Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Current Advances in Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Insect Physiology and Metabolism

Written By

Fei-Ying Yang, Wei-Yi He and Min-Sheng You

Submitted: January 28th, 2020 Reviewed: April 17th, 2020 Published: June 3rd, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.92584

Chapter metrics overview

703 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Research regarding the distribution of metabolites is a vital aspect of insect molecular biology. However, current approaches (e.g., liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry or immunofluorescence) have cons like requirement of massive tissues, low efficiency, and complicated operating processes. As an emerging technology, mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) can visualize the spatiotemporal distribution of molecules in biological samples without labeling. In this chapter, we retrospect the major types of in situ measurement by MSI, and the application of MSI for investigating insect endogenous and exogenous metabolites and monitoring the dynamic changes of metabolites involved with the interactions between insects and plants. Future studies that combine MSI with other genetic tools can facilitate to better explore the underlying mechanisms concerning insect physiology and metabolism.


  • spatial metabolomics
  • in situ characterization
  • endogenous metabolites
  • exogenous metabolites
  • plant-insect interaction

1. Introduction

Insect molecular biology studies the molecular basis of biological processes in insects, including molecular synthesis, modification, mechanisms, and interactions [1]. Metabolites play key roles among all these aspects of insect molecular biology. Therefore, understanding the distribution of metabolites contributes to revealing the mechanisms of insect biology, including ontogeny, metabolism, and physiology. Research methodologies such as liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and immunofluorescence are generally used in visualizing the distribution of metabolites. However, all of them have their shortcomings. LC-MS or gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) usually uses the homogenate of a certain weight of specific tissue(s) or organ(s), resulting in losing in situ spatiotemporal information. Insect body sizes are mostly small, let alone certain tissues; so tissue-specific researches, in most case, consume a large number of insect individuals [2, 3, 4]. On the other hand, ordinary in situ characterization technologies such as immunofluorescence assay and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) require labeling at specific biomolecules [5, 6, 7]. Hence, operating processes such as synthesizing probes and antibodies are usually time-consuming, inefficient, and limited to only one molecule.

As a new molecular visualization technology, mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) has drawn more and more attention in recent years. MSI can visualize the spatial distribution of molecules in specific samples without any labeling and enable simultaneous evaluation and identification of hundreds of molecules in situ. In comparison with LC-MS and GC-MS, MSI requires only one sample for biomolecular localization, which makes it a powerful tool to visualize the changes in organism physiology and biochemistry. The basic principle of MSI is to scan target samples such as tissue slice for desorption and ionization of molecules or ions on the surface of samples by a laser or a high-energy ion beam [8]. Mass analyzer obtains mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) and ion intensity of the molecules or ions from pixels. Mass peaks are obtained from the database of imaging software such as FlexImaging and used to visualize one-dimensional linear profiling, two-dimensional spatial distribution of molecules, or three-dimensional anatomic structure [8]. MSI has been widely applied in life sciences, such as histology [9, 10]; pathology [11, 12]; pharmacology [13, 14]; food science [15]; botany [16, 17, 18, 19]; and microbiology [20, 21].

In this chapter, we introduce the major types of in situ measurement by MSI and present an example of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) to elucidate the operating processes. We also discuss the advances of MSI in insect physiology and biochemistry to better promote the research in entomology.


2. Mass spectrometry imaging method

Among all the MSI technologies, we can divide them into two major groups, vacuum ionization mass spectrometry imaging system and ambient ionization mass spectrometry imaging system, based on whether the environment of the instruments is a vacuum [8]. Based on desorption or ionization ion, vacuum ionization mass spectrometry imaging system can be further divided into different categories, namely MALDI [22], secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) [23], surface-assisted laser desorption ionization (SALDI) [24], and laser desorption ionization (LDI) [25]; ambient ionization mass spectrometry imaging system can be further divided into different categories, namely desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) [26], laser ablation electrospray ionization (LAESI) [27], laser electrospray mass spectrometry (LEMS) [28], electrospray laser desorption ionization (ELDI) [28], atmospheric pressure matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (AP-SMALDI) [29], and air flow-assisted ionization (AFAI) [30]. Among all these above-mentioned technologies, MALDI-MSI is the most popular technology in life science research because it not only can be applied to a wide range from inorganic ion, small molecules to proteins but also has the characteristics of high accuracy and sensitivity [31]. Here, we provide a further explanation of the basic principle of MADLI-MSI and elucidate the workflow for MALDI.

The basic working principle of MALDI is that target analytes on the surface of tissue are crystallized with matrix (e.g., α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid and 2,5-dihydroxyacetophenone) to form a complex. When the complex is exposed by infrared laser at 2.94 or 10.6 μm and/or ultraviolet laser at 337, 355, or 266 nm, it absorbs the laser energy and converts these analytes into a phase of gas, which causes molecule ionization. The ionized molecules automatically enter a mass spectrometer where the molecules are detected and mapped [19].

A typical experimental workflow for MALDI is as follows (Figure 1):

  1. Insect tissues are flash-frozen (with or without fixation) in an embedding media with gelatin, carboxymethylcellulose, or water;

  2. Each sample is cryo-sectioned at 10–20 μm thickness and mounted onto glass slides coated with indium tin oxide, which is then lyophilized for tissue imaging;

  3. The lyophilized slide is subject to three irregular fiducial markings on the surface of each sample for localization;

  4. A digital image of the sample with fiducials is acquired;

  5. A chemical matrix is applied to promote desorption and ionization. Matrix is coated by a sprayer/nebulizer or by solvent-free sublimation to acquire homogeneous matrix coverage over the entire tissue surface;

  6. After matrix deposition, the target is inserted into the instrument, for which experimental parameters (e.g., laser energy, step size of plate movement, and a selected region of the tissue) are optimized to scan the image;

  7. A laser beam is emitted for desorption to acquire mass spectra at every x and y grid points within the scanning area, so to visualize target ions and convert the ion’s intensity into a color scheme;

  8. Hematoxylin-eosin staining is optional for displaying tissue localization.

Figure 1.

MALDI-MSI imaging workflow.


3. Application of mass spectrometry imaging in entomological researches

MSI can visualize the spatial and temporal distributions of molecules. Endogenous metabolites, exogenous metabolites, and insect-plant interactions are three main aspects of MSI application to insect tissue section for in situ characterization. Endogenous metabolites refer to lipids, neuropeptides, proteins, and defense compounds [32, 33, 34, 35]; exogenous metabolites are drugs and insecticides [36, 37]; insect-plant interactions are associated with the fate of plant secondary defense compounds in insects [38]. We summarize the major applications of MSI for a better understanding of insect physiology and metabolism (Table 1).

Species Tissue Major analyte Method Embedding medium Thickness (μm) Matrix Ref.
Endogenous metabolites
Anopheles stephensi Whole-body Lipids AP-SMALDI 5% CMC 20 DHB [42]
Aedes aegypti Ovarian follicles Lipids 3D-SIMS / 100 / [41]
Apis mellifera Brain Neuropeptides MALDI / 14 CHCA [51, 52]
Brain Protein MALDI / 12 CA [32]
Brain L-arginine MALDI / 12 DHB [53]
Venom Venom toxins MALDI / 10 CHCA [54]
Drosophila melanogaster Body Peptide MALDI Agarose 10 CHCA [55]
Brain Lipids SIMS 10% Gelatin 15 / [47]
Brain Phospholipid SIMS 10% Gelatin 12 / [49]
Collar Lipids SIMS 10% Gelatin 10 / [46]
Brain & head GABA MALDI 4% CMC 15 CHCA [56]
Malpighian tubule Lipids MALDI 5% CMC 12 DHB、DAN [48]
Surface Lipids MALDI / / LiDHB [43]
Whole-body Neuropeptides AP-SMALDI 5% CMC 20 DHB [29]
Whole-body Lipids MALDI 10% Gelatin 20 DHB [45]
Wing Lipids SIMS PBS / DHB [34, 44]
Graphosoma lineatum Head to abdomen Non-polar compounds DAPPI / / / [57]
Paederus riparius Whole-body Defensive compounds AP-SMALDI 10% Tragacanth gum 16 DHB [35]
Periplaneta americana Brain Neuropeptides MALDI Gelatin 14 CHCA [33]
Neuro-endocrine tissues Neuropeptides MALDI Paraffin 20 DHB [58]
Prorhinotermes simplex Head to abdomen Non-polar compounds DAPPI / / / [57]
Solenopsis invicta Venom Venom proteins MALDI Gelatin 14 DHB [59]
Exogenous metabolites
Drosophila melanogaster Whole-body Insecticide MALDI 10% Gelatin 15 DHB [36]
Schistocerca gregaria Whole-body Drugs DESI 5% CMC 50 / [37, 60]
Helicoverpa armigera Whole-body Biopesticide MALDI / 16 DHB [61]
Insect-plant interaction system
Aphis glycines Feeding leaf Metabolites MALDI / / DHB、DAN [62, 63]
Athalia rosae Whole-body Glucosinolates MALDI Water 15 CHCA [64]
Chorthippus dorsatus Gut, feces Metabolites LDI 1% PBS 12 DHB、DAN、CHCA [38]
Acromyrmex echinatior Nest Microbial MALDI / / DHB、CHCA [65]
Ants Propleural plate Fungus MALDI / / DHB [66]
Bombus terrestris Whole-body / MALDI pHPMA 12 DHB、SA [67]

Table 1.

Overview of the application of MSI in insect sciences.

3.1 Insect endogenous metabolites

3.1.1 Lipids

Lipids are basic cell components and play important roles in insect development and reproduction, such as maintenance of cell membrane structure and intra or extracellular signaling [39, 40, 41]. For example, glycerophospholipids, phosphatidylcholines, and phosphatidylethanolamines are basic components of cell and lysophospholipids have an important function in inflammation, abiotic stress, and biotic stress signal transmit [42]. MSI has been widely applied in many aspects in model insect Drosophila melanogaster, such as the neutral lipids three-dimensional spatial distribution on the surface adults [43, 44], body lipid distribution [45], brain lipid structure [46, 47], wing lipids [34, 44], Malpighian tubule phospholipid distribution [48], and phospholipids in the brain treated with cocaine [49]. Moreover, MSI detected and localized the composition and distribution of triacylglyceride in Aedes aegypti, phospholipid and phosphatidylcholine in Anopheles stephensi [42], and phospholipids in Schistocerca gregaria [37].

3.1.2 Neuropeptides

Neuropeptides, a kind of structurally diverse signaling molecules, can control and regulate fundamental physiological functions such as growth, reproduction, and environmental stress tolerance in animals [50]. MSI detected and localized the distribution of 14 neuropeptides in coronal brain sections in all development stages of D. melanogaster [29]. These neuropeptides play important roles in physiological processes (e.g., allatostatins and tachykinin-like peptides participate in odor perception and locomotor activity). Neuropeptides can act as transmitters or neuromodulators in the central nervous system [33]. Neuropeptides in the brain of Apis mellifera are related to the functional division of the population and their activities. Worker bees’ neuropeptide levels at the age of 0–15 d increased with the in-hive activities but decreased with out-hive activities (guarding and foraging) at 15–25 d [51]. Further study proved that allatostatin and tachykinin-related neuropeptides in the brain of worker bees were related to aggressiveness behaviors [52]. Neuropeptides distribution in the retrocerebral complex of Periplaneta Americana revealed the differentiation of prohormone processing and the distinctness of neuropeptides-based compartmentalization [33]. These studies proved that MSI has the advantages of sensitivity, which can facilitate to detect peptides in low abundance.

3.1.3 Proteins

As a kind of macromolecules, proteins are fundamental compounds of organisms and take part in important cellular processes, such as DNA replication and metabolisms. MSI can simultaneously and specifically detect the spatial distribution of massive proteins and overcome antibody cross-contamination. MSI system has been used to evaluate the negative impacts in the brain of A. mellifera exposing to a sublethal concentration of imidacloprid. The system has successfully visualized the distribution of 24 proteins (e.g., cytochrome P450s, glutathione S-transferases, and heat shock protein 70s). Besides, 8-day exposure to imidacloprid triggered biochemical changes in A. mellifera brain (e.g., up-regulated acetylcholinesterase and amyloid precursor-like protein and down-regulated cytochrome P450 and disulfide-isomerase protein). This could influence the well-being of A. mellifera (e.g., learning and memory acquisition, maintaining neuronal integrity, detoxification, and apoptosis) [32].

3.1.4 Others

In addition to lipids, neuropeptides, and proteins, MSI can also be used to visualize the distributions of defensive compounds, special proteins (e.g., venom allergens and toxins) and other small molecules (e.g., betaine and amino acids). Defensive compounds (e.g., pederin, pseudopederin, and pederon) were detected and localized in the organs of Paederus riparius [35]. Three venom allergens and two venom toxins were mapped in the honeybee [54]. Poison sac was the lactation of main venom proteins in Solenopsis invicta [59]. Nonpolar compounds (e.g., (E)-1-nitropentadec-1-ene and (E)-hex-2-enal) can be detected from the head to the abdomen in two model insects, Prorhinotermes simplex and Graphosoma lineatum. Gland openings and gland reservoirs were the most active areas in P. simplex and G. lineatum [57]. Other small molecules (e.g., betaine and amino acids) were detected in Schistocerca gregaria [37]. Semiochemicals were mapped on the surface of the adults of D. melanogaster [43]. Two male-specific sex pheromones were localized in the ejaculatory bulb of D. melanogaster [45]. MSI can also be used as a novel in situ metabonomic tool to study the metabolism of L-arginine of the honeybee brain in response to proboscis extension [53].

3.2 Insect exogenous metabolites

3.2.1 Insecticides

MSI can be applied to visualize the distribution of insecticides in insects and their negative influence on the target insects. Imidacloprid was used to study its distribution and accumulation in D. melanogaster. Based on laser irradiation, imidacloprid was found to be converted to guanidine-imidacloprid. It eventually accumulated and spread in the abdominal region [36]. Azadirachta indica is an economical tree that can be used to distract a biopesticide component, azadirachtin-A. It was only presented in the midgut of Helicoverpa armigera after application [61].

3.2.2 Drug/pharmacological test

Pharmacology model animals are crucial for scientists or pharmacologists to test the side effects of newly developed drugs before clinical trials on human beings. Common pharmacology model animal species include mice, rabbits, dogs, and monkeys. Insects, compared with the above-mentioned animals, have pros such as low costs, high fertility, and moral constraints. Locust has become a new model species for pharmacology test because of its high similarity with mammals. Antihistamine drug terfenadine was tested in locust to study the distribution of secondary metabolites. Terfenadine was gradually degraded from hemolymph to stomach and intestinal wall. However, terfenadine-related chemical compounds such as terfenadine acid, terfenadine glucoside, and terfenadine phosphate were distributed in the unexcreted feces in the intestine, which revealed a rapid discharge of metabolites through defecation [37]. Besides, the spatial and temporal distribution of midazolam was tested in locust. The results showed that midazolam was abundant in 30-min but only found in the feces after a 2-hour application. Midazolam glucoside was found in gut, gastric caeca, and feces after a 2-hour application, indicating that glucose conjugates are a major detoxification pathway to neutralize the effects caused by midazolam in locusts [60].

In addition, D. melanogaster was used to test how cocaine, drug removal, and methylphenidate influence the brain lipids. The results showed that cocaine increased the level of phosphatidylcholines and decreased the levels of phosphatidylethanolamines and phosphatidylinositols. Methylphenidate-treated flies failed to rescue the levels of phosphatidylethanolamines and phosphatidylinositols, but enhanced the reversal of phosphatidylcholine levels [49].

3.3 Insect-plant interaction

Plants and herbivorous insects are co-evolved in nature. Plants activate defense reaction by releasing secondary metabolites when they are under attack by herbivorous insects, while herbivores trigger anti-defense systems for adapting and overcoming the side effects of secondary metabolites produced by plants [68]. Illuminating the changes of secondary metabolites during the interactions between insects and plants can contribute to a better understanding of plant resistance and insect adaptability.

Chemical interaction between soybean (Glycine max) and aphid (Aphis glycines) was studied. The metabolite changes (e.g., phosphorylcholine and amino acid) were detected in the aphid-infested soybean leaves. The results suggested that secondary metabolites were produced by dead cells after aphid infestation. Moreover, other compounds such as pipecolic acid, salicylic acid, formononetin, and dihydroxyflavone were consistently detected in the plant regions infested by aphids [62]. It was also found that isoflavones can be accumulated in mesophyll cells or epidermis but were not present in the vasculature. The results indicated that isoflavones take part in non-phloem defense response [63].

In addition, MSI can be used for physiological studies such as annihilation of the plant secondary metabolites by herbivores. Glucosinolate gradually changes in the distribution and metabolic sequestration were detected in the body of Athalia rosae that fed on host plants after different periods. The glucosinolate sinalbin was accumulated in the hemolymph and eventually circulated the Malpighian tubules. The results indicated that the insect gut plays a crucial role as a regulatory functional organ [64].

Moreover, MSI can be applied to the entire metabolic process of secondary metabolites in the plant-insect-soil system. The fate of the secondary metabolites produced by Dactylis glomerata was tracked in the different organs of herbivore Chorthippus dorsatus, and finally in the soil solution. After infestation by herbivores, levels of quinic acid, apigenin, and luteolin decreased, while those of flavonoids and rosmarinic acid increased in the leaf wounds of plants in 1 d. Quinic acid can be detected during the digestion process in the grasshoppers’ gut and unexcreted feces [38]. Overall, MSI is a useful tool to visualize plant defense and insect defense processes from the responses of plants infested by herbivores to insect defense systems responding to plant-derived metabolites.


4. Conclusion

MSI has been proved to be an effective and powerful tool to visualize molecules’ spatial distribution and temporal changes. In this chapter, we introduce the major types of MSI methodologies and describe the typical experimental workflow for MALDI-MSI. We also retrospect three major applications of MSI in insect physiology, for example, endogenous metabolites, exogenous metabolites, and insect-plant interaction. However, MSI still has some technical cons with limited application range that need to be optimized. In addition, MSI can cooperate with other genetic tools (e.g., proteomics, metabolomics, or lipidomics) for a better understanding of sophisticated insect biology.



The work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFD0200400), Special Key Project of Fujian Province (2018NZ01010013), Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2019J01369) in China, and Innovation Fund of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CXZX2018092, CXZX2016128, CXZX2017321 and 324-1122yb059).


Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. Chandrasekar R, Brintha PG, Park EY, Pelsoi P, Liu F, Goldsmith M, et al. Introduction to insect molecular biology. In: Chandrasekar R, Tyagi BK, Gui ZZ, Reeck GR editors. Short Views on Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 1st ed. Manhattan, Academic Publisher; 2014:3-56
  2. 2. Li Y, Wang X, Chen Q , Hou Y, Xia Q , Zhao P. Metabolomics analysis of the larval head of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016;17(9):1460. DOI: 10.3390/ijms17091460
  3. 3. Chintapalli VR, Al Bratty M, Korzekwa D, Watson DG, Dow JAT. Mapping an atlas of tissue-specific Drosophila melanogaster metabolomes by high resolution mass spectrometry. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):1-13. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078066
  4. 4. Shi T, Burton S, Wang Y, Xu S, Zhang W, Yu L. Metabolomic analysis of honey bee, Apis mellifera L. response to thiacloprid. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2018;152:17-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2018.08.003
  5. 5. Koinuma H, Maejima K, Tokuda R, Kitazawa Y, Nijo T, Wei W, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics and quantitative analysis of phytoplasmas in insect vectors. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:4291. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61042-x
  6. 6. Ban FX, Yin TY, Guo Q , Pan LL, Liu YQ , Wang XW. Localization and quantification of begomoviruses in whitefly tissues by immunofluorescence and quantitative PCR. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2020;156:1-8. DOI: 10.3791/60731
  7. 7. Jia HR, Sun YF, Luo SP, Wu KM. Characterization of antennal chemosensilla and associated odorant binding as well as chemosensory proteins in the Eupeodes corollae (Diptera: Syrphidae). Journal of Insect Physiology. 2019;113:49-58. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25996-3
  8. 8. Ho YN, Shu LJ, Yang YL. Imaging mass spectrometry for metabolites: Technical progress, multimodal imaging, and biological interactions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Systems Biology and Medicine. 2017;9(5):e1387. DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1387
  9. 9. Longuespée R, Casadonte R, Kriegsmann M, Pottier C, Picard de Muller G, Delvenne P, et al. MALDI mass spectrometry imaging: A cutting-edge tool for fundamental and clinical histopathology. Proteomics. Clinical Applications. 2016;10(7):701-719. DOI: 10.1002/prca.201500140
  10. 10. Yalcin EB, de la Monte SM. Review of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-imaging mass spectrometry for lipid biochemical histopathology. The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. 2015;63(10):762-771. DOI: 10.1369/0022155415596202
  11. 11. Schubert KO, Weiland F, Baune BT, Hoffmann P. The use of MALDI-MSI in the investigation of psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders: A review. Proteomics. 2016;16(11-12):1747-1758. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500460
  12. 12. Bowrey HE, Anderson DM, Pallitto P, Gutierrez DB, Fan J, Crouch RK, et al. Imaging mass spectrometry of the visual system: Advancing the molecular understanding of retina degenerations. Proteomics - Clinical Applications. 2016;10(4):391-402. DOI: 10.1002/prca.201500103
  13. 13. Liu X, Hummon AB. Mass spectrometry imaging of therapeutics from animal models to three-dimensional cell cultures. Analytical Chemistry. 2015;87(19):9508-9519. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00419
  14. 14. Kwon HJ, Kim Y, Sugihara Y, Baldetorp B, Welinder C, Watanabe KI, et al. Drug compound characterization by mass spectrometry imaging in cancer tissue. Archives of Pharmacal Research. 2015;38(9):1718-1727. DOI: 10.1007/s12272-015-0627-2
  15. 15. Yoshimura Y, Goto-Inoue N, Moriyama T, Zaima N. Significant advancement of mass spectrometry imaging for food chemistry. Food Chemistry. 2016;210:200-211. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.096
  16. 16. Dong Y, Li B, Aharoni A. More than pictures: When MS imaging meets histology. Trends in Plant Science. 2016;21(8):686-698. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.04.007
  17. 17. Sturtevant D, Lee YJ, Chapman KD. Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) for direct visualization of plant metabolites in situ. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2016;37:53-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.10.004
  18. 18. Boughton BA, Thinagaran D, Sarabia D, Bacic A, Roessner U. Mass spectrometry imaging for plant biology: A review. Phytochemistry Reviews. 2016;15(3):445-488. DOI: 10.1007/s11101-015-9440-2
  19. 19. Qin L, Zhang Y, Liu Y, He H, Li Y, Zeng M, et al. Recent advances in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) for in situ analysis of endogenous molecules in plants. Phytochemical Analysis. 2018;29(4):351-364. DOI: 10.1002/pca.2759
  20. 20. Shih CJ, Chen PY, Liaw CC, Lai YM, Yang YL. Bringing microbial interactions to light using imaging mass spectrometry. Natural Product Reports. 2014;31(6):739-755. DOI: 10.1039/c3np70091g
  21. 21. Yang JY, Phelan VV, Simkovsky R, Watrous JD, Trial RM, Fleming TC, et al. Primer on agar-based microbial imaging mass spectrometry. Journal of Bacteriology. 2012;194(22):6023-6028. DOI: 10.1128/JB.00823-12
  22. 22. Wang J, Qiu S, Chen S, Xiong C, Liu H, Wang J, et al. MALDI-TOF MS imaging of metabolites with a N-(1-Naphthyl) ethylenediamine dihydrochloride matrix and its application to colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Analytical Chemistry. 2014;87(1):422-430. DOI: 10.1021/ac504294s
  23. 23. Hoshi T, Kudo M. High resolution static SIMS imaging by time of flight SIMS. Applied Surface Science. 2003;203:818-824. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00834-6
  24. 24. Phan NTN, Mohammadi AS, Dowlatshahi Pour M, Ewing AG. Laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry imaging of drosophila brain using matrix sublimation versus modification with nanoparticles. Analytical Chemistry. 2016;88(3):1734-1741. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-017-0336-4
  25. 25. Le Pogam P, Legouin B, Geairon A, Rogniaux H, Lohézic-Le Dévéhat F, Obermayer W, et al. Spatial mapping of lichen specialized metabolites using LDI-MSI: Chemical ecology issues for Ophioparma ventosa. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:37807. DOI: 10.1038/srep37807
  26. 26. Ifa DR, Wiseman JM, Song Q , Cooks RG. Development of capabilities for imaging mass spectrometry under ambient conditions with desorption electrospray ionization (DESI). International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2007;259(1-3):8-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2006.08.003
  27. 27. Nemes P, Vertes A. Laser ablation electrospray ionization for atmospheric pressure, in vivo, and imaging mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 2007;79(21):8098-8106. DOI: 10.1021/ac071181r
  28. 28. Coello Y, Jones AD, Gunaratne TC, Dantus M. Atmospheric pressure femtosecond laser imaging mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 2010;82(7):2753-2758. DOI: 10.1021/ac9026466
  29. 29. Khalil SM, Pretzel J, Becker K, Spengler B. High-resolution AP-SMALDI mass spectrometry imaging of Drosophila melanogaster. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2017;416:1-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2017.04.001
  30. 30. Tang F, Bi Y, He J, Li T, Abliz Z, Wang X. Application of super-resolution reconstruction of sparse representation in mass spectrometry imaging. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2015;29(12):1178-1184. DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7205
  31. 31. Zaima N, Hayasaka T, Goto-inoue N, Setou M. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2010;11(12):5040-5055. DOI: 10.3390/ijms11125040
  32. 32. Catae AF, da Silva Menegasso AR, Pratavieira M, Palma MS, Malaspina O, Roat TC. MALDI-imaging analyses of honeybee brains exposed to a neonicotinoid insecticide. Pest Management Science. 2019;75(3):607-615. DOI: 10.1002/ps.5226
  33. 33. Ly A, Ragionieri L, Liessem S, Becker M, Deininger SO, Neupert S, et al. Enhanced coverage of insect neuropeptides in tissue sections by an optimized mass-spectrometry-imaging protocol. Analytical Chemistry. 2019;91(3):1980-1988. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04304
  34. 34. Marty F, Rago G, Smith DF, Gao X, Eijkel GB, MacAleese L, et al. Combining time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging mass spectrometry and CARS microspectroscopy reveals lipid patterns reminiscent of gene expression patterns in the wing imaginal disc of Drosophila melanogaster. Analytical Chemistry. 2017;89(18):9664-9670. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00125
  35. 35. Bhandari DR, Schott M, Römpp A, Vilcinskas A, Spengler B. Metabolite localization by atmospheric pressure high-resolution scanning microprobe matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging in whole-body sections and individual organs of the rove beetle Paederus riparius. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2015;407(8):2189-2201. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-8327-1
  36. 36. Ohtsu S, Yamaguchi M, Nishiwaki H, Fukusaki E, Shimma S. Development of a visualization method for imidacloprid in Drosophila melanogaster via imaging mass spectrometry. Analytical Sciences. 2018;34(9):991-996. DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18scp04
  37. 37. Olsen LR, Hansen SH, Janfelt C. Distribution of terfenadine and its metabolites in locusts studied by desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2015;407(8):2149-2158. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-8292-8
  38. 38. Crecelius AC, Michalzik B, Potthast K, Meyer S, Schubert US. Tracing the fate and transport of secondary plant metabolites in a laboratory mesocosm experiment by employing mass spectrometric imaging. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2017;409(15):3807-3820. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-017-0325-7
  39. 39. Beenakkers AT, van der Horst DJ, Van Marrewijk WJA. Role of lipids in energy metabolism. In: Downer RGH, editor. Energy Metabolism in Insects. 1st ed. New York: Plenum; 1981. p. 53-100
  40. 40. Gilbert LI, Chino H. Transport of lipids in insects. Journal of Lipid Research. 1974;15(5):439-456
  41. 41. Castellanos A, Ramirez CE, Michalkova V, Nouzova M, Noriega FG, Fernández-Lima F. Three dimensional secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging (3D-SIMS) of: Aedes aegypti ovarian follicles. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. 2019;34(5):874-883. DOI: 10.1039/c8ja00425k
  42. 42. Khalil SM, Römpp A, Pretzel J, Becker K, Spengler B. Phospholipid topography of whole-body sections of the Anopheles stephensi mosquito, characterized by high-resolution atmospheric-pressure scanning microprobe matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging. Analytical Chemistry. 2015;87(22):11309-11316. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02781
  43. 43. Kaftan F, Vrkoslav V, Kynast P, Kulkarni P, Böcker S, Cvačka J, et al. Mass spectrometry imaging of surface lipids on intact Drosophila melanogaster flies. Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2014;49(3):223-232. DOI: 10.1002/jms.3331
  44. 44. Vrkoslav V, Muck A, Cvačka J, Svatoš A. MALDI imaging of neutral cuticular lipids in insects and plants. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2010;21(2):220-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2009.10.003
  45. 45. Niehoff AC, Kettling H, Pirkl A, Chiang YN, Dreisewerd K, Yew JY. Analysis of drosophila lipids by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric imaging. Analytical Chemistry. 2014;86(22):11086-11092. DOI: 10.1021/ac503171f
  46. 46. Le MUT, Son JG, Shon HK, Park JH, Lee SB, Lee TG. Comparison between thaw-mounting and use of conductive tape for sample preparation in ToF-SIMS imaging of lipids in Drosophila microRNA-14 model. Biointerphases. 2018;13(3):03B414. DOI: 10.1116/1.5019597
  47. 47. Phan NTN, Munem M, Ewing AG, Fletcher JS. MS/MS analysis and imaging of lipids across drosophila brain using secondary ion mass spectrometry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2017;409(16):3923-3932. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-017-0336-4
  48. 48. Yang E, Gamberi C, Chaurand P. Mapping the fly Malpighian tubule lipidome by imaging mass spectrometry. Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2019;54(6):557-566. DOI: 10.1002/jms.4366
  49. 49. Philipsen MH, Phan NTN, Fletcher JS, Ewing AG. Interplay between cocaine, drug removal, and methylphenidate reversal on phospholipid alterations in Drosophila brain determined by imaging mass spectrometry. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 2020;11(5):806-813. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00014
  50. 50. Schoofs L, de Loof A, van Hiel MB. Neuropeptides as regulators of behavior in insects. Annual Review of Entomology. 2017;62(1):35-52. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035500
  51. 51. Pratavieira M, Ribeiro A, Maria A, Garcia C, Simo D, Gomes PC, et al. MALDI imaging analysis of neuropeptides in the Africanized honeybee (Apis mellifera) brain: Effect of ontogeny. Journal of Proteome Research. 2014;13(6):3054-3064. DOI: 10.1021/pr500224b
  52. 52. Pratavieira M, Menegasso ARDS, Esteves FG, Sato KU, Malaspina O, Palma MS. MALDI imaging analysis of neuropeptides in Africanized honeybee (Apis mellifera) brain: Effect of aggressiveness. Journal of Proteome Research. 2018;17(7):2358-2369. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00098
  53. 53. Pratavieira M, da Silva Menegasso AR, Roat T, Malaspina O, Palma MS. In situ metabolomics of the honeybee brain: The metabolism of l -arginine through the polyamine pathway in the proboscis extension response (PER). Journal of Proteome Research. 2020;19(2):832-844. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00653
  54. 54. Francese S, Lambardi D, Mastrobuoni G, la Marca G, Moneti G, Turillazzi S. Detection of honeybee venom in envenomed tissues by direct MALDI MSI. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2009;20(1):112-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.09.006
  55. 55. Zhong Y, Shobo A, Hancock MA, Multhaup G. Label-free distribution of anti-amyloid D-AIP in Drosophila melanogaster: Prevention of Aβ42-induced toxicity without side effects in transgenic flies. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2019;150(1):74-87. DOI: 10.1111/jnc.14720
  56. 56. Enomoto Y, Phan NTAN, Yamaguchi M, Fukusaki E, Shimma S. Mass spectrometric imaging of GABA in the Drosophila melanogaster adult head. Analytical Sciences. 2018;34(9):1055-1059. DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18SCN01
  57. 57. Rejšek J, Vrkoslav V, Hanus R, Vaikkinen A, Haapala M, Kauppila TJ, et al. The detection and mapping of the spatial distribution of insect defense compounds by desorption atmospheric pressure photoionization Orbitrap mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2015;886:91-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.06.007
  58. 58. Paine MRL, Ellis SR, Maloney D, Heeren RMA, Verhaert PDEM. Digestion-free analysis of peptides from 30-year-old formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue by mass spectrometry imaging. Analytical Chemistry. 2018;90(15):9272-9280. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01838
  59. 59. Das T, Alabi I, Colley M, Yan F, Griffith W, Bach S, et al. Major venom proteins of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta: Insights into possible pheromone-binding function from mass spectrometric analysis. Insect Molecular Biology. 2019;27(4):505-511. DOI: 10.1111/imb.12388
  60. 60. Olsen LR, Gabel-Jensen C, Wubshet SG, Kongstad KT, Janfelt C, Badolo L, et al. Characterization of midazolam metabolism in locusts: The role of a CYP3A4-like enzyme in the formation of 1′-OH and 4-OH midazolam. Xenobiotica. 2016;46(2):99-107. DOI: 10.3109/00498254.2015.1051604
  61. 61. Dawkar VV, Barage SH, Barbole RS, Fatangare A, Grimalt S, Haldar S, et al. Azadirachtin-a from azadirachta indica impacts multiple biological targets in cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera. ACS Omega. 2019;4(5):9531-9541. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03479
  62. 62. Klein AT, Yagnik GB, Hohenstein JD, Ji Z, Zi J, Reichert MD, et al. Investigation of the chemical interface in the soybean-aphid and rice-bacteria interactions using maldi-mass spectrometry imaging. Analytical Chemistry. 2015;87(10):5294-5301. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00459
  63. 63. Hohenstein JD, Studham ME, Klein A, Kovinich N, Barry K, Lee YJ, et al. Transcriptional and chemical changes in soybean leaves in response to long-term aphid colonization. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;10:310. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00310
  64. 64. Abdalsamee MK, Giampà M, Niehaus K, Müller C. Rapid incorporation of glucosinolates as a strategy used by a herbivore to prevent activation by myrosinases. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2014;52(1):115-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2014.07.002
  65. 65. Cristopher ABP, Christian MH, Fernandez-Marin H, Gutierrez M. Fungus-growing ant’s microbial interaction of streptomyces sp. and escovopsis sp. through molecular networking and MALDI imaging. Natural Product Communications. 2019;14(1):63-66. DOI: 10.1177/1934578X1901400117
  66. 66. Gemperline E, Horn HA, Delaney K, Currie CR, Li L. Imaging with mass spectrometry of bacteria on the exoskeleton of fungus-growing ants. ACS Chemical Biology. 2019;12(8):1980-1985. DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00038
  67. 67. Strohalm M, Strohalm J, Kaftan F, Krásný L, Volný M, Novák P, et al. Poly[N -(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide]-based tissue-embedding medium compatible with MALDI mass spectrometry imaging experiments. Analytical Chemistry. 2011;83(13):5458-5462. DOI: 10.1021/ac2011679
  68. 68. Voelckel C, Jander G, editors. Insect-plant interactions. Annual Plant Reviews. 1st ed. Vol. 47. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2014

Written By

Fei-Ying Yang, Wei-Yi He and Min-Sheng You

Submitted: January 28th, 2020 Reviewed: April 17th, 2020 Published: June 3rd, 2020