Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Indium Chalcogenide Nanomaterials in the Forefront of Recent Technological Advancements

Written By

Siphamandla C. Masikane and Neerish Revaprasadu

Submitted: August 5th, 2020 Reviewed: October 19th, 2020 Published: December 1st, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.94558

From the Edited Volume

Post-Transition Metals

Edited by Mohammed Muzibur Rahman, Abdullah Mohammed Asiri, Anish Khan, Inamuddin and Thamer Tabbakh

Chapter metrics overview

463 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


In the last decade, there has been an increasing trend in the exploitation of indium chalcogenides in various applications which range from water splitting reactions in renewable energy to degradation of dyes in environmental rehabilitation. This trend is attributed to the interesting and unique properties of indium chalcogenide nanomaterials which can be easily tuned through a common approach: particle size, shape and morphology engineering. In this chapter, we outline the preferred attributes of indium chalcogenide nanomaterials which are deemed suitable for recent applications. Furthermore, we explore recent reaction protocols which have been reported to yield good quality indium chalcogenide nanomaterials of multinary configurations, e.g. binary and ternary compounds, among others.


  • sulfide
  • selenide
  • telluride
  • multinary
  • applications

1. Introduction

Over the years, there has been an increasing demand on state-of-art solutions to solve real world problems such as the energy crises and efficient early-detection protocols in biomedical services. The current systems in place suffer from a range of issues, e.g. an increase in the depletion rate of fossil fuel and petroleum reserves as precursors in the electrical power generation plants [1]. Although, in the context of electricity generation, there exists alternatives such as nuclear power, unwavering challenges such as toxicity of nuclear waste still persist [2]. Another good example is the use of conventional dyes for the detection of tumors (typically having issues with stability and sensitivity) and drug delivery systems, which both generally lack selectivity i.e. in crucial need of smart, guide-assisted delivery to an affected target area [3]. As a response to these issues, among many that exist, scientists and engineers have presented a range of nanotechnology-based solutions through successes in the development and pioneering work on functional nanomaterials and related devices. There are, however, reservations in trusting these technologies in the general public domains, attributed to insufficient knowledge and/or lack of educational strategies [4]. Thus, progress in introducing these systems for general use still remains a challenge, with few successes such as QLED televisions [5] already available to the general public consumers for everyday use.

The core fundamental principle to grasp on nanotechnology and nanomaterials is that when the particle size dimensions of a bulk material decrease to the nanometer scale, improved and/or novel properties emerge. Thus, properties of a material can be tuned to desired standards best suited for specific applications, by simply manipulating particle size and shape. Indium chalcogenide nanomaterials are among many functional materials which boast rich literature in the aforementioned context, hence, their technological importance continues to be showcased in widespread applications to date.

The surge in the interest of indium chalcogenide nanomaterials has mainly been fueled by their recognition as alternative candidates against giants in the field of photovoltaics and sustainable energy solutions, such as cadmium chalcogenides which are known for their toxicity issues albeit achieving high performance and efficiency in metal chalcogenide-based semiconductor solar cells and other optoelectronic applications [6]. There are other less-to-non-toxic candidates which have been identified, such as antimony [7] and tin [8] chalcogenides, among others. However, indium chalcogenides contain a broad spectrum of crystallographic phases/species which exhibit unique properties attributed to different atomic compositions and crystal lattice orientation (polymorphism), contrary to antimony and tin chalcogenides. An example of this can be seen in the indium sulfide series, where InS, In3S4, In6S7 and In2S3 (α-In2S3, β-In2S3 and γ-In2S3 [9]) phases have been obtained experimentally [10]. This, in addition to manipulating particle size and shape, as well as employing other enhancement techniques such as doping and composite fabrications, present endless opportunities to harness tailor-made properties.

The most common and easy route to tune the properties of nanomaterials is by tweaking reaction parameters during synthesis. Therefore, the choice of synthetic methods best suited for specific precursors is of crucial importance [11]. Over the years, there has been an intensive research invested on precursor design necessary to produce high quality nanomaterials [12]. Hence, metalorganic compounds gained unprecedented attention as molecular precursors compatible with a range of fabrication protocols. These molecular precursors have made it possible to access various classes of nanomaterials, although the overall nanomaterial fabrication protocols were initially a hit-or-miss process. As a result of this approach, useful data has been obtained which has formed an integral part of theoretical models used to predict novel nanomaterials and their corresponding properties. As much as molecular precursors have demonstrated their preference and superiority over conventional salt-based precursors in the context of nanomaterial fabrication, the latter is however currently ideal for the development of devices which are sensitive to impurities, among other factors. Hence, recent technological advances (from late 2019 to date of this book chapter) of indium chalcogenide nanomaterials presented in the next sections are predominantly obtained through conventional salt-based precursor routes. Interesting literature on molecular precursors for indium chalcogenide nanomaterials is available elsewhere [13, 14].


2. Indium sulfide series

Research on indium chalcogenide nanomaterials predominantly focuses on the indium sulfide series, attributed to readily available, abundant, cheap and stable precursors. This series finds applications in various applications, typically in optoelectronics. Among recent advancements is the selective NO2 gas sensing abilities of β-In2S3 thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis; this preliminary study introduces β-In2S3 thin films as less toxic and cheaper alternatives to highly selective and sensitive cadmium sulfide-based NO2 gas sensors [15]. In other work, In2S3thin films prepared by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis was evaluated, for the first time, as photoelectrodes (Figure 1) for all-vanadium photoelectrochemical batteries [16]. The efficiency was linked to the degree of optical and photoelectrochemical behavior associated with the thickness of the In2S3 thin films. In both works, it becomes apparent that the physical alterations of the films are necessary to improve selectivity, sensitivity and efficiency. There are two notable recent reports which have provided preliminary solutions as per above: (i) band gap (1.9–2.3 eV) and electrical resistivity (5.5 x 100–6.0 x 103 Ωm) control through thermal treatment of as-prepared In2S3 thin films at different temperatures in the presence/absence of sulfur powder [17], and (ii) tunable morphological (root mean square roughness) and optical properties (transmittance and photoluminescence) of the In2S3 thin films by varying the S/In molar ratio in spray pyrolysis deposition experiments [18].

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of the photoelectrochemical VR-flow cell based on the In2S3-type photoelectrode. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [16]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.

Similar to the research objectives in Ref [15], indium sulfide is yet again demonstrated as a promising alternative to the cadmium sulfide, in this case as a buffer layer in the Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cell [19]. It was found that the indium sulfide-based solar cell achieved 15.3% efficiency compared to 17.1% recorded for the cadmium sulfide counterpart. The authors report that the observed efficiency is attributed to substrate temperature optimization during the sputtering method-based experiments. According to the study, the increase in substrate temperature tempers with the InxSy and Cu(In,Ga)Se2 compositions; an increase in temperature resulted to a sulfur-rich InxSy buffer layer, as well as copper depletion observed in the Cu(In,Ga)Se2 absorber layer, as seen in Figure 2. Furthermore, sodium doping was observed in both the InxSy layer and in the InxSy and Cu(In,Ga)Se2 interface. Thus, it is these features which were identified to play a major role in the increase of the solar efficiency.

Figure 2.

Elemental composition of InxSy and Cu(In,Ga)Se2 layers deposited at different substrate temperatures. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [19]. Copyright 2020 MDPI.

Other efforts to improve attractive properties of In2S3 thin films have been reported, such as silver doping as means of improving electrical transport [20], as well as plasma treatment which consequently results to the self-formation of metallic indium arrays at the surface thus presenting opportunities in fabricating heterostructures for potential use optoelectronics [21]. Bilayer and trilayer InS triangular nanoflakes have also been prepared by chemical vapor deposition [22], potential applications envisaged as heterojunctions in nanoelectronic devices.

The films outlined above are predominantly obtained from existing technologies such as spray pyrolysis, thermal evaporation and chemical vapor deposition, where the films are directly prepared on a substrate. A new, solution-based synthesis of suspended 2D ultrathin sheets was developed [23]. This novel strategy, optimized through the synthesis of In2S3 sheets, exploits a self-assembling anisotropic growth mechanism templated by a combination of amine ligand with a geometrically-matched alkane. The obtained In2S3 sheets exhibited high photoelectric activities best suited for photoelectrochemical applications. Preliminary experiments displayed versatility of the method, attributed to the successful preparation of other 2D nanostructures such as Co9S8, MnS, SnS2, Al2S3 and MoS2. Thus, this presents an alternative route to easily prepare functional thin films which could ultimately be transferred to desired substrate post preparation and manipulation processes.

It has been observed that the recent advances in indium sulfide nanomaterials outlined above predominantly use the multiple precursor route. Although progress has been made in the past few years, the search for novel metalorganic single-source precursors for indium sulfide continues. New indium complexes with aminothiolate ligands have been synthesized and characterized fully [24], their structures are provided in Figure 3. Preliminary evaluations as potential single-source precursors showed that complex 1 is able produce β-In2S3 nanoparticles, complexes 2 and 3 however need extensive work, as the diffraction studies for phase identification were inconclusive. However, microelemental analyses suggest that the nanomaterial exhibit general formulae In2S3 and In2Se2S from complexes 2 and 3, respectively.

Figure 3.

Chemical structures of novel indium (III) aminothiolate complexes prepared by Ref. [24].

2.1 Indium sulfide-based ternary and quaternary nanomaterials

The main interest on indium sulfide-based ternary and quaternary nanomaterials is their optical properties, predominantly exploited in emission/photoluminescence applications. Recent studies in this field has focused on the chalcopyrite-type materials, copper indium sulfide (CuInS2) and silver indium sulfide (AgInS2) in particular. A recent, concise review on the synthesis and applications of CuInS2 is available in Ref [25]. However, there are interesting literature reports which emerged subsequent to the publication of the review. For example, there is a study which has evaluated the influence of halide ions on the optical properties of CuInS2 quantum dots [26]. Similar to our work where we evaluated the influence of halide ligands in the single-source precursors on the morphological and optical properties of cadmium sulfide [27, 28] and lead sulfide [29] nanoparticles, the authors in this case follow a multiple-source precursor route (through the solvothermal synthetic protocols) using CuX (where X = I, Cl and Br) salts. The optical properties show unique behavior with respect to the metal salt used, attributed to the physicochemical properties resulting from the growth processes which consequently promote accumulation of the halide ions in the crystal lattices of the quantum dots. In another report, the importance of controlling the Cu:In ratio in CuInS2 quantum dots to harness different properties for various applications is discussed [30]. The report suggests that the change in the Cu:In ratio induces defects attributed to what the authors refer to as Cu1+vs Cu2+ concentration defects, resulting in different optical emission behaviors as observed in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(a) Resonant photoluminescence (PL) measurements of CuxInS2 quantum dots where x = 0.47 (dashed lines) and x = 0.85 (solid lines), at different excitation energies. (b) the PL peak energies extracted from (a). (c) Simulated absorption (lines) and corresponding PL (shaded peaks) spectra of CuxInS2 quantum dots with respect to Cu1+ and Cu2+ defects. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [30]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.

Although CuInS2 is a reputably known non-toxic material displaying attractive properties which are already exploited intensively in biomedical-based applications, there are however recent reports which have shown compelling experimental evidence contradicting this non-toxic behavior. A recent research study has observed the instability of zinc sulfide (ZnS) shell-free CuInS2 quantum dots relative to the shelled counterparts in the in vitro studies [31], degradation was demonstrated by rapid dissolution in simulated biological fluid (SBF) and artificial lysosomal fluid (ALS) through absorption spectroscopy measurements shown in Figure 5. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that shell-free CuInS2 induces severe toxicity in the in vivo studies compared to the infamous, toxic cadmium selenide. In another report, CuInS2 nanocrystals were exposed in environment-like conditions (including alkaline and acidic settings) thereby promoting weathering [32]. It was observed that when the environmental pathogenic bacteria Staphylococcus aureus CMCC 26003 strain is exposed to weathered CuInS2 nanocrystals, it develops increased tolerance to certain antibiotics such as penicillin G, tetracycline and ciprofloxacin. Thus, these two studies are a constant reminder with regards to creating awareness that alternative “green” approaches require concise evaluations and any possible adverse effects towards disruption of natural and crucial processes. This should however not deter attempts in developing similar technologies such as AgInS2 quantum dots which have recently shown ultralong PL decay time attributed to the coordinating ligands which bear electron rich groups capable of passivating surface trap centers and achieving strong emissions [33].

Figure 5.

(A) Comparative study on the dissolution of CIS (CuInS2), CISZ (zinc-alloyed CuInS2) and CIS/ZnS’ (CuInS2/ZnS core/shell) quantum dots by absorption spectroscopy measurements. (B) Visual evidence of dissolution in SBF. (C-E) dissolution studies in various media. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [31]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.

Apart from the chalcopyrite series, other indium sulfide-incorporated multinary nanomaterials have made significant technological progress. Recently, CdIn2S4 and ZnIn2S4 nanostructures have been prepared by solvent-free green reaction protocols at moderately low temperatures [34]; the nanostructures displayed good photocatalytic activities in hydrogen evolution reactions through the splitting of hydrogen sulfide and water under visible light conditions. The activities were however lower than those of other CdIn2S4 and ZnIn2S4 nanostructures reported elsewhere [3536], attributed to synthetic the method limitations particularly on poor control of physical features such as particle size and shape. The quaternary system which has been recently reported is the Zn2xCu1 − xIn1 − xS2 [37] and Zn2xAg1 − xIn1 − xS2 [38] nanomaterials which display unique optical properties with varying composition and an active component potential in the light harvesting inorganic–organic hybrid nanomaterial, respectively.


3. Indium selenide series

The indium selenide series exhibits similar characteristics to the indium sulfide series, such as multiple crystallographic phases and polymorphic materials which have unique properties already found use in various applications. The chemistry, synthesis and application of the indium selenide series is already disseminated in comprehensive literature reviews available elsewhere [39, 40].

Among recent developments in the synthesis of indium selenide, is a novel reaction protocol which has been designed to growing ultrathin films of stoichiometric indium selenide (InSe) by precipitation of the thermally evaporated InSe crystal on a chemically neutral oil [41]. In another study, the thermal evaporation technique was used albeit to synthesize InSe nanowires on silicon and quartz silica substrates through an edge-epitaxial growth mechanism [42], this work presents a solution on challenges associated with growing nanowires on these substrates as a result of the lattice mismatch. This provides easy access to investigate the efficiency of nanowires on fabricated electronic and optoelectronic devices. The epitaxial growth approach has also been employed in the fabrication of few-layer β-In2Se3 thin films on c-plane sapphire and silicon substrates through the metalorganic chemical vapor deposition method [43], the synthetic protocols have potential scale up capabilities while retaining good quality uniform film. Obtaining defect-free nanomaterials from bulk counterparts through exfoliation mediated processes still remains an economically ideal route, however, the most common issue is low yields. Recent efforts towards this direction is the development of ultrafast electrochemical-assisted delamination of bulk In2Se3 through intercalation by tetrahexylammonium ions in a typical setup provided in Figure 6(d) [44], the authors demonstrated that the results are reproducible and the obtained yields of up to 83% flakes which have large micron-scale lateral sizes suitable for fabricating various nanodevices.

Figure 6.

(a) Top and (b) side view of the layered crystal structure In2Se3; (c) the chemical structure of the tetrahexylammonium-based intercalant; (d) experimental setup; (e) images showing the beginning and completion of the experiment; (f) dispersion of delaminated In2Se3 nanosheets in dimethylformamide. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright 2020 WILEY-VCH.

Applications of binary indium selenide nanomaterials are provided in Table 1. As observed, the choice of synthetic method is crucial since it produces nanomaterials suitable for specific applications. Recent interests are towards synthesizing good quality nanosheets and thin films, attributed to the development of novel next-generation devices for use in various fields. It is apparent that the sought-after features of binary indium selenide nanomaterials are optical properties-related, hence exploitation predominantly observed in optoelectronic applications.

MaterialSynthetic methodApplicationMaterial typeReference
InSeMechanical exfoliation (Scotch tape)Saturable absorber for mid-infrared pulsed laserThin films[45]
Sn-doped InSePhotoluminescent sensor for sulfur vaporsNanosheets[46]
InSeField-effect transistor[47, 48, 49]
Field-effect transistor for pressure sensors[50]
Edge-epitaxial growthPhotodetectorNanowires[42]
Liquid phase exfoliationAll-optical diodes and switchingNanosheets[51]
α-In2Se3Potential use in Ultrafast photonic devices[52]
γ-In2Se3ElectrosynthesisElectrocatalyst for carbon dioxide electroreduction to SyngasNanoparticles[53]
α-In2Se3Mechanical exfoliation (Scotch tape)PhotodetectorNanosheets[54]
In2Se3Electrochemical-based exfoliation[44]
In3S4Electron-beam depositionPotential applications in electrical and thermoelectrical devicesThin films[55]

Table 1.

Recent advances in the application of binary indium selenide nanomaterials.

3.1 Indium selenide-based ternary and quaternary nanomaterials

Multinary indium selenide-based nanomaterials, with the exception of the binary system, are rarely subjects of research interest compared to the sulfide counterparts, most probably due to synthetic challenges associated with limited economic precursors. Hence, recent technologies outlined in section 3 above rely mostly on pre-synthesized (at extreme reaction conditions) and commercial indium sulfide bulk material. Regardless of this, recent efforts on multinary indium selenide-based nanomaterials have been reported.

Silver indium sulfide nanocrystals of the AgIn5Se8 phase have been synthesized through an eco-friendly electrochemical method using L-glutathione as a stabilizing agent [56]. The photoluminescence spectra of the nanocrystals showed an increase in quantum yields with an increase in silver-to-indium ratio used during synthesis. Furthermore, the nanocrystals displayed good photothermal responses which are ideal for hyperthermia applications. Layered manganese indium sulfide nanosheets of the MnIn2Se4 phase prepared by mechanical exfoliation, have recently been demonstrated as a potential candidate for use in magnetic and optoelectronic devices due to their interesting magnetic and transport properties [57]. Computational studies using first-principle calculations have predicted properties of the layered indium selenide bromide (InSeBr) which have significantly been ignored [58]. The comprehensive Raman scattering measurements have predicted that InSeBr would be a good potential candidate for use in optoelectronic properties. Research interests on quaternary indium selenide-based nanomaterials have primarily focused on copper indium gallium selenide [Cu(In,Ga)Se2] materials which are heavily invested in the fabrication of next-generation semiconductor solar cells; a recent, comprehensive review on the science, synthesis and application of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 nanomaterials is available elsewhere [59].


4. Indium telluride series

Indium telluride and derived nanomaterials are rarely common, due to a limited application scope. The most common application of indium telluride nanomaterials is in thermoelectrics. There has been attempts in gas sensing applications showing unsatisfactory sensitivity, attributed to the low electrical resistance of the nanomaterial [60]. Other applications have been mentioned elsewhere with references therein [61]. In a recent report, the authors devised a method of preparing In2Te3 thin films composed of nanowire structures from bulk InTe using a chemical vapor deposition technique through a gold-catalyzed vapor-liquid–solid growth mechanism [62]. It was however observed that the low electrical resistivity and thermal conductivity cannot be improved by simply changing the morphology of the particles. A separate study has reported that these properties can be effectively improved by doping In2Te3 with aluminum and antimony [63]. The stoichiometric InTe phase is also used in thermoelectric applications; recent studies also identify that the thermoelectric performance is improved by doping with antimony [64].

4.1 Indium telluride-based ternary and quaternary nanomaterials

Ternary analogues of indium tellurides also find use in thermoelectric applications, such as copper indium telluride (CuInTe2) and silver indium sulfide (AgInTe2). The thermoelectric properties of the former have recently been reported to be enhanced by doping with manganese [65], while for the latter, adjusting only the silver concentration x (in Ag1-xInTe2) was sufficient [66]. The interesting properties of another ternary material potassium indium telluride (KInTe2), for the first time, have been recently predicted and investigated through theoretical first-principle calculations [67]; preliminary studies suggest the material is a semiconductor with an indirect energy band gap.


5. Conclusions

For over a decade, indium chalcogenide nanomaterials continue to make significant contributions in the development of next-generation functional materials and devices, attributed to their unique properties which can be tuned easily using existing methods. As a result of their multiple crystallographic phases, in addition to the manipulation of the physical features such as morphology, indium chalcogenide nanomaterials remain of interest due to diversified opportunities which still need to be explored.

With the aid of computational modeling and related tools, it has become easier to identify application-specific objectives which guide the thought process when designing reaction protocols for nanomaterial fabrication. The current research-driven focus is on providing easy and efficient solutions to challenges associated with purity, quality and yield which affect the performance of the nanomaterial in desired applications. Hence, the recent literature reports provided in this book chapter have rather revisited classical methods of synthesis which are reputably known for producing high quality precursors, even though having received a lot of criticism over the years due to harsh and/or sensitive reaction protocols best executed by skilled personnel. Therefore, there is now and urgent need for the alternative routes such as the use of low-temperature decomposing single-source molecular precursors, which have been developed over the years, to be improved and incorporated in the fabrication of functional nanodevices.

In many literature reports, there continues to be an exacerbated use of ‘non-toxic alternatives’ and related terms whenever nanomaterials which do not contain heavy metals are presented. Novel and/or improved properties resulting from the physical changes of the material is a good indication that the nanomaterial could exhibit features and behavior different to the bulk counterpart, toxicity could be an example. Thus, an increasing trend on the interest of toxicity studies for nanomaterials is envisaged in the coming years.



The authors wish to thank the DST-NRF (South Africa) and RS-DFID (United Kingdom) for financial support.


Conflict of interest

We declare no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. Salvarli MS, Salvarli H. For Sustainable Development: Future Trends in Renewable Energy and Enabling Technologies. In: Al Qubeissi M, El-kharouf A, Soyhan HS, editors. Renewable energy - resources, challenges and applications. 1st ed. IntechOpen, 2020. p. 1-15. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.91842
  2. 2. Miller WF: Present and future nuclear reactor designs: Weighing the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear power with an eye on improving safety and meeting future needs. Journal of Chemical Education. 1993;70:109-114. DOI: 10.1021/ed070p109
  3. 3. Mir M, Ishtiaq S, Rabia S, Khatoon M, Zeb A, Khan GM, Ur Rehman A, Ud Din F. Nanotechnology: From in vivo imaging system to controlled drug delivery. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2017;12:500. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-017-2249-8
  4. 4. Seegebarth B, Backhaus C, and Woisetschläger DM. The role of emotions in shaping purchase intentions for innovations using emerging technologies: A scenario-based investigation in the context of nanotechnology. Psychology & Marketing. 2019;36:844-862. DOI: 10.1002/mar.21228
  5. 5. Ko YH, Prabhakaran P, Choi S, Kim GJ, Lee C, Lee KS. Environmentally friendly quantum-dot color filters for ultra-high-definition liquid crystal displays. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:1-8. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72468-8
  6. 6. Jin B, Zhai T. 2D Cadmium chalcogenides for optoelectronics. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities., 2020;36:493-503. DOI: 10.1007/s40242-020-0221-8
  7. 7. Lei H, Chen J, Tan Z, Fang G. Review of recent progress in antimony chalcogenide-based solar cells: Materials and devices. Solar RRL. 2019;3:1900026. DOI: 10.1002/solr.201900026
  8. 8. Rehman SU, Butt FK, Tariq Z, Li C. Tin-based novel cubic chalcogenides: A new paradigm for photovoltaic research. In: Kurinec SK, editor. Emerging photovoltaic materials: Silicon & beyond. Scrivener: Wiley; 2018. p. 141-163. DOI: 10.1002/9781119407690.ch5
  9. 9. Sharma Y, Srivastava P. Electronic, optical and transport properties of α-, β- and γ-phases of spinel indium sulphide: An ab initio study. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2012;135:385-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.04.064
  10. 10. Zavrazhnov AY, Naumov AV, Anorov PV, Goncharov EG, Sidei VI, Pervov VS. Tx phase diagram of the In-S system. Inorganic materials. 2006;42:1294-1298. DOI: 10.1134/S0020168506120028
  11. 11. Rajput N. Methods of preparation of nanoparticles-a review. International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology. 2015;7:1806-1811. ISSN: 22311963
  12. 12. Malik MA, Afzaal M, O’Brien P. Precursor chemistry for main group elements in semiconducting materials. Chemical reviews. 2010;110:4417-4446. DOI: 10.1021/cr900406f
  13. 13. Masikane SC, McNaughter PD, Lewis DJ, Vitorica-Yrezabal I, Doyle BP, Carleschi E, O'Brien P, Revaprasadu N. Important phase control of indium sulfide nanomaterials by choice of indium (III) xanthate precursor and thermolysis temperature. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. 2019:1421-1432. DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201900007
  14. 14. Afzaal M, Crouch D, O’Brien P. Metal-organic chemical vapor deposition of indium selenide films using a single-source precursor. Materials Science and Engineering: B. 2005;116:391-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2004.05.044
  15. 15. Souissi R, Bouguila N, Bendahan M, Fiorido T, Aguir K, Kraini M, Vázquez-Vázquez C, Labidi A. Highly sensitive nitrogen dioxide gas sensors based on sprayed β-In2S3 film. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2020;16:128280. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128280
  16. 16. Kumtepe A, Altaf CT, Sahsuvar NS, Abdullayeva N, Koseoglu E, Sankir M, Sankir ND. Indium sulfide based photoelectrodes for all-vanadium photoelectrochemical redox flow batteries. ACS Applied Energy Materials. 2020;3:3127-3133. DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.9b02034
  17. 17. Gotoh T. Effect of heat treatments on the electronic properties of indium sulfide films. The European Physical Journal Applied Physics. 2020;89:20301. DOI: 10.1051/epjap/2020190240
  18. 18. Bchiri Y, Bouguila N, Kraini M, Souissi R, Vázquez-Vázquez C, López-Quintela MA, Alaya S. Investigation of the effect of S/In molar ratio on physical properties of sprayed In2S3 thin films. RSC Advances. 2020;10:21180-21190. DOI: 10.1039/D0RA02945A
  19. 19. Hariskos D, Hempel W, Menner R, Witte W. Influence of substrate temperature during InxSy sputtering on Cu(In, Ga)Se2 buffer interface properties and solar cell performance. Applied Sciences. 2020;10:1052. DOI: 10.3390/app10031052
  20. 20. Tiss B, Bouguila N, Kraini M, Khirouni K, Vázquez–Vázquez C, Cunha L, Moura C, Alaya S. Electrical transport of sprayed In2S3: Ag thin films. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing. 2020;114:105080. DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2020.105080
  21. 21. Rasool S, Saritha K, Reddy KR, Tivanov MS, Gremenok VF, Zimin SP, Pipkova AS, Mazaletskiy LA, Amirov II. Annealing and plasma treatment effect on structural, morphological and topographical properties of evaporated β-In2S3 films. Materials Research Express. 2020;7:016431. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab6a5b
  22. 22. Tu CL, Lin KI, Pu J, Chung TF, Hsiao CN, Huang AC, Yang JR, Takenobu T, Chen CH. CVD growth of large-area InS atomic layers and device applications. Nanoscale. 2020;12:9366-9374. DOI: 10.1039/d0nr01104e
  23. 23. Luo D, Zhou B, Guo B, Gao P, Zheng L, Zhang X, Cui S, Zhou H, Zhou Y, Liu Y. Solution-processable two-dimensional ultrathin nanosheets induced by self-assembling geometrically-matched alkane. Nano Energy. 2020;72:104689. DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104689
  24. 24. Park JH, Chung TM, Park BK, Kim CG. Indium complexes with aminothiolate ligands as single precursors for indium chalcogenides. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 2020;505:119504. DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2020.119504
  25. 25. Wang L, Guan Z, Tang A. Multinary copper-based chalcogenide semiconductor nanocrystals: Synthesis and applications in light-emitting diodes and bioimaging. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2020;22:1-20. DOI: 10.1007/s11051-019-4724-x
  26. 26. Marin R, Skripka A, Huang YC, Loh TA, Mazeika V, Karabanovas V, Chua DH, Dong CL, Canton P, Vetrone F. Influence of halide ions on the structure and properties of copper indium sulphide quantum dots. Chemical Communications. 2020;56:3341-3344. DOI: 10.1039/C9CC08291C
  27. 27. Pawar AS, Masikane SC, Mlowe S, Garje SS, Revaprasadu N. Preparation of CdS nanoparticles from thiosemicarbazone complexes: Morphological influence of chlorido and iodido ligands. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. 2016;2016:366-372. DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201501125
  28. 28. Masikane SC, Mlowe S, Pawar AS, Garje SS, Revaprasadu N. Cadmium chloride and cadmium iodide thiosemicarbazone complexes as single source precursors for CdS nanoparticles. Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry. 2019;64:1063-1071. DOI: 10.1134/S0036023619080072
  29. 29. Masikane SC, Mlowe S, Gervas C, Revaprasadu N, Pawar AS, Garje SS. Lead (II) halide cinnamaldehyde thiosemicarbazone complexes as single source precursors for oleylamine-capped lead sulfide nanoparticles. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. 2018;29:1479-1488. DOI: 10.1007/s10854-017-8056-2
  30. 30. Fuhr A, Yun HJ, Crooker SA, Klimov VI. Spectroscopic and magneto-optical signatures of Cu1+ and Cu2+ defects in copper indium sulfide quantum dots. ACS nano. 2020;14:2212-2223. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b09181
  31. 31. Kays JC, Saeboe AM, Toufanian R, Kurant DE, Dennis AM. Shell-free copper indium sulfide quantum dots induce toxicity in vitro and in vivo. Nano Letters. 2020;20:1980-1991. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05259
  32. 32. Lian ZJ, Lin TY, Yao CX, Su YL, Liao SH, Wu SM. Staphylococcus aureus strains exposed to copper indium sulfide quantum dots exhibit increased tolerance to penicillin G, tetracycline and ciprofloxacin. New Journal of Chemistry. 2020;44:6533-6542. DOI: 10.1039/c9nj05748j
  33. 33. Jiao M, Li Y, Jia Y, Li C, Bian H, Gao L, Cai P, Luo X. Strongly emitting and long-lived silver indium sulfide quantum dots for bioimaging: Insight into co-ligand effect on enhanced photoluminescence. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2020;565:35-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.01.006
  34. 34. Naik SD, Apte SK, Garaje SN, Sethi YA, Shinde MD, Arbuj SS, Kale BB, Sonawane R. Facile template free approach for the large scale solid phase synthesis of nanocrystalline XIn2S4 (X= Cd/Zn) and it’s photocatalytic performance for H2 evolution. New Journal of Chemistry. 2020;44:9634-9646. DOI: 10.1039/d0nj01323d
  35. 35. Kale BB, Baeg JO, Lee SM, Chang H, Moon SJ, Lee CW. CdIn2S4 nanotubes and “Marigold” nanostructures: a visible-light photocatalyst. Advanced Functional Materials. 2006;16:1349-1354. DOI: 0.1002/adfm.200500525
  36. 36. Chaudhari NS, Bhirud AP, Sonawane RS, Nikam LK, Warule SS, Rane VH, Kale BB. Ecofriendly hydrogen production from abundant hydrogen sulfide using solar light-driven hierarchical nanostructured ZnIn2S4 photocatalyst. Green Chemistry. 2011;13:2500-2506. 10.1039/C1GC15515F
  37. 37. Lisensky G, McFarland-Porter R, Paquin W, Liu K. Synthesis and Analysis of Zinc Copper Indium Sulfide Quantum Dot Nanoparticles. Journal of Chemical Education. 2020;97:806-812. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00642
  38. 38. Preeyanka N, Dey H, Seth S, Rahaman A, Sarkar M. Highly efficient energy transfer from a water soluble zinc silver indium sulphide quantum dot to organic J-aggregates. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2020;22:12772-12784. DOI: 10.1039/d0cp01845g
  39. 39. Han G, Chen ZG, Drennan J, Zou J. Indium selenides: structural characteristics, synthesis and their thermoelectric performances. Small. 2014;10:2747-2765. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201400104
  40. 40. Boukhvalov DW, Gürbulak B, Duman S, Wang L, Politano A, Caputi LS, Chiarello G, Cupolillo A. The advent of indium selenide: Synthesis, electronic properties, ambient stability and applications. Nanomaterials. 2017;7:372. DOI: 10.3390/nano7110372
  41. 41. Mamedov RM. A new way of obtaining ultrathin films of indium selenide. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2020;94:1272-1275. DOI: 10.1134/S0036024420060163
  42. 42. Hao S, Yan S, Wang Y, Xu T, Zhang H, Cong X, Li L, Liu X, Cao T, Gao A, Zhang L. Edge-epitaxial growth of InSe nanowires toward high-performance photodetectors. Small. 2020;16:1905902. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201905902
  43. 43. Zhang X, Lee S, Bansal A, Zhang F, Terrones M, Jackson TN, Redwing JM. Epitaxial growth of few-layer β-In2Se3 thin films by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. Journal of Crystal Growth. 2020;533:125471. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.125471
  44. 44. Shi H, Li M, Shaygan Nia A, Wang M, Park S, Zhang Z, Lohe MR, Yang S, Feng X. Ultrafast electrochemical synthesis of defect-free In2Se3 flakes for large-area optoelectronics. Advanced Materials. 2020;32:1907244. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201907244
  45. 45. Hai T, Xie G, Qiao Z, Qin Z, Ma J, Sun Y, Wang F, Yuan P, Ma J, Qian L. Indium selenide film: a promising saturable absorber in 3- to 4-μm band for mid-infrared pulsed laser. Nanophotonics. 2020;9:2045-2052. DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2020-0068
  46. 46. Andres-Penares D, Canet-Albiach R, Noguera-Gomez J, Martínez-Pastor JP, Abargues R, Sánchez-Royo JF. Two-dimensional indium selenide for sulphur vapour sensing applications. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:1396. DOI: 10.3390/nano10071396
  47. 47. Chen F, Cui A, Wang X, Gao C, Xu L, Jiang K, Zhang J, Hu Z, Chu J. Lattice vibration characteristics in layered InSe films and the electronic behavior of field-effect transistors. Nanotechnology. 2020;31:335702. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab8df1
  48. 48. Sangwan VK, Kang J, Hersam MC. Thickness-dependent charge transport in exfoliated indium selenide vertical field-effect transistors. Applied Physics Letters. 2019;115:243104. DOI: 10.1063/1.5128808
  49. 49. Chen YH, Cheng CY, Chen SY, Rodriguez JS, Liao HT, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Chen CW, Sankar R, Chou FC, Chiu HC. Oxidized-monolayer tunneling barrier for strong Fermi-level depinning in layered InSe transistors. npj 2D Materials and Applications. 2019;3:1-7. DOI: 10.1038/s41699-019-0133-3
  50. 50. Wang F, Jiang J, Liu Q, Zhang Y, Wang J, Wang S, Han L, Liu H, Sang Y. Piezopotential gated two-dimensional InSe field-effect transistor for designing a pressure sensor based on piezotronic effect. Nano Energy. 2020;70:104457. DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104457
  51. 51. Liao Y, Shan Y, Wu L, Xiang Y, Dai X. Liquid-exfoliated few-Layer InSe nanosheets for broadband nonlinear all-optical applications. Advanced Optical Materials. 2020;8:1901862. DOI: 10.1002/adom.201901862
  52. 52. Long H, Liu S, Wen Q, Yuan H, Tang CY, Qu J, Ma S, Qarony W, Zeng LH, Tsang YH. In2Se3 nanosheets with broadband saturable absorption used for near-infrared femtosecond laser mode locking. Nanotechnology. 2019;30:465704. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab33d2
  53. 53. Yang D, Zhu Q, Sun X, Chen C, Guo W, Yang G, Han B. Electrosynthesis of a defective indium selenide with 3D structure on a substrate for tunable CO2 electroreduction to syngas. Angewandte Chemie. 2020;132:2374-2379. DOI: 10.1002/ange.201914831
  54. 54. Mech RK, Mohta N, Chatterjee A, Selvaraja SK, Muralidharan R, Nath DN. High responsivity and photovoltaic effect based on vertical transport in multilayer α-In2Se3. physica status solidi (a). 2020;217:1900932. DOI: 10.1002/pssa.201900932
  55. 55. Hossain J, Julkarnain M, Mondal BK, Newaz MA, Khan KA. Unveiling the Electrical and thermoelectric properties of highly degenerate indium selenide thin films: Indication of In3Se4 phase. Materials Research Express. 2019;6:126421. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab5ac1
  56. 56. Sousa FL, Souza BA, Jesus AC, Azevedo WM, Mansur HS, Freitas DV, Navarro M. Aqueous electrosynthesis of silver indium selenide nanocrystals and their photothermal properties. Green Chemistry. 2020;22:1239-1248. DOI: 10.1039/c9gc03647d
  57. 57. Yang J, Zhou Z, Fang J, Wen H, Lou Z, Shen G, Wei Z. Magnetic and transport properties of a ferromagnetic layered semiconductor MnIn2Se4. Applied Physics Letters. 2019;115:222101. DOI: 10.1063/1.5126233
  58. 58. Hu X, Du L, Wang Y, Lahtinen J, Yao L, Ren Z, Sun Z. Raman fingerprints and exciton-phonon coupling in 2D ternary layered semiconductor InSeBr. Applied Physics Letters. 2020;116:163105. DOI: 10.1063/1.5143119
  59. 59. Regmi G, Ashok A, Chawla P, Semalti P, Velumani S, Sharma SN, Castaneda H. Perspectives of chalcopyrite-based CIGSe thin-film solar cell: a review. Journal of Materials Science-Materials in Electronics. 2020;31:7286-7314. DOI: 10.1007/s10854-020-03338-2
  60. 60. Marvan P, Mazánek V, Sofer Z. Shear-force exfoliation of indium and gallium chalcogenides for selective gas sensing applications. Nanoscale. 2019;11:4310-7. DOI: 10.1039/c8nr09294j
  61. 61. Fu Y, Zhou J, Zou HH, Almeida Paz FA, Liu X, Fu L. Unique two-dimensional indium telluride templated by a rare wheel-shaped heterobimetallic Mn/In cluster. Inorganic Chemistry. 2020;59:5818-2582. DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00526
  62. 62. Hsin CL, Huang CW, Wu MH, Cheng SY, Pan RC. Synthesis and thermoelectric properties of indium telluride nanowires. Materials Research Bulletin. 2019;112:61-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.12.006
  63. 63. Vallem S, Bangera KV, Shivakumar GK. Enhanced thermoelectric power of Al and Sb doped In2Te3 thin films. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing. 2019;93:366-370. DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2019.01.025
  64. 64. Zhu H, Zhang B, Wang G, Peng K, Yan Y, Zhang Q, Han X, Wang G, Lu X, Zhou X. Promoted high temperature carrier mobility and thermoelectric performance of InTe enabled by altering scattering mechanism. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2019;7:11690-11698. DOI: 10.1039/C9TA00475K
  65. 65. Ahmed F, Tsujii N, Matsushita Y, Sauerschnig P, Mori T. Influence of slight substitution (Mn/In) on thermoelectric and magnetic properties in chalcopyrite-type CuInTe2. Journal of Electronic Materials. 2019;48:4524-4532. DOI: 10.1007/s11664-019-07234-2
  66. 66. Zhong Y, Luo Y, Li X, Cui J. Silver vacancy concentration engineering leading to the ultralow lattice thermal conductivity and improved thermoelectric performance of Ag1-x InTe2. Scientific reports. 2019;9:1-8. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55458-3
  67. 67. Bouchenafa M, Benmakhlouf A, Sidoumou M, Bouhemadou A, Maabed S, Halit M, Bentabet A, Bin-Omran S, Khenata R, Al-Douri Y. Theoretical investigation of the structural, elastic, electronic, and optical properties of the ternary tetragonal tellurides KBTe2 (B= Al, In). Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing. 2020;114:105085. DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2020.105085

Written By

Siphamandla C. Masikane and Neerish Revaprasadu

Submitted: August 5th, 2020 Reviewed: October 19th, 2020 Published: December 1st, 2020