Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Pathogens Transmitted through Contaminated Rice

Written By

Leka Lutpiatina

Submitted: May 30th, 2020 Reviewed: August 27th, 2020 Published: November 2nd, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.93757

Chapter metrics overview

632 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Rice can be a source of food poisoning because it can be contaminated with dangerous pathogens. Pathogens that often transmitted through rice are Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus. This chapter aims to explain the dangers of pathogens transmitted through contaminated rice, modes of transmission, contamination cases, and precautions. The method used in writing is to review articles. It is known that pathogens transmitted through contaminated rice can cause food poisoning, which occurs due to consuming rice containing pathogenic bacteria. Several cases of contamination of Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus in rice occurred in Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Malaysia, Belgium, America, Australia, Korea, Iran, China, and Nigeria. In general, prevention is by proper handling of raw materials, controlling the temperature of cooking and storing rice, and personal hygiene of food handlers.

Keywords

  • rice
  • pathogens transmitted
  • food poisoning
  • Bacillus cereus
  • Staphylococcus aureus

1. Introduction

Most of the world’s population, especially Asia, use rice as the primary source of carbohydrates in their daily menu. Rice, as a staple food, is usually served with side dishes to complement the taste and also complement one’s nutritional needs. Rice can process with other food ingredients into new dishes, such as fried rice, yellow rice, or uduk rice.

Rice can be a source of food poisoning because it contaminated with dangerous pathogens. In general, food poisoning can cause by contaminant bacteria such as Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella group (except Salmonella typhi), Shigella, Vibrio, Escherichia coli, Campylobacter, Yersinia enterocolitis, Clostridium [1]. Rice-based food poisoning more often caused by Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus based on several cases in the world [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. Besides, Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus are significant sources of microbiological harm from cereal grains and related products [16].

Bacillus cereus can found in soil, plants, and the intestinal tract of insects and mammals. In poor environmental conditions, bacteria can turn into spore forms. Bacillus cereus in spore form can found hiding in raw rice. The bacteria move from the soil to the paddy fields, their spores persist for years, even surviving during cooking due to their resistance to extreme temperatures. However, if rice left at room temperature, in warm and humid conditions, the spores can turn into bacteria and produce toxins that can cause vomiting and diarrhea [17].

Staphylococcus aureus is naturally present in the human body, so these bacteria are one of the essential agents causing food poisoning that often occurs in society. The most significant cause of Staphylococcus aureus entry into the food chain (which then causes staphylococcal poisoning) is the low sanitation of workers handling food [18].

According to the Food Standards Agency (FSA), there are nearly 900,000 food poisoning cases each year. The lifestyle that has changed in recent years has resulted in an increasing dependence on ready-to-eat food, eating out more than cooking, busyness results in having less time to prepare and cook food. This habit is the reason that increases the number of cases of food poisoning [19]. Apart from that, environmental factors also influence the level of contamination. Food prepared under unfavorable conditions and environment implies a higher incidence of food poisoning than others [18]. Food poisoning occurs more frequently in developing countries than in developed countries. This situation is due to differences in the level of sanitation between developed and developing countries [18].

Advertisement

2. Pathogenic Bacillus cereus transmitted through rice

2.1 Characteristics and diseases caused by Bacillus cereus

Bacillus cereus is a spore-forming bacteria that produces a toxin that causes vomiting or diarrhea. Symptoms are generally mild and short-lived (up to 24 h). Bacillus cereus commonly found in the environment (e.g., soil) and various foods. Spores are able to withstand harsh environments, including average cooking temperatures. Bacillus cereus is a Gram-positive, motile (flagellated), spore-forming, rod-shaped bacterium belonging to the genus Bacillus. Species in this genus include Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus mycoides, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus pseudomycoides, and Bacillus weihenstephanensis [17, 20].

Bacillus cereus is widespread and easy to find in the soil, where it adopts a saprophytic life cycle, germinate, grow, and sporulate in this environment [21]. Spores are more resistant to environmental stress than vegetative cells because of their metabolic dormancy and hard physical properties [22].

Bacillus cereus causes two types of diseases, namely emetic syndrome and diarrhea syndrome. Emetic syndrome causes by emetic toxins produced by bacteria during the growth phase in food, a diarrheal syndrome caused by diarrheal toxins produced during bacterial growth in the small intestine [23].

Bacillus cereus has a mesophilic or psychrotrophic strain. Mesophilic strains grow well at 37°C but do not grow below 10°C, whereas psychrotrophic strains grow well at cold temperatures but grow poorly at 37°C [24]. All Bacillus cereus isolates associated with emetic toxin production have found to be mesophilic [25]. Bacillus cereus growth is optimal in the presence of oxygen, although it continues to grow under anaerobic conditions. Bacillus cereus cells grown in aerobic conditions were less resistant to heat and acid than Bacillus cereus cells that grew anaerobically or microaerobically [26]. Bacillus cereus’ mesophilic strains have shown to have higher acid resistance than psychotropic strains [25].

Spores are more resistant to dry heat than humid heat, with heat resistance usually higher in foods with lower water activity. Spores are also more resistant to radiation than vegetative cells [22]. Nisin is a preservative that used to inhibit germination and spore growth. Antimicrobials that inhibit the growth of Bacillus cereus include benzoic, sorbic, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acids [22].

Symptoms of Bacillus cereus disease cause two types of foodborne illness, namely emetic syndrome (vomiting) and diarrhea. Vomiting syndrome is poisoning caused by the ingestion of a cyclic peptide toxin called cereulide that has been pre-formed in food during growth by Bacillus cereus. This syndrome has a short incubation period and recovery time. Symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and stomach cramps occur within 1–5 h after ingestion, with recovery usually within 6–24 h [27].

The diarrheal syndrome caused by enterotoxins produced by Bacillus cereus in the host body, the incubation period before the onset of the disease is 8–16 h, and infection usually lasts 12–14 h. However, it can continue for several days. Symptoms are generally mild, with stomach cramps, watery diarrhea, and nausea [28]. In a small number of cases, both toxins produced, and vomiting and diarrhea develop [17].

No form of the disease is considered life-threatening for normal healthy individuals, with few fatal cases reported [22]. Bacillus cereus has been associated with the non-food-related illness, although this is rare. These bacteria have been found in postoperative and traumatic wounds and can cause opportunistic infections, especially in individuals with immune system disorders, such as septicemia, meningitis, and pneumonia. Bacillus cereus has also known to occasionally cause localized eye infections in humans [29].

The pathogenic mechanisms for Bacillus cereus emetic disease are well known. Emetic toxins (cereulide) cause vacuole formation in HEp-2 cells in the laboratory [29]. Cereulide in experimental animals caused vomiting, potentially by binding to 5-HT3 receptors in the stomach/small intestine to stimulate the vagus nerve and brain [30]. Cereulide produced by the Non-Ribosomal Peptide Synthetase Complex (NRPS) [31]. All NRPS clusters have characterized [23], resulting in a precise method for detecting cereulide-producing Bacillus cereus strains [32]. Emetic toxin production has shown to occur in skim milk in the temperature range of 12–37°C, with more toxins produced at 12 and 15°C than at higher temperatures [33]. Emetic toxins are highly resistant to environmental factors, exhibiting stability from a pH of 2–11 and heating to 100°C for 150 min (pH 8.7–10.6) [22].

Three types of enterotoxins are associated with a form of diarrhea syndrome, namely three components of the enterotoxin Hemolysin BL (HBL), three parts of Non-Hemolytic Enterotoxin (NHE) and one element of cytotoxin K. Enterotoxins are released into the small intestine by the surviving vegetative cells of Bacillus cereus [34]. Diarrheal enterotoxins are stable at pH 4–11 and deactivated by heating to 56°C for 5 min [22].

Up to 26% of the vegetative cells of Bacillus cereus can survive as they travel through the stomach. Diarrheal enterotoxins are unstable at low pH in the stomach and degraded by digestive enzymes. Any previously formed enterotoxins in food are destroyed during passage through the stomach so that they do not cause disease if ingested [22]. In contrast, Bacillus cereus spores can pass unaffected by the gastric barrier. Spores need to be triggered by nutrients and intestinal epithelial cells to initiate germination. In the small intestine, spores germinate, grow and produce enterotoxins [35].

A vital virulence factor required to cause diarrhea symptoms is the ability of vegetative cells and Bacillus cereus spores to adhere to the small intestine’s epithelial cell walls. Spore and cell adhesion efficiency show to be low, around 1% [35]. Enterotoxins’ ability to damage tissue and damage the plasma membrane of small intestinal epithelial cells plays a role in causing diarrhea [27].

2.2 Mode of transmission Bacillus cereus food poisoning

The pattern of transmission Bacillus cereus food poisoning can be caused by ingesting large numbers of bacterial cells and spores in contaminated food (diarrhea type) or by ingesting food contaminated with pre-formed toxins (emetic type). Transmission of this disease caused by the consumption of contaminated food, improper handling/storage of food, and inadequate cooling of cooked food [36].

2.3 Case contamination and precautions for Bacillus cereus in rice

Cases of contamination of Staphylococcus aureus on rice, either in the form of raw rice or cooked rice and other processed rice products, are found in several countries. Further explanations can see in Table 1.

YearFoodCountryFindingsArticle title
2009Brown rice and glutinous riceKorea15 (37%) of 83 samples of brown rice, 23 (37%) of 63 samples of glutinous ricePrevalence, Genetic diversity, and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacillus cereus Strains Isolated from Rice and Cereals Collected in Korea [2]
2009Raw riceAmerikaBacillus species spores found in 94 (52.8%) rice samples with an average concentration of 32.6 CFU/gDetection of Toxigenic Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis in US Rice [3]
2012Cooked rice (white rice, fried rice)BelgiaThe concentration of cereulide found in rice dishes is around four ng/gPrevalence and Levels of Bacillus cereus Emetic Toxin in Rice Dishes Randomly Collected from Restaurants and Comparison with the Levels Measured in a Recent Foodborne Outbreak [4]
2012Cooked and raw ricePakistanAll rice samples showed the presence of Bacillus cereus, the highest number: 3.34 × 101 CFU/mlMicrobial Assessment of Uncooked and Cooked Rice Samples Available in Local Markets of Lahore [5]
2013Baby food (made from rice)IranBacillus cereus and its enterotoxigenic genes have found in infant diets in IranBacillus cereus in Infant Foods: Prevalence Study and Distribution of Enterotoxigenic Virulence Factors in Isfahan Province, Iran [6]
2018Local unhulled (coarse) riceMalaysiaThe number of Bacillus cereus bacteria in all samples found to be more than 1100 MPN/gPresence of Bacillus cereus from Local Unhusked (Rough) Rice Samples in Sarawak, Malaysia [7]
2019Cooked rice (yellow rice)Indonesia21% of yellow rice contaminated with Bacillus cereusStaphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus in Yellow Rice [8]
2020Rice/noodlesChina59 out of 119 rice/noodle samples (50%) were positive for Bacillus cereusA Study on Prevalence and Characterization of Bacillus cereus in Ready-to-Eat Foods in China [9]

Table 1.

Cases of Bacillus cereus contamination in rice (rice-based food).

Precautions for contamination of Bacillus cereus in rice:

  1. Processing (thoroughly cooked and quickly cooled) is one of the easiest ways to prevent foodborne illness associated with Bacillus spp. [37].

  2. Hot foods should store at 140°F/60°C or higher [37].

  3. Reheating cooked food should be stored at 165°F/74°C [37].

  4. If frozen food is allowed to thaw, it must remain at 41°F/5°C or lower [37].

  5. Steaming under pressure, roasting, frying, and grilling foods will destroy the vegetative cells and spores if temperatures within foods are ≥ 145ºF/63ºC [38].

  6. Foods that contain emetic toxins need to be heated to 259°F/126°C for more than 90 min—reheating food until steaming is not sufficient to kill emetic toxins [38].

Advertisement

3. Pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus transmitted through rice

3.1 Characteristics and diseases caused by Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the bacteria that cause food poisoning. Staphylococcus aureus is commonly found in the environment (soil, water, and air) and located on humans’ nose and skin. Staphylococcus aureus is a spherical, Gram-positive, non-spore bacteria. The genus Staphylococcus divided into 32 species and subspecies. Staphylococcus aureus causes food poisoning by producing Staphylococcal Enterotoxin (SE) [39, 40].

Staphylococcus aureus’s growth and survival depend on several environmental factors such as temperature, water activity (aw), pH, presence of oxygen, and food composition. These physical growth parameters varied for different strains of Staphylococcus aureus [41]. The temperature range for Staphylococcus aureus growth is 7–48°C, with an optimum temperature of 37°C. Staphylococcus aureus is resistant to freezing and does well in foods stored below −20°C; however, viability is reduced at −10 to 0°C. Staphylococcus aureus easily killed during pasteurization or cooking. Staphylococcus aureus growth occurs in the pH range 4.0–10.0, with an optimum of 6–7 [41].

Staphylococcus aureus is a facultative anaerobe so it can grow in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. However, growth occurs at a much slower rate under anaerobic conditions [41]. For non-sporing mesophilic bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus has relatively high heat resistance [41]. A highly heat resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain (D-value at 60°C > 15 min in broth) has identified from foodborne outbreaks in India [42].

Several chemical preservatives, including sorbate and benzoate, inhibit the growth of Staphylococcus aureus. The effectiveness of this preservative increases as the pH decreases. Methyl and propyl parabens are also useful [41, 43].

Symptoms of staphylococcal food poisoning generally have a rapid onset, appearing approximately 3 h after ingestion (range 1–6 h). Common symptoms include nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps, and diarrhea. The individual may not show all the signs associated with the disease. In severe cases, headaches, muscle cramps, and temporary changes in blood pressure and pulse may occur. Recovery is usually between 1 and 3 days [39, 41]. Death is rare (0.03% for the general population) but occasionally reported in children and the elderly (death rate 4.4%) [40]. Staphylococcus aureus can cause various health problems not related to food such as skin inflammation (e.g., ulcers and style), mastitis, respiratory tract infections, wound sepsis, and toxic shock syndrome [40, 41].

Staphylococcal food poisoning caused by the ingestion of foods containing pre-formed SE [44], there are several types of SE; enterotoxin A is most commonly associated with staphylococcal food poisoning. Enterotoxins D, E, and H, and to a lesser extent B, G, and I have also associated with staphylococcal food poisoning [45, 46].

SE produced during the exponential phase of Staphylococcus aureus growth in a strain-dependent quantity. Typically, the disease-inducing dose of SE occurs when at least 105–108 CFU/g of Staphylococcus aureus are present [45, 40]. Most of the genes for SE located in plasmid or prophage elements. Thus, transfer between strains can occur, modifying the ability of Staphylococcus aureus strains to cause disease and contributing to pathogen evolution [44, 46].

As the temperature decreases, the SE production rate also decreases. However, SE remained stable under frozen storage. SE is highly resistant to heating and can withstand the processes used to sterilize low-acid canned foods. SE production can occur in the pH range 4.5–9.6, with an optimum of 7–8. SE production can occur in anaerobic and aerobic environments; however, toxin production is optimal under aerobic conditions [41].

3.2 Mode of transmission. Staphylococcus aureus food poisoning

Staphylococcal food poisoning occurs when the food consumed contains SE produced by Staphylococcus aureus. Food handlers carrying enterotoxin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in their nose or hands are considered a significant source of food contamination through direct contact or respiratory secretions [44].

It estimated that in the US, Staphylococcus aureus accounts for 2.6% of foodborne diseases caused by 31 significant pathogens [47]. The incidence of staphylococcal food poisoning is seasonal. Most cases occur in late summer when temperatures are warm, and food is stored incorrectly [40].

Foods associated with the staphylococcal food poisoning outbreak include meat and meat products, poultry and egg products, milk and dairy products, salads, cream sandwich products, and sandwich stuffing. Foods that require extensive handling during preparation and stored above refrigeration temperature (4°C) for a long time after development frequently implicated in staphylococcal food poisoning [39]. Foods high in starch (such as rice) and protein believed to support SE production [41].

3.3 Case contamination and precautions for Staphylococcus aureus in rice

Cases of contamination of Staphylococcus aureus on rice, either in the form of raw rice or cooked rice and other processed rice products, are found in several countries in the world. Further explanation can see in Table 2.

YearFoodCountryFindingsArticle title
2001Rames riceIndonesiaThe number of Staphylococcus aureus in the rice sample: 3.21 Log CFU/gStudy of Microbiological Safety of Snack Food at the FATETA-IPB Canteen, Bogor [10]
2003Rice at the restaurantBrazilRice containing Staphylococcus aureus: 100 CFU/gAn outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning in the Municipality of Passos, MG, Brazil [11]
2004Rice cakeKorea19.3% of rice cakes were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureusOccurrence of Toxigenic Staphylococcus aureus in Ready-to-Eat Food in Korea [12]
2010Uduk riceIndonesiaThe frequency of isolation of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus in uduk rice samples was 6.67%, and not all were found in sufficient amounts to form enterotoxins.Risks of Staphylococcus aureus in Traditional Ready-to-Eat Food and Evaluation of Its Presence in uduk Rice [13]
2014Kerala matta riceIndiaKerala matta rice samples contained coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus.Outbreak of Staphylococcal Food Poisoning [14]
2019Yellow riceIndonesia7% of yellow rice contaminated with Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus in yellow rice [8]
2019Jollof riceNigeriaStaphylococcus aureus found in jollof rice samples at the campus cafeteria.Identification and anti-bacterial Testing of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Jollof Rice sold at selected Cafeterias in Federal University [15]

Table 2.

Cases of Staphylococcus aureus contamination in rice (rice-based food).

Precautions for contamination of Staphylococcus aureus in rice:

  1. The permissive temperature for growth and toxin production by Staphylococcus aureus is between 6 and 46°C. Thus, the ideal cooking and cooling temperatures should be above 60°C and below 5°C, respectively, is below the recommended temperature [48].

  2. Serving food quickly when stored at room temperature, wearing gloves, masks, hairpins during food handling and processing, washing hands frequently, maintaining personal hygiene for food handlers can help prevent Staphylococcus aureus contamination [49].

  3. Other precautions such as raw material control, proper handling and processing, adequate cleaning, and disinfection of equipment used in food processing and preparation must take [50].

  4. Environmental factors that can play an essential role in the proliferation of bacteria and the production of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins are the storage of rice at room temperature for an extended period between preparation and consumption [14].

Advertisement

4. Conclusions

It knows that pathogens transmitted through contaminated rice can cause food poisoning, which occurs due to consuming rice containing pathogenic bacteria. Several cases of contamination of Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus in rice occurred in Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Malaysia, Belgium, America, Australia, Korea, Iran, China, Nigeria. In general, prevention by proper handling of raw materials, controlling the temperature of cooking and storing rice, and personal hygiene of food handlers.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

Thanks go to students and lecturers of the Medical Laboratory Technology Poltekkes Kemenkes Banjarmasin, Indonesia who have supported the writing of this manuscript and to all parties who did not directly play a role in the writing process.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Advertisement

Acronyms and abbreviations

HBL

hemolysin BL

NHE

non-hemolytic enterotoxin

SE

staphylococcal enterotoxin

References

  1. 1. Bardale R. Principles of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2nd ed. New Delhi-110002: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd; 2017. p. 606
  2. 2. Park Y-B, Kim J-B, Shin S-W, Kim J-C, Cho S-H, Lee B-K, et al. Prevalence, genetic diversity, and antibiotic susceptibility of Bacillus cereus strains Isolated from rice and cereals collected in Korea. Journal of Food Protection. 2009;72(3):612-617. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-72.3.612
  3. 3. Ankolekar C, Rahmati T, Lebbe RG. Detection of toxigenic Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis in US rice. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2009;128:460-466
  4. 4. Delbrassinne L, Andjelkovic M, Dierick K, Denayer S, Mahillon J, Van Loco J. Prevalence and levels of Bacillus cereus emetic toxin in rice dishes randomly collected from restaurants and comparison with the levels measured in a recent foodborne outbreak. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 2012;9(9):809-814
  5. 5. Tahir A, Hameed I, Aftab M, Mateen A. Microbial assessment of uncooked and cooked rice samples available in local markets of Lahore. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2012;44:267-270
  6. 6. Rahimi E, Abdos F, Momtaz H, Torki Baghbadorani Z, Jalali M. Bacillus cereus in infant foods: Prevalence study and distribution of enterotoxigenic virulence factors in Isfahan Province, Iran. The Scientific World Journal. 2013;2013:1-6
  7. 7. Bilung LM, Tesfamariam F, Andriesse R, San FYK, Ling CY, Tahar AS. Presence of Bacillus cereus from local Unhusked (rough) rice samples in Sarawak, Malaysia. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management. 2018;13(1):181-187
  8. 8. Leka L, Nudia K, Dewi DR, Wahdah N. Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus in yellow rice. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2019;10(8):2104-2108. DOI: 10.5958/0976-5506.2019.02166.1
  9. 9. Yu S, Yu P, Wang J, et al. A study on prevalence and characterization of Bacillus cereus in ready-to-eat foods in China. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;10:1-11. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03043
  10. 10. Hartini PB. Study of microbiological safety of snack food at the FATETA-IPB Canteen, Bogor [thesis]. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor; 2001
  11. 11. do Carmo LS, Dias RS, Linardi VR, de Sena MJ, dos Santos DA. An outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning in the municipality of Passos, MG, Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2003;46(4):581-586. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-89132003000400012
  12. 12. Su Kyung O, Lee N, Cho YS, Shin D-B, Choi SY, Koo M. Occurrence of toxigenic Staphylococcus aureus in ready-to-eat food in Korea. Journal of Food Protection. 2007;70(5):1153-1158. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-70.5.1153
  13. 13. Erza Apriyadi T. Risks of Staphylococcus aureus in traditional ready-to-eat food and evaluation of its presence in uduk rice [thesis]. Bogor: Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian Institut Pertanian Bogor; 2010
  14. 14. Basavegowda M, Rajegowda RM, Bettappa P, Shivanna UR, Channabasappa AN, Vijaykumar GS. Outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning. International Journal of Medicine and Public Health. 2014;4(3):257-259
  15. 15. Radji M, Adeleye A, Amoo A, Barde G, Mohammed S. Identification and anti-bacterial testing of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from jollof rice sold at selected cafeterias in Federal University. UJMR. 2019;4(1):104-109
  16. 16. FDA. Analysis of microbial hazards related to time/temperature control of foods for safety. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2003;2:33-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003.tb00049.x
  17. 17. Montville TJ, Matthews KR. Food Microbiology: An Introduction. Washington D.C: ASM Press; 2005
  18. 18. Ray B. Fundamental Food Microbiology Second Edition. Boca Raton/London/New York, Washington D.C: CRC Press; 2001
  19. 19. Parashnath M, Indranil C, Food Poisoning: Illness ranges from relatively mild through to life threatening. Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2016;5(4):1-19
  20. 20. Rajkowski KT, Bennett RW. Bacillus cereus. Ch 3. In: Miliotis MD, Bier JW, editors. International Handbook of Foodborne Pathogens. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003. pp. 27-39
  21. 21. Vilain S, Luo Y, Hildreth M, Brözel V. Analysis of the life cycle of the soil saprophyte Bacillus cereus in liquid soil extract and in soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006;72:4970-4977
  22. 22. Jenson I, Moir CJ. Bacillus cereus and other Bacillus species. Ch 14. In: Hocking AD, editor. Foodborne Microorganisms of Public Health Significance. 6th ed. Sydney: Australian Institute of Food Science and Technology (NSW Branch); 2003. pp. 445-478
  23. 23. Ehling-Schulz M, Guinebretière M, Monthan A, Berge O, Fricker M, Svensson B. Toxin gene profiling of enterotoxic and emetic Bacillus cereus. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2006;260(2):232-240
  24. 24. Wijnands LM, Dufrenne JB, Zwietering MH, van Leusden FM. Spores from mesophilic Bacillus cereus strains germinate better and grow faster in simulated gastrointestinal conditions than spores from psychrotrophic strains. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2006a;112(2):120-128
  25. 25. Wijnands LM, Dufrenne JB, Rombouts FM, in ‘t Veld PH, van Leusden FM. Prevalence of potentially pathogenic Bacillus cereus in food commodities in the Netherlands. Journal of Food Protection. 2006;69(11):2587-2594
  26. 26. Mols M, Pier I, Zwietering MH,Abee TJ. The impact of oxygen availability on stress survival and radical formation of Bacillus cereus. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2009;135(3):303-311
  27. 27. Senesi S, Ghelardi E. Production, secretion and biological activity of Bacillus cereus enterotoxins. Toxins. 2010;2:1690-1703
  28. 28. Granum PE. Bacillus cereus. Ch 20. In: Doyle MP, Beuchat LR, editors. Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Frontiers. 3rd ed. Washington D.C: ASM Press; 2007. pp. 445-455
  29. 29. Schoeni JL, Wong ACL. Bacillus cereus food poisoning and its toxins. Journal of Food Protection. 2005;68(3):636-648
  30. 30. Agata N, Ohta M, Mori M, Isobe M. A novel dodecadepsipeptide, cereulide, is an emetic toxin of Bacillus cereus. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 1995;129:17-20
  31. 31. Horwood PF, Burgess GW, Oakey HJ. Evidence for non-ribosomal peptide synthetase production of cereulide (the emetic toxin) in Bacillus cereus. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2004;236(2):319-324
  32. 32. Fricker M, Misselhausser U, Busch U, Scheres S, Ehling-Schulz M. Diagostic real time PCR assays for the detection of emetic food-borne Bacillus cereus in foods and recent food-borne outbeaks. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73:1892-1898
  33. 33. Finlay WJJ, Logan NA, Sutherland AD. Bacillus cereus produces most emetic toxin at lower temperatures. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2000;31:385-389
  34. 34. Wijnands LM, Pielaat A, Dufrenne JB, Zwietering MH, van Leusden FM. Modelling the number of viable vegetative cells of Bacillus cereus passing through the stomach. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2009;106:258-267
  35. 35. Wijnands LM. Bacillus cereus associated food borne disease: Quantitative aspects of exposure assessment and hazard characterization [thesis]. The Netherlands: Wageningen University; 2008
  36. 36. Schneider KR, Parish ME, Goodrich RM, Cookingham T. Preventing Foodborne Illness: Bacillus cereus and Bacillus anthracis. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida: 2004. pp. 1-5
  37. 37. Nazrul Islam M. Fried Rice syndrome, a disease of fast world: Scientific analysis. American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research. 2019;5(6):512-514. DOI: 10.34297/AJBSR.2019.05.000979
  38. 38. Keith RS, Renée GS, Rachael S, Ploy K, Bruna B. Preventing Foodborne Illness: Bacillus cereus. Florida Cooperative Extension Service. University of Florida: Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences; 2015. pp. 1-5
  39. 39. FDA. Bad Bug Book: Foodborne Pathogenic Microorganisms and Natural Toxins Handbook. 2nd ed. Silver Spring: US Food and Drug Administration; 2012. pp. 87-92
  40. 40. Montville TJ, Matthews KR. Food Microbiology: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Washington D.C: ASM Press; 2008
  41. 41. Stewart CM. Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal enterotoxins. Ch 12. In: Hocking AD, editor. Foodborne Microorganisms of Public Health Significance. 6th ed. Sydney: Australian Institute of Food Science and Technology (NSW Branch); 2003. pp. 359-380
  42. 42. Nema V, Agrawal R, Kamboj DV, Goel AK, Singh L. Isolation and characterization of heat resistant entertoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus from a food poisoning outbreak in Indian subcontinent. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2007;117:29-35
  43. 43. Davidson PM, Taylor TM. Chemical preservatives and natural antimicrobial compounds. Ch 33. In: Doyle MP, Beuchat LR, editors. Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Frontiers. 3rd ed. Washington D.C: ASM Press; 2007. pp. 713-745
  44. 44. Argudin MA, Mendoza MC, Rodicio MR. Food poisoning and Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins. Toxins. 2010;2(7):1751-1773
  45. 45. Seo KS, Bohach GA. Staphylococcus aureus. Ch 22. In: Doyle MP, Beuchat LR, editors. Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Frontiers. 3rd ed. Washington D.C: ASM Press; 2007. pp. 493-518
  46. 46. Pinchuk IV, Beswick EJ, Reyes VE. Staphylococcal enterotoxins. Toxins. 2010;2:2177-2197
  47. 47. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson M, Roy SL, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2011;17(1):7-11
  48. 48. James SJ, Evans J, James C. A review of the performance of domestic refrigerators. Journal of Food Engineering. 2008;87(1):2-10
  49. 49. Aycicek H, Cakiroglu S, Stevenson TH. Incidence of Staphylococcus aureus in ready-to-eat meals from military cafeterias in Ankara, Turkey. Food Control. 2005;16(6):531-534
  50. 50. Hennekinne J-A, de Buyser M-L, Dragacci S. Staphylococcus aureus and its food poisoning toxins: Characterization and outbreak investigation. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2012;36:815-836

Written By

Leka Lutpiatina

Submitted: May 30th, 2020 Reviewed: August 27th, 2020 Published: November 2nd, 2020