral antigens on MHC class I molecules during HSV-1 infection. Nat Immunol 2009;10:480-7.https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1720
  107. 107. Nedjic J, Aichinger M, Emmerich J, Mizushima N, Klein L. Autophagy in thymic epithelium shapes the T-cell repertoire and is essential for tolerance. Nature 2008;455:396-400.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07208
  108. 108. Shibutani ST, Saitoh T, Nowag H, Münz C, Yoshimori T. Autophagy and autophagy-related proteins in the immune system. Nat Immunol 2015;16:1014-24.https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3273
  109. 109. Baehrecke EH. Autophagy: dual roles in life and death? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005;6:505-10.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1666
  110. 110. Yorimitsu T, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy: molecular machinery for self-eating. Cell Death Differ 2005;12:1542-52.https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401765
  111. 111. He C, Klionsky DJ. Regulation Mechanisms and Signaling Pathways of Autophagy. Annu Rev Genet 2009;43:67-93.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-102808-114910
  112. 112. Cao B, Parnell LA, Diamond MS, Mysorekar IU. Inhibition of autophagy limits vertical transmission of Zika virus in pregnant mice. Journal of Experimental Medicine 2017;214:2303-13.https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20170957
  113. 113. Torrentes-Carvalho A, Azeredo EL, Reis SR, Miranda AS, Gandini M, Barbosa LS, et al. Dengue-2 infection and the induction of apoptosis in human primary monocytes. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2009;104:1091-9.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762009000800005
  114. 114. Azeredo EL, Neves-Souza PC, Alvarenga AR, Reis SRNI, Torrentes-Carvalho A, Zagne S-MO, et al. Differential regulation of toll-like receptor-2, toll-like receptor-4, CD16 and human leucocyte antigen-DR on peripheral blood monocytes during mild and severe dengue fever: Monocyte activation after dengue infection. Immunology 2010;130:202-16.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03224.x
  115. 115. Limonta D, Torrentes-Carvalho A, Marinho CF, de Azeredo EL, de Souza LJ, Motta-Castro ARC, et al. Apoptotic mediators in patients with severe and non-severe dengue from Brazil: Apoptotic Mediators in Dengue. J Med Virol 2014;86:1437-47.https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.23832
  116. 116. Liang Q, Luo Z, Zeng J, Chen W, Foo S-S, Lee S-A, et al. Zika Virus NS4A and NS4B Proteins Deregulate Akt-mTOR Signaling in Human Fetal Neural Stem Cells to Inhibit Neurogenesis and Induce Autophagy. Cell Stem Cell 2016;19:663-71.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.07.019
  117. 117. Lum F-M, Low DKS, Fan Y, Tan JJL, Lee B, Chan JKY, et al. Zika Virus Infects Human Fetal Brain Microglia and Induces Inflammation. Clin Infect Dis 2017;64:914-20.https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw878
  118. 118. Garcez PP, Loiola EC, Madeiro da Costa R, Higa LM, Trindade P, Delvecchio R, et al. Zika virus impairs growth in human neurospheres and brain organoids. Science 2016;352:816-8.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6116
  119. 119. Calvet G, Aguiar RS, Melo ASO, Sampaio SA, de Filippis I, Fabri A, et al. Detection and sequencing of Zika virus from amniotic fluid of fetuses with microcephaly in Brazil: a case study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2016;16:653-60.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00095-5
  120. 120. Martines RB, Bhatnagar J, Keating MK, Silva-Flannery L, Muehlenbachs A, Gary J, et al. Notes from the Field : Evidence of Zika Virus Infection in Brain and Placental Tissues from Two Congenitally Infected Newborns and Two Fetal Losses — Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:159-60.https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6506e1
  121. 121. Clinical features and neuroimaging (CT and MRI) findings in presumed Zika virus related congenital infection and microcephaly: retrospective case series study. BMJ 2016:i3182.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3182
  122. 122. Oliveira Melo AS, Malinger G, Ximenes R, Szejnfeld PO, Alves Sampaio S, Bispo de Filippis AM. Zika virus intrauterine infection causes fetal brain abnormality and microcephaly: tip of the iceberg?: Physician Alert. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:6-7.https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15831
  123. 123. de Sousa JR, Azevedo RSS, Martins Filho AJ, Araujo MTF, Moutinho ERC, Baldez Vasconcelos BC, et al. Correlation between Apoptosis and in Situ Immune Response in Fatal Cases of Microcephaly Caused by Zika Virus. The American Journal of Pathology 2018;188:2644-52.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.07.009
  124. 124. Thompson MR, Kaminski JJ, Kurt-Jones EA, Fitzgerald KA. Pattern Recognition Receptors and the Innate Immune Response to Viral Infection. Viruses 2011;3:920-40.https://doi.org/10.3390/v3060920
  125. 125. Muir AJ, Arora S, Everson G, Flisiak R, George J, Ghalib R, et al. A randomized phase 2b study of peginterferon lambda-1a for the treatment of chronic HCV infection. Journal of Hepatology 2014;61:1238-46.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2014.07.022
  126. 126. O’Brien TR, Young HA, Donnelly RP, Prokunina-Olsson L. Meeting Overview: Interferon Lambda-Disease Impact and Therapeutic Potential. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2019.https://doi.org/10.1089/jir.2019.0018
  127. 127. Baldridge MT, Nice TJ, McCune BT, Yokoyama CC, Kambal A, Wheadon M, et al. Commensal microbes and interferon- determine persistence of enteric murine norovirus infection. Science 2015;347:266-9.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258025
  128. 128. Galani IE, Triantafyllia V, Eleminiadou E-E, Koltsida O, Stavropoulos A, Manioudaki M, et al. Interferon-λ Mediates Non-redundant Front-Line Antiviral Protection against Influenza Virus Infection without Compromising Host Fitness. Immunity 2017;46:875-890.e6.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.025
  129. 129. Lazear HM, Daniels BP, Pinto AK, Huang AC, Vick SC, Doyle SE, et al. Interferon-λ restricts West Nile virus neuroinvasion by tightening the blood-brain barrier. Sci Transl Med 2015;7:284ra59-284ra59.https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa4304
  130. 130. Caine EA, Scheaffer SM, Arora N, Zaitsev K, Artyomov MN, Coyne CB, et al. Interferon lambda protects the female reproductive tract against Zika virus infection. Nat Commun 2019;10:280.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07993-2
  131. 131. Barrows NJ, Campos RK, Powell ST, Prasanth KR, Schott-Lerner G, Soto-Acosta R, et al. A Screen of FDA-Approved Drugs for Inhibitors of Zika Virus Infection. Cell Host Microbe 2016;20:259-70.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2016.07.004
  132. 132. Bullard-Feibelman KM, Govero J, Zhu Z, Salazar V, Veselinovic M, Diamond MS, et al. The FDA-approved drug sofosbuvir inhibits Zika virus infection. Antiviral Res 2017;137:134-40.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.11.023
  133. 133. Sacramento CQ, de Melo GR, de Freitas CS, Rocha N, Hoelz LVB, Miranda M, et al. The clinically approved antiviral drug sofosbuvir inhibits Zika virus replication. Sci Rep 2017;7:40920.https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40920
  134. 134. Ferreira AC, Zaverucha-do-Valle C, Reis PA, Barbosa-Lima G, Vieira YR, Mattos M, et al. Sofosbuvir protects Zika virus-infected mice from mortality, preventing short- and long-term sequelae. Sci Rep 2017;7:9409.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09797-8
  135. 135. Gan CS, Lim SK, Chee CF, Yusof R, Heh CH. Sofosbuvir as treatment against dengue? Chem Biol Drug Des 2018;91:448-55.https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.13091
  136. 136. Mesci P, Macia A, Moore SM, Shiryaev SA, Pinto A, Huang C-T, et al. Blocking Zika virus vertical transmission. Sci Rep 2018;8:1218.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19526-4
  137. 137. Yin Z, Chen Y-L, Schul W, Wang Q-Y, Gu F, Duraiswamy J, et al. An adenosine nucleoside inhibitor of dengue virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:20435-9.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907010106
  138. 138. Li Y, Zeng Y, Zeng G, Li J, Zhang X, Cai Q, et al. The effects of direct-acting antiviral agents on the frequency of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and natural killer cells in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Med Virol 2019;91:278-86.https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25302
  139. 139. Liu Y, She L-H, Wang X-Y, Zhang G-L, Yan Y, Lin C-S, et al. Expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells from peripheral blood decreases after 4-week antiviral treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014;7:998-1004
  140. 140. Xie X, Zou J, Shan C, Shi P-Y. Small Molecules and Antibodies for Zika Therapy. J Infect Dis 2017;216:S945-50.https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jix406
  141. 141. Kaplan YC, Ozsarfati J, Nickel C, Koren G. Reproductive outcomes following hydroxychloroquine use for autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2016;81:835-48.https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12872
  142. 142. Rosenfeldt MT, O’Prey J, Morton JP, Nixon C, MacKay G, Mrowinska A, et al. p53 status determines the role of autophagy in pancreatic tumour development. Nature 2013;504:296-300.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12865
  143. 143. Xu M, Lee EM, Wen Z, Cheng Y, Huang W-K, Qian X, et al. Identification of small-molecule inhibitors of Zika virus infection and induced neural cell death via a drug repurposing screen. Nat Med 2016;22:1101-7.https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4184
  144. 144. Domenger C, Grimm D. Next-generation AAV vectors-do not judge a virus (only) by its cover. Hum Mol Genet 2019;28:R3-14.https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddz148
  145. 145. Rodriguez SE, Cross RW, Fenton KA, Bente DA, Mire CE, Geisbert TW. Vesicular Stomatitis Virus-Based Vaccine Protects Mice against Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever. Sci Rep 2019;9:7755.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44210-6
  146. 146. Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. Vaccines to Children: Protective Effect and Adverse Events: A Systematic Review. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2009
  147. 147. Betancourt D, de Queiroz NMGP, Xia T, Ahn J, Barber GN. Cutting Edge: Innate Immune Augmenting Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Expressing Zika Virus Proteins Confers Protective Immunity. JI 2017;198:3023-8.https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1602180
  148. 148. Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Porter FW, Weissman D. mRNA vaccines - a new era in vaccinology. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2018;17:261-79.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.243
  149. 149. Brito LA, Chan M, Shaw CA, Hekele A, Carsillo T, Schaefer M, et al. A cationic nanoemulsion for the delivery of next-generation RNA vaccines. Mol Ther 2014;22:2118-29.https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2014.133
  150. 150. Brito LA, Kommareddy S, Maione D, Uematsu Y, Giovani C, Berlanda Scorza F, et al. Self-amplifying mRNA vaccines. Adv Genet 2015;89:179-233.https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adgen.2014.10.005
  151. 151. Bogers WM, Oostermeijer H, Mooij P, Koopman G, Verschoor EJ, Davis D, et al. Potent immune responses in rhesus macaques induced by nonviral delivery of a self-amplifying RNA vaccine expressing HIV type 1 envelope with a cationic nanoemulsion. J Infect Dis 2015;211:947-55.https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiu522
  152. 152. U. S. National Library of Medicine.https://clinicaltrials.gov2020
  153. 153. Petsch B, Schnee M, Vogel AB, Lange E, Hoffmann B, Voss D, et al. Protective efficacy of in vitro synthesized, specific mRNA vaccines against influenza A virus infection. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30:1210-6.https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2436
  154. 154. Makhluf H, Shresta S. Development of Zika Virus Vaccines. Vaccines (Basel) 2018;6.https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines6010007
  155. 155. Richner JM, Jagger BW, Shan C, Fontes CR, Dowd KA, Cao B, et al. Vaccine Mediated Protection Against Zika Virus-Induced Congenital Disease. Cell 2017;170:273-283.e12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.040
  156. 156. Richner JM, Himansu S, Dowd KA, Butler SL, Salazar V, Fox JM, et al. Modified mRNA Vaccines Protect against Zika Virus Infection. Cell 2017;169:176.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.016

Written By

Tamiris Azamor, Amanda Torrentes-Carvalho, Zilton Vasconcelos, Ana Paula Dinis Ano Bom and Juliana Gil Melgaço

Submitted: July 27th, 2020 Reviewed: October 30th, 2020 Published: January 4th, 2021