Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Supported-Metal Oxide Nanoparticles-Potential Photocatalysts

Written By

Vu T. Tan and La The Vinh

Submitted: November 11th, 2019 Reviewed: June 23rd, 2020 Published: July 27th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.93238

Chapter metrics overview

897 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Recently, nanosized metal oxides play an essential role in the photocatalytic system due to their ability to create charge carriers during the light irradiation. Metal oxide nanoparticles display excellent light absorption properties, outstanding charge transport characteristics, which are suitable in the photocatalytic system for the treatment of wastewater. Most of the photocatalysts found in the literature are in the form of powders. Only a few supported photocatalytic systems have been reported. The advantages of supported photocatalysts, such as that they produce a small pressure drop, have good mechanical stability and are easily separated from the reaction medium, make them superior to conventional powder photocatalysts. In this chapter, the definition of supported-metal oxide nanoparticles as the photocatalyst and their synthesis methodology are detailed discussed.


  • photocatalysis
  • metal oxides
  • thin film
  • semiconductor
  • substrate

1. Introduction

1.1 General description about photocatalysis

Photocatalysis by semiconductors, such as those indicated above, is a well-established method for degrading organic contaminants in wastewaters. When the photon with energy greater than the band gap of the semiconductor is absorbed by the solid, an electron is excited from the valence band to the conduction band, resulting in an electron-hole pair. These exciting state conduction band electrons and valence band holes have several possible fates [1]:

  1. they can combine and disperse the energy as heat while still in the bulk matrix of the crystal;

  2. they can become trapped in defect traps;

  3. they can migrate to the surface, where they recombine;

  4. they may take part in redox reactions with electron donors or acceptors adsorbed onto the surface, which is the desirable pathway if degradation of organic contaminants is to occur.

In aqueous systems, these adsorbed species will correspond to water molecules, hydroxide ions, and oxygen molecules.

It is clear to know that in semiconductors, the generation of electrons and holes depends on the position of the energy levels. Besides, the redox potential of a donor species on the surface of the photocatalyst needs to be more negative (higher in energy) than the valence band position of the semiconductor to fill the electron vacancies. Similarly, acceptor molecules must have a more positive redox potential (lower in energy) than the conduction band. In view of this, one of the advantages of TiO2 and ZnO compared to other semiconductors is that their electronic structure is such that it allows both the reduction of protons and the oxidation of water [2]. This phenomenon can be appreciated in the redox potential diagram shown in Figure 1. Recently, the use of TiO2 and ZnO as photocatalysts has been thoroughly investigated.

Figure 1.

Band gaps (eV) and redox potentials for several semiconductors referred to the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE). Reproduced from Ania et al. [3].

Numerous conditions of a photocatalyst are required to achieve high photocatalytic efficiency. Firstly, the bandgap of the semiconductor must be higher than the redox potential of the H2O/OH couple, and the material must be photo-stable. Secondly, the recombination of electron-hole pairs must be minimized. In other words, they need to be kept apart to allow time for the redox reactions to occur. Separation can be achieved by trapping electrons or holes in defects [4] or by using electrically conductive supports [5].

The holes in the photocatalyst valence band can oxidize the adsorbed water or hydroxide ions, while electrons in the conduction band can reduce molecular oxygen to superoxide anions [6]. These processes are summarized in the following equations:


The degradation of organic contaminants is commonly attributed to oxidation by hydroxyl radicals. This process is schematically described in Figure 2. This has led to the use of the term “Advanced Oxidation Processes,” although there is evidence that in some systems, reductive pathways also operate [7].

Figure 2.

Schematic diagram showing the processes involved in semiconductor photocatalysis. Reproduced from Gratzel et al. [2].

Among Advanced Oxidation Processes, the photocatalytic processes are focused on the conversion of highly toxic organic to either less toxic organic compounds or CO2 and H2O [8]. When the photocatalytic reaction is implemented in the presence of O2, the catalyst plays two main roles: to scavenge the photogenerated electrons and to produce active oxygen species [9]. We already know that metal oxides can respond to both UV-light and visible light, depending on the energy band gap of the materials. Newly, the photocatalytic process used visible light is widely employed for environmental cleanup [10].

Recently, many metal oxides (TiO2, ZnO, SnO2, and WO3) have been widely used for the photocatalysis process. This is due to their abundance in nature, stability in many conditions, and the capability to create charge carriers when they were exposed under UV or visible light. The advantageous combination of the electronic structure, light absorption capacities, and excited lifetimes of metal oxides have provided of metal oxides has provided them possible for their application as photocatalyst. The photocatalysis employing metal oxides such as TiO2, ZnO, SnO2, and WO3 has demonstrated their efficiency in the degradation of various harmful pollutants into carbon dioxide and water.

The vast majority of the photocatalysts studied are in powder form with all the difficulties in handling and recovering that implies. Consequently, supported photocatalysts are nowadays an important research area.


2. Supported TiO2 photocatalysts

When the light is irradiated to the surface of the semiconductor, its absorption of photons provokes the photocatalytic reaction at the surface of the catalyst. Among many semiconductor materials, titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles have been widely studied for photocatalytic applications over the last two decades [11, 12]. TiO2 is relatively inexpensive, insoluble in water, and non-toxic. It can provide photogenerated holes with high oxidizing power because of its wide bandgap (3.2 eV) [13].

The common mechanism of the photocatalytic process of TiO2 material consists of the interfacial redox reactions of the generated holes and electrons when the TiO2 materials are irradiated by light with appropriate energy (Figure 3) [14, 15].

Figure 3.

The mechanism of photocatalysis process of TiO2. Reproduced from Hoffman et al. [15]. (1) The formation of the electrons and holes by photon absorption. (2) The recombination of the generated electrons and holes. (3) The electron trapping of Ti (IV) at the conduction band to form Ti (III). (4) The hole trapping of titanol group at the valence band. (5) The oxidative pathways at the conduction band. (6) The reductive pathways at the valence band. (7) Photocatalytic oxidation reactions to form harmless compounds.

Most of the photocatalysts found in the literature are in the form of powders. Only a few supported photocatalytic systems have been reported, even though they have clear advantages from a practical point of view [16, 17, 18]. The most important benefit is that the separation of the supported photocatalysts from the reaction medium is simple, which minimizes the power requirements. In addition, they can be adapted to operate in flow-type continuous reactors [19, 20, 21]. Most recently, research was described by Fernández et al. [21]. They reported two methods of deposition of TiO2 powders on different substrates (glass, quartz, and stainless steel) and evaluated the photocatalytic activities of these supporting materials through the degradation of organic compounds (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

SEM micrographs for the three TiO2/quartz samples. Reproduced from Hoffman et al. [15].

The authors demonstrated the influence of coating methodology and photocatalytic activities. The results showed that titania deposited on quartz displays a similar photocatalytic activity to that of the powder form. Therefore, the result opens a new feature for a new advantage route to immobilize catalyst for flow reactor or batch reactor. Because filtration step to recover the catalyst always causes many drawbacks in water treatment.

Then some authors [22, 23] developed a new type of supported photocatalyst that consists of mixtures of noble metal nanoparticles and commercially available TiO2 nanoparticles (P25, Degussa-Evonik) deposited by dip-coating procedure on quartz substrate. The photocatalytic activity of the immobilized catalyst was evaluated by the degradation of malic acid. A comparison of the photocatalytic activity between supported TiO2 with the powder TiO2 Degussa P-25 shows slightly lower catalytic activity. This phenomenon could be explained by the total surface exposed of the catalyst to the light during the irradiation. However, the result could be compensated by the advantage of eliminating the recovering catalyst after the treatment.

Lately, several works also reported the preparation of thin TiO2 film on quartz substrates (Figure 5) by coating the TiO2 sol using rotary evaporator [24], by dip-coating [25], by spin coating [26].

Figure 5.

Schematic representation of photocatalytic reactor using TiO2 supported on quartz. Reproduced by Natarajan et al. [25].

Recently, Borges et al. [27] supported commercial TiO2 (Degussa P25) on glass spheres as a photocatalyst to treat the wastewater (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Packed-bed photoreactor system and glass spheres photocatalytic bed in photoreactor. Reproduced by Borges et al. [27].

Figure 7 shows the surface morphology substrate of the glass spheres without TiO2 particles. Figure 7b shows the TiO2 supported on the substrate and the homogeneous distribution of TiO2 on the surface of the glass sphere. The authors showed that photocatalytic treatment in photoreactor displays more advantages than in batch system for high volumes of industrial wastewater.

Figure 7.

SEM image of the glass sphere (a), SEM image of TiO2 supported on the glass sphere (b). Reproduced by Borges et al. [27].

Later, several authors also used poly-vinylidene fluoride (PVDF) dual layer hollow fiber membrane as a support to immobilize TiO2 to treat pharmaceutical compound in wastewater (Figure 8) [28, 29].

Figure 8.

Images of the PVDF membranes: (a) outer surface, (b) full cross section, (c) partial cross section, and (d) EDX images of TiO2 nanoparticles at the outer layer. Reproduced by Paredes et al. [29].

The author demonstrated that the TiO2 supported catalyst on PVDF membranes improved the photo-transformation rate of wastewater compounds during the photocatalytic treatment. The author also claimed that the supported catalyst could be easily recycled without any separation systems or catalysis recovery technologies.

It is already to know that TiO2 is used as a photocatalyst in the ultraviolet light region due to its wide bandgap. To improve its photocatalytic efficiency in the visible light, efforts have been made such as, doping TiO2 with anionic species (Fluorine, Sulfur, Nitrogen), or combining TiO2 with other metal oxides. The combination of TiO2 with other metal oxides can reduce the recombination effect of the electron-hole before they migrate to the surface of the material [30]. In addition, the composite of TiO2 with other metal oxides can be generated in the surface hydroxyl groups, which can trap holes after the irradiation process, which improve the separation of the electron-holes. In some cases, the composite of TiO2 with other metal oxides can enhance the crystallinity degree of TiO2 and increases the specific surface area of the composite which are two important properties for a photocatalyst.

Recently, TiO2 is widely combined with other metal oxides, such as ZrO2, SnO2, WO3, CeO2, ZnO, to improve the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 in the ultraviolet light and improving its photocatalytic efficiency in the visible region.

For example, the composite of mixed oxide ZrO2-TiO2 material recently gains a great attention. By combining TiO2 with ZrO2, the surface acidity of the composite can be increased, hence improved the reactivity compared to the TiO2 [31]. In addition, the hydroxyl groups are located on the surface of the catalyst, where the holes are trapped which could improve the efficiency of the degradation of organic pollutant [32]. Therefore, the mixed oxide ZrO2-TiO2 has been widely studied for the photodegradation of toxic organic compounds [31, 32, 33, 34, 35]. Many researchers also focused on the fabrication of ZrO2-TiO2 composite thin film and study its photocatalytic efficiency under ultraviolet or visible irradiation [36, 37, 38, 39, 40].

Luo et al. has fabricated the ZrO2-TiO2 composite thin film on glass substrate using micro-arc oxidation process and used it for the degradation of rhodamine B under ultraviolet irradiation [40]. The ZrO2-TiO2 composite thin film consists of three compounds: anatase, rutile, and ZrO2 phases, results that the generated electron can transfer from rutile to anatase. This phenomenon inhibits the recombination of the generated electron-hole pairs, thus improved the photocatalytic efficiency of the composite. The photodegradation of MB under UV light irradiation shows that the photocatalytic activity of ZrO2-TiO2 composite thin film is three times higher than that of the pure TiO2 thin film.

Alotaibi et al. have reported the preparation of ZrO2-TiO2 composite thin film on glass substrate using aerosol-assisted chemical vapor deposition [32]. The photocatalytic activity of the fabricated composite thin film was evaluated through the photodegradation of resazurin redox dye under Ultraviolet light irradiation (Figure 9). The composite shows an enhancement of photocatalytic activity compared to a pure TiO2 thin film fabricated by the same condition.

Figure 9.

SEM images of the (a) ZrO2, (b) TiO2 and (c) ZrO2-TiO2 composite films with the high magnification. The side on images—(d) ZrO2, (e) TiO2, and (f) ZrO2-TiO2 composite—shows the film thickness. Reproduced by Alotaibi et al. [32].

Tungsten oxide (WO3) is a common dopant in heterogeneous photocatalysis. In the last decade, WO3 was extensively combined with TiO2 to improve the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 in both UV and Visible light. Besides of using the catalyst in the powder form, the preparation of WO3-TiO2 film and its photocatalytic activity was extensively studied [41, 42, 43, 44] due to its advantage of the recuperation way. The WO3-TiO2 film has been fabricated by several methodologies such as sol-gel and dip coating [45]; spin-coating [46]; solvothermal method combining magnetron sputtering [47]; or film on pyrex substrates by casting methodology [48].

For example, Fu et al. have fabricated the WO3-TiO2 film on quartz substrate by dip-coating synthesis [42]. The photocatalytic efficiency was evaluated by the degradation of 4-chlorophenol-4 CP, xenobiotic micropollutants, under the irradiation visible light. The result shows that by incorporation of WO3 into TiO2, the WO3-TiO2 film can shift the absorption band from near UV region to the visible region. Under visible light, for the degradation of 4-CP, the prepared composite film demonstrated a higher photocatalytic activity for than that of pure TiO2 film.

Recently, Adel et al. have prepared the WO3-TiO2 thin film on glass substrate by reactive chemical spraying and tested its photocatalytic activity under visible light. The results show that the photocatalytic thin film can degrade completely dye in textile, wastewater leading to cleaner processes [49].

Spanu et al. have prepared Pt deposited on WO3-TiO2 nanotube arrays on Ti foil by sputtering method in order to improve the photocatalytic activity of the WO3-TiO2 system. The photocatalyst was used for the fabrication of H2 by photocatalysis. The Pt deposited on WO3-TiO2 nanotube arrays show highly enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution efficiency comparing to other single-photocatalyst system such as (Pt-TiO2 and WO3-TiO2) and pristine TiO2 nanotubes [50].


3. Supported ZnO photocatalysts

ZnO is a metal oxide with a broad energy band gap (3.37 eV), which is one of the best semiconductors in the last decade. Recently, ZnO is extensively used as a photocatalyst under UV or Visible light irradiation due to its outstanding electrical, mechanical, optical, and non-toxic properties. In addition, the production cost of ZnO is low cost comparing to the fabrication of other semiconductors [51].

The mechanism of photocatalysis process of ZnO to degrade organic compounds under irradiation light can be summarized as follows [52]:


ZnO shares many similar properties with TiO2, including a similar band gap (see Figure 1). There have even been several examples of ZnO displaying a higher photocatalytic activity than TiO2 [53]. In addition, ZnO exhibits a better quantum efficiency because it can absorb a larger fraction of the solar spectrum than TiO2 [54] and its price is even lower than that of TiO2 [55]. Compared to TiO2, ZnO can be easily supported on different types of substrates by means of low-temperature synthesis methods [56].

We already know that the photocatalytic efficiency of a photocatalyst is evaluated through the photogeneration of electron-hole pairs and their time-life. However, the main limitation of ZnO as a photocatalyst is the rapid recombination rate of photogenerated electron-hole pairs, which decreases the photocatalytic efficiency of ZnO. In addition, the use of ZnO as a photocatalyst is limited by the photocorrosion phenomenon. This process occurs because of the action of UV radiation. As a consequence, the catalyst is partially dissolved, which gives rise to a dramatic decrease in catalytic activity [57]. The mechanism of this process is represented by the following self-oxidation reactions [58, 59, 60]:


where h+ is the positive holes created by the action of UV radiation. Photocorrosion is the main obstacle to the use of ZnO as an effective photocatalyst. Therefore, significant efforts have been made to reduce the degradation of ZnO.

Beside TiO2 using as a photocatalyst, Jung et al. [61] studied the synthesis and photocatalytic activity of CuO-ZnO nanowires supported on stainless steel wire meshes (SSWM). They showed that CuO-ZnO structures supported on SSWM exhibit an enhanced photocatalytic activity with respect to catalysts using other supports, such as ITO. This result they attributed to the efficient charge separation of the electron-hole pair favored by the SSWM support [61]. Another advantage of SSWM is its flexibility, which allows the mesh to be easily shaped to the desired configuration.

In general, the procedures used to achieve this involves the deposition onto the ZnO surface of: (a) silver nanoparticles [62, 63, 64, 65, 66]; (b) polyaniline monolayers [67], (c) graphitic carbon [68]; (d) Nafion films [69]; (e) AlSi nanoclays [70]; and (f) C60 fullerenes which become hybridized with ZnO [59].

Although the above modifications improve the photocatalytic stability of ZnO, some problems persist. For instance, Bessekhouad et al. [71] have reported that the photocatalytic activity of the doped materials is impaired by thermal instability and by an increase in the number of hole/electron recombination centers. Therefore, the development of novel methods that provide effective protection of the ZnO photocatalyst against photocorrosion is required.

An attempt must be made to increase catalytic activity under visible irradiation, since the solar spectrum contains a large fraction of visible light compared to UV radiation. Recently, the photocatalytic activity of ZnO in the visible region has been improved by various techniques, such as: (a) modification of the ZnO surface by non-metal element doping [72]; (b) transition metal doping [73, 74]; (c) the combination of ZnO with another semiconductor [75], etc. Of these methods, the coupling of different semiconductor photocatalysts offers great promise as it increases the charge separation of the electron-hole pairs, resulting in an increase in photocatalytic decolorization efficiency [76].

Recently, ZnO has been combined successfully with TiO2 [77], CdO [78], CdS [79], and WO3 [80]. CdO is a good candidate for coupling with ZnO due to its band gap, ~2.2 eV [78], so that CdxZn1-xO nanostructures are active in the visible range. In addition, under visible light the excited electrons from the conduction band (CB) of ZnO can be easily transferred to the CB of CdO since the ECB of CdO is lower than the ECB of ZnO. These transferal processes increase the excess of electrons in the conduction band of CdO, which shifts in the Fermi level of CdO [81], increasing its photocatalytic efficiency. To the best of our knowledge, CdO-ZnO has been always synthesized in powder form. The use of CdO-ZnO supported on a target substrate (such as SSWM) as a photocatalyst for dye degradation processes in UV or visible has reported by Vu et al. [82]. They also attempt to demonstrate in parallel that coupling CdO and ZnO may be also an excellent method to avoid photocorrosion.


4. Supported WO3 photocatalysts

Tungsten oxide (WO3) is a high-ranking material in photocatalysis [83]. The WO3 presents in several phases such as monoclinic, orthorhombic, triclinic, cubic, etc., but only the monoclinic phase exhibits the best photocatalytic efficiency. In addition, WO3 is a material with many advantages, such as harmless, high stability in acidic and oxidative ambient, and its cost fabrication cost is very low compared with other photocatalysts [84].

It has been shown that the band gap energy of WO3 is varied from 2.5 to 3.0 eV [85, 86], leading WO3 can be used as a photocatalyst at the visible region. In recent times, there are many studies focused on the improvement strategies of the photocatalytic efficiency of WO3 [84, 87].

Recently, the researchers have proposed many strategies for the fabrication of WO3 thin film [88], such as sputtering deposition [89, 90, 91, 92], aerosol-assisted chemical vapor deposition [93, 94], sol-gel spin-coating [95, 96], hydrothermal-assisted growth [97, 98], and surfactant-assisted spray pyrolysis [99, 100]. Many works focused on the photocatalytic efficiency of WO3, especially the studying of WO3 thin film as a photocatalyst in the visible region [84, 101].

For example, the author fabricated a WO3 thin film with a thickness 500–600 nm deposited on a quartz substrate by DC reactive magnetron sputtering [102]. The fabricated film WO3 used for the degradation of CH3CHO (acetaldehyde) under ultraviolet, standard fluorescence, and visible light. The result shows that WO3 film fabricated by sputtering can be a good photocatalyst under visible light region.

To improve the separation of photogenerated charged and to increase the photocatalytic activity, many researchers combined other elements with the WO3 thin film. For example, Higashino et al. have fabricated a layer of WO3 on the Al-W allow coatings by selective solution and heat treatment (Figure 10). The formed thin film WO3 exhibits photocatalytic self-cleaning properties under the visible light irradiation [103].

Figure 10.

SEM images of the surface and cross-sectional of WO3. Reproduced by Higashino et al. [103].

Takashima et al. have taken advantage of the multielectron reduction of Pt to improve the photocatalytic activity of WO3 thin film on W foil. The author fabricated Pt loaded WO3 thin film using a reactive DC magnetron sputtering technique or low damage reactive gas flow sputtering [104]. The formed Pt-WO3 thin film was used to photodegrade CH3CHO under visible light. The result shows that the fabricated thin film demonstrates excellent photodecomposition rates under visible light.

Another approach to improve the separation of photogenerated charged, C3N4 is combined with WO3 film to form a heterojunction composite WO3/C3N4. The fabricated composite was deposited don fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrate [105]. The photocatalytic activity of the composite was tested by photocatalytic degradation of MB and Cr6+ in wastewater under UV illumination.

The supported WO3/C3N4 composite present higher photocatalytic activity on the decoloration of MB and the reduction of Cr6+ to Cr3+, compared to the photocatalytic activity of WO3 thin film.


5. Supported SnO2 photocatalysts

SnO2 is an inorganic compound that is exhibiting high optical transparency, excellent thermal and chemical stability, and strong oxidizing properties [106]. The band gap of SnO2 is quite large, around 3.6 eV, which leads that SnO2 can be used as a photocatalyst at the UV region. This property makes SnO2 becoming an excellent photocatalyst for the degradation of many organic compounds.

Recently, SnO2 played an important role in the photo-oxidation of pollutants and received a lot of attention despite the outstanding properties of this material. However, the vast number of researches used SnO2 in the powder form as a photocatalyst for the degradation of the toxic organic compound, and the experiments are usually performed using SnO2 in the powder form. There are only a few works describing the use of supported SnO2 thin film as a photocatalyst.

In recent times, many methodologies have been applied for the fabrication of SnO2 thin films such as, sol-gel [107], pulsed plasma deposition [108], pulsed laser deposition [109], reactive evaporation [110], and chemical bath deposition [111] methods.

For example, Jana et al. used the galvanic technique to fabricate SnO2 thin film on transparent conducting oxide (TCO) [112].

Figure 11 shows the nanoporous flake-like structure, which allows more efficient transport of reactant molecules to the active interfaces and results in a higher photocatalytic activity for degrading methyl orange (MO) dye than that of P25 under UV light [112].

Figure 11.

The SnO2 thin film and the photocatalytic activity of SnO2 thin film. Reproduced by Jana et al. [112].

However, the SnO2 in the powder form presents low photocatalytic activity comparing with other semiconductors due to its wide-band gap, 3.6 eV, and the rapid recombination of the photo generated electron-hole pairs. Thus, the SnO2 thin film could present lower photocatalytic efficiency comparing with SnO2 in the bulk form. Therefore, the SnO2 thin film is widely combined with other metal ions such as Ni, Co, Fe [113], Cr [114], Zn [115], Sb [116], W [117], or other semiconductors, such as ZnO [118], TiO2 [119], etc.

For example, the W-doped SnO2 thin films are fabricated on glass (ITO) substrate by simple chemical deposition techniques [120]. The result showed that the energy band gap is varied by the doping concentration of W, which is in the range of 3.46–3.35 eV. In addition, the UV-Visible absorption and Photoluminescence characterization results demonstrated that W-dopant SnO2 could narrow the band gap, thus enhancing the photocatalytic efficiency of the W-doped SnO2 in the visible light (Figure 12). The author used the fabricated W-doped SnO2 for the degradation of Methylene Blue and Rhodamine (RHB) under the visible region. The W-doped SnO2 thin film presents higher photocatalytic efficiency comparing to the pure SnO2 thin film in the visible light irradiation.

Figure 12.

Schematic representation for photocatalytic mechanism of RHB in W-SnO2 thin films. Reproduced by Vadivel et al. [120].

In recent time, Sr-doped metal oxides have great attention in electronic and optoelectronic applications. Besides, when Sr is combined with SnO2, the crystal growth rate of SnO2 is reduced, making the Sr-doped SnO2 to have a higher specific surface area. Thus, the combination of Sr with SnO2 can improve the photocatalytic activity of SnO2. For example, Haya et al. have prepared Sr-doped SnO2 thin film on glass substrate by simple sol-gel technique and study its photocatalytic activity under UV-irradiation [121]. The doping of Sr makes the SnO2 thin film to decrease its degree of crystallinity, reducing the particle size and increasing the specific surface area of the thin film. The results show that the Sr-doped (8%) SnO2 film has higher photocatalytic activity compared to undoped SnO2 thin film.

In addition, many researchers also combined with other metal elements to improve the photocatalytic activity of SnO2 thin film such as Cu-doped SnO2 [122], Fe-doped SnO2 [123], F- or Sr-doped [124], and Cl-doped SnO2 [125] on glass substrate.

Recently, to improve the photocatalytic efficiency of SnO2 thin film, B/Ag/F was doped with the SnO2-ZnO composite film on glass by the sol-gel route. The fabricated composite thin film was used for the degradation of methyl green and formaldehyde under UV irradiation. The result showed that the synergy of ZnO and tri-doping B/Ag/F had improved the photocatalytic activity of SnO2 thin film [126]. In addition, Kong et al. also prepared B/Fe co-doped SnO2-ZnO thin film on glass substrates using the sol-gel technique. The prepared composite thin film improved the lifetime of the photogenerated charge carriers and optical absorption properties. The photocatalytic efficiency of the composite thin film was evaluated through the degradation of organic pollutants such as acid naphthol red and formaldehyde. The B/Fe co-doped SnO2-ZnO film exhibits the highest photocatalytic activity compared with an undoped or only singly doped SnO2 thin film [127].


6. Conclusion

In this chapter, an overview of the development of supported catalysts and their prospects from a scientific point of view is presented. We can see that the field has experienced major advances in the last 5 years, especially in the area of supported TiO2, ZnO, WO3, SnO2, and mixed oxides on several types of substrates (SSWM, quartz, glass (ITO)). Based on the literature presented here, we believe that there is still quite a lot that can be achieved in improving the performance of supported catalysts for photocatalytic applications.


  1. 1. Philippopoulos CJ, Nikolaki MD. Photocatalytic Processes on the Oxidation of Organic Compounds in Water. Croatia: New Trends in Technologies; 2010. pp. 89-107. DOI: 10.5772/7588
  2. 2. Ania CO, Velasco LF, Valdés‐Solís T. Photochemical behavior of carbon adsorbents. In: Novel Carbon Adsorbents. Oxford: Elsevier; 2012. pp. 521‐547
  3. 3. Photoelectrochemical Cells. Nature. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  4. 4. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles with Defects—Ischenko—2005—Advanced Functional Materials—Wiley Online Library. 2005. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  5. 5. Öztas M, Bedir M. Thickness dependence of structural, electrical and optical properties of sprayed ZnO:Cu films. Thin Solid Films. 2008;516(8):1703-1709. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.05.018
  6. 6. Eslami A et al. Photocatalytic degradation of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) in contaminated water by ZnO nanoparticles. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 2008;83(11):1447-1453. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.1919
  7. 7. Environmental Applications of Semiconductor Photocatalysis. Chemical Reviews. 1995;95(1):69-96. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  8. 8. Wang H et al. Semiconductor heterojunction photocatalysts: Design, construction, and photocatalytic performances. Chemical Society Reviews. 2014;43(15):5234-5244. DOI: 10.1039/C4CS00126E
  9. 9. Nosaka Y, Nosaka A. Generation and detection of reactive oxygen species in photocatalysis. Chemical Reviews. 2017;117:11302-11336. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00161
  10. 10. Byrne C, Subramanian G, Pillai SC. Recent advances in photocatalysis for environmental applications. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2018;6(3):3531-3555. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.080
  11. 11. Nakata K, Fujishima A. TiO2 photocatalysis: Design and applications. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C Photochemistry Reviews. 2012;13(3):169-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2012.06.001
  12. 12. Fujishima A, Rao TN, Tryk DA. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C Photochemistry Reviews. 2000;1(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1016/S1389-5567(00)00002-2
  13. 13. Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Dyes in the Presence of Titanium Dioxide under UV and Solar Light: Effect of Operational Parameters—Akbal—2005—Environmental Progress. 2005;24(3):317-322. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  14. 14. Schneider J et al. Understanding TiO2 photocatalysis: Mechanisms and materials. Chemical Reviews. 2014;114(19):9919-9986. DOI: 10.1021/cr5001892
  15. 15. Hoffmann MR, Martin ST, Choi W, Bahnemann DW. Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chemical Reviews. 1995;95(1):69-96. DOI: 10.1021/cr00033a004
  16. 16. Taoda H. Development of TiO2 photocatalysts suitable for practical use and their applications in environmental cleanup. Research on Chemical Intermediates. 2008;34(4):417-426. DOI: 10.1163/156856708784040579
  17. 17. Wang L, Wang X, Cui S, Fan X, Zu B, Wang C. TiO2 supported on silica nanolayers derived from vermiculite for efficient photocatalysis. Catalysis Today. 2013;216:95-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.06.026
  18. 18. Singh S, Mahalingam H, Singh PK. Polymer-supported titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental remediation: A review. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2013;462-463:178-195. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2013.04.039
  19. 19. Enhancement of Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange by Supported Zinc Oxide Nanorods/Zinc Stannate (ZnO/ZTO) on Porous Substrates. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2013;52(38):13629-13636. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  20. 20. Photocatalytic Degradation Activity of Titanium Dioxide Sol–Gel Coatings on Stainless Steel Wire Meshes—Science Direct. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2010;124(2):1225-1231. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  21. 21. Fernández A et al. Preparation and characterization of TiO2 photocatalysts supported on various rigid supports (glass, quartz and stainless steel). Comparative studies of photocatalytic activity in water purification. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 1995;7(1):49-63. DOI: 10.1016/0926-3373(95)00026-7
  22. 22. Characterization and Photocatalytic Activity in Aqueous Medium of TiO2 and Ag-TiO2 Coatings on Quartz—Science Direct. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 1997;13:219-228. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  23. 23. Yu J, Xiong J, Cheng B, Liu S. Fabrication and characterization of Ag–TiO2 multiphase nanocomposite thin films with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2005;60(3):211-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.03.009
  24. 24. Photocatalytic Degradation of Phenol in a Fluidized Bed Reactor Utilizing Immobilized TiO2 Photocatalyst: Characterization and Process Studies—SciAlert Responsive Version. Journal of Applied Sciences. 2011;11(13). Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  25. 25. Photocatalytic Reactor Based on UV-LED/TiO2 Coated Quartz Tube for Degradation of Dyes—Science Direct. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2011;178:40-49. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  26. 26. Hanaor DAH, Triani G, Sorrell CC. Morphology and photocatalytic activity of highly oriented mixed phase titanium dioxide thin films. Surface and Coating Technology. 2011;205(12):3658-3664. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.01.007
  27. 27. Borges ME, García DM, Hernández T, Ruiz-Morales JC, Esparza P. Supported photocatalyst for removal of emerging contaminants from wastewater in a continuous packed-bed photoreactor configuration. Catalysts. 2015;5(1):77-87. DOI: 10.3390/catal5010077
  28. 28. Borges ME, Sierra M, Esparza P. Solar photocatalysis at semi-pilot scale: Wastewater decontamination in a packed-bed photocatalytic reactor system with a visible-solar-light-driven photocatalyst. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2017;19(4):1239-1245. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-016-1312-y
  29. 29. Paredes L et al. Application of immobilized TiO2 on PVDF dual layer hollow fibre membrane to improve the photocatalytic removal of pharmaceuticals in different water matrices. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2019;240:9-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.067
  30. 30. Sathasivam S et al. Combinatorial atmospheric pressure CVD of a composite TiO2/SnO2 thin film. Chemical Vapor Deposition. 2014;20:69-79. DOI: 10.1002/cvde.201307081
  31. 31. Kambur A, Pozan G, Boz I. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of TiO2–ZrO2 binary oxide nanoparticles. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2012;s115-116:149-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.12.012
  32. 32. Alotaibi AM, Sathasivam S, Parkin IP. Aerosol assisted chemical vapour deposition of a ZrO2–TiO2 composite thin film with enhanced photocatalytic activity. RSC Advances. 2015;5(83):67944-67950. DOI: 10.1039/C5RA12340B
  33. 33. Polisetti S, Deshpande PA, Madras G. Photocatalytic activity of combustion synthesized ZrO2 and ZrO2–TiO2 mixed oxides. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2011;50(23):12915-12924. DOI: 10.1021/ie200350f
  34. 34. Wang X, Patel RL, Liang X. Significant improvement in TiO2 photocatalytic activity through controllable ZrO2 deposition. RSC Advances. 2018;8(45):25829-25834. DOI: 10.1039/C8RA03423K
  35. 35. Koohestani H, Sadrnezhaad SK. Improvement in TiO2 photocatalytic performance by ZrO2 nanocompositing and immobilizing. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016;57(58):28450-28459. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2016.1183233
  36. 36. Maver K, Štangar UL, Černigoj U, Gross S, Korošec RC. Low-temperature synthesis and characterization of TiO2 and TiO2–ZrO2 photocatalytically active thin films. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences. 2009;8(5):657-662. DOI: 10.1039/B817475J
  37. 37. Hernández-Alonso M, Tejedortejedor I, Coronado J, Soria J, Anderson M. Sol-gel preparation of TiO2-ZrO2 thin films supported on glass rings: Influence of phase composition on photocatalytic activity. Thin Solid Films. 2006;502:125-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.07.256
  38. 38. Linnik O et al. TiO2/ZrO2 thin films synthesized by PLD in low pressure N-, C- and/or O-containing gases: Structural, optical and photocatalytic properties. Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures. 2012;7:1343-1352
  39. 39. Hernández-Alonso MD, Tejedor-Tejedor I, Coronado JM, Soria J, Anderson MA. Sol–gel preparation of TiO2–ZrO2 thin films supported on glass rings: Influence of phase composition on photocatalytic activity. Thin Solid Films. 2006;502:125-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.07.256
  40. 40. Luo Q et al. Preparation and characterization of ZrO2/TiO2 composite photocatalytic film by micro-arc oxidation. Transactions of the Nonferrous Metals Society of China. 2013;23(10):2945-2950. DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62818-6
  41. 41. Tatsuma T, Takeda S, Saitoh S, Ohko Y, Fujishima A. Bactericidal effect of energy storage TiO2–WO3 Photocatalysis in dark. Electrochemistry Communications. 2003;5:793-796. DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2003.07.003
  42. 42. Fu L, Cai W, Wang AW, Zheng YH, He L, Fu ZX. Synthesis and photocatalytic properties of TiO2–WO3 hybrid film. Materials and Technologies. 2015;30(5):264-268. DOI: 10.1179/1753555714Y.0000000256
  43. 43. Kim H-M, Kim D, Kim B. Photoinduced hydrophilicity of TiO2/WO3 double layer films. Surface and Coating Technology. 2015;271:18-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.01.054
  44. 44. Chen G-S, Cheng C. Searching for the formation of TiO2 mesoporous films with durable photoactivity by synergy of WO3 and sodium using a simple sputtering and annealing process. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2014;150-151:354-362. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.12.017
  45. 45. Rampaul A, Parkin IP, O’Neill SA, DeSouza J, Mills A, Elliott N. Titania and tungsten doped titania thin films on glass; active photocatalysts. Polyhedron. 2003;22(1):35-44. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-5387(02)01333-5
  46. 46. Tatsuma T, Takeda S, Saitoh S, Ohko Y, Fujishima A. Bactericidal effect of an energy storage TiO2–WO3 photocatalyst in dark. Electrochemistry Communications. 2003;5(9):793-796. DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2003.07.003
  47. 47. Tang K et al. Fabrication of WO3/TiO2 core-shell nanowire arrays: Structure design and high electrochromic performance. Electrochimica Acta. 2020;330:135189. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135189
  48. 48. Tae Kwon Y, Yong Song K, In Lee W, Jin Choi G, Rag Do Y. Photocatalytic behavior of WO3-loaded TiO2 in an oxidation reaction. Journal of Catalysis. 2000;191(1):192-199. DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1999.2776
  49. 49. Youssef AB, Laamari M, Bousselmi L. TiO2 and WO3/TiO2 thin films for photocatalytic wastewater treatment. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management. 2019;24:151. DOI: 10.1504/IJEWM.2019.10022371
  50. 50. Spanu D, Recchia S, Mohajernia S, Schmuki P, Altomare M. Site-selective Pt dewetting on WO3-coated TiO2 nanotube arrays: An electron transfer cascade-based H2 evolution photocatalyst. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2018;237:198-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.061
  51. 51. Ong CB, Ng LY, Mohammad AW. A review of ZnO nanoparticles as solar photocatalysts: Synthesis, mechanisms and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;81:536-551. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.020
  52. 52. Rajamanickam D, Shanthi M. Photocatalytic degradation of an organic pollutant by zinc oxide–solar process. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2016;9:S1858-S1868. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.05.006
  53. 53. Lizama C, Freer J, Baeza J, Mansilla HD. Optimized photodegradation of reactive blue 19 on TiO2 and ZnO suspensions. Catalysis Today. 2002;76(2):235-246. DOI: 10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00222-5
  54. 54. Sakthivel S, Neppolian B, Shankar MV, Arabindoo B, Palanichamy M, Murugesan V. Solar photocatalytic degradation of azo dye: Comparison of photocatalytic efficiency of ZnO and TiO2. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells. 2003;77(1):65-82. DOI: 10.1016/S0927-0248(02)00255-6
  55. 55. Chiu WS et al. Photocatalytic study of two-dimensional ZnO nanopellets in the decomposition of methylene blue. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2010;158(2):345-352. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.01.052
  56. 56. Vu TT, del Río L, Valdés-Solís T, Marbán G. Tailoring the synthesis of stainless steel wire mesh-supported ZnO. Materials Research Bulletin. 2012;47(6):1577-1586. DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.02.017
  57. 57. Kenanakis G, Giannakoudakis Z, Vernardou D, Savvakis C, Katsarakis N. Photocatalytic degradation of stearic acid by ZnO thin films and nanostructures deposited by different chemical routes. Catalysis Today. 2010;151(1):34-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.02.054
  58. 58. Neppolian B, Choi HC, Sakthivel S, Arabindoo B, Murugesan V. Solar/UV-induced photocatalytic degradation of three commercial textile dyes. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2002;89(2):303-317. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00329-6
  59. 59. Fu H, Xu T, Zhu S, Zhu Y. Photocorrosion inhibition and enhancement of photocatalytic activity for ZnO via hybridization with C60. Environmental Science & Technology. 2008;42(21):8064-8069. DOI: 10.1021/es801484x
  60. 60. Photo-induced dissolution of zinc in alkaline solutions—Science Direct. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  61. 61. Fabrication of CuO-ZnO Nanowires on a Stainless Steel Mesh for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Applications. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  62. 62. Ren C et al. Synthesis of Ag/ZnO nanorods array with enhanced photocatalytic performance. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010;182(1):123-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.141
  63. 63. Facile Synthesis of Ag/ZnO Heterostructures Assisted by UV Irradiation: Highly Photocatalytic Property and Enhanced Photostability—Science Direct. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  64. 64. Xie W, Li Y, Sun W, Huang J, Xie H, Zhao X. Surface modification of ZnO with Ag improves its photocatalytic efficiency and photostability. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2010;216(2):149-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.06.032
  65. 65. Tian C, Zhang Q, Jiang B, Tian G, Fu H. Glucose-mediated solution–solid route for easy synthesis of Ag/ZnO particles with superior photocatalytic activity and photostability. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2011;509(24):6935-6941. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.04.005
  66. 66. Han Z, Ren L, Cui Z, Chen C, Pan H, Chen J. Ag/ZnO flower heterostructures as a visible-light driven photocatalyst via surface plasmon resonance. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2012;126:298-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.07.002
  67. 67. Photocorrosion Inhibition and Photoactivity Enhancement for Zinc Oxide via Hybridization with Monolayer Polyaniline. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  68. 68. Photocorrosion Suppression of ZnO Nanoparticles via Hybridization with Graphite-like Carbon and Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity—Google Search. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  69. 69. Wang J, Liu P, Wang S, Han W, Wang X, Fu X. Nanocrystalline zinc oxide in perfluorinated ionomer membranes: Preparation, characterization, and photocatalytic properties. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2007;273(1):21-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2007.03.062
  70. 70. Suchithra PS, Shadiya CP, Mohamed AP, Velusamy P, Ananthakumar S. One-pot microwave mediated growth of heterostructured ZnO@AlSi as a potential dual-function eco-catalyst for treating hazardous pollutants in water resources. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2013;130-131:44-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.10.010
  71. 71. Bessekhouad Y, Robert D, Weber J-V, Chaoui N. Effect of alkaline-doped TiO2 on photocatalytic efficiency. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2004;167(1):49-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2003.12.001
  72. 72. Chen L-C, Tu Y-J, Wang Y-S, Kan R-S, Huang C-M. Characterization and photoreactivity of N-, S-, and C-doped ZnO under UV and visible light illumination. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2008;199(2):170-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2008.05.022
  73. 73. Kaneva NV, Dimitrov DT, Dushkin CD. Effect of nickel doping on the photocatalytic activity of ZnO thin films under UV and visible light. Applied Surface Science. 2011;257(18):8113-8120. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.119
  74. 74. Cobalt-Doped Zincblende–Wurtzite Mixed-Phase ZnO Photocatalyst Nanoparticles with High Activity in Visible Spectrum—Science Direct. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2014;144:435-441. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  75. 75. Zhu H-Y, Xiao L, Jiang R, Zeng G-M, Liu L. Efficient decolorization of azo dye solution by visible light-induced photocatalytic process using SnO2/ZnO heterojunction immobilized in chitosan matrix. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2011;172(2):746-753. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.06.053
  76. 76. Tian H, Ma J, Li K, Li J. Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange with W-doped TiO2 synthesized by a hydrothermal method. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2008;112(1):47-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.05.005
  77. 77. Adsorption-Photodegradation of Humic Acid in Water by using ZnO Coupled TiO2/Bamboo Charcoal Under Visible Light Irradiation—PubMed—NCBI. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2013;262:16-24. Avaialble from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  78. 78. ZnO/CdO Composite Nanorods for Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue under Visible Light—Science Direct. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2011;125:277-280. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  79. 79. Pawar RC, Lee CS. Single-step sensitization of reduced graphene oxide sheets and CdS nanoparticles on ZnO nanorods as visible-light photocatalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2014;144:57-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.06.022
  80. 80. Li D, Haneda H, Ohashi N, Hishita S, Yoshikawa Y. Synthesis of nanosized nitrogen-containing MOx–ZnO (M = W, V, Fe) composite powders by spray pyrolysis and their visible-light-driven photocatalysis in gas-phase acetaldehyde decomposition. Catalysis Today. 2004;93-95:895-901. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2004.06.099
  81. 81. Encapsulation of CdO/ZnO NPs in PU Electrospun Nanofibers as Novel Strategy for Effective Immobilization of the Photocatalysts—Science Direct. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2012;401:8-16. Available from: [Accessed: 17 January 2020]
  82. 82. Vu T, Rodil A, Marban G, Valdés-Solís T. Nanostructured stainless steel wire mesh-supported CdxZn1-XO: A stable photocatalyst under visible and ultraviolet irradiation. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2014;2:1612-1620. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2014.06.018
  83. 83. Janáky C, Rajeshwar K, de Tacconi NR, Chanmanee W, Huda MN. Tungsten-based oxide semiconductors for solar hydrogen generation. Catalysis Today. 2013;199:53-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.07.020
  84. 84. Dong P, Hou G, Xi X, Shao R, Dong F. WO3-based photocatalysts: Morphology control, activity enhancement and multifunctional applications. Environmental Science. Nano. 2017;4(3):539-557. DOI: 10.1039/C6EN00478D
  85. 85. Johansson M, Niklasson G, Osterlund L. Structural and optical properties of visible active photocatalytic WO3 thin films prepared by reactive dc magnetron sputtering. Journal of Materials Research. 2012;27:3130-3140. DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2012.384
  86. 86. Wicaksana Y, Liu S, Scott J, Amal R. Tungsten trioxide as a visible light photocatalyst for volatile organic carbon removal. Molecules. 2014;19:17747-17762. DOI: 10.3390/molecules191117747
  87. 87. Tahir MB, Nabi G, Rafique M, Khalid NR. Nanostructured-based WO3 photocatalysts: Recent development, activity enhancement, perspectives and applications for wastewater treatment. International journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2017;14(11):2519-2542. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-017-1394-z
  88. 88. Formation of a Photocatalytic WO3 Surface Layer on Electrodeposited Al–W Alloy Coatings by Selective Dissolution and Heat Treatment. Scientific Reports. 2019. Available from: [Accessed: 11 June 2020]
  89. 89. Valerini D, Hernández S, Di Benedetto F, Russo N, Saracco G, Rizzo A. Sputtered WO3 films for water splitting applications. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing. 2016;42:150-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2015.09.013
  90. 90. Zheng H, Sadek AZ, Latham K, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Nanoporous WO3 from anodized RF sputtered tungsten thin films. Electrochemistry Communications. 2009;11(4):768-771. DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.01.033
  91. 91. Khatko V et al. Tungsten trioxide sensing layers on highly ordered nanoporous alumina template. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2006;118(1):255-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2006.04.030
  92. 92. Visible-Light Active Thin-Film WO3 Photocatalyst with Controlled High-Rate Deposition by Low-Damage Reactive-Gas-Flow Sputtering. APL Materials. 2010;3(10). Available from: https://aip.scitationo.rg/doi/10.1063/1.4922942 [Accessed: 11 June 2020]
  93. 93. Kim H, Bonsu RO, O’Donohue C, Korotkov RY, McElwee-White L, Anderson TJ. Aerosol-assisted chemical vapor deposition of tungsten oxide films and nanorods from oxo tungsten(VI) fluoroalkoxide precursors. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015;7(4):2660-2667. DOI: 10.1021/am507706e
  94. 94. Houweling ZS, Geus JW, Schropp REI. Hot-wire chemical vapor deposition of WO3−x thin films of various oxygen contents. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2013;140(1):89-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.02.072
  95. 95. Au BWC, Chan KY, Pang WL, Lee CL, Mustafa AH. Tungsten oxide (WO3) films prepared by sol-gel spin-coating technique. Solid State Phenomena. 2018;280:71-75. Available from: /SSP.280.71 [Accessed: 11 June 2020]
  96. 96. Kim K-W et al. Various coating methodologies of WO3 according to the purpose for electrochromic devices. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:821-823. doi: 10.3390/nano10050821
  97. 97. Mathuri S, Margoni MM, Ramamurthi K, Babu RR, Ganesh V. Hydrothermal assisted growth of vertically aligned platelet like structures of WO3 films on transparent conducting FTO substrate for electrochromic performance. Applied Surface Science. 2018;449:77-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.033
  98. 98. Hydrothermal Formation of Tungsten Trioxide Nanowire Networks on Seed-Free Substrates and Their Properties in Electrochromic Device. Request PDF. Available from: [Accessed: 11 June 2020]
  99. 99. Bertus LM et al. Synthesis and characterization of WO3 thin films by surfactant assisted spray pyrolysis for electrochromic applications. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2013;140(1):49-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.02.047
  100. 100. Manceriu L, Duta A. Synthesis of WO3 thin films by surfactant mediated spray pyrolysis. Ceramics International. 2012;38:2873-2882. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.11.060
  101. 101. Lai CW. WO3 nanoplates film: Formation and photocatalytic oxidation studies. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2015;22:7. Available from: [Accessed: 11 June 2020]
  102. 102. Visible Light-Induced Photocatalytic Properties of WO3 Films Deposited by DC Reactive Magnetron Sputtering. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A. 2012;30:031503 Available from: https://avs.scitationo.rg/doi/abs/10.1116/1.3696876?journalCode=jva [Accessed: 11 June 2020]
  103. 103. Higashino S, Miyake M, Ikenoue T, Hirato T. Formation of a photocatalytic WO3 surface layer on electrodeposited Al–W alloy coatings by selective dissolution and heat treatment. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):16008. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52178-6
  104. 104. Takashima J, Oka N, Shigesato Y. Photocatalytic activity of WO3 films crystallized by postannealing in air. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2012;51(5R):055501. DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.51.055501
  105. 105. Cui L et al. Facile preparation of Z-scheme WO3/g-C3N4 composite photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic performance under visible light. Applied Surface Science. 2016;391:202-210. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.055
  106. 106. Bouras K et al. Optical and structural properties of Nd doped SnO2 powder fabricated by the sol–gel method. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2014;2(39):8235-8243. DOI: 10.1039/C4TC01202J
  107. 107. Huang Y, Li D, Feng J, Li G, Zhang Q. Transparent conductive tungsten-doped tin oxide thin films synthesized by sol–gel technique on quartz glass substrates. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology. 2010;54(3):276-281. DOI: 10.1007/s10971-010-2182-0
  108. 108. Huang Y, Zhang Q, Li G. Transparent conductive tungsten-doped tin oxide polycrystalline films prepared on quartz substrates. Semiconductor Science and Technology. 2008;24(1):015003. DOI: 10.1088/0268-1242/24/1/015003
  109. 109. Nakao S, Yamada N, Hitosugi T, Hirose Y, Shimada T, Hasegawa T. Fabrication of transparent conductive W-doped SnO2 thin films on glass substrates using anatase TiO2 seed layers. Physica Status Solidi C: Current Topics in Solid State Physics. 2011;8(2):543-545. DOI: 10.1002/pssc.201000505
  110. 110. Yadav JB, Patil RB, Puri RK, Puri V. Studies on undoped SnO2 thin film deposited by chemical reactive evaporation method. Materials Science and Engineering B. 2007;139(1):69-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2007.01.032
  111. 111. Rifai A, Iqbal M, Tapran N, Nuruddin A, Suyatman S, Yuliarto B. Synthesis and characterization of SnO2 thin films by chemical bath deposition. AIP Conf. Proc. 2011;1415:231-233. DOI: 10.1063/1.3667263
  112. 112. Jana S, Mitra B, Bera P, Sikdar M, Mondal A. Photocatalytic activity of galvanically synthesized nanostructure SnO2 thin films. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2014;602:42-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.182
  113. 113. Soussi L et al. Effect of (Co, Fe, Ni) doping on structural, optical and electrical properties of sprayed SnO2 thin film. Surfaces and Interfaces. 2020;19:100467. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100467
  114. 114. Gandhi TI, Ramesh Babu R, Ramamurthi K. Structural, morphological, electrical and optical studies of Cr doped SnO2 thin films deposited by the spray pyrolysis technique. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing. 2013;16(2):472-479. DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2012.07.008
  115. 115. Cho Y, Parmar NS, Nahm S, Choi J-W. Full range optical and electrical properties of Zn-doped SnO2 and oxide/metal/oxide multilayer thin films deposited on flexible PET substrate. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2017;694:217-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.293
  116. 116. Gupta S, Yadav BC, Dwivedi PK, Das B. Microstructural, optical and electrical investigations of Sb-SnO2 thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis. Materials Research Bulletin. 2013;48(9):3315-3322. DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.05.001
  117. 117. Wang M et al. Transparent and conductive W-doped SnO2 thin films fabricated by an aqueous solution process. Thin Solid Films. 2013;544:419-426. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.02.088
  118. 118. Ynineb F et al. Influence of Sn content on properties of ZnO:SnO2 thin films deposited by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing. 2013;16:2021-2027. DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2013.07.023
  119. 119. Medjaldi F, Bouabellou A, Bouachiba Y, Taabouche A, Bouatia K, Serrar H. Study of TiO2, SnO2 and nanocomposites TiO2:SnO2 thin films prepared by sol-gel method: Successful elaboration of variable–refractive index systems. Materials Research Express. 2020;7(1):016439. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab6c0c
  120. 120. Vadivel S, Rajarajan G. Effect of W doping on structural, optical and photocatalytic activity of SnO2 nanostructure thin films. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. 2015;26(9):7127-7133. DOI: 10.1007/s10854-015-3335-2
  121. 121. Haya S, Brahmia O, Halimi O, Sebais M, Boudine B. Sol–gel synthesis of Sr-doped SnO2 thin films and their photocatalytic properties. Materials Research Express. 2017;4(10):106406. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aa8deb
  122. 122. Influence of Cu Doping on Structural, Optical and Photocatalytic Activity of SnO2 Nanostructure Thin Films. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 148(3):528-532. Available from: [Accessed: 13 June 2020]
  123. 123. Nassiri C, Hadri A, Chafi F, Rouchdi M, Fares B, Mzerd A. Structural, optical and electrical properties of Fe doped SnO2 prepared by spray pyrolysis. Journal of Materials and Environmental Sciences. 2017;8:420-425
  124. 124. Thangaraju B. Structural and electrical studies on highly conducting spray deposited fluorine and antimony doped SnO2 thin films from SnCl2 precursor. Thin Solid Films. 2002;402(1):71-78. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01667-4
  125. 125. Abass AK. Electrical and optical properties of chlorine doped SnO2 coatings. Solid State Communications. 1987;61(8):507-510. DOI: 10.1016/0038-1098(87)90502-3
  126. 126. Han K, Peng X-L, Li F, Yao M-M. SnO2 composite films for enhanced photocatalytic activities. Catalysts. 2018;8(10):453. DOI: 10.3390/catal8100453
  127. 127. Kong X, Li F, Qi Z, Qi L, Yao M. SnO2-based thin films with excellent photocatalytic performance. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. 2017;28:1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10854-017-6459-8

Written By

Vu T. Tan and La The Vinh

Submitted: November 11th, 2019 Reviewed: June 23rd, 2020 Published: July 27th, 2020