Open access peer-reviewed chapter

An Introduction of Biomimetic System and Heat Pump Technology in Food Drying Industry

Written By

Khurram Yousaf, Kunjie Chen and Muhammad Azam Khan

Submitted: December 11th, 2019 Reviewed: July 15th, 2020 Published: November 30th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.93386

From the Edited Volume


Edited by Maki K. Habib and César Martín-Gómez

Chapter metrics overview

425 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Drying of food products is a relatively complex, nonlinear, and dynamic process due to simultaneous heat and mass transfer, rapid moisture evaporation, and biological and chemical reactions. Therefore, the monitoring of food quality during the drying process using bio-inspired technologies can play a vital role. The demand for high-quality dried food products and the rapid growth of energy in food processing are attracting new and renewable sources of energy. Energy efficiency, improved food product quality, and less environmental impact are always the main priorities of any drying system development. In-depth knowledge of biomimetic systems and drying kinetics would be helpful to design new dryers and technologies. Due to the excellent features (controllable drying temperature, drying time, drying air velocity, and relative humidity), heat pump drying systems have been used widely to ensure food and agricultural product quality. This chapter helps to understand the relationship between bio-inspired technologies and the role of heat pump technology in the food drying industry in terms of cost-effectiveness, energy saving, and better food product quality.


  • heat pump
  • drying
  • biomimetic
  • food quality
  • energy efficiency

1. Introduction

Drying remains an essential part of food processing to enhance the shelf life of agricultural produce. To facilitate storage, preserve nutritional value, and add value in farm products, drying has been an essential solution [1]. Vegetables and fruits are one of the primary sources of vitamins and minerals. They have a high amount of nutritional components due to which they are considered a basic need for a balanced diet. Food products contained a high amount of moisture, such as vegetables and fruits, which have more than 80% and cereals more and less 30% [2]. Therefore, vast amounts of foodstuff deteriorate annually because of the inappropriate handling (pre- and postharvesting) and lack of processing facilities. Approximately 30–50% of losses occur in vegetables and fruits from field to consumer. The easy availability of fresh food to consumers for an extended period, process, and storage facilities are compulsory [3]. However, the increasing infrastructure and processing cost of post-storage techniques are essential limitations. Due to increasing demand of high-quality food products, various conventional and mechanical food drying methods have been employed to process and protect from deterioration such as solar drying, oven drying, hot air drying, vacuum drying, freeze drying, microwave drying, infrared drying, and air source heat pump (ASHP) drying [4].

The ASHP drying system has two main components: an HP and a drying assembly—a functional HP system is composed of a compressor, condenser, evaporator, refrigerant, and throttle valve [5, 6]. Similarly, the drying system consists of the dryer and other necessary accessories. In the drying cycle, the materials to be dried are fed into the drying chamber and dehydrated until attained desired moisture content. In the HP cycle, the condenser provides the heat for the drying process by condensation of the refrigerant; similarly, the refrigerant absorbs heat and evaporates in the evaporator. The compressor of the HP compressed it again and delivered to the condenser to complete the cycle [7]. The hot heat generated by the condenser and cold heat by the evaporator can be used at the same time during the HP operation. The hot and cold heat from condenser and evaporator will be used to heat the product and dehumanization, respectively. Due to the excellent capability of the HP to convert the latent heat of vapor condensation into sensible heat of air makes it attractive in the drying industry. Many investigators recognized the utilization of HP in drying, which has attracted applied and theoretical research on drying using the HP [8, 9, 10].

The energy-saving capability and the ability to control air humidity and temperature are the main advantages of HP technology. These factors create options for variable drying conditions. Drying is one of the most energy-intensive practices, as it consumes up to 15% of industrial energy and 9–25% of national energy in developed countries [11]. About 40% of energy could be saved by using HP dryers as compared to electric resistance dryers. The drying process utilizes up to 70, 50, and 60% of total energy in the manufacturing of wood products, textile fabrics, and farm corn production, respectively [12]. Therefore, it is necessary to find out appropriate HP technology to reduce energy consumption. It has been reported that HP drying helps to improve product quality.

The performance of the HP system can be improved by the implementation of a sophisticated control strategy [13]. The three-layer ANN model has been used in the prediction of HP system performance. The study depicted that the application of ANN in the prediction of the HP system was consistent and robust [14]. Yang et al. [15] have used a simultaneous control strategy to improve the precision of drying temperature and superheat. A stable drying temperature was attained using two fuzzy controllers with different membership functions and control rules. The study revealed that the newly developed controller is reliable to reduce the nonlinearities of drying temperature and superheat. The yum slices of different thicknesses and longan were dried using the step-down and continues dehumidification strategies of controlling relative humidity [16]. It concluded that a step-down approach was found more energy efficient for 12 or 18 mm thickness, whereas a continuous decrease of relative humidity strategy was found energy efficient for longan, respectively.

Besides these drying systems, smart drying mechanisms (biomimetic systems) can be cost-effective in controlling various foodstuffs quality parameters with variable drying process time. The quality of food products can be assessed through many senses such as appearance, smell, and taste. The human sense inspired systems including electronic noses (odor sensing technology) and electronic tongues (taste sensing technology) are extensively under considerations by researchers and scientists for different food processing steps, e.g., drying, packaging, and storage. These biomimetic systems provide reasonable information on odor and taste to analyze the quality of food products. The combination of these biomimetic systems, computer software, and data analysis methods exhibits environment-friendly, cost-effective, and multifunctional results for food quality control. Many studies highlighted the significance of HP technology in terms of energy efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and product quality. However, there is a need to summarize the technological advancement of the HP drying system in the food industry. The HP drying system can be more sophisticated and attractive if coupled with biomimetic odor and taste sensing systems for food safety and quality. This chapter presents the recent developments in HP drying technologies of food products, studies these advancements to maintain the food quality, and further discusses the research potential in this field.


2. HP drying and its application in the food industry

2.1 HP drying

Heat pumps raise the energy gained from the low-temperature level to high-temperature level and transfer it to the energy carrier medium. In an HP, both the heating and cooling processes of the refrigerator are utilized. Nowadays, HP technology is used in the domestic and commercial sectors for space heating and cooling such as in offices, water heating, swimming pools, commercial drying in agriculture, and the wood industry as well as the cotton industry. The main objective of the utilization of HP technology in the food drying sector is to dehydrate the food products for quality enhancement at minimum cost. HP drying technology is one of the most efficient and controllable methods of water extraction from the material. The research and development in HP technology have improved its performance. HP drying technology has been modified to air source HP drying, ground source heat pump drying (GSHPD), chemical source heat pump drying (CSHPD), and hybrid heat pump drying (HHPD), as shown in Figure 1 . The following chapter reflects the contribution of significant HP technologies in the food drying sector.

Figure 1.

The primary classification of heat pump dryers [17].

2.2 Performance indicators of HP drying system

2.2.1 The coefficient of performance

The coefficient of performance (COP) of the HP system refers to estimate the performance during heating conditions. In an ideal model, the heating of hot air in the drying chamber is a hot air adiabatic cooling process as follows:

c p T d r , a , in T d r , a , out = d d r , a , out d d r , a , in r s E1

In actual condition, enthalpy change occurs during hot air passed through the drying chamber as follows:

Δ h d r , a = c p T d r , a , in T d r , a , out r s d d r , a , out d d r , a , in E2

For materials,

D R = M t M t Δ t Δ t E3

During the hot air cycle, two heat exchange processes occur in the HP drying system, as follows:

Q evap = m evap , a C p , a T evap , a , in T evap , a , out E4
Q cond = m cond , a C p , a T cond , a , out T cond , a , in E5


C p , a = 1.01 + 1.84 d E6
W h = m a h d r , a , in h H P , a , in E7
W comp + W h = m a Δ h d r , a + Δ Q H P E8
W comp + W h = m a Δ h d r , a + h H P , a , out h H P , a , in E9

The compressor power and speed can be controlled by motor frequency. The COP of the HP and the whole system can be measured using the following relationships:

C O P hp = Q cond W copm E10
COP S = Q cond W E11

2.2.2 Specific moisture evaporation rate

The ratio of water removed from material to total energy consumption is termed a specific moisture evaporation rate (SMER). The HP drying system must apply energy and dehumidified material. It must be measured to evaluate the performance of the heat pump drying system. The SMER (kg/kWh) is given as follows:

SMER = M e v p W h + W f + W comp E12

2.2.3 Moisture extraction rate

It is defined as water extracted from material to the total time of material drying in the chamber and expressed in kg/h. Moisture extraction rate (MER) is one of the important factors to evaluate the HP drying system performance. MER can be calculated as follows:

M E R = M e v p t d r E13

2.3 Air source heat pump drying of food

An air source HP dryer works on a simple principle of HP technology with the condenser as a heat source and evaporator as a dehumidifier. Liu et al. [6] designed a multifunctional air source HP dryer and investigated the drying performance of 3-mm thickness garlic slices in three different ambient temperature and humidity conditions. The drying rate and energy consumption of the HP drying system were investigated by utilizing different hot air circulation modes using an enthalpy-humidity diagram.

An air source HP drying system not just depends on the HP but also the circulation style of the drying medium. According to the circulation style and degree of ventilation, ASHP dryer can be divided into open, semi-open, and closed types. The exhaust gas flowing out of the drying chamber contains a high amount of heat; the temperature of exiting gas is usually higher as compared to the ambient temperature. As a result, it is essential to pass the exiting gas through the evaporator of the HP to increase the thermal efficiency of the HP drying system. Sometimes, it restricts the heat exchange due to dust particles adhered to the surface of the evaporator. BAR can be adjusted by changing the degree of opening and closing of duct valves. The BAR can be expressed as follows:

BAR = a bypass a throughevaporator E14

Yousaf et al. [5] used the HP dryer test bench with a series of heat pumps for parboiled rice drying of different varieties and sample loads, as shown in Figure 2 . SMER, MER, and COP of HP dryer were calculated and analyzed in open and closed cycles. The COP of the closed-loop cycle (2.211) drying was higher than open-loop cycle (1.409) because fresh air entered into the system during the open-loop cycle. Saensabai and Prasertsan [18] conducted a simulation study of five different configurations of the air source HP. Soponronnarit et al. [19] reported that COPhp and SMER enhanced with 0% BAR and reduced with increasing of BAR during paddy seed drying. Chapchaimoh et al. [20] utilized the closed system HP dryer for ginger drying, where air and nitrogen were used as a drying medium. The study concluded that SMER in air and nitrogen was 0.06 and 0.07 kg H2O/MJ, respectively. Similarly, energy consumption for air and nitrogen drying was 16.67 and 14.29 MJ/kg, respectively. Many studies have been done on drying of food products using different HP technology systems, as shown in Table 1 .

Figure 2.

Air source heat pump dryer test bench with a series of heat pump units [5]. (A = temperature and humidity sensors, q = quality sensor, V = air flow sensor, HP1, 2, 3 = heat pump units, T = temperature sensors, and 1–13 = air duct valves).

Sr. no. Researcher Food product Heat pump dryer type Reference
1 Achariyaviriya et al. Papaya glace Air source heat pump [21]
2 Aktas et al. Apple Vapor compression cycle [22]
3 Artnaseaw et al. Chili Vacuum heat pump [23]
4 Artnaseaw et al. Shiitake mushroom Vacuum heat pump [24]
5 Best et al. Rice Solar-assisted vapor compression cycle [25]
6 Chen et al. Lemon Vapor compression cycle [26]
7 Chua et al. Guava and banana Two-stage heat pump [27]
8 Colak and Hepbasli Apple Ground source heat pump [28]
9 Colak et al. Mint leaves Ground source heat pump [29]
10 Cunney and Williams Grain Air source heat pump [30]
11 Fatouh et al. Jew’s mallow, spearmint, and parsley Air source heat pump [31]
12 Hancioglu and Hepbasli Laurel leaves Ground source heat pump [32]
13 Hawlader et al. Yam Air source heat pump [33]
14 Hawlader et al. Food grains Air source heat pump [34]
15 Hawlader and Jahangeer Green beans Air source heat pump [35]
16 Hawlader et al. Apple and guava Dual condenser vapor compression cycle [36]
17 Ho et al. Potatoes Air source heat pump [37]
18 Icier et al. Agriculture broccoli floret Dual condenser vapor compression cycle [38]
19 Icier and Erbay Olive leaf Dual condenser vapor compression cycle [39]
20 Jia et al. Foam rubber, sliced carrots, and root Air source heat pump [40]
21 Pal et al. Green sweet pepper Dual condenser vapor cycle [41]
22 Prasertsan and Saen-saby Red pepper Atmospheric freezer heat pump [42]
23 Queiroz et al. Tomatoes Air source heat pump [43]
24 Rahman et al. Peas Dual condenser vapor compression cycle [44]
25 Rossi et al. Vegetables Air source heat pump [45]
26 Shi et al. Horse mackerel Air source heat pump [46]
27 Soponronnarit et al. Papaya glace Air source heat pump [47]
28 Teeboonma et al. Papaya and mango Dual condenser vapor compression cycle [48]
29 Vazquez et al. Grapes Vapor compression cycle [49]
30 Zhang et al. Carrot cubes Air source heat pump [50]
31 Aktas et al. Mint leaves Air source heat pump [51]
32 Erbay and Hepbasli Fresh laurel leaves Ground source heat pump [52]
33 Taşeri et al. Grapes Air source heat pump [53]
34 Yousaf et al. Paddy Air source heat pump [5]
35 Liu et al. Garlic slices Air source heat pump [6]

Table 1.

Heat pump drying application in different food product drying.

2.4 Ground source or geothermal heat pump drying of food

Recent developments in HP technology made it attractive for researchers to conserve energy and processing time. The geothermal HP system can save 44 and 70% energy as compared to air source heat pumps and air conditioning and conventional electrical heating [54]. The ground source heat pump (GSHP) drying system is relatively similar to the ASHP drying system with the addition of a ground source heat exchanger, as shown in Figure 3 . The following system extracts heat from the ground by a ground source heat exchanger with the help of a circulated antifreeze water solution. The extracted heat is transferred to refrigerant in the evaporator and delivered to the food drying chamber. However, few studies on GSHP drying of food have been reported.

Figure 3.

Schematic diagram of ground source heat pump food drying system [29]. (1) Evaporator temperature and pressure; (2) condenser temperature and pressure; (3) fluid temperature at the ground heat exchanger inlet; (4) fluid temperature at the ground heat exchanger outlet; (5) fresh air temperature and humidity; (6) air inlet temperature and humidity; and (7) air outlet temperature and humidity.

Colak et al. [29] designed a GSHP dryer unit for a single layer of mint leaves drying. The drying system was designed and developed in Solar Energy Institute, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. The mint leaves were dried at three different drying temperatures 40, 45, and 50°C, constant relative humidity of 16%, and mass flow rate range of 0.01–0.05 kg/s. It revealed that the highest exergy efficiency (97.24%) was achieved at maximum temperature (50°C) and a mass flow rate of 0.05 kg/s. Another researcher studied the energy and exergy analysis of the GSHP drying system during laurel leaves drying. The COP of the GSHP and the whole system is in the range of 1.63–2.88 and 1.45–2.65, and SMER and SMExR of the system are in the range of 0.122 and 5: 11 kg/kWh respectively [55].

2.5 Hybrid solar-assisted heat pump drying of food

Sun drying has been used for food drying purposes for decades in tropical and subtropical countries, where solar energy is used as a primary source of energy to preserve fruits, vegetables, and other agricultural products. The traditional drying of food products by direct exposure has limitations, such as spoilage due to inappropriate climate conditions, waste of food due to the animal, birds, insects, and, most importantly, uncontrollable temperature and humidity conditions. The advancement of research and development in science and technology has changed the world; researchers and scientists are trying to find out the ways to reduce energy consumption in food processing and conservation. These globally renowned challenges in the food industry help researchers to design a hybrid drying system. Solar-assisted heat pump (SAHP) dryers are the best alternative to overcome energy crises challenges in the food industry [56]. According to literature, many studies have been done on the hybrid solar-assisted drying system, such as forced convection [57, 58, 59, 60, 61], solar-assisted auxiliary air heater dryer [62, 63, 64], and chemical heat pumps (CHP).

A SAHP dryer consists of a vapor compression cycle unit combined with a solar collector and drying chamber having a high coefficient of performance, as shown in Figure 4 [65, 66, 67]. There are different kinds of SAHP dryers, depending on design, use, and material to be dried. The combination of the HP dryer and solar collector with the availability of solar energy can increase the energy efficiency and temperature of the drying system. Troger and Butler [68] studied the solar collector cum rock bed storage system for peanut drying. Gan et al. [69] studied the drying kinetics and quality of Misai Kucing leaves, stem, flowers, and mix components and compared the SAHP drying with conventional solar drying. The results were evidence of the change in color and loss of two bioactive components by solar drying. However, these changes were not seen in SAHP drying. The reason could be the higher drying temperature, long processing time, and degradation of chlorophyll.

Figure 4.

Solar-assisted heat pump drying system [35].

Best et al. [70] developed a modified 7-kW air conditioning unit combined with a solar collector for rice drying. Another study of mushroom drying using a SAHP system with a flat plate solar collector and a GSHP system has been reported in the literature. Heat pump system, solar system, and SAHP system were employed for mushroom drying at 250–220, 270–165, and at 230–190 min, respectively. A computer program and PLC were used to control and monitor the relative humidity, drying air temperature, and weight of material to be dried. The mushrooms were dried from initial moisture 13.24 to 0.07 g (dry basis) using two different drying air temperatures of 45 and 55°C and 310 kg/h mass flow rate. SMER, energy utilization ratio, and COP were found to be in the range of 0.26–0.92 kg/kW h, 0.42–0.66, and 2.1–3.1, respectively [71]. Saffron drying has been studied in Iran using a solar-assisted hybrid photovoltaic thermal HP dryer. The system performance was investigated using variable drying air temperature (40, 50, and 60°C), mass flow rate (0.008, 0.012, and 0.016 kg/s), and drying modes with or without an HP. The study reported that using an HP, maximum dryer efficiency (72%) and SMER (1.16) were observed at drying air temperature of 60% and mass flow rate of 0.016 kg/s. Moreover, with the increase of drying air temperature and mass flow rate, energy consumption and drying time reduced. It also revealed, when dryer equipped with an HP, the average energy consumption decreased by up to 33% [72].


3. Conclusion

Considering the drying kinetics of food products, HP technology is the best option for new demands of energy efficiency, product quality at a lower cost, and lower environmental impact. Many studies have discussed the HP system for food drying and concluded that HP drying systems are suitable for heat-sensitive products. The biomimetic systems are contributing as a key element in smart drying processes and becoming a very useful factor in the food drying industry. However, it has some limitations in its widespread applications in food drying industry. In the case of a bio-inspired electric nose, its sensing ability is greatly affected by humidity, background noise, temperature, sensor poisoning, and sensor variations. This chapter reported the contribution of HP technology in food drying. The demands of high-quality food products and energy-efficient technologies for food processing are increasing day by day. The future work on biomimetic systems and HP technology would allow researchers to produce more automated food drying plants involving innovative intelligent approaches. It can be seen in this book chapter, research and development in HP drying have improved to hybrid type HP dryers. No doubt, the performance of these hybrid systems has increased but would increase installation and processing costs.



The financial support of the College of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, under the Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund CX-(17)1003 is thankfully acknowledged.


Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.




  1. 1. Yousaf K, Kunjie C, Cairong C, Abbas A, Huang Y, Arslan C, et al. The optimization and mathematical modeling of quality attributes of parboiled rice using a response surface method. Journal of Food Quality. 2017;2017(5960743):1-13
  2. 2. Hasan MU, Malik AU, Ali S, Imtiaz A, Munir A, Amjad W, et al. Modern drying techniques in fruits and vegetables to overcome postharvest losses: A review. Journal of Food Processing & Preservation. 2019;43(12):e14280
  3. 3. FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2012
  4. 4. Goh LJ, Othman MY, Ruslan SMH, Sopian K. Review of heat pump systems for drying application. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2011;15:4788-4796
  5. 5. Yousaf K, Liu H, Gao X, Liu C, Abbas A, Nyalala I, et al. Influence of environmental conditions on drying efficiency and heat pump performance in closed and open loop drying of paddy. Drying Technology. 2019;2019(1691011):1-14
  6. 6. Liu H, Yousaf K, Chen K, Fan R, Liu J, Soomro SA. Design and thermal analysis of an air source heat pump dryer for food drying. Sustainability. 2018;2018(10):1-17
  7. 7. Liu S, Li X, Song M, Li H, Sun Z. Experimental investigation on drying performance of an existed enclosed fixed frequency air source heat pump drying system. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2018;130(2018):735-744
  8. 8. Mohammadi I, Tabatabaekoloor R, Motevali A. Effect of air recirculation and heat pump on mass transfer and energy parameters in drying of kiwifruit slices. Energy. 2019;170:149-158
  9. 9. Li H, Xie L, Ma Y, Zhang M, Zhao Y, Zhao X. Effects of drying methods on drying characteristics, physicochemical properties and antioxidant capacity of okra. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2019;101:630-638
  10. 10. Feng Y, Zhou C, ElGasim A, Yagoub A, Sun Y, Owusu-Ansah P, et al. Improvement of the catalytic infrared drying process and quality characteristics of the dried garlic slices by ultrasound-assisted alcohol pretreatment. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2019;116:108577
  11. 11. Chua KJ, Mujumdar AS, Hawlader MNA, Chou SK, Ho JC. Batch drying of banana pieces – Effect of stepwise change in drying air temperature on drying kinetics and product color. Foodservice Research International. 2001;34:721-731
  12. 12. Mujumdar AS. Handbook of Industrial Drying. 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker Inc: New York, USA; 1987
  13. 13. Lutfy OF, Selamat H, Noor SBM. Intelligent modeling and control of a conveyor-belt grain dryer using a simplified type-2 neuro-fuzzy controller. Drying Technology. 2015;33:1210-1222
  14. 14. Wei XQ, Li NP, Peng JQ, Cheng JL, Su L, Hu JH. Analysis of the effect of the CaCl2 mass fraction on the efficiency of a heat pump integrated heat-source tower using an artificial neural network model. Sustainability. 2016;2016(8):410
  15. 15. Yang Z, Zhu Z, Zhao F. Simultaneous control of drying temperature and superheat for a closed-loop heat pump dryer. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2016;93:571-579
  16. 16. Ju HY, Zhao SH, Mujumdar AS, Fang XF, Gao ZJ, Zheng ZA, et al. Energy efficient improvements in hot air drying by controlling relative humidity based on Weibull and Bi-Di models. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2018;111:20-29
  17. 17. Daghigh R, Ruslan MH, Sulaiman MY, Sopian K. Review of solar assisted heat pump drying systems for agricultural and marine products. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010;14(9):2564-2579
  18. 18. Saensabai P, Prasertsan S. Effects of component arrangement and ambient and drying conditions on the performance of heat pump dryers. Drying Technology. 2003;21(1):103-127
  19. 19. Soponronnarit S, Wetchacama S, Kanphukdee T. Seed drying using a heat pump. International Energy Journal. 2000;1(2):97-102
  20. 20. Chapchaimoh K, Poomsa-ad N, Wiset L, Morris J. Thermal characteristics of heat pump dryer for ginger drying. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2016;95:491-498
  21. 21. Achariyaviriya S, Soponronnarit S, Terdyothin A. Mathematical model development and simulation of heat pump fruit dryer. Drying Technology. 2000;18(1-2):479-491
  22. 22. Aktas M, Ceylan I, Yilmaz S. Determination of drying characteristics of apples in a heat pump and solar dryer. Desalination. 2009;239:266-275
  23. 23. Artnaseaw A, Theerakulpisut S, Benjapiyaporn C. Development of a vacuum heat pump dryer for drying chilli. Biosystems Engineering. 2009;105:130-138
  24. 24. Artnaseaw A, Theerakulpisut S, Benjapiyaporn C. Drying characteristics of shiitake mushroom and Jinda chili during vacuum heat pump drying. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2009;88:104-114
  25. 25. Best R, Cruz JM, Gutierrez J, Soto W. Experimental results of a solar assisted heat pump rice drying system. Renewable Energy. 1996;9(1-4):690-694
  26. 26. Chen HH, Hernandez CE, Huang TC. A study of the drying effect on lemon slices using a closed-type solar dryer. Solar Energy. 2005;78:97-103
  27. 27. Chua KJ, Mujumdar AS, Chou SK, Hawlader MNA, Ho JC. Convective drying of bananas, guava, and potato pieces: Effect of cyclical variations of air temperature on drying kinetics and color change. Drying Technology. 2000;18(4-5):907-936
  28. 28. Colak N, Hepbasli A. Exergy analysis of drying of apple in a heat pump dryer. In: Second International Conference of the Food Industries & Nutrition Division on Future Trends in Food Science and Nutrition. 2005. pp. 145-158
  29. 29. Colak N, Kuzgunkaya E, Hepbasli A. Exergetic assessment of drying of mint leaves in a heat pump dryer. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 2008;31:281-298
  30. 30. Cunney MB, Williams P, editors. An engine-driven heat pump applied to grain drying and chilling. In: Proceedings Second International Symposium on the Large Scale Applications of Heat Pumps. 1984
  31. 31. Fatouh M, Metwally MN, Helali AB, Shedid MH. Herbs drying using a heat pump dryer. Energy Conservation and Management. 2006;47:2629-2643
  32. 32. Hancioglu KE, Hepbasli A. Exergetic performance assessment of a ground source heat pump drying system. International Journal of Energy Research. 2007;31:760-777
  33. 33. Hawlader MNA, Bong TY, Yang Y, editors. A simulation and performance analysis of a heat pump batch dryer. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Drying Symposium. 1998
  34. 34. Hawlader MNA, Chou SK, Jahangeer KA, Rahman SMA, Eugene LKW. Solar-assisted heat pump dryer and water heater. Applied Energy. 2003;74:185-193
  35. 35. Hawlader MNA, Jahangeer KA. Solar heat pump drying and water heating in the tropics. Solar Energy. 2006;80(5):492-499
  36. 36. Hawlader MNA, Perera CO, Tian M. Properties of modified atmosphere heat pump dried foods. Journal of Food Engineering. 2006;74(3):392-401
  37. 37. Ho JC, Chou SK, Mujumdar AS, Hawlader MNA, Chua KJ. An optimization framework for drying of heat sensitive products. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2001;21:1779-1798
  38. 38. Icier F, Colak N, Erbay Z, Kuzgunkaya EH, Hepbasli A. A comparative study on exergetic performance assessment for drying of broccoli florets in three different drying systems. Drying Technology. 2010;28:193-204
  39. 39. Icier F, Erbay Z. Optimization of drying of olive leaves in a pilot-scale heat pump dryer. Drying Technology. 2009;27:416-427
  40. 40. Jia X, Clements S, Jolly P. Study of heat pump assisted microwave drying. Drying Technology. 1993;11(7):1583-1616
  41. 41. Pal US, Khan MK, Mohanty SN. Heat pump drying of green sweet pepper. Drying Technology. 2008;26:1584-1590
  42. 42. Prasertsan S, Saen-saby P. Heat pump drying of agricultural materials. Drying Technology. 1998;16(1-2):235-250
  43. 43. Queiroz R, Gabas AL, Telis VRN. Drying kinetics of tomato by using electric resistance and heat pump dryers. Drying Technology. 2004;22(7):1603-1620
  44. 44. Rahman MS, Perera CO, Thebaud C. Desorption isotherm and heat pump drying kinetics of peas. Food Research International. 1998;30(7):485-491
  45. 45. Rossi SJ, Neues LC, Kicokbusch TG. Thermodynamic and energetic evaluation of a heat pump applied to the drying of vegetables. In: Mujumdar AS, editor. Drying ’92. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1992. pp. 1475-1478
  46. 46. Shi Q-L, Xue C-H, Zhao Y, Li Z-J, Wang X-Y. Drying characteristics of horse mackerel (Trachurus japonicus) dried in a heat pump dehumidifier. Journal of Food Engineering. 2008;84(1):12-20
  47. 47. Soponronnarit S, Nathakaranakule A, Wetchacama S, Swasdisev IT, Rukprang P. Fruit drying using heat pump. RERIC International Energy Journal. 1998;20:39-53
  48. 48. Teeboonma U, Tiansuwan J, Soponronnarit S. Optimization of heat pump fruit dryers. Journal of Food Engineering. 2003;59(4):369-377
  49. 49. Vazquez G, Chenlo F, Moreira R, Cruz E. Grape drying in a pilot plane with heat pump. Drying Technology. 1997;15(3-4):889-920
  50. 50. Zhang X, Mao Z, Sun L. Heat pump fluidized bed drying of agricultural materials. In: Annual Meeting of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. 2004
  51. 51. Aktaş M, Khanlari A, Aktekeli B, Amini A. Analysis of a new drying chamber for heat pump mint leaves dryer. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(28):18034-18044
  52. 52. Erbay Z, Hepbasli A. Application of conventional and advanced exergy analyses to evaluate the performance of a ground-source heat pump (GSHP) dryer used in food drying. Energy Conversion and Management. 2014;78:499-507
  53. 53. Taşeri L, Aktas M, Sevik S, Gulcu M, Uysal Seckin G, Aktekeli B. Determination of drying kinetics and quality parameters of grape pomace dried with a heat pump dryer. Food Chemistry. 2018;260:152-159
  54. 54. Omer AM. Ground-source heat pump system and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2008;12:344-371
  55. 55. Hancioglu KE, Hepbasli A. Exergetic evaluation of drying of laurel leaves in a vertical ground-source heat pump drying cabinet. International Journal of Energy Research. 2007;31:245-258
  56. 56. Kumar M, Sansaniwal SK, Khatak P. Progress in solar dryers for drying various commodities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016;55:346-360
  57. 57. Sarsavadia PN. Development of a solar-assisted dryer and evaluation of energy requirement for the drying of onion. Renewable Energy. 2007;32:2529-2547
  58. 58. Juraev ET, Akhatov JS. Study of mixed-mode forced convection solar drier. Applied Solar Energy. 2009;45:61-64
  59. 59. Slama RB, Combarnous M. Study of orange peels dryings kinetics and development of a solar dryer by forced convection. Solar Energy. 2011;85:570-578
  60. 60. Singh PL. Silk cocoon drying in forced convection type solar dryer. Applied Energy. 2011;88:1720-1726
  61. 61. Banout J, Ehl P, Havlik J, Lojka B, Polesny Z, Verner V. Design and performance evaluation of a double-pass solar drier for drying of red chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Solar Energy. 2011;85:506-515
  62. 62. Ferreira AG, Charbel ALT, Silva JG. Experimental analysis of a hybrid dryer. Thermal Engineering. 2007;6:3-7
  63. 63. Lopez-Vidana EC, Mendez-Lagunas LL, Rodrıguez-Ramırez J. Efficiency of a hybrid solar-gas dryer. Solar Energy. 2013;93:23-31
  64. 64. Reyes A, Mahn A, Vasquez F. Mushrooms dehydration in a hybrid-solar dryer, using a phase change material. Energy Conversion and Management. 2014;83:241-248
  65. 65. Chaturvedi SK, Shen JY. Thermal performance of a direct expansion solar assisted heat pump. Solar Energy. 1984;33(2):155-162
  66. 66. Morrison GL. Simulation of packaged solar heat-pump water heaters. Solar Energy. 1994;53(3):249-257
  67. 67. Kuang YH, Wang RZ, Yu LQ. Experimental study on solar assisted heat pump system for heat supply. Energy Conversion and Management. 2003;44(7):1089-1098
  68. 68. Troger JM, Butler JL. Drying peanuts with intermittent air flow. Transactions of ASAE. 1980;23(1):197-199
  69. 69. Gan SH, Ng MX, Tham TC, Chua LS, Aziz R, Baba MR, et al. Drying characteristics of Orthosiphon stamineus Benth by solar-assisted heat pump drying. Drying Technology. 2017;35(14):1755-1764
  70. 70. Best R, Soto W, Pilatowsky I, Gutierrez LJ. Evaluation of a rice drying system using a solar assisted heat pump. Renewable Energy. 1994;5(1):465-468
  71. 71. Şevik S, Aktaş M, Doğan H, Koçak S. Mushroom drying with solar assisted heat pump system. Energy Conversion and Management. 2013;72:171-178
  72. 72. Mortezapour H, Ghobadian B, Minaei S, Khoshtaghaza MH. Saffron drying with a heat pump-assisted hybrid photovoltaic-thermal solar dryer. Drying Technology. 2012;30(6):560-566

Written By

Khurram Yousaf, Kunjie Chen and Muhammad Azam Khan

Submitted: December 11th, 2019 Reviewed: July 15th, 2020 Published: November 30th, 2020