Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) in Food, Water, and Drug Analyses: Recent Advances and Applications

Written By

Marwa El-Azazy

Submitted: February 21st, 2020 Reviewed: March 31st, 2020 Published: May 2nd, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.92333

Chapter metrics overview

776 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a potent electrochemical technique with a variety of applications. EIS measurements involve the application of an alternating current (AC) voltage (or current) to the system under investigation, followed by measurement of the response in the form of AC current (or voltage) as a function of frequency. By and large, EIS is an exceptionally attractive in terms of applications. Being nondestructive with a feasibility of implementation to the system to be measured and the usefulness of data obtained in characterizing the studied systems, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy has realms of applications. As food and water safety and security is becoming a universal concern, the need for a technique that can detect water and food contaminants with relatively high sensitivity and selectivity is evolving. EIS has started to realize its potential with a wide-term use in water and food analyses.

Keywords

  • electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
  • electrochemical techniques
  • food analysis
  • drug analysis
  • water analysis

1. Introduction

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a usually described as a potent(if not the most powerful) electrochemical analytical technique. The history of EIS goes back to the late nineteenth century, thanks to the foundations established by Heaviside on his work on the linear systems theory (LST). By the end of the same century, the success achieved by Warburg to broaden the conception of impedanceto the electrochemical systems (ES) came to the scene. It was close to the middle of the twentieth century, when the EIS started to realize its potential! That came with the invention of the potentiostat in the 1940s, followed by the frequency response analyzers in the 1970s. This progress has led to the application of EIS chiefly in investigation of corrosion mechanisms [1, 2, 3].

Later on, this has opened the doors for realms of applications of EIS. Applications encompassed electrocatalysis and energy [3, 4, 5]; characterization of materials, e.g. corrosion phenomenon surveillance [6, 7]; and depiction of quality of coatings [8], exploring mechanisms of processes such as electrodeposition and electro-dissolution [9, 10], food and drug analysis [11, 12, 13], detection of biomarkers [14, 15], and water analysis [16, 17].

It is noteworthy to mention that impedance spectroscopy (IS), depending on the material used, the device, and the system or process to be studied, has two main categories: EIS (the topic of this chapter) and dielectric IS. A major difference is that EIS applies to systems/materials involving chiefly ionic conduction, in contrast to electronic conduction in the case of dielectric IS. Therefore, it can be observed from the fields of EIS applications that EIS usually applies to systems like electrolytes (solid/liquid), polymers, and glasses [18, 19, 20, 21].

In general, EIS measurements involve the application of an alternating current (AC) voltage or current to the system under investigation, followed by measurement of the response in the form of AC current (or voltage) as a function of frequency. Measurements are usually performed using the potentiostat, and the measured response is analyzed using a frequency response analyzer (FRA) [18]. By and large, three factors make EIS exceptionally attractive in terms of applications:

  1. Capability to explore the ES at relatively low frequencies using the minimal perturbation that in turn serves to keep the kinetic information of the system under investigation at near zero conditions (steady state). Therefore, EIS is said to be a steady-state and nondestructive technique. The majority of the electrochemical techniques, however, involve an application of large perturbation for sensing the membrane/electrolyte interface, with the purpose of obtaining mechanistic data following the driving of the reaction to a state that is far from equilibrium [3].

  2. Feasibility of implementation of EIS into the system to be measured.

  3. The usefulness of data obtained in characterizing the studied ES, where EIS provides on-site data on the relaxation data over a range of frequencies, from as low as 10−4 Hz and up to 106 Hz.

A combination of the three advantages led to the wide use of EIS as previously mentioned.

The current chapter throughout the following sections is investigating the applications of EIS in a variety of matrices, mainly in food, drug, and water analysis, and the recent advances in these fields as well as comparisons between EIS and other electroanalytical approaches applied for the same purposes.

Advertisement

2. Chapter taxonomy

Throughout the current chapter, readers will be exposed to the different analytical techniques, especially the electrochemical-based approaches, which are generally used for detection of pollutants in food, drug, and water.

Readers will be more focused on the applications of EIS in specific. A comparison between EIS and the other techniques commonly used in water and food analysis will be exhibited.

Advertisement

3. Food and water security: the global concern

The safety, quantity, and the quality of food and water are becoming worldwide concerns. Water is the most crucial source for human development. With the advancement of human life, uncountable contaminants are intimidating the aquatic system. These intimidations include but not limited to automation/industrialization, widespread use of chemicals, increased population, and suburbanization. Subsequently, water pollution is becoming a significant health and environmental concern.

By and large, the safety of food and water is influenced by contaminants. Among these pollutants, heavy metals, elevated anions (sulfates, phosphates, fluoride, etc.), dyes, agricultural waste, pesticides, drugs, and pharmaceuticals are the most common. Heavy metals, in specific, are widely used in many industrial, domestic, and agricultural applications, and they are nondegradable, an issue that raises the concern about their potential influence on public health, water systems, and the ecosystem in general. As, Cd, Cr, Pb, and Hg have been reported to be the highest systemic toxicant elements.

According to the US EPA and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), these toxic elements are probable to be carcinogenic. Moreover, accumulation of Pb, Cd, and Hg in the human body over time can cause serious health problems [22, 23, 24, 25, 26].

Similarly, food, leather, and textile industries discharge huge amounts of polluted wastes. With the various structures of the chemicals used in these industries, numerous problems develop. Dyes, a key water pollutant and even if discharged as traces (as low as 1 ppm), would color large volumes of water. Reports show that amount of dyes as huge as 7 × 105 tons per annum are being produced annually, demonstrating the magnitude of the problem. Released dyes do not only affect the aquatic beings but also the human health. Their impact includes carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, poisoning, disturbance of the metabolism in aquatic bodies, etc. [27, 28].

On the other hand, and representing a significant category of aquatic pollutants, pharmaceutically active materials (PhAMs) are usually released into the aquatic systems from different sources, including but not limited to the effluents of the manufacturing sites and hospitals, illegal disposal, veterinary applications, and landfill leachate. Daily use by humans and the subsequent conversion of PhAMs into various metabolites with variable chemical structures is also a major source. The fate of these metabolites, and probably their parent drug compound, is usually the wastewater [29, 30, 31, 32, 33].

The increasing understanding of the assembly of the food chain and the probability of infection of human with these resilient microorganisms, either directly or via the food chain, has explained largely the spread of these species. Therefore, the process of food production and commercialization is posing rigorous regulations nowadays. Different societies, such as the Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), European Union (EU), and World Health Organization (WHO) in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) creating the FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), are setting up standards for the maximum residue levels (MRLs) permissible in raw and processed food products of animal or poultry origin. Yet, any food product that would conform to these criteria and the preceding risk assessments cannot be banned by countries of the World Trade Organization (WTO) [34, 35, 36, 37, 38].

The elevating concerns on food and water safety and the existence of these materials at relatively low concentrations have created the need to find sturdy as well as sensitive detection and removal/remediation technologies. Detection technologies included traditional techniques such as spectrophotometry, spectrofluorimetry, atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), as well as electrochemical and the more sophisticated chromatographic approaches [27, 28, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49]. Each of these techniques has its pros and cons.

Electrochemical techniques are among the widely used techniques for detection of pollutants in food and water analyses. The following subsections will be focused on the electrochemical approaches and EIS in specific in detection of contaminants in water and food samples.

3.1 Electrochemical techniques: principles, advantages, and sensing mechanisms

As an analytical approach, electroanalysis offers many advantages including but not limited to simplicity, sensitivity, specificity, and applicability in various matrices and cost-effectiveness. These advantages are of specific importance when it comes to detection of drugs and pharmaceuticals, especially in food and water samples as well as in quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) laboratories. According to the signal being measured (voltage/potential, current, conductance, impedance), electroanalytical techniques can be categorized into potentiometric, amperometric, conductometric, and impedimetric techniques. Subcategories for each technique also exist, and coupling with other technologies has been investigated.

Sensors, and in particular those based on the classical potentiometric technique, or the new polyion, galvanostatic, or voltammetric sensing mechanisms, now possess the foothold in analytical chemistry. Offering irresistible advantages, on the in vitro scale, such as operation simplicity, sturdiness, and remarkable sensitivity hitting nine orders of magnitude, selectivity, and functionality over wide range of matrices, suitability for on-line or real-time analyses, and most prominently their liability for miniaturization, make the use of sensors indispensable [50, 51, 52, 53].

Figure 1 shows an illustration of ISE (ion-selective electrode) potentiometric sensor and generation of potential across the different phase boundaries.

Figure 1.

Schematic illustration of ISE cell assembly and the generation of EMF across different phase boundaries.

The sensing mechanism especially if the target analyte is a biomolecule depends on tailoring the surface of the sensor with a bio-receptor that can selectively bind to the target bio-analyte. Following the adsorption of the bio-analyte from the solution on the surface of the probe, a change in the electrochemical signal can be observed and measured. Such a change is correspondingly dependent on the bio-analyte concentration.

Figure 2 shows a schematic illustration of the sensing mechanism in plastic microfluidic channels. The left panel shows the generation of streaming potential, ΔE, as a result of pressure-driven flow and surface charge at the electric double layer (EDL). The right panel shows a sensogram with signal inversion upon adsorption of the analyte. The bottom graph shows the pulsed streaming potentials as a function of heparin with immobilized protamine.

Figure 2.

Schematic illustration of the generation of streaming potential as a result of pressure-driven flow and surface charge at the electric double layer (EDL)—left upper panel. The right panel shows a sensogram with signal inversion upon adsorption of the analyte. The bottom graph shows the pulsed streaming potentials as a function of heparin with immobilized protamine on a surface of a cyclo-olefin copolymer (COC) microchannel. Data points were fitted using Langmuir isotherm. Graphs are replicated from the authors’ own work with permission from Copyrights@ American Chemical Society (ACS) [45].

EIS as an electrochemical technique entails measurement of the change in the charge transfer resistance (Rct) following the interactions between the analyte and the receptor and the consequent change in the interfacial electron transfer kinetics. The following sections will be dealing with the application for EIS for sensing different target analytes in different matrices [53, 54].

Advertisement

4. EIS in drug analysis

The effects of presence of the PhAMs either in waste and drinking water or even in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are still inarticulate. However, what is well understood is that the impact extends to humans and animal’s health, the aquatic environment, and in the long run the ecosystem. This effect is greatly dependent on the released dose of the PhAMs as well as their pharmacological effects. The issue becomes of concern when we know that the metabolites might be of a higher risk than the parent drug compound. At the microbial level, microorganisms upon prolonged exposure to anti-infectives, for example, become more tolerant, and new strains, which cannot be cured using the conventional antimicrobials, are now in the scene [55, 56, 57].

EIS, being capable of detecting as low as 10−12 M of the target analyte, is widely used in drug analysis. Several drug categories were analyzed using EIS. Table 1 shows some examples of drugs analyzed using EIS, as well as the matrices and type of electrode used together with the sensing interface, sensing strategy (label-free or labelled), and limit of detection (LoD).

Target drugSensing interfaceElectrodeMatrixSensing measurement method and strategyLoDRef
RaloxifeneNd2O5 NPs@GO/GCEGCEND
Serum and urine
EIS
CV
Amperometry
(Label-free)
ND
ND
18.43 nM
[58]
OTCAptasensor (Fe3O4@mC900)GCEMilk samplesEIS
(Label-free)
0.027 pg mL−1[59]
TETAptasensor 1:
CPE/OA/anti-TET
Aptasensor 2: MBCPE/Fe3O4NPs/OA/anti-TET
CPE
MBCPE
Tablets, milk, honey, and serumEIS
(Label-free)
10−110−7 M
3.0 × 10−13 M
[60]
TOBAptasensor/ SnOx@TiO2@mCGCEUrine and serumEIS
(Label-free)
0.01 nM[61]
ChloramphenicolAu/N-GGCEEye dropsEIS
(Label-free)
0.59 μM[62]
SulphamethoxazoleMIP-decorated Fe3O4 MNPsSPCESeawaterEIS
(Label-free)
0.001 nM[63]
17β-estradiolAu nanoparticle-thiolated protein G-scaffoldAuSerumEIS
(Label-free)
26 pg mL1[64]
BPAAuNPs/PB/CNTs-COOH/GCEGCEWaterEIS
(Labelled detection)
0.045 pM[65]
P4ssDNA/AuAuTap waterEIS
(Labelled detection)
0.90 ng mL1[66]

Table 1.

Applications of EIS in analysis and characterizations of different drug materials in variable matrices.

The electrochemical properties of raloxifene, an important chemotherapeutic agent, were assessed using different techniques including EIS. Three electrodes were tested for this investigation: (1) bare screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE), (2) graphene oxide (GO)/glassy carbon electrode (GCE), and (3) neodymium sesquioxide nanoparticles Nd2O5 NPs@GO/GCE. The target was to assess the interface properties of these electrodes. Results showed that the Rct of the third electrode was much smaller than the other electrodes. Other electrochemical techniques such as cyclic voltammetry (CV) were used in the same work [58].

Other examples included the determination of an important class of PhAMs, which is antibiotics, a subclass of antimicrobials. Label-free detection of oxytetracycline (OTC) in milk samples was performed using a mixture of iron oxide and mesoporous carbon (Fe3O4@mC) together with nanocomposites made of Fe(II)-based metal-organic frameworks (525-MOF) by calcination at different temperatures. The sensor showed a very high sensitivity with a LoD = 0.027 pg mL−1 and a linear range of 0.005–1.0 ng mL−1. Moreover, the fabricated aptasensor showed a high selectivity for oxytetracycline in the presence of similar drugs like tetracycline, doxycycline, and chlortetracycline [59].

Similarly, label-free detection of tetracycline (TET) was performed using two aptasensors made of carbon paste electrode (CPE) with oleic acid (OA) and a magnetic bar carbon paste electrode (MBCPE) with Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles and oleic acid (OA) following the modification of electrode surfaces using anti-TET. The LoD were 1.0 × 10−12 to 1.0 × 10−7 M and 3.0 × 10−13 M for the two aptasensors, respectively, and the sensors were applied to pharmaceutical formulations, serum samples, as well as food products (milk and honey) [60].

A sensor based on nanocomposites of mC with SnOx and TiO2 nanocrystals was used to determine tobramycin (TOB) in urine and serum samples selectively and in the presence of kanamycin, oxytetracycline, and doxycycline. The aptasensor showed an excellent sensitivity with a LoD of 0.01 nM [61].

Chloramphenicol was also determined in eye drop formulations using N-doped graphene nano-sheet-Au NP composite (Au/N-G). The LoD was 0.59 μM, and the sensor showed a selectivity in the presence of interferences like oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline, ascorbic acid, and metronidazole [62]. Other applications included sulphamethoxazole using molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) decorated with Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) on SPCE [63].

Immunosensors for 17β-estradiol composed of Au electrode nanoparticle-thiolated protein G-scaffold. This structure has facilitated the anchoring of a mouse monoclonal anti-estradiol antibody. The LoD was 26 pg mL−1. As per the authors, square wave voltammetry (SWV) was more sensitive (18 pg mL−1) and required less time and effort compared to EIS [64].

Bisphenol A (BPA), a xenoestrogen with an estrogen-mimicking effect and that is widely used as a precursor in plastics industry, has been determined using a labelled aptasensor made of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), Prussian blue (PB), and functionalized carbon nanotubes (AuNPs/PB/CNTs-COOH).

Determination of progesterone (P4) in water and other clinical samples was performed using single-stranded ssDNA aptamers with high binding affinity to P4 [66].

Advertisement

5. EIS in food analysis

In addition to food contamination with antimicrobials and other drugs, bacteria and other pathogens like mycotoxins (secondary metabolites of microfungi) or chemicals such as pesticides are also other sources of food contamination. Food contamination can occur at any stage of food production, storage, or dissemination. Sicknesses caused by foodborne pathogens include symptoms such as diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, septicemia, meningitis, and even death [50, 53, 67, 68]. Pathogens include famous strains of bacteria such as different species of Salmonella (e.g., S. enteritidisand S. typhimurium), Escherichia coli(E. coli), and Staphylococcus aureus(S. aureus).

Table 2 shows examples of different bacterial strains that have been determined in food products using EIS-based aptamers.

TargetSensing interfaceElectrodeMatrixSensing methodLoDRef
Bacteria (LoD is measured as/CFU mL−1)*
S. enteritidisGNPs@SPCESPCEPoultry productsEIS600[69]
S. typhimuriumGNPs@SPCESPCEAnimal-based productsEIS600[70]
SalmonellaGO+AuNPs@GCEGCEPork meatEIS3.0[71]
Mycotoxins
OTADiazonium modified-SPCESPCEsCocoa beansEIS0.15 ng mL−1[72]
OTAThiolated DNA aptamerAuFood productsEIS0.120.40 nM[73]
AFB1Cys-PAMAM-modified electrodeAuPeanuts and corn snacksEIS0.40 ± 0.03 nM[74]
Pesticides
AcetamipridAg-NG/GCEGCECucumber and tomatoesEIS0.033 pM[75]

Table 2.

Applications of EIS in analysis of food and food products.

Colony-forming unit (CFU) mL−1.


A highly specific DNA—aptamer to S. enteritidisin pork products—was developed using gold NPs, i.e., modified SPCE (GNPs-SPCE). The developed aptasensor was selective towards S. enteritidisand showed a negative response towards mixture of other pathogens [69]. Similarly, the same electrode was used as a sensor for S. typhimurium[70]. The developed sensors were capable of differentiating between the targeted Salmonellaspecies (S. enteritidisand S. typhimurium) and the other Salmonella.

Another Salmonellasensor was fabricated using a GO/Au NP-modified GCE. The sensor was applied for pork samples and achieved a LoD of 3.0 colony-forming unit (CFU mL−1) in this case [71] compared to 600 CFU mL−1 using the GNPs@SPCE aptasensors [69, 70].

The mycotoxin ochratoxin (OTA) has been determined in a variety of samples, e.g., in cocoa beans, using EIS aptasensor developed using a diazonium-coupling reaction mechanism for the immobilization of anti-OTA-aptamer on screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) [72]. EIS was also applied for the determination of OTA using a thiolated DNA aptamer immobilized by chemisorption to the surface of Au electrode [73]. Other mycotoxins, e.g., Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) were detected using layer coating of cystamine (Cys), poly (amido-amine) dendrimers of generation 4.0 (PAMAM G4) and DNA aptamers (on Au electrode) specific to AFB1 [74].

Pesticides, e.g., acetamiprid, were determined in samples of vegetables (tomatoes and cucumber) using AgNP-modified nitrogen-doped graphene (AgNPs/NG). The designed aptasensor was sensitive, selective, and economical and did not require intricate labelling procedures [75].

Advertisement

6. EIS in water and wastewater analysis

Discharge of heavy metals (HMs) into the water bodies via industrial activities and other sources, e.g., mining, acid rain, agricultural waste, etc., denotes a worldwide challenge. As previously mentioned in this chapter, HMs and other emergent contaminants possess a significant influence on the environment and human health. The intensifying flux of HMs into aquatic environments and the properties of HMs (toxicity, degradation rates, accumulation, uptake, bioavailability, etc.) necessitate the presence of firm rules and action plans for monitoring, detoxification methodologies, and treatment technologies to keep their concentrations within the permitted levels [23, 24, 25, 26, 76].

Table 3 shows examples for the applications of EIS in determination of water contaminants such as HMs, pesticides, drugs, and pharmaceuticals.

TargetSensing interfaceMatrixLoDRef
Heavy metals
Hg2+, Cd2+Arthrospira platensiscells (Spirulina)Municipal wastewater10−20 M and 10−20 M[77]
Pb2+, Cd2+PET-SPEWater1 nM for both metals[78]
Hg2+Cu2O@NCsRiver water samples0.15 nM[79]
Pesticides and herbicides
Parathion-methylArthrospira platensiscells (Spirulina)Municipal wastewater10−20 M[77]
Paraoxon-methylArthrospira platensiscells (Spirulina)Municipal wastewater10−18 M[77]
TriazineArthrospira platensiscells (Spirulina)Municipal wastewater10−20 M[77]
AcetamipridAg-NG/GCEWastewater0.033 pM[75]
Drugs and pharmaceuticals
SulphamethoxazoleMIP-decorated Fe3O4 MNPs@SPCESeawater0.001 nM[63]
BPAAuNPs/PB/CNTs-COOH/GCEWater0.045 pM[65]
P4ssDNA/AuTap water0.90 ng mL−1[66]

Table 3.

Applications of EIS in analysis of water.

EIS has been applied for quantitative determination of HMs in water samples. In one of the investigations, a bi-enzymatic biosensor was constructed by immobilizing Arthrospira platensiscells (Spirulina) on gold interdigitated transducers. Consequently, phosphatase and esterase activities were inhibited by HMs and pesticides, respectively. This approach was used to determine Hg2+ and Cd2+ as well as parathion, paraoxon, and triazine pesticides, alone or in mixture with the HMs [77].

In another approach, a three-electrode sensor was printed on a polyethylene terephthalate film (PET) and was applied for impedimetric determination of Pb2+ and Cd2+ in water samples at nanomolar level [78]. An electrochemical DNA biosensor based on microspheres of cuprous oxide (Cu2O) and nano-chitosan (NC) was used for Hg2+ detection in river water samples with a LoD of 0.15 nM [79].

Other contaminants like pesticides and herbicides as well as drugs and pharmaceuticals were also determined using EIS [63, 65, 66, 75, 77] (Table 3).

Advertisement

7. Conclusions

The literature is rich in articles and reviews that investigate the applications of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in detections of various contaminants such as heavy metals, drugs, and pharmaceuticals, as well as pesticides. The advantages that impedance spectroscopy introduces as an electrochemical technique are innumerable. High sensitivity, specificity, selectivity, no time or effort consumption, and being label-free are the major advantages reported in the majority of the surveyed literature. As the mentioned contaminants usually exist as traces in complicated matrices, impedance spectroscopy with the mentioned advantages was usually the electrochemical technique of choice for the detection of these contaminants in water, food, and drug matrices.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Macdonald DB. Reflections on the history of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Electrochimica Acta. 2006;51:1376-1388
  2. 2. Barsoukov E, Macdonald JR. Impedance Spectroscopy: Theory, Experiment, and Applications. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2018
  3. 3. Pejcic B, De Marco R. Impedance spectroscopy: Over 35 years of electrochemical sensor optimization. Electrochimica Acta. 2006;51:6217-6229
  4. 4. Randviir EP, Banks CE. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy: An overview of bioanalytical applications. Analytical Methods. 2013;5:1098-1115
  5. 5. Rupp GM, Opitz AK, Nenning A, Limbeck A, Fleig J. Real-time impedance monitoring of oxygen reduction during surface modification of thin film cathodes. Nature Materials. 2017;16:640
  6. 6. Keddam M, Nóvoa XR, Vivier V. The concept of floating electrode for contact-less electrochemical measurements: Application to reinforcing steel-bar corrosion in concrete. Corrosion Science. 2009;51:1795-1801
  7. 7. Alexander CL, Orazem ME. Indirect electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for corrosion detection in external post-tensioned tendons: 1. Proof of concept. Corrosion Science. 2020;164:108331
  8. 8. Song D, Wan H, Tu X, Li W. A better understanding of failure process of waterborne coating/metal interface evaluated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Progress in Organic Coating. 2020;142:105558
  9. 9. Pettit CM, Garland JE, Etukudo NR, Assiongbon KA, Emery SB, Roy D. Electrodeposition of indium on molybdenum studied with optical second harmonic generation and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Applied Surface Science. 2002;202:33-46
  10. 10. Frateur I, Cattarin S, Musiani M, Tribollet B. Electrodissolution of Ti and p-Si in acidic fluoride media: formation ratio of oxide layers from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. 2000;482:202-210
  11. 11. Soaresa C, Tenreiro Machadob JA, Lopesc AM, Vieiraa E, Delerue-Matosa C. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy characterization of beverages. Food Chemistry. 2020;302:125345
  12. 12. Lopes AM, Machado JT, Ramalho E, Silva V. Milk characterization using electrical impedance spectroscopy and fractional models. Food Analytical Methods. 2018;11:901-912
  13. 13. Liu X, Duckworth PA, Wong DK. Square wave voltammetry versus electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as a rapid detection technique at electrochemical immunosensors. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2010;25:1467
  14. 14. Mishra SK, Kumar D, Biradar AM, Rajesh. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy characterization of mercaptopropionic acid capped ZnS nanocrystal based bioelectrode for the detection of the cardiac biomarker—myoglobin. Bioelectrochemistry. 2012;88:118-126
  15. 15. Rajesh, Sharma V, Tanwar VK, Mishra SK, Biradar AM. Electrochemical impedance immunosensor for the detection of cardiac biomarker Myogobin (Mb) in aqueous solution. Thin Solid Films. 2010;519:1167-1170
  16. 16. Finšgar M, Xhanari K, Petovar B. Copper-film electrodes for Pb(II) trace analysis and a detailed electrochemical impedance spectroscopy study. Microchemical Journal. 2019;147:863-871
  17. 17. Fan L, Zhao G, Shi H, Liu M, Li Z. A highly selective electrochemical impedance spectroscopy-based aptasensor for sensitive detection of acetamiprid. Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 2013;4315:12-18
  18. 18. Sacco A. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy: Fundamentals and application in dye-sensitized solar cells. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;79:814-829
  19. 19. Kumar S, Singh PK, Chilana GS. Study of silicon solar cell at different intensities of illumination and wavelengths using impedance spectroscopy. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells. 2009;93:1881-1884
  20. 20. Halme J, Vahermaa P, Miettunen K, Lund P. Device physics of dye solar cells. Advanced Materials. 2010;22:E210-E234
  21. 21. Scrosati B, Croce F, Persi L. Impedance spectroscopy study of PEO-based nanocomposite polymer electrolytes. Journal of the Electrochemical Society. 2000;147:1718-1721
  22. 22. Vakili M, Rafatullah M, Salamatinia B, Abdullah AZ, Ibrahim MH, Tan KB, et al. Application of chitosan and its derivatives as adsorbents for dye removal from water and wastewater: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2014;113:115-130
  23. 23. Zhang L, Zeng Y, Cheng Z. Removal of heavy metal ions using chitosan and modified chitosan: A review. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2016;214:175-191
  24. 24. Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ. Heavy metals toxicity and the environment. EXS. 2012;101:133-164
  25. 25. Järup L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination. British Medical Bulletin. 2003;68:167-182
  26. 26. U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Mercury Study Report to Congress. 1997. Available from:http://www.epa.gov/mercury/report.htm
  27. 27. El-Azazy M, Dimassi S, El-Shafie AS, Issa AA. Bio-wasteAloe veraleaves as an efficient adsorbent for titan yellow from wastewater: Structuring of a novel adsorbent using Plackett-Burman factorial design. Applied Sciences. 2019;9:1-20. DOI: 10.3390/app9224856
  28. 28. El-Azazy M, El-Shafie AS, Ashraf A, Issa AA. Eco-structured biosorptive removal of basic Fuchsin using pistachio nutshells: A definitive screening design—Based approach. Applied Sciences. 2019;9:1-19. DOI: 10.3390/app9224855
  29. 29. Singh KP, Singh AK, Singh UV, Verma P. Optimizing removal of ibuprofen from water by magnetic nanocomposite using Box-Behnken design. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2012;19:724-738. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-011-0611-4
  30. 30. Aa N, Kommer GJ, Van Montfoort J, Versteegh J. Demographic projections of future pharmaceutical consumption in the Netherlands. Water Science and Technology. 2011;63:825-831. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2011.120
  31. 31. Avcı A, Inci I, Baylan N. Adsorption of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride on multiwall carbon nanotube. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2020;1206:127711. DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.127711
  32. 32. Yu F, Sun S, Han S, Zheng J, Ma J. Adsorption removal of ciprofloxacin by multi-walled carbon nanotubes with different oxygen contents from aqueous solutions. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2016;285:588-595. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.39
  33. 33. Carabineiro S, Thavorn-Amornsri T, Pereira M, Serp P, Figueiredo J. Comparison between activated carbon, carbon xerogel and carbon nanotubes for the adsorption of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin. Catalysis Today. 2012;186:29-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.08.020
  34. 34. WHO. Worldwide strategy for the containment of antimicrobial resistance. WHO. 2001. Available from:http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/WHO_CDS_CSR_DRS_2001.2a.pdf
  35. 35. USDA. Foreign Agricultural Service. Veterinary drug MRL database. Available from:http://www.mrldatabase.com/default.cfm?selectvetdrug=1
  36. 36. FAO/WHO. Available from:http://www.codexalimentarius.net/mrls/vetdrugs/jsp/vetd_q-s.jsp
  37. 37. Lelieveld H, Motarjemi Y. Fundamentals in management of food safety in the industrial setting: Challenges and outlook of the 21st Century. Food Safety Management System. 2014:1-20. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381504-0.00001-9
  38. 38. Commission Regulation 1353/2007/EC of 20th November, amending Council Regulation 2377/90/EC laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin. Official Journal, L303
  39. 39. Elazazy MS, Ganesh K, Sivakumar V, Huessein YHA. Interaction of p-synephrine with p-chloranil: experimental design and multiple response optimization. RSC Advances. 2016;6:64967-64976. DOI: 10.1039/C6RA10533E
  40. 40. Aly H, El-Shafie AS, El-Azazy M. Utilization of 7-chloro-4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1, 3-diazole (NBD-Cl) for spectrochemical determination of l-ornithine: A multivariate optimization-assisted approach. RSC Advances;9(38):22106-22115
  41. 41. Al-Saad K, El-Azazy M, Issa AA, Al-Yafei A, El-Shafie AS, Al-Sulaiti M, et al. Recycling of date pits into a green adsorbent for removal of heavy metals: A fractional factorial design-based approach. Frontiers in Chemistry. 2019;7:552. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00552
  42. 42. El-Azazy M, Kalla RN, Issa AA, Al-Sulaiti M, El-Shafie AS, Shomar B, et al. Pomegranate peels as versatile adsorbents for water purification: Application of Box–Behnken design as a methodological optimization approach. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy. 2019;38:1-12. DOI: 10.1002/ep.13223
  43. 43. Elazazy MS, Shalaby A, Elbolkiny MN, Khalil HM. Performance and characteristics of a new metoclopramide hydrochloride selective membrane electrode. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal. 2004;56:49-56
  44. 44. Elazazy MS, Shalaby A, Elbolkiny MN, Khalil HM. Development of high performance ion-selective electrode for in situ measurements. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal. 2003;55:491-497
  45. 45. Pu Q , Elazazy MS, Alvarez JC. Label-free detection of heparin, streptavidin, and other probes by pulsed streaming potentials in plastic microfluidic channels. Analytical Chemistry. 2008;80:6532-6536
  46. 46. Elazazy MS, El-Mammli MY, Shalaby A, Ayad MM. Conductometric determination of some important carboxylic acid derivatives and hydrochlorides in pharmaceutical formulations. Chemia Analityczna. 2008;53:725-736
  47. 47. Jia W, Chu X, Ling Y, Huang J, Chang J. High-throughput screening of pesticide and veterinary drug residues in baby food by liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography. A. 2014;1347:122-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.04.081
  48. 48. Zhang B, Han X, Gu P, Fang S, Bai J. Response surface methodology approach for optimization of ciprofloxacin adsorption using activated carbon derived from the residue of desilicated rice husk. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2017;238:316-325. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.04.022
  49. 49. He X, Wang GN, Yang K, Liu HZ, Wu XJ, Wang JP. Magnetic graphene dispersive solid phase extraction combining high performance liquid chromatography for determination of fluoroquinolones in foods. Food Chemistry. 2017;221:1226-1231. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.035
  50. 50. Li F, Yu Z, Han X, Lai RY. Electrochemical aptamer-based sensors for food and water analysis: A review. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2019;1051:1-23
  51. 51. Tóth K, Štulík K, Kutner W, Fehér Z, Lindner E. Electrochemical detection in liquid flow analytical techniques: Characterization and classification (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry. 2004;76:1119-1138
  52. 52. Su L, Jia WZ, Hou CJ, Lei Y.Microbial biosensors: a review. Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 2011;26:1788-1799
  53. 53. Vasilescu A, Marty J. Electrochemical aptasensors for the assessment of food quality and safety. TrAC, Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2016;79:60-70
  54. 54. Ramnani P, Saucedo NM, Mulchandani A. Carbon nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors for label-free sensing of environmental pollutants. Chemosphere. 2016;143:85-89
  55. 55. Ebele AJ, Abdallah MA, Harrad S. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the freshwater aquatic environment. Emerging Contaminants. 2017;3:1-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.emcon.2016.12.004
  56. 56. Boyer EW. Management of opioid analgesic overdose. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;367:146-155. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1202561
  57. 57. Carbajo JB, Petre AL, Rosal R, Herrera S, Leton P, Garcia-Calvo E, et al. Continuous ozonation treatment of ofloxacin: Transformation products, water matrix effect and aquatic toxicity. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2015;292:34-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.075
  58. 58. Chena T-W, Merlin JP, Chen S-M, Anandaraj S, Elshikh MS, Tseng T-W, et al. Sonochemical synthesis and fabrication of neodymium sesquioxide entrapped with graphene oxide based hierarchical nanocomposite for highly sensitive electrochemical sensor of anti-cancer (raloxifene) drug. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2020;64:104717
  59. 59. Song Y, Duan F, Zhang S, Tian J-Y, Zhang Z, Wang Z-W, et al. Iron oxide@mesoporous carbon architectures derived from an Fe(ii)-based metal organic framework for highly sensitive oxytetracycline determination. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2017;5:19378-19389
  60. 60. Jahanbani S, Benvidi A. Comparison of two fabricated aptasensors based on modified carbon paste/oleic acid and magnetic bar carbon paste/Fe3O4@oleic acid nanoparticle electrodes for tetracycline detection. Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 2016;85:553-562
  61. 61. Wang M, Hu B, Yang C, Zhang Z, He L, Fang S, et al. Electrochemical biosensing based on protein-directed carbon nanospheres embedded with SnOx and TiO2 nanocrystals for sensitive detection of tobramycin. Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 2018;99:176-185
  62. 62. Borowiec J, Wang R, Zhu L, Zhang J. Synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheets decorated with gold nanoparticles as an improved sensor for electrochemical determination of chloramphenicol. Electrochimica Acta. 2013;99:138-144
  63. 63. Zamora-Gálvez A, Ait-Lahcen A, Mercante LA, Morales-Narváez E, Amine A, Merkoçi A. Molecularly imprinted polymer-decorated magnetite nanoparticles for selective sulfonamide detection. Analytical Chemistry. 2016;88:3578-3584
  64. 64. Liu X, Duckworth PA, Wong DK. Square wave voltammetry versus electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as a rapid detection technique at electrochemical immunosensors. Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 2010;25:1467
  65. 65. Azadbakht A, Roushani M, Abbasi AR, Derikvand Z. A novel impedimetric aptasensor, based on functionalized carbon nanotubes and Prussian blue as labels. Analytical Biochemistry. 2016;512(2016):58-69
  66. 66. Jiménez GC, Eissa S, Ng A, Alhadrami H, Zourob M. Aptamer-based label-free impedimetric biosensor for detection of progesterone. Analytical Chemistry. 2015;87:1075-1082
  67. 67. Yeni F, Yavas S, Alpas H, Soyer Y. Most common foodborne pathogens and mycotoxins on fresh produce: A review of recent outbreaks. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2016;56:1532-1544
  68. 68. Sharma H, Mutharasan R. Review of biosensors for foodborne pathogens and toxins. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2013;183:535-549
  69. 69. Labib M, Zamay AS, Kolovskaya OS, Reshetneva IT, Zamay GS, Kibbee RJ, et al. Aptamer-based impedimetric sensor for bacterial typing. Analytical Chemistry. 2012;84:8114-8117
  70. 70. Labib M, Zamay AS, Kolovskaya OS, Reshetneva IT, Zamay GS, Kibbee RJ, et al. Aptamer-based viability impedimetric sensor for bacteria. Analytical Chemistry. 2012;84:8966-8969
  71. 71. Ma XY, Jiang YH, Jia F, Yu Y, Wang ZP. An aptamer-based electrochemical biosensor for the detection of Salmonella. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2014;98:94-98
  72. 72. Mishra RK, Hayat A, Catanante G, Ocana C, Marty J-L. A label free aptasensor for ochratoxin a detection in cocoa beans: An application to chocolate industries. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2015;889:106-112
  73. 73. Castillo G, Lamberti I, Mosiello L, Hianik T. Impedimetric DNA aptasensor for sensitive detection of ochratoxin a in food. Electroanalysis. 2012;24:512-520
  74. 74. Castillo G, Spinella K, Poturnayová A, Snejdárková M, Mosiello L, Hianik T. Detection of aflatoxin B1 by aptamer-based biosensor using PAMAM dendrimers as immobilization platform. Food Control. 2015;52:9-18
  75. 75. Jiang D, Du XJ, Liu Q , Zhou L, Dai LM, Qian J, et al. Silver nanoparticles anchored on nitrogen-doped graphene as a novel electrochemical biosensing platform with enhanced sensitivity for aptamer-based pesticide assay. The Analyst. 2015;140:6404-6411
  76. 76. Fu F, Wang Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2011;92:407-418. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011
  77. 77. Tekaya N, Saiapina O, Ouada HB, Lagarde F, Namour P, Ouada HB, et al. Bi-enzymatic conductometric biosensor for detection of heavy metal ions and pesticides in water samples based on enzymatic inhibition in Arthrospiraplatensis. Journal of Environmental Protection. 2014;5:441-453
  78. 78. Avuthu SGR, Narakathu BB, Eshkeiti A, Emamian S, Bazuin BJ, Joyce M, et al. Detection of heavy metals using fully printed three electrode electrochemical sensor. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2014;10:669-672
  79. 79. Liu S, Kang M, Yan F, Peng D, Yang Y, He L, et al. Electrochemical DNA biosensor based on microspheres of cuprous oxide and nano-chitosan for Hg(II) Detection. Electrochimica Acta. 2015;160:64-73

Written By

Marwa El-Azazy

Submitted: February 21st, 2020 Reviewed: March 31st, 2020 Published: May 2nd, 2020