Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Polyploidy in the Ginger Family from Thailand

Written By

Kesara Anamthawat-Jónsson and Puangpaka Umpunjun

Submitted: May 10th, 2019 Reviewed: May 18th, 2020 Published: June 24th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.92859

Chapter metrics overview

613 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Polyploidy is common in the ginger family Zingiberaceae. The aims of the present paper are (1) to provide a general introduction on species diversity with emphasis on conservation; (2) to highlight the human-use significance of this family, focusing on the two major genera, Zingiber (ginger) and Curcuma (turmeric); (3) to present chromosome number data from 45 natural and cultivated Curcuma taxa from Thailand, of which polyploids are predominant; and (4) to describe our own work on cytotaxonomy of selected Thai Curcuma species. We obtained somatic chromosome numbers from root tips and analysed meiotic chromosome behaviour from flowers. We also used the molecular cytogenetic method of ribosomal gene mapping on chromosomes to infer mechanism of polyploidization and reveal genomic relationships among closely related species. The main results of our cytogenetic studies include the following. The most sought-after medicinal Curcuma cultivars growing on a large-scale basis are secondary triploids, so as taxa in natural habitats that are harvested for local utilisation. These triploids are sexually deficient, due to meiotic pairing abnormalities, but they are propagated asexually via rhizomes. The ribosomal mapping results indicate natural triploidization process via hybridisation, either within populations or across the species boundaries.

Keywords

  • Curcuma
  • cytogenetics
  • cytotaxonomy
  • ethnobotany
  • ginger
  • medicinal plants
  • polyploidy
  • triploidy
  • turmeric
  • Zingiber

1. Introduction

Taxonomic classification of the ginger family (Zingiberaceae) is still under revision for many floras, as more than 3000 species names have been used worldwide, but only half of these are accepted. These aromatic herbs grow in moist areas of the tropics and subtropics, including some regions that are seasonably dry. The ginger family comprises about 50 genera and more than 1300 species worldwide, and in Thailand 21 genera with about 200 species have been described. Numerous species are endemic to Thailand, but the majority has a wider distribution, especially over Southeast and South Asia. A few species of this family are commercially cultivated, such as ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.), turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) and aromatic ginger (Kaempferia galanga L.). Interestingly, these widely cultivated species are sexually deficient triploid or pentaploid plants—the elite cultivars are therefore propagated by rhizomes. These polyploid species are superior to their diploid relatives in terms of growth and yield, while the sought-after quality characters remain unchanged.

Advertisement

2. The ginger family (Zingiberaceae), with emphasis on Curcuma

The ginger family or Zingiberaceae comprises about 50 genera and more than 1300 species worldwide [1, 2]. The family distribution is pantropical, with centre of species diversity in South and Southeast Asia. Some species are found in America and subtropical and warm-temperate Asia. In China, 20 genera and 216 species (141 endemic, four introduced) have been recorded [1]. Geographically, Thailand is part of the Indochinese region that harbours the highest ginger genetic resources [3, 4]. Several of these species are rare and endemic to Thailand [5]. A large number of Thai taxa of Zingiberaceae are known as edible, ornamental or medicinal plants, from which commercial products beneficial to human can be developed.

Two best known genera in the context of cultivation and human uses worldwide are Zingiber Miller (ginger) and Curcuma Linnaeus (turmeric). The largest genus Zingiber, which comprises 100–200 species, is native to Southeast Asia especially in Thailand [6], China [7], the Indian subcontinent and New Guinea [8]. It contains the true gingers, plants grown for their medicinal and culinary value. The best known is Z. officinale, the garden ginger.

Curcuma is a genus of about 120 accepted species in the family Zingiberaceae that contains such species as turmeric (C. longa) and Siam tulip (C. alismatifolia Gagnep.). They are native to Southeast Asia, southern China, the Indian subcontinent, New Guinea and northern Australia [6, 8, 9, 10, 11]. Tropical Asia and South Asia are the diversity hotspots of the genus. Although the species diversity is very high and new species are being discovered regularly, other species are disappearing. Habitat loss, due to global warming, deforestation, agricultural expansion and anthropogenic activities, is one of the main causes of biodiversity loss worldwide [12, 13, 14]. In addition, overharvesting for use in traditional medicine has raised a serious concern that wild plants will be disappearing from nature.

According to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, seven Curcuma species have been declared endangered to extinction (EN) and six additionally critically endangered (CR). The endemic EN species are C. caulina J. Graham, India [15]; C. colorata Valeton, Indonesia [16]; C. coriacea Mangaly & M. Sabu, India [17]; C. corniculata Skornick., Lao [18]; C. prasina Skornick., Thailand [19]; C. sahuynhensis Skornick. & N.S. Lý, Vietnam [20]; and C. vitellina Skornick. & H.D.Tran, Vietnam [21]. The endemic CR species are C. bhatii (R.M.Sm.) Skornick. & M. Sabu, India [22]; C. leonidii Skornick. & Luu, Vietnam [23]; C. newmanii Skornick., Vietnam [24]; C. pygmaea Skornick. & Sida f., Vietnam [25]; C. supraneeana (W.J. Kress & K. Larsen) Skornick., Thailand [26]; and C. vamana M. Sabu and Mangaly, India [27]. There clearly is an urgent need to protect these Curcuma species in their natural habitats while at the same time encouraging ex situ conservation and supporting researches aiming to find viable methods for sustainable cultivation of species of economic potential.

Advertisement

3. Recent publications on the ginger family

The survey of recent (2019) publications on Zingiberaceae in the Web-of-Science database, using “ginger” as keyword in titles (Figure 1), shows that the genus Zingiber (ginger) is by far the most investigated worldwide. The most researched topics concern medicinal properties and health benefits of ginger (1); pharmaceutical, biochemical and molecular characterisation (2); applications in food science and chemistry (3); other technologies and industrial applications (4); as well as some effort in improving cultivation (5). On the other hand, research on Zingiber diversity, taxonomy, ecology and genetics (6) is limited.

Figure 1.

Distribution of recent publications by research topics in 2019, obtained from web-of-science database (webofknowledge.com/WOS_), using the single keyword “ginger” in title. Research topics (x-axis): 1, medicinal properties and health benefits; 2, pharmaceutical, biochemical and molecular research; 3, food science and chemistry; 4, other technologies and industrial applications; 5, cultivation and agriculture; and 6, biodiversity, taxonomy, ecology and genetics. Y-axis: Percentages of the number of publications in 166 totals. Blue columns include papers on Zingiber, ginger, gingerols and ginger-related topics. Red columns include papers on Curcuma, turmeric, curcumins and related topics. Grey columns include other species in the ginger family Zingiberaceae.

Ginger (Z. officinale) is a very popular spice used worldwide, whether it be used to spice up meals, or as a medicine [28]. Ginger can be used for a variety of food or medicine items, as vegetables, candy, soda, pickles and alcoholic beverages. It is one of the most versatile, ancient, significant, medicinal, nutritional herbs with several ethnomedical values. This plant is recognised due to its therapeutic properties, including antibiotic, antimicrobial, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects [29]. Phenolic acids, diarylheptanoids, terpenoids and flavonoids are reported to exist in ginger rhizomes [30]. A list of 72 gingerols and diarylheptanoids derivatives from ginger rhizomes is presented in Asamenew et al. [31], and among these compounds, gingerol- and shogaol-related derivatives are the principal medicinally active components contributing to the characteristic pungent flavour of ginger together with essential oil major component, zingerone. These bioactive compounds have been shown in experiments to be effective for inflammatory diseases [32] and osteoarthritis [29], to help induce apoptosis in cancer cells [33] and to show anti-leukaemic effect [34]. Ginger has a great pharmaceutical potential.

Our survey of recent (2019) publications on Zingiberaceae in the Web-of-Science database, using “Curcuma” as keyword in titles (Figure 2), shows that C. longa (turmeric, saffron turmeric) is the single most researched Curcuma species. The results show that this species has received much attention in the area of pharmaceutical research and medicinal applications. Turmeric is commonly used as spice, dye, drug and cosmetics [35], but recent research efforts have further characterised its medicinal properties and have identified its biochemical components in high resolution and specificity. The genus Curcuma is rich in flavonoids, tannins, anthocyanin, phenolic compounds, oil, organic acids and inorganic compounds [36]. The biological activities of Curcuma have been attributed to the non-volatile ingredients of the rhizome, cucurminoids (e.g. curcumin), as well as to the volatile terpenoids [37]. Curcumin has been shown in experiments to have strong anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects [29, 36]. The European Union has recommended the use of numerous medicinal plants for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders, and among them are ginger root (Z. officinale) and turmeric root (C. longa) [38].

Figure 2.

Distribution of recent publications by research topics in 2019, obtained from web-of-science database (webofknowledge.com/WOS_), using the single keyword “Curcuma” in title. Research topics (x-axis): 1, medicinal properties and health benefits; 2, pharmaceutical, biochemical and molecular research; 3, food science and chemistry; 4, other technologies and industrial applications; 5, cultivation and agriculture; and 6, biodiversity, taxonomy, ecology and genetics. Y-axis: Percentages of the number of publications in 200 totals. Red columns include papers on Curcuma longa (turmeric). Yellow columns include papers about all other Curcuma species, e.g. C. zedoaria (white turmeric, 7%), C. caesia (black turmeric, 5%), C. xanthorrhiza (Javanese ginger/turmeric, 5%), C. amada (mango ginger, 5%), C. aromatica (fragrant turmeric, 3%) and 17 other Curcuma species with less than 3% each.

Some 23 other Curcuma species have recently been explored in search for new medicinal applications (Figure 2). The top five Curcuma species investigated are C. zedoaria (Christm.) Rosc. (white turmeric, native to South and Southeast Asia, cultivated in Thailand), C. caesia Roxb. (black turmeric, native to Northeast India, natural species of Thailand), C. xanthorrhiza Roxb. (Javanese ginger/turmeric, originated from Java island, cultivated in Thailand), C. amada Roxb. (mango ginger, originated from East India, natural species of Thailand) and C. aromatica Roxb. (fragrant turmeric, natural species of South Asia, cultivated in Thailand). Bioactive ingredients, including terpenes (more than 40 monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes), antioxidants flavonoids and phenolic compounds are present in all these species [39, 40]. Curcumin from C. zedoaria, as from C. longa, shows good anti-inflammatory effects [36]. Zederone and zedoarondiol, from rhizomes of En-Lueang (Curcuma cf. amada), show strong cytotoxicity in a leukaemic cell line and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, as well as having antioxidant and haemolysis properties [41]. Dry extracts from rhizomes of C. xanthorrhiza and C. zedoaria have been shown to have anticancer and antiviral properties [42, 43, 44]. Furthermore, volatile oils extracted from leaves of C. caesia have broad antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effects in vitro [45, 46]. In contrast to C. longa, many of the medicinal Curcuma species are not in large-scale cultivation, and this increases the risk of overharvesting of rhizomes from wild plants. The good news is that researchers are beginning to improve local cultivars and finding suitable methods of micropropagation of these Curcuma species, for example, C. angustifolia Roxb. [47].

Advertisement

4. The genus Curcuma in Thailand

Forty-five species are found in Thailand or almost 50% of the total species diversity of Curcuma worldwide (Table 1). At least 12 of these species are endemic to Thailand. New species have recently been described. For example, C. saraburiensis Boonma & Saensouk from Saraburi province, Central Thailand [48] and C. putii Maknoi & Jenjitt [49]. Several species of Curcuma are cultivated throughout Thailand for commercial purposes. The whole plant has economic values: the above-ground part of the plant bears attractive flowers that have been exported worldwide as cut flowers, such as Siam tulip (C. alismatifolia) and C. parviflora Wall. [50], whereas the below-ground rhizomes are harvested and sold in local markets for use as crude extracts in the traditional medicine or for the production of certified pharmaceutical products. Medicinal species, such as C. comosa Roxb., has received much attention in recent years for being a phytoestrogen-producing plant (e.g. [51, 52]). Products from rhizomes of C. comosa have been developed for use as an anti-inflammation remedy and for treatment of uterine abnormalities and ovarian hormone deficit [53, 54].

Species of Curcuma L.2n chromosome numberPloidyNaturalCultivatedReferences
C. aeruginosa Roxb.63Triploidx4, 6, 9
C. alismatifolia Gagnep.32xx9
C. amada Roxb.42Diploidx1, 2, 4, 9, 10
C. angustifolia Roxb.42 (64)Diploidx4, 6, 9, 10
C. aromatica Roxb.42, 63, 86Di-, tri-, tetraploidx1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10
C. aurantiaca van Zijp42Diploidxx4, 6, 9, 10
C. bella Maknoi*, K. Larsen & Sirirugsaa
C. bicolor J.Mood & K. Larsenxx
C. caesia Roxb.*b63Triploidx9, 10
C. candida (Wall.) Techapr.*c42Diploidx12
C. cochinchinensis Gagnep.x
C. comosa Roxb.42, 63Di-, triploidxx5, 9, 11
C. ecomata Craibx
C. elata Roxb.*d63Triploidx4, 5, 7, 9, 11
C. flaviflora S.Q.Tong42Diploidx7
C. glans K. Larsen & J. Moodx
C. glacillima Gagnep.ca. 32x
C. hermandii Gagnep.20xx9
C. latifolia Roxb.63, 84Tri-, tetraploidxx4, 5, 9, 11
C. leucorhiza Roxb.Triploidx6,
C. longa L.63 (32, 48, 62-64)Triploidx1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 10
C. maehongson C. Maknoix
C. mangga Val.42 (63)Diploidx4, 9
C. nakornsawan C. Maknoix
C. parviflora Wall.28, 30, 32, 36, 42x9
C. petiolata Roxb.42, 64Di-, triploidxx9, 10
C. pierreana Gagnep.x
C. putii Maknoi & Jenjitt.*e
C. ranong C.Maknoix
C. rhabdota Sirirugsa & M. Newman24xx9
C. roscoceana Wall.42Diploidxx4, 9
C. rubescens Roxb.63Triploidx9
C. rubrobracteata Skornickova, Sabu & Prasanth k.63Triploidx7
C. saraburi C.Maknoix
C. saraburiensis Boonma & Saensouk*fx
C. singularis Gagnep.42x9
C. sparganiifolia Gagnep.xx
C. stenochila Gagnep.x
C. tak C.Maknoix
C. ubonratchani C.Maknoix
C. viridiflora Roxb.x
C. woodii N.H.Xia & J. Chen*g42Diploid8
C. xanthorrhiza Roxb.63Triploidx3, 6, 7, 9, 10
C. zedoaria (Christm.) Rosc.63, 64, 84, 105Tri-, tetra-pentaploidx2, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11
C. cf. Zedoaroides Chaveer. & Tanee*h63Triploidx11
Total number of taxa = 453319

Table 1.

List of Curcuma species found in Thailand, based on Maknoi [11] (except *), with 2n somatic chromosome number, ploidy level and distribution.

Species references: a, Maknoi et al. [55]; b, Puangpairote [56]; c, Jenjittikul and Larsen [57]; d, Larsen [6]; e, Maknoi et al. [49]; f, Boonma and Saensouk [48]; g, Chen et al. [58]; and h, Puangpairote et al. [59].


Chromosome/ploidy references: 1. Ramachandran [60]; 2. Ramachandran [61]; 3. eFlora [9]; 4. Leong-Skornikova et al. [10]; 5. Soontornchainaksaeng and Jenjitikul [51]; 6. Zaveska et al. [62]; 7. Chen et al. [63]; 8. Chen et al. [58]; 9. Puangpairote [56]; 10. Rice et al. [64]; 11. Puangpairote et al. [59]; 12. Nopporncharoenkul et al. [65].

We have studied C. comosa and its related species, collectively called wan-chak-motluk in Thai language for its phytoestrogen properties. The plant produces bright colourful flowers in the form of inflorescences (Figure 3a). Its rhizomes are ovoid to ovate spheroidal in shape and about 8–15 cm in diameter (Figure 3b). Wan-chak-motluk belongs to three Curcuma species: C. comosa, C. elata Roxb. and C. latifolia Rosc. [51]. Curcuma comosa is recognised by its inflorescences with short peduncles (Figure 3a), whereas the other two species have long peduncles more suitable for flower arrangements. Curcuma elata and C. latifolia produce large and branchy rhizomes (Figure 3b).

Figure 3.

Our own research work on selected Curcuma species from Thailand. (a) Triploid Curcuma comosa plants, showing the above-ground part of the plant with 60–150-cm-tall leafy shoots and 15–32-cm-long inflorescences with short peduncle and dark pink flowers. (b) Rhizome of the triploid Curcuma sp. “elata-latifolia”. Typical rhizome of this species is ovoid-ellipsoid in shape and about (7–15) × (6–10) cm in size, with 2–7 lateral rhizomes, 2–12 cm long and up to 5 secondary lateral rhizomes. (c) Mitotic metaphase cell of C. candida showing diploid chromosome number 2n = 42. (d) Mitotic metaphase cell of C. comosa showing diploid chromosome number 2n = 42. (e) Male meiotic cell of the diploid C. candida showing normal chromosome pairing with 21 bivalents at metaphase-I. (f) Male meiotic cell of the triploid cytotype of C. comosa showing chromosome pairing at metaphase-I with 21 trivalents, indicating autotriploidy. (g) Male meiotic cell of the triploid C. latifolia showing irregular synapsis at metaphase-I chromosome pairing with 21 trivalents, indicating allotriploidy. (h) A mitotic interphase cell of the triploid cytotype of C. comosa showing three major sites of the 45S ribosomal genes, confirming triploidy in this species. (i) A mitotic interphase cell of the triploid cytotype of C. comosa showing three major sites of the 45S ribosomal genes, one large C. comosa marker site Cc1 and two smaller sites. (j) A mitotic interphase cell of the triploid cytotype of C. elata showing three major sites of the 45S ribosomal genes and three minor sites, confirming triploidy in this species. (k) A mitotic interphase cell of the triploid cytotype of C. elata showing three major sites of the 45S ribosomal genes, again confirming triploidy in this species. Scale bars represent 5 μm. References: (a–b) [51]; (c, e) [65]; (d, f–g) [59]; (h, j–k) [66]; and (i) [56].

Our chromosome number investigations have shown that the three wan-chak-motluk species can be further separated into five cultivars or cytotypes ([51]; see also Table 1): C. comosa has two cytotypes, diploid with 2n = 2x = 42 (Figure 3d) and triploid with 2n = 3x = 63 (Figure 3f); C. elata (and C. cf. “elata-latifolia”) is triploid with 2n = 3x = 63; but C. latifolia has two cytotypes, triploid with 2n = 3x = 63 (Figure 3g) and tetraploid with 2n = 4x = 84. The group of wan-chak-motluk has been extended to cover more Thai taxa [59], including triploid C. caesia, triploid C. cf. zedoaroides Chaveer. & Tanee and tetraploid C. cf. zedoaria (Christm.) Rosc.

We have also recently described cytotaxonomy of the white flowering C. candida (Wall.) Techapr., to be diploid with 2n = 2x = 42 ([65]; Figure 3c, e). C. candida is a conservation-vulnerable species, rare and endemic to the Tenasserim Range bordering Thailand and Myanmar. As this species has the potential to be developed as an ornamental or medicinal plant [67], efforts are being made to promote cultivation rather than harvesting it from the wild.

Advertisement

5. Polyploidy in Curcuma

Our studies and those of others have shown that while most Thai Curcuma species are diploid (2n = 42), other species are polyploid (Table 1). This ploidy level determination is based on the meiotic chromosome pairing in pollen mother cells, i.e. a diploid plant shows 21 bivalents, resulting from a complete synapsis of homologous chromosomes at metaphase-I of the meiotic cell division (e.g. Figure 3e). Therefore, we have concluded that the base chromosome number for Curcuma, at least the Thai species investigated, to be 21 (x = 21), but we have also identified this as “secondary” base chromosome number, possibly deriving from three times primary base number x = 7 [59, 66]. Leong-Skornickova et al. [10] measured genome size of 51 Indian Curcuma taxa using flow cytometry and obtained chromosome counts from about one-third of the plants. They established that the base number was x = 7 for Indian Curcuma because all the 2n numbers in their study were multiples of seven, from hexaploids (2n = 42) up to 15-ploids. This x = 7 is most likely an ancestral base number of Curcuma. Most angiosperms, woody and herbaceous, are considered being ancient polyploids with the original base numbers x = 6 and x = 7 [68]. The major crop plants of the world are polyploid, for example, wheat, maize, potatoes, banana, cotton, oilseed rape and coffee beans, and most of these highly productive plants are ancient polyploids [69]. Therefore, in this context, all Thai Curcuma species (Table 1) are basically (ancient) polyploids, ranging from 2n = 42 (primary hexaploid, secondary diploid) to 2n = 63 (primary 9-ploid, secondary triploid) and 2n = 84 (primary 12-ploid, secondary tetraploid). However, for the matter of consistency among our studies, we treat all Thai Curcuma taxa based on the secondary base number x = 21. This is in line with most other chromosome studies, whereby the meiotic analysis is used to determine ploidy levels, for example, the most cultivated turmeric species C. longa is triploid with 2n = 63 [60, 64].

The genus Curcuma contains chromosome numbers spanning the full range of the family Zingiberaceae, from 2n = 20 to 105 [10, 51, 59, 61, 63, 64, 70], but is characterised by chromosomes of particularly small sizes, usually less than 2 μm. A large number of Curcuma species (at least 25 species) have the diploid chromosome number 2n = 42 (base number x = 21), several (ca. 12) species have 2n = 63, and other numbers such as 20, 24, 32, 34, 84 and 105 have also been reported. Polyploidy is indeed very common in the ginger family Zingiberaceae.

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) mapping of the tandemly repeated 45S (18S–25S) ribosomal DNA on chromosomes of wan-chak-motluk supports the occurrence of triploidy among the species and cytotypes with 2n = 63 [66]. Sets of three ribosomal FISH signals (loci) are apparent in the triploid C. comosa (Figure 3h, i) and the triploid C. elata (Figure 3j, k). In addition, the meiotic figure obtained from the triploid cytotype of C. comosa comprises of 21 trivalents; each is a pairing of three homologous chromosomes (Figure 3f). Cytogenetic characteristics of triploidy have been observed in other Curcuma species, such as C. longa [60] and C. zedoaria [71].

This triploidization is likely to be the outcome of hybridization between unreduced (2n) and normal (1n) gametes within or between the diploid populations. Such mechanism has been well documented [72, 73]. In Zingiberaceae, multiple occurrences of triploid formation have been shown in the ornamental ginger genus Globba L. from Southeast Asia, based on molecular phylogenetic analysis of both chloroplast and nuclear genes [74]. The situation with Curcuma—wan-chak-motluk—is similar to that of Globba in that tetraploids (2n = 84) are extremely rare (Table 1) and the triploids are variable both morphologically and cytogeographically [51]. The molecular study by Zaveska et al. [75] has shown that in Curcuma, the genus of palaeopolyploid origin, its evolution is most likely driven by hybridization and polyploidization.

Once a triploid has arisen, it could easily survive because Curcuma, like other genera in Zingiberaceae, reproduces predominantly by vegetative means, i.e. the plants often propagate by rhizomes and numerous bulbils produced on the inflorescence. In the context of cultivation and utilisation of wan-chak-motluk, triploid cultivars (with 2n = 63) are indeed very popular among the growers, for example, for having larger rhizomes. We have also found that triploid and tetraploid plants do have proportionally larger genome sizes compared with the diploid plants [59]. Polyploidization in plants often increases cell size as well as growth rates, giving rise to plant phenotypes having higher physiological capacity and productivity [76]. Increasing the ploidy level is known to be positively correlated with plant production, both biomass and yield [69]. Furthermore, polyploids are often said to have a broader ecological tolerance than their diploid progenitors [77]. This is thought to be due to the effects of increased heterozygosity providing metabolic flexibility to cope with wider arrays of conditions [76]. In addition, the advantages of having more copies of the genes should allow polyploids to thrive in environments that pose challenges to their diploid progenitors [78]. In Zingiberaceae, triploids are highly successful in cultivation, mainly due to their productive rhizomes. In natural environments, triploids may be superior as a likely result of the plant’s fitness as described above. Curcuma triploids are indeed common and widespread over a vast geographical range throughout Asia [9, 10, 62, 63, 70, 71]. Future studies combining cytogenomics, genetics, physiology and ecology should shed light onto the underlying physiological mechanism and its genetic basis of such gains in polyploidy.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

The most widely cultivated plants belong to the two largest genera of this family, the ginger genus (Zingiber) and the turmeric genus (Curcuma). They are also the best researched plants from this family, and the most researched topics concern medicinal properties and health benefits, pharmaceutical, biochemical and molecular characterisation, as well as applications in food science and technology. The present study identifies numerous polyploid species in the turmeric genus (Curcuma) from Thailand. In particular, triploid species and/or cultivars are popular for a large-scale cultivation. The plants are easily propagated via underground rhizomes, which are also the part of the plant that contains bioactive compounds with medicinal properties. Rhizomes of triploid cultivars are bigger than those of the diploid, wild relatives and thus are more economically valuable. Triploids are also the most adaptable plants in diverse environments. On the other hand, the overharvesting of wild plants, in search for novel or better bioactive compounds, poses a serious risk of species extinction. Cytogenetic research, such as that presented here, can provide useful information for both types of activities, i.e. in the plant improvement for cultivation and in the conservation of natural biodiversity.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Mahidol University and University of Iceland. We appreciate the contribution in taxonomic identification of plant materials from Dr. Thaya Jenjittikul of Mahidol University. We thank both Dr. Tidarat Puangpairote from Prince of Songkla University and PhD student of Mahidol University, Nattapon Nopporncharoenkul, for their accurate cytogenetic work on Zingiberaceae of Thailand.

References

  1. 1. eFloras. 20. Zingiberaceae Lindley. In: Flora of China. Vol. 24. St. Louis, 15 MO/Cambridge, MA: Missouri Botanical Garden/Harvard University Herbaria; 2020. p. 322. Available from: http://www.efloras.org [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  2. 2. Wu DL, Larsen K. Zingiberaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven P, Hong DY, editors. Flora of China. Vol. 24. Beijing, China/St. Louis, MO: Science Press/Missouri Botanical Garden Press; 2000. pp. 322-377
  3. 3. Larsen K, Larsen S. Gingers of Thailand. Chiang Mai: Queen Sirikit Botanic Garden; 2006
  4. 4. Leong-Skornickova J, Newman M. Gingers of Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. Singapore: Singapore Botanic Gardens; 2015
  5. 5. Saensouk S. Endemic and rare plants of gingers family in Thailand. Khon Kaen University Research Journal. 2011;16:306-330
  6. 6. Larsen K. A preliminary checklist of the Zingiberaceae of Thailand. Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany). 1996;24:35-49
  7. 7. eFloras. 1. Zingiber Miller. In: Flora of China. Vol. 24. St. Louis, 15 MO/Cambridge, MA: Missouri Botanical Garden/Harvard University Herbaria; 2020. p. 323. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.efloras.org [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  8. 8. WCSP. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families [Internet]. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens; 2020. Available from: http://wcsp.science.kew.org/ [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  9. 9. eFloras. 11. Curcuma Linnaeus. In: Flora of China [Internet]. Vol. 24. St. Louis, 15 MO/Cambridge, MA: Missouri Botanical Garden/Harvard University Herbaria; 2020. p. 359. Available from: http://www.efloras.org [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  10. 10. Leong-Skornickova J, Sida O, Jarolimova V, Sabu M, Fer T, Travnicek P, et al. Chromosome numbers and genome size variation in Indian species of Curcuma (Zingiberaceae). Annals of Botany. 2007;100:505-526
  11. 11. Maknoi C. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Curcuma L. (Zingiberaceae) with particular reference to its occurrence in Thailand [PhD thesis]. Thailand: Prince of Songkla University; 2006
  12. 12. Walther G-R, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, et al. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature. 2002;416:389-395
  13. 13. Laurance WF, Sayer J, Cassman KG. Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2014;29:107-116
  14. 14. Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature. 2015;520:45-50
  15. 15. Romand-Monnier F, Contu S. Curcuma caulina. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2013. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T44392545A44510728.en [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  16. 16. Olander SB. Curcuma colorata. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T117308749A124281530.en [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  17. 17. Romand-Monnier F. Curcuma coriacea. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2013. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T44393421A44507719.en [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  18. 18. Leong-Skornickova J, Souvannakhoummane K, Tran HD. Curcuma corniculata. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T125297777A125297800.en [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  19. 19. Leong-Skornickova J. Curcuma prasina. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T125297897A125297901.en [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  20. 20. Tran HD, Leong-Skornickova J. Curcuma sahuynhensis. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T131724352A131724370.en [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  21. 21. Leong-Skornickova J, Tran HD, Newman MF, Dinh Quang D. Curcuma vitellina. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T201889A132688601.en [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  22. 22. Sabu M. Curcuma bhatii. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T117308352A124281490.en [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  23. 23. Leong-Skornickova J. Curcuma leonidii. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T131774861A131774866.en. [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  24. 24. Leong-Skornickova J, Tran HD. Curcuma newmanii. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T132967025A132967030.en [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  25. 25. Leong-Skornickova J, Tran HD. Curcuma pygmaea. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T131774887A131774892.en [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  26. 26. Leong-Skornickova J, Tran HD, Newman M, Lamxay V, Bouamanivong S. Curcuma supraneeana. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T201917A132691416.en. [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  27. 27. Sabu M. Curcuma vamana. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T117310982A124281770.en [Accessed: 23 February 2020]
  28. 28. Ravindran PN, Nirmal Babu K. Ginger: The Genus Zingiber. CRC Press; 2005. pp. 576
  29. 29. Panda SK, Kumari KL, Adhikari L, Sahu PK, Pal A. A review on clinical efficacy of traditional plants on osteoarthritis. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2019;10:4040-4053
  30. 30. Gu C, Howell K, Dunshea FR, Suleria HAR. LC-ESI-QTOF/MS characterization of phenolic acids and flavonoids in polyphenol-rich fruits and vegetables and their potential antioxidant activities. Antioxidants. 2019;8. article 405
  31. 31. Asamenew G, Kim H-W, Lee M-K, Lee S-H, Kim YJ, et al. Characterization of phenolic compounds from normal ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) and black ginger (Kaempferia parviflora wall.) using UPLC-DAD-QToF-MS. European Food Research and Technology. 2019;245:653-665
  32. 32. Ara T, Koide M, Kitamura H, Sogowa N. Effects of shokyo (Zingiberis Rhizoma) and kankyo (Zingiberis Processum Rhizoma) on prostaglandin E2 production in lipopolysaccharide-treated mouse macrophage RAW264.7 cells. PeerJ. 2019;7. article e7725
  33. 33. Gan HY, Zhang YQ , Zhou QY, Zheng LR, Xie XF, et al. Zingerone induced caspase-dependent apoptosis in MCF-7 cells and prevents 7,12-dimethylbenz(a) anthracene-induced mammary carcinogenesis in experimental rats. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology. 2019;33. article e22387
  34. 34. Babasheikhali SR, Rahgozar S, Mohammadi M. Ginger extract has anti-leukemia and anti-drug resistant effects on malignant cells. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2019;145:1987-1998
  35. 35. Ravindran PN, Nirmal BK, Sivaraman K. Turmeric: The Genus Curcuma (Medicinal and Aromatic Plants-Industrial Profiles). Abingdon: Taylor and Francis Group; 2007. pp. 484
  36. 36. Ayati Z, Ramezani M, Amiri MS, Moghada AT, Rahimi H, Abdollahzade A, et al. Ethnobotany, phytochemistry and traditional uses of Curcuma spp. and pharmacological profiles of two important species (C. longa and C. zedoaria): Review. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2019;25:871-935
  37. 37. Dosoky NS, Satyal P, Setzer WS. Variations in the volatile compositions of Curcuma species. Food. 2019;8. article 53
  38. 38. Thumann TA, Pferschy-Wenzig E-M, Moissl-Eichinger C, Bauer R. The role of gut microbiota for the activity of medicinal plants traditionally used in the European Union for gastrointestinal disorders. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2019;245. article 112153
  39. 39. Akter J, Hossain M a, Takara K, Islam MZ, Hou D-X. Antioxidant activity of different species and varieties of turmeric (Curcuma spp.): Isolation of active compounds. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C: Toxicology & Pharmacology. 2019;215:9-17
  40. 40. De B, Karak S, Das S, Begum S, Gupta P, De Pradhan I, et al. Profiling non-polar terpenes of rhizomes for distinguishing some Indian Curcuma species. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. 2019;13. article UNSP 100207
  41. 41. Anuchapreeda S, Khumpirapang N, Chiampanichayakul S, Nirachonkul W, Saiai A, Usuki T, et al. Characterization and biological properties of zederone and zedoarondiol from rhizomes of en-Lueang (Curcuma cf. amada). Natural Product Communications. 2018;13:1615-1618
  42. 42. Lourembam RM, Yadav AS, Kundu GC, Mazumder PB. Curcuma zedoaria (Christm.) roscoe inhibits proliferation of MDA-MB231 cells via caspase-cascade apoptosis. Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental Medicine. 2019;19:235-241
  43. 43. Sufiawati I, Gunawan I, Wijala I, Rusdiana T, Subranas A. Reduction of salivary tumor necrosis factor alpha levels in response to magic mouthwash with Curcuma xanthorrhiza in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Journal of Research in Pharmacy. 2019;23:55-61
  44. 44. Wahyuni TS, Permatasari AA, Widiandani T, Fuad A, Widyawaruyani A, Aoki-Uysubo C, et al. Antiviral activities of Curcuma genus against hepatitis C virus. Natural Product Communications. 2018;13:1570-1582
  45. 45. Borah A, Paw M, Gogoi R, Loying R, Sarma N, Munda S, et al. Chemical composition, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial and in-vitro cytotoxic efficacy of essential oil of Curcuma caesia Roxb. Leaves: An endangered medicinal plant of north East India. Industrial Crops and Products. 2019;129:448-454
  46. 46. Deeki LT, Manivannan SJ, Sujata U, Biswajit RG. Targeting metabolic profiling of black turmeric (Curcuma caesia Roxb.) accessions for industrially important compounds. Research Journal of Biotechnology. 2019;14:24-28
  47. 47. Jena S, Ray A, Sahoo A, Sahoo S, Kar B, Panda PC, et al. High-frequency clonal propagation of Curcuma angustifolia ensuring genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2018;135:473-486
  48. 48. Boonma T, Saensouk S. Curcuma saraburiensis (Zingiberaceae), a new species from Thailand. Taiwania. 2019;64:245-248
  49. 49. Maknoi C, Ruchisansakul S, Jenjittikul T. Curcuma putti (Zingiberaceae), a new species from Thailand. Annales Botanici Fennici. 2019;56:351-353
  50. 50. Khumkratok S, Boontiang K, Chutichudet P, Pramaul P. Geographical distributions and ecology of ornamental Curcuma (Zingiberaceae) in North-Eastern Thailand. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2012;15:929-939
  51. 51. Soontornchainaksaeng P, Jenjittikul T. Chromosome number variation of phytoestrogen-producing Curcuma (Zingiberaceae) from Thailand. Journal of Natural Medicines. 2010;64:370-377
  52. 52. Thongon N, Boonmuen N, Suksen K, Wichit P, Chairoungdua A, et al. Selective Estrogen receptor modulator (SERM)-like activities of diarylheptanoid, a phytoestrogen from Curcuma comosa, in breast cancer cells, pre-osteoblast cells, and rat uterine tissues. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2017;65:3490-3496
  53. 53. Jaipakdee N, Limpongsa E, Sripanidkulchai B, Piyachaturawat P. Preparation of Curcuma comosa tablets using liquisolid techniques: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2018;553:157-168
  54. 54. Tabboon P, Tantiyasawasdikul S, Sripanidkulchai B. Quality and stability assessment of commercial products containing phytoestrogen diarylheptanoids from Curcuma comosa. Industrial Crops and Products. 2019;134:216-224
  55. 55. Maknoi C, Sirirugsa P, Larsen K. Curcuma bella (Zingiberaceae), a new species from Thailand. Thai Journal of Botany. 2011;3:121-124
  56. 56. Puangpairote T. Genomic characterization of phytoestrogen-producing curcuma in Thailand [PhD thesis]. Thailand: Mahidol University; 2015
  57. 57. Jenjittikul T, Larsen K. Kaempferia candida wall. (Zingiberaceae), a new record for Thailand. Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany). 2000;28:45-49
  58. 58. Chen J, Lindstrom AJ, Xia NH. Curcuma woodii (Zingiberaceae), a new species from Thailand. Phytotaxa. 2015;227:75-82
  59. 59. Puangpairote T, Maknoi C, Jenjittikul T, Anamthawat-Jónsson K, Soontornchainaksaeng P. Natural triploidy in phyto-oestrogen producing Curcuma species and cultivars from Thailand. Euphytica. 2016;208:47-61
  60. 60. Ramachandran K. Chromosome numbers in the genus Curcuma Linn. Current Science India. 1961;30:194-196
  61. 61. Ramachandran K. Chromosome numbers in Zingiberaceae. Cytologia. 1969;34:213-221
  62. 62. Zaveska E, Fer T, Sida O, Leong-Skornickova J, Sabu M, Marhold K. Genetic diversity patterns in Curcuma reflects differences in genome size. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2011;165:388-401
  63. 63. Chen J, Xia N, Zhao J, Chen J, Henny R. Chromosome numbers and ploidy levels of Chinese Curcuma species. Horticultural Science. 2013;48:525-530
  64. 64. Rice A, Glick L, Abadi S, Einhorn M, Kopelman NM, et al. The chromosome counts database (CCDB)—A community resource of plant chromosome numbers. New Phytologist. 2015;206:19-26
  65. 65. Nopporncharoenkul N, Jenjittikul T, Chuenboonngarm N, Anamthawat-Jónsson K, Umpunjun P. Cytogenetic verification of Curcuma candida (Zingiberaceae) from Thailand and Myanmar. Thai Forest Bulletin (Botany). 2020;48:7-17
  66. 66. Soontornchainaksaeng P, Anamthawat-Jónsson K. Ribosomal FISH mapping reveals hybridity in phyto-oestrogen producing Curcuma species from Thailand. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 2011;292:41-49
  67. 67. Picheansoonthon C, Koonterm S. Notes on the genus Kaempferia L. (Zingiberaceae) in Thailand. Journal of Thai Traditional and Alternative Medicine. 2008;6:27-51
  68. 68. Stebbins GL. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. Bristol, UK: J. W. Arrowsmith Ltd; 1971
  69. 69. Leitch AR, Leitch IJ. Perspective—Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploidy plants. Science. 2008;320:481-483
  70. 70. Sirisawad T, Sirirugsa P, Suwanthada C, Apavatjrut P. Investigation of chromosome numbers in 20 taxa of Curcuma. In: Chantaranothai P, Larsen K, Sirirugsa P, Simpson D, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on the Family Zingiberaceae; Khon Kaen University, Thailand. 2003. pp. 54-62
  71. 71. Islam MA, Meister A, Schubert V, Kloppstech K, Esch E. Genetic diversity and cytogenetic analysis in Curcuma zedoaria (Christm.) roscoe from Bangladesh. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 2007;54:149-156
  72. 72. Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. Polyploidy in angiosperms. Trends in Plant Science. 1997;2:470-476
  73. 73. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploidy formation in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 1998;29:467-501
  74. 74. Takano A, Okada H. Multiple occurrence of triploid formation in Globba (Zingiberaceae) from molecular evidence. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 2002;230:143-159
  75. 75. Zaveska E, Fer T, Sida O, Krak K, Marhold K, Leong-Skornickova J. Hybridization among distantly related species: Examples from the polyploid genus Curcuma (Zingiberaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2016;100:303-321
  76. 76. Otto SP, Whitton J. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics. 2000;34:401-437
  77. 77. Levin DA. Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. The American Naturalist. 1983;122:1-25
  78. 78. Madlung A. Polyploidy and its effect on evolutionary success: Old questions revisited with new tools. Heredity. 2013;110:99-104

Written By

Kesara Anamthawat-Jónsson and Puangpaka Umpunjun

Submitted: May 10th, 2019 Reviewed: May 18th, 2020 Published: June 24th, 2020