Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Heat Treatment of Metastable Beta Titanium Alloys

Written By

Sudhagara Rajan Soundararajan, Jithin Vishnu, Geetha Manivasagam and Nageswara Rao Muktinutalapati

Submitted: October 16th, 2019 Reviewed: March 28th, 2020 Published: May 11th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.92301

From the Edited Volume


Edited by Sadek Crisóstomo Absi Alfaro, Wojciech Borek and Błażej Tomiczek

Chapter metrics overview

855 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Heat treatment of metastable beta titanium alloys involves essentially two steps—solution treatment in beta or alpha+beta phase field and aging at appropriate lower temperatures. High strength in beta titanium alloys can be developed via solution treatment followed by aging by precipitating fine alpha (α) particles in a beta (β) matrix. Volume fraction and morphology of α determine the strength whereas ductility is dependent on the β grain size. Solution treatment in (α + β) range can give rise to a better combination of mechanical properties, compared to solution treatment in the β range. However, aging at some temperatures may lead to a low/nil-ductility situation and this has to be taken into account while designing the aging step. Heating rate to aging temperature also has a significant effect on the microstructure and mechanical properties obtained after aging. In addition to α, formation of intermediate phases such as omega, beta prime during decomposition of beta phase has been a subject of detailed studies. In addition to covering these issues, the review pays special attention to heat treatment of beta titanium alloys for biomedical applications, in view of the growing interest this class of alloys have been receiving.


  • beta titanium alloys
  • heat treatment
  • duplex aging
  • precipitation hardening
  • intermediate phases
  • fatigue behavior

1. Introduction

High specific strength and excellent corrosion resistance of titanium-based materials make them an attractive choice for application in various industries such as aerospace, biomaterials, and automotive [1, 2]. Alloying of pure titanium opens a new horizon to develop a variety of products with exceptional properties. Based on the alloying elements and phases present at room temperature, Ti alloys are broadly classified into α, α + β, and β alloys. Compared to α and α + β alloys, β alloys have advantages such as excellent higher specific strength, sufficient toughness, excellent corrosion resistance, better biocompatibility, good fatigue resistance, and good formability.

Moeq is a well-accepted measure to characterize the β-phase stability for a given composition and equation for the deriving the Moeq is shown in Eq. (1) [3, 4].

Moeq.=1.0wt.% Mo+0.67wt.% V+0.44wt.% W+0.28wt% Nb+0.22wt.% Ta+2.9wt.% Fe+1.6wt.% Cr1.0wt.% AlE1

Beta titanium alloys with a Moeq between 10 and 30 are metastable and hence heat treatable and deeply hardenable [4]. Moeq of the various beta titanium alloys along with their commercial name is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Moeq of various beta Ti alloys.

Unlike α + β alloys, in β alloys, higher beta stabilizer content results in complete retention of beta phase upon air cooling or water quenching from solution treatment temperature (above β transus temperature). This difference in transformation can be related to the difference in electron density; the α + β alloys have <4 el/atom, while β alloys have higher electron density, for example, it is 4.148 el/atom for Ti-15-3 alloy [5]. Beta alloys are more workable because of the higher stacking fault energy of the BCC phase, which supports the formation of multiple and cross slips upon deformation, thereby preventing crack formation [6].

In most of the commercial beta alloys, metastable or thermodynamically unstable β phase with BCC crystal structure is formed upon quenching after solution treatment. Hence, subsequent aging leads to the precipitation of the α phase from the beta matrix. To understand the transformation in detail, modeling of precipitation of α by decomposition of β is performed under the framework of Johnson-Mehl-Avrami for Ti-15-3 a metastable beta alloy [7] and Ti-5Mo-2.6Nb-3Al-0.2S/β21s [8], both being β alloys. The transformation of β to α + β upon aging is a slow diffusion-controlled growth of alpha plates in the beta matrix. Hence, the aging time decides the α precipitation fraction [7]. Various microstructures and correspondingly mechanical properties are feasible through heat treatment of β titanium alloys, thereby making them a wide spectrum of candidate materials for a wide range of applications. Beta Ti alloys with less beta stabilizing element were found to have faster precipitation reactions. For example, VT22 alloy exhibited higher precipitation kinetics compared to the Ti-15-3 and Timetal LCB [9]. Devaraj et al. reported that superior strength is achieved through the micro and nanoscale precipitation of α phase in a beta matrix of Ti-1Al-8V-5Fe [10]. As already mentioned, heat treatment of β titanium alloys is comprised of two steps, that is, solution treatment and aging. The solution treatment can be subdivided into α + β and β solution treatment based on the temperature (i.e., α + β solution treatment T < β transus temperature and β solution treatment temperature T > β transus temperature). In beta alloys, Ti-6Cr-5Mo-5V-4Al and Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr, solution treatment in α + β range followed by aging yielded a better strength–ductility combination compared to solution treatment in the β range followed by aging [11, 12]. Further, if the α + β solution treatment is preceded by rolling in the α + β range even better strength–ductility combination was obtained; this was attributed to the formation of finer β grains in Ti-3.5Al-5Mo-6V-3Cr-2Sn-0.5Fe [13]. Similarly, α + β rolling followed by α + β solution treatment of Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al resulted in improvement of fracture toughness [14]. Deformation or cold working in-between solution treatment and aging could lead a path for obtaining homogeneous precipitation because the dislocations serve as a precursor for precipitation [9]. Zhan et al. also reported that dislocations formed during the high strain rate deformation of the metastable β alloy Ti-6Cr-5Mo-5V-4Al have acted as nucleation sites for the α laths/precipitation at elevated temperature [15]. Similarly, in Ti-15-3 alloy cold working before duplex aging is found to be advantageous in forming finer precipitates [16]. Ti-15-3 alloy exhibits lower precipitation kinetics compared to Timetal LCB and VT22 alloy [17]. Cold working before aging or two-step/duplex aging can be used to increase the precipitation kinetics in Ti-15-3. However, intervening cold work also leads to a significant loss in ductility. Aging of Ti-15-3 alloy with deformed microstructure for prolonged times leads to dislocation rearrangement and formation of subgrains [18]. Grain boundary α and precipitation free zones may occur in aged condition; they play an important role in degrading the tensile and fatigue properties. The authors have reviewed various processing techniques of the beta titanium alloys elsewhere [19]. The heat treatment of beta titanium alloy for biomedical application [20, 21] and heat treatment of additively manufactured beta Ti alloy [22] have also been reported in the literature.


2. Solution treatment

Solution treatment comprises of heating the sample from 20 to 30°C above the beta transus temperature (super-transus) or ∼50°C below the beta transus temperature (sub-transus) for a specified time and rapid cooling of the sample to room temperature. Hence, beta transus temperature (βtrans) plays a vital role in selecting heat treatment temperatures. This beta transus temperature is strongly influenced by the alloying element (i.e., alpha stabilizers will rise the βtrans, beta stabilizers will lower the βtrans, and neutral elements will hardly do the changes in the βtrans). The equation (Eq. (2)) to find the beta transus temperature is given below [23].


Beta transus temperature for some of the important beta titanium alloys is listed in Table 1.

S.NoAlloy nameCommercial nameβtrans temperature (°C)
1Ti-13V-11Cr-3AlB 120 VCA650
2Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4ZrBeta C795
3Ti-15V-3Cr-3Sn-3AlTi 15-3760
4Ti-11.5Mo-6Zr-4.5SnBeta III745
5Ti-10V-2Fe-3AlTi 10-2-3800
6Ti-1Al-8V-5FeTi 1-8-5825
8Ti-4.5Fe-6.8Mo-1.5AlTIMETAL LCB800
10Ti-8V-8Mo-2Fe-3AlTi 8-8-2-3775
11Ti-6V-6Mo-5.7Fe-2.7AlTIMETAL 125704

Table 1.

βtrans temperature of the beta titanium alloy [16].

Solution treatment temperature and the cooling rate strongly influence the mechanical properties realized after subsequent aging treatment. Depending on the requirement, metastable beta alloys such as Ti-13V-l1Cr-3Al and Ti-15Mo-3Al-3Nb-0.2Si are supplied in the solution-treated condition to ease the down-stream cold working operations [4]. Schematic representation of super- and sub-transus solution treatment and the aging process is shown in Figure 2. Super-transus solution treatment is done above the βtrans temperature and sub-transus solution treatment below the βtrans temperature. In alloys, such as Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr, both super-transus and sub-transus solution treatments were found to be useful in practice [24]. However, prolonged solution treatment above β transus may lead to a remarkable loss of mechanical properties owing to the coarsening of β grains [25]. Selection of the solution treatment temperature will also have a strong influence on the morphology and distribution of the alpha precipitation. For example, in Ti-1Al-8V-5Fe (Ti185), sub-transus solution treatment results in higher yield strength and tensile strength and this enhancement is ascribed to the nanoscale α precipitation in the β matrix [10].

Figure 2.

Schematic representation of solution treatment and the aging process.


3. Aging

During age hardening, solution-treated alloy will be heat treated in the temperature range of 480–620°C for 2–16 h. This heat treatment leads to precipitation of fine alpha phase in the beta matrix, and these precipitations hinder the movement of dislocations, making deformation difficult. This phenomenon is referred to as precipitation hardening. Coherency strains between α precipitates and the β matrix induce a strengthening effect [5]. Comparative examination of the microstructure of solution-treated (800°C/0.5 h) (ST) and microstructure of solution-treated and aged (ST + A) (500°C/8 h) Ti-15-3 samples has clearly revealed the presence of α precipitates in the latter. Precipitation leads to a significant increase in mechanical properties like tensile strength (79%) and hardness (44%) [26]. Age hardening is more effective for beta alloys compared to the α + β alloy owing to the capability of the former to form finer and homogenous α precipitates [27]. The sequence of precipitation of α is dependent on the Moeq of the alloy. The sequence of precipitation is given below:

For lowerMoeqsolutelean alloy,for exampleTi10V2Fe3Al,
For higherMoeqsoluterich alloy,for exampleTi13V11Cr3Al,

3.1 Single aging

To produce optimum strength–ductility combination, post solution treatment, aging or soaking the material in the temperature range of 200–650°C (well below the βtrans temperature) for a specified time followed by air or furnace cooling is performed [3]. Single aging comprises of heating to the desired temperature, holding for a specified time, and cooling in air or furnace. In Ti-3.5Al-5Mo-6V-3Cr-2Sn-0.5Fe beta alloy, single-step aging at 440°C for 8 h resulted in high tensile strength of 1637 MPa [28]. In Ti-15-3 alloy, aging at 520°C for 10 h yields a good combination of fatigue life and fracture toughness [29]. Similarly, in the same Ti-15-3 alloy, single-step aging led to a significant increase in the microhardness and fatigue life compared to the solution-treated condition [30].

3.2 Duplex aging

Dual-step aging or duplex aging unlocks the room for further betterment in the mechanical properties through finer and homogeneous α precipitation compared to single-step aging. Many researchers have reported the advantage of duplex aging over single-step aging of beta Ti alloys; most studied is the low-high combination, that is, a low temperature for first step aging and a somewhat higher temperature for second step aging [31, 32, 33, 34, 35]. Enhancement of the material behavior during unidirectional and cyclic/fatigue loading could be achieved through duplex aging. In Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr alloy (also known as Ti 38-644, Beta C), duplex aging resulted in more homogenous alpha precipitation [3]. Precipitates were found to be finer and microstructure was also free of precipitate-free zones (PFZs) and grain boundary α (GBα); this led to a significant improvement in fatigue life of Ti 38-644 [33]. In Ti-15-3 alloy, finer and more homogenous distribution of α precipitates was achieved through duplex aging compared to the single-step aging [34, 36]. In addition to an increase in the mechanical strength (i.e., YS and UTS), increase in ductility was also achieved by duplex aging of Ti-15-3 alloy [17]. Santhosh et al. [37] reported that duplex aging of Ti-15-3 sample leads to (i) a refined and homogenous distribution of the α precipitates in β matrix; (ii) a higher α phase fraction in β matrix; (iii) freedom from PFZs; and (iv) much less GBα, compared to single-aged Ti-15-3 sample. Similarly, duplex aging of the β-C alloy leads to a substantial increase of fatigue behaviour by producing the completely recrystallized β microstructure with homogenously distributed α precipitates and reducing the grain boundary α [32]. Finer and homogenous α precipitation resulting from duplex aging enhanced the fatigue limit of beta alloy Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr [38]. In a pre-strained Ti-10Mo-8V-1Fe-3.5Al, two-step aging was found more effective and yielded higher strength than conventional aging [39]. In contrast to the proceeding instances, Kazanjian et al. reported that multi-step aging made little difference to fatigue crack growth compared to the single-step aging [40]. In addition to the single and duplex aging, triplex aging or aging performed in three steps was attempted by some researchers on Ti-15-3 beta alloy; they found no significant benefit in either tensile strength or ductility of the material [41]. Duplex aging was also found to result in an enhancement of thermal stability during the elevated temperature application [24].


4. Influence of the rate of heating to the aging temperature

During the heat treatment of metastable beta titanium alloys, heating rate adopted to attain the desired aging temperature has an influential role in the α precipitation [42, 43, 44, 45]. In Timetal LCB, lower heating rate (0.25 ks−1) yielded an optimum combination of strength and ductility with a finer and homogenous α precipitation compared to the faster heating rate (20 ks−1) [42]. However, this heating rate will vary from alloy to alloy. For example, a similar heating rate of 0.25 ks−1 produced coarser and non-uniform alpha precipitation in the Ti-15-3 alloy and the same authors reported 0.01 ks−1 as the optimum heating rate for this alloy [42]. Wu et al. [45] reported a significant increase in microhardness of the Ti-15-3 alloy when a lower heating rate was used. They attributed it to the homogenous alpha precipitation. In addition, the lower heating rate yielded a microstructure free of grain boundary α.


5. Grain boundary α

Grain boundary alpha (GBα) is found detrimental by serving as a nucleus for crack initiation along α/β interfaces during the monotonic as well as cyclic loading. When the thickness of these GBα exceeds several microns, ductility and fatigue crack inititation and propagation are detrimentally affected. Crack is found to propagate with little resistance along the GBα in Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3A1 [46]. In addition to tensile ductility, GBα also has a strong negative influence over the fatigue behaviour of the β titanium alloys [32, 47]. In fatigue loading, the preferred site for the crack initiation will be the grain boundary decorated with α and inclined at 45° to the axis of loading [48]. This inclined GBα provides potential sites for slip localization as well as fracture inititation. Similarly, subsurface crack initiation induced by the well-developed GBα is commonly observed in the highly β stabilized Ti alloy β-C [32]. One of the strategies to improve the endurance limit is by properly designing a duplex aging heat treatment step compared to single aging, in order to facilitate more uniform α precipitation. Duplex aging of Ti-15V-3Al-3Cr-3Sn alloy at 250°C/24 h + 500°C/8 h resulted in a microstructure almost free of GBα, and this was also reported as one of the important reasons for the notable increase in fatigue life in high cycle regime after duplex aging [34]. Presence of GBα supports the intergranular fracture and reduces the ductility of the material [25, 28, 49, 50]. In aged Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al, soft zones were observed along the grain boundaries due to the GBα; these zones preferentially undergo plastic deformation upon loading [51]. Moreover the fractographic studies have revealed the presence of a band of intense deformation originating from the grain boundary triple point and spreading into the grain interior. This was ascribed to the accommodation deformation required for continous GBα, which has been stopped at triple point leading to high localized stress concentrations.


6. Precipitation-free zones (PFZs)

Non-uniform distribution of precipitates can occur during certain heat treatment conditions forming regions in microstructure free of precipitates usually near proximity of grain boundary. Uneven precipitation of α upon certain aging conditions may result in such zones where precipitation will not occur, and such zones are termed as precipitation-free zones (PFZs). The preferential α phase nucleation along beta grain boundaries can result in depletion of solute atoms near grain beta boundary region eventually resulting in the formation of PFZs. The hardness of this PFZ is less than the precipitation-hardened surrounding matrix. Hence, PFZs act as sites for strain localization during loading and reduce the tensile strength and ductility as the strength difference between PFZs and aged matrix is higher [34, 50]. In the case of fatigue loading, the presence of PFZs can act as crack nucleation sites imposing a deleterious effect in Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr [33] and Ti-15-3 [34] by slip localization leading to early crack initiation. To avoid the formation of PFZs and to improve the monotonic and fatigue loading behaviour, duplex aging is developed; results are promising [32, 33, 34].


7. Intermediate phases

The intermediate phases, such as isothermal ɷ phase and β′ phase, are formed during low-temperature aging, with the aging temperature generally in the range of 200–450°C [3]. Moreover, the omega phase can also form athermally. The ɷ phase provides nuclei for the α precipitation in the subsequent high-temperature aging (second step of duplex aging), thereby promoting the finer and homogenous distribution of the α phase [3]. The above statement is proven in Ti-7333 near beta alloy, isothermal ɷ phase formed during aging has assisted the precipitation of the α phase in the beta matrix [52]. During the first step of the dual-step aging of Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr-0.3Fe, ∼10% volume fraction of ɷ phase was reported by Coakley et al. [53] and this ɷ phase contributed to a ∼15% hike in microhardness compared to the solution-treated or quenched sample. However, the ɷ phase leads to the embrittlement/loss of ductility in Ti-Mo alloys due to the inhomogeneous slip distribution caused by the interaction of dislocation and ɷ phase/particles upon deformation [54]. Researchers also reported ɷ precipitation during low-temperature aging of Ti-15-3 alloy [7, 34]. However, the embrittlement effect of the ɷ phase could be efficiently compensated by processing to realize fine β grains [51]. Researchers also reported dynamic precipitation of ɷ phase under cyclic loading condition [55].

Similarly, stress-induced ɷ phase is observed in a metastable beta alloy during the dynamic compression deformation [56]. The ɷ phase is hexagonal in leaner beta alloys and trigonal in heavily stabilized beta alloys [56]. Other than the ɷ phase, the metastable phase β′ forms as an intermediate phase during the aging of some beta Ti alloy. β′ phase with a BCC crystal structure forms if the distortion is less due to the higher concentration of alloy. Similarly, ɷ phase with hexagonal crystal structure forms when the distortion in BCC lattice is higher, which is the case with less concentrated alloys [27]. In line with the preceding discussions, isothermal ɷ is proven to be assisting the alpha nucleation in the Ti-20V [57]. In addition to ɷ phase, α″ (martensite) phase was also observed in the initial microstructure of the solution-treated Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al and the author reported that stable α could be formed from this α″. This is in addition to the ɷ phase serving as the nucleus for α formation upon aging [58]. The intermediate martensitic phases α′ and α″ are suppressed when alloying is done with sufficient beta stabilizer content. This leads to enhancement of the hardenability of the beta alloy [4].


8. Annealing

In general, annealing is performed to eliminate the deleterious residual stress (stress-relieving annealing) and to ease the fabrication process (recrystallization annealing). Schematic representation of the beta alloy and alpha-beta alloy microstructure in annealed condition is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Schematic representation of typical (a) beta (β) alloy and (b) alpha-beta (α-β) alloy microstructures in annealed condition.

Deleterious tensile residual stresses are induced during various thermo-mechanical processing steps and fabrication techniques like welding. Sources of residual stresses are given in Table 2.

AgingSolid-state reactions such as precipitation, phase transformation
QuenchingNon-uniform thermal expansion or contraction
FabricationGrinding, polishing, milling, and welding

Table 2.

Sources of residual stresses.

The residual stress gets superimposed on to the service stress, leading to a significant reduction of the life of the component. For example, Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr metastable beta alloy was subjected to the stress-relief annealing at 650–750°C for 4 h followed by air cooling [24]. Stress-relief annealing is an intermediate step of thermo-mechanical processing. This annealing is not meant for altering the microstructure. Hence, extreme care should be taken to select the temperature and time combination (i.e., higher temperature annealing should be performed for a shorter time and lower temperature annealing should be performed for a longer time). Post heat treatment, oil/water quenching will not be carried out to avoid insidious residual stress formation. In metastable beta alloys, mostly the heat treatment procedure generally starts with solution treatment and this is followed by aging. In solution treatment, quenching is performed and unwanted residual stresses will get induced due to non-uniformed thermal expansion. Often, the stress-relieving annealing is combined with aging, as the temperature involved is about the same. For example, in Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al, isothermal aging at 495 and 525°C for 8 h leads to precipitation (age hardening) as well as relief of the stresses induced during the solution treatment [24]. In addition to the stress-relieving annealing, recrystallization annealing is also performed to enhance the fabricability of beta titanium alloys, more specifically, if a significant reduction in cross-section is involved, for example sheet formation [4]. Cold workability of Ti-15V-3Cr-3Al-3Sn and Ti-7Mo-5Fe-2A alloys is notably increased by the annealing treatment [59]. In variance to the foregoing discussion, annealing does not increase the cold workability of the Ti-5Mo-5V-5Al-1Fe-1Cr (VT-22) and Ti-7V-4Mo-3Al (TC6) [59]. Cold working is directly related to the formation of sub-grain and cell structure. Little or no influence of the annealing on the cold workability of VT22 and TC6 is attributed to the poorly defined sub-grain and cell structure [59].


9. Mechanical properties influenced by heat treatment

9.1 Tensile, microhardness, and impact properties

The volume fraction of the beta phase in solution-treated alloy plays an important role in determining the tensile strength achieved through heat treatment process [60]. The optimum combination of tensile strength and ductility could be achieved through adequate knowledge of the aging temperature and holding time. For example, in Ti-3.5Al-5Mo-6V-3Cr-2Sn-0.5Fe beta alloy, aging at 440°C for 8 h leads to the peak strength of 1697 MPa with 5.6% of ductility. On the other hand, with the same holding time (8 h), 18% ductility along with a considerable decrease in the tensile strength is obtained by increasing the aging temperature to 560°C; the difference is attributed to the variation in the size of the acicular α precipitates [28]. The influence of aging on Young’s modulus and ductility of Ti-15-3 alloy was clearly brought out by Naresh Kumar et al. [23]. Hardenability of the beta Ti alloy is proportional to the content of the beta stabilizer. For example, the beta alloy Ti-5Al-2Sn-2Zr-4Mo-4Cr possesses an excellent hardenability; it can be hardened uniformly up to 150 mm of thickness [60]. Single-step aging has increased microhardness of Ti-15-3 alloy by 40% compared to the as-received/solution-treated condition [30]. In a similar way, finer precipitation kinetics associated with duplex aging process yields a higher hardness value in Ti −15-3 alloy [36]. In Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr-0.3Fe, duplex aging (300°C/8 h + 500°C/2 h) was adopted; a ∼15% increase at first stage and 90% increase at second stage in the microhardness was observed. The remarkable increase in the microhardness in the second stage is ascribed to the precipitation of α phase [53]. Aging after α + β solution treatment resulted in a considerable increase in the hardness of β CEZ alloy, but the impact property deteriorated [61].

9.2 Fatigue behavior

In beta alloys, precipitate-free zones and grain boundary α also have control over the fatigue behavior [32]. Precipitation-free zones can be a fatigue crack nucleation site and reduce fatigue life. Similarly, the presence of soft zones associated with grain boundary α also reduces the resistance to fatigue crack propagation. Hence, duplex aging treatment yielding homogeneous alpha precipitation in beta grains and essential freedom from precipitation-free zone and grain boundary alpha is promising to improve the fatigue life of β alloys. In Ti-15-3 alloy, aging at 500°C at 8 h leads to a ∼24% of surge in the fatigue strength compared to the solution-treated alloy and the α platelets precipitated during the aging strongly influence the fatigue behavior [26]. Dual-step aging (300°C/2 h + 608°C/8 h) was found to improve the fatigue limit of Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr by yielding a microstructure with finer and homogenous alpha precipitation [38]. In Ti-3Al-8V-6Cr-4Mo-4Zr beta alloy, duplex aging led to a loftier hike in fatigue strength and a marginal increase in the fatigue crack growth behavior [32]. Tsay et al. described the prominent influence of the aging temperature upon the fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR); they concluded that the coarser α platelets resulting from longer aging time resist the fatigue crack growth effectively [62]. On the other hand, with a coarser lamellar microstructure, fatigue life in high cycle regime will not be attractive [41].


10. Heat treatment of biomedical beta titanium alloys

Beta titanium alloys are appropriate materials for a wide range of biomedical applications encompassing orthopedic and dental implants, vascular stents, intracranial aneurysms and maxillofacial prostheses. In particular, metastable biocompatible beta titanium alloys have gained substantial interest in this regard and it is highly imperative to tailor the microstructure and properties of these components or devices by suitable thermo-mechanical processing route. The vast majority of the processing routes include a homogenization treatment (for an uniform microstructure without cast dendritic structures), a forming operation (hot/cold rolling or forging), solution treatment, and aging. Since the present context is focusing on heat treatment, the following section will discuss about solution treatment and aging of some relevant metastable beta titanium alloys for cardiovascular stent and orthopedic applications.

10.1 Heat treatment of beta titanium alloys for cardiovascular stent applications

Nitinol is one of the widely used materials for vascular stent applications due to its unequivocal superelasticity properties associated with a reversible stress-induced transformation. However, recently there is a growing distress related with the nitinol implant materials over nickel ion release, which can elicit nickel hypersensitivity, toxicity and carcinogenicity. These mounting concerns have stimulated intensive research for the development of Ni-free biocompatible and corrosion-resistant titanium-niobium (TiNb) based alloy systems for these applications. Titanium-niobium (TiNb) based alloy systems are capable of exhibiting superelasticity functionalities based on the allotropic transformation between parent β (disordered bcc) phase and an orthorhombic α″ (martensite) phase.

Compared to nitinol alloys, Ni-free TiNb alloys possess inferior superelastic properties at room temperature, particularly in terms of inadequate recovery strain (less than 4%) due to a low critical stress for slip deformation. As depicted in schematic Figure 4a, a material with superelastic property exhibits a two-stage yielding. The initial yield stress corresponds to the critical stress for inducing martensitic transformation leading to superelasticity, whereas the second yield relates to the critical stress for slip-induced plastic deformation. In the case of TiNb alloys, the apparent martensitic yield stress increases with an increase in temperature; hence higher stresses are required to induce martensite transformation, which can be above the critical slip-inducing stress, leading to plastic deformation with no superelasticity as shown schematically in Figure 4b.

Figure 4.

Schematic representation of (a) two-stage yielding phenomenon exhibited by superelastic materials during monotonic loading and (b) cyclic loading unloading test in which material-A exhibits superelasticity and material-B shows plastic deformation occurring prior to martensitic transformation.

Heat treatment is an efficient strategy to improve the critical stress for slip deformation in TiNb alloys. Stable superelasticity and higher recovery strain (4.2%) were obtained by aging a Ti-26Nb alloy by a low-temperature annealing treatment (600°C) followed by aging (300°C). This was attributed to the precipitation of dense and finer ω during aging heat treatment consequently leading to a higher critical stress for slip deformation [63]. A high-temperature, low-duration annealing (900°C/5 min) treatment on a Ti-Zr-Nb-Sn-Mo alloy exhibited nearly perfect superelasticity with a relatively high recovery strain of 6-6.2% [64, 65]. A well-developed {001}β<110>β type recrystallization texture due to the presence of Sn resulted in these desirable large recovery strains and solid solution strengthening by Mo addition developed higher tensile strength values. It is also noteworthy to mention here that one of the drawbacks associated with thermal treatment-assisted microstructural evolution is the chemical stabilization of β phase (due to β stabilizer enrichment) adversely affecting superelastic properties. To counteract this, short-duration aging treatments have been developed, which can yield ultra-fine grain β grains (1–2 μm) with concurrent improvement in superelastic properties [66].

10.2 Heat treatment of beta titanium alloys for orthopedic implant applications

The usage of beta titanium alloys for orthopedic implants can be attributed to their inherent biocompatible compositions and lower elastic modulus values compared to conventional orthopedic materials. Compared to conventional CP titanium and Ti-6Al-4V, beta Ti alloys exhibit lower modulus values reducing clinical complications associated with stress shielding. Solution treatment in beta phase often results in a retained beta phase along with non-equilibrium omega (ω) or martensitic (α″) phase precipitation. As a lower elastic modulus is essential for reducing the clinical complications associated with bone tissue resorption, these metastable phases play a predominant role in determining the implant efficacy. Among these, omega phase precipitation is associated with an increase in strength, reduction in ductility, and in most instances an undesirable increment in modulus values. Moreover, in the case of solution-treated and aged condition, volume fraction, size, and morphology of α precipitates are dependent on ω precipitation. In contrast, orthorhombic α″ martensite or hexagonal α′ in a beta matrix can significantly reduce modulus values, improve the ductility, even though with a corresponding reduction in strength. Compared to the low-strength solution-treated conditions, cold working/oxygen content increase/subsequent aging can result in strengthening associated with ω and/or α precipitation. For example, aging of low-modulus biomedical ternary alloys (Ti-35Nb-7Zr-5Ta and Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr) in the temperature range of 300–400°C induced ω, 400–475°C ω-α mixture, and high temperature aging above 475°C revealed α precipitation without any ω [67, 68]. It should also be taken in to account that an increased oxygen content in these alloys suppressed ω formation while promoting α precipitation.

Heat treatment of newly designed Sn-based β titanium alloys (Ti-32Nb-2Sn and Ti-32Nb-4Sn) exhibited a single β phase microstructure after solution treatment at 950°C for 0.5 h followed by quenching; subsequent aging resulted in alpha phase precipitation [69]. Higher aspect ratio of precipitated alpha led to age hardening after aging at 500°C for 6 h; aging at 600°C, on the other hand, delitioriosly affected mechanical properties due to matrix softening and relatively coarser alpha precipitates. The presence of Sn even in smaller amounts can suppress the ω/α″ precipitation. The abrasion resistance of Ti-10V-1Fe-3Al (βtransus = 830°C) and Ti-10V-2Cr-3Al (βtransus = 830°C) was investigated under different microstructures established by various heat treatments [70]. α + β solution treatment resulted in near spherical or rod-like α, β annealing led to metastable β grains and acicular martensite phase, β + (α + β) produced flake α phase or Widmanstatten α phase and aging at a low and medium temperatures generated high density of nano ω phase precipitates. This study concluded that a dual phase mixture of β and flake-shaped alpha is an appropriate microstructure for improving the abrasion resistance.

11. Conclusions

Metastable beta titanium alloys have exclusive properties like the ease of fabrication, excellent biocompatibility, and good corrosion resistance. Hence, a steady progress has been there in the application of these alloys in aerospace industries and other high-technology industrial segments. Metastable beta titanium alloys are evolving as a potential candidate even for biomedical and automotive industries. As the βtrans temperature of the metastable beta alloys is significantly lower when compared to α and α + β alloys, the cost of processing is considerably lower. Possibility of tailoring the properties through heat treatments based on the requirement is an important and outstanding property of the metastable beta titanium alloys. However, sound knowledge in the process-structure–property correlation is required. Heat treatments should be designed appropriately to avoid embrittlement due to intermediate phases such as ɷ and premature failure due to the grain boundary alpha (GBα). In this chapter, we have attempted to provide insights into the heat treatment of metastable beta titanium alloys and optimization of the heat treatment parameters to achieve maximized material performance under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions.


The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Management of Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT)—Vellore campus, Tamil Nadu, India for allowing us to submit this manuscript.


  1. 1. Boyer RR. Attributes, characteristics, and applications of titanium and its alloys. Journal of Metals. 2010;62:21-24. DOI: 10.1007/s11837-010-0071-1
  2. 2. Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, Gogia AK. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants—A review. Progress in Materials Science. 2009;54:397-425. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004
  3. 3. Santhosh R, Geetha M, Nageswara Rao M. Recent developments in heat treatment of Beta titanium alloys for aerospace applications. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals. 2016;70:1681-1688. DOI: 10.1007/s12666-016-0985-6
  4. 4. Kolli R, Devaraj A. A review of metastable beta titanium alloys. Metals (Basel). 2018;8:506. DOI: 10.3390/met8070506
  5. 5. Froes FH. Titanium - Physical Metallurgy Processing and Application. United States of America: ASM International; 2014
  6. 6. Tang L, Hua K, Li J, Kou H, Zhang Y, Fan J, et al. Formation of slip bands and microstructure evolution of Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr-0.5Fe alloy during warm deformation process. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2018;770:183-193. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.097
  7. 7. Naveen M, Santhosh R, Geetha M, Nageswara Rao M. Experimental study and computer modelling of the β → α + β phase transformation in Ti15-3 alloy under isothermal conditions. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2014;616:607-613. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.07.163
  8. 8. Malinov S, Sha W, Markovsky P. Experimental study and computer modelling of the β⇒α+β phase transformation in β21s alloy at isothermal conditions. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2002;348:110-118. DOI: 10.1016/s0925-8388(02)00804-6
  9. 9. Ivasishin OM, Markovsky PE, Matviychuk YV, Semiatin SL. Precipitation and recrystallization behavior of beta titanium alloys during continuous heat treatment. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science. 2003;34:147-158. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-003-0216-8
  10. 10. Devaraj A, Joshi VV, Srivastava A, Manandhar S, Moxson V, Duz VA, et al. A low-cost hierarchical nanostructured beta-titanium alloy with high strength. Nature Communications. 2016;7:1-8. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11176
  11. 11. Li C-L, Mi X-J, Ye W-J, Hui S-X, Yu Y, Wang W-Q. Effect of solution temperature on microstructures and tensile properties of high strength Ti–6Cr–5Mo–5V–4Al alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2013;578:103-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.04.063
  12. 12. Shekhar S, Sarkar R, Kar SK, Bhattacharjee A. Effect of solution treatment and aging on microstructure and tensile properties of high strength β titanium alloy, Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr. Materials and Design. Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd; 5 February 2015;66(Part B):596-610. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.015
  13. 13. Du ZX, Xiao SL, Shen YP, Liu JS, Liu J, Xu LJ, et al. Effect of hot rolling and heat treatment on microstructure and tensile properties of high strength beta titanium alloy sheets. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2015;631:67-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.030
  14. 14. Srinivasu G, Natraj Y, Bhattacharjee A, Nandy TK, Nageswara Rao GVS. Tensile and fracture toughness of high strength β titanium alloy, Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al, as a function of rolling and solution treatment temperatures. Materials and Design. 2013;47:323-330. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.053
  15. 15. Zhan H, Ceguerra A, Wang G, Cairney J, Dargusch M. Precipitation of string-shaped morphologies consisting of aligned α phase in a metastable β titanium alloy. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:2-11. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20386-1
  16. 16. Weiss I, Semiatin SL. Thermomechanical processing of beta titanium alloys—An overview. Materials Science and Engineering. 15 March 1998;243(1–2):46-65. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00783-1
  17. 17. Ivasishin OM, Markovsky PE, Matviychuk YV, Semiatin SL, Ward CH, Fox S. A comparative study of the mechanical properties of high-strength β-titanium alloys. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2008;457:296-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.03.070
  18. 18. Makino T, Chikaizumi R, Nagaoka T, Furuhara T, Makino T. Microstructure development in a thermomechanically processed Ti-15V-3Cr-3Sn-3Al alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A. 1996;213:51-60. DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(96)10236-7
  19. 19. Sudhagara Rajan S, Jithin V, Geetha M, Nageswara Rao M. Processing of Beta Titanium Alloys for Aerospace and Biomedical Applications. Vol. 2. Rijeka, Croatia: Intech open; 2018. p. 64. DOI: 10.5772/32009
  20. 20. Hida M, Miyazawa K, Tsuruta S, Kurosawa M, Hata Y, Kawai T, et al. Effect of heat treatment conditions on the mechanical properties of Ti-6Mo-4Sn alloy for orthodontic wires. Dental Materials Journal. 2013;32:462-467. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2012-118
  21. 21. Nag S, Banerjee R, Fraser HL. Microstructural evolution and strengthening mechanisms in Ti-Nb-Zr-Ta, Ti-Mo-Zr-Fe and Ti-15Mo biocompatible alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2005;25:357-362. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2004.12.013
  22. 22. Liu YJ, Wang HL, Li SJ, Wang SG, Wang WJ, Hou WT, et al. Compressive and fatigue behavior of beta-type titanium porous structures fabricated by electron beam melting. Acta Materialia. 2017;126:58-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.052
  23. 23. Naresh Kumar K, Muneshwar P, Singh SK, Jha AK, Pant B. Thermo mechanical working and heat treatment studies on meta-stable beta titanium alloy (Ti15V3Al3Sn3Cr) plates. Materials Science Forum. 2015;830–831:151-155. DOI: 10.4028/
  24. 24. Cotton JD, Briggs RD, Boyer RR, Tamirisakandala S, Russo P, Shchetnikov N, et al. State of the art in beta titanium alloys for airframe applications. Journal of Metals. 2015;67:1281-1303. DOI: 10.1007/s11837-015-1442-4
  25. 25. Sauer C, Luetjering G. Thermo-mechanical processing of high strength β- titanium alloys and effects on microstructure and properties. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2001;117:311-317. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00788-9
  26. 26. Ismarrubie ZN, Ali A, Satake T, Sugano M. Influence of microstructures on fatigue damage mechanisms in Ti-15-3 alloy. Materials and Design. 2011;32:1456-1461. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.051
  27. 27. Lütjering G, Williams JC. Titanium. 2nd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2007
  28. 28. Chen Y, Du Z, Xiao S, Xu L, Tian J. Effect of aging heat treatment on microstructure and tensile properties of a new β high strength titanium alloy. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2013;586:588-592. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.10.096
  29. 29. Ma J, Wang Q. Aging characterization and application of Ti–15–3 alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A. 1998;243:150-154. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00793-4
  30. 30. Sudhagara Rajan S, Swaroop S, Manivasagam G, Rao MN. Fatigue life enhancement of titanium alloy by the development of nano/micron surface layer using laser peening. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2019;19:7064-7073. DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2019.16639
  31. 31. Wagner L, Gregory JK. Thermomechanical surface treatment of titanium alloys. Materials Science Forum. 1994;163–165:159-172. DOI: 10.4028/
  32. 32. Schmidt P, El-Chaikh A, Christ HJ. Effect of duplex aging on the initiation and propagation of fatigue cracks in the solute-rich metastable β titanium alloy Ti 38-644. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science. 2011;42:2652-2667. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-011-0662-7
  33. 33. El Chaikh A, Schmidt P, Christ HJ. Fatigue properties of duplex-aged Ti 38-644 metastable beta titanium alloy. Procedia Engineering. 2010;2:1973-1982. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.212
  34. 34. Santhosh R, Geetha M, Saxena VK, Nageswara Rao M. Effect of duplex aging on microstructure and mechanical behavior of beta titanium alloy Ti-15V-3Cr-3Al-3Sn under unidirectional and cyclic loading conditions. International Journal of Fatigue. 2015;73:88-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.12.005
  35. 35. Santhosh MNR, Geetha M, Saxena VK. Studies on single and duplex aging of metastable beta titanium alloy Ti–15V–3Cr–3Al–3Sn. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2014;605:222-229
  36. 36. Furuhara T, Maki T, Makino T. Microstructure control by thermomechanical processing in β-Ti-15-3 alloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2001;117:318-323. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00790-7
  37. 37. Santhosh R, Geetha M, Saxena VK, Nageswararao M. Studies on single and duplex aging of metastable beta titanium alloy Ti-15V-3Cr-3Al-3Sn. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2014;605:222-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.03.183
  38. 38. Campanelli LC, da Silva PSCP, Bolfarini C. High cycle fatigue and fracture behavior of Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr alloy with BASCA and double aging treatments. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2016;658:203-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.02.004
  39. 39. Song ZY, Sun QY, Xiao L, Liu L, Sun J. Effect of prestrain and aging treatment on microstructures and tensile properties of Ti-10Mo-8V-1Fe-3.5Al alloy. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2010;527:691-698. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.09.046
  40. 40. Kazanjian SM, Starke EAA Jr. Effects of microstructural modification on fatigue crack growth resistance of Ti-15V-3Al-3Sn-3Cr. International Journal of Fatigue. 1999;21:127-135. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00064-X
  41. 41. Boyer R, Rack H, Venkatesh V. The influence of thermomechanical processing on the smooth fatigue properties of Ti–15V–3Cr–3Al–3Sn. Materials Science and Engineering A. 1998;243:97-102. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00785-5
  42. 42. Ivasishin OM, Markovsky PE, Semiatin SL, Ward CH. Aging response of coarse- and fine-grained β titanium alloys. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2005;405:296-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.06.027
  43. 43. Wain N, Hao XJ, Ravi GA, Wu X. The influence of carbon on precipitation of α in Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2010;527:7673-7683. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.08.032
  44. 44. Contrepois Q, Carton M, Lecomte-Beckers J. Characterization of the β phase decomposition in Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr at slow heating rates. Open Journal of Metal. 2011;01:1-11. DOI: 10.4236/ojmetal.2011.11001
  45. 45. Wu X, del Prado J, Li Q, Huang A, Hu D, Loretto MH. Analytical electron microscopy of C-free and C-containing Ti-15-3. Acta Materialia. 2006;54:5433-5448. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.07.002
  46. 46. Chesnutt JC, Froes FH. Effect of α-phase morphology and distribution on the tensile ductility of a metastable beta titanium alloy. Metallurgical Transactions A. 1977;8:1013-1017. DOI: 10.1007/BF02661592
  47. 47. Benjamin R, Nageswara Rao M. Crack nucleation in β titanium alloys under high cycle fatigue conditions—A review. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 6th International Conference on Fracture Fatigue and Wear. Porto, Portugal: IOP Publishing Ltd; 26-27 July 2017;843. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/843/1/012048
  48. 48. Sauer C, Lütjering G. Influence of α layers at β grain boundaries on mechanical properties of Ti-alloys. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2001;319–321:393-397. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01018-8
  49. 49. Du Z, Xiao S, Xu L, Tian J, Kong F, Chen Y. Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of a new β high strength titanium alloy. Materials and Design. 2014;55:183-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.070
  50. 50. Leyens C, Peters M. Titanium and titanium alloys: Fundamentals and applications. Weinheim: Wiley-Vch Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2003. DOI: 10.1002/3527602119. ISBN: 3-527-30534-32003
  51. 51. Terlinde GT, Duerig TW, Williams JC. Microstructure, tensile deformation, and fracture in aged Ti 10V-2Fe-3Al. Metallurgical Transactions A. 1983;14A:2101-2115
  52. 52. Dong R, Li J, Fan J, Kou H, Tang B. Precipitation of α phase and its morphological evolution during continuous heating in a near β titanium alloy Ti-7333. Materials Characterization. 2017;132:199-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.07.032
  53. 53. Coakley J, Vorontsov VA, Jones NG, Radecka A, Bagot PAJ, Littrell KC, et al. Precipitation processes in the beta-titanium alloy Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2015;646:946-953. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.251
  54. 54. Gysler A, Lütjering G, Gerold V. Deformation behavior of age-hardened Ti-Mo alloys. Acta Metallurgica. 1974;22:901-909. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(74)90057-1
  55. 55. Hagihara K, Nakano T, Todai M. Unusual dynamic precipitation softening induced by dislocation glide in biomedical beta-titanium alloys. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:1-9. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08211-7
  56. 56. Ankem S, Greene C. Recent developments in microstructure/property relationships of beta titanium alloys. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2002;263:127-131. DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(98)01170-8
  57. 57. Shi R, Zheng Y, Banerjee R, Fraser HL, Wang Y. ω-assisted α nucleation in a metastable β titanium alloy. Scripta Materialia. 2019;171:62-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.06.020
  58. 58. Barriobero-vila P, Requena G, Warchomicka F, Stark A, Schell N, Buslaps T. Phase transformation kinetics during continuous heating of a β -quenched Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al alloy. Journal of Materials Science. 2015;50:1412-1426. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-014-8701-6
  59. 59. Karasevskaya OP, Ivasishin OM, Semiatin SL, Matviychuk YV. Deformation behavior of beta-titanium alloys. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2003;354:121-132. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00935-8
  60. 60. Donachie M. Introduction to selection of titanium alloys. In: Titanium: A Technical Guide. Ohio: ASM International; 2000. pp. 5-11
  61. 61. Sukumar G, Bhav Singh B, Bhattacharjee A, Siva Kumar K, Gogia AK. Ballistic impact behaviour of β-CEZ Ti alloy against 7.62 mm armour piercing projectiles. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2013;54:149-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.11.002
  62. 62. Tsay L, Chang ST, Chen C. Fatigue crack growth characteristics of a Ti-15V-3Cr-3Sn-3Al alloy with variously aged conditions. Materials Transactions. 2013;54(3):326-331. DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.M2012349
  63. 63. Kim HY, Ikehara Y, Kim JI, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S. Martensitic transformation, shape memory effect and superelasticity of Ti-Nb binary alloys. Acta Materialia. 2006;54:2419-2429. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.019
  64. 64. Fu J, Yamamoto A, Kim HY, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S. Novel Ti-base superelastic alloys with large recovery strain and excellent biocompatibility. Acta Biomaterialia. 2015;17:56-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.001
  65. 65. Fu J, Kim HY, Miyazaki S. Effect of annealing temperature on microstructure and superelastic properties of a Ti-18Zr-4.5Nb-3Sn-2Mo alloy. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2017;65:716-723. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.09.036
  66. 66. Sun F, Nowak S, Gloriant T, Laheurte P, Eberhardt A, Prima F. Influence of a short thermal treatment on the superelastic properties of a titanium-based alloy. Scripta Materialia. 2010;63:1053-1056. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.07.042
  67. 67. Qazi JI, Rack HJ. Metastable beta titanium alloys for orthopedic applications. Advanced Engineering Materials. 2005;7:993-998. DOI: 10.1002/adem.200500060
  68. 68. Hao YL, Niinomi M, Kuroda D, Fukunaga K, Zhou YL, Yang R, et al. Aging response of the Young’s modulus and mechanical properties of Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr for biomedical applications. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science. 2003;34A:1007-1012. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-003-0230-x
  69. 69. Bahl S, Shreyas P, Trishul MA, Suwas S, Chatterjee K. Enhancing the mechanical and biological performance of a metallic biomaterial for orthopedic applications through changes in the surface oxide layer by nanocrystalline surface modification. Nanoscale. 2015;7:7704-7716. DOI: 10.1039/c5nr00574d
  70. 70. Li C, Li H, van der Zwaag S. Unravelling the abrasion resistance of two novel meta-stable titanium alloys on the basis of multi-pass-dual-indenter tests. Wear. 15 December 2019;440–441:203094. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2019.203094

Written By

Sudhagara Rajan Soundararajan, Jithin Vishnu, Geetha Manivasagam and Nageswara Rao Muktinutalapati

Submitted: October 16th, 2019 Reviewed: March 28th, 2020 Published: May 11th, 2020