Effect of different formulations of mixed blue green algae on the growth of Paddy plants under greenhouse condition.
Blue green algae (BGA) are prokaryotic phototrophic organisms that can fix the atmospheric nitrogen biologically, and were directly applied as a biofertilizers in agricultural fields specifically Paddy field. Since they are having the ability to fix nitrogen, they are formulated with various adsorbents for the purpose of enhancing the crop growth along with maintaining the soil fertility and other soil factors responsible for productivity. The present study revealed that the formulations of blue green algae isolated from paddy fields of southern districts with different adsorbents like alluvial soil, sand, charcoal, and powdered paddy straw. All the adsorbents mixed with blue green algae showed significant growth when compared to the control plant. This determined that the adsorbent formulated mixed blue green algae enhanced the paddy plant growth under greenhouse condition.
- BGA formulations
- nitrogen fixers
- natural biofertilizers
Blue green algae are present abundantly in rice fields and are important in helping to maintain rice fields fertility through nitrogen fixation. They are belongs to a group of ubiquitous photosynthetic prokaryotes which possessing the ability to synthesis Chlorophyll a and carryout an important role in nutrient recycling and the maintenance of organic matter in aquatic systems including lakes, rivers and wetland. Nitrogen fixing blue green algae are known to be a prominent component of the microbial population in wetland soils, especially rice fields, contributing significantly to the fertility as a natural bio-fertilizer.
Nitrogen fixation is one of the most important biological processes and, though, the atmosphere contains about 79% nitrogen, most of the plants cannot utilize it. They can utilize combined nitrogen, like ammonium, nitrate, nitrite; etc. This process is called biological nitrogen fixation.
Blue green algal species that thrived in rice field release small quantities of ammonia as the major fertilizing product, and small nitrogenous polypeptides during active growth, whereas most of the fixed products are made available mainly through autolysis and decomposition. They have an important role to play in crop production as promising biofertilizers. Here an attempt was made to study the different formulations of blue green algae from the paddy field with the following objectives: Isolation and mass culturing of blue green algae form the areas of selective southern districts of Tamil Nadu. The selective isolated blue green algae have been formulated with different adsorbent like alluvial soil, sand, charcoal, powdered paddy straw and analyzed the interaction effect of various for BGA on vegetative growth of paddy plant (Figure 1).
2. Materials and methods
The soil samples collected from the areas namely as Thiruvadanai, of Ramnad, Selugai and Amaravathipudur of Sivagangai and Sakkimangalam of Madurai (Figure 2). They were stored at room temperature and were used as samples for further research.
2.2 Culture techniques
The BG 11 with nitrate and without nitrate medium was prepared and sterilized in autoclave for 121°C, 15 lb pressure for 20 min. After cooling, the samples were inoculated in the BG 11 medium for enrichment. The inoculated flasks were maintained at a temperature of 25°C and 12 h light and 12 h darkness (light intensity 3000 lux).
2.3 Identifying and sub culturing
The blue green algal growth was observed and identifying the organisms under Labomed vision 2000 smart scope B6. The selective identified organisms were sub cultured in BG0 under lab and maintained for further analysis (Figure 3).
2.4 Formulations of BGA
The BGA mixture (10 ml of each
3. Paddy plant selected for general greenhouse procedure
Seeds of Paddy variety CR-1009 were surface sterilized with hot water for 5 min and washed with sterile water repeatedly. Then these seeds were placed in hot water for 10 min to soften the seed coat. Sterile garden soil was used to fill the earthen pots 15 cm height; 52 cm diameter. About 5 kg of sterile soil were taken in each earthen pot which was mixed with different adsorbent formulated BGA. Seeds (15 Nos.) were sown in each pot and germinated seedlings were thinned out to 10 in each pot. The above experimental plants were maintained under greenhouse conditions. The sterilized tap water was used for irrigating the plants. Such experimental pots were assigned for the following treatments:
C—control (without organism)
T1—alluvial soil + mixed BGA
T2—sand + mixed BGA
T3—charcoal + mixed BGA
T4—powdered paddy straw + mixed BGA
3.1 Determination of growth
The paddy plant vegetative growth (15th day) was measured with the following growth parameters.
3.2 Determination of fresh and dry weight
The plant materials were cut into bits and weighed. Then they were dried in an oven at 90°C until the weight became constant.
3.3 Shoot and root length determination
The shoot and root lengths of the plants were measured using a meter-scale.
3.4 Determination of leaf number
The number of leaves or leaflets was counted for each plant.
3.5 Estimation of chlorophyll
The experimental leaf tissue was estimated for chlorophyll by following the method of Arnon . Fifty milligram of Leaf tissue was homogenized in 80% pre chilled acetone by using a mortar and pestle and centrifuged at 3000 rpm. The pellet was homogenized again with acetone and was centrifuged repeatedly till the pellet become pale. The collected supernatants were pooled and the absorbance of the supernatant was read at 645 and 663 nm.
The chlorophyll content (mg/g fr.wt) was calculated by using the following formula:
where l is the path of light length in cm (1 cm), V is the volume of the extract in ml and W is the fresh weight of the sample in g (Chlorophyll contents were expressed either as mg or μg for the plant samples).
3.6 Protein estimation
The experimental fresh leaf tissue of the protein content was estimated by Lowry’s method . About 50 mg of the leaf tissue was weighed and was homogenized in hot 80% ethanol and macerate in a mortar with pestle. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was collected for the analysis purpose. The collected pellet was suspended in a suitable volume of 5% TCA in an ice-bath for 15 min. The pellet was re extracted once in hot absolute ethanol and twice with ethanol-ether mixture, every time discarding the supernatants after centrifugation. Such collected pellet contained proteins and nucleic acids.
The extracted protein sample was placed in 1 ml of sodium hydroxide at 100°C for 4–5 min. The alkaline copper reagent (5 ml) was added and allowed to stand at room temperature for 10 min. Then the folin phenol reagent (0.5 ml) was added rapidly and mixed immediately. After 30 min, the absorbance was measured at 750 nm in a UV–Visible Spectrophotometer. The quantity of protein in the sample was calculated with a standard curve prepared using bovine serum albumin of different concentrations.
3.7 Statistical analysis
The data collected in this study was subjected to statistical methods standard deviation bar charts and pie charts applied .
4. Results and discussion
Blue green algae (cyanobacteria) play an important role in maintenance and build-up of soil fertility, consequently increasing rice growth and yield as a natural biofertilizer . They are photosynthetic nitrogen fixers and are free living. Increase in water-holding capacity through their jelly structure .
Cyanobacteria are known to be one of the promising supplements to nitrogenous fertilizer, but the process biological nitrogen fixation, mediated through the enzyme nitrogenase may be inhibited in presence readily available nitrogen source. Supplementation of chemical fertilizer with blue green algae could conserve up to 30% of commercial fertilizer and it is generally believed that the nitrogen fixed by these organisms is made available to the rice plants through exudation or autolysis and microbial decomposition. Onkar et al.  in addition to contributing fixed nitrogen and adding organic matter to soil such blue green algae are also known to excrete growth promoting substances, solubilize insoluble phosphates, improve fertilizer use efficiency of crop plants and amend the physical and chemical properties of soils, increasing soil aggregate size, there by correcting soil compaction, reduce oxidizable matter of the soil and narrowing down the C:N ratio .
Nitrogen fixing filamentous cyanobacteria occurs in wide range of habitats mainly rice-field ecosystem and agricultural fields [11, 12]. In rice field among photosynthetic aquatic organisms, investigations have been emphasized more on isolation and identification of nitrogen fixing cyanobacterial populations in agro-ecosystems for sustainable agriculture.
Shelf-life of cyanobacteria biofertilizer can be augmented by selecting translucent packing material, dry mixing and paddy straw as a carrier . Conventionally, soil has been used as a carrier for cyanobacterial biofertilizers whereas in one study it was reported that soil based inoculums have proved to be disadvantages due to poor inoculums loading, heavy contamination and its bulky nature [14, 15, 16]. Sugar cane waste; rice husk  and coconut coir  was developed as new carrier material . Field trials conducted using straw based, soil based and multani mitti based BGA biofertilizer and it was reported that multani mitti based biofertilizer gave highest yield followed by straw based and soil based BGA inoculants .
In the present study the paddy field soil was collected from four different villages namely as Thiruvadanai of Ramnad, Selugai and Amaravathipudur of Sivagangai and Sakkimangalam of Madurai district and blue green algae were isolated as
|Shoot length (cm)||13.17 ± 0.29||18.83 ± 0.29||15.5 ± 0.50||17.43 ± 0.40||18.13 ± 0.12|
|Root length (cm)||2.13 ± 0.23||3.93 ± 0.12||3.37 ± 0.12||3.6 ± 0.10||3.87 ± 0.12|
|No of leaves||2||3||2||3||3|
|Fresh weight (g)||0.17 ± 0.00||0.21 ± 0.00||0.20 ± 0.00||0.207 ± 0.00||0.209 ± 0.001|
|Dry weight (g)||0.043 ± 0.00||0.052 ± 0.00||0.0507 ± 0.00||0.043 ± 0.00||0.051 ± 0.00|
|Chlorophyll a (μg)||0.0313 ± 0.001||0.485 ± 0.001||0.251 ± 0.002||0.388 ± 0.001||0.279 ± 0.001|
|Chlorophyll b (μg)||0.0187 ± 0.001||0.1513 ± 0.001||0.074 ± 0.002||0.104 ± 0.001||0.080 ± 0.001|
The shoot and root length and fresh and dry weight of the paddy plant treated with alluvial soil + Mixed BGA and powdered paddy straw+ Mixed BGA showed maximum (18.83 ± 0.29; 3.93 ± 0.12 cm and 0.21 ± 0.00; 0.052 ± 0.00 g & 18.13 ± 0.12; 3.87 ± 0.12 cm and 0.209 ± 0.001; 0.051 ± 0.00 g) growth when compared to control (13.17 ± 0.29; 2.13 ± 0.23 cm and 0.17 ± 0.00; 0.043 ± 0.00). The number of leaves in all treated plants including control was more or less same (2 or 3). But the chlorophyll
Katoh et al.  reported that
Cyanobacteria also improve soil characteristics by modifying texture size and subsequent aeration and enhancing carbon content and water holding capacity . Such organisms are one of the major components of the nitrogen fixing biomass in paddy fields. The importance of cyanobacteria in agriculture for paddy cultivation is directly proportional to their ability to fix nitrogen and other positive effects for plants and soil. The nitrogen is the second limiting factor next to the water for plant growth in many fields and efficiency of this element is met by fertilizer .
Current study suggested that the efficiency of paddy plant growth was enhanced due to the application of formulated BGA with various adsorbents. Such blue green algae were generally applied as biofertilizers in agriculture for improving the soil fertility by the process of biological nitrogen fixation.
The blue green algae distributed in different environments. They are actively involved in the fixation of atmospheric nitrogen by the action of nitrogenase enzyme which is present in such organisms but not in plant cells.
The authors have expressed their sincere thanks to the President, Vice-President, Secretary, Principal, Head of the Department, Thiagarajar College, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India for their encouragement, support and provided the necessary facilities for the successful completion of the research work. And also they expressed their sincere thanks to their family and friends for the successful supportive work.
Juliana BO. Rice in Human Nutrition. Rome: The International Rice Research Institute and Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1993
Kainuma K. Rice—Its potential to prevent global hunger. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Suitable Use of Agricultural Resources and Environment Management with Focus on the Role of Rice Farming. Japan: FAO Association; 2004. pp. 41-46
Kubo M, Purevdorj M. The future of rice production and consumption. Journal of Food Distribution Research. 2004; 35(1):128-142
Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology. 1949; 24:1-15
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with Folin phenol reagent. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1951; 193:265
Little TM, Hills FC. Agricultural Experimentation. USA: John Wiley and Sons; 1978
Song T, Martensson L, Eriksson T, Zheng W, Rasmussen U. Biodiversity and seasonal variation of cyanobacterial assemblage in a rice paddy field in Fujian, China. The Federation of European Materials Societies Microbiology Ecology. 2005; 54:131-140
Roger GA, Bergman B, Henriksson E, Udris M. Utilisation of blue green algae as bio fertilizers. Plant and Soil. 1982; 52(1):99-107
Onkar NT, Tingujam I, Keithellakpam OS, Oinam AS, Gunapathi O, Laxmipriya K, et al. Enumeration, pigments analysis and nitrogenise activity of Cyanobacteria isolated from unexplored rice fields of Manipur, India falling under Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspots. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2015; 4(6):666-680
Swarnalakshmi K, Dhar DW, Singh PK. Evaluation of blue green algal inoculation on specific soil parameters. Acta Agronomica Hungarica. 2007; 55(3):307-313
Chunleuchanon S, Sooksawang A, Teacemroong N, Boonkered N. Diversity of nitrogen fixing cyanobacteria under various ecosystems of Thailand population dynamics as affected by environmental factors. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2003; 19:167-173
Dhar DW, Prasanna R, Singh BV. Comparative performance of three carrier based blue green algal biofertilizerfor sustainable rice cultivation. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 2007; 30(2):41-50
Jha MN, Prasad AN. Useful carrier for cyanobacteria their response to cyanobacterial growth, acetylene-reductase activity, cyanobacterial grazers and paddy yield in calcareous soil. World Journal of Microbiology. 2005; 21:1521-1527
Bisoyi RN, Singh PK. Effect of phosphorus fertilization on blue-green algal inoculum production and nitrogen yield under field condition. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 1988; 5:338-343
Jha MN, Prasad AN, Sharma SG, Bharati RC. Effects of fertilization rate and crop rotation on diazotrophic cyanobacteria in paddy field. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2004; 17:463-468
Raynand PA, Metting B. Colonization potential of cyanobacteria on temperate Irrigated soils of Washington State, USA. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture. 1988; 5(3):197-208
Kannaiyan S. Biological fertilizer for sustainable rice ( Oryza sativa) production. Advances in Agricultural Research in India. 2000; 13:67-107
Malliga P, Uma L, Subramanian G. Lignolytic activity of the cyanobacterium Anabaena azollaeML 2 and the value of coir waste as a carrier for BGA biofertilizer. Microbios. 1996; 86:175-183
Pabbi S. Cyanobacteria biofertiliser (Reveiw). Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture. 2008; 3(2):95-111
Katoh H, Furukawa J, Yokotani KT, Yasuaki K. Isolation and purification of an axenic diazotrophic drought tolerant cyanobacterium, Nostoc commune, from natural cyanobacteria l crusts and its utilization for field research on soils polluted with radioisotopes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics. 2012; 1817(8):1499-1505
Choudhary ATMA, Kecskes ML, Kennedy LR. Utilization of BNF technology supplementing urea N for sustainable rice production. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2004; 37(10):1627-1647
Hashem MA. Problems and prospects of cyanobacterial biofertilizer for rice cultivation. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2001; 28(9):881-888
Mulbry W, Kondrad S, Pizarro C. Biofertilizers from algal treatment of dairy and swine manure effluents. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2008; 12(4):107-125
Richert L, Golubic S, Guedes RL, Ratiskol J, Payri C, Guenennec J. Characterisation of exopolysaccharides produced by Cyanobacteria isolated from Polynesian microbial mats. Current Microbiology. 2006; 51(6):379-384
Malik FR, Ahmed S, Rizki YM. Utilization of lignocellulosic waste for the nitrogenous biofertilizer. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2001; 4:1217-1220